1 00:00:27,199 --> 00:00:33,680 all right good evening mayor and Council um my name is Holly strong strong 2 00:00:31,240 --> 00:00:39,360 representing ches energy and just wanted to come to you tonight um to talk about 3 00:00:37,000 --> 00:00:44,079 a few of the items um that we've been in discussion with over um I guess probably 4 00:00:41,879 --> 00:00:49,800 starting back in June and July when you all were reviewing your gasing ordinance 5 00:00:47,600 --> 00:00:54,440 and uh as we were going through the ordinance and kind of reviewing it and 6 00:00:52,160 --> 00:00:58,440 looking through some of the items we boiled it down to May the three 7 00:00:56,480 --> 00:01:03,199 different areas that we would like to kind of um bundle 8 00:01:00,440 --> 00:01:07,360 the the um languages that we're looking at Under The Umbrellas and one of them 9 00:01:05,159 --> 00:01:13,960 would be environmental issues the second one is fees and then the third one is 10 00:01:11,280 --> 00:01:18,159 grandfathering and I have a copy of the presentation that I provided with you 11 00:01:15,920 --> 00:01:22,759 all for you all tonight and then there's also a document um at the top it says 12 00:01:20,640 --> 00:01:27,360 Lakeside ordinance and proposed ches peek revisions and so that's going to be 13 00:01:25,040 --> 00:01:31,600 more of a supplement document that um I'll refer to but basically what it is 14 00:01:29,680 --> 00:01:35,640 is we went through the ordinance and picked out the language that's currently 15 00:01:33,520 --> 00:01:39,920 in there and the Chesapeake recommendations are in red in there and 16 00:01:37,759 --> 00:01:45,240 then if there's any items that we would like to um delete or strike through 17 00:01:43,320 --> 00:01:52,280 that's reflected with the the strike through in there um so I will begin this 18 00:01:49,240 --> 00:01:55,240 part um and I'll kind of walk you through it so it'll be a little bit 19 00:01:53,399 --> 00:01:59,880 easier but it's a lot of information to digest um but basically tonight we just 20 00:01:57,680 --> 00:02:05,840 wanted to run through it and bring a couple of items uh to the Forefront for 21 00:02:03,240 --> 00:02:10,319 discussion so why consider the ordinance revisions we believe that adoption of 22 00:02:08,840 --> 00:02:14,760 these proposed revisions that we'll discuss tonight are going to be a 23 00:02:11,520 --> 00:02:20,200 win-win for the town of Lakeside City staff ches Peak and our lessur in this 24 00:02:18,160 --> 00:02:25,080 town um one of the things that we're looking at doing with the with the 25 00:02:22,560 --> 00:02:30,519 proposed revision would be to eliminate any duplicative testing um this is going 26 00:02:28,239 --> 00:02:34,680 to ultimately save the taxpayer dollar it's going to reduce the amount of work 27 00:02:32,319 --> 00:02:40,959 required by City staff and it's also going to allow the existing Regulatory 28 00:02:37,519 --> 00:02:47,159 Agencies such as the TCEQ to operate as they are intended and operate as um they 29 00:02:44,400 --> 00:02:51,720 do on a very daily basis and another thing to consider is that restrictive 30 00:02:49,080 --> 00:02:57,440 drilling ordinances could affect the development potential of future Wells um 31 00:02:54,400 --> 00:03:04,239 impacting potential royalties um we have seen um some recently in the news um the 32 00:03:01,120 --> 00:03:09,280 city of south lake has um passed a very restrictive Gast trilling ordinance and 33 00:03:06,560 --> 00:03:15,560 as a result um there's little uh activity going on in there little 34 00:03:12,360 --> 00:03:21,280 gastron in there one of the the first items under environmental issues is 35 00:03:17,239 --> 00:03:28,879 going to be air sampling and the first page um pages one to two is what the 36 00:03:26,400 --> 00:03:35,360 current ordinance reads and what we're proposing is that um we stick with what 37 00:03:32,239 --> 00:03:39,920 the tcq has in place already and there's been numerous third party studies on 38 00:03:37,799 --> 00:03:44,959 Regional natural gas operations that consistently show no cause for concern 39 00:03:43,159 --> 00:03:49,680 and you all were provided with a letter from Brian bner who is our environmental 40 00:03:47,400 --> 00:03:55,319 health and safety adviser who is also with me this evening um and that letter 41 00:03:52,560 --> 00:03:59,319 outlined a few of those studies that we um kind of picked for you all to look 42 00:03:57,079 --> 00:04:06,000 through uh the studies are very lengthy I've provided a copy to Diana for you 43 00:04:01,879 --> 00:04:10,400 all to um review at your leisure um but in there um you know you can just kind 44 00:04:08,439 --> 00:04:15,040 of read through that at your and there's a copy also should be included with the 45 00:04:13,680 --> 00:04:18,519 presentation tonight so the current ordinance 46 00:04:17,040 --> 00:04:26,080 language is inconsistent with the current tcq regulation and the tcq has 47 00:04:22,000 --> 00:04:33,000 pracy within Texas to permit inspect and enforce those air violations on the mun 48 00:04:29,639 --> 00:04:39,360 ipal level The Authority exists around the nuances or the the nuisance with the 49 00:04:35,720 --> 00:04:44,720 dust and the odor and the tcq must take any survey samples ultimately to be able 50 00:04:42,039 --> 00:04:50,360 to enforce any air quality um consequences that may be occurring um so 51 00:04:48,639 --> 00:04:56,960 this would the current ordinance requires unnecessary air sampling um 52 00:04:53,600 --> 00:05:01,680 creating un enforceable duplication Chesapeake's commitment here 53 00:04:59,600 --> 00:05:08,360 into cross the board net is 100% compliance if it's if it's broken we'll 54 00:05:05,240 --> 00:05:12,520 fix it um period and the recommendation that Chesapeake makes here is just to 55 00:05:10,280 --> 00:05:17,960 revise the language to require the operator to maintain compliance with all 56 00:05:14,520 --> 00:05:23,680 state and federal regulatory standards and on page seven of the supplement that 57 00:05:20,240 --> 00:05:28,759 you have um there's a a best practices and red that we've outlined and that's 58 00:05:26,240 --> 00:05:32,080 the elite detection and compliance plan and that's kind of suggested language 59 00:05:30,600 --> 00:05:38,360 that you all can go back and read through um that we we feel would be a 60 00:05:35,160 --> 00:05:43,080 win-win for both Lakeside and chest speak the next issue under 61 00:05:41,280 --> 00:05:48,360 environmental under the environmental umbrella is going to be the water 62 00:05:45,240 --> 00:05:50,919 sampling and on pages 2 through three in your 63 00:05:49,240 --> 00:05:57,400 supplements it outlines what the current ordinance 64 00:05:54,000 --> 00:06:03,280 says and one thing that we have experienced here in the bar is that 65 00:06:00,039 --> 00:06:09,360 there is no evidence of exist water and well water well contamination resulting 66 00:06:05,759 --> 00:06:13,120 from Barnet shell natural gas production and again I've got Brian burner here 67 00:06:11,520 --> 00:06:17,680 that you can answer questions if you have more specific um thoughts or 68 00:06:15,599 --> 00:06:21,560 concerns if you've read about something um to proba to try and work through 69 00:06:19,960 --> 00:06:28,039 those or talk through some of those issues and the current ordinance also 70 00:06:24,199 --> 00:06:32,599 shows a distance of 2,000 ft um from the well board that the water well would 71 00:06:29,800 --> 00:06:36,960 need to be sampled and we ches believes that it's impossible to isolate the 72 00:06:34,319 --> 00:06:42,560 actual source of contamination of a water well at a distance of 2,000 ft so 73 00:06:40,240 --> 00:06:47,440 Chesapeake recommends that the town of Lakeside conduct post Drilling and post 74 00:06:45,160 --> 00:06:53,639 rcking sampling of the municipal water wells within 300 ft of the wellbore 75 00:06:50,960 --> 00:06:58,639 within 30 days of the conclusion of that fracking or drilling activity and then 76 00:06:56,199 --> 00:07:01,840 the cost for such testing would be covered in the permitting 77 00:07:02,160 --> 00:07:10,840 fees and so there's again there's language on pages two and three in red 78 00:07:07,080 --> 00:07:15,680 you can go back and look at um that that we would recommend for you to consider 79 00:07:13,000 --> 00:07:15,680 there as 80 00:07:16,120 --> 00:07:22,800 well the third issue under the environmental umbrella relates to the 81 00:07:21,319 --> 00:07:30,160 lift and the line compressors um the current ordinance has 82 00:07:26,039 --> 00:07:36,440 setbacks in place 6 to 700t set backs in place and um it mandates a lot of 83 00:07:33,599 --> 00:07:42,319 permanent structures to be um surrounding these gas lift compressors 84 00:07:39,919 --> 00:07:46,440 and by mandating those enclosures like is represented in the 85 00:07:44,080 --> 00:07:50,840 presentation um it can impact the performance of the compressor which goes 86 00:07:48,840 --> 00:07:55,680 back to impacting the performance of The Well ultimately and potentially 87 00:07:53,080 --> 00:08:00,280 impacting um the potential development of those gas Wells and it can also 88 00:07:57,759 --> 00:08:05,400 prolong the activity on the side um additional heat on this system can 89 00:08:02,120 --> 00:08:10,879 affect the well productivity as well and Alternatives if the noise is the issue 90 00:08:08,520 --> 00:08:16,319 there are sound blankets that can very effectively reduce and stay keep those 91 00:08:14,120 --> 00:08:21,759 compressors within allowable limits allowable decel levels of that's in your 92 00:08:18,720 --> 00:08:25,879 current ordinance um lift compressors are also they're often rented and not 93 00:08:24,280 --> 00:08:32,039 owned by The Operators making the permanent enclosure impractical to 94 00:08:28,840 --> 00:08:36,640 enclosure a rented um compressor and within that and then the 600t setbacks 95 00:08:34,719 --> 00:08:41,240 are not necessary to mitigate sound again we can do that with the sound 96 00:08:38,719 --> 00:08:46,399 blankets or the the the shorter sound walls around the compressor Jack the's 97 00:08:44,159 --> 00:08:51,320 recommendation would be a require permanent structure only if the lift or 98 00:08:48,640 --> 00:08:56,519 line compressors are unable to meet those allowable noise limits and the 99 00:08:53,680 --> 00:09:01,200 chest PE would also recommend removal of the stepb distance 100 00:09:01,839 --> 00:09:08,720 and that is reflected on page four of the 101 00:09:10,320 --> 00:09:17,600 supplement the and the the next issue under the 102 00:09:15,880 --> 00:09:23,279 environmental umbrella would be the sound and the preactivity sound survey 103 00:09:20,920 --> 00:09:27,760 that we do it's 72-hour sound survey measures the regular frequency that's 104 00:09:26,079 --> 00:09:32,959 conducted by a third party and it demonstrates the Ambient sound levels 105 00:09:30,920 --> 00:09:39,000 and what we have found in our sound survey is that the ambient levels are 106 00:09:36,000 --> 00:09:43,519 slightly higher than what the current ordinance allow so even at ambient it's 107 00:09:41,560 --> 00:09:48,279 out of compliance and this is due to road noise the location of the you know 108 00:09:46,160 --> 00:09:54,240 being in the nearby flight path and even crickets chirping made those those 109 00:09:50,920 --> 00:09:59,279 deciel levels Spike slightly just's recommendation would be 110 00:09:57,079 --> 00:10:04,839 to delete the current ordinance language relating to low frequency noise and 111 00:10:02,519 --> 00:10:08,839 we're working with Baron um our environmental or not our environmental 112 00:10:06,560 --> 00:10:14,360 company a environmental company in the Barnet shell that does a lot has a ton 113 00:10:11,160 --> 00:10:19,959 of experience with sound surveying um in other cities to develop a reasonable 114 00:10:17,360 --> 00:10:25,399 deciel level that would work for those low frequency um ambient levels now the 115 00:10:23,440 --> 00:10:31,720 difference between low frequency frequency pure tones it's very umed and 116 00:10:29,519 --> 00:10:35,760 can be very confusing and I've talked with a few of you all about having 117 00:10:33,320 --> 00:10:41,120 potentially at the next council meeting having Barons come by and providing a a 118 00:10:38,800 --> 00:10:46,480 presentation and kind of explaining what that means what what can the human year 119 00:10:42,920 --> 00:10:51,959 actually hear and how can you um you know have an ordinance that that allows 120 00:10:49,000 --> 00:10:56,519 for you know a reasonable amount of of noise on the 121 00:10:54,160 --> 00:11:01,639 site um and what you do have in your ordinance is the the decibel level 122 00:10:59,440 --> 00:11:07,839 during fracking and drilling um which would be five five DB sound level not to 123 00:11:05,279 --> 00:11:12,920 exceed five DB during the daytime and three DB at night time and then in your 124 00:11:10,800 --> 00:11:20,079 the current ordinance for fracking it says um noise level not to exceed 7even 125 00:11:15,800 --> 00:11:25,480 DB and we would recommend 10 DB um just of bumping that up to up three decal 126 00:11:27,320 --> 00:11:34,639 levels and the final issue under the environmental umbrella 127 00:11:32,639 --> 00:11:39,800 is going to be as it relates to the Railroad Commission permit and basically 128 00:11:37,680 --> 00:11:45,320 the current ordinance requires an approved Railroad Commission permit at 129 00:11:42,000 --> 00:11:50,639 the time that Chesapeake submits the gas well or that any company would submit 130 00:11:46,959 --> 00:11:55,160 the gas well permit and for various reasons that I've outlined here we would 131 00:11:53,120 --> 00:11:59,399 like to recommend that prior to the issuance of the gas 132 00:11:57,880 --> 00:12:04,639 well is when you would need to have the approved Rel commission permit so and 133 00:12:02,480 --> 00:12:10,200 for one of the main reasons and one of the big things here is that leasing 134 00:12:07,360 --> 00:12:15,199 continues to go on um after we've submitted the well or the well 135 00:12:12,360 --> 00:12:19,160 application and so having to go back having our land team having to go back 136 00:12:16,639 --> 00:12:25,120 to the state and amend those permits constantly uses up resources uh CH speak 137 00:12:22,760 --> 00:12:29,519 resources State resources constantly amending those permits as we take and 138 00:12:27,600 --> 00:12:34,760 expand our wells and our least hold in that area um another reason because the 139 00:12:32,560 --> 00:12:38,959 city permitting process can be lengthy especially if there's a you know a 140 00:12:36,480 --> 00:12:44,240 council meeting involved or there's much work to be done with the surrounding 141 00:12:41,760 --> 00:12:48,720 Community um we can go ahead and have that process started and not necessarily 142 00:12:46,800 --> 00:12:53,480 need an approved Road Commission permit in hand and ultimately any activity on 143 00:12:51,839 --> 00:12:58,920 that site requires the roadroad commission perit as far as drilling goes 144 00:12:56,160 --> 00:13:05,279 but our request is that the ordinance language say um what it points out here 145 00:13:02,680 --> 00:13:09,639 in this box which is on page nine of your supplement document in red and that 146 00:13:07,880 --> 00:13:13,839 says prior to the issuance of a gasv permit operator shall provide to the 147 00:13:11,680 --> 00:13:19,760 town a copy of the approved rail recission permit to drill but not before 148 00:13:16,760 --> 00:13:19,760 applying for a city of 149 00:13:20,720 --> 00:13:28,360 permit I'll move on to the second umbrella that we've kind of defined