1 00:00:02,240 --> 00:00:10,880 Okay, welcome everyone. I want to call the uh East Dundee regular board meeting 2 00:00:07,440 --> 00:00:14,480 August 17th, 2026 to order. Roll call, please. 3 00:00:11,679 --> 00:00:16,080 » Trusty Oakland is absent. Trusty Guma >> here. 4 00:00:14,960 --> 00:00:17,600 » Trusty Solder >> here. 5 00:00:16,480 --> 00:00:19,039 » Trusty Saviano >> here. 6 00:00:18,080 --> 00:00:21,680 » Trusty Kunzie >> present. 7 00:00:19,680 --> 00:00:26,279 » Trusty Mahoney is absent. And President Pearson 8 00:00:22,160 --> 00:00:26,279 » here. To the pledge of allegiance. 9 00:00:27,920 --> 00:00:36,399 I aliance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic 10 00:00:33,440 --> 00:00:42,480 for which it stands. One nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and 11 00:00:39,200 --> 00:00:47,399 justice for all. >> All right. Do we have anyone for public 12 00:00:44,399 --> 00:00:47,399 comment? 13 00:00:48,960 --> 00:00:54,000 All right. There not being anything, we don't have a public hearing, do we? 14 00:00:53,280 --> 00:00:59,840 » We do not. >> We do not. And then uh I will entertain 15 00:00:57,120 --> 00:01:05,199 a motion for uh the consent agenda. >> And I wanted to pull item D out. 16 00:01:02,239 --> 00:01:09,840 » Pull D out. Okay. Okay. I will move to approve a regular V 17 00:01:08,080 --> 00:01:14,400 village board meeting minutes dated August 3rd, 2026. I will also move to 18 00:01:12,400 --> 00:01:17,560 accept the warrants list in the amount of $211,286.54. 19 00:01:19,119 --> 00:01:26,960 I will move to approve a resolution accepting a documentary film proposal 20 00:01:24,479 --> 00:01:31,439 from David A. Hudson and approving professional services agreement for the 21 00:01:29,520 --> 00:01:37,439 creation of a featurelength film documentary in the amount not to exceed 22 00:01:34,640 --> 00:01:43,439 $24,100. Uh I will move to approve a resolution 23 00:01:40,000 --> 00:01:48,720 accepting a proposal from Bbach and Aean LLP for professional auditing services. 24 00:01:46,479 --> 00:01:55,759 And I will move to approve a resolution approving the minutes of certain closed 25 00:01:51,040 --> 00:01:58,399 minutes meetings of the village board. >> Any discussion? We get a second. 26 00:01:57,520 --> 00:02:01,759 » Get a second. >> I will second that. 27 00:02:00,000 --> 00:02:05,040 » Any discussion? >> No. All right. 28 00:02:03,920 --> 00:02:07,200 » Roll. >> Trusty Guma. 29 00:02:06,000 --> 00:02:10,000 » Yes. >> Trusty Solder. 30 00:02:08,319 --> 00:02:12,400 » Yes. >> Trusty Saviano. 31 00:02:11,200 --> 00:02:15,200 » Yes. >> Trusty Kunzie. 32 00:02:13,360 --> 00:02:20,080 » Yes. And that takes us to agenda items A. Oh, 33 00:02:18,319 --> 00:02:23,680 I'm sorry. We got to go back to D. >> I'll make a motion to approve a 34 00:02:21,520 --> 00:02:28,400 resolution approving a donation and license agreement with Mary Kay. Harvey 35 00:02:25,440 --> 00:02:33,440 and family for the loan and display of the Embrace the Earth with wisdom art 36 00:02:31,040 --> 00:02:35,200 sculpture at the depot park. >> Second. 37 00:02:34,239 --> 00:02:39,760 » Okay. >> And then just uh wanted to put on the 38 00:02:37,599 --> 00:02:46,319 record a thank you to Mary Kay. Harvey. puts tons of work into volunteering and 39 00:02:43,280 --> 00:02:50,879 putting on art events and donating artwork. So, just wanted to throw an 40 00:02:49,200 --> 00:02:54,959 official thank you to her on there. second. 41 00:02:51,680 --> 00:02:58,959 » And and then as a side note, uh since we have a few other artists we're talking 42 00:02:56,800 --> 00:03:04,159 to that would like to see their artwork show up and donate into the community on 43 00:03:01,200 --> 00:03:08,480 the Fox River or other places, um just like shoring up some of the language 44 00:03:05,920 --> 00:03:12,959 because it's uh it mentions three different things in the title of a 45 00:03:10,319 --> 00:03:17,680 donation, a license agreement, and a loan. And it's kind of one of the three. 46 00:03:15,040 --> 00:03:20,959 I think this is a donation, but we just want to clean up because we could 47 00:03:18,959 --> 00:03:24,560 sometimes have a licensed artwork agreement where they own it and they're 48 00:03:23,040 --> 00:03:29,519 licensing it to us or they're putting it on loan without paying for it. Um, but I 49 00:03:27,280 --> 00:03:34,640 think this is a donation. So, just cleaning up the language in this as we 50 00:03:32,799 --> 00:03:39,120 finalize it. But I'm okay with proceeding if that's fine. I think 51 00:03:37,040 --> 00:03:42,560 that's the only concern. >> Makes sense. 52 00:03:40,239 --> 00:03:47,519 » Okay. Any other? So, do you feel like we could uh approve 53 00:03:44,799 --> 00:03:51,599 this uh with the caveat that we clean up the license verse loan verse donation? 54 00:03:50,720 --> 00:03:56,640 » Yes. >> Yes. That's And it sounds like the 55 00:03:53,680 --> 00:03:59,439 intent is for this to be a donation. >> Yes. 56 00:03:58,159 --> 00:04:02,000 » Great. >> Go ahead, take a hold. 57 00:04:00,720 --> 00:04:04,640 » Trusty Guma. >> Yes. 58 00:04:03,519 --> 00:04:07,360 » Trusty Solder. >> Yes. 59 00:04:06,159 --> 00:04:10,080 » Trusty Saviano. >> Yes. 60 00:04:08,480 --> 00:04:15,519 » Trusty Kunzie. >> Yes. 61 00:04:12,879 --> 00:04:19,919 And uh let's move on to other agenda agenda items. A 62 00:04:18,320 --> 00:04:24,960 » I will move to approve resolution rejecting all proposals received in 63 00:04:22,800 --> 00:04:31,880 response to the villages request for proposals for the 2026 lead service line 64 00:04:28,240 --> 00:04:31,880 replacement project. 65 00:04:32,400 --> 00:04:39,199 » Second. >> Okay. Any discussion? 66 00:04:35,680 --> 00:04:44,560 » It's a heavy sigh. any background uh to share on that in 67 00:04:42,400 --> 00:04:46,800 the path forward just to put on the record for 68 00:04:45,919 --> 00:04:50,080 » people here >> those watching. Yeah, we have Phil our 69 00:04:48,720 --> 00:04:53,199 public works director could speak on this and we also have a representative 70 00:04:51,360 --> 00:04:57,759 from back. >> Yes. Good evening. So we village 71 00:04:55,759 --> 00:05:02,400 budgeted for a rel relatively small project lead service line replacement 72 00:04:59,680 --> 00:05:07,039 project in 2026 to replace approximately 12 lead services. Uh we received one 73 00:05:05,040 --> 00:05:10,720 bid. Unfortunately, it was just one bid that was substantially higher than what 74 00:05:08,720 --> 00:05:16,800 we budgeted for, nearly twice the project, the budgeted amount. Um 75 00:05:15,039 --> 00:05:22,160 as a result, we've been preparing to reject bids um 76 00:05:20,320 --> 00:05:28,400 as a new funding opportunity has recently presented itself to us. Um, we 77 00:05:25,280 --> 00:05:35,360 felt we staff felt that the approximate cost to replace the 12 78 00:05:31,600 --> 00:05:39,440 lead service lines at roughly $32,000 per service 79 00:05:37,199 --> 00:05:42,880 was substantially almost double what we're seeing in the region for replacing 80 00:05:41,360 --> 00:05:46,800 lead service lines. So, we didn't feel that that was a a responsible 81 00:05:45,680 --> 00:05:54,639 expenditure. >> But I just I guess my question is is 82 00:05:50,960 --> 00:05:59,199 this because I mean the Okay, that could be one reason, but it's 83 00:05:56,479 --> 00:06:04,160 is it maybe because we're getting this backlog of 84 00:06:01,440 --> 00:06:08,880 municipalities changing their lead lines and so the work is backing up and this 85 00:06:07,039 --> 00:06:11,840 is just going to be a higher rate because of that 86 00:06:10,319 --> 00:06:14,880 » certainly could be the case. Yes. >> Do we know? Do you know I guess is the 87 00:06:14,240 --> 00:06:19,840 question. >> Caitlyn Wright is here from back 88 00:06:18,160 --> 00:06:24,000 » join us again this evening. Go ahead. >> Thank you Phil. Um, so to speak on that 89 00:06:22,160 --> 00:06:30,479 directly, I it's a combination of things. A, you are correct that I expect 90 00:06:27,039 --> 00:06:33,600 to see pricing naturally go up. Um, the state has already identified that 91 00:06:32,000 --> 00:06:38,639 there's not enough contractors to do this type of work presently um, in terms 92 00:06:36,319 --> 00:06:43,919 of a labor force. So, yes, I do expect pricing to go up. Do I expect pricing to 93 00:06:41,600 --> 00:06:49,919 double like what we saw in this bid right now in the market? No. 94 00:06:46,720 --> 00:06:55,440 um likely what happened and we did talk there were multiple plan holders. We 95 00:06:52,800 --> 00:07:00,080 called those plano holders and inquired as to why they didn't submit a bid. The 96 00:06:57,840 --> 00:07:06,319 other plan holders were smaller local plumbing firms. They were not. 97 00:07:03,520 --> 00:07:13,759 This project was too big for the local plumbers to get bonded for and so small 98 00:07:10,319 --> 00:07:18,000 that the big contractors who are already booked out for the rest of the year 99 00:07:15,440 --> 00:07:23,039 threw a number at it. So that's why we saw such a high number. Um again, I do 100 00:07:21,039 --> 00:07:28,240 expect us to naturally see an increase in pricing. We had other projects bid 101 00:07:25,680 --> 00:07:32,400 this year and we were not seeing 32,000 per service line. you're seeing like 102 00:07:30,000 --> 00:07:35,360 18,000 per service line. So >> that's what I want. 103 00:07:33,440 --> 00:07:42,000 » Yep. >> So do you feel like the solution might 104 00:07:38,639 --> 00:07:45,680 be uh we're bidding out for a bigger batch that you know we're phasing so 105 00:07:44,160 --> 00:07:51,199 that they feel like it's worth bidding on the larger scope over time and then 106 00:07:48,800 --> 00:07:54,879 is it normal about the required bonds for the project is the reasons is that 107 00:07:53,280 --> 00:07:59,599 just smaller companies aren't comfortable with those bonds? Yeah, I'm 108 00:07:57,039 --> 00:08:04,639 not I am by no means an expert on getting bonding for this type of work as 109 00:08:02,319 --> 00:08:09,120 a contractor, but my understanding was it was just too large of a scope of 110 00:08:06,960 --> 00:08:12,240 project for them to secure that bond. Um, I don't want to speak on all of 111 00:08:11,039 --> 00:08:17,280 their behalf, but that was the information that I was given. Um, in 112 00:08:15,199 --> 00:08:22,080 terms of what I think we can do better for next time, yes, a larger size 113 00:08:19,759 --> 00:08:26,400 program will naturally entice more larger contractors to do this. We're 114 00:08:24,080 --> 00:08:32,080 seeing contractors going after 100, 200, 300, 500 plus-siz sized lead service on 115 00:08:29,919 --> 00:08:38,080 replacement projects. I also feel that the timing of advertising for bids will 116 00:08:34,959 --> 00:08:41,599 be really critical. Um, contractors have booked out their summer. So, we we 117 00:08:40,000 --> 00:08:45,600 advertised this kind of late in the year. Um, just trying to get the project 118 00:08:43,839 --> 00:08:50,800 going. We thought a small project people would be able to fit that in. we were 119 00:08:48,880 --> 00:08:56,720 they can fit it in, but obviously it set a price that we didn't necessarily want 120 00:08:52,560 --> 00:09:01,760 to recommend. Um, my recommendation is that we would advertise this larger 121 00:08:58,959 --> 00:09:06,720 scale program either in November or December so that contractors are 122 00:09:04,080 --> 00:09:10,800 planning to do the work for next year. Um, and we're getting in advance of 123 00:09:08,640 --> 00:09:13,519 other projects going out for bid for 2027. 124 00:09:12,399 --> 00:09:15,920 So, >> okay. 125 00:09:15,279 --> 00:09:21,839 How many >> suggesting we take a $2.1 million loan 126 00:09:19,519 --> 00:09:24,080 to do this project? >> So 127 00:09:22,320 --> 00:09:28,000 » that's on the next motion. >> Yep. I'm happy to speak on that. Um 128 00:09:27,600 --> 00:09:30,000 » go ahead. >> Do you want me to speak on that? 129 00:09:28,959 --> 00:09:34,080 » You may as well. While you're up there, go ahead and do it. 130 00:09:30,560 --> 00:09:38,880 » Right. So the village um two three years ago had put in a project plan requesting 131 00:09:37,200 --> 00:09:44,320 loan funding for a variety of different projects. Lead service line replacements 132 00:09:41,440 --> 00:09:50,480 was part of that request for funding. Um, we have been requesting funds 133 00:09:47,519 --> 00:09:56,399 through IEPA for lead service lines for I think the past two years or maybe this 134 00:09:52,640 --> 00:10:02,080 was our first year. In any case, IEPA has created a secondary subset of funds 135 00:10:00,640 --> 00:10:06,560 through their lead service line replacement funding bucket. Without a 136 00:10:05,200 --> 00:10:12,720 description, I'm going to end up talking with my hands, so I apologize. But this 137 00:10:10,640 --> 00:10:17,600 subset of funding is first come, first serve. So it's the village is eligible 138 00:10:15,839 --> 00:10:22,079 to receive the funding. The village has done everything that you guys can do to 139 00:10:19,519 --> 00:10:25,760 score appropriately, but your score is tucked into your census track data. 140 00:10:24,000 --> 00:10:34,079 There is nothing we can do to alter your score. So funds were exhausted for 141 00:10:28,880 --> 00:10:38,279 projects um requested at a score of 255. The villages scored at 142 00:10:39,040 --> 00:10:51,200 » 254. I wish um the villages score 143 00:10:46,800 --> 00:10:55,440 is 155. So IPA allocates funds from the highest scored project down to the 144 00:10:53,440 --> 00:11:00,800 lowest scored project until they exhaust funds. They exhausted at a score of 255. 145 00:10:58,880 --> 00:11:04,959 Again, Village didn't do anything wrong in terms of trying to secure that 146 00:11:02,320 --> 00:11:10,800 funding. But now that they have now that IEPA has a an additional bucket of 147 00:11:08,079 --> 00:11:17,440 funds, they're basically saying all of these communities who did everything 148 00:11:12,720 --> 00:11:21,200 right, um you can chase this funding. Uh they don't recommend us taking a project 149 00:11:19,200 --> 00:11:25,600 out to bid until we get a letter of commitment from my EPA. So the next step 150 00:11:24,240 --> 00:11:29,680 would be going through a loan application process. There's a borrowing 151 00:11:27,760 --> 00:11:33,279 ordinance. There's a legal opinion. There's steps that the board is going to 152 00:11:31,040 --> 00:11:38,959 have to take in order to say, "Hey, we are ready to go after this funding." Um, 153 00:11:36,399 --> 00:11:45,279 we would submit that to IEPA assuming it checks all the boxes. They would issue a 154 00:11:41,040 --> 00:11:51,279 letter of commitment. There are I didn't count how many, but the total 155 00:11:48,720 --> 00:11:58,720 sum amount that's being asked for in this separate pool of funds is 282 156 00:11:55,120 --> 00:12:04,640 million worth of projects. IEPA has said that they don't have 282 million to give 157 00:12:01,680 --> 00:12:10,240 out this year, but they have not told me what the magic number is that they do 158 00:12:06,560 --> 00:12:14,320 have. Um, they said it's sizable. I I presume that's well over a hundred 159 00:12:11,760 --> 00:12:17,839 million. Is it 200 million? I I don't know what that number is. They might not 160 00:12:16,000 --> 00:12:24,079 know what that number is also because it might be contingent on bid pricing 161 00:12:20,000 --> 00:12:28,880 coming in on other projects. So, um, if the village wanted to go forward with a 162 00:12:25,519 --> 00:12:32,480 longer or a larger sized program, we were looking to allocate or go after 163 00:12:30,639 --> 00:12:36,959 this loan funding anyway. And it looks like it's something that the village can 164 00:12:34,079 --> 00:12:39,600 pursue presently. Um, should the village want to do so. 165 00:12:39,200 --> 00:12:44,079 » Okay. >> Bill, how many lead service lines do we 166 00:12:41,680 --> 00:12:48,240 still have left to replace? >> 110 is it? 167 00:12:45,519 --> 00:12:55,120 » We're estimating around 370, give or take. We have yet to finalize our actual 168 00:12:50,639 --> 00:12:58,160 inventory. I want to say there'sund over a hundred services out there that 169 00:12:56,720 --> 00:13:03,760 are unknown at this point. So, we're still working with homeowners and to 170 00:13:01,040 --> 00:13:08,000 determine what those material types are. >> Okay. 171 00:13:04,880 --> 00:13:13,200 » Do you recommend trying to find one contractor to do all 300 to get the best 172 00:13:10,560 --> 00:13:17,519 pricing or splitting it between a few to not overwhelm one or have you seen in 173 00:13:15,519 --> 00:13:22,399 other communities a pattern that works better? I think for the size program 174 00:13:19,519 --> 00:13:27,360 that the village has presently 100 or 300 you're going to get the same sort of 175 00:13:24,800 --> 00:13:32,160 interest level um we're seeing some communities have to do 500 to 800 to a 176 00:13:30,399 --> 00:13:37,279 thousand a year that's going to be an entirely different scope of work and you 177 00:13:34,720 --> 00:13:45,360 would probably actually reduce it or split it out to like a 300 per 178 00:13:40,800 --> 00:13:50,399 contractor range. So, um, could we do a 300 lead service lines in one year? Can 179 00:13:48,480 --> 00:13:57,680 a contractor handle that scope of work? Yes, that is feasible. Um, I I think the 180 00:13:53,680 --> 00:14:02,959 110, uh, which is what that 2.1 million is estimated to be for is a really good 181 00:14:01,199 --> 00:14:08,639 size program. We're not tearing up all of town. Um, but we are going to do a 182 00:14:06,240 --> 00:14:13,839 considerable amount for that first year. and we can potentially do it in three 183 00:14:10,480 --> 00:14:17,040 years time if we phase the program um that direction. So, 184 00:14:16,639 --> 00:14:20,800 » okay. >> Does it make sense to go after more of 185 00:14:18,639 --> 00:14:26,880 the funding? >> We So, the village is in line to chase 186 00:14:23,760 --> 00:14:33,199 future fiscal years for funding. Um we had sized the project based off of kind 187 00:14:29,680 --> 00:14:40,079 of staff recommendations for that 2.1 feeling reasonable. Um, but I will say 188 00:14:37,360 --> 00:14:43,680 we've had success with IEPA. Say like bid if we took this forward, we bid the 189 00:14:42,240 --> 00:14:49,519 project after we got a letter of commitment from IEPA and bids came in 190 00:14:45,920 --> 00:14:53,680 higher than expected. IEPA has so far been open to increasing that loan 191 00:14:51,680 --> 00:14:58,720 amount. I don't know that I can go back to them and say we actually want to do a 192 00:14:55,680 --> 00:15:04,399 300 lead service line program this year when they're expecting 110. 193 00:15:01,760 --> 00:15:09,120 But um to your question, yes, we are planning to pursue loans for future 194 00:15:06,959 --> 00:15:12,199 years as well. >> All right. 195 00:15:12,320 --> 00:15:19,279 » So, I have a question, Phil. I remember when we first started talking about this 196 00:15:17,279 --> 00:15:26,480 years ago, >> the first obligation we had was to 197 00:15:21,600 --> 00:15:31,680 submit a plan to Illinois for what we were going to do. Have we done that? 198 00:15:29,440 --> 00:15:37,279 » We have. So that's the project plan which is this document here. 199 00:15:34,639 --> 00:15:44,959 And it does propose replacing approximately 110 lead led 200 00:15:39,920 --> 00:15:48,880 service lines in 27, another 110 in 2028 and then another 110 in 2029. 201 00:15:48,399 --> 00:15:52,480 » Okay. >> So it's a three-year program. 202 00:15:50,240 --> 00:15:55,199 » So that's in line with what we're asking for. 203 00:15:53,279 --> 00:15:59,920 » Yes. And as Caitlyn mentioned, that's exactly what 204 00:15:57,199 --> 00:16:05,199 we're eligible for for this round of loan funding if we're successful is year 205 00:16:02,480 --> 00:16:10,000 one of this three-year program >> that was proposed in the project plan 206 00:16:08,639 --> 00:16:15,920 because we think we're going to have more than the 330 over the 110 over the 207 00:16:12,880 --> 00:16:21,199 next three years. We may have to expand one of the years or have a fourth year 208 00:16:18,720 --> 00:16:25,279 just to kind of get us to the to the finish line. 209 00:16:21,759 --> 00:16:30,839 » And my understanding is some of these loans have been forgiven actually. Is 210 00:16:27,519 --> 00:16:30,839 that not true? 211 00:16:31,440 --> 00:16:39,519 » Yes. Um I wouldn't say forgiven per se. So there is a principal forgiveness 212 00:16:36,079 --> 00:16:46,880 component um that is directly linked to funds allocated from USPA the federal 213 00:16:42,959 --> 00:16:53,120 side. So Illinois state revolving fund um has money that is from Illinois and 214 00:16:51,199 --> 00:16:58,079 whatever revenue sources that the state is creating for that. And then we also 215 00:16:55,680 --> 00:17:05,439 are allocated funds every year from the federal government. Those funds have a 216 00:17:01,279 --> 00:17:09,760 requirement dictated by US EPA on a set percentage is for principal forgiveness. 217 00:17:07,280 --> 00:17:15,280 A set percentage is for loan. So what they did this past year was 49% or the 218 00:17:13,039 --> 00:17:20,959 past five years technically um 49% of those funds have to be 219 00:17:18,000 --> 00:17:26,720 principal forgiveness funds. 51% have to be given out as loan funding. It was at 220 00:17:23,520 --> 00:17:30,559 the discretion of IEPA on how they decided what was principal forgiveness 221 00:17:28,559 --> 00:17:34,400 or who got principal forgiveness and who didn't. 222 00:17:32,160 --> 00:17:40,400 uh the communities that were formerly allocated funds that 255 project number 223 00:17:37,520 --> 00:17:45,760 and higher most all of them received some portion of principal forgiveness 224 00:17:42,480 --> 00:17:49,840 and some portion of loan. Everyone below that 255 225 00:17:47,520 --> 00:17:55,360 the principal forgiveness was exhausted on what was kind of assumed for this 226 00:17:52,400 --> 00:17:59,039 year. What ended up happening last year? Same exact thing happened last year. So 227 00:17:57,679 --> 00:18:04,080 many communities got principal, forgiveness, and loan funding. And a lot 228 00:18:01,840 --> 00:18:07,840 of communities last year said, "We'll take the principal, forgiveness money, 229 00:18:05,919 --> 00:18:11,919 you take the loan. We're not going to we're not going to take the loan portion 230 00:18:09,360 --> 00:18:17,919 of that." And so all of this loan money was left over that IEPA still is 231 00:18:14,960 --> 00:18:21,200 required to give out as loan money. I think that is part of the pool of 232 00:18:19,440 --> 00:18:24,640 funding that we are now pursuing right now. 233 00:18:22,320 --> 00:18:31,039 » So almost certainly would not be eligible. There is this current 2.1 get 234 00:18:28,880 --> 00:18:36,080 to call it million that we are pursuing I can 99.9% say with confidence that 235 00:18:34,640 --> 00:18:41,280 there is no principal forgiveness associated with it. It is a 0% loan for 236 00:18:38,799 --> 00:18:47,679 30 years >> yes and there's no um 237 00:18:46,000 --> 00:18:54,840 issue with paying that back or penalty for paying that back early. So, 238 00:18:51,840 --> 00:18:54,840 » okay. 239 00:18:54,960 --> 00:18:58,200 » Thank you. 240 00:18:59,120 --> 00:19:07,039 » Okay. So, we have to vote on rejecting the bids first. 241 00:19:04,320 --> 00:19:10,039 » Yeah, we got to uh we got to vote on A first. 242 00:19:11,440 --> 00:19:18,000 » So, do we have any more discussion on A? >> Okay, let's go ahead and do a roll call. 243 00:19:16,880 --> 00:19:20,640 » Trusty Guma. >> Yes. 244 00:19:19,120 --> 00:19:22,799 Trusty Solder. >> Yes. 245 00:19:21,600 --> 00:19:26,000 » Trusty Saviano. >> Yes. 246 00:19:24,320 --> 00:19:29,840 » Trusty Kunzie. >> Yes. 247 00:19:27,600 --> 00:19:34,280 » Okay. And then that takes us to B. And we're going to need a motion for that. 248 00:19:35,760 --> 00:19:42,480 I'll make a motion to approve a resolution approving a contract for 249 00:19:39,919 --> 00:19:48,480 design engineering services for the 2027 lead service line 250 00:19:46,320 --> 00:19:51,960 replacement project from Baxter and Woodman, Inc. 251 00:19:52,559 --> 00:19:54,400 » A second. >> Second. 252 00:19:53,840 --> 00:19:57,760 » Second. >> Any more discussion on that? 253 00:19:56,160 --> 00:20:03,799 » So this this motion that we're approving 254 00:20:00,799 --> 00:20:03,799 now 255 00:20:05,360 --> 00:20:14,960 design engineering services. But is this not then the process of applying for 256 00:20:13,039 --> 00:20:18,000 this loan? It is for that. 257 00:20:16,160 --> 00:20:21,000 » It's essentially for both. >> Yes. 258 00:20:23,600 --> 00:20:31,919 » Part of the loan application process is we have to show to IEPA that you are 259 00:20:29,039 --> 00:20:37,360 shovel ready for a project. So, we will design this project up to what I would 260 00:20:34,559 --> 00:20:44,400 technically call 60% or permit ready design. Um, basically so that IEPA has 261 00:20:41,520 --> 00:20:48,000 specifications and an exhibit to review as well as the loan application 262 00:20:46,000 --> 00:20:51,679 documents. They'll want to review those. We don't 263 00:20:49,679 --> 00:20:56,799 have to secure a permit for this work, but in order to secure the loan, they 264 00:20:54,000 --> 00:21:01,520 want to see that we are ready to go. Once that's reviewed, assuming it's 265 00:20:59,440 --> 00:21:04,640 approved and assuming that there's still funds available because again they're 266 00:21:03,120 --> 00:21:12,640 operating this as first come first serve, then we would um receive a letter 267 00:21:08,480 --> 00:21:16,159 of commitment from EPA after which we we can take this out to bid in January. We 268 00:21:14,559 --> 00:21:22,640 could take this out to bid in November. We could hold it until April. I would 269 00:21:18,799 --> 00:21:27,440 not advise doing that. um should we not get a letter of commitment that design 270 00:21:24,559 --> 00:21:31,440 work is not like thrown out the door. We would just pause until the village wants 271 00:21:28,880 --> 00:21:35,919 to move it forward. So >> could conceivably have it next year. 272 00:21:33,600 --> 00:21:38,919 » Correct. Yep. >> Okay. 273 00:21:39,919 --> 00:21:47,360 And I'll add too if I could highlight one one sentence in my memo is we are 274 00:21:44,480 --> 00:21:53,600 building our 2027 street improvement program after 275 00:21:51,600 --> 00:21:57,840 with the hopeful replacement of these 110 lead service 276 00:21:55,760 --> 00:22:04,720 lines. We're going to improve the streets following this project next 277 00:22:01,440 --> 00:22:08,720 summer. So it'll be lead service lines first portion of the year and then 278 00:22:07,280 --> 00:22:12,159 closer to towards the end of the year we'll have our complete our street 279 00:22:10,320 --> 00:22:15,039 improvement project ideally on these streets. 280 00:22:13,120 --> 00:22:22,400 » Yeah. >> How much I mean how much do you have to 281 00:22:19,120 --> 00:22:26,480 tear up the road to get the line replaced? 282 00:22:23,919 --> 00:22:31,840 You cannot get it from the side or you can or 283 00:22:28,960 --> 00:22:35,679 » um so we we have to gain access to where the water man is to make that connection 284 00:22:33,679 --> 00:22:40,159 point. So if your water manes in the road which the majority of the villages 285 00:22:37,520 --> 00:22:47,039 water manes are in the road. Um there's going to be like a 4 foot by six foot 286 00:22:42,400 --> 00:22:50,559 pit give or take. Um we incentivize the contractor is not going to want to 287 00:22:48,559 --> 00:22:57,440 dig up more than they absolutely have to. Right. So, um, that's kind of the 288 00:22:54,240 --> 00:23:00,480 average, I would say, size, but it will be a patchwork quilt because you're 289 00:22:59,200 --> 00:23:06,480 going to have that in front of every single home. 290 00:23:02,320 --> 00:23:10,000 » Correct. Um, unless they encounter a problem, that should be the only 291 00:23:08,240 --> 00:23:13,440 location in the roadway that's getting dug up. Um, unless they're having to do 292 00:23:12,080 --> 00:23:19,360 something where they have to follow the service line up into like the parkway. 293 00:23:16,799 --> 00:23:23,200 That is very rare. I wouldn't plan for that being an issue. So, it's really 294 00:23:21,760 --> 00:23:30,960 where the water man is, you're going to see that pit across down the road in 295 00:23:26,960 --> 00:23:35,919 front of each home. So, >> So, if Phil, if that's the case, if 296 00:23:33,440 --> 00:23:40,159 you're saying that after that we would improve the road, 297 00:23:38,159 --> 00:23:45,520 are you saying we would just fill that pit in with gravel and then tear up the 298 00:23:43,039 --> 00:23:50,240 entire surface and resurface? >> Correct. Yes. 299 00:23:48,159 --> 00:23:55,520 So, for example, we're looking at First Street from the from Bington to the 300 00:23:52,960 --> 00:23:59,200 north to the corporate limit that entire stretch. We're looking at replacing all 301 00:23:56,960 --> 00:24:05,360 lead services potentially on Wenholes from water to first Lincoln from Water 302 00:24:02,480 --> 00:24:08,320 to Wenholes. Um, and then other streets in that area. So, 303 00:24:06,720 --> 00:24:13,159 » is that the area that had the higher levels of lead too? 304 00:24:09,840 --> 00:24:13,159 » Correct. Yes. 305 00:24:13,840 --> 00:24:20,559 » So, those are bad too. It'll be a busy construction season in this part of the 306 00:24:18,559 --> 00:24:24,080 community, but certainly they'll need it. 307 00:24:22,799 --> 00:24:28,480 And the interesting thing about last year's project with the contractor that 308 00:24:26,320 --> 00:24:32,799 performed the work is they essentially pulled the service out. So they, as 309 00:24:30,960 --> 00:24:38,880 Caitlyn mentioned, they opened up created an opening in the street and 310 00:24:35,120 --> 00:24:44,640 they pulled the service, they connected the existing lead service to the copper 311 00:24:41,679 --> 00:24:48,080 service. He ran a section of copper pipe in the basement copper line and just 312 00:24:46,400 --> 00:24:51,799 pulled it all the way out. Was a fascinating process. 313 00:24:53,200 --> 00:25:00,960 » Good tape. >> We got good tape to tie together. 314 00:24:58,480 --> 00:25:03,760 » Any other discussion? >> Let's take a vote. 315 00:25:02,640 --> 00:25:05,679 » Trusty Guma, >> yes. 316 00:25:04,400 --> 00:25:07,919 » Trusty Solder, >> yes. 317 00:25:06,799 --> 00:25:09,840 » Trusty Saviano, >> yes. 318 00:25:08,720 --> 00:25:12,960 » Trusty Kunzie, >> yes. 319 00:25:11,600 --> 00:25:20,279 Okay. And then uh let's take that takes us to 320 00:25:15,120 --> 00:25:20,279 C. I'll entertain a motion for that. 321 00:25:20,720 --> 00:25:28,559 I move to approve an ordinance amending section 151.008 322 00:25:25,760 --> 00:25:36,679 of chapter 151 title 15 of the code pertaining to 323 00:25:32,559 --> 00:25:36,679 temporary structures. 324 00:25:37,360 --> 00:25:41,279 » Any second? >> A second. 325 00:25:38,960 --> 00:25:45,919 » You got a second. Okay. Uh any discussion? It looks like it was pretty 326 00:25:43,440 --> 00:25:48,559 pretty well basic of what we all discussed last time. 327 00:25:48,159 --> 00:25:53,360 » Well, >> does this say that you can only extend 328 00:25:50,240 --> 00:25:55,760 it two times and that's it? >> Reading that right. 329 00:25:54,159 --> 00:26:02,279 » Right. >> I didn't see that. Where's that at? 330 00:25:59,279 --> 00:26:02,279 » Oh, 331 00:26:02,720 --> 00:26:07,880 so limits the total extension to two. 332 00:26:09,200 --> 00:26:17,760 Do we want that in there? >> Well, I feel like we didn't really work 333 00:26:15,200 --> 00:26:21,200 in most of the things we talked about. So, I 334 00:26:19,600 --> 00:26:25,200 I think we wanted to figure out a permanent way to have it, so we didn't 335 00:26:22,880 --> 00:26:29,360 need to have it be temporary if possible. But there were things we 336 00:26:27,120 --> 00:26:34,240 talked about with maybe having a structural engineer certify it uh to 337 00:26:31,840 --> 00:26:41,039 make sure that it's able to hold a snow load and it's not just an event tent 338 00:26:36,960 --> 00:26:44,880 rental specs, but beefier specs. Um, and that we'd have permanent grade anchoring 339 00:26:43,200 --> 00:26:50,480 footings inspected by the building department. Uh, an annual reinspection, 340 00:26:48,320 --> 00:26:59,120 not just each time they extend a request. Um, we did work in the fire 341 00:26:53,919 --> 00:27:05,440 marshall to inspect it. Um, but I'd like to see, you know, which things like the 342 00:27:02,000 --> 00:27:10,080 sign off on egress and fire retardant fa fabric, um, heat and venting safety. 343 00:27:08,080 --> 00:27:12,720 Those were some things we talked about. >> I think that's all covered though. 344 00:27:11,440 --> 00:27:17,679 Number two, an inspection by the building official and fire inspector 345 00:27:15,120 --> 00:27:21,279 inspector reveals that the temporary structure is being maintained per the 346 00:27:19,919 --> 00:27:25,200 manufacturers's installation requirements, including and without 347 00:27:23,120 --> 00:27:30,000 limitation, structural maintenance, anchorage, and fabric 348 00:27:27,760 --> 00:27:33,279 » or did you want it all >> itemized out? 349 00:27:31,120 --> 00:27:38,880 » Well, I feel like the the fire marshall section was a little more full. I think 350 00:27:35,919 --> 00:27:44,840 it seemed like mostly that, but some of these other things weren't uh as spelled 351 00:27:41,840 --> 00:27:44,840 out. 352 00:27:47,440 --> 00:27:55,600 And then there was a ADA section in the ordinance that we dropped the villages 353 00:27:52,720 --> 00:28:02,320 ADA codes for the states. Uh, and I didn't research what that implication 354 00:27:58,799 --> 00:28:05,600 is. So, just wanted to hear from staff before proceeding to make sure that was 355 00:28:04,000 --> 00:28:10,559 looked at and that was intentional and not just something that kind of got 356 00:28:07,360 --> 00:28:17,440 dropped and swapped because I'm not sure what the ramifications of that are. 357 00:28:14,480 --> 00:28:22,880 Um, but yeah, rather in the language where it says uh 358 00:28:21,039 --> 00:28:27,279 I should look exactly, but where it says the the village board's discretion on 359 00:28:25,520 --> 00:28:33,600 whether or not they want to extend it, I'd rather that be an objective standard 360 00:28:29,600 --> 00:28:38,159 instead of uh subjective, like depending on who the village board is and your 361 00:28:35,840 --> 00:28:43,600 relationship with them, uh you may or may not get this. I'd rather it be meet 362 00:28:40,559 --> 00:28:50,480 these objective standards and that's the only criteria or if there's uh an 363 00:28:47,679 --> 00:28:54,159 extension of doing something temporary because we're building a permanent 364 00:28:51,840 --> 00:28:58,000 structure that progress is shown. So, it's not just a promise that someday 365 00:28:56,720 --> 00:29:02,559 we're going to build something, but we haven't built anything or pulled any 366 00:29:00,240 --> 00:29:08,960 engineering drawings or drafting permits or done any work at all. So like to see 367 00:29:06,720 --> 00:29:13,679 it uh strengthened up a little bit more to 368 00:29:10,880 --> 00:29:19,440 make it a little more objective and make sure we cover u 369 00:29:17,039 --> 00:29:25,320 something that can move from temporary to permanent and have all the mechanisms 370 00:29:21,360 --> 00:29:25,320 to have yearly inspections. 371 00:29:26,240 --> 00:29:34,880 we could uh touch base with Chris and the attorney, but I think that was the 372 00:29:31,919 --> 00:29:40,720 hard part was drawing that fine line on what's temporary and everything you just 373 00:29:37,600 --> 00:29:45,440 described is permanent. So like how do you at what point do you cross over that 374 00:29:44,399 --> 00:29:49,840 we're not just looking at something that's temporary anymore but we're just 375 00:29:47,120 --> 00:29:54,799 requiring exactly what is required with permanent structures with footings and 376 00:29:52,240 --> 00:30:00,000 the load carrying and all that other type of permanent fixtures that you're 377 00:29:58,240 --> 00:30:03,919 going to need that eventually you want. I mean I if I remember correctly just 378 00:30:02,240 --> 00:30:08,399 talking with Chris, Mark, and Kelly about this is these were the standards 379 00:30:06,320 --> 00:30:11,840 for something temporary whereas everything else might just require a 380 00:30:10,240 --> 00:30:16,000 clear amendment to the building code if you want to just permit that going 381 00:30:13,120 --> 00:30:20,960 forward. But the building inspector's recommendation is to not codify that is 382 00:30:18,480 --> 00:30:26,240 to just keep it in line with the ICC's temporary definitions of these. So 383 00:30:23,919 --> 00:30:30,799 having, you know, the building inspector grant one or two extensions and then if 384 00:30:28,720 --> 00:30:36,559 he or she denies it, then it goes to the board for two extra extensions 385 00:30:34,240 --> 00:30:44,640 180 days at a time. The theory is you're giving maybe three, four years of 386 00:30:40,880 --> 00:30:49,360 uh leeway for this business to come into a more permanent structure. 387 00:30:47,520 --> 00:30:54,559 » But it seems like they could just reapply and start over. Like there's not 388 00:30:51,919 --> 00:30:56,720 a cap defined in there that they could internally. 389 00:30:55,200 --> 00:31:00,720 » They sure can. >> Yep. 390 00:30:58,880 --> 00:31:04,880 » But yeah, I think we were trying to see if there was a middle ground. Like 391 00:31:02,960 --> 00:31:10,399 temporary structures don't really work for year round. uh permanent ones uh too 392 00:31:08,960 --> 00:31:16,720 expensive, but we were trying to figure out if there was a year round 393 00:31:14,480 --> 00:31:22,799 uh like soft covered like a tent that is sturdier than a cheap or flimsy one that 394 00:31:19,840 --> 00:31:26,799 we could reinspect and make sure that as it degrades it's being replaced. It does 395 00:31:25,120 --> 00:31:32,880 seem like a lot of the things that are being done uh Alanos is like the 396 00:31:30,480 --> 00:31:38,159 anchorings and footings are more burly and sturdy than like a tent before an 397 00:31:35,440 --> 00:31:43,840 event. So like there is an in between. So if we can't define it in a way we're 398 00:31:41,200 --> 00:31:49,360 comfortable with and I'd almost want to just strengthen you know making sure 399 00:31:46,320 --> 00:31:54,880 that it's not an eternally granted privilege if you have u the village 400 00:31:52,880 --> 00:32:00,000 board's favor but if not then you don't. So, I'd rather it be an objective hard 401 00:31:57,200 --> 00:32:04,320 cut off uh or if we can define it as something that is very structured but is 402 00:32:02,880 --> 00:32:06,960 encouraging outdoor dining for restaurants. Sure. 403 00:32:05,200 --> 00:32:14,000 » But it seems like we're kind of back to the original one with eternal granting 404 00:32:10,640 --> 00:32:17,519 uh exceptions because I think it was has it been five years that we've been 405 00:32:16,240 --> 00:32:20,240 extending or was >> something like that, right? 406 00:32:18,799 --> 00:32:23,519 » Because it could easily be another five or 10. 407 00:32:21,440 --> 00:32:29,200 And we also talked about having a certificate of insurance that claims the 408 00:32:27,200 --> 00:32:35,039 village is not liable for anything that happens if a tent does fail. Um there 409 00:32:32,320 --> 00:32:39,039 were a lot of concerns about just permitting something that's not safe and 410 00:32:37,360 --> 00:32:43,200 I feel like we're maybe still >> I'd be hesitant to list a lot of 411 00:32:41,440 --> 00:32:48,880 different criteria because this is covering not only 412 00:32:45,919 --> 00:32:53,840 but our tents that we put up for our events too. or temporary structures. 413 00:32:52,080 --> 00:32:58,320 » Well, I wouldn't change those, >> right? But if you're telling people that 414 00:32:56,080 --> 00:33:03,360 they have to pass all these rules that we're we're trying to make objective, 415 00:33:00,480 --> 00:33:06,720 then what structure is this? Is this for a th00and square foot structure or is 416 00:33:05,200 --> 00:33:09,200 this for a 100,000 square foot structure? 417 00:33:07,919 --> 00:33:13,360 » Once you go beyond temporary, >> I think that's what the the inspectors 418 00:33:11,200 --> 00:33:18,159 are trained to do is, hey, hey, it's it's sturdy enough for what it's going 419 00:33:15,120 --> 00:33:23,279 to be doing for this weekend or for the 180 days. It's good. And then we have to 420 00:33:21,200 --> 00:33:28,480 approve it. The board has to approve it. I see what you're saying. I 421 00:33:25,840 --> 00:33:31,840 And then once 180 days, what if Alianos takes it down today and then they put 422 00:33:30,480 --> 00:33:35,200 one up in two days because they want to put up a new one. Is that another 180 423 00:33:33,840 --> 00:33:39,919 days now? Because they took it down and they put it up. 424 00:33:37,679 --> 00:33:43,679 » They could trigger the extension bit for the building inspector. 425 00:33:41,120 --> 00:33:47,679 » It's costly, labor intensive to put that up. 426 00:33:45,279 --> 00:33:51,039 » Yeah. But if you're reinstalling and reattaching everything and some of the 427 00:33:49,519 --> 00:33:54,880 fabric is frayed, you're probably not going to go through the effort of 428 00:33:52,240 --> 00:33:58,640 installing bad fabric and you are checking all connections. So 429 00:33:57,039 --> 00:34:02,480 » I think that's why >> Sorry. 430 00:33:59,760 --> 00:34:05,760 » I think that's why temporary structures is treated as temporary because you take 431 00:34:04,080 --> 00:34:10,560 it down, put it up again, and it's kind of refreshed. But if you just make it 432 00:34:07,600 --> 00:34:15,200 permanent, it will degrade over time. So it is a new category. I wouldn't want to 433 00:34:12,800 --> 00:34:20,639 change temporary rules. I agree with that. I last time we talked 434 00:34:18,159 --> 00:34:25,040 thought we brought up seeing if we could get some manufacturer specs from where 435 00:34:22,560 --> 00:34:29,599 we built that thing and you know seeing >> if present did you have anything to add 436 00:34:27,679 --> 00:34:32,399 in the conversation when me you Chris and Kelly met about this 437 00:34:31,359 --> 00:34:36,240 » how we came up to this. >> So if I remember right this verbiage is 438 00:34:34,800 --> 00:34:40,240 in there because now it's going to allow him to reapply which then opens up the 439 00:34:38,639 --> 00:34:44,000 inspection for everything you're looking for. Okay. It's not just here's your one 440 00:34:42,800 --> 00:34:48,960 permit and then we're going to let it fly for six years. This gives us the leg 441 00:34:46,720 --> 00:34:52,960 up to get in there. Okay, here your 180 days are up. Reapply. Me and Chris are 442 00:34:51,040 --> 00:34:56,399 back in there. Visual inspection, but you're only allowed to do it so long. 443 00:34:54,639 --> 00:35:00,160 Temporary is temporary at the end of the day. So, if it does take it down for two 444 00:34:57,760 --> 00:35:03,359 days and put it back up, that's kind of what we're getting at. We don't want to 445 00:35:01,359 --> 00:35:06,960 leave it up for 10 years, but we also want to be able to get in there and 446 00:35:04,560 --> 00:35:11,359 check it. So, and that's something that Kelly and us went over is because the 447 00:35:09,839 --> 00:35:13,760 code's very strong. It's either temporary or you take it down and you 448 00:35:13,200 --> 00:35:17,760 build something. >> This is where I said to that gray area 449 00:35:16,000 --> 00:35:21,599 where now you're just going to make it a permanent structure and you're going to 450 00:35:19,119 --> 00:35:25,280 be amending the building code and it's not really best practices to 451 00:35:23,599 --> 00:35:30,320 » So, how can we get in there and verify it's safe? Permanent. You permanent 452 00:35:28,240 --> 00:35:33,760 reapply. Get an inspection and we go in there and hey, this is wrong. Your 453 00:35:31,680 --> 00:35:37,040 fabric's off. Your fabric's expired. Change your fabric. the permanent will 454 00:35:35,520 --> 00:35:38,720 approve them. So we can at least get in there every year and do something with 455 00:35:38,400 --> 00:35:42,640 it. >> So we're talking about allowing that 456 00:35:40,160 --> 00:35:48,240 structure to be permanent, >> not allowing them to reapply to extend 457 00:35:45,440 --> 00:35:54,800 it, not allowing it to be permanent. >> So up to to 180 458 00:35:52,160 --> 00:35:59,440 plus the building inspectors if >> he or she wants to grant to it con cons 459 00:35:57,680 --> 00:36:03,680 uh consecutively, that's their discretion and that that power of that 460 00:36:01,520 --> 00:36:07,440 authority. But when that person, whoever it is, denies it, then the appeal 461 00:36:05,440 --> 00:36:11,040 process is to the board for the two extent two times. 462 00:36:09,200 --> 00:36:14,640 » So it could be >> perpetual 463 00:36:11,839 --> 00:36:22,800 » perpetual but but if one of the inspectors flags 464 00:36:19,599 --> 00:36:28,560 it, then it then it becomes limited to two renewals 465 00:36:25,040 --> 00:36:35,119 » via the appeal process before the board. If they get the appeal and we grant it, 466 00:36:32,000 --> 00:36:43,359 does then it go back to perpetual as long as they 467 00:36:38,560 --> 00:36:47,520 approve it or does it say once you go back to the board, you've got it for 360 468 00:36:46,400 --> 00:36:50,079 more days and that's it. >> I think it's 180. 469 00:36:48,960 --> 00:36:54,000 » Well, 180* >> I would imagine that the final decision 470 00:36:52,320 --> 00:36:58,839 from the building inspector would stand firm after that six months. six months. 471 00:36:59,520 --> 00:37:05,920 I mean, if you want us to go back and look at a more 472 00:37:04,079 --> 00:37:09,680 » this is clear as mud. >> Yeah. And that is very difficult when 473 00:37:08,000 --> 00:37:13,920 dealing with building codes. You typically don't want to deviate from 474 00:37:11,440 --> 00:37:20,320 that. But if if the board's will is to create something like that and amend the 475 00:37:16,640 --> 00:37:25,200 building code, you sure can. Um just not recommend it. 476 00:37:21,920 --> 00:37:28,880 » Yeah. I'd like to get out of where we just have to answer whether or not we're 477 00:37:27,040 --> 00:37:33,200 going to make somebody tear down a tent based on our opinion every year for five 478 00:37:31,280 --> 00:37:38,960 years and then the next five years instead of having a process a process 479 00:37:36,160 --> 00:37:43,760 that doesn't allow that. That is just objective. You meet these or you don't. 480 00:37:41,119 --> 00:37:50,320 » Well, this this is that is it not because it's going to be them 481 00:37:46,480 --> 00:37:57,920 being the arbiter, not us. Uh but they can come to us to grant it 482 00:37:55,520 --> 00:38:02,880 anyway. Isn't that part of this >> for for 180 days and then that's it. 483 00:38:01,040 --> 00:38:03,760 » But then they could just reapply again. >> No. 484 00:38:03,280 --> 00:38:05,920 » Is there? >> No, that has to come down. 485 00:38:05,200 --> 00:38:09,119 » Then it has to come. >> That'll have to come down and then he 486 00:38:07,359 --> 00:38:14,240 can reapply and then he can reconstruct it. That's the I think what the goal 487 00:38:11,760 --> 00:38:20,240 Kelly was trying here was we'll get as much as we can, but at some point or 488 00:38:17,040 --> 00:38:22,960 another it's going to have to come down. So, so 489 00:38:21,599 --> 00:38:27,680 » you know there is another route we could look at. Maybe like we discussed this in 490 00:38:25,280 --> 00:38:32,640 the past that maybe there's just a a code amendment to our zoning that allows 491 00:38:30,000 --> 00:38:39,359 for seasonal type stuff but not year round but like seasonal temp tents for 492 00:38:35,359 --> 00:38:45,119 example awnings in the B1. Maybe that could be crafted into the zoning code as 493 00:38:42,000 --> 00:38:48,480 an option away from the building code. >> So that is another option to explore. 494 00:38:46,880 --> 00:38:52,720 Can you look into the Illinois code because it it says that the Illinois 495 00:38:50,240 --> 00:38:59,119 code differentiates between tents which are fabric membrane structures 496 00:38:55,599 --> 00:39:04,320 and rigid aluminum frame structures with hard or non-fabric ball panels. 497 00:39:02,560 --> 00:39:10,640 » The Illinois codes are the minimum standard. So we village IC and the fire 498 00:39:08,079 --> 00:39:15,920 district's ICC that have adopted or higher standard. So those are designed 499 00:39:13,680 --> 00:39:19,200 for areas that don't have adopted codes. So 500 00:39:17,599 --> 00:39:21,839 » you can't go from a more stringent to a less stringent. 501 00:39:20,400 --> 00:39:24,880 » So if someone went to build a brand new house right now, they can't go off the 502 00:39:23,359 --> 00:39:28,960 state code, they have to go off what the village eastund adopted. 503 00:39:27,119 --> 00:39:32,160 » Now the v there was no village. It was unincorporated or there was an area that 504 00:39:30,640 --> 00:39:35,920 didn't adopt the code. That is the absolute bare minimum that a contractor 505 00:39:34,480 --> 00:39:39,760 has to build that house to. That's how that's how that works. 506 00:39:37,280 --> 00:39:44,560 » Can we revert to state code when it comes to 507 00:39:42,079 --> 00:39:47,760 structures, temporary permanent structure? 508 00:39:46,160 --> 00:39:50,720 We've been doing some digging on how some people get around this. We really 509 00:39:49,280 --> 00:39:54,000 have. And what it comes down to, it's going to cost money. Um, you know, 510 00:39:52,560 --> 00:39:57,920 Elgrove Village has a permanent tent outside one of our hotels. I called them 511 00:39:55,839 --> 00:40:02,400 up directly. They permanently anchored it down. It's raided. They sprinkled it 512 00:40:00,240 --> 00:40:07,280 and they fired it. You don't have that option here. They turned it into a 513 00:40:05,280 --> 00:40:09,760 building. You can't do that with this one. 514 00:40:07,839 --> 00:40:12,800 » We're also trying to keep costs in mind when you're coming up with stuff like 515 00:40:11,040 --> 00:40:16,240 this. Everything's going to cost money to make in work. 516 00:40:14,079 --> 00:40:21,040 » Yeah. Yeah. 517 00:40:17,920 --> 00:40:26,240 Or we charge them for the inspections and all the things. We still are putting 518 00:40:23,359 --> 00:40:31,200 research into all these to set it up. But are you saying ongoing it costs us a 519 00:40:28,640 --> 00:40:36,000 lot or can those costs be put on >> fair cost to bring it up to a more 520 00:40:34,320 --> 00:40:39,839 satisfying safety >> cost? Yeah. 521 00:40:36,960 --> 00:40:44,240 » Yeah. I mean we can certainly bring it back 522 00:40:41,359 --> 00:40:47,920 with those other criterias uh for your consideration but you know this a 523 00:40:46,560 --> 00:40:52,359 situation like this we could also look at zoning as an alternative 524 00:40:53,119 --> 00:41:02,560 » in the meantime can we get some specifications from the manufacturer 525 00:41:00,079 --> 00:41:06,079 » I did I did acquire some not all but yeah I I could work on it but that's 526 00:41:04,480 --> 00:41:09,280 only going to answer the question for this one establishment not 527 00:41:08,000 --> 00:41:11,760 Because whatever gets written is going to have to hold water for everybody else 528 00:41:10,640 --> 00:41:14,720 that puts the tent up, >> right? 529 00:41:12,400 --> 00:41:19,760 » Just wondering the rating, weight rating, snow load rating, 530 00:41:18,000 --> 00:41:22,800 tired rating, >> if they have done any of that work or 531 00:41:21,440 --> 00:41:27,359 not, the manufacturer. >> Yeah, we can get some of that from them. 532 00:41:25,920 --> 00:41:30,240 » It comes down to what you want to do in the future because even if it comes back 533 00:41:28,720 --> 00:41:35,280 that it's still good, he's still on an expired permit right now. 534 00:41:32,880 --> 00:41:38,800 » So that's what I think this is trying to fix. 535 00:41:36,640 --> 00:41:42,960 So, if we're saying we really want them to eventually have to take it down and 536 00:41:41,040 --> 00:41:47,760 put it back up to reapply so that we can get in with the inspection, is there a 537 00:41:45,119 --> 00:41:53,440 route where we could just yearly inspect it and say these things don't meet uh a 538 00:41:50,960 --> 00:41:57,760 brand new tent specs, but if they do, you can continue one more year and we 539 00:41:55,680 --> 00:42:02,160 reinspect again next year. Kelly looked into that and I do believe 540 00:41:59,599 --> 00:42:07,440 that was where the option came from with the um coming to the board if there was 541 00:42:05,119 --> 00:42:13,200 a problem because she's very adamant that the book the codes the code. 542 00:42:11,200 --> 00:42:18,960 » Yeah, I'd like to I mean I'd be okay with every year you get inspected and if 543 00:42:16,079 --> 00:42:22,480 it meets inspection uh you continue but as soon as it doesn't it comes down 544 00:42:20,319 --> 00:42:28,640 immediately and there's no appeal to the board uh to see if we can 545 00:42:26,000 --> 00:42:32,800 uh just skirt around safety because I'd rather not let that be an option. 546 00:42:31,119 --> 00:42:36,079 » I think we I'd feel more comfortable getting that out of 547 00:42:33,839 --> 00:42:39,119 » Yeah, we would have to look over that option. 548 00:42:37,520 --> 00:42:41,920 » We got to watch that fine line of what you allow right now that's not written 549 00:42:40,640 --> 00:42:44,000 in an ordinance because if something were to happen, it's going to be on all 550 00:42:43,200 --> 00:42:46,560 of us. >> So, we got to make sure if we get an 551 00:42:45,599 --> 00:42:50,480 answer out of this. >> I think this right here is a good 552 00:42:48,640 --> 00:42:56,160 starting point. It at least gets our inspectors in there and they got a year. 553 00:42:53,680 --> 00:42:59,680 They're essentially up to a year now to figure things out. 554 00:42:57,760 --> 00:43:03,520 » Yeah. And I believe it gave the leg up on giving him the time or or the 555 00:43:01,760 --> 00:43:09,040 business, not the single way out, giving the business time to make a future plan 556 00:43:05,760 --> 00:43:12,880 for okay, we're going to allow it for now. What's your plan? 557 00:43:11,359 --> 00:43:16,480 » I think that was the last conversation when this all started at the board 558 00:43:14,400 --> 00:43:20,400 meeting was this was to a temporary relief to give him the adequate time 559 00:43:18,960 --> 00:43:22,640 frame to figure out a permanent solution. 560 00:43:22,160 --> 00:43:26,160 improve >> right now. That was the story. 561 00:43:24,720 --> 00:43:28,720 » That was the story. Yeah. >> Yeah. 562 00:43:26,560 --> 00:43:31,599 » This is a shortcut allowing just letting it be up. Okay. 563 00:43:30,000 --> 00:43:33,200 » And plus it gets our inspectors in there. 564 00:43:32,000 --> 00:43:38,720 » Yeah. And it gets us in there to get eyes on it to at least allow to be safe 565 00:43:35,520 --> 00:43:42,560 to standards for now. So Chris, myself, and and Kelly were in 566 00:43:41,119 --> 00:43:46,720 emails back and forth, and this is what we ended up coming up on. So when I go 567 00:43:45,359 --> 00:43:49,839 back, I feel more comfortable going with the attorneys who want to move any other 568 00:43:48,560 --> 00:43:53,119 verbage around. >> So it makes sense to put this through. 569 00:43:51,359 --> 00:43:58,160 so that you can get eyes on it and then we can still do research and tweak. 570 00:43:56,240 --> 00:44:00,720 » Yeah. And you can always strike this. >> Okay. 571 00:43:58,880 --> 00:44:03,520 » This just like any other ordinance you do, you can come back and strike if you 572 00:44:02,160 --> 00:44:06,400 come up with a better off. >> Yeah. That's always fair. At least you 573 00:44:05,359 --> 00:44:07,839 can get in there and make sure it's safe. 574 00:44:07,440 --> 00:44:12,640 » Mhm. >> So, as it's written, this does demand 575 00:44:10,640 --> 00:44:15,680 they get inspected now and then take it down if it doesn't meet inspections 576 00:44:14,400 --> 00:44:19,680 after so many days. >> Yeah. Or the appeal, actually. So 577 00:44:17,920 --> 00:44:22,560 they'll come to the appeal and then you guys will decide if you'll give them the 578 00:44:20,880 --> 00:44:25,680 extra. Was it 180? >> 180. And then at that point which gave 579 00:44:24,000 --> 00:44:27,680 them to the spring, right? Is that what the time frame it was? 580 00:44:27,280 --> 00:44:31,520 » Yeah. >> Which gave them to the spring. 581 00:44:29,440 --> 00:44:35,359 » So because I believe there was a mapped out plan of attack on this in June or 582 00:44:34,240 --> 00:44:38,480 Right. the June. >> And that's and it's and that's the 583 00:44:37,040 --> 00:44:39,839 scenario if the building inspector doesn't approve it. 584 00:44:39,440 --> 00:44:43,839 » Yeah. >> Yeah. I mean I hope it gets approved and 585 00:44:42,079 --> 00:44:48,400 it's fine. Yeah, >> but since 586 00:44:45,680 --> 00:44:52,800 I'd rather uh if it isn't approved that it does come down because it has been 587 00:44:50,960 --> 00:44:55,599 five years of extending it hoping that eventually we'll upgrade it. So, 588 00:44:54,240 --> 00:44:59,760 » right. I think that's the crux of this that it was always communicated to the 589 00:44:57,040 --> 00:45:03,040 board that we're working on a solution. >> Yeah. Yeah. 590 00:45:00,720 --> 00:45:07,440 » And in those situations, I'd like to see actual proof of money invested in a 591 00:45:05,599 --> 00:45:13,280 space and some building happening and engineering paid paid for or something 592 00:45:10,400 --> 00:45:16,680 » because uh it's one thing to say you're going to do it. 593 00:45:17,280 --> 00:45:19,440 » All right. >> Thank you. 594 00:45:18,800 --> 00:45:21,920 » Thanks, Mark. >> Thank you. 595 00:45:20,400 --> 00:45:27,119 » Let's go ahead and take a vote. >> Okay. Trusty Guma. 596 00:45:25,280 --> 00:45:30,520 » No. >> Trusty Solder. 597 00:45:31,599 --> 00:45:34,599 No. 598 00:45:34,800 --> 00:45:38,720 » Trusty Saviano. >> Yes. 599 00:45:37,680 --> 00:45:41,720 » Trusty Kunzie. >> No. 600 00:45:42,880 --> 00:45:48,960 » We'll come back and present another option for the board via the zoning. 601 00:45:46,960 --> 00:45:52,960 » Has applied again for their temporary. 602 00:45:52,079 --> 00:45:56,079 » I'll have to check >> since that meeting that we had last 603 00:45:54,640 --> 00:46:00,720 time. >> I didn't go after them because I'm 604 00:45:58,720 --> 00:46:05,040 trying not to seam out anyone on this one. So, I didn't catch up with them. 605 00:46:02,400 --> 00:46:08,720 » We have two in town. >> I would I don't think we do have two. 606 00:46:08,000 --> 00:46:13,680 » No, >> I I think there's a huge difference 607 00:46:11,359 --> 00:46:21,520 between one and the other like to say that what a yurt is the same as a giant 608 00:46:18,640 --> 00:46:24,720 aluminum structure is >> that's what we're trying to figure out. 609 00:46:22,560 --> 00:46:27,920 I mean, what what can we do to make it more of a permanent? What can they do to 610 00:46:26,640 --> 00:46:31,359 make it more of a permanent? Can they change the framework? What? 611 00:46:29,680 --> 00:46:35,680 » Well, that's what we should be asking. Everything will cost a lot more money 612 00:46:33,599 --> 00:46:39,440 and I think that's the hiccup. >> Understood. 613 00:46:37,440 --> 00:46:44,079 » We'll come to something. >> All right. How about uh D? We need 614 00:46:41,920 --> 00:46:48,960 direction and uh discussion direction regarding a potential ordinance amending 615 00:46:46,319 --> 00:46:57,599 section 70.11, 70.12, 70.13, and 70.14 on in repealing 616 00:46:53,839 --> 00:47:01,920 schedule 7 of chapter 71 charter. truck routes. 617 00:46:59,359 --> 00:47:06,960 » So, are we talking about 618 00:47:04,720 --> 00:47:10,960 banning trucks from the truck route that we made a couple years ago? Is that what 619 00:47:09,599 --> 00:47:15,680 this is saying? >> Yeah. In a nutshell, they would not 620 00:47:12,640 --> 00:47:19,599 designate Bington as the truck route. >> It would say they only can go on the 621 00:47:17,040 --> 00:47:22,319 highways unless they're making a delivery inside of the downtown. 622 00:47:21,200 --> 00:47:26,880 » Correct. >> I thought, so if that's possible, why 623 00:47:24,640 --> 00:47:29,760 didn't we do that two years ago? Yeah, I thought we had 624 00:47:28,000 --> 00:47:32,800 » I thought that I thought we were told we can't do that. 625 00:47:31,040 --> 00:47:36,800 » I don't know the answer to that. >> I thought there was a high dot 626 00:47:34,400 --> 00:47:39,040 designated truck. No. >> No. 627 00:47:38,640 --> 00:47:42,640 » Um >> we were told 628 00:47:40,560 --> 00:47:49,119 » we have to allow some way for these trucks to get through. And 629 00:47:46,240 --> 00:47:53,760 that's why we designated Bington because we wanted to limit it from all of these 630 00:47:51,599 --> 00:47:57,680 side streets and just say fine, if you have to come through, you have to go 631 00:47:55,119 --> 00:48:02,319 down Bington. That's why it was designated. 632 00:47:59,760 --> 00:48:04,720 But if we had the option to just say no, no trucks. 633 00:48:04,160 --> 00:48:08,160 » Yeah. >> Well, we have to allow trucks. We just 634 00:48:06,560 --> 00:48:13,359 not telling them they have to go on that one street. That's it. 635 00:48:11,839 --> 00:48:20,000 » They're you're going to get trucks. are going to get Josh like help us out here. 636 00:48:17,040 --> 00:48:23,839 » So, here's what I've I've found just in being in Village Hall, being around town 637 00:48:21,760 --> 00:48:29,200 for the last few years. I would guesstimate that 80 to 90% of our truck 638 00:48:26,559 --> 00:48:34,559 traffic is trucks trying to get over to Lion and Carpentersville. 639 00:48:31,760 --> 00:48:38,880 So, we had a discussion when uh Eric was still here as a village administrator. 640 00:48:36,640 --> 00:48:44,720 Uh we were talking about doing a a truck study and I pitched the idea, how about 641 00:48:42,079 --> 00:48:48,960 we save that money and just no trucks through East Dundee because they're all 642 00:48:46,240 --> 00:48:52,319 going over to uh Lion Eyes and uh I'm sorry, not Lion Eyes, but RevCore and 643 00:48:51,040 --> 00:48:55,839 Carpentersville. >> Um 644 00:48:54,319 --> 00:48:58,800 they can go through Carpentersville to get through RevCore. They don't need to 645 00:48:57,119 --> 00:49:01,680 come through Eastundi through RevCore. So that's what I pitched and that's kind 646 00:49:01,119 --> 00:49:05,520 of where we >> and then we had lengthy conversations 647 00:49:03,200 --> 00:49:07,520 with Kelly and Kelly went back and forth with the ID do engineers, 648 00:49:06,960 --> 00:49:12,640 » right? >> And after a discussion with ID do 649 00:49:10,079 --> 00:49:16,960 multiple times, they said basically you could just submit to us your update that 650 00:49:14,480 --> 00:49:22,800 you're going to designate to three rows 72, 25, and 68 is the state highways and 651 00:49:20,400 --> 00:49:24,960 that's it in Eastund. So that's where we're going to go with that. 652 00:49:23,839 --> 00:49:28,880 » Okay, >> great. 653 00:49:27,119 --> 00:49:31,599 That is the exemption. >> Yes. 654 00:49:29,839 --> 00:49:34,319 » With the and like President Pearson said, the exemption is for deliveries. 655 00:49:33,440 --> 00:49:37,599 They can make it >> obviously. 656 00:49:35,119 --> 00:49:41,040 » What about Lioniz? >> That would be considered part of the 657 00:49:39,200 --> 00:49:46,000 operation for deliveries. >> But what you're saying is you think this 658 00:49:43,280 --> 00:49:49,200 might cut down trucks by 80%. That's my 659 00:49:46,960 --> 00:49:53,680 » this this this would target the trucks that are making a delivery from out west 660 00:49:51,680 --> 00:49:59,520 and want to go to like Bington and they say, "Oh, well, East Bington's a a pass 661 00:49:57,280 --> 00:50:03,200 through, so we'll go through there." Whereas now those outside that have 662 00:50:01,599 --> 00:50:06,640 nothing to do with Lionizer RevCore can just say, "Oh, we got to stay on 72 to 663 00:50:05,200 --> 00:50:10,400 60 25." >> Or they can take 664 00:50:09,599 --> 00:50:12,960 whatever. >> Sure. 665 00:50:13,280 --> 00:50:20,960 and Bronco, if I may, um the the ordinance presented uh does technically 666 00:50:19,200 --> 00:50:23,839 for the trucks going to Lion Eyes or Third Street, there's actually a 667 00:50:22,000 --> 00:50:27,920 designated route for them specifically in this ordinance. So, they're not 668 00:50:25,839 --> 00:50:32,720 » uh just grandfathered in as originally was discussed like uh like delivery 669 00:50:30,079 --> 00:50:35,119 trucks. They have a designated route for them. 670 00:50:33,520 --> 00:50:40,240 » Yeah. For them specifically. >> Yeah. 671 00:50:37,760 --> 00:50:43,240 » Third Street to Bington. down to 68 to 72. 672 00:50:44,480 --> 00:50:50,280 » So, is there does Carpentersville have a designated shakra? 673 00:50:50,559 --> 00:50:55,520 » Yeah, we're going to we're going to 674 00:50:53,760 --> 00:50:58,559 » they're going to they're going to warn they're going to warn their designation. 675 00:50:56,800 --> 00:51:03,760 » We're going to send those two businesses a courtesy update just so they know 676 00:51:02,000 --> 00:51:07,760 » after the board's decision. >> So, how how would a truck get to RevCore 677 00:51:06,000 --> 00:51:10,480 then? They have to go down 678 00:51:09,440 --> 00:51:13,440 » to 31 >> Main Street 679 00:51:12,480 --> 00:51:15,359 Carp. >> I wouldn't want to take a semi down that 680 00:51:15,040 --> 00:51:17,440 hill. >> What's that? 681 00:51:15,839 --> 00:51:21,760 » I wouldn't want to take a semi down that hill. 682 00:51:18,000 --> 00:51:24,960 » Oh, well, you can also take what is the road that goes um 683 00:51:24,160 --> 00:51:30,000 » Lake Marian. >> Lake Marian goes and then you could turn 684 00:51:27,839 --> 00:51:32,720 left on I mean, listen, this is their problem. 685 00:51:31,760 --> 00:51:36,800 » You don't have to worry about it. >> Like at Walmart, you could turn off 25 686 00:51:34,559 --> 00:51:40,160 and that goes there, too. Yeah, >> there's there's multiple ways they could 687 00:51:38,240 --> 00:51:43,040 do it. >> And there's a hill on either side of 688 00:51:41,839 --> 00:51:45,839 like >> I mean 689 00:51:44,079 --> 00:51:50,319 » they don't want to go past the river the hill. But 690 00:51:46,800 --> 00:51:53,520 » isn't RevCore doing deliveries? >> What does RevCore even do? 691 00:51:52,160 --> 00:51:57,839 » They make fans. >> Yeah. So, but aren't those trucks exempt 692 00:51:56,400 --> 00:52:01,200 if they're doing deliveries >> into downtown? 693 00:51:58,960 --> 00:52:06,079 » Yeah. They're not just passing through. >> Ref. 694 00:52:03,839 --> 00:52:10,000 Well, yes, if they are going to downtown East Indie, then yes, they would be 695 00:52:08,000 --> 00:52:15,200 exempted and allowed to do that. >> The beer semis can still go to 696 00:52:12,160 --> 00:52:20,240 » I think that RevCore probably they're not just doing business only with 697 00:52:17,119 --> 00:52:25,680 businesses in downtown is my guess. >> Maybe they're 698 00:52:21,520 --> 00:52:32,720 » I would wholeheartedly agree with that. >> This isn't for a vote. 699 00:52:27,760 --> 00:52:35,359 » It is. Yeah. So, I think we're on board. >> Yes. 700 00:52:34,400 --> 00:52:37,920 is the answer. >> Oh, we've never done a truck study 701 00:52:37,040 --> 00:52:42,640 either. >> We did do a truck study. We did one a 702 00:52:39,920 --> 00:52:44,880 few years back. Um don't have those results, 703 00:52:43,599 --> 00:52:50,319 » but this would have been a more comprehensive one that uh chief was uh 704 00:52:48,240 --> 00:52:54,319 referring to and it was great suggestion saying, you know, why can't we just ask 705 00:52:52,240 --> 00:52:56,960 the attorneys if we could just omit Bington from our truck route and save 706 00:52:56,079 --> 00:53:00,319 the headache? >> Yeah. 707 00:52:57,760 --> 00:53:04,559 » Yeah. And that truck route study showed that a lot of trucks were going down 708 00:53:04,960 --> 00:53:12,160 Water Street all the way about 72, which is why we looked at changing the park, 709 00:53:11,280 --> 00:53:16,079 » right? >> Changing the truck route and all that 710 00:53:13,599 --> 00:53:20,319 because that was a disaster. >> So, 711 00:53:18,400 --> 00:53:25,760 what what's the plan? we get rid of the truck route and then 712 00:53:22,800 --> 00:53:30,800 » come back with the ordinance and then uh >> update I do 713 00:53:28,400 --> 00:53:35,200 » I think clear signage to make sure trucks are very aware and the courtesy 714 00:53:32,559 --> 00:53:38,720 call I think is a great idea. Yeah, >> we'll definitely let the two businesses 715 00:53:36,720 --> 00:53:45,119 know with the letter that the board has XYZ accordance 716 00:53:41,920 --> 00:53:50,640 » and then um clarity on like the license class license plate classifications. Uh 717 00:53:49,200 --> 00:53:57,680 there were like four spots that they were all different in like for classes F 718 00:53:53,440 --> 00:54:02,319 through Z or B through V or H through Z there was and some didn't say. So, just 719 00:54:00,640 --> 00:54:05,760 when we write this up, make sure it's consistent. And I'm not sure what those 720 00:54:04,160 --> 00:54:12,000 classifications are, but make sure we're targeting the right classes. 721 00:54:09,040 --> 00:54:17,839 » And also, uh, navigation, right? Like I don't know 722 00:54:16,240 --> 00:54:22,480 what truckers use. Do they don't use Google Maps probably? Right. Do they 723 00:54:19,760 --> 00:54:24,160 » Chief knows that one pretty good. He's >> called and yelled at them quite some 724 00:54:23,760 --> 00:54:27,440 time. >> Yeah. 725 00:54:25,599 --> 00:54:31,200 » Right. Several different apps, right? And you're correct. Google Maps isn't 726 00:54:29,040 --> 00:54:33,119 one of them. They have have apps that are specific to truckers. 727 00:54:32,720 --> 00:54:35,599 » All right. >> I can't tell you for sure what there 728 00:54:34,240 --> 00:54:39,920 are. There's more. >> Contact those apps, right? 729 00:54:36,960 --> 00:54:42,559 » Well, so ID do once we once we advise ID do okay 730 00:54:40,559 --> 00:54:46,559 » and inform Google Maps that's supposed to go out. Now, what when we did this 731 00:54:45,200 --> 00:54:49,839 the first time, what some of the truckers would we would stop would say 732 00:54:48,480 --> 00:54:51,440 is that I, you know, I didn't know. I was just following my app. 733 00:54:51,119 --> 00:54:57,680 » Yeah. >> So, I don't think it's a perfect system 734 00:54:54,880 --> 00:55:00,960 is is the answer. It'll take a while, >> right? 735 00:54:59,760 --> 00:55:04,480 One of the things that we did to our ordinance before though is that we made 736 00:55:02,640 --> 00:55:08,319 trailer or truck length part of our ordinance and that that has helped us as 737 00:55:06,480 --> 00:55:12,880 far as being able to enforce them >> because then we don't have to bring them 738 00:55:09,520 --> 00:55:18,960 up the ploy to I'm sorry, PAL to have them weighed and etc. 739 00:55:16,559 --> 00:55:23,280 » Can our signs say local East Dundy deliveries only or something that makes 740 00:55:21,040 --> 00:55:27,200 it clear that they're like, "Oh, it is a local delivery. It's for carbon." Well, 741 00:55:25,200 --> 00:55:31,599 the the local delivery is part of the state statute. We have to allow it. What 742 00:55:29,520 --> 00:55:35,680 Phil put out on the signage was it just essentially says no trucks and there was 743 00:55:33,440 --> 00:55:40,160 the orange flags hanging, so it was very visible. Now, we've made stops on 744 00:55:38,400 --> 00:55:45,760 truckers that said yes, I saw the signs, but I had to go that way. So, 745 00:55:43,760 --> 00:55:49,040 » yes. Yes. When you start here, you have to go that way. You don't have to start 746 00:55:47,359 --> 00:55:51,920 there. >> Okay. 747 00:55:50,880 --> 00:55:55,440 » Thank you. >> Good. 748 00:55:52,640 --> 00:55:58,960 » All right. Good. Move on to E. Discussion direction regarding exterior 749 00:55:57,200 --> 00:56:02,880 and permanent signage for the downtown parking garage. 750 00:56:00,960 --> 00:56:07,280 » Who's talking about that? Anyone? >> I like the third one. 751 00:56:05,760 --> 00:56:08,880 » It's a very efficient discussion. >> There you go. 752 00:56:08,160 --> 00:56:17,440 » I mean, >> yeah. So, um, we had in the budget to 753 00:56:11,920 --> 00:56:22,799 have 11,000 for the um the counting uh app uh function. U I believe looked into 754 00:56:20,640 --> 00:56:28,319 it and it wasn't really exactly what we were looking for. Anything else would 755 00:56:25,040 --> 00:56:31,920 have been maybe 50 $60,000 to have a numeric count of how many open spaces 756 00:56:30,160 --> 00:56:34,880 are there. Uh but we do know that as part of the 757 00:56:33,599 --> 00:56:37,520 parking garage, we communicated that there was going to be signage at some 758 00:56:36,000 --> 00:56:41,760 point. We've had like the temporary banners out there for a while. So now we 759 00:56:39,520 --> 00:56:47,119 want to move into something more permanent. Uh staff presented an option 760 00:56:44,480 --> 00:56:50,640 at the PZHC meeting a few months back. PCHC basically said, "This is great, but 761 00:56:49,359 --> 00:56:57,040 how about something more historic looking that matches the downtown?" Um, 762 00:56:54,400 --> 00:57:01,040 one PCAC member was an architect mentioned a marquee style, like a 763 00:56:58,880 --> 00:57:06,559 theater style. So, we kind of went with that and we got some uh renders on uh 764 00:57:04,160 --> 00:57:09,920 options for the board to consider. One, two, or three, or none at all? Go back 765 00:57:08,319 --> 00:57:12,640 to the drawing board, however the board seats fit. 766 00:57:11,119 --> 00:57:14,240 » Now, are there are there going to be two of these or one? 767 00:57:13,520 --> 00:57:19,119 » Just the one. >> Okay. 768 00:57:16,400 --> 00:57:21,520 » All right. Yeah, the third one is my preference as well 769 00:57:20,160 --> 00:57:26,799 » with the curved arrow. >> Yes. 770 00:57:23,200 --> 00:57:31,680 more vintage and true to the second one is way too clunky. The third I mean the 771 00:57:28,799 --> 00:57:37,359 first one if if people hated arrow I would be okay with that. The second one 772 00:57:35,599 --> 00:57:41,520 » what is our resident designer >> I have a hard time figuring out what 773 00:57:39,440 --> 00:57:48,960 shirt and pants to wear. So I'll let I'll let you figure out what you want. 774 00:57:45,839 --> 00:57:54,640 Yeah, I I think uh the third one also, but if we could use our village branded 775 00:57:51,920 --> 00:58:00,640 font, Ignite, it's very condensed and bold. And this is like P with a big gap 776 00:57:57,599 --> 00:58:05,200 before A then R. This would just be like park as one unit. 777 00:58:02,079 --> 00:58:09,920 » I mean, I have to I have to assume that the park portion of this uh was not 778 00:58:08,319 --> 00:58:13,839 » I mean, they didn't dimension any of the lettering. There's no way that's what 779 00:58:12,079 --> 00:58:17,760 they would actually do, right? Like this isn't they're not even spaced evenly, 780 00:58:16,400 --> 00:58:21,680 » right? >> Well, you'd be surprised what a sign 781 00:58:20,000 --> 00:58:25,839 shop will do if they're not given any design specs. They will do whatever it's 782 00:58:24,319 --> 00:58:28,480 cheapest and easiest. So, >> I like the consistency of using our 783 00:58:27,440 --> 00:58:32,960 font. >> Yeah, that seems like a good idea. 784 00:58:32,240 --> 00:58:37,799 » All right. >> Yeah. for reference just like that's our 785 00:58:34,799 --> 00:58:37,799 font. 786 00:58:38,000 --> 00:58:44,960 » So filling in a bit more because it's taller letters, but that's our village 787 00:58:42,720 --> 00:58:49,680 font that could kind of fill the space a little better. 788 00:58:47,440 --> 00:58:54,240 But that would be it's Ignite. It's on all of our signs, so it also match and 789 00:58:51,680 --> 00:58:57,319 feel like that's a village's words. >> All right. 790 00:58:57,760 --> 00:59:01,960 Hopefully that won't be an extra $5,000. 791 00:59:02,400 --> 00:59:07,359 So your recommendation is change the font. 792 00:59:05,440 --> 00:59:12,559 » Yeah. To the village branded font. Ignite is the name of that font. Yes. 793 00:59:10,400 --> 00:59:16,400 » Village staff has sent that font. I I don't know if it's just not translating 794 00:59:14,000 --> 00:59:19,760 the concept, but we will make sure >> when we move forward to get a final 795 00:59:18,000 --> 00:59:24,799 proof and review that, but they do have those fonts that both the Factori or 796 00:59:22,160 --> 00:59:28,720 Factora and then Ignite as well. So >> yeah, I think Ignite will fit this the 797 00:59:26,480 --> 00:59:32,799 best. Okay. Um, and yeah, I wasn't sure if they just 798 00:59:30,880 --> 00:59:37,359 have some stock letters and they're showing this because it's a lower price, 799 00:59:34,880 --> 00:59:39,839 uh, but to do a custom letter, if it's a structural sign, might cost more. So, 800 00:59:39,599 --> 00:59:43,200 » yeah, >> we'll have to see because that might 801 00:59:41,520 --> 00:59:48,559 affect the the cost. >> Sure. When I last talked to them, um, I 802 00:59:45,119 --> 00:59:52,640 asked if if this cost and concept factored in our fonts, Ignite or Vector, 803 00:59:51,520 --> 00:59:55,680 and I was told it would be the same price regardless of the optional font. 804 00:59:55,200 --> 01:00:00,799 » Perfect. >> We find this company racing 805 00:59:58,559 --> 01:00:07,680 the sl. >> Well, we reached out to um a three 806 01:00:04,160 --> 01:00:13,040 different companies and then um this one is what staff depending on costs and 807 01:00:11,119 --> 01:00:19,200 just overall designs that we got. This is u we the staff wasn't directed to 808 01:00:16,799 --> 01:00:24,440 continue with this company and bring concepts to the 809 01:00:20,240 --> 01:00:24,440 » one of the more responsive ones. 810 01:00:24,720 --> 01:00:31,920 If I have a local company who would bend this, we take a look at that. 811 01:00:30,400 --> 01:00:39,920 » We could reach out to other more local companies if you'd like. 812 01:00:36,400 --> 01:00:43,839 » Always open to getting lower quotes and using local people. Yeah, 813 01:00:41,680 --> 01:00:47,280 » I do think this one is past the expiration date that they put in their 814 01:00:45,680 --> 01:00:49,200 proposal. So, >> we've been talking with them though. 815 01:00:48,559 --> 01:00:54,160 They just >> Okay. 816 01:00:51,920 --> 01:00:57,359 » All right. You guys got enough to go on then? 817 01:00:55,200 --> 01:00:59,760 » And another reason why this company reached out and we talked to them is 818 01:00:58,720 --> 01:01:02,799 because they were also the ones interested in bidding for uh the gateway 819 01:01:01,839 --> 01:01:06,559 signage, >> the welcome east ones. So that's how 820 01:01:04,559 --> 01:01:13,440 they kind of were always on our radar as a reputable company through um Gary Rber 821 01:01:11,280 --> 01:01:15,839 coming into town or the ones that historic 822 01:01:14,240 --> 01:01:17,599 » into town. Okay. Because we just talked about that. 823 01:01:16,400 --> 01:01:21,520 » Yes. Yes. >> It is kind of a niche kind of signage 824 01:01:19,599 --> 01:01:25,760 industry to do these structural lit signs. So, I'd want to make sure they're 825 01:01:23,760 --> 01:01:27,599 comfortable the other vendor with those same specs. But, yeah. 826 01:01:27,200 --> 01:01:33,119 » Okay. >> More more quotes better. 827 01:01:30,640 --> 01:01:39,200 » Okay. >> That takes us on to our report. 828 01:01:37,119 --> 01:01:44,880 » Trusty Goomba, >> no report. 829 01:01:41,440 --> 01:01:47,599 » All right. Trusty Ser. >> Uh, no report. 830 01:01:46,319 --> 01:01:52,799 » Trusty Sabiano, >> no report. 831 01:01:48,960 --> 01:01:58,160 » All right. And then last, >> I will just say that uh yesterday my 832 01:01:55,920 --> 01:02:03,520 wife and I were walking down the water street and 833 01:02:01,359 --> 01:02:10,079 three uh kayaks were rented out 834 01:02:06,480 --> 01:02:17,920 and the parking lot was full except for >> two empty spots and that was it. So 835 01:02:14,880 --> 01:02:22,400 » it's all getting used. That's cool. That's one. 836 01:02:19,680 --> 01:02:28,160 » Okay, Phil. Phil, 837 01:02:24,319 --> 01:02:32,160 » we went live today with the blue and they can be picked up in our lobby and 838 01:02:30,400 --> 01:02:36,720 then our office will be carrying them as well. What it is is it uh benefits 839 01:02:34,720 --> 01:02:41,359 autism awareness. So, if we pull over an autistic driver that has uh 840 01:02:39,200 --> 01:02:44,960 communication needs, doesn't communicate like like you and I would, they can hand 841 01:02:43,520 --> 01:02:49,280 the officer the blue envelope. They've got other information That just leads to 842 01:02:47,599 --> 01:02:51,200 safer stops. >> Good. 843 01:02:49,839 --> 01:02:56,720 » Awesome. >> Okay. 844 01:02:53,440 --> 01:03:00,880 » Just on Tristy Kunzy's uh report, uh we have had 35 rentals for the back. 845 01:03:00,319 --> 01:03:05,200 » How many? >> 35. 846 01:03:03,440 --> 01:03:07,920 » Um I can send that to you via email. It's uh 847 01:03:06,559 --> 01:03:11,280 » just depends on how long you're going to do it and stuff. 848 01:03:09,760 --> 01:03:14,960 » And uh 849 01:03:13,119 --> 01:03:18,720 that's awesome. Do we I mean, we're getting a cotton, 850 01:03:17,760 --> 01:03:23,680 aren't we? >> We will get a uh a payment later on the 851 01:03:21,599 --> 01:03:26,240 year for that. Yeah. Percentage. >> That's great. 852 01:03:24,160 --> 01:03:29,520 » How many weeks has it been up? >> Uh three weeks. 853 01:03:28,400 --> 01:03:31,680 » How many? >> Three weeks. 854 01:03:30,160 --> 01:03:34,000 » Three weeks. >> And we've had terrible weather, 855 01:03:33,280 --> 01:03:36,480 » right? >> Yeah. 856 01:03:34,799 --> 01:03:40,160 » And a lot of people online are saying there's no law. What? How? Why would I 857 01:03:39,599 --> 01:03:46,079 listen? That >> damn people people online are wrong. 858 01:03:42,960 --> 01:03:49,039 » It's controversial. Um, all right. Do we have anything? 859 01:03:48,400 --> 01:03:52,240 » No report. >> No report. 860 01:03:50,960 --> 01:03:57,119 » No report. >> All right. I do have one thing going off 861 01:03:54,400 --> 01:04:02,799 of online stuff. Um, I want to put it out on the video that none of us have 862 01:04:00,240 --> 01:04:06,880 signed any NDAs or anything regarding any sort of data centers or anything 863 01:04:04,720 --> 01:04:12,480 like that. And to think that I would take money from anybody is ridiculous 864 01:04:09,920 --> 01:04:16,960 and it's very insulting because if you knew how the government works, the 865 01:04:14,880 --> 01:04:22,000 trustees make the decisions, not the village president. So please educate 866 01:04:19,920 --> 01:04:25,520 yourself before you make comments online. That's all I got. 867 01:04:24,799 --> 01:04:30,400 » I had to say it. >> Trying to say we took money. 868 01:04:28,079 --> 01:04:32,319 » I don't know. East, we're Eastundee. I mean, how much money could they give 869 01:04:31,599 --> 01:04:36,880 you? >> I'll be down in South with my new 870 01:04:33,920 --> 01:04:44,160 friends. Um, okay. I'll entertain a motion to close the 871 01:04:41,039 --> 01:04:50,240 open forum and go to executive session for C6, sale of property. And we will 872 01:04:46,640 --> 01:04:54,400 not return back to open session. >> Right. I will make a motion to move to 873 01:04:52,559 --> 01:05:00,720 executive session close to the public and media under the provisions of the 874 01:04:55,839 --> 01:05:07,200 Illinois Open Meetings Act 5 ILCS 120/2 or C6 sale of property and will be 875 01:05:04,960 --> 01:05:11,520 leaving from close session and noting into open session. 876 01:05:09,359 --> 01:05:13,760 » Second. All 877 01:05:11,680 --> 01:05:17,760 » in favor? >> We need roll call. 878 01:05:16,559 --> 01:05:20,319 » Trusty Guma. >> Yes. 879 01:05:19,280 --> 01:05:22,160 Trusty Solder. >> Yes. 880 01:05:21,119 --> 01:05:23,920 » Trusty Saviano. >> Yes. 881 01:05:22,880 --> 01:05:26,920 » Trusty Kunzie. >> Yes. 882 01:05:27,039 --> 01:05:31,240 » All right. Thanks for coming in. 883 01:05:32,079 --> 01:05:36,720 » Yeah. If you got need a minute, go right ahead.