And let's move on to approval of meeting minutes as everyone on the board had a chance to
take a quick look at the meeting minutes. Yes.
any questions? >> okay. So on the emotion motion to
approve a second. All those in favor say any opposed?
all right. Motion passes. Moving on to street names.
>> we have everything today. Yep. In the car.
my postal district in 29526 in pencil point we have scudder drive branch street, sprague
way and outer street in piper. So district two now about two seven and inglewood phases one
and two we have burbridge drive garcia loop lish street mare drive and we're circle in
aigner galvin's very postal district 29544 and 29511 in hutch track we have deer meadow
way white deer ridge road, white ridge drive and wildflower ville caught in the
law supposed to district 29569 and sell the towns we have tommy b loop okay no public
input required can anyone make a motion to approve motion to approve a second second.
>> all those in favor? >> any opposed? All right.
motion carries moving on to rezonings first on the list development agreement.
>> so this development agreement coincides with the rezoning request how I on a
farm and I'll very I'm going to run through them together if you want to but we need to do
public input on the development frame after I get through it. >> yeah.
so the development agreement proposes a max unit count of 372 single family homes with
a minimum lot size of 7000ft in a maximum building height of 40ft.
the development agreement also commits to naturally force or program buffers varying and
width from 100 foot to 200 foot. They are donating 1.21 acres
of land for expansion of the existing fire station their proposed walking trails their
plan to relocate existing unimproved roadway to maintain access to the adjacent property
they're proposing no lots in the floodplain and they're proposing a list of offsite
road improvements including a left and right turn lane on. None of have a left lane a left
turn lane on this very road a right turn lane on highway not a52 over east ferry and a
traffic signal at the intersection of highway none of have an already ferry there
plan to reserve 25 foot a right of way for the widening of highway none of the
commercial developers also committed to install on a right turn lane on and off and
contributing $200,000 to the cost of the traffic signal and they're also planning to
reserve 25 foot around way for the widening of highway none of and they're also proposing a
$5,800 fee per lot to horry county you want me to go through the rezoning to now
what would you prefer that's for joe baskins requesting to rezone 186.84 acre portion from
f to m p for 372 town our single family homes on highway 95 and always ferry existing
zone in the areas predominately f I with some residential and some commercial zoning future
land use designation and see it in conservation and rural communities so it's currently
vacant. So here's the plan showing the 372 single family units with
the gross density of 1.99 dwelling units an acre and a net density of 2.31 dwelling
units maker the plan proposes three sustainable development criteria sidewalks 100%
increase in that of open space and eight pocket parks also being proposed is a 200 foot
naturally forested streetscape buffer along highway 95 and always very road 100 foot and
actually force a buffers around the perimeter of the project six foot wide walking trails
access to the existing private road and a list of traffic improvements specified in the
dia and traffic study. >> here's the key wetland delineation the proposed 9.07
acres of will on impact the property is in the supplemental 584 zones on the rear public
notice map and if you set conditions one is the applicant here today.
thank you sir. As usual, grossman did a great job of summarizing both the
development agreement and the rezoning but it wasn't obvious and he had a large hand in the
development agreement because all the traffic improvements are included there.
we're at the same density as actually you'd be at it if I because of the half half acre
lots. However they're compressed as you've seen in other imhotep's
to create those buffers around the project. It's not a complicated project
fairly simple I think the the traffic out there justifies the traffic improvements including
the traffic light. So thank you very much. >> thank you.
any questions? He needs to put his name on the record.
oh please put your name out there. I've gotten 46 of bob oleander
drive in myrtle beach. >> thank you. Okay, now I'm going to open to
public input. You should do three, four, three against anybody want to
speak on behalf of this project and I'm I've got a couple of state
o'leary's ferry I have a question on the. I know you can answer on the
first page of the agreement and then add on implies that pin number for that 4.1 acre one
eight acres of the property for a commercial development wants to develop in number nine
of the agreement. It says a county has agreed to a contribution of $200,000
towards the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection at highway 95 and
o'leary's ferry road. It's unclear from the documents if upon county council vote to
approve this rezoning and signatures for the development agreement that the 4.18 acre
property that is zoned faa is guaranteed to be reserved for commercial use for the
developer. I'm not saying it is I'm saying it's unclear.
if that's true then I believe it should be presented or we county residents as such
including what the commercial use will be in order for our community to have complete
information to form an opinion on the rezoning presented to us.
>> thank you. Thank you. Anybody else?
okay. Close public input. I do want to bring up to you
you know, I think that santa so he he can clarify his opinion is different than mine but the
commercial developer was included in this day solely for the purpose of the contribution
towards the light and the reservation of the right away. They're not guaranteed any
rezoning by way of the development agreement itself. >> thank you.
I just wanted to add the use that the commercial developer was proposing is allowed in the
current zoning allowed him to I don't have to rezone. >> okay.
thank you. All right. We'll move on to the second.
we have c ranch at circle
. >> so they're requesting a feature land use map amendment
with this one I'm going to run through them together. Map is requesting to amend the
future land use designation from suburban to mixed use now because request murray's on
1.23 acres from how a commercial to m r b three 413 for example townhomes on ranch
it's our home for all drive in myrtle beach the existing zoning the area is
predominantly commercial with some residential to the north feature land use designation is
suburban and commercial corridors so it's currently vacant.
here's the plan on the 13 b simple townhomes with a gross density of 10.57 dwelling units
and your plan proposes to sustainable development criteria sidewalks and a 1200
square foot community garden. The plan also proposes a 25 foot top c streetscape for a
long range circle a ten foot taxi streetscape along four wheel drive and a five foot top
b buffer on the remaining side and rear of the property. It's not within a flood zone.
poet notice map and a few site conditions. All right, great.
the applicant here today your name and address for the record caitlin weber with g three
engineering and polly's island. >> grayson did a great job of presenting.
I'm just here to see if anyone has any questions about the project.
it's really well explained. >> all right. Any questions for the
applicant? One question I had you want to get answered is the changing
the classification to mixed use what's what's the trigger of that versus leaving it as is
and put in the residential and is that not allowed? >> and so the proposed density
would exceed what's allowed for the suburban designation which is 3 to 7 and they're proposing
10.57. So mixed use is more appropriate designation given
for that density project. >> okay. Thank you.
all right. Thank you. You got it.
okay. This time open public input. Anybody want to speak for or
against or questions? Okay, I'll close public input. Moving right along we'll go to
number nine sophie grayson napkins requested a petroleum use map amendment as well.
they're requesting to amend the classification from rural to rural communities.
I'm going to run through them together at this request and a reason to point four acres from
lfa to image. So 14.5 to subdivide for five single family homes the
existing zoning in the areas bramley lfa with some seven in close proximity to trina's
designations rural and rural communities. So it's currently residential.
here's the plat showing the proposed subdivision into five lots.
it's not within a flood zone public notice map and a few seconds.
>> all right, thanks. Grayson is the commuter name and for the record please just
yield 315 main street. >> grayson thanks. Your presentation is here to
answer some questions. I'm getting any. Anybody have any questions for
the applicant? Okay. All right.
thank you. All right. Next up 001 napkins requesting
a freeze on 3.4 acres from cfa to three for for commercial uses on highway nine and loans.
this request is within the highway 57 resolution area existing existence on the areas
predominantly pd with commercial along the nine corridor between these
designations suburban sites currently vacant. Here's the proposed
reconfiguration that they're looking to do to the properties as the reason they're rezoning
it because they can't reconfigure it with different zoning classifications ones
asking for one cfa not within a flood zone public notice map and a few site conditions that
all right see I'm here today shep guyton again 46 of rb oleander drive this is very
similar to the project I had with you a couple of months ago where we had combined parcels
of different zoning districts in order to create what will be a commercial convenience center
layer. We have to consolidate that zoning under one use part
of it's already already four so the request is to make the balance of it already for
understanding that does fall in the highway 57 overlay which makes staff support difficult
but we understand that. Okay. Thank you.
any any questions for the outcome? All right.
thank you. Thank you all right. >> moving right along 003 oh
afghans request an arizona three acre portion from f eight as a 42 combined property on
donor salt road and garment's very existence on the area is predominantly ffa with some as
a 40 jason petro and designation as rural site is currently vacant.
here's the proposed plat it's not within a flood zone public notice map and few site
conditions and q is the applicant to that ashley cowan diamond shores and grace and
pretty much explain the whole thing. It's a minor subdivision on the
bottom they're selling to the property owner slightly north from here to combine with the
sod farm that's existing as a $40. >> happy to answer any
questions any questions for the applicant. All right.
thanks for coming. See you next week. All right.
moving right along 004 the applicant request nouri's own 5.68 acres from highway,
commercial and emissive to ag three for commercial center on how I favor one and both circle
and carmi existing zoning areas predominately ffa and cfa with some residential adjacent
future land use designations rural communities so it's currently residential it's not
within a flood zone notice map and a few site conditions. >> all right thanks.
how can I actually karen diamond shores could you put me back in the area this perfect I
just want to point out a couple of things. This site slightly north at 501
is farm bureau insurance so it's also highway commercial. I'm just pointing out some
other commercial uses. This site right here is actually a furniture store even
though it is sfr myself 20 it's also a commercial use slightly down the road here you also
have the flooring connection and ag three zoning district and you also have professional
roofing which is the rv for slightly down the road and right here you have an ag to
zoning use. >> you don't have the site plan in front of you but it has been
submitted for a commercial sketch plan review. I'd be happy to bring that with
me at the next meeting or maybe staff can include it in the slideshow for you but the
entire northern portion of the site is actually wetlands so when we come in with the with
the site plan you'll see that this portion right here is the only portion that's going to be
used for development. I think we've got 16 units for the trade shop with associated
parking and then pond and wetlands up here. So it's not going to be
completely filled with with trade shop and I would be happy to answer any questions that
you have. >> all right. Thank you.
any questions? >> all right. Thank you.
okay. On to the next one, grayson 005 napkins request trees on one
acre from cfa 2 or 3 for quick service restaurant oh, how am I?
544 and comma existing zoning in the areas predominantly cfa with a mix of residential and
commercial along how I 544 peachtree land use designation suburban that's currently
vacant. Here's the site plan showing the proposed use it's not
within a flood zone notice map and a few site conditions. >> okay the argument from thank
you grace and excellent job and thanks for putting the site plan up for me.
I think it's noted in the staff review that this is a use that can existing we happen on the
cfa zoning. What the applicant is trying to do is make sure that they can
get in this double loaded parking as is right now with the current zoning this would
have to be parallel parking which doesn't meet the parking requirements of the fast food
chain that they're trying to put in. As you know if you've been down
this section of 544, there's also a waffle house two parcels up.
>> oh, perfect. Thank you. Oh, that's good waffle house
right here a bojangles just a little bit further down and you've also got a mcdonald's
and a dunkin. Those are the only eating establishments until you get to
the food lion or a little further up near the university where they've got some of the
other eating, I'm happy to answer any questions or any questions for the applicant.
all right. Thank you. All right, chris and 006
applicants requesting a reason 3.57 acres from faa to ag to for boat and rv storage on
spring beauty drive and conway existence on the area is predominately for with some
served in an emergency one and closed proximity feature land use designations rural sites
currently vacant is not within flood zone notice map conditions okay and as the
applicant here today
the name and address of the record please henrietta 1017 third
avenue. >> thank you. Anything on that?
no. Sure. I'm just here if we got any
questions. Got any questions? Okay.
any questions on this one for the applicant. Appreciate it.
see you next week. Thank you. All right.
moving right along 007 after applicants requesting a reason 23.26 acre portion from cfa to
ari four for commercial uses on sam ridge road and bartell road off providence parkway in
little river existence on the area is cfa and some residential may 7th and six
withdrawing his designations mixed use the site is currently vacant.
>> the parcel is within the right away acquisition area for a right for project at robert
ridge parkway and sam ridge road connector. It's not within a flood zone
public notice map and a few site conditions. All right.
thank you. Grayson is the applicant here all right.
>> mark sharp going again. This is one of those projects we've been working on for
several months because it is part of the road for project. There's an existing use to the
left of the proposed right away that's medical in nature owned by a medical provider.
so we've continued to work with staff, try to find the best solution so we don't interfere
and actually enhance what goes on the road for that first step was actually getting the zoning
in place for what we intend that used to be. So that's why we're in front
of you today. All right. Any questions for the applicant
today? We'll see you next week. Thank you.
thank you. Okay. Moving on.
next up we have a development agreement. Good afternoon, roger.
union deputy director. I'm going to go over this development agreement.
>> this is a standalone development agreement. There's no rezoning associated
with this. So this is for the pine ridge residential tract as you can
see on the slide there's a lot of text you can imagine how big the agreement is.
so this one was for 700 plus acres and for a time period of ten years and this is along
the columbus parkway. So the agreement came into place when the council has a
pending ordinance for amendment and now the work with the developer and everything and we
got a few proposals in there which would all be going through so the first one would
be reserving approximately 125ft wide right of way for the building and the improvements
for the building and then that should be completed before two 100 permits and then grasslands
connect to improvements. That's a part of it and there's a separate ridge road project
agreement which has its own design standards and permitting and constructions to be
completed by the developer and that is for the road project corridor.
I'll show you in the next slide and there's another item which would be the 17 bypass traffic
signal improvements and intersection. So this is the proposed road
corridor which would be 125ft all along and there are a few funding sources that are
identified in the agreement which would be a multi-county business park and the municipal
improvement district and also a part unit fee of $5,800 which would be generated for the
project and the agreement also has a provision for additional park acreage for the county
recreation facility which would before occurs and the total residential units will not
increase more than 2000. Not all the major. Okay.
thank you. I will now open this up for public input.
anybody want to any input? Okay I'll close public input. No vote on this.
right. Good. Okay.
moving right along. We're into text amendments. >> we're back over
. >> all right, so this text amendment is about the zoning
board of appeals and variances as you all are familiar, we just updated our landscape and
buffer ordinance right now currently within the ordinance within as far as what the
zoning board of appeals can do with variances, they cannot grant a variance on any major
developments. >> so what this would allow is within two thirds vote the
zoning board of appeals could allow some variances, would still prohibit variances on the
types the streetscape buffers associated with major development but it would allow
relief on type and be buffers up to a maximum of 50% so that that's it.
okay. Thank you very much. Anybody have any questions now?
okay. >> moving right along. Imagine 2040 comprehensive plan
. Okay. >> okay.
so we have our industrial corridors which you all have become really familiar with
over the last couple of meetings. >> this is our project
timeline. We are currently in step six of the process.
we are in the 30 day public comment period and today is just another instance of when
the public will be able to come and speak about the industrial corridors and give us their
input. >> we have we opened the survey in march and the survey does
still remain open today and we've received a few additional responses.
we're up to 100 and 102 total responses if anybody's watching and I'm taking survey, please
do. That's only one way we've been gathering public input.
we've had two public open houses today in those public open houses we do some mapping
exercises and other things to gather input from the public and get their feedback.
>> so just a couple things here is some overview of industries that we currently have within
our county. It would be no surprise tourism industries are our top
employment industries currently with accommodations and food service and then retail being
the next one. Other high ranking employment industries that we have are
construction. >> so let's just to give a idea of where we're at and what
industries we currently have so the next thing here is what does horry county consider
industrial? So I want to open by saying that this time does centers are
not allowed in our zoning ordinance at all so when we talk about light and heavy
industrial light, industrial is all things like food and beverage manufacturing,
warehousing and wholesale distribution vehicle and equipment repair and two yards
and how industrial is things like that plant and asphalt plants I'm cost saying and
heavier manufacturing uses so why did we need this change so you can see on this map the
star indicates our economic activity center which is currently the only future land
use designation that we have staff and sport industrial rezoning that the red that you
see around it is major residential developments that are either in progress or have
recently been approved and they're encroaching into those economic activity centers which
then limits the ability of staff to support rezonings. We have to meet certain
separation requirements for industrial or residential. So another thing is over the
years we've seen existing residential start backwards and existing industrial be
encroached upon by residential development. >> what industrial corridors
will do is create a dedicated space for future industrial development.
>> the other thing we've seen some questions on is what about existing residential that may
be within those industrial corridors any rezoning would still have to comply with the
separation requirements in our zoning ordinance. So for like a heavy industrial
of our zoning ordinance intent statement says that m three has to be 1000ft from residential
so those things wouldn't be would still be considered by staff as part of the rezoning
process if there is residential inside of an industrial corridor staff would support
lighter industrial or some transition uses like business parks to transition to the
heavier industrial within those industrial corridors and as part of this residential
development will generally be discouraged within these corridors that it could be
mitigated through buffering or other compatibility measures to make those more suitable within
or adjacent to the corridors but generally would be discouraged see so other
reasons why this matters and why don't we for the voters approve the ride for
transportation program the plan transit transportation improvements total
approximately $6.6 billion and these projects will require significant amounts
of materials such as asphalt and concrete and right now we have a limited number of actual
asphalt plants limited supply can affect the pricing and availability of materials and
by identify an appropriate locations for a future industrial development
industrial corridors can create or may create opportunities for these types of uses where they
are appropriate and meet zoning requirements and then it's jumping around suitability
model. So we did a suitability model to determine where these
industrial corridors were suitable. We looked at things like
wetlands, roads, major roads, railroads, residential and flood zones and we assign those
things certain weights, flood zones and wetlands were weighted one of the highest the
highest category and then roads and residential and we closed out with preference being the
least weighted of those things. >> so on the left hand side you see the original suitability
model stuff that took that one step further and removed conservation lands fema and
supplemental flood zones major residential projects from the suitability model to hone it in
further and then we consider the survey results those color bills indicate right is where
they did not want to industrial to be and then the yellow and green is where yellow was for
light and green is for heavy. So those were areas where they thought light and heavy
industrial would be suitable and then we came up with our original first draft of the
industrial corridors. >> then we got public comment and in front of all of you is a
packet of emails that have been sent to us over the last several weeks from the public
about the draft that's been available on our website. >> so we took and compiled the
themes that we were seeing within these public inputs and we've seen people ask for more
community feedback. They're concerned about lack of the or the loss of the rural
character in our community. They have concerns about environmental wetland impacts
and the impact on traffic and infrastructure. >> we've also seen some
comments in support saying that this will create more jobs and economic development and it
will create areas for planned future industrial growth. So we've seen comments and
support and comments in opposition and so what we did is we revise the draft
industrial corridor areas. >> so on the left hand side we have the original map presented
to you all at the last two at the last planning commission workshop and meeting and on the
right we have the revised map showing revisions we had made to the industrial corridors
that we removed some areas we were in some areas that were designated feature as scenic
and conservation and then we added some areas east of north and south of inner where they
are now only able to support up to white industrial instead of all the way up heavy
industrial. So what are our next steps? As you'll see we have an
additional next step here on july 16th we are doing an additional open house and
public input for the draft industrial corridors. That's one of the comments that
we've seen a lot is the need for more community input. So we want the community to
provide additional input so we will be having another meeting on july 16th in this room at
530 just till 7 p.m. Staff will be here to answer questions, get more public input and hear
from the people this is their plan. We want to hear from them and
so those are our next steps. >> thank you very much. Qr code for the draft read it
comment scan it now tell your friends all right this one we are going to open public input
on this one. Anyone want to come up and do any input today?
okay I'll close public input last or genda and we'll make a motion to adjourn second all
those in favor say aye. All next week