[0:00] Everybody, we'll get it going. Um, call
to order. The February 12th, 2026 City
[0:05] of Friendswood Planning Zoning
Commission regular meeting is now called
[0:07] to order. Communications from the
public. In order to comply with the
[0:11] provisions of the open meetings act, the
commission may um may not deliberate on
[0:16] subjects discussed under this agenda
item. However, the commission may direct
[0:20] such subjects to be placed on a later
regular commission agenda for discussion
[0:24] and or possible action.
There's nobody from the public here. So,
[0:29] we'll go on to cons consent agenda.
These items are considered routine or
[0:35] ministerial in nature and will be
enacted with one motion. There will be
[0:38] no separate discussion of items unless a
commissioner so request in which case
[0:42] the item would be removed from the
consent agenda and considered
[0:45] separately. Item A, consider approval of
the minutes for the regular meeting held
[0:49] Thursday, January 22nd, 2026.
Item B, consider approval of McCraken
[0:55] Manor replat number one located at 401
West Edwood Drive to create four
[1:00] commercial reserves.
Do we have a motion?
[1:04] » Motion to approve.
>> Commissioner Rouse,
[1:06] » second.
>> Commissioner Bounds.
[1:08] We have a motion, a second. All in
favor? Motion passes.
[1:19] Okay.
Item four, action items.
[1:24] Item A, site plan 3711 FM528, Friendwood
City Center. Consider approval of the
[1:30] site plan for a retail shell building
and gas station to be located at 3711
[1:35] FM28 located in Friendwood City Center.
Aubrey Steph C.
[1:41] » Yes, sir. Um, so this is a big night.
Um so this is our first uh site plan
[1:49] approval for the Friendswood City
Center. Um this site is 3711
[1:55] um FM 528. So this is going to be this
is the only lot it's lot five the only
[2:00] lot that it allows a gas station in the
PUB. Um so this site will be a retail
[2:06] center and gas station about 14,600
765 square feet and 45 parking spaces
[2:14] being provided on site. Uh the remainder
of the 110 required spaces will be
[2:18] accounted for in the shared parking
areas um which there's 322 public
[2:24] parking spaces. Um the buildings will
have rear entry from Larabe which is the
[2:30] street running behind them. And um
uh all of the landscaping and sidewalks
[2:38] and everything is compliant with the PUD
uh changes and amendments that we made
[2:43] um recently.
Okay,
[2:48] applicants not here. So, we'll move on
to commissioner discussion. Commissioner
[2:53] Bounds.
[2:59] » No, I I really don't have anything to
say.
[3:02] » Okay, Mr. Man,
>> my only question was this one's slightly
[3:07] different than the other three, but
basically they're it's the other three
[3:12] especially are pretty much all the same
as we're going in through it. Why do we
[3:17] split it up into four different items on
here?
[3:20] » Uh there are four different property
owners.
[3:22] » There are different. Okay.
>> And four different addresses.
[3:25] » Well, yeah. Okay.
>> Yeah, it's in different lots, but yeah,
[3:29] it's all different owners. And then this
gas station, you said 47 uh parking
[3:34] spaces, but then there's additional
parking for everything. So 47 seems like
[3:39] a lot for a gas station already. Is that
because there's is it like the down the
[3:44] road they have the bar and gas station?
Is there more to it than that? Is that
[3:50] why they have so many parking?
>> Yeah. So it will be the convenience
[3:53] store and then a retail center attached
to it or extend Oh, in addition. I got
[3:57] you. Okay. Yeah,
>> that's it.
[4:00] Okay, Mr. Rice,
>> look good to me.
[4:04] » Um, and Aubrey, I've I've had a few
people ask me, we discussed this
[4:09] already, but just for the record, um, on
the um on all the utilities and and such
[4:16] for this property, are these being
supplied off of that that property? Are
[4:20] they being supplied by the the rest of
the city's services? Right.
[4:25] » Uh, yes. So
>> basically how how much of the
[4:28] infrastructure is actually in for the
whole whole development?
[4:32] » Um
we actually had a meeting this morning.
[4:35] So um I would say I'm I'm guessing about
70% of the paving is in um they are
[4:43] relocating the sewer line for this for
the front five properties because we
[4:48] just recently vacated that easement. So
they're relocating that sewer line and
[4:52] they're actually building a new lift
station. Um, so the new lift station
[4:57] will be required to be operational
before we issue a CO for this project,
[5:02] but we wanted to get the permits going,
get the site plans approved so they can
[5:06] start construction. Um, but they will
not be able to get COs until the lift
[5:12] station is complete.
>> That's the same thing for drainage as
[5:15] well, correct?
>> Yes. Yeah.
[5:17] » Yeah. And other than that, I I think the
uh landscape and everything looks uh
[5:22] looks good. So,
um, with that, do we have a motion?
[5:28] » Motion to approve.
>> Commissioner Rose.
[5:31] » Second.
>> And Commissioner Man, we have a motion,
[5:34] a second. All in favor? Motion passes.
[5:43] Okay.
[5:46] Item B, site plan for 3715 FM28
Friendwood City Center.
[5:52] Consider approval of the site plan for a
retail Shell building to be located at
[5:55] 3715
FM 528 located at Friendswood City
[5:59] Center. Aubrey, anything additional?
>> Um, this is just another 14,926qt
[6:05] building uh with 91 parking spaces being
provided on site. Uh, and it's the same.
[6:11] They have the rear entry from Larabe as
well.
[6:13] » Okay. Any commissioners have comments on
this one?
[6:17] » No.
>> Do we have a Do we have a motion? Motion
[6:21] to approve.
>> Commissioner Rose
[6:22] » second.
>> Commissioner man.
[6:24] » We have a motion and a second. All in
favor? Motion passes.
[6:33] » Okay. Item C, site plan for 3723 FM28,
Friendswood City Center. Consider
[6:39] approval of the site plan for a retail
shell building to be located at 1323
[6:43] FM28 located at Friendwood City Center.
Aubrey, anything? Uh this one's just a
[6:49] little bit bigger, about 16,000 square
feet. Uh 90 parking spaces. Um but the
[6:55] same architect designed all these
buildings so they would be consistent
[6:58] with each other. Um so they will they'll
fit together really well.
[7:02] » Very good. Any comments, commissioners?
No. Do we have a motion?
[7:07] » Motion to approve.
Do we have a second?
[7:12] » Second bounds.
[7:18] Okay, we have a motion, a second. All in
favor? Motion passes.
[7:26] And the final one,
[7:32] site plan for 3727 FM28 Friendwood City
Center. Consider approval of the site
[7:37] plan for a retail shell building to be
located at 3727 FM28
[7:42] located in Friendswood City Center.
Anything on this one, Aubrey?
[7:46] » Uh, no. This, uh, same thing.
>> Commissioners, any comments?
[7:50] » I had one comment. Okay.
>> Um,
[7:53] I know they've already been
touch with Becky and Aubrey, but on Can
[7:59] you pull out the site plan,
the landscape plan? I'm sorry.
[8:04] I'm going to figure out how
[8:09] » there's there's a pipeline ement that
runs diagonal through that property and
[8:13] they have the shrubs
screening shrubs for the parking lot
[8:19] stop at that easement but pipeline
companies allow you to to do landscaping
[8:24] within the ement as long as you're not
planting trees or doing anything that
[8:29] goes down deep. So my suggestion, my
comment would be let's screen the whole
[8:34] parking lot.
It's the first it's the first thing you
[8:38] see as you come around the corner past
the church is that corner of the parking
[8:42] lot. They won't have any landscaping
there
[8:45] since I know they stopped it because of
the pipeline easement, but I don't think
[8:50] they need to and I'd like to see that
there. But that'd be my only comment.
[8:54] » That's like the northwest corner. Is
that
[8:57] » correct?
Guys, I don't know how to make my
[9:02] regular screen share.
That's what I'm
[9:17] pulled up, but it's
[9:21] get it to drag over.
[9:35] I see. I see what you're saying.
>> I didn't even catch that.
[9:39] » Well, I mean, it's it's got an easement
there, so
[9:42] » right here.
>> Yeah,
[9:43] » correct.
>> Yeah.
[9:45] » So, it's not it's not life or death or
anything. I'm just making a suggestion
[9:50] that we pass that along to them.
>> Yeah. If we can't if we can't bring that
[9:53] up, that's fine. Um, we all got it on
our screens. Um, any other comments? Um,
[10:00] Travis?
>> No.
[10:03] » Mr. Bounce?
>> Um, I will say that I I agree with you.
[10:08] So that I think that there's there's no
reason not to have additional there.
[10:12] » That's the first thing you see as you
come around the corner kind of,
[10:15] » but at the same time it does meet
requirements, right?
[10:18] » I think so.
Yeah, we can um see if they can get the
[10:22] permission from the pipeline company to
extend the shrubs.
[10:27] » So, like I said, just a suggestion. Not
even I just wanted to make sure it was
[10:31] out there.
>> That's a good one. Thank you for
[10:33] catching that. Um
do we have a motion?
[10:38] » Motion to approve.
Second. Sure.
[10:41] » Man, we have a motion, a second. All in
favor? Motion passes.
[10:51] Okay, next item five, discussion.
Discuss proposed changes to site plan
[10:56] and plat approval procedures which would
require amendments to appendix B
[11:00] subdivisions city code, appendix C
zoning city code and the design design
[11:07] criteria manual DCM. Aubrey,
>> uh, yes. So, um, just a followup to the
[11:14] introduction of this item from the last
meeting. Um I did do some benchmarking
[11:19] with other cities. Um all the ones in
Galveastston County. So Alvin, Clear
[11:24] Lake Shores, Dickinson, Galveastston,
KMA, League City, Periland, Santa Fe,
[11:28] and Webster. Um of course there are a
few cities that don't have zoning.
[11:32] Alvin, KMA, and Santa Fe. Um so for
those cities, their planning commission
[11:39] approves plat or city council in the
case of KMA. Other than that, all the
[11:44] other cities um their planning and
zoning commissions uh are still
[11:48] approving plat. And then for commercial
and multifamily site plans, um their
[11:55] staff um there were no planning and
zoning commissions that approve site
[12:00] plans. It's not required by law. Um it
is has been historically required by law
[12:05] for the commissions to approve plat
which you as we said changed a few years
[12:10] ago. Um, so just to give you that
information. Um,
[12:16] and the newspaper notices will be
published next week for the proposed
[12:22] changes to the subdivision ordinance and
zoning ordinance. We're advertising them
[12:26] as two separate items and they'll be two
separate agenda items. So you can
[12:29] consider them individually, plats and
site plans. Um, so that will be at our
[12:35] March 12th meeting for consideration and
recommendation or public hearing and
[12:40] recommendation and then it'll go to city
council um, April 6th for public hearing
[12:46] and consideration of the ordinance.
>> Okay.
[12:50] Any comments, Commissioner Bounds?
>> No, I think we we discussed it pretty
[12:55] much last time.
Commissioner Man,
[13:00] » I'm still torn
and I'm trying to find
[13:06] looking at this. It saves everybody
time. I know we we discussed that, but
[13:10] I'm trying to figure out
um
[13:15] both sides. And so we save time. What
are we losing? Like we're changing it.
[13:21] So there's got to be a goods and others
to to all of it, right? So what are we
[13:25] losing by us not doing it? And I this is
actually really good because I was
[13:29] thinking that it would not be nobody
else does the site plans, you know. Um
[13:35] so this has changed me my thought
process on it. So
[13:40] what are we losing?
It's all benefit.
[13:46] » I mean I I don't know if
>> you're oversight. That's
[13:53] » yeah I mean obviously seven eyes on
things versus two
[14:01] um you know there are some benefits
there and you know like Marcus caught
[14:04] the shrubs tonight. I mean um you know
there's little things like that. I mean
[14:09] we look at you know these plans a lot
and by the time they get to y'all you
[14:16] know we haven't looked at them in a
couple of days. Um, but I mean
[14:19] commissioners always bring valuable
input to the site plans.
[14:24] » I'm wondering too if we also bring a
little bit of detachment from being in
[14:30] it the way you you all are. Um, which
maybe give us a little different
[14:34] perspective as well as uh commissioners
in the community running into people at
[14:39] HB and around. We do kind of get the
sense of how people like things. I know
[14:45] people uh whether I like it or not want
to give me their opinion everywhere I go
[14:50] about the um the town and how we're
doing stuff. So now I lean back the
[14:55] other way that that might be good might
be beneficial to us overall.
[15:02] » Mr. Rush
>> kind of same boat with you
[15:06] » back and forth depends on the day
>> depends on the the situation too. But I
[15:13] love being a pain in Becky's side.
Always pepper her with questions and I
[15:19] would miss that.
>> That's another benefit.
[15:21] » That is a benefit.
>> This did throw me a curveball tonight. I
[15:25] I wasn't expecting this.
>> We don't have a zoning official.
[15:31] Correct. I mean, that's that's like a
dedicated staff person in Dickinson.
[15:36] » Yeah, it all the cities are different.
Um, so I mean a zoning official is equal
[15:42] to a a planner or just every city's
nomenclature is different.
[15:49] » I'm still weighing pros and cons and I
know Commissioner Phillips had wanted
[15:55] some time to think about it too. So I'm
curious to hear where she's on it as
[15:59] well and other feedback I've gotten.
I don't want to rush into it.
[16:08] Um, I'm all about efficiency and uh
streamlining processes. So, on that
[16:14] side, I'm I'm I'm in favor, especially
saving time off off y'all's plates. Um,
[16:20] I do have concerns. I've had a a few
citizens reach out to me in opposition
[16:25] to this. Um, the other thing that uh
that came to mind after our last
[16:30] meeting, which y'all brought up some
good comments, was uh
[16:35] when we're not looking at the the plans,
we will kind of miss those things. We
[16:42] may decide that, hey, do we need to go
back and look at that? This has went
[16:46] through several times. It meets our
current ordinance. Do we need to look
[16:50] over an ordinance and maybe make a
change because we don't necessarily like
[16:53] that. we don't think it fits what we
need for modern day friends would right
[16:58] so we we do lose that aspect of it also
um and like you said getting rusty
[17:04] because
>> you know you get too much time in
[17:07] between and
there's there's aspects for and against
[17:12] so I'll just leave it at that for now
>> I would like to ask a question um
[17:18] if if this was accepted
could you send
[17:26] send it to us outside of this meeting.
We look at it and make it yes or no
[17:33] based on that. It has to be in or out.
>> Okay.
[17:39] » Yeah. We could I mean we would we could
give you staff reports but it would be
[17:43] after the fact. I mean you have to have
a meeting to make a decision
[17:46] » like the DRC report be accurate.
>> Yeah.
[17:51] » Any other comments?
No, I I I personally like the oversight,
[17:56] but that's just me.
>> I enjoy doing that.
[18:00] » Is there Is there anything you want to
say in response to anything anybody's
[18:04] mention?
>> No.
[18:06] » Becky's got something to say to me, but
she's going to save it for later.
[18:09] » Karen, you have any additional input?
>> Okay. All right. Good.
[18:16] » Go ahead.
>> I don't know. I'd like to hear from the
[18:18] city council.
Is it appropriate to call them up at
[18:22] this point or No,
[18:26] » discussion.
[18:32] » Either council member, would you like to
step up and
[18:42] » boy, I'm the wrong person to call up
here.
[18:45] » Said age before beauty.
>> Yeah, you have some background here.
[18:48] Well, yeah. I have, you know, five years
on planning and zoning. So, um I think
[18:53] you you all thinking about it the right
way. Absolutely. That there are pros and
[18:58] cons. What city council is going to do,
you know, obviously I have no way of
[19:02] knowing that everyone's going to have
their own, you know, perspective on it.
[19:06] Uh and but I know for a fact they will
take your recommendation very seriously.
[19:13] So, I I give you, you know, every
council to think about what you're going
[19:18] to put down and the reasoning behind it.
Even if it's reasons that you think you
[19:23] like this but don't like this because
that's going to help some of the council
[19:27] members who aren't as familiar with
planning and zoning, understand that the
[19:31] some of the thinking process. So, so
that would be helpful to to them even if
[19:36] it's not unanimous, if you can give some
pros and cons. Um, you know, Travis, one
[19:40] of the things you said in the last
meeting really has stuck with me, uh,
[19:44] for me, and that was, how are you going
to rule effectively? And not you, you
[19:50] guys will all be fine. The current
commission be fine, but two years from
[19:54] now, three years from now, when it's
been some turnover and people have never
[19:57] seen site plans or plats and all a
sudden there's an exception or something
[20:01] that does need to come to planning and
zoning, how are they going to have the
[20:05] background to really understand what
they're looking at for that exception?
[20:08] and you brought that up and that's
resonated that's resonated with me.
[20:12] However, I do know from my long
experience how much time staff has to be
[20:16] here after hours and and that to if we
could reduce that that would be awesome.
[20:23] Uh I I just think that but so what
you're you are saying I'm agreeing with
[20:27] you. There are pros there there are
cons. Um, and I would rather not give
[20:33] you sway you one way or another with my
opinion. If privately, I'll be glad to
[20:37] talk to any one of you about what my
private opinion is of this, but there
[20:42] are pros and cons and you just have to
weigh in your own mind and rule. And
[20:46] even if it's not unanimous one way or
the other, you when it gets written up,
[20:50] I really highly think it would be
helpful for council to see all the
[20:54] thinking.
>> That's a great point. I think you added
[20:56] a lot there. So when we do finally say
we say both ways.
[21:01] » Yeah, I think that'll be helpful.
>> Thank you, Council Member Matanga.
[21:05] Council member Branson, would you like
to
[21:07] » or Hanks
>> or Hanks? Sorry.
[21:11] Oh, man.
>> I think he said it well.
[21:43] Thank you.
Okay.
[21:47] Anything else, commissioners?
Okay. We'll move on to communications.
[21:52] Receive an update regarding the
comprehensive plan update. a resilient
[21:55] comm community communities project RCP
grant for the general land office.
[21:59] Aubrey,
>> so we um had to cancel our bus tour um
[22:04] because of the weather. Um so we have it
rescheduled for Monday, February 23rd.
[22:09] Um and fortunately I we've got really
good turnout. Like I think almost every
[22:16] commission every subcommittee member has
uh responded that they're coming just
[22:20] about. So it'll be a good turnout. Um we
the flyers with the surveys went out in
[22:27] the Friday folders to the uh FISD kids.
And then um we are uh the consultant is
[22:36] going to be coming to attend a work
session with Downtown Economic
[22:40] Development Corporation on March 17th.
Um and then we're also looking to
[22:45] schedule a panhandled property owner
meeting that day as well, maybe at like
[22:50] 1:30. Um I our GIS department did
address labels to all the property
[22:55] owners in the like north of the creek on
in the panhandle. So we'll be sending
[23:00] invites to all of those property owners
um and have the meeting in here. Um and
[23:05] then that day also
make use of the consultants time while
[23:10] they're here. Uh we'll probably also be
meeting with our EOC staff. Um they're
[23:15] the ones that oversee our hazard
mitigation plans with Galveastston and
[23:18] Harris counties. and we do have to
incorporate some of the goals of those
[23:23] plans into our comprehensive plan. So,
we'll um hopefully meet with them that
[23:26] day. Um the next uh CPAC meeting, which
is the advisory committee, is to be
[23:32] determined uh hopefully the end of
March, beginning of April. Um and then
[23:36] there is a project website that's live
now. If you go to the city's uh website
[23:42] on the homepage, you have to scroll down
just a tad, but it's one of the main
[23:46] things on the front page. So, um, all of
our activities with this project are on
[23:50] that web page. Um, so that's where we're
at with that.
[23:55] » Thank you.
>> Uh, item B, announcement of the next
[23:58] planning zoning commission regular
meetings
[24:02] for Thursday, February 26, 2026
and Thursday, February 12th, 2026.
[24:09] » Oh, March 12th. Did I put
>> Sorry, I read it wrong. Sorry.
[24:13] » That's okay. Um, item D, receive the
January 2026 DRC report and business
[24:19] report invitation to the state of the
city address on Thursday, March 5th.
[24:24] Invitation to the regional roundt in
Leaport hosted by T Texas Downtown and
[24:29] City of Leaport. Aubrey,
>> uh, yes. So, the reports were included
[24:34] in your backup material. Um, if anybody
has any questions on that, let me know.
[24:39] Um just development overall is really
slow right now. Um we only issued one
[24:46] new single family home permit in
January.
[24:49] » I think we're at 12 for the fiscal so
our fiscal year this reporting is on
[24:53] fiscal year. So October 1st our new fix
fiscal year
[24:56] » and we've only issued 12 new homes this
year whereas last year we were at 43. Um
[25:02] but Georgetown is saying they're going
to get going here pretty soon. Um so
[25:06] hopefully maybe by May hope we'll maybe
see in plats from Georgetown and um get
[25:13] them going. Um but the invitation to the
state of the city was sent out um and
[25:18] then the Texas downtown regional roundt
in Leaport um is not this Friday but
[25:24] next Friday from 9 to 3. Um so if y'all
if anybody wants to attend I need to
[25:29] know like as soon as possible so I can
get those registrations done.
[25:32] » Okay.
>> Real quick on those words. I know we
[25:36] were talking a little bit last meeting,
the March 12th is spring break and there
[25:41] were a lot of people that were suspect
of going and then you said we're kind of
[25:45] light as well. So maybe before we put
that out if we do we know are we going
[25:51] to have enough people to have a meeting
and do we have enough events?
[25:55] » Uh I just we're doing three newspaper
notices for public hearings for that
[26:00] meeting for March 12th. Okay.
>> March 12th. Yeah. So, um I know Stacy's
[26:05] not going to be here. She let me know
she's not going to be here for the next
[26:08] two meetings. Um so, yeah, we may need
to take a head count.
[26:13] » You're not here the 12th.
>> How about you?
[26:17] » I don't think I will be
>> and I'm not here on the 12th.
[26:20] » I won't be here.
>> That's why I brought it up. I think the
[26:25] earlier we identify that day
>> change.
[26:28] » Yeah. which it's all it's all city
initiated stuff pretty much. So we'll
[26:33] just pull all those push that back a
month.
[26:37] » We we should have some plat is the only
thing
[26:43] » which we're have we have plats for the
26
[26:48] » tomorrow's a submittal date and I know
that I've talked to at least one person
[26:52] that should be submitted.
>> Well and the yeah the site plan was
[26:55] turned in for um the replat tonight.
Yes. However, both of those they're
[27:03] pushing
if they're really clean on this submitt,
[27:06] we could maybe get them on the February
26 meeting.
[27:10] » Okay,
>> we could try.
[27:12] » Um, okay. Thank you for bringing that
up. So, we will we'll we'll pivot, make
[27:20] some changes in our decisions. Okay.
Yeah. Okay.
[27:27] » Next, um,
city council updates from Council Member
[27:32] Matanga.
[27:37] » Good evening, commissioners. Thank you
all for being here. Glad y'all were able
[27:42] to get a quorum. Thank you, Travis, for
coming in.
[27:45] » I apologize for my tardiness. Oh, no.
I'll flog myself appropriately.
[27:50] » Not from him. Not for me. Good job.
Thank y'all for being here. Uh it's
[27:54] important to keep the process moving. Uh
city council had a meeting on February
[27:58] 2nd and it was a very packed agenda. We
got a lot of good things done as related
[28:06] to planning and zoning. We did uh take
on the uh future land use map update and
[28:13] the um zoning change for the property on
2351
[28:19] and where the person was coming in to go
from industrial and CSC
[28:25] uh to a plan unit development with
apartments and commercial. Uh, and so
[28:30] some of my comments earlier when you
asked about, you know, the the pros and
[28:33] cons, I that was on my mind because in
that meeting a lot of people were um
[28:38] curious and spent some time thinking
through what planning and zoning said on
[28:42] their recommendation because you
recommended uh unanimously, if I
[28:48] remember correctly, to move that forward
as a positive recommendation to city
[28:52] council
>> with with some uh restraints though
[28:56] because of the noise. Yes. Yes.
>> Yes. And city council looked um at what
[29:03] the developer had changed and some of
the ways they had tried to at least say
[29:08] they were addressing noise. And I can't
speak for the other uh council members,
[29:13] but at least I wasn't swayed by that nor
um how they tied some of the development
[29:18] of apartments to commercial. Uh I
personally didn't feel it was tied very
[29:23] heavily. Uh but in that meeting we
unanimously voted against making that
[29:30] change but I do know a lot of
consideration was put to what planning
[29:35] and zoning voted and why uh on that but
so we typically don't like to go against
[29:42] uh P&Z but in this particular case we
looked broader quite honestly we looked
[29:47] at what we needed in that area what made
good sense for that area and this
[29:52] particular project in this in that
particular location just didn't make
[29:57] sense to council
>> and and I think that means the system
[30:01] kind of worked a little bit because
we're looking at it through a soda straw
[30:05] in terms of the planning and zoning of
it and the ability to do it and then
[30:10] handing it off to y'all to make the
broader decision. So
[30:14] » to me that I I thought that was a that
worked well.
[30:17] » Yeah, each kind of looked in its lane a
little bit. Yeah,
[30:21] » I I think that's right. But uh anyway,
that that was the only as I remember it,
[30:26] the only planning and zoning item from
that meeting.
[30:29] » Thank you, sir. We appreciate your time.
Glad
[30:32] » to be here.
>> Okay. Well, we'll continue with
[30:34] communications from our commissioners.
Uh Commissioner Man,
[30:39] » just glad to be here.
>> We're glad you're here,
[30:44] » Commissioner Bounds.
>> Uh thank you to the staff. Appreciate
[30:47] hard work.
City council members, thank you for
[30:51] showing up.
Thank you,
[30:56] » Commissioner Rice.
[31:00] » Nothing new to say.
>> My faith in the whole system's uh kind
[31:03] of in limbo being that the timekeeper
was late, but
[31:08] but no, I appreciate everything. I
appreciate y'all being in attendance and
[31:12] uh appreciate all the work everybody
puts in. Um Aubrey, anything additional?
[31:17] » Yes, sir.
>> Karen,
[31:19] » yes, sir.
>> Becky. Okay. And with that, thank you
[31:23] everyone for attending this evening.