[This transcript was generated automatically from audio using AI and hasn't been reviewed by a person -- it can contain mistakes, including plausible-sounding sentences that were never actually said. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record.]

[0:02] We are going to have a meeting with the public office.
[0:08] We have a meeting with the public.
[0:11] It's the meeting.
[0:13] It's the meeting.
[0:16] We have to do a meeting.
[0:19] Okay.
[0:21] That meeting out.
[0:23] Great.
[0:24] John, if you want to make wrong call.
[0:27] It's not good.
[0:29] That's out of total.
[0:30] Alright.
[0:31] How
[0:33] you?
[0:35] Yes, like in years.
[0:36] I'm doing this.
[0:37] Here.
[0:37] Just take that.
[0:39] Here.
[0:40] Here.
[0:40] Can you give me any extra?
[0:45] Here.
[0:46] I've got your shuff, there.
[0:48] Somewhere, so.
[0:49] To mine.
[0:51] Oh, hang on.
[0:52] We have to go.
[0:53] We think we're going to get started.
[0:54] We have fiveления earrings tonight.
[0:57] The sign up should in the front is for you.
[0:59] One if you sign up.
[1:01] Some of y'all didn't put the amount that I want the agenda, if you didn't, and you still want to sign up to speak tonight.
[1:08] We would appreciate that.
[1:10] We have another sheet we can put out there.
[1:13] They said it's
[1:18] all for the first one.
[1:20] I think we're done, but I can put that on as well.
[1:24] So I think our wants to be for any of the items with sign up to so we can call on you.
[1:31] All right, we're going to get started with the public hearing for a request of Z-2601 proposed text
[1:38] and MS regarding, especially, oriented business based shops, game scale partners and tattooed studios.
[1:45] The proposed text and MS for section 2.1, third, zero, section 3.2, the zero, the section 3.3,
[1:53] zero and section 4.50. So with the public hearings, we're going to have staff make a presentation
[2:00] and I'll open the public here and we'll have to go into the statement side up. We also have
[2:07] the new gadget that times you. So we get three minutes and when you get up to the podium,
[2:12] you'll see that you have a regular level like a regular level. So at one minute, a yellow light
[2:16] and then go on. And with red one goes on, you know, to wrap up so that everyone gets a chance to
[2:22] you know, we asked for a trap door, but they didn't put that in the
[2:25] section.
[2:27] All right.
[2:28] So we're going to start with for a one presentation by
[2:32] staff.
[2:33] Yes.
[2:34] Good evening commissioner.
[2:38] To provide a brief synopsis of the purpose of this text
[2:42] amendment.
[2:43] I know there's a lot of questions out there on what the city's trying to
[2:48] do by making these changes.
[2:50] And what we're attempting to do is provide more
[2:55] restrictions or these types of uses to get ahead of the game when they do come in and try
[3:00] to protect the areas of the community, the residential areas. And so we're placing these in
[3:09] an M2 districts, which are medium and if capturing, they tend we only have about three areas in
[3:15] the city that are so into manufacturing. And if you see on the markets those green areas,
[3:23] the Dan is circling with the cursor. It's when we'd love for their providing more protection
[3:32] to our residential districts and other retail and general business districts. And so this,
[3:40] this is not to make it easier for these types of businesses to come in, it's to provide more
[3:45] guidance on where they can go and protect other districts from those types of uses.
[3:53] Therefore, to just get started with the changes that are made to this, to the ordinance.
[4:01] We are adding definitions of these types of businesses, including CBD.
[4:09] And I can go more into it if you'd like.
[4:11] There are quite a bit of changes in this amendment.
[4:14] Definition for CBD. Definition for E cigarette. Game of skill-parallel, sexually oriented business, smoke tobacco, CBD, CED store, tattoo studio, tobacco, tobacco paraphernalia, tobacco product, bake shop, and papers smoking services.
[4:38] Now, most of those uses other than the sexually oriented businesses are the ordinances being
[4:47] amended to add those uses to the C2 commercial district, but they will be subject to a conditional
[4:56] use permit.
[4:57] So our conditional use permit chart will be amended to list these uses and require in addition
[5:04] to a BNSE2, they will also have to go before the mining and selling commission and city council
[5:12] for review and approval of the proposed use within that C2 district.
[5:22] In addition to that, we are adding guidelines as to distances that these uses are going to be
[5:30] to be from from other uses. And for the vape shop, the game of skill,
[5:38] parlor, and the tattoo studio, the conditional use permit required.
[5:44] The conditional use permit will also require the distance requirements.
[5:47] And they're all the same. It's five hundred feet measured property line
[5:51] to property line from school, public or private, a family day care home,
[5:57] child care facility, use center, community center, recreational facility,
[6:01] park church, religious institution, hospital, or other similar uses
[6:06] where children regularly gather. In addition to that,
[6:10] tattoos, all those uses shall not be located within 1,500 feet, measured,
[6:16] property lines, and property lines from another of the same use. So, from
[6:21] either another tattoo studio or from another big shop, they will additionally
[6:26] have to meet that 1500 distance requirement from each other.
[6:32] And any, it also states that
[6:34] any of these types of uses that are legally existing on the effective date of this when this
[6:40] ordinance is enacted, they may continue to operate as non-conforming uses and they'll not be required
[6:46] to obtain the condition of use permit. If they're already in existence when this is adopted.
[6:52] However, any change or expansion of that non-conforming use show required compliance with this
[6:57] and require a condition we use permit.
[7:02] Now, the sexually oriented business estate in earlier
[7:05] would be listed under M2 Medmedium Manufacturing Districts
[7:10] with the additional required requirement of the condition we use permit,
[7:15] which will vote before K&Z and City Council for public hearing
[7:20] and consideration review and consideration.
[7:24] In addition, we do have the sessions.
[7:30] Six, which talks about, essentially, oriented businesses. It also talks about our chapter 26 of our
[7:37] code of ordinances. And there, it talks about the location restrictions. And I looked at a minute ago,
[7:42] it's a thousand feet. It's worth the code of ordinances. I'll read this from all those similar uses,
[7:48] left schools and churches and datecares. So in addition to the condition or use permit requirement,
[7:55] and it will require those distances also.
[8:01] Therefore, staff is making a recommendation
[8:03] that this be approved with these proposed
[8:08] or maintenance and available for questions.
[8:13] Thank you, sir.
[8:15] All right, I'm going to open the public hearing
[8:18] and I will call the names out to sign up for this.
[8:22] All right, I'm going to get off to the public hearing.
[8:30] Thank you very much. And thank you for your work on all this. Thank you for your work, too.
[8:36] But when I found this out about this amendment, I would represent the Good Samaritan Center,
[8:41] we're located at 140 Industrial Loop, which happens to be in the end too.
[8:46] And wanted to make sure that y'all are aware of some of the things that are on industrial,
[8:51] with there is a church on industrial with there is MHD, which is right next to part of our building.
[8:58] There's our clinic. There is new to Verizon, which is a adult daycare, and then there's also
[9:03] another nonprofit to our north. And so it's a tricky day. And also the county jails there and other
[9:10] places. And so it's a tricky area to have these businesses. And as I looked, and I completely appreciate
[9:18] the idea that M2 seems like a reasonable thing, but when you look at the one on
[9:23] highway street, that's supposed to be for primary school. It's also supposed to
[9:28] the high school and fairly close to the new middle school. And then, out on
[9:32] tidy day, all year close to the ground, you're close to the new sports fields and all
[9:38] those things. So, I don't even be your decision. I don't even be your work, but I wanted
[9:43] to make sure y'all are aware that there are some pretty sensitive areas in sensitive
[9:47] clientele, especially on industrial loot, go out there. There are really only a couple of
[9:53] manufacturing places out there at this point with SRM and maybe the T-shirt place that
[10:01] outside of that is pretty limited. So I wanted to make sure you're aware, one of my
[10:07] guess my protests that I would not welcome those businesses to be close to us and the other non-profits
[10:12] that are near us, and thank you for your time. I appreciate it.
[10:18] Thank you. Thank you, John.
[10:22] Dan McCoy.
[10:26] Well, thank you for letting me be here today. I'm Dean McCoy. I'm the CEO of Coventry
[10:29] Chocolate, and we're actually looking to run next door to the center that he was just talking
[10:34] about. It's a pleasure to be here, and I want to talk about this issue, because I think
[10:39] people often don't think about what he into means, it's just to be anything. So I've been
[10:48] week in home here and when I stepped out and said,
[10:50] yeah, oh, I came to French for a lot.
[10:52] Could we have a manufacturing facility?
[10:54] And could we make functional chocolate?
[10:57] So we looked around and we found this amazing spot
[10:59] at the center.
[11:00] We just talked about it.
[11:02] And that very had not been really developed.
[11:05] It certainly has some good structures or some great businesses
[11:08] there, but not a lot of development.
[11:10] So we acquired a building.
[11:12] We built two billion dollars in building
[11:14] the most technologically sophisticated chocolate
[11:16] after it in the Southern United States,
[11:18] here in Florida, as far as almost five years ago,
[11:21] I spent an amazing run in.
[11:23] We recruited local people, we trained them here
[11:26] as chocolateiers, and we recruited people from
[11:28] other towns, we trained local people to be chocolateiers,
[11:30] and we then able to be remarkably successful,
[11:33] it's doing an amazing run in.
[11:34] I showed you guys from some of you
[11:36] sitting on this panel on where we should put
[11:38] in a community factory, the facility,
[11:40] and not in contract with various
[11:41] like it down to a very spark,
[11:42] but to actually do it in various crank results.
[11:45] We put in landscaping and building and we brought in a million dollars of equipment from
[11:50] at the time.
[11:50] And I mean, for about a country to build this technology factory, and so it's created
[11:56] an amazing place.
[11:57] And right, these are before I came, we were like 30 minutes closing to that, because we had
[12:00] eight children in the shop, actually, that it came and visited the top of that.
[12:04] So we have a retail presence there in it, in fact, so I've provided two pages of written
[12:09] notes, and that are a really, really small file, and so you're going to have to look
[12:13] concentrated to read them, but I think this recommendation is a little bit
[12:17] discounted. This is an area that is gateway corridor to Prince
[12:21] Burke. It is right off to 90. We're a less than a hundred yards. We're at all
[12:26] the people coming in to the downtown. You know, the city is actually supported
[12:30] putting a tourist on it, actually pointing down at this area to the
[12:34] top of the factory. And, of course, the tax thought and their remarkable
[12:38] ability is holding up to the approval of that, but the city was strong enough
[12:41] step up and actually support it. So I would encourage you to go back to drawing work a little bit,
[12:46] because I think this is an issue that we need many other cities are actually restricting
[12:51] these businesses. They're not expanding opportunities. So I would say go back to drawing work.
[12:57] This isn't the right recommendation for this particular area for sure. I do not in be your decision.
[13:02] I do understand the pressures that have been on the city and these are not easy decisions
[13:06] been having legally and regulatory lives, but I would encourage you to take them to look. I think
[13:12] this is an area that is a success story. We certainly put our factory there because you
[13:17] had to do often so that we could actually grow this area. I'd like to think that all the buildings
[13:21] in our area that are now paying you to black and the landscaping that is now done that we play
[13:26] a part in action sparring done. And so I would hope that you would attempt them to take this.
[13:31] Thank you, Susan.
[13:32] Thank you.
[13:35] Is that an answer?
[13:37] Okay.
[13:38] It's an answer.
[13:44] Thank you very much for the opportunity to express my opinion on this particular issue.
[13:49] And I just, basically, want to echo a lot of things that are, as I said, I'm the owner of
[13:54] a professional business building there by the cross street from the council, the police department.
[14:03] And we've been there since finished the building in 2008.
[14:07] We've been there a long time, and we established that business in order to provide a
[14:12] professional building where people could have applied area for the business and larger areas.
[14:19] And so we had our business there a while until I retired.
[14:23] And now we rent the building just by and up into several tenants.
[14:27] One is the church that's previously mentioned.
[14:29] And we have a nonprofit, and we have a global accountants and a building contractor.
[14:41] And so they like the area because they get this quiet, it's a professional, and we're
[14:49] able to meet those needs and maybe we can better open years to make sure that it's that
[14:54] time of area.
[14:54] And the white comic is that this allowing these types of businesses.
[15:00] The scenario will beg if the impact, not only my business, the other business in the area, and I think the decrease of property values.
[15:08] I think it will take on the rest of the tennis professional tennis harder to get.
[15:15] And I just think that for all the other reasons that I've mentioned, it's not a good idea to allow these types of businesses in that kick the area.
[15:24] And I would say some of the things, but basically it's basically equity, some things that I've already said, so thank you very much for the opportunity.
[15:36] Thank you.
[15:40] Read the Davis.
[15:42] Thank you.
[15:47] Thank you for letting me speak.
[15:49] I am read the Davis.
[15:51] I work in the area that Mr. Manz just spoke of,
[15:55] around in this room. But I would also like to echo what Mr. Willenay said a little earlier.
[16:05] Going to the Highways Street area, besides the primary school be there, there is a church.
[16:13] Almost directly across the street from the primary school, and I know if I'm sure if they have youth meetings during the week.
[16:25] Department of Complex where some folks have had some unfortunate situations in their life,
[16:33] some of them being addictions now live in that of the Department of Complex, but
[16:39] possibly are not capable of keeping a full-time job due to their addictions and recovery process.
[16:48] Moving over to just for a loop area, of course, there is a spichail right there and I seek a spichail.
[16:56] People are turned loose sometimes, and they're facing here waiting for some kind of vibe or Uber or something like that to pick them up.
[17:06] We have a church right there also.
[17:09] Tuesday evenings, they have an addiction program, and it's not just a K&A.
[17:16] education, such as drugs and sex addiction. One other night a week, they have a youth program that
[17:24] means one evening a week every week you're around. The municipal court is also with Mr. Nancy's
[17:34] of complex and one evening I believe it's twice a month and I'm not certain. I just found out about
[17:40] meeting in 522. So I'm not nearly as well prepared as the other speakers. But municipal court does
[17:48] hold a view court evening, starting at 5 o'clock. And I believe it's one evening twice a month.
[17:58] They have counselors coming in, a lot of the teenagers come. And so there's a certain evening
[18:06] set aside for them. Moving on around to the women's shelter, a lot of these women that are there
[18:13] had to leave their home and not much of anything in the dead of night due to abuse,
[18:20] maybe sexual abuse, not necessarily. Some of those women have their children with them.
[18:28] Moving on around to the good Samaritan. There are children that come to the good Samaritan
[18:34] with their parents or grandparents, I've seen children there quite often.
[18:41] Okay, there's one to be sure that I'll track there. And then talking about across the street
[18:47] from the gestural room, Fort Lawrence Scott, and the center that you should be the
[18:53] parent for nature here at the center, they have a lot of youth groups also. Thank you for the time
[18:59] all of your work. Thank you, Stavis,
[19:05] you come by home. Stop.
[19:07] Okay, got it. All right, Dave White,
[19:16] thank you.
[19:18] Dave White, thank you again for all that you do.
[19:22] I know there's some difficult situations for you to have to think too.
[19:26] I would kind of echo what has been said. I'm concerned.
[19:34] And I am building on Adams, and that is not directly related to this, and, however, whatever,
[19:44] what is directly related to this is the mission is that we have to face as a community.
[19:50] It seems to me that I would be delighted for someone here to recognize this idea that this is opening a door
[20:00] that we would never be able to shut again, and that's my concern, is that this is opening the avenue for things that we don't want to have in front of you.
[20:13] And that's my concern.
[20:15] The other concern is that we're lumping these all together, as if they all are all the same level.
[20:21] And I don't believe they are.
[20:23] these issues should be tied to pick together.
[20:27] So those are my concerns. Number one, this is opening a door.
[20:32] And are you have challenges enough in this town instead of opening a door
[20:38] to issues that could be detrimental to them?
[20:43] I think we should open doors that could be beneficial to them.
[20:48] And so I'm just very concerned that this is a crack in the door
[20:52] And I'm very concerned about the rippling effect of this.
[20:57] That it won't stop here.
[20:59] It won't stop for this decision that you have to make.
[21:04] This is just the beginning of the decisions.
[21:07] And so I had to spread it.
[21:09] We'd like to just say, I'm absolutely opposed to being into that.
[21:15] And why do we end up in what Arizona?
[21:17] We're going to decide.
[21:23] Okay, there's no one else here that's inside up on allow a couple more people that's speaking between sign up.
[21:34] And then I'm going to close that with hearing.
[21:39] And we will go to take action on it for those text and visit.
[21:44] I will put comments and questions from them.
[21:49] just to clarify, just to clarify as we come.
[21:54] Currently, all those functions are well bought right.
[22:00] And then some just to correct.
[22:02] Yes, they could be allowed.
[22:04] And so this makes it more restrictive.
[22:08] And that's the distance requirements.
[22:11] By law, I correct me.
[22:12] Make where you might claim further by law.
[22:15] We need to provide some place for them to go.
[22:19] We can't just say none can come into the city we can provide guidelines on where they can go and us what we're trying to do get ahead of it right now.
[22:30] Unpreposed, not, you know, a location, a specific location, it's not being considered. We have an application for a month. This is to get ahead of if it being happened in the future and have better criteria to where they could go, what they would have to be, what restrictions they'd have to meet before they could locate and that place.
[22:52] just to the general public this the reason with us we proposed or brought this up a couple
[22:58] months back and the primary purpose of it is put in place a conditionary use permit that gives us
[23:04] a chance to know that because technically they can talk in the organization he gives us the chance
[23:09] to put it before public scrutiny and public hearings and those before planning is on it and it also
[23:13] goes to proceed counsel that's not in place now so this is not a bad thing this is something to get
[23:22] place. So I make a cut you off. Now that's fine. I make that spreadsheet. Is this on? Can you hear me? Yes, okay.
[23:32] Yeah, I think it's important, especially in relation to the safe training or any business
[23:36] regulations. We already have those in place in our ordinances, but we have to identify
[23:42] zoning districts where they could possibly go. Usually we're trying to restrict those so that they don't
[23:49] that surrounding residential users in some retail
[23:53] uses as much as other parts of the town,
[23:56] plus the distance regulations,
[23:59] which we already have business regulations
[24:00] and our orders for those types of businesses.
[24:03] It's important to have those there.
[24:05] There are states that have been done academic
[24:09] and other council studies to support the distance
[24:12] that we have separated in our lives from churches, schools,
[24:16] and other similar uses, no we can't completely restrict the areas available in town to ban
[24:24] the property, that's impossible under federal law. The other uses that we're addressing in
[24:31] this order, where I'll put in one of this for consideration about PNC, they could be handled separately,
[24:39] But there's been a lot of interests in particular and lately in the Bay uses, for,
[24:46] the history of Texas has to be, has been to treat.
[24:49] The Bay shops, the same as tobacco stores, and we're pretty much preempted by
[24:55] the state wall and regulation of tobacco locations.
[24:58] So the general retail is only, so we kind of, in this case,
[25:03] stepped out a little bit to regulate our proposed regulation on that stops to try to
[25:12] alleviate the growth of both shops over time to reduce the level of growth and also to
[25:19] protect certain sensitive users from those as well. Mainland users that young people
[25:26] pre-foot.
[25:29] So it was a good point though that this is several uses that are put into one ordinance
[25:33] but they in the uses are not the same but some of the regulatory authority we have are similar.
[25:39] So that's why it was brought to you as one of our plans.
[25:43] I'd be happy to answer your question.
[25:46] So you make up that question for me.
[25:51] First thing.
[25:52] A question for Mr. McKay.
[25:58] You're a business, but I heard the children actually.
[26:08] Susanna.
[26:10] Under Chapter 26.
[26:13] Does it say that one is what is the distance threshold?
[26:20] It cannot be within a thousand feet of a residential subdivision.
[26:28] That's correct.
[26:30] So, therefore, if you took it, we pulled up a Google Earth map.
[26:37] And I'm going to say, I'm going to pinpoint the chocolate factory.
[26:42] You had the opportunity tonight to bring Sam here.
[26:54] It's like some of us really need Thomas, not too lazy to leave and go.
[27:00] Okay, so if we won't let the Google round and through a thousand foot circle around your business, I think that would include every bit of industrial load.
[27:14] But it did, and all we had to do was about to do is draw a circle around
[27:21] 30s for the church, and that would get the rest of them.
[27:25] So I think the intent of this ordinance is to say, this is where they're allowed to,
[27:33] they're allowed to exist in these zoning areas. And one thing that we've heard tonight
[27:39] It was probably unwise to talk.
[27:43] You've got three that are at C1 and one that is in the United
[27:49] Church.
[27:50] But all the discussion is about the one that's in the
[27:53] manufacturing tonight.
[27:57] So I think that Mr. McKinkey would agree that the idea of the
[28:09] certain areas. And these are the procedures that you have to go through. Maybe you can't
[28:19] because of the types of businesses and the types of the holes that are around the San
[28:28] Industrial Loop. Maybe there's an M2 someplace else that would be available where you could go.
[28:35] But I think state law does not allow us to ban things. Is that correct?
[28:44] You have to allow.
[28:47] No, we can't ban them from the jurisdiction.
[28:49] Okay, so it's not available.
[28:52] Okay, it's the Constitution law as far as sexual and or in businesses are concerned.
[28:57] And we can't ban any legal employees per second.
[29:01] Okay, under Texas law.
[29:02] So we have to provide some, we have to provide them some relief, but then we can regulate using state ball with distances as to how close they can be together, how close they can be to a sub-degent, how close they can be to a child care facility, how close they can be to a church, I'm sorry that there's no, they're about how close they can be to a child or factory.
[29:30] But I think this, I think this, this ordinance or this tax amendment is trying to get to a problem before it becomes a problem because right now there is no right place.
[29:49] Is that correct working can they work and they work if
[29:54] It was her plot wanted to come in today. Where could they off?
[30:00] But we do that. Currently, it's after 20 states of our code, some regulation on the dog business,
[30:09] is it?
[30:12] They could go into C2.
[30:14] Which is the orange, if you look at the map, and there's more orange, C2, zoning districts, then there are.
[30:23] that I want the M1s, I'm sorry the M2s,
[30:29] M2s can you show us where they are in,
[30:31] and like in relation to,
[30:33] in general with Leo's hand, but where the other M1s and the M2s.
[30:37] So that dark green that,
[30:39] that is being, is M2,
[30:42] that dark green that, that we're circling with the cursor,
[30:47] right there,
[30:49] and that's how we're going to be.
[30:51] What is a little bit of this? Is that much more?
[30:54] Yeah. It's the R.D. Park.
[30:57] R.D. Park.
[30:59] And then there's another dark green one down on.
[31:02] And there's a story that's written this story.
[31:05] One, two, three.
[31:07] Oh, and four.
[31:08] And what is this one?
[31:09] What do you just want to do?
[31:10] Business?
[31:13] And that was just a high grade.
[31:17] It's a team.
[31:22] So that's the third one.
[31:26] That's the third one.
[31:30] I guess a question really is if I'm too appropriate.
[31:35] That's it.
[31:36] That's the third one.
[31:40] That's the third one.
[31:42] That's the third one.
[31:42] Look at the state of the lab.
[31:44] She wants to.
[31:44] are important. We were trying to find a place that if you look at the C2, there's more C2 areas
[31:52] that are next to residential areas, and so we were trying to protect those areas and by putting
[32:02] them in the M2s, because there's fewer M2 districts, they're more towards the outskirts of town.
[32:10] And just to clarify, in the chapter 26, it's actually a dismissive business, and that has its own ordinance.
[32:17] I think we talked about this, and they have a little bit more restriction as to distance.
[32:24] Yes, but they also are not allowed within a thousand eighth of residential areas, but that is not included in the list of places and restrictions.
[32:38] It's not in this one-ordnance amendment, but it's already in chapter 26.
[32:46] Correct, but we have included a 1500, I'm sorry, a 500 foot distance from certain uses and a 1500 for each other.
[32:58] And this proposed amendment.
[32:59] I'm the one who was the gentleman with six came and they'll be headmills, so these things they had been meditian.
[33:05] But again, the chapter 26 and I think that we're talking about the reason we can have some of those extra restrictions.
[33:12] It would be kind of like that.
[33:15] Yes, that's a good point.
[33:17] I think that's a point there.
[33:19] Just so you know, I represent a lot of these contexts on this issue and certification.
[33:23] We've been sentenced, I think I'll also be using this on to the rate of the Senate and
[33:27] workers.
[33:28] I know a lot, so I had to let it get these issues, so when we do anything related to the
[33:35] statutory businesses, we have a lot of academic studies to support those business requirements.
[33:43] We don't have those surveyed jobs, but we don't have those together in the city, so we're
[33:49] trying to identify a distance for
[33:53] that we can support, even though, in the chapter 26, we know we can support the decisions that they're in there.
[34:01] So it's something some ways, this is an experiment, especially on the VHOP issue.
[34:08] In order to try to give them the average, you know, maybe we get it now, and also impact, we certainly can help it.
[34:16] But we don't have studies like these experts that look at our businesses.
[34:20] So, Nick, is there any guidelines on stick, we want to take him to out of this and there's
[34:26] only a C2 available, is that initiative?
[34:30] It can be.
[34:32] As it relates to sexual and business is it can be, we have to put the rule of thumb as we
[34:37] have to provide in our territory, which is the city limits of this jurisdiction, at least
[34:43] 10% of our whole area available for their use.
[34:47] And so we had to run the numbers and look at the rainy high of measurements, the pre-evitative
[34:54] use of distances to see if they had enough space.
[34:58] Now, we don't have to move on to the label space for sale, for them to be able to be
[35:03] building, or whatever we want to do, and we just have to make sure it exists in the community.
[35:07] So there are some limitations on big shops, and 10 to 2 fathers, we don't have similar requirements.
[35:15] Just on the side frame, I don't know what you're doing this, I think.
[35:18] And it's everything.
[35:19] It's made up of the opposition.
[35:24] The amount of it is essentially in the discussion
[35:30] of the sexual law in the business.
[35:34] There's no discussion of based, based,
[35:37] shops or anything.
[35:39] It seems to me though that with the M2, with the restrictions that are placed on sexually
[35:51] oriented businesses and where are M2 is located in the city of Fredericksburg,
[36:01] I believe
[36:01] every M2 is perhaps, every F2 is within a thousand feet of a residential area with making
[36:12] exception of M2 that's out on time to deal with.
[36:21] They've got to be somewhere, but we run
[36:23] about to stay all. So the issue, I guess, the issue that's where you put it. Where's the most
[36:34] control of
[36:36] what's going to be the reason to do things down. And where if you're, if you're, if you're
[36:49] You know, looking at such as what he's got it, that you've got to meet these requirements, and then you start looking at the available M2 going, well I can't go here, and I can't go here, and I can't go here, and I can't go here, and I can't go here, do I want to go, do I want to do I want to be here, or do I want to go to the other city?
[37:13] That was the intent.
[37:16] Also, you can't forget that he had a conditioner.
[37:18] You experimented 13 requirements that had been met.
[37:21] And there's a child for requirements.
[37:22] But the most important one is,
[37:24] and a lot of everybody is noticed.
[37:26] Everybody is an opportunity to come in here.
[37:27] If I can come in on specific...
[37:30] It tells us about it. In most cases, we listen, in death way, almost all cases, in council lists, there's two
[37:36] circuit records there that are built in and we're trying to put a place that are not at place currently.
[37:42] So, for that reason, I'd like to make a motion that we improve the C-2601 effort.
[37:49] And I was a second member.
[37:50] All right, and for motion by June, second by Tom, any other discussion?
[37:57] On date, right?
[37:58] On date, all those?
[38:00] All right.
[38:01] Motion carries this written, and goes to City Council for Young.
[38:05] So I believe it's important.
[38:10] We should move on to the same discussion to the City Council patient.
[38:14] We'll be in public directly.
[38:20] All right, we're going to go to I.
[38:21] And before we request the Z-264,
[38:26] a post-tex cement,
[38:27] that requires multiple family residential businesses
[38:29] within the C1 labor and commercial district.
[38:32] The proposed textments are a prefections report,
[38:35] 00, which in the C1 labor and commercial district.
[38:40] All right, so then you're up again.
[38:44] Yes. For this textment,
[38:47] the purpose of it is to create,
[38:49] To bring it more in line to how we are currently regulating other multi-family uses within the C1 districts.
[38:57] So currently, for instance, town homes and duplexes, have the requirement of adding a conditional use permit process to any developments proposed within those districts.
[39:09] You do have C1 districts that are closer to some single family residential areas, so it just provides oversight for when these developments are proposed in the C1 districts.
[39:27] And as stated, we already do that for other multi-family developments within the C1 district.
[39:33] So it brings more in line to what's required.
[39:38] Therefore, in the C1 district, multi-family will now require amendment is adopted, it will put in a requirement for conditional use permit and not allow it outright.
[39:52] Well, thank you.
[39:55] And right now, I'm going to open the public hearing.
[39:57] Is there anyone here?
[39:59] We would like to speak on this text a minute.
[40:06] Close the public hearing.
[40:07] And we'll go, I will free take action on the proposed text in a minute.
[40:12] Questions or comments?
[40:15] Please check.
[40:17] Make it up for a little bit.
[40:18] I wish we could prove the 26 or 40.
[40:26] And the other discussion,
[40:31] we'll be right about the approach.
[40:40] We're going to go to item 4C.
[40:44] Request Z-2605 by Senator Timberman,
[40:47] and the Bureau of Theatre,
[40:49] to consider a commissionary supervision
[40:50] for Section 3.50 to establish and operate
[40:53] the standardized business in the historic shopping district
[40:57] overlaid from property commonly known as four away by
[41:00] Smith Street.
[41:01] I don't care if I'm pleased myself for many years.
[41:03] I've done business with this company.
[41:05] I hope you continue to visit with some of the
[41:07] business.
[41:08] All right.
[41:08] I will also be refusing myself and Mr.
[41:10] Muscle.
[41:11] Come up here and take over to me.
[41:33] 4605 and what presentation on the
[41:35] Act of
[41:39] Mr. Acerry.
[41:40] Well, we're going to hear from the city for
[41:42] that fund first. That's fine. Yeah, I hope all of you got the information of parts
[41:54] were equipped and why do you felt like we've been there before because we had and we're
[42:02] trying to move back home. So I don't know, hopefully we all got that to read, but just in case
[42:10] we had to read the two units that the 408 Main Street, who forwarded 501 on the hills is going to move back to us.
[42:22] We have a long, well-stacked history there.
[42:26] At that location, we first bought, moved there in 1984.
[42:34] So we get business there at 14 May 1984. We were there until 1986.
[42:46] Then we moved into
[42:48] four, four, six, main, and we were there at 14, I mean, four, four, six, and we were in that
[43:18] at that location until 2017, when I sold the 2221 franchise.
[43:27] That point, the minimum was to land on the street, and then now it's under a new
[43:36] owner, but we still own the business, not still work there. So we're requesting to move back
[43:42] to do that and altering our sense of 21 office out of our building for a week, also surely
[43:50] help that we are allowed to do that, taxes are eating this, you know, alive. I don't know
[43:57] about job, but I need a little income coming in from that building to help pay those taxes out
[44:04] And we are currently in the field, we don't have a sign of.
[44:15] And so hopefully there should be no problem.
[44:20] We don't need to have with us moving in there.
[44:22] Is this any data to be found in some data?
[44:25] You know, we all have the city, the preservation of the staff following your presentation.
[44:35] Well, I mean, trying to keep it short.
[44:37] No, you all need to run like a long.
[44:39] So glad you've turned back to the city.
[44:42] Maybe not, you all have any comments?
[44:44] Question for me.
[44:47] I think that what I think that was the city that's a presentation.
[44:51] and then we hold public hearing, the members of the Council might have questions for you or in the report.
[45:05] Yes, we received the conditional use permit application by the applicant to operate a standardized
[45:14] business, which is a business that operates 10 or more stores or banks with standardized features
[45:21] in the historic shopping district, Vice in 321. The Hills Realty for the property that is located at
[45:29] It consists of a single-story multi-suite commercial property, which includes four-way to four-ten-west-main.
[45:38] And it contains an existing 6,394-square-foot building on an approximately 19,602-square-foot-lot.
[45:51] It has access to 13,000 square feet of paved parking.
[45:57] And it's located in the 400 block of West
[46:00] main, which includes other businesses,
[46:03] such as Marseille, Virgilary, Shotsie House,
[46:07] Boopkeeping Tax Solutions, and Jolly's House
[46:10] in Bed and Breakfast.
[46:12] To the south, there are some auto-oriented businesses,
[46:18] and staff feels the establishment of the real estate office
[46:21] does not appear that it would detract
[46:22] from other business operations section 3.510 of the historic shopping district overlay allows for standardized businesses to the opportunity to request a condition we use permit with the ideal user adding diversity to existing businesses not in proximity to other similar retailers and that it would not alter the general characteristics of the surrounding area.
[46:49] This is located with an CBD central business district with the historic district shopping overlay.
[46:56] We did send out notices to all the surrounding property owners within 200 feet.
[47:02] And we received one in one favor. Was that correct, one in favor?
[47:09] Section 4.5.461 establishes review and evaluation criteria for the historic shopping district.
[47:18] And it states that the Pline and Zoning Commission and City Council
[47:22] shall review any applications for a conditional use permit
[47:27] for standardized business within the historic shopping district,
[47:32] following the criteria listed in your pocket,
[47:36] which is affirmative findings that the existence of such a business will not,
[47:40] and it lists for materially alter the general characteristics of us around being area,
[47:47] The track from the uniqueness of the shopping district contribute to the nationwide trend of standardized offerings, or impair the intent of this ordinance, or to the comprehensive plan of the city, and it requires for the PNZ and the City Council to find affirmative actions that it adds diversity, it complements surrounding businesses, and it helps promote and foster the local economic base as a goal.
[48:15] And in your, in your recommendation, I suggest that you list some of the criteria, what you
[48:24] find in either in favor or against this application.
[48:30] And as stated by the applicant, they were previously located there, the original office by
[48:39] records operated there until 2019 and so therefore staff feels that given the use of the location
[48:48] was the original realtor office and there appears to be no proposed increase in intensity or
[48:53] major changes to the building to make it look more standardized staff is recommending a approval
[48:58] of the request is presented.
[49:03] I'd like to open the public hearing.
[49:10] And it's a lovely sign up for the public hearing
[49:17] for 26.05.
[49:21] So I will pay it personally.
[49:23] I'd like to speak in the audience about this issue.
[49:31] I'm going to go to the mic,
[49:40] but I don't want to, okay, close the public hearing, and take action on the additional use format.
[49:49] So I want to open a discussion by the planning of zoning commission.
[49:54] So, I have question problem from Mac, what people ordinance that we're very standardized
[50:03] businesses.
[50:11] So, business that would qualify as its business at that time and continue to operate in
[50:19] their location as long as they operate in the same line of order.
[50:27] So what would happen if the business that was operating as a grandfather standardized business left
[50:34] application?
[50:36] For the non-conforming use, the grandfather used by Spiders, by like actually if it's the same
[50:46] business and they're temporarily a stop business, they can come back and operate in the same
[50:51] location.
[50:53] It's a temporary outage of stop business, what qualifies it's temporary.
[50:57] I think under our ordinance, it's for 16, about days, but there are some provisions elsewhere in our
[51:04] code of order, just for 90 days, laps, 90 or not, too.
[51:09] So if you're in some of that,
[51:12] but the selling of this and moving into the different building would, yes, that there's no more
[51:19] in poverty and no more grain poverty.
[51:23] I was in one of the,
[51:26] Mr. Doody.
[51:29] This is change on me.
[51:31] I want to remind you that you gave up your grandfather,
[51:36] and when you left,
[51:38] you knew when you left,
[51:40] that you were losing your grandfather.
[51:43] And now you're back asking for a tool
[51:47] that I standardized business in the historic shopping district.
[51:51] And that is what the historic theme,
[51:56] change on the aim is designed to prohibit
[52:00] we don't want change on the aim,
[52:03] and unfortunately you are a change train business,
[52:09] plain and simple.
[52:12] You have no defense,
[52:16] and we cannot allow you to do this because if we do,
[52:20] Then we allow other chain businesses the opportunity to come in to this little shopping district.
[52:33] I would like to make a motion that why you chose the seat for anybody who wants to put in, if it has comments.
[52:41] So, read the comments.
[52:43] So, all of them, then, you know, the introduction of the ordinance.
[52:47] Do you have any background as to why if what they've produced an actor?
[52:52] In terms of why we felt as a city, let's put an important point.
[52:56] the ordinance, sorry, I hope we can prepare me. The ordinance itself, it's adopted in 2008,
[53:02] really set forth those reasons and that is to keep the character of the downtown historic downtown
[53:11] shopping districts. Basically the same is there a period of that time because there was a concern that
[53:17] there had been some deterioration as the uniqueness and local character and the insert and
[53:24] And the ordinance at that time has since been recognized as a device or a wave of the city
[53:33] to maintain the uniqueness, not only for tourism, which is an important part of the business
[53:41] industry, but also for the local nature of the retailers in town, and you're still a small
[53:51] community and the local nature of retail was considered at that time to be important. And actually, two months ago, the city council asked me and the city manager to formally, it took formal action to ask us to make the organizations stronger and that regard to protect those interests.
[54:13] And at that time, the City of Current City Council re-arranging those issues that they felt
[54:20] might need to be protected, which was presented.
[54:23] So, for us, I can tell nothing has changed for the 2019 today, as well as the members of the
[54:30] City Council.
[54:31] Thank you.
[54:34] I'm sorry.
[54:35] I was going to go with the Council in 2008, but we passed the standardized business
[54:41] or the feeling of the members of the council at that time, or the we need to do everything
[54:51] we could to protect the nature of the community.
[54:56] We saw the increase in standardized businesses and it's being detrimental to the
[55:06] of the small town, the small town field or German heritage.
[55:17] I have some disagreements with the staff,
[55:25] with the staff recommendations. Section 4.561, the review criteria says the plan and zoning
[55:34] commission and city council shall review and evaluate conditional use permits applications
[55:40] for all standardized businesses within the historic shopping district using the criteria
[55:47] and the criteria under a appropriate finding that the existence of such businesses will not
[55:55] And that's the key here is the two words we'll not want, materially, effect, general,
[56:05] characteristic of the surrounding area of small German town in the old country environment.
[56:12] I think the addition of standardized businesses on, on Main Street, Douglas, material,
[56:18] a materially effective, the general characteristics of the shopping district. Number two, it will not
[56:26] detract from the uniqueness of the material leave of the identity of the historic shopping district.
[56:37] a standardized business, the efficient standardized businesses to, to, to mainstream, of course,
[56:47] maturity holders, that the identity of that, that was the reason that we passed the standardized business
[56:54] organs in 2008 to try to preserve the data to downtown. Now, the three contribute to the
[57:03] my trend of standardized offerings. And it's a reason why businesses have to have standardization.
[57:13] It's all it's marketing, it's efficiency and business. Okay, number four,
[57:21] impaired the intent of the ordinance on the comprehensive plan of the city. Well,
[57:30] This application,
[57:33] the approval of this application, would compare the intent of your
[57:39] metaphor, we should not pass, we should not approve this, and I'm going to have no
[57:46] request.
[57:48] We have a vote, we have a roll call for you on this.
[57:53] And, excuse me, as Mr. Muscle, that just appropriated all of the conditions for the approval,
[58:00] I would make a motion that we define this request based on all four of the items that
[58:07] he just read under eight of five point four states one.
[58:16] We have the motion, Dr. Strudely, a second by Mr. Hager.
[58:24] We'll call tomorrow,
[58:29] and we'll make the vote on is to deny anything.
[58:37] Okay.
[58:37] Tell me.
[58:40] Thank you.
[58:41] Thank you.
[58:42] Comment.
[58:43] Time.
[58:44] Comment.
[58:47] Comment.
[58:49] Comment.
[58:55] Comment.
[58:57] Comment.
[58:58] five, five, and one.
[59:06] Thank you.
[59:43] Thank you, Mr. Russell.
[59:45] Thank you.
[59:46] We need to go to item 4D.
[59:49] We request Z2606 by April Land.
[59:53] First, you can be a casualer.
[59:55] FAFA, L.C.
[59:56] You can consider it.
[59:56] You're saying it's perfect.
[59:58] Perception 3.420.
[1:00:00] 0 to establish, operate, arrest, Northland, 15s for property, only know this trial, where I miss thanks, quick.
[1:00:07] It's a little bit of a map chair.
[1:00:10] I'll have to refuse myself a little more time. This is our plan. Hope we'll do it.
[1:00:14] Was this with her?
[1:00:15] I'm sure you stay all right.
[1:00:17] Okay.
[1:00:18] Ms. Dan, if you come up here and tell us a question.
[1:00:21] Now, I'll talk to several of this staff at Clearwater.
[1:00:26] Good evening board members.
[1:00:28] Thank you for the opportunity at once, Dennis.
[1:00:31] Thank you for the opportunity to speak with you today about bringing a cat cafe to our community here in front of spurred.
[1:00:40] My daughter and I are going to be business partners.
[1:00:43] She and I've been traveling around the country and we noticed this trend of cat cafe, so I didn't even know it existed.
[1:00:49] until we've sent Augustine Florida, which is another huge tourist area, and also we went to
[1:00:55] Dalbywood and Pigeon Forest, and they have one in Knoxville. And well, I'm going to
[1:01:00] go and explain to you, um, this is not just a business idea, it's a community center solution,
[1:01:05] that supports animal welfare, mental health, tourism, and local economic growth. First, animal welfare
[1:01:13] adoption.
[1:01:15] We have pathways to partner with shelters and rescue organizations that showcase
[1:01:19] adoptable cats in a relaxed, full-legged environment.
[1:01:24] Research shows that environments for cats can interact positively with people, can improve their
[1:01:29] behavior and health and chances of adoption, and that would be fewer animals and our shelters
[1:01:34] that we have currently do strange and our local resources and work on its finding living
[1:01:40] homes.
[1:01:41] Second, mental health and quality of life, interacting with animals has been showed to
[1:01:47] reduce stress and lower blood pressure and improve overall motion will be.
[1:01:53] In fact, a say said 74% of petal nurse reported improve mental health just from
[1:01:58] in interaction and even short visits with cats like those in a cafe setting can provide
[1:02:04] con comfort and connection, especially for people who may not be able to own pets themselves.
[1:02:09] They're spouse-and-a-be allergic.
[1:02:11] They may live in an apartment complex.
[1:02:13] It doesn't allow pets.
[1:02:14] They're various, you know, hinders us to this.
[1:02:18] Third, economic, and tourism benefits.
[1:02:21] Birders Birders Birders are already as destination
[1:02:23] for unique experiences.
[1:02:26] Why are these shops and local culture?
[1:02:28] A cat cafe adds something different and memorable.
[1:02:33] A family friendly attraction,
[1:02:34] which I can see we do need more of personally
[1:02:36] as a mother of single mom and two children, and I feel like we would encourage visitors to stay
[1:02:42] longer, spend more locally, and return again. These types of niche, niche businesses are
[1:02:49] proven to increase their track balance, support, you know, local surrounding spots. And then fourth
[1:02:55] community engagement and education, I can't think of because of gathering space for events like
[1:03:01] and children's birth, they will have it, I will have it in the space right,
[1:03:04] children's birth base, parties, or any of that really, of the sorts.
[1:03:09] I've also talked to Chris Nashman here, a local artist, who wants to teach painting
[1:03:13] with kitty's classes.
[1:03:15] I've talked to a yoga instructor, who wants to do yoga, yoga, you know, obviously humans
[1:03:19] do it in the yoga, but in the room with the cats, so I can't yoga.
[1:03:25] And just so you know, this room is subrated behind glass, like a cute glass room,
[1:03:31] area. So it's not in the area where the copy is served and in any food that say as a vendor
[1:03:37] in town with sale to me, just reset to the public.
[1:03:41] We finally, I want to address health and safety, which I kind of just jump the gun.
[1:03:45] Pack-type-based operators that are strict guidelines with food preparation areas, complete
[1:03:49] these separate group animal areas, routine sanitation, and controls guest-tap capacity.
[1:03:57] Additionally, research shows that when cat cafes are properly designed with quiet spaces and enrichment,
[1:04:03] they can support both animal welfare and human interaction.
[1:04:07] In closing, the cat cafe is not just about coffee and cats.
[1:04:12] It's about creating a space that improves lives.
[1:04:15] It's a towards adoption.
[1:04:17] It strengthens our local economy.
[1:04:20] It enhances tourism and provides safe, positive environment for our communities to connect.
[1:04:25] a lot, hopefully I have many people from our local community who are kind of like, I don't
[1:04:30] this one, we should of course track, although it's great to fight more for them, of course,
[1:04:35] but I want something from the local and the things to do, something different. Anyway, I believe
[1:04:41] this is exactly the kind of thought-pollinnovative business that reflects the spirit of the threat of
[1:04:46] Thank you for your time and consideration,
[1:04:48] I appreciate to serve you on this board if you.
[1:04:51] Thank you.
[1:04:53] All right, we'll take all that number two by the addition by step.
[1:04:57] Yes, we received a conditional use permit application
[1:05:01] to establish and operate a rest,
[1:05:03] what would be considered a restaurant limited.
[1:05:06] Use within an existing one story,
[1:05:09] 1600 square foot structure previously utilized
[1:05:13] as an office building.
[1:05:15] And it's address at 1219 East Vane Street.
[1:05:19] This, they're proposed to use would include a coffee shop with an accessory cat lounge that we'd be separated with an enclosed glass area and accessible by the patrons.
[1:05:29] The site area is 12,196 quft feet. It's known C1 neighborhood commercial. They have 20
[1:05:39] parking spaces available and this use of limited restaurant in a C1 district requires a
[1:05:48] conditional use permit. The planning and zoning commission and city council have criteria
[1:05:55] that must be evaluated for conditional use permit applications, and it is listed within your, within your packet.
[1:06:05] In reviewing and evaluating the criteria for the conditional use permit, there are 13 items that must be considered when reviewing the application of these 13 items, staff finds that the applicant has meant or responded to all the requirements.
[1:06:19] The requested use and establishment of a limited use is in keeping with the existing uses in the surrounding neighborhood areas.
[1:06:28] In addition, the 1600 square foot facility has approximately the 12 parking spaces that would accommodate approximately 80 patrons for our table.
[1:06:39] So 0.83 of off-street parking, therefore staff is recommending approval based upon confirmation
[1:06:46] of parking and occupancy.
[1:06:49] Thank you.
[1:06:51] All right.
[1:06:51] I'm going to open the public hearing.
[1:06:53] Could there anyone who would like to comment on this application?
[1:07:01] I think we're going to be playing my button down here tonight.
[1:07:05] A public hearing.
[1:07:06] I will close the public hearing.
[1:07:10] or take action on the kitchen's funny comments, questions from the mission?
[1:07:17] I'll set a couple of questions for you.
[1:07:20] Yes, the cats.
[1:07:23] So help our delays stay bigger, over nine years later,
[1:07:27] back in the day of the show.
[1:07:28] And actually, by...
[1:07:32] I talked to the SPCA, CDU, actually now I should down that resign or I'm not sure, but I got another
[1:07:40] thing up on that local government free animal rescue. But basically, the original thought, and I first
[1:07:45] talked to CDU before she left, is they would provide all of the vet care and also when the
[1:07:51] to me that aren't even spain and neutered,
[1:07:54] that've been de-warnered, that've had their shards,
[1:07:57] that've been, you know, that it's lead treatment,
[1:07:59] all that, and they've already been there,
[1:08:01] quite a small gym day, so that made sure a lot of the disease
[1:08:05] that they, you know, they're clean, healthy cats,
[1:08:08] and they're already for adoption.
[1:08:11] They would stay there, always pack that face, you know,
[1:08:13] it's a big area, and not in cages.
[1:08:15] They're like in a little pulmonary, but it's, you know,
[1:08:18] their own area, and that people could come in and interact with the cats in a more
[1:08:23] vulnerable life environment.
[1:08:26] So I kind of answered question now, but I was just, I've never seen one before, I'm
[1:08:30] afraid.
[1:08:31] So, you know, the cancer there, and they say they're overnight, somebody, I, I, I'm just kind
[1:08:36] of like that too, but I can't forward it, but I can't forward it, even facility, are there
[1:08:39] any other regulations from that perspective?
[1:08:42] Well, we've not to be concerned.
[1:08:43] I think the KACA case I talked to didn't, I mean, I talked to the one in Florida, and
[1:08:47] in Tennessee, and they said, but the one at Florida that had seven hundred
[1:08:52] Catholic doctrines in just five years of being open, and then not so to
[1:08:55] see ones that they had a thousand adoptions. I think she's been over this
[1:08:58] nineteen between eighteen.
[1:09:02] So, I mean, it's a really good community partnership, well,
[1:09:07] so. So, I call them the the cats are there, I'm going to say
[1:09:18] So they are living there.
[1:09:23] They have unparalleled efforts to try to run.
[1:09:27] So we've got labor boxes, we've got beds.
[1:09:33] So the staff is going to clean labor boxes.
[1:09:37] One of the concerns that I have is to make sure that all the city health
[1:09:46] health regulations, as far as, you know,
[1:09:55] counterpoint or is there going to be a separation of between the food for food preparation,
[1:10:02] the food serving, and that I've got no problem with it as long as there is a
[1:10:10] as the health department says, this is fine, there's no, it's in the best interest
[1:10:16] who they'll save you while they're up to.
[1:10:18] Yes, I talked to Kelly Bowfords, and she said I've showed her my plans and for instance,
[1:10:24] we had two separate, for instance, mud sinks.
[1:10:27] So the mop that we use in the cat lounge every morning when we clean up before the
[1:10:31] the open for the day, we vacuum up mop and be the cat, sleeping, going to wash and
[1:10:35] all that.
[1:10:36] That is a separate mop, a separate sink, separate everything in that area.
[1:10:41] And then for the cat bay, there's already another mud sink that exists on this
[1:10:45] that is used for the kitchen, if that makes sense.
[1:10:49] But the cat says, no way they get into the kitchen.
[1:10:52] I mean, I guess unless obviously if you open a door in this case,
[1:10:55] it goes like, I mean, I mean,
[1:10:57] but if you take them up and take them up.
[1:10:59] Right, so that's my issue here, or the concern I have is,
[1:11:03] you're having, you're having patrons from the cat
[1:11:06] that are going into the cat room, right?
[1:11:10] Yes.
[1:11:11] And you're playing with the cats.
[1:11:12] I mean, why have a cat with a cat boy with a boy?
[1:11:15] Right.
[1:11:16] They're hard.
[1:11:17] And their sanitizer.
[1:11:18] All these pack, I could say the sanitizer at the door.
[1:11:20] And we also have a sink, a hand-warning sink,
[1:11:23] in the cat room.
[1:11:24] That's it.
[1:11:24] Patrists and wash their hands before they need to go out.
[1:11:27] We're going to come back.
[1:11:28] We're going to be happy.
[1:11:33] Yeah, the question?
[1:11:34] I have a couple times a couple.
[1:11:38] Do you have a current park, local park, non-profit?
[1:11:44] Well, no, but I did talk the whole country animal rescue.
[1:11:47] I talked to Stevie and then I deep over back, and then they might have it on my phone.
[1:11:54] Another employee emailed me saying Stevie had, I guess, a quid or left, so now there's
[1:11:58] someone else that told me to come in and, you know what I'm about to do?
[1:12:01] You'll come to Amberview.
[1:12:02] They're how he's six.
[1:12:03] Now, basically the SBCA, I think they changed their name in the whole country, and the rest
[1:12:07] of the athletes.
[1:12:08] But the question is, are these cats individually created at night?
[1:12:14] No, they're not.
[1:12:15] Or are they segregated in the room?
[1:12:18] Well, there's no way for them to get out there.
[1:12:22] But no, I'm talking to them that sounds like we're going to have a cat fight in there.
[1:12:28] Well, the next thing that we'll together, and you don't expect to have trouble.
[1:12:33] Well, the hacker base, I think, to say they have not an outbreak and you, with the
[1:12:38] SPCA or whoever these hackers have worked with, they picked the cast of the most
[1:12:42] sociable and easy-going.
[1:12:44] I mean, if you had a aggressive cat, they, or if you don't know, you get one, they kind
[1:12:48] of pick it up and they take it back to SPCA.
[1:12:51] That's what I've been took, but I have not heard of any, like, cats dying due to the violence
[1:12:56] or, I mean, I basically fall in there and they're not in greats, but we're talking 10, they
[1:13:03] maybe 12 cats, that we're not talking like 40.
[1:13:05] No, thank you.
[1:13:07] That was another question I had.
[1:13:09] How many do you expect to have an facility?
[1:13:13] I will give you the fact that you said in your comments
[1:13:16] that this is something unique.
[1:13:20] I'm assured that I don't think anybody in the community's
[1:13:22] ever conceived of having a cap facility
[1:13:26] for a walk-in.
[1:13:27] I want to know if you're doing this.
[1:13:30] I had an idea until last year.
[1:13:31] So are you expecting a lot of flip traffic?
[1:13:35] Where's all the things?
[1:13:36] Not a lot of flip traffic, no sir.
[1:13:38] Because there's no sidewalks in that area, not really.
[1:13:40] I mean, water burgers, two doors down from there.
[1:13:45] All right.
[1:13:47] And I'm not sure if you're going to be able to.
[1:13:50] But how do you propose to run a birthday party at that room?
[1:13:54] Well, not in the cap room.
[1:13:55] There's a separate on the side hat building
[1:13:57] where it looks like maybe it was a garage at one point
[1:14:00] very in. That's a poll empty space. I was going to have a party and then
[1:14:05] airy, but they don't bring the cats in. They, you know, they get a birthday cake
[1:14:08] there and whatever their games, but then they would go in with the cat lounge to go
[1:14:12] they go back and forth. Right. Yes. But the cat wanted that airy
[1:14:15] except. So, so that our local health person that you've talked to Kelly
[1:14:21] Officer of her department, this basically told you that that is permissible that
[1:14:25] have something like a birthday party where if your kids go back and forth.
[1:14:29] So they're going to have the wash up between rooms.
[1:14:32] Do have sanitizer and a sink in that room plus a public bathroom.
[1:14:36] There's many, and Kelly told me exactly what I needed.
[1:14:39] Two different months.
[1:14:40] Okay.
[1:14:41] Three departments taking the kitchen.
[1:14:42] I have a separate hand washing scene.
[1:14:44] The kitchen.
[1:14:45] That's a separate room.
[1:14:46] Three departments.
[1:14:47] I visit her three times now.
[1:14:50] Okay.
[1:14:51] Let me see.
[1:14:52] There was something in your house back here.
[1:14:55] Okay.
[1:14:56] Thank you very much.
[1:14:57] I have a question for Susanna.
[1:14:58] Thank you.
[1:15:00] You said what we're going to incorporate that the applicant has met. Something to the effect that they have met the requirements or they have addressed them. What does that mean?
[1:15:17] That they've provided information showing that, for instance, with us, the things that we
[1:15:24] check for in the site plan, like parking, landscaping, you know, said.
[1:15:30] So that they have a dress, they have met that requirement.
[1:15:33] Correct.
[1:15:34] Okay.
[1:15:35] Thank you.
[1:15:38] Any other questions or comments?
[1:15:42] I already mentioned.
[1:15:47] I can make a motion.
[1:15:48] the truth, and there should be experiment for the board of the global nine piece of
[1:15:51] mainstream.
[1:15:54] I have most of my time to say that by summer, any of the sessions, I'll take a ride.
[1:16:01] I'll take a ride.
[1:16:02] All right.
[1:16:03] You can't say it so much.
[1:16:05] Yeah.
[1:16:06] Yeah.
[1:16:07] Thank you.
[1:16:25] Thank you.
[1:16:27] Thank you.
[1:16:28] Thank you.
[1:16:28] Thank you.
[1:16:28] Thank you.
[1:16:29] No.
[1:16:30] I'm going to go on to I'm going to request 826-07 by Kevin Spragt, VDI, and I'm going to
[1:16:37] look at the center of condition that you're probably by section 3.2 and 0.2 to a lot
[1:16:42] drive through a drive that facilitates for a property commonly known as 727 balance.
[1:16:48] Mr. Spragt is.
[1:16:59] Okay, Kevin Spragt is V.I. Consulting Engineers.
[1:17:07] So, we are requesting full of regroupable of our CUP for the drive through for our cleaners.
[1:17:17] Some of you were here last time, some of you weren't.
[1:17:21] But we have changed nothing.
[1:17:24] And our asking for y'all is not a group of you.
[1:17:28] The only thing that is changed in the NIH is we have, first of all at the end, we have done
[1:17:38] the simple drawing, so in the architectural drawing, we've done all the drawings that you need to do.
[1:17:43] And I've started building the project.
[1:17:46] We have text up approval.
[1:17:48] We have simple approval.
[1:17:49] We have electrical department approval.
[1:17:52] We have the farm marshals approval.
[1:17:55] And we started to get our building permit and this came to an end.
[1:18:00] So here I am asking for us to take the CUP.
[1:18:06] So we can move all of our businesses over there.
[1:18:10] Can you have a very quick.
[1:18:12] There's a answer.
[1:18:13] Okay.
[1:18:15] All right.
[1:18:17] So then.
[1:18:19] Yes.
[1:18:19] We received the condition we use permit application to allow a drive through.
[1:18:24] associated with the dry cleaning laundry business at 720 South Adams located between two existing
[1:18:31] developments that include Guadalupe Bank and Happy State Bank. The proposed development includes
[1:18:37] a two-story building that is approximately 31,500 square feet in consists of 16 units,
[1:18:43] eight on each floor. It is likely or possible that some of these units will be combined
[1:18:49] lowering the possible total number of units.
[1:18:53] The anticipated use uses include professional offices,
[1:18:57] general retail and personal services.
[1:18:59] The drive-through is requested for the direct cleaning
[1:19:02] business, and it will be located on the north end
[1:19:04] of the first floor of the building.
[1:19:07] The application was reviewed with sports conformity,
[1:19:12] with relevancy ordinances, including Section 7.131.
[1:19:16] That is the review and evaluation criteria for site plans and section 5.460, which is the review and evaluation criteria for a conditional use permit.
[1:19:28] The site is 63,634 square feet.
[1:19:34] The zone is C2 commercial.
[1:19:37] It has a building coverage of 24 percent
[1:19:41] and the zone allows for a 75 percent maximum.
[1:19:45] The impervious coverage is 79 percent
[1:19:48] within 80 percent maximum.
[1:19:50] It's a two story building 28 feet.
[1:19:54] The zone allows for a maximum height of 38 feet.
[1:19:57] There are 72 parking spaces provided for general retail and professional offices, which has a requirement of one parking space for every 400 square feet.
[1:20:09] Personal services requires one parking space for 300 square feet. There are utilities available to the property and extension of existing infrastructure will not be extended, existing infrastructure will not be extended at the developer's expense to serve the property.
[1:20:29] As far as attention, the Stonewater Detention Plants and Studies shall be reviewed as part
[1:20:35] of the civil construction plans, elevations and renderings were provided as well as a narrative
[1:20:40] that indicates the development's compliance with the entry corridor overlay.
[1:20:45] Landscaping was also reviewed for compliance.
[1:20:52] And as if we sent out notices to all the surrounding property owners and we only received
[1:20:57] one in opposition today after the printing of the packet for review and evaluation criteria for
[1:21:06] a conditional use permit. There are 13 items which must be considered and reviewed.
[1:21:12] Staff has found that the applicant hasn't met or responded all the requirements including
[1:21:17] adequacy and convenience of off-street parking and determination of the proposed use
[1:21:25] that the proposed use will not be detrimental to public safety, or materially injurious to
[1:21:30] properties in the vicinity, and the determination that the proposed use in the site development
[1:21:35] will be compatible with existing uses in the vicinity. As stated by the applicant, this was
[1:21:41] previously approved in 2023,
[1:21:45] and they got approval by P&Z and Council, and staff is recommending
[1:21:51] that it once again be approved with the following conditions that they have an approved addressing
[1:21:57] plan, approved landscape and screening plan, approved civil construction plan, and also re-approval
[1:22:04] of the previous site plan as a condition of approval. And that is the same exact site plan that was
[1:22:10] presented in approved last time.
[1:22:14] Thank you very much. I'm going to open the public here. Is there
[1:22:19] anyone here would like to make comments on this application.
[1:22:23] Is.
[1:22:29] I'm building this.
[1:22:30] Member of Health and Public Health.
[1:22:31] By the building is at the corner, at the end of the bill, just on the side of the bill.
[1:22:39] By the way, it's just on the side of the bill.
[1:22:40] By the way, I know the text stop has been.
[1:22:44] Let's give it our approval.
[1:22:45] My concerns are to be traffic, these rest,
[1:22:50] to the edge of that area.
[1:22:53] To be ready to have ball grains and happy bank and another bank on the other side.
[1:22:59] And that's a 30-busy street, particularly with the high school and just kind of wrote.
[1:23:05] So that's why I can serve as a trapping phone.
[1:23:08] That's all right. Thank you.
[1:23:12] And you want us to highlight the comments.
[1:23:17] All right, we're close to the public hearing.
[1:23:19] And we will go over and take action on the good to show you some of it.
[1:23:23] Do you want to have questions or comments?
[1:23:25] So the question, which is Anna, is Kevin here tonight
[1:23:30] because it's a renewal.
[1:23:36] I have to change anything and still attract leaders.
[1:23:40] I still don't want to thank everything to say anything.
[1:23:42] I think it's just two years down the road.
[1:23:45] You haven't turned on any drone.
[1:23:47] Correct.
[1:23:48] And I probably shouldn't get the bulldozer out there.
[1:23:49] Yeah.
[1:23:50] But who do that?
[1:23:51] The banks would take this long.
[1:23:53] Well.
[1:23:55] Which one of what do you have on both sides out?
[1:24:01] So, the other question I have is, does Mr. Strangham's need as Mr. Wyke on up with the traffic from
[1:24:13] Walgreens, happy statement, Department of Defense.
[1:24:19] Is there a need for a reserve of employment for a driving story?
[1:24:26] Okay, so is the answer then no?
[1:24:30] And I believe that Evan will answer that.
[1:24:33] That's correct.
[1:24:33] He can not have a reply.
[1:24:35] So in the subdivision was originally developed, all of those access points were also reviewed.
[1:24:40] So there's actually a process all the way to happy state.
[1:24:46] So the limited number of dry movies in that area,
[1:24:49] I don't know if that's why I'm going to share it.
[1:24:52] That was a trap.
[1:24:53] It should not be.
[1:24:55] It is.
[1:24:55] It is going to our.
[1:24:56] Friends and text on is not a problem.
[1:25:01] So can it.
[1:25:02] What do you go to break ground.
[1:25:04] May.
[1:25:05] And keep the 26.
[1:25:07] No, yes.
[1:25:09] I have.
[1:25:10] So.
[1:25:11] I'm just frustrated for being here.
[1:25:13] It's.
[1:25:13] It's going to be a lot of this.
[1:25:15] I think a motion.
[1:25:16] You're approved.
[1:25:16] The 26.
[1:25:17] So seven.
[1:25:17] is returned to the address, and plan the last gay and the
[1:25:23] main plan of the civil construction plan and the
[1:25:25] approve the greatest site plan in this motion.
[1:25:29] I'll first start.
[1:25:31] And the most you might want to give a second by Tom
[1:25:33] and any other discussion.
[1:25:36] On paper.
[1:25:37] I would like to know
[1:25:47] that there are no
[1:25:52] at one one in sidewalks, the section of the State of Division of Designs and Standards
[1:25:56] and at the 30th of Division of Regulations in the City of British, British, and other
[1:26:01] cohorts.
[1:26:03] I'd like to thank you.
[1:26:04] So, here to the very end of the event.
[1:26:06] Thank you for your rest time.
[1:26:07] Thank you for all of us.
[1:26:10] Thank you.
[1:26:10] Thank you.
[1:26:12] Thank you.
[1:26:13] Thank you.
[1:26:14] Thank you.
[1:26:14] Thank you for your recommendation.
[1:26:16] This evening, I would like to thank you for the invitation.
[1:26:18] Thank you.
[1:26:20] Thank you.
[1:26:21] Thank you.
[1:26:22] city council where we discussed ordinances that we wanted to
[1:26:26] contemplate what we used in a still new process. So this one was picked
[1:26:31] out and basically worked on structuring this ordinance in
[1:26:38] such a way that we respond and keep up with the development that was currently
[1:26:42] ongoing while we work on trying to build a code. So I'm going to actually
[1:26:46] cast this over for civil and she's going to do some of that detail, so I'm
[1:26:58] I'm just going to read your section in the words and how I was changing this approach.
[1:27:03] We're supposed to invent locations, sections B and C.
[1:27:10] These days, it's I've actually constructed a lot of virtual leads and notes,
[1:27:16] and then a lot of them along arterial and molecular roots.
[1:27:20] We have a little bit of detail that slide around some of the materials should be six vote wide, but it's back over.
[1:27:28] Or provide that buffer.
[1:27:31] And then the other section in session sheet.
[1:27:34] The maintenance responsibility.
[1:27:35] Because the minute I was able to clarify that the adjacent property, sorry.
[1:27:40] This amendment also clarifies that the adjacent property owners are responsible for maintaining that right away.
[1:27:47] We'll be maintaining the intersection of sidewalk or a BDA compliance, and then painting an instruction for you by the way or coping clients.
[1:27:58] And then, of course, the city will retain the right to maintain sidewalks. Sorry, I miss that.
[1:28:04] The city will retain the right to maintain sidewalks as necessary.
[1:28:10] There's shared maintenance responsibility for most equitable maintenance standards, as well as well as well here's work voyage, and I've been an unobstructed walking path.
[1:28:20] Again, this accomplishes the main objectives in this ordinance, or trying to succeed me.
[1:28:25] So, are you having any questions?
[1:28:28] Okay.
[1:28:30] Any questions?
[1:28:31] Any questions?
[1:28:32] Okay.
[1:28:34] Any questions?
[1:28:35] So this is not, we're not talking anything out of the neighborhood.
[1:28:41] This is just commercial areas in our curable.
[1:28:45] That is correct.
[1:28:46] So if you'll look at the cross sessions for collectors and art materials,
[1:28:49] there are eight book-wide art ways outside of the pavement,
[1:28:53] and then by the side of a sidewalk,
[1:28:56] that doesn't have to try and bring you to it.
[1:28:57] We have 50 book-wide vocals, frees,
[1:29:02] adding a five-foot sidewalk within that.
[1:29:04] creating utility companies. So it's kind of an integral step to basically put more of
[1:29:12] that on us on development and more here. So we don't have sidewalks to nowhere. That's correct.
[1:29:22] So the city has a program that they're budgeting to 150,000,000,000 dollars a year.
[1:29:31] All right, all right, okay, all of the time, I'm in a year, this was about the third
[1:29:39] week.
[1:29:40] So, we budgeted money for sidewalk construction for over 10 years now, I got it.
[1:29:46] And if you give us a current goal, even today, with concrete prices on Berlin, your
[1:29:51] foot.
[1:29:55] Last time seeing this, I'm turning with a $15.
[1:29:57] I learned that the house was losing your foot.
[1:30:01] 1, 15 per foot, 1, 15 per foot, okay, all right. So this is considered that we will be voting on your right.
[1:30:14] Yes, this is for your recognition for a city council to consider in the same direction.
[1:30:22] Shouldn't we not address the residential development at the same time?
[1:30:27] So, that would be basically looking through all of our way from our section as well, all of the utility companies and additions of that.
[1:30:36] So, this was basically taking steps to make progress while not opening that camera points, yes, yet. That will be open during that you can see the video discussion.
[1:30:50] We keep bringing up, but this is more because to be thinking about all the 15 public areas
[1:30:57] we had about parks and to keep you taking off, one of the things that I wanted to talk
[1:31:01] about in the trade on the side, one of the things that I was seeing today, when I was pregnant,
[1:31:06] and I thought I was a food, we would make a progress, we would bond with it.
[1:31:16] I think we would make progress, as all the new adults, we would be in the data.
[1:31:21] It's probably up on the end.
[1:31:26] I'm a museum called.
[1:31:30] One more suffocation.
[1:31:31] Do you think it's going to work?
[1:31:33] It's going to be a spirit.
[1:31:34] You've got to work.
[1:31:35] This is a course while I'm all terrible.
[1:31:37] I haven't been in that infront of you.
[1:31:40] You can say I have to really take that forward.
[1:31:42] Sit next to you.
[1:31:43] I'm a professor.
[1:31:48] It's probably just an error on our residential sidewalks or something
[1:31:51] that we should definitely address or should be addressed and be notified about this.
[1:32:00] So if you have sidewalks, where do you think would you tell them to be sent?
[1:32:07] Because don't be most free-hand by utilities, you can put me to the front of the house and
[1:32:11] or behind the property line, or on the street.
[1:32:15] Yes, there are some of them.
[1:32:16] I'm just going to say that there's five people and he has our water and he's about to
[1:32:23] And the next 10 to the five feet beyond that is about a lot of drawing utilities, electric gas and occasions.
[1:32:31] And then there's another question about when to construct another event.
[1:32:34] We're at a sub-efficient with the home construction.
[1:32:38] And then you see I assume it would be when the developer develops property correctly.
[1:32:43] Because there's a pathway to the home construction building by the country.
[1:32:47] So there are many details in consideration.
[1:32:52] conversations that we want to add up with staff and community and things that I want to
[1:32:58] present in. Right now, this is basically focused upon the areas where we can easily be
[1:33:03] applied and can also have all the commercial development, what's given place, and it does
[1:33:09] need some of the government for the digital and the comprehensive package, the live, those pedestrian
[1:33:13] pathways across the city. And then we've learned with some additions, I've gone about to bring
[1:33:19] But that's really, really interesting.
[1:33:22] We, the loop, they're all subdivision aside.
[1:33:25] Not single.
[1:33:26] So if we can continue to utilize those opportunities to give those energy,
[1:33:30] the subdivision themselves.
[1:33:31] Okay, thank you.
[1:33:33] All right, anybody had questions on the floor?
[1:33:35] What was before us, right now?
[1:33:38] I'd like to make a motion.
[1:33:40] We approved an in-excession,
[1:33:43] 6.11 sidewalks.
[1:33:46] Standards.
[1:33:48] Second.
[1:33:55] All right, we have a lot to do in the second minute.
[1:33:58] Let's take a look at the discussion.
[1:34:02] All right, all of those.
[1:34:07] Thank you.
[1:34:09] All right, let's go to action.
[1:34:11] I don't buy a V request as T20602, I may send a grant link to a grant code.
[1:34:19] Instruction, LLC, you consider the site plan reviewed for an addition to an existing
[1:34:23] event center located in one of the 11 form of March 29th.
[1:34:27] Read, read, and describe this lot to a R-H-3, Gretchen, and Gretchen, and Gretchen, and
[1:34:32] It's a grant review here.
[1:34:34] It's great.
[1:34:37] Thank you.
[1:34:37] Thank you.
[1:34:38] I'm not nice at Ramlin, I'm dead, I'm like so, I'm a centerline, we're a engineering consultant.
[1:34:44] Recently, we've got our office too, but I'd like to give up on Barney.
[1:34:47] Basically, it couldn't be here to last, so I'm here to pass the engineering representative.
[1:34:51] We have existing debates in our located there at 1111.
[1:34:54] At the end of that, it's read.
[1:34:56] The homework is converting that into a retail center.
[1:35:00] It is the same owner as the Hilded Restaurant.
[1:35:03] We've prepared a side plan for six to the comments last week.
[1:35:06] And we have approximately 700 square foot addition to the
[1:35:10] east side of building that sits within those setbacks.
[1:35:14] They can be seeing on the design.
[1:35:19] We don't have this in the context.
[1:35:21] You know, we just noticed that the staff report was missing.
[1:35:29] I will.
[1:35:31] Mine is on page 123.
[1:35:33] Although it is not under this subject.
[1:35:47] Okay,
[1:35:50] all right, that's permission here and we'll get all of this right.
[1:35:53] All right, thank you very much.
[1:35:55] Do then you want to go over the staff to help me.
[1:35:57] Yes, any show that I'll just agree with you.
[1:36:01] I'll just agree with you.
[1:36:02] I love this too.
[1:36:04] Okay, so that's the big thing.
[1:36:07] We received an application for review of a site plan for an addition to an existing
[1:36:12] event center, which is LAPO SAVA.
[1:36:15] The existing event center is approximately 5,177 square feet.
[1:36:20] And the proposed addition is an additional 731 square feet on the east side of the building.
[1:36:27] The property was replied in 2001 and it included this 1.09 acre lot.
[1:36:33] surrounding uses include Hill Disrest Strong, which is the same owner as this property
[1:36:40] to the West, a convenience store to the east and Oakwood RV park to the north.
[1:36:47] The application was reviewed for its conformity with relevant city ordinances including section 7.131
[1:36:55] review and evaluation criteria for the site plan. The site is 1.09 acres. It's
[1:37:02] to media manufacturing. The building coverage that is being proposed is 12.4% which is approximately
[1:37:11] 5,900 in eight square feet and pervious coverage of 15.58% which accounts to about 7,097 square feet.
[1:37:24] They allow that district to last for a 38 foot maximum but they're they're not
[1:37:30] Proposing that height. Access and circulation, the site has access off of FM-2093, and they're parking
[1:37:39] when they responded to us after the packet was printed and they've advised us that they're
[1:37:47] proposing retail uses. Therefore, retail asks for one space for every 400 square feet. They do
[1:37:54] enough area for parking on on site for that if it had been the event center it would be
[1:38:02] one space for everyone hundreds for feet or one space for every four seats as required by
[1:38:07] sections 7.860.
[1:38:09] Can you stop and say that again please, we're telling you that they changed the concept of the use of the building is
[1:38:17] that you just had advised. So their proposal is to add retail to as what as we were told in our response.
[1:38:26] Yes, the first thing they were going to have a no-invent center. Is it an existing event?
[1:38:31] An existing event center. That's existing. You should see the three archways.
[1:38:37] Yeah, those will be stored front glass with entrances. And so the proposal for the new use of the building.
[1:38:44] It hasn't been operational yesterday, Vincent or sometime, but the idea is that it will be three retail
[1:38:50] suites.
[1:38:52] And the current owner is going to develop and use one of those suites, and please see other
[1:38:56] things.
[1:38:56] I understand.
[1:38:57] Thank you.
[1:38:58] Yes, sir.
[1:38:59] So we were advised of that during the responses that originally we thought it was going
[1:39:04] to be an addition to the existing events center, but it's being converted to retail uses.
[1:39:09] Thank you.
[1:39:10] and therefore the parking requirement is one space for every 400 square feet. And within the site,
[1:39:15] there is enough to accommodate the required parking spaces for that amount of square footage.
[1:39:24] Since they have addressed the majority of the development services comments,
[1:39:32] however, the engineering comments are still pending. Therefore, staff would recommend that there be a
[1:39:38] additional approval with those conditions that have not been meant to be complied with, and they include providing text data approval for the driveway.
[1:39:47] And I believe there was still engineering in pervious cover and drainage requirements that had not been addressed adequately.
[1:39:59] And now, on those two items, we have submitted this to textop for their concurrence on that existing driveway that is there for their approval.
[1:40:07] And that is pending, and we did submit additional information, so I think, pervious cover and verification that needs is important.
[1:40:14] Has that passed forward?
[1:40:17] Thank you.
[1:40:19] Okay.
[1:40:28] All right.
[1:40:30] I think that's it.
[1:40:40] I don't think that's it.
[1:40:41] I'm sorry.
[1:40:42] I'd imagine that.
[1:40:43] Well, if we were to take a change in pants, the parking, the change in jeans, the change in
[1:40:48] jeans, the parking, the performance of genuine.
[1:40:53] Mr. that, that side plane is outpainted, we submitted a revised side plane and
[1:40:58] based on the comments that we received.
[1:41:00] It was, it was just received after the packet was printed with them delineating the parking.
[1:41:06] Yes.
[1:41:07] But it did meet the minimum one space for every 400 square feet of.
[1:41:11] Okay.
[1:41:14] And what about our trash is where we need us in order to address that the dumpster would be the shared dumpster with Hilda since it's it's the same worship.
[1:41:24] So in fact, you're asked to approve something we can't see.
[1:41:30] That Greg.
[1:41:32] We we were trying to pull it up, but
[1:41:38] since it was after the packet was printed that it was received.
[1:41:56] We can't we can't prove something we cannot say
[1:42:02] on this out of your control, do we
[1:42:04] What?
[1:42:05] When you tables, don't you text me?
[1:42:09] I didn't.
[1:42:10] I didn't say we'd not turn it down.
[1:42:11] I just didn't even take no action or something.
[1:42:14] I said the table until the next meeting.
[1:42:16] Yes.
[1:42:17] I'm going to put it on the agenda.
[1:42:18] We have a full time.
[1:42:21] I was back and came back.
[1:42:22] I got it.
[1:42:24] I got it.
[1:42:25] You have a bite this morning.
[1:42:26] No.
[1:42:28] Okay.
[1:42:28] I'm excited.
[1:42:29] Don't take a passion of me.
[1:42:31] Thank you.
[1:42:31] Thank you.
[1:42:32] I'm sorry if it's said we're not on this update.
[1:42:39] Yeah, I guess three alternatives.
[1:42:41] One is to take no action.
[1:42:42] The only comes back up on the advocacy and staff are very into very
[1:42:46] In fact, you can take a hold, which can use it in fact.
[1:42:49] Which are nice and easy.
[1:42:50] It's quite a matter of whether you can take a hold to a date serving,
[1:42:53] which just could be immediately selected in the future.
[1:42:56] So if we take no action, it's in public on staff.
[1:42:59] You can hit everything together for us.
[1:43:01] and put it on June. I see a combination of no action and tablet, so they get to the next one.
[1:43:09] I do have a copy of this, I find that I can email to Ms. Muscale. She wants to say that I can borrow.
[1:43:15] We can do that.
[1:43:20] We need to send it right now.
[1:43:23] Yes. Well, I think now, I think how many did we need to do is we need to be able to sit down and
[1:43:29] number one, so look at it, look at it, part of the company meeting and develop any questions
[1:43:36] that we have so that we can ask them to tell us the questions of staff and of the applicant.
[1:43:42] So it's very, it's 30 days, but we'll see you all in there.
[1:43:49] We need a motion to table this, maybe?
[1:43:52] Yes.
[1:43:53] We need a motion to some kind of attention.
[1:43:56] I made that motion, I say we table it to take no action.
[1:44:02] sorry as I said.
[1:44:03] Like the motion by Jim is second by Jim.
[1:44:06] Any other discussion on their right or I'll post.
[1:44:12] All right, give us a stop here we look.
[1:44:14] Thank you for that.
[1:44:17] Thank you for all of us.
[1:44:19] Bless.
[1:44:20] I'll look at that for your minutes.
[1:44:21] Anybody here to be.
[1:44:23] Question between two minutes.
[1:44:26] Comment.
[1:44:26] Question of a group.
[1:44:26] I don't know if you don't check it.
[1:44:30] Motion in the second one in this session.
[1:44:32] All right.
[1:44:34] All right.
[1:44:34] Those are actually those who live in the number of six.
[1:44:38] I leave the direction of the second one.
[1:44:40] Is that a fascinating thing for you?
[1:44:42] I don't know.
[1:44:43] We don't have any comments.
[1:44:49] Anything to report?
[1:44:51] Cliff will be back at the next move.
[1:44:55] And we stand adjourned.