Are you ready? Are we all ready? Okay. It is 6 p.m. I'm going to open this in the council meeting in the December 3rd, 2025,
roll call please.
Dr. Beckley. Here. Palashin. Here. Fred Toby. Here. Casey Dick. Brian Goodspeed. Here. Jim Weaseman. Here. And Patrick Kale.
We're
a calendar of upcoming events.
Next schedule commission meeting is Monday,
December 15th, 2025 at 8.30.
Our next schedule for County Council meeting will be Wednesday,
December 17th, coming close by at 6 p.m. both here, same location.
First off, we have adoption of minutes for
our last regularly held meeting from November 5th.
We'll cancel a moment to renew and then I'll entertain a motion.
I'm a motion.
I'm a motion to vote me.
I have a second.
I'll second.
I'm good speaker.
All in favor?
That's approved.
I'm going to open the floor now for public comment regarding action items,
but I do have a request from some people to talk in general.
Council have any issues with them?
Speaking very quickly about, okay.
First up, I did not forget who's first up.
You want to get the list?
We'll just read off this first one.
That's the Chancellor.
I'll give you the list then so you'll have it.
Thank you very much.
Have a good one.
I've done no division I.
Good job.
I'll stay here and be a partner in health.
Thank you so much.
Well, you said my name.
I'm assuming we have to say our name
and where we're from, right?
At least your name.
Okay, Jackie can answer from Blackford County, from Harper City.
And I just kind of wanted to like talk to y'all just generally about some concerns.
And I know we're given three minutes, I think my husband's going to give me his three minutes.
But one won't take too long, but I'm just asking for some grace as I talk through some
stuff with you.
But first I just want to ask you guys a couple questions if I could.
And the first question I'm going to ask you is the same question that I've asked the commissioner since 2001.
And today, I really appreciate the honest answers they've given when I've asked this question.
Because sometimes when you put on a spot and you're asked a question and I don't even want to say or how to answer,
they didn't answer honestly, and I really appreciate that.
I'm going to ask you guys the exact same question, and then I'm going to tell you what my response was when I was asked this question.
So, the question I have for you is this, have you guys read the Indiana Constitution?
Have you read it?
Part of it.
You've read part of it?
Portions?
Yeah.
Portions of it?
Okay.
And that's kind of the answer that they gave me too.
They said, yeah, I've read portions of it, part of it.
Two commissioner meetings ago, Dan actually said he hadn't read it yet.
And this time when I asked, he said he'd started reading it and the other two said
the same thing, part of it, some of it, that kind of thing. And I was like, yeah, okay. I was kind
of shocked that they hadn't really finished reading it because of like how important the Indiana
Constitution is, especially when we have elected officials, officers swearing, you know, to uphold
the Constitution. So I was like, oh, it concerns me that people raise the right hand and swear
no to something that they haven't even read, but I also get it. So that's why I'm going to
to be honest with you and let you know.
And I was asked that very same question five years ago
as a government teacher,
I couldn't give them an answer of yes.
Shame on me, right?
Shame on me.
Like I knew the US Constitution,
but I didn't know my own state constitution here.
I was teaching in the state of India.
And we were also at a point, right?
In 2020, we were trying to figure out
what the heck's going on with our country?
What's going on with our state?
We're going through COVID.
We're going through all these crazy things.
And I'm trying to figure out one as a teacher and one as a person like how can we fix this?
And somebody asked me that question. Have you read the Indiana State Constitution? I had to say no.
Then I said to myself, maybe I should open that book and maybe I should start reading it.
And I did. And what I found absolutely amazing was these epiphanies that were coming to me.
And I'm being straight up honest with you. Like I'm like, oh my gosh, I've been praying for wisdom.
God says this, pray for wisdom. I will give it to you. Do the research. So that's
what I started doing. I started doing research and I really started investigating
what was in our Indiana Constitution. You want to know what I found? I found
that the Almighty God gave people rights. The Almighty God. It is said in
all 50 state constitutions, believe it or not, and the United States Constitution.
and I'm like, I love my God.
And he gave us these rights.
Then as I started doing more research
and I started thinking about all the stuff
I've been teaching in history and government,
I started thinking about, you know,
our founding fathers were pretty smart cookies.
And the reason why they were smart
is because they took these wonderful, glorious rights
that we've been given by God
and they put them in a document
and that document's called the Constitution.
But they were so smart
Then what they decided to do is they had the rights over on one side and then they established
government.
And when they established government, they told government officials this one thing.
One thing.
It is your sole job to protect the rights of the people.
That's yours.
The government, our elected servants, is their sole job to protect the rights of
the people.
How are you going to do that?
Well, we're going to split up those three branches of government and y'all are going
to hold each other accountable. And if you start messing with people's rights, the people's
then now, our founding fathers put in there, the people can actually write a little note
to the government and say, hey, I have some injury here. There's a problem here. Somebody's
infringing upon my rights. And for the most part, we know what those rights are. We've
got freedom of speech. We have freedom of religion. We've got all these things, right?
We kind of can name them, right? There's a lot more rights in there that we've
given them kind of forget about. One of those is we can write notes to our elected
officials saying hey I've been injured in this way and I need remedy. I need
somebody to listen to how I'm being injured and I need my government official,
my officers, my sheriff, my police, my firefighter, whatever it is. I need them
to come and like listen to my note that I'm writing you and address and
And address that. I'm seeking remedy.
The fancy words for that is redress of grievance, right?
So we've been given this right to redress of grievances, and people have been doing that.
Along with another one of those rights is we have the right to a jury of our peers.
It's called due process of law.
These things are the epiphanies that I was, that I was all of a sudden starting to understand.
and I thought, you know what, I need to start sharing that with the government officials
because the sad part is our government officials haven't been talking the same thing. They haven't.
We failed. I failed as a teacher for 17 years because I didn't know it. If I could go back
to my students and apologize that I didn't teach them according to the Constitution,
you better believe I wouldn't have hurt people. Because now I know different. Because
I've studied and I've learned. I've dug in books, hours and hours and hours.
So what I did is I took the knowledge and wisdom that God has been giving me and we've been teaching other people.
And I think the part that we've missed is we haven't talked to you guys in layman terms.
We haven't. And I apologize for that.
So my goal tonight is just to kind of cover a couple of those things and let you know what that's all about.
We've been coming to you and we've been reading these notices to you, right?
these notices and Napa Davis, we've done commissioners and the zoning board and last night we're
whatever that meeting was was like and ordinance something or other and
and so we've been giving you these things and these wonderful you know legal document all this
kind of stuff. These are the notes that I told you that people could write to our officials and
say, Hey, this is the injury that we feel that we have received. And we would like to
have remedy to this injury. Could you please look at it? In fact, we're writing everything
down in this notice that says what the law is. It's called the Constitution, which is
the common law. It protects our rights, fundamental principles, there's things called map sums
of law that back all of that up. We've been giving that to you, hoping that you
would read it. We would want you to read it. We would want you to investigate what's actually
in it so then you can come back and say, hey, we're listening to you. I read your letter.
I'm going to write it with our back. We've asked for that. So when we ask for at the
very end, please take further notice. Could you please respond to us like in a sworn
affidavit, under penalty of purchase, because that's what we're doing, that you as
government elected have been given the right to do what you do. Like we're just
asking you to keep us in the Constitution where you have been granted
authority to use the power that you're using to make the legislation laws
whatever show us where did you get that from. In fact we've given so many days
we'll say hey can you do that in 10 days 20 days 30 days can you get back
with us just show us in the Constitution granted the authority to
do what you're doing. That's, I mean, fair. So you just give a notice, hey, can you like, like,
get back with us on. And also in there, we stated that after 16 days, if you don't respond to us,
then you agree with us. No problem. You agree with us. Perfectly fine. People in Michigan
can say hunky dory, swanky, right? No one. Hundreds, hundreds of notices in affidavits
have been given. People are like pouring their heart out. They're sharing these
notes, these grievances with you. And not one elected government official has
responded to the notice. That's a good thing and not such a good thing. The
good thing is for the people that have been submitting them because by tax
acquiescence that people have already won. You've agreed to everything that's in the notice
and you probably don't even realize it. And the reason why you don't realize it
is because what has happened is this. The notice has been taken, it's been handed,
I'm going to hand this to you by the way, it's been handed and then on hot light more than one
time in numerous meetings throughout all the counties it's been handed over to the county
council, an attorney, a lawyer. They've handed it over and this is what they've
said. What do we do with these?
And the attorney says back to the people, back to
the county council, a commissioner, whoever it is. It's nothing. It's a
nothing burner. It's you don't have to do anything with that. It's nothing
burner. It's totally that sovereign citizen stuff which I'm gonna put on
record right now. It doesn't have anything to do with sovereign
sovereign citizenship, sovereign citizenship as a folks, it's stupid, it's dumb, and that's
not what these are about. It's just we the people coming to you writing you a note saying,
here's where we think our injury is and we need you to fix it. We need you to listen
to the will of the people, the common good of the people, the public good of the people.
That's all we want you to do. And show us in the Constitution where you've got
the authority to do what you're doing, right? So they hand it over to the attorney.
The attorney tells him it's a nothing burner and you guys really don't pull it out and read it because you've been told by county council that you don't, it's a nothing burner.
You realize we're the county council, right? Well, I meant like when I say council, I mean a attorney council, like the council, like your attorneys, your lawyers, that kind of thing. Not, not you guys. But when I say.
council, I mean, you know, we don't have that same attorney. We have a different attorney.
Right. You all have different ones. I'm talking in generic terms. Like, you know,
like the commissioners have theirs, you guys have yours, the only board has theirs, everybody
has theirs. But they're turning it over to the attorney that's affiliated with the board.
This is something I want to ask you guys.
Who's alive? The person that raised their hand
and sworn oath to the Constitution or the attorney? I can tell you right now the
The attorney is not the one being held liable.
It's the person that raised the hand for the oath
to the Constitution.
The attorney has billable hours.
Person doesn't have to swear an oath.
But I'll bet your bottom dollar if you go to the attorney
and you say, will you swear under penalty of perjury
that you are advising the boards
according to the common law
that the people are coming to you with.
I can bet you your bottom dollar they won't
because they're not beholden to that. They won't, but you guys are beholden to it.
If they even remotely pause when you ask that question, I would hope that you guys would have an
aha moment because they have not advised you according to common law and the Constitution.
They haven't advised you according to what our rights are and that it's your job to uphold.
We'd ask for you to come and show us.
We literally could take our notices and affidavits because we've won by tax
acquiescence. Tax that means silent, acquiescence mean no response is a
response, ignorance of the law is no excuse. We could take those and submit those
in a judicial court, won by an elected judge. We could ask for a jury of our
peers. Do you really think in Blackford County when you've got hundreds and
hundreds and thousands of people telling me we do not want large corporations coming into our county
and taking over our county with solar farms and wind farms and CO2 capture and et cetera,
et cetera, et cetera. And no matter what you say, it's been proven and affidavit and notices
I've given you that public money is being used for non-public purposes.
Supreme Court, July 2024, Trump versus USA came down and said there's absolutely no
immunity for an unofficial act. If you're acting outside of the granted authority that
has been given to you by the people, you've committed an unofficial act and you have
zero immunity for that.
Why am I saying this? I don't want anybody to be into that kind of trouble.
But what I can say is that people are demanding, we have the right to demand,
that people are demanding that you take our notices in our affidavit seriously,
that you investigate it, and you come back to us and show us where you've been given
than constitutional authority, not case law, not statutes,
not codes, not ordinances, actual constitution
where you've been granted authority
to abrogate the rights of the people,
the public good, the will of the people.
That's what we're asking.
Humble, demanding.
So now if you guys have questions for me,
if you're free to ask them, be more than happy to.
Yeah, could you clarify? You said, you said nothing burner. It's a figure of
speech. It's a nothing burner. That's a nothing burner, which means, oh, this
doesn't mean anything. It's just the people grinding. It doesn't hold or
stand. It won't stand. You know, that's a nothing. It's a nothing burner.
That's, and so, yeah, yeah, sorry. Is that lingo like swanky and hippie
skippy and you know kind of belly but yeah it's a nothing burner so yeah so if
you guys have any questions if you guys want to meet later I mean there are so
many of us that have been like doing this and once again it's it's not because
we want to come at you or have one over on you or anything like that it
doesn't it's not that it's we want you to come so we can learn together and
so that you can actually see hey this is what the Constitution actually says
And this is what you've been granted authority to do and this is what you haven't been granted authority to do
And if you're ever in doubt don't right and then you look at it go
Oh, does that advocate the rights of the people does that go against their right if it goes against their right?
It's a flat out. No
If you're not sure assemble with the people and ask you're not beholden to the attorney you've been holding to the people
What exactly do you think that county council has done that's in violation?
Now, I haven't read the entire Indiana Constitution, but I've read the United States Constitution several times.
I've been a law enforcement for 30 years, so I take that serious, the legal wrangling.
But as far as county council, I don't know what you mean when you say that we have violated your rights.
And if you feel agreed, there are courses that you can take to remedy that.
You can't demand the very body that you say has caused these problems to fix those problems.
It wouldn't be proper.
So specifically then.
What has Kennedy Council done that you feel is a violation of the Indiana State Constitution,
which is basically the United States Constitution Water Bank.
That's where they got most of that stuff.
So my question to you is I'm going to ask you a question with this answer. I'm going to give you a question to answer this.
What have you voted on that deals with money?
That is our sole responsibility as a county council.
So if you voted on anything dealing with public monies, tax monies,
that is for a non-public purpose.
in other words, there's no such thing as a private public contract. It's not in the Constitution.
So if you voted on anything that deals with a public private contract, I will be very specific
with this. If you have voted on any kind of contract whatsoever that deals with paying RWE
to come into our county as an economic entity for economic development, if you have had
anything to do with that. It is a non-public purpose because it is paying private landowners
to put equipment on their land. We've been told specifically by the commissioners in economic
development that Blackford County has spent a single dime on these Windows 4 projects.
And we've given Athedavid and notices that that's not true. And I gave that information
last night they took pictures of exactly where all that money is being
fuddled down to just by the fact that you give a tax abatement to a private
landowner and you don't give the same tax abatement to every single private
person in the county. We haven't given the tax abatement to a private individual.
It will happen. We haven't. We can't. We can't even think that we might or might be
with the future. So you're saying all tax evasions for anything? Not if it's done
with the will of the people. See, this is the biggest issue. What was the
will of the people, how will the people be determined by elections? This could
actually go to a vote. So let me ask you this question. If you took every
single person in Blackford County and you just did one election on whether
where people wanted to have wind turbines, solar farms,
CO2, battery storage.
If you had all the people come and just do the one vote
and whether the public good,
the common good of the people wanted these things here,
I could tell you without a shadow
with down 95% of the people would say no.
No.
Well, let's put it to the vote then.
Not that many people put our public meetings.
Not a public meeting, I'm talking an official vote.
Yeah.
Well, you're also saying developmentally, thanks.
So it's called the common good.
So this is part of the research that needs to be done.
We've given it to you in multiple of these notices and affidavits.
It's all in there.
The Supreme Court decisions, where the money comes from,
how it's filtered down through these companies that operate in the commerce.
Whenever you have a company that operates in the commerce,
they are held under the same standards as you guys are. They can't do anything in
commerce that goes against the will of the people or the common good of the
people. It's kind of like you wouldn't have a house of ill repute. You wouldn't
have prostitution or a porn something in this county. You just wouldn't. Why?
Because the people wouldn't want it. Because it's statutorily prohibited by
law. So yeah. And you realize and I guess we're gonna have to wrap this
If you feel you've been wrong, I encourage everybody to take proper action.
Okay, so, and giving you notes and after David says, proper action and now what we need you to do is
That's not proper action. There are courts of law that you can file injunctions and you can file all the motions that you want.
If you think we have broken the law, I encourage you to do so.
Just going back, I just, the last thing I'm going to say is when you come as one of the
people, you come by surrogate, and when you come by surrogate, it means you come by right.
Again, we're talking about the Constitution.
We have our rights.
We can come as not only people to come to you and just talk to you, and that's basically
what we do.
And we've been with you 23 minutes?
And that is like full of rights, I think.
And engagement and dialogue is important, I'm not saying that.
I am just saying that.
And I think we got fundamental disagreements on certain things.
I think we probably agree on a lot of things,
but at this point, this is a,
we don't have a lot of say in approval
of what goes and what doesn't.
Our only best and interest in that was a tax abatement.
And that's a whole other discussion
from whether that should be here or not.
That was a money money issue
that reached a very serious
and deliberated on quite a bit.
Appreciate what you guys do.
No, thank you.
Thank you.
So, if you guys want to talk or just get all your time, that's all right.
She had one. Okay. Everybody then good.
Thank you guys very much. I really appreciate it.
And we, I'm, I'm free to talk after the meeting.
Or we'll make myself available. I'm glad.
Okay.
Okay. Real quick, we're going to move things around judge by you want to talk about additional appropriation real quick.
And then you've got another commitment. So thank you so much for what accommodate I appreciate the clarification because I've been saying nothing burger for most of my life.
I've always said that.
I'm saying the wrong.
I don't know.
Yeah.
The burger folks appreciate the time reason I reached out for the additional appropriation requests.
in our funding line item for juvenile detention over the last six or seven years
we've managed to stay within the constraints of our original request each
year as my usual circumstances this year that resulted in a couple of lengthier
stays and secured facilities that required money expenditure without state
or federal assistance and billing that is going to come in as due this month
is going to cede in the budget amounts that I have in the year.
So certainly want to avoid doing them to the red.
My original intent was to request additional $5,000 that would have covered the billing.
The future billing I'm going to give this month that technically wouldn't be paid until next month will be an additional $4,000.
I'm happy to go ahead and take the five.
I use next year's budget to cover the incoming billing for this month due next month.
And then hopefully next year shakes it early to where it washes or evens out through the
year.
I just wanted to kind of make aware of the fact that if I don't ask for the full amount
now, though, if we do run into a strange occurrence at the end of next year, will we have more
than we would anticipate as far as the attention on math to come back for an additional
next year as well, since that budget's already set. But year over year, we've usually had anywhere
from two to six thousand dollars left in that line item, two to five thousand, excuse me,
left in that line item. So it's not a regular problem.
So if we just hold with the five thousand and then we need eight hundred and two hundred for
during meals? Yes, as well. And I apologize. I thought that was written as a transfer
early request. If that was an additional appropriation, that is correct.
That's what we need to do. Okay, we can move that in. We can move that through transfers.
Lisa. I mean, we can, but it's already been advertised as an additional way till December
17th meeting since we advertise at all. For that one, that will not create a problem
for me. Additional appropriation, not the problem for juvenile detention. We can do that.
I do need to take up today.
Okay.
Discussion question now
motion to approve additional appropriation.
Mind this being with a motion.
Didn't wisdom.
And that was just the 5,000.
Yeah, 5,000.
They'll have to do the pedigree and jury mills separately.
This is the set.
That's a message.
So we should all transfer.
And I don't want to.
and ask for it tonight in the incorrect.
So I'd like to double check and make sure
and I'll clarify it forward.
Either way, I don't know as an advertisement.
Yes, we do a transfer or an invention.
Absolutely, well, I have a first and I have a second
for $5,000,
I got a vote all in favor of $5,000.
I think we can do this one.
Through five though.
Thank you folks and a quick preview
for that for next year.
I'll solicit some options or offers
If any local facilities are offering a monthly expense, the whole positions for us through
the year, all way down to what we've done in the past to see if there might be any savings
benefit involved, and all approaching with that begin in the year, if I think there's
a way that we can eliminate the risk for potential additional occurring or maybe manage
that cost more appropriately over the year, I find something like no.
Is it new that took more, or is it certain ones are just in there longer?
So, this particular time, it wasn't necessarily more.
It's the two of them required a facility.
They did not utilize subsidy funding from the state or federal government that I typically receive.
And again, I'm hoping that will continue to be not a problem as opposed to habit creating.
But for backup options,
There are some facilities that will accept low monthly payments over the course of the year and they reserve a spot for you
for when those instances occur and then you pay nothing extra.
Okay.
And all these math to see if that would make more sense or less sense and get with you if I think there can be a savings reliant.
Okay.
One.
Anything else you need from me?
I really want to pay on that.
Oh, is it working or not?
5,000. Well, it comes out of county general. Well, yeah, it's, yeah, so that's what circuit course, county general.
General, I hope to dump back into it. If I have leftovers, name my other funds. So thank you, judge. Sure. Thank you all. Have a great night.
Okay, let's go back up to.
the action items, the 2026 salary orders.
I think we've got all ready for approval.
There's been no changes or anything like that.
I don't need to make a motion to approve.
I'm just here with a motion to add a second.
I'll sign it in.
I'll sign it with a second to do a roll call with on this.
Chair Muizman?
A question.
My son-in-law is in here.
Should I abstain from this one?
No.
I approve.
Who are we at?
Brian Gidsby?
Hi.
Fred Toby?
Pardon.
Kyle Lushin?
Hi.
And Jack Beckley?
Thanks.
Next up, we have a request from the Whiteford County Historical Society.
There was some confusion on these forms.
I guess they haven't heard of this for a couple of years.
That is correct.
I've sent it to them and I don't know that they've.
They didn't work in it, or they didn't turn it in time, so they have not been getting funding the last several years.
So, talk with Mr. Tabor, and we've worked it out, and these come in and ask for this. So, with presented to the council for a request for special funds.
I didn't get one last year.
No. So they have, for some reason, they've not been turning to these.
this forward.
I just didn't get it filled out for a lot of people here.
So they haven't received any funding from us for a couple of them.
Thank you.
We'll pay out of the permits.
This is something I want to pay this year.
Yeah.
Because they have they've been.
This is for 26.
Yeah.
Yeah. This is for 26.
Yeah.
I'll entertain a motion.
Oh, okay.
I'll tell you what the motion, do I have a second?
Second.
Jim Wiesman with a second.
We'll go ahead and do a roll call vote on this.
So we're doing the 2000.
Okay.
Jim Wiesman?
Aye.
Ryan Goodspeed?
Aye.
Fred Tobi, Kyle Lashane, and Jack Bethway.
The question is for Drew Fother.
Rainier Day Fund, do you want me to like to put some money in that you're going to fund?
Do you want to see the copy in your packets from the resolution we did that's awarding?
We don't have anything to fund.
There's no day funds, plus
an amount available in the weekend probably.
It's a 10 percent and it is 300 million $3,022,553.28, so roughly $300,000.
We've always had a pretty healthy rainy day fund that has been helpful in rainy days,
So I do encourage the council to approve the amount to be transferred into that fund.
I understand the motion for the amount.
Do we know how much we've used? How much have we used this year?
I don't know that we have.
What number is that?
The very bottom is 34.
Oh, there it is, 1186. No, we have not used anything this year.
We're currently at 1.2 million.
So maybe we don't have to put as much in as we had before.
Any recommendations, Lisa?
I mean, I would say probably 200,000, 100,000, 200,000.
We'll get the numbers.
Yeah.
I'll make a motion with maybe 300,000.
Write this fee with a motion to transfer $200,000 to the regular day of funding.
Do I have a second?
I'll second that.
I will have the new resolution next meeting since I didn't know how much we were going to do, so I will have a new resolution to sign it on the 17th.
Non-action matters.
Department heads, anybody have?
What do you mean, department heads?
Oh, sorry, Tyler.
We don't talk about them.
They're active.
Committee reports.
Committee corrections.
Department heads, you got it?
Yeah, we're great.
100.
Solid waste.
He's on here in economic development.
That's no important.
Life for development.
In the LAPC.
Financial reports.
courts ending cash balance as of November 2025, $3,022,553.28, total expenditures for
November 2025, $542,481.33, total revenue for November 2025, $212,751.93, additional appropriations
We have addressed third decor and we have EMS lift or
just move that from the subsidy
to be able to pay the subsidy bill.
That is correct.
This is for the infants?
Yes.
What happened was in 2024
there was a check that was written that was fraudulently tried
to cash.
So we didn't, we had to pay that money out of it.
really came out of 2024, but we had to void that check. So, but it wasn't void until 2025,
but it didn't put that money back in 2025. So, that's why we're short. So, we had to pay it out
of 2025's budget. It was really 24's, but we paid it out of that. So, that's why it is off.
That makes sense. It was a fraudulent. Somebody had changed the name on it,
on the check, and luckily it was a lot of money, so they, it was $250,000, but yeah.
No suspects? No, no, because it was in the mail and so then they held that, so it
never got cashed. It was attempted for? Yes, attempted money. Yes, we weren't
out the money, but they didn't cash the check in 24, so when it came in 25,
that made a short and 25 budget. The money's there it's just wasn't used in 24 like it should have been.
Questions?
I have a motion to approve the appropriation of 223,750 dollars.
Mr. Gisby with a motion to have a second.
So Mr. Weasel, what's the second?
Will Colgo, please?
Jim Weasel.
Hi.
Brian Gisby.
Hi.
Fred Tobi.
Hi.
Kyle Lashine.
Hi.
Jack Betley.
Hi.
Procreation crew, five of you.
How many elected officials training 3,000 members?
What exactly do you know?
That is something that the recorders have in charge of.
And this is for any county elected official.
They can use that instead of going for hotel registration
for any state-called meeting.
And so we haven't used it.
And all of a sudden, now everybody
knows that you can use it.
So we've been using that money.
So we did not budget it that much for this year.
This is the money that was in the quarter's office
that we never use for training, but official, right?
Correct.
Now, we don't have enough in it.
There's money in it, we just didn't
appropriate enough money in it.
We didn't, I don't even know how much cash
fund that is in there.
People went to conferences.
Yes, a lot more went to conferences this year.
I was very, I was very proud of it.
We had multiple people going to this year.
Yeah, we've had, because we, oh yeah.
So does that mean we under budget it next year?
Yeah, it may be.
Well, that's an easy thing to fix.
Well, we had to have more training because of the changes at the legislation without all the lips.
Okay.
Questions?
I'll entertain a motion to approve the $6,000 appropriation.
So we're doing it at a certain time.
All right, Mo.
Mo.
Angus B. Fred Toby, Kyle Lashine, and Jack Beckley.
Hi.
Transfer funds.
We can do these individually or since it just transfers, it's already been budgeted,
we can do a motion for all.
However, you guys want to handle it.
The only question I had was the ARP.
70,000.
What's the name of that?
The new laws.
I just moved to revenue loss that's what you have to be able to spend that money
which you're supposed to have that money spent by the end of 26 is that right I
think we had to do you have to put it into revenue loss to spend that if you're
not spending out of that chair of global okay that's how the federal government
I don't want to miss the right time.
Yes, yes.
How much for do we have in the ERP?
265,346 dollars and 53 cents.
That would be $446.
Yes.
64 to 70 of that.
Yeah, I'll say I can't.
What about that plan though for something?
Most 70.
Most maybe I'm not sure.
70,000 or the what?
Wasn't there something else that was coming out of it?
I'd have to look at it.
I don't know what else.
it was on there.
And he already spent that money, yes, and that's that Sheriff's Global.
He's already spent that money. I can look, but I don't have that budget form in front of me.
We're still at 265, 346.
Yes.
And this is...
And I believe that's after the 70,000.
Yeah.
What was it?
What was the system that eats?
What was
this global system?
That's why he was doing the...
I believe it was for the NCAR system and then he used all the money that I mean
he didn't use all of it so that was left he were used out of the budget from last
year and then didn't need the 70,000 in it for this year that
makes sense we
still have 265 that needs to be used by the end of this year. 26. This isn't 26.
Next year. Yes, yes,
but we do need to spend that soon.
You know where she's the drug free? No, that is, um, uh, well, it's grace.
Is that one green? Yeah, that one's gray, Marshall, or gray.
It's the grants through the World Coordinating Council.
Any other questions on this transfer, one item, the one item, then I'll entertain a motion to approve all transfers as presented.
I'm going to approve the transfers as presented.
The motion to have a second.
I'll second it.
I was saying with a second, we'll call will please Jim Weasel. Hi, Ryan Goodspeed. Hi, Fred Toby.
Kyle Lashine and Jack Beckley. Hi.
Thanks for the proof, I know.
And as I'm we opens.
Other questions or comments.
In general,
we don't hear that.
You're essentially, this is your guys moment.
We probably should actually, probably this is probably the time to interview, but I'll look at the, I think, half of the meeting.
Now, do you have anything to say?
I know that you're jumping at the bit, I can pull it.
I don't think I want to.
Something you won't be able to get out of.
Anybody else?
Have I been?
Okay.
If there's anything you know, go to the public comment.
I'll take a motion to adjourn.
Yeah.
Second?
Second.
All in favor?
It is a journey. Thank you all for coming out.