1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:10,240 Thank you. I would like to welcome everyone. Apologies that we're just a tad behind. But let's 2 00:00:10,240 --> 00:00:15,400 go ahead and get started because we've got a pretty full agenda today. I'm Janet Graham 3 00:00:15,400 --> 00:00:21,560 and I am the chair of the policy committee and I also represent District 7, which is Conway 4 00:00:21,560 --> 00:00:26,280 and Portions of Carolina Forest. And I would ask each board member around the horseshoe 5 00:00:26,280 --> 00:00:33,440 to introduce yourselves, please. My name is David Cook. I represent District 1 and I am 6 00:00:33,440 --> 00:00:40,440 a member of the policy committee. Debbie Edmonds, District 2. Tracy Winters, District 3, and 7 00:00:40,440 --> 00:00:47,480 I serve on the policy committee. Howard Barnard, District 5. Neil James, District 10. 8 00:00:47,480 --> 00:00:58,000 Pam Dawson, District 6. Melanie Wellens, District 8, committee member. James Edwards, 9 00:00:58,000 --> 00:01:04,540 District 9. And Eddie Ingraminterum, Superintendent. I messed up the first time, so. Well, Pam, 10 00:01:04,540 --> 00:01:14,560 Lord Brooks. Tyler Nolemley, sorry. Thank you. Okay. Do we, if everybody's had a chance 11 00:01:14,600 --> 00:01:17,560 to review the agenda, do we have a motion to approve? 12 00:01:17,560 --> 00:01:23,640 So moved. Second. We have a motion and a second. Is there, are there any, is there anybody 13 00:01:23,640 --> 00:01:29,440 against it or do we have any discussion? Okay, so moved. If everyone's had a chance 14 00:01:29,440 --> 00:01:36,240 to review the minutes, we will ask for an approval, but you should have received 15 00:01:36,240 --> 00:01:42,000 just a few minutes ago the updated version that has some minor typographical corrections 16 00:01:42,000 --> 00:01:49,160 on it. I can tell you what they are if you want me to. It's just some wording. Or if 17 00:01:49,160 --> 00:01:54,920 you want to, you can give us a motion to approve. Motion to approve. Second. We have a motion 18 00:01:54,920 --> 00:02:02,720 to approve and a second. All those in favor? Aye. Any opposed? Aye's had it. Okay. For 19 00:02:02,720 --> 00:02:09,960 our new business, Mr. Lee James is going to come before us and give us a review of 20 00:02:10,000 --> 00:02:16,240 some of our results and some of the wording that we may need to shore up in that. 21 00:02:21,760 --> 00:02:26,920 Thank you. So good evening. I'm here to discuss just some, some slight modifications 22 00:02:26,920 --> 00:02:32,440 that I'd like to recommend for our results, more governance policies to bring them 23 00:02:32,440 --> 00:02:37,600 in line with what our current practices are. I'll go through each individually. You'll 24 00:02:37,640 --> 00:02:43,560 see there are very minor changes with the exception of R7. So R1 Literacy. In R1 25 00:02:43,560 --> 00:02:47,560 Literacy, it talks about the overall student performance in the current policy. The 26 00:02:47,560 --> 00:02:50,720 overall student performance will meet or exceed the district consolidated goals. 27 00:02:50,720 --> 00:02:54,320 You'll see the majority of these changes are related to those district consolidated 28 00:02:54,320 --> 00:02:58,680 goals. Those goals are no longer a part of our policy manual. What we are 29 00:02:58,680 --> 00:03:04,200 instead relying on are our strategic, strategic plan performance goals. So our 30 00:03:04,240 --> 00:03:08,680 strategic plan is a document that is updated every year and is recreated or 31 00:03:08,680 --> 00:03:14,000 redeveloped every five years. So that's a part of district practices, part of our 32 00:03:14,000 --> 00:03:17,280 practices in learning services and in other divisions because it affects 33 00:03:17,280 --> 00:03:22,440 everyone. So that will always be up to date and I would recommend that we use 34 00:03:22,440 --> 00:03:30,640 that as the comparison for these results reports. You'll see the same language 35 00:03:30,640 --> 00:03:35,600 in R2 Numeracy, just replacing district consolidated goals with strategic 36 00:03:35,600 --> 00:03:47,120 plan performance goals in R3 Science and in R4 Social Studies. I did not see the 37 00:03:47,120 --> 00:03:55,800 need for amendments for R5 or R6. Those do not relate to any of these goals in 38 00:03:55,800 --> 00:03:59,680 our reports on a variety of areas that are not commonly measured for 39 00:03:59,720 --> 00:04:05,080 accountability. The biggest change that I would like to recommend is actually in 40 00:04:05,080 --> 00:04:11,720 R7, I'm trying to get it to fit on one page here. In R7, current policy states 41 00:04:11,720 --> 00:04:15,480 that college and career readiness will be measured using the on-time graduation 42 00:04:15,480 --> 00:04:22,800 rate and the composite SAT and ACT scores. Since the writing of this 43 00:04:22,800 --> 00:04:27,280 policy, the South Carolina Department of Education has included in its 44 00:04:27,280 --> 00:04:32,640 accountability system for high schools a definition of college and career 45 00:04:32,640 --> 00:04:37,680 readiness which actually relies on I think eight different indicators. So we no 46 00:04:37,680 --> 00:04:40,800 longer have the need to designate what it is whenever it's defined for our 47 00:04:40,800 --> 00:04:46,600 schools and their accountability if you choose to do so. So what I'm 48 00:04:46,600 --> 00:04:49,560 recommending that language be changed to is that the college and career 49 00:04:49,560 --> 00:04:54,720 readiness will be measured using the criteria set forth by the South 50 00:04:54,720 --> 00:04:58,040 Carolina Department of Education Accountability Manual. That will bring 51 00:04:58,040 --> 00:05:01,680 in line with what our schools are responsible for and their efforts. The 52 00:05:01,680 --> 00:05:07,720 college and career readiness rate will meet or exceed the strategic plan 53 00:05:07,720 --> 00:05:12,960 performance goals baseline measure. I didn't want to ignore graduation 54 00:05:12,960 --> 00:05:17,240 rate entirely so I would like to propose leaving that in as a very 55 00:05:17,240 --> 00:05:22,160 important metric for us and the on-time graduation rate will meet 56 00:05:22,200 --> 00:05:27,040 or exceed the strategic plan performance goals baseline measure. SAT and 57 00:05:27,040 --> 00:05:32,240 ACT composite scores are not, they are part of college and career readiness 58 00:05:32,240 --> 00:05:35,320 and will still continue to be reported but it's not necessarily to 59 00:05:35,320 --> 00:05:38,560 stand alone because there's so many other ways kids can become college and 60 00:05:38,560 --> 00:05:44,040 career readiness. So I did recommend that we take that out and those are 61 00:05:44,080 --> 00:05:48,120 the policy changes that I would recommend. Any questions? 62 00:05:53,120 --> 00:05:59,440 Any questions from our committee members? No questions but you know once 63 00:05:59,440 --> 00:06:06,080 again as you did in the other presentation appreciate this time and 64 00:06:06,080 --> 00:06:11,760 going through this and especially the college and career readiness 65 00:06:11,800 --> 00:06:15,880 because recognizing that there are several different ways to measure 66 00:06:15,880 --> 00:06:20,760 that performance but thank you sir. Thank you. Thank you Mr. Cook for 67 00:06:20,760 --> 00:06:24,120 reminding me to thank him for that because we've talked and there's a lot 68 00:06:24,120 --> 00:06:30,680 of work that goes into this so thank you. Oh I'm sorry. Mr. James you 69 00:06:30,680 --> 00:06:37,560 know how many pages are in that plan? Or in which strategic plan? 70 00:06:37,800 --> 00:06:48,000 107? 3. 173? 173 excuse me that was all. It's rather extensive. Yeah that's a 71 00:06:48,000 --> 00:06:56,840 huge. It is. What's in there is excellent. There needs to be some way we 72 00:06:56,840 --> 00:07:04,520 can pull that out. Putting in the policy manual or something so you can 73 00:07:04,560 --> 00:07:10,520 refer to that without having to go to a 173 page document. We do have an 74 00:07:10,520 --> 00:07:14,560 area on our accountability website where we have just the strategic plan 75 00:07:14,560 --> 00:07:18,080 performance goals listed entirely separately so you're correct. It is a 76 00:07:18,080 --> 00:07:21,080 very large document. It has many elements that are required from the 77 00:07:21,080 --> 00:07:26,680 state and of course it is rather robust even in comparison to others. I'm 78 00:07:26,680 --> 00:07:31,640 sorry. A lot of board work to play. But we have already separated out 79 00:07:31,680 --> 00:07:36,120 performance goals since that's what this part focuses on. I certainly don't have 80 00:07:36,120 --> 00:07:42,280 any problem with you changing it. I just hate to see us know the policy 81 00:07:42,280 --> 00:07:46,280 manual is way too long and now we've got a strategic plan that's 82 00:07:46,280 --> 00:07:53,640 underneath 173 pages long. It should be getting shorter not longer. I hope that 83 00:07:53,640 --> 00:07:57,240 our next strategic plan cycle results in a more abbreviated plan. Thank you 84 00:07:57,240 --> 00:08:02,080 very much. Mr. James. That's like that's a lot of shot. It is just a 85 00:08:02,080 --> 00:08:07,000 comment on getting more verbose when we're going to get shorter. 86 00:08:10,160 --> 00:08:16,920 Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. I'm sorry. Yes. Mr. James. Thank you so 87 00:08:16,920 --> 00:08:22,480 much. This now is my understanding that this will sync us up with the 88 00:08:22,480 --> 00:08:27,400 reports that you provide us on the our report will now be synced directly to 89 00:08:27,400 --> 00:08:32,360 the strategic plan performance goals. We know that we have a measurement 90 00:08:32,360 --> 00:08:36,800 objective and in that measurement objective if I'm not mistaken don't 91 00:08:36,800 --> 00:08:40,920 we have year over year incremental gains embedded in those strategic 92 00:08:40,920 --> 00:08:46,320 performance goals on many of the. We do. All of these were written as 93 00:08:46,320 --> 00:08:49,120 comparison to the baseline measure we talked about last time about the 94 00:08:49,160 --> 00:08:54,360 importance of having lofty goals for us to strive to attain. And we also 95 00:08:54,360 --> 00:08:58,880 talked about how we should compare itself to show the growth to show how we 96 00:08:58,880 --> 00:09:02,520 have grown. So every time that I make a report for a results report I 97 00:09:02,520 --> 00:09:09,720 include that information in there. Great. I'm very very pleased to see 98 00:09:09,720 --> 00:09:15,240 that we are eliminating the confusion of having the district consolidated 99 00:09:15,240 --> 00:09:19,240 goals which are no longer in many cases applicable. Thank you so much for 100 00:09:19,240 --> 00:09:26,000 going to the trouble of syncing this up. Thank you. Thank you. Next on our 101 00:09:26,000 --> 00:09:33,040 agenda is G C one board self assessment. And we have discussed this several 102 00:09:33,040 --> 00:09:40,400 times and you have received in your packet a sample self assessment that 103 00:09:41,000 --> 00:09:45,200 from the South Carolina School Board Association. I did not receive any 104 00:09:45,240 --> 00:09:49,920 other samples from any board members. So if everybody's had a chance to look at 105 00:09:49,920 --> 00:09:59,840 this. Do any of our committee members have any discussion on this item. Yes, 106 00:09:59,840 --> 00:10:06,120 sir. Mr. Cook. So one I just you know we've discussed this before. I like 107 00:10:06,120 --> 00:10:10,280 anything with metrics kind of makes things easy for me. I like to score 108 00:10:10,320 --> 00:10:17,000 out. And I think that this is very thorough. I believe that it really it runs 109 00:10:17,000 --> 00:10:23,360 through pretty much everything in the G C's all the way down and then also to be 110 00:10:23,360 --> 00:10:28,960 able to have a little bit of narrative to go along with it. I think it just 111 00:10:28,960 --> 00:10:33,800 pulls it all together. I like this personally. I would hope that everybody 112 00:10:33,800 --> 00:10:40,360 else who is if hopefully everybody's had a chance to look at this. We are 113 00:10:40,360 --> 00:10:46,200 supposed to do this before I think our first meeting in January. So we really 114 00:10:46,200 --> 00:10:53,040 need to get this done so that we all can this fill out this form and assess 115 00:10:53,040 --> 00:10:59,440 ourselves. And we also need to make sure that when we do it that we get 116 00:10:59,440 --> 00:11:05,040 the results back in a timely manner and that we are meeting to discuss what those 117 00:11:05,040 --> 00:11:13,560 results are. So that will come later, I suppose, but is is the we're going to 118 00:11:14,520 --> 00:11:19,640 what I propose is that we if we adopt this that we be ready in January at our 119 00:11:19,640 --> 00:11:21,400 first meeting to do this assessment. 120 00:11:21,920 --> 00:11:28,520 Yes, sir. And if I could, Madam Chairman, so I'm guessing that we're all going to do 121 00:11:28,520 --> 00:11:33,880 one. Yes, then we're going to sit down at the meeting and come together. Somebody 122 00:11:33,880 --> 00:11:38,840 has to compile it. Great. And then give it to us. Give us a chance to look it 123 00:11:38,840 --> 00:11:47,480 over. And then we need to have a discussion. Thank you. Okay. 124 00:11:48,480 --> 00:11:55,760 Yes, ma'am. Well, no board members have any committee members have any any other 125 00:11:55,760 --> 00:12:03,200 comment? Yes, ma'am. Under each in our policy manual under each one, almost all of 126 00:12:03,200 --> 00:12:08,440 them like under GC2, GC3, there are requirements for these board self 127 00:12:08,440 --> 00:12:14,800 assessments. So since in the policy manual, it says, for example, we're 128 00:12:14,840 --> 00:12:18,840 supposed to do a board self assessment pertinent pertinent to governing 129 00:12:18,840 --> 00:12:25,440 commitments. That's GC2. And then we're supposed to do one under GC3 pertinent 130 00:12:25,440 --> 00:12:31,720 to board job description, one under GC4 pertinent to officers role. So is the 131 00:12:31,720 --> 00:12:36,160 proposal that we're going to use the same board self assessment for each one 132 00:12:36,200 --> 00:12:42,280 of the board self assessments that are called out under each one of the 133 00:12:42,840 --> 00:12:47,800 governance culture items? If I'm understanding what you're asking, are 134 00:12:47,800 --> 00:12:51,360 you asking if we're going to do one for each one of those? Are we going to use 135 00:12:51,360 --> 00:12:55,880 this one document for all of that? That's the question. Okay, I am assuming 136 00:12:55,880 --> 00:12:59,400 that we're going to use one document for all of that. And if anybody has 137 00:12:59,400 --> 00:13:05,320 anything that they want to single out, there's some space at the end that 138 00:13:05,320 --> 00:13:08,160 you can say, well, none of this was addressed in this document. And I 139 00:13:08,160 --> 00:13:12,600 would like to see this addressed. That would be my suggestion. And do we have 140 00:13:12,600 --> 00:13:17,880 clarification on who specifically is going to be tasked with compiling the 141 00:13:17,880 --> 00:13:22,520 results and presenting the report? I was assuming it would be Amanda. She's 142 00:13:22,520 --> 00:13:27,840 not here. There she is. Amanda's volunteering. She's got her hand up. 143 00:13:28,320 --> 00:13:32,240 That was my assumption. 144 00:13:35,760 --> 00:13:37,920 Does anybody have any objection to that? 145 00:13:39,520 --> 00:13:40,840 Thank you so much. Thank you. 146 00:13:43,840 --> 00:13:48,960 Okay, we're now down to GC eight item number three, which is in GC 10, if 147 00:13:48,960 --> 00:13:54,720 applicable, board member employment slash subcontracting with Ori County 148 00:13:54,760 --> 00:13:58,800 schools. And Ms. Wellens will be discussing that with us. 149 00:14:00,880 --> 00:14:06,560 Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I just wanted to bring it to the policy 150 00:14:06,560 --> 00:14:14,560 committee's attention that we currently have no wording. And thank 151 00:14:14,560 --> 00:14:18,080 you, Kenny, for providing the information that you've provided to 152 00:14:18,080 --> 00:14:33,120 us. No wording in our in GC eight under governments policies about board 153 00:14:33,120 --> 00:14:39,160 members working directly for Ori County schools and or subcontractors. 154 00:14:39,360 --> 00:14:54,680 Um, and according to the information that Kenny provided 59, 19, 300, um, they 155 00:14:54,680 --> 00:14:57,000 are not permitted, correct, Kenny? 156 00:15:00,000 --> 00:15:07,300 Good evening. Yes, I can share information with you in reference to this. There's a South 157 00:15:07,300 --> 00:15:14,680 Carolina Code of Law section 5919-300, which talks about board members receiving pay as 158 00:15:14,680 --> 00:15:21,000 a teacher. It says it shall be unlawful for a school trustee to receive pay as a teacher 159 00:15:21,000 --> 00:15:27,600 of a free public school that is located in the same district of which such person is 160 00:15:27,600 --> 00:15:35,920 a trustee. So the law is in place in reference to receiving pay, and that would be all inclusive 161 00:15:35,920 --> 00:15:42,920 pay coming directly from the district or pay coming through a third party. What also we 162 00:15:42,920 --> 00:15:49,480 have in researching this particular topic, there is a South Carolina Attorney General's 163 00:15:49,480 --> 00:15:57,240 opinion that is dated January 5, 2016 that also talks about this type of relationship 164 00:15:57,240 --> 00:16:02,920 in reference to what is described, legal term described as master-servant relationship 165 00:16:02,920 --> 00:16:09,080 or one party having authority over another. And it also incorporates not only a teacher 166 00:16:09,080 --> 00:16:15,440 role but other roles that may be within a school system from an employee standpoint. 167 00:16:15,440 --> 00:16:20,600 And also in looking at this, I have looked at language from other school boards in the 168 00:16:20,600 --> 00:16:26,800 state of South Carolina to make sure that whatever language is suggested here mirrors 169 00:16:26,840 --> 00:16:32,800 or is similar to those, and I have some suggested language for you for consideration in reference 170 00:16:32,800 --> 00:16:38,920 to it, which will include not only what the statute says but expands it for those that 171 00:16:38,920 --> 00:16:47,920 need a further definition of clarification. Do you have those languages now? Yes, I do. 172 00:16:47,920 --> 00:17:09,320 Again, this is the law portion of it. And this is a portion that I was able to find in 173 00:17:09,320 --> 00:17:16,280 some other school board policies in South Carolina where it expands it not only, again, 174 00:17:16,320 --> 00:17:20,760 for just teacher but it also talks about otherwise being employed in other positions 175 00:17:20,760 --> 00:17:26,800 and that it's irrelevant as to the source of the pay if it's coming directly from the 176 00:17:26,800 --> 00:17:32,560 district or third party. This particular school board did include temporary agencies when 177 00:17:32,560 --> 00:17:39,480 it comes to substituting teachers, substitutes for other employment pieces as well. And 178 00:17:39,480 --> 00:17:45,760 it talks about whether someone is a volunteer and defines whether what that is, if you're 179 00:17:45,760 --> 00:17:54,520 in a volunteer capacity which you are having responsibilities or overseeing certain aspects 180 00:17:54,520 --> 00:18:01,200 of the district or if you are responding to or directly report to superintendent, principal, 181 00:18:01,200 --> 00:18:07,720 a district or school administrator, those types of things. So, again, this is extracted 182 00:18:07,720 --> 00:18:14,280 from information from the law but also from the Attorney General's opinion that was 183 00:18:14,400 --> 00:18:15,880 established in 2016. 184 00:18:19,960 --> 00:18:27,400 Okay. So, essentially what we're saying is any board member who is a seated board member 185 00:18:28,400 --> 00:18:34,520 enters into conflict of interest if you are being paid by the district in which you sit on the board. 186 00:18:35,320 --> 00:18:41,480 That's specifically with the law and right. And then the Attorney General expands it so the 187 00:18:41,480 --> 00:18:47,640 pay element is also out of the question as far as coming from either the district or third party 188 00:18:47,640 --> 00:18:53,160 but also if you're not getting paid. It's a volunteer. A volunteer in a position of some 189 00:18:53,160 --> 00:18:59,480 capacity within the system that it could in essence create a conflict of interest relationship 190 00:18:59,480 --> 00:19:04,440 with that being in that position paid or not paid because you also in a higher position 191 00:19:04,440 --> 00:19:08,040 by being a board member. That's the master servant. Relationship. 192 00:19:08,600 --> 00:19:14,200 Okay. Any committee members have any questions or commentary on that? Yes, sir. Mr. Cook. 193 00:19:15,880 --> 00:19:21,880 Thank you for all your clarification, Kenny. I want to go back to the volunteering a little bit. 194 00:19:22,680 --> 00:19:29,400 So, as I look through this and this is something that I stopped doing when I got on the board 195 00:19:29,400 --> 00:19:36,360 that I want to make the volunteers say for the band, you know, if I'm working for the band, 196 00:19:36,360 --> 00:19:43,720 if you really look down and get into this, any principals, athletic director or other school 197 00:19:43,720 --> 00:19:48,840 or district administrator, I guess even volunteering for the band could be considered 198 00:19:49,480 --> 00:19:56,920 under this, come under this. Is that correct? It could, sir. Again, the impression that you 199 00:19:56,920 --> 00:20:04,280 would have in your role, dual roles could create a potential conflict. Now, say for example, 200 00:20:04,280 --> 00:20:09,800 if you're volunteering on the day that you're reading to kids, that's a little bit different. 201 00:20:10,680 --> 00:20:14,440 It's not a position that you would have, like you're volunteering to help 202 00:20:14,440 --> 00:20:21,000 do something established with a specific group or activity. Let's say they gave me 203 00:20:21,000 --> 00:20:25,880 a responsibility to watch this group and be responsible for that group. That's kind of... 204 00:20:25,880 --> 00:20:31,240 Yeah, right. Like you being a chaperone, that type of thing, that might be one of those 205 00:20:31,240 --> 00:20:39,960 issues that could be a conflict of interest. But if the group is assigned to clean the road 206 00:20:39,960 --> 00:20:44,440 for Adopt a Highway and you volunteer in that capacity, that's different. 207 00:20:44,440 --> 00:20:48,680 Great. Thank you. Any other committee members? 208 00:20:51,640 --> 00:20:54,200 Ms. Edmonds, I think, and then Mr. James. 209 00:20:54,200 --> 00:20:58,760 Okay, so just so we do the right thing. We want to do the right thing and make 210 00:20:58,760 --> 00:21:07,880 sure because unlike you, I didn't quit going to volunteer to read, so I should not go to read. 211 00:21:07,880 --> 00:21:12,760 No, no. You're volunteering to read. That's not really in a position. That's volunteering your 212 00:21:12,760 --> 00:21:18,760 time to read to kids. So that's not like you're in a solid position where 213 00:21:19,320 --> 00:21:23,800 superior versus someone of a lesser position. Okay. All right. Thank you. 214 00:21:24,440 --> 00:21:33,240 Yes, ma'am. What if you're volunteering for staff in the office so that they can have Christmas 215 00:21:33,240 --> 00:21:40,440 lunch or something like that? That's a position that you're substituting yourself in, 216 00:21:40,440 --> 00:21:44,840 so that may be a great area that could potentially be a conflict of interest. 217 00:21:44,840 --> 00:21:49,320 Okay. Thank you. And my suggestion to you, when there is a doubt or question, 218 00:21:49,320 --> 00:21:53,320 err on the side of caution. Mr. James. 219 00:21:53,320 --> 00:22:01,240 Mr. Jenrett, I may also have, I guess, stepped in it. I have been responsible for building the 220 00:22:01,240 --> 00:22:08,920 sets for a chorus production. And in the building of those sets, I had students assisting me. 221 00:22:10,040 --> 00:22:15,240 I was solely a volunteer working for the Coral Director. Is that an issue? 222 00:22:16,040 --> 00:22:22,520 I see that as a little bit different, because what capacity are you in a 223 00:22:23,080 --> 00:22:27,160 control, controlling over somebody else? I mean, you said you had others, 224 00:22:27,160 --> 00:22:31,240 students working in building, but you're sort of joining them to build something, 225 00:22:31,240 --> 00:22:35,720 so I don't know if that's really the same. Well, I just want to make sure, 226 00:22:35,720 --> 00:22:40,280 because I see this as a really gray area. We're getting into the weeds. 227 00:22:41,000 --> 00:22:46,440 I think the intent is crystal clear. As a board member, we're not supposed to be in a 228 00:22:46,440 --> 00:22:53,000 position that would influence or put the principal or assistant principal in a position that they may 229 00:22:53,000 --> 00:22:58,760 not want to do their job, because we're the ones that were involved in the supervision of kids. 230 00:22:58,760 --> 00:23:04,520 I understand that. But at the same time, I think we all got into this business because we 231 00:23:04,520 --> 00:23:09,640 wanted to make the schools a better place. We had children, grandchildren that are going 232 00:23:09,640 --> 00:23:14,920 through the schools, so we want to be participating in some way, so that's a fine line. 233 00:23:15,880 --> 00:23:23,640 I guess would there be a, if we were to be involved in an activity, should we have a legal 234 00:23:23,640 --> 00:23:28,600 interpretation by you to say it's okay before we agree to undertake a certain activity? 235 00:23:29,800 --> 00:23:35,320 That's fine as far as the suggestion, whether it's thumbs up or thumbs down with certain 236 00:23:35,400 --> 00:23:41,720 activities. But I would look at it like this. If you're working in a volunteering in a capacity 237 00:23:41,720 --> 00:23:48,920 that is a position of some sort within the system, then that clearly, to me, is a conflict of 238 00:23:48,920 --> 00:23:53,800 interest. Or are you subbing to do something that is a service that an employee would do 239 00:23:53,800 --> 00:23:58,840 normally, that type of thing? But devoting your time to help the betterment of the school, 240 00:23:58,840 --> 00:24:04,440 the community, I think it's a little bit different than the other volunteer aspect that 241 00:24:05,240 --> 00:24:10,280 the intent of the opinion is based on. Mr. 242 00:24:13,640 --> 00:24:20,600 Kenny, may I ask, so in my mind, I'm drawing a distinction and you correct me if I'm wrong. 243 00:24:22,040 --> 00:24:27,240 If that person wants to volunteer, but they're having some sort of 244 00:24:27,240 --> 00:24:33,560 discretion or authority in that position that they're wanting to volunteer for, 245 00:24:33,560 --> 00:24:38,600 then it would be best not to serve. That's correct. Okay. Mr. Varnit. 246 00:24:41,160 --> 00:24:50,040 Mr. General Rat, you and I have spoken about what I feel was another conflict of interest 247 00:24:51,000 --> 00:25:03,000 in board members recusing themselves. I think the law clearly says when there's an issue 248 00:25:06,200 --> 00:25:16,520 that any board member has someone in their family or close friends, relatives, 249 00:25:16,520 --> 00:25:27,240 that receives a financial benefit, they must recuse themselves from discussion and from voting. 250 00:25:28,200 --> 00:25:35,000 Your answer is you can recuse from an individual. I don't believe that's what the law says. 251 00:25:35,720 --> 00:25:41,320 And what I'd like you to do, Mr. General Rat, is give me the legal opinion. 252 00:25:41,880 --> 00:25:50,440 I want that recorded on the video and in the minutes. And then I'm going to go to the 253 00:25:50,440 --> 00:25:57,960 South Carolina Ethics Commission and ask them for an opinion. Mr. Varnit, does the recusal that 254 00:25:57,960 --> 00:26:03,560 you're talking about, does it pertain to this issue right here with the care custody and control 255 00:26:04,120 --> 00:26:09,800 exerted over some of our employees and the act of conflict of interest? 256 00:26:10,360 --> 00:26:16,920 Yes. It's a conflict of interest. I'll give you an example. Last week we voted on a holiday bonus. 257 00:26:17,960 --> 00:26:21,320 Okay. Is it possible for us to separate these? 258 00:26:21,320 --> 00:26:26,520 No. I don't think so because that's a conflict of interest and it needs to be 259 00:26:26,520 --> 00:26:32,840 covered in the same paragraph. And it needs to be specific writing in that. 260 00:26:33,800 --> 00:26:43,080 We have a worm, a word of mouth. When I ask Kenny, Kenny says, as long as it's the way we've done it. 261 00:26:44,040 --> 00:26:50,040 Sir, there's a law that's an exception. And it is also found on the South Carolina Ethics 262 00:26:50,040 --> 00:26:55,400 Commission website in reference to large groups. And that's a large group exception. 263 00:26:55,960 --> 00:27:01,960 The large group exception means that you're voting for mass of large group of individuals, 264 00:27:01,960 --> 00:27:08,600 that type of thing. And when doing so, that if the board member has a family member 265 00:27:09,800 --> 00:27:15,320 that is receiving the same, nothing greater than, then they are able to vote and block 266 00:27:15,320 --> 00:27:21,000 the large groups. What we have done in the past historically is that in the event that a 267 00:27:21,000 --> 00:27:25,960 board member does have a family member, they still complete the recusal form and state 268 00:27:25,960 --> 00:27:30,200 their family member. And they also state verbally that they're voting for the group 269 00:27:30,200 --> 00:27:36,360 except their family member. But there is the large exception group. And that's what happened 270 00:27:36,360 --> 00:27:44,680 at the last meeting with each board member. Thank you very much. And I would add too that if 271 00:27:45,800 --> 00:27:51,480 you're looking at, if you have care, custody or control of a situation, you have that master 272 00:27:51,480 --> 00:27:55,800 servant relationship. And that's where the conflict is coming from. And I think we all 273 00:27:55,800 --> 00:28:05,640 understand that. Okay. Everybody good? Okay. May I ask a question? Certainly. Is the next step 274 00:28:05,640 --> 00:28:14,680 that this proposed change to GC8 will come before us as a business item? We will. Thank you. 275 00:28:15,880 --> 00:28:21,000 Along with any, any others that we discuss that need to come as well. Thank you. 276 00:28:21,080 --> 00:28:24,840 Thank you, sir. Oh, well, you might as well stay there. 277 00:28:27,000 --> 00:28:34,200 Next, we're discussing electronic participation in board meetings and possibility of proxy. I 278 00:28:34,200 --> 00:28:40,840 think that was on the original one. Yes. And doing research and references to this topic, 279 00:28:41,480 --> 00:28:46,120 of course, you may be familiar with some of you on the board at the time 280 00:28:47,080 --> 00:28:54,680 and some of you were not. But during COVID, the practice was to have meetings virtually to conduct 281 00:28:54,680 --> 00:29:02,440 business. And at some point in time, the director from the state level is to all board meetings to 282 00:29:02,440 --> 00:29:08,040 occur in person. And so we moved into that direction. Actually, we moved in that direction 283 00:29:08,040 --> 00:29:14,840 prior to the information coming down from the state to do so. And with that in mind, 284 00:29:15,800 --> 00:29:22,840 so the electronic or virtual option was being used then. And for most school boards that are out 285 00:29:22,840 --> 00:29:29,480 there now, they are conducting their meetings in person with individuals all appearing in person, 286 00:29:29,480 --> 00:29:37,720 voting in person by hand, by voice, et cetera. There are few that do some electronic options, 287 00:29:37,720 --> 00:29:42,760 but those options are very specific as to when they were, when they are to occur. 288 00:29:42,760 --> 00:29:47,720 And there are some components that are out there that you have to take into consideration. 289 00:29:48,520 --> 00:29:52,760 One being the connectivity issue. You may have issues as far as connecting 290 00:29:54,360 --> 00:29:59,800 and with whomever, wherever the person is and the board room. 291 00:30:00,000 --> 00:30:05,920 There are also issues, I think most importantly, that overshadows that, the issues of confidentiality 292 00:30:05,920 --> 00:30:12,560 in reference to who's on the other end, who has access, or with the capabilities of highly 293 00:30:12,560 --> 00:30:18,840 intelligent folks, they're able to tap in to your connection and join you when you don't 294 00:30:18,840 --> 00:30:24,640 need or want them to join you. Also, the confidentiality aspect of things happening 295 00:30:24,640 --> 00:30:32,320 in reference to the topics that you would discuss by law in executive session. So, most boards 296 00:30:32,320 --> 00:30:39,120 are doing it in person, voice vote, in person votes, et cetera, and just some language that 297 00:30:39,120 --> 00:30:44,840 I've seen is in reference to all votes by members would be by hand or voice vote and 298 00:30:44,840 --> 00:30:51,360 also there's no proxy voting when it comes to voting at the board level. So again, that's 299 00:30:51,360 --> 00:30:59,880 what most are doing, just want to share that, but they are up to you that do the electronic 300 00:30:59,880 --> 00:31:04,080 connection, but there are some concerns in reference to that. 301 00:31:04,080 --> 00:31:09,480 Discussion? Mr. Cook. 302 00:31:09,480 --> 00:31:16,880 Thank you, Mr. Graham. So, I've been thinking about this a lot. It's easy for me to, you 303 00:31:16,920 --> 00:31:21,400 know, I drive over an hour to get here every meeting that I come to and it's easy for me 304 00:31:21,400 --> 00:31:26,600 to go, oh, that would be great for me. I zoom every day and I do it all the time. But we 305 00:31:26,600 --> 00:31:32,080 bring up these, you know, connectivity is not usually a problem, but I do start thinking 306 00:31:32,080 --> 00:31:37,120 of confidentiality, safety and security. One of the other things that I think of 307 00:31:37,120 --> 00:31:42,960 is, I guess I have no other way to describe it other than, well, wow, this could really 308 00:31:43,000 --> 00:31:47,760 just become a thing for somebody. I mean, at some point we could go, oh, this is so convenient. 309 00:31:47,760 --> 00:31:53,440 I'll just, eh, I don't feel like going tonight. I'm going to just do this. And, you know, 310 00:31:53,440 --> 00:32:00,440 I feel like that could turn into an issue. And the other part about it is, if I'm not 311 00:32:00,440 --> 00:32:05,440 going to be here, which I've probably missed a couple meetings, I guess, in my two years, 312 00:32:05,440 --> 00:32:11,640 but I am fully confident that everybody else who's sitting at this board right now can 313 00:32:11,640 --> 00:32:17,320 make good and sound decisions. And I believe that that's, you know, we are a board that 314 00:32:17,320 --> 00:32:22,720 works as one together. And I do, you know, I trust everybody here. So I don't think, 315 00:32:22,720 --> 00:32:26,920 you know, for me, you know, if this were ever to come do a vote, I would probably not 316 00:32:26,920 --> 00:32:33,920 vote for it. Thank you, ma'am. I also, I feel that way as well. Because I love 317 00:32:34,240 --> 00:32:41,240 phoning in and zooming in. But I do understand the need for me to personally be here. If 318 00:32:44,080 --> 00:32:49,080 I'm sick, I'm not coming here. And I don't want to call in. And I don't want to zoom 319 00:32:49,080 --> 00:32:54,080 in. If I'm on vacation, I'm not zooming in. If there's an emergency, I'm going to 320 00:32:54,080 --> 00:32:59,200 take care of it. I'm probably not going to be here. And just like Mr. Cook said, 321 00:32:59,240 --> 00:33:05,440 we have 12 highly intelligent people on this board. They are perfectly capable of making 322 00:33:05,440 --> 00:33:09,960 decisions. In my absence, I feel like I think it would be presumptuous of me to think that 323 00:33:09,960 --> 00:33:15,320 if I'm not here, you can't make a right decision. I just, I know that's not true. 324 00:33:15,320 --> 00:33:22,320 So I would be voting for us to be present at a meeting to participate and to vote. 325 00:33:23,320 --> 00:33:27,320 I think that's what our constituents expect. Yes, ma'am. 326 00:33:27,320 --> 00:33:34,320 I feel the same way as Mr. Cook and yourself. My question is, we still get to give our proxy 327 00:33:36,480 --> 00:33:39,320 during committee meetings, however. 328 00:33:39,320 --> 00:33:46,320 Yes, that's different. And we need to clean that verbiage up, too. Yes, ma'am. 329 00:33:47,320 --> 00:33:48,320 Ms. Whelan? 330 00:33:48,320 --> 00:33:49,320 I'm good. 331 00:33:49,320 --> 00:33:53,320 Any other board members? 332 00:33:53,320 --> 00:34:02,320 Is there proposed language to amend the current policy manual that identifies that we're allowed to 333 00:34:02,320 --> 00:34:08,320 provide proxy for committee meetings? I know it was bit ambiguous in our current policy manual. 334 00:34:08,320 --> 00:34:13,320 The committee meetings is stated in the committee meetings to do that, but we can make it 335 00:34:13,320 --> 00:34:16,320 explicitly clear as far as board meetings are concerned. 336 00:34:16,320 --> 00:34:23,320 I think it would be helpful to be as direct and unambiguous as possible in the policy manual. 337 00:34:23,320 --> 00:34:30,320 So if I might ask the policy committee to consider cleaning that language up, as the chairwoman suggests. 338 00:34:32,320 --> 00:34:37,320 I would ask that you give us some language that would be crystal clear. 339 00:34:37,320 --> 00:34:45,320 And I would suggest that we tie all these things up before the end of this fiscal year. 340 00:34:45,320 --> 00:34:49,320 Not fiscal year, this calendar year. 341 00:34:49,320 --> 00:34:55,320 So when we meet again on Wednesday, could you have that for us? 342 00:34:55,320 --> 00:35:01,320 And maybe we put something on the agenda to discuss more if we need to. 343 00:35:01,320 --> 00:35:02,320 Yes. 344 00:35:02,320 --> 00:35:10,320 And just to remind all board members, we do have on schedule two special call meetings after tonight, 345 00:35:10,320 --> 00:35:15,320 one on December 11th and another on December 19th. 346 00:35:15,320 --> 00:35:22,320 So there are agendas that these items can be added to get those matters voted upon. 347 00:35:22,320 --> 00:35:27,320 So if you could get us the language before Wednesday, we can look at it, think about it, 348 00:35:27,320 --> 00:35:32,320 discuss it on Wednesday, and then maybe have it as a business item on the night. 349 00:35:32,320 --> 00:35:34,320 Is it the 19th? 350 00:35:34,320 --> 00:35:36,320 You can do that, or yes. 351 00:35:36,320 --> 00:35:38,320 Yes, you can do that for the 19th. 352 00:35:38,320 --> 00:35:40,320 Can we vote on it this next? 353 00:35:40,320 --> 00:35:50,320 Well, if there is the desire of the committee to forward to and you're reporting tonight a suggestion, 354 00:35:50,320 --> 00:35:55,320 then you discuss it tonight and it can be voted on December 11th. 355 00:35:56,320 --> 00:35:58,320 If that's the desire of the committee. 356 00:35:58,320 --> 00:35:59,320 Yes, ma'am. 357 00:35:59,320 --> 00:36:00,320 Are we talking about two different things? 358 00:36:00,320 --> 00:36:05,320 One, the verbiage on the screen, and then two, the proxy voting, verbiage. 359 00:36:05,320 --> 00:36:06,320 All right. 360 00:36:06,320 --> 00:36:08,320 Which one are we doing this evening? 361 00:36:08,320 --> 00:36:13,320 We're talking about number five, electronic participation in board meetings. 362 00:36:13,320 --> 00:36:18,320 That would be at the next one once he gives us verbiage. 363 00:36:18,320 --> 00:36:23,320 However, this in front of us, is that for this evening? 364 00:36:23,320 --> 00:36:24,320 Do we need to make a motion? 365 00:36:24,320 --> 00:36:25,320 No. 366 00:36:25,320 --> 00:36:26,320 Not now. 367 00:36:26,320 --> 00:36:27,320 Not now. 368 00:36:27,320 --> 00:36:28,320 Okay. 369 00:36:28,320 --> 00:36:29,320 No. 370 00:36:29,320 --> 00:36:35,320 Do you want all the items that you discussed to be voted on together in unison? 371 00:36:35,320 --> 00:36:42,320 If so, then that could be done on the 11th, and you discuss those items as you report them out tonight, 372 00:36:42,320 --> 00:36:43,320 if that's what you want to do? 373 00:36:43,320 --> 00:36:49,320 I want to be as clear as possible to our board members and also to the public as to what we're doing. 374 00:36:49,320 --> 00:36:53,320 So I think that the more we have it in public, the clearer it'll be. 375 00:36:53,320 --> 00:36:57,320 So if we vote in a block, sometimes things get lost and misrepresented. 376 00:36:57,320 --> 00:37:00,320 So I would just like to bring it forth one at a time. 377 00:37:00,320 --> 00:37:02,320 That is my suggestion to the committee. 378 00:37:02,320 --> 00:37:04,320 What do you think? 379 00:37:04,320 --> 00:37:05,320 I'm good with that. 380 00:37:05,320 --> 00:37:06,320 I'm good with that. 381 00:37:06,320 --> 00:37:10,320 I'm good. 382 00:37:10,320 --> 00:37:11,320 Okay. 383 00:37:11,320 --> 00:37:13,320 Thank you. 384 00:37:13,320 --> 00:37:20,320 I guess our next meeting date is Wednesday? 385 00:37:21,320 --> 00:37:22,320 We're not meeting. 386 00:37:22,320 --> 00:37:23,320 It's a policy committee. 387 00:37:23,320 --> 00:37:27,320 Not the policy committee, but the board is meeting a special call for you. 388 00:37:27,320 --> 00:37:34,320 And just to reiterate why, on December 11th, the board will be, after its announcement, 389 00:37:34,320 --> 00:37:38,320 this evening of the top three finalists, the board will be conducting those interviews 390 00:37:38,320 --> 00:37:40,320 on the 11th in a special call meeting. 391 00:37:40,320 --> 00:37:43,320 And the interviews will be conducted in the executive session. 392 00:37:43,320 --> 00:37:47,320 But because the board is meeting and you have to develop an agenda, 393 00:37:47,320 --> 00:37:52,320 then add other items as you deem fit for that purpose. 394 00:37:52,320 --> 00:37:55,320 If we take care of everything we need to do on the 11th, 395 00:37:55,320 --> 00:37:59,320 the policy committee probably doesn't need to meet again until 25, 396 00:37:59,320 --> 00:38:05,320 which would need to be January, I would think. 397 00:38:05,320 --> 00:38:15,320 Is that convenient for y'all? 398 00:38:15,320 --> 00:38:18,320 How about January the 27th? 399 00:38:18,320 --> 00:38:21,320 At four? 400 00:38:21,320 --> 00:38:23,320 January 27th. 401 00:38:23,320 --> 00:38:24,320 I'm sorry. 402 00:38:24,320 --> 00:38:26,320 Ms. Graham, I think that's our second meeting. 403 00:38:26,320 --> 00:38:29,320 In January, the facilities committee has a standing committee. 404 00:38:29,320 --> 00:38:30,320 Okay, that's right. 405 00:38:30,320 --> 00:38:32,320 Well, we can do three then. 406 00:38:32,320 --> 00:38:34,320 Thank you. 407 00:38:34,320 --> 00:38:44,320 Ms. Graham, could you put some times on the self assessment? 408 00:38:44,320 --> 00:38:49,320 In other words, you need to have it filled out 409 00:38:49,320 --> 00:38:57,320 and needs to be in by such and such a date so she can consult. 410 00:38:57,320 --> 00:39:02,320 I would ask that we have it when we come for our first meeting in January, 411 00:39:02,320 --> 00:39:04,320 which is the 13th. 412 00:39:04,320 --> 00:39:07,320 Well, if you need to do it the first meeting in January, 413 00:39:07,320 --> 00:39:09,320 she's going to meet it before then. 414 00:39:09,320 --> 00:39:13,320 No, I mean we actually have it and can print it out 415 00:39:13,320 --> 00:39:16,320 and have it complete to give to her on the 13th. 416 00:39:16,320 --> 00:39:21,320 And then maybe she can have the results to us by the 27th. 417 00:39:21,320 --> 00:39:24,320 Because if I remember correctly in our policy, 418 00:39:24,320 --> 00:39:30,320 it says that we have to have it done by our first meeting in January. 419 00:39:30,320 --> 00:39:32,320 Or sometimes there. 420 00:39:32,320 --> 00:39:37,320 I thought that was the assessment itself had to be done on the first meeting. 421 00:39:37,320 --> 00:39:40,320 And I must be misunderstanding what you're saying. 422 00:39:40,320 --> 00:39:42,320 Excuse me. 423 00:39:42,320 --> 00:39:50,320 In the annual work plan under the board self assessments that we agreed to, 424 00:39:50,320 --> 00:39:55,320 those were all supposed to be covered on January the 13th. 425 00:39:55,320 --> 00:39:58,320 The self assessments for GC6. 426 00:39:58,320 --> 00:40:05,320 There's a whole section here under our annual work plan. 427 00:40:05,320 --> 00:40:06,320 Okay. 428 00:40:06,320 --> 00:40:15,320 Well, do you want us to have this out to you so that you can have it ready 429 00:40:15,320 --> 00:40:17,320 and back to us by the 13th. 430 00:40:17,320 --> 00:40:19,320 Back here by the 13th and complete. 431 00:40:19,320 --> 00:40:20,320 Yes, ma'am. 432 00:40:20,320 --> 00:40:21,320 Okay. 433 00:40:21,320 --> 00:40:23,320 I'm sure Amanda can work with it. 434 00:40:23,320 --> 00:40:27,320 And she will compile the results and we will have the results 435 00:40:27,320 --> 00:40:31,320 by the work, our session on the 27th. 436 00:40:31,320 --> 00:40:33,320 That'll give a couple of weeks. 437 00:40:33,320 --> 00:40:35,320 So do you need more than that? 438 00:40:35,320 --> 00:40:36,320 Excuse me. 439 00:40:36,320 --> 00:40:42,320 I thought the language said we had to have it on the first meeting. 440 00:40:42,320 --> 00:40:44,320 Does it just say January? 441 00:40:44,320 --> 00:40:47,320 It says the first meeting but you would have it. 442 00:40:47,320 --> 00:40:50,320 She's going to get it to us and we're going to complete it and bring it back. 443 00:40:50,320 --> 00:40:53,320 I thought we had to have the assessment. 444 00:40:53,320 --> 00:40:56,320 We physically did the assessment on the first meeting. 445 00:40:56,320 --> 00:41:00,320 If that's what you want to do, we can do that. 446 00:41:00,320 --> 00:41:02,320 That's what we agreed to on the work plan. 447 00:41:02,320 --> 00:41:08,320 And on here it says annually in January and then we agreed to it on the work plan in January 13th. 448 00:41:08,320 --> 00:41:10,320 Okay. 449 00:41:10,320 --> 00:41:16,320 So I would say we get the assessment back to her the first week 450 00:41:16,320 --> 00:41:22,320 and she puts it all together and she can send it back to us 451 00:41:22,320 --> 00:41:28,320 and we can look at it and then do the assessment at the first meeting. 452 00:41:28,320 --> 00:41:31,320 We can even do it if you like. 453 00:41:31,320 --> 00:41:35,320 Since we're going to be meeting a couple more times this month, 454 00:41:35,320 --> 00:41:38,320 go ahead and get it to us now and have it, just have it done. 455 00:41:38,320 --> 00:41:44,320 All right. I like that. 456 00:41:44,320 --> 00:41:46,320 Okay. Are we good? 457 00:41:46,320 --> 00:41:47,320 Everything set? 458 00:41:47,320 --> 00:41:49,320 We need a motion to adjourn. 459 00:41:49,320 --> 00:41:51,320 Second. 460 00:41:51,320 --> 00:41:52,320 No objections. 461 00:41:52,320 --> 00:41:53,320 We're adjourned. 462 00:41:53,320 --> 00:41:55,320 Thank you.