Board Meeting

Emery Water Conservancy District, UT · · More Emery Water Conservancy District, UT meetings · More Utah meetings

Transcript

Download: Text · SRT
AI TRANSCRIPT

This transcript was generated automatically from audio using AI and hasn't been reviewed by a person — it can contain mistakes, including plausible-sounding sentences that were never actually said. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record.

[0:01] Yes, there we are. It is every water concerns the district board meeting. The date is the 24th of August,
[0:10] 2000, 26, and we're meeting here at the every water concerns district boardroom, and the
[0:18] Dr. Frank is leading the meeting and it's exactly seven o'clock.
[0:27] Okay, seven o'clock, caller meeting order.
[0:33] Welcome everybody here.
[0:36] Hopefully you have a good short meeting.
[0:42] Okay, first thing on the agenda, call the order.
[0:46] Lee
[0:50] Malcolm Quicks, my name, Greg Johansson, Chris Payne,
[0:54] Brian Jensen, Cory Cloud, Dash Wynn, Gary Juegs,
[0:58] Leonard O' Magnison.
[1:00] We have no guess here tonight, so go to number two.
[1:08] A possible call for links with agenda items.
[1:14] They might have got anything that way.
[1:29] OK, we're going to number three.
[1:31] Public comment.
[1:33] and it's not any public here, no public here, so we're going number four. Disgestion,
[1:45] the approval is now in the June 22, 20, 26 minutes,
[1:56] everybody did a chance to read
[1:58] Again, anybody going to question all of that?
[2:05] Maybe we'll approve the minutes of June 22nd.
[2:09] I'll second that.
[2:11] The move, second and receptive, and it's always good.
[2:16] All right.
[2:17] Anybody opposed?
[2:20] No, nobody opposed.
[2:24] They'd number five.
[2:27] Discussion and approval would be now
[2:30] of the financial importance of voucher stickers.
[2:33] And
[2:38] you've already seen the things there that were ready to left for us.
[3:30] Who's there to do that?
[3:32] They're the drone sprayers.
[3:36] Weed sprayers.
[3:38] Where they come from?
[3:39] Right by the house.
[3:42] How long have you been here to never?
[3:43] Just be the second year.
[3:50] Never to stay out of that.
[3:56] What do you say?
[3:57] The verdict is still out.
[3:59] You don't think they're getting stuck here over there?
[4:01] I think that time is there all around.
[4:03] on. They last year we waited too long, they should maybe we were already, so I hadn't
[4:13] come back again the second time, and it seemed to be a whole lot better.
[4:23] Through the water tank.
[4:25] Our WTA, that is the company that Emory Water is kind of a partner in, we have, we have
[4:36] There were a lot of them.
[4:37] Do you mean?
[4:39] No, I don't believe.
[4:43] Is it the expanse or is it the expanse?
[4:46] It's the expanse, is it?
[4:48] Where are you at?
[4:49] 21 pounds.
[4:51] Yeah, 20,000.
[4:55] Who's wise at all?
[4:57] They uh, they uh, hold on a RWTA.
[5:02] Our WTA, they are a group that was put together several years ago to develop affordable software for these monitoring stations and things like that.
[5:14] And now we are part of the company that we also pay them dues for the software.
[5:23] Oh, yeah, that makes sense.
[5:24] Waysado used to be Grant Sado,
[5:27] but here at J.C. Jeff's old place.
[5:29] Oh, okay.
[5:30] Yeah.
[5:32] I just never heard the name before.
[5:35] I still call him Grant's or Cance.
[5:38] You know, so, yeah, I understand.
[5:42] Where, where in here would I find the repair over there to?
[5:46] Or the Grant people gone?
[5:49] Yeah, they sold it.
[5:51] The repair of the North Beach.
[5:53] It'd be all divided out.
[5:58] That's why I can't find out.
[5:59] Yes.
[6:01] What do you think of that cost?
[6:06] I can't remember.
[6:10] We were under a budget bill from what we had presented about it.
[6:14] It's like 167,000.
[6:16] Yeah, and somewhat that.
[6:20] That would appear on the last one?
[6:22] No, I'm not talking about it.
[6:23] I'm talking about it.
[6:35] That has been billed,
[6:39] isn't it, and it went, no, it's not in there, and I'm trying to remember what the bill was up top my head, I can't remember what it was.
[6:48] Did you know about that?
[6:52] I don't hold out there for you after I'll pull the bill for you that's all right I just
[6:57] wonder that we're done I have to bend that was kind of a mess here yeah there's a big
[7:02] mess that can bend avoided and I've got the point of the fingers but yeah does the screen
[7:33] What are
[7:36] resources and a lower Colorado river basin put in money for help from that every year?
[7:48] Well, and also, San Pete County, Paisis.
[7:53] We pay $25 per cent to San Pete, $25 per cent to San Pete.
[7:59] Okay, he's the other guy.
[8:03] On the tile, that guy didn't tell him how to read his source.
[8:08] So much a year or more than he did.
[8:12] He's by the hour.
[8:15] Well, we put a lemon on it or something that we did not know.
[8:19] No, we just...
[8:20] We just put it right there.
[8:22] Tyler Lekker.
[8:24] What did he do?
[8:26] This one.
[8:29] So he deals with so much time.
[8:31] When he does the meetings or does work on it, then he does.
[8:35] But it's not.
[8:37] It's just when he does the meetings or the meetings.
[8:39] He's trying to shepherd funding well and some of the political stuff for the PL566 project,
[8:51] which is the debris basins, flood control through, or up above Joe's valve.
[9:01] I don't think that we did.
[9:05] We just, as long as the project progresses, we're somehow going to miss that.
[9:11] He's been, because he's been the last couple of commissioners.
[9:16] He's been more aware of that.
[9:18] Yeah, more aware.
[9:19] Yeah, I don't have a problem with that.
[9:20] I just can't remember how we were doing.
[9:25] Any more questions on the number five?
[9:32] One more for good, yes.
[9:34] The financial report.
[9:36] I'll stick to that.
[9:38] And in the back of the day, if I find out, true reports about your state of mind, all
[9:45] in favor, any body opposed,
[9:51] no body opposed, never since the suggestion of the water
[9:57] report that
[10:02] senior packet updated as of today, and that's pretty much what we stand today.
[10:09] As far as Joe's values concerned, we're in better shape than what we anticipated a little bit, a little bit.
[10:26] There's this image print on the elevation of the north on 810, 2570.
[10:36] The last year is 58.34.
[10:41] 58.20, 58.
[10:43] You have that on the capacity.
[10:47] No, no, I don't know, that's a misprint.
[10:50] How's that?
[10:51] I don't think that idea is a misprint.
[10:52] I think it's right.
[10:56] I think don't look 47% or.
[10:59] It don't.
[11:00] It's not as terrible.
[11:08] That's only a thousand acre feet different than last year.
[11:12] There's 58.30, I hear 58.24 this year.
[11:19] So six feet, is it equal to 1180 feet before?
[11:24] That's what they say.
[11:27] I'm not the surveyor on that one, so I could tell you how I could do these.
[11:30] Look at the webpage, if that's what it's about.
[11:33] A lot of people tell us.
[11:35] That's what they say.
[11:37] It's good to have for me, I guess.
[11:40] Any question is all there.
[11:51] Any extra that's coming from Joe's Valley is just going in there right now.
[11:57] But we need that, doesn't amount to much.
[12:01] I have a ten.
[12:02] I'm going to go get some in here, pretty good.
[12:07] I don't know where they're going to get it, but they're going to eat it.
[12:12] So is anybody out there?
[12:13] Yeah, they'll be out on the first, first of September, four of those singers, if they get any extra water, headed that way.
[12:25] And the man of troubles with that, little pond, huh?
[12:28] The lower man of pond, yeah.
[12:31] So you think you ain't great?
[12:36] Well, I've trouble regulating the little man of pond all without hunting, going water.
[13:02] Yeah, there's a few, uh, a few places that I think that road is said, we need to get, well,
[13:09] that section is on the list to be clean this fall, this winter, so we'll try and build
[13:15] that banks back up again and we uh what really different on the
[13:23] more we've got that problem this year I haven't had any haven't done
[13:26] anything and have a problem last year no said sure that your buddy from Idaho
[13:31] keeps calling me it was not for me to spend on it so thank you but your buddy from
[13:35] Idaho keeps calling me wanting to spend some money on your boss break
[13:42] I didn't know how to buddy in Idaho yeah you met him down in St. George
[13:48] Oh, right.
[13:51] We don't have nothing.
[13:57] I'm glad to hear you say that because I don't want to spend that money.
[14:04] It's crazy.
[14:05] We don't have that problem this year.
[14:07] No.
[14:09] Why is that?
[14:10] We don't know.
[14:11] I say we don't know why either.
[14:18] I got a phone call the other day, being accused of putting, what's the fish killer road
[14:23] and road,
[14:26] a road, a road, a road, a road, a road, a road, a road, a road, a road, a road
[14:31] something like that, in the canals and killing honey to the north, you know what, I might be
[14:38] all, but I kind of think that could outdo this. That's that sudden. Great. Can you
[14:48] do that more? Maybe it does. Maybe it does. Wait a minute. You're talking not
[14:55] about the bank settlement. You're talking about the flow going up and down.
[15:01] Yep, it's the foes gone up and down my case, yes. No, that's what I'm saying. Yeah, I'm
[15:07] about to shore that ain't making a boss and give up a little. In fact, because of these
[15:13] floods, there have been a few days that that canals been empty. More than, more than
[15:19] a handful. And a few days. Did you spend empty?
[15:25] I don't know. I'm not sure what it's empty.
[15:27] I mean, that son is not standard at most.
[15:31] That might be.
[15:38] That's a good idea.
[15:39] We'll just empty that now.
[15:40] That's what I was thinking.
[15:42] Well.
[15:47] No.
[15:48] But it might be something you want to think about.
[15:51] You get a lost problem.
[15:54] You'd have to talk to Corey about that.
[15:59] How do you want that?
[16:00] Yeah, they're getting a little ahead of their self-knowledge.
[16:11] But, actually, over the years, we spent a lot of money on that.
[16:15] Most killer stuff.
[16:17] Yep, a whole lot of money.
[16:19] And it's dangerous.
[16:20] I don't like putting it out.
[16:22] I don't like my guys putting it out.
[16:24] You guys like it over there, fair.
[16:31] Everybody else put it out quite a bit.
[16:33] Yeah, you see the fish when you're doing that?
[16:37] Oh, yeah.
[16:38] It's come more than the leaf out of the water, what do you do?
[16:44] It's just bad news about about like bathing and rubbing alcohol or paint thinner, because
[16:51] that basically what it is, bathing.
[16:54] So whatever you're doing, do it again, maybe next year you're sick of warps.
[17:01] All right. We'll be any any questions all that we
[17:11] don't have to hold on that. Do we know?
[17:19] Okay
[17:21] The fire and clogged sheeters have to say more for amber. No
[17:27] There's a two different. See this is a different situation
[17:37] When when we went looking at the side for the money
[17:45] the site that they had proposed was going to hit fair, not money, and with the
[17:55] process, the pervading process was in the works. We had a little bit of the
[18:04] equipment already on hand, and so I made a phone call and said I need some money
[18:11] and they say as long as you don't spend over 25 you've got it and I says all right we're
[18:16] going to build another cloud seat or pit on there. With the agreement that fair
[18:21] indication like the money would help us pay with yearly maintenance which Tracy said yes
[18:28] it's a go. So there's this proposed site. Uh-huh. You just won't go with an error? No, here's the
[18:39] Colton and Dill, you had a Colton and Dill who went up and found the site at a day that
[18:45] the meeting is in the works and the only question we got is it might be on the fish lake
[18:52] type side.
[18:53] Not my computer.
[18:56] Was that?
[18:56] Had to go clear white.
[18:58] Yeah.
[18:58] Probably.
[19:00] Yeah, even towards Mary's nipple.
[19:02] It sounds like Mary's nipple.
[19:05] Why not?
[19:06] I don't remember.
[19:07] I'm not.
[19:07] Okay.
[19:14] What's that side of?
[19:17] It's a 12 mile, or even quick, even to grow right there.
[19:23] What's the kind of drop and be able to pass you your troop then?
[19:28] You can do that.
[19:31] That one should end both really.
[19:34] You think I wanted that, too?
[19:37] You want the Farron or the better, fair, fair,
[19:39] and would be 30, 12 miles wide, you know?
[19:44] Maybe we'll add one there someday.
[19:47] I'm all about it.
[19:48] I love it.
[19:52] That's more the better.
[19:53] I hope so.
[19:54] I hope so.
[19:56] Anyway, so that's just kind of an informational thing
[19:58] that I needed to inform you on.
[20:00] We don't need it.
[20:01] that's what I'm doing.
[20:04] I'm proving myself, and I figured it was a known and lost.
[20:14] Yes. So
[20:21] if anything, the board role on that senior deal, or not, or get to go, that was an informational deal.
[20:29] Okay.
[20:34] Discussion, approval of the BL 5-6-inch project. I forgot what that was.
[20:44] That project is the project that we've been working on for six years now for the debris
[20:51] base since about Joe's bath. That's what that's about.
[20:59] One on the ceiling, one on the aisle, are you right?
[21:02] Correct. The fire and black canyon is kind of
[21:11] put us in panic mode. And so we decided to go after
[21:17] work emergency water protection money as opposed
[21:21] to waiting on these other deals with PL566 for those. Okay, I'll let you continue on with that.
[21:39] So I'm going to give you a little historical rundown here.
[21:45] We got worried about fires about
[21:47] of Joe's life, years ago.
[21:51] And applied for public law 566 watershed money,
[21:56] similar to what Farron built, mill site work.
[22:02] And our pitch at that time was, we
[22:06] really needed to prepare ourselves in case there's a fire.
[22:13] We need to have these structures in place not only for fire
[22:18] of it for erosion control.
[22:21] Well, after we got going, it was approved, and we were approved
[22:27] on that basis. And after about a year at NCS combined and informed us that they couldn't
[22:37] justify a watershed project, something that was going to happen. It had to be something
[22:44] that was already happening.
[22:48] And so we had to analyze the sediment.
[22:52] I think you have some idea of the sediment that was being
[22:58] deposited in the reservoir.
[23:01] So we had what we call a bathometrics survey.
[23:05] That's where they analyze ground in the water under the water.
[23:13] Then you compare that to the original contours, 1962, and you come up with how much reservoir
[23:25] you've lost in the last 50 years, and that was fairly informative.
[23:35] We found that the bottom pretty well filled in up to the how that works, and we found
[23:44] that most of the sediment was in the upper, actually, upper 16 feet.
[23:53] So the delta, you see, come down, see the curriculum out of water, that's the bulk of the
[24:03] seven right there.
[24:09] What we found that that seven amount was about half of what was
[24:18] expected by the Bureau of the Report in a definite plan report in 1962.
[24:27] They estimated
[24:31] I think 10,000 acre feet lost in 100 years, which would be 5,000.
[24:39] And I think we came up with about 20, 200 or 300 acre feet that have been lost in 53 years.
[24:51] So now we're in trouble with the sediment.
[24:56] We're not building enough sediment to justify the water shape, but what we've also discovered
[25:05] and there's no way to prove a lot of it is that most of the sediment is grabbed on
[25:13] through the reservoir and down the creek,
[25:19] and then we're catching it on our water reservoir
[25:23] or a kitchen and then a filtered land of the water treatment plants.
[25:28] And we're catching up in a so easy diversion and we're catching up in CCNH.
[25:33] The CCNH can out.
[25:39] District spending, we finally figured almost a hundred thousand here.
[25:45] And even with that said, it was in the canals.
[25:52] Castle Valley is spending 30 to 40,000 years of building new buildings and then the
[26:02] backwash, the plant has to backwash more often so that water goes back and out that we
[26:11] lose that water because it's a bubbler version, it's no great loss but it's a problem for
[26:18] them to create something so much. So we've made an effort to justify the fact that we've
[26:28] got a normal watershed, and yes, we're producing that much sediment. It's just not standing
[26:39] And we got downstream damage occurring, which is just as bad as if we were losing passing
[26:49] in the reservoir.
[26:50] And more effect downstream.
[26:55] So we thus slowed the whole process down.
[27:01] That's why it's been so tedious.
[27:03] The other thing that slowed it down is that the funding dropped out from under a sun was that two years ago?
[27:10] Two years ago, yeah.
[27:12] And the district stepped up, what would you spend?
[27:15] $2,000?
[27:16] I don't think it's quite standard.
[27:18] Yeah, it was close.
[27:20] It was $175.
[27:22] $175?
[27:23] Yeah.
[27:24] To keep it alive.
[27:25] But the NRCS would have been more happy to drop the watershed from the entire, in fact,
[27:36] they're still then dragging their peaks, been dragging this thing, and keep asking for this, and asking for that.
[27:44] At one point there was an argument over it, whether it was a flood control measure or a medication bag.
[27:52] And the funding was tied to, they didn't want to do.
[27:57] Well, yeah, it was a flood control project and that's 100%.
[28:05] Yeah, they changed the definition on us.
[28:08] So they changed the definition on us.
[28:11] So it was a 75-25.
[28:14] And we resisted that, that took six or nine months
[28:19] We finally got an official statement out of the upper echelon of the NRCS, but yeah,
[28:27] this was a flood project, not something else, not a watershed project.
[28:33] We've jumped through a thousand or so last.
[28:37] Could you kind of prove, couldn't you, right now, what that late means?
[28:40] Well, it kind of proves your theory, what you're saying about that.
[28:43] That said, we're going through the red horn down, because if you go up there right now,
[28:46] whether it's just a ditch, where the flowery water comes in,
[28:50] you've got all settled, you've got settled and built up.
[28:53] Every thing is just a ditch, it goes through.
[28:55] But the very first that this summer when you have a massive
[28:59] intense storm tide on the face of grandma,
[29:03] is the weather as well.
[29:05] And that produced a whole bunch of flood mud crap in it.
[29:11] The whole thing, I'd like to do the weather as well.
[29:13] It was the very first time I said,
[29:15] that you guys on the lower amount of text that said,
[29:19] you can lose your water.
[29:21] That storm, the creek was clear.
[29:24] The reservoir was clear.
[29:26] I tell the storm hit.
[29:27] The reservoir was still clear as could be.
[29:30] But the water coming out of Joe's Valley was bad.
[29:35] Because it was a really great food.
[29:37] It ran yesterday.
[29:38] And you can see a clear, I don't know about,
[29:43] Sealy creek, but lowering water, where we're working right now, I look at it every time I drive by it there.
[29:48] We had to say thing in south water. When we read that it had been settler's fault, but there we moved with it.
[29:54] When we thought that it worked great, but that water instead of coming in and stopping on a settler's...
[30:00] It just made a ditch underneath, so this water was staying up here, leaves the print down underneath. It was just a ditch through there. I'm wrong straight through. I think that's what you're going to do tonight, man. You want to see mud coming through the reservoir.
[30:22] That water, that's what it looks like. That's what was coming out of the middle side. Plugged up the whole water treatment plant. Couldn't even turn it out.
[30:35] had to shut it down. They had three-day storage of water or whatever they had in the tank.
[30:44] We had to flush the bottom of the dam just to get water that was treatable.
[30:52] So you want to see sediment. We had that flood hit the other day.
[31:00] It's just, go drive down the boat dock at Farron at Millside right now, you'll just see
[31:09] what can happen.
[31:12] It's just crazy.
[31:15] Logs, mud, rocks, came down drywalls.
[31:21] Biggest flood we've had.
[31:22] I've seen it in 50 years.
[31:30] We're in, we're in, we're in, we're in near trouble, we really are big trouble, because
[31:37] it's all, it's right next to the outlet works, you don't want to get in, so I don't know
[31:43] what we're going to do, but he adds a heck of a mask.
[31:48] So I'll finish my little story.
[31:52] So at this point in time, all the need was done on a project that we wanted to build up there.
[32:04] And borrowers, it was only used in the disposal area, the disposal material.
[32:10] All that, all the need was completed.
[32:15] So, the environmental, all the environmental cultural studies are completed, they are completed.
[32:23] Now we hit this juncture, we need a structure up there before next spring.
[32:30] And now we've got, we have got a proof of, there's no permits, all we've done is just the
[32:36] work.
[32:36] and so now we're trying to figure out how we can take that effort that's been accomplished
[32:46] how we can pull that out and go for funding to the federal or state or whatever we can do.
[32:55] We need about six million dollars but
[33:02] District has sometimes that they could participate
[33:06] in a 75 or 25 or even a 50-50, but they couldn't do a 50-50 necessarily borrow money.
[33:22] So, yeah, we're in a limbo state right now trying to figure out how we can use the work that's already been accomplished
[33:32] and get funds and get some construction going to the point next thing.
[33:39] This is what you were of the daily needs for the funding of the emergency water protection act.
[33:47] If we get into that money, it would probably deplete our capital reinvestment fund into
[34:01] a pool
[34:10] especially with the idea that in a couple of years, well, unofficially, I've been told
[34:19] in a couple of years, Jill's Valley will be on the top.
[34:24] That's for being projects.
[34:27] Yeah, we have a major project.
[34:31] So,
[34:37] you've already read a letter.
[34:40] You've probably been in a letter.
[34:45] He can.
[34:46] I've got a letter into he can.
[34:49] We've been in contact with the younger's office.
[34:55] emergency department. Division of emergency services are managing something like that.
[35:02] I've been in contact with them that have no money.
[35:08] There could be possibility we could get
[35:12] some money from Colorado River.
[35:17] It would take some creative thinking I talked to him this morning
[35:20] about that. And he says, yeah, there's a possibility that we have to just create a thinking.
[35:32] They want water and return.
[35:38] So that efforts kind of floundering around at the moment.
[35:42] The
[35:47] duration of the fire, the impacting, the ownership, the exterior and the other side of the
[35:53] case, the other side of the paperwork. I'm saying, have you went up and looked at the
[35:57] fire and you know, have deemed it like we're going to be in trouble?
[36:01] It's going to be a mess. Yeah.
[36:03] You know, I'm going to have to turn the logs, put that in and work.
[36:07] Yeah, but where else?
[36:08] So it's just, it's this thing kind of a way, the game right now then.
[36:11] wait for, and what's next to get in place, say that again, and say this whole thing, just
[36:21] got to wait and get, wait for all the agencies to get in place for an agency to be sympathetic
[36:28] to us.
[36:31] As far as the comments are concerned, the only one that we don't have back is the Forest Service
[36:36] correct.
[36:46] I think I'm going to give him a deadline on October 1st, I think on October 1st.
[36:57] I read that today.
[37:03] Somebody here that our hands is tied for doubt, actually.
[37:09] We don't have the funds.
[37:14] We could literally, we might go up and just build the one, build one of those.
[37:21] Like we did on the dining and
[37:26] on the course of this.
[37:30] I'm not sure.
[37:31] I think you'd have to have a straight encroachment for metting on.
[38:05] I think it's been going on for several years.
[38:15] We discussed this when, it was two years ago when the district put in the money to keep
[38:22] things going.
[38:24] And we discussed it at that meeting and that's when we got tired of it.
[38:28] When we put the money again, we put the discussion approval in that case.
[38:34] Do you discuss it if there's something needed for you?
[38:37] But that's when we decided to let it, to keep going with it rather than let it die with all the money we've spent.
[38:46] Great.
[38:49] Great move to number nine.
[38:52] I have a few of them.
[38:54] Everybody else is.
[38:57] Okay.
[38:58] Number nine.
[39:00] Discussion of approval or denial of failure.
[39:04] and giving you a flood play and shore water management conference.
[39:11] There is a conference in Logan, the end of this month.
[39:15] The end of this month, the end of October.
[39:18] The end of this month.
[39:20] Yeah, the end of September.
[39:26] Kyle would like to go to,
[39:30] not really because it will be a learning thing
[39:33] but because of the shoulders that he could, he could rub and possibly some funding sources
[39:42] of that as well. According to our policy, the board needs to approve the travel expenses
[39:50] or potential travel expenses. And that's why we've got Kyle on here so we need a discussion
[39:58] and approval attempt to attend that vote.
[40:00] So it would be government fees.
[40:04] Hotel.
[40:05] Hotel.
[40:06] It's a travel.
[40:07] Good idea.
[40:10] Good idea.
[40:11] Do you guys know what your status was?
[40:13] What cows do it?
[40:15] Absolutely.
[40:16] Your?
[40:17] Yes.
[40:19] Yep.
[40:21] So we want to do a vote.
[40:23] Do you have a boardwalk?
[40:24] Do you send him up there?
[40:33] I know.
[40:35] I'll just say that.
[40:41] Get some more seconds.
[40:43] In the second percent, tell us to look all first.
[40:48] All in favor.
[40:49] Aye.
[40:51] Anybody opposed?
[40:53] No opposed.
[40:57] Okay, number 10.
[40:59] Discussion and approval are now
[41:01] of Utah water years or seven
[41:05] October, 27th.
[41:08] But the Utah Water Users Association have an annual meeting.
[41:17] This one's in light, and it's on the 27th.
[41:20] Really there's no discussion or approval or denial or anything there, it's just an informational
[41:24] thing.
[41:26] Everybody's invited if you want to go.
[41:29] The co-will send you the information as we get it and let us know and we'll get you registered
[41:34] if you want to go.
[41:41] I've got a copy of the agenda.
[41:44] I want to hear it.
[41:46] It came today.
[41:47] Yeah, just barely.
[41:48] I got one too.
[41:49] Oh, okay.
[41:49] I'm going for it.
[41:50] I'm pretty disappointed in the agenda.
[41:53] I have a lot of creativity.
[41:55] I don't want to go.
[41:57] That's good to know.
[41:58] Yeah, I went for a copy earlier today.
[42:01] I'll have to think about it.
[42:02] I sit on that board, and yeah, there was a conversation
[42:06] about Orrin and Out of Ideas.
[42:09] Ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha.
[42:15] I can get it smart, is it?
[42:18] Start writing them down.
[42:19] I know some of the board that's not going to this.
[42:24] Yeah, that'll go.
[42:25] Win.
[42:26] So let's go.
[42:27] Let's draw this down, huh?
[42:29] Well, send them out to you guys in the email.
[42:31] I'll let you know, then if it's something you want
[42:33] to go to, let me know.
[42:34] It's just a one-day meeting.
[42:36] This is just on the 27th.
[42:38] Yeah.
[42:39] Kind of wants a year deal, or what is that?
[42:41] Yeah.
[42:41] They have that one.
[42:43] They have the one in St. George.
[42:44] It's the big one in the, in the winner of spring, I guess, in this.
[42:52] Which is a good one.
[42:54] Anybody who can.
[42:56] How to think about the castle.
[42:58] Tell you that.
[43:01] The one in March?
[43:02] Yeah.
[43:03] Yeah.
[43:04] Okay, we're done with number 11, discussion approval or denial of Utah Association of Special District
[43:15] Conference in November 4th to the 6th.
[43:21] That is another meeting that's held in late annually and we are a special district and
[43:28] That is the place where your districts go to learn all the laws, the procedures, and
[43:36] also the call if I'm correct, if I'm not wrong, to get certified to sit on a board, is that correct?
[43:41] Well, thank you for the training for the first time in training.
[43:46] You guys are doing great.
[43:48] For sure.
[43:50] I think it's a good, good progression.
[43:52] I know that I'm poor.
[43:54] I'm poor fully trained.
[43:58] If not, I know somebody that would be glad to try again.
[44:00] That's my way.
[44:02] When we come home from that,
[44:04] and there's only some things on the agenda,
[44:06] like going along on that,
[44:09] Yeah.
[44:09] Yeah.
[44:11] Where's it?
[44:12] It's a business.
[44:14] You guys put it in a dress.
[44:17] It's my soul cut and dried.
[44:19] Yes.
[44:20] Yeah.
[44:21] Yeah.
[44:22] I don't know.
[44:23] I don't know.
[44:26] Some of the ladies are opposed to districts.
[44:30] And they keep trying to either limit them by law
[44:34] or get rid of them entirely.
[44:37] So, yes, we need to keep up on all of that,
[44:45] find ourselves without a job.
[44:48] Right?
[44:49] That was a good one.
[44:51] It was a good one.
[44:52] It was a good one.
[44:55] It's really thing, and that anyone on this board wants to bring up.
[45:06] All speaker was. I'd like to bring up a motion to adjourn this evening.
[45:16] Yes, we'll entertain a motion to adjourn. You got it right there. Plain, I already said it.
[45:24] I'll check it that.