1 00:00:15,440 --> 00:00:20,960 meeting for Wednesday, September 9th, 2026. 2 00:00:18,720 --> 00:00:22,960 » Roll call, please. Bethany. >> All right. Commissioner Harlo, 3 00:00:22,480 --> 00:00:24,480 » here. >> Commissioner Curry, 4 00:00:23,920 --> 00:00:26,080 » here. >> Commissioner Kenberger, [clears throat] 5 00:00:25,600 --> 00:00:29,439 » here. >> Commissioner Jablonsky is absent. 6 00:00:28,320 --> 00:00:30,880 Commissioner Cernovich >> here. 7 00:00:29,920 --> 00:00:32,480 » Commissioner Willoughby >> here. 8 00:00:31,279 --> 00:00:33,600 » Commissioner Fusone >> here. 9 00:00:32,800 --> 00:00:35,040 » Commissioner Moore >> here. 10 00:00:34,000 --> 00:00:39,920 » Chairman Cashman >> here. Next order of business are public 11 00:00:37,520 --> 00:00:43,680 comments for non-aggenda items. Is there anyone here to speak on a non-aggenda 12 00:00:42,079 --> 00:00:47,280 item? Seeing none, we'll move on. Next, our 13 00:00:45,920 --> 00:00:51,840 approval of minutes. We have the minutes from August 6, 2026 special meeting. Do 14 00:00:50,160 --> 00:00:55,360 the commissioners have any requested revisions, reitions to the minutes? 15 00:00:54,399 --> 00:00:58,079 » None. >> Hearing none. Can I have a motion to 16 00:00:56,480 --> 00:01:01,520 approve the minutes as submitted? >> Krillinburgger. So motions. 17 00:01:00,239 --> 00:01:04,159 » Curry. Second. >> Roll call vote, please. Bethany. 18 00:01:03,039 --> 00:01:06,720 » Commissioner Harlo. >> I. Commissioner Curry. Hi, 19 00:01:05,680 --> 00:01:08,159 » Commissioner Krillinberger. >> Hi, 20 00:01:07,119 --> 00:01:09,760 » Commissioner [clears throat] Cernovich. >> Hi, 21 00:01:08,560 --> 00:01:12,320 » Commissioner Willoughby. >> Abstain, 22 00:01:10,479 --> 00:01:13,840 » Commissioner Fusone. >> Hi, 23 00:01:13,040 --> 00:01:15,200 » Commissioner Moore. >> Hi, 24 00:01:14,240 --> 00:01:18,560 » Chairman Cashman. >> Hi. 25 00:01:16,240 --> 00:01:25,280 » Uh, next we have a public hearing. Um case A-27-2026 26 00:01:21,520 --> 00:01:30,240 the preserves of Hensdale for South 010 Madison Street a map amendment exterior 27 00:01:28,000 --> 00:01:34,799 parents and site view and tenative and final plat of subdivision to allow for 28 00:01:32,000 --> 00:01:38,079 development of 19 code compliant lots single [clears throat] family detached 29 00:01:35,840 --> 00:01:42,079 homes and an outlot for stormwater detention and one lot for future 30 00:01:39,759 --> 00:01:47,360 development located in the R2 district as well as a private park with public 31 00:01:43,840 --> 00:01:49,920 access located in the OS district. And I have a motion to open the public 32 00:01:48,880 --> 00:01:52,720 hearing. >> So moved. Willoughby. 33 00:01:51,600 --> 00:01:55,200 » Second. Cernovich. >> Roll call, please. Becky. 34 00:01:54,159 --> 00:01:56,399 » Commissioner Harlo. >> Hi. 35 00:01:55,520 --> 00:01:57,759 » Commissioner Curry. >> Hi. 36 00:01:56,799 --> 00:01:59,119 » Commissioner Kenberger. >> Hi. 37 00:01:58,159 --> 00:02:00,399 » Commissioner Cernovich. >> Hi. 38 00:01:59,520 --> 00:02:01,759 » Commissioner Willoughby. >> Hi. 39 00:02:00,719 --> 00:02:02,880 » Commissioner Fone. >> Hi. 40 00:02:02,079 --> 00:02:04,159 » Commissioner Moore. >> Hi. 41 00:02:03,280 --> 00:02:08,000 » Chairman Cashman. >> Hi. 42 00:02:05,920 --> 00:02:11,039 » Is there um someone here from the applicant to make a presentation? 43 00:02:11,001 --> 00:02:12,640 [clears throat] >> How we doing? Good evening. 44 00:02:12,160 --> 00:02:17,200 » Welcome. >> My name is Walker Kikas on behalf of the 45 00:02:14,720 --> 00:02:21,120 applicant. Um, first want to say thank you so much for having us tonight. Thank 46 00:02:18,879 --> 00:02:23,440 you so much for Bethany, Tim Ryan, and the whole team for putting this 47 00:02:22,080 --> 00:02:28,000 together. You all been fantastic. Appreciate it. 48 00:02:25,440 --> 00:02:34,680 » And before we move on, can I ask um for everyone who wishes to speak tonight to 49 00:02:29,760 --> 00:02:34,680 be sworn in by our court reporter? 50 00:02:35,680 --> 00:02:40,560 » If you if you intend to speak, please um raise your right hand. 51 00:02:39,040 --> 00:02:44,720 » Audience, everything you're about to say tonight, 52 00:02:42,480 --> 00:02:49,200 the whole truth. I do. I do. 53 00:02:46,400 --> 00:02:51,360 » Great. Thank you. >> Okay. 54 00:02:49,760 --> 00:02:56,080 » All right. Thank you. So, we'll do a brief overview here and then open up for 55 00:02:53,040 --> 00:03:01,120 any questions. Um, the project scope of this, as you mentioned, is 19 code 56 00:02:58,080 --> 00:03:05,920 compliant single family homes. Um, so it is zoned R2 currently right now and 57 00:03:04,239 --> 00:03:11,200 we're not requesting any variances, so it will stay R2. Um, and then also on 58 00:03:09,200 --> 00:03:17,280 top of that, there's three phases really or three components. First is the north 59 00:03:13,840 --> 00:03:23,680 seven lots and then you have the south 12 lots and then you have the uh just 60 00:03:21,120 --> 00:03:30,280 over 15 acres of which is going to be open space um which will be the open 61 00:03:26,480 --> 00:03:30,280 space district OS. 62 00:03:32,720 --> 00:03:38,560 So to zoom in on on both sides of these on the north side here this these are 63 00:03:36,239 --> 00:03:43,920 the seven lots here. Uh they're roughly well they are 100 by 400. So they are 64 00:03:41,440 --> 00:03:48,319 rather large lots. And then something to point out is the five- foot gravel path 65 00:03:46,879 --> 00:03:52,640 uh on the north side there. It is highlighted in yellow in the photo there 66 00:03:50,000 --> 00:03:57,040 on top. Um that will connect both Madison Street to Adam Street. 67 00:03:55,599 --> 00:04:00,319 So that will be a nice kind of thorough fair basically connecting instead of a 68 00:03:59,040 --> 00:04:05,040 sidewalk going all the way around to Ogden, they'll be able to connect 69 00:04:02,000 --> 00:04:10,319 straight through there. Now to the southside there is 12 lots. 70 00:04:07,840 --> 00:04:17,040 Uh they range from over 20,000 square feet to over 34,000 square ft. Um there 71 00:04:15,200 --> 00:04:21,600 was a question about the culdesac there. So the culdesac is in fact a culde-sac. 72 00:04:20,000 --> 00:04:25,840 It is not a street. It is not going to Bonnie Bray. It is staying on our 73 00:04:23,520 --> 00:04:29,600 property and you'll have access on Adam Street. So, if you're taking a right on 74 00:04:27,520 --> 00:04:33,520 Ogden, get on to Adams and then you take a another right into the culde-sac and 75 00:04:31,919 --> 00:04:38,639 it'll be a roundabout and then come back to Adam Street. 76 00:04:36,240 --> 00:04:43,120 Uh, another thing to mention here is the new head wall extension connecting the 77 00:04:40,400 --> 00:04:47,600 sidewalks. I know that was a a important point and we wanted to address that as 78 00:04:44,960 --> 00:04:51,280 well. So, uh, we met with engineering and they said if you put in a head wall 79 00:04:49,360 --> 00:04:55,040 there that we'll be able to connect the sidewalk from the north to the south as 80 00:04:53,600 --> 00:04:59,759 well. So essentially, you go from all the way from Adam Street along the 81 00:04:57,360 --> 00:05:05,199 gravel path all the way down south Adam Street along a sidewalk and over the 82 00:05:02,720 --> 00:05:08,560 head wall, which would be a sidewalk and into that area as well. So since you 83 00:05:07,039 --> 00:05:12,080 were we're creating a loop all the way around. 84 00:05:10,720 --> 00:05:15,440 That's kind of the brief presentation there. Uh please let us know if you have 85 00:05:14,000 --> 00:05:20,880 any questions. Thank you all so much. >> Great. Thank you, Laurel. Questions? 86 00:05:20,080 --> 00:05:24,320 » After [clears throat] the commissioner talk, then we'll open it up for input 87 00:05:22,479 --> 00:05:28,800 from the community. Um I I do have a number of questions, 88 00:05:27,199 --> 00:05:32,000 but just >> to be clear about what you were just 89 00:05:30,320 --> 00:05:34,400 saying about the head wall. >> Yes. 90 00:05:32,320 --> 00:05:39,120 » So does that mean that the entire property will have what is essentially a 91 00:05:37,360 --> 00:05:43,840 sidewalk around it? >> Yes, correct. 92 00:05:40,800 --> 00:05:47,759 » So all along Adams, all along Ogden. >> No, I'm sorry. Not not Ogden. Um the 93 00:05:46,479 --> 00:05:51,520 engineer can speak to that, but basically I do would not allow a 94 00:05:49,280 --> 00:05:56,240 sidewalk along Adams there or along Ogden. So there is a sidewalk that 95 00:05:54,080 --> 00:06:01,120 connects from the culdesac street if you're going north on Adams. So right 96 00:05:58,639 --> 00:06:04,240 now the waterway goes underneath Adams right now. 97 00:06:01,919 --> 00:06:08,800 » So essentially we're adding a head wall there that would widen up a space for a 98 00:06:07,280 --> 00:06:11,759 sidewalk so that no one has to walk in the street like it is currently. 99 00:06:10,720 --> 00:06:19,039 » Okay. >> Okay. [clears throat] Um, 100 00:06:15,520 --> 00:06:24,160 so, um, I'll start off by saying thank you for everything that has gone into 101 00:06:21,280 --> 00:06:32,319 this proposal thus far. This is like this is a huge amount of work and, um, 102 00:06:26,639 --> 00:06:37,039 I'm super appreciative about that. Um, some that said, I do have some 103 00:06:34,720 --> 00:06:46,080 questions. Um, some things seemed somewhat vague. Um, I'll start with the 104 00:06:40,319 --> 00:06:53,199 traffic study. Um the in-out numbers, there was definitely um justification 105 00:06:48,479 --> 00:07:00,000 given for those in the handout. Um but they they 106 00:06:55,919 --> 00:07:04,400 don't seem realistic to me as a Hinsdale resident um knowing the patterns of our 107 00:07:02,800 --> 00:07:09,759 neighborhoods and so forth >> in terms of the in-out at um the peak 108 00:07:07,280 --> 00:07:15,599 times and it also >> just thinking about um [clears throat] 109 00:07:12,960 --> 00:07:20,479 the Ogden Avenue traffic conditions which that um sheet didn't really 110 00:07:18,000 --> 00:07:25,360 address. only addressed the traffic that would be coming from the homes. Um, you 111 00:07:23,440 --> 00:07:32,080 know, it's two lanes in both directions and I would be really concerned about 112 00:07:28,960 --> 00:07:38,240 the left turns in and the left turns out off of Adams or coming from Adams. Um, 113 00:07:35,360 --> 00:07:42,400 especially if it's a school bus that has to do that every day and they're just 114 00:07:40,000 --> 00:07:48,560 waiting and waiting and wait, you know, it's it could really be problematic. So, 115 00:07:44,800 --> 00:07:53,360 I think the traffic study needs um more development. Um and perhaps even if a 116 00:07:52,080 --> 00:07:58,800 light did go in [clears throat] there, it could be something that was timed, 117 00:07:56,160 --> 00:08:05,280 you know, synchronized with Madison and and 83 so that it wouldn't um 118 00:08:03,680 --> 00:08:09,759 you wouldn't just have this traffic snarl every single day. It would it 119 00:08:07,280 --> 00:08:14,879 would really flow. But I I do think they need something with this many people 120 00:08:11,280 --> 00:08:21,680 going in there. Um, I'm wondering if these are going to be 121 00:08:18,800 --> 00:08:25,120 speck homes or custom homes. >> So, essentially, we're we're just doing 122 00:08:23,440 --> 00:08:29,039 the infrastructure to it and then we're going to either sell them to people that 123 00:08:26,960 --> 00:08:32,880 want to buy a custom home or sell them to a builder. So, we're just 124 00:08:30,720 --> 00:08:35,760 redeveloping the land and subdividing the lots. 125 00:08:33,680 --> 00:08:40,399 » I see. Okay. And so, that's why the covenant was written as though there may 126 00:08:37,599 --> 00:08:41,279 be many different developers coming in. >> Exactly. 127 00:08:40,959 --> 00:08:47,120 » Okay. >> Yes. Got it. Um and I did appreciate by 128 00:08:44,240 --> 00:08:53,200 the way in your covenant um details such as your monotony clause because um 129 00:08:49,839 --> 00:08:58,800 Hinsdale does not have you know a single sort of monotonous development style and 130 00:08:56,399 --> 00:09:07,519 it would be in my view it would be a shame if this if this beautiful area 131 00:09:03,120 --> 00:09:14,640 ended up vastly different from what the rest of the town is. Um, 132 00:09:10,880 --> 00:09:18,399 okay. Thinking also though about the the exterior appearance and site plan 133 00:09:16,880 --> 00:09:23,760 criteria, many of your answers to those questions 134 00:09:20,320 --> 00:09:30,080 had to do with um we will match the neighborhood. So that seemed very vague. 135 00:09:27,760 --> 00:09:35,200 There's no neighborhood there. And so I was just wondering what you were 136 00:09:31,120 --> 00:09:40,959 referring to if it is Monty Bray or um the houses in Oakwork or the other 137 00:09:39,200 --> 00:09:46,080 side of Ogden which is largely commercial. 138 00:09:43,040 --> 00:09:50,880 » No, it it would be the houses from AC across south of Ogden into Hinsdale. 139 00:09:49,600 --> 00:09:55,120 Hinsdale proper. >> Okay. Yes. Like on South Adams South 140 00:09:53,600 --> 00:09:56,480 Monroe like >> Yes. 141 00:09:55,519 --> 00:10:00,160 » there. >> Yes. Exactly. But at the at the same 142 00:09:58,240 --> 00:10:05,120 time, it's hard for us to dictate exactly what these houses will look like 143 00:10:01,760 --> 00:10:10,160 because we're subdividing the lots and say a builder come in comes in and says, 144 00:10:07,440 --> 00:10:13,920 "Oh, no, we didn't you specified a certain brick or something like that." 145 00:10:12,000 --> 00:10:19,519 It would be hard to kind of narrow and pinch everybody down into that. We 146 00:10:16,880 --> 00:10:26,079 obviously do not want this to look like a just blanketed subdivision. We want it 147 00:10:23,360 --> 00:10:29,920 to, you know, adhere to Hinsdale. every lot will go through planning and 148 00:10:28,079 --> 00:10:34,880 development and go through that whole process. So we are looking to kind of 149 00:10:31,600 --> 00:10:39,920 adhere to uh Hinsdale look for sure. >> Okay. Um 150 00:10:37,680 --> 00:10:45,040 to that end I would suggest that maybe the in the exterior appearance and 151 00:10:42,562 --> 00:10:47,040 [clears throat] site plan information we could tighten up that language a little 152 00:10:46,560 --> 00:10:48,880 bit >> for sure 153 00:10:47,519 --> 00:10:51,279 » so that um >> we would end up with that result. 154 00:10:50,160 --> 00:10:52,720 » Yeah, we're happy to take a look at it with Bethany [clears throat] and the 155 00:10:52,240 --> 00:10:59,440 team. >> Okay. Um 156 00:10:55,279 --> 00:11:03,360 Do you have any plans for wetland landscaping? 157 00:11:01,120 --> 00:11:08,000 » No. So, John Pinbrook did an absolute great a great job with meeting with all 158 00:11:05,920 --> 00:11:14,880 the neighbors in in the immediate area and saying, "What do we want this park 159 00:11:11,440 --> 00:11:19,600 open space to look like?" And it was a strong majority saying we want this to 160 00:11:16,640 --> 00:11:24,000 be as natural as possible with maybe a c maybe a walking path or something like 161 00:11:21,040 --> 00:11:29,760 that and some benches, but to leave it as much untouched as possible. Um so we 162 00:11:27,360 --> 00:11:34,959 heard that we related to the the Hinsdale team. Um and that's what we 163 00:11:32,000 --> 00:11:42,000 kind of settled with there is to leave it as natural as possible. 164 00:11:38,480 --> 00:11:49,200 » Okay. Um [clears throat] I think in order to do that, you still need a plan. 165 00:11:45,040 --> 00:11:54,800 And it so that for instance, if invasives start to creep in, you either 166 00:11:52,320 --> 00:12:02,720 let them naturalize or you take them out. Um maybe you as you're creating 167 00:11:59,680 --> 00:12:09,279 your walking path, you create a focal point and that's where the benches are 168 00:12:05,200 --> 00:12:13,040 sort of pointed or um >> you see what I'm saying? Still a very 169 00:12:10,959 --> 00:12:18,639 light touch. But I think you need a plan. I mean, even just the maintenance 170 00:12:15,279 --> 00:12:21,120 plan because the way that it's all grass right now, I mean, someone has to be 171 00:12:20,160 --> 00:12:27,120 mowing that. >> Yes, for sure. 172 00:12:21,920 --> 00:12:31,120 » So, um, there needs to be a like a clear even a light touch plan in terms of that 173 00:12:30,079 --> 00:12:34,000 wetland. >> For sure. 174 00:12:32,320 --> 00:12:38,800 » Um, okay. There wasn't anything in the 175 00:12:36,639 --> 00:12:45,760 packet having to do with the school impact. Have you looked at how many 176 00:12:41,200 --> 00:12:51,200 students you're thinking you would be um um 177 00:12:47,360 --> 00:12:53,440 adding to Monroe CHMS Central? 178 00:12:52,079 --> 00:12:58,800 » We did take a brief >> Yeah, we did take a a brief look at that 179 00:12:55,040 --> 00:13:04,079 and and we're working with city staff on nothing was necessarily in writing on on 180 00:13:01,680 --> 00:13:10,320 things, but it it did come up. So, we'll continue to work with them on that. 181 00:13:05,839 --> 00:13:16,480 » Okay. And then um my last point would be that um I know you have a lot of water 182 00:13:13,839 --> 00:13:22,399 detention on here and I'm sure other commissioners will speak to that. Um but 183 00:13:19,839 --> 00:13:29,519 I'm I do have a concern just kind of at the 30,000 foot level. Um that the edge 184 00:13:26,639 --> 00:13:37,440 of the flood plane goes over several of the lot lines um with a few of them in a 185 00:13:32,560 --> 00:13:42,959 very significant way. And um we have had developments in in um 186 00:13:40,959 --> 00:13:48,160 Hinsdale built in a flood plane in the past. Salt 187 00:13:45,600 --> 00:13:52,880 Creek um you know the Grow Mill development is the one that really comes 188 00:13:49,760 --> 00:13:58,959 to mind. And when you have an enormous hundred-year storm, 189 00:13:56,079 --> 00:14:05,199 people really, you know, are in danger and they lose property and it it doesn't 190 00:14:01,360 --> 00:14:12,959 seem necessarily responsible to be developing the edges of it um in that 191 00:14:09,600 --> 00:14:19,839 way. So, I just I would hate to see people 192 00:14:16,399 --> 00:14:24,800 purchase these beautiful lots, you know, invest their lives and their homes and 193 00:14:21,680 --> 00:14:28,320 everything here and then have a huge event like that 194 00:14:26,880 --> 00:14:30,560 » for sure. [clears throat] >> Good. The engineer speak to that? 195 00:14:30,160 --> 00:14:34,639 » Yes. >> Thank you. 196 00:14:32,399 --> 00:14:38,800 » Well, uh my name is Alex Her. the civil engineer uh on this project and so um 197 00:14:38,079 --> 00:14:41,279 flood plane >> which firm 198 00:14:40,000 --> 00:14:47,920 » Gabriel Group >> Engineering and so um this uh concern 199 00:14:44,399 --> 00:14:52,959 was raised by staff and uh county. So um the design of the each lot which uh 200 00:14:50,079 --> 00:14:57,600 touches the flood plane will meet um county village and FEMA standards uh for 201 00:14:55,760 --> 00:15:01,680 minimum protect you know the the minimum required protection. Obviously, we're 202 00:14:59,360 --> 00:15:05,360 going to do more than the minimum, but the flood plane permitting will go 203 00:15:03,519 --> 00:15:10,000 through the county. So, we will make sure we meet county as well as uh 204 00:15:07,920 --> 00:15:16,079 village standards for any lots developed within the edges of the flood plan. 205 00:15:13,680 --> 00:15:20,639 » To your knowledge, has the county changed their [snorts] 206 00:15:18,880 --> 00:15:25,440 requirements after any of these big events have 207 00:15:22,639 --> 00:15:31,760 occurred in recent years? Uh I believe their ordinance uh was u adopted or 208 00:15:28,720 --> 00:15:34,160 revised and adopted in 2022 um after the new flood plane maps were 209 00:15:33,680 --> 00:15:37,519 issued. >> Okay. 210 00:15:34,560 --> 00:15:41,120 » So it's been that in the last since the last revision. 211 00:15:38,399 --> 00:15:43,680 » Okay. Okay. Good. Thank you. No further questions. 212 00:15:42,160 --> 00:15:46,240 » Thanks Laura [clears throat] Cynthia. 213 00:15:44,560 --> 00:15:50,480 » You touched on a lot of things. Thank you again for all the work done for 214 00:15:48,000 --> 00:15:55,519 this. I have some of the same questions. Um, one of them, however, and you're the 215 00:15:53,040 --> 00:16:01,920 engineer. Um, I have a concern that these lands were inhabited by Native 216 00:15:58,720 --> 00:16:06,399 Americans for a long period of time, and I'm wondering in your construction, have 217 00:16:03,600 --> 00:16:13,279 you done any overview of what you might expect once you number one tear down the 218 00:16:10,160 --> 00:16:16,240 buildings as well as the construction as you're move? And I know you won't be 219 00:16:14,560 --> 00:16:21,360 part of the houses being built. you're going to be just [clears throat] 220 00:16:18,639 --> 00:16:24,480 doing the the ground works uh for these lots, but I'm wondering if you think 221 00:16:23,199 --> 00:16:28,160 that that's something you should look into. 222 00:16:25,680 --> 00:16:32,320 » Uh yes, it will be. Um uh one permit that's required of this is the storm 223 00:16:29,920 --> 00:16:36,800 water pollution prevention permit by the IEPA. We'll need to get one on uh we'll 224 00:16:34,959 --> 00:16:41,199 need to uh obtain a permit for this project. And one of the reviews is um 225 00:16:39,120 --> 00:16:45,680 done by the state uh historical preservation office and they look 226 00:16:43,199 --> 00:16:50,639 through various cultural architectural or archaeological uh issues for this 227 00:16:48,240 --> 00:16:55,759 land. So yes, it will go through um the state um historical preservation 228 00:16:54,000 --> 00:16:59,120 » that would be checked before anything begins with constructions of homes on 229 00:16:57,839 --> 00:17:05,280 the property. Correct. >> Correct. Yes. Um [clears throat] 230 00:17:01,680 --> 00:17:09,679 then a question the the open space um I know that you are giving to the village 231 00:17:07,120 --> 00:17:15,360 of Hinsdale although it's the HOA is going to be maintaining that parcel of 232 00:17:11,520 --> 00:17:19,880 property it's it's designated to or or given to the village of Hinsdale. Is 233 00:17:16,720 --> 00:17:19,880 that correct? 234 00:17:20,319 --> 00:17:24,959 » Yeah. Beth Bethany you want to clarify on that? 235 00:17:23,439 --> 00:17:32,799 » Yeah. So what they're proposing is that that uh that about 15 acres of land will 236 00:17:30,240 --> 00:17:37,760 be maintained privately uh in the future by the future homeowners association. Um 237 00:17:35,600 --> 00:17:42,880 our village code in our subdivision does allow them to um propose subject to 238 00:17:40,799 --> 00:17:47,760 village board approval private common open space instead of publicly dedicated 239 00:17:45,120 --> 00:17:51,520 land. And they are able they don't have to keep this land to be publicly 240 00:17:49,200 --> 00:17:55,200 accessible but they have um with this path added especially to provide 241 00:17:53,440 --> 00:17:59,039 connection to Madison Street they are making the land publicly accessible 242 00:17:57,280 --> 00:18:02,480 which is not required by the code otherwise there's a fee in lie that 243 00:18:00,559 --> 00:18:06,000 they'd be required to pay. >> Okay. [clears throat] 244 00:18:03,840 --> 00:18:10,559 It's nice to know with the the water that's there, are there any concerns or 245 00:18:08,240 --> 00:18:15,200 anything you need to do because I'm sure if it is a village property, um there's 246 00:18:12,960 --> 00:18:18,400 liability issues if something were to occur on that property. And I'm 247 00:18:17,120 --> 00:18:22,720 wondering because I know you're taking one bridge down, there is one remaining, 248 00:18:21,200 --> 00:18:28,080 is there anything you need to do to protect that as a public space or is 249 00:18:25,440 --> 00:18:31,200 there anything you would require? >> Um 250 00:18:29,600 --> 00:18:35,440 I mean they're they're engineering the site so that you know there shouldn't 251 00:18:33,520 --> 00:18:39,520 hopefully be flooding within this area. Um they'd have to look into further of 252 00:18:37,280 --> 00:18:44,880 what an HOA might need to do in terms of liabilities, insuranceances, um but it 253 00:18:42,000 --> 00:18:47,919 won't be publicly dedicated land. So that's something that the future HOA 254 00:18:46,400 --> 00:18:50,320 would be required to maintain and look into. 255 00:18:48,799 --> 00:18:53,440 » Okay. And I had, you know, question about the 256 00:18:52,320 --> 00:18:58,240 homes being designed. [clears throat] So, is your plan to if someone came in 257 00:18:55,919 --> 00:19:03,440 and said, "I'm going to take over all these properties in one builder," or are 258 00:19:00,080 --> 00:19:07,520 you going to try and sell portions of it at a time? 259 00:19:05,679 --> 00:19:10,000 » We're we're pretty early in the in the process on that. We're we're still 260 00:19:09,039 --> 00:19:13,360 trying to get through all the infrastructure and trying to get this 261 00:19:11,600 --> 00:19:18,160 passed and through dupage and so forth. So, it's it's we haven't even put it to 262 00:19:16,080 --> 00:19:21,360 market or anything. So, it's it's very hard to say at this time. I'm just 263 00:19:19,919 --> 00:19:25,039 wondering what safeguards we would have so we don't wind up with a little 264 00:19:23,520 --> 00:19:28,240 development there where everything kind of looks the same. 265 00:19:26,640 --> 00:19:30,400 » Well, I think in the covenants it's very >> Is the covenant strict enough that would 266 00:19:29,840 --> 00:19:37,160 protect us? >> Yes, it really gets into the details of 267 00:19:32,720 --> 00:19:37,160 » architecture review by 268 00:19:39,440 --> 00:19:44,320 » Yes. So, there's another plans. I know you were talking about park bench is 269 00:19:42,320 --> 00:19:48,160 there in your question about landscaping and having an idea what that would look 270 00:19:45,919 --> 00:19:51,120 like. Um, playground equipment I thought. Is that 271 00:19:49,679 --> 00:19:54,880 ever something that would come to pass that you would want to add, but that's 272 00:19:52,960 --> 00:19:55,600 nothing you'd be doing at this point? >> Correct. 273 00:19:55,280 --> 00:20:01,600 » Okay. >> Yes. 274 00:19:57,919 --> 00:20:06,000 » Uh let's see. I think that is and the assessments to the homeowners 275 00:20:04,080 --> 00:20:09,120 as you start to sell things off. I'm thinking whomever buys this has to 276 00:20:07,679 --> 00:20:12,320 continue taking care of the property until everything is divided up equally. 277 00:20:11,520 --> 00:20:17,840 Correct. >> Exactly. For sure. 278 00:20:15,039 --> 00:20:22,400 um the bridge that you removed and I know that it was in bad shape. Is there 279 00:20:20,080 --> 00:20:29,520 a reason you wouldn't put that back? >> That was it. It was a very dilapidated 280 00:20:25,120 --> 00:20:34,480 wood structure that jumped off into like a a little island you could call 281 00:20:32,320 --> 00:20:37,919 » um just for liability purposes and all this stuff. It it was like it doesn't 282 00:20:36,400 --> 00:20:41,679 make sense to even put this back, especially with that island there. Who 283 00:20:40,400 --> 00:20:45,840 knows if someone gets stuck there, someone brings something on it. So we we 284 00:20:44,320 --> 00:20:47,440 agreed we'll we'll go and take that down. 285 00:20:46,320 --> 00:20:48,960 » Great. Thank you. >> Sure. 286 00:20:47,760 --> 00:20:50,880 » No more question. >> Thanks. 287 00:20:49,840 --> 00:20:53,280 » Great. >> Jen, 288 00:20:51,679 --> 00:20:57,039 » uh my my questions are pretty straightforward and thank you guys are 289 00:20:54,640 --> 00:21:01,440 very thorough. Um can you elaborate on publicly accessible? Will there be 290 00:20:58,720 --> 00:21:05,679 parking for uh uh for the public? Will they actually be welcome or will there 291 00:21:03,039 --> 00:21:10,159 be some sort of obstacle to using the park? No, this this is strictly, you 292 00:21:07,760 --> 00:21:16,480 know, like Bethany mentioned, this is owned and maintained by the HOA and this 293 00:21:13,039 --> 00:21:21,120 will be open and and free for the public um you know, citizens of Hinsdale to 294 00:21:19,120 --> 00:21:24,960 come and enjoy themselves. So there there is no catch or signup sheet or 295 00:21:24,000 --> 00:21:26,960 anything like that. >> Okay. And park some parking available 296 00:21:26,640 --> 00:21:32,799 for >> Oh, I apologize. No, no, no parking um 297 00:21:30,080 --> 00:21:35,200 for it. It just didn't it didn't make a lot of sense because we're bringing the 298 00:21:33,760 --> 00:21:40,240 sidewalk straight down kind of there too. Um so no no parking but if anybody 299 00:21:38,880 --> 00:21:43,520 wants to walk or ride their bike and enjoy nature then have at it. 300 00:21:42,400 --> 00:21:47,440 » I'm coming. >> It sounds good. It is a beautiful piece. 301 00:21:45,760 --> 00:21:51,039 » Uh and it looks like you're going to have comments from the neighbors. So 302 00:21:49,039 --> 00:21:57,600 what's your perspective on the comments you got from the neighbors? Uh was the 303 00:21:53,679 --> 00:22:00,799 process Salt Creek and residents pretty uh positive from your perspective? 304 00:21:58,960 --> 00:22:05,039 » For sure. There was definitely obviously rightfully so. There was concern about 305 00:22:02,720 --> 00:22:09,120 water and and where is this water going to go? We're concerned about flooding 306 00:22:06,240 --> 00:22:13,039 and so forth. Again, rightfully so. But, uh, like like Alex mentioned, we're 307 00:22:10,960 --> 00:22:18,640 going we're going to hear strictly to Hinsdale and DuPage County. Um, and 308 00:22:17,280 --> 00:22:20,159 whatever their recommendations are, we're going to follow that and go from 309 00:22:19,760 --> 00:22:23,919 there. >> Okay. and a little bit more than the 310 00:22:21,600 --> 00:22:29,520 minimum as you [laughter] >> um the uh uh covenants some of the 311 00:22:26,559 --> 00:22:34,640 covenants look like they are uh actually not as restrictive as village of 312 00:22:31,360 --> 00:22:37,679 hensdale so I would and maybe I'm wrong maybe I didn't read them correctly but 313 00:22:35,840 --> 00:22:42,159 like signage is the one that stuck out for me because we're very signoriented 314 00:22:40,480 --> 00:22:48,000 Julie um [laughter] 315 00:22:43,679 --> 00:22:52,720 so uh if if uh is there something in there that I missed that said uh subject 316 00:22:50,640 --> 00:22:59,520 to the more restrictive of these covenants or village, county, state, 317 00:22:56,320 --> 00:23:02,799 federal restrictions or is that >> that's that's a good question. I could 318 00:23:00,960 --> 00:23:08,240 check on that and and make sure that it does adhere to at a minimum Hinsdale 319 00:23:06,320 --> 00:23:11,200 » and and village staff and the village attorney have reviewed those covenants 320 00:23:09,679 --> 00:23:14,799 and it was my understanding that they were revised so that they would meet 321 00:23:13,120 --> 00:23:19,200 village code requirements. >> Okay. very specifically the uh 322 00:23:16,880 --> 00:23:22,720 construction signage uh that's temporary, you know, we are building a 323 00:23:20,960 --> 00:23:27,039 house here. We are Bob's construction company. It looked from my understanding 324 00:23:25,039 --> 00:23:30,320 of the village code that that would not be allowed here, but I might be wrong. 325 00:23:28,880 --> 00:23:33,840 » I will double check on that after the meeting. We do allow for certain 326 00:23:31,919 --> 00:23:37,600 construction signage. Um but I'll double check to make sure there's no conflicts 327 00:23:35,200 --> 00:23:43,600 with the with the code right now. And >> sounds good. Um a and lastly uh you seem 328 00:23:41,919 --> 00:23:48,080 very confident in this and this seems like a to me a very good plan so far 329 00:23:45,600 --> 00:23:53,039 subject to further cave. What is your have you done other work in the area? 330 00:23:50,240 --> 00:23:56,640 » Yes for yeah we've we've built we're we built plenty of homes in Elmherst area. 331 00:23:55,280 --> 00:24:02,640 We've we've built multiple homes in Hinsdale Clarin Hills. Um so yes 332 00:23:59,600 --> 00:24:04,960 » you're not a builder. You're a land >> Yes. I speculator. 333 00:24:04,000 --> 00:24:07,120 » Yeah. I I thought you were talking about personally me. I apologize. 334 00:24:06,159 --> 00:24:12,480 » I kind of am. >> Uh yes. So, so there are multiple 335 00:24:09,360 --> 00:24:17,679 partners on this this deal. Um, and within the LLC there is everybody is 336 00:24:15,679 --> 00:24:23,600 welloriented in different facets, but yes, there is a um a builder that is 337 00:24:21,120 --> 00:24:27,440 that is on this team as well. Um, one of the partners that is very active in 338 00:24:25,679 --> 00:24:30,559 Elmherst has built, like I said, in Hinsdale and Clearon Hills. Yes. 339 00:24:29,039 --> 00:24:33,440 » Okay. And you're well financed. This is going to go through and you're going to 340 00:24:31,679 --> 00:24:38,080 finish the plumbing and >> Yes, for sure. 341 00:24:34,559 --> 00:24:45,279 » Okay. Um, good. That's all I have. Thanks, J. Julie. 342 00:24:40,640 --> 00:24:52,799 » Hi. Um, my first question is Okay. Um, it's my understanding it's not a PUB. 343 00:24:48,480 --> 00:24:57,120 So, how can you ask for waivers? >> I I can answer that. So, our subdivision 344 00:24:54,960 --> 00:25:01,039 code does allow them to ask for specific waiverss to the subdivision code. So the 345 00:24:59,600 --> 00:25:05,760 waiverss that they're requesting are for, for example, that sidewalk along 346 00:25:03,440 --> 00:25:08,559 Ogden Avenue and street trees, which are in the subdivision code, not the zoning 347 00:25:07,679 --> 00:25:10,400 code. >> Okay. 348 00:25:09,200 --> 00:25:13,200 » So they're they're not zoning code waiverss because that would require a 349 00:25:11,679 --> 00:25:17,520 variation. >> Um my next question is about the 350 00:25:14,960 --> 00:25:22,320 landscaping plans. Has the village forester had a chance to review those? 351 00:25:20,559 --> 00:25:25,840 » Yes, he we're still working through the comments. 352 00:25:22,880 --> 00:25:29,360 » Yep. There are still a few um fi I think one of the conditions that staff has 353 00:25:27,520 --> 00:25:33,440 recommended that's added if if this should move forward as a recommendation 354 00:25:30,799 --> 00:25:37,039 tonight is that all final um village forester comments would be addressed and 355 00:25:35,200 --> 00:25:41,279 there's pretty minor ones still that are left but but there were still a few of a 356 00:25:39,520 --> 00:25:45,279 few dead trees here or there and then to allow for some flexibility of because we 357 00:25:43,840 --> 00:25:48,559 don't know what the individual lots will be built out as and where those 358 00:25:46,799 --> 00:25:52,159 driveways specifically will be that maybe a street tree or two would be 359 00:25:50,480 --> 00:25:57,279 moved a little bit this way or that way still meeting the code requirements for 360 00:25:54,080 --> 00:25:59,440 I think the 40 foot spacing. So, >> thank you. 361 00:25:57,760 --> 00:26:03,520 » But they have reviewed it and we we would like to add to make sure that they 362 00:26:00,799 --> 00:26:08,640 they address those final comments. >> Okay, that's very helpful. Um even 363 00:26:06,640 --> 00:26:12,640 though I would have liked if that had all been figured out before you were in 364 00:26:10,480 --> 00:26:19,760 front of us tonight so we know exactly what we're voting on. Um, okay. My next 365 00:26:16,960 --> 00:26:26,480 question, um, and Cynthia, you brought this up. 366 00:26:23,120 --> 00:26:31,600 Um, if you were going to do a Shipo, you know, historical review, 367 00:26:28,960 --> 00:26:37,120 I think that's very important because, as you probably are aware, that whole 368 00:26:33,919 --> 00:26:41,760 area was um, villages for the Native Americans. 369 00:26:38,799 --> 00:26:48,159 Um, I know Oakbrook did a survey many years ago that lists what was found and 370 00:26:45,200 --> 00:26:52,799 what should be done for um, future development. 371 00:26:49,840 --> 00:26:58,559 And I think that's something um, that needs to be looked at. And we've had 372 00:26:55,440 --> 00:27:03,440 another applicant in front of us before a few years ago and they had all that 373 00:27:01,360 --> 00:27:07,520 work, everything done before they came in front of us. So they knew they could 374 00:27:05,840 --> 00:27:11,279 go ahead. Um, 375 00:27:09,679 --> 00:27:17,200 so I would like to see something like that. Um, it seems like you have a lot 376 00:27:15,200 --> 00:27:24,480 of things you're considering which you don't have the final answer on yet. 377 00:27:21,440 --> 00:27:29,200 So certain things are kind of vague to me like the landscaping, the shipo 378 00:27:27,600 --> 00:27:33,360 review, um, the exterior appearance of the 379 00:27:31,679 --> 00:27:37,039 homes. Um, 380 00:27:34,320 --> 00:27:38,880 » there's no exterior appearance on per comp 381 00:27:37,760 --> 00:27:42,159 » right on code compliance >> and that's what these would be all be 382 00:27:40,720 --> 00:27:47,440 » okay but I still have >> we're really talking subdivision here 383 00:27:44,159 --> 00:27:52,880 » okay um I had some questions too about the park open hours how that would be 384 00:27:50,880 --> 00:27:58,159 enforced >> so I I think we we would list that in 385 00:27:55,039 --> 00:28:03,120 the HOA documents uh but yes it would it would adhere to the village of Hensdale 386 00:28:00,559 --> 00:28:10,080 parks as well so that there it would be I I believe is it 8:00 or 7 8 o'clock 387 00:28:06,799 --> 00:28:14,000 that um there's a cut off time for uh people using that. 388 00:28:12,000 --> 00:28:17,760 » I thought I read somewhere the cut off time in your plan was going to be six 389 00:28:15,919 --> 00:28:22,080 o'clock. Am I mistaken? >> It it could to to be honest, I'm I'm not 390 00:28:19,919 --> 00:28:27,520 exactly sure that specific line in the HOA documents. Um but if I could for for 391 00:28:25,279 --> 00:28:31,919 the forestry, she she mentioned them there. Yes, we're we're going to we're 392 00:28:29,679 --> 00:28:36,480 actively working on the rest of the engineering and we've already um emailed 393 00:28:34,720 --> 00:28:41,120 the village basically saying yes, we're working on these. It was a couple of of 394 00:28:38,799 --> 00:28:45,520 trees that we were taken down. Um and then like like Bethany said, just we 395 00:28:44,240 --> 00:28:49,520 don't know exactly where what side of the driveways these houses are going to 396 00:28:47,200 --> 00:28:53,440 have, so it would be premature to finalize tree placement when we don't 397 00:28:52,080 --> 00:28:57,840 know exactly where everything's going to fall. So, but yes, we we will we will 398 00:28:55,840 --> 00:29:00,399 accept, you know, the forestry's uh remarks on that. 399 00:28:58,880 --> 00:29:04,000 » Would that have to go to the tree board, Bethany, or back to us, or how would 400 00:29:03,120 --> 00:29:07,120 that work? >> Um, to my knowledge, I don't believe 401 00:29:05,919 --> 00:29:11,440 that they'd have to go to the tree board. Um, there these are pretty minor 402 00:29:09,840 --> 00:29:16,159 comments that we'd work with them on. There were a couple of trees, um, like 403 00:29:14,159 --> 00:29:20,240 some buckthorn that were still can be shown as removed. There were some dead 404 00:29:17,840 --> 00:29:24,080 trees that were noted. Um, so these were pretty minor. Um, but I will double 405 00:29:22,720 --> 00:29:28,320 check if it needs if this would need to go to the tree board for some of those 406 00:29:25,919 --> 00:29:31,440 tree removals. Um, and that would but it wouldn't need to come back here if we 407 00:29:29,760 --> 00:29:34,240 added that as a condition of approval to work with staff. 408 00:29:32,399 --> 00:29:38,399 » And the conditions on page two that are being recommended addresses all that so 409 00:29:36,480 --> 00:29:44,640 that the village has the authority to then address all the tree issues and 410 00:29:41,919 --> 00:29:46,720 » for building permits. So, it have to be reviewed and approved before they get 411 00:29:45,919 --> 00:29:49,200 the permit. >> Sounds like you guys are going to be 412 00:29:47,919 --> 00:29:58,600 busy. >> Yeah. Um, okay. I also had a question 413 00:29:53,679 --> 00:29:58,600 about the school impact. Um, 414 00:30:03,279 --> 00:30:10,559 and then do you have any plans for like street lights, things like that? 415 00:30:08,559 --> 00:30:13,520 » Yes, th those are in the the plans as well. I don't miss that. 416 00:30:11,919 --> 00:30:16,080 » Yeah, we're we're going to be fixing the the existing street lights. Yes, 417 00:30:15,440 --> 00:30:19,480 exactly. >> Okay. Yeah. 418 00:30:19,520 --> 00:30:23,840 Okay, that's all I have. Thank you. >> Thank you. 419 00:30:21,840 --> 00:30:27,760 » Thanks, Julie. And Mark. [clears throat] >> Yeah. All right. Thank you. U Thank you 420 00:30:26,080 --> 00:30:31,520 very much for the plans. I understand this is a very constrained site from a 421 00:30:29,919 --> 00:30:37,039 water resource perspective. So, I'm going to bear that in mind while why I 422 00:30:33,360 --> 00:30:42,080 make my comments, but um first, uh I wanted to start with the open space. Um, 423 00:30:39,760 --> 00:30:48,080 did we is the park district been engaged as it relates to I I'm I'm totally 424 00:30:44,960 --> 00:30:53,919 opposed to it being remaining public. I think it putting it on the HOA. It I've 425 00:30:51,440 --> 00:30:58,159 seen enough detention ponds that get left to HOAs to fund. I don't see it 426 00:30:56,880 --> 00:31:01,200 happening. It's >> you're opposed to what? 427 00:30:59,200 --> 00:31:03,200 » To staying with the HOA, the public space. 428 00:31:02,399 --> 00:31:08,399 » Oh, >> because it it really that's a lot to put 429 00:31:06,320 --> 00:31:12,559 on a HOA. I mean detention ponds alone, let alone 15 acres. I think what Harlo 430 00:31:10,559 --> 00:31:15,520 or Commissioner Harlo was saying was important. We need a maintenance plan to 431 00:31:14,080 --> 00:31:18,960 understand what maintenance looks like. What are we maintaining too? There's a 432 00:31:17,279 --> 00:31:21,520 lot in this covenants and restrictions for maintenance. [clears throat] But at 433 00:31:20,399 --> 00:31:25,679 the end of the day, if that doesn't happen, we go through the lean process. 434 00:31:23,200 --> 00:31:31,200 We go through um you know, potentially turning over to the village in the first 435 00:31:27,360 --> 00:31:35,760 place um or at the end of the day. So, I would like to start there of is this an 436 00:31:34,080 --> 00:31:39,600 amenity that could be turned over to the to the village as park? We don't get big 437 00:31:38,240 --> 00:31:43,120 chunks of open space like this that could become parks. Why not take the 438 00:31:41,679 --> 00:31:44,960 opportunity of putting it in the public trust? 439 00:31:43,919 --> 00:31:48,080 » That's that's my opinion. >> Could you address that, Bethany? Because 440 00:31:46,000 --> 00:31:51,039 I know the village talked about it and they prefer this approach versus taking 441 00:31:50,399 --> 00:31:54,399 over the lake >> in in the initial stages with the 442 00:31:52,799 --> 00:31:58,159 applicants and they can also speak to this because we've spoke about this uh 443 00:31:56,080 --> 00:32:02,000 consistently. We did talk about uh the possibility of this land being dedicated 444 00:31:59,919 --> 00:32:06,159 to the village. The village did do some initial cost estimates of what it would 445 00:32:03,600 --> 00:32:11,279 just cost to mow the grass and it was exponentially high compared to our 446 00:32:09,039 --> 00:32:15,679 current parks budget. And so there were some concerns of um how do we how do we 447 00:32:13,600 --> 00:32:20,080 also maintain public access but keep it private? And so they have they have 448 00:32:18,159 --> 00:32:24,720 looked at the private option. >> I still think that should be explored 449 00:32:21,840 --> 00:32:27,760 more mowing. Maybe that's not the use. Maybe it's a prairie. Maybe it's 450 00:32:25,919 --> 00:32:32,159 something like being nature preserve. >> We also did get like what it would do be 451 00:32:30,080 --> 00:32:35,600 to to go to maintenance plans and everything, what it would be to actually 452 00:32:33,600 --> 00:32:39,200 plant, do native plantings, wetland restoration, and the costs were quite 453 00:32:37,600 --> 00:32:43,120 high, but it is something that you guys can recommend that the village board 454 00:32:40,720 --> 00:32:47,760 look at further. Um, but we did do initial costs last year and they they 455 00:32:45,440 --> 00:32:51,840 were above budget. >> Yeah, I that's that's my biggest 456 00:32:49,360 --> 00:32:55,919 challenge with with this is that I just I think it's a lot to put on HOA. 457 00:32:53,840 --> 00:32:58,960 typically the the you know I don't know if a special service area was discussed 458 00:32:57,840 --> 00:33:03,760 but that's not necessarily appropriate if we're going to keep it for the public 459 00:33:01,039 --> 00:33:09,039 right to put it on the HOA to fund an SSA either. So that's why I think at the 460 00:33:06,960 --> 00:33:15,200 end of the day an SSA is not necessarily the right mechanism. I I truly think we 461 00:33:12,240 --> 00:33:19,679 need to explore more. I I I think 20 years from now the endgame is this 462 00:33:17,760 --> 00:33:24,000 either there's a lean on every property there because of maintenance issues. And 463 00:33:22,159 --> 00:33:29,039 I'm not trying to be a doomsday, but I just think this is the way it's going to 464 00:33:25,919 --> 00:33:32,000 play out is that either there's lean or at the end of the day it's turned over 465 00:33:30,240 --> 00:33:37,039 to the village. So why not explore that from the beginning and it sounds like 466 00:33:34,559 --> 00:33:39,840 you've explored it, but I I would highly encourage that. 467 00:33:38,399 --> 00:33:44,960 » Even though it's been under private control for 50 years. 468 00:33:42,000 --> 00:33:50,320 » Yeah. And it's there's del there's trees falling down in it. There's it's 469 00:33:47,360 --> 00:33:54,480 » I mean it's it's not >> a great from a natural resource 470 00:33:52,720 --> 00:33:59,679 perspective and if I I mean that's just my opinion. I agree. 471 00:33:55,440 --> 00:34:03,519 » So um so that's the public um plan but at a minimum if it stays in this I agree 472 00:34:02,000 --> 00:34:07,919 with Commissioner Harlo we need a maintenance plan because maintenance is 473 00:34:05,679 --> 00:34:13,200 the trigger for what is the village going to hold to the HOA to from a 474 00:34:11,440 --> 00:34:16,960 maintenance perspective because the village has the ability to do the 475 00:34:15,280 --> 00:34:20,879 maintenance themselves and then recoup those costs. what is the baseline 476 00:34:18,960 --> 00:34:24,240 maintenance requirement so that that can be held against that if it does stay in 477 00:34:22,720 --> 00:34:30,079 the private sector. >> So, good idea. 478 00:34:25,359 --> 00:34:33,679 » Um, so the other items I had um obvious 479 00:34:32,320 --> 00:34:38,560 around a detention pond. I understand you need that to get your volumes. Um, 480 00:34:36,240 --> 00:34:44,159 they it makes maintenance challenging. You you can only get into that pond from 481 00:34:40,240 --> 00:34:48,240 lots nine and or from nine and 10. Um it it's just the retaining walls are 482 00:34:46,159 --> 00:34:52,560 another added level of maintenance. And so I think part of this personally I 483 00:34:50,399 --> 00:34:57,119 know it's you know conforming. It's the density. You got to fit you know storm 484 00:34:55,040 --> 00:35:01,359 water requirements. You got the culdeac. You got all these lots. It's the density 485 00:34:59,040 --> 00:35:04,880 that's driving the decision or the need to have that retaining wall. I'm not a 486 00:35:03,359 --> 00:35:10,160 fan of retaining walls in detention ponds. They end up you know they there 487 00:35:07,280 --> 00:35:14,320 are barriers to maintenance. um especially if you can only get in from 488 00:35:11,599 --> 00:35:17,920 two lots to to do that maintenance. Um and they are a maintenance need 489 00:35:15,920 --> 00:35:23,920 themselves that again retaining walls are expensive. You know my my my you 490 00:35:21,760 --> 00:35:28,400 know concern is that the density is too high for everything you need to fit comp 491 00:35:26,560 --> 00:35:33,920 um based on the water resource constraints at this site. So um that's 492 00:35:31,440 --> 00:35:40,320 just another one of my comments. And I also um just you know I understand um ID 493 00:35:37,839 --> 00:35:46,079 do won't let you put the crossing um there. I'm assuming we're going to 494 00:35:42,240 --> 00:35:50,800 Monroe with this school um this year. I that's a just a challenging crossing if 495 00:35:48,800 --> 00:35:54,000 if people do try to cross there. I don't think they're going to go all the way up 496 00:35:51,839 --> 00:35:59,119 to the north end of the thing, walk over to Madison, and then come back down. Um 497 00:35:56,880 --> 00:36:05,280 I I have some concerns that there will be, you know, um some crossing at a very 498 00:36:02,480 --> 00:36:09,760 crazy intersection to a dead end culde-sac on Adams, right? That's what's 499 00:36:07,839 --> 00:36:12,240 on the other side behind manner. >> Correct. 500 00:36:10,240 --> 00:36:14,720 » Yeah. So I just I have some concerns there 501 00:36:13,280 --> 00:36:17,280 » with this much. You know, >> I don't think anyone's walking to school 502 00:36:16,400 --> 00:36:20,400 from this area. >> I know, but I People do cross there. 503 00:36:19,280 --> 00:36:23,280 Yeah. Oh, I cross there. >> Yeah, I cross there. Yeah. 504 00:36:21,599 --> 00:36:25,280 » But I've seen school buses picking up kids. 505 00:36:23,760 --> 00:36:29,920 » I agree. I'm just saying in general there's, you know, there isn't increased 506 00:36:28,000 --> 00:36:33,280 amount of potential for trying to cross that. I just 507 00:36:31,280 --> 00:36:38,880 » um I'm just raising that as a concern. >> And do you have a suggested alternative? 508 00:36:35,440 --> 00:36:41,280 » No, I don't. But this isn't my project. >> Understood. 509 00:36:39,680 --> 00:36:46,720 » Yeah. Good. >> But the school district does have to 510 00:36:42,720 --> 00:36:48,640 sign off on the final plan. So they will have input here. 511 00:36:47,599 --> 00:36:51,440 » Yeah. >> Those are my considerations. 512 00:36:50,720 --> 00:36:55,440 » Thank you, Mark. >> Yep. 513 00:36:52,640 --> 00:37:01,359 » Hi, how are you? Um, Commissioner Willby brings up a really good point. Um, I do 514 00:36:58,160 --> 00:37:04,800 know that, um, over in Gro Mill, you can't get a loan backed by Freddy and 515 00:37:03,119 --> 00:37:10,240 Fainy because the HOA has not kept up with their, um, flood issues and you 516 00:37:07,920 --> 00:37:14,160 can't get a loan. Um, so I mean, that's a really valid point. If there's this 517 00:37:12,000 --> 00:37:19,280 becomes a problem, these houses can't get loans because the the flooding 518 00:37:16,560 --> 00:37:23,599 becomes so bad that Fanny and Freddy won't support back a loan. Do you want 519 00:37:22,720 --> 00:37:27,839 to answer? >> Right. Um, the homes will be outside of 520 00:37:26,640 --> 00:37:32,480 the flood plane. >> Um, so there should be no issues getting 521 00:37:30,560 --> 00:37:36,000 insurance for homes outside of the flood plane. There is flood plane on the 522 00:37:34,400 --> 00:37:38,880 property, but the homes will be outside of the flood movements. 523 00:37:37,520 --> 00:37:43,520 » I think it's actually more of an issue with the village not wanting to, you 524 00:37:41,040 --> 00:37:48,320 know, cover this cost. Less of a problem, I guess. Um I mean yes the 525 00:37:46,160 --> 00:37:54,640 flood planes obviously an issue but more along the lines of the HOA covering or 526 00:37:50,960 --> 00:37:59,839 being in charge of this um open place. Yeah. 527 00:37:55,680 --> 00:38:05,680 » Um okay. So um as many have said before this is a gateway to the village and I 528 00:38:02,880 --> 00:38:12,640 really wish we had an opportunity to know what was being developed for sure 529 00:38:09,599 --> 00:38:16,720 on the west side um of Adams but we don't. That's not your problem. Um but 530 00:38:14,320 --> 00:38:23,680 we are given certain criteria to look at um 12 or 13 points that you know all 531 00:38:19,520 --> 00:38:27,760 relate to um the existing structures nearby and the 532 00:38:25,599 --> 00:38:32,079 compliance and comp compatibility with things nearby and um it's really hard 533 00:38:29,920 --> 00:38:35,520 for us to um look at that because there's we don't know what's coming. So 534 00:38:33,839 --> 00:38:40,240 just for the record, I think we should be looking at this um as you know, at 535 00:38:38,880 --> 00:38:43,119 least not as a whole because this is owned by different people, but we 536 00:38:42,079 --> 00:38:47,680 should, you know, have a better understanding as to what's being 537 00:38:44,560 --> 00:38:52,560 developed over there. Um with that said, relates to you guys, um it being the 538 00:38:49,839 --> 00:38:58,560 gateway, um I know IDA will not allow you to plant trees or anything or bushes 539 00:38:55,119 --> 00:39:04,480 or arboret along Ogden. Um, but I would like to see some landscaping um, behind 540 00:39:02,000 --> 00:39:08,160 that easement if possible. Um, on the burm. I think we talked about a burm 541 00:39:06,320 --> 00:39:12,480 going right there. I think it's important to kind of have some coverage 542 00:39:10,800 --> 00:39:15,839 between Ogden and those houses. I don't know how much space because you don't 543 00:39:14,160 --> 00:39:19,359 know what's being built there yet, but I do think that's really important to 544 00:39:17,520 --> 00:39:22,480 have. Um, >> yeah. Um, as part of the grading plan, 545 00:39:21,359 --> 00:39:24,960 uh, there is a burm. >> Yes. 546 00:39:22,880 --> 00:39:30,880 » On private property between the homes and Ogden. Would it be possible to build 547 00:39:27,040 --> 00:39:33,599 on ever build um plants on on that BM? >> Uh I don't see why not. I mean that make 548 00:39:32,560 --> 00:39:37,760 most sense because I don't think anyone's wants to look at Ogden outside 549 00:39:36,000 --> 00:39:39,760 the back window. So right >> I think most folks 550 00:39:38,800 --> 00:39:42,400 » Well, you would think that >> Yeah, I would. But but they don't. 551 00:39:41,200 --> 00:39:45,280 » Yeah, I would put [laughter] evergreens on these BMS, right? 552 00:39:43,440 --> 00:39:50,960 » Yeah. I really think that's a suggestion that we should um implement as a 553 00:39:47,599 --> 00:39:57,280 condition to this site plan if you're against it or not. No, we we're we're 554 00:39:54,880 --> 00:39:58,000 we're willing to to entertain it for sure. 555 00:39:57,520 --> 00:40:01,440 » Okay. Yes. >> Looks like there's the burn is about 7 556 00:39:59,520 --> 00:40:07,119 foot high from the backyards. >> Yeah. 557 00:40:03,920 --> 00:40:10,960 » Uh well, as I think about um Kensington over there, that development, and you 558 00:40:08,880 --> 00:40:14,320 just I mean, obviously the trees aren't that tall, but you just when you're up 559 00:40:12,160 --> 00:40:17,839 in those houses, you just look directly onto Ogden. 560 00:40:16,240 --> 00:40:20,880 » Oh, the new development. >> Yeah. 561 00:40:18,640 --> 00:40:24,079 » Um and you can honestly when you're in a on Ogden, it's not even not on Octton, 562 00:40:22,880 --> 00:40:27,200 but when you're on Octton, you can see in the windows. So, it's just being a 563 00:40:26,079 --> 00:40:35,680 gateway to the village. I think it's important. So, um, and then I just echo 564 00:40:32,079 --> 00:40:38,560 the park security measures. Um, I was over there looking at the property and I 565 00:40:37,200 --> 00:40:42,480 was asked to leave. So, whoever's doing that did a great job. [laughter] 566 00:40:41,119 --> 00:40:44,560 They said, "Who are you? This private property. 567 00:40:42,880 --> 00:40:48,000 » What were you doing?" >> I was looking at the I was looking at 568 00:40:46,240 --> 00:40:51,038 all this. Um, but I >> Did you say on the record that you were 569 00:40:49,520 --> 00:40:54,160 on our property? Is that what you said? [laughter] 570 00:40:51,760 --> 00:40:57,040 or not. There's no sidewalk. So, >> did you see that? No trespassing sign 571 00:40:56,278 --> 00:41:01,520 [laughter] posted. >> Have you been sworn in? 572 00:41:00,160 --> 00:41:04,800 » Um, >> officer will take care of you when 573 00:41:02,828 --> 00:41:07,920 [laughter] >> um 574 00:41:06,319 --> 00:41:13,119 anyways, I do know that since it's been vacant, I I have teens and I know they 575 00:41:10,880 --> 00:41:17,920 have not my kids, I'm just getting us all in trouble. Um, that that teens have 576 00:41:15,599 --> 00:41:22,240 been over there a lot. Um, and just so you guys are aware that it's become a an 577 00:41:20,240 --> 00:41:25,680 issue with trespassing. For sure. >> For sure. Yeah, we we've been working 578 00:41:23,520 --> 00:41:31,040 with city staff, city staff and the police have been phenomenal. Um, we're 579 00:41:28,800 --> 00:41:34,400 doing our best to secure it, but at the same time, we're our hands were kind of 580 00:41:32,640 --> 00:41:40,240 tied with Kameed trying to get out there in disconnecting 950 North Madison. Um, 581 00:41:38,400 --> 00:41:45,599 so we hope to have a disconnect letter in hand um within the next week and then 582 00:41:43,920 --> 00:41:49,119 mobilize the crew and have these things demoed within two weeks. 583 00:41:47,040 --> 00:41:55,680 » Okay. I would just suggest like >> I don't know um just as simple as a sign 584 00:41:53,359 --> 00:41:59,520 stating the hours or something to keep people off the out of the park 585 00:41:58,079 --> 00:42:02,319 » right now. It says no trespassing everywhere. 586 00:42:00,800 --> 00:42:04,800 » I'm just saying once it's developed, Steve, [laughter] 587 00:42:03,440 --> 00:42:08,240 » that's for sure. Well, she was on the public street. 588 00:42:06,640 --> 00:42:10,240 » Yeah, I'm sure you never crossed the curb. 589 00:42:08,960 --> 00:42:12,914 » I don't know. Something was weird was going on. They said there was an 590 00:42:11,200 --> 00:42:20,240 investigation. I need to leave. It was a [laughter] whole thing. 591 00:42:15,359 --> 00:42:25,280 » Um and then um just my concern with the traffic. Um I think it is going to be a 592 00:42:22,800 --> 00:42:29,920 bigger issue and not necessarily your fault but again looking at the whole 593 00:42:27,359 --> 00:42:34,079 picture um it'll be something that once we do get the proposal for next door 594 00:42:32,319 --> 00:42:39,440 we'll have to take a look at and it might affect your sit you know whether 595 00:42:36,880 --> 00:42:43,440 ID do takes a piece whatever it's just in the future that's it's going to be 596 00:42:41,040 --> 00:42:48,079 huge a huge piece of the project. >> Yes. Again, we're willing to work with 597 00:42:45,119 --> 00:42:51,520 village of Hinsdale um and in the public to, you know, to do what's right 598 00:42:50,000 --> 00:42:54,800 basically in this in this situation. So, if something does come up, we're happy 599 00:42:53,040 --> 00:42:56,079 to work the v with the village. >> Appreciate that. 600 00:42:55,440 --> 00:42:58,720 » For sure. >> And and related to that, the development 601 00:42:57,599 --> 00:43:03,520 plan, I thought there was a letter in here about the just rough schedule, you 602 00:43:01,040 --> 00:43:09,520 really are looking to start on the north lots first and then um reserve place as 603 00:43:07,440 --> 00:43:11,839 it was called the culdeac. That would be the second phase. 604 00:43:10,560 --> 00:43:16,319 » Yes, correct. So, we're going to be basically doing all the the whole water 605 00:43:13,839 --> 00:43:18,960 and sewer loop all the way around. And it's not like we're just going to be 606 00:43:17,599 --> 00:43:22,240 just on the north side. We're going to be doing a little stuff on the south 607 00:43:20,240 --> 00:43:26,000 side, too, with the water and sewer loop around, moving some earth, that kind of 608 00:43:23,760 --> 00:43:30,240 stuff. Um, but yes, our our main focus will be on the north seven lots first. 609 00:43:29,040 --> 00:43:36,400 » Great. >> And with those north seven lots, that's 610 00:43:32,720 --> 00:43:40,079 where they on this plan um in our packet, that's where the flood plane 611 00:43:38,400 --> 00:43:47,520 really encroaches on several of the lots. um most uh dramatically. Can you 612 00:43:45,040 --> 00:43:52,240 just explain expand upon your statement that all of the homes will be built 613 00:43:49,680 --> 00:43:58,880 outside of the flood plane? >> I'm really concerned about lot 13 where 614 00:43:55,200 --> 00:44:04,000 90% of it is in the flood plane. 14 it looks like about 75% of it is in the 615 00:44:01,599 --> 00:44:08,720 flood plane. I don't know how you can position a house without having it like 616 00:44:06,000 --> 00:44:13,040 at the curb. So if you could just um there's easements on those specific lots 617 00:44:11,119 --> 00:44:15,200 different depths to stay away if you could describe the storm water easements 618 00:44:14,640 --> 00:44:19,920 that they're on. >> How does that work? 619 00:44:16,720 --> 00:44:23,839 » Right. So um for flood plane to relocate the flood plane limits. We would fill in 620 00:44:22,240 --> 00:44:27,599 part of the flood plane and provide compensatory storage on other parts of 621 00:44:26,000 --> 00:44:31,920 the property. So there's a lot of land where we can move dirt around. And so 622 00:44:30,640 --> 00:44:35,680 essentially we're going to change the flood plane limits once the homes are 623 00:44:34,000 --> 00:44:40,000 proposed. So once they figure out what the final footprints are, we'll move the 624 00:44:38,000 --> 00:44:43,760 flood plane limits appropriately and we'll compensate for that at other parts 625 00:44:41,599 --> 00:44:46,960 of the property or of the land. And there's plenty of land outside of the 626 00:44:44,880 --> 00:44:51,119 flood plane to provide that compensatory storage. So that these easements, the 627 00:44:49,520 --> 00:44:55,839 storm water drainage, storm water management easements that you have on 628 00:44:52,720 --> 00:45:01,359 like lot 16, 15, 14 that get increasingly deeper that will be kind of 629 00:44:59,280 --> 00:45:04,880 driven by final engineering with the county and village or will those 630 00:45:03,040 --> 00:45:09,680 easements is that what you think they'll be? 631 00:45:05,920 --> 00:45:15,280 » Well, those easements are are fixed. So >> So no one can build on those parts I 632 00:45:12,640 --> 00:45:18,079 mean they're deep lots. um they really can only build out towards the street 633 00:45:16,720 --> 00:45:21,760 side, not the back side. >> Correct. And and you'll see those shaded 634 00:45:19,920 --> 00:45:23,839 boxes. That's the proposed footprint and those are large footprint. 635 00:45:23,359 --> 00:45:28,560 » Right. >> And so um yeah, and and those um the 636 00:45:26,720 --> 00:45:33,680 southern lots where the flood planes are encroaching. We'll be relocating those 637 00:45:30,480 --> 00:45:38,160 flood plane limits by uh providing compensatory storage on the other lots. 638 00:45:36,640 --> 00:45:41,760 So we'll just move it around, move the flood plane limits around to make sure 639 00:45:39,839 --> 00:45:46,560 the final flood plane limit is outside of the building. on this these drawings 640 00:45:45,359 --> 00:45:50,560 » where they >> these are all easements. So you can't 641 00:45:48,880 --> 00:45:52,960 build on this lot even though it's this deep. You [clears throat] can only build 642 00:45:51,839 --> 00:45:55,040 in this portion of the >> right there. 643 00:45:53,760 --> 00:46:00,200 » Yeah. >> Keeping away from the storm lot. 644 00:45:57,200 --> 00:46:00,200 » Yep. 645 00:46:01,760 --> 00:46:09,680 » And other questions or comments? Thank you Scott. 646 00:46:05,760 --> 00:46:15,760 » Keeping on that same thread. Uh, hi. By the way, as we look at square 647 00:46:13,280 --> 00:46:21,280 footage of home that can be built and we look at the size of the lots and we're 648 00:46:18,400 --> 00:46:26,240 saying that there's an easement or a non-buildable part of these lots, does 649 00:46:23,760 --> 00:46:31,440 that count against the F and how big those houses can be? Because in other 650 00:46:29,599 --> 00:46:37,440 words, if you can't build if you have a lot that's could allow for a 20,000 651 00:46:34,640 --> 00:46:40,319 square foot lot or whatever and a house to be built on that, but you can only 652 00:46:39,119 --> 00:46:46,400 use >> 10% of the lot or 20% of the lot. It 653 00:46:43,200 --> 00:46:50,880 doesn't make sense for it to be zoned R2 to me. And so I'm asking the architect 654 00:46:48,640 --> 00:46:57,200 in the room and how that works because it it doesn't seem to me to make sense 655 00:46:54,319 --> 00:47:00,720 » from you don't like utility easements and everything are not part of the 656 00:46:58,480 --> 00:47:03,599 » No. Uh the whole lot counts for the underlying property, not the 657 00:47:02,079 --> 00:47:05,839 » even if it's not a buildable part of the lot. 658 00:47:04,000 --> 00:47:10,560 » Correct. So any sort of easements like if you even had a rear um comed easement 659 00:47:08,400 --> 00:47:14,560 or a storm sewer ement your back, it's still the underlying lot. 660 00:47:11,920 --> 00:47:19,520 » Okay, cool. Thank you. Um that helps. Um, I'm going to go to where 661 00:47:17,359 --> 00:47:24,720 Commissioner Fusonei was a little bit too. 662 00:47:21,200 --> 00:47:28,480 There's something about all of this area that I think we have to look at 663 00:47:26,160 --> 00:47:33,440 holistically. We're touching on it with the water. 664 00:47:30,400 --> 00:47:38,560 And if if you're saying you're going to now maneuver 665 00:47:36,240 --> 00:47:42,960 water, hold it, retain it, do whatever you're 666 00:47:40,400 --> 00:47:46,480 going to do for these houses on this lot. And we're then we're going to do 667 00:47:44,960 --> 00:47:50,640 the same thing on the west side of the road. 668 00:47:48,079 --> 00:47:53,839 And they're connected. That water is connected. That waterway is connected. I 669 00:47:52,880 --> 00:48:00,160 think we have to look at this holistically as one area of water 670 00:47:57,200 --> 00:48:03,920 management, not just each component because whatever you guys do is now 671 00:48:02,240 --> 00:48:08,800 going to put off on the other side for them to have to do something similar. 672 00:48:06,000 --> 00:48:13,440 And I'm not sure that each is going to solve the holistic problem as individual 673 00:48:11,680 --> 00:48:16,640 components. I'm just not I just don't not 674 00:48:15,359 --> 00:48:20,400 » the county does. >> Well, but they did does the county know 675 00:48:18,960 --> 00:48:24,079 that this is all happening? Does the county know both parcels are going? 676 00:48:22,640 --> 00:48:27,359 » Yeah, though the county is going to be involved in this everything. They look 677 00:48:25,839 --> 00:48:31,920 at it holistically. Okay. >> Not just even for Claire Hillsdale. 678 00:48:30,640 --> 00:48:35,680 » So the entire water >> so for this body water doesn't man 679 00:48:34,319 --> 00:48:39,839 matter them. >> It matters to them but they look at it 680 00:48:37,440 --> 00:48:43,680 all together. No, I mean it to this our governing body, this committee, it water 681 00:48:42,160 --> 00:48:44,559 doesn't matter because the county takes that 682 00:48:44,079 --> 00:48:47,280 » correct >> and does that. 683 00:48:45,520 --> 00:48:50,480 » Yeah, it's a plan commission. We don't get involved in water 684 00:48:48,640 --> 00:48:54,400 » and and they will be required to meet all county requirements. And just to 685 00:48:52,559 --> 00:48:58,079 confirm, their team has been in touch already with DuPage County several 686 00:48:56,480 --> 00:49:00,559 times, many times with staff. >> Just want to make sure that that's 687 00:48:59,200 --> 00:49:05,680 addressed, right? Because if I'm a neighbor, that's my concern, 688 00:49:03,760 --> 00:49:11,359 » right? Number one. Number two is the traffic. And it's the exact same issue. 689 00:49:09,839 --> 00:49:13,280 But the county doesn't do the traffic, do they? 690 00:49:12,720 --> 00:49:16,640 » No. >> No, we do. 691 00:49:14,480 --> 00:49:21,760 » So, if we're looking at the traffic and we're looking at that holistically 692 00:49:19,839 --> 00:49:24,880 and you're going to put these houses in here with school age children, then 693 00:49:23,520 --> 00:49:28,480 we're going to put senior living across the way and then some other units, 694 00:49:27,040 --> 00:49:33,200 right, that are going to be back in the other area. First of all, are you guys 695 00:49:30,880 --> 00:49:36,480 involved in that area at all? The the to the west? 696 00:49:33,839 --> 00:49:41,839 » No. Your group is not. No. Okay. >> So, there is no continuity factor 697 00:49:40,160 --> 00:49:46,559 occurring here. And I think about sidewalks 698 00:49:43,599 --> 00:49:51,680 because senior people need sidewalks to walk and that area needs them and this 699 00:49:49,520 --> 00:49:55,760 area needs them too. So, I know we talked about the trees along Ogden and 700 00:49:53,680 --> 00:50:00,480 the Burm. I would prefer to have a sidewalk along there that would connect 701 00:49:57,920 --> 00:50:04,160 you over to that area. And I know we have a sidewalk plan. This 702 00:50:02,480 --> 00:50:08,720 isn't part of the sidewalk plan. I understand and get all that. I think we 703 00:50:05,920 --> 00:50:13,760 need to revisit the sidewalk plan again holistically for that area of the 704 00:50:11,200 --> 00:50:17,839 village because otherwise it's going to be an island. And if we're going to have 705 00:50:16,240 --> 00:50:22,640 traffic that's going to increase dramatically in that area when the 706 00:50:20,480 --> 00:50:26,640 senior part's done and all that's done, there's no way you're going south on 707 00:50:24,319 --> 00:50:31,200 Adams taking a left onto Ogden. It ain't going to happen. You can't do it now. 708 00:50:29,359 --> 00:50:35,440 Coming from the south going north, you can't do it. So, I don't see how that 709 00:50:33,920 --> 00:50:39,680 occurs. And then the only way that those people 710 00:50:37,440 --> 00:50:45,119 in in all these homes are going to be able to get to Monroe School is to go up 711 00:50:42,720 --> 00:50:50,240 to Spring Road, down Spring Road, then down Madison. That's it. 712 00:50:47,760 --> 00:50:55,599 » Or they have to go through Claron Hills. One of the two. So, this has to kind of 713 00:50:53,200 --> 00:51:01,119 be baked in to the thought process on what's going on here. I'm not seeing it. 714 00:50:57,680 --> 00:51:04,720 I don't think we're there yet. Um, I think we can get there. I'm not saying 715 00:51:02,480 --> 00:51:07,680 that that's a deal killer at all. I'm just saying it needs to be thought 716 00:51:06,000 --> 00:51:12,720 through a little bit more. The other thing I would say is the the the access. 717 00:51:09,760 --> 00:51:16,000 So lot 20 isn't part of this. >> Correct. Correct. 718 00:51:13,760 --> 00:51:21,359 » Why? >> Uh long long story short, we just there 719 00:51:19,839 --> 00:51:26,480 was we thought we were going to sell it off 720 00:51:23,440 --> 00:51:30,880 at at a certain point. Um so we decided let's just focus on this square for now 721 00:51:28,559 --> 00:51:33,920 and then we'll revisit that later. >> Okay. So there's no other reason besides 722 00:51:33,040 --> 00:51:40,720 that. >> Okay. Has has consideration been con 723 00:51:37,359 --> 00:51:44,559 been given to extending Glendale Road west to Adams? 724 00:51:43,280 --> 00:51:49,520 » Uh no. >> Is that is where Glendale dead ends to 725 00:51:47,119 --> 00:51:52,319 the north side of lot 20 and where that path and road is is where it would go 726 00:51:51,839 --> 00:51:55,839 through. >> That would have to be that would have to 727 00:51:53,760 --> 00:51:58,640 go through the village. We we we're putting in a culde-sac and then 728 00:51:56,960 --> 00:52:01,359 basically deeding it over to Hinsdale. though. Um, 729 00:51:59,520 --> 00:52:05,839 » this is all the way up north on >> Yeah, correct. Cor correct. I mean, we 730 00:52:03,839 --> 00:52:09,920 » Where's the Is there a culde-sac up? >> Yeah, the culde-sac is on the south, but 731 00:52:07,599 --> 00:52:12,640 yes, for a city road to You're You're saying to go on that property. Is that 732 00:52:11,760 --> 00:52:16,079 what you're saying? >> Yeah. 733 00:52:13,440 --> 00:52:22,800 » Uh, I don't I don't know that at this point. I mean, we we haven't even 734 00:52:18,720 --> 00:52:26,400 entertained um you know, developing that at at this point. 735 00:52:23,760 --> 00:52:31,359 » Okay. I just raise it because it might help with the traffic flow. It might 736 00:52:28,480 --> 00:52:34,720 help with things up in that area. >> And you're saying to bring the street 737 00:52:32,880 --> 00:52:37,280 all the way to Adams. Is that what we're saying? 738 00:52:36,400 --> 00:52:40,319 » Okay. >> So, that's a consideration. 739 00:52:38,720 --> 00:52:47,079 » Um, >> agree with the trees. Um, I'm going 740 00:52:43,119 --> 00:52:47,079 through. I've got a bunch here. 741 00:52:47,200 --> 00:52:52,319 » The pedestrian br as you have it though. That's where the pedestrian bridge will 742 00:52:50,640 --> 00:52:57,599 be replaced up in that area on that walkway as you guys have it now. 743 00:52:55,280 --> 00:53:02,079 » Uh, there's there's a wooden a wooden Yes. Wooden um structure there that 744 00:53:00,240 --> 00:53:05,359 we're taking it down. But that >> concrete one in the back that will stay. 745 00:53:03,839 --> 00:53:06,960 » The one up in on the north side. >> Yes. Exactly. 746 00:53:06,319 --> 00:53:14,160 » Yes. >> Um but the sidewalk that connects the 747 00:53:10,400 --> 00:53:17,359 north houses down to the south. Is that going to be a side like an actual 748 00:53:16,079 --> 00:53:19,680 sidewalk or a path? >> Yes, that will that will be a sidewalk. 749 00:53:18,960 --> 00:53:24,000 So once >> So the connectivity is that culvert area 750 00:53:22,160 --> 00:53:26,160 or whatever it's called the area that's >> the head wall. The head wall. Yes. 751 00:53:25,280 --> 00:53:30,119 Exactly. Right. >> All right. 752 00:53:27,119 --> 00:53:30,119 Um, 753 00:53:31,839 --> 00:53:38,040 bear with me. I'm trying to skip the ones that have already been answered. 754 00:53:43,119 --> 00:53:53,680 » Um, okay. on the site review plan that we had. It it was kind of raised earlier 755 00:53:50,800 --> 00:53:59,839 when it said um things along the lines of on the amendment application. This 756 00:53:56,640 --> 00:54:04,000 document it said uh consistency of the proposed amendment with the purpose of 757 00:54:01,359 --> 00:54:07,800 this code to match with the surrounding Salt Creek Club. 758 00:54:09,359 --> 00:54:14,000 » Say say that what what was the question or criteria 759 00:54:11,760 --> 00:54:17,200 » consistency. So it says on the on the amendment on the map amendment 760 00:54:15,520 --> 00:54:20,400 application, it says the consistency of the proposed amendment with the purpose 761 00:54:18,640 --> 00:54:24,079 of this code says this proposed amendment will be consistent and match 762 00:54:22,000 --> 00:54:27,760 the surrounding Salt Creek Club. >> So I I think that's because the water 763 00:54:25,680 --> 00:54:32,319 goes up to their property line too. So it was basically insinuating that we 764 00:54:29,520 --> 00:54:33,680 plan on leaving it natural all all the way up here. 765 00:54:32,800 --> 00:54:36,160 » All the way over there too. >> Yes, exactly. 766 00:54:34,319 --> 00:54:42,480 » Thank you. That that helps a lot. >> Um open natural space. 767 00:54:39,920 --> 00:54:48,000 » Okay, that's good. The other one was the site plan review. Now, I I know that you 768 00:54:46,079 --> 00:54:54,319 guys, it sounds like you have builders on your 769 00:54:50,880 --> 00:54:58,160 within your group, within your team, and those builders, you know who they 770 00:54:56,880 --> 00:55:03,280 are. You know what they're going to build. 771 00:55:00,400 --> 00:55:07,440 It says that that the that the general design is going to meet the overall 772 00:55:05,359 --> 00:55:12,880 neighborhood and all that stuff right in here. But and I know we said that 773 00:55:11,040 --> 00:55:16,720 there's governing documents to this 774 00:55:14,559 --> 00:55:19,440 » covenants. >> But the covenants aren't okay. 775 00:55:18,000 --> 00:55:22,000 » They're in here. >> So So all that's going to be met and 776 00:55:21,200 --> 00:55:25,920 we're all good with that. >> Yeah. It spells out, you know, masonry, 777 00:55:24,240 --> 00:55:29,920 you know, first floors. Yeah. >> Which island masonry, right? [laughter] 778 00:55:28,640 --> 00:55:32,400 » I thought I saw that. >> Make sure there needs to be masonry. No 779 00:55:31,200 --> 00:55:33,440 thin brick. >> Cool. 780 00:55:32,800 --> 00:55:42,000 » Is nice. >> All right. Hang on. I'm spinning quick 781 00:55:36,079 --> 00:55:47,760 here. Oh. Um on the one through six, the south lots 782 00:55:44,800 --> 00:55:50,760 along Ogden, you've got the setbacks there. 783 00:55:53,520 --> 00:55:58,400 You see where it's on? It's on this document on page five. 784 00:55:57,599 --> 00:56:04,799 » Yes. >> So your setbacks say 35 foot front 785 00:56:02,400 --> 00:56:09,359 setback line. >> Yes, that's correct. 786 00:56:06,480 --> 00:56:12,559 But I think the back setback line on the other document says it's supposed to be 787 00:56:11,040 --> 00:56:15,520 50 ft. >> You want to answer that? 788 00:56:14,559 --> 00:56:17,760 » I can speak to this. >> Yeah. 789 00:56:15,920 --> 00:56:22,240 » So technically those are considered through lots. So they have a double 790 00:56:19,760 --> 00:56:26,240 front frontage basically. So they wouldn't have as you see on the lots to 791 00:56:24,559 --> 00:56:30,319 the north, they have a true rear setback, but these technically have a 792 00:56:28,319 --> 00:56:33,440 front setback, a primary front setback, and a secondary front setback. So that's 793 00:56:32,160 --> 00:56:39,040 why you're seeing a slight difference between both sides of the preserve 794 00:56:34,880 --> 00:56:43,359 place. Okay, thank you. That helps. I learned something new there. Uh, and 795 00:56:41,119 --> 00:56:47,280 lots one and seven, they are going to face lot one will face the house will 796 00:56:45,599 --> 00:56:49,119 face north and lot seven, the house will face south. Correct. 797 00:56:48,319 --> 00:56:53,640 » Correct. >> All right. Um, 798 00:56:58,559 --> 00:57:05,920 okay. Yeah, that's that's all I've got. I I just look at the cohesiveness of 799 00:57:02,960 --> 00:57:08,559 this plan with West and I think that's a big thing that still needs to be settled 800 00:57:07,920 --> 00:57:14,640 out. >> Absolutely. Thanks, Scott. And I'll use 801 00:57:10,799 --> 00:57:18,960 that as a perfect segue because um we've been looking at this property for seems 802 00:57:16,559 --> 00:57:22,640 like a decade. I mean, I've I've been on the plan commission for I think 13 years 803 00:57:20,640 --> 00:57:28,000 and we looked at this with Ryan Development years ago and the biggest 804 00:57:25,119 --> 00:57:31,200 issue and it commissioners have touched on it is traffic. not necessarily for 805 00:57:29,920 --> 00:57:36,559 what you guys are proposing, but ultimately what will be developed here 806 00:57:33,040 --> 00:57:42,799 » and without working with ID do and creating dedicated turn lanes um so Adam 807 00:57:40,319 --> 00:57:47,920 southbound have a dedicated turn lane so you can go um eastbound and then also um 808 00:57:46,000 --> 00:57:51,440 northbound from west if you're coming west on Ogden be able to turn north 809 00:57:49,920 --> 00:57:57,200 that's going to require some additional land be set aside from the properties to 810 00:57:54,799 --> 00:58:01,280 allow for a larger um and then to get the approval from ID dot so it's kind 811 00:57:58,960 --> 00:58:05,920 crucial. Without approval, I'd be surprised if anything could be developed 812 00:58:03,760 --> 00:58:09,520 other than R2 on these properties because it would just create a density 813 00:58:07,440 --> 00:58:13,599 and traffic that would be too big. With that said, we we don't know. We've we've 814 00:58:11,760 --> 00:58:18,000 had plenty of discussions and we know what we talked about with Ryan in years 815 00:58:15,839 --> 00:58:22,640 past and there's some current plans are developing. 816 00:58:20,000 --> 00:58:27,119 um what they could obviously set aside with on Adams to create a left an 817 00:58:24,799 --> 00:58:34,079 additional lane on Adams out of their property. But the issue is what I see is 818 00:58:30,160 --> 00:58:38,160 on lots one, two, and three on your south portion that if ID do wants to 819 00:58:36,720 --> 00:58:42,000 create a turn lane that they're going to need to take some land from those lots 820 00:58:40,720 --> 00:58:45,680 and you know and this is going to be a long process whenever I do would get 821 00:58:43,440 --> 00:58:49,200 around to making this approval. I know like someone mentioned lights, but I 822 00:58:47,359 --> 00:58:54,480 think in as we found in the Brian project um they're not supportive of a 823 00:58:51,200 --> 00:58:58,640 light. It's too close to um 83 and Pascinelli um and also to Madison to add 824 00:58:57,359 --> 00:59:06,079 another additional light there. >> That's correct. if if years from now 825 00:59:02,559 --> 00:59:11,680 they did need to take land um from those lots, lot one is larger than 20,000, but 826 00:59:10,319 --> 00:59:15,440 then you get into an issue if they needed to take some land off at lot two 827 00:59:13,280 --> 00:59:19,920 and three. Has there been any discussion? What are your thoughts about 828 00:59:17,040 --> 00:59:22,480 that? Because to Scott's point, we need to we know that at some point we're 829 00:59:21,440 --> 00:59:26,319 going to be looking on the west side of the street and we need to make sure this 830 00:59:24,160 --> 00:59:30,319 works for all the residents that are going to be living in these facilities 831 00:59:28,000 --> 00:59:34,000 and the neighborhood for Fullerburg and everyone up on Adams, even Oak 832 00:59:32,240 --> 00:59:38,000 residents, too. So, we need to make sure, but I'm just kind of curious what 833 00:59:35,680 --> 00:59:42,160 your thoughts are. Um, and do you feel like if this dedication for this 834 00:59:39,920 --> 00:59:48,559 culde-sac and this road, you know, it goes into place that you could 835 00:59:45,599 --> 00:59:54,400 lose some land on those lots um, whatever ID do would require to and 836 00:59:51,680 --> 00:59:58,480 still go forward and have buildable lots >> for sure. Again, we're willing to work 837 00:59:56,079 --> 01:00:03,920 with the village on on especially if this is good for the village, good for 838 01:00:00,559 --> 01:00:07,680 the public. Um, obviously, you know, good for our residents, too. 839 01:00:05,119 --> 01:00:11,359 » Good for you, too. Yeah, exactly. Um, but long story short, I mean, we're we 840 01:00:10,000 --> 01:00:15,680 don't know anything about that project. We're not involved in that project. So, 841 01:00:12,720 --> 01:00:20,319 we don't we have no idea um we would have to really work with the village and 842 01:00:17,599 --> 01:00:26,240 see how much they is IDAT looking to take with their turn lanes and so forth 843 01:00:23,440 --> 01:00:30,480 um to see what that would look like. Does it get it past underneath the 844 01:00:28,160 --> 01:00:33,119 20,000 foot threshold? Therefore, we have to do variances and we have to do 845 01:00:31,920 --> 01:00:36,480 this, that, and the other. and it's just a whole different 846 01:00:34,640 --> 01:00:40,079 » it rolls downhill very quickly, right? So again, to answer to answer your 847 01:00:38,000 --> 01:00:42,720 question, we're open to it, but we just don't know what's going on. 848 01:00:41,280 --> 01:00:46,400 » I just want to make sure that's on the record because it we know at some point 849 01:00:44,240 --> 01:00:50,880 we're going to have to address it. Um it would be definitely a benefit for these 850 01:00:48,960 --> 01:00:53,680 19 properties um would benefit them because it's going 851 01:00:52,559 --> 01:00:57,200 to be easier to get it out of that neighborhood and would benefit the 852 01:00:54,960 --> 01:01:00,559 entire area. Yeah. So I think it would be a good case for a hardship and a 853 01:00:59,119 --> 01:01:05,200 variance, you know, because it's not like it's some um 854 01:01:03,200 --> 01:01:06,400 it's an important issue for the entire community. So 855 01:01:05,920 --> 01:01:10,400 » for sure. >> Um 856 01:01:06,799 --> 01:01:17,040 » make one follow on to that. Um would it be possible to tweak um the way that the 857 01:01:14,319 --> 01:01:22,720 culde-sac is laid out so that lots one, two, and three were a little bit larger 858 01:01:18,880 --> 01:01:26,160 from the start in anticipation of if land needed to be carved from the 859 01:01:24,559 --> 01:01:30,880 Ogden side, then they wouldn't need a variance. They would still 860 01:01:27,920 --> 01:01:35,520 » qualify as R2. Um, and that would mean lots seven, 861 01:01:33,200 --> 01:01:39,839 eight, and nine probably, you know, the ones on that side 862 01:01:37,599 --> 01:01:43,040 shrinking just a little bit. But >> it almost feel like if they took the 863 01:01:41,119 --> 01:01:45,520 angle of the colise, >> rotated it slightly. 864 01:01:44,319 --> 01:01:49,040 » Yeah. >> You have any thoughts on that or you 865 01:01:47,680 --> 01:01:51,599 want to look into that? >> Um, 866 01:01:50,559 --> 01:01:57,839 » it's the center line. >> I mean, uh, phase two, the culde-sac uh, 867 01:01:55,359 --> 01:02:03,520 portion was a challenge. Um, you can see the gray changes over there. Yeah. 868 01:02:00,559 --> 01:02:07,839 » Um and u I mean I don't want to get into the weeds of the technical aspects but 869 01:02:05,760 --> 01:02:14,319 it it was very difficult to come up and meet the detention requirements for this 870 01:02:10,480 --> 01:02:18,640 phase. And um uh there was there was a comment about these retaining walls. it. 871 01:02:16,960 --> 01:02:23,599 We had to work very closely with the village um engineering consultant to 872 01:02:21,200 --> 01:02:27,680 come up with this and it was a very it was a a collaborative process to come up 873 01:02:26,160 --> 01:02:32,079 with this >> because of the um the challenges 874 01:02:31,040 --> 01:02:37,839 » right >> um so to relocate 875 01:02:35,839 --> 01:02:43,440 this culde-sac would 876 01:02:39,359 --> 01:02:48,160 um significantly I feel reduce the buildable area on those northern lots 877 01:02:45,760 --> 01:02:51,359 now even though They look big, right? They're they're big, 878 01:02:49,359 --> 01:02:57,040 » but you can see where the detention >> pond takes. And we are really squeezing 879 01:02:55,680 --> 01:03:00,400 down the buildable area, >> right, 880 01:02:57,440 --> 01:03:06,079 » to meet the uh storm water requirements. >> Um, and not just, but you know, exceed 881 01:03:02,799 --> 01:03:11,040 the, you know, we we exceeded slightly. Um, so that's my initial thought is 882 01:03:09,200 --> 01:03:13,920 » it was challenging to make everything work. It's like a 4D puzzle, literally. 883 01:03:13,200 --> 01:03:17,599 » Right. >> I mean, I'm not suggesting that. I don't 884 01:03:16,000 --> 01:03:19,119 think it makes sense to change something for an unknown. 885 01:03:18,799 --> 01:03:22,559 » Yeah. >> But I just think we need to be aware of 886 01:03:20,640 --> 01:03:27,599 it. And it is a fascinating concept where you retaining water above a a pond 887 01:03:25,760 --> 01:03:32,640 like a lake which is you know interesting concept. But um you know 888 01:03:29,520 --> 01:03:36,000 again trying to um slow down um the movement of water into the the 889 01:03:34,079 --> 01:03:39,119 waterways. So I just want to mention it and I think 890 01:03:37,359 --> 01:03:42,799 » I mean lot one seems like you have the depth and then who knows what ID even 891 01:03:41,200 --> 01:03:45,760 require. You know that they're going to be very specific on what the 892 01:03:44,000 --> 01:03:49,839 requirements are. And who even knows their timeline? I mean, right, I I 893 01:03:47,440 --> 01:03:54,720 worked on the I290 expansion back 30 years ago. 894 01:03:53,359 --> 01:03:56,960 » 30 years ago, still nothing [laughter] happened. So, we were talking about it. 895 01:03:56,319 --> 01:04:00,400 » It's coming. >> Yeah, it's coming. It's But so again, um 896 01:03:59,680 --> 01:04:02,960 » Okay. Well, that >> you know, thanks for the, you know, the 897 01:04:01,920 --> 01:04:06,000 the awareness. >> Okay. 898 01:04:03,359 --> 01:04:10,720 » Um but uh yeah, this was challenging and this we made it work 899 01:04:08,000 --> 01:04:15,920 » uh on sidewalks. And I'm I'm glad um Scott, multiple um commissioners brought 900 01:04:12,880 --> 01:04:21,440 it up. Is there a reason and I I actually I live on Adams just south of 901 01:04:18,000 --> 01:04:26,319 Aen and I love this area and I go for walks and runs up up Adams and Spring 902 01:04:24,079 --> 01:04:30,559 Road and down Madison. So I'm very familiar with this area and of all times 903 01:04:28,160 --> 01:04:35,039 of day and there are, you know, people jogging, walking, biking. I mean, it's 904 01:04:33,280 --> 01:04:39,200 it's amazing how much traffic there is, but it's so beautiful. It makes it's a 905 01:04:37,280 --> 01:04:43,280 it's a very peaceful area. The amount of bikers is amazing. like in in the dark 906 01:04:41,359 --> 01:04:48,720 you'll see um them up there biking up and down Adams the sidewalk you stop you 907 01:04:45,680 --> 01:04:52,880 ended at the preserve um place is there any reason that couldn't on the lot one 908 01:04:51,039 --> 01:04:58,240 that that sidewalk couldn't extend down to where the the radius starts and then 909 01:04:55,280 --> 01:05:03,039 terminate you know at the at Adams because I just even though there's no 910 01:05:00,240 --> 01:05:07,440 crossing from South Adams to this North Adams it there are people going across 911 01:05:05,359 --> 01:05:10,480 there I mean literally a path is almost made by the number of people that cross 912 01:05:09,359 --> 01:05:14,799 it every So, I just think having getting them off 913 01:05:12,960 --> 01:05:18,640 the street once something happens to the west, I'm sure there'll be sidewalks as 914 01:05:16,480 --> 01:05:22,000 part of that because as Scott mentioned, I mean, if you have uh seniors and 915 01:05:20,559 --> 01:05:26,240 everything, we're going to want to use this great amenity, this park, this 916 01:05:24,240 --> 01:05:31,200 space and want to connect with that, but it would just seem like it'd be since 917 01:05:28,559 --> 01:05:35,440 you're putting the walk in now on lot seven, just seeing it extend a little 918 01:05:33,760 --> 01:05:40,319 further south, I think, would be helpful. 919 01:05:37,839 --> 01:05:45,920 Uh I mean we could do that but I believe discussion with staff was that it was 920 01:05:43,680 --> 01:05:47,599 essentially the thought was it led to nowhere. Right. 921 01:05:47,119 --> 01:05:50,160 » Right. >> But realistically like you were saying 922 01:05:49,200 --> 01:05:52,480 people going to cross. >> Right. 923 01:05:50,960 --> 01:05:56,900 » So >> that goes to the if we're going to 924 01:05:54,960 --> 01:05:59,280 repurpose this entire area [clears throat] 925 01:05:57,280 --> 01:06:03,119 » the sidewalk plan needs to be revisited. I know it's not for this discussion. 926 01:06:01,039 --> 01:06:06,640 » It's not for this and when I do gets involved I mean we're gonna need to 927 01:06:04,319 --> 01:06:07,760 really work with that. Yeah, but it needs to occur, 928 01:06:07,359 --> 01:06:10,240 » right? >> And it's it's not anything you guys are 929 01:06:09,839 --> 01:06:12,960 doing wrong. >> So, that's one thing I take you to 930 01:06:11,599 --> 01:06:16,400 consider that because it's just kind of curious. I was surprised that it 931 01:06:14,400 --> 01:06:21,200 stopped, you know, at that spot. >> We're open We're open to that. 932 01:06:17,680 --> 01:06:26,720 » And then regarding um like the path from lot 20 from basically Madison to Adams, 933 01:06:23,920 --> 01:06:31,599 why gravel versus pavement? Uh 934 01:06:28,720 --> 01:06:36,640 » the reason I ask is like accessibility, you know, strollers, you know, pushing a 935 01:06:33,680 --> 01:06:40,720 baby in a stroller on gravel is a is a challenge. You know, it's like going to 936 01:06:38,319 --> 01:06:43,039 the beach with the stroller. Um what was the rationale behind it? 937 01:06:41,599 --> 01:06:47,760 » Well, it would it would be compacted gravel. So it' be the very small stuff 938 01:06:45,039 --> 01:06:51,359 that you can roll things easily across, but it again at the same time the whole 939 01:06:49,520 --> 01:06:55,520 thought process was to leave it as natural as possible and not just cover 940 01:06:53,680 --> 01:06:59,440 this whole thing with concrete. the gravel walks I mean um have to be 941 01:06:57,760 --> 01:07:03,440 maintained also. I mean they'll run out and everything and costly. I just I just 942 01:07:02,480 --> 01:07:07,359 think >> in my personal opinion it's a mistake 943 01:07:05,440 --> 01:07:11,680 for it to be gravel at the get-go that it'd be more effective to all the 944 01:07:10,000 --> 01:07:16,079 neighbors over on Madison, the Fullersburg neighborhood and connecting 945 01:07:14,000 --> 01:07:21,119 those, you know, basically Madison and Adams together. And I know from seeing 946 01:07:18,720 --> 01:07:24,640 like plan commission, you know, signs up on North Adams, there's undeveloped lots 947 01:07:23,599 --> 01:07:27,359 that are just full of trees and everything that will be houses at some 948 01:07:26,079 --> 01:07:31,520 point. So, we're going to be adding more than just these 19 lots. There'll be 949 01:07:29,280 --> 01:07:34,799 plenty of additional homes built. >> I I just think the connection needs to 950 01:07:34,079 --> 01:07:37,920 be better. >> Yes. So, you said a water main, correct? 951 01:07:37,119 --> 01:07:41,760 » Water man underneath the >> Yeah, there I think that was part of the 952 01:07:40,160 --> 01:07:47,119 consideration too with city staff. Their water meter the water man is going 953 01:07:43,839 --> 01:07:51,520 underneath that gravel path as well. So, Bethany, what what what's the village 954 01:07:49,599 --> 01:07:54,720 take on that? >> I would have to con confer back with our 955 01:07:53,760 --> 01:07:57,760 village engineering. >> Okay, 956 01:07:56,240 --> 01:08:00,480 » that's something we can look into though if you add it as a condition. 957 01:07:59,039 --> 01:08:06,720 » It is fascinating on the north end of this where the village line moved. I I I 958 01:08:04,960 --> 01:08:10,319 assumed it was either on the west side or in the center of the road, but I was 959 01:08:08,880 --> 01:08:15,200 shocked when I saw that it's actually on the east side of Adams. 960 01:08:12,160 --> 01:08:18,159 » Yeah. Um, so I was teasing Bethany that when they go to get a building permit, 961 01:08:16,640 --> 01:08:21,759 they have to pull it from Hinsdale and Oakbrook [laughter] because their 962 01:08:20,319 --> 01:08:25,040 driveway is going to be in Oakbrook and their, you know, the curb cuts in 963 01:08:23,679 --> 01:08:26,400 Oakbrook and then the house is in Hinsdale. 964 01:08:25,839 --> 01:08:28,319 » For sure. Yeah. >> Fascinating. 965 01:08:26,880 --> 01:08:33,279 » Yeah. >> Um, [clears throat] 966 01:08:31,199 --> 01:08:34,640 and with that, any other >> questions or comments right now from 967 01:08:34,319 --> 01:08:39,920 commission? >> Just one quick one. I'm sorry. I I 968 01:08:36,400 --> 01:08:44,839 forgot it earlier. Um, Bonnie Bray Road dead ends into lot 12 969 01:08:45,279 --> 01:08:52,960 » and there's lot 12 goes north of Bonnie Bray and there's no way for anybody in 970 01:08:50,080 --> 01:08:56,960 that neighborhood to have access to the park that we're now describing or is 971 01:08:55,440 --> 01:09:01,839 there anything that can be done there from being a good neighbor to figure out 972 01:09:00,000 --> 01:09:07,839 a solution in that little area right there? It's on page eight of 21 973 01:09:06,799 --> 01:09:13,359 » versus going north. >> Can you come across 974 01:09:10,799 --> 01:09:15,920 » it's just it's it's only by it's only by >> I mean there's no way even if you shrink 975 01:09:14,799 --> 01:09:20,799 these down >> you're just going to be blocked by lot. 976 01:09:18,560 --> 01:09:24,960 » So to answer your question talking with Alex the Yeah. lot lot 11 and 12 is 977 01:09:23,520 --> 01:09:29,759 right here. Correct. >> Yeah. If even if we were to shrink those 978 01:09:27,279 --> 01:09:35,199 down to the minimum 20,000 square feet, there's no way to get around that on the 979 01:09:31,920 --> 01:09:36,319 north side there with a detention pond. >> Okay. 980 01:09:35,679 --> 01:09:40,400 » To to go. >> So the elevation is too it's too steep. 981 01:09:38,880 --> 01:09:43,279 » Yeah. It's too steep and it would it would be a waterway essentially. 982 01:09:42,319 --> 01:09:49,440 » Yes. >> Have to be. [laughter] 983 01:09:45,520 --> 01:09:54,400 » Thank you. That answers my question. >> Anything else? 984 01:09:50,799 --> 01:10:00,719 » One other idea following on that. Um could just be [clears throat] a sidewalk 985 01:09:56,800 --> 01:10:05,520 or gravel path that connects to the end of the culde-sac that just goes down the 986 01:10:03,040 --> 01:10:08,560 lot line basically. >> How does that elevation look over here? 987 01:10:07,440 --> 01:10:12,320 She's saying connect right here. >> I think you'd want to ask the people in 988 01:10:09,679 --> 01:10:16,239 Bonnie Bray if they want people Bonnie Bray is a a public end right now 989 01:10:14,719 --> 01:10:19,840 and you'd be encouraging people to go down. 990 01:10:16,640 --> 01:10:25,280 » Oh, to go through their property. Okay. I kind of remember back in the Ryan 991 01:10:22,400 --> 01:10:28,640 project that this came up and I I thought that neighbors then didn't want 992 01:10:27,679 --> 01:10:33,969 to change. >> Right. Okay. 993 01:10:31,440 --> 01:10:35,989 » Neighbors in the audience saying [laughter] 994 01:10:37,520 --> 01:10:44,880 » they don't want that. >> And Juliet, you had a question. 995 01:10:41,040 --> 01:10:49,120 » Yes. Back to lot 20. Does that about um Butler Cemetery? 996 01:10:47,280 --> 01:10:52,480 » Yes. Yes. There is a cemetery north of that. Correct. 997 01:10:49,840 --> 01:10:56,480 » Are there any plans for that? I believe Institute of Basic Life owns 998 01:10:54,880 --> 01:11:00,880 it. >> The cemetery? 999 01:10:57,840 --> 01:11:04,239 » Oh, I'm I'm not sure. Yeah, we're >> we have no knowledge of that. 1000 01:11:02,880 --> 01:11:07,679 » And and to be honest, what do you do with the cemetery? 1001 01:11:06,560 --> 01:11:12,640 » Well, um >> golf. 1002 01:11:08,960 --> 01:11:17,440 » Well, [laughter] come on. >> Enjoy the peaceful. 1003 01:11:14,239 --> 01:11:21,840 » Yes, you're right. Um, and I've got a a process question. 1004 01:11:20,239 --> 01:11:24,880 Um, >> based on this conversation, it seems 1005 01:11:23,360 --> 01:11:30,239 like there's >> uh some I do work that's less to be done 1006 01:11:28,159 --> 01:11:34,800 » and I've not part of this project. >> Understood. Well, actually, I guess 1007 01:11:32,640 --> 01:11:39,280 that's my question. What is the process? I got the impression that that's a 1008 01:11:36,800 --> 01:11:42,320 lengthier process and that it's external to what we're trying to do. 1009 01:11:40,560 --> 01:11:47,760 » It' be tied in with whatever happens in the west side of the west side of Adams. 1010 01:11:48,239 --> 01:11:56,719 All right. So, it's it's not relevant. >> Well, only relevant in the point that it 1011 01:11:53,360 --> 01:12:00,159 could possibly impact like lots one, >> two, and three. 1012 01:11:58,080 --> 01:12:06,880 » Possibly, but we don't know. >> Which could cause the uh angle of the 1013 01:12:04,480 --> 01:12:12,800 street that leads into the culac >> to be changed. So, is that a contingent 1014 01:12:10,400 --> 01:12:18,159 that is problematic to us voting positively for 1015 01:12:16,239 --> 01:12:23,040 this? I don't know the answer to that. 1016 01:12:20,560 --> 01:12:26,560 » I mean, it's this is something we just need to be aware of. We whenever 1017 01:12:25,120 --> 01:12:30,800 something gets proposed for the Westside Adams, we will be part of it and then 1018 01:12:28,960 --> 01:12:34,239 we'll we'll bring it up. I just wanted to make sure that they're I'm figured 1019 01:12:32,400 --> 01:12:38,400 they were aware of it, which you are, but that just, you know, we just have to 1020 01:12:36,159 --> 01:12:41,679 cross that bridge when we get to it. Okay. Not part of this process. 1021 01:12:40,159 --> 01:12:45,120 » No, it could be IDOT might say there's no changes allowed. They're not going to 1022 01:12:43,280 --> 01:12:48,640 do anything. >> No chang 1023 01:12:47,360 --> 01:12:52,239 on the west side. >> Yeah. Is that 1024 01:12:50,560 --> 01:12:55,760 » But to your point, do we get up in front of it instead of doing something 1025 01:12:53,920 --> 01:12:58,000 approving something and then having to look and say we should have maybe done 1026 01:12:57,440 --> 01:13:00,159 this? >> Yeah. 1027 01:12:58,320 --> 01:13:03,600 » Yeah. That's my point. >> Looking at like you said to look at the 1028 01:13:01,760 --> 01:13:06,480 whole project and say what is where is this going to go? 1029 01:13:04,719 --> 01:13:12,640 » Yeah. If there if there is a turn a lane needed here and it causes a problem with 1030 01:13:08,400 --> 01:13:17,440 lot one and two uh which makes it something different than we would 1031 01:13:14,239 --> 01:13:21,280 approve is is this the c before the horse if that really is something we can 1032 01:13:19,440 --> 01:13:25,199 kick down the road and say deal with it later that's fine. 1033 01:13:23,360 --> 01:13:28,719 » Beth any thoughts on that? >> So in prior talks with the village 1034 01:13:26,800 --> 01:13:32,320 attorney on this because this is a code compliant RT subdivision and not a 1035 01:13:30,800 --> 01:13:36,159 planned development they're not asking for variations. There's very little that 1036 01:13:34,560 --> 01:13:41,040 the village can do at this stage to impel them to give roadway dedication. 1037 01:13:39,199 --> 01:13:46,239 And it was said earlier of roadway dedication for what at this point. There 1038 01:13:42,719 --> 01:13:50,239 aren't plans to to perfectly know what would be needed with that other project 1039 01:13:48,080 --> 01:13:54,159 on the other side of the road. Um but to confirm what the applicants have said 1040 01:13:52,000 --> 01:13:58,239 earlier, they they are happy to talk with the other developers and be part of 1041 01:13:55,920 --> 01:14:02,320 this project moving forward and and have those negotiations. So, it would be 1042 01:14:00,480 --> 01:14:06,000 something that would be mutually beneficial to everyone in the area and 1043 01:14:04,239 --> 01:14:11,760 for these developments. So, >> okay. And it is R2. It is compliant. And 1044 01:14:09,360 --> 01:14:18,080 to Steve's point, we've seen a handful of proposals for this area. Um, this is 1045 01:14:14,960 --> 01:14:22,640 about as least dense as you're going to see on this property. Right. 1046 01:14:20,560 --> 01:14:24,480 » Correct. And this is code compliant as it is zoned today. 1047 01:14:24,080 --> 01:14:31,040 » Okay. >> Yeah. The R2 minimum 20,000 uh square 1048 01:14:27,520 --> 01:14:33,600 foot lots. All right, that's Do you have any comment on that? It wasn't a 1049 01:14:32,719 --> 01:14:36,560 question, >> so it was fine. 1050 01:14:35,040 --> 01:14:41,280 » Uh, I mean, we we definitely went to more more of a restrictive zoning, too, 1051 01:14:38,960 --> 01:14:47,199 as opposed to three and four. Um, that is smaller lots and try to smash as much 1052 01:14:43,679 --> 01:14:52,080 as as as in as a as possible, but no, we decided to do R2, which is bigger lots 1053 01:14:50,239 --> 01:14:55,040 that kind of fit the footprint of it as well as to kind of preserve as much as 1054 01:14:53,679 --> 01:14:57,520 possible, too. So, there was some thought there. 1055 01:14:56,159 --> 01:14:59,760 » Thank you. to your point like fits the nature of the area of the lots that are 1056 01:14:59,520 --> 01:15:03,080 there. >> Yes. 1057 01:15:00,080 --> 01:15:03,080 » Right. 1058 01:15:04,159 --> 01:15:09,280 » Yes. Um not any more commissioner. >> Just one question. I'm concerned a 1059 01:15:08,239 --> 01:15:14,080 little bit about the market marketability of 13 and 14. Do you 1060 01:15:12,800 --> 01:15:18,480 foresee that? And I know you're talking about moving soil around and trying to 1061 01:15:15,840 --> 01:15:22,080 adjust the way the flood plane is, but if I were going to build a houseite, 1062 01:15:20,239 --> 01:15:28,320 that would not be my choice to pick those two lots. Did you ever think about 1063 01:15:24,640 --> 01:15:33,520 reducing the size of the instead of the you know that how many are there? Six of 1064 01:15:29,840 --> 01:15:37,280 them seven of them. Seven. Are you concerned at all about that? 1065 01:15:35,520 --> 01:15:43,760 » Uh no. Ba basically working with the engineers and talking to DuPage and um 1066 01:15:40,480 --> 01:15:50,159 the city engineer as well. We have had extensive talks with them over basically 1067 01:15:46,560 --> 01:15:55,440 a year now. Um, and again like like Alex engineer said, everything is outside of 1068 01:15:52,320 --> 01:16:00,560 the flood plane. So everything is very marketable as well as these lots are 1069 01:15:57,679 --> 01:16:05,600 massive. They're 100x 400 ft deep. >> So it looks like a a 50 by 150 on on the 1070 01:16:03,520 --> 01:16:09,920 site plan right now, but it's they are very large. Um, and everything is going 1071 01:16:07,920 --> 01:16:13,920 to be outside. So >> I just as a homeowner, I'm sorry to 1072 01:16:11,600 --> 01:16:18,640 interrupt. Um, I would, even though it's a very deep lot, I wouldn't want to look 1073 01:16:16,000 --> 01:16:21,600 at a pond out in my backyard if in, you know, everyone talks about the 1074 01:16:19,520 --> 01:16:24,800 hundred-year flood, which we seem to have every so many years we get the 1075 01:16:23,360 --> 01:16:29,840 hundredyear flood. >> Um, I just wondered if there was a 1076 01:16:26,480 --> 01:16:33,520 concern about that on particularly those two, but you're saying there's not. 1077 01:16:31,280 --> 01:16:38,520 » No, no, no concern. >> And the market will dictate that. 1078 01:16:35,280 --> 01:16:38,520 » It will, 1079 01:16:38,880 --> 01:16:43,448 » but lot 19 is still available if you would like that. [laughter] 1080 01:16:45,199 --> 01:16:52,800 I want 20. >> 20. Yeah. 1081 01:16:50,560 --> 01:16:57,440 » Top of the hill. Lot 19. >> Yeah. 1082 01:16:55,520 --> 01:17:01,520 » Thank you, commissioners. Um like to listen to any residents um community 1083 01:17:00,159 --> 01:17:03,120 members that would like to speak to this matter. 1084 01:17:01,840 --> 01:17:06,480 » All right. Thank you all very much. >> Thank you. Appreciate it. I'm sure we'll 1085 01:17:04,800 --> 01:17:10,400 talk more. >> Yes, sir. Please come up. tell us who 1086 01:17:08,239 --> 01:17:14,719 you are and uh where you live and sure love to hear what you have to say. 1087 01:17:11,520 --> 01:17:18,880 » I'm Dan Hammer and uh I live at 424 Glendale which is one of maybe the only 1088 01:17:16,960 --> 01:17:23,040 houses that actually abuts this project but it's on the corner of Glendale that 1089 01:17:21,199 --> 01:17:27,040 uh you were mentioning drive straight into the property. Um so I have a few 1090 01:17:26,080 --> 01:17:30,480 questions. I used to be a real estate developer so pardon me. try to go 1091 01:17:28,159 --> 01:17:33,679 through them quick because um because I have I questions and you may not be able 1092 01:17:32,640 --> 01:17:36,880 to answer them but I think these are questions that I just want to get on the 1093 01:17:35,440 --> 01:17:39,840 record because I think maybe uh commissioners might have similar 1094 01:17:38,000 --> 01:17:43,600 questions and some of them were riffs off of the things that were brought up. 1095 01:17:41,520 --> 01:17:46,719 Uh so what I didn't understand is there going to be a development agreement 1096 01:17:44,800 --> 01:17:51,760 that's signed that's a commitment that the village can hold the homeowners 1097 01:17:48,960 --> 01:17:54,960 association to uh regarding all the maintenance and the plans for the storm 1098 01:17:53,280 --> 01:17:58,239 water the dredging or any problems that come up in the park and if there's 1099 01:17:57,199 --> 01:18:03,199 because it seems like there should be some sort of contract with the developer 1100 01:18:00,239 --> 01:18:06,800 to get the subdivision um approved and then if they don't live up to those 1101 01:18:04,800 --> 01:18:09,920 commitments then the village would be able to lean the homeowners association 1102 01:18:08,400 --> 01:18:12,080 and so forth. So, I don't know if I'm putting the cart before the horse here, 1103 01:18:11,120 --> 01:18:16,239 but it seems like that would be the natural thing. And I don't know if this 1104 01:18:14,400 --> 01:18:21,280 logistically if this is an approval of the project to go forward or if it's 1105 01:18:18,159 --> 01:18:24,159 subject to further negotiations or uh or what, but it seems like that would be be 1106 01:18:23,040 --> 01:18:28,159 nice to have a development agreement that all the plan commission was happy 1107 01:18:26,000 --> 01:18:31,520 with locked down before you were on the record supporting the project. 1108 01:18:29,760 --> 01:18:34,320 » We're recommending body the village board would ultimately approve this, but 1109 01:18:33,440 --> 01:18:37,440 » Okay. >> That's a really good point and other 1110 01:18:36,080 --> 01:18:39,040 commissioners have brought up similar concern 1111 01:18:37,679 --> 01:18:42,159 » and that Okay, I guess. Great. And that because I think there are going to be a 1112 01:18:40,800 --> 01:18:45,280 lot of there's going to be a lot of expertise involved in maintaining this 1113 01:18:43,600 --> 01:18:48,239 park. The water issues are significant even if the counties can oversee what 1114 01:18:46,640 --> 01:18:54,560 needs to be done and it is going to require systematic dredging and and bank 1115 01:18:51,280 --> 01:18:59,360 management and whatever else. Um so I I that is none of my expertise and I'm 1116 01:18:56,320 --> 01:19:03,040 part of a home of a large association of residents that um have brought that 1117 01:19:01,199 --> 01:19:06,159 those issues up a lot. I got to say I'm very excited about a code compliant 1118 01:19:04,960 --> 01:19:11,120 project coming in here. I think this is great. It's a huge improvement from 1119 01:19:08,400 --> 01:19:16,560 where we were with the um tiny houses that were there in the original plan 1120 01:19:12,480 --> 01:19:20,159 years ago. Um but uh if they don't maintain the association doesn't 1121 01:19:18,239 --> 01:19:24,080 maintain it. Uh you know, the village will end up owning it in the end. I do 1122 01:19:22,080 --> 01:19:27,760 think that's highly likely um because it's not enough houses really to fund 1123 01:19:26,320 --> 01:19:33,600 this. And I do think it should be a village uh park. Uh we've all maintained 1124 01:19:31,520 --> 01:19:37,520 it. The village should buy this. So to have the opportunity to get it for free 1125 01:19:35,280 --> 01:19:42,080 effectively if you could negotiate that in exchange for the village maintaining 1126 01:19:39,760 --> 01:19:45,120 it um and taking that off the homeowners association. I would think that'd be an 1127 01:19:43,679 --> 01:19:49,440 advantage assuming that you knew what you were getting into with the pricing 1128 01:19:46,880 --> 01:19:55,440 of maintaining it. Um I'm concerned that lot 20 which is not 1129 01:19:51,920 --> 01:19:59,280 on the picture um but is uh to the east is not in the group. Yeah. I think seem 1130 01:19:57,840 --> 01:20:03,360 to want it in the association and subject to the developer agreement and 1131 01:20:01,040 --> 01:20:08,400 so that um it was helping to fund the park and uh and especially because it's 1132 01:20:06,159 --> 01:20:11,600 right next to my house and so I'd also like a commitment in the development 1133 01:20:09,600 --> 01:20:15,360 agreement that that will also stay R2 and it won't turn into something else 1134 01:20:13,440 --> 01:20:22,080 because right now a lot of commercial activities happen in that building. Um 1135 01:20:19,679 --> 01:20:24,800 the uh let's see, you know, I would put in the plan now. I would actually 1136 01:20:23,199 --> 01:20:27,760 honestly think the village should want to buy that as the entrance to the park 1137 01:20:26,320 --> 01:20:31,199 cuz almost all the village residents that'll get there will be coming up 1138 01:20:29,600 --> 01:20:33,840 Madison to get into the park. So, it seems like even if you're not going to 1139 01:20:32,400 --> 01:20:39,679 buy the whole thing and actually pay for it, there's an argument to buy that lot 1140 01:20:35,920 --> 01:20:43,679 20 for the village. Uh let's see. in the development agreement, I think you'd 1141 01:20:40,960 --> 01:20:49,840 want uh in addition to maintenance to keep it open space and to comply with 1142 01:20:45,360 --> 01:20:53,199 the parks open hours and that that um that that trail along the north side 1143 01:20:51,360 --> 01:20:58,480 should I think at least be asphalt like the trails in the neighborhoods in uh 1144 01:20:55,760 --> 01:21:02,239 Oakbrook, which is there's a very common um this is very common the sort of 1145 01:21:00,560 --> 01:21:04,960 wetlands and retention ponds and so forth in all of these buildings in 1146 01:21:03,679 --> 01:21:08,880 Oakbrook and I've jogged through those for years. Uh, and they're all asphalt 1147 01:21:07,120 --> 01:21:12,800 at least, if not concrete, but mostly asphalt. Uh, I agree that there should 1148 01:21:11,360 --> 01:21:16,239 be a sidewalk in Ogden. There are sidewalks. Like the commissioner said, 1149 01:21:14,480 --> 01:21:20,000 there's a there's a sidewalk on Adams. It's just dirt. Uh, right now it's not a 1150 01:21:18,159 --> 01:21:23,199 sidewalk. And the same thing on Ogden. There's people walking on Ogden all the 1151 01:21:21,520 --> 01:21:27,280 time, which I find dangerous. I know some people don't like the idea of um a 1152 01:21:25,920 --> 01:21:31,840 sidewalk in Ogden, and I think it's because they're worried about people 1153 01:21:28,400 --> 01:21:35,199 walking through town. Um, but I'm pro pedestrian and I think uh that you know 1154 01:21:33,520 --> 01:21:40,400 there should be a sidewalk in Ogden. And so I wouldn't offer that waiver. I'd say 1155 01:21:38,159 --> 01:21:44,239 sidewalks that go to nowhere someday go to somewhere. So build a sidewalk and 1156 01:21:42,480 --> 01:21:48,080 the next the next guy who builds a project, he's going to have to build a 1157 01:21:45,199 --> 01:21:54,320 sidewalk. Um, please don't extend Glendale. Uh, and uh, let's see. IBLP 1158 01:21:52,320 --> 01:21:58,560 does own that cemetery. It's the old Butler cemetery and it's where they 1159 01:21:56,080 --> 01:22:03,440 moved all the bodies from Oakbrook that Butler uh found. Um and a lot of them 1160 01:22:01,760 --> 01:22:07,440 are unknown. Nobody knows who they are. It's a problem because IBLP is 1161 01:22:05,840 --> 01:22:10,719 abandoning all of their properties in this area and that's going to be you 1162 01:22:09,360 --> 01:22:13,679 know there are laws about cemeteries which I'm not an expert on to make that 1163 01:22:12,639 --> 01:22:17,040 they're supposed to have funds to maintain them and that cemetery is 1164 01:22:15,360 --> 01:22:21,840 falling apart. The tree there are big trees down and so forth. I've tried to 1165 01:22:19,360 --> 01:22:25,120 get Bronzewood to buy that property and they have entered into negotiations, but 1166 01:22:23,600 --> 01:22:27,840 they didn't go anywhere. So, that's as far as I know that's dead. But that 1167 01:22:26,719 --> 01:22:32,880 really the village should be doing everything in my opinion to force IBLP 1168 01:22:30,560 --> 01:22:36,960 using the power of whatever uh finding them and regulating them or or or or 1169 01:22:35,360 --> 01:22:40,159 negotiating with the state to push them because if they end up if that's the 1170 01:22:38,560 --> 01:22:42,719 last thing IP owns, it's just going to be a mess. 1171 01:22:41,440 --> 01:22:43,760 » You mean the village of Oakrook? Isn't that in Oakbrook? 1172 01:22:43,520 --> 01:22:47,280 » Yes. >> Oh, it might be in Oh, okay. That might 1173 01:22:45,440 --> 01:22:50,639 be an Oakbrook. Yeah. Sorry. Well, then Oak should be doing [laughter] say Oak 1174 01:22:49,760 --> 01:22:54,960 » the middle should be working with Oakbrook to do that. But um and then the 1175 01:22:53,360 --> 01:22:58,000 final thing I'd say is on that on that path is going to run right along the 1176 01:22:56,400 --> 01:23:01,920 cemetery. So it is a nice way of breaking the homeowners away from being 1177 01:23:00,080 --> 01:23:05,920 literally next to the cemetery. But I would wouldn't want that path to have 1178 01:23:03,760 --> 01:23:09,440 10-ft privacy walls on one side and cemetery walls on another side. It would 1179 01:23:08,000 --> 01:23:12,320 not be a very pleasant path. So, I wonder if under the development 1180 01:23:10,639 --> 01:23:17,280 agreement, I would think you'd want that the backyards of those houses to be open 1181 01:23:14,880 --> 01:23:21,760 like they are in sort of Oakbrook on those similar paths in Oakbrook. 1182 01:23:20,080 --> 01:23:25,320 » Those are all my comments. Thank you. >> Okay. Thank you. 1183 01:23:34,320 --> 01:23:44,560 » Um, hi, my name is Bob Lindren. Um, I live at 1020 Birchwood Road in Oakbrook 1184 01:23:41,199 --> 01:23:47,600 and um, the uh, so I'm going to give you a slightly different perspective here. 1185 01:23:46,480 --> 01:23:54,560 I'm going to give you a little bit of an Oakbrook perspective on on this area and 1186 01:23:51,440 --> 01:23:59,280 on Fullerburg Woods. Um, my wife and I have lived on Birchwood Road at this 1187 01:23:56,080 --> 01:24:05,440 location since 1987. So, we've seen a lot here and and we've 1188 01:24:02,239 --> 01:24:10,719 spent many many many more hours fighting zoning and development issues relating 1189 01:24:07,440 --> 01:24:16,080 to the IBLP than we ever care to uh than we ever thought we would get into. Um, 1190 01:24:14,159 --> 01:24:21,360 the number of Hinsdale residents currently who utilize Ogden Avenue on a 1191 01:24:19,040 --> 01:24:26,320 reg Adams Road rather on a regular basis between Ogden and Spring is precisely 1192 01:24:24,159 --> 01:24:31,360 zero. This is an Oakbrook Street for all 1193 01:24:28,480 --> 01:24:36,480 intents and purposes. And um I recognize, you know, there's a long 1194 01:24:32,880 --> 01:24:40,719 history of kind of joint governance and joint identity in Fullersburg between 1195 01:24:38,480 --> 01:24:45,440 Hinsdale and Oakbrook. When we first moved here, there was a joint uh area 1196 01:24:43,360 --> 01:24:49,679 association. Fullersburg Woods Area Association was equally comprised of 1197 01:24:47,199 --> 01:24:54,239 Hinsdale and Oakbrook residents. Uh my wife and I both served on that group and 1198 01:24:52,800 --> 01:24:58,880 uh we made a lot of good friends who live in Hinsdale in that process. 1199 01:24:57,280 --> 01:25:02,960 Hinsdale and Oakwork have a little different way of doing things and we 1200 01:25:00,800 --> 01:25:07,199 understand that and appreciate it. But there are other than the uh IBLP 1201 01:25:05,280 --> 01:25:12,800 sidewalk currently and the history on that of course is the IBLP was forced 1202 01:25:10,000 --> 01:25:19,040 into building that sidewalk because Oakick residents were deeply concerned 1203 01:25:15,120 --> 01:25:24,239 with the number of uh their uh I don't know exactly what to call them students 1204 01:25:21,199 --> 01:25:31,360 I guess or whoever they were but young people uh pre-teens and teenagers who 1205 01:25:27,679 --> 01:25:37,040 would be parading up and down uh Adams Road and it creating a big uh health 1206 01:25:33,679 --> 01:25:42,639 issue, safety issue. But uh that that traffic is gone now and there are no 1207 01:25:39,600 --> 01:25:46,719 sidewalks up and down Adams Road as you well know if you walk we've probably 1208 01:25:44,639 --> 01:25:53,760 passed one another on Adams. >> Um I walk my dogs on Adams every day and 1209 01:25:51,040 --> 01:25:58,719 um so there are no sidewalks, there are no street lights and the character of 1210 01:25:56,480 --> 01:26:04,159 that area, particularly that part of Fullersburg is defined by that. So, I 1211 01:26:02,159 --> 01:26:09,520 ask you to think long and hard before turning uh an area which is basically 1212 01:26:06,800 --> 01:26:16,400 populated by Oakbrook residents and and and imposing, if you will, a Hinsdale 1213 01:26:12,000 --> 01:26:20,320 sensibility um on that area. Um if you do, you do. It's your call to make. We 1214 01:26:18,159 --> 01:26:23,920 understand that. But wanted to let you know there there are other people 1215 01:26:21,679 --> 01:26:28,560 affected by this decision. >> Related to that, are you in support of 1216 01:26:25,600 --> 01:26:34,159 like the R of the R2 size properties? >> Uh yeah. Now, I I think I wanna I want 1217 01:26:30,719 --> 01:26:37,600 to uh I want to commend uh the development team, the applicants because 1218 01:26:36,080 --> 01:26:42,639 it seems very clearly what they've done is on the north unit, they've tried to 1219 01:26:39,840 --> 01:26:48,000 echo, if you will, the Oakbrook zoning. We on Birchwood Road, we're in Oakbrook 1220 01:26:44,800 --> 01:26:53,679 R2 zoning, which is minimum lot size of one acre. So, uh and they've come very 1221 01:26:50,800 --> 01:26:58,320 close to one acre on the seven, uh northernmost lots on the southern 12 1222 01:26:56,400 --> 01:27:03,600 lots. they kind of mirror the other side of Ogden a little bit more. So there's 1223 01:27:00,560 --> 01:27:08,639 clearly a there there there's a a detectable obvious effort to try to 1224 01:27:05,920 --> 01:27:15,840 harmonize if you will and I I appreciate that. Um on the subject of water when we 1225 01:27:14,080 --> 01:27:20,480 some of you may remember there was an epic flood in the area and I think it 1226 01:27:17,440 --> 01:27:22,080 was 1988 or ' 89. Anybody old enough and been around long enough? 1227 01:27:21,520 --> 01:27:24,800 » 87. >> 87 excuse me. Thank you. 1228 01:27:23,440 --> 01:27:27,440 » The year I got married. >> Okay. It was actually I should remember 1229 01:27:26,239 --> 01:27:32,159 it better because this year we moved into our house. At the time we were told 1230 01:27:30,080 --> 01:27:36,560 that was a hundred-year flood. There have been three more of them since then 1231 01:27:34,159 --> 01:27:42,400 of the same magnitude. So be careful what you call a 100red-year flood. We've 1232 01:27:38,480 --> 01:27:46,880 had um uh a lot of change not only in the weather but in the amount of the 1233 01:27:44,639 --> 01:27:52,320 area that is covered by impermeable surface. Um there's been a lot of 1234 01:27:49,360 --> 01:27:57,840 development and uh the holistic theme is I think a very important one and I don't 1235 01:27:54,639 --> 01:28:01,520 know uh if if uh Hinsdale staff has coordinated with Oakbrook staff at all 1236 01:27:59,760 --> 01:28:08,159 and it's still in the planning stage there as well but there's a 16 12 acre 1237 01:28:04,320 --> 01:28:13,199 parcel to the west of this property across Adams just north of Birwood where 1238 01:28:11,199 --> 01:28:19,600 there's a development proposal being uh entertained by Oakbrook at this time and 1239 01:28:16,080 --> 01:28:26,080 uh it's uh it's It's eight um Oakbrook R1 lots that are being asked for. They 1240 01:28:22,480 --> 01:28:29,120 are asking for a variance and um I also think it's savvy on the part of a 1241 01:28:27,600 --> 01:28:33,840 developer to go in and not ask for variance because the second you open ask 1242 01:28:31,280 --> 01:28:39,280 for a variance, you open Pandora's box in terms of other things that people can 1243 01:28:35,840 --> 01:28:43,840 can come at you with. But two acres of that 16 and a half in the pro plan 1244 01:28:41,040 --> 01:28:49,280 that's proposed are dedicated to uh to uh retention ponds. And my I understand 1245 01:28:47,199 --> 01:28:54,880 that the plan is to vent those to release those to the other side of a of 1246 01:28:51,520 --> 01:28:59,040 atoms. So this is all very complicated and very interconnected. And with all 1247 01:28:56,639 --> 01:29:02,880 due respect to to uh storm water management engineers, I don't think 1248 01:29:00,960 --> 01:29:06,719 there's a natural phenomenon in the urban world that's more poorly 1249 01:29:04,880 --> 01:29:13,840 understood than underwater uh underground water movement. And u so 1250 01:29:10,239 --> 01:29:18,000 it's just um it's a very very uh fraught and delicate area. 1251 01:29:15,760 --> 01:29:22,880 Um, I think that was basically it. I'm a 1252 01:29:20,000 --> 01:29:28,400 little bit concerned about the parking issue since the IBLP property has been 1253 01:29:25,600 --> 01:29:34,800 vacated. Um, some of you may know there's been a little bit of a problem 1254 01:29:30,719 --> 01:29:38,639 with uh un unauthorized u activity on that property. There was this summer 1255 01:29:36,320 --> 01:29:43,120 there have been a lot of kids in the uh condemned buildings. Um police have 1256 01:29:41,360 --> 01:29:48,719 Hinsdale police have been called on a number of occasions and uh those people 1257 01:29:46,480 --> 01:29:54,400 have all parked on Birwood Road and they're going to use those side roads 1258 01:29:50,880 --> 01:29:59,440 off of uh Adams uh for parking. And so I'd really um I like Dan Heammer's idea 1259 01:29:57,280 --> 01:30:04,000 and one thing that uh Hinsdale could do is is is buy that lot and make it 1260 01:30:01,280 --> 01:30:10,159 parking for this park. Um there would be a tremendous amount of logic to that. Um 1261 01:30:07,360 --> 01:30:15,360 but uh uh parking on the side streets is is of concern. 1262 01:30:12,400 --> 01:30:18,880 Um I think that's maybe you've raised a lot of really really good issues. It's 1263 01:30:16,960 --> 01:30:26,800 been a very uh a very thorough examination. Um again traffic is u 1264 01:30:24,880 --> 01:30:30,719 it's hard to see how that problem is really going to be sol soluble. Um 1265 01:30:29,040 --> 01:30:34,159 although I do think that it's more logical probably uh if ID do needs to 1266 01:30:32,880 --> 01:30:39,840 take property it would be more logical to take it from the west side of uh of 1267 01:30:37,040 --> 01:30:46,000 Adams than from the east side. Um but it's uh it's a real dilemma because I ID 1268 01:30:42,800 --> 01:30:51,199 dot is not going to signal that Adam's uh intersection and uh there's there's 1269 01:30:48,880 --> 01:30:56,080 there's no uh even even with a dedicated left turn 1270 01:30:53,600 --> 01:30:59,679 lane and my wife made this comment earlier today. If there's a dedicated 1271 01:30:58,000 --> 01:31:04,639 left turn lane, traffic is still going to back up from that intersection and 1272 01:31:02,239 --> 01:31:10,239 they're going to block access uh egress, if you will, from the culde-sac road. 1273 01:31:08,639 --> 01:31:14,719 So, it's going to be difficult for residents of that culde-sac road to exit 1274 01:31:12,080 --> 01:31:18,719 onto Adams even other than to exit and go right and go up to Spring and then do 1275 01:31:16,800 --> 01:31:22,719 what they need to do. So, there are a lot of issues to be uh carefully 1276 01:31:20,639 --> 01:31:28,159 considered. I agree with Dan. We've come a long way from the proposal that we 1277 01:31:24,639 --> 01:31:34,159 looked at five years ago now, I believe. >> Um, time flies. A few of you were here 1278 01:31:30,800 --> 01:31:38,400 then, I remember. Um, and um, so hopefully we can it would be nice if I 1279 01:31:36,880 --> 01:31:42,239 agree with the comment that that the density is a problem on the north end 1280 01:31:40,239 --> 01:31:47,679 that some of those there's maybe more lots there than should be there. Um I I 1281 01:31:46,000 --> 01:31:48,880 I I have to believe that the applicant has made a good faith e e e e e e e e e 1282 01:31:48,800 --> 01:31:52,400 e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e effort to balance 1283 01:31:50,560 --> 01:31:57,280 those concerns with the economic viability of the of the project. So if 1284 01:31:55,360 --> 01:32:02,560 seven is number seven's number, I would have hoped uh that there had been a more 1285 01:32:00,080 --> 01:32:06,719 elegant solution to placing those houses. There are really two logical 1286 01:32:04,960 --> 01:32:11,520 buildable areas on this property. They're the high spots just north of 1287 01:32:09,280 --> 01:32:17,120 Ogden and at the very north end of this property. And if if the parcels had been 1288 01:32:14,239 --> 01:32:21,520 able to be located on that high ground looking down, it would have perhaps 1289 01:32:18,400 --> 01:32:26,800 involved some terracing. But um but to have seven lots all individually coming 1290 01:32:24,400 --> 01:32:31,040 down onto Adams Avenue driveways coming down and as you uh know from walking 1291 01:32:29,679 --> 01:32:38,080 that that's right at the bottom of a hill and um people drive much faster 1292 01:32:35,440 --> 01:32:42,480 than the 30 mph speed limit on Adams coming over that hill. So I think there 1293 01:32:40,000 --> 01:32:46,800 safety issues there and at a minimum the speed limit on Adams needs to come down 1294 01:32:44,800 --> 01:32:51,600 to the speed limit on Madison which is 25. I I haven't understood for a long 1295 01:32:49,360 --> 01:32:55,520 time why Adams has been at 30 and Madison at 25 but uh so that's all I've 1296 01:32:54,800 --> 01:32:59,320 got. Thanks. >> Thank you. 1297 01:32:55,840 --> 01:32:59,320 » Thank you very much. 1298 01:33:04,080 --> 01:33:11,840 » Hi Eric missile through Chevel Drive. We are the property. It looks onto uh the 1299 01:33:08,800 --> 01:33:14,800 big uh commercial building. Our property will look when you look to the left 1300 01:33:13,120 --> 01:33:17,760 right onto this property. >> Okay. 1301 01:33:15,280 --> 01:33:19,360 » You're on the south side of Chiovel. >> Yes. 1302 01:33:18,239 --> 01:33:24,960 » Okay. >> Um it comes down to a couple fundamental 1303 01:33:21,920 --> 01:33:30,960 issues here, guys. Let's talk water. That lake is a solution to a bigger 1304 01:33:28,239 --> 01:33:35,920 community problem. Start with the water on the south side of Ogden. Go look at 1305 01:33:32,880 --> 01:33:40,159 that culvert that goes under the uh IBLP building. That's a bottleneck that 1306 01:33:38,000 --> 01:33:44,400 causes flooding that flows into the creek that flows into here. We're 1307 01:33:42,639 --> 01:33:50,080 looking at a big commercial building for redoing IBLP. Bad idea. We oppose it 1308 01:33:47,520 --> 01:33:56,159 since opinions have been stated that's going to drain into here. 1309 01:33:53,120 --> 01:34:00,080 How deep is this lake and creek? Two feet. I might not have measured it. 1310 01:33:58,639 --> 01:34:05,199 I've lived around there long enough and fish there. It's about two feet deep. 1311 01:34:02,719 --> 01:34:08,320 it's full. That that is the solution to a lot of the flooding problems. I know 1312 01:34:06,800 --> 01:34:14,239 it takes money. I know it's going to hurt your project, but that's the 1313 01:34:10,159 --> 01:34:18,880 answer. Um I I would really and again I get the DuPage County overseas, not this 1314 01:34:16,239 --> 01:34:21,880 board, but that's how how to fix it. traffic 1315 01:34:22,320 --> 01:34:32,719 Ogden and Adams is not conducive for the Brian redevelopment 1316 01:34:29,040 --> 01:34:37,600 that was uh abandoned a couple years ago or what is being regurgitated uh 1317 01:34:35,520 --> 01:34:41,679 allegedly now. That's not the right solution for the property. You're going 1318 01:34:38,880 --> 01:34:46,880 to have eight new homes going up that IBLP sold north of Birwood. You're going 1319 01:34:44,159 --> 01:34:51,199 to have 19 homes here if I'm doing the math right. Could I ask on the on those 1320 01:34:49,199 --> 01:34:55,040 homes? Is that going from Birchwood the open area into the woods or is it 1321 01:34:53,360 --> 01:35:00,000 starting at the top of the hill? >> It's south of Deer Park and it will go 1322 01:34:58,159 --> 01:35:02,560 west will be the street will be east west from what was presented to the 1323 01:35:01,840 --> 01:35:08,000 village of Oakbrook. >> Okay. All right. Thank you. 1324 01:35:05,600 --> 01:35:12,560 » So you all a sudden you're going to have 30 new homes around here. That's going 1325 01:35:10,639 --> 01:35:20,000 to be a lot of traffic plus what you're going to put into the west. 1326 01:35:15,840 --> 01:35:24,320 And my opinion is that should be R2. IBLP has carved up and started trading 1327 01:35:22,560 --> 01:35:28,159 off individually and no one's looking at this collectively. 1328 01:35:26,480 --> 01:35:32,239 You know, this is something if we go back 30 years ago, Bob and Sharon, I 1329 01:35:30,000 --> 01:35:37,520 think you you bought that 30 years ago when BLP wanted to develop hotels and it 1330 01:35:35,840 --> 01:35:41,280 was a a broader issue. The communities need to collaborate here, too. 1331 01:35:39,920 --> 01:35:44,800 I'm certain there's discussions behind the scenes. I don't know what has but I 1332 01:35:43,520 --> 01:35:48,880 would really encourage Oakrook and Hinsdale to work collectively together 1333 01:35:46,159 --> 01:35:53,400 for a good solution. >> Thank you. 1334 01:35:49,440 --> 01:35:53,400 » Great. Thank you very much. 1335 01:35:53,840 --> 01:35:57,080 » Yes sir. 1336 01:36:00,560 --> 01:36:11,199 » Hi Steve Carlson 16 Bonnie Bray. Just briefly, I think the point was very well 1337 01:36:06,239 --> 01:36:19,520 made that expecting this HOA with maybe 19 homes to financially and otherwise 1338 01:36:14,239 --> 01:36:25,199 take care of that open land is just a major problem in the making a disaster 1339 01:36:21,679 --> 01:36:31,120 waiting to happen. uh if for whatever reason if Hinsdale parks do not feel 1340 01:36:28,480 --> 01:36:34,960 like they could take that land I would hope there would be some conversation 1341 01:36:32,639 --> 01:36:40,320 with county because a lot of people don't realize it but at county has a 1342 01:36:38,639 --> 01:36:46,719 small parcel at the west end of Birchwood which is actually designated 1343 01:36:42,960 --> 01:36:51,040 as Brush Hill Forest Preserve so it would be great to have it part of 1344 01:36:48,000 --> 01:36:55,679 Hinsdale Parks if that doesn't work really explore if it could county land 1345 01:36:53,920 --> 01:37:01,119 because again I think expecting this private entity to take care of something 1346 01:36:57,600 --> 01:37:05,880 like that is just not going to happen. Thank you. 1347 01:37:02,239 --> 01:37:05,880 » Great. Thank you sir. 1348 01:37:14,719 --> 01:37:24,159 » My name is Sharon Lren and I live in Oakrook at 102 Birwood Road and I just I 1349 01:37:22,159 --> 01:37:31,679 want to make one comment. I've been listening. There's been some very good 1350 01:37:26,159 --> 01:37:36,239 comments and um points made. Um however, everybody's talking about water and it 1351 01:37:34,080 --> 01:37:42,000 being a problem. And then everybody's talking about oh well, we need 1352 01:37:38,719 --> 01:37:46,239 sidewalks. We need all these things. Okay. 1353 01:37:43,520 --> 01:37:53,679 Drive down um Adams Road and look to the west. You 1354 01:37:51,280 --> 01:37:58,800 don't see any sidewalks. You don't see any street lights. And you keep going 1355 01:37:55,920 --> 01:38:03,920 down Adams. There's no sidewalks. And there's no street lights. And there's no 1356 01:38:00,960 --> 01:38:10,800 dead elderly people. And there's no elderly people just walk hobbling 1357 01:38:06,080 --> 01:38:18,800 around. Okay? You have to think of the area. The area is called Fullersburg 1358 01:38:14,320 --> 01:38:25,600 Woods. Okay? the more concrete you put in that area with sidewalks and um 1359 01:38:22,639 --> 01:38:30,159 everything, okay, it's not permeable. You're going to cause more water 1360 01:38:27,360 --> 01:38:38,560 problems, which you're arguing that you want to solve. So, I think there's um um 1361 01:38:35,440 --> 01:38:45,560 this is not downtown Hensdale. This is Fullersburg Woods. Thank you. 1362 01:38:42,320 --> 01:38:45,560 » Thank you. 1363 01:38:51,760 --> 01:38:59,440 Hi, I'm Patty Bellwock and I live over on Canterbury Court over I've lived on 1364 01:38:58,080 --> 01:39:03,360 the west side, I've lived on the south side and now I live in like what I said 1365 01:39:01,520 --> 01:39:07,360 it's like living in Hayward, Wisconsin. It's beautiful and thank you for all 1366 01:39:05,760 --> 01:39:11,119 you're doing here. This is a lot of work. I see it. The only thing I was 1367 01:39:09,360 --> 01:39:16,239 talking about or came to talk about and I did talk with one of the guys ahead of 1368 01:39:13,520 --> 01:39:20,480 time um because when we they asked us to come and kind of take a mini vote on 1369 01:39:18,800 --> 01:39:24,239 when they were talking about putting the nine homes or whatever they were doing 1370 01:39:22,000 --> 01:39:28,159 in there a year ago or two years ago and I said my only request was about the 1371 01:39:26,480 --> 01:39:32,639 safety and you've all talked about it because it's changed. I've been over 1372 01:39:29,600 --> 01:39:37,920 here 22 years now and it's changed so um you know up and down um our street 1373 01:39:35,520 --> 01:39:40,800 Madison and especially in the last year there have been four major homes at the 1374 01:39:39,600 --> 01:39:44,080 north end that have been built. You could barely because if you go over to 1375 01:39:42,719 --> 01:39:48,800 walk in the woods, you know, over at Fullersburg, you can barely turn around 1376 01:39:45,760 --> 01:39:52,560 because three huge trucks were at each house almost, you know, and that's kids 1377 01:39:50,719 --> 01:39:56,320 are around there now, too. And then now when we build this, it's the same thing. 1378 01:39:54,320 --> 01:40:02,400 And it's fine, but we just were concerned about they had said that they 1379 01:39:58,320 --> 01:40:08,080 were going to exit or in um the intro and exit would be on Adams, you know, 1380 01:40:04,560 --> 01:40:11,360 rather than on um Madison because we've got so many. And then with Salt Creek 1381 01:40:09,760 --> 01:40:14,080 Club in the summer, the kids are running up and down there and everything. And 1382 01:40:12,800 --> 01:40:17,920 then in the winter, you would be surprised or those that are there know 1383 01:40:16,080 --> 01:40:21,920 that the bus loads come those first couple of blocks have a lot of many 1384 01:40:19,440 --> 01:40:25,040 kids. Even Canterbury Court has about I would say eight kids under the age of 1385 01:40:23,440 --> 01:40:28,400 five now. And you know, and everybody thinks it's all mostly older people over 1386 01:40:26,880 --> 01:40:31,840 there, but there are a lot of younger people. So, I'm just saying we were 1387 01:40:29,920 --> 01:40:34,880 concerned and I really just wanted to talk about it. And then he was nice 1388 01:40:33,360 --> 01:40:38,880 enough to talk about it with me before the meeting and he assured me that 1389 01:40:36,719 --> 01:40:42,480 that's the way it was going to stand. So I and I just thank you for all you've 1390 01:40:40,719 --> 01:40:45,280 done and that you're doing with your time and effort. Thank you. 1391 01:40:44,320 --> 01:40:48,600 » That's it. >> Thank you, ma'am. 1392 01:40:56,239 --> 01:41:01,679 » My name is Bonnie Brown and I live at 541 Bonnie Bray. All 1393 01:41:00,239 --> 01:41:04,320 » right. [laughter] We'll get through that. 1394 01:41:02,719 --> 01:41:06,000 » You like it your name when you saw the house? 1395 01:41:04,639 --> 01:41:10,000 » It started with the home inspector before I even go out the place. 1396 01:41:08,239 --> 01:41:14,639 Uh, my questions might be a little more specific than a lot of them have be 1397 01:41:12,159 --> 01:41:21,360 been. Just so I've got it on the record, the culde-sac will never connect to 1398 01:41:17,600 --> 01:41:24,639 Bonnie Bray Road. Is that a yes answer to that? That is not part of the plan. 1399 01:41:24,000 --> 01:41:29,280 » That is correct. >> Correct. That is correct. 1400 01:41:25,440 --> 01:41:32,000 » Okay. How about a walking path? Because >> there is no path proposed. 1401 01:41:30,480 --> 01:41:36,800 » No, there is no pathway. Okay. Because we don't want to become the parking lot 1402 01:41:33,520 --> 01:41:42,000 for the park either. Um, they addressed the sidewalk all the way around the you 1403 01:41:40,080 --> 01:41:45,679 you could walk all the way around and they didn't mention the east side of the 1404 01:41:43,760 --> 01:41:50,719 property except for a head wall. Does that head wall go the entire length of 1405 01:41:48,239 --> 01:41:54,719 the development or >> just at the culvert just where the 1406 01:41:53,199 --> 01:41:56,480 street where the creek goes underneath Adams? 1407 01:41:55,440 --> 01:41:58,800 » Oh, all right. Okay. >> Just so there's width there to put a 1408 01:41:57,840 --> 01:42:02,800 sidewalk in. >> Okay. So then there is there a sidewalk 1409 01:42:00,639 --> 01:42:07,600 through because he his exact words were that you could walk all the way around 1410 01:42:05,679 --> 01:42:12,960 and that so there will be a sidewalk the rest of the way on the east side also. 1411 01:42:10,719 --> 01:42:16,239 » No west sidewalk. >> No on the east side. On the east side 1412 01:42:14,639 --> 01:42:18,400 that's that faces up towards Bonnie Bray. 1413 01:42:17,520 --> 01:42:21,920 » No, there's no sidewalk. >> There's no sidewalk there. Okay. 1414 01:42:19,840 --> 01:42:24,239 » Along the around the culde-sac there's a sidewalk mean 1415 01:42:22,880 --> 01:42:28,880 » Okay. Just a circle around the culde-sac. Yes. But not the entire east 1416 01:42:26,239 --> 01:42:32,800 side of the development. Okay. Um, you mentioned street lights and said you 1417 01:42:30,400 --> 01:42:36,159 were going to fix the existing, but will you be adding street lights in the 1418 01:42:34,400 --> 01:42:39,199 culde-sac? >> Yes, they are required to by village 1419 01:42:38,080 --> 01:42:42,719 code. >> Okay. Because we don't have them on 1420 01:42:40,800 --> 01:42:49,760 Bonnie Bray. So, we have our nice darkness. We get to see the um and the 1421 01:42:47,280 --> 01:42:54,639 only other comment was just I what made my hair stand on N was when they said 1422 01:42:52,159 --> 01:43:00,000 lots 13 and 14 in the flood plane, they'll just move dirt to get it off the 1423 01:42:56,480 --> 01:43:03,199 flood plane. That was a little worrisome of where that water water would go. 1424 01:43:02,239 --> 01:43:06,440 Thank you. >> Thanks, Bonnie. 1425 01:43:11,760 --> 01:43:20,960 Anyone else like to speak on the matter? Great. Thank you. I appreciate your 1426 01:43:17,760 --> 01:43:27,400 input. It's very helpful. Commissioners, other questions or 1427 01:43:23,520 --> 01:43:27,400 comments, discussion? 1428 01:43:27,840 --> 01:43:35,520 Okay, hearing that. Um, I'll have a vote to close the public hearing. 1429 01:43:33,360 --> 01:43:38,080 » Krillinberger still motions. We have a second. 1430 01:43:36,400 --> 01:43:40,800 » Second. More. >> Roll call vote, please. Bethany. 1431 01:43:39,600 --> 01:43:42,080 » Commissioner Harlo. >> I. 1432 01:43:41,119 --> 01:43:43,520 » Commissioner Curry. >> I. 1433 01:43:42,400 --> 01:43:47,119 » Commissioner Krillinberger. >> I. 1434 01:43:43,840 --> 01:43:50,800 » Commissioner Cernovich to close the public. 1435 01:43:49,760 --> 01:43:55,119 » No, I'm >> Commissioner. 1436 01:43:51,760 --> 01:43:55,119 » You want to keep it open, huh? 1437 01:43:55,360 --> 01:44:00,239 Commissioner, did we did we make a vote? Commissioner Cernovich. 1438 01:43:58,719 --> 01:44:02,960 » Um, I'm just wondering we should have some more discussion before 1439 01:44:02,000 --> 01:44:06,480 » we're going to have discussion just closes the public hearing. 1440 01:44:04,080 --> 01:44:09,040 » Okay. Can we reopen it if needed? >> Why would you want to do that? 1441 01:44:07,600 --> 01:44:10,960 » Are there additional comments and questions? 1442 01:44:09,679 --> 01:44:13,520 » I would like to have some more information before we take the vote. 1443 01:44:13,119 --> 01:44:16,400 » Okay. >> Well, yeah, we're going to 1444 01:44:14,800 --> 01:44:19,199 » we're going to talk this as close as the public 1445 01:44:16,960 --> 01:44:21,280 » this, but it could be Okay. >> Yes. 1446 01:44:20,000 --> 01:44:24,719 » Are there additional are there additional questions for the applicant? 1447 01:44:22,800 --> 01:44:30,159 We can we can leave the public hearing. >> No, but I I guess I would I would prefer 1448 01:44:28,000 --> 01:44:38,239 a lot of things are kind of vague. I would like to have some answers 1449 01:44:34,239 --> 01:44:42,600 continue the public hearing. Um I feel like they still have some work to do. 1450 01:44:43,040 --> 01:44:49,280 Um I would like to see them reach out to 1451 01:44:46,560 --> 01:44:53,280 Shipo for one. Uh we had a lot of questions more questions about flooding. 1452 01:44:51,760 --> 01:45:01,280 Um I I I'd like more details about the 1453 01:44:56,480 --> 01:45:05,760 plan. I don't know how others feel. >> The issue is do we close the public part 1454 01:45:03,600 --> 01:45:08,639 of the meeting and then can we address those if if we close the meeting or not? 1455 01:45:08,239 --> 01:45:11,119 » Oh yeah. >> Or if we continue. 1456 01:45:09,679 --> 01:45:12,960 » I just want to make sure that that >> yes 1457 01:45:11,600 --> 01:45:16,320 » both can be done. >> Thank you Scott. Okay. 1458 01:45:14,080 --> 01:45:19,119 » If we have questions we can still reach out and questions can be 1459 01:45:17,920 --> 01:45:23,600 » Yes. To the applicant. Yes. >> Okay. My recommendation is that if this 1460 01:45:21,520 --> 01:45:26,639 is continued to a future public hearing, we do not close the public hearing. 1461 01:45:26,080 --> 01:45:30,080 » There you go. >> Yeah, there you go. 1462 01:45:27,360 --> 01:45:34,800 » So >> maybe we should talk about where 1463 01:45:32,239 --> 01:45:38,080 » where people sit and what the thoughts are because we could continue. 1464 01:45:36,159 --> 01:45:42,159 » Okay. >> I just feel, you know, this is a very 1465 01:45:40,080 --> 01:45:48,000 special area. Um there's a lot to consider. 1466 01:45:45,360 --> 01:45:53,040 I don't feel that there's a need to rush through this. I appreciate all the hard 1467 01:45:50,159 --> 01:45:58,880 work you've done over the past year or so. Um, but I feel that there's still 1468 01:45:55,840 --> 01:46:05,840 questions and I think we should do it right. Take our time before this move 1469 01:46:01,840 --> 01:46:09,760 would move on to the board of trustees >> like specific questions. 1470 01:46:08,080 --> 01:46:14,560 » Um, a lot of questions that came up to us. 1471 01:46:11,840 --> 01:46:18,880 Um, well my I would like to have a ship overview for one. Um I think there's 1472 01:46:17,600 --> 01:46:23,679 been a lot of discussion about sidewalks. 1473 01:46:20,880 --> 01:46:29,840 Um traffic um the traffic study we had 1474 01:46:28,159 --> 01:46:33,520 was quite different than the one we had gotten from Ryan which was 1475 01:46:32,320 --> 01:46:35,760 » because the loads are different. >> Well the loads are different. 1476 01:46:34,560 --> 01:46:40,560 » This is 19 houses >> but um 1477 01:46:38,320 --> 01:46:45,520 » you you study a million times there be that's the loads. It's it's published 1478 01:46:42,800 --> 01:46:50,639 data. Well, but I'm I think we need to like several people brought up, we need 1479 01:46:47,199 --> 01:46:55,760 to look at the whole area and whole it like both both developments. 1480 01:46:52,719 --> 01:47:01,920 » We can't I mean this is a co-compliant subdivision application. We can't tie it 1481 01:46:58,880 --> 01:47:03,199 to some other unknown. 1482 01:47:02,880 --> 01:47:06,480 » Okay? >> You know what I mean? Like it'd be like 1483 01:47:05,199 --> 01:47:08,880 you trying to develop a house and they're like, "Well, we're not going to 1484 01:47:07,280 --> 01:47:12,960 give you approval on the house until your neighbor, you know, develops his 1485 01:47:10,560 --> 01:47:16,800 house." I mean, if it In fact, when we did the Ryan, they were developing the 1486 01:47:14,480 --> 01:47:21,360 entire thing. So, it was it was inherent. It was went all the way from 1487 01:47:18,400 --> 01:47:26,560 Madison to to 83. So, that was all and made it it was complicated, but it was 1488 01:47:23,360 --> 01:47:30,719 one project. This is different in that, you know, that McNotton developed those 1489 01:47:28,639 --> 01:47:36,080 series of houses off of Madison. That's, you know, one piece that's done. This is 1490 01:47:33,040 --> 01:47:38,400 then the the east side of Adams. It's a subdivision project. 1491 01:47:38,000 --> 01:47:42,080 » Yes. >> The big unknown is the west side. And I 1492 01:47:40,400 --> 01:47:44,960 don't I don't know what it could end up being and nothing ever happens. It's 1493 01:47:43,520 --> 01:47:46,719 going to be in our two houses, >> right? 1494 01:47:45,360 --> 01:47:50,639 » You just don't know. There's no way of knowing. 1495 01:47:47,280 --> 01:47:53,840 » Well, another question I had um there are quite a few questions about who's 1496 01:47:52,719 --> 01:47:56,480 going to maintain. >> I mean, I think that's I mean, that's 1497 01:47:55,040 --> 01:48:01,600 one that I I think >> so I have a list of things. 1498 01:47:59,360 --> 01:48:05,600 » It's code compliant, but we are making a map amendment with respect to the OS and 1499 01:48:03,520 --> 01:48:08,480 I want to make a map amendment in the right direction from a maintenance 1500 01:48:06,960 --> 01:48:11,760 perspective. Yeah, I think that I think those have been really good points. 1501 01:48:09,840 --> 01:48:16,560 Well, I mean to your point is should it be should we recommend that the to the 1502 01:48:14,320 --> 01:48:19,360 board that the village buys this? Are we being like, you know, pennies are 1503 01:48:18,960 --> 01:48:22,239 foolish? >> Yeah, we need to explore options. I 1504 01:48:20,960 --> 01:48:26,080 mean, I think the gentleman brought up the the county there's con, you know, 1505 01:48:24,320 --> 01:48:30,320 there's there's partners that we could pull in conservation foundation to 1506 01:48:27,920 --> 01:48:34,880 explore this. I I think that needs to be explored way more than it and no offense 1507 01:48:32,719 --> 01:48:38,800 to the village staff, but I think >> we are missing an opportunity to get 1508 01:48:37,199 --> 01:48:42,639 this in the public trust where it's going to likely end up anyways. I mean, 1509 01:48:40,560 --> 01:48:46,080 I know when this started, I was hoping that this was going to be a public park, 1510 01:48:44,400 --> 01:48:50,480 you know, owned by >> and then, you know, this other concept 1511 01:48:48,080 --> 01:48:56,340 and I was curious on what's the stance, >> but the maintenance aspect is a really 1512 01:48:53,760 --> 01:48:58,960 important issue. I mean I I [clears throat] mean that was a creek 1513 01:48:57,440 --> 01:49:03,360 back in the day. >> It's a baselike principle. Put the dams 1514 01:49:00,719 --> 01:49:07,840 in made the this shallow pond >> that and it likely could become a 1515 01:49:05,600 --> 01:49:11,600 liability to an HOA too from it being damned up if there's you know I mean we 1516 01:49:09,760 --> 01:49:15,119 just took out the Grom mill >> um dam you know that from a water 1517 01:49:13,520 --> 01:49:19,199 quality perspective. Not going to go down that rabbit hole but it could 1518 01:49:16,560 --> 01:49:22,880 become a liability from a a maintenance of I I believe that's damned up down in 1519 01:49:21,920 --> 01:49:25,760 the cemetery. >> Yeah. Yeah. They have a couple dams. So, 1520 01:49:24,639 --> 01:49:30,320 it's just something that needs to be explored more of because all of that 1521 01:49:28,239 --> 01:49:35,280 that you're putting on a HOA, like I said, in my line of work, I've seen 1522 01:49:33,440 --> 01:49:37,920 » a homeowner associations can't even take care of the detention bonds in some 1523 01:49:36,719 --> 01:49:42,679 communities and and >> I can't imagine what those HOF fees 1524 01:49:39,520 --> 01:49:42,679 would be. 1525 01:49:42,719 --> 01:49:48,159 » That's part of it because if the village if the village is saying they don't want 1526 01:49:46,639 --> 01:49:52,000 to maintain it because it's too expensive, 1527 01:49:49,920 --> 01:49:54,239 » how why would an HOA want to assume that? 1528 01:49:52,639 --> 01:49:56,159 » Okay. and then the liability. >> Right. 1529 01:49:54,639 --> 01:50:00,080 » Right. So, you've got both of those issues that an HOA is going to have to 1530 01:49:57,920 --> 01:50:03,679 take care of. If this if we had thought about this, the re the reason it's zoned 1531 01:50:02,159 --> 01:50:07,840 what it's zoned now, >> right? 1532 01:50:05,280 --> 01:50:12,320 » You can't build on wetlands. So, it never should have been zoned R2 to begin 1533 01:50:10,159 --> 01:50:16,239 with, right? In other words, you can't build a house. You can't build it. 1534 01:50:14,400 --> 01:50:20,719 » So, it should have been public lands or public property to start with. It just 1535 01:50:18,159 --> 01:50:25,679 wasn't because it was bulk area. So now 1536 01:50:23,440 --> 01:50:29,760 we're tied up with these gentlemen on their project and thinking about this, 1537 01:50:28,080 --> 01:50:33,360 but I don't know that the HOA thing I think 1538 01:50:31,679 --> 01:50:38,320 I think you raised a really good point and and Bethany, you're already saying 1539 01:50:35,679 --> 01:50:43,600 that the village has looked at this and is kind of going maybe not. I mean, 1540 01:50:40,800 --> 01:50:48,719 could that be revisited by them and and a plan put together where they could 1541 01:50:46,000 --> 01:50:52,560 accept it? And if not, then we start to explore other partners, right? 1542 01:50:51,600 --> 01:50:55,440 » Um, >> yeah. I mean, like the 1543 01:50:53,760 --> 01:50:58,960 » but this is like the big part of actually what the charge is before us. 1544 01:50:57,679 --> 01:51:04,800 » I mean, it's fascinating to know that the Duke bount forest preserve district 1545 01:51:01,280 --> 01:51:09,520 has land west of this, you know, down one, you know, and, you know, 1546 01:51:06,880 --> 01:51:14,239 Fullersburg Woods is a great asset for the entire community and it's great to 1547 01:51:11,600 --> 01:51:18,480 have that that park land and forest preserve land there. You know, maybe 1548 01:51:16,480 --> 01:51:21,679 this maybe there is if it's not Hinsdale, maybe it is the forest 1549 01:51:19,920 --> 01:51:24,960 preserve district. >> I feel the village is going to 1550 01:51:23,280 --> 01:51:28,400 ultimately get all the responsibility of pleasing this area, ensuring 1551 01:51:26,719 --> 01:51:30,960 maintenance, all the benefit of not getting the land. Yes. 1552 01:51:29,360 --> 01:51:36,159 » Or all the challenges. Yes. >> With a property but not by not having 1553 01:51:33,840 --> 01:51:39,760 the land and so why go through all burden if we don't explore the 1554 01:51:38,000 --> 01:51:44,320 opportunity to get the land. >> So is this a question for the applicant? 1555 01:51:43,119 --> 01:51:49,040 » No, I think this is more a question for the Well, but no, if it's a if a 1556 01:51:46,960 --> 01:51:54,000 homeowners uh if the homeowners association fees are going to be $10,000 1557 01:51:52,000 --> 01:52:00,480 a month, >> that's just an absurd amount. I hope 1558 01:51:57,040 --> 01:52:05,920 » um does that sully the project and and again this is a market 1559 01:52:02,800 --> 01:52:10,320 » thing. It's I don't think it's up to us to say the homeowners association fees 1560 01:52:07,840 --> 01:52:15,040 are going to be too much. No, no, but but it's part of our package in the 1561 01:52:11,920 --> 01:52:21,040 covenants and restrictions and I my opinion is I don't like how they are set 1562 01:52:18,800 --> 01:52:22,080 up for in my opinion they're set up for failure. 1563 01:52:21,599 --> 01:52:25,040 » I agree. >> Well, and I think this is much more 1564 01:52:23,199 --> 01:52:26,880 complicated than a detention pie. >> Yes, it is. 1565 01:52:25,520 --> 01:52:30,880 » I mean, this is a waterway. >> Yeah. To the to the resident's point, 1566 01:52:28,800 --> 01:52:34,639 but people who are moving into this want to be near this park. I think it's an 1567 01:52:33,520 --> 01:52:38,960 amenity, >> not a liability. And 1568 01:52:37,440 --> 01:52:42,639 » it's going to be maintained. It sounds like it's going to be maintained in a 1569 01:52:40,239 --> 01:52:48,239 way that is and I I don't know I don't know nothing about know nothing about 1570 01:52:44,080 --> 01:52:57,119 nothing but in a way that is more open and free and uh original prairie sort 1571 01:52:52,639 --> 01:52:59,199 rather than uh the palace at Versailles. >> I mean 1572 01:52:57,599 --> 01:53:02,880 » so maybe there's some maybe it's going to be less expensive. 1573 01:53:00,719 --> 01:53:07,040 » I mean that goes to your point Commissioner Harlo. I mean there isn't a 1574 01:53:04,719 --> 01:53:09,360 plan for what it's to be maintained to. Um 1575 01:53:08,000 --> 01:53:13,360 » it's kind of a plan. We were told it's going to be open lands. 1576 01:53:11,599 --> 01:53:17,440 » That's a lot of different definitions to that plan. 1577 01:53:14,800 --> 01:53:21,360 » They're on for example on the south side of the water feature that will 1578 01:53:19,199 --> 01:53:26,400 essentially be people's backyards that are I mean I guessing it'll probably be 1579 01:53:24,239 --> 01:53:30,639 mowed up to the edge and accessible. Is that truly part of the park too? you 1580 01:53:28,560 --> 01:53:34,800 know, some things I just think it >> it would need the benefit of maybe 1581 01:53:32,480 --> 01:53:39,040 exploring this more is also then looking at a little bit more comprehensive what 1582 01:53:37,440 --> 01:53:41,599 does the park look like from a use perspective. 1583 01:53:40,159 --> 01:53:45,119 » Well, then that's is that a matter of continuing and asking that question? 1584 01:53:43,760 --> 01:53:49,280 » Well, and asking the village I mean that's where I mean the idea continuing 1585 01:53:47,040 --> 01:53:52,480 and asking the village to really investigate this more 1586 01:53:50,800 --> 01:53:55,360 » and ultimately that's a village board decision. 1587 01:53:53,520 --> 01:53:59,199 » So that ultimately that decision would be a village board decision. So clearly 1588 01:53:57,520 --> 01:54:03,360 there could be a recommendation to move this forward with the village board to 1589 01:54:01,040 --> 01:54:08,320 consider those as options. >> Um I do want to make it um at least put 1590 01:54:06,239 --> 01:54:13,040 it on the record that about a year ago we the village did contact the DW page 1591 01:54:10,639 --> 01:54:16,000 county forest preserve just to see you know based on the budget discussions of 1592 01:54:14,560 --> 01:54:20,639 would they be open to this land acquisition. Um, according to our 1593 01:54:18,719 --> 01:54:24,000 discussions with them, their policy is that they only will accept land that 1594 01:54:22,320 --> 01:54:28,639 would be adjacent to land they already exist and there is no direct adjacent 1595 01:54:26,239 --> 01:54:32,960 land. So at that time when we had reached out to them, they were not 1596 01:54:30,320 --> 01:54:36,480 interested in the parkland um aspect. We could of course circle back with them 1597 01:54:34,639 --> 01:54:41,599 but that was the policy decision at the time that they had informed the village. 1598 01:54:40,080 --> 01:54:45,920 » I appreciate everything that the applicants have given us and I really 1599 01:54:44,080 --> 01:54:49,760 appreciate village staff. You know, Bethany, as I always remind you, I no 1600 01:54:48,080 --> 01:54:55,040 longer have to bring my zoning code book with to meetings and you take care of a 1601 01:54:52,480 --> 01:54:58,719 lot of the issues before it even gets to us. But, um, 1602 01:54:57,040 --> 01:55:01,920 » I just think that the meeting needs to be continued to explore some other 1603 01:55:00,480 --> 01:55:07,159 options. >> Um, take our time, do this, right? 1604 01:55:07,440 --> 01:55:14,239 Bethany, can I ask you a question? If you know or anyone else is remembering 1605 01:55:11,440 --> 01:55:19,440 when the woodlands was developed, clearly different than the village of 1606 01:55:15,679 --> 01:55:24,639 Hinsdale. No sidewalks, rolling hills, there's been water issues there. Uh that 1607 01:55:22,639 --> 01:55:30,239 was looked at differently. Why were there no reasons to ask that development 1608 01:55:28,400 --> 01:55:34,719 to have sidewalks? How was that looked at differently? Because I look at this 1609 01:55:32,080 --> 01:55:39,199 property as the same type of environment as the woodlands. 1610 01:55:36,480 --> 01:55:42,400 » I have the answer. Actually, our our expert historian might know the 1611 01:55:40,719 --> 01:55:46,000 development of the woodlands better, but it's my understanding that part of that 1612 01:55:44,239 --> 01:55:50,239 was even maybe not even developed in Hindale and annexed in later. 1613 01:55:48,320 --> 01:55:53,599 » It was, but then when they did the storm water 1614 01:55:51,599 --> 01:55:56,639 improvements, there was a special and then there were significant village 1615 01:55:54,960 --> 01:56:00,159 storm water improvements later on, >> but they were never required to put 1616 01:55:58,159 --> 01:56:02,880 sidewalks or make it look like ones. No, but they had to chip in. When the storm 1617 01:56:01,679 --> 01:56:04,320 water improvements were made, they had to pay, 1618 01:56:03,599 --> 01:56:06,960 » right? >> The residents of 1619 01:56:05,280 --> 01:56:11,599 » something. >> We both paid those SSAs 1620 01:56:09,440 --> 01:56:17,199 » when the storm we both paid those when >> we paid those. Oh, yes, we did. 1621 01:56:15,040 --> 01:56:20,560 » Yes. >> So, I mean the I think there's a few 1622 01:56:19,040 --> 01:56:25,040 issues that kind of boil to the top. It's first the part the this open space. 1623 01:56:23,280 --> 01:56:28,960 Should it be owned by the village or should it be private and with public 1624 01:56:26,639 --> 01:56:34,719 access? I think that's a big question and I my con idea there's a consensus 1625 01:56:32,400 --> 01:56:40,560 here that the commissioners would like it to be publicly like owned by Hinsdale 1626 01:56:38,159 --> 01:56:44,320 so it could be maintained prop that's >> because I do think I mean 1627 01:56:42,880 --> 01:56:50,000 » that is not on the table. >> Yes it's a map my opin it's we're m 1628 01:56:47,520 --> 01:56:53,840 being asked to review a map amendment right with respect to going from R2 to 1629 01:56:52,719 --> 01:56:58,880 open space >> I think we have a clear how the open 1630 01:56:56,159 --> 01:57:02,320 space is set up not >> set up but owned is a whole different 1631 01:57:00,560 --> 01:57:03,599 thing. You're not offering it to the village. 1632 01:57:03,119 --> 01:57:05,199 » No, >> I don't know whether 1633 01:57:04,480 --> 01:57:08,320 » aren't we? >> No, this is that's not on the table. The 1634 01:57:06,800 --> 01:57:10,880 the offer is the offer. >> That'd be a good place. Come on. Thank 1635 01:57:09,840 --> 01:57:15,040 you. >> Yeah. So, we were offering it to the 1636 01:57:14,239 --> 01:57:17,599 village. >> That's what I thought. 1637 01:57:16,000 --> 01:57:24,159 » Yes. 100%. We were offering it to the village. Yes, we we Yes, we 1638 01:57:22,159 --> 01:57:27,920 said no. I mean from from this meeting obviously things have changed a little 1639 01:57:25,280 --> 01:57:31,440 bit but we you want you want to answer this? 1640 01:57:28,159 --> 01:57:34,080 » Yeah. John Pemrook swearing construction here. 1641 01:57:32,159 --> 01:57:38,800 » Yeah. I appreciate everybody's time and everybody's putting a lot of effort into 1642 01:57:35,760 --> 01:57:43,920 this. But we've been back and forth for two years on this now. So there's many 1643 01:57:41,920 --> 01:57:49,440 phases have gone through this. So we did offer this to the village. They refused 1644 01:57:46,239 --> 01:57:54,400 it. They said they couldn't afford it. So we said we take it over because I've 1645 01:57:51,520 --> 01:57:59,520 been at this racket for 45 years. So I've built about 600 customuilt homes. 1646 01:57:58,159 --> 01:58:04,719 These homes that are going to go in these lots are about4 to5 million. 1647 01:58:03,119 --> 01:58:09,520 Okay. So we're talking here tonight saying these each house here going to be 1648 01:58:07,199 --> 01:58:14,400 4 to 5 million on the top side. On the bottom side is about two and a half to 1649 01:58:11,119 --> 01:58:22,159 three million. Now we're talking about that they can't afford to maintain this 1650 01:58:16,560 --> 01:58:27,199 property. I just me put 45 years of I disagree and but that's just me because 1651 01:58:24,159 --> 01:58:31,040 I've never seen that on that quality. Now if you're in a different situation 1652 01:58:29,119 --> 01:58:37,199 but we're maintaining I'm maintaining it for the last two years and the cost that 1653 01:58:35,040 --> 01:58:42,960 I can do it for and that the village could do it for this is a whole 1654 01:58:39,679 --> 01:58:47,136 difference because we have our numbers really fine-tuned 1655 01:58:44,960 --> 01:58:51,360 and we have to have that. So [clears throat] we're talking about I've 1656 01:58:49,360 --> 01:58:56,960 you know I understand you're looking at this and saying well but we've there's 1657 01:58:54,080 --> 01:59:02,320 two years of discussion here and Hensdale refused it. That's what I would 1658 01:59:00,159 --> 01:59:09,760 that's what we were told that Hensdale did not want to do this. So it's that's 1659 01:59:05,360 --> 01:59:13,199 why we've gone this route public private can we hold for just a sec now. Was that 1660 01:59:11,520 --> 01:59:17,440 on the staff level or on the village board level? So the the when this was 1661 01:59:15,840 --> 01:59:20,800 brought up, the village the village staff expressed concerns and there were 1662 01:59:19,280 --> 01:59:24,000 also some elected and appointed officials involved that were in 1663 01:59:22,400 --> 01:59:27,840 discussion about preliminary budget numbers that was brought back to the 1664 01:59:25,920 --> 01:59:32,320 applicant that there there are budget concerns and then they have decided to 1665 01:59:30,239 --> 01:59:36,639 make it private. So [clears throat] the the the initial and budget analyses were 1666 01:59:34,880 --> 01:59:40,400 done but it wasn't by all any means conclusive. Again, this can be a 1667 01:59:38,560 --> 01:59:44,560 recommendation from the plan commission for the village board to consider this, 1668 01:59:42,159 --> 01:59:48,239 but that would need additional time for additional review of what those costs 1669 01:59:46,239 --> 01:59:52,960 would be the village and the villages. The trustees are ultimately the budget 1670 01:59:50,480 --> 01:59:56,320 makers. So, if if there was an ability to look at what those long-term 1671 01:59:54,159 --> 01:59:59,920 maintenance costs would be, um that's something that can be done at the next 1672 01:59:57,599 --> 02:00:04,080 stage as well. I think it might also be helpful for the village engineer, the 1673 02:00:02,400 --> 02:00:08,960 the engineer for the applicant to come up and kind of talk through what the 1674 02:00:06,159 --> 02:00:12,320 historic IDNR resource, you know, and review process looks like. And I think 1675 02:00:10,800 --> 02:00:16,239 it would also be good for him to kind of go through with everyone of what's 1676 02:00:13,920 --> 02:00:19,760 required with DuPage County for a storm water maintenance plan on a private side 1677 02:00:18,239 --> 02:00:22,800 because there will be some of those maintenance items built in. They're 1678 02:00:21,599 --> 02:00:25,760 typically not something that's brought forward with the plan commission packet 1679 02:00:24,239 --> 02:00:30,159 and they're done as part of that DuPage County review. But I also think that 1680 02:00:27,920 --> 02:00:34,400 there is an ability to add in with our HOA documents or if this does say 1681 02:00:32,080 --> 02:00:39,040 privately owned and maintained for additional maintenance, you know, plans 1682 02:00:37,040 --> 02:00:42,418 to be put in place. So >> So are we talking acquisition costs of 1683 02:00:41,040 --> 02:00:44,880 the land and then maintenance of the [clears throat] land? 1684 02:00:42,960 --> 02:00:48,159 » Yes. There's always Well, and and in this particular case, they could choose 1685 02:00:46,480 --> 02:00:50,960 to donate the land to the village as part of the subdivision process, 1686 02:00:49,920 --> 02:00:54,639 » public benefit. >> Yes. As part of that. 1687 02:00:52,320 --> 02:00:58,000 » So those are on the table. >> No, they've not been offered. they well 1688 02:00:56,320 --> 02:01:00,400 they've been offered and declined so it's not on the offer. 1689 02:00:58,800 --> 02:01:03,440 » I think it's important to recognize I think there's some frustrations that 1690 02:01:01,760 --> 02:01:06,800 there's professionals that have been working on this a really long time but 1691 02:01:05,280 --> 02:01:10,320 this is really the first time we've seen or heard of any of it. So, for us to ask 1692 02:01:09,040 --> 02:01:14,400 these questions, I think are really important because we're the lay people 1693 02:01:11,920 --> 02:01:19,040 and professionals that are, you know, volunteering to do this. And I think um, 1694 02:01:17,840 --> 02:01:20,400 you know, our question should be addressed 1695 02:01:19,520 --> 02:01:24,480 » without a doubt. >> And to be to be clear, the the land has 1696 02:01:22,880 --> 02:01:29,440 not been declined by the village. That's a decision that's done by the village 1697 02:01:26,560 --> 02:01:33,199 board. So, the proposal has come forward based on concerns by that were brought 1698 02:01:31,520 --> 02:01:36,400 up in discussions with the applicant and staff that there are budgetary concerns 1699 02:01:34,800 --> 02:01:40,239 with long-term maintenance on the villages side. At the end of the day, 1700 02:01:38,560 --> 02:01:44,000 it's always been clear that the village board has to decide should they take the 1701 02:01:41,920 --> 02:01:48,080 land or should it be privately owned and maintained, right? And the applicant has 1702 02:01:45,920 --> 02:01:51,520 chosen to go the easy route of trying to make it privately owned and maintained 1703 02:01:49,920 --> 02:01:54,159 for further budget discussions. >> And I think we got some useful 1704 02:01:52,719 --> 02:01:59,760 information here. And the these are private property rights. So they can 1705 02:01:56,480 --> 02:02:05,920 offer it to the village or not. And 19 time $3 million is some large amount of 1706 02:02:03,119 --> 02:02:11,440 value in residential real estate to be held by people who have means. So it 1707 02:02:09,920 --> 02:02:14,080 sounds to me like there might be some resources here to maintain this 1708 02:02:13,360 --> 02:02:17,280 property. >> Concern is John's point. 1709 02:02:15,520 --> 02:02:20,880 » Yeah. No inexpensive house. 1710 02:02:18,159 --> 02:02:25,119 » Sorry. Yeah. I I I Yeah, that's you know, if we were talking about $500,000 1711 02:02:23,119 --> 02:02:28,719 homes, and I'm not knocking any price, but I'm just This is my territory, 1712 02:02:27,920 --> 02:02:33,520 right? >> Um but we're not, 1713 02:02:30,960 --> 02:02:37,599 » you know, the lots here are going to be very expensive because the property was 1714 02:02:35,520 --> 02:02:42,560 very expensive and to develop this property is very expensive. So, the lots 1715 02:02:39,520 --> 02:02:46,800 are expensive, but it we all we're in Hensdale, so we all know about Hensdale 1716 02:02:44,880 --> 02:02:52,880 and surrounding suburbs. The lots are expensive anyway. So, there's been a lot 1717 02:02:49,280 --> 02:02:56,960 of like, you know, uh, numbers being crunched and this and that. So, I'm 1718 02:02:54,239 --> 02:03:02,880 saying under the seventh lots at the northern half, they're going to be $5 1719 02:02:59,440 --> 02:03:08,960 million homes. Okay? And the southern half, there'll be any 1720 02:03:05,840 --> 02:03:13,199 place with 2.5 to 3.5 million >> on top of the land costs. on top of the 1721 02:03:11,199 --> 02:03:20,560 land costs. Like I'm doing houses right now in Elmhurst. A 50 by190 lot is $1 1722 02:03:17,679 --> 02:03:25,760 million. Now we're putting a a house on top of that. Another 2.7. 1723 02:03:23,199 --> 02:03:31,280 That's Elmerst because I built over 400 houses in the Elmerst in the last 30 1724 02:03:27,920 --> 02:03:36,880 years. So I'm just saying is the HMO is not a problem in this. I'm 1725 02:03:35,280 --> 02:03:40,960 just saying the way we've we've set it up. But if the village wanted to take 1726 02:03:38,639 --> 02:03:46,080 this and take it over and maintain the whole thing, but we've had discussions 1727 02:03:43,520 --> 02:03:51,599 about sidewalks, the sidewalk, hence they didn't want the cost of maintaining 1728 02:03:48,960 --> 02:03:56,480 the sidewalks. I can go down the road here with discussions and I'm not it's 1729 02:03:54,080 --> 02:04:00,960 two years of discussions here. So it's like we're trying to say, well, we want 1730 02:03:59,440 --> 02:04:05,520 to be part of this as well because I think it's a beautiful property. I think 1731 02:04:02,400 --> 02:04:10,960 anybody I always say when that I call it a quiet park. This is my vision of a 1732 02:04:07,679 --> 02:04:14,639 quiet park. No phones, no lab, no computers, no nothing. You sit out 1733 02:04:12,719 --> 02:04:18,960 there, you read a book, there'll be a book stand there and all your problems 1734 02:04:16,800 --> 02:04:24,000 go away. So because it's a beautiful piece of property and I want to keep it 1735 02:04:20,560 --> 02:04:29,599 as much pristined as possible but there is a lot of engineering involved and 1736 02:04:27,599 --> 02:04:34,239 that's why we've got DuPage we've got the engineers in Hinsdale we got this 1737 02:04:31,520 --> 02:04:39,040 fine engineer here so these are all professionals that make this all 1738 02:04:35,840 --> 02:04:44,159 possible so there is restrictions on us you know and that's the on all sorts of 1739 02:04:42,080 --> 02:04:48,000 it so I think it's a beautiful piece of 1740 02:04:45,520 --> 02:04:52,239 property so I'm trying to keep it like we're talking about wetlands and stuff 1741 02:04:49,679 --> 02:04:56,719 and maintaining it. Well, the way it's been maintained for the last 10 years, I 1742 02:04:55,440 --> 02:04:59,280 don't think it should be maintained like that. 1743 02:04:57,760 --> 02:05:03,520 » There's a lot of this stuff that's been cut that should go back to wetlands. 1744 02:05:01,920 --> 02:05:07,840 Should go back to the natural side of it. We're talking about when a tree 1745 02:05:05,119 --> 02:05:12,560 falls over the ground. Let the ground take it back unless it's blocking a 1746 02:05:09,679 --> 02:05:18,159 sidewalk. That's what wetlands is about. So, we're very concerned too. I I me 1747 02:05:17,040 --> 02:05:23,840 personally because I think it's a beautiful piece of property and I want 1748 02:05:19,840 --> 02:05:28,800 it maintained and as much destruction as less as possible on that piece of 1749 02:05:25,520 --> 02:05:33,119 property. So it's like we're looking at but when we when we're discussing and 1750 02:05:30,880 --> 02:05:36,960 you correct when you said this is the first time we're looking at this and we 1751 02:05:34,960 --> 02:05:43,440 we're concerned and I understand that but on the price of the houses there I 1752 02:05:40,560 --> 02:05:49,360 don't think that maintaining what's there because anybody that's going to 1753 02:05:45,360 --> 02:05:53,760 buy there is buying it for the it's just so beautiful 1754 02:05:51,280 --> 02:05:59,679 » you know it's it's just believable and it's been there like you said for you 1755 02:05:56,239 --> 02:06:02,800 know forever and I think there's a lot of it there that should go back to 1756 02:06:01,280 --> 02:06:08,480 natural because if you look at the other side towards Bonnie Bra has been taken 1757 02:06:05,119 --> 02:06:12,880 over and it's beautiful you know it's just natural you know so 1758 02:06:10,639 --> 02:06:17,119 » well but one thing I was like because right now one thing that's missing like 1759 02:06:15,119 --> 02:06:23,360 just you started with the maintenance that if if there was a a strong 1760 02:06:19,920 --> 02:06:27,440 maintenance agreement and plan that made sense okay the it's privately owned 1761 02:06:25,920 --> 02:06:31,280 owned, they need to maintain it. But if they don't, then this is what the 1762 02:06:29,280 --> 02:06:34,480 repercussions are for the village. True, which is not currently in I mean I I 1763 02:06:33,679 --> 02:06:38,719 have to go back and read these covenants, but I don't remember reading 1764 02:06:35,599 --> 02:06:44,400 anything to that specificity about maintaining the the park. 1765 02:06:40,639 --> 02:06:47,920 » There is they talk um about going into the lean lean process, but it doesn't 1766 02:06:46,239 --> 02:06:51,440 define what maintenance is and what are you maintaining too. I think that's the 1767 02:06:49,760 --> 02:06:56,960 part. Do you think if there was a defined plan to like Laurel's comment 1768 02:06:53,520 --> 02:07:00,400 and yours that really did seem to cover everything that then? 1769 02:06:58,880 --> 02:07:03,119 » Yeah, I still have reservations. It's not that not 1770 02:07:01,280 --> 02:07:06,320 » that would be plan B. So plan A would be public. 1771 02:07:03,599 --> 02:07:10,719 » Yeah. Because to with all due respect I I get I get the funding part. I'm not 1772 02:07:08,960 --> 02:07:16,000 the maybe the money will be there. It's the actual execution of you know a 1773 02:07:13,360 --> 02:07:20,639 homeowners association actually implementing. I appreciate your your 1774 02:07:18,400 --> 02:07:24,800 vision for this property, too. I mean, I I spent a lot of time in Dean Ma Nature 1775 02:07:22,880 --> 02:07:28,560 Preserve. Love that place. You know, is there an opportunity? I think we need to 1776 02:07:26,639 --> 02:07:30,560 explore. What does it mean for this to be a park? 1777 02:07:29,520 --> 02:07:35,599 » To your point, it hasn't been maintained. Mowing it just to mow it 1778 02:07:32,320 --> 02:07:39,440 right now, you know, and is that what is that what the maintenance plan goes to? 1779 02:07:37,760 --> 02:07:44,079 I I think you need a maintenance plan. You need a vision to then understand 1780 02:07:41,360 --> 02:07:48,079 what you're maintaining, too. Um, so I think the open space, Jim, to your 1781 02:07:46,079 --> 02:07:53,440 point, it is under our preview if we're we're saying this goes to OS. What does 1782 02:07:50,320 --> 02:07:57,840 the OS look like? Um, just like we would say what do the houses look like when 1783 02:07:55,360 --> 02:08:02,079 it's going to R2. That's my opinion. We have an opportunity here sitting on this 1784 02:08:00,239 --> 02:08:06,639 commission. I don't know that I want to just toss it to a recommendation to the 1785 02:08:04,159 --> 02:08:08,960 board to consider. I think I would like to have it a little bit vetted out so we 1786 02:08:08,320 --> 02:08:12,719 could have some >> to like Julie's point, continue it and 1787 02:08:10,719 --> 02:08:14,800 get some more study. Not that I don't trust the [clears throat] board, I just 1788 02:08:13,599 --> 02:08:18,960 think we have the opportunity to provide. Well, I think that would also 1789 02:08:16,400 --> 02:08:21,360 communicate to the board that we want them to look at this again. 1790 02:08:20,320 --> 02:08:25,280 » Yeah. >> And also the water issue, you know, 1791 02:08:23,280 --> 02:08:27,760 would page maybe we get an answer by then. 1792 02:08:26,480 --> 02:08:32,560 » Okay. I >> mean getting that's that's a long 1793 02:08:30,239 --> 02:08:35,679 process. I mean storm water I'm confident that they're going to comply 1794 02:08:34,159 --> 02:08:38,239 with the storm water premise. The county doesn't give you you have to like the 1795 02:08:37,840 --> 02:08:43,040 flood plan. >> It's not negot negotiate. So, I think 1796 02:08:40,320 --> 02:08:45,440 the storm water I'm it's more like this open space and what's going to happen to 1797 02:08:44,800 --> 02:08:49,760 it. >> Um, and then 1798 02:08:47,920 --> 02:08:53,840 you know the sidewalks, one of the residents spoke. I mean, I guess should 1799 02:08:51,920 --> 02:08:58,719 there be sidewalks? I mean, I is interesting because I walk Adams down 1800 02:08:55,840 --> 02:09:03,920 Spring Road and there are no sidewalks and so I walk facing traffic. If it's 1801 02:09:01,280 --> 02:09:07,040 dark, I put some reflective stuff on because I almost got a guy on a bike, 1802 02:09:05,840 --> 02:09:11,360 you know, because you just it's dark. I mean, there's no street. It's beautiful. 1803 02:09:08,960 --> 02:09:14,800 I mean, you can walk up on deer and raccoons. There's It's a really nice 1804 02:09:13,119 --> 02:09:19,440 neighborhood. Should we even have the sidewalks along Adam? [laughter] 1805 02:09:16,800 --> 02:09:22,719 » I think you should connect the two the north and the south if you're going to 1806 02:09:21,280 --> 02:09:25,440 have that's going to be all the same kind of HOA. Correct. I think you 1807 02:09:24,480 --> 02:09:27,760 connect them so that they >> and maybe just leave it like 1808 02:09:26,480 --> 02:09:32,400 » feel like they're in the neighborhood and and it's not 1809 02:09:29,679 --> 02:09:37,119 » it's not like, you know, sidewalk, >> but should the sidewalks be in the back, 1810 02:09:35,199 --> 02:09:41,360 not along Adams? you know, like >> I think the natural path that's already 1811 02:09:39,119 --> 02:09:46,000 there is kind of in in a little bit, right? That's correct. Yeah. So, I think 1812 02:09:43,280 --> 02:09:48,320 you maintain that, >> right? But that would be different than 1813 02:09:47,440 --> 02:09:51,440 what they're showing here because basically once they get up here, it's 1814 02:09:50,079 --> 02:09:53,280 all along Adam. >> I think it almost Oh, I see what you're 1815 02:09:52,960 --> 02:09:57,360 saying. >> Would it would it be better to follow 1816 02:09:54,880 --> 02:10:00,239 the flood plane and connect with down by the bridge? 1817 02:09:58,800 --> 02:10:04,800 » Got to stay outside of the lot line >> and then it would have the aesthetic 1818 02:10:01,920 --> 02:10:08,960 more of what that part of Fullersburg Woods looks like. Mhm. 1819 02:10:06,400 --> 02:10:10,880 » versus sidewalks along the curved line. >> I understand what exactly you're saying. 1820 02:10:10,239 --> 02:10:15,040 » Yeah. >> And then maybe you you know you have 1821 02:10:13,040 --> 02:10:18,400 because you have the head wall and you have the connection from the culinary 1822 02:10:17,119 --> 02:10:22,800 » then they get and then you still have the connection from Madison 1823 02:10:20,800 --> 02:10:25,440 » across. I guess I still back to the gravel. 1824 02:10:23,679 --> 02:10:29,520 » I mean we got water manes under every street in town. I mean why why do we 1825 02:10:27,199 --> 02:10:34,639 care? >> Yeah. Asphalt they can dig up and fix. I 1826 02:10:31,840 --> 02:10:38,239 mean, I I just think if we're going to make connect these 1827 02:10:36,239 --> 02:10:41,679 neighborhoods, I think we should connect them. I think it's I've been going 1828 02:10:39,679 --> 02:10:45,040 through since you bought it. It's been great. Thank you. You know, when the 1829 02:10:43,119 --> 02:10:49,119 gates open sometimes, >> sometimes I'll go from Madison across 1830 02:10:47,280 --> 02:10:53,760 Adams, you know, can work change my path, but um 1831 02:10:50,800 --> 02:10:54,800 » it's a gravel the gravel trail is my idea. 1832 02:10:54,400 --> 02:10:58,159 » Okay. >> Okay. I didn't want concrete. 1833 02:10:56,719 --> 02:11:03,679 » Okay. But what about >> Yeah, but it's it's going to be a gravel 1834 02:10:59,840 --> 02:11:07,920 that it's not loose gravel, but if he if he decided, well, no, John, we disagree 1835 02:11:05,520 --> 02:11:11,280 with you that it has to be a concrete sidewalk, that's okay. 1836 02:11:09,599 --> 02:11:14,000 » But what about asphalt to match >> orphalt? Yeah, that's the current one's 1837 02:11:13,520 --> 02:11:16,800 asphalt. >> Yeah, that's current one. 1838 02:11:15,199 --> 02:11:19,840 » I think that would kind of because I agree. I mean, you walk through Fuller's 1839 02:11:18,159 --> 02:11:24,320 Bird Wood, especially after the recent rainstorms, there's a lot of maintenance 1840 02:11:21,599 --> 02:11:30,000 needs. There's it's washed out quite a bit. So I think you know even the 1841 02:11:26,639 --> 02:11:32,079 crushed limestone compacted requires a lot of maintenance unless you have your 1842 02:11:31,119 --> 02:11:35,760 drainage. >> Let's focus on a simple issue. Let's 1843 02:11:33,840 --> 02:11:38,000 like sidewalks. I mean what are your thoughts about that? 1844 02:11:36,639 --> 02:11:42,079 » I like what you just said a lot. >> Not having them along on [clears throat] 1845 02:11:40,079 --> 02:11:46,000 the seven north properties instead of having where you're showing them is 1846 02:11:44,000 --> 02:11:48,639 following more of the flood plane line. So they go in the back. 1847 02:11:48,079 --> 02:11:53,599 » Is that possible? >> Could be. Yeah. Like I didn't want the 1848 02:11:50,960 --> 02:11:58,880 sidewalks there but it's a village. It's a like but it's a requirement. So that 1849 02:11:57,040 --> 02:12:02,560 you know >> well they'd still have a sidewalk per 1850 02:12:00,639 --> 02:12:05,599 se. It's just not street. >> Yeah. 1851 02:12:03,599 --> 02:12:08,800 » Like it is right now. There's a sidewalk right there that twists in. 1852 02:12:07,119 --> 02:12:14,400 » But I guess if I was buying one of these properties, you know, in this seven 1853 02:12:10,719 --> 02:12:17,360 lots, would I rather people, you know, do I want people walking in the back? 1854 02:12:16,880 --> 02:12:20,656 » No. >> You know, 1855 02:12:17,760 --> 02:12:23,040 » probably. You know, [clears throat] 1856 02:12:21,520 --> 02:12:27,840 » you know, you could you could keep like it currently does in a way, 1857 02:12:25,199 --> 02:12:31,360 » you know, it starts by the the head wall where you're proposing that and it goes 1858 02:12:29,679 --> 02:12:35,760 up and hits the road, >> you know, but you could in a way like 1859 02:12:33,199 --> 02:12:39,119 bring it back to Adams and just have that, you know, through the park area, 1860 02:12:37,360 --> 02:12:43,040 this open space area, >> keep that and then eliminate the 1861 02:12:40,800 --> 02:12:47,280 sidewalks, you know, along the those seven lots, right? And then you you'd be 1862 02:12:45,520 --> 02:12:50,960 able to every because everyone walks on Adams because there's no sidewalks. And 1863 02:12:49,040 --> 02:12:54,880 then if you did walk from Madison across, you know, you say this is an 1864 02:12:52,639 --> 02:12:57,199 asphalt path, you could still connect these neighborhoods together. 1865 02:12:56,239 --> 02:12:59,599 » Correct. >> Right. 1866 02:12:57,520 --> 02:13:03,280 » It's like on the traffic study, you know, just me personally, but you know, 1867 02:13:01,520 --> 02:13:07,161 if I was living there, I would never be making a left on Ogden, right? 1868 02:13:05,199 --> 02:13:10,320 » Because I've got a brain in my head, [laughter] you know. But I understand 1869 02:13:08,800 --> 02:13:15,520 there's people out there that don't have brain would want to stay 25 minutes and 1870 02:13:13,920 --> 02:13:20,079 and make a left, you know, onto that street. But it's like, you know, once 1871 02:13:18,000 --> 02:13:24,400 you get used to it, you know, first of all, it's too dangerous anyway with the 1872 02:13:22,800 --> 02:13:26,400 traffic that's on Oden, but we can't stop that, 1873 02:13:25,440 --> 02:13:32,480 » you know. >> But, uh, we we definitely Yeah. But like 1874 02:13:29,599 --> 02:13:36,800 we're two years at this, so working with village staff and with everyone and this 1875 02:13:34,400 --> 02:13:42,560 is where we've come to. We are open to your suggestions for sure. Yeah. It's 1876 02:13:39,440 --> 02:13:50,480 just, you know, uh it's R2 compliance, you know, that was my big thing 1877 02:13:45,040 --> 02:13:57,280 » on this that I wanted R2 compliance. >> Uh and I didn't want it overbuilt 1878 02:13:53,040 --> 02:14:02,639 » and I'm concerned about it be prestige when I leave it. I want it better 1879 02:14:00,639 --> 02:14:06,000 looking than it is today. But I think it's beautiful because like I tell 1880 02:14:04,320 --> 02:14:09,679 people if you're having a stressful day or anything, just go out there and sit 1881 02:14:08,079 --> 02:14:12,079 down for a while and just have a look out on. 1882 02:14:10,560 --> 02:14:16,320 » Yeah. No, it's beautiful. I agree. >> You got to go back to your work again. 1883 02:14:14,400 --> 02:14:18,159 » It's unique to Instale, too, to have >> it. It's totally unique. 1884 02:14:17,760 --> 02:14:22,320 » Yeah. >> Because we have what I call like 1885 02:14:19,599 --> 02:14:23,920 manicured parks. We don't have a space like this. 1886 02:14:22,880 --> 02:14:27,760 » Yeah. >> And I've been talking to a good few 1887 02:14:25,360 --> 02:14:33,679 neighbors, especially on Madison there, that uh are big into gardening and big 1888 02:14:30,800 --> 02:14:38,719 into that. And we've had discussions that when they hitch, 1889 02:14:37,119 --> 02:14:43,920 you know, the homeowners association would come together that my thoughts 1890 02:14:40,480 --> 02:14:49,840 that there should be a gardening comm set up to maintain it and have guidance 1891 02:14:46,800 --> 02:14:54,719 and make it more beautiful. So there's a lot of uh 1892 02:14:51,840 --> 02:15:00,239 process here to it of course but >> you know we're here in front of you for 1893 02:14:56,960 --> 02:15:04,400 R2 you know that's you know and it's I've heard discussions about across the 1894 02:15:02,159 --> 02:15:08,239 street which we have nothing to do with >> uh [clears throat] whatsoever but 1895 02:15:06,320 --> 02:15:12,239 » you know to me it's only hearsay right now 1896 02:15:09,360 --> 02:15:16,400 » what's it could be our two it could it might not be developed at all right 1897 02:15:14,480 --> 02:15:21,040 » you know and I understand that I do might be involved but this is all I 1898 02:15:19,280 --> 02:15:24,400 don't think it should you know he has a vision but we don't know what is going 1899 02:15:23,520 --> 02:15:29,760 to be there >> well John would you be if we would you 1900 02:15:26,320 --> 02:15:34,960 be if we voted to continue this and then so we gave the staff and the v the board 1901 02:15:32,719 --> 02:15:40,239 more time to consider the ownership aspect of this what what's being 1902 02:15:37,520 --> 02:15:43,040 proposed and to address any other concerns and then 1903 02:15:41,760 --> 02:15:46,320 » sure yeah >> we basically see in a month 1904 02:15:45,119 --> 02:15:48,960 » I don't know if the village would be able to get budget numbers turned around 1905 02:15:48,159 --> 02:15:50,320 within a month. >> Okay. So, a couple months. 1906 02:15:50,259 --> 02:15:53,840 [clears throat] >> Yeah. So, just be aware that this would 1907 02:15:51,679 --> 02:15:57,199 probably delay them for a significant more time. 1908 02:15:54,560 --> 02:16:00,800 » That would be, you know, on f like >> that's why I'm asking you. 1909 02:15:58,239 --> 02:16:05,760 » Yeah. That would be Yeah. Because Yeah. If it was I don't mind a month at four 1910 02:16:03,119 --> 02:16:10,239 weeks, like after two two years, four weeks. But if you said three months down 1911 02:16:07,920 --> 02:16:15,360 the line, I think that's >> Would you think in a couple months like 1912 02:16:11,599 --> 02:16:18,239 if it wasn't in um October that November at the latest? You're talking about an 1913 02:16:16,880 --> 02:16:21,760 acquisition cost than a maintenance cost, right? 1914 02:16:19,520 --> 02:16:26,159 » More of the maintenance cost. Um, but what I'd recommend is um, and I I still 1915 02:16:24,480 --> 02:16:28,904 would like their engineer to speak to the maintenance and monitoring plans 1916 02:16:27,599 --> 02:16:32,719 that's required with DuPage County [clears throat] so that it's understood. 1917 02:16:30,719 --> 02:16:35,679 There's there maybe is two things brought [snorts] to the table. What does 1918 02:16:33,920 --> 02:16:39,439 it mean for the village, you know, maintenance and responsibility versus 1919 02:16:37,359 --> 02:16:43,519 what does it mean for a private HOA? And those are two separate costs that we can 1920 02:16:41,599 --> 02:16:47,280 try to bring forward. At the end of the day though, again, it is a village. the 1921 02:16:45,840 --> 02:16:50,880 village board would make that ultimate decision, right? 1922 02:16:48,160 --> 02:16:54,000 » Um, and the village staff has not, again, the village staff hasn't made 1923 02:16:52,639 --> 02:16:58,080 that decision. It's the village board who would, 1924 02:16:55,519 --> 02:17:01,439 » but we we can try to get those costs on our end. 1925 02:16:59,519 --> 02:17:07,120 » Yeah. So, yeah, I just want to expand on um Bethy's um request that I go over 1926 02:17:04,240 --> 02:17:15,120 this. So, Dwage County has jurisdiction over wetlands and flood plane. So this 1927 02:17:10,960 --> 02:17:21,200 private public park um most of it is grass essentially and it's the um the 1928 02:17:17,840 --> 02:17:24,399 creek and the um um the borderline of the creek is where you got the natural 1929 02:17:22,880 --> 02:17:30,000 plantings, the wetlands, things like that and that needs to be maintained. Um 1930 02:17:27,359 --> 02:17:36,319 that's where the most of the um high maintenance efforts are. So um we have 1931 02:17:34,080 --> 02:17:41,200 to provide the county because they oversee wetlands and flood plane a 1932 02:17:38,479 --> 02:17:46,080 maintenance plan a plantings plan and we also have to provide a budget to them. 1933 02:17:43,280 --> 02:17:49,840 And so on a project that John P's working on in Elmherst it's a private 1934 02:17:47,760 --> 02:17:54,160 owner 60 foot lot. It backs up the salt creek. It's got wetlands and flood 1935 02:17:52,000 --> 02:18:00,639 plane. So they also have to come up with we came up with a maintenance plan and a 1936 02:17:57,040 --> 02:18:05,200 planting plan and it's the single uh owner 1937 02:18:02,960 --> 02:18:10,960 can afford it. I mean it's it's a mod it's a modest what I find is a modest 1938 02:18:07,519 --> 02:18:18,479 plan for for this two $2.5 million home. >> Yes. And so for 19 homes with the same 1939 02:18:15,200 --> 02:18:23,599 or double the value will be reasonable to maintain what they need to maintain 1940 02:18:20,719 --> 02:18:28,559 to meet county standards. And the rest is really just mowing. It's if you've 1941 02:18:26,479 --> 02:18:33,840 seen it, it's it's a lot of grass and that's that's a very basic maintenance 1942 02:18:30,559 --> 02:18:40,319 operation. But the specialty maintenance is by the homeowner or in this case HOA 1943 02:18:36,719 --> 02:18:44,319 and it is a reasonable cost that is very common when the property backs 1944 02:18:42,719 --> 02:18:50,559 up to a creek or pond or whatever that has wetlands flood plane. 1945 02:18:46,160 --> 02:18:56,399 » And do you have those costs? Do you >> um I think the it was like around $2,000 1946 02:18:54,240 --> 02:19:01,439 two to $3,000 for the planting and maintenance and that's already just 1947 02:18:58,960 --> 02:19:06,160 planting month. Um that was the initial planting plan and then really the 1948 02:19:03,760 --> 02:19:08,880 maintenance is just pay attention that >> cut grass 1949 02:19:07,200 --> 02:19:11,359 » cut grass village is not comfortable >> it's not dead 1950 02:19:09,840 --> 02:19:13,040 » they thought that initially was way too much 1951 02:19:11,679 --> 02:19:16,639 » staff has not reviewed their maintenance and monitoring plan I don't believe 1952 02:19:14,719 --> 02:19:21,439 we've seen that or that's been submitted to the county so we we would probably 1953 02:19:19,200 --> 02:19:25,040 want to review that and see that I don't know if that's been prepared yet 1954 02:19:23,120 --> 02:19:28,319 » I thought you said that the was really expensive so you didn't 1955 02:19:26,160 --> 02:19:31,280 » the wetlands plans that we got together and I apologize I don't have them in 1956 02:19:29,840 --> 02:19:34,719 front of me and they're from quite a bit ago. They were substantially higher and 1957 02:19:33,359 --> 02:19:39,760 they were they were also wetlands mitigation and mowing costs. 1958 02:19:37,519 --> 02:19:43,599 » Yeah. I mean I would suggest we don't put you on the spot with that. 1959 02:19:41,519 --> 02:19:47,439 » I don't want to I can't remember this morning explor [laughter] 1960 02:19:46,399 --> 02:19:50,000 and they're out of date anyway. >> Explore the options. What are the 1961 02:19:48,720 --> 02:19:53,840 components? what are the components that would be covered under maintenance 1962 02:19:51,359 --> 02:19:59,600 monitoring plan for as you're committed but even though those are requirements 1963 02:19:56,880 --> 02:20:04,000 somebody needs to do them and that and I my point as I said earlier I'm not 1964 02:20:01,840 --> 02:20:09,280 necessarily worried about the funds it's the execution that you know HOAs are 1965 02:20:06,960 --> 02:20:14,880 typically people doing it as a side job or you can I know you can hire third 1966 02:20:10,960 --> 02:20:18,720 parties that manage as HOA but execution is usually the issue of doing the 1967 02:20:16,720 --> 02:20:22,640 maintenance and and what are we meaning to so I think my opinion would be is 1968 02:20:20,640 --> 02:20:26,800 that we just need to explore this option more at the base of it though I don't 1969 02:20:25,040 --> 02:20:31,359 want to miss an opportunity if there's an opportunity for this to be public 1970 02:20:28,720 --> 02:20:34,640 lands I think that needs to be explored too 1971 02:20:32,000 --> 02:20:40,560 » uh just to be clear um it's the county that will um monitor it to make sure 1972 02:20:38,160 --> 02:20:43,840 it's in compliance and if the homeowners don't take care of it they will go in 1973 02:20:42,160 --> 02:20:48,800 and lean in and do it themselves so it wouldn't be the village jurisdiction 1974 02:20:47,120 --> 02:20:52,479 » um so the county that >> I'm let me clarify. I understand that 1975 02:20:50,479 --> 02:20:57,920 part. Okay. The the codes, covenants, and restrictions tie in the the village 1976 02:20:55,280 --> 02:21:02,319 for the a for this. This is specifically talking about the village for the open 1977 02:20:59,439 --> 02:21:06,319 space. I agree there might be carveouts related to the storm water management. 1978 02:21:04,000 --> 02:21:09,680 But as written right now, codes or the the codes, conditions, and restrictions 1979 02:21:08,560 --> 02:21:12,080 are written to the village responsibility. 1980 02:21:10,800 --> 02:21:15,280 » So the the grass. >> Yeah. 1981 02:21:13,520 --> 02:21:18,720 » So I think I think it just needs more thought. That's 1982 02:21:17,680 --> 02:21:21,680 We're not going to solve it. >> I mean, that storm we had on feel like 1983 02:21:20,960 --> 02:21:27,120 it [clears throat] was it was a Saturday, August 6th or something. I 1984 02:21:23,840 --> 02:21:32,399 mean, it flooded across Adams at the low point. Um, it didn't get anywhere near 1985 02:21:29,920 --> 02:21:36,560 to the your flood plane high high water spots, but it it definitely went across 1986 02:21:34,399 --> 02:21:40,640 the street and blocked the street. So, it happens. And that's where all that 1987 02:21:38,080 --> 02:21:46,399 grass was underwater for, you know, at least half a day. So I I apologize but 1988 02:21:44,000 --> 02:21:53,439 to get this clear. So are you saying that you're going to look into that 1989 02:21:50,399 --> 02:21:55,439 Hensdale takes it over? Is that what I'm hearing? 1990 02:21:53,840 --> 02:22:00,399 » Well, we're that's one one thing we're if we did continue it I want them to 1991 02:21:57,760 --> 02:22:03,600 revisit that the option is the Hel of you guys 1992 02:22:02,479 --> 02:22:06,479 know for two years >> not from us. We're asking that be 1993 02:22:05,760 --> 02:22:10,000 explored. Right. >> Yeah. So, I don't know who's giving me a 1994 02:22:07,920 --> 02:22:13,680 note that who's suddenly saying that Kenzel wants nothing to do with it. They 1995 02:22:12,240 --> 02:22:18,800 can't afford it. >> And you know, I'm just saying it's new 1996 02:22:15,840 --> 02:22:22,560 here to me today to say, well, now we're going to look at it 1997 02:22:20,080 --> 02:22:26,560 » after two years because we were open to that 1998 02:22:23,439 --> 02:22:29,600 » very early on, but we we were said no. >> Oh, I remember when I I remember when 1999 02:22:27,920 --> 02:22:32,240 you presented at the community house and neighbors and everything. Yeah. It 2000 02:22:31,439 --> 02:22:35,040 wasn't >> I don't I don't remember I don't 2001 02:22:33,439 --> 02:22:37,760 remember it being private then. I think the idea was hopefully that would be 2002 02:22:36,720 --> 02:22:41,120 deed to the village >> who would be making that decision of 2003 02:22:39,439 --> 02:22:43,439 saying okay Hinsdale are going to take it completely over 2004 02:22:42,479 --> 02:22:46,640 » the village board. >> The village board. 2005 02:22:44,399 --> 02:22:49,280 » Okay. And like do they have to meet and discuss this? 2006 02:22:47,680 --> 02:22:51,439 » This would be referred to the village board. 2007 02:22:50,160 --> 02:22:53,359 » This is going to the village board no matter what. 2008 02:22:52,080 --> 02:22:58,160 » Right. I understand that. But would it be at that then it would move on from 2009 02:22:56,319 --> 02:23:02,880 here and that would be a stipulation to say this is an option that the village 2010 02:23:00,560 --> 02:23:06,560 board will discuss at that time >> h that they might just do that and 2011 02:23:05,200 --> 02:23:08,560 you're saying why can't we just do that now essentially like what are we waiting 2012 02:23:08,080 --> 02:23:12,000 on >> why would that be wait like 2013 02:23:10,399 --> 02:23:14,399 » hold this up for another three months >> I get it 2014 02:23:12,560 --> 02:23:18,160 » yeah no >> I get it 2015 02:23:15,600 --> 02:23:20,880 » we've done we've done plenty of that I mean ultimately they're the decision 2016 02:23:19,680 --> 02:23:25,840 makers are the ones that are alive >> because when the village they'll come 2017 02:23:22,319 --> 02:23:30,960 back can say no which I'm a not a I'm not a betting man [laughter] 2018 02:23:28,240 --> 02:23:32,720 um you know I wouldn't want to have lost three months 2019 02:23:32,319 --> 02:23:37,359 » true >> it is my understanding that the function 2020 02:23:34,479 --> 02:23:42,319 of this organization is to deliberate these sort of issues and then go to the 2021 02:23:39,760 --> 02:23:47,280 board with a recommendation with enough information to do that 2022 02:23:44,800 --> 02:23:51,520 it's my view that based on the conversation in the two-year process 2023 02:23:49,359 --> 02:23:56,880 that Bethany you mentioned elected official appointed officials, village 2024 02:23:53,680 --> 02:24:03,439 staff and the applicant um have gone through that we have enough information 2025 02:23:59,760 --> 02:24:09,359 that the uh that the that assembled group and the applicant have both come 2026 02:24:05,280 --> 02:24:14,960 to the conclusion that the current plan of keeping this a private park with 2027 02:24:12,000 --> 02:24:21,760 public access maintained by the very well-healed homeowners association is 2028 02:24:18,080 --> 02:24:26,479 the optimal plan. We can disagree, but from what I've heard, it sounds like 2029 02:24:24,319 --> 02:24:33,600 this has been turned over, thought about, and um and it's real different 2030 02:24:29,920 --> 02:24:38,560 than Grom Mill, which is less well healed, I'll say. And I I don't know 2031 02:24:35,280 --> 02:24:43,840 their average income or anything. Um but that this is not a bad plan. So if we 2032 02:24:42,399 --> 02:24:47,439 actually disagree with that and we think it's a bad plan and we think that the 2033 02:24:45,760 --> 02:24:52,080 there's no way that this is going to work which I do not think since that's 2034 02:24:49,040 --> 02:24:56,880 the case then we should continue this. If this is not a bad plan and there are 2035 02:24:55,200 --> 02:24:59,359 risks, there are always risks. We went through what's the place on the corner 2036 02:24:58,399 --> 02:25:02,399 of 55th and >> in zone metals. 2037 02:25:00,399 --> 02:25:08,240 » Yeah, different issues, but we ended up having to trust the developer who stood 2038 02:25:04,800 --> 02:25:14,240 in front of us similarly and said, I am a developer who really likes to do good 2039 02:25:10,399 --> 02:25:18,319 work. That worked out pretty well. Um I think we're in a similar situation here 2040 02:25:16,479 --> 02:25:26,880 and maybe it'll go bad in three or four years or 10 years or 30 years. Um, but I 2041 02:25:22,399 --> 02:25:31,280 I I I I'm inclined to believe that you guys have thought this through and that 2042 02:25:29,200 --> 02:25:35,439 this is going to be well maintained by yourselves as you develop it and then 2043 02:25:33,359 --> 02:25:40,720 the homeowners association eventually. >> I'll be like either way I'm involved in 2044 02:25:38,800 --> 02:25:45,040 this project for the next three years. So the book stops with me and any of you 2045 02:25:43,120 --> 02:25:48,880 after tonight can research John Pembrook Island Construction. You can talk to 2046 02:25:46,479 --> 02:25:54,080 Elmer. That's where I have 500 customuilt homes in the last 30 years. 2047 02:25:51,920 --> 02:25:58,880 And I'm not blowing up myself, but it speaks for itself. What I don't uh 2048 02:25:56,800 --> 02:26:03,040 misrepresent myself because my word is my bond. And I I tell that to everybody 2049 02:26:01,280 --> 02:26:06,479 I build a house with. You can get all the attorneys in the world. You can get 2050 02:26:04,560 --> 02:26:10,479 all the inspectors. Who's left at the end of the day? The homeowner and the 2051 02:26:08,240 --> 02:26:14,720 builder. And if the builder shows up and takes care of business, there is no 2052 02:26:12,479 --> 02:26:21,760 problems. But I can stand on my track record. I have a long track record on 2053 02:26:17,520 --> 02:26:26,479 building and developing. So, it's like I appreciate your comments, but it's two 2054 02:26:23,439 --> 02:26:29,520 years that we've discussed all this. Maybe you're not privy to everything 2055 02:26:28,160 --> 02:26:35,439 that we've discussed, but we've discussed way before that. Honestly, 2056 02:26:32,800 --> 02:26:39,200 when I started here, I thought Hinsdale, why wouldn't they want this? Why 2057 02:26:37,680 --> 02:26:43,760 wouldn't they want to take this? This is a one a golden opportunity. 2058 02:26:41,520 --> 02:26:49,200 » I was told no, it would never happen. and it would never pass. It should then 2059 02:26:46,160 --> 02:26:53,280 we went to to the public private option. I think that's a great idea too. I think 2060 02:26:51,280 --> 02:26:58,399 because these houses the people that are going to buy these houses, 2061 02:26:55,840 --> 02:27:02,479 you know, I'm a simple builder. Okay. So, but the people I've been I've been 2062 02:27:00,720 --> 02:27:07,520 dealing with for the last 30 years. People say to me, 10 years ago, people 2063 02:27:04,960 --> 02:27:12,800 couldn't put 20% down to buy these houses. People are coming with $2 2064 02:27:09,520 --> 02:27:16,479 million down and then get a mortgage. Where they got the money, I don't know. 2065 02:27:14,560 --> 02:27:21,920 But the money is there. And I'm telling you that that's the people I deal with 2066 02:27:19,040 --> 02:27:27,920 all day long. And that's the caliber of people that will be building in these 2067 02:27:23,680 --> 02:27:33,120 houses. So I know I know you have you're hesitant on that, but I totally disagree 2068 02:27:30,640 --> 02:27:37,200 with you, but that's just because the caliber of people that are buying these 2069 02:27:34,800 --> 02:27:41,920 houses. And if I drive around Hinsdale or drive in all Elmhorse or Sharon Hills 2070 02:27:39,359 --> 02:27:47,840 or Western Springs, all the houses are maintained, you know, two $3 million 2071 02:27:45,680 --> 02:27:50,960 houses, we can all drive around them. They're all being maintained. They're 2072 02:27:49,200 --> 02:27:54,640 all being kept up because it's their biggest investment they'll ever make 2073 02:27:52,560 --> 02:27:56,399 probably in their life. >> Okay. 2074 02:27:55,120 --> 02:28:00,319 » Which is true. I mean, I would think if these 19 people, this is now going to be 2075 02:27:58,240 --> 02:28:04,479 like their water waterway. >> Yeah. I would bet that as soon as they 2076 02:28:02,960 --> 02:28:07,439 would build houses, these first seven, they're going to look across and see 2077 02:28:05,600 --> 02:28:11,120 that chain link fence that's overgrown at Salt Creek Club 2078 02:28:09,040 --> 02:28:14,319 » and want that thing, you know, they contact 2079 02:28:12,960 --> 02:28:17,200 and say, "Get that thing out of there because it's an eyesore." 2080 02:28:15,520 --> 02:28:21,439 » I don't know if they know what they would be signing up for either, right, 2081 02:28:19,359 --> 02:28:25,600 from the initial like we don't know how much. I mean, $10,000, who knows? I 2082 02:28:24,479 --> 02:28:27,600 mean, we don't know what they're it's going to be. 2083 02:28:26,000 --> 02:28:31,680 » Well, I guess there's two options. one I guess kind of want to get a feel for the 2084 02:28:29,280 --> 02:28:35,600 the commissioners here is one option is we we vote on what we have in front of 2085 02:28:34,160 --> 02:28:40,880 us and if we want to make recommendations to the board and we can 2086 02:28:38,000 --> 02:28:44,080 do that or secondly if we were going to continue it I would want to continue 2087 02:28:42,479 --> 02:28:48,319 just for a month >> and and that's as much time as the board 2088 02:28:46,080 --> 02:28:51,760 can have to really you know do a pause and say think about this again about 2089 02:28:50,160 --> 02:28:55,359 purchasing or get you know getting the land and then also looking at the 2090 02:28:53,840 --> 02:28:57,520 maintenance plan and agreement and getting put some more meat on the bone 2091 02:28:56,720 --> 02:29:02,479 Right. >> And and but not beyond a month because 2092 02:29:00,240 --> 02:29:05,680 that's not fair to John and and his group. 2093 02:29:04,080 --> 02:29:09,439 » I don't know if we re if we vote it through and recommend our recommend say 2094 02:29:07,680 --> 02:29:12,800 our recommendations. Won't that same thing happen even if we don't extend it 2095 02:29:11,200 --> 02:29:17,359 a month? >> Like they have the time to review it 2096 02:29:15,840 --> 02:29:20,160 whether we extend it a month or not. >> The board. 2097 02:29:17,920 --> 02:29:23,359 » Yeah. The board. >> So there'll be two reasons. 2098 02:29:21,359 --> 02:29:26,720 » I just don't know why we're we >> because there'll be two it'll be two two 2099 02:29:24,880 --> 02:29:31,760 meetings for the board, right? Ult ultimately because this this public 2100 02:29:28,640 --> 02:29:35,520 versus private land um for the park would be the village board decision. Um 2101 02:29:34,000 --> 02:29:38,880 there could be a recommendation from the plan commission to still look at the 2102 02:29:37,439 --> 02:29:42,000 maintenance and monitoring plan if it stays private and what those costs would 2103 02:29:40,479 --> 02:29:45,680 be to the homeowners and putting together an established plan, maybe 2104 02:29:44,160 --> 02:29:49,600 building some of that into the HOA covenants. So, in the case that there 2105 02:29:47,600 --> 02:29:53,760 truly is a a maintenance and monitoring plan, which a lot of communities do 2106 02:29:51,680 --> 02:29:57,280 require, we just don't have as um in-depth of a of a landscape code 2107 02:29:56,399 --> 02:30:00,560 because we don't have a bunch of detention ponds historically in 2108 02:29:58,720 --> 02:30:04,399 Hinsdale. We're pretty built out. It's not large developments with detention 2109 02:30:02,399 --> 02:30:08,000 pond lots, but there's tons of companies that can put a detailed maintenance and 2110 02:30:06,000 --> 02:30:11,680 monitoring plan as the private side so that we can understand what those costs 2111 02:30:09,760 --> 02:30:14,800 might be to individual homeowners. And then we can go back and try to figure 2112 02:30:13,200 --> 02:30:19,040 out what those village costs would be as well if it became a publicly dedicated 2113 02:30:16,640 --> 02:30:22,960 park and present those to the village board. 2114 02:30:20,560 --> 02:30:28,520 » How many applications have we had like this where we've made a decision in one 2115 02:30:25,520 --> 02:30:28,520 meeting? 2116 02:30:29,600 --> 02:30:31,359 » I mean >> we've never had an application like 2117 02:30:31,120 --> 02:30:34,960 that. >> Well, like this. But for for 2118 02:30:33,200 --> 02:30:39,439 » I mean like you take the oaks that was one meeting. We subdivided that was a 2119 02:30:38,479 --> 02:30:42,720 » meadows >> in Meadows. Wait a minute. Total that's 2120 02:30:41,200 --> 02:30:47,520 a totally different >> totally different but I guess size and 2121 02:30:44,800 --> 02:30:49,359 scope I mean and questions and trying to think 2122 02:30:47,840 --> 02:30:52,960 » I guess so I guess the question is I mean where did the commissioners feel 2123 02:30:50,880 --> 02:30:55,920 about continuing versus voting? >> That's why I would like to continue. 2124 02:30:54,240 --> 02:31:01,200 » I have to say my concern is I think our job is to try and fine-tune this as best 2125 02:30:58,479 --> 02:31:04,960 we can have our best recommendation and then present it to them. I feel like if 2126 02:31:03,280 --> 02:31:10,479 we do this too soon it's we're just handing it over to say this. So whether 2127 02:31:08,560 --> 02:31:16,000 is and I don't want to delay you too long. Time is money and weather 2128 02:31:13,120 --> 02:31:17,760 permitting. Um I just think we need more time to digest this. 2129 02:31:17,280 --> 02:31:20,880 » Yes, >> we have too many questions about things. 2130 02:31:19,600 --> 02:31:27,040 Um even something as simple >> as one quick question. 2131 02:31:23,680 --> 02:31:30,960 » If if we revisit the you sell it to us, you deed it to us, whatever the village 2132 02:31:29,120 --> 02:31:36,240 takes it >> um or you gift it, whatever happens. Are 2133 02:31:34,080 --> 02:31:39,120 you guys still amendable to that if if we 2134 02:31:36,720 --> 02:31:41,439 » Oh, we are. Yes, we are. Yeah. But it's the board that's making the decision, 2135 02:31:41,040 --> 02:31:43,600 right? >> You own the land. 2136 02:31:42,319 --> 02:31:47,840 » Well, yes, that's correct. Yeah. >> And if if we're not asking that question 2137 02:31:45,600 --> 02:31:50,880 and the answer is now, no, we're not going to do that. 2138 02:31:48,880 --> 02:31:56,000 » That's an answer we need to know right now. If you are willing to do it, then I 2139 02:31:53,760 --> 02:31:59,359 think we need to do the work. >> Yeah. 2140 02:31:56,640 --> 02:32:02,960 » And and find out what your options are. >> Find out what you're willing to put into 2141 02:32:00,960 --> 02:32:07,520 the maintenance plan. Bake that in, understand it, right? Get all that kind 2142 02:32:05,120 --> 02:32:11,200 of documented, and then let you see that plan. and then have the village go what 2143 02:32:09,359 --> 02:32:15,120 do we want to do and let the board make up their mind but give them give them 2144 02:32:13,439 --> 02:32:17,120 the numbers and the options so that we know where we're going 2145 02:32:15,920 --> 02:32:19,439 » so continue yes >> I continue 2146 02:32:18,000 --> 02:32:23,920 » nana >> but a month I continue one month 2147 02:32:21,040 --> 02:32:27,439 » yeah no just a month >> I want to vote because I think they can 2148 02:32:25,520 --> 02:32:33,280 provide the this information what we are requesting directly to the village the 2149 02:32:30,080 --> 02:32:38,720 board without us having to meet again >> continue like you started so I think I 2150 02:32:37,520 --> 02:32:43,609 Um continue >> your vote. 2151 02:32:40,080 --> 02:32:43,609 » I abstain. [laughter] 2152 02:32:43,760 --> 02:32:49,280 » I think we have all >> continuing interest in everybody. 2153 02:32:48,640 --> 02:32:52,319 » It's >> It feels like we're continuing to 2154 02:32:51,200 --> 02:32:57,520 continue >> near impossible to get everything in a 2155 02:32:54,240 --> 02:33:01,439 month, but at least it's a good start. >> But further down the road, 2156 02:32:59,520 --> 02:33:05,439 » I'm still confused and the and I appreciate the month because it hurts. 2157 02:33:03,840 --> 02:33:10,720 You know, there's a lot of, you know, but I'm just saying is who's making the 2158 02:33:07,520 --> 02:33:15,920 decision on because >> I wanted Hinsdale. I wanted to give this 2159 02:33:13,280 --> 02:33:19,600 to Hinsdale two years ago. >> So, who's making the decision now in a 2160 02:33:18,080 --> 02:33:23,359 month to saying we're going to take this? It I I find it not going to 2161 02:33:22,800 --> 02:33:29,040 happen. >> Well, I mean, isn't the the 2162 02:33:26,560 --> 02:33:33,120 situation where the continuence is on part for the village to evaluate what 2163 02:33:31,040 --> 02:33:36,319 their options are in more detail, right? I mean, so it's not necessarily putting 2164 02:33:34,640 --> 02:33:37,760 it back on you, John. Right. But I think our 2165 02:33:36,720 --> 02:33:41,520 » I think it will help the whole process because the board will have to get 2166 02:33:39,200 --> 02:33:43,200 involved and think about this with staff in the next month. 2167 02:33:42,880 --> 02:33:48,080 » Yeah. >> You know, and I mean, we we've 2168 02:33:45,040 --> 02:33:51,359 recommended things that were referred to us, re-recommended back to the board and 2169 02:33:49,840 --> 02:33:54,160 then they voted no, >> you know, because they never wanted to 2170 02:33:52,399 --> 02:33:56,399 refer to us in the first place. So ultimately the board can do what they 2171 02:33:55,200 --> 02:34:01,200 want but I think >> given a month hopefully if we then took 2172 02:33:59,040 --> 02:34:04,960 that time John that then the board will actually be more educated about all the 2173 02:34:03,040 --> 02:34:08,800 issues on this so that when it gets from us to the board it'll be a better 2174 02:34:07,520 --> 02:34:11,680 process for them. >> Didn't you say they could you couldn't 2175 02:34:10,000 --> 02:34:14,319 get that information in a month together? 2176 02:34:12,399 --> 02:34:17,680 » I I can't make promises but they would also need to have a m I'd want the 2177 02:34:16,319 --> 02:34:21,439 applicant to also look at the maintenance monitoring plans just so 2178 02:34:19,200 --> 02:34:27,600 both can be presented accurately. And since I'm, you know, we're open to it, 2179 02:34:23,760 --> 02:34:34,319 but I go back to this fine woman here's uh statement is to say, well, if we're 2180 02:34:31,359 --> 02:34:39,120 recommending it, right, why can't we like the board is going to look at this 2181 02:34:36,560 --> 02:34:43,600 in a whatever in a month, right? But if we sent it to the board with a 2182 02:34:41,120 --> 02:34:48,640 recommendation to say the owner is open to give this to 2183 02:34:47,200 --> 02:34:54,319 Hensdale, >> it's up to you now to say yes or no and 2184 02:34:51,840 --> 02:34:58,560 they're going to say no. >> I'm firmly believe they're going to say 2185 02:34:56,240 --> 02:35:01,840 no. Well, we're not held up for a month just because of that. Now, if there's 2186 02:34:59,760 --> 02:35:06,399 other instances that you can't on this is R2, 2187 02:35:02,880 --> 02:35:11,280 » right? and you're saying no, you know, I we can't do it for other reasons. I'd 2188 02:35:08,560 --> 02:35:14,240 like to hear that. It just can't be just uh 2189 02:35:12,000 --> 02:35:17,120 » it just can't be the public private park though. I think any 2190 02:35:15,439 --> 02:35:21,200 » Well, just to clarify, you keep saying it's R2. Part of the site is R2. We're 2191 02:35:19,359 --> 02:35:25,800 being asked to review the open space. So, I don't I know that 2192 02:35:22,640 --> 02:35:25,800 » Sorry, apolog. 2193 02:35:27,600 --> 02:35:35,280 challenge could be is if I look at this application in its entirety, either we 2194 02:35:32,399 --> 02:35:35,920 heavily condition it or vote no. >> Right. 2195 02:35:35,600 --> 02:35:37,920 » Right. >> Yes. 2196 02:35:36,160 --> 02:35:43,680 » And I think our first vote would be for the map amendment, which we can't do 2197 02:35:40,800 --> 02:35:47,920 » until, you know, it's decided it's going to be public or private. 2198 02:35:45,280 --> 02:35:51,200 » Okay. No, I just clearing. Yeah. 2199 02:35:49,200 --> 02:35:56,240 My hope would be if we did continue it that in a month's time we things we have 2200 02:35:55,040 --> 02:35:58,640 much more clarity. >> Yeah. 2201 02:35:56,560 --> 02:36:02,160 » And we'd know like say the board goes no absolutely not we want this to be 2202 02:36:00,319 --> 02:36:07,359 private then we know that and then then the focus is on the maintenance plan and 2203 02:36:05,200 --> 02:36:09,359 and that language and then we recommend to the board and then it's the board's 2204 02:36:08,960 --> 02:36:13,040 job to >> and the first thing I do when I come 2205 02:36:10,960 --> 02:36:17,143 back is I'm going to apologize to each one of you when the board said yes. 2206 02:36:15,123 --> 02:36:17,143 [laughter] 2207 02:36:18,160 --> 02:36:23,439 We hope they do. >> John, are you one of the builders? Will 2208 02:36:22,319 --> 02:36:24,960 you be building homes? >> Yes, 2209 02:36:24,000 --> 02:36:28,720 » you will. >> I might build them all, but it's just 2210 02:36:26,880 --> 02:36:30,560 that's not in the game plan right now. You 2211 02:36:29,040 --> 02:36:33,120 » know how many you might be building? >> I might build four or five or six, you 2212 02:36:32,880 --> 02:36:35,359 know. >> Okay. 2213 02:36:33,520 --> 02:36:39,359 » You know, yeah, they're going to be big houses. They're going to each one of 2214 02:36:36,800 --> 02:36:44,399 these houses are is more than a year build because these are going to be very 2215 02:36:41,760 --> 02:36:47,920 expensive homes. So, you have some ideas of the houses you're going to be 2216 02:36:45,920 --> 02:36:51,359 building your building. So, might we be privy to that? 2217 02:36:48,800 --> 02:36:56,880 » Oh, yes. I can show you many. I can show you 300 of them. If you want, you know, 2218 02:36:54,000 --> 02:37:00,720 I can bring or send Becky information on on curb appeal houses that I know that's 2219 02:36:59,600 --> 02:37:02,399 going to go that way. >> Okay. 2220 02:37:01,200 --> 02:37:06,479 » Yeah. Just >> and I'm amazing stone guys by trade. So, 2221 02:37:04,800 --> 02:37:09,200 » I know that's where I love I was reading that. Three generations. 2222 02:37:08,080 --> 02:37:13,520 » I knew there was a mason. >> Three generations. Yeah. So, yeah. But I 2223 02:37:11,680 --> 02:37:18,160 can furnish that to Bethany. She can send it on TE of the caliber of houses 2224 02:37:16,399 --> 02:37:21,520 that I know that are going to go there. >> Okay. The owners will be buying the 2225 02:37:19,920 --> 02:37:23,760 property though and then Yes. And then the contract. 2226 02:37:22,240 --> 02:37:25,760 » So you're not building anything on spec there? 2227 02:37:24,160 --> 02:37:28,560 » No, they're too expensive. >> Yeah. [laughter] 2228 02:37:27,120 --> 02:37:33,359 Big speculation. >> Yes. I I I don't like it. 2229 02:37:31,040 --> 02:37:35,280 » I like to go Las Vegas, but not that heavy. 2230 02:37:33,920 --> 02:37:41,040 » That's a rolling a big dice. >> That's right. 2231 02:37:37,600 --> 02:37:47,520 So, commissioners, do I have um a motion to continue this 2232 02:37:44,720 --> 02:37:51,120 to our our October? What's the date? October 2233 02:37:49,920 --> 02:37:55,600 meeting. >> Let me give you the date specific. Um 2234 02:37:53,760 --> 02:38:00,000 and I I would be helpful to have a specific motion of to provide additional 2235 02:37:57,520 --> 02:38:01,120 time for that >> next. 2236 02:38:00,479 --> 02:38:04,640 » Okay. [laughter] Let me give you the date. And same I 2237 02:38:03,280 --> 02:38:08,240 know there was a lot of discussion here about asphalt paths versus gravel paths 2238 02:38:07,439 --> 02:38:12,399 um >> and and some and possibly looking at a 2239 02:38:10,880 --> 02:38:17,359 different side. Yeah. So it would be good for a recap of of giving the 2240 02:38:14,319 --> 02:38:23,120 specific direction. Our next Octo October date to continue the public 2241 02:38:19,200 --> 02:38:29,200 hearing would be to October 14th at 6:30 p.m. 2242 02:38:24,479 --> 02:38:35,439 » October 14th. Okay. So, and and with that, this potential motion would be to 2243 02:38:33,359 --> 02:38:42,399 request that the village staff and the board reconsider 2244 02:38:38,160 --> 02:38:45,600 um ownership of this open space versus being privately owned and publicly 2245 02:38:44,080 --> 02:38:52,080 access that um we see more detail in the 2246 02:38:50,080 --> 02:38:58,880 maintenance plan and agreement that would be part of the covenants. Um, so 2247 02:38:55,200 --> 02:39:05,040 some more work on that. Um, some clarity on the fact that it would follow village 2248 02:39:01,600 --> 02:39:09,680 of Enzel park hours. There's another one. Um I personally, 2249 02:39:08,160 --> 02:39:12,640 and I don't know if you guys would agree with it, the idea of looking at the 2250 02:39:11,120 --> 02:39:18,040 sidewalks again >> and 2251 02:39:13,920 --> 02:39:18,040 » um mostly for lots 2252 02:39:18,160 --> 02:39:24,080 lots >> 9 through 2253 02:39:20,080 --> 02:39:29,600 » um 12 12 through 19. No, 13 through 19. The seven 2254 02:39:26,399 --> 02:39:34,720 lots in the northwest. um possibly not having the sidewalk along the roadway, 2255 02:39:32,479 --> 02:39:38,160 but possibly along the um at the back following the flood plane or the 2256 02:39:36,399 --> 02:39:47,080 waterway. Um providing an asphalt path between 2257 02:39:42,240 --> 02:39:47,080 Madison and Adams versus gravel. 2258 02:39:47,200 --> 02:39:55,200 Um someone had I thought a good comment and I would agree with um right now like 2259 02:39:51,600 --> 02:40:00,640 the Butler Cemetery and the roadway and everything. I mean, there's no fences. 2260 02:39:56,800 --> 02:40:04,399 You can walk into the cemetery. Is I don't know. I can't remember if there's 2261 02:40:01,840 --> 02:40:06,319 anything in agreement about fences in the covenants. 2262 02:40:05,359 --> 02:40:10,720 » Not yet. >> But I think it would probably be nice to 2263 02:40:08,319 --> 02:40:15,120 have something related to that path that there wouldn't be fencesh 2264 02:40:13,280 --> 02:40:19,120 » a prohibition of fences either on the north side of that path or on the south 2265 02:40:16,880 --> 02:40:22,880 side of it so it could be stay open to those properties. 2266 02:40:21,359 --> 02:40:26,880 » I don't know if the rest of you would agree with that or not. 2267 02:40:24,720 --> 02:40:29,920 I think there should be something there. Is that what you're suggesting? 2268 02:40:28,319 --> 02:40:31,840 » No, no offense. So you don't create a tunnel. So you don't create I agree with 2269 02:40:31,600 --> 02:40:34,560 you. >> That is open like a current. 2270 02:40:32,960 --> 02:40:38,000 » I agree. And the sidewalks, just a question. These are we saying now that 2271 02:40:36,240 --> 02:40:43,040 all of these walkways are going to be in an ash vault rather than concrete. 2272 02:40:40,640 --> 02:40:45,680 » Uh there's focusing specifically on the gravel walk that was proposed that that 2273 02:40:44,640 --> 02:40:49,200 would be asked for. >> What about the rest of them? 2274 02:40:46,960 --> 02:40:52,080 » Well, I guess in my mind if you elim if you and this would be up to you, John. 2275 02:40:50,800 --> 02:40:54,640 » Well, if it was in the back, it's definitely should be as not concrete. 2276 02:40:54,399 --> 02:40:56,640 » Yeah. >> Yeah. 2277 02:40:54,880 --> 02:41:00,880 » And then I think it would blend in more naturally with um 2278 02:40:58,399 --> 02:41:05,359 » this with the open space >> and then once you get down to 2279 02:41:03,600 --> 02:41:09,760 um let's see preserve place. I mean I think 2280 02:41:07,840 --> 02:41:13,840 that would just follow village standards be concrete walks you know basically 2281 02:41:11,439 --> 02:41:18,720 from the head wall down to around the culde-sac to keep that concrete or would 2282 02:41:16,720 --> 02:41:21,439 you want that to be asphalt as >> asphalt so it's all the same? 2283 02:41:20,080 --> 02:41:24,160 » I think it blends in better with the environment there. Is there any issue 2284 02:41:22,800 --> 02:41:27,040 with the village on that? >> Are you proposing asphalt to long 2285 02:41:26,080 --> 02:41:28,640 preserve place? >> Yes. 2286 02:41:27,920 --> 02:41:32,240 » For the walks, >> I would have to check our subdivision 2287 02:41:30,080 --> 02:41:35,680 code um to see if there's a specific. >> We have a month to investigate. 2288 02:41:33,840 --> 02:41:37,920 » We do. [laughter] >> Sorry, Bethany. I know you have nothing 2289 02:41:37,200 --> 02:41:40,479 to do. >> Nothing. 2290 02:41:39,920 --> 02:41:44,800 Keep it >> for the phone to ring. 2291 02:41:41,760 --> 02:41:50,000 » Um were there any other >> I had one quick 2292 02:41:47,600 --> 02:41:55,439 » What did you They are going to do a ship overview. They have not started that 2293 02:41:52,880 --> 02:41:59,200 as part of the permit they need to pull for construction for NPD, the National 2294 02:41:57,359 --> 02:42:03,840 Pollutant Discharge Elimination System. They are required through the notice of 2295 02:42:00,880 --> 02:42:06,640 intent to do the Illinois Historic Preservation and the Endangered 2296 02:42:05,680 --> 02:42:09,439 Threatened. >> It's part of the process. 2297 02:42:07,520 --> 02:42:13,439 » It's part of the process. They have to have that to submit their construction. 2298 02:42:11,280 --> 02:42:15,920 » And we had we're doing a project golf club and we had to do that. 2299 02:42:14,640 --> 02:42:21,040 » Yeah. Part of the process. >> Good. So it sounds like you guys have a 2300 02:42:18,319 --> 02:42:25,680 lot to do work to do more than like over the next few months like the water thing 2301 02:42:24,399 --> 02:42:28,160 too. >> Anything else? 2302 02:42:26,240 --> 02:42:32,800 » Any other approvals >> part of the motion? 2303 02:42:29,680 --> 02:42:37,439 » No, I think how's that feel? >> Great. I wanted to recommend the um 2304 02:42:34,880 --> 02:42:40,640 landscaping arbor or whatnot along the burm against 2305 02:42:39,120 --> 02:42:41,680 » Oh, landscaping along Ogden. >> Yeah. 2306 02:42:41,439 --> 02:42:44,160 » Yeah, >> that's a good one. 2307 02:42:42,560 --> 02:42:50,880 » Yeah. I also think that um in thinking about 2308 02:42:48,399 --> 02:42:56,399 the maintenance requirements for the wetland 2309 02:42:52,479 --> 02:43:03,439 um you know for this whole area I think we there needs to be a little clarity 2310 02:42:59,040 --> 02:43:07,439 about um trees tree damage when trees come down 2311 02:43:05,280 --> 02:43:11,439 do they just get left there or they you know thinking 2312 02:43:09,760 --> 02:43:16,240 about some of the big storms that we've had that have come through and there 2313 02:43:13,280 --> 02:43:23,680 There are old trees on that property and so stuff comes down and 2314 02:43:20,000 --> 02:43:29,040 that'll change how the park looks relative to now if those trees start to 2315 02:43:25,840 --> 02:43:35,040 come down and they just get left to rot. Um I'm not commenting on what that 2316 02:43:32,640 --> 02:43:41,200 direction should be. I'm just saying people who think it it's lovely now with 2317 02:43:37,920 --> 02:43:45,840 the trees up, if they all start to it, like if it starts to convert into 2318 02:43:43,600 --> 02:43:50,160 looking more like Fullerburg, that should be an intentional decision on 2319 02:43:47,359 --> 02:43:53,359 people's part and not just, oh, we didn't really plan for that and now 2320 02:43:52,000 --> 02:43:56,560 these things are down and there's no budget to get rid of them. 2321 02:43:55,840 --> 02:44:01,600 » So, >> well, that's one thing that this was in 2322 02:43:58,240 --> 02:44:05,520 Bethy's package on page two. Under any motion we put together the following 2323 02:44:03,600 --> 02:44:09,520 conditions they wanted to include that all final engineering comments must be 2324 02:44:07,359 --> 02:44:13,520 addressed prior to building to building permit issuance. All final tree 2325 02:44:11,680 --> 02:44:16,080 protection and planting plans comments provided by the superintendent of 2326 02:44:14,640 --> 02:44:20,080 forestry and grounds must be addressed prior to building permit issuance. Final 2327 02:44:18,319 --> 02:44:23,439 pen selections and locations for street trees must review and approved by 2328 02:44:21,680 --> 02:44:27,040 superintendent forestry and grounds. Then all requirements listed in title 11 2329 02:44:25,600 --> 02:44:30,560 the village code shall be which is subdivision code I believe shall be met 2330 02:44:29,279 --> 02:44:35,200 prior to recording the plan of subdivision. So I think I mean and on to 2331 02:44:32,640 --> 02:44:38,240 Mark's point the trees are one thing but the county is going to determine what 2332 02:44:36,640 --> 02:44:42,240 happens along the waterway. I mean they're very specific about what can be 2333 02:44:40,399 --> 02:44:45,279 planted or what maintained there. >> Yes. 2334 02:44:43,439 --> 02:44:46,560 » They're triggering buffer requirements right? 2335 02:44:45,600 --> 02:44:50,319 » Yeah. Yeah. >> I mean down to the species of what what 2336 02:44:48,560 --> 02:44:54,319 the plants have to be. So, >> so I think it'd be between the villages 2337 02:44:52,800 --> 02:44:58,240 um superintendent forestry and then the 2338 02:44:56,160 --> 02:45:00,560 county on what they need for the wetlands 2339 02:44:59,279 --> 02:45:03,040 » that that should be addressed. >> Okay. 2340 02:45:01,120 --> 02:45:07,600 » And those those village arborist comments are related only to the public 2341 02:45:05,200 --> 02:45:11,080 street trees, not to the interior street trees. 2342 02:45:08,080 --> 02:45:11,080 » Oh, 2343 02:45:11,120 --> 02:45:18,640 I think the interior trees that would be more of a landscape plan. 2344 02:45:15,840 --> 02:45:23,120 And I don't know that any of these are actually that. So, 2345 02:45:20,160 --> 02:45:25,920 » no, we have there was a tree survey >> and uh 2346 02:45:24,800 --> 02:45:27,600 » survey was already here. >> No, you're right. 2347 02:45:26,560 --> 02:45:32,000 » Yeah, >> the tree identification preservation 2348 02:45:29,600 --> 02:45:34,399 plan is already in here. >> So, this was 2349 02:45:33,279 --> 02:45:37,520 » it's >> this would have to be, you know, 2350 02:45:35,600 --> 02:45:40,960 basically comply. >> Yeah, this this would not require an 2351 02:45:39,200 --> 02:45:44,800 overall landscape plan besides the street trees. Of course, we can get them 2352 02:45:42,960 --> 02:45:47,760 to look at if they're not putting street trees on Ogden, we can look at working 2353 02:45:46,399 --> 02:45:52,240 with them and putting those on private property. But similar like what we did 2354 02:45:49,680 --> 02:45:55,680 with the Oak subdivision, um you know that we review the street trees, the the 2355 02:45:54,080 --> 02:45:59,520 subdivision code, but the individual lots would be developed separately with 2356 02:45:58,080 --> 02:46:03,920 under separate permit. And then obviously um anything that's required by 2357 02:46:01,760 --> 02:46:09,720 DuPage County for the waterways would be submitted to them as well and the 2358 02:46:06,240 --> 02:46:09,720 detention ponds. 2359 02:46:10,240 --> 02:46:19,040 » Okay. Does that sound like a motion? >> I I think so. Can I [laughter] give a 2360 02:46:15,040 --> 02:46:22,800 can I give one more summary? Um uh so we will look at some um additional 2361 02:46:20,880 --> 02:46:27,439 information to help the village board reconsider the ownership of the private 2362 02:46:24,880 --> 02:46:31,200 versus public parkland. Um we will work with the applicant to look at details on 2363 02:46:29,120 --> 02:46:36,240 a possible maintenance and monitoring plan. Um if it does stay into private 2364 02:46:33,920 --> 02:46:41,760 ownership by an HOA to be maintained and owned. Um, we'll provide some clarity on 2365 02:46:39,359 --> 02:46:45,600 the village of Hinsdale park hours and see if if there's um potential reasoning 2366 02:46:43,920 --> 02:46:49,920 for changing what was included in their HOA covenants. We'll um have the 2367 02:46:48,240 --> 02:46:55,120 applicant look at sideways, especially behind lots 13 to 19 and possibly 2368 02:46:52,560 --> 02:47:00,319 reorienting that sidewalk at the rear. Um reooking at possibly changing any of 2369 02:46:58,000 --> 02:47:05,200 the gravel or concrete paths and sidewalks into an asphalt path. and 2370 02:47:02,560 --> 02:47:08,160 village staff will check to see um if there's any issues with putting an 2371 02:47:06,399 --> 02:47:12,720 asphalt path along preserves place, which is going to be a publicly 2372 02:47:09,279 --> 02:47:16,960 dedicated road. Um looking at some HOA covenants that would possibly restrict 2373 02:47:14,319 --> 02:47:22,960 fences being um constructed along the north property line, especially along 2374 02:47:18,720 --> 02:47:27,680 that Butler Cemetery area. Um the IDNR or SHIPO or any sort of natural resource 2375 02:47:25,279 --> 02:47:32,080 or history reviews will be done with the final permitting as part of the DW Page 2376 02:47:29,520 --> 02:47:36,000 County storm water process. and um possibly looking at landscaping and 2377 02:47:33,600 --> 02:47:39,200 those street trees on Ogden in that BM. Does that sound like a good summary? 2378 02:47:38,319 --> 02:47:40,560 » Very good, >> Steve. 2379 02:47:39,920 --> 02:47:44,800 » Yes, sir. >> Uh the open the meeting is still open. 2380 02:47:43,120 --> 02:47:48,960 Do you want to do something like that before we do the motion or 2381 02:47:47,200 --> 02:47:51,200 » if we're going to continue it and keep the meeting open, right? 2382 02:47:49,920 --> 02:47:55,200 » Yes, we would continue the public hearing. That's why the motion basically 2383 02:47:53,279 --> 02:47:59,279 failed previously to close the public hearing with all that discussion. So, we 2384 02:47:57,520 --> 02:48:02,319 will transfer this to continue the public hearing 2385 02:48:00,800 --> 02:48:07,760 » and then hopefully we can bring all this information to the next meeting. 2386 02:48:05,120 --> 02:48:13,279 » So, do I have a motion to continue this to our October 14th meeting at 6:30 with 2387 02:48:10,880 --> 02:48:17,359 the conditions and the research that was mentioned by Bethany? 2388 02:48:14,880 --> 02:48:20,319 » So, moved. Will it be seconded? >> Roll call vote, please. Bethany. 2389 02:48:19,279 --> 02:48:21,760 » Commissioner Harlo. >> Hi. 2390 02:48:20,720 --> 02:48:24,399 » Commissioner Curry. >> I. Commissioner Krillinberger. 2391 02:48:23,600 --> 02:48:25,920 » I. >> Commissioner Cernovich. 2392 02:48:25,520 --> 02:48:28,080 » Hi. >> Commissioner Willoughby. Hi, 2393 02:48:27,040 --> 02:48:29,120 » Commissioner Fonei. >> Hi, 2394 02:48:28,399 --> 02:48:31,520 » Commissioner Moore. >> Hi, 2395 02:48:29,520 --> 02:48:34,319 » Chairman Cashman. Hi, >> thank you very much. Appreciate your 2396 02:48:32,960 --> 02:48:38,560 patience and time. >> Thank you. 2397 02:48:36,880 --> 02:48:43,560 » Here, do I have a motion to adjurnn? >> Krillinburgger. So, motion. 2398 02:48:39,920 --> 02:48:43,560 » All in favor? All right.