1 00:00:30,000 --> 00:00:34,000 Good evening, everyone. As corporate officer, I call this meeting to order. 2 00:00:34,000 --> 00:00:42,000 For the information of the public, Councillor Spock is joining us online while Councillors Morley and Barry and Merrick McMenson are unable to attend. 3 00:00:42,000 --> 00:00:51,000 Due to the absence of the mayor and acting mayor and pursuant to the council procedure by law, the members present must choose a chair for tonight's meeting. 4 00:00:51,000 --> 00:00:56,000 So at this time, I will ask for a motion to appoint one of the members in chambers as chair. 5 00:00:56,000 --> 00:01:00,000 Thank you all, move the Council of Point, Councillor Your Couture is chair for this evening. 6 00:01:00,000 --> 00:01:04,000 Oh second. 7 00:01:04,000 --> 00:01:07,000 Any discussion? 8 00:01:07,000 --> 00:01:11,000 All those in favor? 9 00:01:11,000 --> 00:01:13,000 Motion carries. 10 00:01:13,000 --> 00:01:15,000 Councillor, you two too, you are now chair. 11 00:01:26,000 --> 00:01:31,000 Thank you everyone for bearing with that procedural aid on there. 12 00:01:31,000 --> 00:01:50,000 So that time of year, I guess there's been sickness going around, is my assumption with that. 13 00:01:50,000 --> 00:01:54,000 We'll move on to item two, which is our territory acknowledgment. 14 00:01:54,000 --> 00:01:57,000 Councillor Harder, could I have our territory acknowledgment, please? 15 00:01:57,000 --> 00:01:58,000 Thank you chair. 16 00:01:58,000 --> 00:02:02,000 The city of Langford sits upon the traditional territories of the co-saleish peoples. 17 00:02:02,000 --> 00:02:05,000 The waspsum, songies, and sheeninations. 18 00:02:05,000 --> 00:02:08,000 As well as the wasshanish peoples represented by the start-lip, 19 00:02:08,000 --> 00:02:12,000 kitchen, sail, seek from Malhap for nations. 20 00:02:12,000 --> 00:02:15,000 We thank them for sharing this beautiful land. 21 00:02:15,000 --> 00:02:17,000 Thank you very much, General. 22 00:02:17,000 --> 00:02:19,000 Would this want more for the meeting conference? 23 00:02:19,000 --> 00:02:20,000 Good evening, everyone. 24 00:02:20,000 --> 00:02:23,000 My name is Marie Watmal, and I will be the moderator for tonight's meeting. 25 00:02:23,000 --> 00:02:26,000 Participation by the public is in person or via Zoom. 26 00:02:26,000 --> 00:02:29,000 By the using the Zoom app or telephone. 27 00:02:29,000 --> 00:02:33,000 If you're joining us for the Zoom app, and wish to make a comment, please use the raise hand function in the app, 28 00:02:33,000 --> 00:02:36,000 keeping in mind your able to both raise and lower your hand. 29 00:02:36,000 --> 00:02:39,000 And you'll be called on based upon your username. 30 00:02:39,000 --> 00:02:42,000 You'll need to unmute yourself when it's time for you to speak. 31 00:02:42,000 --> 00:02:46,000 If you're joining us by a telephone, you must press star nine on the telephone key patch. 32 00:02:46,000 --> 00:02:47,000 To raise your hand. 33 00:02:47,000 --> 00:02:52,000 You should hear a recording that advises you the moderator will be notified you wish to speak. 34 00:02:52,000 --> 00:02:55,000 And you'll be called upon using the last three digits of your phone number. 35 00:02:55,000 --> 00:02:58,000 Please press star six to unmute your phone. 36 00:02:58,000 --> 00:03:04,000 If you're attending in person, you can approach the podium on at a time once the public input person begins. 37 00:03:04,000 --> 00:03:08,000 And in all cases, please start by providing us with your first initial. 38 00:03:08,000 --> 00:03:14,000 Last name and municipality of residence indicate which item are items on the agenda you wish to speak to. 39 00:03:14,000 --> 00:03:21,000 During public participation, you may speak to any item on the agenda subject to the three-minute time limit. 40 00:03:21,000 --> 00:03:28,000 And there may be more than one opportunity to speak, but additional comments are limited to those not raised by you previously. 41 00:03:28,000 --> 00:03:35,000 At this time, we remind the public that the city doesn't tolerate bullying or harassment of city staff elected officials, 42 00:03:35,000 --> 00:03:40,000 or members of the public during counselling committee meetings, so please keep your comments respectful. 43 00:03:41,000 --> 00:03:49,000 For any matters not appearing on tonight's agenda, please contact City Hall by calling 2-5-0-478-7882. 44 00:03:49,000 --> 00:03:56,000 During regular business hours, only if you experience technical difficulties in getting through tonight, please contact City Hall tomorrow. 45 00:03:56,000 --> 00:04:02,000 As always, the city also accepts written submissions and comments. 46 00:04:02,000 --> 00:04:06,000 Thank you very much. I can have a motion to approve the agenda. 47 00:04:07,000 --> 00:04:10,000 Thank you chair Almyw, if that council approve the agenda is presented. 48 00:04:10,000 --> 00:04:12,000 It will second. 49 00:04:12,000 --> 00:04:17,000 Thank you very much. And if there's no discussion, I'll call the question on that. All in favor. 50 00:04:17,000 --> 00:04:19,000 And any opposed? 51 00:04:19,000 --> 00:04:21,000 That carries. 52 00:04:21,000 --> 00:04:23,000 We're bringing this on to item 5. 53 00:04:23,000 --> 00:04:29,000 Public participation. We'll start off in the gallery here if anyone would like to speak to any item on the agenda. 54 00:04:29,000 --> 00:04:32,000 Please raise your hand and I can call you forward. 55 00:04:32,000 --> 00:04:35,000 And we can get started with that. 56 00:04:37,000 --> 00:04:44,000 Seeing no one at this time in the gallery, I will move online. 57 00:04:44,000 --> 00:04:49,000 And I do see one hand raised online there, so I'll hand that over to let them in. 58 00:04:49,000 --> 00:04:53,000 I'll pizzervurn through, please omit yourself in the app. 59 00:04:53,000 --> 00:05:04,000 Provides your first initial last name or municipality of residence for the record and indicate which item items on the agenda you wish to speak to. 60 00:05:05,000 --> 00:05:07,000 Can you hear me there? 61 00:05:07,000 --> 00:05:09,000 We sure can. 62 00:05:09,000 --> 00:05:13,000 Okay, I'm sorry. I just missed the very beginning there of the opening. 63 00:05:13,000 --> 00:05:19,000 Are we talking about the proposal of rezoning on Sunderland Road? 64 00:05:19,000 --> 00:05:25,000 Any matters on the agenda, so that would be the you're talking about the bylaw. 65 00:05:25,000 --> 00:05:31,000 For the rezoning application. 66 00:05:31,000 --> 00:05:33,000 Yeah, go ahead. 67 00:05:33,000 --> 00:05:34,000 Okay. 68 00:05:34,000 --> 00:05:40,000 My name is Vurn True owner of the future orphan law that 2626 Sunderland Road, Langford BC. 69 00:05:40,000 --> 00:05:44,000 I've been a willing seller since day one on this project. 70 00:05:44,000 --> 00:05:50,000 In October of 2023, this mayor and council promised to never orphan another property in Langford again. 71 00:05:50,000 --> 00:05:52,000 Yeah, here we are. 72 00:05:52,000 --> 00:05:59,000 January 19, 2025, the sustainability committee recommended that no action to be taken by council. 73 00:05:59,000 --> 00:06:08,000 Two weeks later, council is ready to move this project forward without further consultation after the developer wrote a letter to the city. 74 00:06:08,000 --> 00:06:10,000 Find it kind of fishy. 75 00:06:10,000 --> 00:06:15,000 If that's the threshold for moving forward, the man do I ever have a show stop for for you. 76 00:06:15,000 --> 00:06:18,000 I'm currently on vacation in Australia. 77 00:06:18,000 --> 00:06:23,000 I've had to reschedule my life yet again to bring by concerns forward. 78 00:06:23,000 --> 00:06:28,000 As I've been doing now for the past two years with the city and four years with this developer. 79 00:06:28,000 --> 00:06:36,000 To be very clear, I am all four development in Langford as long as it is done in a sustainable fashion. 80 00:06:36,000 --> 00:06:40,000 The reason that I oppose this application are as follows. 81 00:06:40,000 --> 00:06:44,000 Number one, this will be another failed project. 82 00:06:44,000 --> 00:06:48,000 Number two, we already have two failed projects on Pete road. 83 00:06:48,000 --> 00:06:50,000 Do we really need a third? 84 00:06:50,000 --> 00:06:56,000 Number three, one of the members of this original group has already declared bankruptcy. 85 00:06:56,000 --> 00:07:07,000 Number four, the maintenance proposal for these properties is a bribe to achieve rezoning on a project that they have no plans on starting, let alone completing. 86 00:07:07,000 --> 00:07:13,000 Number five, we only need to look at the track record of the past four years to see the intent. 87 00:07:13,000 --> 00:07:19,000 They can't even be bothered to respond to me about the replacement of our joining fence. 88 00:07:19,000 --> 00:07:27,000 It was installed 18 years ago and has suffered increased rot due to lack of maintenance of prickled bushes on their side of a fence. 89 00:07:27,000 --> 00:07:31,000 Number six, my property value has been destroyed. 90 00:07:31,000 --> 00:07:41,000 Number seven, the proposed public space atop the parking that borders my property will not only take away all of my privacy and enjoyment in my backyard. 91 00:07:41,000 --> 00:07:46,000 It will increase the height of the parkated cells at intent to 15 feet of height. 92 00:07:46,000 --> 00:07:50,000 So it's going to be 60 feet in height and 85 feet in length. 93 00:07:50,000 --> 00:07:55,000 This will create an intolerable heat sink to my property and steal any morning sun. 94 00:07:55,000 --> 00:07:59,000 In closing, the city has made it clear. 95 00:07:59,000 --> 00:08:03,000 They cannot force the developer to buy a property. 96 00:08:03,000 --> 00:08:07,000 However, the developer cannot force the city to rezone theirs. 97 00:08:07,000 --> 00:08:11,000 There is no legal recourse for voting no tonight. 98 00:08:12,000 --> 00:08:17,000 If you truly care for the citizens of Langford, you will vote no to this rezoning application. 99 00:08:17,000 --> 00:08:23,000 If you don't care, and it's only about your legacy as a mayor or counselor, you will vote you through. 100 00:08:23,000 --> 00:08:26,000 If you could just finish up, we are just over time here, but thank you. 101 00:08:26,000 --> 00:08:31,000 This will be a deciding factor when the citizens of Langford go to the polls in October. 102 00:08:31,000 --> 00:08:33,000 Thank you. 103 00:08:33,000 --> 00:08:35,000 Thank you very much. 104 00:08:35,000 --> 00:08:38,000 Do we have any other members online at this time? 105 00:08:42,000 --> 00:08:47,000 See, no other hands raised. 106 00:08:47,000 --> 00:08:50,000 I'll look back to the gallery for a last call. 107 00:08:53,000 --> 00:08:56,000 Oh, I do see another hand raised online. 108 00:08:56,000 --> 00:08:58,000 I will let best up. 109 00:08:58,000 --> 00:09:03,000 Well, if when user ending in 417, please press star 6 on the telephone keypad to unmute. 110 00:09:03,000 --> 00:09:06,000 Write your first initial last name. 111 00:09:06,000 --> 00:09:11,000 The municipality of residents and item are items on the agenda that you wish to speak to. 112 00:09:23,000 --> 00:09:24,000 Please. 113 00:09:24,000 --> 00:09:25,000 Please. 114 00:09:25,000 --> 00:09:26,000 Let's go. 115 00:09:26,000 --> 00:09:29,000 It's Larry March speaking. 116 00:09:29,000 --> 00:09:30,000 Go ahead. 117 00:09:30,000 --> 00:09:31,000 Please. 118 00:09:31,000 --> 00:09:32,000 Okay. 119 00:09:32,000 --> 00:09:33,000 Okay. 120 00:09:33,000 --> 00:09:34,000 Yes. 121 00:09:35,000 --> 00:09:37,000 Yes. We live in Langford. 122 00:09:37,000 --> 00:09:40,000 You know, we've been here about eight months now. 123 00:09:40,000 --> 00:09:43,000 I'm looking at the density of this project. 124 00:09:43,000 --> 00:09:48,000 And it seems pretty high for this location on 22 stories. 125 00:09:48,000 --> 00:09:51,000 For one of the buildings is a death. 126 00:09:51,000 --> 00:09:58,000 Two high-adents and I'm wondering how the traffic is going to be coordinated on Pete Road. 127 00:09:58,000 --> 00:10:02,000 Has it been any traffic studies done or traffic analysis done for the series? 128 00:10:02,000 --> 00:10:04,000 It's pretty bad right now. 129 00:10:04,000 --> 00:10:12,000 And it's just going to get worse, especially accessing on Pete Road or Sunderland Drive or Sunderland Road. 130 00:10:12,000 --> 00:10:16,000 So that's kind of just my concerns right now. 131 00:10:16,000 --> 00:10:22,000 I believe the density is too high and I can of course the application at this point. 132 00:10:22,000 --> 00:10:25,000 I just think it's too much for this area. 133 00:10:25,000 --> 00:10:27,000 Thank you. 134 00:10:27,000 --> 00:10:29,000 Thank you very much. 135 00:10:29,000 --> 00:10:31,000 And I see we have another user online there. 136 00:10:31,000 --> 00:10:44,000 Thank you. 137 00:10:44,000 --> 00:10:46,000 Hello, can you hear me? 138 00:10:46,000 --> 00:10:47,000 Yes, we can. 139 00:10:47,000 --> 00:10:50,000 We've been 26 30 Sunderland Road. 140 00:10:50,000 --> 00:10:54,000 The house right close to the open not. 141 00:10:54,000 --> 00:11:00,000 I want to speak about of course the development you are obviously going to prove from what I understand. 142 00:11:00,000 --> 00:11:06,000 I just wanted to let you know that we will do a freedom of information request, 143 00:11:06,000 --> 00:11:10,000 requesting the exchange between the city and the developer. 144 00:11:10,000 --> 00:11:17,000 Because I want to see exactly the reason why the city changed their mind on this development. 145 00:11:17,000 --> 00:11:22,000 At the last meeting there was absolutely no rush to prove this development. 146 00:11:23,000 --> 00:11:29,000 Until there is a clear plan on endorsing on enforcing the maintenance plan. 147 00:11:29,000 --> 00:11:40,000 It is obviously not enforced right now and you showed us from past experience that you have no way to enforce anything regarding developers. 148 00:11:40,000 --> 00:11:51,000 So I would like to have like a clearance where on how are you going to enforce the maintenance plan and how are you going to make sure our property value is not going to decrease. 149 00:11:51,000 --> 00:11:54,000 And how my life in this neighborhood is not going to get worse. 150 00:11:54,000 --> 00:12:01,000 Today I have to work my daughter down the street in the morning because of sketchy people living in the empty houses. 151 00:12:01,000 --> 00:12:09,000 If you go down the path there is there is literally trash on the lots which is unsafe for my kids. 152 00:12:09,000 --> 00:12:15,000 My kids found drugs in this path just because developers destroyed our neighborhood. 153 00:12:15,000 --> 00:12:18,000 So what are you going to do to keep our kids safe? 154 00:12:18,000 --> 00:12:22,000 And for us to be happy to live in this neighborhood it becomes a disaster. 155 00:12:22,000 --> 00:12:26,000 I'm ashamed of inviting people because of what it looks like. 156 00:12:26,000 --> 00:12:30,000 So please give us transparency and I sense some email. 157 00:12:30,000 --> 00:12:32,000 I had some answers. 158 00:12:32,000 --> 00:12:33,000 I want more than that. 159 00:12:33,000 --> 00:12:40,000 I want to see your exchanges with the developers and I want to make sure the decision are taken in good faith. 160 00:12:40,000 --> 00:12:43,000 And in the best interest of the main court citizen. 161 00:12:45,000 --> 00:12:46,000 Thank you, LA. 162 00:12:46,000 --> 00:12:49,000 Can we just get your last name for the record please? 163 00:12:49,000 --> 00:12:51,000 Then it's DA entity. 164 00:12:51,000 --> 00:12:52,000 Thank you. 165 00:12:52,000 --> 00:12:53,000 Thank you. 166 00:12:53,000 --> 00:12:54,000 Thank you. 167 00:12:54,000 --> 00:12:56,000 Thank you very much. 168 00:12:56,000 --> 00:13:10,000 Hi anyone else for public participation at this time either online or in the gallery. 169 00:13:11,000 --> 00:13:13,000 Well thank you very much everybody. 170 00:13:13,000 --> 00:13:26,000 With no other hand raised I will follow public participation to a close. 171 00:13:26,000 --> 00:13:29,000 This moves us on to the consent agenda. 172 00:13:29,000 --> 00:13:33,000 Can I have a motion for council to adopt the recommendations of the consent agenda? 173 00:13:33,000 --> 00:13:38,000 I'll move that council adopt the recommendations for each item of the consent agenda as presented. 174 00:13:38,000 --> 00:13:39,000 Second. 175 00:13:39,000 --> 00:13:42,000 Thank you very much. 176 00:13:42,000 --> 00:13:46,000 And I'll call the question all of favor. 177 00:13:46,000 --> 00:13:48,000 And any opposed. 178 00:13:48,000 --> 00:13:50,000 That carries. 179 00:13:50,000 --> 00:13:52,000 We'll move on into item eight. 180 00:13:52,000 --> 00:13:54,000 We have our committee resolutions. 181 00:13:54,000 --> 00:13:57,000 First up is 8.1 committee advisory committee. 182 00:13:57,000 --> 00:13:59,000 And that is 8.1. 183 00:13:59,000 --> 00:14:04,000 The west shore RCMP annual report. 184 00:14:04,000 --> 00:14:05,000 Thank you chair. 185 00:14:05,000 --> 00:14:06,000 I'll move that. 186 00:14:06,000 --> 00:14:10,000 Council received the 2025 west shore RCMP annual report for influence on. 187 00:14:10,000 --> 00:14:12,000 Second. 188 00:14:12,000 --> 00:14:13,000 Thank you very much. 189 00:14:13,000 --> 00:14:16,000 Any motivation on this? 190 00:14:16,000 --> 00:14:17,000 Yeah. 191 00:14:17,000 --> 00:14:19,000 Springfully. 192 00:14:19,000 --> 00:14:20,000 Yeah. 193 00:14:20,000 --> 00:14:22,000 Thank you chair. 194 00:14:22,000 --> 00:14:26,000 Community advisory committee did have the opportunity to. 195 00:14:26,000 --> 00:14:29,000 Receive this last week when it was presented by Superintendent Glesby. 196 00:14:29,000 --> 00:14:33,000 Really appreciative of Superintendent Glesby for making himself available and being. 197 00:14:33,000 --> 00:14:35,000 Great generous with this time. 198 00:14:35,000 --> 00:14:38,000 Just in responding to the committee's questions. 199 00:14:38,000 --> 00:14:42,000 I'll note that the committee was quite complementary on this year's report. 200 00:14:42,000 --> 00:14:50,000 Just noting the level of detail and spatial analysis that was presented in contrast to some of the previous years. 201 00:14:50,000 --> 00:14:52,000 So a lot of gratitude for that. 202 00:14:52,000 --> 00:14:55,000 And just recognizing his new role in the community. 203 00:14:55,000 --> 00:14:58,000 And I think he's been on in the role for about two weeks now. 204 00:14:58,000 --> 00:15:00,000 It was really great to have him here in chambers. 205 00:15:00,000 --> 00:15:14,000 Nothing further for me. Thank you and Councillor Wigner. Yes, thank you. I don't know a lot to add. It was great to hear from the new superintendent and appreciate the conversation that the committee had. 206 00:15:14,000 --> 00:15:26,000 That's quite interesting and informative. So also the report had quite a few interesting visuals and statistics. So it's worth a read for people that are interested. 207 00:15:26,000 --> 00:15:31,000 And the previous council meeting we did get an introduction from the superintendent as well. 208 00:15:31,000 --> 00:15:37,000 For people that might be interested in knowing a little bit about his background. So that's all I have. 209 00:15:37,000 --> 00:15:43,000 Thank you very much. All uh, while the question on that motion, all in favor. 210 00:15:43,000 --> 00:15:46,000 And any opposed? 211 00:15:46,000 --> 00:15:55,000 That carries. We'll move on to item 8.1.2 application for an extended area of operation for the liquor primary license. 212 00:15:55,000 --> 00:16:05,000 I'll move that council direct staff to inform the liquor and cannabis regulation branch that the city of Langford will opt out of the public notification for the application to extend the area of operation. 213 00:16:05,000 --> 00:16:12,000 For an existing liquor primary license for the log has pub located at 2323 mill stream road. 214 00:16:12,000 --> 00:16:14,000 And I can second. 215 00:16:14,000 --> 00:16:17,000 Thank you and any motivation on this item. 216 00:16:18,000 --> 00:16:27,000 Yeah, so similarly straightforward for this item. The applicant is just looking to expand their services into a glass to area. 217 00:16:27,000 --> 00:16:30,000 So just essentially expanding the patio. 218 00:16:30,000 --> 00:16:35,000 Committee had no concerns and they were quite excited to see as well that this area was friendly. 219 00:16:35,000 --> 00:16:46,000 So felt no need to opt into the process and typically this is something that is covered in provincial realm. So I don't think there was any concerns of the committee level. 220 00:16:46,000 --> 00:16:49,000 Thank you very much. And anything to add to council. 221 00:16:49,000 --> 00:16:57,000 Yeah, not really. I guess I'm sort of a housekeeping item in a way. We've seen this kind of application before where we have often out. 222 00:16:57,000 --> 00:17:02,000 Love the public notification as long as there were no concerns. So as we didn't hear any. 223 00:17:02,000 --> 00:17:07,000 And in fact, there was some positive comments. I feel comfortable. 224 00:17:07,000 --> 00:17:11,000 Thank you. And I do see council spot on mine. 225 00:17:11,000 --> 00:17:21,000 Thank you chair. I just have a question probably through you to planning or who never would be dealing with form and character around the fence. 226 00:17:21,000 --> 00:17:25,000 And I'm just wondering how much say we have on that. 227 00:17:25,000 --> 00:17:28,000 It says that a picket fence will go in place there. 228 00:17:28,000 --> 00:17:35,000 And I'm wondering about the look of that the maintenance of it, the ongoingness of it. 229 00:17:35,000 --> 00:17:45,000 And then favor of the recommendation, but I am concerned about the materials that will be used and how this will appear. 230 00:17:45,000 --> 00:17:48,000 If I could just check in on that. 231 00:17:48,000 --> 00:17:50,000 Yeah, I think you can respond for that question. 232 00:17:50,000 --> 00:17:58,000 I don't believe it's entirely germane to the actual agenda item on hand is this is just about opting out of the liquor license. 233 00:17:58,000 --> 00:18:03,000 But that has definitely a great question, but it's better suited to it under four on. 234 00:18:03,000 --> 00:18:08,000 Thanks chair. I'll check with staff separately. Thanks. 235 00:18:08,000 --> 00:18:09,000 Thank you very much. 236 00:18:09,000 --> 00:18:15,000 With that, I will call the question on 8.1.2 all in favor. 237 00:18:15,000 --> 00:18:18,000 And any opposed. 238 00:18:18,000 --> 00:18:20,000 That carries. 239 00:18:20,000 --> 00:18:27,000 I will move on to item 8.1.3. This is by law number 2265 for the lingered station. 240 00:18:28,000 --> 00:18:36,000 Yes, I'll move that council, consider giving first second and third reading to the lingered station by law number 2265 2026. 241 00:18:36,000 --> 00:18:39,000 Then I can second. 242 00:18:39,000 --> 00:18:40,000 Thank you. 243 00:18:40,000 --> 00:18:44,000 It was great to have this item brought to committee. 244 00:18:44,000 --> 00:18:54,000 Really just taking the opportunity to review our by laws and around the cultural district on station avenue now that about four years of past since it first opened. 245 00:18:54,000 --> 00:19:02,000 The committee had a really great discussion just surrounding the merits of updating the current regulations, the permitting guidelines and the view model. 246 00:19:02,000 --> 00:19:05,000 And there was some comments as well noted at committee. 247 00:19:05,000 --> 00:19:11,000 Just regarding some additional opportunities that south look forward through this update in. 248 00:19:11,000 --> 00:19:16,000 Presenting some opportunities to advance our reconciliation initiative at the city. 249 00:19:16,000 --> 00:19:23,000 By encouraging greater indigenous participation and finding some creative ways to connect the community with local makers and artists. 250 00:19:23,000 --> 00:19:28,000 So I was really happy to see this coming forward and be supporting it. 251 00:19:28,000 --> 00:19:32,000 Thank you very much, any other comments from this item. 252 00:19:32,000 --> 00:19:47,000 I just have a question about just the I guess through the chair to staff about the fee structure and the idea that we wouldn't increase it regularly every year as a way of just making sure we don't fall behind. 253 00:19:47,000 --> 00:19:51,000 I just would like a little bit more information about that. 254 00:19:51,000 --> 00:19:54,000 Through the chair. Thank you for the question. 255 00:19:54,000 --> 00:20:03,000 It's lofted review this as the CPI increase was added after a year or so after the length of the station open. 256 00:20:03,000 --> 00:20:09,000 And upon reflection and looking at the pricing of the units and how they are creeping up. 257 00:20:09,000 --> 00:20:20,000 Given that the district isn't yet where we'd like to see it in terms of footsteps and the vendors being busy are throughout the week and also year around. 258 00:20:20,000 --> 00:20:26,000 We didn't want to see those prices escalating beyond reach. 259 00:20:26,000 --> 00:20:33,000 Entrepreneurs that are there because it would essentially take away the intent of what we're trying to do and we're just not there yet. 260 00:20:33,000 --> 00:20:38,000 So we just felt that it was better to keep it like the fixed rate and set of. 261 00:20:38,000 --> 00:20:40,000 Having them go up. 262 00:20:40,000 --> 00:20:42,000 Over here. 263 00:20:42,000 --> 00:20:44,000 Thank you just a quick follow up then. 264 00:20:44,000 --> 00:20:50,000 It sounds like it's just a very evolving dynamic situation still and it's pretty fantastic. 265 00:20:50,000 --> 00:20:53,000 But we're looking for more regular foot traffic. 266 00:20:53,000 --> 00:21:05,000 So I guess I was thinking the staff time of looking at it every year might be more than a regular increase but it seems that may be. 267 00:21:05,000 --> 00:21:13,000 Your ability to assess the situation needed might prevent a business from leaving which would you know for trying to fill a station I can see that being quite a bit of work as well. 268 00:21:13,000 --> 00:21:16,000 So is that part of how you factor just retaining those businesses. 269 00:21:16,000 --> 00:21:22,000 Yeah thanks for the question to the chair we don't anticipate seeing the rates going up. 270 00:21:22,000 --> 00:21:30,000 I would say at least the next three years we are still in a building phase and although we have seen a lot of interest. 271 00:21:30,000 --> 00:21:43,000 And vendors like I've shared with the committee have actually grown up and have scaled up at the district from ten foot to twenty foot and recently the clinical move to working order. 272 00:21:43,000 --> 00:21:46,000 Is this in line for which is a great success story. 273 00:21:46,000 --> 00:21:53,000 So we want to keep nurturing that and we just feel within the next three years then we could re-evaluate. 274 00:21:53,000 --> 00:21:59,000 For now we don't see us needing to evaluate this on an annual basis. 275 00:21:59,000 --> 00:22:04,000 Thank you that's helpful appreciate the extra information. 276 00:22:04,000 --> 00:22:09,000 Thank you very much I'll call the question on this item all in favor. 277 00:22:09,000 --> 00:22:12,000 And anyone opposed. 278 00:22:12,000 --> 00:22:15,000 That carries unanimously thank you. 279 00:22:15,000 --> 00:22:18,000 Last committee advisory. 280 00:22:18,000 --> 00:22:25,000 The advisory committee resolution we have by law number two two three nine and two two one two the animal control by laws. 281 00:22:25,000 --> 00:22:33,000 Thank you chair before I bring a motion forward on this one actually we did have some discussion at the committee and I was wondering if I could ask a question three is staff. 282 00:22:33,000 --> 00:22:34,000 Please do. 283 00:22:34,000 --> 00:22:36,000 Thank you through. 284 00:22:36,000 --> 00:22:46,000 During the committee there was an amendment brought forward and at the time I believe that there were some questions that staff may have wanted to get back to the committee with with a more full some response. 285 00:22:46,000 --> 00:22:53,000 I'm just wondering if staff have had the opportunity to provide a more full some response to what was discussed to committee. 286 00:22:53,000 --> 00:22:55,000 Thank you chair through you. 287 00:22:55,000 --> 00:23:04,000 So we have had a chance to look at this and and it is actually something that was quite carefully considered when we were drafting the by law. 288 00:23:04,000 --> 00:23:13,000 So there is a regulation and it's called the spheres of current jurisdiction environment and wildlife regulation and under that. 289 00:23:13,000 --> 00:23:26,000 The city to regulate prohibit and impose requirements respecting the feeding or attracting of dangerous wildlife or members of the family survey which is the dear family. 290 00:23:26,000 --> 00:23:33,000 However, it's important to note that under the provincial wildlife act general regulation. 291 00:23:33,000 --> 00:23:52,000 It states at section 23.01 one a person commits an offense if the person intentionally bates or feeds a turkey or an ungulate within 200 meters of a dwelling school yard or playground in region one. 292 00:23:52,000 --> 00:24:02,000 Region one is all of anchor violent and dear or members of the ungulate family so now you've all had a biology lesson today. 293 00:24:02,000 --> 00:24:06,000 And so yes, we could put in a regulation. 294 00:24:06,000 --> 00:24:13,000 However, the province has already done that they've created an offense under the offense at. 295 00:24:13,000 --> 00:24:18,000 And we've reviewed some of the other. 296 00:24:18,000 --> 00:24:21,000 By laws in the region. 297 00:24:21,000 --> 00:24:31,000 For example, a big for is is a person must not intentionally feed or leave food out for the purpose of feeding dear. 298 00:24:31,000 --> 00:24:37,000 Oak base is that a person shall not feed among other animals dear. 299 00:24:37,000 --> 00:24:47,000 A squimals is no person shall intentionally feed or leave out food for the purpose of feeding wildlife in there they include dear so. 300 00:24:47,000 --> 00:24:52,000 It's basically a duplication of what the provincial. 301 00:24:52,000 --> 00:24:55,000 Prohibition yes. 302 00:24:55,000 --> 00:25:05,000 So I'll let Lauren Fetcher speak to the potential impact on staffing resources if this were to be added. 303 00:25:05,000 --> 00:25:12,000 But for the purposes of prohibiting it, that's already been done by provincial legislation. 304 00:25:12,000 --> 00:25:16,000 Thank you, and to carry on through the chair. 305 00:25:16,000 --> 00:25:22,000 During the committee meeting, I did make the the comment or the note note that. 306 00:25:22,000 --> 00:25:27,000 Should this bylaw amendment be made or to the proposed bylaw. 307 00:25:27,000 --> 00:25:34,000 The impacts on staffing or the requirements for staffing based on complaints. 308 00:25:34,000 --> 00:25:46,000 Would be significant something as simple as growing flowers in your in your front yard is effectively an attractive for dear I know that I've got dear in my own yard and so. 309 00:25:46,000 --> 00:25:54,000 You know the the bylaw itself may with that include and make create unintentionally of course. 310 00:25:54,000 --> 00:26:05,000 I'm just a man's on city staff and we as it is now we are keeping up we don't want to be raised with the added. 311 00:26:05,000 --> 00:26:13,000 Publication because the public will complain and we will have to address those complaints. 312 00:26:13,000 --> 00:26:22,000 Thank you very much before we have a motion just given what we have heard tonight we have any questions from council on this item. 313 00:26:23,000 --> 00:26:25,000 Thank you to the chair. 314 00:26:25,000 --> 00:26:37,000 Okay, so this is quite a bit of new information. Thank you very much for that filling me in there I guess I'm wondering about the dangerous aspect of dear. 315 00:26:37,000 --> 00:26:45,000 So yes, we don't want to have the meeting our flowers and things so maybe people can fence it off or what have you but. 316 00:26:45,000 --> 00:26:54,000 New blocks are quite aggressive or other times, you know, maybe dear little cubes so I'm just wondering if they are considered. 317 00:26:54,000 --> 00:27:07,000 Are they are they listed as in just a with this provincial legislation, would there be I guess enough teeth to that for any specific. 318 00:27:07,000 --> 00:27:16,000 Tack or you know through some area where they're repeated Lee having an aggressive year to have that dealt with properly. 319 00:27:16,000 --> 00:27:27,000 Sorry, I think I might have caused some confusion so under the environment and wildlife regulation that is under the community charter. 320 00:27:27,000 --> 00:27:33,000 They've just said out what that we can regulate prohibit and impose requirements. 321 00:27:33,000 --> 00:27:45,000 With respect to dangerous wildlife which are specifically defined animals or members of the family survey which are dear so it's not. 322 00:27:45,000 --> 00:27:54,000 I didn't intend to convey that dear are considered dangerous wildlife there to separate things is just that those are the wildlife that we can regulate under that regulation. 323 00:27:58,000 --> 00:28:09,000 Okay, sorry, that does help clear that like a little bit one more probably we're done in question but just trying to get really clear on this but is there. 324 00:28:09,000 --> 00:28:14,000 If there's a problem with dear who do people call. 325 00:28:14,000 --> 00:28:18,000 That would be the provincial conservation service. 326 00:28:18,000 --> 00:28:21,000 Thank you. 327 00:28:21,000 --> 00:28:24,000 Any other questions at this time. 328 00:28:25,000 --> 00:28:29,000 No questions thank you chair. I will move in the committee motion as read in. 329 00:28:29,000 --> 00:28:38,000 I'll move that council consider getting first second and third reading to city of Langford animal responsibility by law number two two three nine twenty twenty six. 330 00:28:38,000 --> 00:28:44,000 That the addition of and dear following dangerous wildlife under part four section twenty two. 331 00:28:45,000 --> 00:28:56,000 To read twenty two a person must not feed any dangerous wildlife or dear or provide dangerous wildlife or dear access to food for any other edible substance. 332 00:28:56,000 --> 00:29:07,000 And that council consider giving first second and third reading to city of Langford animal control miscellaneous and ending by law number two two one two twenty twenty six. 333 00:29:07,000 --> 00:29:10,000 Thank you and we have a second for that. 334 00:29:10,000 --> 00:29:15,000 Second for discussion. Thank you very much. Councilor who can more to be. 335 00:29:15,000 --> 00:29:20,000 Thank you. I have brought it forward just recognizing the will of committee. 336 00:29:20,000 --> 00:29:25,000 To be honest, I do feel a little bit torn about this and I recognize will be debating by law so. 337 00:29:25,000 --> 00:29:34,000 I will keep my comments short at this point. I just wanted to make sure that the will of the committee would reflect it at this table for the discussion. 338 00:29:34,000 --> 00:29:35,000 Thank you. 339 00:29:35,000 --> 00:29:38,000 I'm sorry for waiting any follow up. 340 00:29:38,000 --> 00:29:45,000 I guess one more question through the chair to snap if I might just to be clear on the process then. 341 00:29:45,000 --> 00:29:51,000 There will be opportunities to look into the further and then have another debate with council when it comes back as a. 342 00:29:51,000 --> 00:29:53,000 I love. 343 00:29:53,000 --> 00:29:58,000 It's held on the agenda later tonight as dialogue nine point or under by loss is nine. 344 00:29:58,000 --> 00:30:01,000 That's what I was afraid of. I'm like when am I going to be. 345 00:30:00,000 --> 00:30:18,000 I will see them. Thank you, though, this further. So I guess at this time, we're just looking at it as a resolution. And so I will have to hold on to those other thoughts. Perhaps they'll be more discussion coming later. 346 00:30:18,000 --> 00:30:25,000 Thank you. If I may to staff on the side of my deal with a question, I just came up as I was going through this. 347 00:30:25,000 --> 00:30:35,000 Hearing that, dear are already covered underneath the provincial wildlife act. And so there's the recommendation to deal with the CEOs and the province for that side. 348 00:30:35,000 --> 00:30:52,000 I'm just wondering how that relates to the entirety of part four. I believe that'd be second twenty of the bylaw then, which is entirely with respect to feeding or attracting dangerous wildlife. 349 00:30:52,000 --> 00:31:21,000 Thank you through the chair. So given the nature of dangerous wildlife, given that we don't want bears wandering our streets and that they are more likely to. 350 00:31:21,000 --> 00:31:39,000 What just rub garbage, for example, and getting to a staff believe and tree. We've had talks, presentations to this council from I believe the organization is called bear wise. 351 00:31:39,000 --> 00:31:45,000 Given the this variety and the the potential. 352 00:31:45,000 --> 00:31:59,000 We believe that that regulating dangerous wildlife is a good use of our staff resources and education and making sure that people are not attracting. 353 00:31:59,000 --> 00:32:05,000 Or doing anything to continue the attraction. Whereas. 354 00:32:05,000 --> 00:32:11,000 Beer are not nervous as much of a safety risk to the public. 355 00:32:11,000 --> 00:32:14,000 Thank you very much. I can start a rough visually. 356 00:32:14,000 --> 00:32:28,000 Thank you through you. I actually do have a question just rising from the discussion. I'm not sure if bylaw would have a comment to this question, but do we have a sense of how much enforcement recurrently performing on on complaints related to wildlife. 357 00:32:29,000 --> 00:32:30,000 Through the chair. 358 00:32:30,000 --> 00:32:32,000 At present. 359 00:32:32,000 --> 00:32:40,000 Our primary source of concern around any type of wildlife is very specifically around bears. 360 00:32:40,000 --> 00:32:50,000 And I have to say those complaints come in typically in the spring when bears are coming out or more into the fall when they're there. 361 00:32:50,000 --> 00:32:55,000 But it's basically around trying to sign up for the winter. 362 00:32:55,000 --> 00:32:57,000 But throughout the year. 363 00:32:57,000 --> 00:33:01,000 Lankford does has what have it share of beer. Sorry, bear complaints. 364 00:33:01,000 --> 00:33:06,000 There are very few deer complaints specifically. 365 00:33:06,000 --> 00:33:11,000 I would say that probably my chosen has far more air concerns. 366 00:33:11,000 --> 00:33:13,000 Excuse me, the length for it has. 367 00:33:13,000 --> 00:33:16,000 Hopefully that helps answer the question. 368 00:33:17,000 --> 00:33:20,000 Thank you. I would have a follow up and this is putting on the spot. 369 00:33:20,000 --> 00:33:23,000 So I recognize if you don't have response at this time. 370 00:33:23,000 --> 00:33:30,000 Is there a sense of how many conservation officers are currently patrolling or serving the link for the area? 371 00:33:30,000 --> 00:33:32,000 Yep. Through the chair. 372 00:33:32,000 --> 00:33:39,000 My understanding is that Vancouver Island is serviced by at least five conservation officers. 373 00:33:39,000 --> 00:33:43,000 And those people do travel down the island. 374 00:33:43,000 --> 00:33:49,000 Of course primarily on the basis of incoming complaints from the public and through the wrap line. 375 00:33:49,000 --> 00:33:52,000 Thank you. 376 00:33:52,000 --> 00:33:55,000 Thank you very much. 377 00:33:55,000 --> 00:34:03,000 On that I will call the question on this committee resolution is read in all in favor. 378 00:34:03,000 --> 00:34:05,000 And any opposed? 379 00:34:05,000 --> 00:34:09,000 Not carries. Thank you. 380 00:34:10,000 --> 00:34:13,000 We're moving on to section nine now of the agenda. 381 00:34:13,000 --> 00:34:21,000 We have nine point one by law number two one four six. 382 00:34:21,000 --> 00:34:24,000 And I think probably the best way is we move into bylaws here. 383 00:34:24,000 --> 00:34:25,000 My apologies. 384 00:34:25,000 --> 00:34:30,000 You're going to be to start off to see if we have any questions that any member of council has with respect to these. 385 00:34:30,000 --> 00:34:36,000 And then once we go on through some questions move on to entertaining a resolution at that point in time. 386 00:34:36,000 --> 00:34:39,000 And Councilor Wigner I do see your light first. 387 00:34:39,000 --> 00:34:40,000 Thank you. 388 00:34:40,000 --> 00:34:44,000 We did hear quite a few questions come up from the public. 389 00:34:44,000 --> 00:34:52,000 I guess it'll will pick a couple that I think are crucial in the task for another speaker. 390 00:34:52,000 --> 00:34:59,000 Would staff through the chair could staff remind us about what was done for the graphic analysis. 391 00:34:59,000 --> 00:35:04,000 It's been in many weeks and even months that we've been debating this. 392 00:35:04,000 --> 00:35:09,000 There was a traffic impact assessment, but and also we're doing a transportation plan. 393 00:35:09,000 --> 00:35:11,000 So this is a very complex situation. 394 00:35:11,000 --> 00:35:15,000 If you could comment on that. 395 00:35:15,000 --> 00:35:24,000 Through the chair, yes, there was a complete traffic impact assessment completed for this property prior to rezoning. 396 00:35:24,000 --> 00:35:32,000 We had to pass the high threshold of being approved not only by the engineering department here at City of Langford, 397 00:35:32,000 --> 00:35:38,000 but also the Ministry of Transportation and Transit and that was just the first step in that process. 398 00:35:38,000 --> 00:35:47,000 Of course with this rezoning being deferred until after the OCP or the official community plan was adopted. 399 00:35:47,000 --> 00:35:59,000 That gave staff the opportunity to take the density from the OCP and put it into our traffic model as we are currently working on our transportation master plan. 400 00:35:59,000 --> 00:36:07,000 So not only were we able to have the information of what the immediate impact of this development would be, say, on the nearest. 401 00:36:07,000 --> 00:36:12,000 Lesson or so intersections, which is kind of the scope of the. 402 00:36:12,000 --> 00:36:23,000 It's the graphic impact assessment that's done is done on a finer scope and everybody was always worried about what's the broader impact of all of these developments combined what's the compounding effect. 403 00:36:23,000 --> 00:36:35,000 And we were able to take the density that the projected potential density based on the OCP and our housing needs assessment target. 404 00:36:35,000 --> 00:36:47,000 That into our traffic model and anticipate what the impact is on those in your by intersections and of course we have done two phases of public engagement as far. 405 00:36:47,000 --> 00:37:00,000 And we're at the point now in the transportation master plan that we can confidently say and as you've seen through the presentations from what that there's no significant amount of. 406 00:37:00,000 --> 00:37:10,000 Road widening meeting that we don't need to for lane heat roads in order for the density in our downtown core the work of course as per the. 407 00:37:10,000 --> 00:37:18,000 OCP and all of our different policies around transportation there does need to be mode shift and we do need to prioritize. 408 00:37:18,000 --> 00:37:27,000 The different modes of of transportation are listed in the hierarchy of of transportation in the OCP. 409 00:37:27,000 --> 00:37:40,000 But through the resolution as you can see we were just able to confirm what came out of the TI which was that Pete road the offshoot of Pete road needs to be connected through to the bill. 410 00:37:40,000 --> 00:37:42,000 And we heard from community. 411 00:37:42,000 --> 00:37:50,000 You know that this provides some relief to that community that's already feeling like it's hard to take a left turn out of that intersection already. 412 00:37:50,000 --> 00:38:02,000 So the intersections of Pete road and Pete road and I know they're the same name but that is that there's an intersection just across from the fire hall there we where we have a parking right for BC transit. 413 00:38:02,000 --> 00:38:12,000 And that will connect through to the bill or we'll have to connect through to develop prior to building permit or they have to bond for it. 414 00:38:12,000 --> 00:38:17,000 And we'll have to obtain the right of way for that as well. 415 00:38:17,000 --> 00:38:26,000 And then the intersections of Pete and Pete and the intersections of Pete and our encote will become right in right out. 416 00:38:26,000 --> 00:38:30,000 So those are the you know some of the immediate. 417 00:38:30,000 --> 00:38:38,000 Results of the traffic impact assessment and of course all their frontage improvements and everything of that nature. 418 00:38:38,000 --> 00:38:43,000 That will contribute to active transportation corridor along the. 419 00:38:43,000 --> 00:38:52,000 Pete to senderland connection there's a piece of road dedication there which would the development would also improve which will help with more shift. 420 00:38:52,000 --> 00:39:03,000 And then if through our transportation master plan as we've discussed the Pete road to senderland corridor being the the Pete road being the transit corridor in Jacqueline being the. 421 00:39:03,000 --> 00:39:11,000 Patential active transportation corridor there's a plan for the whole city and staff are very much looking forward to bringing that forward. 422 00:39:11,000 --> 00:39:27,000 Once we have all of the public engagement and we got a lot of public engagement points to incorporated there so we're very much looking forward to bringing that forward but at this time staff can say with confidence that we can support this application. 423 00:39:27,000 --> 00:39:33,000 Thank you and actually considering if I can jump in there quickly just based off of what the engineer brought forward. 424 00:39:33,000 --> 00:39:41,000 Am I right in understanding you've listed several projects and upgrades for traffic in the rest through this area. 425 00:39:41,000 --> 00:39:52,000 That the vast majority of these are either being done by this development or through funds raised by this development that would not otherwise be able to be done in as rapid up succession. 426 00:39:53,000 --> 00:40:06,000 Thank you chair for the question so any requirements that come out of the TA so any of the recommendations that come out of the traffic impact assessment are directly tied to that development to pay for. 427 00:40:06,000 --> 00:40:19,000 Not with DCC's or anything like that it's just that in order to what they're building permit they'll hire they have to build or bond for the requirements that are in the TA if Council passes the resolution as it stands today. 428 00:40:19,000 --> 00:40:33,000 Other broader improvements as you may have alluded to would be covered by our development cost charge a road development cost charge program or you know there's other funding sources as well that. 429 00:40:33,000 --> 00:40:44,000 I could be contributed to those improvements in the future, but that's typically how we address if there's a compounding effect that it's it would be considered a regionally beneficial. 430 00:40:44,000 --> 00:40:49,000 Improvement therefore would be applicable for our DCC program. 431 00:40:49,000 --> 00:40:56,000 Thank you so some potential immediate upgrade required for that element permit as well as the. 432 00:40:56,000 --> 00:41:19,000 That's correct and and if anything changes so if the density changes or the drive locations change and then the TA would have to be updated and the resolution is flexible to capture any of those amendments as well because it says any any recommendations from the TA so. 433 00:41:19,000 --> 00:41:28,000 Anything in the development changes throughout the development period the TA would have to be updated and then reapproved again by the city and MOTT. 434 00:41:28,000 --> 00:41:34,000 Carage implementation and they will not receive a building permit until those are either built or bonded for. 435 00:41:34,000 --> 00:41:39,000 Thank you very much for that's the real explanation with that very much appreciated. 436 00:41:39,000 --> 00:41:43,000 Councillor waitner is I encroached on your time please back to you. 437 00:41:43,000 --> 00:41:49,000 It's very complicated stuff my other question is quite different so if you don't mind I will. 438 00:41:49,000 --> 00:42:01,000 One more question before I give way something that's come up so much is the maintenance plan and the ability to enforce it and so this is an unusual condition that we've got here. 439 00:42:01,000 --> 00:42:17,000 And how enforceable is it really we're trying to do our belts and suspenders approach here but before we have our by laws for the good neighbor policy and our construction impact mitigation strategy specific by laws. 440 00:42:17,000 --> 00:42:19,000 How can we enforce. 441 00:42:19,000 --> 00:42:28,000 On a property that you know I'm hearing from the public is not in great shape right. 442 00:42:28,000 --> 00:42:42,000 Thanks through the chair registering the maintenance plan and a section two nineteen covenant on title does improve our ability to enforce matters that are not covered by current by laws as councils aware there. 443 00:42:42,000 --> 00:42:55,000 Vila is kind of under development right now through the good neighbor policy and construction impact management strategy that will speak to matters that are in the maintenance plan that are in city by laws right now. 444 00:42:55,000 --> 00:42:59,620 If it went bad occurs over the coming months, that will, you know, 445 00:42:59,620 --> 00:43:05,960 look at that by law enforcement mechanism as well, but in the meantime, those matters 446 00:43:05,960 --> 00:43:11,520 are not referred by by law as so through registering the maintenance plan on title, that 447 00:43:11,520 --> 00:43:18,480 gives us an ability to, you know, follow up on those matters, receive reports on, you know, 448 00:43:18,480 --> 00:43:22,680 the degree of maintenance that's occurring as committed to in the maintenance plan, and 449 00:43:22,680 --> 00:43:27,520 it'll follow up with a property owner, um, as needed to ensure that those commitments 450 00:43:27,520 --> 00:43:33,960 are being adhered to. And if I can just add to that, uh, those cabinets are enforced through 451 00:43:33,960 --> 00:43:40,520 corridor. So then if we get a corridor and it's not enforced, then it would be a contempt 452 00:43:40,520 --> 00:43:45,920 action. Thank you very much. I have a follow-up to that. But, John, sir, how do I do 453 00:43:45,920 --> 00:43:51,160 want to take the floor if you have something related to this item? Thank you. I was going to ask 454 00:43:51,160 --> 00:43:58,600 about this plan, but I appreciate that. Thank you. My kind of follow-up from what this conversation 455 00:43:58,600 --> 00:44:04,240 has been is along that maintenance plan, and really alluded to in public participation there, 456 00:44:04,240 --> 00:44:09,520 which is the difference between what we are currently seeing, which is the long leg to get the 457 00:44:09,520 --> 00:44:15,560 actions on many of the properties in the core. And, like, actually many of us have this table here 458 00:44:15,640 --> 00:44:21,040 being a resident of the core. We see this every day, the, uh, quite prominent impacts this 459 00:44:21,040 --> 00:44:28,640 has in our, in our, in our neighborhood. And I just, uh, I hope that this really is able to be the 460 00:44:28,640 --> 00:44:33,640 benefit for the public that through this meet and sorter, at least my interpretation of it, 461 00:44:33,640 --> 00:44:38,520 is that it prevents us from having this long leg time for the remediation or action, like, 462 00:44:38,520 --> 00:44:43,480 works randomly seeing. And just wondering if I do have that right interpretation or if staff 463 00:44:43,480 --> 00:44:55,720 can walk that out a bit. Thank you through the chair. So, uh, yes, we, we have the ability to 464 00:44:55,720 --> 00:44:59,960 act once the maintenance plan is not. Not. 465 00:45:00,000 --> 00:45:24,000 And so it's just important that our maintenance plans are clear and enforceable and then we can go, but as I said, we do have to go through the court, we don't have control over your time necessarily. So I'm not saying that it's an overnight fix, but certainly would be enforceable sort of court order. 466 00:45:24,000 --> 00:45:42,000 And thank you Mr. Chair, if I could add, it's really hard for someone to dispute us holding them to their own plan, right? It's hard to claim on do hardship when we're just holding them to their own plan in their own commitment and that in a way does make it more enforceable. 467 00:45:42,000 --> 00:45:58,000 Thank you very much. That provides me a bit of ease on that difference as to what we're looking at this time around versus what is resulted in the distrust that a lot of the public has in our court right now. And sorry, I'm talking to you, Mr. Fletcher. 468 00:45:58,000 --> 00:46:17,000 And just to broaden the discussion a little bit further, we have to, we can't compare what's going to happen in the future to our past sort of experiences with a new mechanism coming in the play where we can actually monitor. 469 00:46:17,000 --> 00:46:33,000 We can we can have a bit of a high grading the observation as it has it develops is going to probably put the city in a far better position take action whereas in the in the past we just haven't had that awareness we haven't had the mechanisms. 470 00:46:33,000 --> 00:46:42,000 I think we're going to be in a far better position to have a better handle on the situations as the developer. 471 00:46:42,000 --> 00:46:54,000 Thank you very much. Councillor Wigner believe you did say you had additional follow up questions. Is it all in the same item or would like to allow Councillor how to the chance if she has a different question at this time. 472 00:46:54,000 --> 00:47:07,000 It could just add a quickly follow up here just because this is a sensitive topic and I know that some of these buildings are occupied and some are not occupied so to through the chair just wondering if a comment on. 473 00:47:07,000 --> 00:47:23,000 I'm not sure how to ask things exactly but does maintenance plan apply to both I mean I saw a lot of detail in there but can you just remind me of there's not going to be a need to involve the tendency branch or other levels of government because we have this maintenance plan we can. 474 00:47:23,000 --> 00:47:35,000 I understand it it's both occupied and unoccupied. So I don't want to speak too much about it but we can't you serve. 475 00:47:35,000 --> 00:47:46,000 Real maintenance plan we can't you serve requirements of the residential tendency act so those would still be applicable with respect to any tenant properties. 476 00:47:47,000 --> 00:48:05,000 Thank you actually that could be good thing if if the tenant wants to complain we will still have the right to do so as a tenant landlord relationship but this maintenance plan has both provisions for occupied and unoccupied properties so I think. 477 00:48:06,000 --> 00:48:20,000 Yeah just wanting to think about that level of detail that there would be potentially different actions needed depending on whether they're occupied or not but they are all in the maintenance plan so I don't think we have a follow up question there. 478 00:48:20,000 --> 00:48:25,000 Thank you and Councilor how did you have a question at this time regarding this by law. 479 00:48:25,000 --> 00:48:36,000 Thank you you know I didn't have a question my questions about the transportation plan and both maintenance plan have been answered and staff have provided additional months on some of the regulatory levers so. 480 00:48:36,000 --> 00:48:47,000 Thank you just because this is right the item I do want to reach out to Councilor Spalk online just confirm that you don't have any questions before motion is considered on this item. 481 00:48:47,000 --> 00:48:50,000 No thank you sir. 482 00:48:50,000 --> 00:48:52,000 Thank you very much. 483 00:48:53,000 --> 00:48:55,000 Councilor Wagner would you have another question for the title. 484 00:48:55,000 --> 00:49:05,000 I did have another question just to be absolutely clear so through the chair we hear about feasibility of projects as a question that comes from the public. 485 00:49:05,000 --> 00:49:16,000 You know not wanting another failed project but it's my understanding that we don't consider that so just looking at staff for clarification of we need to put aside. 486 00:49:16,000 --> 00:49:28,000 As hard as that is we need to put aside things in the neighborhood that are hurting people of experienced and consider this application on good faith assuming that it would. 487 00:49:28,000 --> 00:49:39,000 Through the chair yes each application is considered and must be considered on its own merits this is about land use and density and rezoning and. 488 00:49:39,000 --> 00:49:48,000 It shouldn't be influenced by what neighboring properties may or may not have done. 489 00:49:48,000 --> 00:49:58,000 Thank you with those questions being addressed I would that be looking to entertain a motion if we have someone willing to bring one forward at this time. 490 00:49:58,000 --> 00:50:02,000 I actually do have one more question if I wait. 491 00:50:03,000 --> 00:50:08,000 Please just again to clarify and then I would be prepared to make a motion but. 492 00:50:08,000 --> 00:50:26,000 It was brought up that in last decisions that the council had decided not or committee have decided not to take action but that's not how I understood the resolution I understood it as not taking action until such time as a landscape on came forward. 493 00:50:26,000 --> 00:50:38,000 And then we had new information come to us as a council that was provided in public so I just wanted to make very clear before I do any motion that. 494 00:50:38,000 --> 00:50:52,000 Was there any information that staff had that was not provided I recall a letter that was in the public agenda and we made some adjustments to the application based on that letter but I just want to be very clear about what is. 495 00:50:52,000 --> 00:50:58,000 The reasoning behind moving forward with even though the committee resolution was to have another look at it. 496 00:50:58,000 --> 00:51:00,000 Through the chair. 497 00:51:00,000 --> 00:51:12,000 I'll just make two points the first being that both of our advisory committees the community advisory committee in the sustainable development advisory committee are that just that they are advisory. 498 00:51:12,000 --> 00:51:24,000 So as when council sits around this table they can take that recommendation that comes out of the committee into account but they are not the decision maker council is the decision maker so. 499 00:51:24,000 --> 00:51:34,000 I obviously council can take the discussion take the recommendation of committee into account when they make their motion following. 500 00:51:34,000 --> 00:51:47,000 Like when they are considering that item at the next council meeting but it's not a binding recommendation is for council to consider as part of their deliberations on the second point would be that yes the. 501 00:51:47,000 --> 00:51:59,000 We can did provide a letter of outlining new commitments say which to make to address some of the concerns that came out of a committee around landscaping and public open space. 502 00:51:59,000 --> 00:52:03,000 And the heat island kind of reflection. 503 00:52:04,000 --> 00:52:12,000 comments that had that had been made house regards the neighboring property and that letter was posted publicly as part of the council agenda. 504 00:52:12,000 --> 00:52:18,000 As well as spoken to during public participation when council considered that committee recommendation on for very second. 505 00:52:18,000 --> 00:52:30,000 And those that deliberation can be seen in the video of that meeting and all information that council considered as part of that deliberation is part of the agenda under that item. 506 00:52:30,000 --> 00:52:32,000 Thank you. 507 00:52:32,000 --> 00:52:48,000 That is helpful because this is challenging so I will move that council give line for zoning by law amendment number 707 2614 261626262626262626262626. 508 00:52:48,000 --> 00:52:58,000 Pete road and 26222625 and 2629 Sundayland road by law number 21462626 or second and third readings. 509 00:52:59,000 --> 00:53:01,000 Thank you. 510 00:53:01,000 --> 00:53:02,000 Thank you. 511 00:53:02,000 --> 00:53:05,000 And Councillor Wagner I'll look to you for any motivation. 512 00:53:05,000 --> 00:53:06,000 Thank you. 513 00:53:06,000 --> 00:53:10,000 We have been through this twice a committee. 514 00:53:10,000 --> 00:53:13,000 First I was not the chair of that committee. 515 00:53:13,000 --> 00:53:20,000 Councillor Gottry was running the committee and I asked so many questions and then when it came back this year. 516 00:53:20,000 --> 00:53:27,000 We I was the chair of the committee and we've looked at it again and there's still so many questions and then tonight again we've had so many questions. 517 00:53:27,000 --> 00:53:30,000 It is there's no doubt is the high density project. 518 00:53:30,000 --> 00:53:35,000 It's a very large project and it's not intense scrutiny for this council. 519 00:53:35,000 --> 00:53:39,000 It's our first power project that we we have to own it. 520 00:53:39,000 --> 00:53:46,000 In the passive and very vocal about the city center concept map that I thought was just creating so much problem in the community. 521 00:53:46,000 --> 00:53:52,000 But now we have the official community plan and it does speak to this density in this area. 522 00:53:52,000 --> 00:54:01,000 It's a transit corridor and having worked through that process over like almost 18 months I would think. 523 00:54:01,000 --> 00:54:12,000 Open over a year with a lot of public feedback and not everybody would be happy with how it turned out but it does have very clearly that this density. 524 00:54:12,000 --> 00:54:19,000 Can go here and we focus so much on quality city building in the official community plan. 525 00:54:19,000 --> 00:54:29,000 New design guidelines coming that will fly to this development the construction impact mitigation and good neighbor policy will also apply to this project. 526 00:54:29,000 --> 00:54:34,000 And then many conditions I counted up 22 terms and conditions that were added. 527 00:54:34,000 --> 00:54:48,000 So we really tried again to say belts and suspenders we tried to think of things that would help the community see that there was more green space I asked for many things that I felt were important free bedroom units because I've heard. 528 00:54:48,000 --> 00:54:56,000 Family size units are hard to get in the city center and people do want affordable homes near transit and shops and services. 529 00:54:56,000 --> 00:55:03,000 And so this could provide some homes for those kinds of people and multi generational families or many roommates. 530 00:55:03,000 --> 00:55:15,000 Fortability is just such a challenge and as we talked about we are not really able to consider the feasibility of our projects we just have to put that aside and look at the project and and way. 531 00:55:15,000 --> 00:55:19,000 We think there's enough community benefits so I kept asking for more. 532 00:55:19,000 --> 00:55:27,000 I asked for more trees more green space public right of way on the private space that is a different than I've ever. 533 00:55:27,000 --> 00:55:39,000 Part of an application before where that was considered so we have been working very hard to make this very robust process with many conditions that. 534 00:55:40,000 --> 00:55:49,000 We're trying to really bring that community benefit in line with our quality city building goals that came through our official community plan so. 535 00:55:49,000 --> 00:55:53,000 But given all that and the questions that also were brought up tonight. 536 00:55:53,000 --> 00:55:55,000 I am supporting the motion. 537 00:55:57,000 --> 00:55:59,000 Thank you very much council. 538 00:55:59,000 --> 00:56:01,000 Thank you and thank you for your comments. 539 00:56:01,000 --> 00:56:11,000 I will be supporting motion tonight and I'm very grateful for the discussions that we've had at this table in the community and at the committee as well. 540 00:56:11,000 --> 00:56:19,000 Because it's taken a while to get here but I do think that we're better off for it just through all of the questions and contemplation that's been considered to date. 541 00:56:19,000 --> 00:56:27,000 When this application was first delayed or momentarily paused to wait until the OCP was completed. 542 00:56:27,000 --> 00:56:35,000 You know I really respected that decision because I think our community is at a bit of a crossroads right now when it comes to growth. 543 00:56:35,000 --> 00:56:43,000 And what I hear frequently from members of the community is that growth isn't necessarily a bad thing but we don't want to continue to see growth happen. 544 00:56:43,000 --> 00:56:45,000 If it means. 545 00:56:45,000 --> 00:56:49,000 Crawling out into mountain sides and blasting away hillsides and clear-cutting forests. 546 00:56:49,000 --> 00:56:55,000 And the reality is that in an island in a community was pounding the biography. 547 00:56:55,000 --> 00:57:03,000 That means that we have to start having these challenging conversations about how we want to grow up and how we want to that's fire existing areas. 548 00:57:03,000 --> 00:57:09,000 Within this application, I really appreciate the focus that the applicant. 549 00:57:09,000 --> 00:57:20,000 Has considered the consideration that the applicant has provided around our intention and our vision to create a family for a city center that's more welcoming families. 550 00:57:20,000 --> 00:57:27,000 And right now if you try to find a three bedroom condo in length for it, it is very challenging because we just simply haven't been building them. 551 00:57:27,000 --> 00:57:30,000 So I think a 10% ratio. 552 00:57:30,000 --> 00:57:37,000 I would love to see more but I do recognize that financial viability is very challenging in the development industry right now. 553 00:57:37,000 --> 00:57:41,000 And that is a consideration for permitting unimics. 554 00:57:41,000 --> 00:57:45,000 But I do think that that is a huge benefit for this proposal. 555 00:57:45,000 --> 00:57:52,000 And I just want to comment as well around some of the comments that have been made regarding park space. 556 00:57:52,000 --> 00:57:57,000 And recently, our last council meeting we adopted our purpose in trails monster planned. 557 00:57:57,000 --> 00:58:02,000 And especially in the city center where there are so many people moving to the city center, so many families. 558 00:58:02,000 --> 00:58:06,000 It's really important that we have an adequate park strategy. 559 00:58:06,000 --> 00:58:12,000 And this application provides wonderful onsite amenities on site green space and public space for its residents. 560 00:58:12,000 --> 00:58:14,000 And you know the city. 561 00:58:14,000 --> 00:58:19,000 I think we'll be able to continue focusing on our destination parks and neighborhood parks. 562 00:58:19,000 --> 00:58:25,000 Like portrait park and woodlands that are within walking distance to this proposal. 563 00:58:25,000 --> 00:58:31,000 So I do just want to close off by saying I recognize that enterprises can be very contentious and especially when we focus. 564 00:58:31,000 --> 00:58:37,000 As a community for so long on quality or sorry on quantity rather than quality. 565 00:58:37,000 --> 00:58:43,000 I think it is going to set us up for a challenge in conversation, but I do appreciate how we found this conversation. 566 00:58:43,000 --> 00:58:53,000 And I appreciate that there is ongoing recognition and we're happening behind the scenes to make sure that we are building that solid foundation. 567 00:58:53,000 --> 00:58:58,000 To make sure that we're not just running city hall as a business, but we are building an institution. 568 00:58:58,000 --> 00:59:07,000 And making sure that this institution has the capacity that we need to have the right by laws policies, guidelines and regulations in place. 569 00:59:07,000 --> 00:59:11,000 So that we can go successfully moving forward. 570 00:59:11,000 --> 00:59:13,000 Thank you very much. 571 00:59:13,000 --> 00:59:15,000 Councillor Spock just out. 572 00:59:15,000 --> 00:59:16,000 There we go. 573 00:59:16,000 --> 00:59:17,000 Your hand is up. 574 00:59:17,000 --> 00:59:19,000 The floor is yours. 575 00:59:19,000 --> 00:59:20,000 Thank you chair. 576 00:59:20,000 --> 00:59:24,000 I just want to start with acknowledging that this is being a great discussion. 577 00:59:24,000 --> 00:59:36,000 And also I appreciate the work that our staff has done, but I also want to acknowledge the significant community input that I've received on this application. 578 00:59:36,000 --> 00:59:47,000 Since we brought forward the sustainable development community recommendation and and also previous to that, but especially since then. 579 00:59:48,000 --> 00:59:58,000 Many residents have expressed that at this point in time, they don't support this tower at this location. 580 00:59:58,000 --> 01:00:01,000 And as an elected official, I feel very. 581 01:00:00,000 --> 01:00:07,500 We strongly that I have an obligation to listen carefully to their feedback. 582 01:00:07,500 --> 01:00:13,900 This proposal does align with our official community plan and our broader growth objectives. 583 01:00:13,900 --> 01:00:22,500 And as I said, the guidelines, policies and the work that has been put into this is commendable. 584 01:00:22,500 --> 01:00:29,900 However, I feel very strongly that we need to consider cumulative impacts, not just 585 01:00:29,900 --> 01:00:39,900 whether this fits on paper, but the timing and the sequencing across the city center, whether or not it's appropriate. 586 01:00:39,900 --> 01:00:46,900 At this point, a second and third reading, I think it represents a significant step forward. 587 01:00:46,900 --> 01:00:58,900 So, at this point in time, I'm not persuaded that advancing this application serves the best interest of our community in terms of pacing and infrastructure. 588 01:00:58,900 --> 01:01:13,900 Readiness and as much as the huge effort and robust work that's being done in maintaining the public trust I am not hearing it at this point in time. 589 01:01:13,900 --> 01:01:19,900 And I want to be clear that my decision is not a rejection of growth. 590 01:01:20,900 --> 01:01:25,900 It's not a, it's not a rejection of this proponent. 591 01:01:25,900 --> 01:01:31,900 But it is a judgment about timing and cumulative impact. 592 01:01:31,900 --> 01:01:36,900 So, I will not be supporting the second and third reading at this time. 593 01:01:36,900 --> 01:01:38,900 Thank you. 594 01:01:40,900 --> 01:01:43,900 Thank you very much, Councillor Spock. 595 01:01:44,900 --> 01:01:59,900 For for myself, really echoes the comments that I made when this first came forward from the standable development committee, which was very much at that time going into the meeting. 596 01:01:59,900 --> 01:02:11,900 We were dealing with a lot of our issues around properties that were not being maintained the fallout of previous previous projects and as we said, as we heard today during public participation. 597 01:02:11,900 --> 01:02:15,900 The other failed project, what is going to be the impact on the community? 598 01:02:15,900 --> 01:02:19,900 Are we going to have the other pit and the rest? 599 01:02:19,900 --> 01:02:29,900 The reality of the situation, though, is as I'm out of that last meeting when this came forward from the committee, was that we are in a very different institutional framework today. 600 01:02:29,900 --> 01:02:36,900 And we were when those first projects were coming forward, resulting in what we see in our downtown core now. 601 01:02:36,900 --> 01:02:46,900 And it was through those conversations that I really believe that is a city we have institutionally matured that we have brought in the bylaws. 602 01:02:46,900 --> 01:02:58,900 We have brought in the protections that we need so that a project like this going forward as the potential to provide amazing benefits to our community once built. 603 01:02:58,900 --> 01:03:03,900 But we've seen the risks, if it doesn't, we've seen the risks when I go sideways. 604 01:03:03,900 --> 01:03:10,900 And I think a big part of our role of the city is to ensure that we are protecting our residents from those risks. 605 01:03:10,900 --> 01:03:13,900 And I believe we are at that point. 606 01:03:13,900 --> 01:03:23,900 I believe that with the work that we have been doing over these last three years and building up the bylaws here in the city and building up this institutional maturity. 607 01:03:23,900 --> 01:03:28,900 I believe that the city is at a point where it can manage a project like this. 608 01:03:28,900 --> 01:03:32,900 And even if this project in the end is not feasible. 609 01:03:32,900 --> 01:03:34,900 We will not be left with the shell. 610 01:03:34,900 --> 01:03:40,900 We will not be left with the derelict site as we have been from properties in the past. 611 01:03:40,900 --> 01:03:47,900 I said it last meeting that in many ways this is our last chance to try to get this right for this fails. 612 01:03:47,900 --> 01:03:51,900 I think we will not entertain a power for decades. 613 01:03:51,900 --> 01:03:56,900 And so there's a lot of pressure on this, there's a lot of pressure on the city and the bylaws that we have put together. 614 01:03:56,900 --> 01:04:08,900 But in conversation and looking at reviewing a work that we have done as a council, the work that staff has done in bringing these bylaws into place and enforcing them. 615 01:04:08,900 --> 01:04:16,900 I do believe that we are well positioned to protect our residents and to see the benefits of this project. 616 01:04:16,900 --> 01:04:20,900 And really ensuring that we are mitigating against those risks. 617 01:04:20,900 --> 01:04:26,900 So that being said, I am supportive of this in general. 618 01:04:26,900 --> 01:04:34,900 So any last comments, motivation from any members of council before I call the question on this data. 619 01:04:34,900 --> 01:04:36,900 Just before sorry to interrupt. 620 01:04:36,900 --> 01:04:40,900 And just before you do that, be clear. 621 01:04:40,900 --> 01:04:43,900 This is first second and third reading of the bylaw. 622 01:04:43,900 --> 01:04:48,900 I know lots are spotted so it's second and third, so I just want to make sure the video is clear. 623 01:04:48,900 --> 01:04:50,900 Thank you very much for that clarification. 624 01:04:50,900 --> 01:04:54,900 For second third, adoption still yet to come. 625 01:04:54,900 --> 01:04:59,900 I will call the question on this all in favor. 626 01:04:59,900 --> 01:05:02,900 And any opposed. 627 01:05:02,900 --> 01:05:04,900 That is councillors. 628 01:05:04,900 --> 01:05:13,900 That is a post. 629 01:05:13,900 --> 01:05:20,900 That brings us on to item 9.2 bylaw number 2239 and 2.2. 630 01:05:20,900 --> 01:05:27,900 1.2. 631 01:05:27,900 --> 01:05:30,900 Similarly, we will start off if there is any questions. 632 01:05:30,900 --> 01:05:37,900 And then if there is the motion. 633 01:05:37,900 --> 01:05:40,900 Sure, I have a good question. 634 01:05:40,900 --> 01:05:46,900 But yes, so we are back to the animal control. 635 01:05:46,900 --> 01:05:52,900 We get the right thing at some looking at the right thing here. 636 01:05:52,900 --> 01:05:57,900 I guess based on the conversation earlier. 637 01:05:57,900 --> 01:06:03,900 I would like to clarify that staff is recommending that we don't include beer. 638 01:06:03,900 --> 01:06:06,900 In this at this time because it's already. 639 01:06:06,900 --> 01:06:10,900 There is a way to manage that through conservation officers. 640 01:06:10,900 --> 01:06:17,900 So I just want to be really clear because there was quite a bit of new information that came out for me from the discussion. 641 01:06:17,900 --> 01:06:20,900 But. 642 01:06:20,900 --> 01:06:29,900 I guess do you believe that the provincial conservation officers are the best to handle the. 643 01:06:29,900 --> 01:06:32,900 Potential damage or risk or anything from deer. 644 01:06:32,900 --> 01:06:35,900 And that. 645 01:06:35,900 --> 01:06:47,900 It may complicate or bylaw to extent that would really require a lot of staff resources. 646 01:06:47,900 --> 01:06:59,900 So the province as an active legislation that makes conservation officers responsible for. 647 01:06:59,900 --> 01:07:01,900 Management of. 648 01:07:01,900 --> 01:07:12,900 Beer if acted a regulation that makes it an offense under potential law for someone to feed animals that include beer. 649 01:07:12,900 --> 01:07:25,900 And then they have also granted the authority to a municipality to regulate prohibit and impose requirements with respect to ear. 650 01:07:25,900 --> 01:07:35,900 So we if we put it in then it becomes something that we to enforce with our resources. 651 01:07:35,900 --> 01:07:41,900 And we will become the first step rather than the province. 652 01:07:41,900 --> 01:07:44,900 I think that's where the box feels. 653 01:07:44,900 --> 01:07:49,900 Help them intended. 654 01:07:49,900 --> 01:07:53,900 Thank you. I think that brings the clarity I was looking for. 655 01:07:53,900 --> 01:07:56,900 Thank you. 656 01:07:56,900 --> 01:07:57,900 Thank you. 657 01:07:57,900 --> 01:08:02,900 Any other questions at this time. 658 01:08:02,900 --> 01:08:08,900 Looking for a motion then for item nine point two. 659 01:08:08,900 --> 01:08:11,900 Thank you. 660 01:08:11,900 --> 01:08:18,900 I'm going to move that council give animal responsibility by law number two two three nine twenty twenty six first second and third readings. 661 01:08:18,900 --> 01:08:21,900 And that council give animal control miscellaneous. 662 01:08:21,900 --> 01:08:26,900 Mending by law number two to one two twenty twenty six first second and third readings. 663 01:08:26,900 --> 01:08:29,900 I will second. 664 01:08:29,900 --> 01:08:32,900 Thank you and any motivation at this point in time. 665 01:08:33,900 --> 01:08:42,900 So so far we talked a lot about deer but I'm just going to pull back and talk about the rest of the by law because this is a very important date that's coming to council. 666 01:08:42,900 --> 01:08:48,900 I was surprised to see that the city actually hadn't made any updates to this by law since I think 1986 or 87. 667 01:08:48,900 --> 01:08:54,900 So it is quite overdue and I think quite timely as well just recognizing that. 668 01:08:54,900 --> 01:09:01,900 You know especially through COVID we've got a lot of new dog ownership in the community and as it stands our current regulatory tools don't necessarily give us. 669 01:09:02,900 --> 01:09:10,900 A lot of discretion in enforcement when there isn't an incident for in the event of an incident arising. 670 01:09:10,900 --> 01:09:15,900 So I appreciated just having the dangerous and aggressive dog definitions clearly laid out. 671 01:09:15,900 --> 01:09:18,900 Disapport community safety moving forward. 672 01:09:18,900 --> 01:09:26,900 And then as well just given you know at this during my time at this table I have been a vocal advocates. 673 01:09:26,900 --> 01:09:33,900 For our community to become more aware and more proficient in not encouraging. 674 01:09:33,900 --> 01:09:41,900 Wildlife interactions when we move into neighborhoods where they previously may have room free so I do support. 675 01:09:41,900 --> 01:09:47,900 Some of the wording and the viola just to discourage those types of potential interactions from happening. 676 01:09:47,900 --> 01:09:52,900 In our community just hearing the comments tonight regarding enforcement. 677 01:09:52,900 --> 01:10:00,900 Some of the you know main themes that we're seeing to date I didn't hear from staff that deer is a current enforcement concern. 678 01:10:00,900 --> 01:10:07,900 I do recognize that it is probably occurring in our community given the fact that this is a very. 679 01:10:07,900 --> 01:10:10,900 This region is it's full of deer. 680 01:10:10,900 --> 01:10:20,900 But I I do recognize the challenge is an enforcement and I'm comforted by the fact that there is already a way for us to enforce this through provincial legislation. 681 01:10:20,900 --> 01:10:25,900 And I I do hear the concerns around staff capacity just recognizing this is. 682 01:10:25,900 --> 01:10:31,900 Unfortunately another instance where we're seeing provincial resources perhaps not. 683 01:10:31,900 --> 01:10:35,900 In line with our community needs and although I. 684 01:10:35,900 --> 01:10:43,900 We feel encouraged to help I do want to put pressure on the province to make sure that they're funding those programs appropriately so that this doesn't get. 685 01:10:43,900 --> 01:10:51,900 Last down to property taxpayers to have to do a fund and manage so with that in mind putting that forward on the table for council. 686 01:10:51,900 --> 01:10:53,900 Congratulations. 687 01:10:53,900 --> 01:10:54,900 Thank you. 688 01:10:54,900 --> 01:10:55,900 I don't sure. 689 01:10:55,900 --> 01:10:56,900 Thank you. 690 01:10:56,900 --> 01:10:58,900 Yeah, I got so into the deer. 691 01:10:58,900 --> 01:11:01,900 I actually have a question if I'm not about deer. 692 01:11:01,900 --> 01:11:02,900 Please do. 693 01:11:02,900 --> 01:11:03,900 So it's through the chair. 694 01:11:03,900 --> 01:11:07,900 I was I'm wondering more about the dogs of and that there's many. 695 01:11:07,900 --> 01:11:12,900 Schools that have fields and playgrounds and that kind of thing and how do we manage. 696 01:11:13,900 --> 01:11:16,900 When it's not the CRD or not the city of life or property. 697 01:11:16,900 --> 01:11:22,900 What people might be using the goals is almost like an off leash dog park. 698 01:11:22,900 --> 01:11:26,900 So could we get some clarity on what residents might do. 699 01:11:26,900 --> 01:11:31,900 If this bylaw would apply to that situation. 700 01:11:31,900 --> 01:11:34,900 Perhaps I can help through the chair. 701 01:11:34,900 --> 01:11:46,900 Presently school district 62 is the property holder when it comes to all of the school related playing fields playgrounds those types of areas. 702 01:11:46,900 --> 01:11:49,900 And by their own policy. 703 01:11:49,900 --> 01:11:55,900 They do not allow for dogs to be on the school grounds during school hours. 704 01:11:55,900 --> 01:12:02,900 That's a change from a few years ago where it was an absolute prohibition to have dogs on school property. 705 01:12:02,900 --> 01:12:04,900 I believe it was about two years ago. 706 01:12:04,900 --> 01:12:16,900 School district revisited that policy and determined that when classes are not in session having dogs on these playgrounds and playing fields or sorry sports fields. 707 01:12:16,900 --> 01:12:18,900 It really isn't a problem. 708 01:12:18,900 --> 01:12:23,900 And so with that change in policy there's been a lot fewer complaints. 709 01:12:23,900 --> 01:12:26,900 And I've checked with the animal control people on this. 710 01:12:26,900 --> 01:12:35,900 The use to receive quite significant numbers of complaints about people taking dogs on the school grounds after hours. 711 01:12:35,900 --> 01:12:38,900 Since I'd adjustment me by the school district. 712 01:12:38,900 --> 01:12:41,900 Those complaints have dropped off substantially. 713 01:12:41,900 --> 01:12:44,900 But in in attempt to ask answer the question. 714 01:12:44,900 --> 01:12:49,900 Generally it is it is the school district itself through its own staff. 715 01:12:49,900 --> 01:12:55,900 Where someone has if someone has to step in and deal with a dog and a dog owner. 716 01:12:55,900 --> 01:13:10,900 The property they manage that themselves and our bylaw will apply only to city control sports fields playing fields facilities playgrounds that type of thing. 717 01:13:10,900 --> 01:13:13,900 Thank you very much for that clarification. 718 01:13:13,900 --> 01:13:16,900 And on the same topic I can start I believe. 719 01:13:16,900 --> 01:13:18,900 Thank you through the chair. 720 01:13:18,900 --> 01:13:24,900 I was reminded of a question that was brought to my attention between committee and now and that's just regarding the licensing fees. 721 01:13:25,900 --> 01:13:28,900 Recognizing this bylaw proposes some updates. 722 01:13:28,900 --> 01:13:38,900 Can staff just confirm with the licensing fee process would look like with applicants would have to apply to the city of Frankfurt and the CRD or if it's just the one body. 723 01:13:38,900 --> 01:13:39,900 Through through the chair. 724 01:13:39,900 --> 01:13:41,900 Thank you for the question. 725 01:13:41,900 --> 01:13:47,900 The form of contract with the service provider and that's the CRD of course. 726 01:13:47,900 --> 01:14:05,900 It would be the licensing fees are able to the CRD the contract itself has the CRD observing the license fees and any picketing amounts so penalties that come out of violations of the bylaw itself. 727 01:14:05,900 --> 01:14:08,900 And that is seen as because essentially. 728 01:14:08,900 --> 01:14:14,900 The CRD are managing the licensing the canvassing if that's a necessary step. 729 01:14:14,900 --> 01:14:27,900 And enforcement as well as collection of unpaid fines so the contract really does allow that contract to the ability to be fully managing of that aspect. 730 01:14:27,900 --> 01:14:31,900 Thank you I think the comment was just in the spirit of not wanting to. 731 01:14:31,900 --> 01:14:41,900 I encourage pet owners from obtaining a license and wanting to encourage responsible pet ownership so I appreciate that clarification that it's not a duplication of the fee but just in the. 732 01:14:41,900 --> 01:14:42,900 Thank you. 733 01:14:42,900 --> 01:14:43,900 That's correct. 734 01:14:43,900 --> 01:14:45,900 Thank you. 735 01:14:45,900 --> 01:14:46,900 Thank you. 736 01:14:46,900 --> 01:14:47,900 Thank you. 737 01:14:47,900 --> 01:14:48,900 The chair. 738 01:14:48,900 --> 01:14:56,900 Just please super fair on this if someone gets bitten by a dog on school property what do they do because I don't know that there's any. 739 01:14:56,900 --> 01:14:58,900 And the call if you know what I mean. 740 01:14:58,900 --> 01:14:59,900 Who do we. 741 01:15:00,000 --> 01:15:02,000 Thank you for help. 742 01:15:02,000 --> 01:15:11,840 Yes, I may say the chair. There's still under the annual control bylaw, even though the bylaw itself 743 01:15:11,840 --> 01:15:20,440 does not manage the presence of dogs on school property. It is still the mainstay or managing 744 01:15:20,440 --> 01:15:28,960 the behavior of dogs. Everything from the requirement to be licensed. The picking up of 745 01:15:28,960 --> 01:15:36,320 dog droppings and that kind of thing, all falls into the bylaw. Has would any type of an unfortunate 746 01:15:36,320 --> 01:15:44,000 situation like a dog bite, and that would be investigated by the CRD under its contract and 747 01:15:44,000 --> 01:15:51,840 enforcement of this bylaw? Thank you very much. There comes to a comment, I guess, at this point that 748 01:15:51,840 --> 01:15:58,880 we've got to, we've already, for a second, so I think I can move into a comment. This is quite comprehensive 749 01:15:58,880 --> 01:16:05,680 and there's some good news in here about making sure that we're taking good care of animal welfare 750 01:16:05,680 --> 01:16:13,200 is dressed in here as well, and I appreciated that there was a lot of thought went into, I think, 751 01:16:13,200 --> 01:16:20,480 you know, when you do update something to go very comprehensive like this, I thought was very important 752 01:16:20,480 --> 01:16:27,840 step. We'd have so many residents with dogs and it's going to only increase, I believe the 753 01:16:27,840 --> 01:16:33,520 stat was 30% of people have dogs and more people are moving here because we know we're fast growing, 754 01:16:33,520 --> 01:16:38,880 so yes, it's very timely and appreciate the level of detail. 755 01:16:39,440 --> 01:16:49,840 Thank you. My comments before I call the question really due, just go back to the item around the 756 01:16:51,680 --> 01:16:58,320 around the deer. I really do see the benefit in having this explicitly laid out as was originally 757 01:16:58,320 --> 01:17:05,360 recommended by committee. I recognize that this is covered by the province, but so is bear and 758 01:17:05,360 --> 01:17:12,400 other wildlife. In my experience in recognizing this is just anecdotal. I have not looked up the 759 01:17:12,400 --> 01:17:19,840 statistics on this, on whole, but I've had far more things to get run in with deer than I ever have 760 01:17:20,480 --> 01:17:27,280 with bear or cougar, and that's just by many years of work and many years of being out in the bush all 761 01:17:27,360 --> 01:17:34,240 together. Whether that be here within city limits or in the wild, so recognizing that 762 01:17:34,240 --> 01:17:40,880 there are beyond a new sense and they do provide a level of danger to our community. 763 01:17:41,760 --> 01:17:47,280 So personally, I did like to see that as part of this, I recognize that it was an additional 764 01:17:47,440 --> 01:17:56,160 ask on staff and there is the potential for it to be revisited in that in that light, but as it is, 765 01:17:57,360 --> 01:18:03,280 I don't think I can support it without that, as I do think that it was an important addition in the sense 766 01:18:03,280 --> 01:18:11,440 here in some retrospect. So with that, I will follow the question if there are no other comments. All in favor. 767 01:18:11,760 --> 01:18:29,600 And a post. That's just myself a post. Thank you. I will move on to by-law number 2248 and any questions on this item. 768 01:18:29,600 --> 01:18:38,400 Seeing none, if we have a motion for by-law number 2248. 769 01:18:41,440 --> 01:18:49,440 For me, I'll just skip the right page here. Turn the page. I move that counsel. 770 01:18:49,440 --> 01:18:58,880 Give length for zoning by-law number 3751234. Goldstream avenue RT1 text amendment by-law number 2248 771 01:18:58,880 --> 01:19:04,080 2926. First, second and third readings. Thank you. And do we have a second? 772 01:19:05,360 --> 01:19:09,840 Second. Thank you. And answer a webinar. Do you have any motivation on this item? 773 01:19:11,440 --> 01:19:19,680 So this Goldstream site was quite an interesting discussion. Again, every application we get seems to have quite 774 01:19:19,680 --> 01:19:27,120 a bit of nuance to it. Working challenges, there's density concerns, and yet this was just a text 775 01:19:27,120 --> 01:19:33,280 amendment. So there are seven townhouses that were already approved. And this was just to add some 776 01:19:34,400 --> 01:19:42,080 permanent suites, rentals. And I felt that given that there was no parking variance, and we actually reduced 777 01:19:43,200 --> 01:19:49,120 my community. We recommended two units and there's three parking spots. We were trying to be very sensitive 778 01:19:49,120 --> 01:19:55,520 to having enough parking in the area and acknowledging that there's a lot of trees along the road 779 01:19:55,520 --> 01:20:02,000 side there that we want to protect the trees, but not overdue frontage in this particular case. 780 01:20:02,000 --> 01:20:10,320 So it was quite a lengthy discussion. And so at this point, I would continue to support. I didn't 781 01:20:10,320 --> 01:20:15,600 receive other information that would have changed my mind. But I do know there was a lot of community 782 01:20:15,600 --> 01:20:23,760 interest, and that this is challenging area. But I also think this is a nice place for people to live. 783 01:20:23,760 --> 01:20:29,840 So it's, it's an affordability concern having something that is a rental within a townhouse 784 01:20:30,400 --> 01:20:37,200 makes sense as a sort of an opportunity that we don't have a lot of that type of housing for people. 785 01:20:37,920 --> 01:20:44,400 And you do find that in strad as they manage the parking quite well with their static councils, 786 01:20:44,400 --> 01:20:51,760 nobody puts up with the people, breaking all the rules. We went through that as a strad of being 787 01:20:51,760 --> 01:20:59,920 quite into enforcing our strad of bylaws. So I do support this application in terms of it's 788 01:21:00,640 --> 01:21:07,600 being able to provide some homes and it's only two units, which I know for some people feels a lot. 789 01:21:08,480 --> 01:21:14,400 But the seven townhouses were already approved. So along with this application, I guess I would add, 790 01:21:14,400 --> 01:21:20,560 because it came back we are able to add things like heat pumps and the low carbon 791 01:21:20,560 --> 01:21:25,440 concrete policy, and that they will have to park in their garages. So there was some opportunity here 792 01:21:25,440 --> 01:21:32,400 because of the update that I think this is an improvement. Thank you very much. Councillor Hurder and 793 01:21:32,400 --> 01:21:38,400 comments. Thank you. Maybe it's a point of privilege at first. As the secondary I am allowed, 794 01:21:38,400 --> 01:21:42,640 or through the chair. As the secondary I am allowed to vote in opposition. Is that correct? 795 01:21:42,640 --> 01:21:48,480 Absolutely. Once the motion is on for belongs to the floor. Thank you. I appreciate those comments 796 01:21:48,480 --> 01:21:54,000 from Councillor Waigner. I will not be supporting this application. We did hear from residents 797 01:21:54,000 --> 01:21:57,680 in the surrounding neighborhood and previous meetings. I don't think we heard from any tonight. 798 01:21:58,560 --> 01:22:02,640 But just recognizing some of the challenges and concerns that have been expressed to date 799 01:22:02,640 --> 01:22:09,200 and recognizing that this site has been, or this site has been the subject of multiple applications. 800 01:22:09,200 --> 01:22:14,160 I do currently feel that the seven townhouses that this site permits is an appropriate level of 801 01:22:14,160 --> 01:22:20,080 densification or an appropriate level of density rather. I appreciate the applicant looking 802 01:22:20,080 --> 01:22:27,200 to find new ways to encourage home ownership, my home entry. But I'm just not sure that the site is 803 01:22:27,200 --> 01:22:34,080 the particular or is the right fit for that type of suggestion. So I will not be supporting it. 804 01:22:36,560 --> 01:22:41,200 Thank you. And while I've comments as well, I was going to ask Councillor Spock if you wouldn't 805 01:22:41,200 --> 01:22:43,920 before first. I see your hand raised. The floor is yours, Councillor. 806 01:22:45,600 --> 01:22:53,920 Thank you, Chair. I appreciate that. So yes, we did have a really good discussion at committee about this 807 01:22:53,920 --> 01:23:02,080 and our last council meeting. I think already that the seven townhouse units is significant 808 01:23:02,080 --> 01:23:09,200 density for that area that doesn't really lend itself to active transportation. It is a beautiful 809 01:23:09,200 --> 01:23:18,960 neighborhood. We did hear from the neighbors. However, and we did reduce one of the units taking one 810 01:23:18,960 --> 01:23:28,640 suite out of the units. So it's not perfect, but I am going to support this. We do acknowledge that 811 01:23:28,640 --> 01:23:35,680 home ownership is very, very difficult to attain. So I think there is the mortgage helper 812 01:23:35,680 --> 01:23:43,200 aspect with the suite in the townhouse. And also there's the point of family diversity that I believe 813 01:23:43,200 --> 01:23:51,360 council are very spoke to at the last meeting. Different combinations of families and people that 814 01:23:51,360 --> 01:23:59,760 define themselves as family and they can live comfortably within in one dwelling, sharing it with their 815 01:23:59,760 --> 01:24:07,680 sense of integrity around it. So although on balance it, it isn't perfect, but I think that it 816 01:24:07,680 --> 01:24:13,360 is allowing more residents to move into a very beautiful area. And I hope that in future we can work on 817 01:24:13,360 --> 01:24:21,200 the infrastructure along Goldstream so that people can let their kids get on the bus if there's going to be 818 01:24:21,200 --> 01:24:29,280 better transit down there eventually. And we do have the trail. That is that is along there. And I think 819 01:24:29,280 --> 01:24:35,920 we just need to continue to monitor the challenges on that road, which is basically along the lake. 820 01:24:35,920 --> 01:24:44,880 Thank you. Thank you very much. And it can definitely echo a lot of the comments made. The difficult part 821 01:24:44,880 --> 01:24:51,600 from me with this bylaw is really that we are looking at the text amendment. And we are comparing 822 01:24:52,480 --> 01:24:59,280 what is being proposed not versus what is currently there. Well, rather what was previously 823 01:24:59,280 --> 01:25:08,160 proposed. So we are comparing one set of current laws, the regulations and bylaws, who are previous one, 824 01:25:08,160 --> 01:25:16,560 we don't have the actual visual onsite as what the current situation is. Through this really to highlight 825 01:25:16,560 --> 01:25:24,320 what Councilor Wagner brought forward is that by this text amendment, yes, there are tremendous benefits 826 01:25:24,320 --> 01:25:29,040 that we've been able to add to the community. We are concerns that come up with this as well, 827 01:25:29,600 --> 01:25:36,640 but at the end of the day taking a look at it, I really do believe that these concerns are mitigated 828 01:25:36,640 --> 01:25:46,000 and mitigated primarily. In the fact that we are providing potentially two new homes for two 829 01:25:46,000 --> 01:25:54,480 families by allowing this addition of the rental sweets. And that is a massive benefit in this 830 01:25:54,480 --> 01:26:00,320 time where so many families are struggling to be able to find affordable homes or even find homes at all. 831 01:26:00,320 --> 01:26:09,680 So we've done a lot to ensure that the parking side is being mitigated. We've done a lot to provide 832 01:26:09,760 --> 01:26:15,040 those additional parking spots and the community needs in this. And at the end of the day, 833 01:26:15,040 --> 01:26:22,880 I think it is a bit of that balancing act and I'm very strongly and as a part of this given that 834 01:26:22,880 --> 01:26:28,880 context. So with that, if there is no other comments, I will call the question. All in favor. 835 01:26:30,720 --> 01:26:35,040 And any opposed. That is just a counter harder and opposition. 836 01:26:36,000 --> 01:26:46,960 We will move on to by law number 2250. This is the 1029 Marwood Avenue. If we have any questions on this 837 01:26:46,960 --> 01:26:56,080 before motivation. First, sorry before motion. Say no questions. If we have a motion for this by law. 838 01:26:57,040 --> 01:27:03,120 Thank you. I will move that council give link for zoning by law number 300 amendment number 7254 839 01:27:03,920 --> 01:27:09,760 1029 Marwood Avenue by law number 2250 2026 per second and third readings. 840 01:27:10,720 --> 01:27:15,200 Second. Thank you. Now to you again, Councillor Wagner for motivation. 841 01:27:16,400 --> 01:27:22,960 Thank you. Yes, as you know, chair of the Sustainable Development Advisory Committee and having been 842 01:27:22,960 --> 01:27:30,080 through a process of really digging into what this means. It's quite an interesting application 843 01:27:30,080 --> 01:27:37,600 again. So subdividing and having more density in this area. But I think it was a thoughtful application 844 01:27:37,600 --> 01:27:45,280 of it. It seems to fit with what's already there. There was a layout and part of it is fitting with the 845 01:27:45,920 --> 01:27:52,960 small scale multi unit housing legislation that again, it takes some of the control out of our hands 846 01:27:53,600 --> 01:28:00,080 because when you make these lots, there's a certain density that is proposed by the promise that we'll fit 847 01:28:00,080 --> 01:28:07,840 there. But I saw some improvements to the budget on both Marwood and Brown Road. There was, you know, 848 01:28:07,840 --> 01:28:15,760 addition of heat pumps again and other features that made this application. The museum 849 01:28:16,880 --> 01:28:23,520 perhaps one of those missing middle gentle density type of applications in an area that we know is really 850 01:28:24,560 --> 01:28:34,080 great for families and it is always hard to see all the trees come down as they well when buildings go in 851 01:28:34,800 --> 01:28:42,160 and yet that's that's how this neighborhood has been evolving. So trying to look at this application 852 01:28:42,160 --> 01:28:48,080 in that context, I felt I could support it. Thank you very much and any motivation from yourself, 853 01:28:48,080 --> 01:28:53,680 Gildzarder. Thank you for you not much to add. I would agree with the comments that this is quite a 854 01:28:53,680 --> 01:28:58,640 thoughtful proposal. I do agree that it will fit really well into the existing neighborhood context. 855 01:28:59,360 --> 01:29:03,200 You know, I hear from residents who live in the Happy Valley neighborhood from time to time and 856 01:29:03,280 --> 01:29:06,800 they often just talk about how wonderful it is to live there because of their neighbors, 857 01:29:06,800 --> 01:29:12,160 because of the existing community that's been developed over climb. So I see this as a wonderful addition. 858 01:29:13,040 --> 01:29:19,040 I appreciate the improvements that will be coming to Marwood Road. We're sorry Marwood Avenue and Brown Road 859 01:29:19,040 --> 01:29:23,360 in particular, just recognizing I think Marwood Avenue does tend to see a lot of 860 01:29:24,160 --> 01:29:29,360 vehicle traffic during, before and after school, pick up and strengthen the difference that 861 01:29:29,360 --> 01:29:37,040 I do get hosted at the Luxon Fairgrounds there. So I think overall this is a positive addition 862 01:29:37,040 --> 01:29:41,840 to the neighborhood or this will be a positive addition to the neighborhood and I'm happy to support it. 863 01:29:44,160 --> 01:29:48,240 Thank you very much, Councillor Spock and the comments on this by law. 864 01:29:50,560 --> 01:29:55,360 Nothing further, thank you. Thank you very much. I won't call the question on this one. I'll 865 01:29:55,680 --> 01:29:57,680 give her. 866 01:29:59,280 --> 01:30:01,680 And that was it. 867 01:30:00,000 --> 01:30:10,000 All in favour, so none opposed to that carries. Sorry, my, everything just jumped on me. There we go. 868 01:30:10,000 --> 01:30:18,000 We are now on to 9.5 by a law number 2265. This is the link for station by law any questions before we entertain a motion. 869 01:30:18,000 --> 01:30:20,000 All look for a motion then. 870 01:30:20,000 --> 01:30:27,000 Thank you all move that council give the link for station by law number 2265, 2026, first, second and third readings. 871 01:30:27,000 --> 01:30:29,000 I will second. 872 01:30:29,000 --> 01:30:31,000 Thank you. Any motivation on this? 873 01:30:31,000 --> 01:30:37,000 Thank you. We've had good discussion at committee and earlier this evening during the committee resolutions portion of the meeting. So I'll keep it brief. 874 01:30:37,000 --> 01:30:41,000 Just look forward to these updates coming forward. 875 01:30:41,000 --> 01:30:48,000 And my gratitude to staff as well for all of the time and effort that's put into making solution avenue in the cultural district of wonderful, as it is. 876 01:30:48,000 --> 01:30:58,000 Because it's consistently in area of the cities I hear acclades for and just how much it's allowed, especially downtown residents to connect with their neighbors so. 877 01:30:58,000 --> 01:31:07,000 It was definitely missing for a long time just having that casual third space and it's really developing into a beautiful beautiful asset for our community. So thank you. 878 01:31:07,000 --> 01:31:09,000 Thank you, then. 879 01:31:10,000 --> 01:31:18,000 Thank you. Yeah. I with the questions I asked earlier. I feel quite good about this. I think this area is quite exciting. It's developing. 880 01:31:18,000 --> 01:31:24,000 We see lots of music in the park and food trucks and really appreciate stuff just making it very vibrant. 881 01:31:24,000 --> 01:31:36,000 I go down there quite a bit myself and see different cultural festivals and you know it's great to see so many people coming out that are having a new experience. 882 01:31:36,000 --> 01:31:46,000 You know, I just really loved that kind of lighting festival. I went through this year, learned about Columbia and lighting day to celebrate the beginning of winter. 883 01:31:46,000 --> 01:31:50,000 So I've learned through the station. I think it's great. 884 01:31:50,000 --> 01:31:56,000 And I see that there's a lot of thought put in here as well to supporting indigenous initiatives and artists initiatives. 885 01:31:56,000 --> 01:32:04,000 So I think that we're setting ourselves up for continuing to grow this space and I like what I'm saying. 886 01:32:05,000 --> 01:32:12,000 Thank you very much. Seeing know the comment. I'll call the question on this all in favor. 887 01:32:12,000 --> 01:32:16,000 And that carries unanimously. 888 01:32:16,000 --> 01:32:28,000 Now we're on to by law number two to seven six. This is the sewer utility by law number 1600 is there a staff comment on this as for the background report or just as presented. 889 01:32:28,000 --> 01:32:34,000 I was always to freeze the SCRF and user rates for 2026. 890 01:32:34,000 --> 01:32:39,000 Thank you very much. Are we have any questions on this report from please. 891 01:32:39,000 --> 01:32:40,000 Thank you through the chair. 892 01:32:40,000 --> 01:32:57,000 I'm just wondering if staff can comment or provide a little bit of background on the next on the move away from setting a few structure for five year period and moving towards that annual restructuring that we've been seeing in recent years. 893 01:32:57,000 --> 01:33:09,000 The future the first five year rate setting was from 2015 to 2019 and since that time we've been setting rates on an annual basis. 894 01:33:09,000 --> 01:33:13,000 Over the last couple years we've been doing discussions with. 895 01:33:13,000 --> 01:33:31,000 We've been doing discussions with the second of the two 21 year periods of the agreement and so work fairly working through finalizing a financial model for this period and that will see. 896 01:33:31,000 --> 01:33:42,000 The changes has a result of that financial model and at that time we may be able to set a multi year rates going forward. 897 01:33:42,000 --> 01:33:46,000 If that's a main reason why it's been had done annually. 898 01:33:46,000 --> 01:33:52,000 We've lost years just in anticipation of that information coming forward. 899 01:33:52,000 --> 01:33:55,000 Thank you. 900 01:33:55,000 --> 01:34:05,000 Thank you if I may just build off that do we have a expected online for that for me have someone going to be complete or is that still allow for the term in. 901 01:34:05,000 --> 01:34:07,000 For you. 902 01:34:07,000 --> 01:34:13,000 I would need to be on some time late spring perhaps into the summer. 903 01:34:13,000 --> 01:34:23,000 We're doing currently reviewing and again of our consultants reviewing the information provided by wish room very mental. 904 01:34:23,000 --> 01:34:37,000 We've been updated with some growth projections that needed to be updated as well and so I would expect late spring into summer something coming forward if not before that. 905 01:34:37,000 --> 01:34:53,000 Thank you for the chair I had a similar question but just to clarify this we're looking at financial modeling over the next 25 years of this plan I gather there's a sewer master plan but because it's. 906 01:34:53,000 --> 01:35:00,000 Independent company we don't necessarily see all this information but will we we see a public report on this. 907 01:35:00,000 --> 01:35:06,000 Financial modeling and is it over the life of what I believe would be another 25 years or so. 908 01:35:06,000 --> 01:35:10,000 Through the cherry it's an additional it's another 20 years. 909 01:35:10,000 --> 01:35:30,000 So it was to 21 year terms the first 21 year term yeah inspired or was renewed in September 2025 and so there's like a 20 and a half years remaining in the current agreement and what will come forward. 910 01:35:30,000 --> 01:35:36,000 So I can effectively be looking at rates. 911 01:35:36,000 --> 01:35:54,000 I merely won't necessarily be projecting all of the information I'm going forward by will bring forward if I read setting into the future whether that's a five year period or a three year period initially so that is the information that will. 912 01:35:54,000 --> 01:35:58,000 I'm going to go this year. 913 01:35:58,000 --> 01:36:03,000 Thank you very much do we have a motion for this item at this time. 914 01:36:03,000 --> 01:36:08,000 Please thank you all move that council give sewer utility by law number of. 915 01:36:08,000 --> 01:36:19,000 One six zero zero twenty sixteen amendment number nine by law number two two seven six twenty seven six first second and third readings. 916 01:36:20,000 --> 01:36:25,000 Twenty I think I miss read that it was twenty two seven six twenty three six. 917 01:36:25,000 --> 01:36:29,000 Great I will second as corrected. 918 01:36:29,000 --> 01:36:31,000 Thank you very much and any motivation on this. 919 01:36:31,000 --> 01:36:37,000 Thank you just briefly appreciate the questions and responses from staff that helps clarify things for me. 920 01:36:37,000 --> 01:36:48,000 I also appreciated the report including the comparator graph as well just to kind of get a sense of where link for stands in relation to some of our neighboring municipalities so I will be supporting the motion tonight. 921 01:36:49,000 --> 01:36:51,000 Thank you and council. 922 01:36:51,000 --> 01:36:54,000 Yeah it's it's something we serve. 923 01:36:54,000 --> 01:37:00,000 We have looked at anytime sort of anticipating these ongoing negotiations. 924 01:37:00,000 --> 01:37:08,000 Taking quite some time I'm pleased to see that the rates are frozen this year while we continue to negotiate. 925 01:37:08,000 --> 01:37:12,000 It does say they'll probably have been the future but. 926 01:37:12,000 --> 01:37:18,000 Well I guess we'll cross that bridge when we come to it so appreciate that there's a lot of ongoing negotiations and I. 927 01:37:19,000 --> 01:37:30,000 Thank you very much seeing no other hands or light so I'll call the question on this all in favor. 928 01:37:30,000 --> 01:37:34,000 And that is unanimous and that carries. 929 01:37:34,000 --> 01:37:44,000 I will move on to item nine point seven this is the revenue anticipation borrowing by law is there a comment from staff on this item or again just the report. 930 01:37:44,000 --> 01:37:49,000 This is effectively a most keeping item it's a requirement of our banking agreements. 931 01:37:49,000 --> 01:37:52,000 This comes forward every year as a result. 932 01:37:52,000 --> 01:38:00,000 The city has never had to borrow through a revenue anticipation borrowing my line and we don't that and this being able to or needing to. 933 01:38:00,000 --> 01:38:09,000 This year the reason why municipalities have these is that because we collect the majority of our income halfway through the year. 934 01:38:09,000 --> 01:38:17,000 And we have a municipality that would be more cash strapped or cash flow strapped may need to borrow in order to cover their expenses for the first six months. 935 01:38:17,000 --> 01:38:24,000 So that's the reason why this is going forward, does they say we don't anticipate it or nothing to use it. 936 01:38:24,000 --> 01:38:28,000 Thank you very much any questions on this item. 937 01:38:28,000 --> 01:38:30,000 If we have a motion. 938 01:38:30,000 --> 01:38:34,000 I would do prepared to move that. 939 01:38:34,000 --> 01:38:36,000 We're going to go wrong page. 940 01:38:36,000 --> 01:38:38,000 Pardon me. 941 01:38:38,000 --> 01:38:40,000 I'm simply ready with the right page. 942 01:38:40,000 --> 01:38:48,000 That council give revenue anticipation borrowing by law number twenty to seven twenty twenty six for a second at their greetings. 943 01:38:48,000 --> 01:38:49,000 How second. 944 01:38:49,000 --> 01:38:52,000 Thank you and any motivation on this item. 945 01:38:52,000 --> 01:38:57,000 So you know I think this was pretty well explained we've seen these each year. 946 01:38:57,000 --> 01:39:00,000 I'm glad to know that we don't budget for it. 947 01:39:01,000 --> 01:39:04,000 We don't anticipate needing to use it, but we do. 948 01:39:04,000 --> 01:39:09,000 Benefit from having it as an opportunity if something really. 949 01:39:09,000 --> 01:39:11,000 You never know. 950 01:39:11,000 --> 01:39:13,000 It might happen so definitely. 951 01:39:13,000 --> 01:39:16,000 It's well named revenue anticipation borrowing. 952 01:39:16,000 --> 01:39:19,000 So yeah, it's a good. 953 01:39:19,000 --> 01:39:22,000 Thank you and any comments. 954 01:39:22,000 --> 01:39:23,000 I'll be in front there. 955 01:39:23,000 --> 01:39:24,000 Thanks. 956 01:39:24,000 --> 01:39:25,000 Thank you. 957 01:39:25,000 --> 01:39:28,000 I will all the question and all in favor. 958 01:39:31,000 --> 01:39:33,000 And that is unanimous as well. 959 01:39:33,000 --> 01:39:34,000 I carries. 960 01:39:38,000 --> 01:39:40,000 And that brings us through by laws. 961 01:39:40,000 --> 01:39:43,000 Next item up is our in camera resolution. 962 01:39:43,000 --> 01:39:45,000 Do we have a motion to go in camera please. 963 01:39:45,000 --> 01:39:46,000 Thank you chair. 964 01:39:46,000 --> 01:39:52,000 I'll move that council close the meeting to the public pursuant section ninety one I and G of the community charter. 965 01:39:52,000 --> 01:39:57,000 You consider the receipt of advice that is subject to solicitor client privilege. 966 01:39:58,000 --> 01:40:01,000 Including communications necessary for that purpose. 967 01:40:01,000 --> 01:40:05,000 Litigation or potential litigation affecting the municipality. 968 01:40:05,000 --> 01:40:07,000 Second. 969 01:40:07,000 --> 01:40:08,000 Thank you. 970 01:40:08,000 --> 01:40:10,000 Thank you everyone who came out tonight. 971 01:40:10,000 --> 01:40:14,000 I will call the question all in favor. 972 01:40:14,000 --> 01:40:17,000 And opposed. 973 01:40:17,000 --> 01:40:19,000 That carries unanimously. 974 01:40:19,000 --> 01:40:21,000 We are heading in camera. 975 01:40:27,000 --> 01:40:29,000 Thank you.