1 00:00:00,160 --> 00:00:10,240 Call the meeting to order with the pledge of allegiance. Begin with 2 00:00:06,960 --> 00:00:16,480 » I aliance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic 3 00:00:13,200 --> 00:00:21,439 for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and 4 00:00:19,359 --> 00:00:27,039 justice for all. >> Thank you. 5 00:00:24,160 --> 00:00:33,280 Uh the third item on the agenda, review and approval of the April 27th, 2020 6 00:00:31,840 --> 00:00:36,239 six agenda. >> 7 27 7 00:00:34,480 --> 00:00:39,120 » 27 27. 8 00:00:37,200 --> 00:00:44,160 » I move we approve the agenda for April 27th, 2026 as 9 00:00:42,719 --> 00:00:46,640 um proposed. >> Four. 10 00:00:45,120 --> 00:00:53,039 » All in favor? >> I opposed. None. Motion carries. 11 00:00:50,480 --> 00:00:57,760 Now, we have to approve the March 23rd, 2026 regular planning commission meeting 12 00:00:56,160 --> 00:01:02,640 minutes. Um, you all should have gotten a copy of 13 00:00:59,920 --> 00:01:07,280 that. Uh, if you have any errors that need to be changed, any omissions, any 14 00:01:05,680 --> 00:01:14,680 misspellings, anything that we need to deal with. 15 00:01:10,880 --> 00:01:14,680 Now, I'll need a motion. 16 00:01:17,520 --> 00:01:28,479 I move we accept the uh planning commission's regular 17 00:01:25,200 --> 00:01:34,479 commission meetings for March 23rd, 2026 as written. 18 00:01:31,439 --> 00:01:39,280 » Thank you. All in favor? I opposed. None. Motion carried. 19 00:01:37,439 --> 00:01:44,640 » At this point in the meeting, we open it up to the citizens comments. Um, if 20 00:01:42,000 --> 00:01:50,320 you're here for the public hearing for the uh Edwards, that will come when we 21 00:01:48,000 --> 00:01:54,000 deal with that. That will be later. But at this point, it's anything else you 22 00:01:52,159 --> 00:02:00,399 want to talk to us about. If you have concerns, problems, um, 23 00:01:58,799 --> 00:02:03,560 we'll open up the floor to anybody at this point. 24 00:02:05,920 --> 00:02:13,520 Okay. All right. Then I'm going to close the 25 00:02:10,239 --> 00:02:19,879 citizens comments and participation. We will move into the zoning 26 00:02:15,360 --> 00:02:19,879 administrators report. Mariano, 27 00:02:20,319 --> 00:02:30,400 you all should have a copy of the reports for March. Uh clearly their mark 28 00:02:26,640 --> 00:02:35,680 for us. We have quite a few applications. 29 00:02:31,920 --> 00:02:41,599 only one uh violation written and looked into 30 00:02:37,440 --> 00:02:45,680 uh and then just uh notes on the meetings that we're having now and 31 00:02:43,840 --> 00:02:49,920 projects that are coming up in the next couple months. 32 00:02:48,160 --> 00:02:52,879 » Pardon me. I'm sorry I didn't hear that. >> Just meetings that are coming up. 33 00:02:51,599 --> 00:02:57,200 » Okay. >> And applications for 34 00:02:55,440 --> 00:03:04,280 » Okay. >> Okay. All right. All right. 35 00:02:59,920 --> 00:03:04,280 Um, any questions for Mariano? 36 00:03:05,760 --> 00:03:14,720 Nope. Okay, we'll move on to the next. Um, we are going into old business. We 37 00:03:13,040 --> 00:03:21,440 have been working on a data center ordinance for the township. 38 00:03:17,280 --> 00:03:29,959 Um our our planner has put together a comprehensive document 39 00:03:25,440 --> 00:03:29,959 that has a lot of um 40 00:03:30,720 --> 00:03:36,400 where we should look at where we're going to have make some definitions for 41 00:03:34,239 --> 00:03:44,560 the ordinance. We're going to have to change some um 42 00:03:40,480 --> 00:03:53,760 change some wording for like commercial uh data center versus computer sales 43 00:03:48,400 --> 00:04:00,080 computer center selling um or or fixing. So and I think there was some issues 44 00:03:57,599 --> 00:04:05,120 as regarding the number the restrictions that if because it is going to be a 45 00:04:02,159 --> 00:04:12,080 special use we can have so many restrictions that we can make it more 46 00:04:07,760 --> 00:04:18,720 palatable to the township. Um you all should have gotten the packet. 47 00:04:15,760 --> 00:04:25,360 Any question? I mean Dan kind of want to go over a little bit just kind of 48 00:04:22,560 --> 00:04:32,080 Yes. Thank you. Sure. To oversimplify 49 00:04:28,479 --> 00:04:38,720 um the issue, data centers are part of the use of permitted 50 00:04:35,440 --> 00:04:42,840 zoning or in research and office zoning district and have been for a while. 51 00:04:51,040 --> 00:04:58,000 » Thank you. um some of the issues that could come 52 00:04:53,280 --> 00:05:01,680 with the hypers scale data centers of um so what we're looking at with the zone 53 00:04:59,520 --> 00:05:06,800 ordinance amendment set of zoning ordinance amendments is to propose some 54 00:05:04,960 --> 00:05:14,240 definitions and clarify some things regarding data centers distinguish 55 00:05:09,039 --> 00:05:18,320 especially those data centers um since our last meeting we've had now 56 00:05:16,639 --> 00:05:22,720 three three other discussions about this issue so um I can kind of drill down 57 00:05:20,960 --> 00:05:27,759 some specifics we left off with in March. Um the comments in our packet 58 00:05:25,360 --> 00:05:32,800 regarding this are on page 8 following along in the packet. Um in March we 59 00:05:30,720 --> 00:05:35,840 gathered some comments when we address these will hopefully provide a 60 00:05:34,160 --> 00:05:41,759 comprehensive set of ordinance amendments. Um the first topic we uh 61 00:05:39,360 --> 00:05:45,840 discussed in March was to distinguish small scale from large scale data 62 00:05:43,360 --> 00:05:50,560 centers based on building core area. We initially had kind of distinction based 63 00:05:47,440 --> 00:05:55,360 on that acreage of the parcel. Um but having it based on building area is 64 00:05:52,960 --> 00:05:59,360 going to be easier to enforce from zoning administration standpoint and 65 00:05:56,960 --> 00:06:05,759 from just terms in terms of distinguishing these these building 66 00:06:01,520 --> 00:06:09,840 scale. And so we uh we did agree the plan commission gave direction that uh 67 00:06:07,680 --> 00:06:13,440 in no case should any data center be permitted use by right. Um, every one of 68 00:06:12,080 --> 00:06:18,160 them should have a public hearing through the special use permit process, 69 00:06:16,000 --> 00:06:24,080 whether they're large scale or small scale. Um, so we uh distinguish large 70 00:06:21,680 --> 00:06:28,319 from small at a size of 50,000 square feet. Um, I don't have an example of a 71 00:06:26,800 --> 00:06:32,560 community name off the top of my head, but I've seen one other community at 72 00:06:30,080 --> 00:06:38,240 least in Michigan do that distinction between large and small, but just to to 73 00:06:35,520 --> 00:06:42,880 draw a visual for you to understand what that looks like in your packet. um on 74 00:06:40,560 --> 00:06:51,120 pages 8 and n there are some visual examples of some sites that you consider 75 00:06:46,960 --> 00:06:57,840 around that 50,000 foot threshold. Um, five images in here. There is a uh two 76 00:06:55,919 --> 00:07:01,440 I'm just going to rattle them off here, but if you're familiar with any of them, 77 00:06:59,280 --> 00:07:09,280 we tried to find some in the area county. Um, the 242 community church in 78 00:07:05,039 --> 00:07:15,199 S Township, uh, about 51,000 ft. Um, there's a warehouse, flexible tent space 79 00:07:11,919 --> 00:07:23,280 at 7852nd Street in Dexter, up to the same size. Uh the bushes in um Dexter is 80 00:07:20,800 --> 00:07:28,639 roughly the same size. It's about 49,800 square ft. Uh here in Lima Township, 81 00:07:26,240 --> 00:07:34,560 there's a hilltop greenhouse and farms. Um oddly enough, the the greenhouse 82 00:07:32,639 --> 00:07:40,240 portion, kind of the transparent windows portion of that complex. Those green 83 00:07:37,520 --> 00:07:44,639 houses are about 80 feet in total. So give you an idea of what that looks 84 00:07:41,840 --> 00:07:49,599 like. The last example we had was from Chelsea. The hatch stamping a 85 00:07:46,479 --> 00:07:56,560 manufacturing site Chelsea. So from the outside these look like fairly navigable 86 00:07:54,319 --> 00:08:01,360 small mediumsiz warehouse or maybe mediumiz box retail store. So that would 87 00:07:59,599 --> 00:08:05,520 be the distinction where we start finding this. Um you know of course they 88 00:08:03,680 --> 00:08:09,599 all have a public hearing. They all have to go through the special use process. 89 00:08:07,680 --> 00:08:13,520 Um, but it's at that point where the ones that are smaller will have a a less 90 00:08:11,919 --> 00:08:17,919 sprinkled set of regulations and the ones that are larger. And that's what 91 00:08:15,680 --> 00:08:22,479 I'll get into from here to talk about what some of those regulations would be. 92 00:08:20,160 --> 00:08:28,160 Um, before I get into that, just to go in the sequence of the packet. We also 93 00:08:25,759 --> 00:08:33,120 uh put together a map that has the locations of the combined flood planes, 94 00:08:30,319 --> 00:08:39,279 wetlands, and county owner or recreation parcels um on page 11 of the packet. And 95 00:08:37,519 --> 00:08:44,399 uh so that's a map that shows you kind of where you could expect that 96 00:08:43,039 --> 00:08:49,120 if if you're the developer, a prospective developer of a large scale 97 00:08:46,480 --> 00:08:56,000 data center, um you know, I'm sure that you're looking for places that you don't 98 00:08:51,279 --> 00:09:01,120 have those kinds of barriers um to site usability. And so these would in all 99 00:08:58,560 --> 00:09:05,600 likely be places that that you wouldn't see u being targeted for hyperscale data 100 00:09:04,000 --> 00:09:11,760 centers. We don't know for sure, but just to give you an idea of what some of 101 00:09:06,880 --> 00:09:15,839 those environmental sense are um in it's I guess all these cases whether 102 00:09:14,080 --> 00:09:19,519 it's flood planes or wetlands and you have zoning ordinance restrictions 103 00:09:17,920 --> 00:09:24,399 against building those areas or restrictions with legal um or if it's 104 00:09:22,000 --> 00:09:28,800 the preserve parcels those are publicly owned parcels um there are going to be 105 00:09:26,720 --> 00:09:33,040 some barriers that that prevent you from being able to pursue this kind of use on 106 00:09:31,440 --> 00:09:39,040 those sites at least at a large scale. So just to give you an idea, I think um 107 00:09:36,160 --> 00:09:46,880 since mentioned that putting that map together, it's a good idea. 108 00:09:42,720 --> 00:09:51,600 You move down um later in your packet uh starting on page 14, we get into some of 109 00:09:49,120 --> 00:09:57,360 the specific updates that the planning commission asked us to look at and enter 110 00:09:54,160 --> 00:10:03,120 into set of amendments. The first one and we were kind of um 111 00:10:00,560 --> 00:10:07,040 debating this debating it but having an open-ended discussion about the closed 112 00:10:04,640 --> 00:10:10,959 loop cooling system requirement. Um the first thing we do here is to define what 113 00:10:09,200 --> 00:10:16,000 a closed loop cooling system is and there's kind of a generic definition. Um 114 00:10:13,600 --> 00:10:20,240 we you know I think as these ordinances get developed a lot of communities are 115 00:10:18,160 --> 00:10:24,720 working on definitions from different legal resources. We've certainly done 116 00:10:22,959 --> 00:10:28,640 that. and looked at some examples. And so a lot of this language overlaps with 117 00:10:26,320 --> 00:10:33,279 examples that we've seen. Um there's a definition for the closed loop going 118 00:10:30,320 --> 00:10:38,720 system in here which is you need to have a definition in order to link back to a 119 00:10:36,800 --> 00:10:42,560 term you use later in the zoning. This is just simply laying out what that 120 00:10:40,480 --> 00:10:47,519 would look like. It's a sealed system where uh coolant circulates continuously 121 00:10:45,440 --> 00:10:51,920 absorbing heat from the source and then transfers that heat through the heat 122 00:10:49,120 --> 00:10:59,200 exchanger for removal without uh coolant ever being exposed to the environment. 123 00:10:53,920 --> 00:11:04,720 Um which that that would apply to water coolant coming in and circulating uh 124 00:11:01,760 --> 00:11:11,120 inside of inside of closing environment. Um, we also 125 00:11:07,920 --> 00:11:14,640 have um on on pages 14 and 15 of your packet, we have the same amendments we 126 00:11:13,120 --> 00:11:18,720 looked at previously with adding the data centers to the light industrial 127 00:11:16,160 --> 00:11:22,800 district as special name uses, removing them from the research office district 128 00:11:21,040 --> 00:11:28,560 and then applying some of the terminology about uh computer repair 129 00:11:25,200 --> 00:11:33,839 that was associated with it into the village commercial district. You have 130 00:11:30,160 --> 00:11:37,040 more like retail commercial stores Then we get into this what are called 131 00:11:35,279 --> 00:11:43,200 the supplementary regulations which apply to specific special land uses. Um 132 00:11:40,160 --> 00:11:47,279 many special land uses have a set of specific requirements as we'll see with 133 00:11:44,720 --> 00:11:52,480 the the cemetery tonight. It's much simpler set of departments but uh 134 00:11:49,760 --> 00:11:55,839 special use requirements nonetheless. Um for data centers we've established some 135 00:11:54,320 --> 00:12:01,040 initial requirements under the supplementary regulations. Um the first 136 00:11:58,880 --> 00:12:08,079 one that I'll highlight is on page 15. we talk about the land area um for the 137 00:12:05,440 --> 00:12:14,560 small scale 50,000 foot and under these would be um we recommend they adhere to 138 00:12:12,399 --> 00:12:20,880 the minimum zoning district requirement of 1 acre and and surely they'll likely 139 00:12:17,600 --> 00:12:24,000 be larger if it's 50,000t building. Um but then you get into larger scale and 140 00:12:22,720 --> 00:12:30,000 that's where we can have a conversation about um scaling up the size of the 141 00:12:27,440 --> 00:12:34,320 building um or the size of the site based on the size of the building. You 142 00:12:31,519 --> 00:12:39,920 might have a a ratio of acreage based on the size of the building. For example, 143 00:12:36,079 --> 00:12:45,279 each fraction of um let's say 10,000 square ft um of building area. You might 144 00:12:43,040 --> 00:12:49,200 add an acre of land requirement, something along that those lines and we 145 00:12:46,880 --> 00:12:54,800 can look at developing that further. Or you might say based on the setbacks and 146 00:12:52,000 --> 00:12:57,519 um you know requirements for managing storm water on the site there's going to 147 00:12:56,240 --> 00:13:01,760 have to be a certain amount of open space based on a building of a certain 148 00:12:59,360 --> 00:13:05,279 size and sometimes the acreage of the site doesn't matter that much and in 149 00:13:03,040 --> 00:13:09,360 fact you might save some land for other uses or preservation purposes if you if 150 00:13:07,839 --> 00:13:13,519 you don't have a minimum acreage in there. So it's kind of a philosophical 151 00:13:11,760 --> 00:13:16,720 discussion. One item I ask you to look at as a planning condition is if you 152 00:13:14,880 --> 00:13:24,480 want a minimum acreage requirement for the large sites. Um, moving on to 153 00:13:20,320 --> 00:13:28,480 setbacks. On page 15, we have some uh specific setback requirements. Again, 154 00:13:26,639 --> 00:13:33,760 for the small sites, you might have the basic setback that's used in the zoning 155 00:13:31,120 --> 00:13:38,800 ordinance um for the light industrial zoning district. And then for the larger 156 00:13:35,519 --> 00:13:43,360 sites, uh looking at this 150 foot setback from lot lines to the building 157 00:13:41,279 --> 00:13:47,120 and 100 foot set back to the parking area. 158 00:13:44,959 --> 00:13:51,279 Um, fencing and screening is another item that we can have some flexibility 159 00:13:49,279 --> 00:13:55,279 on. There may be no specific fencing and screening requirement as long as you 160 00:13:53,120 --> 00:14:00,240 adhere to the other fencing requirements in the zoning ordinance. Uh, or you may 161 00:13:57,760 --> 00:14:07,360 have decorative fencing requirements. Maybe it's a 6ft tall 162 00:14:03,040 --> 00:14:11,440 metal um, decorative metal maybe a black or decorative metal fencing that would 163 00:14:09,040 --> 00:14:16,639 apply to a property like this or perhaps a brick screening wall. Um, we really 164 00:14:13,440 --> 00:14:19,839 haven't gone into the fencing and and uh wall requirements yet, but those are 165 00:14:18,320 --> 00:14:24,160 things that would be reasonable to ask for at least along the front of the 166 00:14:21,120 --> 00:14:28,639 property. Um, buffering and green belts, we recommend um again for the smaller 167 00:14:26,959 --> 00:14:33,279 sites adhering to the basic requirements, but for the larger sites, 168 00:14:30,959 --> 00:14:36,240 um, you might look at a 100 foot wide green belt maintained around the 169 00:14:34,639 --> 00:14:43,279 perimeter of the property in which there's a burm um at a 3:1 170 00:14:39,600 --> 00:14:49,120 uh rise. Uh, so basically a you have a a burn that rises at a rate of three feet 171 00:14:46,720 --> 00:14:52,800 for every three feet wide for every one foot tall. So, um to get up to that six 172 00:14:51,199 --> 00:14:57,760 foot height minimum that we recommend would be at least 18 ft on on both sides 173 00:14:55,519 --> 00:15:02,560 of the outside and then a 10ft kind of shelf minimum wage on the top where you 174 00:14:59,680 --> 00:15:06,800 plant trees. Um just to give some additional buffering and and spatial 175 00:15:05,199 --> 00:15:14,560 protection to neighboring properties there. Uh moving on to noise which is 176 00:15:09,680 --> 00:15:19,199 subsection G on page 16. We talked about changing the requirement from being 177 00:15:16,880 --> 00:15:23,680 based on the receiving building on a site nearby to being based on the 178 00:15:21,279 --> 00:15:28,480 receiving property line. And so the requirement here would be to keep it at 179 00:15:25,920 --> 00:15:33,519 measurement of no higher than 55 dB as measured at the nearest residentially or 180 00:15:30,079 --> 00:15:38,160 agriculturally zoned property line. Um and that's a pretty enforceable standard 181 00:15:35,519 --> 00:15:42,000 that you could use a sound study to um evaluate what the anticipated impacts 182 00:15:40,399 --> 00:15:49,199 are before you consider an approval project. Uh cooling methods again um to 183 00:15:46,880 --> 00:15:54,079 preserve the uh this is a new requirement again we added subsection J 184 00:15:52,320 --> 00:15:58,800 on page 16 would be to preserve the availability of nearby portable water 185 00:15:56,320 --> 00:16:02,320 supply and to maintain the integrity of various surface and groundwater 186 00:16:00,480 --> 00:16:06,240 resources. any data processing or computer center that proposes to use 187 00:16:03,839 --> 00:16:12,560 water cooling must do so primarily through a closed loop system or recycled 188 00:16:08,880 --> 00:16:15,600 water system. Um and then we could add something, this isn't in the packet, but 189 00:16:14,000 --> 00:16:21,920 we could add something that says if the a more efficient water usage um method 190 00:16:20,399 --> 00:16:26,880 is presented by the applicant, the planning commission and the board have a 191 00:16:24,000 --> 00:16:29,759 discretion to approve an alternate. Um if you'd like us to include something 192 00:16:28,240 --> 00:16:33,839 like that, we can include something like that. 193 00:16:30,800 --> 00:16:39,440 Um, and then another couple of items here moving down toward the bottom of 194 00:16:36,000 --> 00:16:43,600 the the list of of u components of this supplementary 195 00:16:41,120 --> 00:16:49,040 regulations. um the set of supplementary regulations, the decommissioning plan, 196 00:16:45,519 --> 00:16:55,199 there would be this kind of language that we borrowed or um over overlapped 197 00:16:52,480 --> 00:17:00,399 with a lot of from another example, but um looking at decommissioning and having 198 00:16:57,600 --> 00:17:05,439 some requirements for how the applicant shall include a decommissioning plan in 199 00:17:03,279 --> 00:17:09,919 their project that shows the anticipated life of the data processing center, the 200 00:17:08,160 --> 00:17:13,280 manner in which it's decommissioned, the actions that will be taken to resto 201 00:17:11,439 --> 00:17:17,280 restore the site, removal of the equipment, the estimated cost of 202 00:17:15,120 --> 00:17:20,160 decommissioning, the method for ensuring the owner and operator will have 203 00:17:18,880 --> 00:17:24,559 sufficient funds available to decommission later. Um, and then there's 204 00:17:23,039 --> 00:17:32,320 also a requirement in here that automatic decommissioning could kick in 205 00:17:27,439 --> 00:17:37,520 if um there is no operation at the data processing or computer center for more 206 00:17:34,000 --> 00:17:43,840 than one year. Um, then there would have to be decommission that sets in motion. 207 00:17:40,960 --> 00:17:48,720 So, all new aspects to think about there in addition to the other requirements 208 00:17:46,000 --> 00:17:54,320 that you see on page 16, well, actually page 14 through 17, which we um reviewed 209 00:17:52,080 --> 00:17:59,039 previously. Um, I guess the last thing I'll say is that, you know, kind of 210 00:17:56,640 --> 00:18:03,440 zooming back out, you and the planning commission are really only obligated to 211 00:18:00,559 --> 00:18:06,880 allow uses or approve uses through site review that are permitted in the 212 00:18:04,400 --> 00:18:10,960 underlying zoning district. Um and the township is really only obligated to 213 00:18:09,200 --> 00:18:16,080 engage in bringing a different zoning district to a parcel to make the um make 214 00:18:13,840 --> 00:18:20,720 a use available on that parcel through resoning if the resoning gels with the 215 00:18:18,880 --> 00:18:25,520 future land use map of the master plan. And so that brings us back to um kind of 216 00:18:23,679 --> 00:18:31,039 the fundamental issue here. There's very limited acreage in Lima Township on 217 00:18:28,160 --> 00:18:34,320 which it's zoned appropriately to allow all these things to kick in that we're 218 00:18:32,559 --> 00:18:41,200 describing here, especially for at least for large data center sites. Um and so 219 00:18:37,440 --> 00:18:47,280 another exercise that um that we're starting with this process is to um not 220 00:18:45,520 --> 00:18:51,360 make the conditions for a hyperscale data center with this set of zoning 221 00:18:48,720 --> 00:18:55,919 ordinance amendments in terms of setting aside a future land use map amendment or 222 00:18:54,000 --> 00:18:59,200 reszoning a bunch of property. We're not recommending any of that occurs right 223 00:18:57,520 --> 00:19:03,440 now, but what we are recommending is that there's at least a mechanism in the 224 00:19:00,799 --> 00:19:09,919 zoning ordinance to um bring in those discussions and allow study of areas um 225 00:19:07,120 --> 00:19:13,919 based on uh somebody demonstrating that there's a regional need and that 226 00:19:11,919 --> 00:19:18,080 environmental impacts will be satisfied and all those kind of high level 227 00:19:16,000 --> 00:19:24,080 planning goals um through a master plan amendment. um and that that sets the 228 00:19:20,880 --> 00:19:29,360 township up to not um fall into an issue of exclusionary zoning. So, there's um 229 00:19:26,880 --> 00:19:33,919 some some adjustments to the amendments section of the zoning ordinance that 230 00:19:30,720 --> 00:19:38,720 will allow um kind of a very specific process for kind of outside initiated 231 00:19:36,880 --> 00:19:42,720 master plan or future land use map amendment. um that allows the planning 232 00:19:41,039 --> 00:19:46,559 commission to bring in studies and allow people to make their case for kind of 233 00:19:44,640 --> 00:19:51,919 restarting the master planning process to um make room for large sites whether 234 00:19:49,679 --> 00:19:55,120 they're data centers or other uses. Um but just so that you have a means to 235 00:19:53,600 --> 00:20:02,720 recommend that to people so that there's not kind of a a no with no way to appeal 236 00:20:00,480 --> 00:20:06,640 more or less. So that's the the final aspect of this set of amendments is to 237 00:20:04,480 --> 00:20:11,760 have some specific language around amending the future land use map of the 238 00:20:08,799 --> 00:20:15,840 master plan. So with that we um we have some 239 00:20:14,480 --> 00:20:19,039 questions that could probably be answered with some additional discussion 240 00:20:17,679 --> 00:20:24,080 from the planning commission but otherwise we're happy to continue 241 00:20:21,760 --> 00:20:28,400 preparing this for an eventual uh public hearing. 242 00:20:25,600 --> 00:20:32,400 um you know coinciding with uh there's a moratorum that's going to be expiring 243 00:20:30,640 --> 00:20:36,640 here in a couple of months and we could probably get this close to finalization 244 00:20:35,039 --> 00:20:40,320 um around that time frame. So I'm happy to we're happy to answer any questions 245 00:20:38,559 --> 00:20:42,559 that you might have at this point and facilitate any discussion you want to 246 00:20:41,919 --> 00:20:47,480 have. >> Okay, 247 00:20:44,480 --> 00:20:47,480 » questioning 248 00:20:50,880 --> 00:20:59,520 fencing. What are pros and cons about um well screening versus fencing? I mean, 249 00:20:57,440 --> 00:21:03,200 do is it better to have a visual barrier or do you want to be able to see what's 250 00:21:01,039 --> 00:21:07,919 going on in there? >> Yeah, I I'm sure the proprietors in 251 00:21:05,760 --> 00:21:12,640 these places want to have a lot of security, but that can be done through 252 00:21:10,159 --> 00:21:17,440 means other than just walling them off. And I think that generally 253 00:21:15,520 --> 00:21:21,440 it's a best practice to shed some daylight on places to the best extent 254 00:21:19,039 --> 00:21:26,400 you can with uh maybe transparent fencing and landscaping um often serves 255 00:21:24,159 --> 00:21:32,320 the community better than having walls um even for large impactful sites. side. 256 00:21:29,520 --> 00:21:37,039 Now, if there's a need for a wall as a um as a sound barrier, if the sound 257 00:21:35,679 --> 00:21:40,000 study comes back and says that there would be a need to provide sound 258 00:21:38,559 --> 00:21:46,159 mitigation, that's certainly something we could allow for make make room for in 259 00:21:42,480 --> 00:21:49,600 the zoning ordinance. Um but primarily, uh it seems that the best approach for 260 00:21:47,679 --> 00:21:55,000 sites like this is typically put more of a decorative fencing around the 261 00:21:50,880 --> 00:21:55,000 perimeter and landscaping. 262 00:21:55,679 --> 00:22:01,200 » Okay. Yeah. And it does seem like they're going to want fencing anyway for 263 00:22:00,400 --> 00:22:03,600 security, >> right? 264 00:22:01,840 --> 00:22:11,600 » Um so that's fine. 265 00:22:07,600 --> 00:22:16,720 Um just a a and well on page 16 266 00:22:14,159 --> 00:22:22,360 letter J. Can we take out the word primarily? 267 00:22:18,720 --> 00:22:22,360 Seems like a loophole. 268 00:22:22,765 --> 00:22:30,320 » [clears throat] >> Yeah, I think that's a good 269 00:22:26,559 --> 00:22:36,080 recommendation to be clear. Um, along with that, would there be an 270 00:22:32,720 --> 00:22:40,799 interest in having a a way for a alternate 271 00:22:37,600 --> 00:22:44,080 water usage plan to be presented? I don't know what that looks like. 272 00:22:41,840 --> 00:22:47,919 » I think so. Yeah. >> Yeah. And that could be graywater uh 273 00:22:46,640 --> 00:22:51,679 recycling. Maybe some of it would be not 274 00:22:49,440 --> 00:22:55,520 technically um closed loop, but there may be some other ways that um 275 00:22:53,840 --> 00:22:59,440 manufacturers might recycle water that perhaps this isn't contemplating. So I 276 00:22:58,159 --> 00:23:04,400 think it's a good idea to strike primarily and then have something that 277 00:23:01,520 --> 00:23:09,840 says an alternative water usage plan would be proposed if 278 00:23:07,120 --> 00:23:14,240 that makes sense. >> And then I just had a question about the 279 00:23:11,600 --> 00:23:18,320 decommissioning. Um how does that work with the financing like the bond and 280 00:23:15,919 --> 00:23:22,880 letter of credit? Like if they have a letter of credit and we grant them the 281 00:23:21,679 --> 00:23:27,440 zoning, they build their thing and everything. Does the letter of credit 282 00:23:24,720 --> 00:23:33,039 can that be like withdrawn later and us not know about it or is it something 283 00:23:29,120 --> 00:23:36,080 that's created and continues? I'm not sure I'm asking that. I think 284 00:23:34,799 --> 00:23:42,000 you know what I mean. >> Yeah. Well, um, 285 00:23:39,840 --> 00:23:47,919 the letter of credit would typically have the municipality 286 00:23:44,880 --> 00:23:54,080 assigned on it so that there's a it's connected to L Township. Um, 287 00:23:52,000 --> 00:23:56,720 » so we're kind of the beneficiary sort of thing. 288 00:23:54,720 --> 00:24:01,919 » Yeah, I'm trying to think of examples. um whether it's a performance bond or a 289 00:23:59,600 --> 00:24:07,360 letter of credit u it's something that there would have to be typically the 290 00:24:04,480 --> 00:24:11,840 financial institution would file that with the municipality um so that I want 291 00:24:10,240 --> 00:24:17,600 to come back with a better answer on that um so that we know that that's a 292 00:24:15,840 --> 00:24:20,880 something that can't be received >> yeah I'd just like to understand how 293 00:24:18,960 --> 00:24:24,400 that works like if they the company folds and goes away 294 00:24:22,880 --> 00:24:30,080 » does the money go to the township and then the township is responsible for um 295 00:24:27,840 --> 00:24:34,400 administering that and yeah >> yeah that is the ultimate goal. Um yes 296 00:24:32,640 --> 00:24:39,360 we'll come back with some more research on that to make sure there's um sound 297 00:24:37,360 --> 00:24:44,559 returns on that. I'm not sure if there's anywhere else in the zoning ordinance we 298 00:24:40,720 --> 00:24:50,720 really get into um financial shies like that. We'll try to be consistent and 299 00:24:47,360 --> 00:24:54,640 make sure that what we write is legally defensible for sure. 300 00:24:52,080 --> 00:24:59,200 » Okay. That's all I had. 301 00:24:55,520 --> 00:25:04,960 » All you had. Anybody else? >> Um the only thing I said I agree with 302 00:25:02,240 --> 00:25:10,320 you on um Jay that if there's a more efficient 303 00:25:07,520 --> 00:25:18,159 water system that becomes a you know that is brand new. Yeah, brand new. Um 304 00:25:14,480 --> 00:25:23,679 that is better then we could maybe add something in there that if if that comes 305 00:25:20,799 --> 00:25:30,400 about then you know. And then the other thing is on uh monitoring wells for if 306 00:25:27,200 --> 00:25:36,559 it's a well septic piece of property. Do we one want to have a definition for 307 00:25:32,480 --> 00:25:42,240 what a monitoring well is and and just I mean just as long as it's 308 00:25:39,919 --> 00:25:49,279 noted in there that if it is well and septic that there may be what do we say 309 00:25:45,679 --> 00:25:53,679 go provide details for monitoring wells. >> Yes. Yeah. Yeah, I think having a 310 00:25:51,440 --> 00:25:56,880 definition is a good idea. Um, >> yeah, 311 00:25:54,320 --> 00:26:05,200 » we added some language in here that I didn't go over today. Um, subsection K, 312 00:26:00,480 --> 00:26:08,799 uh, there is a statement that, uh, trying to 313 00:26:07,039 --> 00:26:15,200 I'll read the last sentence because it's short. If the private private well water 314 00:26:12,720 --> 00:26:18,880 supply method is proposed, provide details for monitoring wells. So it's a 315 00:26:17,520 --> 00:26:23,360 very simple statement but there's a that's in the section about water usage. 316 00:26:21,039 --> 00:26:28,159 Um we also mentioned having water utilization report that's submitted with 317 00:26:25,200 --> 00:26:34,400 the application that shows intake volume water sources etc. So 318 00:26:31,039 --> 00:26:37,600 » um yes that that um details for monitoring walls they do a 319 00:26:35,840 --> 00:26:41,679 lot of latitude planning commission has to ask for you want to ask right but I 320 00:26:39,440 --> 00:26:45,440 think we should have a definition. All right. 321 00:26:43,440 --> 00:26:49,080 Um, the only other thing, let me see if there's anything else 322 00:26:49,279 --> 00:26:52,679 notes here. 323 00:26:54,000 --> 00:27:03,840 Okay. So, are we good with not saying the large scale 324 00:27:00,480 --> 00:27:12,240 um acreage amount for that? They are kind of um they be applicable as each 325 00:27:09,120 --> 00:27:18,159 tied to the size of the building. We good with that? Okay. All right. Then um 326 00:27:16,559 --> 00:27:21,039 and I think the minimum in light industrial is 1 acre. Is that correct? 327 00:27:20,640 --> 00:27:23,600 Yeah, >> it is. 328 00:27:21,679 --> 00:27:29,520 » Y let me see. 329 00:27:26,240 --> 00:27:33,919 I think that's it. And again, they're they're both going to 330 00:27:31,440 --> 00:27:37,679 be special uses. So, we do have some leeway. 331 00:27:35,120 --> 00:27:41,279 » We didn't talk about for the large ones. I think I don't think we talked about um 332 00:27:39,840 --> 00:27:42,799 specifying a minimum >> minimum acreage 333 00:27:42,000 --> 00:27:43,840 » acreage. >> Right. Right. 334 00:27:43,520 --> 00:27:48,480 » Yeah. >> Right. So, we're just going to leave it. 335 00:27:46,799 --> 00:27:50,480 » I don't know. But it was >> Are we 336 00:27:50,159 --> 00:27:52,720 » Yeah. >> What do we say? 337 00:27:52,080 --> 00:27:56,480 » Well, >> just let the block coverage ratio and 338 00:27:55,520 --> 00:28:00,399 all that kind of stuff, >> right? black coverage ratio and and 339 00:27:59,120 --> 00:28:02,880 maybe um >> limited 340 00:28:00,960 --> 00:28:11,279 » equivalent to the size of the building maybe or if the building gets too huge, 341 00:28:07,120 --> 00:28:17,840 would you want more acreage? >> Well, you made the good point. I mean, 342 00:28:13,039 --> 00:28:23,200 we could require more a larger ratio of land to building size, but then it's 343 00:28:20,000 --> 00:28:27,679 also taking more land off out of other uses. Mhm. 344 00:28:24,640 --> 00:28:32,320 » So we would be left with just letting it be determined by setbacks and lot 345 00:28:30,240 --> 00:28:34,399 coverage ratios and everything. >> Okay. 346 00:28:32,799 --> 00:28:36,240 » So I mean that's the question. Is everybody comfortable with that? 347 00:28:35,840 --> 00:28:38,720 » Right. >> Right. 348 00:28:36,720 --> 00:28:44,399 » Right. >> I would offer two I 349 00:28:41,679 --> 00:28:49,279 didn't see this. We talked about open space requirements. Um, you know, if you 350 00:28:47,039 --> 00:28:54,399 if you wanted to, you could keep it so that there's no minimum acreage 351 00:28:50,559 --> 00:29:01,279 requirement, but you could also have a requirement that states you need to 352 00:28:57,520 --> 00:29:04,880 maintain 25% of the site as open space or or something along those lines. We 353 00:29:03,039 --> 00:29:08,880 looked at some examples of what other communities have done for that. Of 354 00:29:06,480 --> 00:29:13,039 course, again, that makes us might be polluting the site, but it also ensures 355 00:29:10,960 --> 00:29:18,480 that that's um in a way that preserves natural resources, right? Helpful given 356 00:29:16,000 --> 00:29:21,360 all the environmental impacts. >> Yeah. If you could get some examples of 357 00:29:20,799 --> 00:29:26,320 that. >> Yeah. Yeah, that might be good because 358 00:29:24,240 --> 00:29:30,559 it looks like the setback for the large one would be 359 00:29:28,720 --> 00:29:36,799 say 15 >> 150 ft from all lot lines. 360 00:29:34,080 --> 00:29:40,480 » So, Well, what if they wanted to put some 361 00:29:38,559 --> 00:29:43,679 kind of power generation system? I mean, there's different requirements for 362 00:29:41,679 --> 00:29:49,039 setbacks on those. >> That's a good point. Um because we said 363 00:29:46,320 --> 00:29:53,679 specifically building and parking setbacks, 364 00:29:50,799 --> 00:29:57,360 » power accessory substation or something along those lines. It would be um just 365 00:29:55,679 --> 00:30:02,640 the default unless we make something specific for those. So if we wanted to, 366 00:29:59,840 --> 00:30:09,279 we could recommend that there's a 150 foot set back from buildings or 367 00:30:06,000 --> 00:30:12,000 accessory substations or similar power generation facilities, those kinds of 368 00:30:11,120 --> 00:30:22,080 things. >> Yeah, that that makes sense. 369 00:30:16,559 --> 00:30:27,120 Okay, anybody else? Any other comments? If not, 370 00:30:24,559 --> 00:30:33,279 I think we kind of giving you a little bit more direction and maybe we can I 371 00:30:30,080 --> 00:30:38,880 know we can't have a uh cannot have a public hearing for our 372 00:30:34,880 --> 00:30:43,440 next meeting because of Memorial Day and we're a week early. So, it would be June 373 00:30:41,919 --> 00:30:48,960 when we would have the public hearing for this if and that gives you a couple 374 00:30:45,760 --> 00:30:52,720 months to get get it kind of dialed in. >> Mhm. So 375 00:30:50,880 --> 00:30:57,840 » yeah, if we could try to get a revision done for the May meeting, um possibly at 376 00:30:55,840 --> 00:31:00,559 least an interim update and then have the hearing in June if that schedule 377 00:30:59,679 --> 00:31:03,600 still works. >> Yep. Yep. Okay. Does that sound good to 378 00:31:03,200 --> 00:31:07,919 everybody? >> Yep. 379 00:31:04,080 --> 00:31:14,559 » All right. Thank you, Dan. All right. Now, we're going to the new 380 00:31:10,559 --> 00:31:19,760 business, Edward Cemetery. Um, we'll start with and I don't know. Is 381 00:31:17,440 --> 00:31:23,440 there an extra survey for people to look at if they're here to talk about? 382 00:31:21,200 --> 00:31:28,880 » You need to um Oh, >> really? 383 00:31:24,480 --> 00:31:31,760 » Yeah. Yeah. I put an extra copy survey >> that lets people know what they're 384 00:31:30,320 --> 00:31:36,080 talking about. >> Yeah. I just have one extra. I thought 385 00:31:34,240 --> 00:31:39,039 we were going to get big ones brought. Did you bring some big ones, Mariano? 386 00:31:38,080 --> 00:31:42,880 » No. >> Oh, you can use mine, too. 387 00:31:41,200 --> 00:31:46,320 » Yeah, you can use mine. Just get As long as I get it back, I'm good. 388 00:31:44,080 --> 00:31:51,880 » No, let him use mine. I I'll have him use mine and then my other spare. 389 00:31:48,480 --> 00:31:51,880 » Okay. Okay. 390 00:31:52,640 --> 00:32:01,159 » That way you can keep an eye. You know, you know what we're talking about. 391 00:31:58,159 --> 00:32:01,159 » Okay. 392 00:32:03,120 --> 00:32:10,720 I guess what we'll do is um first what I'd like to do 393 00:32:08,799 --> 00:32:14,960 » is before the public hearing I'd like is the applicant here? 394 00:32:12,320 --> 00:32:19,840 » Okay. What I'd like you to do is say what you're planning on doing 395 00:32:17,440 --> 00:32:25,360 and then we'll open it up to the public for their comments and concerns 396 00:32:22,320 --> 00:32:30,399 questions. And if you have a question or concern, you got to address us, not 397 00:32:27,360 --> 00:32:33,679 them. So, okay. All right. So you can just kind of tell us what you're 398 00:32:31,840 --> 00:32:39,120 planning on doing. >> Well, just a simple 16 sight family 399 00:32:36,159 --> 00:32:44,080 cemetery with a simple fence around it. We've got a nice clear spot away from 400 00:32:41,120 --> 00:32:47,919 anyone else's view on our property. Um we picked out so far. It's visible in 401 00:32:46,480 --> 00:32:51,919 that survey you guys have in your packets. 402 00:32:49,440 --> 00:32:55,519 Um I don't know how many personal details you want to know. That's about 403 00:32:53,120 --> 00:32:58,480 all as far as factual business details. Um 404 00:32:56,240 --> 00:33:02,480 » okay. All right. Then I and now we we'll open 405 00:33:01,039 --> 00:33:06,000 up for the public hearing. >> Do you want Dan do his review? 406 00:33:04,480 --> 00:33:08,720 » Well, yeah, Dan, I guess you could do your review. 407 00:33:07,440 --> 00:33:12,039 » Or you think we should do the public hearing first? 408 00:33:12,080 --> 00:33:20,000 » I guess if if my review it might help u clear up some details maybe. 409 00:33:18,320 --> 00:33:22,720 » All right, why don't we do that? Do your review 410 00:33:21,279 --> 00:33:27,440 » and then you guys get >> Sorry. Sorry everybody waiting. Um, 411 00:33:26,159 --> 00:33:31,200 thank you everybody for letting us comment on this request. Um, the 412 00:33:29,679 --> 00:33:36,960 applicant's materials in your packet start on page 22. I think that some of 413 00:33:34,399 --> 00:33:42,240 those materials I did not um cover my report, but I do want to mention the 414 00:33:38,799 --> 00:33:48,399 applicant uh submitted responses to the special land use 415 00:33:45,440 --> 00:33:54,559 criteria from section 334 of the zone or which I refer to as well and they 416 00:33:51,840 --> 00:34:00,720 provided their own answers to the um the criteria and uh I just encourage you to 417 00:33:57,200 --> 00:34:04,320 look at those um because they they give a lot of personal detail in the 418 00:34:02,399 --> 00:34:08,800 background that um this report does not necessarily get into. Um so I just want 419 00:34:07,360 --> 00:34:13,760 to mention that they've submitted materials. Um of course our report 420 00:34:11,520 --> 00:34:20,079 starts around page 34 and I'll get into my comments here. 421 00:34:17,119 --> 00:34:26,159 Um as mentioned I think this is a request for a a private cemetery. uh 422 00:34:23,119 --> 00:34:31,040 private cemetery is a permitted special need use in the RR rural residential 423 00:34:29,200 --> 00:34:36,879 zoning district which is this parcel zoning uh under the line of zoning 424 00:34:33,440 --> 00:34:42,480 ordinance. Um the parcel is zone rural residential. It's also master plan for a 425 00:34:39,520 --> 00:34:46,720 one one to 5 acre parcels which uh aligns with that zoning. There are no 426 00:34:44,560 --> 00:34:51,440 flood zones or wetlands that appear on public uh publicly available mapping on 427 00:34:49,119 --> 00:34:58,320 the site. Um the submitts that were provided include uh six sheets uh sealed 428 00:34:55,679 --> 00:35:03,359 by a surveyor. There's a vicinity sketch uh parcel boundary cemetery survey 429 00:35:00,560 --> 00:35:07,920 cemetery details and two sheets of legal descriptions. 430 00:35:05,040 --> 00:35:11,359 Um this is a special land use and because uh special land uses require 431 00:35:10,079 --> 00:35:16,480 site plan review under the zoning ordinance um all requirements under 432 00:35:14,400 --> 00:35:21,040 article 7 of the zoning ordinance were reviewed with this report and so we're 433 00:35:19,040 --> 00:35:25,839 obligated to kind of call all them out. I know this is a long report um pretty 434 00:35:23,200 --> 00:35:30,320 simple site we work through findings on all these requirements. Um some of these 435 00:35:28,240 --> 00:35:34,720 standards are not applicable to a site of this nature. It's not a um it's not a 436 00:35:32,720 --> 00:35:39,440 site that has any paving or or very detailed design um features and so some 437 00:35:37,920 --> 00:35:44,480 of the requirements don't apply but some do. I'll just summarize the ones that um 438 00:35:42,320 --> 00:35:51,040 would apply from article 7 that don't appear to be provided so far. Um the 439 00:35:47,680 --> 00:35:55,440 first one is relating to uh topographic information. If the surveyor um can 440 00:35:53,200 --> 00:36:00,720 provide some elevation data, some grading information proposed or existing 441 00:35:58,640 --> 00:36:04,880 contours, I assume the topography is not going to change very much. Um that would 442 00:36:02,640 --> 00:36:09,520 be something we look for on the plans. Um simple request is to have the name, 443 00:36:08,400 --> 00:36:16,560 address, and phone number of the property owner um 444 00:36:12,720 --> 00:36:19,440 and the uh applicant on the actual site plan drawings. I know the surveyor's 445 00:36:18,000 --> 00:36:26,160 information was on those drawings, but having owners on there as well would be 446 00:36:22,480 --> 00:36:31,280 required under article 7. We also would look for um the proposed there's a 447 00:36:29,760 --> 00:36:35,280 section that pertains to proposed streets and driveways. Um within that 448 00:36:33,440 --> 00:36:40,079 section, what appears to be missing that should be provided is the propos 449 00:36:36,800 --> 00:36:44,400 proposed surface type and width of the access driveway. Uh there's an easement 450 00:36:42,079 --> 00:36:49,680 that's provided. I didn't see the the surface materials um for the the width 451 00:36:47,760 --> 00:36:56,160 of the driveway. So, those details should be added. Um moving down to some 452 00:36:53,760 --> 00:37:00,240 other standard information, just adding notes pertaining to the existing zoning 453 00:36:57,920 --> 00:37:06,000 of the site and the surrounding sites. Uh we're looking for required yard 454 00:37:02,880 --> 00:37:08,960 setbacks and that can just be a list um coming from article 4 of the zoning 455 00:37:07,599 --> 00:37:13,520 ordinance. There can be a list of what the setback requirements are. Uh, and 456 00:37:11,200 --> 00:37:18,800 then landscaping strips is something that the zoning ordinance calls out in 457 00:37:16,320 --> 00:37:22,640 article 7 here. There's a more specific section that pertains to landscaping 458 00:37:20,400 --> 00:37:27,520 that I'll go in greater detail on a little bit later so we can talk about 459 00:37:23,920 --> 00:37:30,800 that then. Um, it appears there are no buildings and I 460 00:37:29,599 --> 00:37:34,240 mentioned that a couple times in the report, but I just wanted to verify 461 00:37:31,920 --> 00:37:41,760 there would be no elevated structures. Is that correct? Headstones. Okay. Um 462 00:37:38,160 --> 00:37:46,400 and um we also mentioned in this section the 463 00:37:44,079 --> 00:37:50,960 last thing is just uh means of water providing water if there's any well 464 00:37:48,240 --> 00:37:55,520 water that available for irrigation or for um you know watering uh watering 465 00:37:54,079 --> 00:38:00,320 bases or anything of that nature. So just giving some details on supposed 466 00:37:57,119 --> 00:38:04,079 watering methods. Um and moving into the supplementary regulations for cemeteries 467 00:38:02,320 --> 00:38:08,880 under [clears throat] section 512 of the zoning ordinance. Um I'll again just go 468 00:38:07,200 --> 00:38:13,760 over what was not provided or what's not available from the plans. Um 469 00:38:12,079 --> 00:38:18,720 you know setbacks are not a concern. They they uh meet all I will say the 470 00:38:16,960 --> 00:38:24,240 planning how this is written the planning commission um she'll be re 471 00:38:21,839 --> 00:38:28,800 reviewing the proposed setbacks to make sure that they're appropriate u based on 472 00:38:26,400 --> 00:38:34,320 the existing planned neighboring land uses. Um the site is over 100 feet from 473 00:38:31,520 --> 00:38:39,680 any lot line and it's very um apparently low impact use and setbacks appear to be 474 00:38:37,520 --> 00:38:44,000 adequate from a planning perspective. Um that's ultimately up to the planning 475 00:38:41,040 --> 00:38:47,520 commission. Um there should be no building located closer than 100 ft of 476 00:38:46,240 --> 00:38:52,960 the property line and there are no buildings. Um getting to what's what's 477 00:38:50,800 --> 00:38:57,839 not met here. There needs to be adequate what calls off streetet waiting space 478 00:38:55,680 --> 00:39:02,800 provided for funeral processions. the no vehicle stands or waits in a dedicated 479 00:38:59,680 --> 00:39:08,079 driveway. Um there is significant uh access driveway length that is provided 480 00:39:06,160 --> 00:39:12,560 but we would ask that the applicant just show where they anticipate having the 481 00:39:10,640 --> 00:39:19,920 off streetet waiting space designated on the site and um along with that uh you 482 00:39:17,280 --> 00:39:24,720 know an estimate of the ant anticipated highest number of vehicles on the site. 483 00:39:21,680 --> 00:39:28,240 Um, you know, it's kind of a thing you don't want to have to think about too 484 00:39:26,720 --> 00:39:34,640 much or estimate, but we do want to have some perspective of um how many vehicles 485 00:39:31,200 --> 00:39:40,079 will be on the site at once. Um, we also mentioned um that there's a 486 00:39:38,160 --> 00:39:46,000 public road access. This is a parcel that's got two narrow access points to 487 00:39:42,960 --> 00:39:50,960 the public roads on Sci Church Road along the north edge of the site and 488 00:39:47,760 --> 00:39:54,480 then um more specifically on Fletcher Road where the driver will be entering 489 00:39:52,560 --> 00:39:59,040 the roadway. There is a proposed easement uh and we have other comments 490 00:39:56,640 --> 00:40:02,880 regarding the easement. Um we would ask ultimately that whatever easement is 491 00:40:00,560 --> 00:40:06,400 provided is recorded um with the Washington County Register of Deeds and 492 00:40:04,320 --> 00:40:11,040 then provided to the township within 45 days of recording. 493 00:40:08,400 --> 00:40:14,480 um give or take that can be up to what the sometimes the timing of those things 494 00:40:12,640 --> 00:40:21,520 takes longer or shorter. So that can be up to the township to determine. Um we 495 00:40:18,079 --> 00:40:25,040 also recommend the uh documentation of perpetual care and maintenance is 496 00:40:23,440 --> 00:40:29,760 provided with the easement or the easement agreement. Um so there's 497 00:40:27,760 --> 00:40:34,000 demonstration of perpetual care on that property. Um getting into the location 498 00:40:32,320 --> 00:40:39,280 and site arrangement. Again, this is a partial the actual parcel on which the 499 00:40:36,320 --> 00:40:43,040 cemetery plot is proposed is uh officially landlocked. There's zero 500 00:40:40,880 --> 00:40:49,359 frontage and so they would have to use the parcel to it which I call parcel one 501 00:40:45,760 --> 00:40:52,240 in the site step plan report at 2071 South Fletcher Road. There's a home on 502 00:40:50,880 --> 00:40:56,400 that parcel and then the parcel the cemetery will be on is landlocked. Um it 503 00:40:54,640 --> 00:41:00,000 appears that there are solid lines on the survey drawings showing that the 504 00:40:58,079 --> 00:41:07,520 cemetery is further divided from that parcel. Um I would recommend against any 505 00:41:03,200 --> 00:41:13,040 site that has a true real property um that's divided out there because that 506 00:41:09,920 --> 00:41:17,040 will run into frontage limits and issues with the land division act. So in in its 507 00:41:15,040 --> 00:41:22,640 place that should be a recorded easement rather than a new divided parcel. Um and 508 00:41:20,400 --> 00:41:29,200 that would alleviate a lot of concerns. Um although not all. I will I'll mention 509 00:41:24,880 --> 00:41:35,359 some more further down here. Um I uh 510 00:41:31,359 --> 00:41:41,599 I mentioned in the report um that this is a parcel that because it's landmocked 511 00:41:38,319 --> 00:41:46,480 it's um it's has to use the property in front of it and it's essentially a zero 512 00:41:43,280 --> 00:41:51,839 frontage parcel which under section 12.2 to the zoning ordinance. Any lot that's 513 00:41:48,560 --> 00:41:57,520 been created that has zero frontage or non-conforming frontage is required to 514 00:41:54,480 --> 00:42:01,520 be seen as a non-conforming lot on which you can only build a single family home 515 00:41:59,520 --> 00:42:05,119 or an accessory um building that's customarily 516 00:42:03,440 --> 00:42:10,160 incidental to the home. So, picture a shed or an accessory building with a 517 00:42:07,200 --> 00:42:14,800 home. Um the zoning ordinance does not capture private cemeteries under that 518 00:42:12,960 --> 00:42:21,920 terminology. And so we run into the issue with this parcel um that you you 519 00:42:18,880 --> 00:42:26,319 can't build a new use like a private private cemetery on a parcel of that 520 00:42:23,760 --> 00:42:32,400 nature um unless you get approval from the board of zoning appeals. And so this 521 00:42:29,119 --> 00:42:36,480 review ultimately um has to get back to the zoning board of appeals. It's 522 00:42:34,400 --> 00:42:41,760 interchangeable DZA, ZBA, whatever you want to call whatever it's officially 523 00:42:39,040 --> 00:42:47,520 called. I think it's the ZBA. um they'll have to go to the ZVA for approval. Um 524 00:42:44,319 --> 00:42:51,119 per section 12.2 paragraph 3 um basically says to build anything like we 525 00:42:49,440 --> 00:42:55,119 had a couple months ago with a different project other than a single family home, 526 00:42:53,440 --> 00:42:59,119 you have to get approval from the ZBA. So 527 00:42:56,079 --> 00:43:03,200 » um the complicating news with that is that there has to be an application to 528 00:43:00,640 --> 00:43:09,760 the ZBA. Basically has to go through the the dimensional variance type of review. 529 00:43:05,920 --> 00:43:12,720 Um, I will say that just glancing at some of the criteria that's been 530 00:43:11,359 --> 00:43:16,400 addressed with the special land use application, um, probably some of that 531 00:43:15,119 --> 00:43:19,920 can translate to a zoning board of appeals application as well, but 532 00:43:18,000 --> 00:43:25,040 ultimately that's a separate application that has to go to the CDA. Um, and 533 00:43:23,200 --> 00:43:27,920 that's the most significant issue. It's um, really comes down to the 534 00:43:26,480 --> 00:43:32,319 configuration of the land, making sure that there's no new splits and based on 535 00:43:30,560 --> 00:43:36,960 the fact that this is a landlock parcel that it goes through the appropriate 536 00:43:33,680 --> 00:43:41,599 review process. Um, moving to the rest of my comments, there are no concerns 537 00:43:39,680 --> 00:43:46,000 with uh any other dimensional requirements of the property. Um, 538 00:43:43,680 --> 00:43:49,520 there's no concerns about height um of any buildings. Of course, there's no 539 00:43:47,599 --> 00:43:54,000 density because there's no dwelling units here. um the width of the parcel 540 00:43:52,000 --> 00:43:59,040 is sufficient for the use that's required in terms of the the width of 541 00:43:55,920 --> 00:44:02,720 the the parcel once you get into the parcel even though the official um 542 00:44:01,359 --> 00:44:08,240 technical width of the parcel is determined by its frontage which there 543 00:44:04,400 --> 00:44:12,720 is zero width as we discussed um on page 42 of the packet uh there's some 544 00:44:10,640 --> 00:44:15,920 discussion of landscaping um I will say that under anything that 545 00:44:14,400 --> 00:44:20,560 requires site plan review all of the landscaping standards or those zoning 546 00:44:17,359 --> 00:44:27,520 ordinance apply um but only the specific requirements. Um I I go through these 547 00:44:25,280 --> 00:44:31,520 one by one. Um some of the zoning ordinance landscaping requirements are 548 00:44:28,960 --> 00:44:36,319 based on parcels that have parking lots or required parking areas. There is no 549 00:44:34,319 --> 00:44:40,319 minimum required parking lot for a cemetery. And so essentially that's a 550 00:44:38,560 --> 00:44:45,040 non-applicable requirement. There's no required landscaping based on parking. 551 00:44:42,720 --> 00:44:48,000 Um there's no frontage and so there's no required landscaping based on 552 00:44:46,840 --> 00:44:53,359 [clears throat] the frontage or green belt of the site. Uh there's no 553 00:44:50,079 --> 00:44:56,800 buildings and that alleviates um two aspects of landscaping that would 554 00:44:54,800 --> 00:45:01,119 typically apply where you have to do perimeter landscaping around a building 555 00:44:58,880 --> 00:45:05,280 and also there's an requirement of screening between buildings and 556 00:45:03,280 --> 00:45:10,960 residential uses and in this case there's no building on this site. Um so 557 00:45:09,200 --> 00:45:15,119 officially you go through the list and there are no specific landscaping 558 00:45:13,200 --> 00:45:18,880 requirements. However, the planning commission may recommend specific 559 00:45:16,800 --> 00:45:22,079 landscaping as a condition of their special land use approval to make sure 560 00:45:20,400 --> 00:45:26,000 this use coheres with the the neighboring properties and blends in 561 00:45:23,680 --> 00:45:30,400 well. Um and that's the discretion of the planning commission. One thing I 562 00:45:28,160 --> 00:45:34,720 will mention related to that going back to the arrangement of the site um this 563 00:45:33,040 --> 00:45:40,960 is a the way it's drawn up you'll see that the access ement on their middles. 564 00:45:37,839 --> 00:45:47,520 It kind of goes across that um the flag portion of their property at 2071 South 565 00:45:43,920 --> 00:45:51,920 Fletcher. Um but then it crosses over part of that property kind of on an 566 00:45:50,000 --> 00:45:56,560 angle. And one recommendation I would have um fully understanding there's not 567 00:45:54,079 --> 00:46:00,160 an intent for the the home site that would be changing hands or changing 568 00:45:58,240 --> 00:46:04,079 families, but there is always the chance that that will occur. So my 569 00:46:02,079 --> 00:46:09,599 recommendation would be to make the easement flush with the property line so 570 00:46:06,880 --> 00:46:13,680 that um if ever there is a split between the the use of the private sanitary one 571 00:46:11,839 --> 00:46:17,200 family and whoever's living in the house that there's a kind of a a clean 572 00:46:15,520 --> 00:46:21,200 separation there and that there's no need to kind of cross over the easement 573 00:46:18,960 --> 00:46:25,520 or share that part of the property more than is necessary. Um that's a little 574 00:46:23,280 --> 00:46:28,800 bit nit nitpicky, but it just would clean up a potential access concern in 575 00:46:27,359 --> 00:46:34,240 the future if there is ever a split where the family is no longer associated 576 00:46:31,119 --> 00:46:37,440 with um the frontage parcel. Uh so that's just one recommendation. I I kind 577 00:46:35,920 --> 00:46:41,680 of put a little graphic in the packet that shows having that ease flush with 578 00:46:40,000 --> 00:46:45,359 property line, maybe widened out a little bit so that there is room to 579 00:46:42,880 --> 00:46:50,240 plant some trees or have uh some some greenway separating that house. Um, and 580 00:46:48,800 --> 00:46:53,680 that's really the discretion of the planning commission if they want to 581 00:46:51,359 --> 00:46:58,800 adopt that as a condition of approval. Um, and uh up to the applicant how they 582 00:46:56,800 --> 00:47:03,280 would plan that unless the planning commission has specific requirements 583 00:47:00,400 --> 00:47:08,240 that they impose on that. Um, my report also includes special land use findings 584 00:47:06,160 --> 00:47:11,599 on page 44. Uh, because this is a special land use and zoning ordinance. 585 00:47:09,839 --> 00:47:17,680 Um, I will try to summarize these as best possible. Um the first is that the 586 00:47:15,760 --> 00:47:21,680 uh special land use will be harmonious and in accordance with the general 587 00:47:19,040 --> 00:47:25,599 objectives of the township master plan. Um 588 00:47:23,520 --> 00:47:29,280 the the cemetery will be anticipated to bring low levels of traffic to the site. 589 00:47:27,760 --> 00:47:33,280 There will be use that's compatible with preservation of low inensity land use 590 00:47:31,200 --> 00:47:38,079 that's typical of the agricultural zoning districts. So um it appears that 591 00:47:35,599 --> 00:47:42,240 that standard doesn't matter. Um the use has to be designed, 592 00:47:40,480 --> 00:47:45,680 constructed, operated and maintained so as to be harmonious and appropriate in 593 00:47:44,000 --> 00:47:51,119 appearance with the existing or intended character of the area. Um again this is 594 00:47:48,079 --> 00:47:57,440 a small site 2288 ft of total uh cemetery plot space um on 595 00:47:55,440 --> 00:48:02,560 over 9 acres of land that's presumed to be largely open space. So again 596 00:48:00,079 --> 00:48:06,319 harmonious it will be anticip anticipated to be harmonious with its 597 00:48:04,319 --> 00:48:10,319 surroundings. Um it's also not anticipated to be hazardous or 598 00:48:07,920 --> 00:48:15,280 disturbing to existing and nearby uses uh which is one of the criteria we have 599 00:48:12,240 --> 00:48:19,760 to look at um in section C. Um so long as the appropriate approvals are um 600 00:48:18,480 --> 00:48:24,160 received from the county health department. I believe that standard has 601 00:48:21,599 --> 00:48:29,119 been met um that the use is compatible with existing and adjacent uses of land 602 00:48:26,800 --> 00:48:32,480 um and will promote the use of land in a socially and economically desirable 603 00:48:30,640 --> 00:48:35,760 manner. Uh the proposed use will have minimal impact on the adjacent 604 00:48:33,760 --> 00:48:42,319 properties and will allow the subject site and adjacent properties to develop 605 00:48:38,240 --> 00:48:46,079 in whatever manner they choose in a in a socially and economically desirable 606 00:48:43,839 --> 00:48:50,319 manner. Essentially uh whether the site will be served 607 00:48:47,839 --> 00:48:54,319 adequately by public water uh private public or private water and waste 608 00:48:51,920 --> 00:49:00,079 treatment services. Again, um pending any information on irrigation or water 609 00:48:57,440 --> 00:49:05,280 for races, um there's really anticipated to be very minimal public utility 610 00:49:02,400 --> 00:49:08,720 component to this. Um that the use will not create excessive public uh public 611 00:49:07,040 --> 00:49:14,160 costs and will not significantly decrease property values of surrounding 612 00:49:10,480 --> 00:49:17,200 properties. Um that one again this is a preserving open space and will involve 613 00:49:16,000 --> 00:49:21,040 no development that will cause detrimental impacts to neighboring 614 00:49:18,720 --> 00:49:27,119 properties that will reduce property values that you can anticipate. Um last 615 00:49:24,800 --> 00:49:30,000 two here the second last is that they will meet the requirements and standards 616 00:49:28,559 --> 00:49:34,079 of the zoning ordinance and other applicable law standards and 617 00:49:31,280 --> 00:49:38,240 requirements or regulations. Um those will be met subject to the conditions of 618 00:49:36,000 --> 00:49:42,240 this report. Um and then finally that this will be harmonious with the natural 619 00:49:40,079 --> 00:49:46,319 environment and more unique natural features and again this is a small 620 00:49:43,839 --> 00:49:52,319 disturbed area in a larger site that'll be mostly open space. So we believe that 621 00:49:48,559 --> 00:49:55,599 criteria criterion has been met and so we think there's adequate justification 622 00:49:54,000 --> 00:50:02,000 for the special land use approval in this report pending um any action by the 623 00:49:58,480 --> 00:50:06,640 ZBA on uh the um the variance aspect of it or the the ZBA's review aspect of it 624 00:50:04,240 --> 00:50:14,960 and then pending preliminary and final site plan review. Um that being said, I 625 00:50:11,520 --> 00:50:20,480 we think that this use could be um conditionally approved for special end 626 00:50:17,119 --> 00:50:24,160 use and um potentially for preliminary site plan understanding that there would 627 00:50:22,160 --> 00:50:29,520 have to be significant more details that come back with the final site plan 628 00:50:25,520 --> 00:50:34,160 review. um the procedural aspect of that. If this if and when this goes to 629 00:50:31,440 --> 00:50:38,400 the ZBA, the ZVA needs to have a preliminary site plan approval in hand 630 00:50:37,040 --> 00:50:42,319 that they can reference if they're going to approve that part of it. So, it's 631 00:50:40,160 --> 00:50:47,520 kind of a back and forth process. Um but the planning commission could um 632 00:50:45,440 --> 00:50:52,720 uh grant preliminary site plan approval and special land use approval today um 633 00:50:50,480 --> 00:50:57,280 pending ZDA approval and pending site plan final site approval at a later 634 00:50:54,720 --> 00:51:01,280 date. um subject to the conditions I've mentioned uh throughout my statements 635 00:50:58,960 --> 00:51:05,760 here um which I believe I have stated throughout my other comments here. I 636 00:51:03,200 --> 00:51:09,040 don't um I can certainly help walk through those again if you'd like as 637 00:51:07,200 --> 00:51:14,000 we're writing a motion but I won't repeat them now. I think okay 638 00:51:10,960 --> 00:51:17,680 » summarize everything so far. So happy to answer any questions 639 00:51:16,160 --> 00:51:22,400 turn it over back to the planning commission and the public. 640 00:51:19,520 --> 00:51:27,760 » Okay. All right. What we can do now is open up the public hearing to the people 641 00:51:24,559 --> 00:51:34,160 that want to talk. Uh haven't, you know, want to express something about this. Um 642 00:51:31,440 --> 00:51:41,440 if you stand up, say state your name and your address for the record and we'll 643 00:51:37,599 --> 00:51:45,680 whoever wants to go first. >> Jim Brley. Uh I own property right there 644 00:51:44,960 --> 00:51:50,720 on the corner. >> Right. So I'm on 645 00:51:47,520 --> 00:51:55,280 » Yeah. My question is, and I guess you know it's legal to have a family 646 00:51:53,280 --> 00:51:59,839 cemetery, is there going to be any cost to their 647 00:51:58,319 --> 00:52:05,440 township? The reason I asked that, I mean, I don't 648 00:52:01,839 --> 00:52:12,319 think any township and ours included are not running with all kinds of money. So 649 00:52:08,559 --> 00:52:16,000 if if all it's one thing if the township has to pay something that's only going 650 00:52:14,319 --> 00:52:23,200 to benefit you, you know, and and the other 651 00:52:19,440 --> 00:52:30,319 question I have is is there something in there, maybe I 652 00:52:25,200 --> 00:52:38,880 missed it, how the actual burial sites um uh are I mean is it the same as what 653 00:52:35,280 --> 00:52:43,520 it would be in another else, you know, I mean, is it going to be in a casket? Is 654 00:52:40,480 --> 00:52:47,040 it going to be a mold or whatever? You know, I mean, that's a couple of 655 00:52:44,960 --> 00:52:50,880 concerns that that I have. >> Okay. 656 00:52:48,800 --> 00:52:55,520 All right. Um, >> I have some questions unless you need to 657 00:52:52,800 --> 00:53:01,040 answer his. No, I mean basically what we'll go over I know there's something 658 00:52:56,960 --> 00:53:08,000 in in the um in the review that talks about uh perpetual maintenance and that 659 00:53:06,160 --> 00:53:12,079 they will take care of it and it will not go back 660 00:53:10,480 --> 00:53:17,359 to the township. I think it was something like that. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. 661 00:53:15,119 --> 00:53:22,240 So that would be the only thing that you know one question [clears throat] it 662 00:53:19,440 --> 00:53:27,839 should be it's their responsibility. Um and then you know if they default on 663 00:53:25,520 --> 00:53:34,480 that then we go after them. So >> Right. And they were talking about the 664 00:53:30,079 --> 00:53:37,599 the specifications of getting to and from. 665 00:53:35,359 --> 00:53:42,559 » Right. Right. Yeah. Cuz it's I I think the thing off 666 00:53:39,680 --> 00:53:44,559 of Fletcher is pretty narrow. Is it 66? Is it 667 00:53:42,960 --> 00:53:49,359 » I believe it's only 25 ft. >> 25 ft. And it's only 25 off of side of 668 00:53:47,280 --> 00:53:53,040 church too. Isn't that correct? Yeah. Yeah. So, are they going to be required 669 00:53:51,520 --> 00:53:58,480 to build a separate driveway to that plus 670 00:53:56,240 --> 00:54:02,800 their home driveway or >> um the way it looks like on the plan 671 00:54:02,079 --> 00:54:05,680 » comes out? >> It comes off the home driveway. 672 00:54:04,640 --> 00:54:10,960 » Yes. >> The home driveway. Now, they might need 673 00:54:07,760 --> 00:54:13,599 to to you know, >> well, it' be an ement 674 00:54:12,160 --> 00:54:17,359 » fortifi. Yeah, it' be an e >> easement for the cemetery. 675 00:54:15,839 --> 00:54:20,480 » Right. Right. even though it's a personal drive, it would be an easement, 676 00:54:19,760 --> 00:54:26,800 » right, >> for there to get to the cemetery. So, 677 00:54:25,280 --> 00:54:32,960 » be an easement to get back there. And then, as he had um Dan had said, maybe 678 00:54:30,720 --> 00:54:39,280 you want to from the driveway portion of the site go down, 679 00:54:36,400 --> 00:54:43,880 » put a little down to go into where the uh burial sites will be. 680 00:54:44,319 --> 00:54:49,200 Okay, Richard, if you don't mind, I don't want to stand. So, that's fine. 681 00:54:48,400 --> 00:54:51,680 Take off. >> No. Um, 682 00:54:50,240 --> 00:54:55,040 » several questions, but I'm going to go back partly to what Mr. First had to 683 00:54:53,520 --> 00:54:59,520 say. Sadly, you guys are gone. I'm going way 684 00:54:57,520 --> 00:55:05,760 down the road. No one from the family is available to 685 00:55:03,440 --> 00:55:11,760 maintain the cemetery. What happens at that point? they they 686 00:55:09,040 --> 00:55:18,480 have to set aside money in the beginning for for upkeep and and stuff, you know, 687 00:55:15,839 --> 00:55:20,800 25, 50, 75 years down the road. >> Mhm. 688 00:55:19,040 --> 00:55:25,359 » Um, how is that handled? >> I'm not sure. Is there is like bonds are 689 00:55:23,680 --> 00:55:29,280 there bonds that are put for something like that or not? Or 690 00:55:27,680 --> 00:55:31,280 » didn't say it goes with the property, the responsibility goes with the 691 00:55:30,720 --> 00:55:36,319 property owner. >> Goes with the property owner. Yeah. 692 00:55:35,200 --> 00:55:39,280 » Yes. >> Okay. And there was that question. Who 693 00:55:38,319 --> 00:55:44,880 owns >> parel two? 694 00:55:40,880 --> 00:55:50,880 » Who owns parallel two? >> Um, it looks like she 695 00:55:48,160 --> 00:55:54,000 » Jeffrey Spencer. >> It's your father. 696 00:55:51,920 --> 00:55:58,480 » Yeah. So, I'm in Edwards now cuz I'm married, but I see Spencer was my father 697 00:55:56,319 --> 00:56:03,119 and he passed away in 2021. >> Okay. Inherited 698 00:56:00,559 --> 00:56:06,640 » and you've got the property above that. You've got the house above that. Okay. 699 00:56:06,000 --> 00:56:10,160 That's great. >> And we're planning to change that name 700 00:56:08,079 --> 00:56:12,240 out of or the parcel out of his name to our name 701 00:56:10,559 --> 00:56:14,720 » to your name. Okay. All right. >> Okay. That that helps. 702 00:56:14,000 --> 00:56:18,079 » Whoops. >> Because I was going to say I know Jeff's 703 00:56:16,079 --> 00:56:20,079 not here, but if it was in a state or an LLC or something, 704 00:56:19,359 --> 00:56:24,720 » right? >> Just in terms of clarification there. 705 00:56:22,240 --> 00:56:28,720 Um, the other question that I have, if you'll look at your certified survey, 706 00:56:27,040 --> 00:56:34,319 uh, we have the property just to the north on Sio Church and we border along 707 00:56:31,280 --> 00:56:40,720 the other ement, which is fine, but you have us looking like we own all the way 708 00:56:37,280 --> 00:56:43,760 to the far right. David and Barb Miller own that property. It was formed by 709 00:56:42,480 --> 00:56:48,319 Crafts. >> They're not listed here as a owner. It's 710 00:56:46,640 --> 00:56:50,880 like you have us all the way across that. 711 00:56:48,880 --> 00:56:54,240 » Oh, I see. I see. They probably should have notified. I don't know if you 712 00:56:52,240 --> 00:56:58,319 notified them or not. >> I don't know. 713 00:56:54,960 --> 00:57:00,000 » I guess once I can tell >> you. 714 00:56:58,720 --> 00:57:03,920 » Oh, you didn't. >> Not 715 00:57:01,040 --> 00:57:07,599 » because you don't live with you don't live within 300. 716 00:57:05,119 --> 00:57:11,280 » Yeah, they do say 300 ft. It's 300. It's to live within 717 00:57:09,680 --> 00:57:17,400 » but the person >> generally we would notify you. Okay. Got 718 00:57:17,440 --> 00:57:22,559 » so >> so I believe that you need to get a 719 00:57:19,680 --> 00:57:25,440 correct survey done certified surveyor. 720 00:57:24,640 --> 00:57:28,640 » Yeah. [laughter] >> You missed the house 721 00:57:26,559 --> 00:57:31,960 » cuz he didn't put that down. Yeah, you're right. 722 00:57:32,480 --> 00:57:38,720 » And we'll let them know. But I think they officially [clears throat] should 723 00:57:36,000 --> 00:57:40,960 get something from the township. I I doubt there's any issues, but it's 724 00:57:40,480 --> 00:57:45,119 something >> they Yeah, they should have. I agree. 725 00:57:43,440 --> 00:57:50,960 Maybe because I don't know why that didn't show up. H I don't know. 726 00:57:48,640 --> 00:57:55,760 » Yeah, because you have our names going further to the east than we own. 727 00:57:52,960 --> 00:57:57,599 » Right. Right. Like over over where that 260 is. 728 00:57:57,040 --> 00:58:00,799 » Correct. >> Gotcha. 729 00:57:59,520 --> 00:58:05,200 I do have the list of people. >> Correct. If you follow the north south 730 00:58:02,960 --> 00:58:07,680 line that comes along partial too, you'll continue straight to Saturn 731 00:58:06,960 --> 00:58:11,760 Church. >> What was it? What was their names again? 732 00:58:09,599 --> 00:58:15,359 » Dave and Barb Miller. >> Dave and Barb Miller. 733 00:58:14,240 --> 00:58:17,520 » Let me see here. >> She's got a list of the people that she 734 00:58:16,880 --> 00:58:21,680 had not. >> Yes, I did send a a notice out to Dave 735 00:58:20,000 --> 00:58:24,079 and Barb Miller. Okay. Okay. There. Yeah. Good. And who else were we 736 00:58:23,359 --> 00:58:26,000 questioning? >> That's it. 737 00:58:24,640 --> 00:58:28,880 » Oh, okay. >> Well, Tim Brisk is quering, but 738 00:58:27,839 --> 00:58:31,359 » Yeah, I know. [laughter] But he's not within the 300 ft. Yeah. 739 00:58:30,960 --> 00:58:34,160 » Yeah. >> You're too far down the road. 740 00:58:32,640 --> 00:58:36,559 » You're too far. It's too far down the road. 741 00:58:34,319 --> 00:58:39,280 » Too far. [laughter] >> Okay. 742 00:58:38,000 --> 00:58:44,079 » Um, [clears throat] any other >> just in this the same vein? Cuz I caught 743 00:58:41,920 --> 00:58:48,079 something he said, but I wasn't sure. So, down the road, cemeteries in place, 744 00:58:47,280 --> 00:58:52,480 everything's fine, >> right? 745 00:58:48,559 --> 00:58:58,079 » Can they split off partial two and have other homes built up there? Do they have 746 00:58:54,640 --> 00:59:02,480 some odd restrictions for that? It depends on when when was the original 747 00:59:00,240 --> 00:59:04,960 parcel. How big was the original parcel for your dad? Yeah, it's it's 748 00:59:04,319 --> 00:59:08,400 landlocked. >> Um he's always had it in those two 749 00:59:06,799 --> 00:59:14,319 parcels. >> All right. Yeah. 750 00:59:10,640 --> 00:59:18,559 » So, um I think because it's landlocked and it's because it's got only like 25 751 00:59:17,680 --> 00:59:22,799 ft to one. >> You going to make it into one parcel or 752 00:59:20,799 --> 00:59:27,200 are you going to keep them two? Um, we'd like to pursue getting a combined. 753 00:59:25,440 --> 00:59:32,720 » So then it would become one parcel instead of two, 754 00:59:29,839 --> 00:59:35,040 » but with the 25T easement, they wouldn't be able to subdivide that property 755 00:59:34,400 --> 00:59:37,040 anyhow. >> No, I don't think they'd be able to 756 00:59:36,319 --> 00:59:39,839 divide it with the >> 256 foot wide easement. 757 00:59:39,200 --> 00:59:42,000 » Right. Right. >> To be able to put multiple homes on 758 00:59:41,680 --> 00:59:46,000 them. >> And the only other thing they could do 759 00:59:43,599 --> 00:59:51,520 is, and this is why, it has to go to the ZBA. Anytime you you try to use 760 00:59:49,119 --> 00:59:57,280 something different than uh a non-conforming lot can be used as a 761 00:59:54,319 --> 01:00:01,359 residential home. That's it. So anytime you would try to put like four or five 762 00:59:58,799 --> 01:00:05,440 residential homes that would have >> used 763 01:00:03,200 --> 01:00:08,559 » that would not be allowable unless they went to the ZBA and the ZBA. 764 01:00:08,319 --> 01:00:13,440 Yeah. >> So, if I'm understanding what you just 765 01:00:10,559 --> 01:00:17,520 said, [clears throat] 20 years from now, if they chose with another sibling to 766 01:00:16,000 --> 01:00:22,520 let them build a house, that's not going to be an option for them. 767 01:00:19,520 --> 01:00:22,520 » Um, 768 01:00:22,880 --> 01:00:29,839 » I don't I mean to to split the land off and put another house on it. 769 01:00:28,480 --> 01:00:31,760 » I'm not sure. >> Is that the question? Is it a primary 770 01:00:31,520 --> 01:00:35,680 use? >> It would be a primary use, but 771 01:00:33,839 --> 01:00:38,400 » could they split it off? I'm not even sure you could split it off to be honest 772 01:00:37,359 --> 01:00:43,119 with you. >> Let me word it different. Could they, 773 01:00:40,720 --> 01:00:47,280 you know, build a second home and subleasase it to whomever? It doesn't 774 01:00:46,000 --> 01:00:51,280 have to be a family. >> Yeah. 775 01:00:49,200 --> 01:00:55,440 » I'm really, you know, >> not really highly worried, but just I 776 01:00:53,359 --> 01:00:59,680 caught I thought he said that the property could not be split again or 777 01:00:57,359 --> 01:01:04,559 could not be used as a building site. I'm just trying to clarify that 778 01:01:01,200 --> 01:01:07,839 » and I think and you know I think because neither one of the accesses are 66 ft 779 01:01:07,280 --> 01:01:11,599 wide >> right they got since they got a second 780 01:01:09,920 --> 01:01:15,520 access that might >> that might change it I don't know if 781 01:01:13,599 --> 01:01:19,359 » they if they got the access off the sire church in addition to the access off of 782 01:01:17,599 --> 01:01:23,762 uh Fletcher they're still 783 01:01:21,520 --> 01:01:28,319 » it's still not 66 ft wide [clears throat] 784 01:01:24,640 --> 01:01:31,319 » I thought you just need to access Well, 785 01:01:31,599 --> 01:01:34,400 » why is there two? Is that what you're asking? 786 01:01:33,680 --> 01:01:37,839 » No. No. >> He thought 787 01:01:36,079 --> 01:01:41,599 » you can only put one house on a parcel if you don't have more than if you don't 788 01:01:39,680 --> 01:01:45,040 have 66 foot wide. You need two way traffic. All I'm saying is there's two 789 01:01:43,359 --> 01:01:48,799 access points to the property. One's off of Fletcher and then there's another 790 01:01:47,119 --> 01:01:52,640 easement off of >> side. I think when the house was 791 01:01:51,119 --> 01:01:55,359 originally built >> or going to be, he wasn't sure to build 792 01:01:55,119 --> 01:01:57,760 it. >> Yeah. 793 01:01:55,839 --> 01:02:02,240 » Which he was going to use. And if you see the layout, he picked the much safer 794 01:02:00,480 --> 01:02:05,680 direction. [laughter] >> I know. I looked down early. 795 01:02:03,520 --> 01:02:09,280 » Is it? Oh, okay. >> So, nobody might even be able to get 796 01:02:07,440 --> 01:02:15,000 back there from the one side. [laughter] >> That's not That's not even the most sane 797 01:02:12,000 --> 01:02:15,000 direction. 798 01:02:15,520 --> 01:02:24,079 » Okay. Um, you know, I don't, 799 01:02:20,480 --> 01:02:27,680 like I said, parcel two and we've got parcel one. 800 01:02:26,799 --> 01:02:35,440 I think >> I think it was the two. 801 01:02:31,520 --> 01:02:41,480 » One parcel is believe 9 acres that has our home on it and the other one is 72 802 01:02:38,240 --> 01:02:41,480 years old. 803 01:02:42,400 --> 01:02:50,480 » Doesn't it the sizes are correct? I may have back [laughter] apologies. 804 01:02:48,319 --> 01:02:54,480 » The homes on the 3 acre. Yes. >> And then the larger parcel where you 805 01:02:53,119 --> 01:03:00,000 have the >> the cemeteries on the 9 acres. 806 01:02:56,960 --> 01:03:07,680 » I always thought we had 13. So that >> Yeah. Okay. Okay. All right. Um 807 01:03:04,640 --> 01:03:12,400 » in on the question about future build. >> Mhm. 808 01:03:08,240 --> 01:03:16,559 » Um I did look at Google Earth or on our parcel map. I can't remember which, but 809 01:03:14,000 --> 01:03:20,640 you have to zoom out. Um, the only I think all all parcels around you have 810 01:03:18,720 --> 01:03:24,640 home sites on them and they're they're there's no way to get to Fletcher Road 811 01:03:22,799 --> 01:03:29,760 or side of Church Road in a way that you can develop anything more than what's 812 01:03:26,240 --> 01:03:33,760 there right now, but to the south potentially someday there could that 813 01:03:31,599 --> 01:03:38,640 there's a larger farm property. I forget the name of the road to the south, but 814 01:03:36,000 --> 01:03:45,760 conceivably somebody could build a road through that and then subdivide that. 815 01:03:42,000 --> 01:03:47,839 That's pretty um pretty hypothetical. Um >> right 816 01:03:46,160 --> 01:03:50,960 » in terms of these two parcels, I think there was a good hypothetical that was 817 01:03:49,599 --> 01:03:55,680 raised. >> You under the zoning ordinance can build 818 01:03:53,599 --> 01:04:00,880 up to one single family home and it's accessory building on any non-conforming 819 01:03:58,880 --> 01:04:04,720 parcel that would include the the complete landlock parcel, 820 01:04:02,400 --> 01:04:09,119 » right? technically and they could gain access through an ement either the one 821 01:04:06,480 --> 01:04:12,559 that's existing out to Fletcher Road or up to Style Church Road through that 822 01:04:10,720 --> 01:04:16,720 other there's a there's a strip of access there but there's no driveway. So 823 01:04:14,880 --> 01:04:21,839 » um that other par could have a home on it someday in theory but it's virtually 824 01:04:20,160 --> 01:04:25,920 possible the way the land is configured now that any other any further approval 825 01:04:24,079 --> 01:04:31,680 could occur. You couldn't build a subdivision or a second back there 826 01:04:27,920 --> 01:04:35,839 because there's no room for 66 foot wide private roads right away for example to 827 01:04:33,920 --> 01:04:39,599 get through there anywhere. So >> yeah, 828 01:04:36,160 --> 01:04:42,079 » just a another little bit perspective. >> Okay. All right. Is that 829 01:04:41,760 --> 01:04:47,599 » Yep. >> Clear as mud. Okay. 830 01:04:44,000 --> 01:04:51,280 » Truth. I live just south of >> this farm. Okay. 831 01:04:49,359 --> 01:04:57,680 » Truth. Is it truthale? Okay. >> Truth. And I have one question I guess 832 01:04:54,640 --> 01:05:02,160 where the driveway currently goes up now >> and the proposed easement will go up to 833 01:05:00,640 --> 01:05:04,799 the site location. >> Mhm. 834 01:05:03,119 --> 01:05:11,839 » Is that going are they going to be required to put in an access road to get 835 01:05:07,920 --> 01:05:15,760 there or just provide a easement for future use? 836 01:05:14,799 --> 01:05:20,160 » H >> to the cemetery. 837 01:05:17,200 --> 01:05:25,280 » Yes. The way it was written, it was going to be grass off once off of your 838 01:05:24,079 --> 01:05:28,160 drive, right? >> Yeah. 839 01:05:25,760 --> 01:05:31,440 » It's going to be a grass drive getting to the cemetery. 840 01:05:29,920 --> 01:05:35,680 » Okay. >> And then I think you did make it, Dan, 841 01:05:33,839 --> 01:05:38,799 you did say something about making an easement 842 01:05:36,880 --> 01:05:43,119 » to the cemetery. So, it would be an easement. It wouldn't be a road, 843 01:05:40,559 --> 01:05:46,960 » but it would be an improved easement or is it just 844 01:05:44,240 --> 01:05:50,240 » um healed like it is now? I think it's it well the way this is drawn it's just 845 01:05:49,359 --> 01:05:54,480 feel >> as it is now. 846 01:05:51,520 --> 01:05:57,880 » Yeah. But it says that in the grass 847 01:05:58,079 --> 01:06:04,240 » there is um there's no requirement I'm looking here 848 01:06:02,400 --> 01:06:08,400 um in the specific standards for cemeteries although we do want to have 849 01:06:06,400 --> 01:06:15,520 the information on what the surface material is on the site plan. Um 850 01:06:12,400 --> 01:06:20,240 in section 5.12 for cemeteries um you have to show 851 01:06:17,680 --> 01:06:24,400 uh that there will be direct ingress and egress from a paved public road which 852 01:06:22,240 --> 01:06:28,960 means you have to have the easement connect all the way to Fletcher Road. In 853 01:06:26,559 --> 01:06:32,319 this case there needs to be an easement for ingress and egress from the public 854 01:06:30,559 --> 01:06:37,039 road to the land on which the cemetery is located and that easement must be 855 01:06:34,000 --> 01:06:40,160 recorded. Um and there of course we talked about the provisions for 856 01:06:38,559 --> 01:06:44,079 perpetual care and maintenance of the cemetery property which would include 857 01:06:41,839 --> 01:06:49,680 everything encompassed in that easement up to the cemetery. Um but there is no 858 01:06:47,039 --> 01:06:53,839 specific standard or requirement for what the road paving material is that 859 01:06:52,079 --> 01:06:56,480 I'm aware of unless >> Okay. 860 01:06:54,400 --> 01:07:02,720 » So I guess it could address one one way of saying it could be unpaved. 861 01:06:58,480 --> 01:07:11,039 » Um that brings up the question. Okay. So it's there's no specific 862 01:07:07,039 --> 01:07:17,839 does the the guy that's going to dig the or the cemetery or the I don't think 863 01:07:14,880 --> 01:07:22,880 Johnny going to drive by disrespect but I don't think Johnny's going to drive up 864 01:07:19,359 --> 01:07:27,680 there with his car cuz that driveway is very very narrow and the brush and 865 01:07:24,960 --> 01:07:32,400 everything else. I just I didn't know if cemetery people have certain, you know, 866 01:07:31,280 --> 01:07:34,480 requirements. >> Mhm. 867 01:07:32,880 --> 01:07:37,520 » You know, even if you had to take a backhole up there and that kind of 868 01:07:36,480 --> 01:07:42,400 stuff, you know. >> Mhm. 869 01:07:40,400 --> 01:07:46,000 » That was leading to my question of how are you going to get there? 870 01:07:43,680 --> 01:07:51,680 » Right. Right. Right. >> If you recall, when this cemetery down 871 01:07:48,720 --> 01:07:55,839 here was not being cared for, my father was buried there. We had a 872 01:07:54,319 --> 01:08:02,061 rainstorm. Johnny Mitchell put the cast in the back 873 01:07:58,319 --> 01:08:02,061 of a Suburban. [laughter] 874 01:08:04,480 --> 01:08:10,400 » If it needs to be done, it'll get done. That's probably not an issue. If I can 875 01:08:08,880 --> 01:08:14,480 just say something to you, we've spoken to the funeral director at the home 876 01:08:12,079 --> 01:08:18,480 about that because it is pretty rural, rough land. And he said, "As long as 877 01:08:16,719 --> 01:08:21,839 you've got the paperwork and everything, you can strap it to a trailer if you'd 878 01:08:20,400 --> 01:08:27,920 like and >> Okay. Okay. Well, where my parents are 879 01:08:24,560 --> 01:08:32,480 buried down in Oh, well, it's off of it's in the 880 01:08:30,400 --> 01:08:38,799 country down towards Blissfield >> and it's just grass drive. The the 881 01:08:35,920 --> 01:08:44,239 cemeteries in the middle of the field, >> so and they make it, 882 01:08:43,040 --> 01:08:47,520 » which is fine, >> right? 883 01:08:44,880 --> 01:08:50,080 » No, I just it's not odd to have especially the older seven, 884 01:08:49,759 --> 01:08:57,040 » right, >> to have a grass driver, right? 885 01:08:53,920 --> 01:08:59,279 And I and they're like 16 sight uh burial plots. Is that correct? 886 01:08:58,960 --> 01:09:03,960 » Yes. >> And they're like 10 by 887 01:09:04,560 --> 01:09:07,440 » No. >> 10 by 888 01:09:05,679 --> 01:09:10,640 » 10 by four. >> Yes. 889 01:09:07,920 --> 01:09:18,319 » I have I question. This is more out of curiosity than anything else because 890 01:09:14,480 --> 01:09:23,679 » we're very far away from your property line is. Mhm. 891 01:09:19,679 --> 01:09:31,600 » Um what type of burials is it going to be vaulted? Is it going to be um green? 892 01:09:28,880 --> 01:09:33,759 » I think at state health department state. 893 01:09:32,560 --> 01:09:37,600 » Yeah. >> The state would tell them. 894 01:09:34,799 --> 01:09:38,880 » Well, I mean I'm not oppo I mean opposed either way, 895 01:09:38,319 --> 01:09:44,960 » right? >> I just my concern is with the amount of 896 01:09:41,920 --> 01:09:47,600 wildlife that seems to be up in that direction, 897 01:09:46,808 --> 01:09:52,319 [laughter] >> you know, I just And the depth of the of 898 01:09:50,480 --> 01:09:56,000 some of the reading I was doing, you know, the depths 899 01:09:54,960 --> 01:09:59,920 are different. >> Right. Right. 900 01:09:56,719 --> 01:10:03,400 » It's not six feet anymore. >> It's not 6, 901 01:10:03,440 --> 01:10:10,880 » but I but I think the um I I I know the state regulates 902 01:10:08,880 --> 01:10:14,080 » a lot of that. >> And I don't we didn't get is there 903 01:10:12,719 --> 01:10:17,440 something from We didn't get anything from the state or anything. Yeah. Yeah. 904 01:10:16,000 --> 01:10:24,080 Yeah. So, 905 01:10:19,920 --> 01:10:30,320 uh, anybody else any questions? >> All right. Did we answer your questions? 906 01:10:28,560 --> 01:10:34,719 » Yeah, kind of. [laughter] 907 01:10:33,120 --> 01:10:36,159 » I don't want to come back and fight the township. 908 01:10:35,280 --> 01:10:40,560 » Right. >> Right. And that's what that's definitely 909 01:10:38,640 --> 01:10:45,440 what we don't want to. >> We've already got several township 910 01:10:42,719 --> 01:10:49,840 cemeteries that we have to deal with. Yeah, sure. Right. 911 01:10:47,920 --> 01:10:54,560 » Okay. All right. Well, then I will close the public hearing unless there's any 912 01:10:51,360 --> 01:10:59,320 other comments. All right. Now, we can discuss this. 913 01:10:59,600 --> 01:11:04,920 Um, okay. So, 914 01:11:05,600 --> 01:11:12,000 you guys questions, concerns? 915 01:11:10,400 --> 01:11:18,719 I mean, I think as long as we have the state regulations that you adhere to, 916 01:11:16,080 --> 01:11:23,280 um, I think it sounds to me like it's going to be a very natural cemetery, so 917 01:11:20,800 --> 01:11:28,280 there's not going to be paved roads or anything like that. Um, 918 01:11:28,880 --> 01:11:37,920 yeah, I don't. And it's kind of like a little small parcel, a small acreage 919 01:11:34,159 --> 01:11:43,120 area within a 9 acre parcel. And I don't think any nobody out there 920 01:11:40,159 --> 01:11:45,920 can see that area from where you are. But you know, 921 01:11:44,320 --> 01:11:48,000 » you can barely see >> barely see it. 922 01:11:46,640 --> 01:11:51,600 » Probably if you walked to the back of our property. 923 01:11:49,360 --> 01:11:54,000 » Yeah. Yeah. If you went way back. Yeah. Okay. 924 01:11:52,320 --> 01:11:58,400 » Cuz Yeah. I think you would be the closest 925 01:11:55,600 --> 01:12:03,600 according to my survey here. >> The property the 9.9 is that currently 926 01:12:01,679 --> 01:12:08,080 farmed or just grown up or >> just grown up? Yeah. We have several 927 01:12:05,760 --> 01:12:14,880 mobile fields, but that's all. Okay. >> It's It's backed by forest, so 928 01:12:12,000 --> 01:12:18,239 really only people can see. >> Oh, okay. 929 01:12:16,960 --> 01:12:21,520 » And you're going to keep all the trees and all that jazz. Okay. Good. Good. 930 01:12:20,735 --> 01:12:25,040 [laughter] >> Okay. 931 01:12:22,800 --> 01:12:26,159 » Dear sounds like >> Yeah. 932 01:12:25,520 --> 01:12:32,880 » Yeah. >> The deer will be visiting a lot. Yes. 933 01:12:29,920 --> 01:12:35,880 Questions? Anybody else? concern. 934 01:12:36,080 --> 01:12:41,600 » So the way I'm sure >> perpetual is taken care of. 935 01:12:38,960 --> 01:12:43,920 » Yeah. As long as it's there is an agreement for perpetual maintenance. 936 01:12:43,520 --> 01:12:48,400 Yes. >> Even if it changes hands or something 937 01:12:46,000 --> 01:12:53,120 like that that it be becomes a responsibility of 938 01:12:50,719 --> 01:12:58,040 the new buyer and it's clearly stated to that buyer that they are responsible. 939 01:12:55,040 --> 01:12:58,040 » Yes. 940 01:12:58,159 --> 01:13:04,880 » Okay. Um, so I guess what we need to do, there's 941 01:13:03,199 --> 01:13:09,520 several things on the plan that need to be dealt with. 942 01:13:07,440 --> 01:13:15,679 Um, but for them to go to the ZBA, 943 01:13:13,199 --> 01:13:20,000 we would have to approve the preliminary site plan with all the conditions that 944 01:13:17,600 --> 01:13:23,440 need to be dealt with. Is that correct? >> As well as the special use. 945 01:13:22,000 --> 01:13:25,920 » As well as the special use. We can approve the special use and then 946 01:13:25,120 --> 01:13:32,880 » conditions. You can >> Yeah. Yeah. Okay. 947 01:13:28,400 --> 01:13:38,480 » Yeah, you could um postpone action on the special use, but if you're feeling 948 01:13:35,920 --> 01:13:40,880 ready to um there's no reason you can't. You can do both a [clears throat] 949 01:13:39,360 --> 01:13:46,560 special use and a preliminary site interview today. What the ZBA would need 950 01:13:43,920 --> 01:13:51,199 to review the case would be a approved or conditionally approved preliminary 951 01:13:48,400 --> 01:13:53,679 site plan. I don't think the uh the special use can come now or can be 952 01:13:52,880 --> 01:13:58,159 later. >> Okay. 953 01:13:54,880 --> 01:13:59,360 And then um the final site plan will come before us. 954 01:13:59,040 --> 01:14:03,360 » Yes. >> For the final approval with all the 955 01:14:01,360 --> 01:14:06,560 changes made and things like that. >> Yes. That would be right after the ZVA. 956 01:14:05,440 --> 01:14:10,960 » Okay. >> Okay. 957 01:14:09,120 --> 01:14:15,520 All righty. So, what do you guys want to do? I don't 958 01:14:13,840 --> 01:14:18,000 see any need for any landscaping or anything. 959 01:14:16,719 --> 01:14:24,000 » It's already done. >> It's kind of done. 960 01:14:20,880 --> 01:14:30,880 » Green. Um, so I'm willing I'm ready to make a motion to approve the special use 961 01:14:27,199 --> 01:14:33,520 permit number where is it? It's not on there. 962 01:14:31,280 --> 01:14:42,159 » Uh, 26001 >> one. Um, with the conditions that the 963 01:14:39,120 --> 01:14:50,640 site plan is corrected to include the emissions noted on the planners report. 964 01:14:46,880 --> 01:14:57,040 And um they the applicant obtains approval from ZBA for the um site 965 01:14:55,280 --> 01:15:03,840 limitations and they get the health department approval 966 01:15:00,239 --> 01:15:06,480 and I yeah I guess a separate motion for the 967 01:15:04,239 --> 01:15:11,040 » for the site plan. Yeah, let's let's do the special use first. 968 01:15:09,600 --> 01:15:17,840 » I'll support that. >> Support. All in favor? 969 01:15:14,719 --> 01:15:23,719 » Opposed? None. Motion carried. Now we need to do the site plan preliminary. 970 01:15:26,640 --> 01:15:35,040 » All right. So I will move on this first. I will make the motion 971 01:15:31,840 --> 01:15:37,947 lost her words. What? No. Him. >> Yeah. [laughter] 972 01:15:38,159 --> 01:15:46,239 » Elizabeth is better at the words. No, >> you don't know cuz nobody thinks that 973 01:15:45,120 --> 01:15:50,880 you don't ever do it. >> We have Howard went for the adjournment. 974 01:15:48,640 --> 01:15:57,760 He always [laughter] >> That's all good. 975 01:15:53,760 --> 01:16:00,400 » All right. So, I I move that we give um preliminary site plan approval. 976 01:15:59,600 --> 01:16:04,560 » Okay. >> To application I don't know 20261. 977 01:16:03,360 --> 01:16:11,040 » Yep. um conditioned upon the applicant put 978 01:16:08,719 --> 01:16:18,600 correcting the site plan to include the information that was missing as noted on 979 01:16:14,320 --> 01:16:18,600 the planners report. 980 01:16:19,360 --> 01:16:26,880 » Is that everybody good? Well, I need a second. 981 01:16:23,600 --> 01:16:31,679 » H is that was that you? >> Did you mention the ZVA on that? 982 01:16:29,440 --> 01:16:35,360 » No, I did not because it's a preliminary site plan approval. Oh. 983 01:16:33,520 --> 01:16:39,360 » Yeah. >> Okay. I'll support. 984 01:16:37,199 --> 01:16:45,040 » All in favor? I >> oppose. None. Motion carried. Okay. 985 01:16:43,199 --> 01:16:49,360 » All right. So, you've got some work to do getting your site plan [laughter] 986 01:16:47,360 --> 01:16:53,080 the final to us >> and then um 987 01:16:54,880 --> 01:17:00,400 » and again, like I said, we'll we'll check the final and and if there's 988 01:16:58,880 --> 01:17:05,679 anything on the final we need to change, we can change it. 989 01:17:03,280 --> 01:17:11,520 That's a question too. As far as burial goes, I assume I need the final final 990 01:17:08,239 --> 01:17:12,960 approval before that can occur. >> Um 991 01:17:12,080 --> 01:17:17,920 » I think so. >> I think so. Yeah. Just to be safe. 992 01:17:15,440 --> 01:17:23,440 » Yeah, I I assume so. We The only thing I wanted to say ask that for is that uh he 993 01:17:21,360 --> 01:17:27,600 passed back in November and we've been paying storage fees for him for that 994 01:17:25,600 --> 01:17:31,360 long already and we'll be paying them now for I think you said two more months 995 01:17:29,760 --> 01:17:34,560 until the next meeting. Yeah, >> in June, right? So, 996 01:17:32,800 --> 01:17:37,280 » well, if there was any way to do that, that's the only reason I wanted to ask. 997 01:17:36,239 --> 01:17:41,440 But >> if you can get something to us for the 998 01:17:39,120 --> 01:17:45,120 May meeting, it'll be the the 18th of May cuz we're a week early because 999 01:17:44,000 --> 01:17:48,159 » you got to do the ZBA. >> But you got to do the ZBA. That That's 1000 01:17:47,040 --> 01:17:54,080 going to be the problem. >> Okay. 1001 01:17:51,120 --> 01:17:58,400 » Well, that won't happen until >> Pardon me. The 1002 01:17:55,440 --> 01:18:03,600 » ZBA normally Thursday, >> like two days, 3 days from now. 1003 01:18:01,120 --> 01:18:08,480 Oh, okay. But you could do it in Well, the end of the month on Tuesday. Is that 1004 01:18:06,640 --> 01:18:14,679 what you're talking about? >> Last Thursday. 1005 01:18:10,080 --> 01:18:14,679 » The last Thursday. Oh, wow. 1006 01:18:18,400 --> 01:18:28,120 » Suggestions. >> A special ZBA meeting. 1007 01:18:23,440 --> 01:18:28,120 » Yeah, you can do a special ZBA meeting. 1008 01:18:30,719 --> 01:18:36,400 Uh, you'd have to do that right now. >> Yeah. 1009 01:18:34,640 --> 01:18:39,040 » I don't know. How long does the ZVA notice have to be? Is it like us 15 1010 01:18:38,719 --> 01:18:44,159 days? >> Yeah, 15 days. 1011 01:18:40,560 --> 01:18:46,880 » Well, that ain't going to happen. >> Well, 1012 01:18:46,159 --> 01:18:50,000 » appreciate it. >> Sorry. 1013 01:18:48,320 --> 01:18:57,080 All right. >> At least you know it's approved and you 1014 01:18:51,760 --> 01:18:57,080 know you know there's an end in near so 1015 01:18:58,239 --> 01:19:06,960 » okay let me see where am I as much as 1016 01:19:04,320 --> 01:19:10,960 » Thank you. All right we will move on to committee 1017 01:19:08,800 --> 01:19:17,679 reports township board activities minute. What did you guys do? 1018 01:19:13,679 --> 01:19:22,320 » We had a few things on we was a There was an overage in the wolf account way 1019 01:19:20,880 --> 01:19:28,560 back when >> doing the wolf property the planning. 1020 01:19:25,280 --> 01:19:34,560 » There's quite a bit still owed but we're the township's taking responsibility for 1021 01:19:30,800 --> 01:19:36,239 it and saying it's for the 425 agreement from planning. 1022 01:19:35,760 --> 01:19:42,480 » Okay. >> So we're going to close that one out. to 1023 01:19:38,640 --> 01:19:49,960 get agree on road agreement and we're putting out 350,000 this year 1024 01:19:46,640 --> 01:19:49,960 for roads. 1025 01:19:51,199 --> 01:19:54,199 » Yeah, 1026 01:19:59,520 --> 01:20:06,719 » um as far as let's see, we did approve the 1027 01:20:03,920 --> 01:20:12,800 landscaping waiver for the gas station. >> Good. do that. And I did mention at at 1028 01:20:10,400 --> 01:20:16,080 the recycling to them about their 1029 01:20:14,480 --> 01:20:20,800 » no decision at this point for >> No, I told him he needed to probably 1030 01:20:17,840 --> 01:20:26,000 speak with the people there. >> Okay. 1031 01:20:21,840 --> 01:20:28,960 » Okay. Uh Thornton Farms, that's still with both attorneys. 1032 01:20:28,320 --> 01:20:35,840 » All right. >> There's been no decision yet. And 1033 01:20:32,400 --> 01:20:41,760 actually, Bill um found out that Sykes Drive and Wood Drive should be kept up 1034 01:20:39,920 --> 01:20:48,320 now that we shouldn't have to worry about it as far as for our road 1035 01:20:45,040 --> 01:20:53,840 agreement. That it's something that both of those roads should have been kept up 1036 01:20:50,800 --> 01:20:56,560 without us having to put money towards it. 1037 01:20:54,400 --> 01:20:59,120 » The county should have maintained it. Gotcha. 1038 01:20:57,440 --> 01:21:06,400 » Why is that? There's something to do with the um 1039 01:21:02,960 --> 01:21:10,880 with the state and because they're along the highway, 1040 01:21:10,000 --> 01:21:12,320 both of them. >> Mhm. 1041 01:21:11,199 --> 01:21:17,199 » They're service guys, >> right? They're service drives. 1042 01:21:14,400 --> 01:21:20,080 » I agree. They need upkeeping cuz they really need up. 1043 01:21:17,920 --> 01:21:22,640 » They never have had it. >> It's always been up to us if we want to 1044 01:21:21,840 --> 01:21:26,960 do anything. >> Well, good. That's good. I'm glad 1045 01:21:25,440 --> 01:21:30,159 commission. How do we get the state to pony up some money to do it? 1046 01:21:28,800 --> 01:21:33,679 » He's working on it. >> Yeah, 1047 01:21:32,080 --> 01:21:36,880 » he did find that out though. >> Good for him. 1048 01:21:34,800 --> 01:21:38,800 » Yeah. >> Anything else? 1049 01:21:37,679 --> 01:21:43,840 » That's it. >> Any questions for Nette? 1050 01:21:42,000 --> 01:21:49,936 » Thank you, Nette. >> Move on to the supervisor's report. Just 1051 01:21:46,880 --> 01:21:51,956 ran out of here. [laughter] 1052 01:21:53,040 --> 01:22:02,719 » He had something come up, so that's fine. Uh let's just move the joint um 1053 01:21:58,880 --> 01:22:07,679 planning for Silvin and Lima. >> Okay. We did sign on the intent to plan. 1054 01:22:05,920 --> 01:22:10,960 We did that a couple of months ago. >> Mhm. 1055 01:22:08,239 --> 01:22:15,440 » Uh we will have a public hearing on use for 1056 01:22:13,360 --> 01:22:20,960 that property. That just for everybody's knowledge, it's the property just south 1057 01:22:16,960 --> 01:22:27,520 of uh 94 between Fair Road and 52. It's about 28 acres. There's a 425 agreement 1058 01:22:24,560 --> 01:22:32,480 between Wimma and Silven Township on that that property. Uh so Elizabeth and 1059 01:22:30,719 --> 01:22:38,080 I are on the joint planning commission for that property. So we will be holding 1060 01:22:34,960 --> 01:22:43,120 a public hearing on you know ideas for special use I guess. 1061 01:22:41,199 --> 01:22:49,440 » Oh okay. >> Interesting. All right. I think we're 1062 01:22:45,280 --> 01:22:54,560 going to try to the master plan for it'll refer to the limema master plan 1063 01:22:51,600 --> 01:22:57,120 and the uh silver master plan so that we're not doing 1064 01:22:55,120 --> 01:23:00,480 » so be a whole complete master plan. It'll be like stuff specific to that 1065 01:22:59,440 --> 01:23:03,520 site and then >> okay 1066 01:23:01,120 --> 01:23:09,440 » for the all the background information and all that administration that goes 1067 01:23:06,719 --> 01:23:12,960 into the master plan it's it's going to refer to the other. 1068 01:23:10,880 --> 01:23:16,880 » So at this point there's nothing going on with that. Yeah. 1069 01:23:14,960 --> 01:23:22,320 » And then anybody that would come in for like something the development would 1070 01:23:19,040 --> 01:23:26,080 have to go to you guys. >> Yeah. 1071 01:23:23,679 --> 01:23:32,320 » Even though there's no >> plan yet, but it's under 1072 01:23:29,120 --> 01:23:35,679 » right under that 425 in place, >> right? Cuz that's 1073 01:23:33,440 --> 01:23:38,000 » Yeah, cuz it's a joint. >> Yeah. 1074 01:23:36,080 --> 01:23:42,560 » Okay. >> All right. Makes sense. I had no 1075 01:23:40,719 --> 01:23:48,719 correspondence. Final public comment. Anybody any 1076 01:23:45,679 --> 01:23:53,600 questions, comments? >> Thank you for coming. 1077 01:23:50,480 --> 01:23:57,600 » And noward >> Howard, hit it. 1078 01:23:54,719 --> 01:24:00,600 » I'm over your journey. >> Second. 1079 01:24:01,920 --> 01:24:09,480 » Can Okay. All in favor? I They do. You do it so fast I can't keep up.