1 00:00:23,090 --> 00:00:38,030 Welcome to this evening's committee of adjustment hearing. In accordance with the amendments to the Municipal Act and the Township Procedural by-law to hold electronic meetings, tonight's committee of adjustment hearing is being held as a hybrid meeting with in-person and virtual attendance. 2 00:00:38,970 --> 00:00:46,210 This hearing is being live-streamed and is accessible via the Township's website at kin.ca slash cavaem meetings. 3 00:00:46,210 --> 00:00:52,490 I would like to provide some general reminders to all applicants and agents before I open the floor to the chair. 4 00:00:53,250 --> 00:00:55,810 Please direct all comments through the chair of the committee. 5 00:00:56,710 --> 00:01:00,950 Please ensure your microphone is on mute when not speaking to prevent any background noises. 6 00:01:02,150 --> 00:01:07,670 There is a mandated 20-day appeal period on all approved applications as outlined in the Planning Act. 7 00:01:08,290 --> 00:01:14,790 This appeal period must lapse with no appeals being received before the decision on an application can be considered final and binding. 8 00:01:15,930 --> 00:01:20,750 In order to keep the agenda on track, all speakers are kindly asked not to exceed 10 minutes 9 00:01:20,750 --> 00:01:21,670 a speaking time. 10 00:01:22,590 --> 00:01:27,990 A deferral fee is applicable if a deferral request is made this evening by either the applicant 11 00:01:27,990 --> 00:01:28,910 or the agent. 12 00:01:30,190 --> 00:01:34,390 I will now hand it over to our chair, Mark Coraffa, to provide opening remarks and call 13 00:01:34,390 --> 00:01:35,390 this meeting to order. 14 00:01:40,060 --> 00:01:44,460 This is a hearing of the Township of King Committee of Adjustment, which will be conducting 15 00:01:44,460 --> 00:01:50,260 In accordance with section 45 and 53 of the Planning Act, it is a policy of this committee to 16 00:01:50,260 --> 00:01:55,980 hear each application and all evidence in support of or against an application, including 17 00:01:55,980 --> 00:01:58,600 that of any commenting government agency. 18 00:01:59,500 --> 00:02:04,700 As a result of a favorable decision, certain conditions may be imposed as deemed advisable 19 00:02:04,700 --> 00:02:05,540 by the committee. 20 00:02:06,940 --> 00:02:12,380 Copies of the decision may this evening will be sent to be a email to all owners and their 21 00:02:12,380 --> 00:02:18,200 authorized agents or solicitors, other members of the public who wish to be notified of the decision 22 00:02:18,200 --> 00:02:22,740 of the committee in respect to an application must submit a request to the Secretary 23 00:02:22,740 --> 00:02:28,720 Treasurer. This will also entitle you to be advised of a possible Ontario Land Tribunal 24 00:02:28,720 --> 00:02:34,160 hearing. In the case of a minor variance or non-conforming use application, the decision 25 00:02:34,160 --> 00:02:38,800 of the committee of adjustment may be appealed to the Ontario Land Tribunal within 20 days 26 00:02:38,800 --> 00:02:40,620 after the making of the decision. 27 00:02:41,680 --> 00:02:46,900 In the case of consent application, the decision of the committee or any condition imposed 28 00:02:46,900 --> 00:02:52,700 by the committee may be appealed to the Ontario Land Tribunal within 20 of these after 29 00:02:52,700 --> 00:02:54,480 the giving of the notice of the decision. 30 00:02:55,720 --> 00:03:00,220 Item 1 on the agenda this evening, called to order, good evening, my name is Mark Roth from 31 00:03:00,220 --> 00:03:02,040 the chair of this evening's committee. 32 00:03:02,320 --> 00:03:07,060 Members of the committee present this evening are to my left, Dino Colletti, and to my right, 33 00:03:07,060 --> 00:03:08,820 and Brandt King. 34 00:03:09,360 --> 00:03:11,120 Staff participating at this evening, 35 00:03:11,260 --> 00:03:12,920 shearing Ari Adriana Botso, 36 00:03:13,180 --> 00:03:14,400 the Secretary-Tracker, 37 00:03:14,660 --> 00:03:17,140 Dewani Shaw, Assistant Secretary-Tracker, 38 00:03:17,880 --> 00:03:20,460 Haley Amadi, Assistant Secretary-Tracker, 39 00:03:20,980 --> 00:03:22,920 Gordon Dixon, who's the supervisor of 40 00:03:22,920 --> 00:03:24,420 Development Planning, and your 41 00:03:24,420 --> 00:03:26,920 crush-shoddery. She's a planner with 42 00:03:26,920 --> 00:03:27,380 the town. 43 00:03:28,420 --> 00:03:30,660 Item two, declarations of interests. 44 00:03:31,140 --> 00:03:32,580 I'll ask any members if they have 45 00:03:32,580 --> 00:03:34,420 any interest to disclose this evening. 46 00:03:36,020 --> 00:03:41,760 I would ask that if you noted in the minutes, that no interest have been declared for this evening. 47 00:03:44,680 --> 00:03:51,840 Item 3 option of minutes. We have before us the minutes of hearing from July 15th, 48 00:03:51,920 --> 00:03:56,620 2026 before us for approval. Do all members agree to the adoption of the minutes, 49 00:03:56,740 --> 00:04:01,020 and if so, can I get a motion to adopt the minutes of July 15th? 50 00:04:01,360 --> 00:04:05,140 Motion to adopt. Can I get a second? Thank you, sir. All in favour? 51 00:04:06,580 --> 00:04:10,360 Motion carried the minutes of July 15 have been adopted. 52 00:04:12,700 --> 00:04:14,960 Item 4, request for deferral. 53 00:04:15,900 --> 00:04:20,620 Can the Secretary treasurer please confirm if there are any requests for adjournment this evening? 54 00:04:22,520 --> 00:04:24,900 We have no request for deferral this evening. 55 00:04:25,440 --> 00:04:26,260 Thank you. 56 00:04:29,550 --> 00:04:32,050 Item 5, applications to be heard this evening. 57 00:04:32,790 --> 00:04:37,990 Can the Secretary treasurer please provide us with an overview of the first application to be heard this evening? 58 00:04:40,300 --> 00:04:47,400 Item 5.1 file A2601 for the property of 18 Skyline Trail in Numbleton. 59 00:04:47,520 --> 00:04:52,940 Relief from the zoning bylaws being repusted for maximum driveway with provisions to facilitate 60 00:04:52,940 --> 00:05:00,160 an as-built driveway extension, planning staff recommended approval of application A2601 61 00:05:00,160 --> 00:05:04,060 in accordance with conditions as set out in attachment 1. 62 00:05:04,060 --> 00:05:09,380 Notice hasn't circulated to all properties within a 60-meter radius, and two letters of objection 63 00:05:09,380 --> 00:05:14,620 have been received from 14 Skyline Trail and 8 James Bowman Court. 64 00:05:15,660 --> 00:05:18,100 There are no registered speakers for this item this evening. 65 00:05:19,640 --> 00:05:24,380 Thank you, Secretary Treasurer. I'll call on the applicant or agent in attendance to present 66 00:05:24,380 --> 00:05:28,240 their application to the committee, please. Chair, prior to doing that, could I make a comment? 67 00:05:28,240 --> 00:05:35,460 of course. I visited this property twice over the past week on both occasions. The sign was 68 00:05:35,460 --> 00:05:42,820 not visible at all. It was down flat on the ground. I also understand that staff have spoken 69 00:05:42,820 --> 00:05:49,180 the email to the applicant about signs. Maybe Adrian, it can tell us what she did and then I'll 70 00:05:49,180 --> 00:05:56,440 make another comment. Sure. Secretary Treasurer, do we have any further information around the sign 71 00:05:56,440 --> 00:05:59,360 And did we have any contact with the applicant? 72 00:06:01,180 --> 00:06:12,680 Through the chair, there's been two pieces of correspondence that have been sent out to both owner and agent in regards to placement, sign placement, and there being no visibility. 73 00:06:13,920 --> 00:06:25,380 The first was sent on Wednesday August the 12th, in which case there was a reply, and the sign was repositioned to another location that did not provide visibility. 74 00:06:26,720 --> 00:06:35,200 So, response followed with an image indicating an example of how it should be placed on top of the description. 75 00:06:36,100 --> 00:06:41,400 That was sent the following down Thursday, August 13th, then we have not received a response since then. 76 00:06:42,040 --> 00:06:44,640 Chair, this is a big concern to me. 77 00:06:44,640 --> 00:06:51,800 Signs are important. Neighbors have to have an opportunity to either support or not support applications. 78 00:06:53,220 --> 00:07:01,520 And for that reason, I'm prepared to ask for deferral on this one to give the applicant opportunity to display the sign appropriately for another meeting. 79 00:07:02,040 --> 00:07:02,920 And I would so move. 80 00:07:05,300 --> 00:07:13,860 Before we get a second, can the secretary treasurer remind me what are the rules around signage like the display time? 81 00:07:13,860 --> 00:07:19,520 I get the visibility, these, and that's kind of what we're talking about here. 82 00:07:19,960 --> 00:07:25,340 How many of these, the sign have to be erected prior to the committee meeting? 83 00:07:26,820 --> 00:07:29,600 The notice of hearing is issued at the same time. 84 00:07:30,000 --> 00:07:52,960 At the same time, that the sign should be up, so would be a minimum of 10 days prior to hearing. We do issue that information via email to all the owners and the agents, along with detailed instructions in terms of where it should be placed, how it should be placed up, that it should be stationed to the ground, that it can't be affixed to a tree, a window, a railing, and so on and so forth. 85 00:07:52,960 --> 00:08:04,700 Okay, thank you for that clarification. So Terry, I take your motion. I'll look for a member to second that motion to defer to the next meeting. 86 00:08:05,120 --> 00:08:08,640 Happy to second that motion to defer. Okay, bring to a second. 87 00:08:09,600 --> 00:08:13,360 And before we vote, where we get? 88 00:08:14,500 --> 00:08:22,120 I just want to confirm that because committee is deferring, there will be no additional fees to the applicant correct. 89 00:08:22,120 --> 00:08:22,580 Okay, 90 00:09:08,020 --> 00:09:14,040 okay, the motion's been carried, so this item has been adjourned to a later meeting in the later date. 91 00:09:14,620 --> 00:09:22,940 We'll ask the applicant or agent to work with planning staff to find another date and time, or another date I should say, 92 00:09:23,640 --> 00:09:33,240 for the next committee meeting and please ensure the sign is appropriately visible and installed until the next meeting. 93 00:09:36,800 --> 00:09:41,740 Can the Secretary of Treasurer provide us an overview of the next application for this evening? 94 00:09:43,860 --> 00:09:51,120 Item 5.2 file A2646 for the property of 51, Crest View Road in Novelton. 95 00:09:52,260 --> 00:09:57,280 Relief in the zoning bylaws being requested for minimum interior side yard setback and 96 00:09:57,280 --> 00:10:00,900 locked coverage to facilitate the construction of a proposed cabana. 97 00:10:01,580 --> 00:10:06,440 Planning staff recommended approval of application A2646 in accordance with conditions 98 00:10:06,440 --> 00:10:08,760 as set out in attachment one. 99 00:10:09,060 --> 00:10:13,820 Notice as I circulated to all properties with an A-16 meter radius and no public correspondence 100 00:10:13,820 --> 00:10:14,840 has been received. 101 00:10:15,520 --> 00:10:18,100 There are no registered speakers for this item this evening. 102 00:10:19,060 --> 00:10:24,200 Thank you Secretary Treasurer, I'll call on the applicant or agent in attendance to walk us 103 00:10:24,200 --> 00:10:26,320 through their application to the committee this evening. 104 00:10:26,700 --> 00:10:27,560 Thank you. 105 00:10:30,080 --> 00:10:31,140 Good evening, everyone. 106 00:10:31,540 --> 00:10:32,820 Hopefully you can hear me. 107 00:10:33,320 --> 00:10:33,960 Yes, we can. 108 00:10:34,100 --> 00:10:34,660 Thank you. 109 00:10:34,680 --> 00:10:36,200 Can you introduce yourself for the committee? 110 00:10:37,520 --> 00:10:38,000 Of course. 111 00:10:38,000 --> 00:10:42,700 My name is Danielle Thomes. I am the author, I say agent on behalf of the clients, the 112 00:10:42,700 --> 00:10:49,060 homeowners, Kermalina, and Dominic Laylee at the address 51, Chris, we wrote in Nobleton. 113 00:10:49,880 --> 00:10:54,360 Perfect. Thank you. So we have the materials in front of us. Can you walk the committee through 114 00:10:54,360 --> 00:11:01,800 us to why the variances are being requested this evening? Absolutely. So this we are proposing 115 00:11:01,800 --> 00:11:08,200 Some backyard landscaping, which includes a cabana that we're proposing to be built. 116 00:11:09,060 --> 00:11:15,120 The two variances that we are seeking currently are one a setback. 117 00:11:15,300 --> 00:11:20,100 The recurrently the setback is three meters for the structure that we're proposing. 118 00:11:21,860 --> 00:11:28,720 We would like that to be reflected at 1.75 meters, which aligns with the current house. 119 00:11:28,720 --> 00:11:35,000 helps with the balance and overall aesthetic of the property, giving them the maximum usage of their space as well. 120 00:11:35,500 --> 00:11:41,440 The second would be the total gross area of the command of footprint. 121 00:11:42,240 --> 00:11:51,820 We do understand that the roof and everything covered goes beyond the 120 square meters that is the current bylaw. 122 00:11:51,820 --> 00:12:06,960 However, I would like to note that the enclosed space is actually under, so the footing and the framework for the enclosed space of the structure is 91.01 square meters or the by-law states currently it's 120 square meters that is allowable 123 00:12:06,960 --> 00:12:16,220 and we're hoping to extend some covered sitting areas with simple roofs that go over that to cover that which does go above and beyond the coverage allowed. 124 00:12:19,620 --> 00:12:25,380 Okay, thank you for that. Sorry, I thought I heard you see three meters to 1.75 meters. 125 00:12:25,620 --> 00:12:33,260 The material that I have in front of me has that the minimum setback is currently set at 3.6 meters. 126 00:12:33,800 --> 00:12:35,760 3.6 meters. 127 00:12:36,960 --> 00:12:38,400 Yeah, that might be of a stable length. 128 00:12:38,940 --> 00:12:39,080 Okay. 129 00:12:41,140 --> 00:12:45,920 Thank you. I'll open it up to questions before before we move forward. 130 00:12:45,920 --> 00:12:46,840 Good morning. Good evening. 131 00:12:47,860 --> 00:12:48,760 Through you, Mr. Chair. 132 00:12:50,660 --> 00:12:53,340 Can you tell me how wide this lot is? 133 00:12:56,760 --> 00:12:59,380 I don't have that in front of me. 134 00:12:59,580 --> 00:13:02,440 I've got all my cabana information, but not a lot. 135 00:13:02,720 --> 00:13:04,180 But if you give me one second. 136 00:13:04,980 --> 00:13:09,060 Yeah, it's not clear on the safe plan we've got. 137 00:13:11,560 --> 00:13:12,300 Not that far 138 00:13:34,570 --> 00:13:36,170 off it right here. 139 00:13:54,560 --> 00:13:57,280 Total width is 25.28 meters. 140 00:13:58,460 --> 00:14:07,300 So you'd agree with me that it's a fairly wide lot, and I went and stood in the backyard, 141 00:14:07,960 --> 00:14:13,580 and it is a sizable piece of space in that backyard behind the house. 142 00:14:14,300 --> 00:14:27,260 Can you tell me why the cabana is eating into the side yard setback by about 50% when you have a lot of room on the other side of the lot on the other side. 143 00:14:27,260 --> 00:14:34,140 of the pool, like everything seems to be jammed into this side where it's going to butt up. 144 00:14:34,240 --> 00:14:39,840 I know the site plan says neighboring agricultural, but I think the ground is being scraped 145 00:14:39,840 --> 00:14:48,180 for commercial and mixed residential now, but everything seems to be jammed into that side 146 00:14:48,180 --> 00:14:55,240 yard setback, but to the tune of about a 50% reduction in the side yard setback, when you 147 00:14:55,240 --> 00:14:58,620 have all this other space in this lot. 148 00:15:00,000 --> 00:15:22,700 Yeah, that's a great question. Happy to address. So, yes, coming down into it, part of the conversation with at least these homeowners is that they've got a growing family. They want as much space along the back property line as they can progress in play area. We do intend to add more trees and stuff along the back. And one note on this as well is that, well, we're going to put a bunch of alumni trees behind the piano on that side yard. 149 00:15:22,700 --> 00:15:32,760 setback to add not only a green, sound, noise barrier, and visual barrier as well to the new subdivisions. 150 00:15:32,920 --> 00:15:43,160 They're not looking at this Kavanaugh from the backside, but also for the homeowners as well to help with construction, noise reduction and all of those good things that go with that. 151 00:15:45,430 --> 00:15:52,270 I would agree with you that in terms of the depth, there's a lot of depth space at the back. 152 00:15:52,890 --> 00:15:55,370 But they would have the same visual barrier. 153 00:15:56,250 --> 00:16:00,530 If it actually was within the side yard set back or 3.6, 154 00:16:00,710 --> 00:16:04,970 as opposed to 175. 155 00:16:10,540 --> 00:16:13,740 Sure, it could be on the side yard. 156 00:16:14,380 --> 00:16:17,380 However, it doesn't need a fair bit on the property itself. 157 00:16:17,380 --> 00:16:21,740 So if you start to bring that into the property and the balance kind of gets a little bit 158 00:16:21,740 --> 00:16:27,280 thrown off at least with design intent and functional intent as well without changing too much 159 00:16:27,280 --> 00:16:30,180 and what they're proposing and then you should jump the structure itself. 160 00:16:35,760 --> 00:16:38,500 Chair, thank you through you to staff. 161 00:16:39,160 --> 00:16:44,480 When I first took a look at this application, the thing that stood out right away was the fact 162 00:16:44,480 --> 00:16:53,100 that the house actually is set back by 1.75 also, I thought it possibly could have been a 163 00:16:53,100 --> 00:16:58,240 previous minor variance, but I did ask staff about that and perhaps staff could explain 164 00:16:58,240 --> 00:17:02,880 why the house is legal the way it is and doesn't require a variance. 165 00:17:04,240 --> 00:17:10,540 Through the chair, this question relates to the construction of additions to an existing dwelling. 166 00:17:10,540 --> 00:17:16,300 So, the by-law requires a minimum interior size, a setback of 3.6 meters. 167 00:17:16,720 --> 00:17:22,980 However, the portion of the house with the setback of 1.73 meters was determined to be legal, 168 00:17:23,420 --> 00:17:26,720 not conforming based off the processes the township had in place. 169 00:17:27,300 --> 00:17:33,540 As got specific portion of the dwelling was existing and established prior to the current zoning 170 00:17:33,540 --> 00:17:35,240 by-law and the current zoning requirements. 171 00:17:35,820 --> 00:17:39,340 And this was supported through documentation to township zoning side. 172 00:17:39,340 --> 00:17:41,740 The new additions, like I said, 173 00:17:41,920 --> 00:17:43,080 is additions to the house. 174 00:17:43,580 --> 00:17:46,400 The new additions beyond the existing building footprint. 175 00:17:46,440 --> 00:17:48,660 That was determined to be legal known for me. 176 00:17:48,920 --> 00:17:51,460 I required to comply with the current zoning standards, 177 00:17:51,720 --> 00:17:54,720 including the 3.6 meter interior setback. 178 00:17:55,400 --> 00:18:00,200 At the time of their process through the township, 179 00:18:00,620 --> 00:18:02,880 this was just demonstrated and complied with, 180 00:18:02,960 --> 00:18:05,180 and the applicants have since received all necessary 181 00:18:05,180 --> 00:18:08,340 approvals and permits from the township for the dwelling. 182 00:18:10,080 --> 00:18:16,200 The second question to staff, I could chair, the agricultural land to the south. 183 00:18:17,040 --> 00:18:22,860 Do you know much about the subdivision in terms of what size lots they will be and whether 184 00:18:22,860 --> 00:18:28,400 that crest view will extend and this house will have another one right up against it? 185 00:18:29,380 --> 00:18:32,400 So unfortunately at this time, I do not have the information. 186 00:18:32,400 --> 00:18:40,740 is a draft approved, draft approved plan for single detached dwelling lots, as mentioned in 187 00:18:40,740 --> 00:18:41,460 staff support. 188 00:18:43,680 --> 00:18:44,320 Thank you. 189 00:18:52,560 --> 00:18:57,040 Danielle, the question I'm reading in additional comments from 190 00:18:57,820 --> 00:19:06,000 development engineering, they're requesting that at least 0.6 meters. So my question stems from 191 00:19:06,000 --> 00:19:10,460 the conversation around the trees that you're going to be planting in the in the 192 00:19:10,460 --> 00:19:16,100 setback area. That 0.6 meters from the property line must be 193 00:19:16,100 --> 00:19:21,020 underserved. So did you see that comment and are you and the applicant in agreement 194 00:19:21,020 --> 00:19:26,440 with that? Yes, and yes, we have spoken with, I believe it was our planner, 195 00:19:26,940 --> 00:19:30,620 E.C. at the time, who had mentioned that as well, and that can remain underserved 196 00:19:30,620 --> 00:19:36,440 who will bring the trees in a little bit, at least that two feet, like six meters, and make sure 197 00:19:36,440 --> 00:19:40,740 that that remains undisturbed, and then the trees can grow, as I mentioned before, previously 198 00:19:40,740 --> 00:19:47,060 they will be clung their varieties, so they shouldn't require too much canopy space for or to be 199 00:19:47,060 --> 00:19:52,260 within that disturbed area by too much at all. Okay, thank you. And just to circle back on Terry's 200 00:19:52,260 --> 00:20:00,600 question, we don't know what's going to be developed to the self of the property, like what's 201 00:20:00,600 --> 00:20:06,940 for single-by-touch dwelling lots, that is a different application, but it has been dropped 202 00:20:06,940 --> 00:20:07,460 approved. 203 00:20:08,840 --> 00:20:09,660 Thank you. 204 00:20:12,810 --> 00:20:14,010 No further questions. 205 00:20:14,250 --> 00:20:16,570 I'll look for somebody to move this application. 206 00:20:17,590 --> 00:20:25,010 Chair, I move that application A2646 together with all the recommendation, recommended 207 00:20:25,010 --> 00:20:31,310 conditions of approval, as it is, in my opinion, the proposed meets the four tests 208 00:20:31,310 --> 00:20:33,210 of the Pioneer Act. 209 00:20:33,430 --> 00:20:33,930 Thank you, Terry. 210 00:20:34,390 --> 00:20:35,330 Do I have a second? 211 00:20:37,680 --> 00:20:38,480 Do you know a second? 212 00:20:58,620 --> 00:21:01,520 Okay, Danielle Motion carried your application has been approved. 213 00:21:01,660 --> 00:21:02,300 Thank you. 214 00:21:03,300 --> 00:21:04,180 Thank you very much. 215 00:21:09,690 --> 00:21:13,830 Can the Secretary Treasurer provide us with an overview of the next application for this evening? 216 00:21:21,350 --> 00:21:27,810 Item 5.3 file a 2650 for the property of 81 Elizabeth's Drive in Ogleton. 217 00:21:28,410 --> 00:21:32,970 Relief in the zoning bylaws being requested for the maximum permitted front yard set back 218 00:21:32,970 --> 00:21:40,670 to facilitate the development of the second-story addition of a previously approved single-story garage addition. 219 00:21:41,410 --> 00:21:46,390 Planning staff recommended approval of application A2650 in accordance with the conditions as 220 00:21:46,390 --> 00:21:52,070 set out in attachment one. Notice has been circulated to all properties with an A16 meter radius 221 00:21:52,070 --> 00:21:59,170 and a petition in support has been received. We have one registered speaker for this item this evening, 222 00:21:59,170 --> 00:22:01,130 Mr. Peter Grandduley. 223 00:22:08,830 --> 00:22:10,370 Thank you, Secretary Treasurer. 224 00:22:11,650 --> 00:22:15,010 Hi, Peter, the applicant or agent to speak to this item. 225 00:22:17,990 --> 00:22:22,570 Okay, we'll call you up after the applicant or agent has had a chance to speak. 226 00:22:23,550 --> 00:22:24,870 Okay, I'll call you up after. 227 00:22:25,610 --> 00:22:25,830 Yeah. 228 00:22:26,510 --> 00:22:29,290 We'll forget is the applicant or agent. 229 00:22:30,000 --> 00:22:32,480 We speak to the application. Thank you. 230 00:22:41,930 --> 00:23:01,410 Good evening. Are you want to introduce yourself? I'm Daniel Tzadabri from Nobu Brother Zink. Okay. Daniel, can you take us here? I was trying to go through the previous approval that we had given. Give us a little bit of a context of what's transpired since we got that approval and what you're seeking for this evening. 231 00:23:03,250 --> 00:23:25,950 So, we originally got the minor variants for the setback of a single story garage, and since then the family has grown, and my parents are loving grandparents, and they need more space, and the most reasonable way to get that space was over top of the garage. 232 00:23:25,950 --> 00:23:33,370 And that is basically what this is to inquire about going up about the garage. 233 00:23:35,170 --> 00:23:42,750 Okay, so you mentioned family's growing more space, this is not an in living dwelling unit, it's a garage. 234 00:23:43,150 --> 00:23:45,770 Correct, there's no going to be nobody going to be living in this unit. 235 00:23:46,410 --> 00:23:47,950 No, you mean above the garage? 236 00:23:47,950 --> 00:23:49,190 Correct, no. 237 00:23:50,130 --> 00:23:51,250 Or below the garage? 238 00:23:51,570 --> 00:23:54,070 No, no, no, absolutely nothing on the garage, no. 239 00:23:54,070 --> 00:23:58,870 Okay, so you need more storage space because you have more folks living in the house. 240 00:23:59,550 --> 00:24:04,490 So basically the area upstairs, it's with a washroom as well. 241 00:24:05,050 --> 00:24:10,150 So my children, basically they're saying my parents are talking about an arts studio, 242 00:24:10,490 --> 00:24:12,810 a place a space for them to play indoors. 243 00:24:13,750 --> 00:24:19,090 Since the whole indoor interior of the property now is more for my parents 244 00:24:19,090 --> 00:24:21,310 in terms of a family room and kitchen. 245 00:24:21,310 --> 00:24:27,270 So they just wanted to get a little bit more space for storage as well as the kids to play 246 00:24:27,890 --> 00:24:29,610 It's basically the concept 247 00:24:31,180 --> 00:24:34,980 Okay any questions from committee for Daniel 248 00:24:39,040 --> 00:24:43,940 could you expand on that a bit more so there's going to be no bedrooms above the garage? 249 00:24:43,940 --> 00:24:48,640 No, no. Yeah, so a bathroom and a big play area 250 00:24:49,300 --> 00:24:55,180 Yeah, basically it's I believe it's 600 square feet is what it came out to so 251 00:24:56,680 --> 00:25:03,720 So during the construction we're finding that we're not saving, but it's not as expensive 252 00:25:03,720 --> 00:25:05,940 to go up as we had expected. 253 00:25:06,860 --> 00:25:14,340 We didn't plan on it before I just had a new child, so now we're discussing dance, music, 254 00:25:14,880 --> 00:25:20,080 art that my children and that were in Canada, it's not a fortune. 255 00:25:20,080 --> 00:25:29,360 We like the cold weather, but they're in the cold weather to be inside and doing things of the nature of playing sports and so on as I have my son. 256 00:25:29,600 --> 00:25:37,080 That's what the idea of that space is to have if they get dirty to have the wash when they're to clean up, so this is the concept of having an area up there. 257 00:25:37,520 --> 00:25:40,260 And then, of course, additional storage is included in that. 258 00:25:42,200 --> 00:25:44,240 Okay. Question for staff. 259 00:25:46,620 --> 00:25:54,540 When I was, or staff, when I was looking at the previous approval, so I have before us the approval this evening. 260 00:25:55,420 --> 00:26:08,640 If I look at the planning report, we are proving to permit a front yard set back of 3.6 meters from the zoning that requires a 7.5 meter set back. 261 00:26:09,500 --> 00:26:16,800 So in our previous approval, did we approve a smaller set back than 7.5 meters? 262 00:26:19,850 --> 00:26:26,730 Through the chair, I do not have the previous approval of front of me, but from my understanding in May of 2024, 263 00:26:27,330 --> 00:26:34,670 May of 2024, committee did approve the garage to be the garage to have a 3.6. 264 00:26:35,310 --> 00:26:39,190 So the garage addition to have a 3.6 meter from your set back. 265 00:26:39,190 --> 00:26:46,550 Okay, so we've already approved the 3.6 meter set back, so will be approved before us is just to 266 00:26:46,550 --> 00:26:48,030 recommit to the 3.6. 267 00:26:48,790 --> 00:26:53,090 So the approval is for, so the garage is a tag, I'm sorry. 268 00:26:54,310 --> 00:27:01,450 So the approval from 2024 is for the front-year set back to the garage, which at that time was 269 00:27:01,450 --> 00:27:07,170 supposed to be a single story in garage, as they are now adding a garage addition, a second 270 00:27:07,170 --> 00:27:10,570 story edition on top, they still have to maintain that setback. 271 00:27:10,770 --> 00:27:15,470 So they are a still in front of committee today to have the 3.6-meter setback to the second 272 00:27:15,470 --> 00:27:16,090 floor edition. 273 00:27:16,550 --> 00:27:16,690 Okay. 274 00:27:17,050 --> 00:27:17,190 Okay. 275 00:27:17,330 --> 00:27:18,110 Thanks for the clarity. 276 00:27:18,490 --> 00:27:19,690 I appreciate that. 277 00:27:20,350 --> 00:27:21,730 Any other questions for the applicant? 278 00:27:22,390 --> 00:27:23,830 Just a comment, Chair. 279 00:27:23,950 --> 00:27:29,470 Not so much a question to the applicant, but I remember this application from a couple of years 280 00:27:29,470 --> 00:27:35,770 ago and I think that I was in support of it because it was a single story. 281 00:27:36,670 --> 00:27:43,090 I felt that because it was a single story 3.6 meters, it wasn't appropriate my interference. 282 00:27:43,910 --> 00:27:51,790 I'm not sure how I feel now about it being a 7-2-story structure, but I'll determine that after 283 00:27:51,790 --> 00:27:52,650 all the discussion. 284 00:27:54,270 --> 00:27:55,350 Thank you Mr. Chair. 285 00:27:56,550 --> 00:28:00,250 And maybe we can have the applicant address that issue. 286 00:28:00,250 --> 00:28:07,190 What's the degree of impact on the second story being added to this as opposed to being single story? 287 00:28:07,710 --> 00:28:12,910 As I look at the plan, you're going to drive way and make a turn into the garage. 288 00:28:14,970 --> 00:28:19,170 So, like you're coming in off the street, there's going to be a curb cut and whatnot. 289 00:28:19,390 --> 00:28:22,310 But what's the impact on anybody around you? 290 00:28:22,370 --> 00:28:25,590 I mean that's a consideration for us all the time. 291 00:28:26,810 --> 00:28:33,550 is this, is this tree burned? Is there any kind of break? Whatever. Just what's the degree of 292 00:28:33,550 --> 00:28:46,050 impact? Well, the fortune part of this situation is that we're lined with trees around the whole 293 00:28:46,050 --> 00:28:51,430 property. So I believe the trees are something I could be completely wrong with something to the extent 294 00:28:51,430 --> 00:28:57,630 of 40 to 50 feet, all lines right on the back of where this garage will be. 295 00:28:57,890 --> 00:29:03,130 So in essence, in terms of my opinion, it's not really affecting anything in terms of 296 00:29:03,130 --> 00:29:06,290 sight lines because it's covered with which are evergreen trees. 297 00:29:07,910 --> 00:29:16,170 I've literally spoken to almost every neighbor on the street of cross and Elizabeth, they were 298 00:29:16,170 --> 00:29:23,410 on support which was really powerful and grateful for to them, but to be honest, I don't 299 00:29:23,410 --> 00:29:28,510 see any problems in terms of the visual aspect of where it's laying because of these trees. 300 00:29:28,550 --> 00:29:37,010 It actually creates a really nice structure and then our focal point to view and with the 301 00:29:37,010 --> 00:29:46,910 lighting that's going to be on the new garage is going to upgrade the appearance of the property. 302 00:29:47,870 --> 00:29:50,390 So, is that a board and batten sighting on this? 303 00:29:50,470 --> 00:29:51,230 There you go. 304 00:29:51,670 --> 00:29:53,910 Yeah, that's what we're looking at at the moment. 305 00:29:58,380 --> 00:29:59,940 Okay, thanks for the quiet any other. 306 00:30:00,000 --> 00:30:09,060 Any questions for the applicant? So what we'll do, Daniels, we have you say we have a gentleman who'd like to come and speak and then we'll make a decision. 307 00:30:09,620 --> 00:30:10,040 Thank you. 308 00:30:10,280 --> 00:30:11,160 Thank you. 309 00:30:12,740 --> 00:30:16,180 So I'll invite Peter to the mic. 310 00:30:22,000 --> 00:30:23,200 Thank you. 311 00:30:23,620 --> 00:30:30,420 Good evening. My name is Peter Grondilly, and I do represented a property across the street from 81, 88 Elizabeth. 312 00:30:31,560 --> 00:30:36,540 I have no objection to story or story or story or so on. 313 00:30:36,980 --> 00:30:40,600 I thought that in Novelton you can go up to 90 meters. 314 00:30:42,800 --> 00:30:44,760 So we can make one story in 90 meters. 315 00:30:44,960 --> 00:30:46,700 We can live two stories. 316 00:30:46,940 --> 00:30:48,800 One story is 90 meters. 317 00:30:48,980 --> 00:30:49,360 I don't know. 318 00:30:49,700 --> 00:30:51,280 We don't put anything in the middle. 319 00:30:51,800 --> 00:30:52,740 It's only one. 320 00:30:53,560 --> 00:30:54,020 I don't know. 321 00:30:54,020 --> 00:30:55,480 The height doesn't bother me, 322 00:30:55,720 --> 00:30:57,640 and it's all about taking a similar price there. 323 00:30:57,640 --> 00:31:00,420 He had a lot of comment about this. 324 00:31:00,700 --> 00:31:03,900 Two years ago, he approved it because it was a single story house. 325 00:31:05,980 --> 00:31:08,200 I don't think this will make any difference at this time. 326 00:31:08,580 --> 00:31:14,020 If it's going to two stories, because the fact that the trees are much taller than a two-story 327 00:31:14,020 --> 00:31:15,640 that is going to go there. 328 00:31:16,040 --> 00:31:19,340 So therefore, I think that should be considered. 329 00:31:20,440 --> 00:31:24,880 The main thing that I'm over here also beside that I'm okay with it. 330 00:31:24,880 --> 00:31:35,880 The way the notice that we're now, the way are written, written over here, if I'm confused, I don't know, but this is, 331 00:31:36,760 --> 00:31:44,420 zoning by law 2616-071, which was approved almost two years ago. 332 00:31:45,860 --> 00:31:52,620 And in the height over here, what the by law says about the height, if everybody can build up to nine meters, 333 00:31:53,820 --> 00:32:04,160 Unless, written this again now, we're going to change this from Ari one, from Ari one, to Ari two, I guess, two stories. 334 00:32:06,490 --> 00:32:11,170 Which by-law, is he breaking right now? Why did he have to make an application or not? 335 00:32:12,090 --> 00:32:20,650 So to answer you Peter, there was a point of clarification that I asked, the approval that the applicant received two years ago was for the setback. 336 00:32:20,650 --> 00:32:22,390 that wasn't, we're not talking about height. 337 00:32:22,930 --> 00:32:25,810 So the front yard setback is seven and a half meters 338 00:32:25,810 --> 00:32:28,610 as per the by-law, so because they're building, 339 00:32:29,030 --> 00:32:30,850 they were gonna eat into that setback 340 00:32:30,850 --> 00:32:33,090 and they got approval for 3.6 meters. 341 00:32:33,690 --> 00:32:35,310 Now, because they're adding a second story, 342 00:32:35,930 --> 00:32:39,290 they have to come back and ask for the same setback 343 00:32:39,290 --> 00:32:40,310 because they're going up. 344 00:32:40,370 --> 00:32:43,390 It's not a height conversation that we're having. 345 00:32:43,710 --> 00:32:47,390 It's still the setback from the front yard setback 346 00:32:47,390 --> 00:32:48,110 that we're talking about. 347 00:32:48,210 --> 00:32:48,570 Thank you. 348 00:32:48,570 --> 00:32:49,530 I also have a lot of confusing. 349 00:32:51,150 --> 00:32:52,770 Thank you very much. 350 00:32:53,130 --> 00:32:53,950 Okay, thank you, Peter. 351 00:32:55,750 --> 00:32:56,850 So we'll invite the applicant back. 352 00:32:57,270 --> 00:33:01,530 If we have any other questions, otherwise I'll look for a member to move this item. 353 00:33:13,020 --> 00:33:22,280 Mr. I moved to approve application A2650 together with all the recommended conditions. 354 00:33:22,280 --> 00:33:25,720 of approval. Is it in my opinion that the proposal meets the four tests in the plan 355 00:33:25,720 --> 00:33:35,360 act? And the second for addition is, it's not going to be notable from the roads, and 356 00:33:35,360 --> 00:33:39,880 it's going to blend in a while over time. Thank you, Dino. I'll second. 357 00:33:58,430 --> 00:33:58,930 Okay, Daniel, 358 00:33:59,010 --> 00:34:07,730 motion, carry your application has been approved. Thank you. Thank you. Can the Secretary 359 00:34:07,730 --> 00:34:11,250 the Treasury provide us an overview with the final application for this evening. 360 00:34:17,330 --> 00:34:23,130 Item 5.4, file a 2653 for the property of 570 King Street. 361 00:34:23,790 --> 00:34:28,930 Relief from the zoning bylaws being requested for front yard, set back porch encroachment and 362 00:34:28,930 --> 00:34:35,410 driveway provisions to facilitate the development of an addition to an existing single detached 363 00:34:35,410 --> 00:34:39,030 dwelling and to permit two existing driveways. 364 00:34:39,030 --> 00:34:43,710 An administrative error was recently identified in the notice of hearing. 365 00:34:44,390 --> 00:34:49,750 The planning report has since been corrected and no substantial changes to the application 366 00:34:49,750 --> 00:34:51,990 or staff recommendations have occurred. 367 00:34:52,990 --> 00:34:58,230 Planning staff recommended approval of application A2653 in accordance with the conditions 368 00:34:58,230 --> 00:35:00,150 as settled in attachment 1. 369 00:35:00,590 --> 00:35:05,690 Notice has been circulated to all properties within a 60-meter radius and no public correspondence 370 00:35:05,690 --> 00:35:09,870 has been received. There are no registered speakers for this item in the evening. 371 00:35:10,350 --> 00:35:15,630 Thank you, Secretary Treasurer. I'll invite the applicant or their agent to approach the podium 372 00:35:15,630 --> 00:35:18,230 or online to walk us through this application. 373 00:35:26,540 --> 00:35:29,960 Good evening. Well, ISIS from Springwater Engineering 374 00:35:29,960 --> 00:35:40,440 agent for the eaks. We've read all the comments. We appreciate the feedback. We understand the 375 00:35:41,920 --> 00:35:47,120 conditions, and please to say that the Lake Simcoe Conservation Authority 376 00:35:47,120 --> 00:35:49,320 permit arrived today. 377 00:35:51,920 --> 00:35:58,200 The dryways are existing for agricultural purposes, and the 378 00:35:58,200 --> 00:36:06,780 porch we are not extending farther than the existing porch to the front yard. I can 379 00:36:06,780 --> 00:36:09,560 answer any questions if you have any. 380 00:36:12,420 --> 00:36:14,580 I'll open it up to committee if there's any questions. 381 00:36:15,620 --> 00:36:21,140 Maybe you could just tell us, so everybody knows just what the intent is here is. 382 00:36:21,500 --> 00:36:28,560 I understand you're taking a small house and making into a much larger place with farm garage. 383 00:36:29,820 --> 00:36:36,120 There's a shop being added to the rear of the expanded residents. 384 00:36:38,920 --> 00:36:44,140 What's the degree of impact on this new building on surrounding neighbors? 385 00:36:45,720 --> 00:36:48,180 The neighbors are far and few. 386 00:36:50,710 --> 00:36:55,120 The existing agricultural building on the site is already quite large. 387 00:36:55,560 --> 00:37:00,700 I think the addition will be smaller than that existing agricultural building. 388 00:37:01,280 --> 00:37:04,820 I don't think there's much of an impact to the neighbors. 389 00:37:04,820 --> 00:37:08,560 The addition is to the rear of the existing residents. 390 00:37:09,900 --> 00:37:12,080 At this lot's, a very large lot? 391 00:37:12,280 --> 00:37:13,360 It is a very large lot. 392 00:37:13,520 --> 00:37:15,000 But this is at the front of the lot. 393 00:37:15,300 --> 00:37:16,640 It is at the front of the lot. 394 00:37:17,360 --> 00:37:19,640 And who owns lots on both sides? 395 00:37:20,200 --> 00:37:24,380 I believe that the owner of this property owns the property around. 396 00:37:25,560 --> 00:37:26,440 The ex, yeah. 397 00:37:27,300 --> 00:37:29,720 I believe he's here. You may be able to tell you better. 398 00:37:37,950 --> 00:37:40,750 Any further questions from the committee? 399 00:37:40,970 --> 00:37:41,590 For the applicant. 400 00:37:42,090 --> 00:37:42,390 No? 401 00:37:43,190 --> 00:37:46,670 If we're comfortable with this application, can I get a member to move this item? 402 00:37:48,030 --> 00:37:54,330 Through you, Mr. Chair, I moved to approve application A2653. 403 00:37:54,950 --> 00:37:58,910 Together with all recommended conditions of approval, my opinion that the proposals 404 00:37:58,910 --> 00:38:04,450 meets the four tests on the Planning Act and has minimal impact on anything around it. 405 00:38:04,750 --> 00:38:05,490 Thank you. 406 00:38:06,070 --> 00:38:08,110 Okay. Second. You know a second. 407 00:38:19,060 --> 00:38:21,920 Okay. Motion carried. Your application has been approved. Thank you. 408 00:38:21,980 --> 00:38:23,460 Thank you very much. I'm a great evening. 409 00:38:32,000 --> 00:38:35,740 I'm six on the agenda. The next meeting for committee. Can the Secretary 410 00:38:35,740 --> 00:38:38,500 Treasurer please confirm the date of our next hearing? 411 00:38:41,840 --> 00:38:43,920 The next meeting will take place on Wednesdays of 412 00:38:43,920 --> 00:38:45,700 Number 16, that's expand. 413 00:38:46,700 --> 00:38:47,220 Thank you. 414 00:38:47,300 --> 00:38:49,240 Can I have a motion to adjourn the meeting? 415 00:38:53,540 --> 00:38:55,340 I'll get a second for that motion. 416 00:38:56,200 --> 00:38:56,880 Thank you, sir. 417 00:38:58,400 --> 00:38:59,100 All in favor? 418 00:39:00,120 --> 00:39:00,860 Motion carry. 419 00:39:01,040 --> 00:39:02,060 The meeting is now adjourned. 420 00:39:02,220 --> 00:39:02,600 Thank you.