[0:05] city ​​administration
[0:06] for conducting
[0:07] regular
[0:08] council meeting
[0:09] directors D select. Uh,
[0:11] one quick one
[0:12] addition to
[0:13] agenda in
[0:14] section "
[0:14] Correspondence for
[0:15] actions", we need
[0:17] vote for
[0:18] someone who
[0:18] will vote, er, yes
[0:19] board of directors
[0:20] passive and
[0:21] verbal
[0:22] VCT insurance.
[0:24] So, we'll do this.
[0:26] there. Uh, okay. So, in
[0:31] We have one protocol.
[0:32] for approval
[0:33] regular
[0:33] September 16 meeting
[0:34] and introduction
[0:35] suggestions about
[0:36] approval
[0:37] minutes of the meeting
[0:38] September 16.
[0:38] We support this.
[0:40] Uh, is there a discussion?
[0:43] Good. Everyone who is for
[0:45] approval
[0:45] minutes of 16
[0:47] September, they say Ya. Eh.
[0:48] Everyone who is against and everyone
[0:50] are being held. We have
[0:54] three warrants. Order 77P
[0:56] and fund accounting number
[0:58] two.
[0:59] I will make a suggestion.
[1:00] on approval
[1:01] 77P fund orders
[1:02] vacation number two.
[1:04] I support this. Uh,
[1:06] discussion. Good. THERE ARE-
[1:10] eh, protocol board #2-
[1:12] for the amount of $3565 for
[1:14] protocol. Uh, 7P, what
[1:16] this is a salary,
[1:18] is $12.81, and seven
[1:20] total costs-$
[1:23] 81,549. Uh, more
[1:26] half of these 51,000
[1:28] dollars–this is payment for
[1:29] , uh, a new bond
[1:31] for a gravel pit, and
[1:32] $8,500–Belov,
[1:34] who did a little digging. I will call you.
[1:37] Sticky Brook.
[1:38] Yes. Rent
[1:39] equipment. So this is
[1:40] was a large part
[1:41] of the total amount.
[1:43] Sorry. In fact, on
[1:45] the first record board
[1:46] two amounts are indicated.
[1:47] One amount in writing
[1:49] form, and then one
[1:50] total amount
[1:51] . But there are two accounts,
[1:53] seems.
[1:55] Yes. But they say "
[1:56] "summing up", and
[1:57] then the number they say "summarizing"
[1:59] ", differs from
[2:00] final
[2:01] value.
[2:01] 1339.
[2:06] Where is the friend?
[2:07] On the back...
[2:08] No, just on
[2:09] front side...on
[2:10] first page.
[2:12] Yes.
[2:13] Look at that one.
[2:14] small excerpt
[2:15] text there, under which is
[2:16] "to".
[2:16] Oh, I see 30. Yes, I do.
[2:18] I understand what you mean.
[2:19] you speak. Yes, it is.
[2:22] interesting.
[2:22] I think it's 3565.
[2:25] Yes, a large number.
[2:26] Yes. I wonder if this is
[2:28] they moved it from...
[2:29] I bet,
[2:29] the last one was 3124.
[2:30] They just didn't add it.
[2:31] its.
[2:32] They didn't update.
[2:33] Yes.
[2:33] So I'll just cross it out.
[2:34] it.
[2:35] Oh, okay. Now that you
[2:36] Do you mean?
[2:37] Yes.
[2:37] Good. Uh, so everyone,
[2:40] who supports
[2:41] order approval
[2:42] 77P and record two,
[2:43] I say.
[2:45] I. Everyone who is against.
[2:47] Good. Procedures
[2:49] approval
[2:49] value between
[2:50] meetings.
[2:54] So, I saw this between
[2:55] our last one
[2:56] meeting about what
[2:57] there was 214, and I didn't
[2:58] I knew, I thought I
[3:00] asked Marie
[3:01] put it there because
[3:02] I really am
[3:03] printed out for
[3:04] law, how do we do it
[3:05] we do. So I give this.
[3:09] everyone, and I was going to
[3:10] put it on Chris
[3:11] , because the only
[3:16] the way to do it—
[3:17] one of two ways
[3:19] : to convene special
[3:20] meeting, okay, or we
[3:21] waiting for
[3:23] next meetings.
[3:25] So, I think we
[3:26] you just need to have
[3:27] a clear idea about it
[3:28] because we simply don't
[3:29] we can ratify
[3:30] Willy-nilly. Not
[3:31] what we don't
[3:32] ratify the warrant,
[3:33] until actually
[3:34] let's meet
[3:35] as a group, but we don't
[3:36] we can approve
[3:37] no money. So I thought that was it.
[3:40] written explanation,
[3:41] how to do it
[3:43] How about this idea? Uh,
[3:46] if it's not urgent
[3:47] case before separate
[3:48] meeting, it will be on
[3:49] the next separate
[3:50] meeting, if not
[3:51] will need
[3:52] pay. For example,
[3:53] if there is anything that
[3:54] need to pay, we will hold a special
[3:56] meeting,
[3:56] if not, just
[3:57] let's move this to
[3:58] next.
[3:59] Yes,
[3:59] and then, I know, we
[4:00] usually in July
[4:02] we appoint someone,
[4:03] for him to come to
[4:04] these end of year matters,
[4:05] which need to be done
[4:06] on the 31st, but this
[4:07] only at the end
[4:08] July, at the end
[4:09] June, sorry,
[4:10] That's how it should be, there
[4:11] It is clearly written that
[4:13] need
[4:13] use
[4:14] economical, and I think
[4:15] that we did this on
[4:16] holidays in June, but
[4:18] very little. And I think,
[4:19] that's right, anything is possible
[4:20] wait 2 weeks if
[4:22] this is not extraordinary
[4:23] situation.
[4:24] Yes. If this
[4:24] urgent matter, its
[4:25] must be submitted to
[4:26] next meeting,
[4:26] then convene
[4:27] meeting. There are three of us.
[4:28] will appear, and...
[4:29] That's right.
[4:30] Okay, that's good.
[4:31] Thank you.
[4:32] That's a good explanation.
[4:34] You must copy
[4:35] the rest of this book for
[4:36] me when you have
[4:37] ...
[4:37] Well, now is the time...
[4:39] I think you
[4:40] search on eBay,
[4:41] maybe you can do it
[4:42] find.
[4:42] Yes.
[4:43] Good. Uh,
[4:44] reimburse us
[4:45] water test costs.
[4:46] Was it...Or...
[4:47] did Grange reimburse us?
[4:49] I don't know who I have.
[4:50] check with Chris.
[4:52] Good. Sent
[4:53] a memo.
[4:54] Yes, there was a letter.
[4:55] He really is
[4:56] connected the account, in
[4:57] to whom it was written,
[4:58] what is the score
[4:58] connected. Yes.
[4:59] But I think it's Grange
[5:00] paid their dues
[5:01] part.
[5:02] I think so, but I
[5:03] ...I don't think there is
[5:04] there was something from the church
[5:05] or
[5:06] churches. Someone in
[5:07] told the church that
[5:08] they did it. I think it was
[5:10] church, not gra. Someone
[5:12] did.
[5:12] No, I'm almost sure.
[5:14] I thought it was
[5:14] Larry Lynch, who was
[5:15] wonderful.
[5:16] Good. I will ask.
[5:16] Chris contact
[5:17] you.
[5:18] Yes, it could be in...
[5:18] Yes, I think we have
[5:20] one of three.
[5:20] Yes.
[5:21] Good. Uh,
[5:24] visitors, Colin
[5:25] Bratton here, W.K. Gale
[5:27] here. Dana sneaked in.
[5:28] through the back door. IN
[5:29] someone has something that is not
[5:30] is in order
[5:31] daytime, that they
[5:31] want to discuss?
[5:32] Now
[5:33] I'm just sharing.
[5:34] some information.
[5:35] Um, historical
[5:36] company
[5:37] will open the following
[5:39] two weeks, and then in
[5:40] It will be our 50th.
[5:42] anniversary, and you probably
[5:43] saw this in
[5:44] email
[5:46] Laura, maybe
[5:47] a week ago, but
[5:48] our 50th anniversary
[5:49] will take place on January 18,
[5:51] October, from 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. Em
[5:52] , I would really like to
[5:54] some of you came.
[5:56] Um, it won't be anyone,
[5:57] who will speak for a long time,
[5:58] no long speeches.
[6:00] Um, different people
[6:01] for many
[6:02] years that have made
[6:04] your contribution,
[6:04] offering programs,
[6:06] exhibits, etc. Therefore,
[6:07] we are going
[6:08] share some of
[6:09] the brightest
[6:10] moments. Um, what we
[6:11] prepared, it's just
[6:12] selection of exhibits
[6:14] over the years of work
[6:15] historical
[6:15] society. Um, and we would
[6:17] wish you could
[6:18] to learn a lot about
[6:20] Dumerston, about people in
[6:21] community, which you are,
[6:22] maybe not before
[6:23] met or not
[6:24] knew about all the skills
[6:26] and talents in the city.
[6:27] So, welcome.
[6:30] Very informal and
[6:32] anniversary cake. IN
[6:34] Are there any rock and roll fans among you?
[6:35] Roller skates? No, I'm kidding.
[6:37] Well, if you have
[6:38] attention from the quarry,
[6:39] these are just stones,
[6:40] wall builders.
[6:41] Yes, of course. Good.
[6:43] Perfectly. That's exactly 18
[6:45] October from 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
[6:47] You will hear, you will hear a reminder
[6:49] in two weeks.
[6:50] Good.
[6:51] So, Mr. Brad, in
[6:52] We are meeting downstairs.
[6:53] city ​​council, to
[6:54] discuss this.
[6:55] Let's just
[6:56] Let's do it now.
[6:57] Let's raise
[6:58] here. Come here.
[6:59] You come here,
[7:00] Sit down here.
[7:01] Stay there. What would
[7:03] you didn't say
[7:07] it will be easier for the camera,
[7:08] if I...That's good.
[7:09] Of course.
[7:12] Hmm, so I think that
[7:17] the main reason why
[7:18] I was here, is in
[7:19] because the city
[7:20] is considering the possibility
[7:22] setting tables
[7:23] speed. Hmm, this is
[7:25] some position on this
[7:27] . So, I have
[7:29] only specific
[7:30] remarks on
[7:31] speed tables,
[7:31] but I guess I am too
[7:32] I will be glad.
[7:33] discuss the issue
[7:34] excess
[7:35] speed in more
[7:36] in a broad sense. Um, I would like to say about
[7:41] speed tables
[7:42] specifically, what exists
[7:44] many rules about
[7:45] how to follow them
[7:46] to set up so that
[7:47] answer
[7:48] minimal
[7:48] engineering
[7:49] standards. I think
[7:55] that how strict
[7:57] Vtrans eventually
[7:57] is going to them
[7:58] to provide, it is already
[8:00] another question. So, I think that both New Fain and
[8:06] Marboro introduced them
[8:07] for the last few
[8:08] years, not necessarily
[8:10] following all
[8:11] the rules that are in the book,
[8:12] which should this contain
[8:14] T-shirt. But I think
[8:17] that for familiarization with
[8:19] the best
[8:19] practices, um, me
[8:20] must them
[8:21] to look at and a little
[8:22] to talk about what
[8:24] this is it. Um, and
[8:26] the most important thing, in my opinion, for Dumbstone
[8:29] in particular, it is that their
[8:30] should not
[8:30] to install on any roads where
[8:33] speed limit
[8:34] exceeds 30 minutes per
[8:36] hour. Um, I know that.
[8:41] some problem areas
[8:42] here, if I'm correct
[8:44] I remember the restrictions.
[8:45] speed is
[8:47] 35 mph or more,
[8:48] um, and that will limit,
[8:50] where exactly can they be found
[8:51] to install if
[8:52] you don't want either
[8:53] to take a step if
[8:55] speed limit
[8:56] is 35 miles/hour,
[8:58] we can, that is
[9:00] 30 or 35, then technically
[9:05] establish
[9:06] speed should be
[9:07] illegally.
[9:09] So I was just passing by.
[9:10] this afternoon over
[9:11] Williams Town. I
[9:12] thought: "I'll check
[9:14] it".
[9:14] is obvious that their
[9:15] speed limit
[9:16] in the city center
[9:17] fully complies
[9:18] 25 miles/hour. So
[9:18] question about 30 miles/
[9:20] It's a little strange,
[9:21] because ours
[9:21] speed limit
[9:23] at some point
[9:24] changes from 35 to 25.
[9:25] So,
[9:25] in fact, they can
[9:26] to be at the 25 mark or in
[9:27] within the mark 25. Yes,
[9:29] they can be, I think, on a par or with
[9:31] them, if they
[9:32] are within 25
[9:33] mph, but I don't
[9:34] I think there are some
[9:35] rules on how
[9:36] They are far away in the zone.
[9:37] can be. Um, so
[9:39] if they were in the zone
[9:40] 25 mph, that would be
[9:42] allowed. Um, and then
[9:46] another, and this again
[9:47] yes, they should
[9:48] to be at a distance of 300
[9:50] feet from this
[9:51] turning, how do you
[9:52] must have something on
[9:53] like 300 feet
[9:54] line of sight to
[9:55] what you get,
[9:57] I think it's in Dston.
[9:58] not
[10:02] very easy to find. I mean, this
[10:07] part, I think, is,
[10:08] You know, I wouldn't.
[10:09] expected that Vrance
[10:10] will be here with the team
[10:12] surveyors who
[10:13] accurately measured, but
[10:14] is that they, you
[10:15] they said you have
[10:17] to be a significant area
[10:18] quite a straight road,
[10:21] you said it was 300
[10:22] feet, Yes.
[10:27] And then, obviously, on
[10:29] signs is a sign for
[10:31] this. They have a sign on
[10:32] potholes. There are two
[10:33] signs, it seems.
[10:35] Um, so
[10:36] I only read one,
[10:37] you know, one at a time
[10:39] character set for
[10:40] everyone.
[10:40] Yes, I don't know. William
[10:42] signs two. There is one
[10:43] abbreviation of "says"
[10:44] "recumbent obstacle" or
[10:45] "speed table,
[10:46] approaching" or "
[10:47] speed table", and
[10:48] then there is another one nearby
[10:49] speed tables,
[10:50] but I think, um, I think technically it has.
[10:53] be another set
[10:54] characters before this. Ahem,
[10:56] I don't think so.
[10:58] serious, you know,
[10:59] obstacle. That's right. AND
[11:02] still, um, there must be
[11:03] road markings
[11:04] coating. THERE ARE
[11:07] special set
[11:08] road markings
[11:10] the coverage I have
[11:11] as standard
[11:12] drawings, um, which
[11:13] essences are drawn on the road. This is something on
[11:18] like a series of arrows,
[11:20] um, with an interval
[11:21] about 10 or 15
[11:22] feet, probably 50
[11:24] feet ahead, with
[11:25] both sides of the table
[11:27] speed. Um, then I think that if I remember correctly,
[11:34] then engineering
[11:35] the standard is
[11:36] because at the beginning
[11:37] third set
[11:38] lines or something like that
[11:40] and next to the table itself
[11:41] speed. Hmm, and again
[11:47] anyway, I want
[11:47] to emphasize that I am not
[11:49] I think I'm transgender.
[11:50] will be here as long as they are
[11:51] submitted in good faith
[11:53] efforts to
[11:53] follow the rules
[11:55] . I wouldn't expect that.
[11:57] it will be something like this,
[11:59] what will become big
[12:00] problem. AND
[12:01] how about
[12:01] responsibility?
[12:04] You know what I mean?
[12:05] I say? I think that this
[12:08] potentially can
[12:09] depend on whether
[12:11] it will happen eventually
[12:12] problem. I can't
[12:15] to say, and honestly
[12:17] saying, someone should
[12:18] to have a big enough
[12:19] technical expertise to
[12:24] understand that these things
[12:25] do not respond
[12:26] engineering
[12:27] standards. And, as I
[12:29] already said, and Newfein,
[12:31] and Marorrow is not
[12:32] respond
[12:33] standards by 100%. I think they are both.
[12:37] made efforts to be as good as possible
[12:39] closer to them. But
[12:42] this question is more about
[12:44] city ​​council, than that,
[12:45] What can I do?
[12:46] answer.
[12:48] Do you know any?
[12:49] court cases
[12:50] lawsuits?
[12:52] I don't know. This is not that.
[12:55] what I, um, never
[12:57] did, that is, I...I didn't
[12:58] researched this
[12:59] in advance. I,
[13:01] of course, it could
[13:02] to consider. Hmm, I don't...
[13:04] know exactly which ones.
[13:06] regulations. Hmm, I have to
[13:09] meaning that damage
[13:11] vehicle
[13:12] would not be the main thing
[13:13] problem. And I would again
[13:16] Well, I'm not a lawyer. I can't give you
[13:18] legal advice, but
[13:19] so that someone
[13:21] really exceeded
[13:22] speed limit
[13:23] 25 or 30 mph on "
[13:24] speed bumps
[13:25] ", it would be necessary
[13:25] to go much faster,
[13:26] than the established
[13:27] speed limit
[13:28] at 25 or 30 mph.
[13:28] But on the other hand, you cannot exceed
[13:30] the one who has
[13:30] Williamstown, from
[13:31] at a speed of more than 15
[13:32] mph You
[13:32] need to go with
[13:33] at a speed of 12-10 miles/
[13:34] hours This is quite strict.
[13:36] punishment, or
[13:36] wrong?
[13:37] Therefore, one of the questions that
[13:38] call
[13:39] anxiety and
[13:39] research that I
[13:40] read, is that, you are not trying
[13:42] slow down everyone
[13:43] at a speed of 10 miles/hour.
[13:44] This is a little higher.
[13:45] punishment than I want
[13:46] set for
[13:47] someone on the road with
[13:48] at a speed of 25 miles/hour.
[13:49] Personally, if I
[13:50] has to
[13:51] exceed
[13:51] speed 16 km/h, and
[13:52] then 15, then I
[13:52] trying to achieve
[13:53] minimal
[13:54] speed, because I'm going with
[13:54] at a speed of 15 miles per hour,
[13:55] which is completely
[13:56] corresponds
[13:56] speed limit
[13:57] . I have certain
[13:58] concerns about
[13:59] this.
[13:59] Um, that's one thing. And the other thing,
[14:04] very quickly, do you have
[14:06] us something from New Fain or
[14:07] somewhere else? Marlboro.
[14:09] What effect do they have?
[14:10] Did you see? Or
[14:11] observed
[14:12] decrease in quantity
[14:13] people who talk about
[14:14] excess
[14:14] speed in the city, or
[14:15] ...
[14:17] I know that Marboro
[14:18] installed two of them
[14:19] years ago. They already
[14:22] two seasons work.
[14:25] I don't have any.
[14:25] specific data from
[14:27] Maro, but I know they
[14:28] very happy with them.
[14:30] Um, they, in particular,
[14:31] they think it's good
[14:33] worked hard. They
[14:35] very, you know,
[14:35] they think that they
[14:37] very effectively
[14:38] slow down the movement
[14:39] people in the village. I, New-
[14:43] Fain, I have this.
[14:44] the feeling that now it is
[14:45] a little more difficult
[14:46] a political issue, and
[14:48] that not everyone is in town
[14:49] completely agree about
[14:50] what they took out
[14:51] winter, right?
[14:55] Yes. They, they...that is,
[14:57] , they are not...no
[14:58] nothing that is legal
[14:59] obliges you
[15:00] take them out for the winter,
[15:02] but in the city, I think, in
[15:03] Vermont them
[15:06] allow
[15:08] 600 volts to
[15:09] keep it up
[15:10] to each of them.
[15:11] Yes. They must
[15:12] drill 600
[15:13] bolted into the road.
[15:14] So even 600 volts...I
[15:16] I think my question is:
[15:17] if we want
[15:18] to invest in something,
[15:19] which will reduce
[15:20] speed, I don't know,
[15:21] What will it be? What do we have?
[15:24] When will the wind blow?
[15:25] within six
[15:26] months, four
[15:27] months? We will not have
[15:28] everything. So I know that
[15:29] I can just blow it out.
[15:30] through Dalston in winter,
[15:31] because there are no beds there
[15:32] police officers.
[15:32] Yes. Then there is snow or
[15:34] ice,
[15:34] Yes? Well, but there is no snow, no ice. I have
[15:37] in mind,
[15:38] Yes.
[15:38] Although, unlike
[15:39] other options,
[15:40] maybe it's possible
[15:40] to do all year round,
[15:41] you know, and not like that
[15:42] punitive, but again
[15:42] Yes, that's what we're talking about.
[15:43] We can talk.
[15:44] So I just had
[15:45] I'm curious to know.
[15:46] thought that they
[15:47] need to be cleaned.
[15:49] Yes, I think we would.
[15:50] appreciated.
[15:54] And they, I would say, are
[15:55] their removal. It's about
[15:57] actually about harm,
[15:59] what kind of plow blade
[16:00] will cause tables
[16:01] speed, more,
[16:02] than about the harm you,
[16:03] in fact, you will tear
[16:05] them and replace them every
[16:06] , you know, every few
[16:08] years.
[16:08] And then, I suppose,
[16:09] you probably
[16:10] will have enough
[16:11] often
[16:12] to repaint
[16:13] lines,
[16:13] because you have snow and
[16:15] ice, and you need
[16:16] it will be that they will be
[16:17] visible. And then,
[16:20] after you will asphalt,
[16:22] you'll have to, er, er
[16:24] ...
[16:25] Yes.
[16:27] Um, yes, I should have heard.
[16:28] where we really are
[16:29] thinking about it, and um...
[16:32] Well, I would say that
[16:34] I know that in Lebanon they
[16:35] are in the asphalt, and they
[16:36] leave them, um, and
[16:38] They are ruining them. I would
[16:39] more inclined to
[16:41] this, but I don't
[16:42] I support the restrictions.
[16:43] speed. I don't think so.
[16:45] that we have a certain area
[16:46] or a certain place where
[16:48] they are needed. As in
[16:49] West Village, we
[16:50] let's just say where
[16:51] Did you put them?
[16:59] You know, you put them
[17:00] before Grange, and
[17:01] then people who
[17:02] are going
[17:03] exceed
[17:04] speed, actually
[17:05] they will trample them again
[17:06] after
[17:07] will cross the limits
[17:08] speed. Um, this is
[17:20] helps people who
[17:22] exceed
[17:22] speed, issuers
[17:24] to keep an eye on yours
[17:25] speed, issuers
[17:26] ...
[17:28] Well, even right here,
[17:29] How many cars do you have?
[17:30] you see them moving
[17:32] at a speed of 24 miles
[17:33] per hour or 25 miles per
[17:34] hour?
[17:35] Right. Right.
[17:36] Um,
[17:36] and never like this
[17:37] saw.
[17:38] Um, never do that.
[17:39] saw.
[17:39] Right. AND
[17:41] so I think that, um,
[17:45] if we...I know what it is
[17:46] whole conversation, you still have
[17:48] no, but, hmm,
[17:49] flashing signs, we
[17:50] were also going to do this
[17:52] to pick up, and Jay said,
[17:53] that, um, data from them, but
[17:55] it's a $400 fee
[17:56] per year
[17:59] for someone who has them
[18:00] follows or, you know,
[18:01] receives this data. Um, and
[18:05] I think, um, counter
[18:06] traffic, if
[18:08] you are trying
[18:09] to see when we
[18:10] need to patrol
[18:11] dear, if that's what it is,
[18:13] What do we want, hmm,
[18:14] for example, here, when
[18:15] people exceed
[18:16] speed is the highest,
[18:18] hmm, what do we tell them
[18:19] or ask them, hmm,
[18:20] set the counter
[18:22] traffic
[18:23] right here in the office
[18:24] the city clerk or,
[18:25] hmm, you know, 100 yards away
[18:27] from here by road. Um, and
[18:31] then we definitely
[18:32] we will know when people
[18:33] exceed
[18:34] speed when we
[18:35] Patrols are needed. Ahem,
[18:40] so I think that's it
[18:42] a way to, um, solve
[18:43] this problem. Tables
[18:47] speed, we don't
[18:48] we need ours
[18:49] equipment. If you
[18:50] install here
[18:51] speed table, you don't want ours to
[18:53] dump trucks her
[18:54] moved. Ahem,
[18:55] you know when we carry sand, we transport, you know, 50
[18:58] loads per day.
[19:00] Um, they don't suit you.
[19:01] they are needed
[19:02] only needed for
[19:03] suspensions and everything
[19:04] another. You just, you
[19:06] just causing
[19:07] unnecessary
[19:08] braking,
[19:08] unnecessary wear and tear
[19:09] vehicles
[19:10] . If you destroy
[19:13] a city in this area,
[19:14] if you wanted
[19:15] set tables
[19:17] speed right here,
[19:18] you probably
[19:19] get, um, 90% of people
[19:20] who have to commute to work, not
[19:23] will want to have them.
[19:27] Retired people, hmm,
[19:28] can, you know, not
[19:29] to turn such a thing on them
[19:31] attention, hmm, because
[19:32] they, you know, don't, um,
[19:33] so I think I should
[19:35] definitely worth hearing,
[19:36] where, you know, West-
[19:37] The Village is the only place
[19:38] where is it really not so
[19:40] many trucks. Hmm
[19:44] , but we don't want to, we don't want our
[19:47] trucks drove by
[19:48] them. New Fames
[19:50] is in a place,
[19:51] where heavy loads
[19:52] rise through,
[19:53] hmm, Parish Hill. They
[19:55] don't drive through this
[19:56] bridge over bridge.
[19:57] Yes. I mean that
[19:58] I think I am
[20:00] talked to several
[20:01] people about this, that
[20:04] The main thing, in my opinion,
[20:05] there are eight places that
[20:06] lead here
[20:07] four-sided
[20:08] by the way, for any
[20:09] methods that
[20:10] are used
[20:13] twice, or both
[20:14] ends in the West Village
[20:16] or not. I said that in
[20:17] ends, but possible
[20:18] a third of the way from
[20:19] on the one hand, a third
[20:20] way from another, and
[20:21] school zone.
[20:22] It seems to be targeted
[20:24] zones, right, for
[20:25] safe movement. It
[20:26] all 25.
[20:27] There are children, there are people who
[20:29] walking down the street, and there
[20:30] intersection with four
[20:31] traffic lanes.
[20:32] So it seems to me that
[20:34] we are dealing with
[20:35] eight with something,
[20:36] if we are going to do something
[20:37] to do, right? For
[20:38] otherwise we, you know,
[20:39] we are installing something
[20:40] near the school in West-
[20:41] Village, but in the center
[20:42] there is nothing in the city,
[20:43] what do people always say
[20:44] They complain, don't they?
[20:46] And we will have nothing
[20:47] on
[20:47] East Road. Another thing,
[20:48] which constantly violates
[20:49] rules, this is a ride
[20:50] under the "Stop" sign.
[20:51] Nobody stops.
[20:52] They are just leaving.
[20:53] straight through it.
[20:54] Yes. Yes. And this is even
[20:56] city ​​trucks.
[20:57] Yes. Yes.
[20:58] They don't stop.
[21:00] Right. Lines.
[21:02] We discussed this.
[21:03] What do you think, whether
[21:04] really line
[21:05] will stop the truck
[21:06] or a car?
[21:09] Um, the line is no more legitimate than himself
[21:12] "Stop" sign. Um, and them
[21:15] need
[21:16] to repaint
[21:17] annually. Um, we definitely
[21:20] we can do it,
[21:21] if the council wants it to
[21:23] there were "Stop" lines. Ahem,
[21:26] You know, I just
[21:28] I am looking at
[21:28] white service
[21:30] stripes. Hmm, hmm, that's not true,
[21:34] this will not happen...
[21:36] people passing by
[21:37] through them, usually
[21:38] they know there's a sign there
[21:40] stops. They just
[21:41] passing through
[21:42] them.
[21:42] They are standing at the end.
[21:44] covered bridge to
[21:45] Route 30, and they are
[21:46] It doesn't matter. They are blowing.
[21:47] right through them. It
[21:49] just typical. So this is
[21:50] does nothing. THERE ARE
[21:51] stop sign and
[21:52] a huge white line,
[21:54] and the states...I don't think so
[21:55] that we do this. I think the states
[21:57] they put paint on it.
[21:58] This does nothing.
[22:00] Right.
[22:00] This does nothing.
[22:02] It's good if someone,
[22:03] if it's something on
[22:03] kind of a blind spot,
[22:04] where you go around and not
[22:05] you see a stop sign,
[22:06] you know, you can
[22:07] first notice
[22:08] white line.
[22:09] Now there is a sign
[22:10] apple pie
[22:10] right there on the left. You can't see
[22:12] no one who leaves from
[22:13] half a day. As if you don't
[22:14] can you see the sign
[22:15] apple pie. Ahem,
[22:16] so very quickly that
[22:17] close, so don't
[22:18] close, but we
[22:19] talked about tables
[22:20] speed, so we know the rules.
[22:22] Yes. What is the cost,
[22:24] related to...?
[22:26] So, I, m, quantity,
[22:27] which I just bought,
[22:29] was approximately from
[22:30] four to six. I mean, this
[22:33] will depend on whether
[22:34] how many sets
[22:36] you buy, 000. Yes. AND
[22:37] then, by the way, I have
[22:39] meaning that it would be
[22:40] in a way it is important,
[22:41] but how much
[22:42] it will cost, you know,
[22:44] insulation, and then
[22:45] removal every year...In
[22:46] I don't have a number for
[22:47] this, because this city...Um
[22:49] , again, paint,
[22:50] you are not...
[22:51] signs...
[22:51] Yes, signs...I have them.
[22:52] there is no number for
[22:53] signs. I would expect
[22:55] you know, probably...
[22:56] How much does it cost?
[22:57] a sign on a pole?
[22:58] You know,
[22:59] approximately, it will be,
[23:01] probably 300 dollars
[23:02] together with the pillar. Ahem,
[23:03] maybe it's included
[23:04] in the cost of work,
[23:06] if you said 200,
[23:07] yes per piece,
[23:08] and the new Fain cost 45,
[23:10] and their 100,
[23:11] 4500.
[23:13] I was looking for information in
[23:14] Internet of the past
[23:16] week, it was something on
[23:17] like 3400. Yeah, yeah, um
[23:19] ,
[23:19] two days,
[23:20] including signs,
[23:21] two days for the initial
[23:22] installation,
[23:24] Ahem,
[23:26] and this if expensive, um,
[23:27] closed, otherwise you
[23:28] Signals are needed
[23:30] signs,
[23:30] I feel that
[23:32] we...Oh, I'm part of...
[23:39] So, we were also waiting
[23:40] on the data.
[23:42] Yes. What we have. We
[23:44] spent a whole bunch
[23:45] discussions in the council. I think that's all.
[23:48] processed. I...I don't...
[23:49] I don't do that. I have to check, but I
[23:52] ...I can look and
[23:53] to get this...um...
[23:55] Yes. No, no, no. It
[23:57] easy enough for me
[23:58] to figure it out. Um, and I would,
[24:00] probably just
[24:00] returned briefly
[24:02] to the question of tables
[24:03] speed. That would be...
[24:04] It sounds like you
[24:06] looking for. If you
[24:07] are you going to do them
[24:09] in one place, you
[24:10] it seems to you
[24:11] need to be placed
[24:12] them and in other places,
[24:13] just so that
[24:14] people felt that before
[24:16] they are considered more-
[24:17] less fair.
[24:20] Because, in my opinion,
[24:22] if they were going to go somewhere, then West-
[24:24] The village would be for
[24:25] the simplest of them,
[24:27] the most logical place
[24:28] , you know, this, you know,
[24:29] densely populated village.
[24:32] It's slow, you know,
[24:34] speed limit
[24:35] 25. It somehow
[24:36] remote. Hmm, you know,
[24:38] trucks can
[24:39] to go around it. There is no
[24:40] will be like this
[24:41] heavy traffic, like
[24:42] in other places. I think that if there were
[24:45] easy place to, um,
[24:46] to place them, you know
[24:47] , relatively easy
[24:49] saying, obviously,
[24:50] because, you know, you have
[24:51] there are problems with
[24:52] installation and
[24:53] service, then
[24:54] West Village, I think.
[24:56] would be the place
[24:57] where is it worth
[24:58] to address, hmm, as in
[24:59] East Road or here. I think that would be
[25:03] a little more difficult,
[25:05] I think you have
[25:06] quite clear view and
[25:07] near the school. Yes, I am.
[25:10] I think that at school, I mean, another
[25:12] thing about school
[25:13] consisted in the fact that
[25:15] there you can
[25:16] avoid this if
[25:17] you need time for
[25:18] this, you can
[25:19] to bypass, uh, that's right, I
[25:21] Yes,
[25:23] there are some roots
[25:24] around the school, uh,
[25:26] you know,
[25:26] I wonder what
[25:27] in the west, on the western side there is also
[25:30] fire department with
[25:31] trucks, I have
[25:32] meaning that this is still
[25:33] one thing worth
[25:34] take into account and
[25:34] talk to them,
[25:35] if you at all
[25:36] thinking about the west, I think this is great.
[25:42] discussion, and I think
[25:44] that's right,
[25:45] uh, yeah, I think that's it
[25:49] more than I think,
[25:50] what should it be, uh,
[25:52] yes, bigger, uh,
[25:54] group, uh, mine
[25:55] personal feeling,
[25:57] yes, probably
[25:59] to go to the city,
[26:00] especially when we have
[26:01] was not correct
[26:02] city ​​code,
[26:03] but let's see how
[26:04] they feel,
[26:05] Yes,
[26:06] because from what I heard from
[26:07] people, they are tired
[26:08] from this.
[26:09] Yes.
[26:10] They want us to do something.
[26:11] did, something.
[26:12] Uh, I think
[26:14] just talked
[26:15] about this.
[26:15] Yes. I think that in
[26:16] the sheriff's department he
[26:17] I've been here often, and now
[26:18] , to be honest, I
[26:19] suddenly he is not here
[26:20] saw.
[26:21] He was on my side.
[26:22] Well, do you know why?
[26:26] Good. So, does anyone have
[26:27] one more question for
[26:28] Knees on details?
[26:30] That's all good. Thank you.
[26:31] Yes, Dan.
[26:32] Don't ask questions.
[26:34] Aha.
[26:34] OK. Interesting. I heard
[26:37] some comments, like
[26:39] all these people
[26:39] complain. Not
[26:42] need to be precise,
[26:43] but I think, Todd, no
[26:44] I want you.
[26:45] criticize.
[26:46] Actually, I'll call
[26:47] three people. But who...
[26:48] how many people are there
[26:49] Dmerson Center
[26:50] complained? Um,
[26:51] at the Dmerson Center.
[26:52] Yes. I thought you said,
[26:54] that they constantly
[26:55] complain in Dmerson-
[26:56] center.
[26:56] This is mostly because
[26:57] stop signs, not
[26:58] because of speed.
[26:59] Good. But these are different
[27:00] vehicles
[27:02] Are these residents?
[27:03] These are the residents.
[27:04] And me too
[27:05] interesting, because they only
[27:06] about six.
[27:07] Many people walk
[27:09] to Grange on Wednesday
[27:10] for lunch.
[27:10] Good. Trying
[27:12] cross the street, and
[27:13] they are not
[27:14] are slowing down.
[27:15] Users Res.
[27:16] I'm just trying, and
[27:18] many people also
[27:19] dirt roads.
[27:21] So, this is, you know, what is it?
[27:23] West Emerson. Their,
[27:25] probably 20.
[27:26] Believe it or not, but
[27:27] excess
[27:28] speed, which
[27:29] occurs in West-
[27:30] Emerson, actually
[27:31] happens because
[27:32] local residents.
[27:33] I must say that 85% of those
[27:34] who exceeds
[27:35] speed, that is
[27:36] city ​​residents who
[27:37] live in this area
[27:39] , or they live on the road and immediately
[27:41] next to, holding on to
[27:42] horns, brother. It
[27:43] mostly, I have to say that I am watching
[27:46] on them, I know who
[27:47] they.
[27:47] Of course.
[27:48] So in any case,
[27:50] just curious, because I'm from
[27:51] those people who
[27:52] like to receive
[27:53] information from data.
[27:57] Um, and often
[27:58] organizations respond
[27:59] per voice group, and
[28:05] it's not always
[28:06] most or even
[28:07] close majority
[28:08] people who are
[28:09] interested
[28:09] parties, if
[28:10] you want.
[28:11] Um, so I just
[28:12] interesting, it would be
[28:13] nice to talk to
[28:14] a little more about that. I
[28:15] completely agree with Lee.
[28:17] I think this is important.
[28:19] discussion, uh, so
[28:20] what does it affect
[28:21] budget, uh,
[28:22] discussion, and, uh,
[28:24] if, for example, very
[28:25] small cohort
[28:26] supposedly receives
[28:27] benefit, and this is another one
[28:29] the topic I want
[28:30] to violate, because not
[28:31] always profitable
[28:32] to do such things.
[28:35] There are
[28:35] unforeseen
[28:36] consequences of the attempt
[28:37] solve the problem. THERE ARE-
[28:39] eh, but if there is a very
[28:41] a small cohort that
[28:42] benefits, and all
[28:43] the population pays for
[28:45] this, I think this
[28:46] also needed
[28:47] to take into account in such
[28:48] discussions. I am not
[28:50] against, you know, I wanted
[28:51] I wish everyone
[28:52] followed the rules
[28:53] . I would like to
[28:54] there never were any
[28:56] problems. So I'm not for it.
[28:57] or not, I just
[28:58] I think it is necessary.
[28:59] much more
[29:00] discussions and
[29:01] thought about it with
[29:02] different points of view. Uh-huh
[29:04] , and then,
[29:05] Sorry, continue.
[29:06] Yes,
[29:08] took place in March
[29:10] meeting with Mr.
[29:10] Bratton and someone from
[29:12] sheriff's department,
[29:13] and there was no
[29:14] a huge crowd,
[29:15] but a clear conclusion
[29:16] was that these
[29:17] people were really
[29:19] interested in
[29:20] to do something, and
[29:21] speed table
[29:22] seemed good
[29:23] decision. Almost everyone
[29:26] were disappointed that law enforcement
[29:29] does not happen.
[29:30] Fines are not issued.
[29:31] To get a fine for
[29:33] 35, need to go 50
[29:35] or more. So all this
[29:36] seemed absolutely
[29:38] useless. But, uh, I
[29:40] left with the feeling that
[29:41] these people are very
[29:42] interested in
[29:43] speed tables, and
[29:44] so I, uh, broke it
[29:46] question and contacted
[29:47] this time with Mr.
[29:48] Redom. And, uh, I'm with you.
[29:51] I agree. I would like to know what everyone thinks
[29:55] in the city, but the question
[29:57] excess
[29:57] speed—it
[29:58] approximately each
[29:59] the third thing I hear
[30:01] from people. This is probably
[30:04] the most common thing,
[30:05] until I broke it
[30:06] tax issues with
[30:07] sale. Uh, everything was fine.
[30:08] as if everyone
[30:09] only talked about
[30:10] excess
[30:10] speed and why we
[30:11] nothing to do with it
[30:12] are we doing?
[30:12] And I hear this often.
[30:14] Yes. So, if not
[30:15] take into consideration
[30:16] mind reading or,
[30:16] you know, a survey,
[30:17] or so, I wouldn't
[30:18] refused to put
[30:19] This is up for vote.
[30:20] You know, special
[30:21] meetings and voting;
[30:23] this is a great way,
[30:24] you know, invite
[30:25] people to a wider
[30:26] discussion. But yes,
[30:27] I would like us to
[30:28] could hear from everyone
[30:30] constantly. But if you constantly hear something
[30:33] like that, I don't want to reject it and say
[30:35] : “Oh, I don’t know what everyone
[30:37] think, so now I
[30:38] nothing for anyone
[30:39] "I will do it." Yes. And I...
[30:41] don't want to imply that I
[30:43] ...I mean, I have concerns.
[30:45] to be on dirt road
[30:46] on the road.
[30:47] There was a boy who
[30:48] intentionally drove through
[30:49] at a speed of 50-60
[30:50] meters per hour
[30:51] the other day. He...he's a neighbor.
[30:52] He is local.
[30:53] Yes.
[30:54] And he does it.
[30:55] intentionally at least
[30:56] once or twice a week.
[30:59] And I would really like to
[31:00] this didn't happen, but
[31:01] I'm just a dot. This is not
[31:03] means that
[31:05] I'm calling you.
[31:06] Everyone reacts differently.
[31:07] different, and this
[31:08] wrong. It
[31:09] unacceptable. Perhaps,
[31:11] someday I will find myself in
[31:12] Don't worry, I'll try.
[31:13] deal with it yourself.
[31:15] But, um, I...I
[31:16] I agree that there is
[31:17] bad actors.
[31:19] Undoubtedly. And I wanted
[31:21] I wish there was, uh,
[31:23] simple, uh
[31:24] cost-effective
[31:25] a solution that would not have
[31:26] negative consequences
[31:28] . You know, I would like to
[31:29] for it to exist, and I
[31:30] I'm not saying that it's not true.
[31:31] I'm just saying that, on
[31:32] in my opinion, this
[31:33] deserves
[31:33] much more
[31:34] discussion.
[31:34] That's right. And during
[31:35] for many years, I think Maria can
[31:37] to speak from
[31:37] their name. I have
[31:38] meaning that this
[31:39] question
[31:39] discussed at
[31:40] there are already many on the forum
[31:41] years, many years.
[31:42] So this is not a new topic,
[31:43] which we have,
[31:44] Do you understand what I mean?
[31:45] So if it arises
[31:46] , and it should be followed again
[31:47] to discuss. This has
[31:48] to see again
[31:49] daylight. But I don't
[31:51] I want people to think,
[31:52] that it's just new
[31:53] problem. It was
[31:55] permanent
[31:56] long-term
[31:57] problem during
[31:58] many years,
[31:59] and considering
[32:00] number of soil
[32:01] the roads that we have. «
[32:03] Speeding policemen»
[32:04] nothing will be done about
[32:05] dirt roads.
[32:06] They can no longer
[32:07] to be there.
[32:08] No. Even if they
[32:09] there will be 25, there will be five
[32:10] pit. Even because it's not
[32:11] could be reached
[32:12] to a bad level, because
[32:13] there is no rain. You understand.
[32:14] , what am I talking about? You have yours.
[32:16] , these signs of nature
[32:17] origin.
[32:18] Yes.
[32:19] I contacted the office.
[32:20] Mark, and he tied
[32:22] me with mine
[32:22] deputy, who
[32:24] deals with the sign
[32:28] speed. This is a sign
[32:30] speed P on
[32:31] batteries,
[32:32] which we can
[32:33] to install.
[32:35] So it's already in development,
[32:38] but I think, you know,
[32:39] it would be on our part,
[32:40] when we will work on
[32:42] budget, think
[32:43] about to buy
[32:44] a few more of the same
[32:45] , otherwise they
[32:46] will definitely appear.
[32:48] Yes. Good. We
[32:49] let's close this topic on
[32:50] anything else. Well,
[32:52] No. I would just say,
[32:55] what, um, these signs, signs
[32:56] feedback from
[32:57] radar, like them
[32:58] they call it, I think,
[32:59] will always be
[33:00] the simplest
[33:01] option for
[33:02] solution. They
[33:04] produce several
[33:05] different models. I am not
[33:07] saw a lot of them in
[33:08] Vermont. Hmm, but
[33:11] especially in New
[33:12] There are those in Hampshire who
[33:13] really blink on
[33:14] you. They are similar to
[33:17] blue, almost similar
[33:18] to the police station
[33:19] a siren, which, in my opinion, and this data
[33:23] show that they
[33:24] really enough
[33:25] effective. They
[33:26] economically beneficial.
[33:28] Um, and then when your
[33:31] another one, you know, there is
[33:32] large booklet with
[33:33] research on
[33:34] means against
[33:35] excess
[33:36] speeds, and there are several
[33:37] those that you can
[33:39] get. There are those who
[33:40] just record your
[33:41] speed and give you
[33:42] feedback about
[33:44] what you exceed
[33:45] speed. There is one,
[33:46] who records, and there is more
[33:47] one who betrays
[33:48] beep if
[33:50] you are much
[33:50] exceed
[33:51] speed limit.
[33:53] This is for the neighbors
[33:54] will like it.
[33:55] I just thought, um
[34:02] can I just
[34:03] to say, um, uh, to
[34:04] return to these
[34:05] your meters, because
[34:07] I think this is the way.
[34:08] get the right one
[34:09] information. Ahem,
[34:12] wherever you want
[34:14] set the table
[34:15] speed,
[34:18] set the counter
[34:20] and that's because when
[34:22] they are finding out
[34:23] speed limit
[34:24] and all that, and where do we have
[34:25] it was like this, we had
[34:26] everywhere, from speed
[34:28] , you know, people in West-
[34:29] Village, they thought,
[34:30] that people exceed
[34:32] speed. Um, so we
[34:34] installed there
[34:35] counters. We
[34:37] did it in several
[34:38] places, the same for
[34:39] complaints. And there is a certain
[34:42] percentage, so that you
[34:43] never get 25
[34:45] , right?
[34:46] Yes.
[34:48] Um, you will get
[34:49] a certain percentage that,
[34:50] um, like, you know,
[34:52] at 20 m per hour
[34:53] more, but you want,
[34:54] so that it is very small.
[34:59] Um, so I think this is
[35:00] yes, and when we
[35:01] checked this data,
[35:02] everything was within limits
[35:03] standards. I have on
[35:05] meaning that everyone has
[35:06] problems with
[35:06] excess
[35:07] speed. Everyone has
[35:09] in the world.
[35:10] So, the situation is not
[35:11] worse. At that time on
[35:13] There was no West Street. Ahem
[35:15] , even if people
[35:16] think, you know, they
[35:18] see that one or two
[35:19] the cars still
[35:20] are passing by,
[35:21] and they say, "Oh, everyone,
[35:23] you know, there are several
[35:24] drivers who
[35:25] exceed
[35:25] speed. Hmm, and so on
[35:28] there may be, but all these averages are the same
[35:30] meaning, um, they
[35:31] invent a formula,
[35:33] so that in fact
[35:33] set limits
[35:35] speed on the road.
[35:37] Um, you just don't
[35:38] you can...well i guess
[35:39] maybe you can, I don't know, but that's it.
[35:41] they determine how
[35:42] quickly you can
[35:43] to drive on the road, they take a percentage, so
[35:45] what you don't want
[35:46] it was so
[35:47] low, so that everyone
[35:48] exceeded
[35:49] speed. I have on
[35:50] mind you, this,
[35:51] hmm, that's something
[35:52] wrong
[35:53] attitude. Hmm, but what?
[35:57] regarding safety in
[35:58] center, yes, I hope that people
[36:01] who go, you know, um,
[36:02] across, um, people
[36:04] they will say, you know,
[36:05] let them go
[36:06] ahead of you, right?
[36:08] If they are leaving with
[36:09] at a speed of 24 miles per
[36:11] hour, it's not
[36:11] problem. But when
[36:13] they rise to
[36:14] hill at speed
[36:16] 4550 and...Grange
[36:17] open, and you have
[36:18] these elderly people who
[36:19] are going to their car
[36:21] or walk on the sidelines
[36:22] roads, because there is an embankment there
[36:23] . They won't be.
[36:25] to climb this
[36:26] embankment,
[36:27] truth? You know, someone
[36:28] will suffer.
[36:29] Should we do it?
[36:30] speed table on
[36:31] that hill, are we
[36:32] let's just do it
[36:33] middle ground? Where
[36:34] we made a table
[36:35] speed?
[36:36] We made one on
[36:37] East-West Road. We
[36:39] made one for...us
[36:40] made one on
[36:41] middle road.
[36:44] So we made one
[36:45] on the way down the hill?
[36:46] No, about
[36:47] That's what you're saying. I think that would be
[36:49] yes, if you like it
[36:50] worries.
[36:51] One at Grange, which
[36:52] rises to that
[36:52] hill,
[36:53] Yes? We did...we
[36:54] they made one there, here
[36:55] What am I asking about?
[36:56] I don't think so. I think it was Middle-
[36:59] road, East West Road.
[37:00] Um, and there was another one...
[37:03] Yes, that's right.
[37:05] Good. Because this data is
[37:06] what Lee is talking about
[37:07] . That's why we
[37:08] this data is needed. But
[37:09] if you are so...if we
[37:11] it worries me whether it would be
[37:12] this...Where to put it
[37:13] him now? Do you want
[37:14] to see what he
[37:15] does?
[37:16] Right. I have on
[37:17] I mean, this... I mean...
[37:18] mind you, it's absolutely
[37:19] right. I don't mind,
[37:21] so that they are anywhere,
[37:22] where, in your opinion,
[37:23] You have a problem. Um,
[37:25] because this,
[37:26] um, and it really has
[37:28] to be quite accurate in
[37:32] the right place,
[37:33] because if you will move around the corner,
[37:35] you will get absolutely
[37:36] other data. Yes.
[37:39] But we are talking about
[37:40] people who are leaving
[37:41] on foot. So I have
[37:43] the problem with this,
[37:44] even if I agree, maybe
[37:47] with less and less
[37:48] number of people, but
[37:49] Kiplin Road will be at 35-
[37:50] and. Um, but when you see someone
[37:54] walks, like anywhere else,
[37:55] just slow down
[37:56] .
[37:58] Yes.
[37:58] Let's give it to everyone
[38:00] live,
[38:00] Do you understand? Um, that's all,
[38:02] what is needed. And exactly
[38:03] that's how I feel about
[38:04] cereals. And I, you know,
[38:06] when you come and
[38:07] you see 50 cars here,
[38:08] you know, lunch
[38:09] break, sooner rather than later
[38:11] everything is going on, and you
[38:12] slow it down. Em
[38:13] if someone
[38:14] rises to that
[38:15] hill at speed 40
[38:16] or more...50, dude,
[38:18] they just get started.
[38:19] And, um, if there are people there,
[38:20] they should be arrested,
[38:22] to throw in prison,
[38:23] to deprive of rights Hmm,
[38:24] That's all. And I again
[38:26] I still wish there were
[38:28] law enforcement agencies
[38:29] . If you are even a little
[38:31] Do you know the city of Chester?
[38:33] on the 103rd route,
[38:35] do not exceed
[38:36] speed in this
[38:37] city, because you
[38:38] will stop and discharge
[38:39] fine. And you can
[38:40] to say that they are
[38:41] this is supplemented
[38:42] your budget.
[38:43] More power to them. But
[38:45] they receive
[38:46] apartments.
[38:46] Yes.
[38:47] This is a rough situation, isn't it?
[38:48] wrong?
[38:49] Hmm, please be
[38:50] affection.
[38:51] Right.
[38:52] But this is a rough situation
[38:53] . You want to spend
[38:54] $200,000 per year,
[38:56] or
[38:56] wrong? I wouldn't say
[38:57] who wouldn't say that.
[38:58] I would say, but this
[38:59] sheriff's department
[39:01] No, the department
[39:02] sheriff, um, you know, um,
[39:04] I think they are
[39:05] must patrol,
[39:06] it is not so if we worry about
[39:09] speed. Not Route 30,
[39:10] not route 5. Although I also don't want that
[39:13] people traveled with
[39:14] speed 70 on it, or
[39:16] wrong? Right.
[39:17] Hmm, but in this
[39:18] area, if they
[39:19] sat here,
[39:21] yes, they could
[39:22] stop people, hmm,
[39:23] almost as fast
[39:25] , like, um, they can
[39:26] get back in the car,
[39:28] Yes?
[39:29] Hmm, and I think people
[39:30] would have learned.
[39:32] I know that the locals
[39:33] the residents would learn.
[39:34] Hmm.
[39:36] this one doesn't have it either
[39:37] doubts if you
[39:38] spent that time,
[39:40] which we spend,
[39:41] paying them now, and
[39:42] told them to sit down
[39:43] in the middle half
[39:44] this time, otherwise we don't pay them. Hmm, you
[39:49] would write out a few
[39:50] fines, and people would
[39:52] slowed down. The thing is
[39:56] because, um, from some
[39:57] reasons to, um, stop
[39:58] there are no more people
[40:00] a big problem or
[40:01] something like that. I think I think that's why
[40:06] we didn't do it,
[40:08] then if this
[40:09] correct answer,
[40:10] so that's what
[40:12] I mean, we
[40:13] forced him
[40:14] park your car there
[40:15] car, he was there,
[40:16] but you know, that's enough
[40:17] it's hard when you, when
[40:19] they stop
[40:20] near the church,
[40:22] and they are quite noticeable
[40:23] , yes, that's too much,
[40:25] it's too visible there,
[40:26] you know, okay, there
[40:27] policeman, I am going
[40:28] slow down, I am going
[40:30] make sure I
[40:31] I'd stop if they had
[40:32] was unmarked
[40:33] car. This would be
[40:34] another story. IN
[40:36] There is one of them.
[40:37] They him
[40:38] are used.
[40:39] Yes,
[40:39] it should be just like
[40:41] signs, you understand?
[40:42] They put
[40:43] blinkers, something on
[40:44] pedestrian type
[40:45] transition, you know,
[40:46] they warn on the mountain
[40:47] or downhill or
[40:48] something like that. Idea
[40:50] to manage it with someone
[40:51] I think so
[40:52] hopeless. And now
[40:54] we play as a spy
[40:55] against the spy. Well,
[40:56] let's put
[40:57] unmarked
[40:57] car and we will do
[40:58] all this and that. Let's install a few
[41:00] signs. The sign can
[41:02] good job, and
[41:03] he, well, doesn't have one
[41:04] family that needs
[41:06] to feed, you know, yes,
[41:07] in
[41:10] we were in Taland, this
[41:12] was a city that
[41:12] more than that, but we,
[41:14] well, we considered
[41:15] possibility
[41:15] shame, by
[41:16] essence, photography,
[41:18] when private
[41:19] citizens publish
[41:20] photos of people who
[41:21] violate the law,
[41:25] with their license plates
[41:26] signs, and publish
[41:27] this is in
[41:29] Internet, this
[41:30] illegally. AT,
[41:32] we can do it,
[41:33] if they want, but
[41:34] concerning
[41:35] dental
[41:36] politicians, it seems,
[41:37] what if to
[41:38] pedestrian flow
[41:38] are getting very close
[41:39] fast cars, we
[41:40] must
[41:41] to set...signs
[41:42] . I would just like to apologize,
[41:47] that at the crossroads here,
[41:49] and also in West-
[41:50] Village. I have on
[41:53] meaning that theoretically
[41:54] there are many options,
[41:56] which you could
[41:56] to consider that
[41:57] help achieve
[41:59] some of these goals and
[42:00] to make it
[42:01] safe for
[42:02] pedestrians, but they
[42:03] will not be cheap. I think it's true,
[42:05] you know, you say
[42:07] about construction
[42:08] infrastructure, and I,
[42:09] you know, more than
[42:10] happy to talk about
[42:11] this and discuss
[42:12] options. But this, this, will be significant,
[42:16] you know, the project
[42:17] worth ten
[42:18] thousand dollars.
[42:20] I think it's over.
[42:21] many years since then,
[42:22] how did we not do
[42:23] the hill here, in
[42:24] Grange, and it's over
[42:25] a few years ago,
[42:26] How was the West made?
[42:28] -street. I think that's all.
[42:29] It will go as Lee said.
[42:30] , there will be an anomaly, as in
[42:31] there were several of us
[42:32] weeks ago, and will be
[42:33] several cases
[42:34] excess
[42:35] the speeds we are talking about
[42:36] we know, but I think
[42:37] what will come out of this
[42:38] medium level. But
[42:39] we haven't passed yet
[42:40] West Village. Perhaps
[42:42] , it would be good
[42:42] get data about it.
[42:44] I mean, first of all
[42:45] than we will just say
[42:46] , which seems to be
[42:47] last time we
[42:48] passed Middle Road,
[42:49] that was quite a lot
[42:51] years ago,
[42:52] because everyone complained about
[42:54] excess
[42:54] speed, average
[42:56] the speed was 38 miles
[42:57] /hour Yes.
[42:58] And this is what happened,
[43:00] when I was on the council
[43:01] earlier. We had
[43:02] problem on route 5.
[43:04] Yes.
[43:05] And we used
[43:06] a certain technique that
[43:07] was at the station
[43:08] the sheriff, about whom no one knows
[43:09] didn't know. And everyone there
[43:11] complained. Oh. It
[43:12] really bad. It was on the 40th. I think
[43:15] that's right. This is the 40th. AND
[43:16] it turned out that there was
[43:18] one car that
[43:19] was driving at a speed of 85
[43:21] m/h. Sheriff's Department
[43:22] stopped her, discharged her
[43:24] fine, and average
[43:25] the speed was
[43:26] 38 m/h. And this revealed
[43:29] this whole situation on
[43:30] that time. So this is
[43:33] perception. So I think that if we
[43:35] we're going to go with this
[43:36] way before we
[43:37] let's even talk
[43:38] about things...In the budget
[43:39] we better get
[43:40] our rate. To us
[43:41] better to install
[43:42] counters in those
[43:43] areas where, in our opinion, they are needed,
[43:45] because there is no point in saying
[43:46] what we need
[43:46] order six of them,
[43:48] if we don't do this
[43:48] we will do it.
[43:49] You know what I mean?
[43:50] I say? We are better off
[43:51] first get
[43:52] our data.
[43:53] I would just like to
[43:54] see the data we
[43:55] already collected.
[43:56] Of course. Yes.
[43:57] But I have to
[43:58] mind, but you have to
[43:59] add, you must
[44:00] to think about everything
[44:01] city ​​and add to
[44:02] this something, so that
[44:04] we had in common
[44:05] idea before we
[44:06] let's even think about
[44:07] this is for assembly
[44:08] budget. IN
[44:09] you are public
[44:10] meeting.
[44:11] That's right. Public
[44:12] meeting. Honestly,
[44:14] West Village, if you
[44:15] talk to
[44:15] residents, maybe not
[44:16] to want "lying"
[44:17] "policemen" or,
[44:18] Do you understand what I mean?
[44:19] You don't know. I have on
[44:21] mind you too
[44:21] must take into account
[44:23] features of different
[44:24] villages. Do you understand what it's about?
[44:25] I? So, sorry.
[44:27] Just if you
[44:28] were going to ask
[44:29] traffic report
[44:31] here, on
[44:31] quadripartite
[44:32] stop, which, as that
[44:33] the part that reaches
[44:35] to the grain, this is what,
[44:36] I think, So. And I think you probably
[44:38] need a little lower
[44:39] in size.
[44:40] Good.
[44:41] You want to take them off,
[44:41] when they
[44:42] approaching
[44:43] grains, most likely,
[44:44] from the foot of the hill,
[44:45] because that's where they are not
[44:45] see.
[44:46] I can put
[44:47] a few marks on the road. 50 feet below
[44:49] in size. 100 feet
[44:50] lower in size.
[44:51] Somewhere in this
[44:52] range.
[44:53] Good. Um, no. I have
[44:54] try to see,
[44:55] Where are they now?
[44:56] our cameras, but we, I think we definitely could,
[44:58] that is, get you
[44:59] the data we already have,
[45:00] and then, if there are any
[45:01] a few, we could do this
[45:02] make. Um, and then I think I can
[45:05] to say about something
[45:06] engineering work or
[45:07] speed tables,
[45:08] but I can just
[45:09] to give you more, um,
[45:11] information. Um, yes.
[45:13] a lot of standard
[45:14] information, this is how it is
[45:15] should look like this
[45:17] What are the rules? I will
[45:18] happy to send you
[45:19] all this information,
[45:20] to help
[45:21] to make a decision
[45:22] and see which ones
[45:23] data is for West-
[45:24] Village. I think that
[45:26] A lot of time has passed, and,
[45:28] um, if you still have it
[45:29] data...
[45:31] We must have,
[45:33] you know, 20, that is, but I think it's over.
[45:36] a lot...20 years. I think that immediately
[45:40] after the fire
[45:41] station, between this and
[45:42] grain platform
[45:43] , will be your equal
[45:44] place. Yes, I would, I would
[45:46] I said it again, I would
[45:48] said where are you going to
[45:49] place a table
[45:50] speed. So, if
[45:53] this is because people who
[45:54] exceed
[45:55] speed,
[45:55] will cross
[45:56] speed table, and
[45:58] then they will sit down again
[45:59] her.
[46:00] The word "table"
[46:02] speed".
[46:02] At the moment
[46:03] literally no movement, this
[46:05] there will be tables
[46:05] speed.
[46:06] Oh, okay. Right.
[46:08] OK.
[46:08] It's simple.
[46:09] discussion of tables
[46:10] speed, or
[46:11] wrong? Discussion
[46:12] speed tables.
[46:13] But if you have
[46:14] overview
[46:15] about where, on your
[46:16] opinion, you get
[46:17] most complaints and where,
[46:19] in your opinion, you
[46:20] want to place
[46:21] some device,
[46:22] for example,
[46:22] blinkers or something
[46:24] ...Yes.
[46:25] Um, you know, I think that
[46:26] this is a beautiful place and we
[46:28] could inform them
[46:29] . Um, so in
[46:32] I don't see the future.
[46:34] to make it happen very
[46:35] quickly. So, um, I think... We have time,
[46:40] to get
[46:41] relevant data, and, um
[46:43] , and I don't want to say,
[46:44] I don't care where.
[46:45] they want them
[46:46] to place. I have on
[46:49] meaning that it will not affect
[46:51] for everything that has been done,
[46:52] paving and all that
[46:53] other.
[46:54] Good.
[46:55] Sounds good. Thank you,
[46:57] who came.
[46:58] No, thank you. I will contact you.
[47:01] by you and will give you
[47:03] additional information
[47:04] .
[47:05] Thank you. That's right.
[47:07] You said that
[47:08] received four things.
[47:09] Yes.
[47:10] Cross out one.
[47:11] Thank you. Good.
[47:13] So, uh, the construction
[47:15] completed, but this is the one,
[47:16] which, um, collapsed,
[47:18] and the water flowed under
[47:19] with it, and we reworked
[47:20] her from Belco, um, on the road
[47:22] Stoney Brook, and it was
[47:23] that account. Good.
[47:26] So, we, um,
[47:27] sift a little
[47:28] more sand on
[47:29] next year. Um, and,
[47:33] um, let's do a little
[47:34] planning, we carry
[47:35] some gravel on
[47:37] roads. Hmm, let's fall asleep.
[47:41] a few potholes. We
[47:44] heard about, um, the back
[47:45] bridge, they say that
[47:46] in October for the new
[47:47] rear axle,
[47:50] but it seems nothing
[47:51] arrives on time. So
[47:53] , or
[47:53] we are going
[47:54] to gather together to
[47:55] push...home in
[47:56] garage?
[47:57] No.
[47:59] Unless you want
[48:00] push.
[48:01] What do you say?
[48:02] November is for that.
[48:04] October. October.
[48:05] While it is connected
[48:07] to the tractor.
[48:07] And then I think that this
[48:09] it will be better than one
[48:10] ton.
[48:11] Good. Two-year-old
[48:12] prescription.
[48:13] One ton or a year
[48:14] ago. I don't know which one.
[48:16] year.
[48:16] So, um, it's not yet
[48:17] came out of the workshop.
[48:20] So, um, for a while
[48:21] so, I think they said that in October
[48:24] this could be
[48:25] refined, but, um,
[48:26] it was, I don't know, 6
[48:28] months ago.
[48:29] So, you may not have
[48:30] be this for plowing
[48:32] .
[48:32] I doubt it.
[48:33] Oho.
[48:33] IN
[48:34] Why is there a problem?
[48:36] Um, it's simple, um,
[48:37] body dealers. THERE ARE
[48:39] only one dealer
[48:40] bodies, sorry.
[48:41] So, you will have to. AND
[48:44] this is the first truck,
[48:45] which we didn't know about.
[48:48] So the next
[48:49] truck on
[48:50] next year we
[48:51] ordered two years
[48:52] ago,
[48:52] and we got ours
[48:54] a place in line to
[48:55] install the body
[48:56] next year. So
[48:58] here is this...
[48:59] then the chassis cab
[49:00] stood in
[49:01] workshops to get out
[49:02] to retire.
[49:03] That's right. Yes.
[49:06] Is it prepared?
[49:08] for the plow? Is it possible?
[49:10] to bet on him
[49:11] plow? You just don't have
[49:12] there will be weight. IN
[49:13] we still have Dodge, he
[49:14] still drives well.
[49:15] Good. Hmm, that's simple.
[49:17] question...So I'm completely
[49:18] I'm not worried.
[49:19] Ahem,
[49:20] hmm, it's just a question,
[49:22] you know, this one
[49:23] depreciation
[49:24] value, honestly
[49:25] speaking. If you
[49:26] will continue
[49:27] every, you know, if it's
[49:28] will last 2 years
[49:29] longer than one year,
[49:31] then it will be
[49:31] to decrease, I would
[49:32] said.
[49:33] Well, you have, um, people,
[49:34] who plow for you, yes
[49:36] ?
[49:37] Uh, private
[49:38] contractors.
[49:38] No.
[49:39] Or private individuals,
[49:40] which, you know, plow
[49:41] roads?
[49:42] No. No.
[49:43] Good. Residents.
[49:44] Only four of
[49:45] half of us.
[49:46] Good. Just this
[49:48] residence
[49:49] Connecticut.
[49:55] Well, you know, they
[49:56] wonderful residents who
[49:57] concerns people with
[49:58] plows during
[49:59] major storms, etc.
[50:01] They will help us,
[50:02] just because they do too
[50:03] need somewhere
[50:04] to get there, but we don't
[50:08] we carry
[50:08] responsibility.
[50:10] Oh, no. We are not for anyone.
[50:11] we pass on. And if so
[50:12] we pass on, then they
[50:14] everyone should have
[50:15] relevant insurances
[50:16] in sight. Something else?
[50:18] Hmm, all four.
[50:20] Well, we submitted, um,
[50:22] grant and assistance. Hmm,
[50:24] so we hope that
[50:26] we will get some
[50:27] reimbursement through
[50:28] a couple of months.
[50:29] That's all.
[50:30] While you are here for
[50:31] correspondence, which there
[50:33] little.
[50:33] Next week
[50:34] they spend
[50:35] information meeting
[50:36] in Patna regarding the bridge on
[50:37] Landing Road. Patni-
[50:38] road. Bridge to Landing-
[50:40] road in Patna. I think
[50:42] what is this that
[50:43] next to the old...
[50:44] I know if anyone wants
[50:45] to join this,
[50:46] what is happening under
[50:46] meeting time in Patna,
[50:47] which takes place in
[50:48] the same time as
[50:49] our. Do you want to leave? Not
[50:50] Do you want to go?
[50:52] This is an interstate bridge.
[50:54] So
[50:54] I'll just tell her that
[50:55] There will be no one there.
[50:56] Everything is fine.
[50:57] Yes, I'm fine.
[50:58] Good.
[50:59] He says, "I'm fine."
[51:00] . Yes. Good.
[51:01] Uh, there are some more
[51:04] question about the section
[51:05] information for
[51:06] information? Good.
[51:08] No correspondence. AT
[51:09] , we...Discussion Action
[51:11] by correspondence. Therefore,
[51:12] we must sign
[51:13] or appoint
[51:14] someone for
[51:15] voting for
[51:16] insurance for which
[51:17] they manage BLCT for
[51:18] board of directors.
[51:19] This year we are doing
[51:20] this is by mail, not on
[51:22] meeting. So, we
[51:23] need to be assigned
[51:24] someone for
[51:25] voting. Both
[51:27] these options have
[51:28] the appropriate amount
[51:29] directors for
[51:30] each of them as
[51:31] options and
[51:31] maintenance. So, uh, this is
[51:33] just a question
[51:33] filling out the form, and
[51:34] then we decide,
[51:35] do we want
[51:36] to vote for someone,
[51:37] or just stay,
[51:38] or not at all
[51:38] send them back.
[51:39] Which directors?
[51:41] Director. So, BLCT
[51:42] has a passive state and
[51:43] verb
[51:44] non-profit
[51:45] insurance.
[51:46] Um, so we can
[51:47] to do with them whatever. Does it have
[51:49] anyone have an advantage?
[51:53] What do you usually do?
[51:55] ?
[51:55] We never
[51:57] meet at
[51:58] the county fair or
[51:59] city ​​fair.
[52:00] Good. So this year
[52:01] they decided
[52:02] do it by mail.
[52:03] AT.
[52:03] So if no one was
[52:04] at the city council meeting
[52:05] fair, to
[52:06] vote for us, in
[52:07] We have a vote.
[52:08] Right. Right.
[52:10] We can write in
[52:11] voting, or not
[52:12] Yes?
[52:12] There is no room for
[52:13] letters.
[52:14] No, there are only four of them.
[52:15] I know. But you can
[52:17] just mark them and
[52:18] send.
[52:19] Yes, that's true.
[52:21] Yes, we can. AND
[52:22] I agree with this.
[52:23] Good.
[52:24] I don't care.
[52:26] This is me.
[52:27] I don't care.
[52:27] So I'll tell you what. I will make a proposal.
[52:29] to entrust Paul
[52:30] do these two. I support this. It
[52:32] good.
[52:33] That's good. I don't mind.
[52:35] to do this.
[52:36] Good. Perfectly. We have
[52:37] second word. I support him. All,
[52:40] who supports that
[52:41] Paul was
[52:42] representative for
[52:42] voting for
[52:43] passive and verb
[52:44] board of directors,
[52:45] they say: "I am." Ya. Ya. All
[52:46] against. You can
[52:53] to speak out against, eh-
[52:55] Well, let's see.
[52:56] . Therefore,
[52:57] I want to move.
[52:57] local tax on
[52:59] options at the end and
[53:00] do a few more
[53:01] things before we
[53:02] let's start this
[53:02] discussion. Therefore,
[53:04] regarding appointments, uh,
[53:05] I will make a proposal.
[53:06] to appoint Marsha
[53:07] Dowie to the commission on
[53:08] planning, and Julie
[53:10] Johnson to the committee on
[53:11] cemetery issues.
[53:12] I support this.
[53:13] Good. Are there any
[53:14] discussion on this
[53:16] reason? Good. All,
[53:17] who supports, uh,
[53:18] Marcia's destination
[53:19] Dowie to the commission on
[53:20] planning, Julie
[53:21] Jones to the committee on
[53:22] cemetery issues,
[53:23] they say: "I am." Me. Okay.
[53:27] To all those who are against, I will send them
[53:29] emails, and
[53:31] then, uh, Priscilla,
[53:32] Can you hear us?
[53:39] She can ask.
[53:41] her to contact Julie,
[53:42] so that she knows. She
[53:43] will receive from me
[53:44] emails. But
[53:45] then who is the boss
[53:47] cemetery committee?
[53:48] I think it's Priscilla.
[53:49] Good. So she
[53:50] need to contact
[53:52] you. So what about me?
[53:53] need to do?
[53:55] I will send
[53:55] email, and
[53:57] then I will send a copy,
[53:58] I am just reporting about
[53:59] appointment. Perfectly.
[54:01] Thank you very much.
[54:02] Greeting card and
[54:03] I will let her know when
[54:04] to be here.
[54:05] Perfectly. Thank you.
[54:06] Contact us
[54:07] Marcia. This would be
[54:09] perfectly.
[54:10] Uh, contract for
[54:11] heating
[54:11] community center.
[54:13] I see that Linda
[54:14] online.
[54:17] Greetings. You are enough.
[54:18] weak, but it
[54:19] normally. Uh, everyone
[54:21] reviewed the contract
[54:22] ? What do you think, us?
[54:23] need it
[54:23] sign, are you happy?
[54:24] directors has it
[54:25] sign?
[54:26] Oh, we need
[54:27] sign it, so
[54:28] What are we doing, uh,
[54:29] payments.
[54:31] Okay, in
[54:32] I have a question.
[54:34] Please allow me.
[54:35] I need to get my...This
[54:36] not a contract. He
[54:40] doesn't even fix the price
[54:41] . So the price, how much
[54:47] I understand, we buy,
[54:48] they want to buy 600
[54:49] with a few gallons
[54:50] fuel for 5 or more
[54:52] gallons, but this
[54:55] floating market
[54:56] price that is being adjusted
[54:57] depending on daily
[54:59] market conditions. So we can get to
[55:01] December, and who knows what
[55:02] this can happen, this
[55:04] unpredictable
[55:05] budget, it's not a budget.
[55:07] That's right.
[55:08] We only get
[55:10] fact. Yes, we are
[55:12] we will get a discount of 10
[55:13] gallons per
[55:14] automatic payments,
[55:15] but that's not what I would
[55:16] called monthly
[55:17] budget.
[55:19] It's not even what I
[55:21] received.
[55:23] Right. So, this is,
[55:27] of course, worksheet
[55:28] .
[55:29] Good. So, when I
[55:31] talked to them, we
[55:32] discussed
[55:33] budget plan
[55:36] and calculated
[55:37] total number
[55:38] gallons used
[55:40] , multiplied by the price of
[55:45] the moment when we
[55:46] agreed to this
[55:47] to do, divided into
[55:48] 12.
[55:49] Yes. At the moment
[55:52] it was about 5.39
[55:54] dollar a gallon, and, um,
[55:59] we evaluated all of this to
[56:01] try to find
[56:02] way to smooth out
[56:03] payments, instead
[56:05] to receive
[56:06] blows, hmm,
[56:08] right. So, I don't
[56:10] made fuel oil, I have
[56:11] it is not there, but
[56:12] companies do
[56:13] previous purchase,
[56:14] oh, of course,
[56:15] and that's what we want
[56:16] to record, and which
[56:18] risk of significant
[56:18] price reduction after
[56:20] the way you do it
[56:20] recorded? How is this?
[56:22] working? For
[56:23] some of them you can buy a plan
[56:24] price protection.
[56:25] So if she
[56:26] your price will decrease.
[56:28] That's what I do.
[56:29] November.
[56:30] We will need
[56:31] wait until
[56:32] November.
[56:33] Well, for many of them
[56:34] in June.
[56:36] This should have been done.
[56:37] still in the elections,
[56:38] to get
[56:39] free purchase.
[56:40] Yes. Yes. I get
[56:41] mine in June, and mine
[56:42] fixed. I am not
[56:43] I can raise the price.
[56:44] higher than she is, but I will get a lower price,
[56:46] isn't that right?
[56:46] Yes. I mean, I
[56:47] recorded his, but
[56:48] this is what I used to do
[56:49] community center.
[56:50] They used to buy
[56:51] previous purchase,
[56:52] and this was done in
[56:53] August, or
[56:53] wrong? So we really
[56:55] we want again
[56:56] to talk to
[56:57] Roberts and
[56:57] see if we can
[56:58] We will calm them down. Who
[56:59] Can you calm down?
[57:01] Oh, and look what
[57:01] they can do.
[57:02] It depends on...
[57:03] trust.
[57:04] It depends on them.
[57:06] But we sign,
[57:06] let's see if we want
[57:07] we sign
[57:07] contract.
[57:08] Yes, that's right. Yes. AND
[57:09] for this price, I think they
[57:10] need to receive
[57:11] prices from...I think that
[57:13] they must do
[57:14] it's up for auction. I really want to, because
[57:16] this...I made...numbers,
[57:17] um, on that...if you
[57:19] added what kind of oil it is
[57:20] ...I don't...I don't understand...
[57:22] I don't think...I don't know
[57:23] Are you guys
[57:24] you understand...but that one
[57:25] the sign we just saw
[57:27] paid today
[57:28] in the evening,
[57:30] that this money was
[57:31] deposited in
[57:32] May. So it went.
[57:34] on our surplus.
[57:35] Good. So I'm watching.
[57:37] now for how much
[57:38] they spent plus
[57:40] oil at a price of 8600, and
[57:41] the other half of the sign,
[57:43] on which they
[57:43] are, minus
[57:45] the income they
[57:46] received, we already
[57:47] we have...if we
[57:48] let's take this oil into account
[57:50] at a price of $11,566 with
[57:52] rows with a value of 16,000
[57:54] dollars.
[57:55] Hmm.
[57:56] This is oil for 8600
[57:57] dollars is oil, which
[57:59] bought.
[58:00] This is what they are
[58:01] called...evaluation, or
[58:03] wrong? now. So, I say that this
[58:08] importantly. I understand.
[58:10] your point of view, and, um,
[58:12] you know, this is the world, in
[58:13] which we are living now
[58:14] , where oil prices
[58:16] just oscillating.
[58:18] So we just
[58:19] tried to cope
[58:20] so that, um, a little
[58:21] to smooth out expenses. Ahem,
[58:24] I really don't have any.
[58:26] um, answers for you.
[58:28] This is my first time doing this.
[58:29] Of course. IN
[58:30] I'm not even here.
[58:32] fuel oil at home, so I
[58:33] not quite sure.
[58:35] Good. So,
[58:36] Can I suggest?
[58:37] Yes, give it. I just
[58:40] I will say that
[58:41] it was a brutal year
[58:42] for...
[58:43] And to you guys,
[58:44] lucky, honestly
[58:46] speaking. Or you should
[58:47] to do something else
[58:48] business. You have chosen
[58:49] June for
[58:49] pre-sale
[58:51] , isn't it?
[58:51] If you look at
[58:52] futures markets, this
[58:53] was a month for
[58:54] purchases. Um, but we buy every year, and I know many people,
[58:59] which are purchased every year, and
[59:01] most people, with
[59:02] what we all are
[59:03] talked, I have
[59:04] meaning that they gave
[59:06] business advice,
[59:07] They said, "Hold on,
[59:08] hold on, hold on,
[59:09] because they thought that
[59:11] crisis
[59:12] "so it will be, so it will be"
[59:13] .
[59:13] So in any case,
[59:14] my opinion is
[59:15] because it was
[59:16] a cruel year. No one
[59:17] doesn't really know what
[59:18] will it happen, or what, or
[59:20] that, and it was just
[59:21] hard. Um, and then this
[59:23] becomes something
[59:26] philosophical, but
[59:27] also financial
[59:28] bet on this
[59:29] moment: yes, the price is like this
[59:31] as high as it is now.
[59:33] So you record everything?
[59:36] You pay a little
[59:37] more to get
[59:38] protection against decline?
[59:40] Because they always
[59:40] They take more from you,
[59:41] if you are going
[59:42] to receive protection from
[59:43] decrease.
[59:43] Are you buying half?
[59:45] That's right, and
[59:46] I am not going.
[59:47] to tell you that
[59:48] to do, because I don't know,
[59:49] than
[59:51] this could end.
[59:53] So, Linda, how about
[59:54] so that we are with you
[59:55] turned to
[59:56] several companies
[59:57] and looked to see if
[59:58] Can we be with someone?
[59:58] to offer something
[59:59] pleasant. I know that
[1:00:00] it's too late, and
[1:00:01] let's see what we can do
[1:00:02] to receive from others
[1:00:03] companies. We will make
[1:00:04] list.
[1:00:04] Yes.
[1:00:05] I'll take half of it.
[1:00:06] them, and you will take
[1:00:06] half, and we
[1:00:07] let's put something together
[1:00:08] kind of simple
[1:00:08] scenario, and we
[1:00:09] let's see what they are
[1:00:10] they will say.
[1:00:10] Of course. Sounds
[1:00:12] perfectly. Hmm, looks like "
[1:00:13] "yes", because, in my opinion
[1:00:14] Maria, this is more
[1:00:16] half of the budget. So
[1:00:18] ,
[1:00:19] yes, in
[1:00:20] us really bad
[1:00:21] state. Hmm, what
[1:00:22] regarding this, we
[1:00:23] tried to use
[1:00:24] measures for
[1:00:25] further protection
[1:00:26] buildings from the weather.
[1:00:27] Hmm,
[1:00:29] Did you see that, um,
[1:00:30] blanket on the first
[1:00:31] floor, were
[1:00:32] fitted blankets
[1:00:33] on the windows, and, um, we have
[1:00:35] there were several...we had
[1:00:36] there were three companies,
[1:00:37] to look at
[1:00:38] windows. Hmm, a lot
[1:00:43] windows on the upper floor
[1:00:44] floors do not work,
[1:00:45] because the cords on the
[1:00:47] frames. They are needed
[1:00:51] reboot. Emm,
[1:00:53] companies we work with
[1:00:55] arrived, talked
[1:00:56] about repairs and
[1:00:57] restoration, and
[1:00:58] priorities that we
[1:00:59] they were given, were
[1:01:00] value,
[1:01:01] functionality and
[1:01:02] cost. Um, they are still
[1:01:05] didn't send it to me
[1:01:06] your estimates. We
[1:01:08] also considered,
[1:01:09] um, the estimate, what
[1:01:11] made by W&W
[1:01:12] Building Supply for replacement
[1:01:14] windows
[1:01:15] without taking into account
[1:01:16] workforce, which
[1:01:18] comes out to 60,000
[1:01:19] dollars
[1:01:20] just for the windows themselves.
[1:01:22] Those on top.
[1:01:24] Yes.
[1:01:24] I thought that was it.
[1:01:25] closer to...There is another one
[1:01:27] version. There were two
[1:01:28] different ways in which
[1:01:29] they did these
[1:01:30] estimates. And, um,
[1:01:31] because one of them is
[1:01:33] a certain point, therefore
[1:01:34] that it was supposed to be ARPA, and
[1:01:35] they understood that this
[1:01:36] not so, that's why they
[1:01:37] applied for
[1:01:38] grant, did not receive
[1:01:39] him, and mainly
[1:01:41] there were two different
[1:01:42] ways to do it. AND
[1:01:43] if I'm not mistaken,
[1:01:44] because I was in this
[1:01:45] involved. One
[1:01:47] cost about 150,
[1:01:48] when they counted
[1:01:49] the whole installation, and the other-
[1:01:51] making smaller ones
[1:01:52] windows or some
[1:01:53] another way, was
[1:01:55] over 130,000 to
[1:01:56] replace these windows.
[1:01:57] Linda,
[1:01:58] Yes. Um, they already
[1:02:00] replaced the ones below.
[1:02:02] Yes, that was part of it.
[1:02:04] ARPA.
[1:02:05] Yes. So, we just
[1:02:06] We are talking upstairs. Um,
[1:02:09] other, uh,
[1:02:12] other than me
[1:02:13] I wonder if this is in
[1:02:15] you protocol for
[1:02:16] heating return,
[1:02:17] because, um, always
[1:02:19] was 55 °, all
[1:02:20] thermostats were
[1:02:21] are on. Do you have
[1:02:23] protocol for this? AND
[1:02:24] the question is what
[1:02:25] it concerns me to contact
[1:02:27] electricians, protocol
[1:02:29] for lighting, so
[1:02:30] that we discover that
[1:02:31] the light remains
[1:02:32] turned on since Saturday
[1:02:33] until Monday.
[1:02:34] Good. Yes, we have
[1:02:36] protocol. Um, there are signs.
[1:02:39] about 55 ° on
[1:02:42] thermostats, and then
[1:02:43] signs regarding
[1:02:44] lighting.
[1:02:45] Um,
[1:02:46] I think this person,
[1:02:48] we must find
[1:02:49] way to provide
[1:02:50] this or check this.
[1:02:52] Um,
[1:02:53] good.
[1:02:53] Yes, us too
[1:02:54] asked someone
[1:02:55] go up to the attic and
[1:02:56] look at
[1:02:57] the insulation that is there.
[1:02:58] Um, it looks like this
[1:03:00] original insulation
[1:03:01] from the 50s, or
[1:03:03] they need
[1:03:04] to see a doctor
[1:03:05] at this stage. Yes,
[1:03:06] it will be based on ASUS.
[1:03:08] Yes,
[1:03:09] there is such a thing. So, this is what is worth paying attention to?
[1:03:11] attention. So, when
[1:03:12] estimates will arrive
[1:03:13] on the windows, send
[1:03:14] them to us. We them
[1:03:15] Let's consider. We
[1:03:16] let's find out what
[1:03:16] is happening.
[1:03:17] Of course. The essence of it all
[1:03:19] this is that we do everything possible,
[1:03:21] to make a building
[1:03:22] maximum
[1:03:23] thermally efficient,
[1:03:24] considering the current
[1:03:25] conditions. But yes, we
[1:03:26] definitely should get
[1:03:27] more tender
[1:03:28] suggestions, how do you
[1:03:29] proposed. So I
[1:03:30] ready, you know, if
[1:03:31] will you send me
[1:03:32] list of companies, we can definitely do this
[1:03:34] make. And there is money for
[1:03:35] asbestos waste,
[1:03:36] which we used
[1:03:37] for our house. THERE ARE-
[1:03:38] eh, if you replace
[1:03:38] asbestos ordinary
[1:03:39] insulation, then it's still
[1:03:40] something we can do
[1:03:41] pay attention. Good
[1:03:42] . Er, fuel oil, windows, er,
[1:03:45] it's all falling apart.
[1:03:47] No, I'm kidding. Uh,
[1:03:48] good. Well, when you
[1:03:49] get these things,
[1:03:50] send them to us so that
[1:03:51] we had them.
[1:03:52] Good. Yes. As soon as
[1:03:54] I will get them, I will send them to you.
[1:03:56] Thank you.
[1:03:57] We also do everything
[1:03:58] it is possible that
[1:03:59] hold a meeting
[1:04:00] funds. Um, us
[1:04:02] lucky on
[1:04:03] weekend, hmm, on the Day
[1:04:04] Columbus, leave for
[1:04:06] respite on
[1:04:07] stop for
[1:04:08] rest and on the 91st.
[1:04:10] So we will collect
[1:04:11] funds in this way. Ahem,
[1:04:13] you know, and it was
[1:04:14] made big
[1:04:15] push to get
[1:04:16] more income.
[1:04:17] Good. Thank you for everything.
[1:04:19] your work. IN
[1:04:22] I was just
[1:04:23] questions about
[1:04:23] diesel fuel and
[1:04:24] another. Is this it?
[1:04:26] diesel fuel, but
[1:04:27] it's the same as there.
[1:04:28] Hmm, so who are you?
[1:04:29] hired for our
[1:04:31] company? IN
[1:04:32] I have Dead River
[1:04:33] and Maria
[1:04:34] Sandra. Sandre's.
[1:04:36] Good. Um, so if we are going
[1:04:40] to set prices
[1:04:41] on diesel fuel...
[1:04:44] Well, you send a check
[1:04:46] for the price.
[1:04:50] We would need 13
[1:04:52] 000 per year,
[1:04:53] hmm, diesel fuel
[1:04:55] . They're already talking about this.
[1:04:56] several years. We are not
[1:04:57] we can find no one,
[1:04:59] Who would do that?
[1:05:00] Right. I think that
[1:05:01] this will also be a problem
[1:05:03] . Hmm, but I know that
[1:05:05] when I understood that,
[1:05:07] , hmm, it seems like it will be 20
[1:05:08] 000 more in
[1:05:09] next budget.
[1:05:11] I don't even want to.
[1:05:12] know the next
[1:05:13] week.
[1:05:13] Right. Right.
[1:05:15] But I just thought that
[1:05:16] if anyone remembered
[1:05:17] maybe it was me
[1:05:19] Terry. I should have
[1:05:20] invest.
[1:05:20] Someone asked me,
[1:05:22] should I
[1:05:22] invest. I would
[1:05:23] checked the prices
[1:05:24] elsewhere. The only one
[1:05:26] the problem is that
[1:05:27] they change
[1:05:28] daily. So if you don't
[1:05:29] call each
[1:05:30] companies in one and the same day,
[1:05:34] You don't know. So
[1:05:36] number
[1:05:37] used oil
[1:05:38] totally worth it
[1:05:40] but then add
[1:05:41] community center. I mean, you could
[1:05:44] would get, you know, I mean, more
[1:05:47] city ​​price,
[1:05:48] because we are now
[1:05:49] moving on to thousands
[1:05:50] gallons.
[1:05:51] I just don't believe that.
[1:05:52] they will do it. But
[1:05:54] I think that if someone
[1:05:55] wants...
[1:05:56] Well, you check.
[1:05:58] Yes. Hmm, and if you
[1:05:59] Are you going to work?
[1:06:00] with three companies
[1:06:01] what are you doing there
[1:06:02] are you going to do,
[1:06:03] Paul bypasses from
[1:06:04] door to door to
[1:06:05] costume.
[1:06:08] Donation advice if
[1:06:09] it will shrink.
[1:06:13] Yes. Last year it was
[1:06:14] there was a diesel field,
[1:06:15] which was about to be reduced.
[1:06:16] I remember hearing that.
[1:06:17] on budget
[1:06:18] meetings.
[1:06:19] Good. Committee
[1:06:20] Senators, you have two
[1:06:21] things. Suggestions regarding
[1:06:22] care rules
[1:06:23] trees. So, you have
[1:06:24] is there something you want
[1:06:25] cast out? Look,
[1:06:26] Will it take root?
[1:06:27] Probably not. So care
[1:06:32] behind the trees, I think,
[1:06:33] these are two parts of the work
[1:06:35] . Five at 10,000 each
[1:06:37] . One Baptist
[1:06:38] church, that's what it's about
[1:06:38] she sent
[1:06:39] email. AND
[1:06:40] they left
[1:06:41] look at the hill
[1:06:42] Dston. Maybe they
[1:06:43] will need
[1:06:43] delete some
[1:06:44] trees.
[1:06:45] Hmm, they still are
[1:06:46] working on the price.
[1:06:47] Yes, everything is fine. So
[1:06:49] somewhere between five and
[1:06:50] ten for each.
[1:06:51] Lee, have we ever
[1:06:52] received a report from
[1:06:54] caretaker
[1:06:54] trees?
[1:06:55] No. Not yet. Good. Good
[1:06:57] . This is what
[1:06:58] We are waiting.
[1:06:59] Yes.
[1:07:00] Right.
[1:07:00] Well, we have a lot of people
[1:07:01] who are engaged in
[1:07:01] tree care,
[1:07:02] in this city and
[1:07:02] near. So
[1:07:03] you should be able to
[1:07:04] get a few
[1:07:05] pond.
[1:07:05] Uh, so we know that
[1:07:07] it will happen. Uh, and
[1:07:08] proposed
[1:07:09] regulations. I think
[1:07:10] Priscilla contributed
[1:07:11] changes. Terry, I
[1:07:12] I'm sure it's you.
[1:07:13] read.
[1:07:13] Yes, I read it. The only one
[1:07:15] , what she doesn't
[1:07:15] crossed out, and that was it
[1:07:16] would just
[1:07:17] by crossing out, this is what does she have
[1:07:18] powers
[1:07:19] increase these fees.
[1:07:20] This line is similar to
[1:07:21] may change the price
[1:07:22] for funeral services and
[1:07:23] to set prices,
[1:07:24] because they can't
[1:07:25] to do this. So,
[1:07:27] if you cross it out,
[1:07:28] everything else
[1:07:30] looks good.
[1:07:32] Then we can
[1:07:33] cross this out and
[1:07:34] vote, um, for
[1:07:36] amendment?
[1:07:36] Good. Good.
[1:07:38] What is it?
[1:07:39] I just want this.
[1:07:40] was done.
[1:07:41] This is page three.
[1:07:43] Yes. Good.
[1:07:44] I know where it is.
[1:07:47] Make a suggestion
[1:07:48] about acceptance
[1:07:48] proposed
[1:07:49] rules for the committee
[1:07:50] cemeteries.
[1:07:51] With amendments.
[1:07:52] Good.
[1:07:54] I will support this.
[1:07:55] Uh, is there any more?
[1:07:56] discussion on this
[1:07:57] reason?
[1:07:59] Good. All who
[1:08:00] supports approval
[1:08:02] proposed
[1:08:03] amended rules,
[1:08:04] I say.
[1:08:05] I.
[1:08:06] Anyone against?
[1:08:07] No.
[1:08:07] I'm holding back. I am not
[1:08:09] I think I...I think
[1:08:10] I missed another one.
[1:08:10] meeting where are you
[1:08:11] talked about it. I am not in
[1:08:12] course. So, here it is.
[1:08:14] Sounds good.
[1:08:15] Yes.
[1:08:16] Good. Uh, something else from
[1:08:17] cemetery committee?
[1:08:21] No, except that we are going to demand
[1:08:23] from you budget
[1:08:24] funds, but it's not on
[1:08:25] this meeting.
[1:08:26] Good. Good luck with this.
[1:08:29] . Good.
[1:08:31] Thank you.
[1:08:31] Uh, the last one is yours.
[1:08:32] device for
[1:08:33] speed checks
[1:08:34] on Beaver Pond Road. IN
[1:08:35] we don't have yours
[1:08:35] device for
[1:08:36] speed checks,
[1:08:36] but maybe he will be
[1:08:37] in the future. No. Yes
[1:08:38] .
[1:08:39] Yes, but now with this
[1:08:40] there is little that can be done
[1:08:41] . Um, but it will be
[1:08:43] considered within the framework
[1:08:44] general consideration,
[1:08:45] we can ask
[1:08:46] sheriff's department,
[1:08:48] which one do they have?
[1:08:49] You want to ask,
[1:08:50] Is that so? When he
[1:08:52] will return, his
[1:08:53] the deputy has
[1:08:54] get the device,
[1:08:55] he appoints him
[1:08:56] deputy, and
[1:08:57] The deputy is the one who
[1:08:58] whom
[1:08:58] towed to his
[1:08:59] personal
[1:09:00] cars,
[1:09:01] I think. I don't know.
[1:09:02] Well, we can, as
[1:09:03] only he will be with us,
[1:09:04] I can take it.
[1:09:05] if he wants.
[1:09:06] Allow me to do this.
[1:09:07] make. Good. IN
[1:09:09] within the framework of the new
[1:09:10] local variant
[1:09:11] tax for business.
[1:09:13] Oh yes. Good. THERE ARE
[1:09:21] PowerPoint presentation or
[1:09:23] something like that? Yes. Hmm, so
[1:09:27] , first of all, thank you
[1:09:29] to everyone who contacted
[1:09:30] me regarding the option
[1:09:31] sales tax. I
[1:09:36] already had a few
[1:09:37] wonderful, um, conversations with
[1:09:38] people from this
[1:09:39] reason. Hmm, I, hmm,
[1:09:42] You know, I would like to raise this issue
[1:09:44] now that we
[1:09:45] approaching
[1:09:46] budget season. I,
[1:09:50] hmm, I completely understand,
[1:09:51] and when I heard about
[1:09:52] local tax on
[1:09:54] a choice that, um,
[1:09:55] promotes VLCT, and several
[1:09:56] people across the state
[1:09:58] , I thought, you know, more
[1:09:59] one tax, which
[1:10:01] he is needed. And, hm,
[1:10:06] then I am a lot
[1:10:07] found out about it, and I think that actually,
[1:10:09] hmm, it's really worth it
[1:10:11] discussion. Apparently,
[1:10:15] It is worth noting to everyone,
[1:10:17] who is listening that this is not
[1:10:18] what we would decide
[1:10:20] today. Well,
[1:10:23] today I would like
[1:10:24] to talk about it,
[1:10:25] to gather a bunch
[1:10:26] questions we have
[1:10:27] may arise, and
[1:10:28] ask to put
[1:10:30] questions to others
[1:10:31] to people in the city. And then
[1:10:33] I'll get, um, good ones.
[1:10:34] answers to them,
[1:10:36] thorough answers,
[1:10:37] and then we again
[1:10:38] Let's talk about it. AND
[1:10:40] then we could
[1:10:41] solve
[1:10:42] vote for
[1:10:43] passing this
[1:10:43] questions on the city council
[1:10:44] meeting, and you know what
[1:10:46] we are still very far from
[1:10:47] decision on this
[1:10:48] question. But now, hmm
[1:10:50] , there are some resources from
[1:10:54] about this. On
[1:10:55] state website
[1:10:56] Vermont has some
[1:10:57] resources from this
[1:10:57] reason. THERE ARE
[1:10:58] PowerPoint presentation,
[1:10:59] what can I give you
[1:11:00] send. THERE ARE
[1:11:04] electronic
[1:11:05] correspondence that I
[1:11:06] shared with the election
[1:11:07] advice from
[1:11:08] Department
[1:11:09] Vermont taxes, where
[1:11:10] assessment is offered
[1:11:12] based on
[1:11:12] numbers
[1:11:13] population, not very
[1:11:14] accurate assessment, but, hmm,
[1:11:16] I think you know that.
[1:11:17] there are, um, four wide ones
[1:11:19] categories to which we belong
[1:11:20] we can apply 1%
[1:11:21] local tax on
[1:11:23] choice. Um, to any-
[1:11:29] which of them or their
[1:11:30] combinations. Tax from
[1:11:32] sales, which adds 1% to
[1:11:34] 6% state tax
[1:11:36] from sale. Tax on
[1:11:37] food that adds 1
[1:11:39] %to nine. Alcohol
[1:11:41] in the premises that
[1:11:43] adds, um, 1% to 10, and
[1:11:44] numbers that add 1%
[1:11:46] to nine. Um, you know,
[1:11:53] 1% tax, um, you know,
[1:11:55] nobody wants to pay
[1:11:57] 1% more for nothing,
[1:11:58] but many things
[1:11:59] exempt from payment.
[1:12:03] Most clothes,
[1:12:04] food products
[1:12:06] , medicines and
[1:12:07] medicine, well, I don't think so,
[1:12:08] what medicine in general, but
[1:12:09] majority
[1:12:10] medicines, things,
[1:12:11] which people really
[1:12:12] very necessary, no
[1:12:13] are taxable
[1:12:14] according to this list.
[1:12:17] There is a list that I can
[1:12:19] to send to you. AND
[1:12:21] in fact they are,
[1:12:22] probably a long time
[1:12:23] worked on this
[1:12:24] a list, because all the clothes,
[1:12:26] who is exempt from
[1:12:27] taxation, this
[1:12:28] really necessary
[1:12:30] things, and then the whole
[1:12:31] clothes that
[1:12:31] taxable,
[1:12:33] you know, like wallets,
[1:12:34] watches and wigs,
[1:12:35] you know, things that
[1:12:37] a little, uh, you know, I don't know. Not all of them all
[1:12:41] are wearing. I won't tell you.
[1:12:44] , which one am I on?
[1:12:45] signed, but, uh, in
[1:12:47] anyway, uh,
[1:12:54] you probably already
[1:12:55] pay local
[1:12:56] tax from another city,
[1:12:58] if you buy something from
[1:12:59] Brattlebrough, Marlo,
[1:13:00] you know, uh, Lello, uh,
[1:13:02] Wordsboro,
[1:13:03] Wilmington,
[1:13:04] Willisti, you know, there is a big long
[1:13:07] list. You can
[1:13:10] see the whole map. AND
[1:13:12] Patni, for example,
[1:13:13] pays this only for
[1:13:14] numbers. So, this is
[1:13:17] version. Hmm, this is the way
[1:13:20] get some
[1:13:21] money from Airbnb. And that,
[1:13:25] what I like about
[1:13:26] this tax,
[1:13:27] as far as someone
[1:13:28] might like
[1:13:29] tax, which, um, I don't really like it.
[1:13:32] you know who does, hmm
[1:13:33] , they stink,
[1:13:34] you know, it's worth saying
[1:13:36] . I hope that everyone,
[1:13:38] who wrote to me,
[1:13:39] contacted me and
[1:13:40] is watching this,
[1:13:41] I hope you will not follow
[1:13:43] not only for this, but also for
[1:13:44] all budget
[1:13:45] process, and we
[1:13:45] can we talk
[1:13:47] about all kinds of ways
[1:13:48] save money for
[1:13:49] cities and all that. I
[1:13:50] very much in this spirit, and
[1:13:51] therefore I present
[1:13:53] This is for you. Um, it's a tax,
[1:13:55] which will not be
[1:13:56] to be paid
[1:13:57] exclusively residents
[1:13:58] Dumerston. This is the way
[1:14:00] taxation
[1:14:01] from other cities. If we will establish a 1% tax
[1:14:04] on Airbnb, which
[1:14:05] people will pay,
[1:14:06] who don't live here, we will get from this
[1:14:09] a little money. So, in the narrow case of Airbnb,
[1:14:14] I think this is, um,
[1:14:15] pretty good idea. Not
[1:14:18] I think it's difficult for me.
[1:14:20] imagine that more than
[1:14:21] several residents
[1:14:22] Dumerston when-
[1:14:23] will pay for
[1:14:24] Airbnb in Dumbarton, right?
[1:14:26] Yes? It's just money.
[1:14:28] from them, from
[1:14:29] Vermont
[1:14:29] tax
[1:14:30] management. Perhaps,
[1:14:34] someone is looking at this.
[1:14:35] They calculated that
[1:14:37] these rooms in a year
[1:14:38] will bring in $8,600.
[1:14:42] I just watched
[1:14:43] city ​​report. We are for 2027
[1:14:46] fiscal year, we believe,
[1:14:48] proposed
[1:14:49] get $600,000
[1:14:51] from property taxes
[1:14:53] . We just
[1:14:55] voted for
[1:14:56] tax increase
[1:14:57] on property, it's more,
[1:14:59] but if we do
[1:15:00] everything is possible, they
[1:15:04] think that we can get 78
[1:15:07] thousand dollars per year.
[1:15:10] It seems to me so.
[1:15:11] too big of different
[1:15:12] reasons. In Dumsterton,
[1:15:14] probably per person
[1:15:15] population is not so
[1:15:16] many businesses,
[1:15:17] like in other cities
[1:15:18] similar size.
[1:15:20] So even, you know, we
[1:15:21] Let's say it's 50 or 60.
[1:15:26] And that's it, tax on
[1:15:28] no sale
[1:15:28] applies to
[1:15:29] most categories
[1:15:30] things. If you
[1:15:32] buy in the store,
[1:15:33] this does not apply
[1:15:34] your tax,
[1:15:35] you know, you're going to
[1:15:36] gas station,
[1:15:37] refueling. No. Uh-huh
[1:15:39] , food, snack. No.
[1:15:42] Beer? Yes. So, uh,
[1:15:45] some people never
[1:15:46] will pay this
[1:15:47] tax through their own
[1:15:49] consumer habits. He
[1:15:50] applies to
[1:15:52] online sales. He
[1:15:53] applies to
[1:15:54] the things you buy
[1:15:56] in the town of Dummerston. AND,
[1:15:59] uh, I fell asleep on
[1:16:00] opinion about Airbnb. I, uh,
[1:16:03] especially on the road, in
[1:16:04] I have problems with
[1:16:05] trucks
[1:16:06] deliveries that
[1:16:07] constantly traveling
[1:16:08] up and down. I have
[1:16:09] it feels like
[1:16:10] they tear
[1:16:10] roads and violate
[1:16:11] order. Perhaps,
[1:16:12] You know, I live here.
[1:16:13] not long, but one
[1:16:14] the change I saw was
[1:16:16] much more
[1:16:17] delivery trucks,
[1:16:18] and they all now
[1:16:19] contractors, and they
[1:16:20] ride in these
[1:16:21] rented
[1:16:21] trucks, and
[1:16:22] boyfriend—temporary
[1:16:23] employee, and
[1:16:24] trucks, uh,
[1:16:25] rented, and, uh,
[1:16:26] they drive quite a bit
[1:16:27] quickly. In any
[1:16:29] In that case, we could
[1:16:29] set 1 cent on
[1:16:31] all those purchases that,
[1:16:32] you know, there is no
[1:16:33] exempt from
[1:16:34] taxation
[1:16:34] goods, and I even
[1:16:36] I don't think so.
[1:16:36] most people
[1:16:37] get their food,
[1:16:38] as in a FedEx truck.
[1:16:40] Are you eating something?
[1:16:41] truly exquisite. Hmm,
[1:16:43] Yes. This works like this:
[1:16:44] if you buy
[1:16:45] 1 cent or 1%, 1%.
[1:16:48] Yes, sorry. 1%. Yes,
[1:16:50] I really hope that
[1:16:51] they do not deliver
[1:16:53] you get a product for 1 dollar,
[1:16:54] it should be rolled up
[1:16:55] above.
[1:16:58] Hmm, this is a review. Hmm, yes.
[1:17:05] map. A lot, uh,
[1:17:09] taxes or a lot
[1:17:11] the city adds this to
[1:17:12] Lello, again, in
[1:17:13] a very different city, in
[1:17:15] they have ski traffic,
[1:17:16] they discovered, they told me that
[1:17:18] found that, uh, income
[1:17:20] from this local
[1:17:21] option tax
[1:17:22] was 18 dollars,
[1:17:24] which non-residents
[1:17:25] paid for each 1
[1:17:26] dollar paid
[1:17:27] residents.
[1:17:30] Good. So, Dummerson,
[1:17:34] probably completely different
[1:17:35] equation, but 2:1
[1:17:37] sounds good for
[1:17:38] me. I mean,
[1:17:40] you know, even if
[1:17:41] we, uh, very much
[1:17:42] let's lower this indicator,
[1:17:43] this is a way to force
[1:17:44] visitors pay
[1:17:46] in our city. And more
[1:17:50] one thing that I really like this.
[1:17:52] what it creates for
[1:17:54] us a cool way
[1:17:55] greater participation in
[1:18:01] budget. I know that we can vote for
[1:18:04] budget, but we could
[1:18:06] take this money and
[1:18:07] just use
[1:18:08] them to compensate
[1:18:09] tax increase
[1:18:10] on property that would be
[1:18:11] great, but, you know,
[1:18:13] nobody wants this
[1:18:14] to worry We also
[1:18:16] could connect them with
[1:18:17] project in West-
[1:18:18] Summery. They want
[1:18:20] build a children's
[1:18:21] ground. Part
[1:18:22] this money could
[1:18:23] go for it. We could
[1:18:24] pay for work
[1:18:25] traffic.
[1:18:27] Even with the help of
[1:18:28] other people we could
[1:18:30] would direct money to
[1:18:31] some infrastructure
[1:18:32] , which brings money,
[1:18:35] for example, on
[1:18:36] municipal service
[1:18:37] storm sewer
[1:18:38] or something like that.
[1:18:39] You know, I think that
[1:18:40] it might be possible,
[1:18:42] or maybe not, but I
[1:18:43] would like
[1:18:43] offer
[1:18:44] discussion of what
[1:18:46] we would do with, um,
[1:18:47] such income. AND
[1:18:50] again, we could
[1:18:52] would get about 60
[1:18:53] 000 dollars, um,
[1:18:54] taxing
[1:18:56] sales, hm, and numbers
[1:19:00] . We could get
[1:19:03] about 8,000 dollars,
[1:19:04] just buying a home
[1:19:06] on Airbnb. That is, one of
[1:19:09] main issues
[1:19:10] is how it is
[1:19:11] applied as it is
[1:19:12] actually
[1:19:13] is happening.
[1:19:15] So, uh, the income that
[1:19:17] we get, 75%, 25% goes
[1:19:18] to the tax
[1:19:20] department, because
[1:19:22] they administer
[1:19:23] all of this. They
[1:19:25] contact everyone
[1:19:26] suppliers, with
[1:19:28] everyone
[1:19:28] suppliers,
[1:19:29] such as Amazon and Walmart,
[1:19:31] to contact Bigfoot
[1:19:32] Coffee, you know, from
[1:19:33] the largest to
[1:19:34] the smallest. So, here it is.
[1:19:36] what they tell me. IN
[1:19:38] I have reasons,
[1:19:39] Do you know if it's true?
[1:19:40] Are they doing this? Well,
[1:19:41] they say that they really do it.
[1:19:43] If not, we will be in touch.
[1:19:45] with them. In any
[1:19:46] case, uh, for something
[1:19:47] like Airbnb it really is
[1:19:49] quite simple
[1:19:49] apply. Are there two or
[1:19:51] three big ones
[1:19:51] suppliers. There is Airbnb,
[1:19:53] and there is one called VBO,
[1:19:55] you know. Yes.
[1:19:56] Right. So, there are two
[1:19:58] suppliers. You
[1:19:59] contact them.
[1:20:01] Uh, you know, we all
[1:20:02] let's discuss this and
[1:20:03] we decide, and then these
[1:20:06] the money comes to
[1:20:07] cities, and we can
[1:20:08] get two "
[1:20:09] speed bumps
[1:20:10] "or, you know, something like that"
[1:20:12] like uh, what are we
[1:20:13] Let's decide. But, as I already said, I beg you.
[1:20:21] your suggestions and
[1:20:23] questions. And, uh, if
[1:20:26] your question
[1:20:27] causes despair or
[1:20:30] horror at the idea yet
[1:20:31] one tax, then I
[1:20:32] completely with you
[1:20:33] I agree, but
[1:20:34] I hope that we
[1:20:35] can we talk
[1:20:36] More about this later. Uh, what?
[1:20:42] concerns how
[1:20:43] they behave with
[1:20:44] sellers, sir
[1:20:45] Normale sent
[1:20:46] I have a few good ones,
[1:20:47] thoughtful questions, and
[1:20:49] I'll, uh, look into them. On
[1:20:51] I can do one or two.
[1:20:52] know the answer, but
[1:20:53] I need the rest.
[1:20:54] contact them. IN
[1:20:58] otherwise I can
[1:20:59] to share with you
[1:21:01] PowerPoint presentation
[1:21:02] from VCT, which also has
[1:21:03] reviews from other cities.
[1:21:06] I could, uh, excuse me,
[1:21:07] I could contact
[1:21:09] you. I really
[1:21:12] need a small
[1:21:13] help. What is ours?
[1:21:14] most equal
[1:21:16] city? You know, this
[1:21:17] Marlo? Is this Hartford?
[1:21:19] Which one exactly?
[1:21:20] Apparently.
[1:21:20] Marlo is our most
[1:21:21] an equal city,
[1:21:22] about which we could
[1:21:23] talk to them. Uh,
[1:21:24] they are not similar to
[1:21:25] tourists.
[1:21:31] Renting a home in South
[1:21:32] Pondy, right? All
[1:21:33] want.
[1:21:34] Well, no, they have Airbnb. Airbnb
[1:21:36] . This is really an excess.
[1:21:38] from
[1:21:38] good. Yes. So with Marbor
[1:21:40] actually it wouldn't.
[1:21:42] So the topic is, um, just me
[1:21:44] asked Roger, um,
[1:21:46] how much did we have
[1:21:47] Airbnb.
[1:21:48] Yes. Me too.
[1:21:50] Um, okay. So you have
[1:21:51] everything was fine.
[1:21:53] What number is it?
[1:21:54] Yes? Is that about 30? Yes.
[1:21:57] He told me, uh,
[1:21:58] he really...
[1:21:59] This is strange.
[1:22:00] Let me
[1:22:01] remember this. But yes,
[1:22:02] more than you think.
[1:22:04] Airbnb is bigger than you think, and they, uh,
[1:22:06] some from time to time
[1:22:07] are approved. We
[1:22:09] just happy with
[1:22:09] zoning is simple
[1:22:10] approves of them,
[1:22:12] and this...
[1:22:13] but they are curious.
[1:22:19] I need
[1:22:20] to understand, me
[1:22:21] need to talk
[1:22:23] today or yesterday.
[1:22:24] Good. But I hear that
[1:22:26] they jump from
[1:22:27] platforms and do it
[1:22:28] in others, through the back
[1:22:30] doors, others
[1:22:31] ways,
[1:22:31] so that they don't have to
[1:22:32] seem.
[1:22:33] So that they don't have to
[1:22:34] abandon
[1:22:35] your Airbnb. So it's not
[1:22:37] always a way
[1:22:37] track this if
[1:22:39] they are leaving...I have to
[1:22:40] I mean everything, you know,
[1:22:41] I would never do that.
[1:22:42] did with his
[1:22:43] landlord in New York.
[1:22:44] Right. But here
[1:22:45] Yes.
[1:22:48] So, I think this is
[1:22:49] comparison of cities. I think it will be
[1:22:53] big cities. Um, if
[1:22:56] my mom is 60, because I don't even know what's there.
[1:23:02] more. The college is working
[1:23:03] .
[1:23:04] No, no, but they have, but
[1:23:05] they have a surplus, that's
[1:23:07] like in New
[1:23:08] Baini is much
[1:23:09] more Airbnb.
[1:23:11] So I would say that
[1:23:12] if Airbnb is about
[1:23:14] equal, then we would be
[1:23:15] quite even.
[1:23:16] This is probably similar.
[1:23:20] on, um, tax from
[1:23:21] sale, perhaps. Yes,
[1:23:25] maybe that's all
[1:23:26] case.
[1:23:28] Guilford, maybe. I mean, you have, Alers, these
[1:23:31] enterprises, but
[1:23:32] besides that, right?
[1:23:33] Yes?
[1:23:34] So, Lori can
[1:23:35] be better data on
[1:23:37] sales tax,
[1:23:38] than, uh, score
[1:23:39] population. So I can do that too.
[1:23:42] . Hmm, she might, or maybe
[1:23:44] and no. This was advised to me.
[1:23:46] VCT. But in any
[1:23:50] case, you know, there are many
[1:23:55] reasons, as with any
[1:23:56] what, why they can
[1:23:57] disregard this,
[1:23:58] may not
[1:23:59] take into account that, but
[1:24:00] this is their payment, this
[1:24:01] also their work.
[1:24:03] They, you know, are ours.
[1:24:04] tax agency.
[1:24:06] They, of course,
[1:24:07] correspond with me
[1:24:08] regarding tax payment.
[1:24:09] So I expect them to
[1:24:10] they treat the same
[1:24:12] to other people. And, by
[1:24:16] In essence, this is a way
[1:24:17] attract people who
[1:24:19] don't live here, to
[1:24:20] paying taxes in
[1:24:21] city. They
[1:24:22] use our
[1:24:23] roads and ours
[1:24:24] services while they
[1:24:25] here. And I would like to
[1:24:28] you know, research this
[1:24:29] thus, rather than, we will find out when
[1:24:31] we will learn, unfortunately,
[1:24:33] but unlike
[1:24:34] everything else that we hear things like, "Oh, we will find out which one
[1:24:38] cost when we are behind
[1:24:39] We will pay for it. We will find out which one
[1:24:42] cost, we will find out which one
[1:24:43] the cost when we
[1:24:44] "will pay". So how do you
[1:24:46] like this?
[1:24:46] So let me
[1:24:47] to ask a question
[1:24:48] regarding this data, which
[1:24:49] she sent. That is
[1:24:51] , data for the whole year, yes
[1:24:52] ? Let's skip it
[1:24:53] nine months, because it
[1:24:55] Yes.
[1:24:55] So, according to the data for
[1:24:56] all year round, mostly
[1:24:57] two-thirds of the money
[1:24:58] coming from
[1:24:59] sales.
[1:25:00] Hmm.
[1:25:01] Right. We have
[1:25:02] Not so with Dumerston.
[1:25:03] many sales.
[1:25:04] So think about
[1:25:06] something
[1:25:06] other than Amazon, where
[1:25:08] the tax is 10%.
[1:25:10] Right. Not
[1:25:11] exclude the term "
[1:25:12] "regressive". Sorry
[1:25:13] , which is not yet
[1:25:14] arrived.
[1:25:14] So, we have a few
[1:25:15] gas stations,
[1:25:16] Yes?
[1:25:17] But without gasoline. This is not
[1:25:18] ...
[1:25:19] That's what I mean.
[1:25:20] So, no gasoline.
[1:25:21] So, carbonated drinks,
[1:25:22] sweet bars. I don't know. Or
[1:25:23] this is taken into account
[1:25:24] apple? If you buy an apple from them
[1:25:26] There are apples.
[1:25:26] No, it's not alcohol,
[1:25:31] Yes? Therefore,
[1:25:32] we can't drink
[1:25:33] carbonated water, not
[1:25:34] making food,
[1:25:34] Yes? AND
[1:25:35] how about...But the question is
[1:25:36] in that it is alcohol with
[1:25:37] discount or seat in
[1:25:38] restaurant for
[1:25:38] table? You can
[1:25:41] drink alcohol without
[1:25:42] alcohol. You must
[1:25:44] eat. This is what I
[1:25:46] specifically...This is what I thought. Oh, wait.
[1:25:49] No, sorry. Good.
[1:25:53] Yes, you were talking about
[1:25:54] that food at the gas station
[1:25:56] will be exempt from
[1:25:57] taxation as
[1:25:58] selling.
[1:25:59] Alcohol at the gas station.
[1:26:00] No, alcohol is
[1:26:02] gas station. And I, probably,
[1:26:03] I will think about selling
[1:26:05] food. I understand that food
[1:26:06] and alcohol
[1:26:07] are considered, it seems,
[1:26:08] a restaurant where you can
[1:26:09] to sit down. Alcohol is
[1:26:10] me, and I will have to
[1:26:11] check again because
[1:26:12] if you ask
[1:26:13] me enough times
[1:26:15] about something, I'll start
[1:26:15] doubt, but I
[1:26:17] will have to
[1:26:17] check again. I
[1:26:20] was almost certain,
[1:26:21] that alcohol is out
[1:26:23] the premises is beer,
[1:26:24] which I sometimes buy at, uh-
[1:26:26] uh, Circle K, over there in Irving Irving.
[1:26:29] Yes, in Irving.
[1:26:30] You need
[1:26:31] remember only two
[1:26:32] gas stations in the city,
[1:26:33] dude. Many reasons.
[1:26:39] So how about
[1:26:39] nurseries?
[1:26:42] If people leave
[1:26:43] to buy plants or
[1:26:44] trees, it won't be...
[1:26:46] So, no to that.
[1:26:47] tax.
[1:26:47] I don't know.
[1:26:48] Well, I don't think we should.
[1:26:50] need before this
[1:26:51] reach.
[1:26:51] Yes. So, two-thirds
[1:26:52] this number is
[1:26:53] sales.
[1:26:54] I can write off a lot.
[1:26:54] from this, because we have
[1:26:55] just not that much
[1:26:56] sales. We are not
[1:26:57] tourist city. IN
[1:26:58] We don't have any restaurants.
[1:26:59] We don't have any places where
[1:27:00] You can sit down. We are
[1:27:01] we do not sell
[1:27:01] little things that
[1:27:02] whatever.
[1:27:03] Right?
[1:27:03] So, if in the first
[1:27:04] Next time we're talking about Airbnb
[1:27:05] , but all indicators
[1:27:07] sales, I would say,
[1:27:08] that at least 2/3, 3/4 of
[1:27:09] they will be paid
[1:27:10] residents of Dumerston
[1:27:11] . These will be online-
[1:27:12] sales.
[1:27:13] Delivery will be by
[1:27:14] your house.
[1:27:15] So, if three quarters
[1:27:17] two-thirds of this
[1:27:18] total amount
[1:27:19] will be sales, then
[1:27:20] for Dumbrstone she
[1:27:21] will be higher because
[1:27:22] the only sales are
[1:27:23] online delivery.
[1:27:24] So, I think if
[1:27:25] to see if
[1:27:26] take into account sales,
[1:27:27] What you can and can't do
[1:27:27] take into account, then you can
[1:27:28] only Airbnb should be considered. I understand.
[1:27:30] Yes.
[1:27:30] But if we consider
[1:27:31] sales, then Dmerson
[1:27:32] pays for it. This is not
[1:27:34] tourists.
[1:27:34] Yes.
[1:27:35] So Dmerson pays
[1:27:36] 100% taxes for now. I mean the whole
[1:27:39] property tax.
[1:27:40] Who else do we
[1:27:41] taxed?
[1:27:42] Including a third
[1:27:43] others...I would like to
[1:27:44] we could
[1:27:44] tax
[1:27:45] a third of the inhabitants
[1:27:45] Brother for theirs
[1:27:46] real estate. I have on
[1:27:47] I mean, no. This would be
[1:27:48] unfair. But
[1:27:50] they also want
[1:27:50] tax us.
[1:27:51] Yes. Yes. I know. But
[1:27:53] they tax
[1:27:54] us, because when I go to
[1:27:56] Rattle Bro and buy, I have
[1:27:57] meaning another
[1:27:58] example than alcohol
[1:27:59] , which is sold for
[1:28:00] recipe.
[1:28:03] When I buy something on
[1:28:04] like a toy for
[1:28:05] your child, your
[1:28:12] first PBR, I just
[1:28:13] I'm kidding. But yes,
[1:28:16] I think you have
[1:28:17] radio. And I am ready.
[1:28:20] to argue that, um,
[1:28:21] a significant part of this
[1:28:23] –this is exactly what they are
[1:28:23] sales, but we are talking about
[1:28:25] sales of goods,
[1:28:27] who are not exempt from
[1:28:28] taxation. They will get me because I buy so much.
[1:28:35] belts for your
[1:28:36] lawn mowers, so I
[1:28:37] I'm constantly breaking something and
[1:28:38] I have to order,
[1:28:39] for example, specific
[1:28:41] details for your
[1:28:42] an old car or
[1:28:43] old lawn mower
[1:28:44] . Right. So I make a big contribution.
[1:28:49] into this. And I have
[1:28:51] three people on the road,
[1:28:52] households with
[1:28:53] three or four people and
[1:28:54] three or four
[1:28:55] delivery trucks,
[1:28:56] who travel every day
[1:28:57] her here and there. And if
[1:28:59] you spend your
[1:29:00] money for medicine
[1:29:01] whether it's medicine or what is
[1:29:03] for the most part
[1:29:04] delivery, it doesn't matter
[1:29:05] concerns. This, um,
[1:29:06] actually, I think,
[1:29:08] pretty good
[1:29:09] designed for, um, well
[1:29:10] ,
[1:29:11] I don't know exactly what not.
[1:29:12] is an "exception", but has
[1:29:13] value.
[1:29:14] It's not important.
[1:29:15] discussion. You just
[1:29:16] buy something from
[1:29:17] home delivery.
[1:29:18] Whatever percentage
[1:29:18] there were no things
[1:29:19] exempt from
[1:29:20] taxation or not,
[1:29:20] It doesn't matter.
[1:29:21] Why not? Because we are not going to walk.
[1:29:24] around town and buy
[1:29:25] things that you
[1:29:26] Order released
[1:29:27] from taxation or
[1:29:28] No.
[1:29:28] Well, we order them.
[1:29:29] almost all of our...
[1:29:30] No, we...No. So we don't do this.
[1:29:32] Tax
[1:29:33] Department of Vermont
[1:29:34] connects with
[1:29:35] seller. You
[1:29:36] Look who it is.
[1:29:37] pays.
[1:29:37] Everyone pays for the goods
[1:29:38] that are not exempt from
[1:29:40] taxation, or
[1:29:41] wrong?
[1:29:41] So, it's just equals
[1:29:42] game conditions. Doesn't have
[1:29:43] meaning, or
[1:29:44] Are you ordering 100?
[1:29:44] dollars not
[1:29:45] exempt from
[1:29:45] taxation
[1:29:46] goods, and 100 dollars
[1:29:46] exempt from
[1:29:47] taxation.
[1:29:48] These are just goods, with
[1:29:49] which people pay
[1:29:50] taxes. So no way, neither you
[1:29:52] , no I'll find out for sure,
[1:29:54] when everyone orders
[1:29:55] things. It can't be like that.
[1:29:56] to say: "I order
[1:29:57] only food, and someone
[1:29:57] another only orders
[1:29:58] diapers." I don't know,
[1:29:59] or diapers
[1:29:59] exempt from payment
[1:30:00] taxes. It doesn't matter.
[1:30:01] It was bad.
[1:30:02] example. They order beer.
[1:30:03] That's it. IN
[1:30:05] them alcohol
[1:30:05] sold home, as
[1:30:07] and me. AND
[1:30:07] What about tobacco? Again
[1:30:10] well, no, not from
[1:30:11] paying taxes.
[1:30:16] Well, I don't understand why.
[1:30:18] it doesn't have any at all
[1:30:19] value. If you
[1:30:20] buy food,
[1:30:21] medications and
[1:30:21] necessary things that,
[1:30:23] you know, like
[1:30:23] call
[1:30:24] people's concerns
[1:30:25] regarding the crisis
[1:30:26] accessibility, these things
[1:30:27] exempt from payment
[1:30:28] taxes, and this
[1:30:29] tax on them is not
[1:30:30] will affect.
[1:30:31] It will not affect their
[1:30:32] order that does not
[1:30:32] exempt from payment
[1:30:33] taxes.
[1:30:34] Right.
[1:30:34] He does not exempt from
[1:30:35] paying taxes
[1:30:36] an order that is not
[1:30:36] exempt from
[1:30:37] paying taxes.
[1:30:38] Maybe I can try.
[1:30:39] simplify this? I have on
[1:30:40] mind,
[1:30:42] um, one of the things you
[1:30:44] said, and I believe,
[1:30:45] what exactly is that
[1:30:46] Of course, that's what
[1:30:47] license plate tax
[1:30:48] mainly
[1:30:49] will be paid
[1:30:50] non-residents, or not
[1:30:51] Yes? Right.
[1:30:53] And I think Todd has
[1:30:54] meaning that
[1:30:55] tax category with
[1:30:56] sales mainly
[1:30:57] will be paid
[1:30:58] residents. Exactly so
[1:31:00] . I think that's all that
[1:31:01] he says.
[1:31:02] I would agree with that. I would agree with that. But
[1:31:05] to some extent, someone who
[1:31:06] just, uh, you know, I
[1:31:08] heard from people who
[1:31:09] talked about what
[1:31:10] have a fixed
[1:31:11] income,
[1:31:15] and, uh, you know, I think,
[1:31:16] that they have already laid out
[1:31:17] your wallets,
[1:31:18] watches and wigs,
[1:31:20] maybe they too,
[1:31:21] you know, to some extent,
[1:31:22] that it depends on
[1:31:24] your consumers
[1:31:25] habits. Many people
[1:31:30] will go very far,
[1:31:31] paying little of this
[1:31:33] tax, and then others
[1:31:34] people in the end
[1:31:35] will pay a lot. That,
[1:31:36] what I heard from everyone in
[1:31:37] Lello, Wilmington and
[1:31:39] Dover, this is what no one
[1:31:40] doesn't notice that
[1:31:41] Will taxes go away, uh?
[1:31:42] , no, prices in general
[1:31:44] will increase by 1%
[1:31:44] next year,
[1:31:45] regardless of whether we do it or not.
[1:31:48] They will grow more
[1:31:50] than 1%. So no one
[1:31:51] notices. People who
[1:31:52] live in cities with
[1:31:53] local tax on
[1:31:55] choice, they don't notice,
[1:31:56] when they go to another
[1:31:57] cities. It's like, oh my God,
[1:31:59] it says 1% here
[1:32:00] cheaper. How, uh, I agree with you on
[1:32:05] overall, and that it is almost
[1:32:07] It is probably true that
[1:32:08] most of the residents
[1:32:09] Dmerson would be paid
[1:32:10] so much. But you
[1:32:14] impose this
[1:32:15] standard, for example,
[1:32:16] tax, which
[1:32:17] will pay
[1:32:18] Dummerston residents
[1:32:19] . Let me
[1:32:20] show you this book
[1:32:21] . It has a lot of
[1:32:22] taxes that
[1:32:23] are questioned.
[1:32:24] Everyone who owns
[1:32:26] real estate, pays
[1:32:27] taxes.
[1:32:27] Yes.
[1:32:28] Everyone who owns
[1:32:29] real estate and lives in
[1:32:30] Dummerston, pays
[1:32:31] taxes.
[1:32:33] This is not the level that
[1:32:34] installed for
[1:32:35] everyone. Not everyone pays
[1:32:36] the same amount.
[1:32:37] Right.
[1:32:38] They
[1:32:39] pay something else.
[1:32:40] So, essentially, you
[1:32:41] charge extra
[1:32:42] tax, or
[1:32:43] wrong? So, at 60,000
[1:32:44] dollars, say, 60,000
[1:32:46] dollars of tax, which
[1:32:47] we will charge from
[1:32:48] income per year, this is
[1:32:50] will be in
[1:32:51] average 33 dollars
[1:32:54] for our 1800
[1:32:55] residents. But then,
[1:32:57] of course, some
[1:32:58] out-of-town residents
[1:32:59] will pay it.
[1:33:00] So it was, you know,
[1:33:02] who knows, you know, somewhere
[1:33:03] $25 per resident
[1:33:06] . So yes, it will be
[1:33:08] unevenly. It
[1:33:10] tax with another
[1:33:11] structure. The point is
[1:33:12] because it is a tax on
[1:33:14] another structure,
[1:33:15] which in different ways
[1:33:16] affects people. And I think that according to
[1:33:20] those liberations,
[1:33:21] which we have already
[1:33:22] there are significant
[1:33:23] exceptions for people,
[1:33:25] which, well, you know,
[1:33:26] just get
[1:33:29] medicine, food,
[1:33:30] medicine, medicine, medicine. Well,
[1:33:32] You understand, I understand,
[1:33:33] What are you talking about, but I have to say, and I already said
[1:33:36] to you today, what is this
[1:33:37] was the largest
[1:33:38] the number of people who
[1:33:40] contacted me
[1:33:41] or in fact
[1:33:42] came to see me
[1:33:43] home because they found out
[1:33:44] about this 1%. OK? IN
[1:33:47] I haven't had that since.
[1:33:48] ARPA times. So, you have
[1:33:50] was, and none of them
[1:33:51] supports this. And I
[1:33:52] I'll tell you why. Ago
[1:33:54] that most people, with
[1:33:55] which I spoke,
[1:33:57] have a fixed
[1:33:58] income, are elderly
[1:33:59] people who are now
[1:34:00] They rarely go out in the winter.
[1:34:01] outside, because
[1:34:02] They drive a car.
[1:34:04] OK? They are not
[1:34:05] can get what they need,
[1:34:07] a lot of this in
[1:34:08] Bradborough, and they don't
[1:34:09] can reach
[1:34:10] Keane or Greenfield or
[1:34:11] anywhere. So
[1:34:12] they do everything
[1:34:13] more and more
[1:34:14] orders, and this
[1:34:15] just not medicine or
[1:34:16] other things that
[1:34:17] exempt from
[1:34:18] taxation. Them
[1:34:19] have to do
[1:34:20] much more.
[1:34:23] Now you have
[1:34:24] fixed income, and
[1:34:25] now you suddenly hear
[1:34:26] , that, my God, is that it,
[1:34:28] What should I do to live because I can't
[1:34:30] to get out. And now you mean: okay
[1:34:35] , let's give you 1 more
[1:34:37] %. They are in pain. These people
[1:34:40] are really suffering. AND
[1:34:43] I mean,
[1:34:44] sorry, but that was
[1:34:45] a difficult day for me,
[1:34:46] when I listened to the stories
[1:34:48] about this, about that
[1:34:49] people think, and how
[1:34:50] you can simply say:
[1:34:51] "Well, you can do
[1:34:53] this is for medicine. You
[1:34:54] can you do this for
[1:34:55] "anything you want." No, they
[1:34:57] it hurts. People are hurting.
[1:34:59] Well, I would like these
[1:35:00] people talked to
[1:35:01] by me. I would like to
[1:35:02] they came to me
[1:35:03] home. You can
[1:35:04] connect them with me. I will talk to them and
[1:35:07] I will listen to them. I want
[1:35:08] hear from these people.
[1:35:10] But you don't have them.
[1:35:10] you will receive. In this
[1:35:12] the whole thing.
[1:35:13] You know what? I
[1:35:14] I'll see where I can find them.
[1:35:15] I'll take it. I will talk to
[1:35:16] people. Good. And to
[1:35:17] things we don't need
[1:35:19] to collect tax from
[1:35:20] sale. We can
[1:35:21] to skip completely
[1:35:22] sales tax, and
[1:35:23] we can do it
[1:35:24] numbers. I thought I already told you when you
[1:35:26] I was told that before.
[1:35:28] . I said okay.
[1:35:29] to be in touch with these
[1:35:30] people. I am grateful.
[1:35:31] to the people who contacted
[1:35:33] to me, to
[1:35:33] talk about it and
[1:35:35] share with me
[1:35:36] this point of view. I, I don't have...uh, I would like to hear from people,
[1:35:40] if, uh, tax on
[1:35:41] sales, I think...but
[1:35:42] also, you can...you
[1:35:44] can you do
[1:35:45] more cool things,
[1:35:46] such as children's
[1:35:47] playground, and a larger one
[1:35:48] The number is interesting, but
[1:35:50] for me tax on
[1:35:51] the numbers are really...uh,
[1:35:53] tax on noreiner-
[1:35:54] it's an obvious choice,
[1:35:56] and if I knew for sure,
[1:35:57] as you said about
[1:35:58] a vocal minority,
[1:35:59] if I knew for sure that
[1:36:00] this will really hit home
[1:36:01] people with fixed
[1:36:03] income from all these
[1:36:04] ways,
[1:36:05] then I would be, uh, me
[1:36:06] would be against this, and
[1:36:08] you know, this is fast
[1:36:09] solution for me. But
[1:36:11] I would like
[1:36:12] to make sure that
[1:36:13] each of these people, uh-
[1:36:14] Well, you know we're all on the same wavelength, and we know about everyone
[1:36:18] exceptions, and we all
[1:36:19] we have the same
[1:36:20] information, etc.
[1:36:22] No, no, no. I don't want to offend you, okay?
[1:36:26] But I think we are
[1:36:27] Maria (Todd is already here)
[1:36:29] some time), but we are
[1:36:30] We know Mary
[1:36:31] many people,
[1:36:32] OK? And them
[1:36:34] comfortable talking
[1:36:35] with us, because we were in
[1:36:36] councils. We lived here, in
[1:36:40] city, and therefore I do not
[1:36:41] I will call you names,
[1:36:43] because they came to
[1:36:44] me personally. I am not
[1:36:46] I'm going to sit and
[1:36:47] to say: "
[1:36:48] Call Alex
[1:36:49] ", because I know that they won't do this.
[1:36:52] So you will have to respect that which
[1:36:54] I passed by today, and
[1:36:56] don't think that you
[1:36:57] can you take these
[1:36:58] people and push them out
[1:36:59] their. This is unfair.
[1:37:01] regarding these people. And I don't
[1:37:02] I'm going to give them this.
[1:37:03] speak.
[1:37:04] That's not what I said.
[1:37:05] And I would be grateful,
[1:37:06] if we could just,
[1:37:08] I think to make things right. I think it's important,
[1:37:12] how I responded to those who
[1:37:13] said that
[1:37:16] I don't remember the name, and I
[1:37:17] answered.
[1:37:19] Yes. Um, important.
[1:37:21] remember that if you
[1:37:23] you're managing this, obviously
[1:37:25] that the first step is
[1:37:26] five people who
[1:37:27] are sitting here.
[1:37:28] Yes. Right.
[1:37:29] So, people
[1:37:30] in the city they realize,
[1:37:32] that doesn't matter, that
[1:37:33] we say.
[1:37:34] Yes.
[1:37:35] We can simply
[1:37:36] vote for it.
[1:37:37] If they say: "
[1:37:38] We don't want that.
[1:37:39] They don't want that.
[1:37:40] So your first goal is–
[1:37:42] we.
[1:37:42] You must get
[1:37:43] the three of us,
[1:37:44] Yes? And that's all, otherwise
[1:37:46] everything will be lost.
[1:37:47] Yes.
[1:37:47] Even if you
[1:37:48] get three of
[1:37:49] The city knows us.
[1:37:50] Make sure that everyone
[1:37:51] know that
[1:37:52] we are just the first
[1:37:52] step. The second step is
[1:37:53] special meeting or
[1:37:54] town hall, and people
[1:37:55] may appear,
[1:37:56] can discuss this,
[1:37:57] can do anything
[1:37:58] they will want. Will be
[1:37:58] a show of hands, and this
[1:37:59] there will be a solution. So, I would simply present
[1:38:02] that's right,
[1:38:02] how do I do it
[1:38:03] constantly, and sorry,
[1:38:04] if I don't do this,
[1:38:05] if you have already been here
[1:38:06] before, but it's just
[1:38:07] my military
[1:38:07] preparation. There are
[1:38:08] different types
[1:38:09] presentations.
[1:38:10] Informational is not the same
[1:38:11] what you are looking for. You
[1:38:13] trying
[1:38:13] to convince people. So
[1:38:14] you must
[1:38:15] convince me.
[1:38:16] I don't have the information.
[1:38:17] suitable. You must
[1:38:18] convince me. Your
[1:38:19] the presentation should be
[1:38:20] convincing, not
[1:38:21] informative. I know
[1:38:22] , do you think that there
[1:38:23] information is received
[1:38:24] , and that's true, but you
[1:38:25] trying
[1:38:26] to convince people. So
[1:38:27] look at this from
[1:38:28] this side and go,
[1:38:29] I need to
[1:38:30] three people here
[1:38:30] agreed with me.
[1:38:31] Maybe not everything
[1:38:32] okay, but
[1:38:33] Yes. No, listen.
[1:38:34] Good.
[1:38:35] I am mine, uh, I am not like that,
[1:38:37] uh, I have
[1:38:39] such...I appreciate...
[1:38:41] I quickly think that everyone
[1:38:42] here...Well, not everyone is here. I
[1:38:44] b...room tax
[1:38:46] obviously for me
[1:38:47] obvious. There are a lot
[1:38:49] things on Airbnb,
[1:38:52] so again,
[1:38:53] find out the target
[1:38:54] audience
[1:38:55] and find out what
[1:38:56] will interest the target
[1:38:57] audience.
[1:38:57] Yes. And if the tax on
[1:38:59] sales will not reach
[1:39:00] target indicator,
[1:39:01] they just don't
[1:39:02] They talk about it. IN
[1:39:03] I have a problem with that.
[1:39:04] What
[1:39:05] many people now
[1:39:06] buy cars in
[1:39:08] Caravans.
[1:39:10] Good. Such a tax
[1:39:12] from sales would be
[1:39:13] destructive.
[1:39:14] I don't think so.
[1:39:14] cost of cars
[1:39:16] included.
[1:39:16] I just don't care.
[1:39:18] . Yes.
[1:39:19] You know what? This is good.
[1:39:20] remark.
[1:39:21] Good. And I also think that
[1:39:25] alcohol and cigarettes
[1:39:26] should not be 1%,
[1:39:27] if this too
[1:39:28] regarding numbers,
[1:39:33] because we have
[1:39:34] are opening
[1:39:35] breweries.
[1:39:36] Oh yes,
[1:39:37] that would be great
[1:39:38] okay, that would be it
[1:39:39] alcohol. I don't know,
[1:39:40] how can we...I don't
[1:39:42] I know, cigarettes.
[1:39:43] back on the list.
[1:39:44] Yes. Again, this is"
[1:39:46] sugar "when Maple Valley
[1:39:47] will open again.
[1:39:49] There was a restaurant.
[1:39:52] Yes. Yes. It's worth it.
[1:39:53] pay attention. There
[1:39:55] it was written that you can add
[1:39:56] and subtract every year.
[1:39:57] Just need every year,
[1:39:58] isn't that right? You just
[1:39:59] must report
[1:40:00] in 90 days, what are you doing?
[1:40:01] approved, right?
[1:40:02] There should be a meeting.
[1:40:03] So, if we decide to add
[1:40:04] food and alcohol,
[1:40:05] we can
[1:40:05] not necessarily dishes
[1:40:07] , but alcohol.
[1:40:07] You should do them.
[1:40:09] together.
[1:40:09] Yes. Their
[1:40:11] a little...In
[1:40:12] us them actually
[1:40:14] no.
[1:40:14] I think this is a good idea.
[1:40:16] . I understand that
[1:40:17] the situation is becoming more
[1:40:18] fierce.
[1:40:18] I think they are
[1:40:19] should combine them
[1:40:21] together.
[1:40:21] I have already convinced you.
[1:40:22] Food and rooms are what I wanted. Good.
[1:40:25] So, here it is. IN
[1:40:28] I have a question. If
[1:40:29] you do local
[1:40:31] hack options with 1%. You
[1:40:33] do you mean that
[1:40:34] you can very
[1:40:35] specifically to say,
[1:40:36] which of the three options
[1:40:37] Will you charge?
[1:40:39] Yes.
[1:40:39] Numbers are one.
[1:40:41] Sales. Sales.
[1:40:42] Food and drinks and
[1:40:43] restaurant.
[1:40:44] Good. And these are the only three.
[1:40:46] Good.
[1:40:46] And, uh, you know, to
[1:40:48] from your point of view, this
[1:40:49] normally. Uh, me
[1:40:50] glad you have it
[1:40:51] people close to you
[1:40:53] trust and so on
[1:40:54] They are talking to you, and I hope that one
[1:40:57] I will meet you someday.
[1:40:58] them, and
[1:40:59] the more you there are
[1:41:00] on the forum. So, me too
[1:41:03] I would like to, uh, you know,
[1:41:04] potentially divide
[1:41:05] this is for a vote
[1:41:07] different categories,
[1:41:08] or, you know, any
[1:41:10] degree of expression,
[1:41:11] which people want,
[1:41:12] or, uh, getting
[1:41:14] maximum, uh,
[1:41:15] participating in this, uh, this
[1:41:16] my interest in everything
[1:41:18] this. And, uh, you know, uh
[1:41:23] -uh, I mean, what is it?
[1:41:25] many ways
[1:41:26] to go beyond the law
[1:41:27] , local tax
[1:41:28] for redemption, right?
[1:41:29] So, let's say we
[1:41:30] Let's deal with this.
[1:41:31] Then there are other things that
[1:41:32] you can start
[1:41:33] to consider, this
[1:41:34] short term
[1:41:35] rent, all sorts of things.
[1:41:36] Second homes,
[1:41:37] owners of the second
[1:41:38] housing, you know, people,
[1:41:39] who live in the city
[1:41:40] house.
[1:41:43] Well, that's what today is about.
[1:41:44] was broken again.
[1:41:47] That would be great.
[1:41:48] You know, if you
[1:41:49] did it, but
[1:41:50] earned 10,000 on this
[1:41:52] , reduce the budget by
[1:41:53] 10. No, before that
[1:41:54] moment, okay, we are talking about
[1:41:56] potential tax,
[1:41:58] which will force
[1:41:59] residents to pay
[1:42:00] additional $33. AND,
[1:42:02] you know, from this
[1:42:03] drive gears
[1:42:04] big conversations. How am I?
[1:42:05] already said, I think that
[1:42:07] the more conversations,
[1:42:08] the better. I hope to take
[1:42:10] this participation
[1:42:10] as much as I can, and
[1:42:11] to learn as much as possible
[1:42:12] more, and perhaps
[1:42:13] Will they convince me?
[1:42:14] wrong? I am not a fanatic,
[1:42:15] who says that everyone
[1:42:16] must go their own way
[1:42:18] by. But we just
[1:42:19] voted for
[1:42:20] tax increase
[1:42:21] on property that beats on
[1:42:22] all of them are even worse.
[1:42:23] It hits them all.
[1:42:25] even worse. And from this
[1:42:27] You won't get anywhere. And I didn't hear a single squeak,
[1:42:30] and I didn't hear you say anything
[1:42:31] were they talking about a squeak or
[1:42:32] something like that. We are beating.
[1:42:34] much more than all of them
[1:42:35] worse every year. And then
[1:42:38] this thing with tax from
[1:42:39] sales becomes
[1:42:40] starting point, and
[1:42:42] for good reasons, such as
[1:42:43] you mentioned it, and I completely respect that.
[1:42:45] and I hope that with
[1:42:47] sometimes, uh, you know, I will participate in this
[1:42:49] conversation. But
[1:42:52] budget cuts,
[1:42:53] as you said,
[1:42:54] the reason why people
[1:42:55] are talking to you about
[1:42:56] the accessibility crisis,
[1:42:58] is not about
[1:42:58] hypothetical 1%,
[1:43:00] maybe next time
[1:43:01] year. This is because of the
[1:43:04] they have already happened
[1:43:08] now.
[1:43:09] So let's start with this. I
[1:43:11] their ally in this
[1:43:12] . I am their big ear, and
[1:43:14] they are not talking
[1:43:15] with me directly,
[1:43:16] indirectly,
[1:43:17] you know, uh, you know,
[1:43:19] nothing but bricks
[1:43:20] in my window. I hear about the decrease.
[1:43:23] prices for the people who are here
[1:43:24] live. When I
[1:43:26] recently left and
[1:43:27] submitted his, uh,
[1:43:29] petition, each of these
[1:43:30] The name was as follows:"
[1:43:32] What about taxes? ""
[1:43:34] Truth? So this is the only one,
[1:43:35] what, uh, you know,
[1:43:37] I can do it.
[1:43:39] I hope, Cumbay,
[1:43:40] that doesn't look like me.
[1:43:42] Uh, I don't know what.
[1:43:43] happened before that
[1:43:44] led to this night
[1:43:46] . Uh, I came here from
[1:43:48] the expectation that this
[1:43:50] just an idea for
[1:43:51] discussion. So I don't
[1:43:53] I want to go back.
[1:43:54] Um, that's why I believe that every idea
[1:43:58] should be discussed.
[1:44:00] Some for a short time
[1:44:01] , some for a long time.
[1:44:03] Um, I don't support it.
[1:44:06] taxes. Any
[1:44:07] taxes. I don't think so.
[1:44:08] someone really
[1:44:09] supports. In addition
[1:44:10] the fact that, you know,
[1:44:10] We need taxes.
[1:44:11] They are useful for
[1:44:12] certain things.
[1:44:13] Um,
[1:44:13] if you asked me
[1:44:15] , you know, with a gun
[1:44:16] in your head, you know, or
[1:44:17] Do you want to make 1%? I
[1:44:18] would answer: "No, not in any case. Here
[1:44:20] reasons why not, or
[1:44:21] not
[1:44:21] Yes?"
[1:44:23] But I would skip: "Well,
[1:44:24] you could do this,
[1:44:26] but not that, or you
[1:44:27] could do it."
[1:44:29] So I still think,
[1:44:30] What is healthy?
[1:44:31] discussion, and perhaps
[1:44:32] another step that
[1:44:33] Alex wants to do,
[1:44:35] it is his prerogative,
[1:44:36] because, obviously,
[1:44:37] no one else, um,
[1:44:38] actively not
[1:44:39] interested, is
[1:44:41] get these again
[1:44:42] damn data.
[1:44:43] I mean that
[1:44:44] if possible, state
[1:44:45] Sorry, we don't
[1:44:45] we can deliver to you
[1:44:47] this, until you
[1:44:47] Agree to this. I am not
[1:44:49] I know, I don't.
[1:44:49] I'm working, then
[1:44:50] sorry, we don't
[1:44:51] we are going this
[1:44:52] do. Um, but if
[1:44:53] there will be some
[1:44:54] there is no data that
[1:44:55] can force us
[1:44:56] view one of
[1:44:57] three or two of
[1:44:58] three or three, that is, on
[1:45:00] In my opinion, it's fine.
[1:45:02] So on this I would
[1:45:03] finished. I would think,
[1:45:04] that if you want,
[1:45:05] you know, return it,
[1:45:06] or, you know, who knows?
[1:45:08] But
[1:45:08] Yes,
[1:45:09] I just wanted to give
[1:45:10] such a perspective that
[1:45:12] I am quite easy
[1:45:13] I am worried and
[1:45:14] I'm upset. Um, and this
[1:45:16] It's quite difficult when I
[1:45:18] on this side...
[1:45:19] Yes. For me.
[1:45:20] And therefore in any
[1:45:21] In that case, I just wanted to say that, in my opinion
[1:45:23] I think it was good.
[1:45:24] discussion.
[1:45:24] There is a short deadline,
[1:45:25] if you want to take
[1:45:26] participation in these city
[1:45:26] meeting. I don't know,
[1:45:27] What day is it? You
[1:45:28] need to submit
[1:45:29] a petition or something like that.
[1:45:30] I think this year
[1:45:30] It's too early to take it.
[1:45:31] participation, but it's mine
[1:45:32] task, just to
[1:45:32] You knew. I have on
[1:45:33] meaning that you can
[1:45:34] to convene special
[1:45:35] city ​​council.
[1:45:35] If you want
[1:45:36] attract more
[1:45:36] people, you probably
[1:45:37] would you like to do this?
[1:45:38] at town meetings.
[1:45:39] Special city
[1:45:40] fees are not collected
[1:45:40] many people.
[1:45:41] So I don't know which one.
[1:45:42] deadline for
[1:45:43] presentation
[1:45:44] suggestions for
[1:45:45] city ​​duty officers
[1:45:46] fees,
[1:45:46] city ​​duty officers
[1:45:47] fees, yours
[1:45:48] budget. I have on
[1:45:49] meaning that it is usually
[1:45:54] end of December, not
[1:45:55] February, so there are temporary
[1:45:57] framework, I believe that with
[1:46:04] rooms, in my opinion, you know how, eh
[1:46:07] -eh, we have enough
[1:46:08] good data from this
[1:46:09] reason. I spoke.
[1:46:13] with Roger, and I
[1:46:14] talked to Lori, and I
[1:46:15] talked to V FHA,
[1:46:16] Do you understand? I
[1:46:18] talked to everyone
[1:46:19] these people, and we have
[1:46:20] quite significant
[1:46:20] reasons to believe that
[1:46:21] it just seems
[1:46:22] very clean
[1:46:23] by a shot, not by
[1:46:24] What were you worried about?
[1:46:25] your people, or people,
[1:46:26] who sent
[1:46:27] emails to
[1:46:28] election commission.
[1:46:29] Nobody mentioned it.
[1:46:30] it's like about
[1:46:30] concern. So I feel completely fine.
[1:46:33] ready for this. But
[1:46:34] then I just think,
[1:46:38] Do I want to disassemble?
[1:46:39] it's in parts, but
[1:46:40] then, perhaps,
[1:46:41] to separate
[1:46:42] efforts later. Yes.
[1:46:43] You know what? I probably
[1:46:44] I will do that. Apparently,
[1:46:46] so far simple
[1:46:46] I will move the topic from
[1:46:47] numbers. I will spend more
[1:46:50] several studies
[1:46:51] regarding sales, and, um,
[1:46:52] sales questions
[1:46:54] always was, you know,
[1:46:55] much more difficult
[1:46:56] and harder for
[1:46:57] calculations. I just
[1:47:02] I'll take a bet on
[1:47:03] numbers are the ones that got me
[1:47:05] arranged.
[1:47:05] You can share
[1:47:07] by number? I don't care.
[1:47:08] What is the approximate
[1:47:09] idea of
[1:47:10] number of rooms on
[1:47:11] every photo? Can you
[1:47:13] Do you share it?
[1:47:14] Income for the whole year.
[1:47:16] No, the number of Airbnb in
[1:47:17] our city. This is 40, 60,
[1:47:20] 100, 20?
[1:47:21] I think it's somewhere around 30-40.
[1:47:23] Yes, I think so.
[1:47:25] That's all.
[1:47:26] I mean. You can almost
[1:47:28] calculate in your head.
[1:47:29] I think that in
[1:47:29] most of these places
[1:47:30] staying 15 nights,
[1:47:31] maybe 20 a month.
[1:47:32] 20 is pretty good.
[1:47:33] Yes.
[1:47:34] So, 15 nights
[1:47:35] multiply by 30.
[1:47:37] That's strange, 000. I have
[1:47:40] there is...I know I have it
[1:47:41] good friend who is here
[1:47:43] lives on Airbnb, but if
[1:47:44] do you want to stop
[1:47:45] in Vermont, in this
[1:47:47] area, you know, you don't
[1:47:48] belong to the 1%.
[1:47:53] People don't even
[1:47:54] do this time from
[1:47:56] time. We are going somewhere.
[1:47:57] instead of
[1:47:58] look at the bottom of the web
[1:47:59] pages, for example,
[1:48:00] What is the tax on options?
[1:48:01] . It's like, "Oh my God, they
[1:48:03] charge 30%. You know,
[1:48:05] for
[1:48:05] my family is like
[1:48:06] really tough
[1:48:07] term. This is like: good
[1:48:08] , we need
[1:48:09] clean the house. IN
[1:48:10] We have two days, we
[1:48:11] should be good
[1:48:12] clean the house.
[1:48:13] You know,
[1:48:14] you would be surprised. I mean, I
[1:48:16] quite a few
[1:48:17] I am traveling.
[1:48:18] California, and we stop at
[1:48:19] hotels. There it is.
[1:48:21] many locals
[1:48:22] taxes on the number.
[1:48:25] You know, it's like
[1:48:26] travel for 1%.
[1:48:28] No, that's not true. It
[1:48:29] expensive when you arrive
[1:48:30] to the end. Yes.
[1:48:31] This is approximately 4 and 12%. IN
[1:48:33] Motel 6 has a resort fee.
[1:48:35] Yes. What do you have on?
[1:48:36] mind?
[1:48:40] I think it's worth it.
[1:48:41] continue this
[1:48:42] question. Give
[1:48:43] answers to
[1:48:44] people's questions.
[1:48:44] Discuss this with
[1:48:45] all these people.
[1:48:46] Yes. Well, I'll allow...
[1:48:48] I will allow this.
[1:48:48] to lie down. I will focus on
[1:48:50] regarding rooms. For more
[1:48:51] several meetings we
[1:48:53] let's get back to the topic
[1:48:54] rooms, and no one
[1:48:55] not really
[1:48:55] answers yes
[1:48:56] quickly regarding tax with
[1:48:57] sale. So, perhaps,
[1:49:00] with this will have to
[1:49:01] wait for.
[1:49:03] Good.
[1:49:05] But thank you again.