1 00:00:01,360 --> 00:00:09,520 It is 3:34 April 16th, so we'll call this meeting 2 00:00:05,760 --> 00:00:12,640 to order. We have a quorum. First order of business is to approve 3 00:00:10,920 --> 00:00:16,240 the minutes. Is there a motion to approve the minutes? 4 00:00:14,080 --> 00:00:22,680 So moved. Second. Thank you. All those in favor 5 00:00:19,960 --> 00:00:25,360 Well, are there any clarifications or amendments? 6 00:00:25,760 --> 00:00:28,720 Corrections to the minutes? 7 00:00:28,880 --> 00:00:34,800 All those in favor, please say I. I. >> I. 8 00:00:32,040 --> 00:00:38,960 All those opposed, please say nay. Any abstentions? 9 00:00:36,680 --> 00:00:42,400 The minutes are approved. Next order of business is the approval 10 00:00:40,880 --> 00:00:48,320 of the claims. Is there any discussion about the claims 11 00:00:45,280 --> 00:00:48,320 brought forward this month? 12 00:00:55,000 --> 00:01:02,000 Hearing none, is there a motion to approve the minutes? Uh sorry, to 13 00:00:59,440 --> 00:01:05,880 approve the claims. So moved. 14 00:01:03,520 --> 00:01:09,200 Thank you. Second. Thank you. 15 00:01:07,760 --> 00:01:14,440 All those in favor of approving the claims, please say I. I. All those 16 00:01:11,960 --> 00:01:17,800 opposed, please say nay. Any abstentions? 17 00:01:16,960 --> 00:01:22,120 The claims have been approved. 18 00:01:20,200 --> 00:01:25,680 Is there any unfinished business to be brought before the commission? 19 00:01:27,240 --> 00:01:32,320 Hearing and seeing none, we'll move on to new business. 20 00:01:30,280 --> 00:01:36,160 First order of new business is a contract proposal from Baker Tilly. 21 00:01:38,920 --> 00:01:44,120 Good afternoon. We 22 00:01:42,280 --> 00:01:46,840 as we were looking through, there's a new requirement I'll start back at 23 00:01:45,840 --> 00:01:51,080 There's a new requirement in our state statute that requires 24 00:01:49,480 --> 00:01:56,040 any municipal entity or public entity to 25 00:01:52,680 --> 00:01:59,760 post on their website their services with financial advisors. And so 26 00:01:58,080 --> 00:02:05,320 as we started going through what current contracts existed for the RDC, we 27 00:02:02,520 --> 00:02:10,039 realized that we had not executed a new agreement for Baker Tilly for 2026. So, 28 00:02:08,479 --> 00:02:13,920 um, they obviously they were here last month. 29 00:02:11,480 --> 00:02:18,080 They assisted on the April 15th um, tip report uh, and have continued to 30 00:02:16,040 --> 00:02:22,880 provide as needed basis as needed services. So, uh, we reached out and 31 00:02:20,200 --> 00:02:26,600 asked them to provide a contract for 2026. 32 00:02:24,480 --> 00:02:30,360 Um, they've done so. Uh, it's set up to be DocuSign, so you do not have a 33 00:02:28,440 --> 00:02:36,120 physical copy of it today. Um, but the request would be for you to 34 00:02:32,040 --> 00:02:39,560 approve the Baker Tilly financial uh, 35 00:02:37,000 --> 00:02:42,440 analyst agreement for 2026 for the Redevelopment Commission. As you know, 36 00:02:40,959 --> 00:02:47,920 they assist in many of those kind of ongoing uh, regular reporting 37 00:02:44,560 --> 00:02:51,240 obligations that the RDC has to both the city council 38 00:02:49,920 --> 00:02:54,120 uh, and to to the Department of Local Government 39 00:02:52,520 --> 00:02:58,120 Finance. So, the request would be to authorize Greg to sign that um, on your 40 00:02:56,400 --> 00:03:01,519 behalf via DocuSign. 41 00:03:00,519 --> 00:03:04,560 Uh, is is there any difference between 26 42 00:03:03,360 --> 00:03:08,239 and 25? >> I think the only thing would be updated 43 00:03:06,000 --> 00:03:11,360 rates um, for them, which most folks are updating their rates. And I I frankly 44 00:03:10,120 --> 00:03:15,120 did not go back to look at what the comparison with rates are. Um, but 45 00:03:13,000 --> 00:03:17,880 they've been very fair with us. Okay. And and then the other question that I 46 00:03:16,280 --> 00:03:23,000 have is there are um, certain statements in that amendment 47 00:03:21,560 --> 00:03:27,000 uh, specifying that the city will do certain things. 48 00:03:24,600 --> 00:03:31,519 Has the city already agreed to do those and are those already in place? Cuz it's 49 00:03:28,880 --> 00:03:35,000 beyond the scope of the RDC. Yeah, so there some of those things are 50 00:03:32,840 --> 00:03:39,519 obligations of the of the uh, controller's office cuz the controller's 51 00:03:36,680 --> 00:03:42,560 office serves as treasurer to the Redevelopment Commission. And so, those 52 00:03:41,000 --> 00:03:45,959 would be some of those obligations under that agreement. Okay. And they're 53 00:03:44,400 --> 00:03:51,120 already in place to do those things. Yeah, or or we will make them in place 54 00:03:47,640 --> 00:03:51,120 to do them. Yes, sir. Okay. 55 00:03:53,760 --> 00:03:58,600 Any other questions about the updated contract with Baker Tilly? 56 00:04:04,720 --> 00:04:07,920 Is there a motion to approve the contract? 57 00:04:06,480 --> 00:04:11,560 » I guess I do have one other question. So So what we were provided was the 58 00:04:09,280 --> 00:04:16,840 amendment to the basic contract. Is there a broad city-wide document or 59 00:04:14,080 --> 00:04:20,640 » so there there's a 2020 2024 the Redevelopment Commission entered into an 60 00:04:18,480 --> 00:04:25,000 agreement with Baker Tilly and as many of those are they just do an amendment 61 00:04:22,120 --> 00:04:29,240 each year to kind of update scope and update rates. And so that's that's what 62 00:04:27,360 --> 00:04:33,280 you've been provided as the amendment to the Okay, so the So the base contract is 63 00:04:31,280 --> 00:04:37,040 still in place. This is just the 2026 amendment to that base contract. 64 00:04:34,960 --> 00:04:40,760 » and rates would be the things that would changed. Okay, thank you. 65 00:04:43,040 --> 00:04:50,680 Any other questions about the updated contract with Baker Tilly and 66 00:04:47,919 --> 00:04:50,680 the city of Lawrence? 67 00:04:52,720 --> 00:05:01,280 In so far as it pertains to the Economic Redevelopment Commission, is there a 68 00:04:57,360 --> 00:05:05,960 motion to approve the contract? So moved. 69 00:05:03,360 --> 00:05:09,400 Second. Thank you. All those in favor of approving the 70 00:05:07,200 --> 00:05:14,800 contract, please say I. I. >> I. All those opposed, please say nay. 71 00:05:12,840 --> 00:05:20,880 Any abstentions? So the contract is approved. 72 00:05:17,880 --> 00:05:25,720 The next item on the agenda is the Executive Director's report. Thank you. 73 00:05:23,520 --> 00:05:28,520 So Greg Goodnight, Executive Director of City of Lawrence Redevelopment 74 00:05:26,880 --> 00:05:32,880 Commission. Just a few things. Just a reminder, we have the opening of the 75 00:05:31,640 --> 00:05:39,360 bids for the Pendleton Pike Islands next 76 00:05:35,760 --> 00:05:41,800 Friday the week of 4:24 at 2:00 p.m. Um 77 00:05:40,680 --> 00:05:44,720 just had a couple meetings with different 78 00:05:43,240 --> 00:05:48,240 local property owners about their desires to redevelop their properties 79 00:05:46,560 --> 00:05:54,040 and their willingness to do that possibly themselves or with uh 80 00:05:51,480 --> 00:05:57,080 working with the developer. Uh we've had multiple meetings with multi-family 81 00:05:55,800 --> 00:06:01,480 developers uh throughout looking at different parts 82 00:05:58,880 --> 00:06:06,280 of Lawrence. And um just if if you didn't watch the April 6th City Council 83 00:06:04,200 --> 00:06:10,240 meeting, uh Dustin Meeks from Barnes & Thornburg uh I thought he gave a nice 84 00:06:08,200 --> 00:06:13,960 explanation to a to the to the council as to why city 85 00:06:12,320 --> 00:06:16,600 should be focusing on residential development versus commercial 86 00:06:15,400 --> 00:06:19,880 development. So if you get a chance to go back and review that, it's just a 87 00:06:17,919 --> 00:06:23,160 couple minutes. But I thought he did a good job and 88 00:06:21,280 --> 00:06:27,240 kind of nice information. Um other than that, I'm open for any 89 00:06:24,960 --> 00:06:31,200 questions. Yeah, Greg. Um 90 00:06:28,520 --> 00:06:31,200 in the 91 00:06:31,280 --> 00:06:38,440 in the bills that were paid this month that we approved, there was 92 00:06:35,240 --> 00:06:42,240 something regarding the Monarch property with Project Indigo. 93 00:06:40,240 --> 00:06:44,600 I don't that wasn't familiar to me. Is that something that we've already 94 00:06:43,400 --> 00:06:49,960 approved or something that we're going to be hearing about or 95 00:06:47,360 --> 00:06:55,440 Do you have those claims claims in front of you? 96 00:06:51,800 --> 00:06:59,000 It was from Creek DeVault, I believe. Oh, that 97 00:06:56,880 --> 00:07:02,240 we from time to time that I'm going to guess. Do you remember what the amount 98 00:07:00,040 --> 00:07:06,600 was? Was it a few hundred bucks? Um I don't remember off the top of my 99 00:07:04,600 --> 00:07:10,640 head. I think it was more than that. Okay. I think it was almost a thousand. 100 00:07:08,160 --> 00:07:15,000 So so so from time to time we'll get calls from the Indy Chamber, 101 00:07:13,440 --> 00:07:17,560 different groups, uh economic 102 00:07:16,040 --> 00:07:21,800 Indy what's the Indy Economic Development Corporation? 103 00:07:19,800 --> 00:07:25,440 And they'll they'll have leads on on the Monarch property and we'll kind of 104 00:07:23,080 --> 00:07:29,200 compile and give them some data on that. And I'm guessing that might that might 105 00:07:27,760 --> 00:07:32,760 be what that's for. I'd have to go back and look at it. 106 00:07:30,400 --> 00:07:32,760 Okay. 107 00:07:35,080 --> 00:07:41,480 Any other thing? Yeah, it was a it was a thousand dollars for Project Indigo, 108 00:07:38,640 --> 00:07:45,040 which again was not anything that So 109 00:07:42,520 --> 00:07:50,120 that be a uh A lot of times the economic development 110 00:07:46,760 --> 00:07:56,280 agencies will use a project name as they're looking for potential sites. 111 00:07:54,120 --> 00:08:01,080 And so, one of the things that backfilling that space, 112 00:07:59,320 --> 00:08:05,200 looking at restrictions in the existing bond 113 00:08:03,320 --> 00:08:11,280 documents, looking at looking at how the bond documents might be modified in 114 00:08:07,960 --> 00:08:15,440 order to incentivize a new potential user to come in. So, CREE CREE has 115 00:08:13,880 --> 00:08:18,720 served as the the 116 00:08:17,120 --> 00:08:23,760 redevelopment commission has not issued any bonds in this administration. Has 117 00:08:21,240 --> 00:08:26,840 been kind of in that capacity and so, I'm not bond counsel and so, if you have 118 00:08:25,200 --> 00:08:31,919 bond counsel questions, we would depend on CREE develop for feedback on those 119 00:08:29,200 --> 00:08:35,200 types of questions. So, that would be the 120 00:08:32,919 --> 00:08:39,400 the project name, I believe is probably what as Greg described. It is coming 121 00:08:37,880 --> 00:08:42,200 from one of the economic development 122 00:08:40,479 --> 00:08:45,000 organizations, whether that's a state or local. 123 00:08:43,479 --> 00:08:49,600 They would have attached that as a potential applicant and then would have 124 00:08:47,040 --> 00:08:53,520 been looking at the Monarch TIF specifically to see if there were 125 00:08:51,000 --> 00:08:57,000 opportunities for modification or utilization of 126 00:08:55,080 --> 00:08:59,440 incentives in that TIF district for that purpose. 127 00:08:57,560 --> 00:09:02,480 » Okay. Do we have any feedback on that or is it still in the works or 128 00:09:00,920 --> 00:09:05,880 » I have not heard anything back from it. And that that happens every couple 129 00:09:04,400 --> 00:09:10,800 months. They'll have some sort of lead and they'll they kind of put it in their 130 00:09:08,640 --> 00:09:15,120 in in their portfolios as potential options within Marion County or the 131 00:09:13,200 --> 00:09:17,720 general area. It seems like the last one did 132 00:09:15,839 --> 00:09:21,760 did it have the term the the title Cherry Blossom? I think that was one of 133 00:09:19,839 --> 00:09:25,160 cuz they usually don't disclose who the who the corporation is or something, but 134 00:09:23,560 --> 00:09:28,360 they usually give them names like that, so it's kind of 135 00:09:27,280 --> 00:09:33,480 Okay. Yeah. All right. Thank you. Yeah, thanks. 136 00:09:30,800 --> 00:09:33,480 Anything else? 137 00:09:34,200 --> 00:09:38,040 Is there an update on the overlay district? 138 00:09:38,960 --> 00:09:45,040 We have had Yeah, I I am I actually neglected to 139 00:09:43,480 --> 00:09:49,640 give that to you last month. I meant to give you an update on that last month. 140 00:09:47,200 --> 00:09:55,160 We actually had a meeting um with RAA, Greg, and myself uh with 141 00:09:52,880 --> 00:10:01,080 the city of Indianapolis 2 weeks ago Monday uh about it. The city 142 00:09:58,520 --> 00:10:04,320 of Indianapolis gave us some feedback, some 143 00:10:02,480 --> 00:10:07,960 verbal feedback, and we were anticipating getting their written 144 00:10:06,000 --> 00:10:10,480 comments and feedback. Um 145 00:10:09,160 --> 00:10:14,720 it's overdue from the city of Indianapolis. They wanted to 146 00:10:13,120 --> 00:10:19,520 There were some tweaks that they asked us to consider making, um which we not 147 00:10:17,120 --> 00:10:24,400 seen in yet. Uh once we see them, we will con- socialize that or circulate 148 00:10:21,920 --> 00:10:26,960 that as appropriate. Uh and once we have an agreement that the city of 149 00:10:25,600 --> 00:10:31,000 Indianapolis planning staff will support, then we can move forward with 150 00:10:28,640 --> 00:10:35,800 the introduction and moving forward. Uh we did emphasize the goal of having 151 00:10:32,920 --> 00:10:40,120 that completed yet this year. Um so that continues to be the the timeline that 152 00:10:37,760 --> 00:10:42,520 we're working on. Thank you. 153 00:10:45,280 --> 00:10:48,800 I have nothing else. Anything else? 154 00:10:49,040 --> 00:10:51,360 All right. 155 00:10:57,120 --> 00:11:02,440 Is there any other business to come before the commission? I I apologize. I 156 00:11:00,920 --> 00:11:07,680 should I was reminded of this when we were handed out the summary of of funds. 157 00:11:05,520 --> 00:11:11,480 Um we spoke Andy Mazur when he was here last month. We were talking through the 158 00:11:10,080 --> 00:11:17,680 various funds the three development commission has, and fund 408 uh is a 159 00:11:14,760 --> 00:11:21,040 debt reserve fund that is tied to the bonds that were just paid off, the 160 00:11:19,360 --> 00:11:24,280 Pendleton Pike bonds that were just paid off uh 161 00:11:22,200 --> 00:11:28,880 in December of last year. So that is a bond um 162 00:11:26,480 --> 00:11:33,400 debt reserve for that is no longer necessary to be held 163 00:11:31,320 --> 00:11:36,960 in a segregated account. Uh 164 00:11:34,320 --> 00:11:40,280 his suggestion was that we could simply uh as redevelopment commission 165 00:11:39,360 --> 00:11:45,920 um authorize the transfer of those funds to 166 00:11:42,520 --> 00:11:52,360 406, which is kind of your your main spending account. Uh and and closing out 167 00:11:49,160 --> 00:11:57,960 uh 408. So, I would ask that the commission um just take that action of 168 00:11:55,600 --> 00:12:02,760 authorizing the controller's office to uh 169 00:11:58,720 --> 00:12:08,040 to transfer funds from 408 to fund 406 and close out of 408 as it is no longer 170 00:12:05,480 --> 00:12:08,040 needed. 171 00:12:13,000 --> 00:12:20,720 Does anybody have any questions about that before we take action? 172 00:12:23,200 --> 00:12:28,240 Just clarify when you issue new bonds, generally you 173 00:12:26,360 --> 00:12:31,720 will have a debt reserve that's a requirement of the of the bond documents 174 00:12:30,600 --> 00:12:35,560 and that's required to be held in a segregated account if in So, in the 175 00:12:34,080 --> 00:12:40,040 event that you could never make a bond payment, they would you would call upon 176 00:12:37,560 --> 00:12:45,000 that debt reserve to make that payment. Now that those bonds are retired, you no 177 00:12:41,600 --> 00:12:47,280 longer need that debt reserve. Mhm. I could tell there was a question 178 00:12:45,920 --> 00:12:49,440 coming, so I was trying to preemptively answer. 179 00:12:49,680 --> 00:12:54,880 It may have been for me. I didn't have one yet. 180 00:12:52,080 --> 00:12:54,880 Thank you for that. 181 00:12:56,440 --> 00:13:01,400 I'm assuming that's a It seems like a pretty straightforward 182 00:12:58,920 --> 00:13:06,240 and risk-free move. Yeah, you you don't you can't access you 183 00:13:04,120 --> 00:13:10,640 can't spend money out of that fund. So, in order to access that $185,000, 184 00:13:09,240 --> 00:13:15,600 you need to move it out of that fund for that purpose. Okay. 185 00:13:12,400 --> 00:13:20,080 Is there a motion to transfer the the remaining funds in the debt 186 00:13:17,839 --> 00:13:24,240 reserve the bond debt reserve from 408 to 406? 187 00:13:22,880 --> 00:13:26,520 So moved. Second. 188 00:13:25,320 --> 00:13:31,440 Thank you. All those in favor, please say I. I. 189 00:13:29,040 --> 00:13:35,520 All those opposed, please say nay. Any abstentions? 190 00:13:33,280 --> 00:13:39,080 So, that motion is passed. Sure. 191 00:13:37,880 --> 00:13:41,960 Is there any other business to come before the commission? 192 00:13:44,400 --> 00:13:50,320 Seeing and hearing none, is there a motion to adjourn? 193 00:13:51,080 --> 00:13:55,920 So moved. Second. 194 00:13:54,200 --> 00:14:00,280 Thank you. This meeting is adjourned at 3:48.