[0:02] You are watching the Access channel
[0:04] LaPorte County Channel 97. Next
[0:05] will take place
[0:06] Council meeting
[0:07] LaPorte County 28
[0:09] September. You can
[0:10] find more
[0:12] information about this
[0:13] meeting on the site
[0:15] www.accesslaportecounty.org.
[0:21] Good. Good evening
[0:23] . Welcome to
[0:24] regular meeting
[0:25] council in September. Uh,
[0:27] please turn off
[0:28] all mobile
[0:28] phones and stand up
[0:30] for the Pledge of Allegiance.
[0:32] Ms. Heath, please.
[0:33] I swear allegiance.
[0:36] flag of the United
[0:38] States of America and
[0:39] the republic that he
[0:40] symbolizes, the only
[0:41] nations under God,
[0:42] indivisible, with
[0:43] freedom and
[0:44] justice for
[0:45] everyone.
[0:54] Mr. Arndt, is there
[0:55] vote, be
[0:56] affection?
[0:56] Mr. Pressel.
[0:57] Present. Mr
[0:58] Nigalsky.
[1:00] Present.
[1:00] Mr. Kessler.
[1:02] Present.
[1:02] Mr. Klonowski.
[1:04] Present. Mr
[1:05] Shill. Present.
[1:07] Mrs. Heath.
[1:07] Present.
[1:08] And Mr. Mollenhauer.
[1:09] Present.
[1:10] Everyone is present. Do you have
[1:12] quorum.
[1:12] Thank you. At this time I want to consider
[1:14] question about
[1:15] approval
[1:16] protocol
[1:16] special
[1:17] meeting on August 20 and
[1:18] public hearings.
[1:19] You want to consider
[1:20] agenda.
[1:21] First
[1:21] approval of the order
[1:22] daytime.
[1:22] Oops.
[1:23] I missed one.
[1:23] item.
[1:24] You are right.
[1:25] Then let's move on to
[1:26] approval of the order
[1:27] daytime.
[1:27] Mr. President, I propose a proposal for
[1:30] approval of the order
[1:31] daily, adding
[1:32] next to
[1:32] transfers and
[1:33] spending authorizations.
[1:35] We unintentionally
[1:35] missed the coroner
[1:37] Swanson. She asks
[1:40] $325 per night
[1:41] in Indianapolis for
[1:43] training new
[1:44] sheriff's deputies. Ahem
[1:47] , and this will be removed from
[1:49] account 2053.
[1:52] Where on the agenda
[1:53] do you want...
[1:54] Uh, under the legends and
[1:55] spending authorizations
[1:56] and appropriations...
[1:59] Bottom of the list?
[2:01] Yes, she can...
[2:03] There is already a section with corners,
[2:04] that is, at the bottom of its three
[2:06] ...
[2:06] For two?
[2:07] Or so, under
[2:07] appropriations.
[2:09] although he wants to do
[2:10] transfers.
[2:12] Good. We will deliver
[2:14] this is at the end of the narration
[2:16] . Are there any other points?
[2:25] Okay, so we have
[2:26] offer. I have
[2:28] second offer?
[2:29] Second.
[2:30] Mr.'s proposal
[2:30] Kessler, friend
[2:31] Ms. Heath's suggestion.
[2:32] Everyone who is "for"
[2:33] approval of the order
[2:34] daytime, mark,
[2:35] saying "yes". Yes.
[2:36] Against? Thank you. Good,
[2:39] so now let's move
[2:40] further. Come on, me too
[2:41] I think we probably
[2:42] it's worth breaking it down into...
[2:43] Let's take a look
[2:44] approval
[2:45] protocol
[2:45] special
[2:46] meeting from 20
[2:47] August. I suggest this,
[2:48] President. Therefore,
[2:49] Mr.'s proposal
[2:50] Igalsky.
[2:51] Second.
[2:52] Supported by Mr.
[2:53] Kessler. Everyone who is "in favor"
[2:54] confirm,
[2:55] saying "yes".
[2:56] Yes.
[2:56] Against? Thank you. Uh, in
[2:59] we have approval
[3:00] regular meeting
[3:02] August 24th, and we have
[3:04] joint seminar 24
[3:05] August. I will consider.
[3:09] offer for one
[3:10] either both, or the council
[3:11] will allow me
[3:13] approve both.
[3:15] Mr.'s proposal
[3:16] Mollenhauer. I have
[3:17] Is there a second word?
[3:18] Second.
[3:19] Supported by Ms. Heath.
[3:20] Everyone who is "in favor"
[3:21] confirm,
[3:22] saying "yes".
[3:23] Yes.
[3:23] Against? Thank you.
[3:26] Public
[3:26] discussion.
[3:27] Public
[3:28] discussion now
[3:29] open.
[3:32] Good evening. Steve
[3:33] Hall from the Board of Commissioners
[3:35] district. Small
[3:36] renewal. Uh,
[3:37] elimination of harm from
[3:38] The storm is still ongoing.
[3:39] If anyone of
[3:39] your voters
[3:40] problems will arise,
[3:41] they will call
[3:41] you will be asked
[3:42] questions, contact
[3:42] with the road department,
[3:43] will be added to the list,
[3:44] and they will pick him up
[3:45] . The work is moving.
[3:46] slow. There
[3:46] much more
[3:47] thickets than people
[3:48] thought. And, uh, but
[3:49] they are still working
[3:50] during the day. And also,
[3:51] because budget
[3:51] The hearing is coming to an end.
[3:52] and you guys,
[3:53] are you going to
[3:53] approve the budget, I still want you to
[3:55] remembered about
[3:55] district employees,
[3:56] Please. If we
[3:57] will have to refuse any
[3:58] what increases for
[3:59] elected in the district, then
[3:59] make sure that we will take care of
[4:00] employees. We are not
[4:01] we can allow
[4:02] to lose everything
[4:02] the experience that we have. Thank you.
[4:04] Thank you. Are there any more?
[4:10] someone from
[4:11] the public, who
[4:12] Want to speak? Not
[4:19] seeing no one,
[4:20] public discussion
[4:21] is now closed.
[4:23] Let's move on to reports.
[4:24] heads of departments.
[4:35] Good evening. Dan
[4:36] Barney, Treasurer
[4:38] La Porte County. Uh, me
[4:39] I just want to
[4:40] consider a few
[4:41] things. Uh, we
[4:42] approved our
[4:44] claims in the amount of 414,963.28
[4:47] dollars. This is ours
[4:49] personal income tax
[4:50] property. Uh, we
[4:52] received 59,131.21
[4:55] dollars. So, 1
[4:57] October we will witness
[5:00] court $355,832.07. THERE ARE-
[5:07] uh, we also got
[5:08] our first check for
[5:09] tax on
[5:09] service
[5:10] hotels for the district
[5:11] almost $8,000.
[5:12] So it seems that this
[5:13] the first check that
[5:13] district ever
[5:14] received from this
[5:15] reason. This is related
[5:16] with that new one
[5:16] by resolution, where we can show them
[5:18] account for delays.
[5:19] So almost $8,000.
[5:28] Good.
[5:30] So, we also have
[5:31] item in the section "
[5:32] "Old business", which we will raise, expecting
[5:34] your, uh, letter,
[5:35] which you sent us
[5:37] everyone. Uh, is there anything that
[5:38] you want to consider
[5:39] about this now
[5:40] , do you want
[5:40] consider this in
[5:41] section "Old cases"
[5:42] "?
[5:42] Oh, I'm here. Let's just do it.
[5:47] Good. So, uh, uh, I assume that everyone
[5:51] had the opportunity
[5:52] review
[5:53] documents that, uh,
[5:54] Mr. Barney sent
[5:55] to all of us.
[5:56] Hmm, Mr. Yale,
[5:57] maybe not, because it
[5:57] e-mail address
[5:58] returned, and I
[5:59] took advantage of
[5:59] by email,
[6:00] which is on the website
[6:01] district, so I ask
[6:02] Sorry about that. All
[6:03] OK. I didn't see.
[6:04] this. Is there
[6:05] electronic is written
[6:06] district address?
[6:07] No, it's Comcast, I guess.
[6:08] .
[6:08] Yes, I...That's it,
[6:10] What do I have? He could
[6:11] specify dot com instead
[6:12] dot net. I don't know. But,
[6:14] good.
[6:15] Sorry. I...I understand.
[6:17] I copied and pasted
[6:18] this, so...Okay.
[6:20] I didn't see this. Yes,
[6:22] let's continue.
[6:24] So, at the moment,
[6:25] because most
[6:26] of us at least has
[6:27] document i don't know
[6:28] did everyone have
[6:29] opportunity carefully
[6:29] read it, uh,
[6:30] let's think
[6:31] about taking it off
[6:33] for consideration. Hmm, it seems
[6:34] unofficially
[6:35] pushed him on
[6:36] this meeting, but
[6:37] technically he still is
[6:38] should be on the table.
[6:39] Offer to remove
[6:40] him from consideration.
[6:41] Good. Offer
[6:42] Mr. Yale.
[6:43] Second.
[6:44] the proposal
[6:45] Mr. Casperson. Everyone,
[6:46] Who is "for" the removal?
[6:47] hiring permit
[6:48] workers for
[6:48] Treasurer's office,
[6:49] confirm this
[6:50] with the words "yes".
[6:51] Yes. Yes.
[6:52] Against? Good. Word
[6:55] Yours, sir.
[6:56] Well, I think, having
[6:57] documents in hand, I
[6:59] listed all
[7:00] responsibilities of each of
[7:01] my positions in the office.
[7:02] So, I mean,
[7:03] that each of them has
[7:04] many things, and that one,
[7:05] Who do I want to hire?
[7:06] this is the second deputy.
[7:07] Not a deputy
[7:07] a scout, and another
[7:08] second deputy. It
[7:09] the one I don't
[7:10] worked, I don't know,
[7:11] five or six
[7:12] months. Hmm, that's very
[7:13] important work that
[7:14] supports our
[7:15] deputy
[7:16] scout. And I have to
[7:19] I mean, you know, there is
[7:20] really should be
[7:21] responsible for
[7:22] arrests and, um, moving
[7:23] property, the seizure of which
[7:25] there is also enough
[7:26] important matter,
[7:27] because we need
[7:28] to go through each
[7:29] city, every state
[7:31] institution in the district
[7:32] Laporte. So, that's all.
[7:35] schools, all cities, all
[7:36] villages. So, with all this
[7:38] employees who
[7:40] delay payment
[7:41] taxes, we must
[7:42] send documents
[7:43] Excel, make sure that
[7:44] they are still working
[7:45] to this organization, and
[7:46] then find out whether
[7:47] one of them hired
[7:48] other people about whom
[7:49] we didn't know yet, but
[7:50] then we need
[7:51] view this
[7:51] list. So, this is
[7:52] big process
[7:53] arrest settings
[7:54] for this. Fortunately,
[7:55] we need to do
[7:57] it's only once a year,
[7:58] but this is another big one
[7:59] work. So, of course,
[8:00] we would also like
[8:01] to work on
[8:02] our personal
[8:03] property and
[8:03] improve this
[8:04] process, and we can
[8:05] There is a lot to do.
[8:06] We don't need any
[8:07] solution for this. We,
[8:08] um, we just have
[8:10] clear our data.
[8:12] So every time we send a letter-
[8:14] requirement, computer
[8:15] system automatically
[8:16] clicks on the surcharge in
[8:17] amount of 5 dollars. Well,
[8:18] people get their
[8:19] letter, receive yours
[8:20] tax bill,
[8:21] pay it, but
[8:21] never pay 5
[8:22] dollars. So, unfortunately,
[8:23] the system does not return
[8:25] these 5 dollars, so there is
[8:26] a lot of that
[8:27] the collectors call
[8:28] garbage. Um,
[8:29] junk accounts.
[8:31] So, for example, we send them
[8:32] $5 bills.
[8:33] Well, they never
[8:34] will charge the bill for 5
[8:35] dollars. And the district
[8:36] sent thousands and
[8:37] thousands of these for
[8:38] penalty. So this is
[8:39] just some of the things,
[8:40] which, I think,
[8:41] hindered part
[8:42] our process
[8:42] collection, because we send them things,
[8:44] which they cannot
[8:45] to pull. So this is
[8:46] makes them spend
[8:47] their time, and they don't
[8:48] like...Nobody
[8:48] doesn't like to spend
[8:49] your time, especially
[8:50] because, I think,
[8:51] the pullers are working
[8:52] for a commission. So they
[8:53] really don't want to work on our
[8:54] things through all
[8:55] bad data we eat
[8:56] provided. I mean
[8:57] probably over 8000
[8:58] documents for
[8:59] the last 10 years. So
[9:00] this is necessary
[9:01] to fix. All this
[9:02] a big process, it
[9:04] takes time. Uh, we are ending 2016,
[9:06] because it lasted 10 years,
[9:08] so we no longer
[9:09] we can do anything
[9:10] to be charged since 2016.
[9:11] So, I mean, is
[9:12] Do you have any?
[9:13] questions about
[9:14] the position I am applying for
[9:14] I am hiring or want
[9:15] to hire?
[9:16] Just for clarity,
[9:17] Sir, what position are you applying for?
[9:18] Are you hiring?
[9:18] Second Deputy.
[9:20] This is the second deputy.
[9:22] This will be a comment, right?
[9:25] Five.
[9:26] Good. I think that,
[9:28] Mr. President, um,
[9:30] again, I would
[9:31] said if we
[9:32] 5 months have passed, still
[9:33] one month, no
[9:34] I am going to interrupt.
[9:35] this process directly
[9:36] now. We already
[9:37] talked about the process
[9:38] attempts to close
[9:39] Michigan City on
[9:40] a few days on
[9:40] week. I think that
[9:41] we still have to continue what
[9:43] we are trying
[9:44] make. And again
[9:45] Yes, it's been 5
[9:46] months. So, one more
[9:47] month, I don't think so
[9:48] this will lead to
[9:50] that we can pass
[9:51] through our budget to
[9:52] discuss 100 points
[9:53] , as well as the closure
[9:54] some days in Michigan
[9:56] -City. Not only him
[9:57] office, many
[9:58] offices. Yes, I already have.
[9:59] talked about it with
[10:00] clerical. She is already...
[10:01] I discussed this with her.
[10:02] I discussed this with
[10:03] other managers
[10:04] departments, and all
[10:05] understand in which
[10:06] direction we are moving. So we
[10:07] should, you know,
[10:08] to grit one's teeth or something
[10:10] like this. You know, we don't
[10:11] can...we should
[10:12] decide that we want to do it because there is
[10:14] the only way
[10:15] save money. We all know that the 27th
[10:18] approaching. Therefore...
[10:20] What is your decision?
[10:22] As far as I hear yours
[10:23] comments, so the only thing,
[10:24] What do I need for?
[10:27] to all of us
[10:28] attention, this is what it is not
[10:30] just one office, but
[10:31] several offices, and how we can move
[10:33] go ahead with this
[10:34] in parallel. Emm,
[10:35] well, this position will be
[10:36] the one that I like
[10:36] needed at the port.
[10:37] She won't disappear anywhere.
[10:38] . Only Michigan City.
[10:40] Responsibilities
[10:40] spread throughout the
[10:41] county.
[10:41] That's true, but
[10:42] Michigan staff-
[10:43] City will go to the port. So
[10:44] we are not anyone
[10:44] we release. They
[10:45] are going to the port. This will be 5
[10:47] -year process. We
[10:48] explained it to everyone. It
[10:49] no one was surprised,
[10:51] because I had long
[10:52] discussion with everyone
[10:53] employees
[10:54] department regarding
[10:55] this conversation.
[10:56] Yes, no one
[10:57] discussed with me
[10:58] Michigan closure-
[10:59] City, just so you
[11:00] knew.
[11:00] Good. So,
[11:03] People, remind us?
[11:04] How many people do you have?
[11:05] currently working in La-
[11:06] Porti, including you?
[11:12] Four.
[11:12] So, you have
[11:13] Are there four full ones?
[11:14] someone is incomplete
[11:15] working day?
[11:16] That's four full ones. We attract a little
[11:18] less incomplete
[11:18] employees,
[11:19] starting from this
[11:19] moment, because
[11:20] collection of contributions.
[11:20] And remind me again
[11:21] once when this
[11:22] will begin.
[11:22] Well, collection of contributions
[11:23] starts now.
[11:24] it is gaining
[11:25] revolutions.
[11:26] Good.
[11:26] So, approximately through
[11:28] 40 days. So, four
[11:30] in La Porte, and then
[11:31] one in Michigan City.
[11:32] Or, well, there should be two.
[11:34] Yes.
[11:34] But now only one?
[11:36] Um, well, I'm there.
[11:39] Last time, when
[11:41] you were here and
[11:41] spoke out against this
[11:42] question, I violated
[11:43] a few questions about
[11:44] how this additional
[11:45] position, or this position,
[11:47] if it is replenished,
[11:48] can help with
[11:49] by collection
[11:49] unpaid bills
[11:51] . I haven't had it yet.
[11:52] opportunities
[11:52] view all that
[11:53] you sent, but
[11:54] it seems like this
[11:55] mostly descriptions
[11:57] positions. Will you have
[11:59] opportunity to
[11:59] next meeting
[12:00] potentially
[12:01] view this
[12:02] questions and how they
[12:03] will be able to provide
[12:04] us additional income?
[12:05] Because I think that this
[12:06] justifies this
[12:06] position and helps
[12:07] to prove that we get an additional
[12:09] income that is otherwise
[12:10] would stay
[12:10] unassembled. I wanted
[12:11] would like to see more
[12:12] information from this
[12:13] reason.
[12:16] Good. Is there
[12:17] proposal to make
[12:18] this is under consideration
[12:19] next month?
[12:20] Proposal to take
[12:21] this is for consideration by
[12:22] Mr. Jagelsky.
[12:27] Second. The second from Mr.
[12:29] Keel. Everyone who is "for"
[12:30] to bring this up for consideration
[12:31] , confirm,
[12:32] saying "yes". Yes.
[12:33] Against? No. Good.
[12:37] But, just so you
[12:38] knew, our office in
[12:39] Michigan City in
[12:39] Friday made on
[12:40] amount over 3000 dollars
[12:41] from our office in La-
[12:42] Porti. So, income
[12:43] Michigan City sharply
[12:44] increased over the last
[12:45] a year or so.
[12:46] people found out,
[12:47] that the office is still
[12:47] open. What are they
[12:49] didn't know. Or
[12:50] they are coming
[12:50] personally? Do they pay?
[12:51] they? Do they pay?
[12:53] personally?
[12:53] So
[12:54] Let's
[12:54] make sure that we
[12:55] everything is understood, simply
[12:56] to be careful,
[12:56] isn't that right? So, we
[12:57] postponed this issue
[12:58] for consideration. Let's make sure that I will take into account the additional
[13:00] information, but I don't
[13:01] I think we are more
[13:02] we can put
[13:02] questions and
[13:03] answer.
[13:03] Thank you.
[13:04] Please provide
[13:05] us an additional
[13:05] information
[13:06] in advance to
[13:07] next meeting,
[13:07] so that we have time for her
[13:08] to consider.
[13:09] I persist.
[13:10] I call on everyone
[13:10] to contact
[13:11] treasurer to
[13:12] next meeting,
[13:13] so that we can get
[13:14] answers to all our
[13:15] question of the day...
[13:16] I will.
[13:17] Thank you. Good. Emm,
[13:19] I continue reporting.
[13:20] department heads
[13:22] or managers
[13:22] departments.
[13:27] Good evening. Eric
[13:29] Window maker,
[13:29] ambulance service
[13:30] La-District Assistance
[13:31] Port. I appeal to
[13:32] you to ask
[13:33] about support. Um, we
[13:34] discussed
[13:34] re-installation of machines
[13:35] ambulance under
[13:36] time of hearings on
[13:37] budget. We have
[13:37] ambulance
[13:38] assistance that was
[13:39] damaged in February, if you
[13:40] remember her
[13:41] encountered
[13:41] damage,
[13:42] returned to the manufacturer
[13:43] for repair. All
[13:44] done. So I have
[13:45] opportunity to take
[13:46] first set for
[13:47] remounting
[13:48] next year already
[13:49] this week when we will take away
[13:51] renovated
[13:52] kit. It
[13:53] will deprive us
[13:54] necessary separately
[13:55] to go on his
[13:56] dismantling. They,
[13:57] will probably start
[13:58] repair during
[13:59] the next 3 weeks.
[14:00] So we have a little time.
[14:01] , but I just thought
[14:02] that can be saved,
[14:03] if we analyze
[14:04] him, while we still
[14:05] we are going to pick up
[14:06] this ambulance
[14:07] help. Uh, I don't.
[14:08] I want to drag this out.
[14:09] but just so you
[14:11] knew, new car
[14:12] ambulance
[14:13] now costs about
[14:14] $420,000 and we don't
[14:15] we will see it through to the end
[14:17] 2029. We can
[14:18] to remount two
[14:19] ambulances
[14:20] help next
[14:21] year for 460,000 dollars,
[14:22] so almost two in
[14:23] for the price of one. Simply
[14:26] for general
[14:26] known, process
[14:27] remounting
[14:28] consists in removing
[14:29] chassis body. Chassis
[14:31] is replaced with a new one.
[14:32] They correct
[14:33] any damage,
[14:34] polish the paint,
[14:35] polish the inside
[14:36] part, make it
[14:38] quite new. Uh,
[14:39] any problems with
[14:40] corrosion, etc.
[14:41] are being resolved. Hmm, and this,
[14:42] obviously enough
[14:43] significant savings
[14:44] funds, but I just
[14:46] I want to know if
[14:47] can I get
[14:48] resolution on
[14:49] support for
[14:50] not to exceed 460,000
[14:51] dollars from the budget
[14:52] next year on these
[14:54] two repairs. So I could
[14:55] would remove this setting
[14:57] this week and
[14:57] start the process.
[15:01] Before we take a moment
[15:02] let's move on to
[15:03] acceptance, sir
[15:04] auditor, does it create
[15:05] are there any problems with
[15:06] the way our budget
[15:07] submitted to the state?
[15:10] Not right now, because, um,
[15:12] you would not pay
[15:13] ambulances
[15:14] assistance with
[15:17] ordinary expenses that
[15:18] we have, what are you,
[15:19] guys, already
[15:19] approved on
[15:20] next year. You
[15:22] would have to take it from
[15:23] one of the capital
[15:25] funds, or you
[15:25] would have to take it from
[15:27] whether there are any
[15:28] lighting that can
[15:29] to be available at that time.
[15:31] Good.
[15:33] Mr. President.
[15:34] Resolution on
[15:35] support. Me too
[15:36] I should add that, um, we
[15:37] not only about this
[15:38] we talk, but when I am installing lights.
[15:39] panels during
[15:40] replenishment of stocks
[15:41] and all that other stuff, that's
[15:42] actually more expensive
[15:42] things we don't
[15:43] let's include this.
[15:44] So, the offer for
[15:45] support for the same.
[15:46] Second.
[15:47] Offer for
[15:48] support from Mr.
[15:49] Yeske, second from
[15:49] Mr. Kessler. Is there
[15:50] further discussion
[15:52] from the council?
[15:53] And this is for payment
[15:54] next year.
[15:55] Right.
[15:56] Yes.
[15:58] Everyone who is "in favor"
[15:59] confirm,
[16:00] saying "I". «
[16:01] I". «
[16:02] Against"? Thank you.
[16:04] Have a nice trip
[16:06] .
[16:17] Oh, Jeremy Smeki from
[16:18] Parks Department.
[16:20] Uh, I just wanted to
[16:21] a few updates. Uh,
[16:22] as the commissioner said
[16:23] Holyfield, we,
[16:24] obviously, still
[16:25] we clean. Uh, we have
[16:26] were Pioneer Days
[16:27] this weekend, so
[16:28] we had a lot
[16:29] preparatory work
[16:30] for this. Uh,
[16:31] about 1500, uh, 1600
[16:32] people came to this
[16:33] within 2 days,
[16:34] pretty good
[16:36] number. Hmm, we
[16:38] today we found out,
[16:39] what Google AI advertises
[16:40] next weekend,
[16:41] so please don't
[16:43] look at AI to
[16:44] find dates for your
[16:45] things. Hmm, no
[16:47] trust everything that
[16:48] you see there.
[16:49] Come to the truth
[16:51] sites that can
[16:52] to tell you for sure,
[16:53] when are these days Hmm, I don't.
[16:56] I say that some of their
[16:57] materials
[16:58] false, but
[16:59] go to the website
[17:00] Laporte County Parks
[17:02] or on the Facebook site to
[17:03] find our website at
[17:04] Facebook to find these
[17:05] dates. What's over?
[17:09] So, um, yeah. In any case. Hmm, In any case, we still
[17:13] we clean in Bloom. IN
[17:15] We are trees, uh,
[17:16] trails that are still
[17:17] closed in Lura, this
[17:18] overhanging branches, with
[17:19] which our staff and
[17:20] equipment cannot
[17:22] to cope. Uh, in
[17:24] Bloomie still has hundreds
[17:25] trees on one side
[17:26] the park, and the whole forest
[17:28] closed. Stitches for
[17:29] mountain bikes
[17:30] , horse trails, everything
[17:31] like this. Now that Days
[17:32] the pioneers are over
[17:34] , we are going
[17:34] start doing this.
[17:36] Um, don't drag it.
[17:37] a lot of this, because
[17:38] it's in the forest and we can
[17:40] just clear up
[17:41] path and allow
[17:42] let nature do its thing,
[17:44] but, uh, it will be,
[17:45] you know, there are many more
[17:46] work. Uh, we have
[17:47] several are planned
[17:48] volunteer days with
[17:49] people who are
[17:50] qualified, and
[17:51] which will also help
[17:52] us in this.
[17:53] So, before you
[17:53] go to
[17:54] next point,
[17:55] because people
[17:56] are listening to this meeting,
[17:57] what to do if you
[17:58] looking for volunteers,
[17:59] Who are you looking for? Which
[18:00] workforce?
[18:01] Yeah, you know, obviously,
[18:02] we need people,
[18:03] who know how
[18:04] safe to work with
[18:05] saw, etc. So we
[18:06] quite picky about
[18:07] this. I mean,
[18:09] I don't want anyone to
[18:10] suffered, and, uh,
[18:11] obviously, uh, we don't
[18:12] we want someone
[18:13] suffered on our
[18:14] property. Uh, but we can, you know, people,
[18:16] which we know that
[18:18] have these skills and
[18:19] skills, we can
[18:20] to work with you. AND,
[18:21] you know, the person is here and
[18:23] there, which is simply
[18:23] will help pull out
[18:25] bushes, that's all
[18:26] another matter. You know,
[18:27] after that, we
[18:28] may be needed
[18:29] people from
[18:29] blowers and
[18:30] similar equipment
[18:31] to come and
[18:32] to do this, that
[18:33] useful. And the mountains
[18:34] cyclists
[18:34] came and did
[18:35] this is last time
[18:36] after we have
[18:37] it was a great day
[18:38] volunteering. So,
[18:39] yes, there are several
[18:40] opportunities, so
[18:41] call me at
[18:42] office at 325-831-5,
[18:44] and we will try
[18:45] to register you where
[18:46] we can.
[18:47] Okay, so.
[18:48] Um, and then, um, I know, I think I am.
[18:51] contacted several
[18:52] of you last week.
[18:54] Um, my, um, new one
[18:55] electric
[18:56] truck, I
[18:57] got into an accident. Um,
[18:58] I was hit from the side and
[19:00] crashed into the back of
[19:01] Michigan City. So I
[19:02] I'll take this.
[19:03] truck to
[19:04] get, um, an estimate
[19:05] costs and, you know,
[19:07] repair. She is on the move,
[19:09] but the whole back part
[19:10] in a pretty bad way
[19:11] condition. But, um, yes, I
[19:13] I'll get, um, a grade.
[19:14] the cost of this,
[19:15] working with Monique,
[19:16] working with
[19:16] insurance company,
[19:18] and it wasn't my fault,
[19:19] so it shouldn't
[19:20] to be none
[19:21] expenses for the district.
[19:22] She is completely
[19:23] damaged? He
[19:24] completely broken? No
[19:25] , no, that's not true. This is not
[19:27] That's bad enough. It
[19:28] one back corner, and
[19:29] then everything else
[19:30] the side where the person
[19:31] hit me from the side.
[19:32] Um, but
[19:33] about your truck
[19:34] there are?
[19:34] This is a 2015 Ford Lightning. IN
[19:37] him
[19:37] was aluminum
[19:38] platform, right?
[19:39] Yes, well,
[19:40] Someone knocked me down.
[19:41] parking lot, and I thought,
[19:42] you know, $1,000.
[19:43] Oh, it will be.
[19:44] 15,000.
[19:45] I appreciated this.
[19:46] approximately 10-12 thousand,
[19:47] apparently.
[19:48] Specialist in
[19:49] aluminum.
[19:49] Well, one way or another, but
[19:51] 139 does it, but yes.
[19:53] The platform has yet to be
[19:55] ready.
[19:57] So, we also have
[19:58] another car,
[20:00] which we had, uh,
[20:01] approved, uh, on
[20:02] which we replaced
[20:04] Chevy. He is ready, but
[20:07] Ford has installed
[20:08] wrong, uh, VIN-
[20:09] number. So now they
[20:12] can't give us
[20:13] this car, while
[20:14] he will not have
[20:15] correct VIN number
[20:16] . So, I'm waiting, waiting
[20:18] on this, and then our
[20:19] Chevrolet will go to
[20:20] building renovation, as
[20:21] only this will happen,
[20:22] but
[20:24] good.
[20:24] Yes. Um, and finally, this,
[20:29] uh, I had, uh,
[20:31] that Dodge we're talking about
[20:32] you talked.
[20:35] Yes, sir.
[20:40] Um, so we had a Dodge.
[20:41] 2000 model year, we have
[20:43] two failed
[20:44] collectors, and me
[20:45] had to him
[20:47] to repair, uh,
[20:48] for the amount of, uh, 3157
[20:49] dollars, 78 cents, and in
[20:51] I don't have any of those.
[20:52] money in the budget, and I was hoping I could
[20:55] get a resolution
[20:57] in support, uh, to
[20:58] pay them to
[20:59] next meeting.
[21:05] Okay, this is a repair.
[21:06] engine of the existing
[21:07] trucks, not
[21:08] request for a new one
[21:09] truck.
[21:10] Right. And I would
[21:12] usually didn't ask,
[21:13] but in March we
[21:14] had to pay
[21:15] 5000 dollars, a few
[21:16] dollars to
[21:17] repair that one
[21:18] Chevrolet that will go
[21:19] for building repairs.
[21:21] So when I did that
[21:22] , the council said
[21:23] to return, and if
[21:24] we will need something,
[21:25] to return and
[21:26] to ask for it.
[21:27] Good. What was yours?
[21:28] ...And what was yours?
[21:29] budget for repairs?
[21:30] 3200.
[21:32] Good.
[21:32] Therefore. And then, when we
[21:34] he was returned,
[21:35] battery too
[21:35] discharged. So, this is
[21:37] there was another $218.
[21:39] So, my overall
[21:40] the amount is, hmm,
[21:42] $3776.34, that's what I ask for support.
[21:46] resolutions.
[21:51] Any questions or
[21:52] action from the council? Or
[22:00] there is an offer
[22:01] approve the proposal
[22:02] regarding support
[22:03] car expenses
[22:05] and the truck?
[22:06] Good. On-
[22:07] second.
[22:07] So, the proposal
[22:08] Mr. Ugolski approved,
[22:09] second, Mr. Kessler.
[22:11] Any further
[22:12] comments?
[22:12] Discussion. All who
[22:14] supports the proposal
[22:15] , confirm,
[22:16] saying "yes".
[22:17] Yes.
[22:17] Against? Thank you.
[22:20] I just wish, um,
[22:21] I know that Mr.
[22:22] Director Subeki already
[22:23] remembered Creek-
[22:25] Ridge, um, yes, on
[22:26] weekend, and just
[22:27] wanted it to be in
[22:28] my, um, little one
[22:30] agenda for
[22:31] our comments, and,
[22:32] hmm, my wife and I were
[22:34] there on Sunday yesterday and
[22:35] saw everyone there. Uh, and
[22:37] he...It was just...
[22:38] So, every year it
[22:39] just great, and,
[22:40] of course, the weather
[22:41] was really wonderful.
[22:43] There are horses there with
[22:43] Clydesdale, and
[22:44] cart riding, and I just want to say and
[22:47] not to tell anyone,
[22:48] if you haven't been yet,
[22:49] please come
[22:50] next year.
[22:52] Yes, not the following ones
[22:53] weekend?
[22:55] It was in my
[22:55] calendars from Google.
[22:56] Yes. Yes. Uh-huh.
[22:58] But it was wonderful.
[22:59] work. You guys,
[23:00] really do this
[23:01] just great every year,
[23:02] and this year it's again
[23:03] It was just wonderful.
[23:04] This year was the 29th year
[23:06] , so next year
[23:07] We have the 30th.
[23:08] It is also educational as
[23:09] for adults, as well as
[23:10] for children, you know.
[23:12] Mr. Auditor, you have
[23:13] Did something happen?
[23:13] It's simple.
[23:14] correction. He
[23:15] remembered that the electric
[23:16] the truck was 2015
[23:17] year of manufacture, it is 2025
[23:19] year.
[23:19] Yes, sorry. Sorry,
[23:20] I just went for the sake of it.
[23:21] minutes when I leave,
[23:22] when I change the date. I am not
[23:24] I want someone to
[23:24] said that I move things.
[23:26] I don't think they have
[23:27] that time will be
[23:28] electric
[23:28] trucks. Thank you.
[23:30] Mr. Auditor.
[23:32] And we are working on
[23:33] these loans.
[23:34] Yes.
[23:35] Thank you.
[23:38] Are there any more?
[23:38] department heads?
[23:42] Are there any leaders?
[23:44] departments with Zoom or Teams?
[23:46] You see. No, I have
[23:48] one. I don't see any.
[23:52] Managers' reports
[23:53] departments are closed.
[23:55] Let's move on to reports.
[23:56] about connections. Mona?
[24:00] Uh, just, uh, I have
[24:02] there were two things. And with, uh,
[24:04] the one that concerns
[24:06] Creek Ridge, was the first,
[24:07] but, uh, just want to comment, uh,
[24:10] Sheriff Heath spent, uh,
[24:12] annual, uh,
[24:13] memorial ceremony
[24:14] Neil Thompson this
[24:16] year, uh, on
[24:17] cemetery there in New
[24:18] Carlisle, September 21, e
[24:20] -er, in honor of, er, Nila
[24:21] Neil Thompson, uh, 46
[24:23] years since its
[24:24] deaths at
[24:25] performance of official duties
[24:27] responsibilities. Uh, uh,
[24:29] he was a patrolman in
[24:30] at that time and died under
[24:32] time of persecution
[24:33] on state road 39
[24:34] where the stolen car
[24:36] ambulance, uh,
[24:37] stolen from Nappanee,
[24:38] Indiana state. So, uh,
[24:40] thank him for that
[24:41] he does it every year.
[24:43] It's just what we don't always want to be there,
[24:45] and in the department, and,
[24:46] I hope no one
[24:47] will never want to
[24:48] forget it. He was
[24:51] a wonderful person, and
[24:52] we really don't like it
[24:53] enough, and, hmm, that's all
[24:54] . Thank you for this again.
[24:57] done.
[24:59] Thank you. Mr. Geet.
[25:00] There is no report.
[25:01] Mr. Kill.
[25:02] Mr. Mollenhauer
[25:03] remembered that later
[25:04] there will be a Bears game, and
[25:05] I wouldn't want to bother you.
[25:06] him to do it. So I wave mine too.
[25:08] report.
[25:10] Thank you.
[25:10] I don't think you
[25:11] a fan of the "Bears".
[25:12] I didn't say I was one.
[25:14] I just said that
[25:15] he is.
[25:17] Mr. Pressel.
[25:18] Well, nothing to report.
[25:20] I just want
[25:20] to make sure that we
[25:22] discussed the old
[25:23] matters in the committee on
[25:24] staff. Brian
[25:25] Monaghan will address
[25:26] to Mr. Banek.
[25:27] Good.
[25:28] So we'll do it there.
[25:29] Good. Mr. Ugalesby.
[25:32] Yes. Very quickly, I
[25:34] was at the IIC conference,
[25:35] and I think the common theme
[25:37] -this is, of course, all on
[25:38] 2028, when they have
[25:39] all these things happen
[25:40] abbreviation. And they said that
[25:42] the most important thing is that
[25:43] county commissioners,
[25:44] the county council really
[25:46] agreed and
[25:47] collaborated in
[25:48] this ocean. I know,
[25:49] new ones coming
[25:50] election. I hope so.
[25:52] everyone will arrive with an idea,
[25:53] that this has to happen because
[25:54] I spoke to Mr.
[25:55] Haney after the meeting,
[25:57] because he was on another one. AND
[25:59] he told him that
[26:00] exactly. So, this is
[26:01] repetition of what
[26:02] we need
[26:03] to understand each other, and that's it
[26:04] what else will we experience
[26:05] failures. Yes. The last one,
[26:07] this is the technical department
[26:09] service. We have
[26:10] here, in the courthouse,
[26:12] everything works. We
[26:13] turned on the heating
[26:14] last Monday.
[26:15] That was good, because
[26:16] Tuesday morning everyone
[26:17] came and
[26:17] complained that it was too
[26:18] it's hot. So that was it.
[26:20] good. Uh, with some
[26:23] little things, such as
[26:25] some air
[26:25] norms and other things. We fix small
[26:28] mistakes, but they
[26:29] insignificant compared to
[26:30] what happened in some
[26:31] moment. Therefore,
[26:31] the heating is working
[26:32] as of Monday.
[26:34] So, that's all.
[26:35] Good. Thank you, sir.
[26:37] Kessler.
[26:38] Nothing at the moment.
[26:39] Good. So, one thing I want to break this.
[26:42] last special
[26:44] a meeting where you are not
[26:45] gave me opportunities
[26:46] to meet the little ones
[26:47] cities and
[26:48] towns regarding
[26:49] mandatory
[26:50] decision. So it was
[26:52] rather informative
[26:53] meeting. This is not
[26:55] official, uh, meeting
[26:56] strategic working
[26:57] municipal groups
[26:59] units like this
[27:00] defined in
[27:00] state statute.
[27:05] This is optional.
[27:06] exercise, but after
[27:07] meetings,
[27:07] joining this
[27:09] meeting, I got
[27:10] many reviews about
[27:11] of what she has on
[27:13] to provide
[27:13] feedback
[27:15] to the legislature
[27:16] regarding that
[27:17] will work, and what not,
[27:18] mainly with new
[27:19] the structure of LIT, and how it
[27:21] affects the entire district
[27:22] , cities and towns. Ahem,
[27:29] and after many,
[27:30] let's say so,
[27:31] enthusiastic conversations
[27:32] because of different, um, different
[27:39] problems and various
[27:40] structures that
[27:41] affect the city and
[27:42] village. Um, I said
[27:47] to this group that I will come
[27:48] to all of you and, uh,
[27:49] I will ask.
[27:50] vote for
[27:51] recommendation regarding
[27:52] official
[27:53] MANDATORY
[27:53] decision. Our
[27:55] the restrictions are
[27:57] in that we must
[27:58] to announce
[27:59] MANDATORY meetings
[28:00] in 48 hours, and the first
[28:01] the meeting cannot
[28:02] to happen later 1
[28:04] October, that is, in
[28:05] Thursday. So, um, mine
[28:07] the recommendation is that if you all
[28:13] agree,
[28:14] authorize us
[28:15] to convene MANDATORY
[28:16] meetings. Structure
[28:22] the one I have
[28:23] to manage, but
[28:24] the auditor must be
[28:25] our financial
[28:26] representative, because
[28:27] all colleagues from the city
[28:28] and villages will be
[28:29] treasurers. So it has
[28:34] to be someone who will
[28:35] closest to
[28:36] accounting, income and
[28:38] costs for each of
[28:39] them. So, sir
[28:40] Jagelsky,
[28:41] if you don't
[28:41] Do you deny it, can I?
[28:42] Should I add a little? I
[28:43] also visited one of
[28:45] them with all our
[28:48] municipalities,
[28:49] which we are talking about. AND
[28:50] they are going
[28:51] to talk about what to
[28:52] end of this year for
[28:53] all of them will be rated
[28:54] . If they get
[28:55] four in any
[28:56] from our villages, they
[28:57] should automatically
[28:58] to unite with others
[28:59] villages that
[29:00] are there. If
[29:01] is a volunteer if
[29:02] he wants to voluntarily
[29:03] to participate in
[29:03] united on this
[29:04] stage, he can do it if you want
[29:06] go through this process.
[29:06] Some people know that
[29:07] their fours will be
[29:08] in fours, they
[29:09] will know what they are.
[29:10] Uh, but then that's not true.
[29:12] a lot, and then in
[29:12] some time
[29:13] commissioners must
[29:14] will accept this
[29:15] decisions, and they
[29:16] will respond
[29:17] for the process. But, uh, this
[29:19] would be what
[29:19] worth talking about,
[29:20] they also have
[29:21] discuss this idea
[29:22] association, because it is
[29:23] it will happen anyway
[29:24] next year.
[29:25] Yes, both of these two
[29:26] parallel paths that
[29:27] they are considering between
[29:28] the village government, and
[29:29] then municipal
[29:30] by the government together with
[29:31] district. So yes, sir.
[29:33] auditor.
[29:34] Uh, just for
[29:35] clarification, villages
[29:36] technically not included
[29:38] to MANDATORY
[29:39] parts. They will be invited.
[29:40] before that, but they don't
[29:42] included because it is
[29:43] must be what they are
[29:44] considered tax
[29:45] organ, and they are called
[29:47] united
[29:47] municipalities.
[29:48] But I meant that
[29:50] they are allowed
[29:50] to take voluntarily
[29:51] participation in this.
[29:53] Yes, that's a different topic, but
[29:54] I wanted to tell you,
[29:55] What did you mention?
[29:56] their participation in
[29:57] discussion, and that
[29:58] they actually
[29:59] outsiders
[30:00] observers.
[30:00] Yes.
[30:01] This is all I wanted.
[30:02] to disturb. Thank you.
[30:04] Good.
[30:05] So, if
[30:07] Mr. President, well,
[30:08] first of all, thank you for
[30:09] participation in MANDATORY
[30:10] meeting and for the fact that
[30:11] you represented us
[30:12] there. Hmm, I'm sure.
[30:13] Madam Councilor, you
[30:14] can you understand that
[30:15] in small towns
[30:16] a lot is connected
[30:17] uncertainties with
[30:18] this whole process. Hmm,
[30:19] for any small
[30:20] city ​​local
[30:21] income tax is
[30:22] a significant part
[30:23] budget. Uh, I know,
[30:24] what will they appreciate if
[30:26] the district will move
[30:27] in this matter. So I
[30:28] would make a proposal
[30:29] to appoint a head
[30:30] for the sake of our Karanja
[30:32] emissary and send
[30:33] ...Is this the word that
[30:34] Do you want?
[30:35] I think so.
[30:36] Whatever the word is
[30:37] emissary or whatever
[30:39] he wasn't, and...
[30:39] send the gentleman
[30:40] Rosenbaum as his
[30:41] environment, right?
[30:43] So let's say I would
[30:44] said
[30:44] accounting body
[30:46] , official body,
[30:47] official
[30:47] representative...Regarding
[30:49] me, I'll just be
[30:50] host of the meeting.
[30:51] I will support this.
[30:52] Good. Therefore,
[30:53] Mr. Keel's proposal,
[30:55] second offer
[30:56] Mrs. Geet. Any
[30:57] other discussions?
[30:58] No, sorry.
[31:00] Everyone who is "in favor"
[31:00] please confirm
[31:02] , saying "yes".
[31:03] Yes.
[31:03] Against? Thank you. Hmm,
[31:06] Can I add one more?
[31:07] Of course.
[31:08] The main thing was not
[31:09] to reach an agreement, therefore
[31:10] that it will be very difficult
[31:11] to do during
[31:12] the next 30 days,
[31:13] because it has to be
[31:14] ready for November,
[31:15] at the very beginning
[31:17] November. The main thing—
[31:19] to be able to
[31:19] list all
[31:20] question, and this is it
[31:22] wanted
[31:22] municipalities, to
[31:23] we could send these
[31:24] question as part
[31:26] report to
[31:26] legislative body
[31:27] . Hmm, and one of the key
[31:30] numbers, which, um, Michigan-
[31:31] The City stated that
[31:32] regardless of whether
[31:34] what will they do for
[31:35] new rules, them
[31:36] 4.5 will not be enough
[31:38] a million dollars.
[31:39] So, I know that we
[31:40] talked about some
[31:41] numbers that we don't know
[31:42] will be enough. They are for us.
[31:44] said.
[31:47] Good. Hmm, for now,
[31:49] thanks to
[31:50] pushing Mr.
[31:51] Coal miner, hmm, before
[31:52] we will continue, I want
[31:54] to mark the class of the lady
[31:55] Dolsk from the South
[31:56] Central
[31:57] university. Uh, me
[31:59] I see 1 2 3 six or
[32:01] eight participants. Or
[32:02] Could you all please?
[32:03] Would you please stand up? It
[32:05] the largest group that
[32:06] we have seen for a long time. Thank you.
[32:13] This was the loudest
[32:14] a promise I once made
[32:15] Have you ever heard of it?
[32:19] Good. Oh, so let's go.
[32:24] ...So, from the gallery,
[32:25] good. So, this is actually
[32:27] Yes. We have grandchildren.
[32:29] former advisor,
[32:30] who are present, so this
[32:31] pretty cool. Good.
[32:40] So, moving on to
[32:41] correspondence, you will see three points,
[32:43] listed in your
[32:45] on the agenda, with
[32:46] one additional,
[32:47] which was on the list, but
[32:49] was not on the list, but
[32:50] exactly, by copy
[32:51] Michigan resolutions-
[32:52] City regarding the related
[32:54] with PILOT payment instead
[32:55] taxes, uh, over,
[32:56] which is essentially a discount.
[33:03] So, they are not
[33:04] will receive discounts, but
[33:05] will receive payment
[33:06] immediately, which
[33:07] compensates for this. So, uh-
[33:10] uh, these details
[33:11] contained in your
[33:12] package. Mr. Otters,
[33:14] Is there anything else you want to know?
[33:15] you should pay attention
[33:16] regarding correspondence?
[33:17] No, actually everyone
[33:18] received everything
[33:19] by email.
[33:20] So, the thing is,
[33:21] this was published
[33:22] without the last one
[33:23] item that arrived
[33:24] after publication. So
[33:25] we didn't add it, and I
[33:26] didn't bother
[33:27] ask you to add
[33:28] very long name to
[33:29] this.
[33:30] Yes.
[33:33] So, you know, the key
[33:34] the fact that the city takes all
[33:35] money in advance, and, uh,
[33:37] the district of this is not
[33:38] will see.
[33:44] And that's all for
[33:45] protocol,
[33:46] listed as
[33:47] city ​​ordinance
[33:49] Michigan, uh, from
[33:50] Public Council 4806.
[33:54] And this can be discussed.
[33:55] now, or,
[33:56] uh, we can
[33:57] discuss this.
[33:58] I just want to declare
[33:59] that the council says that it
[34:01] takes a pretty good
[34:02] position on the 10-year
[34:03] benefits. This is a 20-year-old
[34:05] privilege, so I just
[34:06] I say this because of a certain
[34:07] period of time, and I
[34:08] just more against
[34:09] time period than
[34:11] the need for
[34:12] Is this a good project?
[34:13] bad.
[34:14] Of course. Any
[34:17] further comments?
[34:19] Okay, Mr. Otters.
[34:21] We need
[34:22] approve contributions to
[34:23] health insurance,
[34:24] because as of
[34:25] Friday we have
[34:26] salary, and these amounts
[34:27] needs to be changed. And there is
[34:30] an increase of 4.44%, which
[34:32] it was agreed, uh,
[34:34] commissioners, and, uh, this
[34:36] now their 15%, uh, or
[34:38] 20%, depending on
[34:40] how many people were there
[34:42] hired. THERE ARE-
[34:45] uh, they should, uh,
[34:46] to keep from them
[34:48] salaries, and you have
[34:49] new ones in front of you
[34:50] rates, what are they?
[34:51] include. So, be
[34:52] please, this is needed
[34:53] approve today
[34:54] in the evening. And they too
[34:58] were sent
[34:59] earlier.
[35:01] So, I contribute
[35:01] proposal regarding
[35:02] approval of rates
[35:03] in the presented
[35:04] in form. Offer
[35:06] Mr. Ugelski. I have
[35:07] Is there a second phrase?
[35:11] Supported by Mr.
[35:11] Pressel. Any
[35:13] discussion? If so
[35:17] , then everyone who is "for"
[35:18] approval of rates
[35:19] medical contributions
[35:20] insurance,
[35:21] confirm that
[35:21] they say "yes".
[35:22] Yes. Against?
[35:25] Thank you.
[35:26] Good. We have
[35:29] there is nothing for
[35:30] resolutions and
[35:31] resolutions. By
[35:33] old things,
[35:35] Mr. Pressel, you
[35:36] remembered something about
[35:37] township assessor
[35:38] Michigan. Therefore,
[35:39] yes, so I will invite
[35:40] Mr. Bannik. I am not
[35:42] I remember whether we
[35:43] raised this issue
[35:44] last time, or
[35:45] just asked
[35:46] his return
[35:47] this month.
[35:48] So ask him.
[35:49] come up, but we're not there yet
[35:50] that we will refrain from
[35:51] any comments.
[35:52] Let's go quickly.
[35:53] Let's check. Then
[35:54] please remove this from
[35:56] consideration. On-
[35:57] second,
[35:57] make a proposal,
[35:58] that
[35:59] I left the table.
[36:00] Well, then that will do it.
[36:01] official.
[36:01] Suggestion to remove this from
[36:02] consideration from Mr.
[36:03] Pressela, supported
[36:04] Mr. Ugelski. All,
[36:05] who is "for",
[36:05] confirm,
[36:06] saying "yes".
[36:07] Yes.
[36:07] Against? Thank you. Sir
[36:09] Bannik.
[36:10] Mr. Brent Bannick,
[36:11] township assessor
[36:12] Michigan. As said
[36:13] Mr. Pressel, I'm out.
[36:15] before the committee on
[36:16] work evaluations. I
[36:18] met with Mr.
[36:19] Pressel, Mrs. Heath,
[36:20] commissioner, department
[36:22] personnel and office
[36:23] county assessor
[36:24] Laporte, to
[36:24] discuss this position,
[36:26] Deputy for
[36:27] commerce and income.
[36:29] Hmm, that was already on
[36:31] table. Hmm, I was able to do that.
[36:33] to present some
[36:34] data on duties
[36:35] all of mine
[36:36] employees, but
[36:37] exactly about the scope of work
[36:38] which they perform.
[36:40] Uh, almost a quarter
[36:41] our areas
[36:42] processed by a deputy from
[36:43] commercial issues and
[36:44] income. Um, so I
[36:46] was able to clarify this role
[36:48] and any others
[36:49] the questions they have
[36:50] arose. Um, they
[36:51] have their support.
[36:53] So, uh, I'm here to ask permission for
[36:56] hire
[36:56] Good. So I'm going
[36:58] to address two
[36:59] my appointees.
[37:00] So, Ms. Sit, some
[37:01] comments you want
[37:02] add about
[37:03] results of this
[37:04] meeting?
[37:05] I was surprised,
[37:06] How far is this office?
[37:07] overloaded
[37:08] the absence of one
[37:09] employee. If
[37:11] you don't mind
[37:11] share this with
[37:13] Anyway, uh,
[37:14] How far is your office?
[37:16] lags behind due to
[37:17] the absence of this
[37:18] one position.
[37:19] Right. Uh, so we ask for no more,
[37:22] just trying
[37:23] to stay afloat
[37:24] So, this position is ours.
[37:25] already was. So, this, uh,
[37:27] The position has its own
[37:29] permissions, uh,
[37:30] is engaged in, uh,
[37:31] a significant part
[37:32] organizations with
[37:33] rental questionnaires, uh,
[37:35] along with calculations.
[37:37] Many of them are needed
[37:38] do it every year. Ahem,
[37:40] therefore, since this
[37:42] The position is already vacant.
[37:43] almost 5 months, um, in
[37:45] we have 100 appeals or,
[37:46] um, permissions that
[37:47] need to do before
[37:49] end of the year. These are things,
[37:50] which need to be done
[37:51] by the end of the year, to
[37:52] bring this to
[37:53] tax list
[37:54] for next year. So,
[37:55] um, I am, um, my
[37:56] chief deputy
[37:57] went out, um, worked out
[37:58] obtaining permits,
[37:59] um, together with the team from
[38:01] residential
[38:01] construction, um,
[38:02] also performed
[38:03] your work. So, yes,
[38:04] we have a lot of work,
[38:06] which needs to be done,
[38:07] and, um, we really
[38:07] need a person who
[38:08] completed the training, and
[38:09] this matter was
[38:10] done to the end
[38:11] year so that we can
[38:12] bring this to
[38:12] tax list. THERE ARE
[38:14] -uh, we have, like you know, in Michigan-
[38:15] There are many cities, um,
[38:16] real estate,
[38:17] that generate income, and
[38:19] we get them
[38:19] annually. To us
[38:20] a lot is coming
[38:21] investors. So, um,
[38:23] this work on this
[38:24] specific position not
[38:25] is slowing down.
[38:26] So there was this part,
[38:27] and the fact that it is already
[38:28] was a position that
[38:29] existed, that it is not
[38:30] there was a new position that
[38:31] needs
[38:32] approval or something
[38:33] other. I'm not sure.
[38:34] why is it small
[38:34] return to
[38:35] committee on
[38:36] staff to
[38:36] come back here.
[38:37] It just seems that
[38:38] it was a lot of work
[38:40] in vain on the part of Mr.
[38:41] Bannock. And it would be great if we could.
[38:45] to move forward in order to
[38:46] they made up for it,
[38:46] so that we can begin,
[38:47] you know, write these
[38:48] tax invoices.
[38:49] I agree.
[38:50] Yes. I can
[38:51] agree.
[38:52] Mr. Pressel, is there
[38:53] something you would like
[38:54] add to this? You
[38:55] do you understand that
[38:56] the only thing I would like
[38:57] to clarify, this is what we
[38:57] talked to Mr.
[38:58] Schulz, so that
[38:59] to find out if there is something,
[39:00] what can we do with
[39:01] help with it
[39:01] office. In fact, he
[39:02] did the same
[39:03] remark that he
[39:04] will have to hire
[39:05] your office for
[39:06] supporting this role.
[39:07] So, despite
[39:08] that, at the moment, we are very late with
[39:10] this, and we need
[39:11] to resolve this issue
[39:12] pretty quickly.
[39:13] Mr. Helski, am I am wrong in saying that
[39:15] it was ours
[39:16] recommendation
[39:17] send them to
[39:18] committee on
[39:19] staff?
[39:19] No, it wasn't ours.
[39:20] recommendation.
[39:21] Good.
[39:22] I don't believe it. I am not
[39:23] I believe in this.
[39:24] Good. So, what's up?
[39:26] wants? Proposal
[39:28] approve.
[39:29] Second.
[39:29] The proposal was approved by
[39:30] Mr. Molenaar,
[39:31] supported by Ms. Geet.
[39:32] Any further
[39:33] comments? Good. I
[39:36] I'll just add one thing:
[39:38] appraisers positions
[39:39] villages–this is what
[39:40] left after
[39:41] legislative changes
[39:43] the body where it happened
[39:44] government downsizing
[39:45] villages, and this is what
[39:46] is under, um, I don't want to call it that.
[39:48] with close attention, but
[39:50] this is one of those things,
[39:51] which are being discussed
[39:52] about whether it is worth
[39:53] to keep this position,
[39:54] was she
[39:55] absorbed in the office
[39:56] appraiser. Currently this
[39:58] still viable
[39:59] part of the government, and we don't
[40:00] we can just
[40:01] shorten it. Um, I understand the point, but
[40:04] sometimes we need
[40:05] to ask
[40:06] legislature,
[40:07] as we want
[40:08] to consider it
[40:09] structure further,
[40:10] you know, in the future
[40:11] . And everyone who supports
[40:15] proposal,
[40:15] mean that I.
[40:18] Against?
[40:18] No. No.
[40:21] Thank you.
[40:22] And just for
[40:23] protocol, its
[40:24] first introduced
[40:24] Yegilsky, and
[40:25] supported Kiel. Therefore,
[40:26] it was entered on
[40:28] last meeting.
[40:29] Good. Good move.
[40:30] Thank you. Thank you.
[40:33] Good. Continuing...
[40:36] We looked at the old one
[40:37] office work
[40:38] treasurer. We
[40:39] let's move on to the new one
[40:40] matters, namely
[40:41] rental permit Uh,
[40:44] starting with permission
[40:46] for hire for a position with
[40:47] service for
[40:48] Parks and Recreation Department
[40:49] rest. Um, sir.
[40:51] Sebeki, if you are again
[40:52] join us...
[40:53] I hope you have
[40:54] something as interesting as
[40:55] your comment on
[40:56] the last day, but
[40:58] okay...yes, I am
[40:59] I comment. No, I have
[41:00] no, but, uh, more
[41:01] It's gloomy out there.
[41:02] reason. We just
[41:03] hired for this position
[41:04] this year, she
[41:05] not even
[41:05] lasted 6
[41:06] months. This is already
[41:07] third or fourth
[41:08] once when we
[41:09] has to be repeated
[41:10] to hire for this position.
[41:11] Salary, insurance
[41:12] tariffs, things like that
[41:14] reasons why people
[41:15] are being released. We get especially
[41:18] people with families,
[41:19] insurance cost
[41:20] high, and you know it
[41:21] . I know that this is already
[41:23] was discussed, and we
[41:24] tried, but, uh, I
[41:25] just wanted this
[41:27] say.
[41:27] Good.
[41:28] Uh, yes.
[41:31] Any comments or
[41:33] action by the council?
[41:34] Proposal about
[41:35] approval.
[41:36] Second.
[41:36] Proposal about
[41:37] approval from the gentleman
[41:38] Kessler, second from
[41:39] Mrs. Geet. All who
[41:40] supports approval
[41:41] hiring a specialist
[41:42] service
[41:43] parks and areas
[41:44] rest, mark,
[41:45] saying: I am.
[41:46] I.
[41:46] Against?
[41:47] Thank you.
[41:48] Good. Uh, on
[41:51] this moment, and I see
[41:52] , what, uh, clerk
[41:53] joined us
[41:55] via Teams. So, which one
[41:56] great time. Uh,
[41:58] rental permit...
[41:59] comment on
[41:59] deputy clerk
[42:01] for the clerk's office.
[42:02] Mrs. Stevens. You
[42:08] turned on the sound.
[42:09] Let's see,
[42:10] can we do this
[42:11] fix it for you.
[42:15] How are you? Good. Good.
[42:18] Greetings.
[42:18] Good evening.
[42:23] So, this position, uh, in
[42:24] my office
[42:25] chief, three
[42:26] clerk. My girls,
[42:31] my team is there, they
[42:32] really wanted
[42:33] try not to
[42:34] fill this
[42:35] position, but they
[42:36] receive by
[42:37] buttocks.
[42:41] Good. Hmm, I think so.
[42:44] we all know this
[42:45] thing, so I'm looking for
[42:47] lawyer for
[42:48] petition.
[42:54] for
[42:55] approval.
[42:56] Second.
[42:57] Petition for
[42:58] approval from the lady
[42:59] Geet, second from Mr.
[43:00] Kila. All who
[43:01] supports hiring
[43:02] deputy clerk
[43:03] for the third level,
[43:04] confirm,
[43:05] saying "yes".
[43:06] Yes.
[43:07] Against?
[43:08] Yes.
[43:09] Good. Thank you.
[43:11] very much. I know that
[43:13] my team appreciates it.
[43:15] Absolutely. Good. AND
[43:19] now we have
[43:20] discussion of funds
[43:22] 4700 vs. 4700 and 4701 from
[43:25] Mr. Auditor.
[43:28] We are going
[43:29] ask Joey to lead
[43:31] conversation, but before
[43:32] today I sent
[43:33] email from
[43:34] explanation. Not all
[43:35] were able to see him,
[43:37] so I made sure
[43:38] that you have a printed copy. Now that's a bit
[43:40] more pages. And, uh-
[43:42] Well, with a few of you I
[43:43] already discussed this.
[43:45] So we are going
[43:46] let her take over
[43:47] initiative itself.
[43:48] Good. Mrs. Wolensky.
[43:51] Uh, good evening.
[43:54] Sorry, I can't.
[43:55] to be with you, but, um, I
[43:57] sent to you all
[43:58] explanation of how it is
[43:59] happened. Hmm, in 2000 or 24
[44:06] In 2024. Hmm, let me.
[44:10] I need to come back.
[44:11] Hmm, how can that be?
[44:16] tell you Mark, because,
[44:17] I think he was there.
[44:19] the longest and, probably,
[44:20] was there when it happened
[44:21] it started, hmm, we
[44:23] always, hmm,
[44:23] tracked ours, hmm
[44:25] , self-insurance in
[44:26] various funds. Hmm,
[44:33] when is the council
[44:34] voted for
[44:35] self-insurance,
[44:36] they came up with
[44:37] way, um, to make
[44:38] money to the general
[44:45] budget fund
[44:46] commissioner, and then
[44:48] every year on January 2
[44:49] auditor
[44:50] listed these
[44:52] money for 4700 and 4701. 4700–
[44:54] this is medical
[44:55] insurance, 4701–
[44:57] responsibility. Hmm,
[45:07] in 2024 this happened,
[45:08] that the then auditor
[45:10] and the staff is not
[45:11] understood how glad
[45:12] arranged it like this,
[45:14] so that we can control
[45:15] every spent
[45:16] a penny. In return
[45:26] they left it in
[45:28] the commissioner's budget, and, e
[45:29] -eh, there were funds
[45:30] spent not for
[45:31] purpose, and we do not
[45:32] added none, hmm,
[45:33] income to these funds,
[45:35] how we do it now and
[45:36] as they did before. Or
[45:41] couldn't
[45:41] Mrs. Gkey to ask
[45:43] you for a second
[45:44] stop?
[45:44] Of course.
[45:46] So, as for
[45:47] money, please
[45:48] let me try
[45:49] to paraphrase what
[45:50] you have here, then without
[45:51] immediate transfer
[45:53] to direct accounts, which
[45:54] have a specific
[45:55] purpose,
[45:56] they remain as
[45:57] budget opportunity
[45:58] commissioner to be
[45:59] used for
[46:00] other appropriations,
[46:01] other accounts,
[46:02] all sorts of things.
[46:05] That's right, and that's it.
[46:06] happened.
[46:07] Good. Therefore,
[46:13] some funds were
[46:14] transferred to others,
[46:16] hmm, bills, hmm, and, and
[46:17] so, hmm, I don't know if
[46:19] Does anyone of you remember?
[46:21] that in the summer of 2024, hmm,
[46:22] I was the treasurer, and
[46:24] I got a call.
[46:26] with First Source Bank, where we have
[46:27] our medical bill,
[46:29] and, um, we were, and we
[46:30] were significantly
[46:31] exceeded. Um,
[46:41] lawyer, whom Guy
[46:43] DiMartino called for
[46:44] meeting with the council,
[46:45] commissioners,
[46:46] auditor,
[46:47] treasurer, some
[46:48] former
[46:49] treasurers and
[46:50] former auditors
[46:51] , er, staff, and er
[46:52] , we met and
[46:54] tried to find out,
[46:55] What happened. Um, we
[47:01] even invited
[47:02] Karl Sender, who
[47:03] tried us
[47:04] help. Unfortunately, I
[47:11] could not see
[47:12] auditors, uh,
[47:13] our side
[47:14] software
[47:15] provision, so I
[47:16] could not understand that
[47:17] happens until
[47:19] took office
[47:20] chief deputy
[47:21] I didn't see the auditor.
[47:22] in LAO, what happened, and
[47:24] then it was like
[47:25] bulb. Um, so, uh
[47:38] , we tried
[47:39] fix it
[47:40] best
[47:41] at the end of the past
[47:42] year, but only, uh,
[47:43] during the last
[47:45] a few months, uh,
[47:46] my, current
[47:47] auditor staff and
[47:49] me, uh, along with LAO and
[47:50] State accounting
[47:51] council, checked
[47:53] accounting books,
[47:54] uh, and saw where, what
[47:55] was, uh, where, where we
[47:57] were negative, and
[47:58] what do we need
[47:59] to make it so
[48:00] to fix. Now
[48:09] let me
[48:10] add to everything
[48:11] this, that this year
[48:12] we had some very
[48:13] large insurance companies
[48:14] cases, very
[48:15] big ones. Not only that,
[48:20] but also, um, ours
[48:21] insurance rates
[48:22] have grown significantly. Therefore,
[48:29] all this added up to
[48:31] the fact that, um, this
[48:32] shortage, um, at the moment
[48:34] the deficit is
[48:35] about 1.5 million,
[48:37] plus-minus, and, um, our
[48:39] cash balance
[48:40] negative, um, 934,000
[48:42] a little bit of the rest. Um, when
[48:51] we made the order
[48:53] daytime, um, it was
[48:54] proposed
[48:55] ask for 1.75, um,
[48:56] a million, um, because
[48:58] we still have a few
[48:59] months, and as I already
[49:00] said, our insurance
[49:02] payments were
[49:03] extremely high
[49:04] . Um, I was talking to
[49:10] insurance, um, um,
[49:12] representative. I
[49:15] talked to, um,
[49:16] head of department
[49:17] personnel. Hmm, I have
[49:21] it feels like
[49:22] our indicators
[49:23] contract renewal
[49:24] this year too
[49:25] will be higher. So, eh
[49:30] -eh, if we could
[49:31] adhere to 1,750,000,
[49:32] uh, that would be, I think,
[49:34] what we really need
[49:35] it would be necessary
[49:37] to finish this year.
[49:41] And even if we have
[49:42] money will remain,
[49:43] they are moving to
[49:45] this account. Problem
[49:48] in the liabilities account
[49:49] . With the security account
[49:51] Health is fine.
[49:52] Good.
[49:56] So, uh, it's me...me
[49:57] tried my best
[49:58] explain what happened.
[50:04] Uh, hopefully after
[50:06] this meeting, uh,
[50:07] Mr. B. G. will be able to meet or with
[50:14] auditor, or with me, or with both of us
[50:16] , and we will be able to write, uh,
[50:18] a resolution that
[50:19] will prevent
[50:20] repeating this. Uh,
[50:24] You know, I don't know.
[50:25] no other
[50:26] way to prevent
[50:27] this again. If there is
[50:33] question, I'll try it on
[50:35] answer them.
[50:36] I will turn to my
[50:38] colleagues here on the council.
[50:39] I would like to add that
[50:40] on our last
[50:42] seminars on
[50:43] we increased the budget
[50:44] net amount for 2027
[50:46] another 1.5 million
[50:47] dollars because of
[50:48] how high
[50:49] there were insurance premiums.
[50:51] We are actually
[50:51] increased them by 2
[50:52] millions to cover
[50:54] new awards. And this is only
[50:55] at the current rate,
[50:56] and we don't know what
[50:57] they will be
[50:58] next year. And we
[50:59] said about
[51:00] commitment, we
[51:00] Let's cross our fingers that
[51:02] the situation was not
[51:02] as bad as
[51:03] this year, but we can never
[51:05] to say for sure But
[51:06] this is the moment when,
[51:07] How are you?
[51:08] will need, um,
[51:09] now that this is over
[51:10] follow a lot
[51:11] Be careful, we don't
[51:12] we will move on to
[51:13] negative direction.
[51:14] We will ask, uh
[51:15] , or, uh, at the commissioners,
[51:17] we will ask
[51:18] funds for coverage
[51:19] any
[51:20] excessive demands,
[51:21] which can be.
[51:22] Good. So, one thing I appreciate this
[51:25] suggestions or
[51:26] recommendations, this is to have
[51:28] something systemic that
[51:31] guarantees that we do this
[51:32] we will do it. If this
[51:33] the right step for
[51:34] account funding
[51:35] , and then this transfer
[51:36] takes place in
[51:37] first working day
[51:38] year, that's normal. THERE ARE-
[51:40] uh, but to something that is
[51:42] in the system, to the point that
[51:43] is, when it happens
[51:45] change of position, with
[51:46] elected office or
[51:47] assigned position.
[51:51] Um, what do we still have?
[51:52] rulebook,
[51:53] manual, not
[51:54] definitely, um,
[51:55] tribal knowledge.
[51:59] That's right. IN
[52:00] You were something else, sir.
[52:01] auditor?
[52:02] Um, yes, if you
[52:03] looking for someone, in
[52:04] who has many rules
[52:05] and all that is listed
[52:06] , St. Joe County-one
[52:07] from those we are with, you know
[52:09] , regularly
[52:09] we communicate. So we are going
[52:11] to see if there is anything,
[52:12] what can we get
[52:13] from another district.
[52:14] But also, um, we have
[52:15] documentation from
[52:17] other auditors. We
[52:18] also addressed to
[52:19] some auditors.
[52:20] Another auditor put
[52:21] similar question. AND
[52:23] so some others
[52:24] the auditors shared.
[52:25] And we also have
[52:26] document from Lori
[52:27] Rogers, who is exactly
[52:28] shows that they should
[52:29] to do people with
[52:29] self-insured
[52:30] account. This is also
[52:31] was part of
[52:32] email,
[52:33] which I sent you. IN
[52:34] I don't have a copy of
[52:35] yourself, because it was
[52:36] for another district,
[52:37] so there will be
[52:38] various listed
[52:39] expenses from various
[52:40] other funds that are not
[52:40] correspond to ours. AND
[52:42] they do not respond
[52:43] our departments.
[52:44] So, it was simple.
[52:45] in order to
[52:46] show, and in fact
[52:47] on the reverse, on the other
[52:48] SBOA page, was
[52:49] the person's name is given.
[52:50] She's still there. With her
[52:51] easy to contact. Emm,
[52:53] so we know that
[52:54] This is how it should be.
[52:56] done. AND,
[52:57] talking to our
[52:59] colleagues, um, so,
[53:00] You know, we really,
[53:01] um, we think that, um,
[53:03] adoption of a resolution
[53:04] –this is the best way
[53:06] to move forward.
[53:08] Good. Sir
[53:09] Jagelsky.
[53:10] I know what we said.
[53:11] about this last time,
[53:13] about error and mess
[53:14] in advertising, um, money
[53:19] which we were going to spend on the department
[53:21] technical
[53:22] service where not
[53:23] was standard
[53:24] operating room
[53:24] procedures (SOPs). And SOP
[53:25] –this is the best procedure,
[53:27] than the one they have,
[53:28] because on the back
[53:29] SOP documentation everything,
[53:31] what is reported,
[53:32] is recorded there. Therefore
[53:33] if this happens in
[53:35] 2014, who did it?
[53:36] who signed it and
[53:37] all that. And what? AND
[53:39] many people in the industry
[53:40] for amateur activities
[53:41] use these
[53:42] procedures.
[53:42] Yes.
[53:43] I think this is better.
[53:44] documentation than that,
[53:45] what I saw in the district
[53:46] still.
[53:46] Good. Enough
[53:48] good.
[53:49] Well, can I?
[53:49] answer this? THERE ARE,
[53:53] That's a good idea, Mark.
[53:54] and we should have
[53:55] some booklet from
[53:56] instructions, which would
[53:58] explained exactly what
[53:59] to do, but the State
[54:00] accounting board
[54:03] requires that we have
[54:04] was originally
[54:05] resolution, and then,
[54:06] maybe standard
[54:08] operating procedure
[54:09] .
[54:09] That's good.
[54:10] Well, thank you.
[54:11] Mr. Kelly, do you have something?
[54:12] was it?
[54:12] Yes, that is, 4700 is ours
[54:14] group fund
[54:14] medical
[54:15] insurance, right?
[54:16] Yes.
[54:17] Right.
[54:17] And we are self-insured
[54:18] for this, right?
[54:19] Yes. We
[54:20] self-insured
[54:21] for both.
[54:22] other
[54:23] is also commercial
[54:24] insurance.
[54:25] Commercial
[54:25] insurance
[54:26] responsibility,
[54:27] that is, we have
[54:27] responsibility.
[54:28] So we don't pay for
[54:29] award, we are completely
[54:30] insured for
[54:31] this yourself.
[54:31] No, it's not...No, we pay for premiums,
[54:33] but we have a higher one
[54:34] premium level. THERE ARE
[54:35] maximum amount,
[54:36] so you can't
[54:37] to suffer from
[54:38] this.
[54:38] Yes, we have
[54:41] there is a stop loss, but then,
[54:42] what's more
[54:43] complicates the situation,
[54:45] due to losses in this
[54:46] buildings due to flooding
[54:47] On the 23rd, we just
[54:48] let's call it, uh,
[54:50] they should have
[54:51] get layers only
[54:52] for these risky
[54:53] losses. So, we have
[54:55] three or four different
[54:56] insurance companies.
[54:58] If the amount reaches X
[54:58] millions of dollars,
[55:00] it stops here.
[55:01] Then we have another one,
[55:02] which says: "Okay, we can add two more
[55:04] millions of dollars." AND
[55:05] because we
[55:06] had to add layers,
[55:08] it became
[55:08] problematic and
[55:09] it cost more.
[55:12] So, we have a stop loss,
[55:13] so it's not the same as
[55:14] health insurance,
[55:15] because in medical
[55:17] insurance we also
[55:18] we lay down to
[55:19] budget share
[55:20] district. And a year ago
[55:21] one of the reasons why
[55:22] everything is fine this year
[55:24] , is that we
[55:25] added to this two
[55:26] millions of dollars. AND
[55:27] this year with a new
[55:28] increase, as we
[55:30] spoke in the past tense
[55:31] seminar, we added, eh
[55:33] -uh, 500, I'm about 560
[55:34] 000. I know it was
[55:36] less, but approximately.
[55:38] So, while things are going on
[55:38] will go like this,
[55:40] we should have everything
[55:41] OK. The problem that
[55:42] is to some extent
[55:43] a good problem,
[55:44] is that we
[55:45] no need to wait until
[55:46] January to find out,
[55:47] What are our new rates?
[55:48] for the most part
[55:49] next year, so
[55:50] that the insurance has changed
[55:52] from October 1.
[55:52] Hmm. And these two funds, 4701
[55:54] and 4700, are stored
[55:56] on separate
[55:57] bank accounts
[55:59] . They are isolated from
[56:00] the rest of our districts
[56:01] funds, right?
[56:03] So, yes, the reason,
[56:04] why is it nice that these
[56:05] other funds
[56:05] isolated, consists of
[56:07] because no one says
[56:08] : "Hey, I have this here
[56:09] money. I can
[56:10] transfer money." AND
[56:13] so, also, you know,
[56:18] one of the things about
[56:19] procedures,
[56:19] standard
[56:20] operating procedures
[56:21] , one of the things that in
[56:23] we are, is that, nothing
[56:25] translated without
[56:26] second signature or
[56:27] signature from Joey or
[56:28] me. So we stopped.
[56:30] people who
[56:30] are trying something
[56:31] change. And even
[56:34] stop people from
[56:35] try...hmm...I don't want to
[56:36] use
[56:37] the word "abuse",
[56:39] but we have resolutions
[56:40] about salaries, and sometimes
[56:41] we don't have a full
[56:42] working day, so we fill them with staff.
[56:46] So we allow
[56:48] to translate for people
[56:49] small amounts of money,
[56:50] not all, but large amounts
[56:51] part-time
[56:52] day, because otherwise
[56:53] why at all
[56:54] resolution on
[56:55] salary? So that was it.
[56:57] part of the story.
[56:58] So now we have
[56:59] some control to
[57:01] prevent this. And this
[57:02] again
[57:03] is happening,
[57:04] moving 4700, all
[57:05] are looking at this, and everyone
[57:06] know that this is all that
[57:08] can be spent with
[57:09] this account. We are not
[57:10] we can translate it.
[57:11] Good. And there are none
[57:13] other insurance
[57:14] contributions that
[57:15] are combined into this 4701,
[57:16] which are not
[57:17] self-insurance. It
[57:18] simply
[57:18] self-insurance
[57:19] responsibility
[57:20] commercial
[57:20] responsibility.
[57:21] There is
[57:22] everything we cover
[57:23] medical
[57:24] insurance. There is also insurance
[57:26] the life we ​​live
[57:27] we pay as a group, and
[57:29] which also
[57:29] refrains from
[57:30] employees for their
[57:31] choice if they
[57:32] want higher
[57:33] insurance. So, this is
[57:35] includes this, and it was
[57:36] included and rated
[57:37] as part of the amount that
[57:39] paid.
[57:40] So no one can
[57:41] try to take
[57:42] something related to
[57:43] payments
[57:44] for medical
[57:45] insurance and others
[57:46] payments. So things
[57:47] are paid from there,
[57:48] but this is also
[57:49] financed.
[57:50] I guess I'm asking because
[57:51] we are allowed
[57:52] to create funds
[57:52] self-insurance, but
[57:53] I don't believe that we can just
[57:55] to move money from
[57:56] one place and
[57:57] transfer them to
[57:57] another for something that is not
[57:58] is self-insurance.
[58:00] No, you're right.
[58:02] Yes.
[58:02] That's right, we don't
[58:03] we can do this.
[58:04] I can show you,
[58:06] that what we have from
[58:08] SBOA, it does. Good. I can, you know, it's in
[58:11] email,
[58:11] which I sent
[58:12] today, and I know that
[58:13] this is done in a nutshell
[58:14] terms. So let's
[58:15] we will return and
[58:16] let's review, but here
[58:17] What are we doing? You know,
[58:18] in this resolution we are going
[58:20] to make sure that we cover these things.
[58:22] Good.
[58:22] And then, you know, what would
[58:24] there were no guards
[58:25] barriers in 27 that we
[58:26] need to install,
[58:27] we will install them there
[58:29] to control
[58:30] smaller amounts and
[58:31] avert
[58:31] moving things
[58:32] people.
[58:33] Yes.
[58:33] So for the sake of economy
[58:34] I just want time.
[58:35] consider this.
[58:36] Let's try.
[58:37] to limit oneself to what is in
[58:38] agenda, not
[58:39] what will be in
[58:40] future
[58:40] resolution, if
[58:41] we can.
[58:41] Yes.
[58:42] But
[58:42] if I can catch you by surprise...
[58:44] Another question about
[58:45] comment that was
[58:46] said earlier. You
[58:47] mentioned that the funds
[58:49] were spent, I think it's an office.
[58:51] Commissioner improper
[58:52] in a way that is small
[58:54] go to 4701. Under
[58:55] improper
[58:56] spending, you,
[58:57] Joey, they're gone. Good.
[59:00] Can you hear us?
[59:01] I am here.
[59:02] OK, your camera
[59:03] disappeared.
[59:04] Yes, I'm here.
[59:05] Oh, sorry.
[59:06] But under improper
[59:07] you had to spend
[59:08] meaning that it was
[59:09] spent on something that
[59:10] it was impossible
[59:11] to spend, or simply
[59:12] spent on others
[59:13] government goals that
[59:14] were,
[59:14] Joey,
[59:15] legal, but not
[59:16] those that we
[59:16] planned in
[59:17] budget.
[59:18] Joey.
[59:19] Yes, can you hear me?
[59:20] Can I...Can I...
[59:22] to take the floor
[59:23] a second?
[59:25] She did her thing.
[59:26] the first statement, because
[59:27] we usually put
[59:28] these funds for this
[59:29] score. Because
[59:31] there was no account, they
[59:32] spent from this
[59:33] account. It wasn't...
[59:34] It was spent not
[59:35] as intended, in those terms in which
[59:37] you say that...
[59:38] Just on this foundation
[59:39] there was no money, so
[59:40] that they are not
[59:41] transferred the money
[59:42] you're welcome...So,
[59:42] because they
[59:43] spend from this
[59:44] account,
[59:45] use
[59:45] terminology "
[59:46] spent not for
[59:47] purpose, therefore
[59:48] that it is because we have
[59:49] no money for
[59:50] account.
[59:50] Yes.
[59:51] They were spent.
[59:52] not as intended.
[59:53] They were spent.
[59:54] on illegal
[59:55] goals.
[59:55] Okay, that's what I
[59:56] tried to clarify.
[59:58] I know some of you
[59:59] ...I know it's subtle
[1:00:00] hair, you know, but
[1:00:01] a thin hair...but
[1:00:02] to clarify. Thank you.
[1:00:04] Good.
[1:00:04] Hey, Mr. G...
[1:00:06] No.
[1:00:06] There was something...
[1:00:07] Are you okay? And someone
[1:00:09] yet? I know that we
[1:00:10] let's get to the question,
[1:00:11] for which we will
[1:00:12] vote, so I want to finish.
[1:00:14] discussion. Can
[1:00:16] to think that everything is fine.
[1:00:18] Good. Uh, come on.
[1:00:19] let's move on to
[1:00:20] appropriations where we have
[1:00:22] , uh, Mr. Parker from
[1:00:23] Director of Public
[1:00:24] Wanake libraries, e-
[1:00:26] Well, a request to the council
[1:00:27] approve of it
[1:00:28] additional
[1:00:29] appropriation for
[1:00:30] cash reserves
[1:00:31] libraries in size
[1:00:32] $10,000.
[1:00:34] Mr. President and
[1:00:35] council members, very
[1:00:36] Thank you for taking the time.
[1:00:37] listen to our
[1:00:38] request today
[1:00:39] in the evening. Uh, I'm Don.
[1:00:41] Parker. I am the director.
[1:00:42] Public library
[1:00:44] Wanake, and, uh, me
[1:00:45] I will be out soon.
[1:00:47] retirement after 14 years
[1:00:48] work. And therefore,
[1:00:51] planning this and
[1:00:51] trying
[1:00:52] to ensure as much as possible
[1:00:53] smoother transition, we
[1:00:55] found a good one
[1:00:56] candidate. Uh, we invite a candidate
[1:01:01] until my departure, uh,
[1:01:02] because in such a
[1:01:03] small library
[1:01:05] , like ours, except, uh,
[1:01:06] independent, uh,
[1:01:07] accountants, which we use, by
[1:01:10] In essence, the director does
[1:01:12] all. Engaged
[1:01:14] budget planning,
[1:01:15] keeps all records, etc.
[1:01:17] There are many things
[1:01:18] to learn. And we
[1:01:19] wanted, um, our
[1:01:20] new director
[1:01:21] Come while I'm still there.
[1:01:23] , so that, um, as much as possible
[1:01:24] to learn more smoothly
[1:01:25] foundations. Hmm, we don't, hm,
[1:01:29] we expect that this
[1:01:30] will cost something
[1:01:31] like 10,000 dollars,
[1:01:33] but we ask
[1:01:34] spend 10 mm from
[1:01:35] our own
[1:01:36] cash reserves, not
[1:01:37] asking in the district
[1:01:39] extra money, and,
[1:01:40] hmm, there will be more of this,
[1:01:41] than needed.
[1:01:45] And they have enough
[1:01:46] cash reserves. I
[1:01:47] had to repeat that,
[1:01:48] because I don't like it
[1:01:49] liked it.
[1:01:49] Good. Mr. Egge
[1:01:51] asked me.
[1:01:52] Can I ask,
[1:01:53] How much does he earn?
[1:01:54] library director?
[1:01:56] Hmm, I repeat again,
[1:01:57] you must remember,
[1:01:59] that Vanata is public
[1:02:00] friend's library
[1:02:01] town, so-called
[1:02:03] Class C library.
[1:02:04] Hmm, payment standards
[1:02:05] The work is not the same as in
[1:02:06] large libraries,
[1:02:08] where the director has
[1:02:09] master's degree
[1:02:10] Library Science
[1:02:11] activities. Hmm, I
[1:02:14] received a 15-hour,
[1:02:15] hmm, certificate from
[1:02:17] library
[1:02:18] activities at, um, Ivy Tech
[1:02:19] after
[1:02:20] got a job at this
[1:02:22] work 14 years ago.
[1:02:23] Hmm. Uh, current
[1:02:26] the payment is 30-35
[1:02:27] dollars per week
[1:02:29] at 35 hours of operation
[1:02:30] per week and 20
[1:02:31] dollars per hour on
[1:02:33] my position. Uh, we have
[1:02:34] I'm the only one in the library.
[1:02:35] I work full time.
[1:02:36] working day and two
[1:02:37] employees on terms
[1:02:38] part-time worker
[1:02:39] day. So, uh, mine
[1:02:40] payment somewhere
[1:02:41] approximately, it seems,
[1:02:43] when was the last time I saw them
[1:02:44] viewed, 31,000
[1:02:45] dollars per year.
[1:02:46] I simply stated that
[1:02:48] actual salary
[1:02:49] Laporte County
[1:02:50] exceeds 130,000. Therefore,
[1:02:51] this...yes, this is significant
[1:02:52] lower.
[1:02:52] Yes, we would like to think that we give
[1:02:54] you have some value.
[1:02:55] Yes, absolutely. Good.
[1:02:57] The proposal was approved.
[1:02:59] Mr. Yegge asked
[1:03:00] me.
[1:03:00] Second place.
[1:03:01] Race for second
[1:03:02] place between Mrs. Heath
[1:03:02] and Mr....
[1:03:03] Thank you very much.
[1:03:04] Everyone who supports
[1:03:05] proposal,
[1:03:05] confirm this
[1:03:06] with the words "yes".
[1:03:07] Yes.
[1:03:08] Against?
[1:03:09] Leave it to the members
[1:03:10] councils of two cities or
[1:03:11] former council members
[1:03:12] bridge.
[1:03:13] These are small towns.
[1:03:14] That's right, exactly.
[1:03:15] Good. Uh, let's move.
[1:03:17] further. We have a request.
[1:03:19] from the director of
[1:03:20] objects, Angela
[1:03:21] Davis, regarding
[1:03:22] appropriations that are not
[1:03:23] exceeds 125,000
[1:03:24] US dollars, on
[1:03:25] replacement of two boilers in
[1:03:27] prison and
[1:03:28] district complex.
[1:03:31] We voted 7-0.
[1:03:32] for the offer
[1:03:33] support on
[1:03:35] meeting on August 24.
[1:03:36] So, Director Davis
[1:03:40] could not meet
[1:03:42] with us today
[1:03:43] in the evening, how is it
[1:03:43] is obviously on board.
[1:03:45] Any comments,
[1:03:46] any
[1:03:47] recommendations from
[1:03:48] Mr. Pressel or Mr
[1:03:49] Egge?
[1:03:52] Well, yes, the reason why
[1:03:53] She didn't come because we
[1:03:54] It has already been approved. So
[1:03:56] she knew that we are going to divide
[1:03:58] 50/50. We talked about
[1:04:00] to remove it from
[1:04:01] WinTax.
[1:04:01] And Riverboat.
[1:04:02] so we
[1:04:03] let's divide.
[1:04:04] Good. So, this is
[1:04:06] offer?
[1:04:06] Yes, there is.
[1:04:07] Okay, so the proposal
[1:04:09] divide the amount
[1:04:11] equally between, uh, 1191
[1:04:13] Riverboat and 4220 WinTax. I have
[1:04:14] Do you have a second?
[1:04:16] Supported by Mr.
[1:04:17] Castellano. Any
[1:04:18] discussion? All who
[1:04:20] supports the proposal
[1:04:21] , confirm that
[1:04:22] say "yes".
[1:04:23] Yes.
[1:04:23] Against? Thank you. Uh,
[1:04:26] moving on, we
[1:04:28] reached the coroner,
[1:04:29] Mrs. Swanson, who
[1:04:30] requests additional
[1:04:31] appropriation in
[1:04:32] amount of 42,000 dollars
[1:04:34] USA for execution
[1:04:35] contract with
[1:04:36] pathologists,
[1:04:37] related to
[1:04:38] autopsies.
[1:04:40] Good evening.
[1:04:42] I ask for the remainder.
[1:04:44] of what is or was for
[1:04:45] contract. Uh, on
[1:04:47] beginning of budget
[1:04:49] past hearings
[1:04:50] year they gave me 150
[1:04:51] dollars in my
[1:04:52] budget when
[1:04:53] the contract was 192. So,
[1:04:55] I'm here for the remaining 42,000.
[1:04:56] Good. Any
[1:05:01] questions or actions from
[1:05:02] advice?
[1:05:05] Proposal about
[1:05:06] approval.
[1:05:07] Proposal about
[1:05:07] approval from the gentleman
[1:05:09] Pressela.
[1:05:09] Uh, River River. Yes,
[1:05:11] divide again.
[1:05:12] Do you want to share?
[1:05:13] Good. So, I have
[1:05:15] proposal about
[1:05:15] approval of separation
[1:05:16] river tax
[1:05:17] ships and
[1:05:17] wind energy. IN
[1:05:18] Do you have a second?
[1:05:20] Supported by Mr. Keel.
[1:05:21] Any discussions?
[1:05:23] Everyone who supports
[1:05:24] proposal,
[1:05:24] confirm this
[1:05:25] with the words "yes".
[1:05:26] Yes.
[1:05:27] Against? Good.
[1:05:29] Thank you.
[1:05:30] Can I add
[1:05:31] comment? Budget
[1:05:31] next year
[1:05:32] designed for
[1:05:33] full 192.
[1:05:34] Yes.
[1:05:35] Good. Good. And then
[1:05:37] we will get you in
[1:05:38] end of the narrations,
[1:05:39] since there is only...In
[1:05:39] there is one more of us...
[1:05:40] Oh, we have payment.
[1:05:41] the work of the deputy.
[1:05:42] Good. Last in
[1:05:43] application. Good.
[1:05:45] I am here for...
[1:05:45] Thank you. I appreciate it.
[1:05:47] I need it.
[1:05:48] partner. Good.
[1:05:49] Please add more.
[1:05:50] pay 25,000
[1:05:51] dollars for
[1:05:51] professional services-
[1:05:52] this is wages
[1:05:53] deputy. Um...Um...
[1:05:55] proposed
[1:05:56] accounts-1191 and 14 and 4220
[1:05:57] river tax
[1:05:59] ships and wind.
[1:06:00] Okay, I would like to
[1:06:01] change this amount if
[1:06:02] Can I please?
[1:06:03] You can reduce,
[1:06:04] you can't
[1:06:04] increase.
[1:06:05] I'm lowering.
[1:06:06] Good.
[1:06:06] I like it.
[1:06:08] Up to 15,000, after
[1:06:09] I'll look at some of mine.
[1:06:12] numbers and accounts, I think I can.
[1:06:14] do it with another 15,000. In
[1:06:16] I am the only one left.
[1:06:17] 4,700 on account to
[1:06:18] end of the year. I hope that others
[1:06:21] 15,000 is enough for me.
[1:06:22] end of the year.
[1:06:23] Good. So, she
[1:06:24] independently contributes
[1:06:25] changes to your amount.
[1:06:27] Offer
[1:06:27] support 7,500 each tax on
[1:06:29] river vessel and
[1:06:30] wind energy on
[1:06:31] MP's salary.
[1:06:32] Do you want to support?
[1:06:33] whether to approve,
[1:06:34] considering that this
[1:06:35] a smaller amount?
[1:06:35] Good.
[1:06:36] So, the proposal
[1:06:37] approve the distribution of 15
[1:06:38] 000 between tax on
[1:06:39] river vessel and
[1:06:40] wind energy.
[1:06:41] Second,
[1:06:42] I am asking a question.
[1:06:43] to the auditor. Do you want to
[1:06:44] so that we can continue
[1:06:45] to divide these funds,
[1:06:46] does this create for you
[1:06:47] a lot of extra
[1:06:48] work for no reason?
[1:06:49] This creates a certain
[1:06:50] work, but it doesn't have
[1:06:51] value.
[1:06:53] Hmm, the idea is
[1:06:54] because, uh, we're not...we
[1:06:55] not really...hmm,
[1:06:57] we suffer because we
[1:06:58] approaching
[1:06:59] the end of these traditions
[1:07:00] for these accounts. So
[1:07:03] good.
[1:07:04] So, I have
[1:07:05] Mr.'s proposal
[1:07:06] Kessler, which
[1:07:07] Mr. Keel supports.
[1:07:08] Everyone who supports
[1:07:09] proposal,
[1:07:10] confirm,
[1:07:10] saying "yes".
[1:07:11] Yes. Yes.
[1:07:12] Against?
[1:07:13] No.
[1:07:15] 5-2. Good.
[1:07:18] Hey, I'll be back for "
[1:07:20] "Yes," when we get there
[1:07:21] to transfers. Thank you.
[1:07:28] Good. Moving on to
[1:07:30] The Council of Commissioners, which
[1:07:32] requests additional
[1:07:33] appropriation in
[1:07:34] amounting to 1.75 million
[1:07:37] dollars for expanded
[1:07:38] discussion about which
[1:07:40] we talked. It
[1:07:41] concerning the fund
[1:07:42] insurance
[1:07:43] civil
[1:07:43] responsibility
[1:07:44] district. This, as explained
[1:07:45] auditor, but this
[1:07:46] responsibility
[1:07:47] commissioners.
[1:07:48] As you all know, how
[1:07:49] you all know,
[1:07:50] insurance premiums
[1:07:50] grow on everything that
[1:07:51] costs more and more and
[1:07:52] more money every year.
[1:07:54] A lot has come out of
[1:07:55] these four
[1:07:55] accounts.
[1:07:56] Yes, but we have some
[1:07:57] things that seem like we fix it.
[1:08:00] Let's fix it.
[1:08:02] Okay, so we
[1:08:02] discussed in detail
[1:08:04] it. Are there any more?
[1:08:06] question from the council?
[1:08:08] The proposal follows
[1:08:10] from our offer
[1:08:11] approve
[1:08:12] River division
[1:08:13] boat and MED
[1:08:14] economic
[1:08:15] development for 875 each.
[1:08:16] IN
[1:08:17] I have a suggestion.
[1:08:18] approve
[1:08:19] separation 1191
[1:08:20] Riverboats and
[1:08:21] 1112 MED economic
[1:08:23] development from Mr.
[1:08:24] Kessler. I have
[1:08:25] second?
[1:08:27] Supported by Mr.
[1:08:28] Mollenhauer. Are there any
[1:08:29] discussion? Good.
[1:08:34] Everyone who supports
[1:08:35] proposal,
[1:08:35] confirm this,
[1:08:36] saying "yes".
[1:08:37] Yes.
[1:08:38] Against?
[1:08:39] No.
[1:08:40] Thank you.
[1:08:41] Okay, now we are dealing with the fact that
[1:08:47] Planning and
[1:08:48] county zoning
[1:08:49] Laporte demands
[1:08:50] additional 15,000
[1:08:51] US dollars for
[1:08:52] additional coverage
[1:08:54] salaries,
[1:08:54] voted by the council
[1:08:56] in 2025, for a salary
[1:08:57] 2026. So, sir
[1:08:58] auditor, we already
[1:08:59] talked about it
[1:09:01] previously by SBOA or
[1:09:02] DLGF. They explained that
[1:09:04] were accepted
[1:09:06] new rules, and this
[1:09:07] was at the conference
[1:09:08] auditors at the beginning
[1:09:09] year, and it happened
[1:09:10] immediately after
[1:09:12] we approved it
[1:09:13] withdrawal
[1:09:13] registration fees
[1:09:15] contractors from
[1:09:15] register of contractors.
[1:09:18] So, the real
[1:09:19] the proposal is to
[1:09:20] in order to reduce
[1:09:22] registration fees
[1:09:23] contractors to him
[1:09:24] it was impossible for them
[1:09:25] pay, and then
[1:09:26] return them to
[1:09:27] general fund. Well,
[1:09:28] uh, it doesn't matter where you're from
[1:09:30] they will take on
[1:09:31] that moment, but this
[1:09:32] once upon a time
[1:09:33] stock,
[1:09:34] um, of these two, so that we
[1:09:36] could pay him
[1:09:37] his actual
[1:09:38] salary. Because first
[1:09:40] a year ago you could do this
[1:09:41] to do, but not now
[1:09:42] you can.
[1:09:43] Good.
[1:09:44] Then I will add what I will contribute
[1:09:46] changes to this statement.
[1:09:47] There is a possibility
[1:09:48] receiving part
[1:09:49] salaries, but we
[1:09:50] must justify
[1:09:51] every hour he
[1:09:52] spends on everything
[1:09:53] applications, and I still have
[1:09:54] this data is not available. When
[1:09:56] I will have this data,
[1:09:57] we can
[1:09:58] to adjust
[1:09:59] payment structure
[1:10:00] labor. So, for
[1:10:01] clarity when we
[1:10:03] reviewed budgets
[1:10:04] for 2025 for 2026,
[1:10:06] in general
[1:10:08] we took 15,000 dollars
[1:10:09] USA separately
[1:10:10] salary from the account,
[1:10:11] which has different rules
[1:10:13] regarding salary. Here's to
[1:10:16] What are we returning to?
[1:10:18] We are adjusting
[1:10:19] appropriation in
[1:10:20] budgets to be
[1:10:21] confident in
[1:10:22] compliance with the rules.
[1:10:27] Mr. Russell, I wanted to
[1:10:28] would declare that he
[1:10:29] stated that the money
[1:10:31] will be...if he doesn't
[1:10:33] will be able to compensate
[1:10:34] this money is due
[1:10:35] meetings, he himself
[1:10:36] will compensate. Yes.
[1:10:37] I just want
[1:10:38] make sure that you
[1:10:39] understood.
[1:10:40] Of course.
[1:10:40] I don't...I don't think you will find it
[1:10:42] problem.
[1:10:44] Good.
[1:10:44] Just make sure
[1:10:46] that
[1:10:46] Everything is fine. So, what does the council mean?
[1:10:52] Proposal about
[1:10:53] approval from
[1:10:53] Riverboat.
[1:10:54] Proposal about
[1:10:55] approval from
[1:10:56] Riverboat from Mr.
[1:10:56] Kila. I have a friend.
[1:10:58] opinion?
[1:10:58] Second opinion.
[1:10:59] Supported by Mr.
[1:11:00] Pressel. Any
[1:11:01] further discussion
[1:11:02] ? Everyone who is "for"
[1:11:04] allocation 15,000 from
[1:11:06] river vessel 1191,
[1:11:08] confirm,
[1:11:09] saying, “I.
[1:11:11] I.
[1:11:12] Against".
[1:11:13] And I just
[1:11:14] need
[1:11:14] make sure that you
[1:11:15] also agree
[1:11:16] exclude this from the fee
[1:11:17] for services
[1:11:18] contractors.
[1:11:19] Simultaneously.
[1:11:20] So why should we just
[1:11:20] not to make a separate one
[1:11:21] proposal, simply
[1:11:22] so that...Whatever you do
[1:11:23] done.
[1:11:23] Just interrupted to
[1:11:25] we could
[1:11:25] both.
[1:11:26] So, we are looking for
[1:11:27] proposal about
[1:11:28] abolition
[1:11:28] initial 15,000
[1:11:29] US dollars from
[1:11:30] registration fees
[1:11:31] contractors. Such
[1:11:33] way, it will cleanse them
[1:11:34] from the budget article.
[1:11:35] So, it is proposed.
[1:11:36] So, the proposal of Mrs.
[1:11:37] Hit. I have a friend.
[1:11:38] opinion?
[1:11:38] Second opinion.
[1:11:39] Supported by Mr. Keel.
[1:11:40] Everyone who is "in favor"
[1:11:41] confirm,
[1:11:41] saying, “I.
[1:11:42] I.
[1:11:42] Against".
[1:11:43] No. Thank you. Thank you.
[1:11:48] Good. Moving on to
[1:11:51] transfers and
[1:11:52] permits for
[1:11:52] relevant costs.
[1:11:55] Director
[1:11:55] Department of Security
[1:11:57] county health
[1:11:58] Laporte, Mrs. Leiners,
[1:11:59] asks for permission
[1:12:01] spend from 1159 in
[1:12:02] amount of 175,000 dollars
[1:12:03] for part
[1:12:04] building construction
[1:12:06] at the fairground
[1:12:07] the site. And you have
[1:12:09] shadow. I have
[1:12:11] support. I
[1:12:13] I'm confused. What is this not?
[1:12:14] must exceed
[1:12:16] 175,000. School medical
[1:12:18] help is provided
[1:12:19] expansion of your
[1:12:20] object there, on
[1:12:21] fairground
[1:12:22] the site. They
[1:12:24] I was asked if I
[1:12:26] knowing that I
[1:12:27] need space,
[1:12:28] asked if I wanted
[1:12:29] join in on this.
[1:12:31] School medical
[1:12:32] help. That's why we
[1:12:34] here. Ask for funds,
[1:12:35] to help
[1:12:36] pay my share
[1:12:37] buildings.
[1:12:38] Good. So what do we want?
[1:12:39] to do in this building
[1:12:40] ? This is obviously
[1:12:41] partially or it
[1:12:42] satellite base
[1:12:42] ambulance
[1:12:43] assistance for
[1:12:44] fairground
[1:12:45] the site.
[1:12:45] Looking at the gentleman
[1:12:46] Finstermaker, to
[1:12:48] he agreed.
[1:12:49] Yes. So that settles it.
[1:12:50] a big problem for
[1:12:51] us. So, now our
[1:12:53] plumbing on
[1:12:54] outer wall. So
[1:12:55] we can't
[1:12:56] to use it
[1:12:57] all year round, because she
[1:12:58] will freeze. So,
[1:13:00] adding also for her
[1:13:01] goals–keep it
[1:13:02] trailer etc.–she
[1:13:03] will place the entire
[1:13:04] plumbing on
[1:13:05] the inner wall, which
[1:13:06] will allow us both
[1:13:07] to use it
[1:13:08] all year long. Hmm, there will also be room for
[1:13:14] storage,
[1:13:15] for example, during COVID
[1:13:16] , all of our
[1:13:17] medicines on
[1:13:18] warehouse, dressing gowns,
[1:13:19] masks, boots–all of that
[1:13:21] kept in our
[1:13:22] buildings. So between them
[1:13:26] there will be a separate space
[1:13:28] just for this
[1:13:28] inventory. We have, uh
[1:13:31] , obligations from
[1:13:32] some local
[1:13:33] trade unions
[1:13:34] to perform with us
[1:13:35] free work.
[1:13:36] Carpenters' Union
[1:13:37] and trade union
[1:13:38] finishers
[1:13:38] agreed, uh,
[1:13:39] help us with
[1:13:40] some of these issues.
[1:13:41] We will do it.
[1:13:42] similarly, uh, on
[1:13:43] sorry, Mr. Iglesias
[1:13:44] was the only one who
[1:13:45] remembers this from the time
[1:13:47] being on the council,
[1:13:48] when we were building ours
[1:13:49] main building in 2015
[1:13:51] year. We worked
[1:13:52] through Lowe's for their
[1:13:52] participation in life
[1:13:53] communities, and they also
[1:13:54] donated a lot
[1:13:55] workforce for
[1:13:56] this. They also
[1:13:57] agreed to help
[1:13:58] with this. So this will be
[1:13:59] really a project
[1:14:00] community building.
[1:14:01] Good. OK. And I would
[1:14:03] said that even
[1:14:04] regardless of whether
[1:14:05] Will this be approved?
[1:14:06] Is it not approved, I think I know, to
[1:14:08] what will this lead to, but,
[1:14:09] uh, I like it
[1:14:10] to see cooperation, which
[1:14:12] occurs between
[1:14:13] departments here.
[1:14:14] So thank you for this.
[1:14:15] example.
[1:14:16] This will also happen.
[1:14:17] much more.
[1:14:18] Just so you know,
[1:14:19] that, uh, EMS will be back
[1:14:20] to subordination
[1:14:21] Department of Security
[1:14:22] Indiana's health to
[1:14:23] end of the year. No, she is
[1:14:24] will not be mine
[1:14:25] boss. We
[1:14:27] let's be together
[1:14:28] equal, but, uh, there are
[1:14:29] much more
[1:14:30] continuity thanks to
[1:14:32] EMS together with
[1:14:32] department
[1:14:33] health care. Uh,
[1:14:35] and some better ones
[1:14:36] opportunities
[1:14:36] funding, I think
[1:14:38] , that's why they
[1:14:39] do it at the level
[1:14:40] state.
[1:14:40] Good. Fantastically.
[1:14:42] And such an extension
[1:14:43] also allows us
[1:14:44] to have constantly
[1:14:45] electricity in
[1:14:46] our trailer. Ahem,
[1:14:50] we need this
[1:14:51] worked for 7 days
[1:14:52] in a row before we can go to
[1:14:54] road, um, before
[1:14:55] we will be able to place
[1:14:57] any vaccine there
[1:14:58] . So now we have
[1:15:01] there is no such thing
[1:15:02] opportunities, but this
[1:15:03] It will help a lot.
[1:15:05] So, for
[1:15:05] the public is
[1:15:06] refrigerated
[1:15:07] trailer, intended
[1:15:08] for storage and
[1:15:09] use of others
[1:15:10] medical materials,
[1:15:12] who need
[1:15:12] of a certain kind
[1:15:13] cooling.
[1:15:15] Right. It
[1:15:15] mobile medical
[1:15:16] clinic, and it has
[1:15:18] freezer
[1:15:19] for vaccines.
[1:15:19] Good.
[1:15:22] One more comment.
[1:15:23] They got to
[1:15:25] commissions. So that was it.
[1:15:26] fully approved
[1:15:27] them, so you don't
[1:15:28] need to go there-
[1:15:30] here.
[1:15:30] Good.
[1:15:34] Balance of funds...
[1:15:35] sorry, I didn't name it
[1:15:36] you have a balance of funds,
[1:15:37] but there is more than
[1:15:38] a significant amount of money.
[1:15:39] This was before
[1:15:40] highlighted, or...
[1:15:45] So, the funds that...Yes
[1:15:46] and no...Costs
[1:15:47] returning from
[1:15:48] compensation funds
[1:15:49] COVID we received
[1:15:50] for insurance
[1:15:51] compensation that we
[1:15:52] did for these
[1:15:53] vaccination. This money
[1:15:56] were intended for
[1:15:57] of Dr. Box on that
[1:15:59] time for them to go to
[1:16:03] equipment, buildings
[1:16:04] or transport
[1:16:05] means that
[1:16:06] security department
[1:16:07] health is usually not
[1:16:08] could do.
[1:16:09] So it's something like
[1:16:10] government grant?
[1:16:12] It was
[1:16:12] reimbursement
[1:16:13] insurance costs.
[1:16:15] The state took everyone
[1:16:16] insurance documents, and
[1:16:17] as soon as they
[1:16:18] received money from
[1:16:19] insurance companies,
[1:16:20] they distributed them
[1:16:21] between districts on
[1:16:22] based on quantity
[1:16:23] vaccinations that he had
[1:16:24] this district.
[1:16:25] So these are not tax
[1:16:26] funds.
[1:16:27] So they still
[1:16:28] will be allocated,
[1:16:29] if they are in our
[1:16:29] at your disposal.
[1:16:30] You are allocating now.
[1:16:32] You don't need
[1:16:32] additional
[1:16:33] allocation. We can consider this
[1:16:35] again after the meeting
[1:16:36] , and if we
[1:16:37] will be useful
[1:16:37] additional
[1:16:38] appropriation, we will bring them in
[1:16:39] next month,
[1:16:40] but I think we should
[1:16:41] needed. And I think,
[1:16:43] that our lawyer is there,
[1:16:45] if you want
[1:16:46] ask, but we
[1:16:47] can free us
[1:16:48] all and
[1:16:55] next question.
[1:16:57] I am filing a petition.
[1:16:58] about their appropriation. I mean, here
[1:17:00] this is advertised as
[1:17:01] permission to spend {
[1:17:02] slash} is appropriate. Therefore,
[1:17:03] I propose to highlight
[1:17:05] 175,000 from fund 1159.
[1:17:06] Second.
[1:17:07] So, the proposal of Mr.
[1:17:08] Kila, friend
[1:17:09] Mr.'s proposal
[1:17:10] Castle. Any
[1:17:11] further discussion
[1:17:12] ?
[1:17:12] This is not to be exceeded,
[1:17:13] Yes?
[1:17:13] Not to exceed 175,000.
[1:17:16] Right. I don't see.
[1:17:18] so that it is marked here.
[1:17:19] Do you agree with this as
[1:17:20] a friendly amendment?
[1:17:21] Not to exceed 175?
[1:17:23] Yes, that's good.
[1:17:24] Do you agree?
[1:17:25] Yes. Good.
[1:17:27] Everyone who supports
[1:17:29] allocation 175,000 or
[1:17:31] less than 1159, mark,
[1:17:33] saying: I am.
[1:17:36] I.
[1:17:37] Against? Another
[1:17:40] comment, again
[1:17:41] bravo for what you are
[1:17:43] found partners in
[1:17:44] community who are ready
[1:17:45] help with this. But
[1:17:47] whether it's Lowe's or
[1:17:48] trade unions, whether
[1:17:49] anyone else
[1:17:50] large employer
[1:17:51] in the district. Therefore. Beautiful
[1:17:53] work. Or
[1:17:54] could we too
[1:17:55] get advice on
[1:17:56] how it will turn out...
[1:17:58] Good...
[1:17:58] with money, I have
[1:18:00] attention.
[1:18:00] Good. Now we
[1:18:03] moved to a shelter
[1:18:04] for animals of La-
[1:18:05] Port.
[1:18:08] I'm fine.
[1:18:09] Need help?
[1:18:10] With the community, if you
[1:18:11] Are you going to leave?
[1:18:12] Brook. If you
[1:18:13] are you going to help
[1:18:13] me with yours
[1:18:14] last name, thank you.
[1:18:15] Okay, goodbye.
[1:18:16] Thank you.
[1:18:17] How are you doing?
[1:18:18] No, not at first. 21 years old,
[1:18:21] but it's still hard
[1:18:22] for me. Good. Uh,
[1:18:24] I ask permission.
[1:18:25] spend 20,000
[1:18:26] dollars for
[1:18:27] veterinary and
[1:18:27] hospital expenses from
[1:18:30] fund fees for
[1:18:31] control over
[1:18:32] animals.
[1:18:33] Proposal about
[1:18:33] approval, sir
[1:18:34] President.
[1:18:35] Second.
[1:18:36] I want to know if
[1:18:37] Are you going to...
[1:18:39] Thank you. Good,
[1:18:40] Mr.'s proposal
[1:18:41] Igelsky, friend
[1:18:42] Ms. Heath's suggestion.
[1:18:43] Regarding the discussion, whether
[1:18:44] are there any other details,
[1:18:46] which ones would you like
[1:18:47] to provide?
[1:18:50] Uh, about these expenses, I mean, they...This
[1:18:53] made you come
[1:18:54] here. I just wanted to make sure. Yes, I am.
[1:18:57] I mean, by this
[1:18:58] almost everything has been said.
[1:19:00] Good. Who is "for"?
[1:19:01] means saying "yes"
[1:19:03] . Who is "against"? Thank you.
[1:19:06] Now you ask: "
[1:19:08] Do we have a minute?
[1:19:09] correction regarding
[1:19:09] this? It says there
[1:19:11] 10,000 20, and it should be 10,000 and
[1:19:13] 10,000.
[1:19:14] Right. I think
[1:19:16] what is our advertising
[1:19:18] good.
[1:19:19] She is below,
[1:19:21] perfect. Therefore,
[1:19:22] we ask permission
[1:19:23] spend 10,000 on
[1:19:24] services and fees from
[1:19:25] donation fund for
[1:19:26] animal shelter.
[1:19:29] Proposal about
[1:19:29] approval, sir
[1:19:30] President.
[1:19:31] Proposal about
[1:19:32] approval from the gentleman
[1:19:33] Igelsky.
[1:19:34] Second.
[1:19:35] The second from Mr.
[1:19:36] Molitor and Mr.
[1:19:37] Kessler. All who
[1:19:38] support
[1:19:38] proposal,
[1:19:39] confirm,
[1:19:40] saying "yes". Against?
[1:19:41] Thank you. Thank you,
[1:19:42] guys.
[1:19:43] Thank you. See you in
[1:19:45] Thursday.
[1:19:47] Good. We have a sheriff.
[1:19:50] The hit that asks
[1:19:51] permission to spend
[1:19:52] funds from the Fund
[1:19:53] misdemeanors on
[1:19:54] purchasing a replacement
[1:19:55] washing machine for
[1:19:56] prison. Mr. Sheriff.
[1:19:58] Good evening. I am Ron
[1:20:00] Hit, sheriff. Yes, we have
[1:20:02] recently in prison
[1:20:03] The washing machine broke down.
[1:20:04] machine. She was 23 years old.
[1:20:07] . He was
[1:20:08] established in 2003
[1:20:10] . Uh, we were considering
[1:20:11] possibility of repair
[1:20:12] washing machine, but
[1:20:13] they said that
[1:20:14] better to buy a new one
[1:20:15] because of her age. We would
[1:20:17] wasted
[1:20:18] a lot of money, making
[1:20:19] repair. So, we
[1:20:21] please allow
[1:20:22] to spend from the Fund
[1:20:23] misdemeanors 22,500
[1:20:24] dollars for a new one
[1:20:25] prison or
[1:20:26] washing machine for
[1:20:27] prison.
[1:20:28] Proposal about
[1:20:29] approval.
[1:20:29] Second.
[1:20:30] Proposal about
[1:20:31] approval from the gentleman
[1:20:31] Kessler. Second
[1:20:32] proposal from Mrs.
[1:20:33] Hit. Are there any
[1:20:34] discussion? All in favor
[1:20:36] $22,500 for a new one
[1:20:38] washing machine,
[1:20:39] confirm,
[1:20:41] saying "I". "
[1:20:42] Against? Okay. Now
[1:20:45] you are asking for 46,000 from
[1:20:46] Misdemeanors Fund
[1:20:47] annual payment
[1:20:48] renewal
[1:20:49] software
[1:20:50] provision for
[1:20:51] prison management.
[1:20:53] Right. This is ours
[1:20:54] software
[1:20:55] provision for
[1:20:55] prison booking,
[1:20:56] when we register
[1:20:57] someone in prison, where
[1:20:58] we are taking their pictures
[1:20:59] fingerprints,
[1:21:00] we take photos,
[1:21:01] other information. And this
[1:21:02] just our annual
[1:21:03] license for
[1:21:04] software
[1:21:04] provision for
[1:21:05] prison management.
[1:21:06] Good. Uh, and we
[1:21:08] traditionally paid
[1:21:09] this is from the Misdemeanor Fund
[1:21:11] . This is not traditional.
[1:21:12] Well, usually we choose the Foundation
[1:21:14] misdemeanors, while
[1:21:15] they use
[1:21:16] Misdemeanor Fund,
[1:21:16] some commission,
[1:21:17] something like that
[1:21:18] pay for it.
[1:21:19] Good.
[1:21:19] So, yes. Well, we are quite
[1:21:21] agree to take this from
[1:21:22] Misdemeanor Fund. There
[1:21:23] enough money for
[1:21:25] this.
[1:21:28] Any thoughts?
[1:21:29] The proposal was approved,
[1:21:30] second.
[1:21:31] The proposal was approved by
[1:21:32] Mr. Presley, second-mr.
[1:21:33] Kessler. Any
[1:21:34] discussion? All who
[1:21:35] supports the proposal
[1:21:37] , mark by saying
[1:21:38] I.
[1:21:38] Me. Thank you. Thank you.
[1:21:42] Good. Returning
[1:21:44] to parks and areas
[1:21:45] rest, please
[1:21:46] spend or
[1:21:47] transfer 3700
[1:21:48] dollars from the account for
[1:21:49] donations.
[1:21:50] The proposal was approved,
[1:21:51] Mr. President.
[1:21:52] The proposal was approved by
[1:21:53] Mr. Dugalski.
[1:21:54] Second.
[1:21:55] Mrs. Heath. Any-
[1:21:56] what discussions?
[1:21:57] This is Santa Claus,
[1:21:58] Be careful.
[1:21:59] This is Santa Claus.
[1:22:01] Just be.
[1:22:01] careful.
[1:22:02] Is this fund before?
[1:22:03] stood out?
[1:22:04] What is it?
[1:22:04] Is this fund before?
[1:22:06] stood out? That's why
[1:22:07] I am here. This is because for
[1:22:08] to spend
[1:22:10] donations, I have
[1:22:10] to get approval
[1:22:11] from the council.
[1:22:12] Yes.
[1:22:12] To appropriate them.
[1:22:14] Yes, yes.
[1:22:16] Good. All who
[1:22:17] supports the proposal
[1:22:19] , mark it with the words:
[1:22:20] I.
[1:22:21] Against? Thank you.
[1:22:23] Moving on
[1:22:26] .
[1:22:27] Charming, Jeremy.
[1:22:28] The third time–
[1:22:29] charm. Good. Uh-huh
[1:22:37] , now we have
[1:22:38] trial
[1:22:38] term for adults,
[1:22:40] uh, from Mr.
[1:22:40] The President.
[1:22:41] Don't be shy.
[1:22:42] Thank you. Okay, Steve, no.
[1:22:43] was able to come. He
[1:22:44] asked me if I can speak. We
[1:22:46] already had a meeting with
[1:22:47] on this occasion, their
[1:22:49] computers were
[1:22:49] acts of measures
[1:22:50] security, we are going to update
[1:22:52] them to Windows 10, so this
[1:22:53] necessary for our,
[1:22:55] um, so that we could be
[1:22:56] covered by our
[1:22:56] insurance.
[1:22:58] Good.
[1:22:59] So the amount is $
[1:23:01] 12,744.95, um, with Windows 10 for
[1:23:05] computer and Spirit, and
[1:23:07] Spirit Court three.
[1:23:09] Upgrade to Windows 10.
[1:23:12] WITH?
[1:23:13] This is from Windows 10.
[1:23:15] Yes.
[1:23:15] Update to 11 or 11
[1:23:17] or 12, yes.
[1:23:19] Good. Thoughts from the council.
[1:23:22] The proposal is approved.
[1:23:23] The proposal was approved by
[1:23:24] Mrs. Geet. Friend
[1:23:25] supported the proposal
[1:23:27] Mr. Mormon. Are there any
[1:23:28] discussion? Everyone who
[1:23:30] supports approval
[1:23:31] $12,744.95 per
[1:23:32] trial
[1:23:33] term for adults
[1:23:34] for the computer,
[1:23:35] confirm that
[1:23:36] they said "yes".
[1:23:37] Yes.
[1:23:38] Against? Thank you. Now in
[1:23:43] We have a secretary.
[1:23:44] district court, which
[1:23:45] asks for permission
[1:23:46] spend the appropriate
[1:23:48] funds from transferred
[1:23:49] funds. I don't remember.
[1:23:50] so that earlier
[1:23:51] used this
[1:23:52] stock. Hmm, 89 88 99
[1:23:53] consumables
[1:23:56] for the amount of $97.73
[1:23:58] USA for payment
[1:24:00] invoices. IN
[1:24:02] we are also from the same
[1:24:04] fund, but on other
[1:24:05] services and fees, 14,000
[1:24:06] US dollars for
[1:24:07] bill payment-
[1:24:09] Malcon's invoices. This, and
[1:24:11] I see that the secretary
[1:24:13] still in place. So, uh
[1:24:14] -e, who accounts
[1:24:15] Malkon? Or who who
[1:24:17] Malcon?
[1:24:18] they process a lot
[1:24:23] money 4D. Things like that.
[1:24:27] They keep us in
[1:24:28] course.
[1:24:30] Of course. Sir
[1:24:31] Jagelsky. Heather,
[1:24:33] quickly, um, I know that
[1:24:34] you take it off
[1:24:35] your fund, but not
[1:24:36] it would be better this
[1:24:37] to appropriate, because we do not
[1:24:38] we take enough
[1:24:39] money from 4D, because they have
[1:24:41] many redundant
[1:24:42] funds?
[1:24:44] But with 4D we can
[1:24:45] take only interest.
[1:24:47] If so, I thought,
[1:24:48] because I worked with them
[1:24:50] earlier,
[1:24:50] I can't, sorry.
[1:24:52] Good.
[1:24:54] I can't withdraw funds.
[1:24:56] 4D and spend them on
[1:24:57] something like folders
[1:24:58] for the office
[1:25:00] a clerk, or, it seems,
[1:25:01] you know, big ones
[1:25:02] marriage folders, books
[1:25:03] orders and all that.
[1:25:06] We can't do this.
[1:25:07] make. So part,
[1:25:09] and Kerry is better at this
[1:25:11] understands better than me.
[1:25:13] Part comes from
[1:25:15] 4D fund. And part
[1:25:18] comes from our
[1:25:19] perpetuation fund. If
[1:25:20] with
[1:25:20] You're fine.
[1:25:22] There is none
[1:25:22] transfer from the fund,
[1:25:23] I don't care, but I know we don't take
[1:25:26] enough money from 4D,
[1:25:27] and that's the problem, and
[1:25:28] this is an excessive amount
[1:25:29] money.
[1:25:30] Yes.
[1:25:31] So I would just like to see if we
[1:25:33] Let's split this or something.
[1:25:34] like this, because it doesn't matter
[1:25:36] transfer of funds. No, I think yours
[1:25:41] good comment
[1:25:42] taken into account, let's
[1:25:44] just consider
[1:25:45] other sources
[1:25:45] financing,
[1:25:46] at least on
[1:25:47] future. Mr. Otter.
[1:25:49] So this is not the only fund,
[1:25:50] who has to pay
[1:25:52] Malcolm's account. Yet
[1:25:54] 11,300 USD
[1:25:55] came from
[1:25:56] fees
[1:25:56] professional
[1:25:57] employees. It was
[1:25:59] from the commissioner's budget.
[1:26:02] What do they do for
[1:26:04] these 11,300 dollars, yes
[1:26:05] they get it
[1:26:06] information from my
[1:26:08] office where listed
[1:26:09] 4D work done with
[1:26:15] office clerk with
[1:26:16] actual 4D, and then
[1:26:17] make up
[1:26:18] reimbursement. They
[1:26:20] carry out the process
[1:26:21] cost allocation, and
[1:26:22] then we get
[1:26:23] compensation for this.
[1:26:24] Mr. Fagan could
[1:26:25] talk more with
[1:26:26] about this. I
[1:26:27] asked him
[1:26:28] pay this bill.
[1:26:29] I will let him.
[1:26:30] resolve this issue.
[1:26:32] You know, I'll finish this.
[1:26:34] later, but,
[1:26:35] let me
[1:26:36] try again.
[1:26:37] Ms. Stevens, is there
[1:26:39] some way if
[1:26:40] we will divide it between the two of them, it's 4D, and your
[1:26:43] ported number, or
[1:26:44] will this be for you
[1:26:45] consent or not?
[1:26:50] While I can, while I can spend this.
[1:26:52] from there, I can't see
[1:26:53] problems.
[1:26:56] Good. I will contribute
[1:26:57] a proposal that
[1:26:58] so that we can adopt this as
[1:26:59] conditions that if you
[1:27:00] can you share this,
[1:27:01] if not, then the entire amount
[1:27:02] will be taken from
[1:27:03] transferred amount. I support this conversation.
[1:27:05] Good. I will accept.
[1:27:06] petition. You can
[1:27:07] to do everything that
[1:27:08] whatever, you can
[1:27:08] to do everything that
[1:27:09] whatever. You can
[1:27:10] to do it. Good.
[1:27:12] So, the petition. IN
[1:27:13] Do we have a second?
[1:27:16] Supported
[1:27:16] at the request of Mr.
[1:27:17] Ugalsky,
[1:27:18] supported by Mr.
[1:27:18] Pressel. So, I will ask our
[1:27:20] lawyer to express
[1:27:21] your opinion. Sir
[1:27:23] Badges.
[1:27:24] Greetings.
[1:27:25] Yes.
[1:27:29] If we introduce
[1:27:30] proposal regarding
[1:27:31] transfer, expenses or
[1:27:33] appropriation of funds
[1:27:34] on the account of which
[1:27:35] we are not today
[1:27:36] mentioned, but Mr.
[1:27:37] Ugalsky asks
[1:27:38] to offer us
[1:27:39] Mrs. Stevens
[1:27:40] to explore the possibility
[1:27:41] divide this
[1:27:42] invoice between
[1:27:43] this transferred to
[1:27:44] the next period and
[1:27:45] 4D score. Do we have
[1:27:51] Are we entitled to this?
[1:27:54] I think so. It
[1:27:56] just a transfer. It
[1:27:57] not additional
[1:27:58] allocation. Therefore I don't think it's necessary.
[1:28:01] some kind of advertisement. I think you can
[1:28:03] set it up as
[1:28:04] whatever.
[1:28:04] Good. Thank you for
[1:28:06] advice.
[1:28:06] Can I too?
[1:28:07] add?
[1:28:08] Yes, sir.
[1:28:09] Now you need
[1:28:10] advertise only
[1:28:11] additional
[1:28:11] appropriations, and they are in
[1:28:13] basically
[1:28:13] advertised through
[1:28:14] Gateway. We also did
[1:28:16] kindness,
[1:28:17] publishing this in
[1:28:18] newspapers. Actually
[1:28:21] we found this useful
[1:28:22] to do, and we are working on a complete
[1:28:24] compensation, because
[1:28:26] You know, you turned
[1:28:27] our attention to
[1:28:28] problem. We also have
[1:28:29] were technical
[1:28:30] problems. We were leading
[1:28:31] conversations. I don't want to
[1:28:33] now get into it,
[1:28:34] but to move on
[1:28:36] , you received
[1:28:36] the answer to that
[1:28:37] you need.
[1:28:38] Perfectly. So, is it
[1:28:40] Can you tell me?
[1:28:41] Who is second? Excuse me, I
[1:28:42] missed. Thank you,
[1:28:43] Mr. President.
[1:28:45] Yes. Good. So, in
[1:28:46] I have a suggestion,
[1:28:47] friend. Everyone who is "in favor"
[1:28:49] confirm,
[1:28:49] saying "yes".
[1:28:50] Yes. Yes.
[1:28:51] Against? Thank you. Now we transfer funds
[1:28:57] from the Riverboat, sir
[1:28:58] Auditor.
[1:29:00] Yes, it's simple. We get money
[1:29:02] quarterly according to
[1:29:03] with a resolution. To us
[1:29:04] need to be divided
[1:29:06] 50% of them. Unfortunately, they
[1:29:07] always come in
[1:29:08] inconvenient time, so
[1:29:09] we can't get
[1:29:11] them quickly. And here we are
[1:29:12] received this money
[1:29:13] about a month ago,
[1:29:14] but they arrived
[1:29:15] after time,
[1:29:16] established for
[1:29:17] publications, so we
[1:29:18] wanted to make sure
[1:29:19] that we just don't
[1:29:20] we will publish this through
[1:29:22] amount. And that's it.
[1:29:24] So, I'm looking for
[1:29:25] petition for
[1:29:27] transfer 179,059.74
[1:29:28] US dollars with "
[1:29:30] Riverboat" on "
[1:29:31] "a black day."
[1:29:33] So it's postponed.
[1:29:34] Second.
[1:29:35] The petition of the gentleman
[1:29:36] Kessler, second lady
[1:29:37] Hit. Any
[1:29:38] discussion?
[1:29:39] One thing struck me.
[1:29:40] when I was reading
[1:29:40] resolution on this
[1:29:41] about, um, and there
[1:29:42] It is said that our
[1:29:43] the percentages that we earn from the fund for
[1:29:45] rainy day, must
[1:29:46] to stay there. Are we tracking this?
[1:29:51] I will talk to someone,
[1:29:52] because I know this is not
[1:29:53] identified as in
[1:29:54] fund for a rainy day
[1:29:56] now. So we are
[1:29:59] Let's decide.
[1:30:00] Good.
[1:30:00] You know, easy.
[1:30:01] get a number
[1:30:02] retroactively, and then
[1:30:03] if we need
[1:30:03] to tell, we can
[1:30:04] to do this.
[1:30:05] Yes.
[1:30:06] Thanks for breaking this.
[1:30:07] question.
[1:30:07] Good point. IN
[1:30:09] I had this thought, until
[1:30:10] which I had
[1:30:11] to return, but not
[1:30:12] was able to do it.
[1:30:13] Any other
[1:30:13] comments? Everyone who is for
[1:30:15] legend,
[1:30:16] confirm this
[1:30:17] with the words "yes".
[1:30:17] Yes. Yes. Yes.
[1:30:19] Against? Thank you. Good.
[1:30:22] Now we move on.
[1:30:23] to the district attorney
[1:30:24] Mr. Finer's Porter,
[1:30:26] who asks
[1:30:27] transfer to
[1:30:28] total amount 20,000
[1:30:29] US dollars from
[1:30:30] next. Um, with
[1:30:32] fund 2500 district,
[1:30:34] user fees,
[1:30:35] to the fund 2501 on
[1:30:37] pre-trial
[1:30:37] redirection and
[1:30:39] postponement. Hmm, this is
[1:30:45] will allow you to send
[1:30:46] or donate 5000
[1:30:48] dollars to
[1:30:49] Emergency fund
[1:30:50] board of trustees
[1:30:51] Coolspring town,
[1:30:53] $5,000 to
[1:30:54] "We are on" program
[1:30:55] recovery", also
[1:30:56] known as the program
[1:30:57] WAR, and $10,000 for
[1:30:59] judicial and office
[1:31:00] operations. Um, first.
[1:31:06] a question I have.
[1:31:10] User collection
[1:31:12] district 2500 and
[1:31:12] postponement
[1:31:13] pre-trial
[1:31:14] redirection
[1:31:15] Prosecutor 2501. Mr.
[1:31:17] Finer, can I?
[1:31:18] use these
[1:31:19] bills
[1:31:20] directly for
[1:31:21] criminal
[1:31:22] persecution?
[1:31:26] Yes. Um, 2500 is it
[1:31:28] unallocated fund.
[1:31:31] So, all the money,
[1:31:33] received from
[1:31:34] pre-trial
[1:31:34] redirection and
[1:31:36] from violations, all these
[1:31:37] the money goes to the fund
[1:31:39] 2500. 2501–this is, um,
[1:31:40] assigned version
[1:31:41] this. So, our
[1:31:44] claims, um,
[1:31:45] staff for payment
[1:31:47] etc. So, uh, regarding
[1:31:48] PTD fund exists
[1:31:49] set set
[1:31:51] rules that require
[1:31:52] how can this money
[1:31:53] be spent. This is in
[1:31:56] within your
[1:31:57] question, yes.
[1:31:59] Good. Therefore,
[1:32:01] considering these, uh,
[1:32:03] donations to external
[1:32:04] and auxiliary
[1:32:05] organizations, uh, we do not expose ourselves to
[1:32:08] danger because of
[1:32:09] that we can't
[1:32:10] to conduct properly
[1:32:11] How are you, uh, right?
[1:32:17] Good. What
[1:32:19] Is the council happy?
[1:32:25] Question? You can
[1:32:26] question.
[1:32:29] I will ask one thing.
[1:32:30] Mr. Yugalsky.
[1:32:31] Mr. Fagan, uh, every
[1:32:33] the last two months we start working,
[1:32:35] I know you will soon.
[1:32:37] You will resign. And you
[1:32:38] are you working
[1:32:39] reduce some of these
[1:32:40] digits. I know that you
[1:32:42] they said you would have
[1:32:43] enough money. I don't want to be the one who
[1:32:46] believes that this fund
[1:32:47] not good enough,
[1:32:48] This one is there, but I don't like it.
[1:32:49] I like that you
[1:32:50] reduce this amount by
[1:32:52] every meeting, because
[1:32:53] this is not what you are
[1:32:54] were engaged in for
[1:32:55] the last 3 years.
[1:33:01] Is this a comment or
[1:33:02] question?
[1:33:03] It will be both.
[1:33:05] Good. Good. Any
[1:33:07] other questions,
[1:33:08] comments or actions from
[1:33:10] advice?
[1:33:10] I just got
[1:33:11] comment on the heel,
[1:33:12] we are going
[1:33:13] group them all
[1:33:14] together, so that in general
[1:33:15] add up to 20,000, right? What would
[1:33:16] you didn't want to.
[1:33:17] Uh, but in any case, and I today
[1:33:19] called, hmm,
[1:33:20] Well, I called.
[1:33:21] her, uh, trusted
[1:33:22] to the person of the town of Kul-
[1:33:23] Spring, Lois Zasonski
[1:33:24] , and informed her about
[1:33:25] this is because I know that she
[1:33:26] wrote
[1:33:26] email
[1:33:27] Mr. Fagan regarding
[1:33:28] this request, and, uh, I
[1:33:29] told her that if
[1:33:30] he will be approved
[1:33:30] tonight,
[1:33:31] of course, she
[1:33:32] hopes so
[1:33:33] and it will be, because it is very important to her
[1:33:34] will help.
[1:33:35] Good. This is useful
[1:33:36] information. Thank you.
[1:33:37] Proposal about
[1:33:38] approval of three sums
[1:33:39] for a total amount of 20,000
[1:33:40] dollars.
[1:33:41] Proposal about
[1:33:42] approval from the gentleman
[1:33:43] Kila.
[1:33:44] I support.
[1:33:45] Second. Supported by Mr.
[1:33:46] Molinaro.
[1:33:47] Everyone who supports
[1:33:48] proposal,
[1:33:49] confirm this,
[1:33:50] saying "yes".
[1:33:51] Yes.
[1:33:52] Against?
[1:33:52] No.
[1:33:53] Good.
[1:33:56] Proposal about
[1:33:57] transfer approval 14
[1:33:58] dollars.
[1:33:59] Proposal about
[1:34:00] transfer approval 14
[1:34:01] dollars from Mr.
[1:34:02] Kessler.
[1:34:03] Second.
[1:34:03] Supported by Ms. Heath.
[1:34:05] Regarding the discussion, I
[1:34:06] promised Mr. Fagan,
[1:34:07] what will we be
[1:34:07] discuss this with
[1:34:08] nausea. Sorry for "
[1:34:09] Bears, but we have
[1:34:10] What to work on.
[1:34:11] Everyone who supports
[1:34:12] proposal,
[1:34:13] indicate by saying: "I
[1:34:14] ".
[1:34:15] I-"
[1:34:15] Against". Thanks for that.
[1:34:18] Corner. Thank you all.
[1:34:20] Good. So, now we
[1:34:23] moved to the query
[1:34:24] corner about the transfer
[1:34:26] the amount of 325
[1:34:27] dollars.
[1:34:29] 325.
[1:34:30] More than
[1:34:31] enough.
[1:34:32] Ha?
[1:34:33] More than
[1:34:34] enough.
[1:34:34] Yes.
[1:34:36] Good. IN
[1:34:37] Does anyone have a question about this?
[1:34:38] No.
[1:34:39] IN
[1:34:40] Does anyone have any?
[1:34:40] suggestions?
[1:34:41] Offer.
[1:34:42] Proposal about
[1:34:42] approval.
[1:34:43] Offer.
[1:34:44] And a proposal from Mr.
[1:34:45] Ugalsky.
[1:34:45] Second.
[1:34:46] Supported by Ms. Heath.
[1:34:47] And a question from Mr.
[1:34:48] Molinaro.
[1:34:48] Training, right?
[1:34:49] Yes. I have two.
[1:34:50] Deputies who are leaving
[1:34:52] to class, hmm, 6
[1:34:53] October.
[1:34:53] Good.
[1:34:54] This is an offer for
[1:34:55] support, right?
[1:34:56] Yes.
[1:34:57] No, it's her money. This is not
[1:34:59] tax
[1:34:59] taxation.
[1:35:00] They are listed.
[1:35:01] So, you could say,
[1:35:03] What is it
[1:35:03] from my inevitable
[1:35:04] funds.
[1:35:05] Previously allocated?
[1:35:08] Good.
[1:35:09] Everyone who supports
[1:35:10] offer, mark,
[1:35:11] saying, "I am." "I". «
[1:35:13] Against". Thank you. Thank you
[1:35:16] for your patience.
[1:35:18] Good. Moving on to
[1:35:19] council comments and
[1:35:20] lawyer. Mrs. Heath. IN
[1:35:23] I am no more.
[1:35:23] comments.
[1:35:24] Mr. Molinaro.
[1:35:25] Go ahead, Bears.
[1:35:26] Mr. Peel.
[1:35:27] One quick question.
[1:35:29] If you are a manager
[1:35:30] department and you have
[1:35:31] request or something that you
[1:35:32] are you going to break
[1:35:33] question about the meeting,
[1:35:34] I would like to ask you.
[1:35:35] send it
[1:35:36] earlier than the day
[1:35:37] meetings. Today
[1:35:38] need to review
[1:35:39] many electronic
[1:35:40] letters, and, uh, to you
[1:35:41] need them
[1:35:42] sort into a specific
[1:35:43] moment. Uh, just
[1:35:44] send us this
[1:35:45] earlier. That's all. Thank you.
[1:35:47] We appreciate it. Thank you.
[1:35:48] Mr. Brussels.
[1:35:49] No comments.
[1:35:50] Mr. Ugalski.
[1:35:51] Forward, Southern
[1:35:52] Central.
[1:35:53] Sir
[1:35:54] Kessler. All
[1:35:55] good.
[1:35:55] Mr. Biggie.
[1:35:56] Nothing, sir.
[1:35:58] And I have nothing.
[1:35:59] So, uh, thank you all,
[1:36:00] who came. I am looking for
[1:36:01] your favorite
[1:36:02] part of the meeting.
[1:36:03] Proposal about
[1:36:04] closing.
[1:36:04] Mr.'s proposal
[1:36:05] Iglesias, friend
[1:36:06] Ms. Geet's suggestion.
[1:36:07] Everyone who is "in favor"
[1:36:07] confirm,
[1:36:08] saying "yes".
[1:36:09] Yes.
[1:36:11] Thank you.