[0:11] the minutes for the August 10th, 2026
[0:14] meeting.
[0:14] >> Make a motion to approve.
[0:15] >> Motion by Dave.
[0:17] >> Second.
[0:17] by Tom. Any final uh questions,
[0:21] comments, or
[0:24] seeing none, all those in favor signify
[0:26] by saying I.
[0:27] >> I.
[0:28] >> Oppose. Nay
[0:30] minutes pass. The third item on the
[0:33] agenda is appearances. Uh we do have uh
[0:36] a public hearing in which um you can if you are appearing for the public
[0:41] hearing, you can do so under that. Uh
[0:44] otherwise um you are welcome to appear
[0:48] if you don't if it isn't under a public
[0:50] hearing. Um, and I see some people in
[0:54] the audience for like I said the bank
[0:56] and uh the fire station
[1:00] um and Winter Park builders uh are not
[1:04] public hearings. So if you wish to
[1:05] appear now you can
[1:10] second call
[1:12] and final call.
[1:15] All right. Then item four on the agenda
[1:17] is a public hearing for a conditional
[1:19] use permit to allow for the operation of
[1:21] a secondhand store at 1336 East Sumner
[1:24] Street uh zoned B3 General Business
[1:27] District. I declare this hearing open uh
[1:31] and reading of the public notice. Jacob.
[1:40] Sorry.
[1:41] >> Take your time.
[2:04] Okay. Notice of public hearing plan
[2:07] commission. Please take notice that
[2:08] pursuant to section 62.23 23 PN 7 PNDE
[2:13] of the Wisconsin state statutes and
[2:14] section 52.302 302 of the city of
[2:17] Hartford municipal code that a public
[2:19] hearing will be held at 6:00 p.m. or
[2:21] thereafter on August 10th 20 or it
[2:24] should say August I'm reading the wrong
[2:26] one so I must have the wrong packet but
[2:28] it should be August or September
[2:31] >> uh 14th 2026 in the common council
[2:33] chambers at the lower level of the city
[2:35] hall 109 North Main Street by the city
[2:38] of Hartford plan commission to consider
[2:39] a request of Trisha's Seed LLC
[2:44] uh to apply for a conditional use permit
[2:46] to allow for a secondhand store at the
[2:50] property property of 1336 East Sumar
[2:54] Street, tax key 36-220-00001-
[3:00] 023,
[3:02] zoned B3, general business district. All
[3:05] persons wishing to provide testimony for
[3:08] or against the requested applicant
[3:09] application are invited to be present.
[3:11] Written comments may be submitted to the
[3:13] city clerk, Shana Cryamp, 109 North Main
[3:16] Street, Hartford, Wisconsin 53027. A map
[3:19] of the parcel and application can be
[3:22] reviewed in the planning zoning office
[3:23] by appointment 109 North Main Street
[3:25] Monday through Friday between the hours
[3:27] of 7:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. contact
[3:30] 262-673
[3:32] 8272 dated this the
[3:37] 14th day of August 2026. Shannon
[3:40] Crowamp, city clerk, city of Hartford.
[3:43] This was published in the Daily News.
[3:46] >> Thanks. And then staff review, Jacob.
[3:48] All right. Uh, Trisha Shehed LLC uh is
[3:53] Patricia Oralbeck. Uh, the business
[3:56] owner is looking to establish She-Hed at
[3:57] 1336 East Sum Street. This is a
[3:59] pre-existing business that is located on
[4:02] uh State Highway 83 going towards the
[4:05] south. They're looking to relocate their
[4:07] business to this parcel. Uh 1336 East
[4:10] Summer Street is zone B3 uh general
[4:12] business district under the B3 zoning
[4:14] district. Secondhand store is a
[4:16] principal land use that is permitted as
[4:18] a conditional use. Uh after staff
[4:21] review, uh 1336 East Sumar Street is
[4:24] subject to the following. Compliance
[4:26] with building codes, property
[4:27] maintenance, and fire codes. Maintain
[4:30] hours of operation as stated in the plan
[4:32] of business operation. A a sign permit
[4:34] must be submitted for each sign. Signs
[4:36] must comply with chapter 54 of the city
[4:38] of Hartford Municipal Code. Vehicle
[4:40] parking, one space for each 350 square
[4:43] feet of floor area for retail sales,
[4:45] plus one space for each employee on the
[4:47] largest work shift. Pawn broker
[4:50] secondhand article dealers and
[4:51] secondhand jewelry dealers must comply
[4:53] with the requirements in 320
[4:56] section 3209 of the municipal code of
[4:58] the city of Hartford as applicable.
[5:01] Outdoor storage is strictly prohibited.
[5:03] So after reviewing all this, the plan
[5:06] staff recommends approval of the
[5:07] conditional use permit for secondhand
[5:09] store the city of Hartford's B3 general
[5:11] business zoning district uh with the
[5:13] following conditions. Uh compliance with
[5:15] the building codes, property
[5:16] maintenance, and fire codes. Maintain
[5:19] hours of operation as stated in the plan
[5:21] of business operation. Assigned permit
[5:23] must be submitted for each sign. Signs
[5:25] must comply with chapter 54 of the city
[5:26] of Hartford Municipal Code. of vehicle
[5:29] parking. Again, one space for each 350
[5:31] square feet of floor area for retail
[5:33] sales, plus one space for each employee
[5:35] on the largest work shift. Pawn brokers,
[5:37] secondhand article dealers, and
[5:38] secondhand jewelry dealers must comply
[5:40] with the requirements of section 3209 of
[5:43] the municipal code as applicable and
[5:45] outdoor storage is strictly prohibited.
[5:47] Uh so that is what we are recommending
[5:49] with those uh seven conditions.
[5:55] » All right. So the next part of the
[5:57] public hearing is appearances and favor.
[6:00] Anyone wishing to appear in favor?
[6:10] » Then please just state your name and
[6:11] address.
[6:14] >> 418 Hartford. And I'm here obviously to
[6:17] say that I'm in favor of it.
[6:19] >> Super. Thank you.
[6:20] >> Thank you.
[6:23] >> All right. Anyone else wishing to appear
[6:25] in favor?
[6:28] Last call. Anyone wishing to appear in
[6:30] favor?
[6:32] All right, then we go to appearances in
[6:34] opposition.
[6:37] Second call, appearances in opposition.
[6:41] And last call, appearances in
[6:43] opposition.
[6:45] All right, then I declare this hearing
[6:47] closed
[6:48] uh for discussion by plan commission.
[6:51] And Jacob, I just had a question for
[6:53] you. Uh, did you go over this all with
[6:56] uh the applicants?
[6:57] >> We sent this out to the applicant last
[6:59] week with our with our uh write up so
[7:01] that they were aware prior to the
[7:03] meeting.
[7:03] >> And as far as you know, is everything uh
[7:06] in order?
[7:06] >> We've been in discussion with them about
[7:08] several things. Uh I I believe possible
[7:11] accessory structure in the future or
[7:12] storage. So we have been in
[7:14] communication with them on some of the
[7:15] stuff, but uh again they're they're
[7:18] aware of that.
[7:20] Okay. Thank you. Anyone else questions
[7:23] or comments?
[7:25] >> Tom?
[7:25] >> Yes. Um on the building um and was
[7:28] handwritten. There's a fence that's to
[7:30] the west of the building. Um that fence
[7:33] is that going to be for um additional
[7:36] storage or uh what is what's the uh the
[7:40] reason for that?
[7:46] And so it's uh
[7:48] >> we
[7:49] go
[7:50] >> Jake Jacob will answer first.
[7:51] >> So I don't know for sure what it was
[7:53] for. I believe uh it was for uh
[7:58] I don't think it's for outdoor storage.
[8:00] It's mostly for uh
[8:16] I can't honestly answer what the what
[8:18] that uh fenced in area is for.
[8:21] >> Would you like them to answer since
[8:22] >> Yes, please. Yeah.
[8:24] >> Jared or Patricia, you can come up.
[8:26] >> Yeah.
[8:34] It's for additional selling space to
[8:36] have like outside concrete planters or
[8:40] bird baths or whatnot. We wanted to have
[8:42] a secure place um so people couldn't
[8:45] steal the stuff. Like currently right
[8:47] now we have it all sitting outside in
[8:49] front of our shops. We just more for a
[8:51] secured place. And our hopes were that
[8:53] we could put an out building inside that
[8:57] fence and as well as in back and I think
[8:59] that's part of our packet too. Yes.
[9:02] >> Um, so and they wouldn't be storage.
[9:04] They would be additional selling space.
[9:06] >> Okay.
[9:07] >> I know how your store is now and you
[9:09] have a lot of lot of items out front.
[9:11] >> Yes. And that's our intent to put it
[9:13] behind the fencing area and then an out
[9:15] building if possible, but for sure the
[9:17] fencing area if we could.
[9:18] >> Very trusting.
[9:19] >> Yes, I know.
[9:21] >> Okay. Um All right. Yeah, makes sense.
[9:23] Makes I just
[9:24] >> Okay. Thank you.
[9:25] >> Sure.
[9:28] >> Would go ahead. So, would that become an
[9:31] possibly an issue as far as it being
[9:33] outside
[9:35] selling space as opposed to outside
[9:37] storage space?
[9:38] >> Uh, no. The exterior retail area would
[9:41] not be be an issue. Again, we would ask
[9:44] when we the fence gets approved that the
[9:48] street facing side has uh it it's pretty
[9:51] much going to be uh it's going to block
[9:54] all vision into that so that it kind of
[9:56] takes away from that possible uh
[10:00] aesthetic
[10:02] pos problem the problematic uh kind of
[10:05] issues that you can see with some of
[10:06] that outdoor sales stuff. So, we would
[10:08] ask for more of a privacy fence along
[10:10] the the Sumar Street portion. And then
[10:12] again, the sheds. I think the biggest
[10:14] issue with the sheds is fire code. Uh
[10:17] just because you can't be you have to be
[10:19] a certain distance from a building
[10:21] unless you're going to sprinkler and
[10:22] stuff like that. So, again, it it it
[10:25] becomes an issue.
[10:27] >> Thank you.
[10:29] >> Anyone else?
[10:32] >> If not, I would entertain a motion.
[10:35] >> I'll make a motion to approve.
[10:36] >> I'll second. Motion by Tom, second by
[10:38] Tony
[10:40] for uh sorry, approve.
[10:43] >> I know.
[10:45] >> Approving the proposed conditional use
[10:47] permit to allow for the operation of a
[10:48] secondhand store at 1336 East Sum
[10:51] Street, zone B3 General Business
[10:53] District.
[10:54] >> All right. Any final uh Oh, and uh per
[10:58] the uh seven uh recommendations of the
[11:01] planning staff.
[11:04] Um,
[11:05] any final comments or questions?
[11:08] Seeing none, all those in favor signify
[11:10] by saying I.
[11:11] >> I.
[11:11] >> Opposed? Nay.
[11:13] >> Motion passes.
[11:16] All right. Fifth item on the agenda is
[11:18] discussion and consideration of the
[11:19] proposed architectural review in the CC3
[11:22] downtown core district for First
[11:24] National Bank doing business as Forte
[11:26] Bank at 114 1116 West Sumner Street.
[11:30] Jacob.
[11:30] >> All right. Uh, First National Bank doing
[11:32] business as Forte Bank is proposing to
[11:34] do an exterior renovation of their uh,
[11:37] current 6,620 ft building located at 114
[11:41] 1114 and 1116 West Sumar Street.
[11:46] Uh, this is the location of that uh,
[11:48] right just right across the Johnson
[11:51] Street alley here or not alley but North
[11:53] Johnson Street right across from us
[11:55] here.
[11:57] It is CC2. So this isn't the CC3 is more
[12:01] the business core of the downtown. CC2
[12:04] is the extension of the commercial
[12:06] district specifically along uh the west
[12:09] Sumar East Sumar uh portion of the older
[12:12] part of the city.
[12:14] So this is the existing structure
[12:16] from the southeast
[12:20] again from West Summer Street view from
[12:22] the southwest and then the backside with
[12:25] the uh drive-throughs for the cashiers
[12:31] or the bankers
[12:35] and then along North Johnson Street
[12:37] looking towards uh West Sumar.
[12:40] Uh the proposed M materials are
[12:42] longboard uh 6-in tongue and groove
[12:45] planks, light cherry uh
[12:48] and then uh some other uh I'm not
[12:52] proficient on this, but vintage wood
[12:53] nitana it's an ash and then also using
[12:57] coping uh pack clad graphite as well as
[13:02] uh more of an ash gray.
[13:05] So this is the proposed
[13:08] uh again from the southeast street view.
[13:10] Uh the brick facade is of that planking.
[13:15] The signage we are not covering tonight
[13:17] because signage code is different and it
[13:19] doesn't it that doesn't need plan
[13:20] commission approval for signage that
[13:22] just goes that's interior unless they
[13:24] need to appeal.
[13:26] And then again, uh the renovation on the
[13:29] looking from the southwest street, the
[13:31] renderings there with the planking
[13:36] and then also then the canopy portion of
[13:39] the drive-thru is more of that ash plank
[13:42] wood look to it.
[13:45] So that is what uh is coming before you.
[13:48] Uh again, we're recommending approval of
[13:50] the architectural plan uh in the city of
[13:52] Hartford's CC2 downtown transition
[13:54] zoning district at 11:14 and 116 Western
[13:58] Sum West Sumner Street uh with the
[14:01] following conditions. A sign permit must
[14:02] be submitted for each of the new signs
[14:04] and they must comply with chapter 54 and
[14:06] then maintain compliance with the
[14:08] exterior material standards, which this
[14:09] does. So again, we have no issues with
[14:12] this and we recommend approval by the
[14:14] plan commission.
[14:15] >> Great. Thanks, Jacob. Yeah, I'd like to
[14:17] just say um it's always good to see uh
[14:20] when uh businesses in the city um take
[14:24] pride in in their uh buildings and you
[14:27] know want to keep it you know clean and
[14:28] up to date and and uh like I said this
[14:31] is quite an improvement. Thank you.
[14:33] Appreciate that. Anyone else?
[14:37] If not, I'll entertain a motion.
[14:39] >> I'll make a motion to approve.
[14:40] >> Motion by Dave.
[14:41] >> Second.
[14:42] by Tom.
[14:44] again. Um, oh my goodness. Sorry guys.
[14:49] For the approval of I'm just going to go
[14:52] back to this one.
[14:56] The architectural review in the CC2
[14:59] downtown transition zoning district
[15:00] 114116 Summer Street uh improvements.
[15:04] Any final questions, comments, or
[15:06] discussion?
[15:07] >> Seeing none, all those in favor signify
[15:09] by saying I.
[15:10] >> I.
[15:12] >> Oppos? Nay. Motion passes.
[15:18] All right. Next item on the agenda is
[15:20] discussion and consideration for a
[15:22] special exception for exterior material
[15:24] standards for fire station number two at
[15:27] 1455 Shower Drive.
[15:29] >> All right. Uh we 1455 Shower Drive. This
[15:32] came to us at the last plan commission
[15:34] meeting. Uh looking over the plans and
[15:38] also after what was approved by the plan
[15:40] commission. Uh there will be issues with
[15:42] the exterior material standards under uh
[15:44] chapter 52. Uh to address that, they do
[15:48] allow as you I don't I'm not going to
[15:49] read all of it in the in the packet, but
[15:51] there is an allowance for a special
[15:53] exception. A special exception's
[15:54] different than a variance. There is no
[15:56] need for a hardship. Uh this is just the
[15:59] plan commission and it stops here at the
[16:01] plan commission. doesn't go on to the
[16:02] common council uh to review and see if
[16:04] this is aesthetically pleasing enough
[16:06] and it would work in the surrounding uh neighborhood of of this development.
[16:14] Uh again, part of it if you look into
[16:18] our into the packet, so one of the
[16:21] things that talked about was the
[16:22] prevailing materials used on the
[16:24] building is in the same area. Uh there
[16:26] are two structures currently along uh
[16:29] County Trunk Highway K. uh that are uh
[16:32] that do have uh corrugated metal siding.
[16:36] One being uh 3 3462 County Trunk Highway
[16:40] K, which is Simples Auto Repair. Again,
[16:42] that is in the city of Hartford. It's
[16:44] set back a little bit, but again, that
[16:45] is uh Corrugated Metal. And the other
[16:48] one is 1457 East Summer Street, uh
[16:50] Cherry Auto. Uh that one is a main and
[16:53] that one's right up front in our one of
[16:55] our busiest corridors. uh for that uh
[16:58] this will be set back off of our
[17:00] obviously further down County Trunk
[17:01] Highway K and not visually you won't be
[17:05] able to visualize or visually see it
[17:07] from uh West Summer Street or East
[17:09] Summer Street as you go through the
[17:11] city. Uh and what they're proposing is
[17:14] uh this right here. Again, they're using
[17:17] uh metal paneling to kind of break up
[17:21] the the corrugated metal siding. It's
[17:23] that white um three or six inch uh
[17:27] paneling
[17:29] through there as well as then on the
[17:30] fire station two uh number is that u it
[17:34] is a metal clad but it it it has that
[17:37] simulated wood look which breaks up that
[17:39] uh corrugated metal siding. as well as
[17:42] you also have which you don't see with a
[17:44] lot of commercial developments is you
[17:46] see glass garage doors on fire stations
[17:48] which again really softens up that uh
[17:52] south facing or west facing uh portion
[17:56] of the fire station number two.
[17:59] And again, this is how it looks from
[18:00] that other angle.
[18:02] that wraps around to that one two
[18:04] windows there uh along the main uh
[18:07] administration administration portion of fire station number two. So we at
[18:12] this time planning comm or uh planning
[18:14] staff has no issues with the the
[18:17] granting of a special exception to allow
[18:20] uh for uh the the curricade metal
[18:23] paneling as presented.
[18:26] Since you're here, Tony, did you want to
[18:27] say anything or
[18:30] >> I think uh Jacob nailed it. But this
[18:32] also is the provision to not uh provide
[18:35] the masonry min.
[18:37] >> Correct. Correct. Yeah. And no masonry
[18:38] minimum.
[18:39] >> The masonary facade is out.
[18:41] >> Yeah. Okay. Yeah.
[18:42] >> Yeah. Okay.
[18:43] >> All right. Thanks, Jacob. Uh no, I I
[18:47] tend to agree with it, especially with
[18:48] the other two buildings um that's
[18:51] already there and and getting hammered
[18:53] on the budget. So,
[18:55] >> uh, anything else from commission?
[18:59] >> If not, I'd entertain a motion.
[19:01] >> I'll make a motion.
[19:02] >> Motion by Tony.
[19:03] >> Second.
[19:04] by Dave
[19:08] to approve the uh
[19:11] special exception for the exterior
[19:12] material standards for fire station
[19:14] number two, 1455 Shower Drive. Any final
[19:18] discussion or comments?
[19:20] >> Seeing none, all those in favor, seeing
[19:22] nobody by saying I. I
[19:24] >> oppose. Nay. Motion passes.
[19:31] » And item seven on the agenda, discussion
[19:33] of a subdivision concept plan for Winter
[19:36] Park Builders LLC.
[19:38] Jacob.
[19:39] >> All right. Uh the because this one is
[19:41] not an actual item and there's more of a
[19:43] back and forth, we do have the
[19:44] developers here so we can have
[19:45] conversation back and forth with them.
[19:47] It's not like your typical uh plan
[19:49] commission agenda item because it's
[19:51] solely discussion. Uh so again, Winter
[19:53] Park builders, uh they're looking to
[19:55] build on uh these there's three parcels.
[19:58] Uh the one parcel is split by uh West
[20:01] State Street and then the one far
[20:04] southern parcel there that's highlighted
[20:06] with the 18 in it, that is the HADC,
[20:09] City of Hartford uh own parcel. uh as
[20:13] part of this uh as we move forward, we
[20:15] will be looking to reszone this at our
[20:18] next plan commission meeting and moving
[20:19] on to common council as this project
[20:21] moves forward. So again, there's we had
[20:24] received no comment from any of the
[20:26] other departments, engineering, fire,
[20:28] police, water, electric or sanitary. Uh
[20:31] again, the HADC, City of Hartford parcel
[20:34] will be reszoned in in October here. Uh
[20:37] and the only really environmental issues
[20:39] here is there are small patches of
[20:41] wetlands. Um again any type of
[20:44] development near those will require uh
[20:46] wetland delineation for them and any
[20:49] applicable permitting through uh the DNR
[20:52] to if they they look like they're
[20:54] relatively small if there's going to be
[20:55] any fill. I don't think they're Army
[20:57] Corps. They're not connected to the
[20:58] Rubicon River in any way. So I I don't
[21:01] foresee them being waters of the nation
[21:03] of the United States of America, more
[21:04] waters of the state type of scenario.
[21:07] And then uh there are no flood planes
[21:08] located on these three uh parcels that
[21:10] we have to worry about. Uh so again uh
[21:13] from a planning perspective uh we don't
[21:15] have any issues uh
[21:18] looking at it uh based off of what we
[21:22] had prior when we created TID 14 for
[21:25] this parcel uh or as part of this uh as
[21:29] part of this development that to go with
[21:31] the DJS uh we had around 600 units of
[21:35] dwelling units at about close to 100
[21:38] acres. So that comes out about 61 units
[21:40] per acre. Uh, and this is a mix of
[21:42] single family as well as villas, uh,
[21:47] town homes and then also multif family
[21:50] apartments.
[21:51] And then I'll pull up the
[21:57] PowerPoint from the developer.
[22:06] And this was the prior uh layout. It's on the side.
[22:12] Again, north is facing that way, but
[22:15] this is kind of how it was planned out.
[22:17] Uh just north of uh West State Street.
[22:21] And again, this is the portion that will
[22:23] most likely or it's actually the south
[22:26] the southern portion of West State
[22:27] Street that'll be developed first and
[22:29] then moving along to eventually this way
[22:32] to the to the north.
[22:35] and Scott can fill in if any more.
[22:38] >> Hi, Scott Simon with Winter Park
[22:41] Builders. I just wanted to come in front
[22:43] of you to see how you felt about the
[22:44] development, what you were thinking for
[22:47] the future. I know this is part of your
[22:49] planning area. We've been working with
[22:51] staff for over a year now and we've been
[22:53] working with Tom and with um everybody
[22:56] else trying to see what the best fits
[22:58] would be. We started with the basis of
[23:00] working off the Tracy Cross report that
[23:02] was done for you in 2024
[23:05] and a lot of our product is based on
[23:07] what they had recommended.
[23:09] What we have now is just a regular
[23:12] drawing showing you where things are
[23:14] going to be. We're going to be closing
[23:15] on the parcel at three separate times.
[23:17] So, um, based on our most recent
[23:19] discussion with staff, they had said
[23:22] that there is the greatest need for
[23:23] multif family now. So, we're probably
[23:26] going to try to push that forward when
[23:27] we were going to keep bring that at the
[23:29] end. Wanted to see if you had any issues
[23:31] with that. And the pictures that he's
[23:34] taking past you now, if you go back one,
[23:36] please. That's what our ranch villas
[23:39] will look like. There are between 1,400
[23:41] and,600 square ft. And there's three
[23:44] different floor plans and exposures if
[23:46] needed. If not, that's sort of the
[23:48] baseline. If you want to go on to the
[23:50] next one, those are our it's three-story
[23:54] town homes. They're called terrace
[23:55] residents for us cuz they're two in a
[23:57] building. So, it's just again the type
[24:00] of feel we're trying to bring and we
[24:02] wanted to make sure that that was good
[24:03] with you.
[24:05] >> No, I thought they they looked very good
[24:07] and I know you guys uh had challenges
[24:10] with that site and uh um trying to make
[24:13] these things work uh isn't always easy.
[24:16] Um I'm assuming that was the case.
[24:19] >> Part of it. Yes.
[24:20] >> Yeah. Well, thank you. Appreciate that.
[24:23] Anyone else? How many units to the
[24:25] multif family?
[24:26] >> We're looking at 200 of the apartments
[24:28] plus or minus. Um the two other people
[24:31] I've talked to about doing it with are
[24:32] about 150 to 180. We're looking at a
[24:36] portion that would be single family for
[24:37] rent and town home for rent as well.
[24:40] Again, not definitive numbers, but no
[24:41] more than 100 is what we're thinking
[24:43] right now. Um single family
[24:45] approximately 100. Ranch villas just
[24:47] over that. And the town homes are the
[24:50] terrace homes just over that.
[24:52] and Jacob, there wouldn't be an issue
[24:55] with um I guess developing the
[24:59] multifamily portions before the single
[25:02] family portions would there.
[25:03] >> I I generally like doing multif family
[25:05] first because once you got the single
[25:07] family in, no one ever wants to multif
[25:10] family coming in next to them. So that's
[25:12] usually why I like multif family first.
[25:13] >> Good point. Sure.
[25:14] >> Yeah,
[25:16] >> there you go. Just a question for you,
[25:19] Scott. As far as the the terrace
[25:20] terraces here, from a parking
[25:23] standpoint, do they have their own
[25:24] parking? Do they have are they parking
[25:27] on the street or how does that work?
[25:28] >> Every unit has a two-car garage along
[25:30] with a 24T pad behind it. So, each one
[25:33] can take four cars and they're rear
[25:35] loaded off of an alleyway for appearance
[25:37] as well.
[25:38] >> Excellent.
[25:39] >> Yes,
[25:40] it's good.
[25:42] >> Anyone else?
[25:42] >> Good.
[25:43] >> I think they look great.
[25:45] >> No, it's uh
[25:46] >> they look really good. Yes, looks great,
[25:49] Scott. We we appreciate the work you've
[25:51] put into this and uh of the ones that
[25:54] have come before us, this one is looking
[25:56] very very good. So, appreciate it.
[25:58] >> Thank you. And thank you for your time.
[26:01] >> Thank you.
[26:03] >> Um and at this point, I I see you just
[26:06] have this marked as discussion,
[26:07] >> correct? Yeah. Uh so that there won't be
[26:09] any action as
[26:11] >> No, it's just feedback for the developer
[26:12] to go back and if they have to change
[26:14] anything in their in their designs or
[26:16] any number changes that you'd like to
[26:19] see or anything like that or uh it is
[26:21] also going in front of the common
[26:22] council the conceptual at the at the
[26:24] next common council meeting.
[26:26] >> Okay. Um and I'm sure you went over this
[26:28] and if you had any issues I I would have
[26:31] thought you would have brought them up
[26:32] by now and
[26:33] >> we would had Yeah, we would have brought
[26:34] them up already.
[26:35] >> Sure. Super. Well, no. Well, appreciate
[26:37] it again. Thank you. Uh, so then on to
[26:40] item eight, uh, adjournment.
[26:42] >> Make a motion to adjourn.
[26:43] >> Motion by Dave,
[26:45] >> second by Tom to adjurnn. Any final
[26:47] discussions or comments? Seeing none,
[26:49] all those in favor signify by saying I.
[26:51] Oppose. Nay. We are adjourned.