[0:01] All right. I'd like to call the meeting of the city of huber heights, property maintenance review board order.
[0:08] madam secretary, would you please call the roll? All right,
[0:12] ms. Kromer? Here. Mr. Darren? Here. Ms. Hess?
[0:17] mr. Roberts? Here. Mr. Vaughn? Mr.
[0:21] shack. Man madoff. Here. Mr. Winkler here. And
[0:25] I did hear from the other two that they would not be here.
[0:30] okay. So if
[0:34] there's no objection without objection, I will accept
[0:38] the agenda for tonight's meeting. So
[0:42] approved. Alright. In accordance to the rules,
[0:46] I need to swear in whoever is speaking tonight. Mr. Lar,
[0:50] would you raise your right hand? You need to hold
[0:55] on. We're gonna back up. I need a motion to approve. Oh, I thought just
[0:59] speaking it was good. Alright. I need a motion to approve the agenda
[1:04] from july the 10th, or I'm sorry, for this evening,
[1:09] I believe we approve the agenda. Okay. I second. Okay. We don't have to
[1:13] take a vote. No vote. That's it. Okay. Now in accordance, we
[1:17] swear in. Yeah. And I shall ask,
[1:21] let's see. Do you hereby swear or affirm on a
[1:26] threat of perjury to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth so help you god? I
[1:30] do. Alright. Thank you.
[1:36] alright. And I see there is no pending business. So we'll
[1:41] get right into our new business, which is our first
[1:45] case. Tonight is pmrb case 25 dash 24.
[1:49] property owner gault property holdings. Llc is in violation
[1:54] of section 1313 of the property maintenance code at property. Located
[1:58] at 57 37 harshman mill road.
[2:03] mr. Chairman, thank you. Good evening. Good everyone glad you're here. Good
[2:07] evening. Give jerry just a moment to catch up. I really apologize.
[2:11] this just isn't working greatly. Yeah. So we're, we wanna make
[2:15] sure you get to see the, the photos. Okay.
[2:20] property at 5 7 3 7 harshman road is in violation
[2:25] of city code pertaining to junk stored on the property under a carport.
[2:31] this consists of discarded doors and drywall section
[2:35] 13, 13 0 4 states. All permissible items stored
[2:40] outside must be in good condition and usable as intended
[2:44] by the manufacturer. No such items that are broken,
[2:48] dilapidated, or discarded shall be stored outside. Inspection,
[2:53] verifies the property does not meet the standard set forth in the code, therefore the
[2:57] property is in violation. Your attached case review illustrates the
[3:01] violation process and non-compliance of the property.
[3:05] the city's zoning letter mailed to the owner of record have not been
[3:09] returned. There has been no communication from the owner to the code enforcement
[3:13] office. Tax records shows property
[3:17] taxes are traditionally paid. If declared a nuisance by
[3:21] the board, the property will be abated by the city's contractor. Any costs
[3:26] incurred by the city will be invoiced to the property owner. Staff
[3:30] recommendation is as follows, the board to declare the property a nuisance,
[3:35] the board orders staff to have the city contractor abate the property.
[3:39] if so ordered, the city contractor will bring the property into compliance by removal
[3:44] of nuisance. Alright,
[3:48] thank you. Anyone have any questions?
[3:53] looks, this is probably a rental home. Not sure sir.
[3:57] uh, we assume there's at least been some remodeling
[4:01] done, but we're not sure what the status is of the occupant,
[4:06] whether it's unoccupied or not. You have anything from anyone in regards to
[4:10] this one? No. Nothing.
[4:14] alright. Do anyone else have a question?
[4:19] entertain a motion please. You, you'll make a motion to
[4:23] declare the property a nuisance and have the city abate it.
[4:27] I have a second. Second.
[4:31] and vote please. Alright. Mr. Darren? Yes. Mr.
[4:35] sch mangrove. Yes. Mr. Kromer? Yes. Mr. Roberts?
[4:40] yes. Mr. Winkler? Yes. Passes five to zero. Alright.
[4:45] motion carries for pmrb case 25 dash 24.
[4:52] the next case is pmrb case 25 dash 25.
[4:58] wg dome is in violation of section 1313
[5:02] of the property maintenance code at property located at 65 38
[5:07] glen ivy drive.
[5:12] just wanted to let you get a full view of the
[5:16] property. So the property at 6 5 3 8
[5:21] glen ivy is on via violation of city code
[5:25] pertaining to many miscellaneous items stored throughout the yard.
[5:31] there is also substantial trimming of vegetation needed.
[5:35] the house is unoccupied and apparently visited on rare occasions by the owner
[5:39] who now lives elsewhere. This has been a nuisance property for years.
[5:44] it has previously been before this board section
[5:48] 13, 13 0 4 states. All permissible items stored
[5:52] outside must be in good condition and usable as intended by the
[5:56] manufacturer. New as such. Items that are broken, dilapidated
[6:01] or discarded shall be stored outside inspection
[6:05] verifies the property does not meet the standard set forth in the code. Therefore the
[6:09] property is in violation. Your attached case review illustrates the
[6:13] violation process and non-compliance of the property.
[6:17] city zoning letters mailed to the owner of record have not been returned.
[6:21] there's been no communication from the owner to the code enforcement office.
[6:27] additionally, the posting was placed on the front door advising my intent
[6:31] to bring the property to this board. The posting is attached
[6:35] to the report file. That tax record shows property taxes
[6:40] are traditionally paid. If declared a nuisance by the board, the
[6:44] property will be abated by the city's contractor. Any costs incurred by the city
[6:48] will be invoiced to the property owner. Staff recommendation as
[6:52] this follows the board declare the property a nuisance. The board offers
[6:56] staff to have the state contractor abate the property. If
[7:00] so ordered, the city contractor will bring the property into compliance by removal
[7:04] of the nuisance. This will include removal of all items regardless of
[7:08] the condition and trimming of all vegetation. Um,
[7:14] additionally, I had the zoning officer go by today. There's been no improvement at the
[7:18] property. Okay. Okay.
[7:22] anyone have a question? Mr.
[7:27] lar, can you tell me when the last time it was brought to us?
[7:31] you said it's been before, it has been before the board.
[7:36] this will be a guess on my, I would say a couple of years ago. Same thing?
[7:41] same thing. Pretty much. And, um, yes. And the,
[7:45] at that time the owner was living there. There was a language barrier.
[7:49] uh, had a zoning officer last year that was working
[7:53] with her. He's no longer with us, but trying to
[7:58] move her along. Um, she would make some very slight improvements
[8:02] to the front yard. Uh, vietnamese
[8:06] lady, culturally quite different from us as far as what
[8:10] you do in your yard or don't do. Right. And, uh,
[8:14] he worked with or to no avail. And uh, we've had a couple
[8:18] of very concerned neighbors. One living next door as you can imagine. Right. So
[8:23] enough's enough where, you know, we're not even looking to see if the,
[8:27] the garden tools that are being stored outside our
[8:31] serviceable or not. We're taking everything that's not bolted down.
[8:36] is that including the bags of soil I saw on the picture as well, sir. Is
[8:40] that including the bags of soil? Soil I saw on the pictures? Yep. Because you're not supposed to
[8:44] store anything in the front yard according to our outdoor storage and use
[8:49] code, regardless of what it is or what is intended to use sis.
[8:53] so we'll take, we'll take everything.
[8:57] I was just curious as to, nobody's
[9:02] complained for two years or oh no, no. We, I get calls periodically.
[9:08] the problem is there would be a little bit of an improvement. The zoning
[9:12] officer who was working with her, um,
[9:17] I believe gave her too much time. It was too considerate.
[9:22] and sometimes you just enough's enough. We're
[9:27] we're there that this as a repeat offender so to speak? Uh, yes. Absolutely. Yeah.
[9:31] we've been to this property many times. Not this bad
[9:35] before. It comes before us. Well we're, we're hoping that since she is
[9:39] no longer living at the property, 'cause she had been previously living there,
[9:44] um, that once we clear all of this up, clean up all of this yard
[9:48] mess, all of the vegetation that we will have this occur again.
[9:52] but we'll be watching it, believe me. Okay. Alright. Cool.
[9:56] thanks. Anybody else
[10:02] have a motion please? I move for the property of nuisance and have staff
[10:07] abate it and I second, I'll second that. Okay.
[10:12] then we'll have a vote please. Mr. Kromer? Yes.
[10:17] mr. Shack. Madoff. Yes. Mr. Darren? Yes. Mr. Roberts?
[10:22] yes. Mr. Winkler? Yes. Object to zero five to zero. Motion
[10:26] carries for pmrb case 25 dash 25.
[10:31] next case is pmrb case 25 dash 26. The
[10:35] property owner silver bears real estate is in violation of section 1189
[10:40] of the property maintenance code at property located at 76 31
[10:45] dash or through 77 77 old troy pike.
[10:50] yeah. Mr. Chairman board members of the property also known as
[10:54] wayne town za, is in violation of city code as it pertains
[10:58] to sign maintenance. The south facade of the old
[11:03] troy pike multi-tenant sign that's a large one out by the road
[11:07] is so deteriorated that the wayne town letters have actually peeled away from
[11:11] the facade. They're also birds living in it. So, uh, section
[11:15] 11 89 0 4 states every sign whether
[11:19] requiring a sign permit or not, shall be maintained in a safe, presentable,
[11:24] and good structural condition at all times, including replacement
[11:28] of a defective part, painting, cleaning, and other acts
[11:32] required for the maintenance of the sign. Inspection verifies
[11:36] the property does not meet the standards set forth in the code, therefore the property is
[11:41] in violation. Your attached case review illustrates the violation
[11:45] process and non-compliance of the property. The attached photo shows
[11:49] the deterioration city's own letters mailed to the owner
[11:53] of record have not been returned. There has been recent communication
[11:57] from the owner of the code enforcement office. The owner's
[12:02] representative states they have contracted with a signed company to make repairs,
[12:06] but this is after months of no communication nor
[12:10] action regarding this violation. The tax record shows
[12:14] property taxes are traditionally paid. If declared a nuisance by the
[12:18] board, the property will be abated by the city staff. Recommendation
[12:23] is as follows. The board declare the property a nuisance. The board orders
[12:27] staff to have the city abate the property. If so ordered,
[12:31] the city will bring the property into compliance by removal of the nuisance. This
[12:35] will involve obtaining quotes from signed vendors to determine the price
[12:40] for making the needed repair and moving forward with repairs. Now
[12:44] this report was written for last month's meeting. I
[12:48] have an update. Uh, the sign face that was there has been removed,
[12:53] completely removed. The uh, owner
[12:58] has contracted with fast signs, a signed company in
[13:02] huber heights. Spoke with them today because I
[13:06] had issued a permit for it. And they currently have the production
[13:11] done in their, uh, in their building.
[13:15] but they have to attach clips because they have to reattach
[13:19] the sign panel. So it's ready to go back up as soon as they, everything's
[13:24] fastened. And it will be a nicer sign 'cause it'll have led lighting in inside.
[13:28] so, uh, what if you would look at it today, you would see
[13:32] that panel is gone. The one that says wayne town, it's empty and that's the reason
[13:37] why. So there, there in my report.
[13:41] so you're saying it's in the midst of being repaired? Yes.
[13:45] I talked, talked to the sales rep at, uh, fast signs who I deal with on
[13:49] a regular basis. She went back to their manufacturing area and said
[13:54] yes, it's back there. We're just waiting for the tip, the clips to
[13:58] be attached so we can reattach it to the sign
[14:02] once we have the led lighting in place. So
[14:07] she's telling me by the end of october it should be in place.
[14:13] um, and so my question is, you still want to, your recommendation
[14:17] is still declare a nuisance and have it abated when it's in the process or
[14:22] do we yes. Would you recommend no? Yes.
[14:26] so she told me today we are gonna finish this up when we get
[14:30] paid by the, by the customer. She was going to
[14:34] contact the customer and verify that the check's in the mail,
[14:38] for lack of a better word, I have not heard back from her. So I'm going to go on the
[14:42] premise. This is still a violation. This is still in the work. So
[14:46] yes. Declare it a nuisance. Order me to have it abated. I'll handle the
[14:51] abatement with the signed contractor. 'cause I'm quite certain it's
[14:55] going to be taken care of. But I don't think we make an exception to this case just because
[14:59] we have a promise of them fixing it. 'cause it's
[15:03] not fixed as of the date of the meeting. Okay,
[15:07] fair enough. That makes questioning, that makes sense to
[15:11] me. Alright, anybody
[15:15] else have any questions? Alright, uh,
[15:20] question. Okay, you have a motion please.
[15:24] I'll make a motion to declare the property a nuisance and to have the city contractor abate
[15:28] the property. Alright. And a second. Second,
[15:35] and then a vote, please. Mr. Roberts? Yes. Ms. Cromer?
[15:39] yes. Mr. Shack. Madoff. Yes. Mr. Darren?
[15:43] yes. Mr. Winkler? Yes. All
[15:47] right. Motion carries for pmrb case 25 dash 26.
[15:54] nick case is pm rrb 25 dash 28
[16:03] property owner susan gordon is in violation of section 1313 of the
[16:07] property maintenance code at property located at 71 58 mandrake
[16:11] drive. Excuse me. Yes sir.
[16:15] the property at 71 58 manda mandrake drive is
[16:19] in violation of city code as it pertains to exterior maintenance
[16:24] of the house. The vacant house has several issues that are abundantly
[16:28] clear, falling, softening, deteriorated, garage
[16:33] door molding, loose downspouts and mold on the siding
[16:37] section 13 13 0 4 states. The exterior of a structure
[16:42] shall be maintained at good repair, structurally sound, and san
[16:46] sanitary. So as not to pose a threat to the public health, safety, or welfare,
[16:51] the owner shall keep the exterior of all premises and every structure there
[16:55] on in good repair. All exterior surfaces shall be maintained
[17:00] free of conditions, reflective of deterioration or inadequate maintenance.
[17:04] maintenance inspection verifies the property does
[17:08] not meet the standards set forth in the code. Therefore, the property is in violation.
[17:13] your attached case review review illustrates the violation process
[17:18] and non-compliance of the property. The attached photo shows negligence
[17:22] and deterioration city's owner enter may for the owner
[17:26] of record have not been returned. There has been no communication
[17:30] from the owner to the code enforcement office. The tax record shows
[17:35] property taxes are traditionally pla paid if declared a nuisance by
[17:39] the board or the property will be abated by the city. Any costs incurred
[17:43] by the city will be invoiced to the property owner. Staff.
[17:47] recommendation is is as follows, the board declare the property a nuisance.
[17:52] the board orders staff to have the city abate to the property. If so ordered,
[17:56] the city will bring the property into compliance. By removable of nuisance,
[18:01] the city's contractor will make any necessary repairs to bring the
[18:05] property into a proper state of exterior maintenance.
[18:11] thank you. Are those windows broken?
[18:16] a couple of 'em. Yes sir. Or is it just a reflection? I think it's a combination of, I
[18:20] think you have both situations there. Okay.
[18:27] any idea if the owner is deceased or not? No idea sir.
[18:36] anybody else have any questions?
[18:42] alright. I obtain a motion. Please make a motion
[18:46] to declare the property of nuisance and have staff abate it. Alright, second,
[18:51] second. And vote please. Ms. Kromer?
[18:56] yes. Mr. Darren? Yes. Mr. Shack man.
[19:00] rob? Yes. Mr. Roberts? Yes. Mr. Winkler? Yes.
[19:05] motion carries for pmrb case 25 dash 28.
[19:10] next case is pm rrb 25 dash 30. The property owner,
[19:15] shirley criswell, is in violation of section 1313 of the property maintenance
[19:19] code. The property located at 59 0 1 pennywell
[19:23] drive. Yes sir. The property at 59 0 1
[19:28] pennwell is in violation of city code as it
[19:32] pertains to the maintenance of the landscaping. Specifically
[19:36] noxious weeds not being trimmed and removed from the property, particularly along
[19:41] the house and fence line's. Looks like that picture might
[19:45] be a little over scanned. I can't kidding. Take my word for it.
[19:49] the sky's really. There we go. There we go. And go to
[19:54] the other side. Jerry, bring the house the other way. I'm sorry other way.
[19:59] there we go. Holy goodness. Section
[20:04] 13 13 0 4 h four states. All land shall be
[20:08] properly maintained with lawns, hedges, bushes, trees, and other vegetation
[20:13] to be trimmed and kept from becoming overgrown and unsightly. Where exposed to
[20:17] public view or such vegetation may constitute a
[20:21] lighting influence on adjoining property inspection. Verifies
[20:25] the property does not meet the standards set forth in the code. Therefore,
[20:29] the property's in violation city's own letters mailed to the owner
[20:33] of record have not been returned. There has been no communication to the owner to the code
[20:37] enforcement office. Tax records show property
[20:41] taxes are traditionally paid. If declared a nuisance by the board,
[20:46] the property will be abated by the city. Any costs incurred
[20:50] by the city will be invoiced to the property staff. Recommendation
[20:54] is as follows, the board declare the property a nuisance. The board orders
[20:58] staff to have the city abate the property. If so ordered, the city will bring the
[21:02] property in compliance by removal of the nuisance.
[21:07] if you have any questions, you may have answered this already, but
[21:11] is the property vacant? No. No, no. Just ignored
[21:18] all. Any other questions? Anyone?
[21:22] alright. Entertain a motion please. I make a motion to
[21:26] declare the property a nuisance and have the city abate it. Alright,
[21:31] second. Second. Unanim a vote please.
[21:35] alright, mr. Shack madoff. Mr. Darren? Yes.
[21:39] mr. Roberts? Yes. Mr. Kromer? Yes. Mr. Winkler? Yes.
[21:45] motion carries for pmrb case 25 dash
[21:49] three zero. Mr. Chairman, I realize
[21:53] the same thing gets said over and over and over in these case reviews,
[21:58] but for the records, I think we need to, we need to make that
[22:02] same statement with each case. That's why you hear the same
[22:07] verbiage in each, in each case. So it seems unnecessary, but I
[22:11] I think it probably is necessary for legal records. Yeah, I agree.
[22:17] alright, next case is pmrb case 25 dash 31.
[22:21] the property owner, danny caldwell, is in violation of section
[22:26] 1313 of the property maintenance code located at property.
[22:30] uh, look property located at 62 19 apache street. The
[22:34] picture does tell the story here.
[22:39] the property at 62 19 apache street is a violation of the city's outdoor
[22:43] storage code. Numerous junk and discarded
[22:47] items have accumulated on this property. The property has
[22:51] been a nuisance for years and has appeared before this board. Previously.
[22:57] we've also done numerous trash abatements at the property, which don't require
[23:01] board hearings. Uh, there are, uh,
[23:05] as stated, uh, section 13 13 0 4 states.
[23:09] any items a user stored outside of an enclosed building or structure
[23:13] shall be limited to items manufactured for, intended for
[23:18] or customarily used in outboard environments. No items
[23:22] manufactured for, intended for or customarily stored or used
[23:26] indoors may be placed or stored outside. Lawn
[23:30] and power equipment must be kept in the backyard even when used on a regular
[23:34] basis. All permissible items stored outside must be in
[23:38] good condition and usable is intended by the manufacturer.
[23:43] no such items that are broken, dilapidated or discarded shall be
[23:47] stored outside. Investigate, inspection, verifies the
[23:52] property does not meet the standards set forth in the code. Therefore the property is in
[23:56] violation. You attach case review illustrates the violation process
[24:00] and noncompliance of the property. The attached photo shows
[24:04] the items stored on the property as of august 19th, 2025.
[24:10] it has been, reinspected has not gotten any better. City
[24:14] zoning later made. The owner of record have not been returned.
[24:18] there has been no communication from the owner occupant to the code enforcement
[24:23] officer. While the listed owner has been deceased for several years,
[24:27] his son occupies their property and has been spoken to by an
[24:31] officer and is well aware of the violation. His normal
[24:35] practice is let the city clean up the property as he knows fees will be
[24:39] accessed to property taxes. The tax record
[24:44] shows property taxes are not traditionally paid. They are years in
[24:48] arrears. If declared a nuisance by the board, the property will be
[24:52] abed by the city. Any costs incurred by the city will be invoiced
[24:56] to the property. Enter staff recommendation is as follows, the board
[25:00] declare their property a nuisance. The board orders staff to have the city
[25:05] abate the property. If so ordered, the city will bring their property in compliance
[25:09] by removal of the nuisance.
[25:14] so I think you may have partially answered this already, but I know this has been before our board several times before
[25:18] the both the name and the address sound familiar to my years. Yes. Um,
[25:22] essentially the same thing keeps happening. It is, it is picked up and then trash is new. Trash
[25:27] is thrown out there essentially. He, so it's a, it is an unfortunate
[25:31] situation. The, the person who lives there is the son of the owner. He is disabled
[25:36] in a couple of different ways now physically as well.
[25:41] um, he will go to
[25:45] properties. This is in the miami villa's development, which is down off rip
[25:49] rap road. Yep. He'll go around the development cleaning people's yards
[25:53] up for remuneration. Um,
[25:58] and then just brings it home and dumps it on his property. And
[26:02] he knows at some point we will come by and say,
[26:07] I'm gonna get it cleaned up. Nothing ever happens. It's, it's a repeat.
[26:11] he's lived there before with no electricity in that area. That means no water
[26:15] because they're on wells. So we've had issues before at
[26:19] that property,
[26:23] um, where there were five gallon buckets being used
[26:28] for purposes that they're not
[26:32] intended to. That had to be removed. And we have been notifications from the board of health at
[26:37] that time. So this, as long as this man is living
[26:41] there, we'll be dealing with this property. We have to go in occasionally
[26:45] and just clean it up. And that's where we are at this time.
[26:50] and he knows we will. And he's, he knows that we will send a bill
[26:55] and he knows he has no money to pay it. So it'll go onto the property taxes. And
[26:59] because of where this is and the net worth of that property
[27:03] to begin with, the taxes are probably already
[27:08] owed on it or more than what the property's worth in all likelihood. Yes. So,
[27:12] and we don't want, that's not a property that I'm interested in
[27:16] the city taking possession of and tearing down because of what I'm afraid
[27:21] we might find inside as far as the condition of the
[27:25] property and the sanitary conditions and so forth. So we're going to continue to
[27:30] clean it up until such a time as is goes away naturally,
[27:34] if, if you understand what I mean. Mm-hmm . And giving the amount back
[27:38] property taxes is, is any likelihood the county might foreclose on it eventually?
[27:43] um, I, we could probably have it reevaluated on though. I'm
[27:47] guessing the property since it's been in this relative condition for years,
[27:51] as long as I've worked here that it's probably,
[27:55] I would imagine the taxes at least equal or outweigh.
[28:00] I'd have to look through the folder here. The, the tax records are in your, in
[28:04] your reports. But, uh, it, it may be something we wanna look
[28:08] at in the future. So there about 10 k less than the auditor's value looks like.
[28:13] yeah. So my guess is that the auditor went by there and looked
[28:17] at it right now, I don't know if the condition on the outside would make a difference.
[28:21] probably the clutter probably would not make a difference at the property value. It would
[28:26] be a matter of if it had, you know, if the, if it had been partially burned,
[28:30] something like that, that really made it unlivable.
[28:36] you don't do anything with like, uh, I know you as far as evading
[28:40] the property, you go and remove all the junk and stuff that's in the yard.
[28:44] do anything about cleaning the house, the front of the house, washing it down from
[28:48] the mold or anything like that? Or is that the owner's responsibility? I mean as far as
[28:52] I'm concerned, that's the owner's responsibility. Um,
[28:57] at this point in this situation, getting the yard cleaned
[29:01] up and getting all the junk removed,
[29:05] uh, is I think what a priority should be. It's
[29:09] not saying we couldn't spray down the house with, um, a
[29:14] deterrent that would kill it. Sim you know, something that will just eventually
[29:18] cause all the stuff to die. But, but cleaning or
[29:22] spraying a house is something I'm not sure the city's I got. It is,
[29:26] you know what I mean? Yeah, yeah. I was just curious if never been
[29:31] done, but not to my knowledge. Okay. I noticed one of the, uh, gutters
[29:35] like it's hanging. Is that included in this or is this just the junk? Um,
[29:39] I think that we better leave that. At least there's a gutter.
[29:44] so yeah, it's hanging down. That's certainly not the worst of the problems
[29:48] of that property. No. My, my primary concern, the impact
[29:52] this is having on the neighbors 'cause they've been living around this gentleman for years. Everybody
[29:57] knows him is getting the yard cleaned up again.
[30:02] cool. Interesting. Anybody else have any
[30:06] questions, comments? Alright,
[30:10] entertain a motion please. I'll make a motion to declare the
[30:14] property new since and have the ct contractor abate it. Okay. Have
[30:19] a second. Second. And vote please.
[30:23] mr. Darin? Yes. Mr. Roberts? Yes.
[30:27] ms. Kromer? Yes. Mr. Shack. Madoff. Yes. Mr. Winkler?
[30:32] yes. Motion carries pmrb case 25 dash 31.
[30:38] uh, next case is pmrb case 25 dash
[30:42] 32. The property owner isha jones
[30:46] is in violation of section 1313 of the property maintenance code. That
[30:50] property located at 61 33 faulkland avenue
[30:55] answer the property at 61 33. Faulkland drive is in violation
[30:59] of city code as it pertains to maintenance of gutters and downspouts.
[31:03] the entire front section of spouting has become disconnected from the house and
[31:07] must be repaired or removed. Spouting is not a requirement,
[31:12] but if installed it must be property maintained. Section
[31:17] 13 13 0 4 states the exterior of a structure shall
[31:21] be maintained in good repair, structurally sound and sanitary. So as not
[31:25] to pose a threat to the public health, safety or welfare.
[31:29] the owner shall keep the exterior of all premises and every structure there on in good
[31:34] repair. All exterior surfaces shall be maintained free
[31:38] of conditions, reflective of deterioration or inadequate
[31:42] maintenance inspection. Verifies the property does not meet the
[31:46] standards set forth in the code. Therefore the property is in violation.
[31:50] you attach case review illustrates the violation process and non-compliance
[31:55] of the property. The attached photo shows negligence and deterioration.
[31:59] city zoning letters mailed to the owner record have not been returned. There
[32:04] has been no communication from the owner to the code enforcement office. The
[32:08] tax record shows property taxes are traditionally paid. If
[32:12] declared a nuisance by the board, the property will be abated by the ci by the city.
[32:17] any costs incurred by the city will be invoiced to the property
[32:21] owner. Staff recommendation is the board declare the property a
[32:25] nuisance. The board order staff to have the city abate to the property.
[32:30] if so, order, the city will bring the property into compliance by removal of the
[32:34] nuisance. The city's contractor will make the repair needed to reattach
[32:39] the spouting. We're not going to remove it, we're going to reattach it.
[32:46] alright. Questions? Anyone?
[32:51] we have a motion please. I move the
[32:55] third property of nuisance and have staff abate it. Second. I'll second that
[33:00] and a vote please. Mr. Shack. Mangrove? Yes. Ms.
[33:04] kromer? Yes. Mr. Darren? Yes. Mr. Roberts?
[33:08] yes. Mr. Winkler? Yes. Five to zero. Alright. Pmr case
[33:12] 25 dash 32. Motion is carried.
[33:17] and I see we don't have any additional business for tonight. That was our last case.
[33:23] and without objection, the minutes of july the 10th, 2025 pmr
[33:27] beating pmr beating meeting is approved.
[33:31] no objections. It's been approved. So I guess our next meeting
[33:35] then is oct or november the 13th. So I can
[33:39] tell you that the november meeting will still be here at this city
[33:43] hall. The december meeting will probably be at the new building,
[33:47] but that's not confirmed just yet. They are scheduling like an open house.
[33:52] I hope you all come. That's gonna be a little bit before that. A couple days before that. So
[33:56] in november? Uh in december. Oh december. Okay. So we're all getting kind
[34:00] of excited. Okay. I'm ready to, will we be the first board to meet there?
[34:04] of course not. Um, council will be the first. Those are the other reasons. Ceremonial
[34:09] meeting with city council. I'm sure council will be first. Um, bza usually meets before
[34:13] you guys do, but they meet before council also so they'll
[34:17] get missed. So it might be you guys after council. Awesome.
[34:21] cool. Yeah. Alright. That's when the open house is gonna be at.
[34:26] yeah. I think the open house is the ninth. No, but they're
[34:30] supposed to be getting something out. Perfect. There you go. Alright.
[34:35] anything else? If not, I'll entertain a motion to adjourn.
[34:39] do we adjourn? We are so adjourned. Thank you all.