[0:08] Greetings to everyone. Today
[0:10] Monday, September 28.
[0:12] It is 19:01. Congratulations on
[0:14] next meeting
[0:15] Jamaica City Council.
[0:17] The first point
[0:18] the agenda is
[0:19] request for any
[0:20] urgent additions
[0:21] . Are there any urgent
[0:22] addition? If
[0:24] no, next
[0:25] the point is
[0:26] approval of a number
[0:27] minutes of meetings.
[0:29] The first is
[0:30] approval
[0:31] duty officer's protocol
[0:33] meeting from 14
[0:34] September 2026.
[0:35] Second.
[0:36] Good. I will abstain.
[0:37] I was not there.
[0:38] present. Are there any
[0:39] remark? If
[0:41] no, who is "for", be it
[0:42] Please say "yes."
[0:43] Yes.
[0:43] Perfectly. Thank you.
[0:45] Accepted. Next—
[0:48] approval
[0:49] protocol
[0:49] extraordinary
[0:50] meeting from 1
[0:51] September.
[0:53] Second.
[0:53] Thank you. Everyone who is "in favor"
[0:55] please say "
[0:56] Yes". Yes.
[0:58] The next point
[1:00] the agenda is
[1:01] approval
[1:02] protocol
[1:02] extraordinary
[1:03] meeting from 18
[1:04] September. Thank you. THERE ARE
[1:07] remark? If
[1:08] no, who is "for", be it
[1:09] Please say "yes."
[1:11] Yes. Further-
[1:12] approval
[1:13] protocol
[1:13] extraordinary
[1:14] meeting from 20
[1:15] September.
[1:16] Good. Any comments?
[1:18] If not, who is "for"?
[1:19] please say "
[1:21] Yes".
[1:21] And finally,
[1:22] approval
[1:23] protocol
[1:24] extraordinary
[1:25] meeting from 23
[1:26] September.
[1:28] Thank you. Any comments?
[1:30] If not, who is "for"?
[1:31] please say "
[1:32] Yes". Yes.
[1:33] OK. I am going
[1:35] to make a few
[1:36] transfers. I want
[1:40] change order:
[1:41] first you, then
[1:43] JBS. So, the next one
[1:46] point of order
[1:47] daytime was number seven
[1:48] . Now this will be the number
[1:50] three—approval
[1:51] agreements with owners
[1:53] Jambo lands. I will give you
[1:55] a minute to explain
[1:56] of this agreement. I will add
[1:59] something to your words,
[2:01] so that it is better
[2:01] inform the Council.
[2:04] I'm Dave Marks. Currently I
[2:06] Vice-Chairman of the Alliance
[2:08] mountain bikes
[2:09] Jamaicans. We concluded
[2:11] access agreement
[2:12] landowners from
[2:13] school district
[2:14] regarding training
[2:15] mountain trails
[2:16] bicycles near
[2:17] Jamaica schools. This is 10-
[2:21] annual agreement, but
[2:22] after change of ownership
[2:23] need to conclude
[2:24] new. I took the existing one
[2:27] agreement, reviewed it
[2:29] and tried to update,
[2:30] to make it
[2:31] clearer and
[2:32] more relevant. It was
[2:34] a few moments that
[2:35] were not quite
[2:36] accurate or clear.
[2:38] Sent this to Tom,
[2:40] probably a week and a half
[2:41] ago.
[2:44] Perfectly. Yes. Therefore,
[2:45] the only principled one
[2:46] the difference is
[2:48] in that now the deal
[2:49] must be concluded with
[2:50] the city of Jamaica. Um, and
[2:53] if we can do it
[2:54] to settle, we
[2:55] let's send this to our
[2:56] main organization
[2:57] , we will sign and
[2:58] we will have a final
[3:00] document, a copy of which
[3:01] everyone can get it.
[3:04] Are there any questions?
[3:05] regarding the agreement or
[3:06] Well, I think some
[3:08] members of our board
[3:09] there was no then
[3:11] when, uh, when, uh, Jamba
[3:12] , this project, well,
[3:14] you know, it was born.
[3:17] Good.
[3:17] Um, so I just
[3:18] I will share mine.
[3:19] point of view. I draw attention to that
[3:23] the fact that Jamba
[3:24] created these trails and
[3:25] takes care of them.
[3:26] They are on the territory
[3:27] cities. We are talking
[3:29] about the trails that
[3:29] are on
[3:30] city ​​property. Ahem
[3:31] , Jamba liberates the city
[3:33] from responsibility
[3:34] . Um, in exchange for this
[3:37] trails are open for
[3:38] the general public. Ahem,
[3:43] we are free from
[3:44] responsibility and,
[3:46] you know, trails
[3:47] open to the public,
[3:48] and we provide a 10-year
[3:49] validity period. Hmm, we have,
[3:54] like in a city, there are certain
[3:55] obligation, well,
[3:56] you know, on a sign
[3:58] recognition of efforts and
[3:59] expenses incurred by Jamba.
[4:02] We are like a city if
[4:03] we are going to spend
[4:05] any activity,
[4:06] what will interfere
[4:07] using Jamba, we will notify Jamba.
[4:10] Of course. Um, so we have
[4:11] commitment to
[4:13] message that
[4:14] will mostly lie down
[4:15] on Tom. Um, and, uh,
[4:23] the only thing I can do
[4:24] to say: when will it be
[4:26] finally determined
[4:27] using
[4:28] property,
[4:29] assuming that the city
[4:30] will continue with it
[4:31] have. I can't
[4:38] imagine what it would be like,
[4:40] but my only opinion
[4:41] is that we
[4:42] , perhaps, you will have to
[4:44] change it. Not
[4:45] sure how exactly,
[4:47] but it is possible.
[4:48] Of course.
[4:50] Um, so it's just, you know
[4:52] , the terms of this agreement
[4:53] can be changed
[4:54] parties. So this is
[4:57] will be what we want,
[4:58] maybe you will have to
[5:00] make. But the pros and cons
[5:01] disadvantages
[5:03] um, you know, there are advantages
[5:04] and disadvantages for both
[5:06] parties. And finally,
[5:07] school district
[5:08] felt that it was in their
[5:10] interests, and I think
[5:11] that we, as an elected council,
[5:13] could even
[5:13] approve this. Me
[5:15] It seems so, we
[5:17] officially approved it.
[5:18] Right.
[5:19] Okay. So I just
[5:21] wanted to share this.
[5:22] Ahem.
[5:23] Okay. Yes. This sounds
[5:24] It's perfectly normal.
[5:27] Jason was here.
[5:28] last time, and we
[5:29] communicated. I know,
[5:31] that we all had
[5:32] questions that
[5:33] needed
[5:33] solution, but
[5:35] yes, I think there is
[5:35] general consensus,
[5:37] but we just wanted
[5:38] make sure that this
[5:39] was reviewed
[5:40] higher authorities.
[5:42] So,
[5:42] right.
[5:44] So, whatever, I'll contribute
[5:45] proposal
[5:46] approve the agreement
[5:47] landowner from Jamba
[5:49] and the city. Second.
[5:51] OK. Are there any
[5:53] discussion? Good.
[5:54] Well, I guess I don't.
[5:55] it was necessary
[5:56] to speak, but
[5:57] I hope that was it.
[5:58] useful for everyone.
[5:59] I ask everyone who is "in favor"
[6:00] to say "yes". Yes.
[6:02] No objections. Perfectly.
[6:04] OK. Well, you can stay
[6:07] longer.
[6:09] And, uh, as for the actual
[6:10] signing the agreement,
[6:12] just give us
[6:13] know.
[6:13] I, I, I will sign it as,
[6:15] Yes. Like a head.
[6:16] I can come to the office.
[6:18] city ​​council. Or me
[6:19] I can send you
[6:20] scanned copy
[6:21] by email,
[6:23] Shall I send him, or
[6:24] just, me, yes, me,
[6:25] I'll probably be in the office.
[6:26] tomorrow. So, perhaps,
[6:27] I'll just sign it.
[6:29] there.
[6:30] You need
[6:31] original?
[6:32] Uh, I don't think so.
[6:33] needed.
[6:34] I will sign two
[6:35] copies so that we have
[6:36] was I know that
[6:38] not legally required.
[6:40] You are not, for example, a court
[6:41] no need for original,
[6:42] isn't that right?
[6:43] Yes. Just ours
[6:44] executive director
[6:46] sign it, we will provide
[6:47] you a copy with all
[6:48] signatures. Yes.
[6:49] Ideally. Ideally.
[6:51] Outstanding result.
[6:52] OK. Thank you. Thank you.
[6:54] Of course. Of course.
[6:57] Enjoy.
[6:58] See you later.
[6:59] OK.
[7:04] Um, so we have
[7:05] Chrissy's connection
[7:06] Goskins and Chris M. So
[7:07] I will move the point.
[7:08] number five in place
[7:10] point number four,
[7:11] um, discussion about
[7:12] property of the village school
[7:14] Jamaican. It
[7:18] normally? The numbers, um,
[7:22] and, um, uh, Chrissy, no
[7:27] I know how you are.
[7:28] sometimes. Would you like to start and discuss,
[7:33] um, the intersection between, um,
[7:38] this, don't we have
[7:39] there was a question here somewhere
[7:40] about wastewater? It was
[7:42] Well, right? C, point C? Yes, Um, Chrissy, you
[7:47] would like, like,
[7:48] to show yours
[7:49] face on the screen, or
[7:51] you will speak
[7:51] anonymously?
[7:54] Uh, I'll talk
[7:55] anonymously, because now
[7:56] I walk around my kitchen.
[7:57] Ahem,
[8:05] so, um, yes, I can
[8:06] tell me exactly how
[8:07] sewage project
[8:09] waters can
[8:09] intersect with
[8:11] owned by JDS now. Ahem
[8:14] , and to do this
[8:15] as clearly as possible, I want to take a step.
[8:18] back and explain, on
[8:19] What stage are we at now?
[8:21] we are about
[8:22] sewage project
[8:23] waters, which is now
[8:24] status. We have 90%
[8:27] report, which is mainly
[8:28] means that we have
[8:30] the report is ready, and it is in the form of a draft. Um, and
[8:35] this is necessary
[8:36] to present
[8:37] public,
[8:38] community, as well as
[8:39] state to get
[8:40] their comments. Hmm, yes.
[8:45] some more tasks in
[8:47] initial volume
[8:48] projects that have not yet
[8:49] were fulfilled.
[8:54] Detailed
[8:54] archaeological analysis
[8:56] , um, soil drilling
[8:57] along the road and, um,
[8:58] legal and
[8:59] easements or, um,
[9:00] legal and boundary
[9:02] geodetic works,
[9:03] related to
[9:04] by purchasing land. Ahem.
[9:10] So, these are the things that
[9:12] have not yet been made.
[9:14] Um, last winter
[9:15] Jessica and I started
[9:16] to talk about
[9:17] planning, you know
[9:18] , about the appointment
[9:19] presentations. Hmm, ah
[9:23] then the town
[9:24] voted for
[9:25] buying a school bag
[9:26] territory, and this, according to
[9:27] essentially stopped any
[9:28] what presentations and
[9:30] completion of work,
[9:31] because school
[9:32] the area can be
[9:33] suitable place
[9:34] for accommodation
[9:35] public system
[9:36] wastewater. And, in principle, this
[9:40] would happen on that
[9:41] field, um, between
[9:42] basketball
[9:43] playground and
[9:43] a playground.
[9:46] Um, this is the area that
[9:47] we are considering. So
[9:49] to evaluate this
[9:50] property with us
[9:51] remained certain
[9:52] funding funds,
[9:54] which we already have. Ahem,
[9:57] I think we counted.
[9:58] what's left
[9:59] about 40,000 dollars,
[10:00] if we remove all
[10:01] money from those things that
[10:03] I mentioned and which ones I haven't yet
[10:04] were made. Um, and
[10:06] then we could
[10:07] to evaluate the school
[10:08] territory, so that
[10:09] to see if it is
[10:10] appropriate there and what
[10:11] there would be power. Ahem,
[10:15] we haven't done this yet
[10:16] did it because
[10:17] the school grounds are
[10:18] easements that can
[10:19] to influence
[10:20] the feasibility of this
[10:21] option. So, now
[10:26] this question
[10:27] is being studied. Um, and
[10:29] just waiting until
[10:30] this will be explained
[10:32] and updated. Um, and
[10:34] then if we can
[10:35] to bypass these easements,
[10:37] we will be able to move
[10:38] further with the assessment of this
[10:39] option. Hmm, so how
[10:41] I already said, we have
[10:43] some left
[10:44] funding funds,
[10:45] which we already have, and we can use
[10:47] them for further
[10:48] school grades
[10:49] territories and add
[10:51] this is for the report. Um, under
[10:54] last cycle time
[10:55] state funding
[10:57] took the free ones
[10:58] money. I call it
[11:01] free of charge
[11:01] money, um, what are they
[11:03] provided in the form of
[11:04] loans for planning
[11:05] rural projects with
[11:06] wastewater treatment.
[11:09] However, in the latter
[11:10] report, the last one, um,
[11:11] cycle report
[11:12] financing, which
[11:14] he just came out
[11:15] called "Plan
[11:16] target
[11:16] use for
[11:17] Revolving fund
[11:19] of clean water in the state."
[11:22] They returned
[11:23] funding for
[11:24] rural projects with
[11:25] wastewater treatment.
[11:27] They also increased
[11:28] amount of funding.
[11:29] So now we can
[11:31] to get a loan that
[11:32] is written off at 100%, at
[11:34] amount up to $150,000.
[11:38] Um, so we could
[11:39] use this for
[11:41] completion of any
[11:42] what kind of planning.
[11:43] If we are going
[11:44] to take money from others
[11:46] tasks, um,
[11:46] archaeological
[11:47] research and
[11:48] soil drilling, and
[11:49] direct them to
[11:50] completion, you know,
[11:51] school grades
[11:52] areas, then we will be able to get
[11:53] more money.
[11:54] Free money
[11:55] cost nothing
[11:56] taxpayers in
[11:57] Jamaicans, except
[11:59] federal taxes
[12:00] that you pay and
[12:01] who go to
[12:01] financing this
[12:02] programs. But, uh, but,
[12:09] uh, we could get
[12:10] more money to
[12:11] complete this:
[12:12] archaeology, drilling
[12:13] soil, and, and execute
[12:15] part of the project
[12:16] works. Well, so this, this
[12:19] update on
[12:20] financing. Well, this is
[12:21] kind of how these
[12:23] things related to each other
[12:24] yourself. Idea
[12:25] placement, eh,
[12:26] consideration of the joint
[12:28] municipal
[12:28] sewerage in the city,
[12:30] on, uh, JBS property,
[12:31] is that
[12:32] the city already owns it
[12:33] , so we don't need
[12:35] to spend money on
[12:36] land acquisition.
[12:39] So I will be glad,
[12:40] I hope that was it.
[12:42] of course. Well, here
[12:43] many parts. Well, by the way
[12:45] , I will be glad
[12:46] to answer any
[12:47] what questions about
[12:48] this.
[12:49] Well, so I have
[12:50] short question.
[12:53] So the decision, uh, to submit
[12:55] application, uh, for
[12:56] additional 150,000
[12:57] dollars is the solution,
[12:58] which the council adopts, or
[13:00] wrong? What is the role
[13:03] planning commission?
[13:06] Brian here, by the way,
[13:07] Chrissy, Brian is here.
[13:08] .
[13:10] This, uh, application is required
[13:12] would be to sign for, for another one
[13:15] loans, the application would have
[13:16] sign selected
[13:17] council.
[13:18] Good. Of course.
[13:22] Brian, do you think
[13:23] you, that the commission with
[13:24] would carry out planning,
[13:25] would conduct an assessment
[13:26] this or discussed
[13:28] would this be first, first
[13:29] than it will get to
[13:32] advice?
[13:34] We would, of course, do this.
[13:35] done.
[13:36] OK.
[13:37] As required
[13:38] statutory process, that is,
[13:40] who asks us
[13:40] make an elected council.
[13:42] Of course. You are not
[13:46] express none
[13:47] desire or preference in
[13:49] one side or the other. Well, I mean,
[13:51] obviously as a volunteer
[13:52] for the city, we just
[13:54] we are trying to collect
[13:55] facts,
[13:55] isn't that right?
[13:56] We are trying
[13:57] promote projects
[13:58] forward. Well, I'm trying.
[14:00] to push aside one's own
[14:01] personal aspirations
[14:02] aside while doing this. But
[14:04] if something arises where,
[14:05] Well, you know, we
[14:06] need something
[14:07] to do, well, we,
[14:08] obviously, let's take it
[14:10] for this.
[14:10] Yes. Yes. Yes. And if
[14:13] this is what complements, uh,
[14:14] technical and economic
[14:15] justification
[14:16] sewerage, then
[14:17] let's do it.
[14:20] Yes. I mean,
[14:24] Chrissy, I think
[14:25] what would it be
[14:26] significant positive,
[14:28] if, if it turns out,
[14:29] what is this now city
[14:30] property is
[14:31] a suitable place.
[14:36] Right.
[14:37] That would be it. Well, I have.
[14:39] I mean, we could,
[14:41] if possible, we would
[14:42] were able to place
[14:43] public septic tank
[14:44] sewer
[14:45] system on earth that
[14:47] belongs to the city. Then,
[14:48] Well, we won't have to.
[14:50] buy land. It
[14:51] makes the process a little
[14:52] faster, saves
[14:53] We have some money. Eh, and
[14:56] I still wanted to remember, I, didn't mention that.
[14:58] before, we wouldn't
[14:59] managed to do this
[15:00] financing cycle.
[15:03] But for this cycle
[15:04] financing, and I, and I don't know how.
[15:06] will look like in the future, they
[15:08] actually increased
[15:10] your subsidy for
[15:11] construction up to 75%. What
[15:14] means if you
[15:16] take 2 million
[15:18] dollars, you only get back 500,000.
[15:21] Um, so it's a 75% grant.
[15:26] we would need
[15:27] to be ready for
[15:28] construction somewhere
[15:29] next summer, that,
[15:30] probably impossible,
[15:31] but in the future
[15:32] it is quite possible that
[15:33] they will leave it like this,
[15:35] and we want to be
[15:36] ready if they will do it.
[15:40] Good. And, uh,
[15:42] so it's kind of
[15:43] a way to encourage
[15:47] the city to move on in
[15:48] this direction,
[15:49] using
[15:50] free money for
[15:51] planning,
[15:52] isn't that right?
[15:54] What may appear
[15:56] good option
[15:57] financing, you know,
[15:58] when we are ready
[15:59] , well, maybe somewhere behind
[16:00] year.
[16:02] Good. We have two here.
[16:04] committee members, and in
[16:05] Both have questions, right?
[16:07] Yes. Chrissy, I have
[16:08] there was a question about
[16:09] existing easements
[16:10] in the territories that
[16:11] call
[16:12] anxiety or
[16:13] are being processed. Or
[16:14] are they in
[16:16] that area between
[16:16] basketball
[16:17] playground and
[16:18] playground,
[16:19] are they
[16:21] Am I too much?
[16:22] I delve into the details.
[16:23] about where
[16:24] Are easements in place?
[16:25] Can we get around
[16:26] these easements? Are these
[16:27] easements large or
[16:28] a small problem?
[16:30] Yes. I think that this
[16:31] problem being solved.
[16:34] Chrissy, do you want
[16:35] explain why
[16:35] easement in general is
[16:37] problem, regardless
[16:38] from him
[16:38] arrangement?
[16:41] Yes. So, there is
[16:44] several easements on
[16:45] area, and they
[16:46] belong to two different
[16:47] to the owners. One of
[16:53] has owners
[16:54] easement of access
[16:55] through the ground, as well as
[16:56] rights to the source, which
[16:57] is located on
[16:58] school grounds. AND
[17:03] other property, which
[17:05] not even on
[17:06] JVS territory, has
[17:07] rights to the same
[17:08] source. I don't know
[17:13] exactly where this leads
[17:14] easement of access, because
[17:15] no map,
[17:18] truth,
[17:18] which one before that
[17:19] was added. Therefore, we
[17:21] would have to spend
[17:22] money for surveying
[17:24] ALTA survey to
[17:25] determine where this
[17:26] easement,
[17:27] unless, if
[17:28] easement will be
[17:28] canceled, in such a way
[17:30] we don't need it
[17:31] to do this, in
[17:32] ideals
[17:34] all three simply
[17:35] are canceled for
[17:36] by agreement with
[17:36] land owners.
[17:39] Good. We know that
[17:40] the source is located
[17:41] directly next to
[17:42] with the place where we want to install
[17:44] cleaning system
[17:45] wastewater,
[17:46] and that would be a problem,
[17:47] and no one
[17:48] uses these
[17:49] sources, and these are old
[17:50] easement rights. So
[17:52] I suspect that they
[17:54] will be canceled.
[17:57] Siobhan,
[17:58] I will add an extra.
[17:59] question before this
[18:01] point, and then I have
[18:02] there are a few more questions
[18:03] regarding other matters,
[18:04] related to
[18:05] re-profiling
[18:06] schools. So, is
[18:10] negotiations are underway
[18:11] with those owners
[18:12] land regarding
[18:13] discussion of refusal
[18:14] from rights?
[18:17] Not yet. I don't think so.
[18:19] They're getting married, Chrissy.
[18:20] ? I thought that
[18:21] I am going
[18:22] I was forwarding this.
[18:23] question for you. Therefore,
[18:25] yes, too. Agreement on
[18:27] real estate just now
[18:28] closed
[18:28] one of the objects
[18:29] recently sold.
[18:31] So there is an owner there. So
[18:32] , this is
[18:33] Yes, but I will turn to
[18:34] them. I worked on that one.
[18:34] document on the right
[18:35] property and everything else
[18:36] , so I can get
[18:36] information.
[18:37] Yes. Yes. Please.
[18:38] Thank you.
[18:39] Yes. But it is possible.
[18:40] to do enough
[18:41] promptly.
[18:41] If they agree,
[18:43] it will take a few
[18:43] weeks.
[18:44] Well, of course. I just
[18:45] I mean Yes. Yes.
[18:48] I have on
[18:49] attention, especially now
[18:50] because Chrissy
[18:51] gave us such
[18:52] great information. I forgot when you
[18:54] came, Siobhan, but
[18:56] a new one has appeared, oh,
[18:57] OK. OK. Therefore,
[18:59] there is something new, right? So with that,
[19:02] I am sure, fire
[19:03] fired up, and yes, I want to do all this.
[19:05] simultaneously. Now,
[19:07] when the agreement on
[19:08] real estate is closed,
[19:10] and so.
[19:12] my next
[19:13] question: what are the terms
[19:15] submitting an application for
[19:16] loan subject to
[19:17] Forgive me, Chrissy? As
[19:21] we need it quickly
[19:23] submit this application?
[19:25] If I am correct
[19:26] I remember you said,
[19:27] that it is in order of the queue.
[19:32] That's right. This is in order of the queue.
[19:36] Usually we
[19:37] it would be necessary
[19:38] to complete the work that
[19:39] is currently ongoing, but,
[19:40] maybe I can
[19:47] to work with
[19:48] by state to submit
[19:49] application earlier. If
[19:53] we will rearrange some
[19:54] task to evaluate
[19:56] JVS, then I can say,
[19:57] what we do
[19:58] additional planning
[20:00] the first stage, and
[20:01] then we move on to
[20:02] planning the second
[20:03] stage. And so that this
[20:07] the loan covered
[20:08] both stages, we
[20:09] could, you know,
[20:10] apply
[20:11] immediately.
[20:13] OK,
[20:13] I just need this.
[20:15] verify.
[20:15] Okay, that's great.
[20:16] useful. And the reason,
[20:19] why is this so critical,
[20:20] is that we
[20:21] all that's left
[20:23] a few days before,
[20:24] how do we know if
[20:25] we received
[20:26] invitation to
[20:26] grant program
[20:28] conservation fund. AND
[20:30] we can talk
[20:31] more about this.
[20:34] But these two things
[20:34] interconnected,
[20:36] because they exist
[20:37] restrictions on what we can do on
[20:39] site or in a building
[20:40] if we are participants
[20:41] programs as long as they
[20:43] will not complete
[20:43] ecological
[20:44] examination. This can
[20:48] to be completely out of it
[20:49] outside these limits.
[20:51] I don't want to ask.
[20:55] until there is nothing left
[20:56] two weeks before
[20:57] receiving a notification
[20:58] . We don't want
[21:00] create any
[21:01] problems, and if they
[21:03] were here, we would say
[21:04] they are the same, it's no big deal
[21:05] not
[21:07] well, good news in
[21:08] because we
[21:09] shared with them
[21:10] the fact that it is possible,
[21:11] and, in the end, to me
[21:12] it seemed that they are very correct,
[21:15] it was positive
[21:17] discuss the terms,
[21:18] when we can
[21:19] to do the work,
[21:20] compared to when
[21:21] they give out grants,
[21:22] so
[21:23] oh, work, Chrissy, I mean, when would
[21:25] work actually
[21:26] took place
[21:27] no, not the whole project. I mean even
[21:30] just immediately
[21:31] testing the first
[21:32] stage and so on.
[21:33] Oh, okay.
[21:34] So, we need
[21:35] make test holes,
[21:36] but what we should
[21:38] to do according to our
[21:39] funding for
[21:40] test pits, this
[21:41] to reconcile them with
[21:42] archaeology. Oh, no,
[21:43] Sorry. We are more
[21:44] no need
[21:45] to coordinate them with
[21:46] archaeology. We have
[21:47] to go through one's own
[21:48] procedure for
[21:49] wastewater project.
[21:50] We have to go through our
[21:51] own full
[21:52] ecological,
[21:52] archaeological and
[21:53] historical review.
[21:54] OK.
[21:55] Hmm, so this could be
[21:56] what we can do about it
[21:57] to work with them
[22:00] because our project,
[22:01] if he
[22:02] will move forward
[22:03] , will have enough
[22:04] intensive inspection
[22:05] for SRF funding.
[22:11] Hmm, but it exists
[22:12] memorandum of understanding
[22:13] mutual understanding between
[22:14] SRF program and
[22:15] conservation department
[22:16] historical heritage,
[22:18] which allows us
[22:19] to make test holes
[22:20] soil specially
[22:21] for septic tank evaluation
[22:23] without archaeological
[22:24] expertise. So this is
[22:27] could be something over which
[22:28] we can do it with them
[22:29] to work.
[22:30] OK. So I would just
[22:34] asked Chrissy,
[22:35] Jessica and the council
[22:36] selected: if you
[22:37] Do you want me to?
[22:38] turned to the trust,
[22:39] or for our committee
[22:41] turned to the trust,
[22:42] someone has clearly
[22:43] write what we are talking about
[22:44] please. I don't want to
[22:48] undertake
[22:49] responsibility for
[22:50] it
[22:50] for for Mrs. M Mrs.
[22:52] and then we will have to
[22:53] ask if the terms
[22:55] such that we cannot
[22:56] wait until October 16,
[22:57] when should we be
[22:59] I don't think so, Chrissy.
[23:01] , yes, I mean
[23:03] we are not there yet, we
[23:04] first you need to
[23:05] learn about
[23:06] possibility, we haven't yet
[23:07] there
[23:09] yes, and I'm going
[23:10] to propose to Chrissy
[23:11] to work side by side
[23:13] with whoever it is with
[23:14] committee, who
[23:14] communicates with
[23:15] trust with
[23:16] heritage preservation
[23:17] regarding this issue.
[23:18] This will probably be
[23:20] Chrissy.
[23:20] This will probably be
[23:21] Chrissy, I think.
[23:22] Right.
[23:23] Chrissy.
[23:24] That's right. That's right.
[23:25] OK. This is very
[23:28] it is useful to
[23:29] understand sensitivity
[23:30] terms from different
[23:31] sides. This is great.
[23:34] Um, any other
[23:35] question for Chrissy,
[23:36] or Chrissy, is there one? Yes.
[23:38] please.
[23:39] Chrissy, I'm a little
[23:40] newbie and naive in
[23:41] this. When you say
[23:42] about a loan that can be
[23:43] forgive, what are the conditions
[23:45] such a loan?
[23:45] Usually you should
[23:47] to do something. That is,
[23:49] if we are halfway
[23:50] before digging holes or
[23:51] test pits
[23:52] shall we sell the plot of land?
[23:53] the loan will still be there
[23:54] written off, do we have
[23:56] to complete this project?
[23:57] What are we signing up for?
[23:58] when you say "
[23:59] loan subject to
[24:00] "write-off"?
[24:02] Uh, we'll do it.
[24:04] here's the thing: we already have
[24:05] one, um, we already have
[24:06] loan subject to
[24:08] write-off, for, um,
[24:09] current work. Therefore
[24:11] , we have to do
[24:12] our scope of work. By the current agreement we are evaluating, um,
[24:19] public system
[24:20] wastewater. If
[24:23] it turns out that there is no
[24:25] suitable places,
[24:26] So, they don't exist. We write a report about it,
[24:28] we get money, and
[24:30] We get paid for everything. Ahem,
[24:36] if we move on to
[24:37] design and
[24:38] something will happen that
[24:39] stop the project, they
[24:40] will pay for everything we
[24:42] done before
[24:43] moment. Um, and then
[24:48] they will redistribute
[24:49] funding somewhere
[24:51] elsewhere. So actually
[24:54] nothing special
[24:55] there are no conditions. The city has
[24:57] to sign a credit agreement. Although the loan
[25:01] if there is no such thing, you
[25:02] sign the agreement, and
[25:03] when we finish
[25:05] project, they
[25:05] close what
[25:07] called "closing"
[25:08] credit. Hmm, that's right
[25:11] then usually
[25:12] begins
[25:13] loan repayment,
[25:14] but instead
[25:15] they just write off
[25:16] the entire amount.
[25:17] Yes.
[25:18] Up to $150,000.
[25:20] Because in the process
[25:22] engineering work
[25:23] the company sends
[25:24] bills and receives
[25:25] payment, that's the amount.
[25:28] This is a debt. We can't
[25:30] just go and
[25:31] say: "Oh, we are more
[25:33] we don't want this
[25:34] engage in". But,
[25:36] you know, if the project
[25:37] is not viable, then
[25:39] no one will demand
[25:40] refund.
[25:43] Yes. Are there any more questions?
[25:45] to Chrissy? OK.
[25:47] Thank you, Chrissy. You can stay,
[25:50] if you want, of course,
[25:51] if you don't want to
[25:52] add something else from
[25:53] about this.
[25:55] No, I have everything. Thank you.
[25:57] Okay, great.
[25:58] news.
[26:03] Um, since we have
[26:04] critical mass of people,
[26:05] who attended the meeting
[26:06] conservation fund, who
[26:08] wants to talk about
[26:09] it?
[26:13] Okay, not all at once.
[26:15] You, you, you?
[26:17] I nominate Siobhan.
[26:18] Oh, you're nominating Siobhan.
[26:20] Do you agree, Siobhan?
[26:21] Just so that somehow...
[26:22] Proposes Punishment, Punishment
[26:23] puts forward.
[26:25] We had, er, I will
[26:26] briefly, and all that
[26:27] good news.
[26:29] We had a wonderful time.
[26:30] attendance. All members of our
[26:32] elected council were
[26:34] are present. Besides Kate,
[26:35] which was busy. We
[26:37] had the majority
[26:38] members of our
[26:39] steering committee.
[26:46] Um, and two officers from
[26:48] Vermont Preservation Trust, of Vermont and
[26:50] Housing Councils
[26:51] and nature conservation
[26:52] Vermont, which
[26:53] will manage the grant
[26:55] , were there, and also
[26:56] professional photographer
[26:57] who filmed all this,
[26:59] I hope that we
[27:00] could be right
[27:01] introduce yourself,
[27:02] when we receive the grant.
[27:10] Um, and we divided
[27:11] program for several
[27:12] parts. They started
[27:14] from a series of questions about
[27:15] our community and about
[27:17] what are we hoping for
[27:18] . Then Robert spent
[27:21] quick but thorough
[27:23] excursion
[27:23] internal
[27:24] premises, and Tom
[27:25] led us outside and
[27:26] impressed us
[27:27] a walk
[27:28] territory. And they
[27:32] really put
[27:33] difficult questions,
[27:34] but they gave up,
[27:35] um, very much
[27:36] interested and, I would
[27:37] said,
[27:37] tuned
[27:38] positively. Um, others
[27:42] also have
[27:42] to express myself, but as I already mentioned, we have to get
[27:46] reply by October 16
[27:47] . If we are elected for
[27:49] participation in the program, we will send
[27:51] cover letter from
[27:52] with the words: "Please,
[27:53] Give us money.
[27:54] Please be
[27:55] please, please, give us
[27:57] money". Um, and
[28:00] thank them for
[28:01] allotted time. So,
[28:03] we haven't heard anything yet,
[28:07] why don't we
[28:07] expected. We don't
[28:09] We are waiting.
[28:10] Oh, and then Karen
[28:11] planted them in her
[28:12] the car and drove
[28:13] city,
[28:15] showed them all
[28:16] landmarks and
[28:17] did everything she could.
[28:19] And so I think that everything
[28:21] It went very well.
[28:22] isn't that right? I think we
[28:24] explained to them,
[28:24] how important
[28:26] this project is for everyone
[28:27] city ​​and how much it
[28:34] will do...what I
[28:35] am I trying to say?
[28:38] How big is it?
[28:39] this will make an impression
[28:40] on different aspects
[28:41] city ​​life, as well as
[28:42] on the surrounding
[28:43] communities. If we can open there
[28:47] kindergarten, this
[28:48] will help people with
[28:49] surrounding towns
[28:50] .
[28:51] Right. Exactly.
[28:53] Not only here.
[28:54] Any questions about this?
[28:57] OK. Um, I still want
[28:59] add that the building
[29:00] looked great. Volume
[29:03] worked with
[29:04] Therefore,
[29:04] By Greg Soen, Greg
[29:06] ,
[29:06] and he did great
[29:08] , supported by Chrissy.
[29:09] The water was turned on. Tom and
[29:11] Chrissy is over it.
[29:12] worked. Um, and honestly
[29:14] saying, it was
[29:15] really...it looked like
[29:16] great, and Robert has
[29:18] in-depth knowledge of
[29:19] the history of the building. Um, and
[29:22] I just hope
[29:23] that it found a response.
[29:25] This is exactly what I found.
[29:26] I have a review. So I think: well, I hope,
[29:29] They are not callous, are they?
[29:31] Yes? So yes, I want to,
[29:33] you know, personally
[29:34] thank everyone who
[29:35] worked so hard,
[29:36] to bring the building
[29:37] okay, and just
[29:39] to structure
[29:39] meeting, so let's hold it
[29:41] fists. Hmm, one more thing
[29:49] relatively ordinary
[29:50] the question that
[29:51] will need
[29:52] council vote,
[29:53] is that to
[29:54] how we got
[29:55] ownership of
[29:56] property, school district
[29:58] ordered an offer
[29:59] regarding maintenance
[30:00] and repair
[30:01] generator, which are
[30:02] quite significant. Volume
[30:13] unofficially found out,
[30:14] what was passed on to us
[30:15] message: if we
[30:17] as the council officially
[30:18] let's ask for school
[30:19] the district to cover these
[30:20] expenses that are essentially
[30:21] arose before we
[30:22] became owners...
[30:24] about 100 dollars.
[30:29] Yes.
[30:29] That's right. So, this is
[30:31] about two thousand.
[30:32] Yes.
[30:34] What is the advice, rather than
[30:35] everything, agree
[30:36] pay. Therefore I
[30:40] would like to contribute
[30:41] proposal that this
[30:42] officially
[30:43] turned to
[30:44] United
[30:45] educational district
[30:46] West River from
[30:46] asking to pay
[30:48] repair bill
[30:49] generator, which was
[30:50] made before
[30:51] our acquisition.
[30:53] Good. Thank you. Is there
[30:55] some discussions
[30:56] about this?
[30:56] How much, how much is this?
[30:58] is it worth?
[30:58] 21 with something.
[31:00] 2100 and a little more.
[31:02] Good.
[31:04] Um, yes.
[31:05] This figure may increase.
[31:06] This is an old assessment. So
[31:09] can the council
[31:10] allow
[31:11] We just ask them
[31:12] to pay for it. We are not
[31:13] we indicate a specific
[31:14] amount.
[31:15] Right. Right.
[31:16] We simply say:
[31:17] pay for it.
[31:18] Right.
[31:19] I was told that we
[31:20] asked them to perform
[31:21] this work
[31:21] perform. Yes. Yes.
[31:23] That's right.
[31:24] You supported.
[31:25] Good. Are there any more?
[31:26] discussion?
[31:27] Since there is none, I bet on
[31:29] voting. Everyone,
[31:30] Who is "in favor", please?
[31:31] to say "yes". Yes.
[31:32] Perfectly. Another question,
[31:37] that needs
[31:38] council approval,
[31:39] is that with
[31:40] many reasons for us
[31:42] worth getting
[31:42] official assessment
[31:43] the value of this property.
[31:52] And, sorry, my brain
[31:53] ...I can't do it.
[31:54] remember, but we, Tom,
[31:56] talked about it.
[31:59] But I wasn't talking about
[32:01] It's up to you. No, it's not.
[32:02] Yes.
[32:02] Oh, okay. I am trying.
[32:04] remember where it came from
[32:05] it worked. Maybe this
[32:06] was
[32:07] My God. I really like it.
[32:08] Sorry, friends. I have on
[32:10] mind,
[32:10] Is there a reason for this?
[32:11] to do, or
[32:12] Yes, there is. Because...oh,
[32:13] good. Sorry.
[32:16] For the committee. Here in
[32:17] What is the idea?
[32:19] Sorry in advance.
[32:19] committee members who
[32:21] are present here. Will be
[32:23] formulated
[32:24] discussion about
[32:25] whether to sell
[32:26] This is our property. Or
[32:29] leave him? For
[32:30] why do we have it
[32:31] will we use?
[32:33] Now we actually have
[32:35] there is no independent
[32:36] understanding of the real
[32:37] the value of this property.
[32:41] So, this is too much—like
[32:43] for the committee
[32:43] unofficially, and for
[32:45] the board officially—
[32:46] to ask for the city
[32:47] to express, um, without
[32:48] this. Um, it's not...I...I
[32:52] I will get some.
[32:53] cost estimates. Ahem,
[32:55] we can get,
[32:57] you know, very cheap
[32:58] valuation through a broker
[32:59] or order
[33:00] official commercial
[33:02] assessment. Um, you know, this
[33:05] little money, but I will return to
[33:07] board with this,
[33:08] but I would like to
[33:09] hear from members
[33:10] board, is it worth it?
[33:11] I have to spend it.
[33:14] Do you know if there is
[33:15] general consensus,
[33:17] Is this a smart move? AND
[33:18] if so, I can
[33:19] to work with Tom,
[33:21] and we can get
[33:22] a few suggestions.
[33:23] Yes.
[33:24] I think that this
[33:24] definitely worth it
[33:25] to put up for auction. IN
[33:26] we, I mean, are
[33:28] very good option
[33:29] on the table, but I think
[33:30] what we all want to have
[33:31] options if it is
[33:32] possible to evaluate
[33:33] decision.
[33:34] Perfectly.
[33:35] And what about, um, now that
[33:36] we own
[33:36] property, can I
[33:38] sell it anytime,
[33:39] Is there any time limit?
[33:40] interval, duration
[33:41] which we must
[33:42] wait?
[33:43] In fact, such
[33:44] no. So, statutory
[33:46] documents require,
[33:47] so that if we sell
[33:48] her during a certain period of time in which
[33:51] we are still here, because
[33:52] it's been a few years...
[33:54] and there is a bond,
[33:55] so if school
[33:56] the county borrowed money
[33:58] for school improvement,
[33:59] we should pay off
[34:00] bond, but
[34:01] actually none
[34:02] There is no bond.
[34:05] no. School district
[34:06] , in fact, simply
[34:07] brought the building to
[34:08] destruction. They,
[34:09] certainly not
[34:10] invested nothing in it
[34:11] capital
[34:12] investments. So,
[34:13] actually, no penalties if
[34:15] we will sell it.
[34:16] Good.
[34:18] Robert, is there anything to add?
[34:20] before that, or...
[34:20] You know, I think we
[34:22] should keep all
[34:23] options on the table.
[34:24] So this is one of our
[34:25] options.
[34:26] Okay. Good. Perfectly.
[34:27] So I think it's...me
[34:29] I think that this
[34:29] reasonably. Yes.
[34:31] I really think that this
[34:32] should be done as much as possible
[34:33] faster because we
[34:34] let's learn about this
[34:35] grant and other grants,
[34:37] and...
[34:37] the solution should be
[34:38] accepted
[34:39] very soon. I am not
[34:42] I agree. In this regard,
[34:47] we...information gathering is
[34:49] very important, but in
[34:50] no way
[34:51] the steering committee does not
[34:52] gives no
[34:52] recommendations regarding
[34:53] whether we should
[34:55] to do something or not.
[35:00] If we are accepted to
[35:01] grant program,
[35:02] we will spend
[35:03] official public
[35:04] hearing, so that
[35:05] to find out what he wants
[35:06] community, as well as
[35:07] let's start large-scale
[35:08] business and
[35:09] development
[35:10] research to
[35:11] understand, or at all
[35:12] possible to keep
[35:13] this object is in status
[35:14] non-profit
[35:15] organizations. Therefore,
[35:19] That's right.
[35:21] I hear it, but so does Jason.
[35:23] can confirm this.
[35:26] They are not easy to find, and
[35:27] this can go
[35:28] a lot of time. Therefore I think we need
[35:32] to act quickly to
[35:33] when will you be
[35:34] contact the city and
[35:35] discuss these
[35:36] question, we already have everything
[35:38] was, because it will take
[35:39] a certain time.
[35:40] Of course.
[35:41] Right. Ready
[35:43] to do any
[35:44] notes. This...this is not
[35:48] will lead to no
[35:49] actions. It's just data.
[35:52] This is a data point.
[35:54] Yes. And again, sorry,
[35:56] I mean, I heard,
[35:58] What did you say about time?
[35:59] necessary for
[36:00] search for an appraiser. It could be that we
[36:03] at least it has already started
[36:05] to do, and then if
[36:06] that loan or
[36:07] the grant will be awarded, this
[36:08] just perfect
[36:09] will fit into the process.
[36:10] Right.
[36:11] Exactly about
[36:12] That's what I'm saying. But
[36:13] At least we have everything.
[36:14] will be ready. I have on
[36:14] mind you, this may
[36:15] take half a year. I am not
[36:16] I know. No matter what
[36:17] was. I mean,
[36:18] we
[36:18] You could ask. I mean, well, we don't
[36:20] we want them about something
[36:21] ask. We don't want
[36:22] to ask them for something.
[36:23] No, don't ask, we
[36:24] let's just start
[36:25] to look for someone
[36:25] We will not be mistaken. IN
[36:27] we are not there
[36:28] something. Would it be
[36:30] I don't...No, because what now?
[36:31] will it happen? We will receive offers
[36:34] , and this will form
[36:35] Yes. I just wanted to
[36:36] get directions.
[36:37] Yes.
[36:38] And would it be
[36:38] commercial valuation, or
[36:40] also potential
[36:41] housing assessment, if
[36:42] someone wanted
[36:43] build there
[36:44] mansion or something
[36:45] similar? I mean,
[36:46] either one or the other.
[36:47] Yes, exactly. This would be
[36:49] to be both. I have
[36:50] I mean, this
[36:50] commercial
[36:51] real estate, because it
[36:52] building. You understand, this
[36:53] falls under
[36:54] commercial? You
[36:55] Do you understand what I mean?
[36:56] This is not a house now.
[36:57] So will it be?
[36:58] a developer or someone,
[36:59] Do you understand? I suppose that very
[37:02] a wealthy person could
[37:04] want to buy only
[37:05] the ground, and, you know, I think it's worth it.
[37:07] to take into account.
[37:09] I think it's worth doing.
[37:10] both, to have
[37:12] full assessment
[37:13] potential.
[37:14] Yes. Perfectly. OK.
[37:17] Thank you. Thank you. Um, and uh,
[37:21] oh, first of all,
[37:22] talk about the volume
[37:23] work and
[37:24] organizational
[37:25] committee structure,
[37:26] including the process
[37:27] approval regarding
[37:28] for the sake of the chosen ones. I have on
[37:31] mind you, I think that this
[37:32] It was a bit difficult.
[37:34] But this is in order to
[37:35] clarify or
[37:36] specify everything,
[37:37] which is incomprehensible. I think today's
[37:42] the meeting is a kind of
[37:43] a perfect example
[37:44] approval process
[37:46] , you know, things
[37:46] coming to the council,
[37:47] but we have enough here
[37:49] many council members.
[37:53] Um, to talk
[37:54] about the volume.
[37:59] Do you want me to?
[38:00] told about
[38:02] Yes, I think it arose
[38:03] some conflict, and
[38:04] the boundaries of who is who
[38:05] does, were
[38:06] unclear about
[38:07] administrative
[38:08] positions for which
[38:09] The committee is responsible.
[38:12] And I seek clarity in
[38:13] this.
[38:14] Oh, about the building itself.
[38:16] This is true. That's where it's from
[38:18] it's coming. So, I have to
[38:19] I mean, obviously, I come to the building.
[38:22] every day or two to
[38:23] check it out. Now
[38:24] I have humidifiers.
[38:26] on the main system.
[38:27] Thank you, Karen, for
[38:28] recommendation.
[38:29] Ahem,
[38:29] so I don't
[38:30] has to
[38:31] Yes. No, no. And even
[38:32] things like keys,
[38:34] but I keep them so
[38:35] make sure that with
[38:35] there is no problem with that. I am sure that she
[38:38] locked,
[38:38] truth?
[38:39] I'm checking to see if
[38:40] My children play there.
[38:41] . I'm coming in too.
[38:42] I'm checking. Young
[38:44] teenagers.
[38:46] Besides, you know,
[38:48] I don't want anyone.
[38:49] to step on one's feet,
[38:50] but I want clarity
[38:51] from the council. That's why,
[38:52] Actually, I'm talking about this.
[38:53] asked.
[38:54] OK. Ahem,
[38:57] and I think that's it too
[38:58] very important because
[39:00] Tom's role is new
[39:01] role in the city, but under
[39:02] very specific there
[39:04] as supervision or
[39:05] technical
[39:06] service
[39:07] city ​​building,
[39:08] Yes?
[39:09] Um, so this is new in this
[39:10] a large part,
[39:11] You know, a big number.
[39:13] But, uh, and then the role
[39:14] Toma would let him
[39:15] to seek experts to say: "I
[39:17] someone needs to
[39:19] fixed the heating,
[39:20] someone looked at
[39:21] water, someone else" that
[39:22] whatever. It is impossible.
[39:23] to have five people in
[39:24] committee, which all
[39:25] are trying
[39:26] to make sure that
[39:27] The building is in order.
[39:28] truth?
[39:29] This should be public.
[39:30] plan. I think
[39:31] this is what is called
[39:32] physical
[39:33] infrastructure,
[39:34] truth? This is what I imagine: I control
[39:36] physical
[39:36] infrastructure,
[39:37] right?
[39:38] I don't give any
[39:39] recommendations regarding
[39:40] what we do with
[39:41] building. I just
[39:42] I support
[39:42] life activity
[39:43] buildings until we
[39:44] Let's decide what to do with her.
[39:45] do.
[39:45] Uh, and we have something to talk about
[39:46] speak. And I know,
[39:48] that they were not warned,
[39:48] but the system
[39:49] alarms,
[39:49] fire alarm
[39:50] , fire monitoring
[39:51] alarms—this
[39:52] things that
[39:52] you probably
[39:53] need to be agreed with
[39:54] board. To us
[39:55] need to be approved
[39:56] these expenses. And we
[39:56] can we discuss this
[39:57] on the next one
[39:58] meetings. I will have
[39:59] to-do list.
[40:00] Budget, right?
[40:00] I really organized
[40:02] game check
[40:03] company sites
[40:04] DLCT. So, we know that
[40:05] there are a few small ones
[40:06] disadvantages, but nothing
[40:07] serious.
[40:08] shortcomings
[40:09] there was no.
[40:09] Uh, so the children
[40:10] safe to play on
[40:11] the site. You know,
[40:12] these are the things that
[40:13] the city can carry
[40:14] responsibility,
[40:14] if no one is behind this
[40:15] follows,
[40:16] truth? Therefore I
[40:16] I'm trying to follow.
[40:17] these things and
[40:18] to support everything in working condition,
[40:20] you know,
[40:20] making sure that,
[40:21] again, none
[40:21] water pipe
[40:22] will not break through
[40:23] buildings, no one
[40:23] we will go there
[40:24] a week, and then everything
[40:25] will flood, and we will
[40:26] thinking: "What happened?"
[40:27] You know, because
[40:27] does anyone actually have
[40:28] to be there
[40:29] every day or two, or
[40:30] probably every day,
[40:31] just so
[40:31] look around, and I walk around the entire building,
[40:33] just so
[40:33] make sure that everything
[40:34] Right. Simply
[40:35] I'm going around. Yes. Yes.
[40:38] Uh, are there any more?
[40:39] questions about
[40:40] object or things that
[40:41] need to be done on
[40:43] object? I would like to
[40:44] the committee also issued
[40:45] this is under consideration
[40:46] rule. Also,
[40:47] I think we just
[40:48] we want to understand about
[40:50] that we can also
[40:51] ask Tom. He
[40:52] takes on a lot
[40:53] responsibilities. Therefore, uh,
[40:55] It is important for us to understand,
[41:01] if something arises, like
[41:02] Should we act, Tom?
[41:03] This sounds like part of it.
[41:05] your official
[41:06] instructions, or us
[41:07] need to contact
[41:08] to someone else?
[41:10] Right. I have on
[41:11] meaning, of course, any
[41:11] what a big expense
[41:12] must be agreed upon
[41:13] with the board, but
[41:13] if you need
[41:14] help with anything,
[41:14] Call me. I have
[41:15] I mean, Chrissy
[41:16] now you have my number
[41:17] phone. You have mine.
[41:18] phone number. IN
[41:18] Karen has my number.
[41:19] phone. If
[41:20] problems arise,
[41:21] if you say, "Well,
[41:21] you know,
[41:22] we think that there is
[41:23] problem". I, again
[41:24] yes, not an expert in
[41:24] systems
[41:25] alarm system. I am not
[41:26] expert in matters
[41:27] water supply. I am not
[41:28] systems expert
[41:29] heating. I work.
[41:30] over Irving
[41:31] came and checked
[41:32] it. So, my job
[41:34] is to work with
[41:35] suppliers and
[41:37] specialists in these
[41:38] areas, in order to
[41:38] guarantee: if we work in the winter,
[41:41] the generator has
[41:41] work, electricity
[41:43] must be, systems
[41:44] water supply—in
[41:45] normal, and Chrissy now
[41:46] is engaged in the transmission
[41:48] these duties. Ahem,
[41:52] again, I am here,
[41:53] to help, but
[41:54] Tom is the contact person,
[41:56] and he should himself
[41:57] decide what he
[41:58] can really do
[41:59] within its limits
[42:00] current role,
[42:01] because he has
[42:02] double duties.
[42:10] Um, and if he
[42:11] need help
[42:12] or an expert, and this
[42:13] will cost more,
[42:14] than we laid in
[42:15] budget, then this
[42:16] the question is put
[42:17] for the council's consideration.
[42:23] That's right. Yes. And what's more, we
[42:27] done with this
[42:28] building: several
[42:29] years ago, probably
[42:30] because of what has passed
[42:31] a lot of time, too much
[42:32] many people had
[42:34] the keys to it. Therefore I know it's mine...me
[42:38] insisted that
[42:40] Tom limited
[42:41] handing out keys to
[42:42] a large number. It
[42:44] , you could say, my "
[42:45] "dot". So I think,
[42:48] if there is a need for
[42:49] keys or access,
[42:50] discuss this with Tom
[42:52] . He will be the one who...well
[42:53] you know.
[42:54] Greg got
[42:55] set of keys. I
[42:56] gave him one
[42:56] kit. I said:
[42:57] Give it back to me,
[42:58] When
[42:58] you gave Greg a kit
[42:59] keys.
[43:00] Oh, he needed to enter and exit. I
[43:02] asked why he
[43:03] got it back? I am not
[43:05] I am going to allow
[43:06] him to leave them in
[43:07] himself.
[43:07] Yes. Yes. Yes. No, but I
[43:09] said: okay, just
[43:10] ...you know.
[43:11] Yes.
[43:12] We couldn't
[43:13] to meet.
[43:13] Good. Yes. But this, I mean...
[43:16] and then, yes, whatever
[43:17] what a student...
[43:20] the main thing is that someone
[43:21] understood who exactly
[43:22] the keys are there.
[43:25] Yes. But this is certainly
[43:27] , my...
[43:29] yes, my sore subject.
[43:31] Hmm, are there any more?
[43:32] questions about this?
[43:34] Anyone else? No? Perfectly.
[43:38] I have to say that,
[43:39] seeing the work that
[43:40] was performed in order to reach this stage
[43:42] ...Even if we don't
[43:43] we will receive a grant that
[43:45] It would be a bit of a shame,
[43:46] the work itself,
[43:47] done for
[43:48] application submission, I think it was
[43:50] extremely useful
[43:51] . This is really...Karen
[43:56] can confirm that
[43:57] woman in charge
[43:58] kindergarten in...or
[43:59] hers in Wyndham, or
[44:01] she...
[44:02] grew up here, in
[44:03] Jamaicans,
[44:04] truth? But isn't it?
[44:05] she is in charge now
[44:06] one of them?
[44:06] Manages.
[44:07] At Wyndham School in
[44:08] Worsborough.
[44:08] No, at home.
[44:10] Oh, she's at home. In her
[44:11] home. And she lives in Dumbarton. OK. I
[44:14] none of this
[44:15] I understand.
[44:16] Nothing. But Brian I
[44:18] heard. She went to
[44:19] school and met with
[44:20] you. So even
[44:21] just getting,
[44:22] you know, a certain one like that
[44:23] experience. I mean,
[44:25] just all of this,
[44:26] crystallization
[44:27] message and,
[44:28] of course, work with
[44:29] Chissy. Glad
[44:30] to join. So
[44:32] next Tuesday
[44:33] we will do
[44:34] priority
[44:35] discussion of how
[44:36] to attract more
[44:37] volunteers to help them
[44:38] there was more.
[44:40] Right.
[44:42] Many reviews even before
[44:43] official project.
[44:45] Right. Right.
[44:47] I think that's great.
[44:48] OK. Anything else on JBS?
[44:50] Okay. It was wonderful.
[44:52] Honestly,
[44:53] incredible.
[44:54] Um, now
[44:56] You are here. You are here because
[44:59] LT13 or just because
[45:01] love
[45:02] to go to meetings
[45:04] Any advice, Brian? No,
[45:05] seriously, because I want
[45:06] go to you
[45:07] next, if
[45:08] I was here.
[45:09] via LT13.
[45:10] Any support
[45:11] was needed there.
[45:12] Yes.
[45:13] OK. So, um, I
[45:14] I'll move on. What was
[45:16] point six to 1 2 3 4
[45:18] five. Now, point
[45:19] five.
[45:21] Hmm, so, hmm,
[45:22] present
[45:23] landowner, um, oh, me
[45:24] didn't actually specify
[45:26] address. This, and I should,
[45:29] 585 Pleasant Valley Road,
[45:33] um, did, um,
[45:34] official request. Am I
[45:37] forgot who he is
[45:38] arrived first.
[45:41] And then I, Brian Misko
[45:42] , came to me with
[45:47] please, I asked
[45:48] send it
[45:49] by email
[45:50] improvement plan
[45:52] LT13 from the homeowner,
[45:53] which I then forwarded
[45:54] , um, Brian and
[45:55] planning commissions,
[45:57] as we did with others
[45:58] paths and things,
[45:59] which we discussed.
[46:02] OK. Therefore,
[46:03] first I have
[46:04] to reveal that I
[46:05] represented the seller
[46:06] this property before
[46:07] current owner
[46:09] who made the request.
[46:10] So I don't, I don't
[46:11] I present
[46:12] owner, but I
[46:13] familiar with this
[46:14] property, and because of this
[46:15] I just won't, I will refrain from any
[46:17] which vote,
[46:18] which we ultimately
[46:19] let's spend this
[46:20] reason. Um, I, um,
[46:21] contacted Ryan
[46:22] Mayoscom, which
[46:23] represented the buyer
[46:25] during the sale. Um, and
[46:26] just a lot
[46:27] worked with him. And, um,
[46:30] I, you know, I said
[46:32] him, I thought, um, I
[46:33] really simple, um,
[46:35] he, this landowner
[46:36] actually owns
[46:37] property on Stratton.
[46:40] It is not adjacent,
[46:41] Absolutely not. So here
[46:44] there is none
[46:45] real plan. I
[46:46] asked him if he had
[46:48] Do you know if there is anything behind
[46:49] hereby? or, you know, is there,
[46:50] well, not that he
[46:51] had to answer,
[46:53] but I wanted to ask.
[46:54] Um, and he said no. I mean that,
[46:56] as far as he knows,
[46:58] his client does not have
[46:59] nothing special
[46:59] plans for this
[47:00] property. There is, I think,
[47:02] over time there were several
[47:03] washed away the roads
[47:04] Pleasant Valley Road.
[47:06] Um, Pleasant Valley-
[47:07] The road leads nowhere.
[47:09] It simply forms
[47:10] horseshoe, um, from, um, e-
[47:12] Hey, what is this?
[47:13] Well, this is Pleasant Valley-
[47:15] road, and then she
[47:16] becomes LP13.
[47:17] No. No. Really?
[47:19] Yes, I think that's right.
[47:21] This is in
[47:22] Basically, it's Plez...
[47:30] So this is a plot, and
[47:31] here is Pleasant Valley-
[47:33] road.
[47:34] This is L13 Pleasant Valley-
[47:35] road, exit from, um,
[47:37] Mountain Road from here.
[47:40] Oh, this, and then this
[47:41] comes from the side
[47:42] city, from the city of Strata.
[47:43] Of course.
[47:44] And then it becomes LP13 in
[47:46] Jamaicans.
[47:46] Of course. Of course.
[47:48] But this is small
[47:49] horseshoe from Pleasant-
[47:50] Valley Road
[47:50] at the very end
[47:51] Pleasant Valley.
[47:52] Right. Right.
[47:53] And this area, the one that is not
[47:55] includes a bet
[47:56] Forester, it is
[47:57] the area that is the one
[47:58] by myself
[48:00] I don't know for
[48:02] Yes. Here. On
[48:03] north of the pond
[48:04] Forester. This is this one. IN
[48:06] it has a small loop
[48:07] like this.
[48:08] Of course.
[48:09] No, you can.
[48:10] to see the border
[48:11] plots. You see
[48:12] square?
[48:12] Yes.
[48:13] Yes. But if you
[48:15] look,
[48:16] actually, how much
[48:17] I remember, and I think,
[48:18] that this is true. Here
[48:21] It is shown that the area
[48:22] goes around the pond
[48:23] Forester.
[48:24] Of course.
[48:25] Yes. What do you think?
[48:27] It seems so, but
[48:29] I'm not sure, and that
[48:30] The deal was a long time ago,
[48:31] so I forgot the exact one
[48:32] description in the documents.
[48:34] But in any case
[48:36] it's here. This is at the top.
[48:38] This is above 2,500 feet.
[48:40] Right.
[48:41] Part of it. part
[48:43] its. So, any
[48:49] buildings above 2500
[48:50] feet requires, you know
[48:52] , is subject to
[48:54] Act 250. So, although she herself
[49:00] Jamaica, city, no
[49:02] has zoning, if
[49:07] the landowner began
[49:08] to develop a plot
[49:10] above 2500 feet, this
[49:11] the owner would have
[49:12] to get approval
[49:14] according to Act 250. And
[49:21] Brian found the application
[49:23] from Green Mountain, as then
[49:25] was called Green Mount, or
[49:26] was it CVPS or Green Mountain
[49:28] ? I can't remember. Though
[49:34] whatever this would be
[49:35] the company at that time,
[49:37] for installation
[49:38] electric support along
[49:39] LT13 what should have been, well,
[49:44] somewhere around 800 feet,
[49:46] somehow like that. feet
[49:48] power lines
[49:49] ,
[49:50] Yes?
[49:50] Ahem
[49:52] it's been quite a while.
[49:54] Along the entire length of the road
[49:55] .
[49:55] Actually, for the whole
[49:56] the length of the road. Yes.
[49:59] Thousands.
[50:00] Of course. And that's not enough.
[50:03] to be at an altitude of 2500
[50:04] feet or higher, and this
[50:06] was rejected. It was quite a long time ago.
[50:12] Well, those are two different things.
[50:18] First, the current
[50:20] request—improve LT13
[50:27] by means of
[50:28] technology
[50:28] construction, that is
[50:29] add crushed stone
[50:30] material,
[50:34] to equip
[50:35] culverts,
[50:36] create trips
[50:37] etc. Hmm, so what?
[50:40] concerns the current
[50:41] request, then he
[50:42] asks to receive
[50:48] access to the city
[50:49] exclusion zones that
[50:50] possible only with
[50:51] permission of the council. JBC does not
[50:53] has none before
[50:55] relationship. We take
[50:56] participation only then
[50:57] when it comes to
[50:58] retraining
[51:00] trails. So now,
[51:01] or if it was
[51:03] statement under law 250,
[51:04] yes, we would help with
[51:06] technical inspection.
[51:08] Previous work, about
[51:10] which I mentioned
[51:11] Jessica, was there back in 2005
[51:13] year.
[51:15] Yes.
[51:15] Previous owner
[51:21] wanted to share
[51:22] plot for two
[51:23] parts, build
[51:24] two residential buildings,
[51:26] what did he have the right to
[51:27] but at that time it
[51:28] needed
[51:28] easement for
[51:29] communications. This is it.
[51:37] would in itself cause
[51:38] the effect of law 250, as well as
[51:39] would affect the length
[51:41] the road that was going
[51:42] change, and for the length
[51:44] legal path. Was
[51:47] still ecological
[51:49] aspect of law 250, which
[51:50] also acted. So
[51:55] the check was based
[51:56] on ecological
[51:57] factors, change
[51:58] roads and easements
[51:59] for laying
[52:00] communications and
[52:01] power grids up to
[52:02] the area itself.
[52:07] Yes? So, refusal
[52:09] was based on the fact that
[52:11] what am I trying to do
[52:22] download long
[52:23] report with many
[52:24] documents, but the essence
[52:25] in what we have
[52:26] environmentally sensitive
[52:27] areas related to
[52:28] migration corridor
[52:30] bears, which
[52:30] shown on the map
[52:32] on the left, as well as ours
[52:33] picturesque mountains
[52:34] ridges, regarding which in
[52:35] the urban plan is
[52:36] relevant provisions
[52:38] . In short,
[52:49] the city of Stratton also
[52:50] expressed from this
[52:51] drive, because LT13
[52:53] starts in the city
[52:54] Stratton, and then
[52:55] it is clear where she is
[52:56] crosses the city border
[52:57] and turns back.
[53:01] Yes. This is the area,
[53:02] What are we talking about?
[53:04] Is this a place where
[53:04] conducted
[53:05] reconstruction of times
[53:06] the Vietnam War? It
[53:07] and area
[53:08] Forrester? No,
[53:09] she is a little
[53:10] further south.
[53:12] Of course,
[53:13] she is a little
[53:14] further south, and there is
[53:15] access from
[53:16] Forrester.
[53:18] Brian, do you remember?
[53:20] you, or the requirement of the Law
[53:21] 250 from the environmental
[53:22] points of view
[53:23] only concerned
[53:24] the road itself, or
[53:25] road combinations and
[53:26] easement on the line
[53:28] power transmission? So
[53:29] Will this affect our
[53:31] decision?
[53:31] Only on
[53:32] power grid. Me
[53:33] it seems that
[53:34] comments and review by law 250, which I
[53:37] read, related
[53:38] namely communal
[53:39] easement.
[53:41] OK,
[53:41] I understood exactly that.
[53:43] Yes. You said it, and
[53:44] now I think they are
[53:45] were united.
[53:46] But
[53:47] there is a certain moment
[53:48] regarding modification
[53:49] road that has a certain
[53:53] length. Good, because this
[53:55] modification
[53:56] is about 3500
[53:57] feet. So then it was
[54:00] a certain aspect, for
[54:01] what is this too
[54:02] was associated with
[54:04] By Law 250. Of course.
[54:06] I don't know if that's true.
[54:07] now.
[54:08] I don't think so. I think
[54:10] now has them
[54:10] to worry about the height above
[54:12] sea ​​level,
[54:14] height.
[54:15] This is the Law 250
[54:17] if you are building something,
[54:22] anything above 2500 feet in
[54:24] this area. Um,
[54:27] if you walked
[54:28] any part
[54:29] Jamaicans above 2500
[54:30] feet, you would end up
[54:32] in the forest on
[54:33] picturesque ridge.
[54:35] And so, if you're going
[54:36] by the way, you see
[54:37] much more fragile
[54:38] ecosystems,
[54:41] corridors of wildlife
[54:42] nature, a lot
[54:43] habitats
[54:44] animals,
[54:44] isn't that right? And it was, and,
[54:48] as far as I understand
[54:50] refusal, the emphasis was
[54:51] largely
[54:52] made under the influence
[54:53] wild project
[54:54] nature. This was, this was
[55:00] it was simple, that's it
[55:01] went on and on,
[55:02] referring to the report,
[55:03] prepared
[55:04] Stratton and
[55:05] Department
[55:06] security
[55:06] surrounding
[55:07] environment. So, us
[55:13] now they are asking
[55:14] allow the owner
[55:15] land to carry out
[55:16] improvement of that
[55:17] is actually urban
[55:18] property, right? It,
[55:26] this is us, you know,
[55:27] approved as a council
[55:29] reclassification LT13
[55:30] from the 4th class road to
[55:32] legal route. AND
[55:37] we did it. Oh my god,
[55:38] When was that? You
[55:39] presided.
[55:40] It was...No, this one
[55:41] the object never existed
[55:42] nothing like that.
[55:42] Wasn't it?
[55:43] part of that? This is not
[55:44] was part of that
[55:45] recent case.
[55:45] It was not at all
[55:46] newly. This
[55:47] the route was
[55:47] legal for a long time.
[55:48] Oh, of course. OK.
[55:50] I take back my words.
[55:51] back. I'm taking mine.
[55:52] words back. I thought,
[55:53] that this is part of that
[55:54] groups. But I don't think so.
[55:57] what he needs
[55:58] to apply for permission for
[56:00] By law 250, in order to carry out the described
[56:02] actions. They,
[56:07] if they want
[56:08] improve this
[56:09] legal route, then
[56:13] this is what is possible
[56:14] to allow,
[56:17] The elected council will say: we grant you the right
[56:20] access to our
[56:21] public land, and
[56:24] was it
[56:27] and here I would have been, I should have been
[56:28] be, there was a request for that,
[56:30] what I described, and all that,
[56:31] yes, he was, but it's not
[56:33] means that we definitely have
[56:35] to grant an easement.
[56:37] So I would call
[56:38] Ryan and said: "
[56:39] Okay, where's the easement?
[56:40] You must
[56:41] prepare a project
[56:42] easement." You know,
[56:43] well, I think it's important
[56:45] that it is legal
[56:46] path. We would like
[56:49] get more
[56:50] information.
[56:52] Is the ultimate goal
[56:53] classification change?
[56:57] If in this area
[56:58] will not be held
[57:00] no work, then
[57:01] it seems that this
[57:02] too much
[57:02] money and work only
[57:04] in order to say:
[57:05] "Hey, this is legit
[57:06] the path now
[57:07] improved".
[57:10] It's great to have a good
[57:11] expensive, but it's all
[57:12] the same affects
[57:13] violation
[57:16] which long-term
[57:17] perspective, right?
[57:18] Yes? change, for example,
[57:20] what are the actual details,
[57:21] if you are going
[57:23] change specification
[57:24] , width, length hm, I think there is.
[57:30] I can't do this here.
[57:31] to decipher, I have
[57:32] not all
[57:33] it was just a list
[57:34] out of five steps, I have
[57:36] I mean, it wasn't
[57:37] but um
[57:38] Well, this is more like it.
[57:39] on um, it seems to depend
[57:44] from classification
[57:45] road or from the fact that
[57:46] is this a legal trail.
[57:49] She has certain
[57:50] restrictions on
[57:51] width. And therefore, if
[57:54] you will change something
[57:55] so much so that it
[57:56] no longer responding
[57:58] definition of legal
[57:59] trails,
[58:01] then that's right. Therefore,
[58:04] I have a list here. 600
[58:05] yards of crushed stone fraction
[58:07] 1.5, 14,000, 12-inch
[58:08] culvert,
[58:09] pipe delivery,
[58:10] installation, ditches
[58:11] where needed,
[58:12] profiling,
[58:13] giving way,
[58:14] rolling and
[58:15] consolidation.
[58:16] Right. Me
[58:17] reported that there are two
[58:18] blurred areas, but
[58:19] necessary ditches
[58:20] will be needed before
[58:21] How can the road be
[58:23] prepare for
[58:24] crushed stone, calculated
[58:25] approximately 600 yards
[58:26] 2500 feet of gravel
[58:27] roads 25
[58:28] 2500 feet of road, so
[58:31] Yes
[58:32] this includes the road,
[58:33] what is the problem
[58:35] Brian is right if
[58:36] they plan
[58:37] to make it and
[58:37] reclassify as
[58:38] city ​​road, then
[58:39] they will have to
[58:40] bring her in
[58:41] compliance with
[58:42] our traffic rules
[58:43] Ahem
[58:44] and then the city will be
[58:45] carry
[58:45] responsibility
[58:46] thereafter.
[58:47] So, we keep
[58:48] right.
[58:49] We can do it.
[58:49] to deny
[58:50] Well, we would argue
[58:51] journey.
[58:53] And I, you know, here, so
[58:54] hmm, I think the answer is
[58:56] , which will return,
[58:57] will be: "I just we just want to have
[58:59] opportunity to drive
[59:00] "We want to
[59:02] enjoy
[59:03] own property. and
[59:07] my answer would be:
[59:08] "Okay, prepare
[59:09] servitude project GM with
[59:11] details about what
[59:12] you are going
[59:13] to do, when and where,
[59:14] recognizing that this is not possible
[59:15] does not change
[59:16] "city's obligations."
[59:20] This will be expensive. Ahem
[59:24] well, when you say "
[59:25] easement", then I see
[59:26] this is it: now this
[59:27] legally formalized
[59:28] the path, and we are going to provide
[59:30] someone has the right, or
[59:31] selection council,
[59:33] or the council can
[59:33] to appoint
[59:34] road commissioner
[59:37] I reviewed the statutes,
[59:38] I'm not sure if we can, I don't think so
[59:40] the council can do this
[59:41] delegate
[59:42] I don't think we can
[59:44] good
[59:44] but I
[59:47] um, so, glad to hear from you
[59:47] will accept questions of choice
[59:49] decision whether to provide
[59:50] they are someone's right
[59:51] to go to the city hall
[59:52] territory and do
[59:53] improvement.
[59:56] I just call it that.
[59:57] easement. Easier
[59:58] to format it as
[59:59] easement, because
[1:00:00] this way we can
[1:00:01] to say exactly that
[1:00:02] they have the right
[1:00:03] to do and during
[1:00:05] what period of time,
[1:00:06] this is recorded in
[1:00:07] land registers, and
[1:00:08] you know
[1:00:08] then this means that
[1:00:10] this is not permanent
[1:00:11] basis? This is not
[1:00:12] permanent easement.
[1:00:13] So, it's simple.
[1:00:14] easement, which
[1:00:15] covers the time during
[1:00:16] which they perform
[1:00:17] work
[1:00:18] like what you give
[1:00:19] anytime
[1:00:20] the state requires from
[1:00:21] us to have an easement for
[1:00:22] performance of work.
[1:00:23] We signed
[1:00:24] temporary easement,
[1:00:25] which only covers
[1:00:26] work.
[1:00:27] Yes.
[1:00:27] This is essentially your
[1:00:28] method of providing
[1:00:29] permission to execute
[1:00:31] works.
[1:00:31] Yes.
[1:00:32] And it will have all
[1:00:33] legal
[1:00:34] obligations regarding
[1:00:35] reimbursement
[1:00:36] losses, you know.
[1:00:38] Yes.
[1:00:40] Field,
[1:00:41] Does this require a statement?
[1:00:42] about who will be
[1:00:43] to maintain the road
[1:00:44] for travel and
[1:00:45] things like that? Well, in
[1:00:48] easement will be clear
[1:00:49] It is said that, um,
[1:00:50] the recipient acknowledges that
[1:00:52] the provider does not take
[1:00:53] myself none
[1:00:54] obligations, except
[1:00:55] those that exist for
[1:00:56] legally formed
[1:00:57] trails
[1:01:00] and still specially
[1:01:01] to point out that this
[1:01:02] remains
[1:01:03] legal path and
[1:01:04] that it falls under
[1:01:05] these instructions,
[1:01:06] parameters or something
[1:01:07] whatever, but still
[1:01:08] allows public
[1:01:09] access. They are not
[1:01:10] can put
[1:01:11] gate or something else,
[1:01:12] who have already tried
[1:01:13] to do in the past.
[1:01:14] Therefore,
[1:01:14] True.
[1:01:15] That's right. And this is what
[1:01:16] comes to mind: we have
[1:01:17] there were people who
[1:01:18] they put up a gate
[1:01:18] across the legal
[1:01:19] trails and started it
[1:01:20] serve
[1:01:21] True
[1:01:21] and, in fact,
[1:01:22] to serve her
[1:01:23] and that would be true
[1:01:25] and this is city property
[1:01:29] Where is the city property?
[1:01:30] , and where
[1:01:31] so, everything you see on this map,
[1:01:33] this is a city law firm
[1:01:34] path, but
[1:01:35] all this dotted
[1:01:36] what comes in here is
[1:01:37] path
[1:01:38] on the lower half,
[1:01:39] what comes from
[1:01:40] Stratton as a road
[1:01:41] this is a legal path
[1:01:42] cities
[1:01:42] I think it's legal.
[1:01:44] path, something on
[1:01:44] kind of property.
[1:01:46] OK,
[1:01:47] we own, you know,
[1:01:48] if you think about
[1:01:49] property rights as a
[1:01:50] package,
[1:01:51] we own
[1:01:52] part of this
[1:01:53] package.
[1:01:53] OK,
[1:01:54] we have, you know, any-
[1:01:56] Who in the city can
[1:01:57] to cross it, um,
[1:01:58] indefinitely. Them
[1:02:01] it is forbidden to block
[1:02:02] her, interfere with her,
[1:02:03] and, actually, to do
[1:02:05] any actions, therefore
[1:02:06] they turned to
[1:02:07] council with a request for
[1:02:09] permission. So what?
[1:02:14] part of the way they
[1:02:17] completely all?
[1:02:18] Completely, that is, she
[1:02:19] goes from the road to
[1:02:20] mountains
[1:02:21] Pleasant Valley, up to
[1:02:22] the end, yes. Yes. Therefore,
[1:02:24] in Stratton they
[1:02:25] should get this
[1:02:26] the very permission.
[1:02:27] But I don't know if it is
[1:02:28] the answer to this
[1:02:29] question.
[1:02:30] AT
[1:02:30] because if they
[1:02:31] only have this one
[1:02:32] plot, they are not
[1:02:33] will continue
[1:02:34] the road to the very
[1:02:35] end. They will arrive.
[1:02:36] only to your own area
[1:02:38] .
[1:02:38] Yes. But I think that
[1:02:40] they...I heard from the edge
[1:02:41] ears that they too
[1:02:42] are turning to
[1:02:43] Stratton, because I think
[1:02:45] that there are some
[1:02:46] rights where they have
[1:02:47] access to
[1:02:48] Jamaicans, but
[1:02:49] mountain road
[1:02:50] but I suppose that
[1:02:51] they just
[1:02:52] will finish their
[1:02:54] We don't know, they don't
[1:02:55] will do nothing
[1:02:56] here and on someone else's
[1:02:57] territories, no, I think
[1:02:58] , Karen asks how
[1:02:59] they are far away
[1:03:00] are going to come in
[1:03:01] if they do
[1:03:02] all the way
[1:03:04] from so, as far as I understand, there are rumors.
[1:03:09] that there are certain areas,
[1:03:11] which make it difficult for them
[1:03:12] access, and they are not on
[1:03:13] their property, so
[1:03:14] they are trying
[1:03:15] fix these too
[1:03:16] moments.
[1:03:20] This is not under our control.
[1:03:21] including
[1:03:22] this part, which would be
[1:03:24] , or this part.
[1:03:27] I think it's different.
[1:03:28] parts that...Yes.
[1:03:30] Well, that's probably it.
[1:03:32] part
[1:03:32] Well, actually, that's how it is.
[1:03:34] That's right. That's right. They...
[1:03:36] are trying
[1:03:37] improve the area
[1:03:38] outside of your own
[1:03:39] They, as far as I know.
[1:03:41] They are trying...
[1:03:42] they probably
[1:03:43] are trying
[1:03:44] improve part
[1:03:45] Pleasant Valley Roads,
[1:03:46] where do you call from
[1:03:47] Mountain Road
[1:03:49] and you go through
[1:03:50] Stratton Park.
[1:03:51] They
[1:03:52] to get to
[1:03:53] Jamaica Park. What
[1:03:55] leads to the fact that,
[1:03:56] in my opinion,
[1:03:57] next step
[1:03:58] will be: okay, we
[1:03:59] understand the basis
[1:04:00] what you want
[1:04:01] to do, before
[1:04:02] the council will provide
[1:04:03] easement on
[1:04:04] performance of work, we
[1:04:05] need more
[1:04:06] details
[1:04:08] right
[1:04:12] come to the meeting
[1:04:13] and I...we have
[1:04:14] understand that if we are going to give them
[1:04:17] easement, this affects
[1:04:18] neighboring
[1:04:18] landowners who
[1:04:20] we have requirements for
[1:04:21] notification, I'm quick
[1:04:22] looked at...Yes, I think so,
[1:04:23] we must notify
[1:04:25] you about it.
[1:04:25] I was just about to ask
[1:04:27] I'm almost sure that
[1:04:28] we must have
[1:04:29] notice period
[1:04:30] and comments. I...I...I
[1:04:31] I'll discuss this with Nick and
[1:04:33] Alan Hamilton. IN
[1:04:35] there are us
[1:04:36] Hamilton from one
[1:04:37] side, and I forgot which one
[1:04:39] Fitzpatrick.
[1:04:40] that, well, Vietnam
[1:04:43] who? Yes. Yes. Where, where
[1:04:44] Forester? Yes. Yes.
[1:04:46] He was
[1:04:48] he handed it in
[1:04:49] rent, I don't know
[1:04:50] details. I only know,
[1:04:52] what he probably wanted
[1:04:53] use this
[1:04:54] like a gravel pit.
[1:04:57] Well, he's been doing this for a long time.
[1:04:58] , but he wants
[1:04:59] to return and
[1:05:00] to make it
[1:05:01] I think it is.
[1:05:01] put up for sale.
[1:05:03] It is now
[1:05:03] for sale.
[1:05:04] His law 250 restricts
[1:05:06] his, it is closed.
[1:05:08] No more
[1:05:09] gravel.
[1:05:09] Yes.
[1:05:10] True.
[1:05:10] Yes, that's completely true.
[1:05:11] another story.
[1:05:12] True.
[1:05:13] And as for the broader
[1:05:14] context, why they
[1:05:15] do these roads
[1:05:16] work, do we ask
[1:05:17] to provide them with more
[1:05:18] details? I asked
[1:05:21] Ryan, and he said,
[1:05:22] because they just want to
[1:05:23] enjoy
[1:05:24] property.
[1:05:26] I mean, this
[1:05:27] interesting, but
[1:05:28] I have never seen
[1:05:30] I think that would be
[1:05:31] perfectly. I can only
[1:05:32] to say that I never
[1:05:33] I didn't see anyone
[1:05:34] invested
[1:05:34] six-digit amounts in
[1:05:36] a road to walk
[1:05:37] field.
[1:05:39] Yes. It seems that behind this
[1:05:41] there must be something that
[1:05:42] It's worth knowing.
[1:05:44] I can drive to
[1:05:45] any field and
[1:05:46] walk.
[1:05:47] Ha? We need
[1:05:48] know
[1:05:49] to walk legally
[1:05:50] along the path.
[1:05:51] Yes.
[1:05:52] We need, we need
[1:05:53] really need
[1:05:54] register.
[1:05:55] Do we know who this is?
[1:05:57] I don't know who MD is,
[1:05:58] can he say,
[1:05:59] Who are you?
[1:06:00] Just for
[1:06:00] public record that
[1:06:02] he is present.
[1:06:02] Yes, we have
[1:06:06] MD is silent.
[1:06:07] Hello.
[1:06:09] MD joins Zoom.
[1:06:13] I, I saw it, I didn't
[1:06:15] I know. and you do nothing
[1:06:17] you see from your side,
[1:06:18] so that we can lead
[1:06:20] record
[1:06:22] True. Um, MD, if you
[1:06:25] Can you hear us?
[1:06:26] you, please,
[1:06:27] turn on the microphone and
[1:06:28] to say your name,
[1:06:30] because we are leading
[1:06:31] accounting of all participants
[1:06:32] meetings and we will
[1:06:36] forced to remove you
[1:06:39] from a Zoom meeting if
[1:06:40] we won't hear if we don't know yours
[1:06:43] name. Good. Something that
[1:06:45] they say.
[1:06:47] Michael Oh, this is Mike.
[1:06:48] Oh, Mike. Thank you, Mike.
[1:06:51] Thank you.
[1:06:51] Mike.
[1:06:53] Ahem,
[1:06:56] OK. Any, I think
[1:06:58] he doesn't have
[1:06:59] microphone. Mike's
[1:07:00] there is no microphone. I
[1:07:02] always had
[1:07:03] so once in
[1:07:04] one of your letters
[1:07:05] , I think that's good, you
[1:07:07] said they would be glad if
[1:07:08] you wish, we
[1:07:09] can we ask for this
[1:07:12] planning commission
[1:07:14] has no official role
[1:07:15] in this, but we can
[1:07:16] to ask you about
[1:07:17] advice, how are you?
[1:07:18] we can always
[1:07:19] to ask for advice
[1:07:20] but to provide this in
[1:07:21] more formal
[1:07:22] in a sense, have we reached
[1:07:23] that we are going to
[1:07:24] landlord, and we already
[1:07:26] we know what we need to know
[1:07:28] we, we don't know that,
[1:07:30] what do we need to know
[1:07:31] , so the commission with
[1:07:32] planning.
[1:07:33] O. Oh, I think we have
[1:07:34] enough data to contact
[1:07:37] the owner of the land.
[1:07:38] I will do it, I can do it.
[1:07:39] make. I can do it.
[1:07:40] make. I am happy.
[1:07:41] I will do it.
[1:07:42] And the research that
[1:07:43] conducted by Brian.
[1:07:43] I will do this through
[1:07:44] Ryan.
[1:07:45] This is great.
[1:07:46] Yes. Yes.
[1:07:48] Um, if only Ryan
[1:07:50] doesn't want me to
[1:07:50] worked with this
[1:07:51] directly by the client,
[1:07:53] what he probably doesn't
[1:07:54] wants to, but I just
[1:07:55] I want to clarify a little.
[1:07:56] legal analysis
[1:07:57] regarding whether it can
[1:07:58] electoral council
[1:07:59] delegate
[1:08:00] powers. My
[1:08:03] personal interpretation
[1:08:04] the statute consisted of
[1:08:06] because I don't see it in
[1:08:07] us the authority to do this
[1:08:08] .
[1:08:08] Ahem.
[1:08:09] Well, we probably wouldn't.
[1:08:10] wanted this. I have on
[1:08:11] mind you, we still
[1:08:12] we accept it ourselves
[1:08:13] decision. I think there is.
[1:08:14] many...
[1:08:15] I think so, me too.
[1:08:17] I think, but it's worth it
[1:08:18] to ask.
[1:08:22] I also just want to
[1:08:24] get examples
[1:08:25] from our external
[1:08:26] lawyers. I can
[1:08:30] get them in your
[1:08:31] to the company regarding these
[1:08:32] easements. Simply
[1:08:39] to see the type,
[1:08:40] volume, level
[1:08:41] detailing that was
[1:08:42] provided, and how much we want to open
[1:08:45] to the owner of the land,
[1:08:46] understanding that if
[1:08:47] they are going
[1:08:48] build on this
[1:08:49] area,
[1:08:50] most likely, this
[1:08:51] above 2500 feet. So,
[1:08:58] although WW permission is there, I don't
[1:09:00] I think there is still permission.
[1:09:02] I think it's just
[1:09:03] part, northern
[1:09:04] the part that goes up.
[1:09:07] Oh, yes.
[1:09:08] Where are you really?
[1:09:09] rise above 2500
[1:09:10] feet.
[1:09:11] And I know that they
[1:09:12] can...
[1:09:14] look at
[1:09:15] topographic map.
[1:09:16] If
[1:09:17] they wanted
[1:09:17] build two
[1:09:18] houses, they could
[1:09:19] just build
[1:09:20] below 2500 feet. It
[1:09:27] becomes difficult when
[1:09:29] you start
[1:09:29] to connect this um, with
[1:09:34] what is needed
[1:09:35] to bring down communications
[1:09:37] , electricity, communications, and
[1:09:38] to consider the length
[1:09:39] the road that needs to be taken
[1:09:41] improve. Ahem,
[1:09:42] in fact, what we can do as JPC—
[1:09:48] is to contact
[1:09:49] our contact
[1:09:51] representative from Act 250 in
[1:09:52] state, to
[1:09:53] present the basic
[1:10:01] the scenario of what
[1:10:02] types of things
[1:10:02] are offered, and we have
[1:10:04] there are new offers,
[1:10:05] which may include
[1:10:06] expansion of their
[1:10:07] wishes. What
[1:10:12] concerns
[1:10:13] building codes. So
[1:10:14] what are the real and
[1:10:16] real applications
[1:10:17] Act 250 to this
[1:10:18] property?
[1:10:20] Isn't that right?
[1:10:21] Is it the height,
[1:10:22] easement on
[1:10:23] communications, length
[1:10:24] roads—anything,
[1:10:25] need to find out what it is
[1:10:27] actually it is.
[1:10:29] Yes. What factors
[1:10:30] trigger an action
[1:10:31] jurisdiction? Yes.
[1:10:32] So, improvement
[1:10:34] roads included
[1:10:35] as an activity that
[1:10:36] contributes
[1:10:37] not like that by itself. No, it should be
[1:10:40] canceled.
[1:10:41] I'm not even sure.
[1:10:43] , what is the problem with
[1:10:44] length.
[1:10:45] This is a foggy area.
[1:10:49] Law 250, as I find out, continues
[1:10:52] to change regarding
[1:10:53] of what actually
[1:10:55] is used, and what
[1:10:56] No. And, um, the length
[1:11:02] road improvement—
[1:11:03] this is what went into
[1:11:05] Law 181 on roads.
[1:11:08] So, this is how, this is how
[1:11:09] constant
[1:11:11] and their interpretation
[1:11:12] road works
[1:11:14] work can be
[1:11:15] combined with influence
[1:11:16] on the environment. You know,
[1:11:18] of course, if she
[1:11:19] passed through
[1:11:19] wetlands
[1:11:21] or something like that, then
[1:11:22] yes, but it is an existing one
[1:11:23] legal path. Therefore,
[1:11:25] but I mean,
[1:11:25] if they are going
[1:11:26] to say that we will hold large-scale
[1:11:28] grooving work
[1:11:29] etc., that's enough
[1:11:29] serious intervention.
[1:11:30] Yes.
[1:11:31] Assuming that there is
[1:11:33] jurisdiction,
[1:11:34] assuming that it is in
[1:11:35] within the jurisdiction
[1:11:36] law 250, and that's great,
[1:11:38] but if not, we have
[1:11:39] there is no zoning, which
[1:11:40] would this cover.
[1:11:41] And if there are restrictions
[1:11:43] regarding parameters
[1:11:45] a small path.
[1:11:47] M-hm.
[1:11:47] What is the width? If
[1:11:49] they want to go out
[1:11:50] these boundaries and they
[1:11:51] are going to do this
[1:11:52] to do, to eat
[1:11:52] will have to change
[1:11:53] classification. And whether
[1:11:55] they provided a plan where
[1:11:56] they were going to
[1:11:57] install the covers and
[1:11:59] where it would be important
[1:12:00] part?
[1:12:02] Nothing, nothing.
[1:12:05] It just seemed like it.
[1:12:06] on what exactly
[1:12:08] estimate, list, I think.
[1:12:11] Yes.
[1:12:11] As a representative
[1:12:13] city, if you
[1:12:14] are you going to provide
[1:12:15] permission for someone to enter
[1:12:16] to your territory and
[1:12:17] to start something
[1:12:18] change, you,
[1:12:19] probably needed
[1:12:20] detailed list.
[1:12:21] Yes.
[1:12:22] This information,
[1:12:23] isn't that right?
[1:12:24] And write yours
[1:12:25] list of comments.
[1:12:27] That's right. That's right.
[1:12:30] OK. Hmm, thank you,
[1:12:32] Brian, what
[1:12:33] joined. You can
[1:12:34] to stay if
[1:12:36] you want.
[1:12:36] A little. Ahem,
[1:12:38] returning to
[1:12:39] initial number
[1:12:41] three, which is now 1, 2, 3, 4,
[1:12:43] 5, 6. Six.
[1:12:47] I'll try this.
[1:12:48] These are, therefore, problems with
[1:12:49] parking on the road. Um, I
[1:12:51] met, I got up
[1:12:52] and met with Mike
[1:12:54] Dated last week,
[1:12:55] and we were a little like
[1:12:56] around. I saw where
[1:12:57] were current signs.
[1:12:59] That's why Mike was on
[1:13:00] zoom.
[1:13:02] And, um, he really is
[1:13:03] showed me where they were
[1:13:04] problems, the corner where
[1:13:05] people are parking,
[1:13:06] a small road that
[1:13:08] leads the way out.
[1:13:09] Ahem,
[1:13:10] I am going to develop
[1:13:11] plan for signs that
[1:13:12] you can bet, we are going to put
[1:13:15] , my thoughts, ours
[1:13:16] initial thoughts—
[1:13:16] put two signs,
[1:13:18] parking area between
[1:13:19] signs, somehow like that.
[1:13:20] Put a few
[1:13:21] parking signs in
[1:13:22] the other side. We also
[1:13:23] talked about that
[1:13:24] to lay logs or
[1:13:25] railway sleepers, or
[1:13:26] something like that, so that
[1:13:27] people did not move out
[1:13:28] roads in the middle of the road;
[1:13:29] probably better than logs,
[1:13:30] because they look
[1:13:31] more natural. But I am currently developing
[1:13:34] design. Me too
[1:13:36] I work, of course, with
[1:13:37] Charlie Peck on West-
[1:13:38] Wind Road, and all that
[1:13:40] will take place in the spring.
[1:13:42] I will do nothing.
[1:13:43] until winter, until
[1:13:43] snowfall, and
[1:13:44] because in winter these
[1:13:45] places visited
[1:13:46] much less often than
[1:13:47] in the summer, we don't have
[1:13:48] problems with
[1:13:49] parking. So,
[1:13:50] when spring comes, in
[1:13:51] we will have projects
[1:13:52] for both places. We
[1:13:53] Let's order signs. We
[1:13:54] let's set them up enough
[1:13:55] quickly.
[1:13:56] So that's all. AND
[1:13:57] Thank you, Mike, for that.
[1:13:58] met me,
[1:13:59] showed everything and
[1:14:00] told how everything was there
[1:14:02] works. Ahem,
[1:14:03] we need to talk
[1:14:05] about Patriot. As you know,
[1:14:06] next month [
[1:14:07] expires],
[1:14:08] so I try
[1:14:10] move everything from
[1:14:10] server. One of them,
[1:14:12] we have...Neick now
[1:14:13] not on the server at all.
[1:14:15] We are independent of
[1:14:16] this. The next one was
[1:14:18] Patriot. This will be
[1:14:19] increase in value
[1:14:20] for 2000 dollars a year,
[1:14:21] to stay on
[1:14:22] our...Yes. Because
[1:14:24] now it works like this:
[1:14:25] they share one
[1:14:26] license that goes to
[1:14:27] server that
[1:14:27] connects
[1:14:28] direct
[1:14:29] to a database in the cloud.
[1:14:30] To each of them
[1:14:31] will need its own
[1:14:31] entrance to
[1:14:32] connect to
[1:14:33] servers in the cloud. Ago
[1:14:34] we have to buy two
[1:14:35] additional.
[1:14:35] So, it's 2004. Just
[1:14:37] I inform you that this
[1:14:38] like this. We can
[1:14:39] approve this other
[1:14:40] once.
[1:14:40] Can we just
[1:14:41] to go completely into
[1:14:42] cloud? I
[1:14:43] said that we move on completely
[1:14:45] into the cloud.
[1:14:45] Oh, we are moving, we
[1:14:46] licenses are required,
[1:14:47] to completely go
[1:14:48] into the cloud. They are not
[1:14:48] can share
[1:14:49] license. Only
[1:14:50] way to divide
[1:14:51] license—this
[1:14:51] to go back to that
[1:14:52] server, and then
[1:14:53] back into the cloud. Then we have expenses for
[1:14:55] server. So this...this,
[1:14:59] Guys, pretty clever.
[1:15:02] That's the stage I'm at.
[1:15:04] I have prices. If you,
[1:15:06] Guys, approve this, I can do it in a few
[1:15:11] weeks. Ahem,
[1:15:12] it depends on you.
[1:15:14] But this...
[1:15:14] you do, but we don't
[1:15:15] we know how much it is
[1:15:16] now, or...
[1:15:17] this is for 2000 dollars
[1:15:18] more expensive. Each
[1:15:19] the license costs 1000
[1:15:20] dollars per year,
[1:15:21] essentially. There is also
[1:15:22] other expenses,
[1:15:23] related to this, on
[1:15:23] data maintenance
[1:15:24] and all that other stuff. Now
[1:15:26] it's somewhere around 5200 or
[1:15:27] about that.
[1:15:27] Is there any suggestion?
[1:15:29] or something like that? Is there...
[1:15:36] Um, Dalewood Health Farm project
[1:15:37] completed, and looks
[1:15:39] he is great. I drove.
[1:15:40] there, made a few
[1:15:42] photos. That's all.
[1:15:43] for Bransonade. Hey, ours
[1:15:45] farm gradually
[1:15:46] is developing.
[1:15:48] They work hard.
[1:15:49] tonight.
[1:15:50] Yes, Mike Fitzpatrick,
[1:15:51] It's like three days. Yes.
[1:15:53] So they are there.
[1:15:54] I hope I said
[1:15:55] him that it should be
[1:15:56] done by Wednesday.
[1:15:57] So I think they have time. Therefore
[1:16:00] they literally were
[1:16:01] there tonight.
[1:16:02] Oh yes.
[1:16:03] On the way I passed
[1:16:04] past the dump truck, they
[1:16:05] are actively working.
[1:16:06] Good.
[1:16:07] Update on
[1:16:08] town hall. Hey, we
[1:16:09] finished. We her
[1:16:10] painted. She
[1:16:11] looks great. It
[1:16:12] Yes. She looks
[1:16:13] perfectly.
[1:16:14] Looks very, very
[1:16:15] good. Ahem,
[1:16:15] This is over. I am going to ask.
[1:16:17] road crew
[1:16:18] to work a little, because
[1:16:19] when they
[1:16:20] used
[1:16:20] lift, there
[1:16:21] remained
[1:16:21] damage to the grass.
[1:16:22] So I'm going
[1:16:23] to see if they are different
[1:16:25] lamps and more. Um, I am also working on
[1:16:27] lighting
[1:16:27] inside the building,
[1:16:28] trying to install
[1:16:29] new lamps on top.
[1:16:30] Half of them
[1:16:31] burned out. They
[1:16:32] different colors.
[1:16:33] It looks terrible. AND
[1:16:35] at the same time a chandelier
[1:16:36] ahead now too
[1:16:37] has different light bulbs
[1:16:38] colors. So I want
[1:16:39] get more
[1:16:40] effective, you know,
[1:16:41] LED lamps
[1:16:42] and do everything
[1:16:43] standardized. AND
[1:16:44] when we have it there will be fans,
[1:16:46] we can turn on
[1:16:47] light and mother again
[1:16:48] normal lighting
[1:16:49] , because now in
[1:16:49] some lamps
[1:16:50] four lamps each, and
[1:16:51] only one works.
[1:16:52] Good.
[1:16:52] So, I'm working on this.
[1:16:54] . I just need
[1:16:55] I have to order them. I
[1:16:56] talked to Keith. IN
[1:16:58] we have the opportunity
[1:16:59] replace them, he has
[1:17:00] high enough
[1:17:01] ladder.
[1:17:02] Oh, please.
[1:17:04] You can climb.
[1:17:05] there. I do this.
[1:17:06] I won't. Renewal
[1:17:07] regarding elections. Karen,
[1:17:08] you said that
[1:17:09] ballots will be on the 2nd
[1:17:10] numbers, what do you think?
[1:17:11] It
[1:17:11] I think it's October.
[1:17:12] I also think that 2
[1:17:14] October. People
[1:17:15] come and ask
[1:17:16] absentee ballots.
[1:17:17] Everyone who was in
[1:17:18] voter list
[1:17:19] as of September 5,
[1:17:20] will receive a ballot
[1:17:21] by mail from the state. So
[1:17:23] you don't need
[1:17:23] to come and
[1:17:24] request a bulletin.
[1:17:25] You automatically
[1:17:26] receive a newsletter
[1:17:27] for general
[1:17:27] elections. To anyone,
[1:17:29] who is added to
[1:17:30] list after that, I will send a newsletter. And I check it every day, and
[1:17:34] I am sending—I already
[1:17:35] sent, it seems,
[1:17:36] eight or nine on
[1:17:38] this time, so I'm holding
[1:17:39] it's under control.
[1:17:40] The elections will be held on 3
[1:17:42] November. Again
[1:17:43] yes, elective
[1:17:44] polling stations are open from
[1:17:46] 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. And that's why
[1:17:48] you missed the uh
[1:17:49] advertisement.
[1:17:50] Oh, yes.
[1:17:52] delay from
[1:17:53] by the way. Delay in
[1:17:54] works, delay with
[1:17:55] by the way. Yes. Um, in
[1:17:57] Hunter's company
[1:17:58] there were problems with
[1:17:59] their people on
[1:18:00] another project. So
[1:18:01] they want
[1:18:02] to move this,
[1:18:03] probably in the spring
[1:18:04] next year. They
[1:18:05] won't have time
[1:18:05] finish this this
[1:18:06] year. Properly speaking.
[1:18:08] I think we are from the very
[1:18:09] initially expected that
[1:18:10] it may not be
[1:18:10] completed this year.
[1:18:11] Our grants are valid until
[1:18:13] end of the next
[1:18:13] year.
[1:18:14] That's right. When
[1:18:15] he asked me
[1:18:16] answer him. I
[1:18:17] just wanted
[1:18:17] confirm this with you
[1:18:18] , and we discussed it
[1:18:19] . That's why he says that
[1:18:20] they just don't
[1:18:21] they have time. Um, they have
[1:18:22] there was another project, and they
[1:18:24] very helpful from the side
[1:18:25] state. So.
[1:18:27] Yes, I hope we don't
[1:18:29] we will get there.
[1:18:32] Sorry, I can't.
[1:18:33] believe that I just
[1:18:34] said it out loud.
[1:18:35] Okay, I know.
[1:18:36] We check our
[1:18:38] systems here.
[1:18:39] Oh, Karen. Yes.
[1:18:41] I would like to add more.
[1:18:42] something about elections: if
[1:18:43] someone didn't send
[1:18:44] your absentee
[1:18:45] coupon and wants
[1:18:46] vote on the day
[1:18:47] elections,
[1:18:50] they can
[1:18:51] send two
[1:18:51] justices of the peace, to
[1:18:53] they delivered
[1:18:53] bulletin. They
[1:18:54] fill out the form, and
[1:18:55] two justices of the peace
[1:18:57] bring it back.
[1:18:58] True. True.
[1:19:00] Just so people know
[1:19:01] , you understand.
[1:19:03] I know, right? Glory
[1:19:05] To God.
[1:19:06] That's right. Thank God.
[1:19:08] Other than that, I don't know.
[1:19:09] This, this.
[1:19:10] OK. Next
[1:19:14] point of order
[1:19:15] daytime: research
[1:19:16] The whale was discovered
[1:19:17] offer to buy
[1:19:18] our excavator, which
[1:19:20] not working, for
[1:19:20] a round sum of 5000
[1:19:22] dollars. I don't
[1:19:28] It is quite clear whether
[1:19:29] we need this
[1:19:30] approve. So I
[1:19:33] I'd rather be safe.
[1:19:34] and I will make a proposal
[1:19:36] approve the sale
[1:19:37] municipal
[1:19:38] excavator, which
[1:19:39] is not functioning now.
[1:19:42] Second.
[1:19:42] I support.
[1:19:43] Good. For the amount of 5000
[1:19:45] dollars. Second
[1:19:46] The offer is accepted.
[1:19:47] Is there a question whether
[1:19:48] comments?
[1:19:49] I will only add that we are
[1:19:50] everyone talked about
[1:19:51] our excavator
[1:19:52] last summer. To us
[1:19:54] offered 2500
[1:19:55] dollars for trade-in.
[1:19:57] Um, and also Keith
[1:19:58] investigated whether
[1:19:59] can we do it
[1:20:00] repair.
[1:20:01] The arrow seems to
[1:20:02] collapsed. I have on
[1:20:03] mind, we have
[1:20:05] He is already 12 years old. IN
[1:20:06] he still has enough
[1:20:07] small amount of work
[1:20:08] hours, so that added
[1:20:09] of some value to him.
[1:20:10] Um, and we have a resident
[1:20:11] Jamaica, which
[1:20:12] going to buy
[1:20:13] his and, probably,
[1:20:14] to disassemble into
[1:20:15] spare parts or something
[1:20:16] like this, but this.
[1:20:18] I took it apart twice.
[1:20:19] more than us
[1:20:20] we get from the trailer.
[1:20:22] Better than that. Exactly
[1:20:23] Yes. That's right. Yes. I...
[1:20:25] thank you for this.
[1:20:26] said, because you know,
[1:20:28] The cat is also very
[1:20:29] worked on this. So,
[1:20:31] Thank you, Keith.
[1:20:32] Yes. Um, okay, on
[1:20:33] I hereby declare
[1:20:34] voting. Who is "for"?
[1:20:36] please tell me
[1:20:37] "Yes".
[1:20:38] Yes. Perfectly. Um, and this
[1:20:40] takes us to
[1:20:41] usual order
[1:20:42] daytime. I contribute
[1:20:45] proposal
[1:20:45] approve timesheets
[1:20:47] working hours for
[1:20:48] office staff,
[1:20:49] city
[1:20:49] administration,
[1:20:50] appraisers,
[1:20:51] road crew and
[1:20:52] stations
[1:20:53] overload.
[1:20:55] Thank you. Are there any
[1:20:57] discussion about
[1:20:58] this? If any comments
[1:20:59] no, who is "for", be it
[1:21:00] Please say "yes."
[1:21:01] Yes.
[1:21:05] The only small thing
[1:21:06] update: our
[1:21:07] Deputy Jody Rowe
[1:21:08] for the station
[1:21:09] overload already
[1:21:10] spent about 7
[1:21:11] hours with Ernie, and we
[1:21:12] him tomorrow
[1:21:13] let's discuss a few
[1:21:14] moments. OK.
[1:21:19] Mainly, um,
[1:21:20] fees for
[1:21:21] unloading and
[1:21:22] his thoughts on this
[1:21:23] ,
[1:21:23] and his other ideas. So
[1:21:25] Wait for the news. AT,
[1:21:26] Please.
[1:21:27] You mentioned the meeting.
[1:21:28] for unloading. Yes
[1:21:29] , there are um postcards on
[1:21:30] in the city, at the post office and here
[1:21:31] , at the city office. You
[1:21:34] voted last
[1:21:35] a week or two days
[1:21:36] therefore for the increase
[1:21:37] construction fees
[1:21:39] garbage, and it will gain
[1:21:40] effective November 1
[1:21:41] for the council. So
[1:21:42] it was only two
[1:21:43] weeks ago, right?
[1:21:44] Two weeks ago.
[1:21:45] Two weeks have passed.
[1:21:46] Yes, I wasn't here.
[1:21:48] a few weeks ago,
[1:21:49] but if someone
[1:21:50] interesting, I can provide
[1:21:51] this information, or I
[1:21:52] posted a lot
[1:21:53] ads around the city,
[1:21:54] because it is essential
[1:21:54] increase. And again
[1:21:56] yes, we don't do this
[1:21:57] in order to rip people off, and
[1:21:58] just trying
[1:21:59] to cover the costs. Our
[1:22:01] the expenses were
[1:22:01] extremely low
[1:22:02] , and we spend
[1:22:03] a lot of money for
[1:22:04] debris,
[1:22:05] so we just
[1:22:06] we are trying to get out
[1:22:07] zero. So,
[1:22:08] clean up your own
[1:22:09] garages now.
[1:22:10] Yes. Do it now.
[1:22:14] Oh, this...yes, we don't actually operate in
[1:22:16] own interests.
[1:22:17] OK. Next
[1:22:18] point of order
[1:22:19] daytime—
[1:22:20] approval
[1:22:20] payment orders,
[1:22:22] submitted for consideration
[1:22:23] council.
[1:22:23] I support.
[1:22:24] Are there any discussions?
[1:22:25] If there are no comments,
[1:22:26] Who is in favor, please?
[1:22:27] say "yes".
[1:22:28] Yes.
[1:22:28] OK. Appeal
[1:22:30] citizens. Karen, you have
[1:22:31] Do you have a list?
[1:22:32] Um, can I, can I...
[1:22:33] Yes.
[1:22:34] Do we want to at all?
[1:22:35] to talk about
[1:22:35] possible change in volume
[1:22:37] works at the station
[1:22:37] overload?
[1:22:38] I think we...well, we all are.
[1:22:39] met, just
[1:22:40] can we update this
[1:22:41] information. Yes, we...
[1:22:42] met there.
[1:22:44] We organized
[1:22:44] meeting to
[1:22:45] visit the facility, and
[1:22:46] considered specific
[1:22:47] moments that
[1:22:48] need
[1:22:49] improvement, and that
[1:22:50] can be improved. Ahem,
[1:22:52] Tom and I, and all of us,
[1:22:53] I think we still want to announce a tender to
[1:22:56] potentially
[1:22:57] to install a fence
[1:22:58] in the processing area, this
[1:22:59] would be one of
[1:23:00] security issues.
[1:23:02] Greg and I were dating.
[1:23:04] When was that?
[1:23:05] Last week.
[1:23:06] Very quickly. Yes, but
[1:23:08] we haven't done anything yet
[1:23:09] made up. But another idea
[1:23:10] also consists in the fact that we change our
[1:23:13] recycling tariffs
[1:23:14] construction waste,
[1:23:15] which, we hope,
[1:23:16] will reduce the number
[1:23:18] waste that goes there
[1:23:19] get in, and we can reduce
[1:23:21] number
[1:23:21] containers. So this is
[1:23:24] will also allow
[1:23:25] reduce the volume
[1:23:26] necessary work. So
[1:23:28] , um,
[1:23:31] we all seem to
[1:23:32] agreed not to advance with
[1:23:33] current volume
[1:23:34] works, and again
[1:23:35] announce a tender.
[1:23:38] And the idea was to
[1:23:39] in order to move
[1:23:40] metal to where it is now
[1:23:41] stands second
[1:23:42] container. So we don't
[1:23:43] it will have to be like this
[1:23:44] to mess around with a lot
[1:23:45] by repairing the place where
[1:23:46] lies the metal that is
[1:23:47] problem,
[1:23:48] and improve drainage
[1:23:49] there, that we may,
[1:23:50] we can do it ourselves
[1:23:51] even this fall.
[1:23:52] Fantastically. OK.
[1:23:54] With the help of our
[1:23:55] new excavator.
[1:23:57] Of course. Good.
[1:23:58] Thank you for
[1:23:59] this public
[1:24:00] comment. I intervened.
[1:24:01] and just started
[1:24:02] to speak, perhaps,
[1:24:03] ahead of everyone
[1:24:04] others.
[1:24:05] Yes. I just wanted to
[1:24:06] record this in
[1:24:07] protocol.
[1:24:08] Perfectly. Ideally.
[1:24:10] Karen.
[1:24:11] Yes. Um, first of all, I
[1:24:13] I'm sure you noticed.
[1:24:14] flowers on the bridge and such
[1:24:16] other. They were
[1:24:17] beautiful this
[1:24:18] year. Not that they
[1:24:19] were not like this in other
[1:24:20] years, but thank you for
[1:24:21] what they did was
[1:24:23] possible. And Martin
[1:24:24] To Venus and his son
[1:24:25] Matthew, who do
[1:24:26] such a wonderful job.
[1:24:30] Um, I have a request.
[1:24:33] I would like you to
[1:24:34] considered
[1:24:35] possibility
[1:24:36] postponement of the evening
[1:24:37] board meetings, so that
[1:24:38] people could
[1:24:38] visit
[1:24:39] school meeting
[1:24:40] council.
[1:24:43] This is serious. It
[1:24:44] important question. So
[1:24:45] think about it. I am not
[1:24:47] ...I'm just suggesting
[1:24:48] this is now, but first
[1:24:56] meeting, which is
[1:24:57] second...this is the second and
[1:24:58] fourth, you...and
[1:24:59] the second Monday is
[1:25:00] school board, and people
[1:25:01] it is very difficult to keep up
[1:25:03] for both. Chrissy
[1:25:09] tried to get in
[1:25:11] for two meetings
[1:25:12] weeks ago, but
[1:25:13] remained on
[1:25:13] school board meeting
[1:25:15] councils, and um, they
[1:25:16] immediately went to
[1:25:17] closed session on
[1:25:18] 45 minutes, and um, in any-
[1:25:19] in any case, this
[1:25:20] important because I don't
[1:25:26] I feel like Jamaica
[1:25:28] well presented.
[1:25:30] Pretty good, in
[1:25:31] there are two of us
[1:25:32] representatives, and
[1:25:33] both of ours
[1:25:34] The representatives are wonderful,
[1:25:35] Drew and Dana. Right.
[1:25:37] But from the past
[1:25:43] meetings
[1:25:44] one gets the impression
[1:25:45] that few people
[1:25:46] are interested in feelings
[1:25:47] Jamaica or Windom,
[1:25:49] or not just feelings, but
[1:25:50] and our worries.
[1:25:56] So, whatever, I just want you to
[1:25:58] thought about it. Ahem.
[1:26:02] We are today
[1:26:03] published our
[1:26:04] new list of events.
[1:26:07] So, on Wednesday, as well as
[1:26:08] earlier, evening
[1:26:10] gatherings. We
[1:26:12] gathering in front of Peacock
[1:26:14] Outfitters every Wednesday from 6:00 p.m.
[1:26:16] until 8:00 p.m. Ends
[1:26:18] submission deadline
[1:26:19] applications for titles
[1:26:20] poet laureate. Is there
[1:26:21] Are there any poets among you? Let
[1:26:24] there as, applications
[1:26:26] are accepted to
[1:26:27] Wednesdays for the period from 2027
[1:26:29] until 2029 for the position
[1:26:33] poet laureate, and this
[1:26:35] organizes
[1:26:35] Memorial
[1:26:36] Jamaica library.
[1:26:37] Erica Bowman was
[1:26:39] our poetess-
[1:26:40] laureate,
[1:26:42] and she, but we also have
[1:26:44] other talented
[1:26:45] authors in the city. So.
[1:26:48] I hope they
[1:26:49] see their extreme
[1:26:50] deadline in the calendar.
[1:26:52] So.
[1:26:53] OK. Yes, I am.
[1:26:54] saw.
[1:26:55] Yes.
[1:26:55] Thursday—Running
[1:26:57] Jamaica club, he
[1:26:58] starts at 5:30 PM at West
[1:27:00] River Provisions. Friday-
[1:27:03] this is, of course, again
[1:27:04] bingo. And the first
[1:27:05] every Friday
[1:27:06] moon at the door
[1:27:08] number three in jamaica-
[1:27:09] house from 6:00 PM to 9:00 PM—ours
[1:27:11] local artists.
[1:27:12] Galleries are open
[1:27:13] late, so this
[1:27:14] interesting entertainment. And in
[1:27:18] Friday will be alive
[1:27:19] music with jill sax at
[1:27:20] River and Ry. On Saturday it will be
[1:27:23] Luminous Crush. From 9:00 to 11:00
[1:27:27] in the morning—yoga and
[1:27:28] acupuncture with Jill
[1:27:30] Sax at Be Well Homestead. And in
[1:27:34] Sunday at 9:00—yoga at
[1:27:35] city ​​hall with
[1:27:36] Mike McKee. These
[1:27:39] weekends from 9:00 to 17:00
[1:27:41] autumn passes
[1:27:42] open studios, and you can visit
[1:27:45] local artists.
[1:27:47] This seems to be the Council.
[1:27:49] Vermont Arts.
[1:27:51] It seems like it.
[1:27:52] That's right. On the website
[1:27:54] There is also a calendar.
[1:27:55] In the library too
[1:27:56] some are expected
[1:27:57] events. Production
[1:27:59] mini brooms, cutting
[1:28:01] pumpkins. And then in
[1:28:03] us Halloween, that is "
[1:28:04] Jamaica Spooktacular".
[1:28:07] And Jamaica is very
[1:28:08] popular place. Children
[1:28:11] from other cities
[1:28:12] come here because
[1:28:13] We have a great route.
[1:28:14] and very generous people who
[1:28:15] really care
[1:28:17] in the spirit of Halloween. First
[1:28:21] than we will depart from
[1:28:22] this topic, I just
[1:28:23] I want to say about
[1:28:24] Bingo evenings. Yes.
[1:28:26] Which passes
[1:28:27] every Friday.
[1:28:29] This Friday
[1:28:30] half of the profits
[1:28:31] from the lottery 50/50 will go
[1:28:33] on Solar.
[1:28:35] Yes.
[1:28:38] I was in the past.
[1:28:38] Fridays with my son and
[1:28:40] I'm very glad I went.
[1:28:41] because there was a lot of things
[1:28:42] to learn. So
[1:28:47] I feel that
[1:28:47] next Friday
[1:28:49] I will be there soon.
[1:28:49] prepared.
[1:28:52] Former boss
[1:28:53] fire department in Vin
[1:28:54] -Holly was the host
[1:28:56] last time. He
[1:28:57] quite wonderful. He
[1:28:58] so wonderful. He
[1:28:59] unbelievable. He is mine.
[1:29:01] I just like it.
[1:29:02] So, uh, it's just
[1:29:03] high. This is a blast, everyone.
[1:29:05] so cute, and the food
[1:29:07] wonderful. You can take
[1:29:09] popcorn, soda, and
[1:29:10] it's quite inexpensive.
[1:29:12] Besides,
[1:29:13] if you stay, then
[1:29:14] you can eat well.
[1:29:15] There is a complete meal there,
[1:29:17] uh, and it's simple
[1:29:18] a real thrill.
[1:29:20] So, I will be there on Friday.
[1:29:23] Therefore,
[1:29:23] the money they
[1:29:24] gather, go to
[1:29:25] Oh, that's all.
[1:29:26] charity.
[1:29:27] That's right. Uh, yes.
[1:29:28] scholarship for children,
[1:29:30] who are graduating from school,
[1:29:31] students of Great Jamaica.
[1:29:33] Uh, I don't do it.
[1:29:34] students of the building.
[1:29:36] Maybe this is for everyone.
[1:29:37] students.
[1:29:37] Oh, this is for all students.
[1:29:38] It seems for everyone
[1:29:39] students. Yes. Yes. And, uh,
[1:29:41] It seems like there are three days,
[1:29:42] three different weeks when
[1:29:44] the money goes to Solar.
[1:29:46] Yes. Yes. So
[1:29:47] the nearest Friday—
[1:29:48] this...Yes.
[1:29:49] And what time is it?
[1:29:50] At 6 o'clock.
[1:29:52] The doors open at
[1:29:53] 6th, and there is a game that
[1:29:54] you can play while
[1:29:56] people are gathering. Uh,
[1:29:58] that's not what they call it
[1:30:00] ...And then at 7:00
[1:30:00] the first one begins
[1:30:02] a series of games, and then
[1:30:03] break. I actually
[1:30:04] passed out on
[1:30:05] break. I was like,
[1:30:07] I am tired. I have on
[1:30:08] mind you, I'm still recovering from
[1:30:09] colds. Uh, me
[1:30:10] I will try to stay until
[1:30:11] end on Friday. It
[1:30:13] simply, it's real
[1:30:14] high. This is a complete thrill.
[1:30:16] It's like
[1:30:16] people like it.
[1:30:18] Yes. Yes. I mean,
[1:30:19] if you want
[1:30:20] to win, you must have
[1:30:21] many games before
[1:30:22] yourself. So, really
[1:30:24] strategy is needed and
[1:30:25] all that. But this
[1:30:26] perfectly. This is great. We
[1:30:28] took their markers.
[1:30:29] We are like this,
[1:30:30] You are ready.
[1:30:31] Yes. Yes. So, I am very
[1:30:33] I recommend. Uh, in
[1:30:34] I have three more.
[1:30:35] advertisement. Friendly
[1:30:37] gatherings, that is
[1:30:38] Thanksgiving with friends
[1:30:40] , uh, we spend in
[1:30:41] city ​​hall every year on Sunday
[1:30:43] , November 22. So
[1:30:44] come and
[1:30:45] bring some
[1:30:46] dish. This will be
[1:30:47] shared table. Uh, me
[1:30:49] I still don't know whose it is.
[1:30:50] hour. It seems we
[1:30:52] still trying
[1:30:53] to decide on time.
[1:30:55] Santa Claus will come to
[1:30:57] Sunday, December 6.
[1:30:59] Sorry. We need this.
[1:31:00] plan. And, uh,
[1:31:04] later, what day is it?
[1:31:06] Santa will arrive on Sunday.
[1:31:08] , December 6. Firefighter
[1:31:11] the service brings
[1:31:12] Santa, and then
[1:31:13] takes it away, and...
[1:31:15] uh, firefighters
[1:31:17] are coming. Firefighters,
[1:31:18] rescuers.
[1:31:20] Yes, there are many women there.
[1:31:22] Yes,
[1:31:22] We have a wonderful fire department.
[1:31:23] service.
[1:31:24] We have a fantastic
[1:31:25] fire department.
[1:31:26] Great boss.
[1:31:28] Excellent administration
[1:31:29] . Honestly, we Oh,
[1:31:31] we are like that
[1:31:32] happy, and people
[1:31:33] constantly involved
[1:31:34] .
[1:31:34] You get
[1:31:35] additional
[1:31:36] certificates, all that
[1:31:37] . It's simple.
[1:31:38] life-giving.
[1:31:39] That's right. Hmm, festive
[1:31:42] craft fair
[1:31:43] there will also be 12 and 13
[1:31:45] December. Just so you
[1:31:47] could have planned everything
[1:31:49] in the city council.
[1:31:51] with new lighting.
[1:31:54] and just now
[1:31:54] painted new.
[1:31:58] OK. Thank you very much
[1:32:01] Thank you. Anything else good?
[1:32:03] OK. Um, I'll bring it in.
[1:32:04] proposal to complete
[1:32:05] meeting. I support.
[1:32:07] Who is for it?
[1:32:08] I