1 00:00:14,840 --> 00:00:22,460 And let's move on to approval of meeting minutes as everyone on the board had a chance to 2 00:00:22,460 --> 00:00:23,427 take a quick look at the meeting minutes. Yes. 3 00:00:23,427 --> 00:00:28,827 any questions? >> okay. So on the emotion motion to 4 00:00:29,667 --> 00:00:33,871 approve a second. All those in favor say any opposed? 5 00:00:33,871 --> 00:00:39,271 all right. Motion passes. Moving on to street names. 6 00:00:41,411 --> 00:00:42,613 >> we have everything today. Yep. In the car. 7 00:00:42,613 --> 00:00:49,153 my postal district in 29526 in pencil point we have scudder drive branch street, sprague 8 00:00:49,153 --> 00:00:56,227 way and outer street in piper. So district two now about two seven and inglewood phases one 9 00:00:56,227 --> 00:01:04,601 and two we have burbridge drive garcia loop lish street mare drive and we're circle in 10 00:01:04,601 --> 00:01:11,976 aigner galvin's very postal district 29544 and 29511 in hutch track we have deer meadow 11 00:01:11,976 --> 00:01:19,783 way white deer ridge road, white ridge drive and wildflower ville caught in the 12 00:01:19,783 --> 00:01:29,383 law supposed to district 29569 and sell the towns we have tommy b loop okay no public 13 00:01:29,826 --> 00:01:34,310 input required can anyone make a motion to approve motion to approve a second second. 14 00:01:34,310 --> 00:01:38,831 >> all those in favor? >> any opposed? All right. 15 00:01:40,604 --> 00:01:44,709 motion carries moving on to rezonings first on the list development agreement. 16 00:01:44,709 --> 00:01:52,509 >> so this development agreement coincides with the rezoning request how I on a 17 00:01:52,850 --> 00:01:56,487 farm and I'll very I'm going to run through them together if you want to but we need to do 18 00:01:56,487 --> 00:02:00,291 public input on the development frame after I get through it. >> yeah. 19 00:02:00,291 --> 00:02:07,597 so the development agreement proposes a max unit count of 372 single family homes with 20 00:02:07,597 --> 00:02:11,602 a minimum lot size of 7000ft in a maximum building height of 40ft. 21 00:02:11,602 --> 00:02:18,141 the development agreement also commits to naturally force or program buffers varying and 22 00:02:18,141 --> 00:02:21,412 width from 100 foot to 200 foot. They are donating 1.21 acres 23 00:02:21,412 --> 00:02:25,882 of land for expansion of the existing fire station their proposed walking trails their 24 00:02:25,882 --> 00:02:32,491 plan to relocate existing unimproved roadway to maintain access to the adjacent property 25 00:02:32,491 --> 00:02:37,128 they're proposing no lots in the floodplain and they're proposing a list of offsite 26 00:02:37,128 --> 00:02:44,602 road improvements including a left and right turn lane on. None of have a left lane a left 27 00:02:44,602 --> 00:02:47,972 turn lane on this very road a right turn lane on highway not a52 over east ferry and a 28 00:02:47,972 --> 00:02:52,900 traffic signal at the intersection of highway none of have an already ferry there 29 00:02:52,900 --> 00:02:57,647 plan to reserve 25 foot a right of way for the widening of highway none of the 30 00:02:57,647 --> 00:03:02,185 commercial developers also committed to install on a right turn lane on and off and 31 00:03:02,185 --> 00:03:07,591 contributing $200,000 to the cost of the traffic signal and they're also planning to 32 00:03:07,591 --> 00:03:11,429 reserve 25 foot around way for the widening of highway none of and they're also proposing a 33 00:03:11,429 --> 00:03:19,669 $5,800 fee per lot to horry county you want me to go through the rezoning to now 34 00:03:19,669 --> 00:03:25,743 what would you prefer that's for joe baskins requesting to rezone 186.84 acre portion from 35 00:03:25,743 --> 00:03:32,583 f to m p for 372 town our single family homes on highway 95 and always ferry existing 36 00:03:32,583 --> 00:03:40,291 zone in the areas predominately f I with some residential and some commercial zoning future 37 00:03:40,291 --> 00:03:44,628 land use designation and see it in conservation and rural communities so it's currently 38 00:03:44,628 --> 00:03:51,152 vacant. So here's the plan showing the 372 single family units with 39 00:03:51,152 --> 00:03:56,558 the gross density of 1.99 dwelling units an acre and a net density of 2.31 dwelling 40 00:03:56,558 --> 00:04:02,630 units maker the plan proposes three sustainable development criteria sidewalks 100% 41 00:04:02,630 --> 00:04:07,100 increase in that of open space and eight pocket parks also being proposed is a 200 foot 42 00:04:07,100 --> 00:04:10,838 naturally forested streetscape buffer along highway 95 and always very road 100 foot and 43 00:04:10,838 --> 00:04:14,576 actually force a buffers around the perimeter of the project six foot wide walking trails 44 00:04:14,576 --> 00:04:21,810 access to the existing private road and a list of traffic improvements specified in the 45 00:04:21,810 --> 00:04:27,681 dia and traffic study. >> here's the key wetland delineation the proposed 9.07 46 00:04:29,824 --> 00:04:39,424 acres of will on impact the property is in the supplemental 584 zones on the rear public 47 00:04:39,767 --> 00:04:47,342 notice map and if you set conditions one is the applicant here today. 48 00:04:47,342 --> 00:04:55,316 thank you sir. As usual, grossman did a great job of summarizing both the 49 00:04:55,316 --> 00:04:59,253 development agreement and the rezoning but it wasn't obvious and he had a large hand in the 50 00:04:59,253 --> 00:05:03,224 development agreement because all the traffic improvements are included there. 51 00:05:03,224 --> 00:05:07,562 we're at the same density as actually you'd be at it if I because of the half half acre 52 00:05:07,562 --> 00:05:11,650 lots. However they're compressed as you've seen in other imhotep's 53 00:05:11,650 --> 00:05:14,868 to create those buffers around the project. It's not a complicated project 54 00:05:14,868 --> 00:05:21,475 fairly simple I think the the traffic out there justifies the traffic improvements including 55 00:05:21,475 --> 00:05:26,800 the traffic light. So thank you very much. >> thank you. 56 00:05:26,800 --> 00:05:27,616 any questions? He needs to put his name on the record. 57 00:05:27,616 --> 00:05:33,487 oh please put your name out there. I've gotten 46 of bob oleander 58 00:05:33,487 --> 00:05:37,257 drive in myrtle beach. >> thank you. Okay, now I'm going to open to 59 00:05:37,257 --> 00:05:40,930 public input. You should do three, four, three against anybody want to 60 00:05:40,930 --> 00:05:48,493 speak on behalf of this project and I'm I've got a couple of state 61 00:05:56,510 --> 00:06:01,248 o'leary's ferry I have a question on the. I know you can answer on the 62 00:06:01,248 --> 00:06:05,219 first page of the agreement and then add on implies that pin number for that 4.1 acre one 63 00:06:05,219 --> 00:06:10,958 eight acres of the property for a commercial development wants to develop in number nine 64 00:06:10,958 --> 00:06:14,262 of the agreement. It says a county has agreed to a contribution of $200,000 65 00:06:14,262 --> 00:06:17,864 towards the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection at highway 95 and 66 00:06:17,864 --> 00:06:21,668 o'leary's ferry road. It's unclear from the documents if upon county council vote to 67 00:06:21,668 --> 00:06:28,868 approve this rezoning and signatures for the development agreement that the 4.18 acre 68 00:06:28,976 --> 00:06:33,948 property that is zoned faa is guaranteed to be reserved for commercial use for the 69 00:06:33,948 --> 00:06:37,251 developer. I'm not saying it is I'm saying it's unclear. 70 00:06:37,251 --> 00:06:41,755 if that's true then I believe it should be presented or we county residents as such 71 00:06:41,755 --> 00:06:45,892 including what the commercial use will be in order for our community to have complete 72 00:06:45,892 --> 00:06:48,897 information to form an opinion on the rezoning presented to us. 73 00:06:48,897 --> 00:06:52,497 >> thank you. Thank you. Anybody else? 74 00:06:56,604 --> 00:07:01,508 okay. Close public input. I do want to bring up to you 75 00:07:01,508 --> 00:07:08,649 you know, I think that santa so he he can clarify his opinion is different than mine but the 76 00:07:08,649 --> 00:07:15,322 commercial developer was included in this day solely for the purpose of the contribution 77 00:07:15,322 --> 00:07:18,992 towards the light and the reservation of the right away. They're not guaranteed any 78 00:07:18,992 --> 00:07:23,290 rezoning by way of the development agreement itself. >> thank you. 79 00:07:23,290 --> 00:07:27,735 I just wanted to add the use that the commercial developer was proposing is allowed in the 80 00:07:27,735 --> 00:07:32,390 current zoning allowed him to I don't have to rezone. >> okay. 81 00:07:32,390 --> 00:07:37,178 thank you. All right. We'll move on to the second. 82 00:07:37,178 --> 00:07:40,778 we have c ranch at circle 83 00:07:47,121 --> 00:07:52,159 . >> so they're requesting a feature land use map amendment 84 00:07:52,159 --> 00:07:55,463 with this one I'm going to run through them together. Map is requesting to amend the 85 00:07:55,463 --> 00:08:03,504 future land use designation from suburban to mixed use now because request murray's on 86 00:08:03,504 --> 00:08:07,775 1.23 acres from how a commercial to m r b three 413 for example townhomes on ranch 87 00:08:07,775 --> 00:08:11,978 it's our home for all drive in myrtle beach the existing zoning the area is 88 00:08:11,978 --> 00:08:18,152 predominantly commercial with some residential to the north feature land use designation is 89 00:08:18,152 --> 00:08:21,989 suburban and commercial corridors so it's currently vacant. 90 00:08:21,989 --> 00:08:29,530 here's the plan on the 13 b simple townhomes with a gross density of 10.57 dwelling units 91 00:08:29,530 --> 00:08:33,667 and your plan proposes to sustainable development criteria sidewalks and a 1200 92 00:08:33,667 --> 00:08:38,338 square foot community garden. The plan also proposes a 25 foot top c streetscape for a 93 00:08:38,338 --> 00:08:44,445 long range circle a ten foot taxi streetscape along four wheel drive and a five foot top 94 00:08:44,445 --> 00:08:48,115 b buffer on the remaining side and rear of the property. It's not within a flood zone. 95 00:08:48,115 --> 00:08:54,715 poet notice map and a few site conditions. All right, great. 96 00:08:55,256 --> 00:09:03,300 the applicant here today your name and address for the record caitlin weber with g three 97 00:09:03,300 --> 00:09:06,400 engineering and polly's island. >> grayson did a great job of presenting. 98 00:09:06,400 --> 00:09:07,735 I'm just here to see if anyone has any questions about the project. 99 00:09:07,735 --> 00:09:13,735 it's really well explained. >> all right. Any questions for the 100 00:09:14,307 --> 00:09:18,440 applicant? One question I had you want to get answered is the changing 101 00:09:18,440 --> 00:09:25,520 the classification to mixed use what's what's the trigger of that versus leaving it as is 102 00:09:25,520 --> 00:09:28,122 and put in the residential and is that not allowed? >> and so the proposed density 103 00:09:28,122 --> 00:09:34,662 would exceed what's allowed for the suburban designation which is 3 to 7 and they're proposing 104 00:09:34,662 --> 00:09:39,200 10.57. So mixed use is more appropriate designation given 105 00:09:39,200 --> 00:09:42,536 for that density project. >> okay. Thank you. 106 00:09:42,536 --> 00:09:45,639 all right. Thank you. You got it. 107 00:09:45,639 --> 00:09:50,277 okay. This time open public input. Anybody want to speak for or 108 00:09:50,277 --> 00:09:56,928 against or questions? Okay, I'll close public input. Moving right along we'll go to 109 00:09:56,928 --> 00:10:04,728 number nine sophie grayson napkins requested a petroleum use map amendment as well. 110 00:10:07,339 --> 00:10:13,939 they're requesting to amend the classification from rural to rural communities. 111 00:10:15,214 --> 00:10:19,484 I'm going to run through them together at this request and a reason to point four acres from 112 00:10:19,484 --> 00:10:25,257 lfa to image. So 14.5 to subdivide for five single family homes the 113 00:10:25,257 --> 00:10:29,261 existing zoning in the areas bramley lfa with some seven in close proximity to trina's 114 00:10:29,261 --> 00:10:34,661 designations rural and rural communities. So it's currently residential. 115 00:10:35,701 --> 00:10:39,338 here's the plat showing the proposed subdivision into five lots. 116 00:10:39,338 --> 00:10:47,790 it's not within a flood zone public notice map and a few seconds. 117 00:10:47,790 --> 00:10:54,886 >> all right, thanks. Grayson is the commuter name and for the record please just 118 00:10:54,886 --> 00:10:59,240 yield 315 main street. >> grayson thanks. Your presentation is here to 119 00:10:59,240 --> 00:11:02,293 answer some questions. I'm getting any. Anybody have any questions for 120 00:11:02,293 --> 00:11:05,293 the applicant? Okay. All right. 121 00:11:05,898 --> 00:11:10,698 thank you. All right. Next up 001 napkins requesting 122 00:11:15,372 --> 00:11:21,212 a freeze on 3.4 acres from cfa to three for for commercial uses on highway nine and loans. 123 00:11:21,212 --> 00:11:27,318 this request is within the highway 57 resolution area existing existence on the areas 124 00:11:27,318 --> 00:11:30,788 predominantly pd with commercial along the nine corridor between these 125 00:11:30,788 --> 00:11:35,588 designations suburban sites currently vacant. Here's the proposed 126 00:11:37,462 --> 00:11:41,967 reconfiguration that they're looking to do to the properties as the reason they're rezoning 127 00:11:41,967 --> 00:11:46,380 it because they can't reconfigure it with different zoning classifications ones 128 00:11:46,380 --> 00:11:56,380 asking for one cfa not within a flood zone public notice map and a few site conditions that 129 00:11:56,381 --> 00:12:04,188 all right see I'm here today shep guyton again 46 of rb oleander drive this is very 130 00:12:04,188 --> 00:12:10,962 similar to the project I had with you a couple of months ago where we had combined parcels 131 00:12:10,962 --> 00:12:15,200 of different zoning districts in order to create what will be a commercial convenience center 132 00:12:15,200 --> 00:12:19,570 layer. We have to consolidate that zoning under one use part 133 00:12:19,570 --> 00:12:23,341 of it's already already four so the request is to make the balance of it already for 134 00:12:23,341 --> 00:12:27,411 understanding that does fall in the highway 57 overlay which makes staff support difficult 135 00:12:27,411 --> 00:12:31,820 but we understand that. Okay. Thank you. 136 00:12:31,820 --> 00:12:34,619 any any questions for the outcome? All right. 137 00:12:34,619 --> 00:12:40,619 thank you. Thank you all right. >> moving right along 003 oh 138 00:12:42,930 --> 00:12:46,464 afghans request an arizona three acre portion from f eight as a 42 combined property on 139 00:12:46,464 --> 00:12:53,470 donor salt road and garment's very existence on the area is predominantly ffa with some as 140 00:12:53,470 --> 00:12:59,440 a 40 jason petro and designation as rural site is currently vacant. 141 00:12:59,440 --> 00:13:08,419 here's the proposed plat it's not within a flood zone public notice map and few site 142 00:13:08,419 --> 00:13:17,419 conditions and q is the applicant to that ashley cowan diamond shores and grace and 143 00:13:18,730 --> 00:13:23,167 pretty much explain the whole thing. It's a minor subdivision on the 144 00:13:23,167 --> 00:13:29,907 bottom they're selling to the property owner slightly north from here to combine with the 145 00:13:29,907 --> 00:13:33,511 sod farm that's existing as a $40. >> happy to answer any 146 00:13:33,511 --> 00:13:36,715 questions any questions for the applicant. All right. 147 00:13:36,715 --> 00:13:40,385 thanks for coming. See you next week. All right. 148 00:13:40,385 --> 00:13:46,224 moving right along 004 the applicant request nouri's own 5.68 acres from highway, 149 00:13:46,224 --> 00:13:53,531 commercial and emissive to ag three for commercial center on how I favor one and both circle 150 00:13:53,531 --> 00:14:00,538 and carmi existing zoning areas predominately ffa and cfa with some residential adjacent 151 00:14:00,538 --> 00:14:05,409 future land use designations rural communities so it's currently residential it's not 152 00:14:05,409 --> 00:14:13,809 within a flood zone notice map and a few site conditions. >> all right thanks. 153 00:14:15,353 --> 00:14:25,353 how can I actually karen diamond shores could you put me back in the area this perfect I 154 00:14:25,763 --> 00:14:32,537 just want to point out a couple of things. This site slightly north at 501 155 00:14:32,537 --> 00:14:37,408 is farm bureau insurance so it's also highway commercial. I'm just pointing out some 156 00:14:37,408 --> 00:14:43,648 other commercial uses. This site right here is actually a furniture store even 157 00:14:43,648 --> 00:14:51,923 though it is sfr myself 20 it's also a commercial use slightly down the road here you also 158 00:14:51,923 --> 00:14:58,863 have the flooring connection and ag three zoning district and you also have professional 159 00:14:58,863 --> 00:15:03,235 roofing which is the rv for slightly down the road and right here you have an ag to 160 00:15:03,235 --> 00:15:09,874 zoning use. >> you don't have the site plan in front of you but it has been 161 00:15:09,874 --> 00:15:13,477 submitted for a commercial sketch plan review. I'd be happy to bring that with 162 00:15:13,477 --> 00:15:17,649 me at the next meeting or maybe staff can include it in the slideshow for you but the 163 00:15:17,649 --> 00:15:25,257 entire northern portion of the site is actually wetlands so when we come in with the with 164 00:15:25,257 --> 00:15:29,493 the site plan you'll see that this portion right here is the only portion that's going to be 165 00:15:29,493 --> 00:15:36,433 used for development. I think we've got 16 units for the trade shop with associated 166 00:15:36,433 --> 00:15:41,706 parking and then pond and wetlands up here. So it's not going to be 167 00:15:41,706 --> 00:15:48,547 completely filled with with trade shop and I would be happy to answer any questions that 168 00:15:48,547 --> 00:15:49,447 you have. >> all right. Thank you. 169 00:15:49,447 --> 00:15:53,470 any questions? >> all right. Thank you. 170 00:15:55,286 --> 00:16:02,486 okay. On to the next one, grayson 005 napkins request trees on one 171 00:16:02,527 --> 00:16:06,537 acre from cfa 2 or 3 for quick service restaurant oh, how am I? 172 00:16:06,537 --> 00:16:10,540 544 and comma existing zoning in the areas predominantly cfa with a mix of residential and 173 00:16:10,540 --> 00:16:17,140 commercial along how I 544 peachtree land use designation suburban that's currently 174 00:16:17,513 --> 00:16:24,113 vacant. Here's the site plan showing the proposed use it's not 175 00:16:24,353 --> 00:16:31,527 within a flood zone notice map and a few site conditions. >> okay the argument from thank 176 00:16:31,527 --> 00:16:38,735 you grace and excellent job and thanks for putting the site plan up for me. 177 00:16:38,735 --> 00:16:43,740 I think it's noted in the staff review that this is a use that can existing we happen on the 178 00:16:43,740 --> 00:16:47,576 cfa zoning. What the applicant is trying to do is make sure that they can 179 00:16:47,576 --> 00:16:54,150 get in this double loaded parking as is right now with the current zoning this would 180 00:16:54,150 --> 00:16:58,287 have to be parallel parking which doesn't meet the parking requirements of the fast food 181 00:16:58,287 --> 00:17:02,158 chain that they're trying to put in. As you know if you've been down 182 00:17:02,158 --> 00:17:07,831 this section of 544, there's also a waffle house two parcels up. 183 00:17:07,831 --> 00:17:13,231 >> oh, perfect. Thank you. Oh, that's good waffle house 184 00:17:14,737 --> 00:17:18,807 right here a bojangles just a little bit further down and you've also got a mcdonald's 185 00:17:18,807 --> 00:17:23,513 and a dunkin. Those are the only eating establishments until you get to 186 00:17:23,513 --> 00:17:28,150 the food lion or a little further up near the university where they've got some of the 187 00:17:28,150 --> 00:17:35,225 other eating, I'm happy to answer any questions or any questions for the applicant. 188 00:17:35,225 --> 00:17:40,250 all right. Thank you. All right, chris and 006 189 00:17:41,163 --> 00:17:49,272 applicants requesting a reason 3.57 acres from faa to ag to for boat and rv storage on 190 00:17:49,272 --> 00:17:53,810 spring beauty drive and conway existence on the area is predominately for with some 191 00:17:53,810 --> 00:17:59,849 served in an emergency one and closed proximity feature land use designations rural sites 192 00:17:59,849 --> 00:18:07,723 currently vacant is not within flood zone notice map conditions okay and as the 193 00:18:07,723 --> 00:18:09,723 applicant here today 194 00:18:13,996 --> 00:18:19,100 the name and address of the record please henrietta 1017 third 195 00:18:19,100 --> 00:18:22,601 avenue. >> thank you. Anything on that? 196 00:18:22,672 --> 00:18:24,206 no. Sure. I'm just here if we got any 197 00:18:24,206 --> 00:18:26,542 questions. Got any questions? Okay. 198 00:18:26,542 --> 00:18:29,411 any questions on this one for the applicant. Appreciate it. 199 00:18:29,411 --> 00:18:33,490 see you next week. Thank you. All right. 200 00:18:33,490 --> 00:18:40,849 moving right along 007 after applicants requesting a reason 23.26 acre portion from cfa to 201 00:18:42,958 --> 00:18:47,197 ari four for commercial uses on sam ridge road and bartell road off providence parkway in 202 00:18:47,197 --> 00:18:56,197 little river existence on the area is cfa and some residential may 7th and six 203 00:18:57,473 --> 00:19:03,473 withdrawing his designations mixed use the site is currently vacant. 204 00:19:04,780 --> 00:19:08,852 >> the parcel is within the right away acquisition area for a right for project at robert 205 00:19:08,852 --> 00:19:16,592 ridge parkway and sam ridge road connector. It's not within a flood zone 206 00:19:16,592 --> 00:19:21,631 public notice map and a few site conditions. All right. 207 00:19:21,631 --> 00:19:24,833 thank you. Grayson is the applicant here all right. 208 00:19:24,833 --> 00:19:29,872 >> mark sharp going again. This is one of those projects we've been working on for 209 00:19:29,872 --> 00:19:36,212 several months because it is part of the road for project. There's an existing use to the 210 00:19:36,212 --> 00:19:40,716 left of the proposed right away that's medical in nature owned by a medical provider. 211 00:19:40,716 --> 00:19:45,121 so we've continued to work with staff, try to find the best solution so we don't interfere 212 00:19:45,121 --> 00:19:49,158 and actually enhance what goes on the road for that first step was actually getting the zoning 213 00:19:49,158 --> 00:19:53,290 in place for what we intend that used to be. So that's why we're in front 214 00:19:53,290 --> 00:19:55,932 of you today. All right. Any questions for the applicant 215 00:19:55,932 --> 00:19:59,535 today? We'll see you next week. Thank you. 216 00:19:59,535 --> 00:20:02,535 thank you. Okay. Moving on. 217 00:20:03,139 --> 00:20:09,139 next up we have a development agreement. Good afternoon, roger. 218 00:20:14,250 --> 00:20:18,320 union deputy director. I'm going to go over this development agreement. 219 00:20:18,320 --> 00:20:22,158 >> this is a standalone development agreement. There's no rezoning associated 220 00:20:22,158 --> 00:20:26,362 with this. So this is for the pine ridge residential tract as you can 221 00:20:26,362 --> 00:20:29,632 see on the slide there's a lot of text you can imagine how big the agreement is. 222 00:20:29,632 --> 00:20:39,308 so this one was for 700 plus acres and for a time period of ten years and this is along 223 00:20:39,308 --> 00:20:46,382 the columbus parkway. So the agreement came into place when the council has a 224 00:20:46,382 --> 00:20:53,856 pending ordinance for amendment and now the work with the developer and everything and we 225 00:20:53,856 --> 00:20:58,493 got a few proposals in there which would all be going through so the first one would 226 00:20:58,493 --> 00:21:05,534 be reserving approximately 125ft wide right of way for the building and the improvements 227 00:21:05,534 --> 00:21:10,140 for the building and then that should be completed before two 100 permits and then grasslands 228 00:21:10,140 --> 00:21:16,245 connect to improvements. That's a part of it and there's a separate ridge road project 229 00:21:16,245 --> 00:21:20,416 agreement which has its own design standards and permitting and constructions to be 230 00:21:20,416 --> 00:21:25,210 completed by the developer and that is for the road project corridor. 231 00:21:25,210 --> 00:21:31,427 I'll show you in the next slide and there's another item which would be the 17 bypass traffic 232 00:21:31,427 --> 00:21:35,970 signal improvements and intersection. So this is the proposed road 233 00:21:35,970 --> 00:21:42,938 corridor which would be 125ft all along and there are a few funding sources that are 234 00:21:42,938 --> 00:21:46,609 identified in the agreement which would be a multi-county business park and the municipal 235 00:21:46,609 --> 00:21:54,184 improvement district and also a part unit fee of $5,800 which would be generated for the 236 00:21:54,184 --> 00:21:59,870 project and the agreement also has a provision for additional park acreage for the county 237 00:21:59,870 --> 00:22:06,620 recreation facility which would before occurs and the total residential units will not 238 00:22:06,620 --> 00:22:08,597 increase more than 2000. Not all the major. Okay. 239 00:22:08,597 --> 00:22:13,456 thank you. I will now open this up for public input. 240 00:22:13,456 --> 00:22:21,856 anybody want to any input? Okay I'll close public input. No vote on this. 241 00:22:23,499 --> 00:22:23,967 right. Good. Okay. 242 00:22:23,967 --> 00:22:29,967 moving right along. We're into text amendments. >> we're back over 243 00:22:37,213 --> 00:22:42,217 . >> all right, so this text amendment is about the zoning 244 00:22:42,217 --> 00:22:46,789 board of appeals and variances as you all are familiar, we just updated our landscape and 245 00:22:46,789 --> 00:22:53,829 buffer ordinance right now currently within the ordinance within as far as what the 246 00:22:53,829 --> 00:22:58,367 zoning board of appeals can do with variances, they cannot grant a variance on any major 247 00:22:58,367 --> 00:23:04,239 developments. >> so what this would allow is within two thirds vote the 248 00:23:04,239 --> 00:23:09,440 zoning board of appeals could allow some variances, would still prohibit variances on the 249 00:23:09,440 --> 00:23:13,149 types the streetscape buffers associated with major development but it would allow 250 00:23:13,149 --> 00:23:21,791 relief on type and be buffers up to a maximum of 50% so that that's it. 251 00:23:21,791 --> 00:23:26,629 okay. Thank you very much. Anybody have any questions now? 252 00:23:26,629 --> 00:23:30,829 okay. >> moving right along. Imagine 2040 comprehensive plan 253 00:23:35,505 --> 00:23:37,505 . Okay. >> okay. 254 00:23:39,675 --> 00:23:44,347 so we have our industrial corridors which you all have become really familiar with 255 00:23:44,347 --> 00:23:48,180 over the last couple of meetings. >> this is our project 256 00:23:48,180 --> 00:23:51,621 timeline. We are currently in step six of the process. 257 00:23:51,621 --> 00:23:55,792 we are in the 30 day public comment period and today is just another instance of when 258 00:23:55,792 --> 00:24:00,280 the public will be able to come and speak about the industrial corridors and give us their 259 00:24:00,280 --> 00:24:05,901 input. >> we have we opened the survey in march and the survey does 260 00:24:05,901 --> 00:24:10,340 still remain open today and we've received a few additional responses. 261 00:24:10,340 --> 00:24:14,911 we're up to 100 and 102 total responses if anybody's watching and I'm taking survey, please 262 00:24:14,911 --> 00:24:20,911 do. That's only one way we've been gathering public input. 263 00:24:21,450 --> 00:24:25,789 we've had two public open houses today in those public open houses we do some mapping 264 00:24:25,789 --> 00:24:32,761 exercises and other things to gather input from the public and get their feedback. 265 00:24:32,761 --> 00:24:40,770 >> so just a couple things here is some overview of industries that we currently have within 266 00:24:40,770 --> 00:24:44,840 our county. It would be no surprise tourism industries are our top 267 00:24:44,840 --> 00:24:49,278 employment industries currently with accommodations and food service and then retail being 268 00:24:49,278 --> 00:24:55,840 the next one. Other high ranking employment industries that we have are 269 00:24:55,840 --> 00:24:59,221 construction. >> so let's just to give a idea of where we're at and what 270 00:24:59,221 --> 00:25:08,221 industries we currently have so the next thing here is what does horry county consider 271 00:25:10,320 --> 00:25:14,437 industrial? So I want to open by saying that this time does centers are 272 00:25:14,437 --> 00:25:22,110 not allowed in our zoning ordinance at all so when we talk about light and heavy 273 00:25:22,110 --> 00:25:26,149 industrial light, industrial is all things like food and beverage manufacturing, 274 00:25:26,149 --> 00:25:32,749 warehousing and wholesale distribution vehicle and equipment repair and two yards 275 00:25:33,322 --> 00:25:40,290 and how industrial is things like that plant and asphalt plants I'm cost saying and 276 00:25:40,290 --> 00:25:48,438 heavier manufacturing uses so why did we need this change so you can see on this map the 277 00:25:48,438 --> 00:25:53,342 star indicates our economic activity center which is currently the only future land 278 00:25:53,342 --> 00:25:59,682 use designation that we have staff and sport industrial rezoning that the red that you 279 00:25:59,682 --> 00:26:04,152 see around it is major residential developments that are either in progress or have 280 00:26:04,152 --> 00:26:08,290 recently been approved and they're encroaching into those economic activity centers which 281 00:26:08,290 --> 00:26:12,762 then limits the ability of staff to support rezonings. We have to meet certain 282 00:26:12,762 --> 00:26:19,702 separation requirements for industrial or residential. So another thing is over the 283 00:26:19,702 --> 00:26:26,302 years we've seen existing residential start backwards and existing industrial be 284 00:26:26,742 --> 00:26:31,281 encroached upon by residential development. >> what industrial corridors 285 00:26:31,281 --> 00:26:37,881 will do is create a dedicated space for future industrial development. 286 00:26:38,755 --> 00:26:42,925 >> the other thing we've seen some questions on is what about existing residential that may 287 00:26:42,925 --> 00:26:47,730 be within those industrial corridors any rezoning would still have to comply with the 288 00:26:47,730 --> 00:26:54,436 separation requirements in our zoning ordinance. So for like a heavy industrial 289 00:26:54,436 --> 00:26:57,841 of our zoning ordinance intent statement says that m three has to be 1000ft from residential 290 00:26:57,841 --> 00:27:04,848 so those things wouldn't be would still be considered by staff as part of the rezoning 291 00:27:04,848 --> 00:27:09,251 process if there is residential inside of an industrial corridor staff would support 292 00:27:09,251 --> 00:27:16,625 lighter industrial or some transition uses like business parks to transition to the 293 00:27:16,625 --> 00:27:20,563 heavier industrial within those industrial corridors and as part of this residential 294 00:27:20,563 --> 00:27:24,233 development will generally be discouraged within these corridors that it could be 295 00:27:24,233 --> 00:27:31,273 mitigated through buffering or other compatibility measures to make those more suitable within 296 00:27:31,273 --> 00:27:38,981 or adjacent to the corridors but generally would be discouraged see so other 297 00:27:38,981 --> 00:27:43,686 reasons why this matters and why don't we for the voters approve the ride for 298 00:27:43,686 --> 00:27:48,486 transportation program the plan transit transportation improvements total 299 00:27:50,125 --> 00:27:54,496 approximately $6.6 billion and these projects will require significant amounts 300 00:27:54,496 --> 00:27:59,135 of materials such as asphalt and concrete and right now we have a limited number of actual 301 00:27:59,135 --> 00:28:02,838 asphalt plants limited supply can affect the pricing and availability of materials and 302 00:28:02,838 --> 00:28:07,209 by identify an appropriate locations for a future industrial development 303 00:28:07,209 --> 00:28:13,816 industrial corridors can create or may create opportunities for these types of uses where they 304 00:28:13,816 --> 00:28:21,160 are appropriate and meet zoning requirements and then it's jumping around suitability 305 00:28:21,738 --> 00:28:25,676 model. So we did a suitability model to determine where these 306 00:28:25,676 --> 00:28:29,179 industrial corridors were suitable. We looked at things like 307 00:28:29,179 --> 00:28:33,417 wetlands, roads, major roads, railroads, residential and flood zones and we assign those 308 00:28:33,417 --> 00:28:40,390 things certain weights, flood zones and wetlands were weighted one of the highest the 309 00:28:40,390 --> 00:28:47,797 highest category and then roads and residential and we closed out with preference being the 310 00:28:47,797 --> 00:28:55,606 least weighted of those things. >> so on the left hand side you see the original suitability 311 00:28:55,606 --> 00:29:02,679 model stuff that took that one step further and removed conservation lands fema and 312 00:29:02,679 --> 00:29:07,618 supplemental flood zones major residential projects from the suitability model to hone it in 313 00:29:07,618 --> 00:29:15,192 further and then we consider the survey results those color bills indicate right is where 314 00:29:15,192 --> 00:29:21,999 they did not want to industrial to be and then the yellow and green is where yellow was for 315 00:29:21,999 --> 00:29:26,537 light and green is for heavy. So those were areas where they thought light and heavy 316 00:29:26,537 --> 00:29:31,475 industrial would be suitable and then we came up with our original first draft of the 317 00:29:31,475 --> 00:29:36,947 industrial corridors. >> then we got public comment and in front of all of you is a 318 00:29:36,947 --> 00:29:42,752 packet of emails that have been sent to us over the last several weeks from the public 319 00:29:42,752 --> 00:29:50,694 about the draft that's been available on our website. >> so we took and compiled the 320 00:29:50,694 --> 00:29:54,565 themes that we were seeing within these public inputs and we've seen people ask for more 321 00:29:54,565 --> 00:29:59,690 community feedback. They're concerned about lack of the or the loss of the rural 322 00:29:59,690 --> 00:30:02,339 character in our community. They have concerns about environmental wetland impacts 323 00:30:02,339 --> 00:30:06,943 and the impact on traffic and infrastructure. >> we've also seen some 324 00:30:06,943 --> 00:30:13,883 comments in support saying that this will create more jobs and economic development and it 325 00:30:13,883 --> 00:30:18,522 will create areas for planned future industrial growth. So we've seen comments and 326 00:30:18,522 --> 00:30:26,464 support and comments in opposition and so what we did is we revise the draft 327 00:30:26,464 --> 00:30:33,938 industrial corridor areas. >> so on the left hand side we have the original map presented 328 00:30:33,938 --> 00:30:38,174 to you all at the last two at the last planning commission workshop and meeting and on the 329 00:30:38,174 --> 00:30:45,248 right we have the revised map showing revisions we had made to the industrial corridors 330 00:30:45,248 --> 00:30:53,457 that we removed some areas we were in some areas that were designated feature as scenic 331 00:30:53,457 --> 00:31:00,397 and conservation and then we added some areas east of north and south of inner where they 332 00:31:00,397 --> 00:31:04,200 are now only able to support up to white industrial instead of all the way up heavy 333 00:31:04,200 --> 00:31:11,742 industrial. So what are our next steps? As you'll see we have an 334 00:31:11,742 --> 00:31:15,912 additional next step here on july 16th we are doing an additional open house and 335 00:31:15,912 --> 00:31:20,500 public input for the draft industrial corridors. That's one of the comments that 336 00:31:20,500 --> 00:31:26,256 we've seen a lot is the need for more community input. So we want the community to 337 00:31:26,256 --> 00:31:30,493 provide additional input so we will be having another meeting on july 16th in this room at 338 00:31:30,493 --> 00:31:36,867 530 just till 7 p.m. Staff will be here to answer questions, get more public input and hear 339 00:31:36,867 --> 00:31:41,772 from the people this is their plan. We want to hear from them and 340 00:31:41,772 --> 00:31:48,979 so those are our next steps. >> thank you very much. Qr code for the draft read it 341 00:31:48,979 --> 00:31:58,979 comment scan it now tell your friends all right this one we are going to open public input 342 00:31:59,256 --> 00:32:05,763 on this one. Anyone want to come up and do any input today? 343 00:32:05,763 --> 00:32:15,763 okay I'll close public input last or genda and we'll make a motion to adjourn second all 344 00:32:16,539 --> 00:32:21,339 those in favor say aye. All next week