1
00:00:02,130 --> 00:00:25,910
Okay. We're on the open record. Fantastic. Okay. Thank you, everyone, for the meeting to order. We don't have anyone here in the public, but we do have two legislative auditors with us today. And so seeing the one wishing to comment, we'll just move right along to the people of the public minutes. Did anybody see anything in the public minutes that may need to change things?

2
00:00:30,470 --> 00:00:35,950
I did want to make a note, Judge Harris did have a couple of changes that were made.

3
00:00:36,770 --> 00:00:39,330
And we sent that back around to everybody.

4
00:00:39,670 --> 00:00:45,910
It was specifically the discussion on the administrative rule changes and commissioners,

5
00:00:46,430 --> 00:00:49,990
which is in the bottom of page paragraph three.

6
00:00:49,990 --> 00:00:58,050
and the explanation of commissioners who left the meeting in paragraph 6.

7
00:00:58,570 --> 00:01:01,570
Steven, is your motion to refer to the most recent work done?

8
00:01:01,790 --> 00:01:01,950
Yes.

9
00:01:02,630 --> 00:01:02,730
Okay.

10
00:01:03,250 --> 00:01:04,210
So I have a motion.

11
00:01:04,350 --> 00:01:04,830
Do I have a second?

12
00:01:06,350 --> 00:01:07,110
I'll second.

13
00:01:07,630 --> 00:01:08,630
All those in favor?

14
00:01:11,900 --> 00:01:12,120
Okay.

15
00:01:15,040 --> 00:01:15,520
Any opposed?

16
00:01:17,830 --> 00:01:18,130
Okay.

17
00:01:21,670 --> 00:01:22,710
Any opposed?

18
00:01:22,710 --> 00:01:34,250
and request continuing to work with the OPC on trying to get clear rules on disciplinary

19
00:01:34,250 --> 00:01:40,550
proceedings on judges who we've taken action on and then subsequently maintain their

20
00:01:40,550 --> 00:01:47,050
log licenses. So that's what that work is with legislative auditors. I would say continue

21
00:01:47,050 --> 00:01:52,290
their work. I think they're almost done. I'll give it a little bit more of an update on

22
00:01:52,290 --> 00:01:59,670
that in the confidential portion of our meeting. I am working with human resources for that privacy

23
00:01:59,670 --> 00:02:06,670
officer position. I've got some resumes in starting to review those and then I'll get with the staff

24
00:02:06,670 --> 00:02:13,950
to do those interviews and see if we can hire them on. I did distribute some AI training but not

25
00:02:13,950 --> 00:02:19,750
the latest ones. I'll send that out to the commissioners. The annual report has been distributed,

26
00:02:19,750 --> 00:02:26,170
which means we give a copy to the legislature, we, by statute, we owe a copy to the legislature.

27
00:02:26,170 --> 00:02:33,110
That's been submitted. It is posted on the website and continuing to collect the policy signatures.

28
00:02:33,990 --> 00:02:42,890
The website has been updated with all of the ACC case dispositions, both dismissals with warnings as well as public actions.

29
00:02:44,130 --> 00:02:52,370
and we keep working on with the commissioners to on board the new packet distribution process.

30
00:02:52,390 --> 00:03:00,510
What I'm talking about is the encrypted emails at this point I've got everybody on board except for just one.

31
00:03:01,090 --> 00:03:04,870
So we'll keep working with them to try and get that taken care of.

32
00:03:04,870 --> 00:03:11,810
Next, the budget, budget's looking good, not spending much, we do have the carryover

33
00:03:11,810 --> 00:03:12,350
balance.

34
00:03:13,330 --> 00:03:20,690
I expect to sat down with the budget officer, we looked forward, I don't expect my legislative

35
00:03:20,690 --> 00:03:33,100
members any asks, budgetary asks this year, even any anticipated changes should be able to

36
00:03:33,100 --> 00:03:41,800
have been taking care of with our carry over amount. So if I have, for example, if I have

37
00:03:41,800 --> 00:03:47,960
to update our database or bring in new staff, frankly, like that, we should be able to take

38
00:03:47,960 --> 00:03:54,460
care of that, at least for this fiscal year. So we'll find other stuff to take up to the

39
00:03:54,460 --> 00:03:59,640
legislature, but at least the budget won't be awesome. Looking at the case status report,

40
00:04:00,360 --> 00:04:04,640
Since this was prepared, we were at 39, we're at 45.

41
00:04:06,640 --> 00:04:11,820
Again, extrapolating out to the future, that's about 22.5 per month.

42
00:04:12,360 --> 00:04:20,300
If I do 22.5 per month, I will definitely go over 221 cases by the end of the year.

43
00:04:20,580 --> 00:04:27,800
So the case trend, the amount of cases that we do annually continues to rise.

44
00:04:27,800 --> 00:04:39,260
I think three years ago, after we went to online, I said I thought it would level out.

45
00:04:39,540 --> 00:04:45,940
I thought we would level out between 160 and 180, and I'm still not seeing a level

46
00:04:45,940 --> 00:04:53,720
going out. So it is what it is. However, at least our, yes, Steve, what do you attribute

47
00:04:53,720 --> 00:05:11,060
this increase to or can you? I don't know that I can. Analytically, I think it's the

48
00:05:13,820 --> 00:05:20,420
It's the difficulty in appealing cases, we're seeing a lot of rulings come away, this

49
00:05:20,420 --> 00:05:20,840
is a risk.

50
00:05:21,000 --> 00:05:21,280
Very good.

51
00:05:21,380 --> 00:05:23,740
Thank you.

52
00:05:23,740 --> 00:05:24,200
Yeah.

53
00:05:24,340 --> 00:05:25,100
Is that possible?

54
00:05:25,520 --> 00:05:25,640
Yeah.

55
00:05:25,820 --> 00:05:26,660
That's a good question.

56
00:05:27,000 --> 00:05:27,300
That's very good.

57
00:05:27,540 --> 00:05:27,980
That's a good question.

58
00:05:28,900 --> 00:05:29,580
Right here.

59
00:05:30,220 --> 00:05:30,380
Yes.

60
00:05:30,800 --> 00:05:30,880
Yeah.

61
00:05:32,260 --> 00:05:39,680
So I think Anna Dolly, it's the, we're the easier route out of the appellate system.

62
00:05:40,460 --> 00:05:45,200
And then again, anecdotally, I would offer, and you all are seeing it in the complaints

63
00:05:45,200 --> 00:05:52,580
that you're reviewing, the complaints are getting better at saying, I'm not complaining

64
00:05:52,580 --> 00:06:03,340
about the judge's decision, but they decided to get your seeing that, and so I think it's

65
00:06:03,340 --> 00:06:03,540
that.

66
00:06:03,840 --> 00:06:06,940
I think it's easier to come to us than it is to go to the appeals.

67
00:06:06,940 --> 00:06:12,520
So, second part of the question, and I think it has been for years since we started the online

68
00:06:12,520 --> 00:06:13,760
complaint process.

69
00:06:15,000 --> 00:06:17,120
Are you seeing a higher percent?

70
00:06:17,480 --> 00:06:23,300
With that method of filing, are we seeing a higher percentage of no merit cases?

71
00:06:24,480 --> 00:06:25,800
So, no, we're not.

72
00:06:26,660 --> 00:06:35,680
So, the two critical data points are, are we seeing more full investigations in public actions?

73
00:06:35,680 --> 00:06:43,700
And when you extrapolate it out, we're staying at about the same level.

74
00:06:45,840 --> 00:06:51,640
You know, last year was a little bit of a high watermark with the judge candle and the judge

75
00:06:51,640 --> 00:06:57,760
Christians in cases, which were criminal cases that we also resolved at all cases.

76
00:06:57,760 --> 00:07:06,640
And then usually at the end of the year, I put a, you know, I put together a ten-year

77
00:07:06,640 --> 00:07:13,660
report for y'all talking about a report and the case load goes up or the complaint levels

78
00:07:13,660 --> 00:07:14,240
go up.

79
00:07:14,580 --> 00:07:25,340
But when you look at it over the years, we balance between zero, zero public and zero private

80
00:07:25,340 --> 00:07:36,530
actions and two published five, right, two to five, or zero. And I'll do it again

81
00:07:36,530 --> 00:07:43,830
that we still haven't found an increase in meritorious cases. When I went to

82
00:07:43,830 --> 00:07:49,290
Chicago and talked to the other executive directors, I asked them, they all

83
00:07:49,290 --> 00:07:57,170
same to note is the same general trends, increased caseloads, and the increase in the

84
00:07:57,170 --> 00:07:59,530
caseload seemed to be related to health appeals.

85
00:08:01,790 --> 00:08:05,950
I'm trying to remember how many we had before we went to this online portal system.

86
00:08:05,950 --> 00:08:11,670
It feels to me like in the 60 range, it was significantly fewer cases.

87
00:08:11,970 --> 00:08:19,770
When we would have 80 cases a year, it was, wow, it was a busy year, I mean, that was the

88
00:08:19,770 --> 00:08:26,230
discussion around the office. I do have, actually, I didn't bring them down. I did look over the 10-year

89
00:08:26,230 --> 00:08:34,490
stats recently and you can absolutely see that when we went to the online, we exponentially

90
00:08:34,490 --> 00:08:35,250
increase.

91
00:08:37,300 --> 00:08:42,080
It's something that was the right call. It just means we're across. But it gives the

92
00:08:42,080 --> 00:08:50,200
public more access. Absolutely gives the public more access. Of course, we're happy to do whatever you

93
00:08:50,200 --> 00:08:57,880
I would say it's still the minority right across the US there are fewer judicial

94
00:08:57,880 --> 00:09:01,460
conduct commissions that do online because

95
00:09:04,050 --> 00:09:06,390
that is that trending or online

96
00:09:06,390 --> 00:09:12,290
complaints though yeah Texas that was online and went back online because they

97
00:09:12,290 --> 00:09:18,170
were being over problems with compliance I would have to ask Cynthia Gray for the

98
00:09:18,170 --> 00:09:28,710
trend analysis of that, I think, like it went, nobody was online before COVID. COVID hit,

99
00:09:29,330 --> 00:09:35,990
a bunch of folks went online, and then it seems to have stayed at about 30 to 35% of

100
00:09:35,990 --> 00:09:39,570
judicial conduct conditions. My remembering right, Alex, from our last

101
00:09:39,570 --> 00:09:44,170
last conference of the 104, Texas was saying that they were overwhelmed, so they actually pulled

102
00:09:44,170 --> 00:09:47,170
to act their online access. They've closed the online access.

103
00:09:49,750 --> 00:09:52,270
But yeah, it's it's is overall

104
00:09:52,270 --> 00:09:58,790
across the nation. I think it's still, if it's gone up, it hasn't broken 40 percent yet.

105
00:10:00,270 --> 00:10:06,330
These are sort of hours. Any other questions for Alex on budget or statistical report?

106
00:10:08,640 --> 00:10:13,260
If not, I will entertain a motion to go into closed session. You should discuss the character

107
00:10:13,260 --> 00:10:17,460
their professional competence or physical or mental health of an individual are investigated

108
00:10:17,460 --> 00:10:21,380
preceding regarding allegations of promote in this conduct or independent litigation

109
00:10:21,380 --> 00:10:23,740
or records that are subject to attorney-client privilege,

110
00:10:25,920 --> 00:10:27,380
I don't think we're talking about

111
00:10:27,380 --> 00:10:29,240
any confidential security measures today.

112
00:10:30,920 --> 00:10:36,080
Well, maybe, okay, I'll just say, and or confidential security measures, do I have such

113
00:10:36,080 --> 00:10:36,540
motion.

114
00:10:39,200 --> 00:10:41,960
Great, a row call vote starting with those in the room,

115
00:10:42,120 --> 00:10:43,300
Dr. Cheris. I move.

116
00:10:44,360 --> 00:10:47,000
Hi. Hi. And Dr. Cheris.

117
00:10:47,880 --> 00:10:49,940
It was. Excuse me, Dr. Evans.

118
00:10:51,960 --> 00:10:56,780
Hi. My loan online, thank you. Okay, let's pause.

119
00:10:57,500 --> 00:11:00,020
We'll switch our recording.