1 00:05:33,717 --> 00:05:36,117 Open your document. There. 2 00:05:49,967 --> 00:05:51,967 All right. So. 3 00:06:28,673 --> 00:06:31,730 I don't know if 4 00:06:49,393 --> 00:06:53,593 we all have to walk down. Here. 5 00:07:07,245 --> 00:07:10,245 To turn off your house. 6 00:08:01,990 --> 00:08:03,990 Yeah, 7 00:08:04,350 --> 00:08:08,235 it's it's a county. So we had 8 00:08:08,373 --> 00:08:10,741 to restart the whole computer. 9 00:08:10,741 --> 00:08:14,341 But. But look, you don't need 10 00:08:27,358 --> 00:08:29,358 it. No. 11 00:08:30,600 --> 00:08:32,460 We've been waiting for 12 00:08:49,880 --> 00:08:52,880 you. I'm just. I'm joking. 13 00:11:52,263 --> 00:11:54,263 Okay? 14 00:11:54,265 --> 00:11:55,365 Yeah, well, let's not look at 15 00:11:55,365 --> 00:11:58,365 that right now. Let's start 16 00:12:12,283 --> 00:12:14,683 with what we need. 17 00:12:41,790 --> 00:12:43,790 Metro tv 30s. 18 00:13:01,565 --> 00:13:02,533 Good afternoon and welcome to 19 00:13:02,533 --> 00:13:03,635 the regularly scheduled 20 00:13:03,635 --> 00:13:04,868 planning and Zoning committee 21 00:13:04,868 --> 00:13:06,436 meeting. I am Scott Reed, the 22 00:13:06,436 --> 00:13:08,473 vice chair of the committee. 23 00:13:08,473 --> 00:13:10,842 Today is Tuesday, JUNE the 2nd. 24 00:13:10,842 --> 00:13:12,844 And joining me in the chambers, 25 00:13:12,844 --> 00:13:14,244 we have COUNCILWOMAN Parish 26 00:13:14,244 --> 00:13:15,647 rights. We have COUNCILWOMAN 27 00:13:15,647 --> 00:13:18,470 Raymond, we have COUNCILMAN 28 00:13:18,182 --> 00:13:20,582 Hudson. We have COUNCILWOMAN 29 00:13:21,840 --> 00:13:22,287 Rudy. We have COUNCILWOMAN 30 00:13:22,287 --> 00:13:24,188 Jennifer Chappell. And online 31 00:13:24,188 --> 00:13:27,580 we have Chair Owen. Just a 32 00:13:27,580 --> 00:13:29,193 little bit of housekeeping. We 33 00:13:29,193 --> 00:13:30,661 have item number five, which is 34 00:13:30,661 --> 00:13:34,261 being held at the request of 35 00:13:34,631 --> 00:13:37,680 the sponsor. And with that in 36 00:13:37,680 --> 00:13:38,870 mind, we have starting off 37 00:13:38,870 --> 00:13:40,870 ordinance pending legislation, 38 00:13:42,573 --> 00:13:43,574 ordinance 0-127-26, an 39 00:13:43,574 --> 00:13:45,776 ordinance relating to the 40 00:13:45,776 --> 00:13:46,844 zoning of property located at 41 00:13:46,844 --> 00:13:48,680 3827 proper level road 42 00:13:48,680 --> 00:13:49,814 containing approximately 0.22 43 00:13:49,814 --> 00:13:52,583 acres and being in Louisville 44 00:13:52,583 --> 00:13:54,983 Metro. Case number 26. Zone 45 00:13:57,989 --> 00:14:00,989 0025 do have a motion motion. 46 00:14:01,192 --> 00:14:04,192 Motion seconded. Julia. Oh I'm 47 00:14:05,930 --> 00:14:08,199 sorry. Disclaimer. This meeting 48 00:14:08,199 --> 00:14:09,534 is being held pursuant to carry 49 00:14:09,534 --> 00:14:11,669 61.826 and Council of five a 50 00:14:11,669 --> 00:14:13,771 reading for. Thank you Cheryl. 51 00:14:13,771 --> 00:14:16,771 Now to you, Julia. Julia 52 00:14:19,677 --> 00:14:22,677 Williams Office of Planning. So 53 00:14:29,200 --> 00:14:31,489 this is 26 zone 0025. This is 54 00:14:31,489 --> 00:14:33,889 located at 3827 Poplar Level 55 00:14:35,793 --> 00:14:37,228 Road in Council District ten. 56 00:14:37,228 --> 00:14:39,430 The existing use is single 57 00:14:39,430 --> 00:14:42,430 family. The proposed use is 58 00:14:42,734 --> 00:14:44,102 multifamily. The existing 59 00:14:44,102 --> 00:14:45,536 zoning is r five in the 60 00:14:45,536 --> 00:14:47,305 neighborhood Forum district. 61 00:14:47,305 --> 00:14:50,174 The proposed zoning is r six in 62 00:14:50,174 --> 00:14:51,743 the neighborhood Forum district. 63 00:14:51,743 --> 00:14:53,744 The request is for a change in 64 00:14:53,744 --> 00:14:56,381 zoning from r five residential 65 00:14:56,381 --> 00:14:57,548 to r six residential. There was 66 00:14:57,548 --> 00:14:58,483 a waiver and a detailed 67 00:14:58,483 --> 00:14:59,751 district development plan with 68 00:14:59,751 --> 00:15:01,751 binding elements associated 69 00:15:02,487 --> 00:15:04,956 with the site. The site is 70 00:15:04,956 --> 00:15:06,390 approximately 0.22 acres. It's 71 00:15:06,390 --> 00:15:07,892 an existing single family 72 00:15:07,892 --> 00:15:09,626 structure to be converted to a 73 00:15:09,626 --> 00:15:11,429 duplex with a detached third 74 00:15:11,429 --> 00:15:13,965 dwelling unit in the rear. 75 00:15:13,965 --> 00:15:15,800 There's no new construction or 76 00:15:15,800 --> 00:15:17,869 expansion of the existing 77 00:15:17,869 --> 00:15:19,370 structures. This is the 78 00:15:19,370 --> 00:15:20,838 applicant's development plan, 79 00:15:20,838 --> 00:15:23,838 showing the existing home in 80 00:15:24,800 --> 00:15:25,476 the front and then the existing 81 00:15:25,476 --> 00:15:28,476 accessory dwelling unit in the 82 00:15:28,513 --> 00:15:29,814 rear. This is what the subject 83 00:15:29,814 --> 00:15:32,214 property looks like along 84 00:15:32,817 --> 00:15:34,986 Poplar Level Road. The rear of 85 00:15:34,986 --> 00:15:37,386 the property along Jackson 86 00:15:40,224 --> 00:15:43,224 Avenue. These are the existing 87 00:15:43,494 --> 00:15:46,494 dwellings across the front of. 88 00:15:46,699 --> 00:15:48,266 Along a level road. This is 89 00:15:48,266 --> 00:15:50,666 facing northwest toward Poplar 90 00:15:51,436 --> 00:15:53,204 Level Road and Trevilian Way 91 00:15:53,204 --> 00:15:54,973 and then facing southeast 92 00:15:54,973 --> 00:15:57,973 towards Pablo Level Road and 93 00:15:58,710 --> 00:15:59,812 Grenade Avenue. The neighbor. 94 00:15:59,812 --> 00:16:01,245 The applicant held their 95 00:16:01,245 --> 00:16:03,245 neighborhood meeting on 96 00:16:03,248 --> 00:16:04,415 FEBRUARY 25th, 2026. The 97 00:16:04,415 --> 00:16:06,815 Planning Commission held their 98 00:16:06,851 --> 00:16:08,190 public hearing on APRIL 23rd, 99 00:16:08,190 --> 00:16:09,120 2026, where there was a motion 100 00:16:09,120 --> 00:16:11,922 to recommend approval of the 101 00:16:11,922 --> 00:16:14,159 change in zoning, passing by a 102 00:16:14,159 --> 00:16:17,728 vote of 7 to 1. Are there any 103 00:16:17,728 --> 00:16:19,728 questions? Whose council 104 00:16:20,231 --> 00:16:21,566 district is this? Oh, I'm sorry, 105 00:16:21,566 --> 00:16:23,340 would you like to speak to it, 106 00:16:23,340 --> 00:16:24,936 COUNCILMAN Raymond, please. 107 00:16:24,936 --> 00:16:26,972 Well, first I wanted to ask if 108 00:16:26,972 --> 00:16:29,874 if you understood why there was 109 00:16:29,874 --> 00:16:32,511 a no vote. That commissioner 110 00:16:32,511 --> 00:16:35,648 did not speak as to why they 111 00:16:35,648 --> 00:16:39,318 voted no. Yes, I'll speak to it, 112 00:16:39,318 --> 00:16:41,185 if I MAY. So this is a this is 113 00:16:41,185 --> 00:16:42,186 a property. It's a five bedroom 114 00:16:42,186 --> 00:16:44,586 house that was previously 115 00:16:45,256 --> 00:16:47,900 rented out and that there's not 116 00:16:47,900 --> 00:16:48,193 the market that there used to 117 00:16:48,193 --> 00:16:49,293 be for renting five bedroom 118 00:16:49,293 --> 00:16:51,950 houses. And so the owner of 119 00:16:51,950 --> 00:16:53,699 this property is converting it 120 00:16:53,699 --> 00:16:55,133 with only internal renovations. 121 00:16:55,133 --> 00:16:56,567 And so that each floor is 122 00:16:56,567 --> 00:16:57,268 rented. So it's essentially a 123 00:16:57,268 --> 00:16:58,303 duplex. I went to the 124 00:16:58,303 --> 00:16:59,838 neighborhood meeting. There was 125 00:16:59,838 --> 00:17:00,638 no objection actually at the 126 00:17:00,638 --> 00:17:02,141 neighborhood meeting was the 127 00:17:02,141 --> 00:17:03,207 couple who were the current 128 00:17:03,207 --> 00:17:04,409 tenants who were supportive of 129 00:17:04,409 --> 00:17:06,110 this change. So I was actually 130 00:17:06,110 --> 00:17:07,879 really disappointed by this one 131 00:17:07,879 --> 00:17:10,582 no vote because it's delayed 132 00:17:10,582 --> 00:17:12,384 the progress. And it's, it's we 133 00:17:12,384 --> 00:17:13,818 talk about how things move 134 00:17:13,818 --> 00:17:16,354 really slowly. This is a very 135 00:17:16,354 --> 00:17:17,856 simple change that enhances the 136 00:17:17,856 --> 00:17:19,992 neighborhood and is desired by 137 00:17:19,992 --> 00:17:21,659 the residents. And it has still 138 00:17:21,659 --> 00:17:25,259 taken months and months. So I 139 00:17:25,396 --> 00:17:28,967 ask for your support. Thank you, 140 00:17:28,967 --> 00:17:31,102 COUNCILMAN Owen. Thank you, 141 00:17:31,102 --> 00:17:32,905 Vice Chair. Quick, quick 142 00:17:32,905 --> 00:17:33,972 question. So is my 143 00:17:33,972 --> 00:17:35,972 understanding. My understanding 144 00:17:37,242 --> 00:17:39,410 is that this will go from a 145 00:17:39,410 --> 00:17:42,647 single family with a cup for an 146 00:17:42,647 --> 00:17:45,918 for an Adu, or was it a and 147 00:17:45,918 --> 00:17:47,151 then and now it will just be a 148 00:17:47,151 --> 00:17:49,454 multi-family. And so will this, 149 00:17:49,454 --> 00:17:51,289 the the Adu will go away and 150 00:17:51,289 --> 00:17:52,724 there will be three units of 151 00:17:52,724 --> 00:17:55,260 multifamily rental. Is that my 152 00:17:55,260 --> 00:17:58,260 is that a correct understanding? 153 00:17:58,497 --> 00:18:00,598 I don't believe the site had a 154 00:18:00,598 --> 00:18:03,598 cup for an accessory dwelling 155 00:18:04,902 --> 00:18:07,705 unit. So it was being rented, 156 00:18:07,705 --> 00:18:09,308 not as a as a short term rental, 157 00:18:09,308 --> 00:18:11,776 but as a long term rental. 158 00:18:11,776 --> 00:18:15,376 Previously the back of the, the 159 00:18:16,414 --> 00:18:18,349 back unit. It's the I know the 160 00:18:18,349 --> 00:18:21,487 young man who lives in the back. 161 00:18:21,487 --> 00:18:23,321 It's the owner's son. And so do 162 00:18:23,321 --> 00:18:25,570 we know again, I'm I'm I'm, I'm 163 00:18:25,570 --> 00:18:26,580 a I'm for this. I was just 164 00:18:26,580 --> 00:18:27,250 trying to get some 165 00:18:27,250 --> 00:18:28,526 clarification. So so the 166 00:18:28,526 --> 00:18:29,861 current tenants who now occupy 167 00:18:29,861 --> 00:18:31,696 the entire house will now 168 00:18:31,696 --> 00:18:33,299 occupy one floor. The young man 169 00:18:33,299 --> 00:18:35,134 who lives in the Adu in the 170 00:18:35,134 --> 00:18:36,968 back will stay there. And then 171 00:18:36,968 --> 00:18:38,870 a new tenant will move on to 172 00:18:38,870 --> 00:18:40,572 the second floor. Great. And I 173 00:18:40,572 --> 00:18:43,572 just wanted to mention that, 174 00:18:43,841 --> 00:18:45,643 you know, when we do break up a, 175 00:18:45,643 --> 00:18:48,643 a five bedroom house, for 176 00:18:48,913 --> 00:18:50,716 example, we do into two units, 177 00:18:50,716 --> 00:18:52,517 we have created smaller units 178 00:18:52,517 --> 00:18:55,754 that will be more affordable to, 179 00:18:55,754 --> 00:18:57,622 to people. And I think that is 180 00:18:57,622 --> 00:18:58,957 a net positive here. So just 181 00:18:58,957 --> 00:19:01,427 wanted to highlight that. Thank 182 00:19:01,427 --> 00:19:02,660 you very much. Thank you. Chair. 183 00:19:02,660 --> 00:19:04,896 Any other comments? We have 184 00:19:04,896 --> 00:19:07,296 been joined by COUNCILMAN 185 00:19:11,169 --> 00:19:13,169 Vachon. Stewart. COUNCILMAN 186 00:19:15,139 --> 00:19:16,575 Benson, you. Oh, I thought I 187 00:19:16,575 --> 00:19:18,430 acknowledged you. COUNCILMAN 188 00:19:18,430 --> 00:19:21,643 Benson is in the chambers as 189 00:19:23,114 --> 00:19:26,714 well. With that, I think we're 190 00:19:38,563 --> 00:19:42,163 ready to vote. On. Yes. Thank 191 00:19:46,538 --> 00:19:47,873 you. Voting's closing. Vice 192 00:19:47,873 --> 00:19:49,407 Chair Reed, you have eight yes 193 00:19:49,407 --> 00:19:51,142 votes. Thank you very much. 194 00:19:51,142 --> 00:19:52,411 This passes and we'll go to new 195 00:19:52,411 --> 00:19:55,411 business at the next council 196 00:19:58,116 --> 00:19:59,251 meeting. Next is item number 197 00:19:59,251 --> 00:20:01,286 0-137-26. An ordinance relating 198 00:20:01,286 --> 00:20:04,489 to the area wide zoning of 199 00:20:04,489 --> 00:20:05,858 property located at 1901 r 200 00:20:05,858 --> 00:20:07,858 Payne Street, containing 201 00:20:08,600 --> 00:20:09,561 approximately 3.09 acres and 202 00:20:09,561 --> 00:20:12,561 being in Louisville Metro. Case 203 00:20:12,730 --> 00:20:15,730 number 26, zone 0030. Do I have 204 00:20:17,102 --> 00:20:18,270 a motion? Motion and seconded 205 00:20:18,270 --> 00:20:21,806 chair Owen would like to speak 206 00:20:21,806 --> 00:20:23,975 to this, I'm sure. Thank you, 207 00:20:23,975 --> 00:20:25,310 Vice Chair Reed, this is a long 208 00:20:25,310 --> 00:20:27,979 time coming. I'm excited about 209 00:20:27,979 --> 00:20:29,814 this. So a couple of things I, 210 00:20:29,814 --> 00:20:30,815 I want to highlight again here. 211 00:20:30,815 --> 00:20:33,215 We've talked about this 212 00:20:33,919 --> 00:20:36,154 previously, but I wanted to say 213 00:20:36,154 --> 00:20:38,724 that, you know, this I don't 214 00:20:38,724 --> 00:20:40,525 expect to be precedent. I do 215 00:20:40,525 --> 00:20:42,561 not think that we as Metro 216 00:20:42,561 --> 00:20:44,561 government should proactively 217 00:20:45,897 --> 00:20:46,965 go after properties that are 218 00:20:46,965 --> 00:20:48,366 historically that are 219 00:20:48,366 --> 00:20:50,569 grandfathered in as industrial 220 00:20:50,569 --> 00:20:52,404 zoning and pull the industrial 221 00:20:52,404 --> 00:20:53,772 zoning designation out from 222 00:20:53,772 --> 00:20:55,840 under companies who are 223 00:20:55,840 --> 00:20:57,375 operating in in those locations. 224 00:20:57,375 --> 00:20:59,544 I think that is bad practice, 225 00:20:59,544 --> 00:21:01,346 bad business. And I do not 226 00:21:01,346 --> 00:21:02,414 think that this should set that 227 00:21:02,414 --> 00:21:04,617 precedent precedent. So I 228 00:21:04,617 --> 00:21:07,453 wanted to say that, first and 229 00:21:07,453 --> 00:21:09,220 foremost, in the case of this 230 00:21:09,220 --> 00:21:11,824 property, the property has had 231 00:21:11,824 --> 00:21:14,224 multiple explosions over the 232 00:21:14,259 --> 00:21:17,162 years. At least two of those 233 00:21:17,162 --> 00:21:19,300 explosions were deadly. And 234 00:21:19,300 --> 00:21:21,430 frankly, the most recent 235 00:21:22,900 --> 00:21:24,736 explosion. Is it's a small 236 00:21:24,736 --> 00:21:26,237 miracle that it wasn't more 237 00:21:26,237 --> 00:21:28,600 that it didn't take more lives 238 00:21:28,600 --> 00:21:30,475 than it actually did. When you 239 00:21:30,475 --> 00:21:31,577 you saw the the huge chunks of 240 00:21:31,577 --> 00:21:32,677 metal that went flying 241 00:21:32,677 --> 00:21:34,479 throughout the Clifton 242 00:21:34,479 --> 00:21:36,648 neighborhood. And so once that 243 00:21:36,648 --> 00:21:38,830 happened, the mayor came 244 00:21:38,830 --> 00:21:39,117 forward and, and I was in full 245 00:21:39,117 --> 00:21:41,252 agreement that this should 246 00:21:41,252 --> 00:21:42,254 never operate as heavy 247 00:21:42,254 --> 00:21:43,255 industrial again. And we 248 00:21:43,255 --> 00:21:44,656 requested that the Planning 249 00:21:44,656 --> 00:21:46,257 Commission take a look at what 250 00:21:46,257 --> 00:21:48,960 this might look like to down 251 00:21:48,960 --> 00:21:50,762 zone it. The recommendation was 252 00:21:50,762 --> 00:21:53,264 to, to change from m-2, which 253 00:21:53,264 --> 00:21:56,264 is a heavy industrial zoning 254 00:21:56,502 --> 00:21:58,303 zoning designation to cm, which 255 00:21:58,303 --> 00:22:00,471 does allow for some light 256 00:22:00,471 --> 00:22:02,241 industrial zone, but also 257 00:22:02,241 --> 00:22:03,241 allows for some housing, 258 00:22:03,241 --> 00:22:05,143 multifamily housing and some 259 00:22:05,143 --> 00:22:07,179 other things. So it, it adds 260 00:22:07,179 --> 00:22:09,480 more flexibility to what the 261 00:22:09,480 --> 00:22:10,782 property can be used for going 262 00:22:10,782 --> 00:22:13,352 forward, which I think is a 263 00:22:13,352 --> 00:22:15,486 good thing and does will make 264 00:22:15,486 --> 00:22:17,322 it easier for the for the 265 00:22:17,322 --> 00:22:18,724 company to sell going forward, 266 00:22:18,724 --> 00:22:20,291 because they'll be more users 267 00:22:20,291 --> 00:22:23,291 that that could potentially use 268 00:22:23,562 --> 00:22:25,296 the property as opposed to a, a, 269 00:22:25,296 --> 00:22:27,365 only a heavy industrial user 270 00:22:27,365 --> 00:22:30,269 using the property. I wanted to 271 00:22:30,269 --> 00:22:32,137 acknowledge that Commissioner 272 00:22:32,137 --> 00:22:33,538 Lannert voted against this at 273 00:22:33,538 --> 00:22:35,608 the Planning Commission. He was 274 00:22:35,608 --> 00:22:38,209 the sole no vote at the 275 00:22:38,209 --> 00:22:40,712 Planning Commission. And I do 276 00:22:40,712 --> 00:22:42,147 respect Commissioner Lambert's 277 00:22:42,147 --> 00:22:43,616 expertise as it relates to 278 00:22:43,616 --> 00:22:45,490 industrial properties. He's. He 279 00:22:45,490 --> 00:22:46,500 has brokered industrial 280 00:22:46,500 --> 00:22:48,450 properties in Louisville for 281 00:22:48,987 --> 00:22:51,690 the past four decades, and he 282 00:22:51,690 --> 00:22:54,393 suggested that we were reducing 283 00:22:54,393 --> 00:22:55,794 the value of the property by by, 284 00:22:55,794 --> 00:22:58,363 by lowering the zoning, lower 285 00:22:58,363 --> 00:23:01,566 the intensity of zoning from m2 286 00:23:01,566 --> 00:23:03,368 industrial to cm. Again 287 00:23:03,368 --> 00:23:05,768 acknowledging his expertise. I 288 00:23:05,938 --> 00:23:08,807 do have to disagree. In this 289 00:23:08,807 --> 00:23:11,807 particular case, I think that 290 00:23:12,444 --> 00:23:14,879 we have at. I think we've, like 291 00:23:14,879 --> 00:23:16,582 I said previously, we've added 292 00:23:16,582 --> 00:23:18,484 some value to the property in 293 00:23:18,484 --> 00:23:19,751 the sense that we have added 294 00:23:19,751 --> 00:23:22,488 the number of different uses 295 00:23:22,488 --> 00:23:23,622 that can be used, that can be 296 00:23:23,622 --> 00:23:25,691 taken advantage of at this site 297 00:23:25,691 --> 00:23:28,527 going forward, which I think 298 00:23:28,527 --> 00:23:29,827 adds some value. We have 299 00:23:29,827 --> 00:23:31,497 allowed some light industrial 300 00:23:31,497 --> 00:23:33,465 to continue here, which, you 301 00:23:33,465 --> 00:23:35,267 know, could could obviously 302 00:23:35,267 --> 00:23:37,603 turn into to future cash flow 303 00:23:37,603 --> 00:23:40,471 at this site going forward. So 304 00:23:40,471 --> 00:23:41,941 at the very most, I think we 305 00:23:41,941 --> 00:23:43,342 have I don't think we have 306 00:23:43,342 --> 00:23:45,144 reduced the value of this 307 00:23:45,144 --> 00:23:46,311 property in making this zoning 308 00:23:46,311 --> 00:23:49,311 change. One other thing and 309 00:23:49,480 --> 00:23:52,718 then I'll, I'll I'll step back 310 00:23:52,718 --> 00:23:54,920 here with the Planning 311 00:23:54,920 --> 00:23:57,220 Commission, sorry, the planning 312 00:23:57,220 --> 00:23:58,457 staff at Metro Government, 313 00:23:58,457 --> 00:24:01,457 under the leadership of Brian 314 00:24:01,694 --> 00:24:04,694 Davis, has reached out to 315 00:24:04,963 --> 00:24:07,600 Geveden on a handful of 316 00:24:07,600 --> 00:24:10,000 occasions since this process 317 00:24:10,436 --> 00:24:12,503 has been in place. What what I 318 00:24:12,503 --> 00:24:15,140 had requested from the company 319 00:24:15,140 --> 00:24:16,508 is that they come out and 320 00:24:16,508 --> 00:24:18,577 explicitly say that they they 321 00:24:18,577 --> 00:24:21,460 were not against the change in 322 00:24:21,460 --> 00:24:22,681 the zoning. They did not agree 323 00:24:22,681 --> 00:24:25,184 to say that explicitly, but at 324 00:24:25,184 --> 00:24:27,319 the same time, we have given 325 00:24:27,319 --> 00:24:29,319 them multiple opportunities 4 326 00:24:29,455 --> 00:24:31,290 or 5 on 4 or 5 different 327 00:24:31,290 --> 00:24:33,759 occasions to come out and say, 328 00:24:33,759 --> 00:24:35,328 please don't do this. You are 329 00:24:35,328 --> 00:24:36,962 really, you know, taking away 330 00:24:36,962 --> 00:24:38,497 the value of the property by 331 00:24:38,497 --> 00:24:40,499 doing this. And they have not 332 00:24:40,499 --> 00:24:43,869 done that either. And I think 333 00:24:43,869 --> 00:24:45,237 that their silence on that 334 00:24:45,237 --> 00:24:47,700 should be there's something to 335 00:24:47,700 --> 00:24:48,907 be said for the fact that they 336 00:24:48,907 --> 00:24:50,276 did not take the 4 or 5 337 00:24:50,276 --> 00:24:51,377 opportunities to, to state 338 00:24:51,377 --> 00:24:53,178 their opposition to this. And 339 00:24:53,178 --> 00:24:55,314 so I think that's that's 340 00:24:55,314 --> 00:24:57,783 important. So with all of that 341 00:24:57,783 --> 00:24:59,351 said, I would really ask for 342 00:24:59,351 --> 00:25:01,954 your support and hopefully we 343 00:25:01,954 --> 00:25:03,689 can. The this change in zoning 344 00:25:03,689 --> 00:25:04,823 will bring closure to the 345 00:25:04,823 --> 00:25:05,925 neighborhood in a way that I 346 00:25:05,925 --> 00:25:07,693 think will be incredibly 347 00:25:07,693 --> 00:25:08,827 healing. So I ask for your 348 00:25:08,827 --> 00:25:10,897 support and hope to move it 349 00:25:10,897 --> 00:25:12,231 forward. Thank you. Thank you. 350 00:25:12,231 --> 00:25:15,231 Chairman. Does anybody have any 351 00:25:20,239 --> 00:25:22,239 questions? COUNCILMAN Bacon? 352 00:25:23,108 --> 00:25:25,344 Thank you, Vice Chair Reed. And 353 00:25:25,344 --> 00:25:26,680 thank you, Chair Owen, for your 354 00:25:26,680 --> 00:25:28,515 explanation. And and just you 355 00:25:28,515 --> 00:25:29,715 know, for the record, I want to 356 00:25:29,715 --> 00:25:31,484 I've I've stated these issues 357 00:25:31,484 --> 00:25:33,385 before, but I want to state 358 00:25:33,385 --> 00:25:34,620 them again. And I think I think 359 00:25:34,620 --> 00:25:36,789 we're opening up a can of worms. 360 00:25:36,789 --> 00:25:37,923 Ladies and gentlemen, I think I 361 00:25:37,923 --> 00:25:39,725 think we should allow the 362 00:25:39,725 --> 00:25:42,595 market to play its role and do 363 00:25:42,595 --> 00:25:45,798 what it needs to do, and not 364 00:25:45,798 --> 00:25:48,567 rezone a property outside of 365 00:25:48,567 --> 00:25:50,169 the scope of allowing the owner 366 00:25:50,169 --> 00:25:52,404 to go through that zoning 367 00:25:52,404 --> 00:25:53,640 process like they should. This 368 00:25:53,640 --> 00:25:55,407 is going to increase the value 369 00:25:55,407 --> 00:25:56,610 of the property. I can agree 370 00:25:56,610 --> 00:25:59,610 with you on that. COUNCILMAN 371 00:26:00,179 --> 00:26:01,615 Owen, and create a new market 372 00:26:01,615 --> 00:26:05,150 value for this property to be 373 00:26:05,150 --> 00:26:06,586 sold or redeveloped. I strongly 374 00:26:06,586 --> 00:26:09,880 believe that we should not be 375 00:26:09,880 --> 00:26:10,290 doing this for the purpose of 376 00:26:10,290 --> 00:26:11,357 that. Owner needs to go through 377 00:26:11,357 --> 00:26:13,757 this process like everybody 378 00:26:16,280 --> 00:26:17,464 else does. Thank you. 379 00:26:17,464 --> 00:26:18,832 COUNCILMAN. Any other questions? 380 00:26:18,832 --> 00:26:21,700 Would you like to respond to 381 00:26:21,700 --> 00:26:24,100 COUNCILMAN Owen? Okay. Any 382 00:26:26,305 --> 00:26:29,305 questions? That said, I think 383 00:26:33,912 --> 00:26:37,512 we're ready to vote. Chair Owen. 384 00:26:37,884 --> 00:26:40,284 Yes. Thank you. Ordinance 385 00:26:42,988 --> 00:26:44,790 closing. Vice chair Reed, you 386 00:26:44,790 --> 00:26:47,927 have five yes votes and three 387 00:26:47,927 --> 00:26:49,161 no's. Thank you. With that, 388 00:26:49,161 --> 00:26:50,196 we'll go to new business. I'm 389 00:26:50,196 --> 00:26:53,196 sorry, old business. In the 390 00:26:57,736 --> 00:26:59,205 next council meeting. Next is 391 00:26:59,205 --> 00:27:00,639 item number three, an ordinance 392 00:27:00,639 --> 00:27:02,608 imposing a temporary moratorium 393 00:27:02,608 --> 00:27:05,800 on rezoning conditional. And 394 00:27:06,379 --> 00:27:07,846 this is item number 0-135-26. 395 00:27:07,846 --> 00:27:09,582 An ordinance imposing a 396 00:27:09,582 --> 00:27:11,840 temporary moratorium on 397 00:27:11,840 --> 00:27:12,552 rezoning conditional use 398 00:27:12,552 --> 00:27:13,887 permits and plan certain 399 00:27:13,887 --> 00:27:15,487 category two b and three 400 00:27:15,487 --> 00:27:17,487 development plan applications 401 00:27:17,591 --> 00:27:19,125 relating to telecommunication 402 00:27:19,125 --> 00:27:20,659 hotels and data centers pending 403 00:27:20,659 --> 00:27:21,827 a review and recommended 404 00:27:21,827 --> 00:27:23,964 changes by the Planning 405 00:27:23,964 --> 00:27:26,933 Commission. Do I have a motion, 406 00:27:26,933 --> 00:27:28,701 motion, motion and seconded? I 407 00:27:28,701 --> 00:27:29,867 think we have COUNCILWOMAN 408 00:27:29,867 --> 00:27:33,467 Chapel that would like to speak 409 00:27:36,643 --> 00:27:38,612 to this. Sure. Thank. I used to 410 00:27:38,612 --> 00:27:42,212 be on planning and zoning, and 411 00:27:43,820 --> 00:27:46,820 our meetings were much longer. 412 00:27:47,860 --> 00:27:48,989 Preface. No ai has been used to 413 00:27:48,989 --> 00:27:52,391 write this plea and all the 414 00:27:52,391 --> 00:27:53,525 words are my own, as is all of 415 00:27:53,525 --> 00:27:56,930 my words I've said in this 416 00:27:56,930 --> 00:27:58,298 chamber thus far. Colleagues, 417 00:27:58,298 --> 00:28:00,766 we have kicked. This can far 418 00:28:00,766 --> 00:28:01,767 enough down the road. On 419 00:28:01,767 --> 00:28:02,768 JANUARY 23rd, the Planning 420 00:28:02,768 --> 00:28:03,902 Commission was supposed to 421 00:28:03,902 --> 00:28:05,404 release the recommendations for 422 00:28:05,404 --> 00:28:08,275 the changes to the Land 423 00:28:08,275 --> 00:28:10,675 Development Code regarding data 424 00:28:10,709 --> 00:28:12,244 centers. 130 days have passed 425 00:28:12,244 --> 00:28:15,415 since that deadline and we are 426 00:28:15,415 --> 00:28:16,982 without recommendations. Still, 427 00:28:16,982 --> 00:28:18,684 what's even more puzzling to me 428 00:28:18,684 --> 00:28:21,840 is that recommendations were 429 00:28:21,922 --> 00:28:23,722 published online on JANUARY 2nd, 430 00:28:23,722 --> 00:28:25,858 and they were taken down just 431 00:28:25,858 --> 00:28:27,590 hours later. It seemed like the 432 00:28:27,590 --> 00:28:30,590 work was completed. So where 433 00:28:30,194 --> 00:28:32,310 did it go? And to be clear, 434 00:28:32,310 --> 00:28:33,899 these are recommendations that 435 00:28:33,899 --> 00:28:36,350 we're waiting on. It's not 436 00:28:36,350 --> 00:28:37,836 legislation and its final form. 437 00:28:37,836 --> 00:28:39,639 They aren't automatic updates 438 00:28:39,639 --> 00:28:41,141 to our land development code. 439 00:28:41,141 --> 00:28:42,875 They're recommendations that 440 00:28:42,875 --> 00:28:44,900 have the opportunity to be 441 00:28:44,900 --> 00:28:46,112 molded, which will be subject 442 00:28:46,112 --> 00:28:47,547 to public comment and will be 443 00:28:47,547 --> 00:28:49,382 under review by this 444 00:28:49,382 --> 00:28:51,840 legislative body. There's a lot 445 00:28:51,840 --> 00:28:52,919 of work ahead of us, but we 446 00:28:52,919 --> 00:28:55,121 can't move forward without the 447 00:28:55,121 --> 00:28:56,522 foundation of these documents. 448 00:28:56,522 --> 00:28:58,357 Data centers are a hot button 449 00:28:58,357 --> 00:28:59,793 issue worldwide, and they're 450 00:28:59,793 --> 00:29:02,528 certainly one that folks care 451 00:29:02,528 --> 00:29:03,797 about here since they're in 452 00:29:03,797 --> 00:29:05,197 their infancy. We don't 453 00:29:05,197 --> 00:29:07,320 understand a lot of the 454 00:29:07,320 --> 00:29:09,501 implications of a data center. 455 00:29:09,501 --> 00:29:12,400 How big of a population does 456 00:29:12,400 --> 00:29:13,473 one data center serve? How many 457 00:29:13,473 --> 00:29:15,873 data centers does Louisville 458 00:29:17,110 --> 00:29:18,812 need to power its population? 459 00:29:18,812 --> 00:29:20,746 What communities outside of 460 00:29:20,746 --> 00:29:23,146 Louisville benefit from data 461 00:29:23,182 --> 00:29:26,182 centers located here? Do those 462 00:29:26,419 --> 00:29:28,287 communities have buy in? 463 00:29:28,287 --> 00:29:29,756 Louisville has more water than 464 00:29:29,756 --> 00:29:31,824 anyone could than we could ever 465 00:29:31,824 --> 00:29:34,827 need or use is something I've 466 00:29:34,827 --> 00:29:36,896 heard before. But how much has 467 00:29:36,896 --> 00:29:39,798 to be used in order for that 468 00:29:39,798 --> 00:29:42,301 precious finite source to be 469 00:29:42,301 --> 00:29:44,690 tapped and threatened? Solar 470 00:29:44,690 --> 00:29:45,871 panel energy advances as 471 00:29:45,871 --> 00:29:46,940 quickly as televisions do, and 472 00:29:46,940 --> 00:29:49,940 computers are no longer the 473 00:29:50,877 --> 00:29:53,877 size, as buildings. Look how 474 00:29:55,281 --> 00:29:57,500 tiny this one is here. Does 475 00:29:57,500 --> 00:29:59,252 technology in a data center 476 00:29:59,252 --> 00:30:00,287 advance as quickly? And are the 477 00:30:00,287 --> 00:30:02,287 monstrosities that we're 478 00:30:04,257 --> 00:30:06,657 building now appropriate in 510 479 00:30:08,261 --> 00:30:09,361 years? I don't know the answers 480 00:30:09,361 --> 00:30:11,330 to these questions, and I have 481 00:30:11,330 --> 00:30:13,232 a slew of others that are going 482 00:30:13,232 --> 00:30:14,366 around in my head, and I doubt 483 00:30:14,366 --> 00:30:16,135 that anybody else in this room 484 00:30:16,135 --> 00:30:17,336 has answers to these questions, 485 00:30:17,336 --> 00:30:20,739 but I'm sure that you have a 486 00:30:20,739 --> 00:30:21,775 whole lot more. I know that I 487 00:30:21,775 --> 00:30:23,800 am not willing to let 488 00:30:23,800 --> 00:30:25,511 Louisville be a guinea pig for 489 00:30:25,511 --> 00:30:27,247 these data centers. It's 490 00:30:27,247 --> 00:30:28,448 convenient to rally against a 491 00:30:28,448 --> 00:30:30,215 moratorium when it's not your 492 00:30:30,215 --> 00:30:31,918 backyard being threatened. And 493 00:30:31,918 --> 00:30:33,652 let's be clear I live in a very 494 00:30:33,652 --> 00:30:34,853 dense urban area, and I doubt 495 00:30:34,853 --> 00:30:36,590 that a data center would ever 496 00:30:36,590 --> 00:30:37,990 be coming to my backyard. 497 00:30:37,990 --> 00:30:40,659 However, that doesn't mean that 498 00:30:40,659 --> 00:30:42,361 I can't prevent myself from 499 00:30:42,361 --> 00:30:45,265 fighting for someone that might 500 00:30:45,265 --> 00:30:46,365 have one in their backyard. 501 00:30:46,365 --> 00:30:48,435 Beyond that, we all pay a 502 00:30:48,435 --> 00:30:50,736 monthly L.G.A bill and a bill 503 00:30:50,736 --> 00:30:51,737 to Louisville Water. We're all 504 00:30:51,737 --> 00:30:53,205 subjected to the same price 505 00:30:53,205 --> 00:30:55,741 hikes, including the one that 506 00:30:55,741 --> 00:30:59,279 msd is proposing right now. So 507 00:30:59,279 --> 00:31:00,746 if you don't care about the 508 00:31:00,746 --> 00:31:02,214 deforestation of data centers, 509 00:31:02,214 --> 00:31:04,117 their light pollution, their 510 00:31:04,117 --> 00:31:06,517 noise pollution, the creation 511 00:31:06,852 --> 00:31:08,154 of a brown field, etc. Then 512 00:31:08,154 --> 00:31:09,722 maybe you will care when your 513 00:31:09,722 --> 00:31:11,157 water turns brown and your 514 00:31:11,157 --> 00:31:13,557 electricity bills rival your 515 00:31:14,560 --> 00:31:16,960 mortgage payment. Maybe these 516 00:31:17,263 --> 00:31:19,798 are all fears, but they're not 517 00:31:19,798 --> 00:31:21,934 ones that I want to test. Now 518 00:31:21,934 --> 00:31:23,235 let me bring address some 519 00:31:23,235 --> 00:31:24,470 concerns about the moratorium 520 00:31:24,470 --> 00:31:27,600 that my colleagues have brought 521 00:31:27,600 --> 00:31:28,207 up. First, there are no data 522 00:31:28,207 --> 00:31:31,207 centers in the pipeline, so 523 00:31:31,278 --> 00:31:32,779 this legislation would be moot. 524 00:31:32,779 --> 00:31:34,179 GOD forbid that Louisville 525 00:31:34,179 --> 00:31:36,579 metro government takes a 526 00:31:36,750 --> 00:31:37,918 proactive approach to something. 527 00:31:37,918 --> 00:31:40,190 Instead of laying in the weeds 528 00:31:40,190 --> 00:31:42,521 and being reactive to something, 529 00:31:42,521 --> 00:31:45,725 why are we too afraid to put 530 00:31:45,725 --> 00:31:48,125 our residents over private 531 00:31:48,395 --> 00:31:49,930 predatory development? Besides, 532 00:31:49,930 --> 00:31:51,163 if plans for a new data center 533 00:31:51,163 --> 00:31:53,332 were to be submitted tomorrow, 534 00:31:53,332 --> 00:31:55,200 any action by Metro Council 535 00:31:55,200 --> 00:31:56,936 would take little too late. Let 536 00:31:56,936 --> 00:31:58,304 me remind you, we're about to 537 00:31:58,304 --> 00:32:01,904 go on break for about three 538 00:32:03,420 --> 00:32:03,777 weeks. It might be too late. A 539 00:32:03,777 --> 00:32:05,177 moratorium will signal that 540 00:32:05,177 --> 00:32:07,447 Louisville is closed for 541 00:32:07,447 --> 00:32:08,448 business. How could we 542 00:32:08,448 --> 00:32:09,548 insinuate that Louisville is 543 00:32:09,548 --> 00:32:10,649 closed for business? When one 544 00:32:10,649 --> 00:32:12,419 Louisville distributed these 545 00:32:12,419 --> 00:32:13,986 talking points before Derby, 546 00:32:13,986 --> 00:32:16,550 over 2 million packages moved 547 00:32:16,550 --> 00:32:18,157 through ups every day, and we 548 00:32:18,157 --> 00:32:20,260 just passed Memphis as the 549 00:32:20,260 --> 00:32:23,195 largest air cargo hub in North 550 00:32:23,195 --> 00:32:24,630 America. Louisville saw over $3 551 00:32:24,630 --> 00:32:26,433 billion in new capital 552 00:32:26,433 --> 00:32:28,635 investment last year, an amount 553 00:32:28,635 --> 00:32:31,635 that's on par with Austin, 554 00:32:31,771 --> 00:32:33,500 Nashville and Raleigh. Ford is 555 00:32:33,500 --> 00:32:34,441 reinventing the assembly line 556 00:32:34,441 --> 00:32:36,842 in Louisville and how cars are 557 00:32:36,842 --> 00:32:39,790 put together. Ge is building a 558 00:32:39,790 --> 00:32:40,814 new 800 job, half a billion 559 00:32:40,814 --> 00:32:42,282 factory, half $1 billion 560 00:32:42,282 --> 00:32:44,417 factory that will manufacture a 561 00:32:44,417 --> 00:32:46,485 washer and dryer units across 562 00:32:46,485 --> 00:32:48,787 this, an area the size of 33 563 00:32:48,787 --> 00:32:50,557 football fields, slate auto and 564 00:32:50,557 --> 00:32:53,590 new Jeff Bezos backed startup 565 00:32:53,590 --> 00:32:55,228 is building an affordable ev in 566 00:32:55,228 --> 00:32:57,970 their global customization hub 567 00:32:57,970 --> 00:32:58,497 is right here in Louisville. 568 00:32:58,497 --> 00:33:00,897 Taiwan based Foxconn is 569 00:33:01,300 --> 00:33:02,368 investing $173 million into a 570 00:33:02,368 --> 00:33:04,571 new facility that, for the 571 00:33:04,571 --> 00:33:06,472 first time since the 1980s, 572 00:33:06,472 --> 00:33:08,472 manufactured consumer 573 00:33:08,974 --> 00:33:11,974 electronics at scale in America 574 00:33:12,345 --> 00:33:13,747 in downtown, has over two $2.5 575 00:33:13,747 --> 00:33:15,447 billion in development underway. 576 00:33:15,447 --> 00:33:16,815 That includes a 1000 room 577 00:33:16,815 --> 00:33:19,215 convention hotel in Humana's 578 00:33:20,530 --> 00:33:22,121 old hq and a new J.W. Marriott 579 00:33:22,121 --> 00:33:25,721 hotel. And our airport is in 580 00:33:25,758 --> 00:33:28,158 the middle of $1 billion 581 00:33:28,695 --> 00:33:30,497 modernization, improving the 582 00:33:30,497 --> 00:33:33,497 experience and the number of 583 00:33:33,733 --> 00:33:34,634 flights. I've also heard the 584 00:33:34,634 --> 00:33:36,350 administration has promised 585 00:33:36,350 --> 00:33:38,380 these recommendations in JUNE, 586 00:33:38,380 --> 00:33:39,538 and they're actively working on 587 00:33:39,538 --> 00:33:41,938 tightening them up for 588 00:33:42,800 --> 00:33:42,608 distribution. These 589 00:33:42,608 --> 00:33:44,244 recommendations are coming to 590 00:33:44,244 --> 00:33:45,946 us from the planning department 591 00:33:45,946 --> 00:33:47,548 via the Planning Commission. 592 00:33:47,548 --> 00:33:48,915 The administration will have 593 00:33:48,915 --> 00:33:51,510 the same opportunity to offer 594 00:33:51,510 --> 00:33:52,852 their feedback, as does Metro 595 00:33:52,852 --> 00:33:56,122 Council and the public. When we 596 00:33:56,122 --> 00:33:57,900 get these distributed. Besides, 597 00:33:57,900 --> 00:33:58,525 why should we trust that we're 598 00:33:58,525 --> 00:33:59,759 getting these recommendations 599 00:33:59,759 --> 00:34:01,126 when we were told we were 600 00:34:01,126 --> 00:34:04,126 getting them in JANUARY and 601 00:34:05,765 --> 00:34:07,934 then in MAY, and now in JUNE. 602 00:34:07,934 --> 00:34:10,438 And I also hear from my 603 00:34:10,438 --> 00:34:12,838 colleagues, I never support 604 00:34:14,106 --> 00:34:15,575 moratoriums, a moratorium on 605 00:34:15,575 --> 00:34:18,575 moratoriums is a weird flex, 606 00:34:19,450 --> 00:34:20,714 but okay, I'm sure that there's 607 00:34:20,714 --> 00:34:21,982 other, more nefarious reasons 608 00:34:21,982 --> 00:34:24,170 that would prevent a council 609 00:34:24,170 --> 00:34:26,190 person from voting in support 610 00:34:26,190 --> 00:34:27,120 of this moratorium, since there 611 00:34:27,120 --> 00:34:29,356 are only assumptions, I'm not 612 00:34:29,356 --> 00:34:30,757 going to address them, although 613 00:34:30,757 --> 00:34:32,758 I can assure you that your 614 00:34:32,758 --> 00:34:34,561 voters want this moratorium, 615 00:34:34,561 --> 00:34:36,796 and I promise you that there is 616 00:34:36,796 --> 00:34:40,996 no price worth the sale of your 617 00:34:43,603 --> 00:34:46,603 dignity. I'm wrapping up. So. 618 00:34:46,939 --> 00:34:49,375 You know you're coming, but I'd 619 00:34:49,375 --> 00:34:53,346 love to read an email from my 620 00:34:53,346 --> 00:34:55,482 friend David Kaplan. Who or 621 00:34:55,482 --> 00:34:56,549 sorry, David Kaplan, who had 622 00:34:56,549 --> 00:34:57,984 emailed all of the members of 623 00:34:57,984 --> 00:34:59,850 the Planning and Zoning 624 00:34:59,850 --> 00:35:00,487 committee this morning. And I 625 00:35:00,487 --> 00:35:04,870 just want to read this email. 626 00:35:04,858 --> 00:35:06,192 It's fairly short. My friend 627 00:35:06,192 --> 00:35:07,427 Jennifer Chappell asked me to 628 00:35:07,427 --> 00:35:09,195 reach out to seek your yes vote 629 00:35:09,195 --> 00:35:10,830 on a moratorium for data 630 00:35:10,830 --> 00:35:12,899 centers today. These centers 631 00:35:12,899 --> 00:35:14,670 really intrigued me as I own a 632 00:35:14,670 --> 00:35:16,360 parcel where one could be built. 633 00:35:16,360 --> 00:35:18,710 If I were to build one, I would 634 00:35:18,710 --> 00:35:19,506 wait until best management 635 00:35:19,506 --> 00:35:21,241 practices are adopted regarding 636 00:35:21,241 --> 00:35:23,430 them. As my friend Stuart 637 00:35:23,430 --> 00:35:25,211 Benson will tell you, a 638 00:35:25,211 --> 00:35:27,380 machinist or a builder, one 639 00:35:27,380 --> 00:35:28,848 needs a blueprint or a diagram 640 00:35:28,848 --> 00:35:30,216 to get the project done 641 00:35:30,216 --> 00:35:31,685 correctly. This is what a 642 00:35:31,685 --> 00:35:32,919 moratorium would provide, and 643 00:35:32,919 --> 00:35:34,921 I'm puzzled at how the Office 644 00:35:34,921 --> 00:35:36,756 of Planning started on this. 645 00:35:36,756 --> 00:35:38,858 Then it suddenly disappeared. 646 00:35:38,858 --> 00:35:41,610 But the Office of Planning has 647 00:35:41,610 --> 00:35:42,829 made this common practice. They 648 00:35:42,829 --> 00:35:44,298 have studied the Floyds Fork 649 00:35:44,298 --> 00:35:46,801 watershed for decades without a 650 00:35:46,801 --> 00:35:48,268 plan being adopted, not only a 651 00:35:48,268 --> 00:35:49,470 major issue of our tax dollars, 652 00:35:49,470 --> 00:35:51,438 but it's worth showing the rest 653 00:35:51,438 --> 00:35:53,641 of the nation that we're not a 654 00:35:53,641 --> 00:35:55,809 smart growth city building 655 00:35:55,809 --> 00:35:57,711 without future generations in 656 00:35:57,711 --> 00:35:59,379 mind. So let's pass this. These 657 00:35:59,379 --> 00:36:01,281 are my own words. Now it's the 658 00:36:01,281 --> 00:36:03,516 end of his email, but I just 659 00:36:03,516 --> 00:36:05,151 want to encourage my colleagues 660 00:36:05,151 --> 00:36:07,687 to vote yes on this so we can 661 00:36:07,687 --> 00:36:09,522 pass this moratorium, get the 662 00:36:09,522 --> 00:36:10,925 recommendations, have the tough 663 00:36:10,925 --> 00:36:13,925 conversations that we need to 664 00:36:14,194 --> 00:36:15,295 have, and update the ldc 665 00:36:15,295 --> 00:36:18,131 responsibly so we don't sell 666 00:36:18,131 --> 00:36:21,731 out any more of our communities. 667 00:36:22,836 --> 00:36:25,236 Thank you. Thank you, 668 00:36:26,373 --> 00:36:28,773 COUNCILMAN Chappell, what is 669 00:36:28,908 --> 00:36:30,410 the length of the moratorium? 670 00:36:30,410 --> 00:36:33,913 How long are we or is there a 671 00:36:33,913 --> 00:36:36,850 length 180 days, which would be 672 00:36:36,850 --> 00:36:38,986 six months? Okay. COUNCILMAN 673 00:36:38,986 --> 00:36:41,986 Parrish. Right. Thank you, MR. 674 00:36:42,589 --> 00:36:44,125 Chair. I don't I think 675 00:36:44,125 --> 00:36:46,525 COUNCILWOMAN Chappell gave a 676 00:36:46,593 --> 00:36:49,593 great explanation of all of 677 00:36:49,597 --> 00:36:50,932 this. I've. And I've thought 678 00:36:50,932 --> 00:36:53,330 about what I would say because 679 00:36:53,330 --> 00:36:54,868 I have pre-typed message that I 680 00:36:54,868 --> 00:36:56,304 wanted to use. But I just want 681 00:36:56,304 --> 00:36:58,872 to say this makes sense. It 682 00:36:58,872 --> 00:37:01,309 gives us an opportunity to be 683 00:37:01,309 --> 00:37:03,543 proactive. This is what our 684 00:37:03,543 --> 00:37:05,345 constituents are asking for. It 685 00:37:05,345 --> 00:37:06,747 is in the backyard of my 686 00:37:06,747 --> 00:37:08,282 district, even though the one 687 00:37:08,282 --> 00:37:09,983 being built is in district one, 688 00:37:09,983 --> 00:37:12,152 I can you can throw a rock over 689 00:37:12,152 --> 00:37:13,887 into district three. I went to 690 00:37:13,887 --> 00:37:16,570 some neighborhood meetings, and 691 00:37:16,570 --> 00:37:17,558 I heard the concerns from 692 00:37:17,558 --> 00:37:18,759 people who are living in those 693 00:37:18,759 --> 00:37:20,460 communities who, who just found 694 00:37:20,460 --> 00:37:22,963 out about it, who are still 695 00:37:22,963 --> 00:37:25,466 trying to understand it. I then 696 00:37:25,466 --> 00:37:28,466 drove and walked the property 697 00:37:28,702 --> 00:37:30,771 with a constituent and it was 698 00:37:30,771 --> 00:37:32,305 huge. And we and I know that 699 00:37:32,305 --> 00:37:34,400 life thrives around water. I 700 00:37:34,400 --> 00:37:35,909 know that we have a good source 701 00:37:35,909 --> 00:37:37,711 of water, but we need to be 702 00:37:37,711 --> 00:37:39,480 able to make decisions that 703 00:37:39,480 --> 00:37:41,648 mean something to our community. 704 00:37:41,648 --> 00:37:42,917 Louisville has never been 705 00:37:42,917 --> 00:37:44,517 closed for business. There's 706 00:37:44,517 --> 00:37:46,653 not a time I've seen Louisville 707 00:37:46,653 --> 00:37:49,222 close for business. So I think 708 00:37:49,222 --> 00:37:51,570 that if that is a concern, that 709 00:37:51,570 --> 00:37:53,493 doesn't make sense to me. I 710 00:37:53,493 --> 00:37:55,662 think the email from that 711 00:37:55,662 --> 00:37:57,398 Jennifer read is so important. 712 00:37:57,398 --> 00:37:59,267 This person is saying they have 713 00:37:59,267 --> 00:38:01,102 a parcel that could be 714 00:38:01,102 --> 00:38:03,270 considered for that, but they 715 00:38:03,270 --> 00:38:05,106 would not build without having 716 00:38:05,106 --> 00:38:07,940 these regulations in place. And 717 00:38:07,940 --> 00:38:09,750 I think that with us going on 718 00:38:09,750 --> 00:38:10,944 vacation with all the things 719 00:38:10,944 --> 00:38:12,179 that are going on and how this 720 00:38:12,179 --> 00:38:13,947 first one got in because of it 721 00:38:13,947 --> 00:38:15,148 was already zoned, and it's 722 00:38:15,148 --> 00:38:17,317 already ahead of the the laws 723 00:38:17,317 --> 00:38:19,786 we have. The moratorium makes 724 00:38:19,786 --> 00:38:21,589 sense. That's all we're asking. 725 00:38:21,589 --> 00:38:23,490 Let's do something to show the 726 00:38:23,490 --> 00:38:25,192 community we're listening. 727 00:38:25,192 --> 00:38:26,993 Let's do something proactive. 728 00:38:26,993 --> 00:38:28,461 Let's work together. This is 729 00:38:28,461 --> 00:38:29,597 not negative. This is not 730 00:38:29,597 --> 00:38:31,665 against business. This is not 731 00:38:31,665 --> 00:38:33,200 us trying to shut down every 732 00:38:33,200 --> 00:38:34,935 developer. This is saying to 733 00:38:34,935 --> 00:38:37,772 the community that we hear you, 734 00:38:37,772 --> 00:38:41,372 we heard you, and we're taking 735 00:38:42,175 --> 00:38:44,575 action. Thank you. COUNCILWOMAN 736 00:38:45,578 --> 00:38:47,914 Freeman. Yes. Is it appropriate 737 00:38:47,914 --> 00:38:48,983 to ask the planning team 738 00:38:48,983 --> 00:38:51,983 questions about the rollout of 739 00:38:53,720 --> 00:38:55,121 the recommendations? I'm sorry. 740 00:38:55,121 --> 00:38:56,157 MAY I ask the planning team 741 00:38:56,157 --> 00:38:57,757 questions about that? Yes, yes, 742 00:38:57,757 --> 00:38:59,260 yes. Could you all explain 743 00:38:59,260 --> 00:38:59,961 better to us and to people 744 00:38:59,961 --> 00:39:00,961 who've been watching but 745 00:39:00,961 --> 00:39:03,396 haven't quite been able to 746 00:39:03,396 --> 00:39:04,798 grasp it like me? Right. What 747 00:39:04,798 --> 00:39:06,534 has been the timeline for the 748 00:39:06,534 --> 00:39:08,135 recommendations? Why the delay 749 00:39:08,135 --> 00:39:09,837 and when can we expect them and 750 00:39:09,837 --> 00:39:11,938 what will they look like? Sure. 751 00:39:11,938 --> 00:39:14,140 Now, so Brian Davis, the Office 752 00:39:14,140 --> 00:39:15,241 of Planning in terms of when 753 00:39:15,241 --> 00:39:16,343 you can expect something, we 754 00:39:16,343 --> 00:39:18,144 are in the process of 755 00:39:18,144 --> 00:39:19,679 finalizing a draft. We hope to 756 00:39:19,679 --> 00:39:22,830 release it next week. So this 757 00:39:22,830 --> 00:39:24,985 has been an this has been an 758 00:39:24,985 --> 00:39:26,253 interesting and challenging 759 00:39:26,253 --> 00:39:27,988 task for us to complete for a 760 00:39:27,988 --> 00:39:30,358 number of reasons and. And 761 00:39:30,358 --> 00:39:31,725 COUNCILWOMAN Chappell, you know, 762 00:39:31,725 --> 00:39:32,892 addressed several of them just 763 00:39:32,892 --> 00:39:34,728 because there isn't a whole lot 764 00:39:34,728 --> 00:39:35,863 of information out there, a lot 765 00:39:35,863 --> 00:39:37,797 of communities are all kind of 766 00:39:37,797 --> 00:39:39,700 in the same spot and that, you 767 00:39:39,700 --> 00:39:40,834 know, you have this use that is 768 00:39:40,834 --> 00:39:41,935 a somewhat fairly new use, 769 00:39:41,935 --> 00:39:44,437 especially when you think about 770 00:39:44,437 --> 00:39:45,573 the hyperscale data centers and 771 00:39:45,573 --> 00:39:46,574 people are treating it all 772 00:39:46,574 --> 00:39:47,374 kinds of different ways 773 00:39:47,374 --> 00:39:49,542 depending on how the 774 00:39:49,542 --> 00:39:50,977 regulations are. We reached out 775 00:39:50,977 --> 00:39:53,447 to some of the peer cities that 776 00:39:53,447 --> 00:39:55,116 we speak with. And, you know, 777 00:39:55,116 --> 00:39:56,617 they were treating data centers 778 00:39:56,617 --> 00:39:58,818 anywhere from like an office, 779 00:39:58,818 --> 00:39:59,954 like any other office use to, 780 00:39:59,954 --> 00:40:01,455 you know, some sort of heavy 781 00:40:01,455 --> 00:40:02,623 industrial use. And so, you 782 00:40:02,623 --> 00:40:04,458 know, people are all over the 783 00:40:04,458 --> 00:40:06,159 place in terms of how they're 784 00:40:06,159 --> 00:40:08,194 dealing with those. And it's 785 00:40:08,194 --> 00:40:09,629 been a topic where really, 786 00:40:09,629 --> 00:40:11,232 every week there's new 787 00:40:11,232 --> 00:40:13,670 information out there about, 788 00:40:13,670 --> 00:40:14,334 you know, what goes on at the 789 00:40:14,334 --> 00:40:15,360 data centers, how they're 790 00:40:15,360 --> 00:40:16,503 operating, why they're 791 00:40:16,503 --> 00:40:17,571 operating the way they do, and 792 00:40:17,571 --> 00:40:18,706 how communities are dealing 793 00:40:18,706 --> 00:40:19,773 with them. So it's something 794 00:40:19,773 --> 00:40:22,773 that we, we've been watching 795 00:40:22,976 --> 00:40:24,411 and kind of following, you know, 796 00:40:24,411 --> 00:40:25,579 another challenge that that we 797 00:40:25,579 --> 00:40:27,480 were kind of dealing with while 798 00:40:27,480 --> 00:40:28,682 we were in the process of, of, 799 00:40:28,682 --> 00:40:30,517 of, you know, doing all this 800 00:40:30,517 --> 00:40:31,919 research was the state 801 00:40:31,919 --> 00:40:34,454 legislation. And in the session 802 00:40:34,454 --> 00:40:35,923 that we just concluded in APRIL, 803 00:40:35,923 --> 00:40:36,990 there were five different bills 804 00:40:36,990 --> 00:40:38,625 that were proposed that were 805 00:40:38,625 --> 00:40:39,826 called an act relating to data 806 00:40:39,826 --> 00:40:41,628 centers. And so, you know, kind 807 00:40:41,628 --> 00:40:42,796 of the thought was like, you 808 00:40:42,796 --> 00:40:44,264 know, before we put anything 809 00:40:44,264 --> 00:40:45,632 out there, before we we do 810 00:40:45,632 --> 00:40:46,833 anything with this draft, let's 811 00:40:46,833 --> 00:40:47,968 watch and see what the state's 812 00:40:47,968 --> 00:40:49,636 going to mandate, because we 813 00:40:49,636 --> 00:40:50,770 didn't want to produce a 814 00:40:50,770 --> 00:40:52,500 product that was going to be, 815 00:40:52,500 --> 00:40:53,741 you know, essentially null and 816 00:40:53,741 --> 00:40:54,841 void because of an action that 817 00:40:54,841 --> 00:40:56,643 the state was going to be 818 00:40:56,643 --> 00:40:57,811 taking. Now, none of those 819 00:40:57,811 --> 00:40:59,613 wound up passing. But, you know, 820 00:40:59,613 --> 00:41:00,647 they they were out there. And 821 00:41:00,647 --> 00:41:01,781 if you've watched the 822 00:41:01,781 --> 00:41:03,650 legislature in the last couple 823 00:41:03,650 --> 00:41:04,818 of years, you know, you have to 824 00:41:04,818 --> 00:41:05,986 wait until the last two days of 825 00:41:05,986 --> 00:41:07,210 the session for anything, 826 00:41:07,210 --> 00:41:08,788 because that's when everything 827 00:41:08,788 --> 00:41:09,956 gets done. So we were watching 828 00:41:09,956 --> 00:41:11,726 that. So as I stated, though, 829 00:41:11,726 --> 00:41:12,793 we are in the process of 830 00:41:12,793 --> 00:41:14,762 finalizing the draft, it'll be 831 00:41:14,762 --> 00:41:15,795 in a form that is, well, it'll, 832 00:41:15,795 --> 00:41:17,632 it'll look like a, like a 833 00:41:17,632 --> 00:41:18,698 strike through of the current 834 00:41:18,698 --> 00:41:19,833 ldc, because that's how we 835 00:41:19,833 --> 00:41:20,834 write the the proposed 836 00:41:20,834 --> 00:41:22,350 amendments when we do it, you 837 00:41:22,350 --> 00:41:23,803 know, basically it's saying, 838 00:41:23,803 --> 00:41:25,640 okay, this is going to be added, 839 00:41:25,640 --> 00:41:27,741 this is going to be subtracted. 840 00:41:27,741 --> 00:41:28,809 And so, you know, we we will be 841 00:41:28,809 --> 00:41:30,744 releasing that document again, 842 00:41:30,744 --> 00:41:32,246 hopefully next week. And, and 843 00:41:32,246 --> 00:41:34,115 then once, once we do release 844 00:41:34,115 --> 00:41:35,215 that, there will be a 30 day 845 00:41:35,215 --> 00:41:36,916 public comment period in which 846 00:41:36,916 --> 00:41:38,218 we take feedback on that. And 847 00:41:38,218 --> 00:41:39,287 then we take that, take the 848 00:41:39,287 --> 00:41:40,320 public feedback into 849 00:41:40,320 --> 00:41:41,822 consideration before we 850 00:41:41,822 --> 00:41:42,857 consider moving it for a public 851 00:41:42,857 --> 00:41:45,257 hearing before the Planning 852 00:41:47,194 --> 00:41:49,996 Commission. Thank you. A quick 853 00:41:49,996 --> 00:41:51,331 follow up. It 854 00:41:51,331 --> 00:41:52,967 coincidence that we're hearing 855 00:41:52,967 --> 00:41:53,967 this moratorium ordinance, and 856 00:41:53,967 --> 00:41:56,103 those are coming next week, 857 00:41:56,103 --> 00:41:57,170 right. Did this force your hand 858 00:41:57,170 --> 00:41:58,805 again? We've we've been working 859 00:41:58,805 --> 00:42:00,707 on this, you know, as you all 860 00:42:00,707 --> 00:42:01,942 know, for a while. And so, I 861 00:42:01,942 --> 00:42:03,510 mean, you know, we just for 862 00:42:03,510 --> 00:42:04,844 various reasons and obviously, 863 00:42:04,844 --> 00:42:06,579 I, I would not, you know, the 864 00:42:06,579 --> 00:42:08,415 moratorium probably did help to 865 00:42:08,415 --> 00:42:10,250 accelerate things. But, you 866 00:42:10,250 --> 00:42:11,685 know, I think in terms of 867 00:42:11,685 --> 00:42:13,860 having a product where, you 868 00:42:13,860 --> 00:42:14,655 know, we're addressing some of 869 00:42:14,655 --> 00:42:15,957 the concerns that were that 870 00:42:15,957 --> 00:42:16,791 were brought to us by the 871 00:42:16,791 --> 00:42:18,910 community whenever we were 872 00:42:18,910 --> 00:42:19,961 doing our round of public 873 00:42:19,961 --> 00:42:21,295 engagement and, and getting the 874 00:42:21,295 --> 00:42:22,496 feedback and getting all the 875 00:42:22,496 --> 00:42:23,464 information that we've been 876 00:42:23,464 --> 00:42:25,198 gathering. Now, it's taken a 877 00:42:25,198 --> 00:42:27,500 while to put this together. 878 00:42:27,500 --> 00:42:30,337 It's not been an easy thing. 879 00:42:30,337 --> 00:42:31,138 Okay. Thank you. Just one 880 00:42:31,138 --> 00:42:33,206 question for Brian before we 881 00:42:33,206 --> 00:42:35,900 get to COUNCILMAN Chappell. 882 00:42:35,900 --> 00:42:36,209 Many of our constituents, many 883 00:42:36,209 --> 00:42:38,278 of my constituents, are asking 884 00:42:38,278 --> 00:42:40,413 the question, how did they get 885 00:42:40,413 --> 00:42:42,582 this last one in under the wire? 886 00:42:42,582 --> 00:42:43,684 What happened? So there's a 887 00:42:43,684 --> 00:42:45,786 classification in the land 888 00:42:45,786 --> 00:42:47,287 Development code that talks 889 00:42:47,287 --> 00:42:48,389 about data hotels. Would you 890 00:42:48,389 --> 00:42:50,859 explain that a little bit, 891 00:42:50,859 --> 00:42:52,660 please? Sure. So under the the 892 00:42:52,660 --> 00:42:53,828 current regulations there's a 893 00:42:53,828 --> 00:42:55,895 use in there called 894 00:42:55,895 --> 00:42:57,665 telecommunication hotels, which 895 00:42:57,665 --> 00:42:59,432 it's kind of an antiquated term 896 00:42:59,432 --> 00:43:01,402 now given, you know, where 897 00:43:01,402 --> 00:43:02,602 we're at, but it is a type of 898 00:43:02,602 --> 00:43:04,639 data center. And so based on 899 00:43:04,639 --> 00:43:05,972 the information that that, that 900 00:43:05,972 --> 00:43:07,642 we have that's available out 901 00:43:07,642 --> 00:43:09,610 there, then the interpretation 902 00:43:09,610 --> 00:43:11,110 was made that data centers fall 903 00:43:11,110 --> 00:43:12,813 under that particular type of 904 00:43:12,813 --> 00:43:14,982 use under that category, you 905 00:43:14,982 --> 00:43:17,485 know, similar to that. And so 906 00:43:17,485 --> 00:43:19,719 that that is why the project 907 00:43:19,719 --> 00:43:21,455 that was previously, you know, 908 00:43:21,455 --> 00:43:23,157 proposed on Campground Road, it 909 00:43:23,157 --> 00:43:24,358 was allowed to progress through 910 00:43:24,358 --> 00:43:26,494 the system underneath that, 911 00:43:26,494 --> 00:43:27,895 that interpretation, how many 912 00:43:27,895 --> 00:43:29,596 if you had to guess how many 913 00:43:29,596 --> 00:43:30,798 small data centers do we have 914 00:43:30,798 --> 00:43:32,566 in the city? Depending on what 915 00:43:32,566 --> 00:43:34,468 you read, they say there's as 916 00:43:34,468 --> 00:43:36,269 many as three dozen or so of 917 00:43:36,269 --> 00:43:37,638 the smaller data centers. And I 918 00:43:37,638 --> 00:43:38,772 ink, you know, that they they 919 00:43:38,772 --> 00:43:40,541 operate in all different type 920 00:43:40,541 --> 00:43:41,942 of parts of the community. They 921 00:43:41,942 --> 00:43:43,377 look like normal office 922 00:43:43,377 --> 00:43:44,211 buildings or normal warehouse 923 00:43:44,211 --> 00:43:45,345 buildings. You don't really 924 00:43:45,345 --> 00:43:48,820 know what they are out there 925 00:43:48,820 --> 00:43:49,950 right now. The big change in, 926 00:43:49,950 --> 00:43:52,190 in, in the use has been just 927 00:43:52,190 --> 00:43:53,453 the, the expansion of this into 928 00:43:53,453 --> 00:43:54,555 these hyper hyperscale data 929 00:43:54,555 --> 00:43:55,622 centers that you're seeing 930 00:43:55,622 --> 00:43:57,900 developed in other communities 931 00:43:57,900 --> 00:43:58,559 right now. And so that's, 932 00:43:58,559 --> 00:43:59,660 that's what is really got the 933 00:43:59,660 --> 00:44:01,127 attention of people is that, 934 00:44:01,127 --> 00:44:02,960 you know, these larger 935 00:44:02,960 --> 00:44:03,931 facilities that are taking up 936 00:44:03,931 --> 00:44:06,670 massive pieces of land that you, 937 00:44:06,670 --> 00:44:07,535 that, you know, MAY use a lot 938 00:44:07,535 --> 00:44:08,802 of power and water and things 939 00:44:08,802 --> 00:44:10,438 like that for their operations. 940 00:44:10,438 --> 00:44:13,600 So that that's what got people 941 00:44:13,600 --> 00:44:14,241 has gotten people's attention. 942 00:44:14,241 --> 00:44:16,176 And so, you know, that that is 943 00:44:16,176 --> 00:44:18,110 kind of like the, you know, why 944 00:44:18,110 --> 00:44:19,880 you all created a request for 945 00:44:19,880 --> 00:44:21,549 us to research this and kind of 946 00:44:21,549 --> 00:44:23,417 re-explore that so that we can 947 00:44:23,417 --> 00:44:24,418 kind of move away from that 948 00:44:24,418 --> 00:44:26,254 interpretation that we had 949 00:44:26,254 --> 00:44:28,322 before and, and better classify 950 00:44:28,322 --> 00:44:29,689 this new use that's out there. 951 00:44:29,689 --> 00:44:32,890 Okay. Thank you, COUNCILMAN 952 00:44:35,563 --> 00:44:37,664 Chappell. I want to make clear 953 00:44:37,664 --> 00:44:38,699 that I don't have any ill will 954 00:44:38,699 --> 00:44:40,000 towards our planning department. 955 00:44:40,000 --> 00:44:42,403 And I think that you all have 956 00:44:42,403 --> 00:44:43,971 done a lot of work thus far. 957 00:44:43,971 --> 00:44:47,174 And I just feel like your hands 958 00:44:47,174 --> 00:44:48,909 have been tied behind your back. 959 00:44:48,909 --> 00:44:51,479 You didn't tie your own hands, 960 00:44:51,479 --> 00:44:53,581 right. But, you know, there 961 00:44:53,581 --> 00:44:56,150 were public meetings that were 962 00:44:56,150 --> 00:44:57,919 held and you all got 963 00:44:57,919 --> 00:44:59,520 information. And I'm looking 964 00:44:59,520 --> 00:45:02,223 forward to what you all put out. 965 00:45:02,223 --> 00:45:04,792 I think it will be thoughtful, 966 00:45:04,792 --> 00:45:07,995 but it leads me to my question. 967 00:45:07,995 --> 00:45:10,498 This five page document that 968 00:45:10,498 --> 00:45:13,498 was published and then taken 969 00:45:14,835 --> 00:45:16,671 down. Who wrote it? Where did 970 00:45:16,671 --> 00:45:19,671 the mistake happen? Was this, 971 00:45:19,874 --> 00:45:22,376 you know, another cities and we 972 00:45:22,376 --> 00:45:23,843 drafted our own, but it went to 973 00:45:23,843 --> 00:45:25,412 an intern and they accidentally 974 00:45:25,412 --> 00:45:26,713 published it on our website. Or 975 00:45:26,713 --> 00:45:28,849 like, how did this happen? No, 976 00:45:28,849 --> 00:45:30,718 we created that's kind of like 977 00:45:30,718 --> 00:45:31,986 a first draft, a first run at 978 00:45:31,986 --> 00:45:33,854 what, you know, we some of the 979 00:45:33,854 --> 00:45:34,989 things that we were working on 980 00:45:34,989 --> 00:45:36,570 based on the comments that we 981 00:45:36,570 --> 00:45:37,858 had received and we were 982 00:45:37,858 --> 00:45:38,927 planning on having a working 983 00:45:38,927 --> 00:45:39,994 meeting with our, with the 984 00:45:39,994 --> 00:45:41,963 planning committee to kind of 985 00:45:41,963 --> 00:45:43,970 go through that and get some of 986 00:45:43,970 --> 00:45:44,999 their feedback so that we could 987 00:45:44,999 --> 00:45:46,200 then go back, you know, the the 988 00:45:46,200 --> 00:45:47,969 agenda was published. Then we 989 00:45:47,969 --> 00:45:49,700 got word that we weren't going 990 00:45:49,700 --> 00:45:50,838 to be having the meeting 991 00:45:50,838 --> 00:45:52,400 anymore. So we took the agenda 992 00:45:52,400 --> 00:45:53,908 down. So because we lost, we, 993 00:45:53,908 --> 00:45:55,142 we, we weren't going to have a 994 00:45:55,142 --> 00:45:56,243 quorum at the meeting whenever 995 00:45:56,243 --> 00:45:57,945 we were conducting that. When 996 00:45:57,945 --> 00:45:59,112 was your next meeting? I don't 997 00:45:59,112 --> 00:46:00,848 know when their next meeting 998 00:46:00,848 --> 00:46:02,490 was. I mean, we, you know, 999 00:46:02,490 --> 00:46:03,851 after after it was taken down, 1000 00:46:03,851 --> 00:46:05,520 then, you know, then, you know, 1001 00:46:05,520 --> 00:46:06,120 we had spoke with COUNCILMAN 1002 00:46:06,120 --> 00:46:07,989 Winkler and he's like, you know, 1003 00:46:07,989 --> 00:46:09,910 if you all need additional time 1004 00:46:09,910 --> 00:46:11,250 to research this, feel free to 1005 00:46:11,250 --> 00:46:12,893 do that. And so we just, we, 1006 00:46:12,893 --> 00:46:14,128 you know, we never got to a 1007 00:46:14,128 --> 00:46:15,229 point where we wanted to have 1008 00:46:15,229 --> 00:46:16,864 another working meeting with 1009 00:46:16,864 --> 00:46:18,165 the planning committee to talk 1010 00:46:18,165 --> 00:46:19,967 about this. Is Marcus your boss? 1011 00:46:19,967 --> 00:46:21,802 No, but he was the sponsor. 1012 00:46:21,802 --> 00:46:23,572 Anytime, anytime. There's a 1013 00:46:23,572 --> 00:46:25,339 sponsor for some legislation 1014 00:46:25,339 --> 00:46:26,541 that is proposed to us. And we 1015 00:46:26,541 --> 00:46:28,342 we will reach out to them and 1016 00:46:28,342 --> 00:46:29,543 give them updates on what's 1017 00:46:29,543 --> 00:46:31,512 going on with that. And so we, 1018 00:46:31,512 --> 00:46:33,414 you know, he, he knew that that 1019 00:46:33,414 --> 00:46:34,515 we had been doing a lot of 1020 00:46:34,515 --> 00:46:36,484 research and that, you know, 1021 00:46:36,484 --> 00:46:38,352 there was still a lot of things 1022 00:46:38,352 --> 00:46:39,553 coming in. And so we, we had 1023 00:46:39,553 --> 00:46:41,389 reached out to him just to see 1024 00:46:41,389 --> 00:46:42,657 what he, you know, what his 1025 00:46:42,657 --> 00:46:46,257 opinion was on the matter. Sure, 1026 00:46:47,395 --> 00:46:48,629 sure. Yeah. And I just want to 1027 00:46:48,629 --> 00:46:50,265 say, I understand that there 1028 00:46:50,265 --> 00:46:51,799 were things that were hpening 1029 00:46:51,799 --> 00:46:53,834 at the state level regarding 1030 00:46:53,834 --> 00:46:56,834 data centers, and that would 1031 00:47:00,274 --> 00:47:02,176 naturally. Naturally give you 1032 00:47:02,176 --> 00:47:04,645 pause. But I also want to say 1033 00:47:04,645 --> 00:47:07,645 to my colleagues that wouldn't 1034 00:47:07,647 --> 00:47:09,751 have had an impact on whether 1035 00:47:09,751 --> 00:47:11,152 or not we passed a moratorium. 1036 00:47:11,152 --> 00:47:12,553 So if anything, I'd like to 1037 00:47:12,553 --> 00:47:16,153 apologize to the public that we 1038 00:47:18,726 --> 00:47:20,494 have not addressed this sooner. 1039 00:47:20,494 --> 00:47:22,894 COUNCILMAN Hudson, thank you. 1040 00:47:23,765 --> 00:47:26,367 Chair, gen t testimony from 1041 00:47:26,367 --> 00:47:29,967 staff, I'd like to me to 1042 00:47:30,204 --> 00:47:32,604 table, please. Tre is 1043 00:47:33,874 --> 00:47:35,375 motion o the floor. I sry 1044 00:47:35,375 --> 00:47:37,110 Oh, son'm sry Tre 1045 00:47:37,110 --> 00:47:38,879 mionn e floor table. 1046 00:47:38,879 --> 00:47:40,880 This is aoice vote. Correct. 1047 00:47:40,880 --> 00:47:42,883 All those in favor say I can, I 1048 00:47:42,883 --> 00:47:47,683 can we can. I would like a roll 1049 00:47:50,191 --> 00:47:53,191 call. Vote please. Skirt. Vice 1050 00:47:55,130 --> 00:47:56,163 chair chair chair. Yeah. 1051 00:47:56,163 --> 00:47:58,563 COUNCILMAN Hudson, could could 1052 00:47:58,666 --> 00:48:00,468 I before before you make that 1053 00:48:00,468 --> 00:48:01,869 proposal, can we can I ask a 1054 00:48:01,869 --> 00:48:04,710 question, a follow up question 1055 00:48:04,710 --> 00:48:07,309 of Brian Davis. I think it's an 1056 00:48:07,309 --> 00:48:09,111 important clarification before 1057 00:48:09,111 --> 00:48:10,110 we make any motion going 1058 00:48:10,110 --> 00:48:11,512 forward. Is that something 1059 00:48:11,512 --> 00:48:12,713 you're willing to allow me to 1060 00:48:12,713 --> 00:48:14,815 do? I think the motion has 1061 00:48:14,815 --> 00:48:17,815 already been made and seconded. 1062 00:48:19,854 --> 00:48:23,225 I'll have to defer to the clerk. 1063 00:48:23,225 --> 00:48:24,559 How will withdraw my motion. 1064 00:48:24,559 --> 00:48:25,960 Thank you, chair, Vice Chair 1065 00:48:25,960 --> 00:48:27,795 Reed, can I ask Brian a 1066 00:48:27,795 --> 00:48:29,795 question here? Absolutely. 1067 00:48:31,700 --> 00:48:34,302 Thank you. Brian. So I think 1068 00:48:34,302 --> 00:48:37,902 one of the I think it's 1069 00:48:38,607 --> 00:48:41,207 important to to understand. So 1070 00:48:41,207 --> 00:48:42,945 what would the process be if 1071 00:48:42,945 --> 00:48:44,779 somebody wanted to, to reach 1072 00:48:44,779 --> 00:48:48,316 out to the to metro government 1073 00:48:48,316 --> 00:48:50,652 right now and say, we want to 1074 00:48:50,652 --> 00:48:53,652 create a hyperscale data center 1075 00:48:54,220 --> 00:48:56,958 or a data center of significant 1076 00:48:56,958 --> 00:48:58,860 size, what are. And we're still 1077 00:48:58,860 --> 00:49:00,963 kind of, you know, in this kind 1078 00:49:00,963 --> 00:49:05,163 of cat and mouse game of, of, 1079 00:49:05,566 --> 00:49:07,935 do we need to pass a moratorium 1080 00:49:07,935 --> 00:49:09,504 proactively or can we 1081 00:49:09,504 --> 00:49:10,973 effectively do an 1082 00:49:10,973 --> 00:49:12,973 administrative moratorium to 1083 00:49:13,107 --> 00:49:15,420 make sure that we do not have 1084 00:49:15,420 --> 00:49:17,111 any more of these, you know, 1085 00:49:17,111 --> 00:49:19,470 come down the pipeline before 1086 00:49:19,470 --> 00:49:20,147 we're ready for it? Can we talk 1087 00:49:20,147 --> 00:49:22,883 about that a little bit? 1088 00:49:22,883 --> 00:49:25,753 Because, I mean, my, my, my 1089 00:49:25,753 --> 00:49:26,855 preference right now, we have 1090 00:49:26,855 --> 00:49:28,223 effectively done an 1091 00:49:28,223 --> 00:49:30,910 administrative moratorium. We 1092 00:49:30,910 --> 00:49:31,493 do not have any more of these 1093 00:49:31,493 --> 00:49:34,610 proposed in front of us. And so 1094 00:49:34,610 --> 00:49:36,461 since JANUARY, we have 1095 00:49:36,632 --> 00:49:38,320 effectively enacted an 1096 00:49:38,320 --> 00:49:40,320 effective administrative 1097 00:49:41,569 --> 00:49:42,838 moratorium. So can you talk to 1098 00:49:42,838 --> 00:49:44,572 us a little bit about what that 1099 00:49:44,572 --> 00:49:45,906 process looks like and whether 1100 00:49:45,906 --> 00:49:47,575 we run the risk of allowing 1101 00:49:47,575 --> 00:49:51,130 another one of these to go 1102 00:49:51,130 --> 00:49:53,413 through the pipeline without 1103 00:49:55,316 --> 00:49:57,418 being more proactive about it? 1104 00:49:57,418 --> 00:49:58,786 Yes. I I'm reading the language 1105 00:49:58,786 --> 00:50:01,857 of the moratorium right now to 1106 00:50:01,857 --> 00:50:05,920 see how it's worded. Yeah. So, 1107 00:50:05,920 --> 00:50:06,193 so as well as wording the 1108 00:50:06,193 --> 00:50:07,528 moratorium, you know, if that 1109 00:50:07,528 --> 00:50:09,363 were passed, any applications 1110 00:50:09,363 --> 00:50:10,364 would be would be frozen as is 1111 00:50:10,364 --> 00:50:12,935 unless they have a public 1112 00:50:12,935 --> 00:50:13,936 hearing scheduled, you know, 1113 00:50:13,936 --> 00:50:15,700 administratively. I mean, I 1114 00:50:15,700 --> 00:50:16,104 think you're correct. I mean, I 1115 00:50:16,104 --> 00:50:17,940 think there's a lot of 1116 00:50:17,940 --> 00:50:19,600 hesitation for anyone to come 1117 00:50:19,600 --> 00:50:20,275 and submit an application for 1118 00:50:20,275 --> 00:50:22,310 any kind of changes related to 1119 00:50:22,310 --> 00:50:23,411 that. Middletown did pass a 1120 00:50:23,411 --> 00:50:24,613 moratorium. So if someone were 1121 00:50:24,613 --> 00:50:26,414 to come in and ask something 1122 00:50:26,414 --> 00:50:27,682 about a property there, I mean, 1123 00:50:27,682 --> 00:50:28,616 we we would obviously say, well, 1124 00:50:28,616 --> 00:50:29,550 Middletown's past moratorium, 1125 00:50:29,550 --> 00:50:31,950 we're not accepting the 1126 00:50:39,962 --> 00:50:41,395 application. I mean. This 1127 00:50:41,395 --> 00:50:43,230 moratorium sitting in committee, 1128 00:50:43,230 --> 00:50:45,399 we table it and it's sitting in 1129 00:50:45,399 --> 00:50:47,668 committee. Could we then pass 1130 00:50:47,668 --> 00:50:49,337 the moratorium like we had 1131 00:50:49,337 --> 00:50:50,705 talked about previously, when 1132 00:50:50,705 --> 00:50:52,574 COUNCILMAN Winkler had had 1133 00:50:52,574 --> 00:50:53,641 brought this to our committee 1134 00:50:53,641 --> 00:50:55,743 previously. And that's what our 1135 00:50:55,743 --> 00:50:57,279 plan was to let it sit in 1136 00:50:57,279 --> 00:50:59,800 committee. And if somebody 1137 00:50:59,800 --> 00:51:01,182 actually filed an application, 1138 00:51:01,182 --> 00:51:02,617 we thought that we could then 1139 00:51:02,617 --> 00:51:03,684 at the next committee meeting, 1140 00:51:03,684 --> 00:51:05,553 planning and zoning committee 1141 00:51:05,553 --> 00:51:07,722 meeting, we could then pass the 1142 00:51:07,722 --> 00:51:08,723 moratorium to to halt any 1143 00:51:08,723 --> 00:51:10,224 future development going 1144 00:51:10,224 --> 00:51:12,294 forward. Would that be an 1145 00:51:12,294 --> 00:51:13,761 effective approach here, or are 1146 00:51:13,761 --> 00:51:15,464 we running the risk that that 1147 00:51:15,464 --> 00:51:17,332 somebody would get in under the 1148 00:51:17,332 --> 00:51:18,667 wire? I mean, I think someone 1149 00:51:18,667 --> 00:51:19,934 could they could if they were 1150 00:51:19,934 --> 00:51:22,104 to submit an application, there 1151 00:51:22,104 --> 00:51:25,274 is no way that that we would 1152 00:51:25,274 --> 00:51:26,374 schedule a public hearing 1153 00:51:26,374 --> 00:51:28,476 planning and zoning committee 1154 00:51:28,476 --> 00:51:30,746 here. So I think if you know, 1155 00:51:30,746 --> 00:51:32,480 if if you know, if we this item 1156 00:51:32,480 --> 00:51:33,881 were tabled today and then 1157 00:51:33,881 --> 00:51:34,883 someone submitted a pre app 1158 00:51:34,883 --> 00:51:36,151 tomorrow, they're, they're not 1159 00:51:36,151 --> 00:51:37,885 going to have an opportunity to 1160 00:51:37,885 --> 00:51:39,388 get to a public hearing prior 1161 00:51:39,388 --> 00:51:40,988 to you all being able to take 1162 00:51:40,988 --> 00:51:42,891 action in two weeks on this 1163 00:51:42,891 --> 00:51:44,760 item. So I, I don't think we 1164 00:51:44,760 --> 00:51:46,127 run the risk of, of, you know, 1165 00:51:46,127 --> 00:51:47,929 something coming in and getting 1166 00:51:47,929 --> 00:51:49,731 in under the wire in terms of, 1167 00:51:49,731 --> 00:51:52,668 of scheduling a public hearing, 1168 00:51:52,668 --> 00:51:53,734 as is worded in the proposed 1169 00:51:53,734 --> 00:51:55,203 moratorium. Okay. I think 1170 00:51:55,203 --> 00:51:57,306 that's important because, I 1171 00:51:57,306 --> 00:51:59,941 mean, I do not want another 1172 00:51:59,941 --> 00:52:02,343 data center to move quicker 1173 00:52:02,343 --> 00:52:04,378 than we're able to respond. And 1174 00:52:04,378 --> 00:52:06,315 I I'm not stupid. I understand 1175 00:52:06,315 --> 00:52:08,449 that politically, the right 1176 00:52:08,449 --> 00:52:10,251 thing to do here is to be 1177 00:52:10,251 --> 00:52:11,786 proactive and pass a moratorium. 1178 00:52:11,786 --> 00:52:12,420 But just because it's 1179 00:52:12,420 --> 00:52:15,389 politically the right thing to 1180 00:52:15,389 --> 00:52:16,825 do doesn't mean to me that 1181 00:52:16,825 --> 00:52:17,925 we've been effective at 1182 00:52:17,925 --> 00:52:19,427 administratively stopping these. 1183 00:52:19,427 --> 00:52:20,761 And I think we can be 1184 00:52:20,761 --> 00:52:22,163 continuously continue to be 1185 00:52:22,163 --> 00:52:23,264 effectively effective at 1186 00:52:23,264 --> 00:52:25,264 administrating, iteratively 1187 00:52:25,801 --> 00:52:28,200 stopping this. And while it MAY 1188 00:52:28,200 --> 00:52:30,504 not mean anything to some 1189 00:52:30,504 --> 00:52:33,700 people, to me, a moratorium 1190 00:52:33,700 --> 00:52:34,875 should be the absolute last 1191 00:52:34,875 --> 00:52:36,178 resort. And we have another 1192 00:52:36,178 --> 00:52:38,313 option here, and that is to 1193 00:52:38,313 --> 00:52:40,882 basically sit, have this sit in 1194 00:52:40,882 --> 00:52:42,950 in committee and use it if we 1195 00:52:42,950 --> 00:52:44,485 need it. And to me, that's 1196 00:52:44,485 --> 00:52:46,254 another option that we can use 1197 00:52:46,254 --> 00:52:48,156 and a better option than 1198 00:52:48,156 --> 00:52:50,591 actually the last resort, which 1199 00:52:50,591 --> 00:52:53,562 is what is proposed here. So i 1200 00:52:53,562 --> 00:52:55,300 will not because I want another 1201 00:52:55,300 --> 00:52:58,300 data center to move quicker 1202 00:52:58,232 --> 00:52:59,967 than we're able to. I am 100% 1203 00:52:59,967 --> 00:53:02,170 confident that using this 1204 00:53:02,170 --> 00:53:04,500 strategy, we will able to keep 1205 00:53:04,500 --> 00:53:06,875 any data centers from moving 1206 00:53:06,875 --> 00:53:08,976 forward. I will be supporting 1207 00:53:08,976 --> 00:53:10,911 tabling this so we can leave it 1208 00:53:10,911 --> 00:53:12,613 in our back pockets and use it 1209 00:53:12,613 --> 00:53:15,449 when we need it, because I 1210 00:53:15,449 --> 00:53:16,918 again, I believe a moratorium. 1211 00:53:16,918 --> 00:53:18,918 Governments passing moratoriums 1212 00:53:19,421 --> 00:53:22,257 should be used as a absolute 1213 00:53:22,257 --> 00:53:24,726 last resort. Thank you, thank 1214 00:53:24,726 --> 00:53:26,261 you, thank you. CHAIRMAN. I 1215 00:53:26,261 --> 00:53:30,461 think I'd like to get a legal 1216 00:53:30,498 --> 00:53:32,498 interpretation here. Legally. 1217 00:53:33,467 --> 00:53:35,136 Can we stop something if 1218 00:53:35,136 --> 00:53:37,372 somewhere someone were to, you 1219 00:53:37,372 --> 00:53:39,241 know, apply make an application 1220 00:53:39,241 --> 00:53:42,841 for data center and we've got 1221 00:53:43,578 --> 00:53:46,347 this moratorium tabled. Can we 1222 00:53:46,347 --> 00:53:47,815 as a as a body then take a vote 1223 00:53:47,815 --> 00:53:48,884 at the next or an upcoming 1224 00:53:48,884 --> 00:53:51,218 planning and zoning committee 1225 00:53:51,218 --> 00:53:53,221 meeting and effectively impose 1226 00:53:53,221 --> 00:53:55,690 the moratorium in time to stop 1227 00:53:55,690 --> 00:53:57,559 it? Travis Feaster, assistant 1228 00:53:57,559 --> 00:53:59,327 county attorney here. So very 1229 00:53:59,327 --> 00:54:00,395 broadly, this is sort of a 1230 00:54:00,395 --> 00:54:01,930 vested rights conversation. 1231 00:54:01,930 --> 00:54:03,432 It's part of the reason why we 1232 00:54:03,432 --> 00:54:05,567 draft the moratorium to deal 1233 00:54:05,567 --> 00:54:06,702 with items that have been 1234 00:54:06,702 --> 00:54:08,103 scheduled for a public hearing 1235 00:54:08,103 --> 00:54:09,136 ady. Can can move forward 1236 00:54:09,136 --> 00:54:10,671 somewhere along the process. 1237 00:54:10,671 --> 00:54:11,672 You do have a sort of right, 1238 00:54:11,672 --> 00:54:12,874 your application being heard 1239 00:54:12,874 --> 00:54:14,543 and going through the process. 1240 00:54:14,543 --> 00:54:15,643 And the question is sort of 1241 00:54:15,643 --> 00:54:18,120 where that occurs. There's not 1242 00:54:18,120 --> 00:54:19,147 a hard and fast case or statute 1243 00:54:19,147 --> 00:54:21,116 in Kentucky to determine where 1244 00:54:21,116 --> 00:54:22,840 that is. But based on the case 1245 00:54:22,840 --> 00:54:23,151 law, we think it's 1246 00:54:23,151 --> 00:54:24,353 approximately at that sort of 1247 00:54:24,353 --> 00:54:26,870 public hearing phase where all 1248 00:54:26,870 --> 00:54:27,189 the agencies have commented, 1249 00:54:27,189 --> 00:54:28,223 they've gotten all the proper 1250 00:54:28,223 --> 00:54:29,291 stamps and approvals. The only 1251 00:54:29,291 --> 00:54:31,126 thing left is for Metro 1252 00:54:31,126 --> 00:54:32,361 government to hear it. And if 1253 00:54:32,361 --> 00:54:33,294 at that point, Metro government 1254 00:54:33,294 --> 00:54:35,300 says, actually, no, we're not 1255 00:54:35,300 --> 00:54:36,265 going to, that's potentially an 1256 00:54:36,265 --> 00:54:37,866 issue. So if it is earlier in 1257 00:54:37,866 --> 00:54:38,667 that process, you know, 1258 00:54:38,667 --> 00:54:39,634 pre-application or an 1259 00:54:39,634 --> 00:54:41,102 application, but still an 1260 00:54:41,102 --> 00:54:42,637 agency reviews those sorts of 1261 00:54:42,637 --> 00:54:43,372 things, that's where we felt 1262 00:54:43,372 --> 00:54:45,274 comfortable. Again, we don't 1263 00:54:45,274 --> 00:54:46,641 have a hard and fast case to 1264 00:54:46,641 --> 00:54:48,410 point to, but it sounds like if 1265 00:54:48,410 --> 00:54:49,711 we could catch a case in that 1266 00:54:49,711 --> 00:54:51,346 process, that'd be acceptable. 1267 00:54:51,346 --> 00:54:52,680 On the other hand, if case got 1268 00:54:52,680 --> 00:54:53,715 scheduled before council took 1269 00:54:53,715 --> 00:54:55,550 action, then we would start 1270 00:54:55,550 --> 00:54:56,784 having some tough conversations. 1271 00:54:56,784 --> 00:54:57,819 Okay. Thank you, COUNCILMAN 1272 00:54:57,819 --> 00:54:59,421 Parrish. Right. Thank you. MR. 1273 00:54:59,421 --> 00:55:00,889 MR. Chair, point of order, 1274 00:55:00,889 --> 00:55:02,889 COUNCILMAN Hudson. COUNCILMAN 1275 00:55:06,695 --> 00:55:08,664 Hudson, sorry about that. So I 1276 00:55:08,664 --> 00:55:09,865 guess I need to ask the clerk 1277 00:55:09,865 --> 00:55:12,265 for clarification here. I 1278 00:55:30,786 --> 00:55:32,153 withdrew my motion for. O q. 1279 00:55:32,153 --> 00:55:33,589 I'm going to allow COUNCILMAN 1280 00:55:33,589 --> 00:55:36,525 Hudson to make his motion to 1281 00:55:36,525 --> 00:55:39,525 table. Move to table, please. 1282 00:55:39,728 --> 00:55:41,530 Second, I have a motion and to 1283 00:55:41,530 --> 00:55:42,831 in a second, I think the 1284 00:55:42,831 --> 00:55:44,660 request was for voice, voice, 1285 00:55:44,660 --> 00:55:47,660 vote. I'm sorry. Roll call. 1286 00:55:59,448 --> 00:56:01,848 Vote. Chair. Owen. Yes. 1287 00:56:01,950 --> 00:56:03,118 Voting's closing. Vice-Chair 1288 00:56:03,118 --> 00:56:06,320 read. You have five yes votes 1289 00:56:06,320 --> 00:56:10,520 and three no. Thank you. It has 1290 00:56:10,592 --> 00:56:12,394 been tabled and. So we'll move 1291 00:56:12,394 --> 00:56:16,594 on to the next item, which is 1292 00:56:17,650 --> 00:56:18,100 item number 40-138-26. An 1293 00:56:18,100 --> 00:56:19,301 ordinance relating to the 1294 00:56:19,301 --> 00:56:21,301 detailed district development 1295 00:56:21,804 --> 00:56:24,804 plan for properties located at 1296 00:56:25,400 --> 00:56:26,208 9718 Dixie highway and 5308 1297 00:56:26,208 --> 00:56:27,576 Citation Road containing 1298 00:56:27,576 --> 00:56:29,110 approximately 2.7 acres and 1299 00:56:29,110 --> 00:56:32,110 being in Louisville Metro. Case 1300 00:56:32,481 --> 00:56:36,810 number 25ddp0085. Do I have a 1301 00:56:37,186 --> 00:56:39,586 motion? Motion. Motion seconded. 1302 00:56:39,922 --> 00:56:42,322 Julia. Julia Williams, Office 1303 00:56:44,600 --> 00:56:47,600 of Planning. This is 25ddp0085 1304 00:56:47,697 --> 00:56:49,932 for chick fil a. This is 1305 00:56:49,932 --> 00:56:52,332 located at 9718 Dixie highway 1306 00:56:56,271 --> 00:56:58,307 in Council District 14. The 1307 00:56:58,307 --> 00:56:59,942 existing use is institutional 1308 00:56:59,942 --> 00:57:02,942 with a proposed use of 1309 00:57:03,846 --> 00:57:06,246 commercial. The property is 1310 00:57:08,750 --> 00:57:09,851 zoned c two. The request for 1311 00:57:09,851 --> 00:57:11,286 revised detailed district 1312 00:57:11,286 --> 00:57:13,686 development plan with binding 1313 00:57:14,957 --> 00:57:16,526 elements. The property is zoned 1314 00:57:16,526 --> 00:57:17,492 c two and the neighborhood 1315 00:57:17,492 --> 00:57:18,894 forum district. They're 1316 00:57:18,894 --> 00:57:20,629 proposing a restaurant, and 1317 00:57:20,629 --> 00:57:22,665 they're also proposing Fiesta 1318 00:57:22,665 --> 00:57:26,134 Way to be extended to connect 1319 00:57:26,134 --> 00:57:27,337 to Citation Road. This is the 1320 00:57:27,337 --> 00:57:29,337 applicant's development plan 1321 00:57:29,338 --> 00:57:31,730 where you can see Fiesta Way 1322 00:57:31,730 --> 00:57:32,809 connecting to citation, and 1323 00:57:32,809 --> 00:57:35,809 then the location of the 1324 00:57:36,440 --> 00:57:37,450 restaurant. So this is the 1325 00:57:37,450 --> 00:57:39,445 subject property view from 1326 00:57:40,415 --> 00:57:41,851 Dixie highway. Adjacent 1327 00:57:41,851 --> 00:57:43,851 property. The residential 1328 00:57:46,555 --> 00:57:47,656 located along Citation Road. 1329 00:57:47,656 --> 00:57:50,560 Residential. View from Fiesta 1330 00:57:51,994 --> 00:57:54,394 Way. Residential. View from 1331 00:57:55,932 --> 00:57:58,332 Bella Vista. Commercial view 1332 00:57:59,935 --> 00:58:01,370 across Dixie highway. So the 1333 00:58:01,370 --> 00:58:03,138 Planning Commission held their 1334 00:58:03,138 --> 00:58:04,306 public hearing on APRIL 2nd, 1335 00:58:04,306 --> 00:58:05,708 2026, where there was a motion 1336 00:58:05,708 --> 00:58:07,142 to recommend approval of the 1337 00:58:07,142 --> 00:58:09,311 development plan, passing by a 1338 00:58:09,311 --> 00:58:12,911 vote of 8 to 0. Are there any 1339 00:58:14,717 --> 00:58:16,717 questions? Councilmember Sean? 1340 00:58:18,320 --> 00:58:19,288 Thank you, COUNCILMAN Read. I 1341 00:58:19,288 --> 00:58:21,890 don't really have any questions. 1342 00:58:21,890 --> 00:58:22,991 I would like to just make a few 1343 00:58:22,991 --> 00:58:24,693 comments, I guess, on behalf of 1344 00:58:24,693 --> 00:58:27,693 district 14 in support of this 1345 00:58:28,731 --> 00:58:29,866 development, the the developer 1346 00:58:29,866 --> 00:58:33,466 or the the restaurant that is 1347 00:58:33,769 --> 00:58:36,305 coming in is a well, well 1348 00:58:36,305 --> 00:58:38,106 established brand that the 1349 00:58:38,106 --> 00:58:40,506 community is has written 1350 00:58:41,377 --> 00:58:43,680 letters of support rather than 1351 00:58:43,680 --> 00:58:45,648 letters of opposition with. I 1352 00:58:45,648 --> 00:58:47,817 think 31 was the number to be 1353 00:58:47,817 --> 00:58:48,850 exact. I look forward to our 1354 00:58:48,850 --> 00:58:50,850 colleagues supporting this 1355 00:58:51,860 --> 00:58:52,454 development on Dixie highway as 1356 00:58:52,454 --> 00:58:53,755 it continues to grow and the 1357 00:58:53,755 --> 00:58:56,755 momentum is moving forward in 1358 00:58:57,426 --> 00:58:59,629 the right direction. Thank you. 1359 00:58:59,629 --> 00:59:03,229 What was the commission vote on 1360 00:59:04,320 --> 00:59:05,334 this 8 to 0. Travis, is this 1361 00:59:05,334 --> 00:59:06,436 another one of those situations 1362 00:59:06,436 --> 00:59:08,337 where this actually come to us 1363 00:59:08,337 --> 00:59:09,439 for a vote since it passed 1364 00:59:09,439 --> 00:59:10,505 unanimously? This is Laura 1365 00:59:10,505 --> 00:59:11,873 Ferguson, assistant county 1366 00:59:11,873 --> 00:59:13,643 attorney. This is a development 1367 00:59:13,643 --> 00:59:15,143 plan that had the council 1368 00:59:15,143 --> 00:59:16,979 review binding element, if I 1369 00:59:16,979 --> 00:59:18,979 remember correctly. Understand? 1370 00:59:23,453 --> 00:59:25,320 Cool. COUNCILWOMAN Marie. Thank 1371 00:59:25,320 --> 00:59:27,123 you. I read comments that came 1372 00:59:27,123 --> 00:59:28,857 in people very much in support 1373 00:59:28,857 --> 00:59:32,461 of the chick fil a, but they 1374 00:59:32,461 --> 00:59:34,896 were concerned about the exit 1375 00:59:34,896 --> 00:59:37,467 removing the dead end on Fiesta 1376 00:59:37,467 --> 00:59:41,667 Way. Is that still part of the 1377 00:59:43,273 --> 00:59:44,406 plan? Yes. There there's a 1378 00:59:44,406 --> 00:59:46,375 connection through Fiesta Way 1379 00:59:46,375 --> 00:59:48,278 to citation, so it won't be a 1380 00:59:48,278 --> 00:59:50,413 dead end anymore. It will go 1381 00:59:50,413 --> 00:59:52,115 through to citation. Do we have 1382 00:59:52,115 --> 00:59:53,181 any idea how much traffic 1383 00:59:53,181 --> 00:59:56,152 that's going to generate on 1384 00:59:56,152 --> 00:59:57,386 that road? I don't believe a 1385 00:59:57,386 --> 01:00:00,386 traffic study was required for 1386 01:00:04,920 --> 01:00:05,695 this development. Oh it was yes. 1387 01:00:05,695 --> 01:00:07,730 Yeah. There was a traffic study, 1388 01:00:07,730 --> 01:00:08,931 but I could see nothing in it 1389 01:00:08,931 --> 01:00:11,931 within the estimates of what's 1390 01:00:22,511 --> 01:00:23,845 going to happen to Fiesta. I 1391 01:00:23,845 --> 01:00:27,445 I'm not able to answer that 1392 01:00:29,651 --> 01:00:32,488 question. Okay. Thank you. Any 1393 01:00:32,488 --> 01:00:34,888 other questions from the 1394 01:00:36,892 --> 01:00:39,292 committee? Seeing none. This 1395 01:00:43,333 --> 01:00:46,333 requires a roll call vote. 1396 01:00:49,772 --> 01:00:51,373 Chair. Owen. Yes. Votes closing. 1397 01:00:51,373 --> 01:00:53,109 Vice chair rehab eight yes. 1398 01:00:53,109 --> 01:00:54,977 Votes. Thank you. And this will 1399 01:00:54,977 --> 01:00:56,678 go to old business at the next 1400 01:00:56,678 --> 01:00:58,347 council meeting. I am not 1401 01:00:58,347 --> 01:00:59,449 seeing anything else on our 1402 01:00:59,449 --> 01:01:00,617 agenda. Does anyone on the 1403 01:01:00,617 --> 01:01:03,617 committee have any questions or 1404 01:01:04,219 --> 01:01:06,355 anything they'd like to discuss? 1405 01:01:06,355 --> 01:01:09,355 Seeing none, we are adjourned. 1406 01:01:23,710 --> 01:01:24,000 Thank you.