1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:12,280
Mason, for a short period of time. These are commonly used at construction sites, outdoor events, or after natural disasters, when permanent power is not available.

2
00:00:13,000 --> 00:00:24,180
To install a temporary poll, a permit must be pulled by licensed electrical contractor to ensure that the setup is safe and complies with electrical code requirement.

3
00:00:24,180 --> 00:00:30,620
If you have any questions about how to get a tip poll permit, please contact our office.

4
00:05:00,370 --> 00:05:02,190
We'll give another 60 seconds.

5
00:05:32,420 --> 00:05:44,460
Good afternoon, everyone. Today is September 3rd, 2026, it's 303 PM, and it's the

6
00:05:44,460 --> 00:05:52,900
regular schedule of parks and sustainability committee. Today we have some special discussions and

7
00:05:52,900 --> 00:05:54,620
Join me in chamber today.

8
00:05:56,120 --> 00:05:57,460
We have Councilwoman Betsy Rui.

9
00:05:57,560 --> 00:05:59,300
We have Councilwoman Crystal Bass.

10
00:05:59,940 --> 00:06:01,340
Nobody on virtual.

11
00:06:01,680 --> 00:06:03,280
I am Councilman Khalil Batchon.

12
00:06:03,540 --> 00:06:04,340
I'm the chair of this committee.

13
00:06:05,380 --> 00:06:09,160
We have a excused absence for my Vice Chair,

14
00:06:09,260 --> 00:06:10,760
Councilwoman Paul McCrainie.

15
00:06:11,500 --> 00:06:14,600
We will get started with item number one.

16
00:06:14,600 --> 00:06:20,440
Special discussion, ID 26-119 Urban Forest Master Plan

17
00:06:21,100 --> 00:06:25,900
Overview, and it looks like we have Ms. Cindy Sullivan with trees over here.

18
00:06:26,260 --> 00:06:34,920
Please, if you don't mind, come on up and give us your overview, name and title for the record, please.

19
00:06:44,100 --> 00:06:44,520
There we go.

20
00:06:45,040 --> 00:06:51,320
My name is Cindy Sullivan, and I am the President and CEO of Trees Louisville, and I'm here

21
00:06:51,320 --> 00:06:58,160
to talk to you guys today about the Genesis and the process of the Urban Force Master Plan.

22
00:06:58,160 --> 00:07:12,880
So the story starts in 2023 in December, the Metro Council dedicated allocated $200,000 to

23
00:07:12,880 --> 00:07:16,000
trees Louisville to conduct an urban forest master plan.

24
00:07:17,460 --> 00:07:19,880
So what is an urban forest master plan?

25
00:07:19,960 --> 00:07:20,940
What is our tree plan?

26
00:07:22,100 --> 00:07:25,220
We're looking at it, it's basically, hang on, we'll get my folder.

27
00:07:29,120 --> 00:07:34,760
Well, we have that small intermission. We have been joined by the famous councilman, Anthony Piaz

28
00:07:34,760 --> 00:07:35,000
team.

29
00:07:40,070 --> 00:07:43,130
And you would think that I've done this before, but anyway,

30
00:07:45,810 --> 00:07:46,770
it, a urban force master plan

31
00:07:46,770 --> 00:07:56,010
is basically a huge community engagement and awareness mission, right? So we spent 19 months

32
00:07:56,010 --> 00:08:04,630
And had many, many meetings, and the reason that we were doing this is because we know that

33
00:08:04,630 --> 00:08:07,250
we've got a problem here in Louisville with our urban forest.

34
00:08:08,390 --> 00:08:15,070
And the urban forest is extremely important to the health and the quality of life of this

35
00:08:15,070 --> 00:08:15,470
community.

36
00:08:15,990 --> 00:08:18,590
There's impact on public health.

37
00:08:18,890 --> 00:08:23,530
We know that Louisville is dealing with heat stress, more frequent in severe storms, droughts

38
00:08:23,530 --> 00:08:26,630
floods and more from the changing climate.

39
00:08:27,270 --> 00:08:29,150
And we're looking to revitalize our city.

40
00:08:29,390 --> 00:08:34,130
Since 2020, we all will admit that Louisville's

41
00:08:34,130 --> 00:08:37,670
particularly the center of city needs some work.

42
00:08:39,050 --> 00:08:41,810
So for existing residents to stay competitive

43
00:08:41,810 --> 00:08:44,630
in the economic realm and to attract new residents

44
00:08:44,630 --> 00:08:47,310
and new businesses and to retain that talent.

45
00:08:48,010 --> 00:08:51,650
And then there is the sad story from a red lining

46
00:08:51,650 --> 00:08:57,790
from the 1930s and we know that Louisville is, we are working always to prioritize and address

47
00:08:57,790 --> 00:09:03,130
and remediate historical inequitable practices in marginalized communities.

48
00:09:03,430 --> 00:09:09,770
It's a bedrock principle that for Louisville to prosper every single neighborhood needs to thrive.

49
00:09:10,010 --> 00:09:11,230
And that's what we're working for.

50
00:09:12,190 --> 00:09:18,310
So the Urban Forest Master Plan was a partnership with Metro Parks and obviously Metro Council.

51
00:09:18,310 --> 00:09:28,110
And lots of other city agencies, we, again, hired a consulting service, urban canopy

52
00:09:28,110 --> 00:09:34,790
works, a female owned business in North Kentucky, Newport Kentucky, and they spent several

53
00:09:34,790 --> 00:09:36,410
months doing research and analysis.

54
00:09:36,830 --> 00:09:45,510
They looked at tree canopy trends, not just in Louisville, but with our peer cities and

55
00:09:45,510 --> 00:09:52,950
management practices in other cities, and we looked at planting strategies, invasives,

56
00:09:53,190 --> 00:09:59,970
natives, impact of climate, previous efforts, and review of operations and...

57
00:10:00,000 --> 00:10:23,280
And policies. So that took up quite a bit of time. And the map that I'm showing you indicates you're the percent change in canopy from 2012 to 2019. The biggest losses are the darkest burgundy colors and the biggest gains are that dark green. And you can see we didn't gain very much between 2012 and 2019.

58
00:10:23,280 --> 00:10:24,200
That's a nice question.

59
00:10:25,380 --> 00:10:33,460
So, I'm going to point out the Southwestern part of that map there, like biggest losses.

60
00:10:33,720 --> 00:10:39,120
I mean, let's use the very bottom left hand corner there.

61
00:10:39,500 --> 00:10:44,760
There's not been that much development in since 2019 to now.

62
00:10:45,360 --> 00:10:48,800
How are we losing that much percentage in trees?

63
00:10:49,160 --> 00:10:51,940
This was actually 2012 to 2019.

64
00:10:51,940 --> 00:11:00,240
And so we were still seeing losses from Emerald Ashfore that took out millions of trees.

65
00:11:03,540 --> 00:11:11,320
And it does vary in that area between minus 19 and minus 2, so that's quite a bit of variation.

66
00:11:13,220 --> 00:11:14,860
That could also be storms.

67
00:11:14,860 --> 00:11:21,080
It could be other disease problems, weather conditions, all those things.

68
00:11:21,340 --> 00:11:22,880
It's not necessarily always development.

69
00:11:26,840 --> 00:11:31,640
And then the discovery, a period of the Urban Force Master Plan, this is a very busy slide,

70
00:11:31,780 --> 00:11:35,920
I know, I don't expect you to go through all of this, but just keep in mind, we were very

71
00:11:35,920 --> 00:11:37,340
busy for those 19 months.

72
00:11:37,800 --> 00:11:42,700
We had an advisory group of 115 people that met three times for two hour workshops.

73
00:11:42,700 --> 00:11:48,700
We had an equity council that was composed of people from West Louisville and Southwest Louisville

74
00:11:49,240 --> 00:11:59,980
because we know that those are the areas of lowest canopy. We did a survey. We had one-on-one interviews with agencies and other non-profit organizations.

75
00:12:00,500 --> 00:12:10,060
We tabled at events and we met with more than 500 people at various conferences and social and civic meetings.

76
00:12:10,060 --> 00:12:19,740
So, it was very involved that we even had a ban or a poster at the Lynn family stadium during soccer games.

77
00:12:20,620 --> 00:12:29,460
So, what we found during this process is canopy cover does show significant changes by neighborhood.

78
00:12:29,460 --> 00:12:39,720
Some are as low as 13% some are up to 66% so I don't have to tell you probably the 13% canopy is in West Louisville 66 is in East Louisville

79
00:12:40,320 --> 00:12:43,560
Our current system is street tree management is not equitable

80
00:12:43,560 --> 00:12:51,220
We know that because the system results in less trees and those existing trees to be in poor condition in lower income areas

81
00:12:51,220 --> 00:12:56,080
And you can look at the pictures and there's a couple of residential streets

82
00:12:56,080 --> 00:12:59,660
But I also want you to pay mind to the top photograph.

83
00:13:00,320 --> 00:13:01,320
That's Frankford Avenue.

84
00:13:01,880 --> 00:13:04,300
This is one of our biggest economic corridors.

85
00:13:05,380 --> 00:13:08,020
And this, because the adjacent property owner

86
00:13:08,020 --> 00:13:12,080
is responsible for that tree, maybe they don't know

87
00:13:12,080 --> 00:13:13,860
that they're responsible, or maybe they just

88
00:13:13,860 --> 00:13:14,900
don't want to do it.

89
00:13:15,320 --> 00:13:19,100
But this is not the way we want our economic business

90
00:13:19,100 --> 00:13:20,240
corridors to look.

91
00:13:20,860 --> 00:13:23,360
So that's, I think, really important to point out.

92
00:13:23,360 --> 00:13:32,340
And then there were also lots of people during the meetings that called for more coordinated efforts between agencies.

93
00:13:32,740 --> 00:13:38,940
Trees are public infrastructure. They are vital city infrastructure and that's something that we all need to realize.

94
00:13:39,680 --> 00:13:46,300
And success looks like being able to walk and bike and take the bus under shade and not be heat stressed when you're moving around the city.

95
00:13:47,680 --> 00:14:12,080
And, you know, again, these are some of the conditions that were found street trees not being maintained, results in more storm damage and higher cost and management decisions are made by people that don't have the expertise that urban forest or professional urban foresters do.

96
00:14:12,080 --> 00:14:20,440
And if that increases inequity throughout our city and lots of street trees are in poor condition and many residents don't want new trees

97
00:14:20,440 --> 00:14:27,190
So improving the canopy is difficult because trees that are high risk or into climb scare people

98
00:14:28,160 --> 00:14:37,960
So the goals of the master plan were for it all came down to having access for all so to prioritize every neighborhood having at least 30% canopy

99
00:14:37,960 --> 00:14:45,160
There needs to be a mentality change so that we recognize trees as vital city structure

100
00:14:45,160 --> 00:14:50,460
infrastructure that they are, people need to be able to walk and bike comfortably in their

101
00:14:50,460 --> 00:14:52,560
neighborhoods and to get to and from work.

102
00:14:53,160 --> 00:14:59,960
And then we also need to create a long-lived high quality and sustainable urban forest.

103
00:15:00,180 --> 00:15:06,440
To ensure that people can get to where they need to be and that it lasts for many generations.

104
00:15:07,880 --> 00:15:18,380
So, the plan was led by like Trees Louisville and Metro Parks, but there were lots of other departments within Metro government that participated.

105
00:15:18,680 --> 00:15:24,200
You can see that list. Other agencies also were involved in the decision-making process and the findings.

106
00:15:24,200 --> 00:15:34,900
And then there were two Council representatives on the advisory group in the advisory group, and that was Councilwoman Betsy Rui and Councilman Andrew Owen.

107
00:15:36,140 --> 00:15:39,720
So the path forward. I gave everyone has the handout.

108
00:15:40,300 --> 00:15:41,780
Thank you very much.

109
00:15:42,900 --> 00:15:53,320
So there were 20 findings, 20 different findings, and there were then 10 strategies developed to work on over time.

110
00:15:53,320 --> 00:15:59,060
those strategies. And each strategy has several different

111
00:15:59,060 --> 00:16:04,480
action items, and I will tell you that we are very proud of the fact that since

112
00:16:04,480 --> 00:16:11,640
last September, we have started and sometimes even completed more than half of those

113
00:16:11,640 --> 00:16:18,420
33 action items. So there are lots of organizations and agencies in the community

114
00:16:18,420 --> 00:16:23,300
that are working very hard already on implementing this plan, so we're very excited about

115
00:16:23,300 --> 00:16:30,420
that. There's one other thing that I want to mention before I wrap up,

116
00:16:32,770 --> 00:16:34,470
given that today is

117
00:16:34,470 --> 00:16:44,490
has a heat index of 111 degrees. You have all just announced yesterday the release of an updated

118
00:16:44,490 --> 00:16:51,650
Louisville heat mitigation study, Dr. Brian Stone from Georgia Tech University did a study in 2016

119
00:16:51,650 --> 00:16:57,930
and then returned this year to do another study, we are the first city in the United States

120
00:16:58,650 --> 00:17:05,690
to duplicate those studies and his findings are very significant. He found that we are definitely getting hotter

121
00:17:05,690 --> 00:17:13,670
and again there's lots of inequity and he also states that trees and urban tree canopy

122
00:17:13,670 --> 00:17:18,750
are the most efficient, economical, and effective means of reducing heat.

123
00:17:18,750 --> 00:17:28,270
Just planting 50% of available spaces within neighborhood, for instance, can reduce the heat

124
00:17:28,270 --> 00:17:29,830
by seven degrees.

125
00:17:30,550 --> 00:17:37,510
And that's from his study that I sent all of you guys a copy of that, the press release

126
00:17:37,510 --> 00:17:42,350
so that you can access it should be in your inbox by the time you get back to your offices.

127
00:17:43,190 --> 00:17:44,510
And that's all I have.

128
00:17:44,510 --> 00:17:46,850
Thank you so much.

129
00:17:47,550 --> 00:17:53,230
Real quick, I have been joined by Councilwoman Jennifer Chapel, and also I have to read

130
00:17:53,230 --> 00:18:00,150
this meeting is being held percent to care of 61.826 and Councilwoman May we have been joined

131
00:18:00,150 --> 00:18:06,510
virtually by Councilwoman May I share Paula McCraeney.

132
00:18:07,410 --> 00:18:10,340
Any questions on First Indie?

133
00:18:12,280 --> 00:18:19,380
Thank you Mr. Chair, so we discussed this, but I'd just like to reiterate some things

134
00:18:19,380 --> 00:18:25,620
that we discussed, you know, I think, discussed privately in a public forum here.

135
00:18:26,120 --> 00:18:28,020
You know, I think there's some great stuff here.

136
00:18:28,280 --> 00:18:30,780
I really don't have any problem with the plan per se, right?

137
00:18:31,800 --> 00:18:40,300
We're going to talk a little bit about, I think the, I think,

138
00:18:40,760 --> 00:18:46,900
But this is a resolution, right, essentially what we're saying here and I think I just want to make sure I got your intent.

139
00:18:47,580 --> 00:18:51,180
What we're saying here is that, yes, we appreciate the work that was done here.

140
00:18:51,460 --> 00:18:55,680
There's a plan behind this work and that we agree with the plan.

141
00:18:56,000 --> 00:18:57,640
Doesn't mean we have all the budgets sorted out.

142
00:18:57,820 --> 00:18:59,080
Doesn't mean we have the whole plan sorted out.

143
00:18:59,400 --> 00:19:01,360
We still need to work on all of that, right?

144
00:19:01,580 --> 00:19:04,920
But we're saying that at least from a strategy point of view.

145
00:19:05,820 --> 00:19:13,140
We agree with these fundamental principles and action items and you know some of it may be able to get done very quickly

146
00:19:13,140 --> 00:19:17,980
Some of it might take longer and that will have to be sorted out through operating budgets and all this stuff

147
00:19:17,980 --> 00:19:20,720
I think that's what we're getting at here. Is that that makes sense?

148
00:19:20,960 --> 00:19:22,760
That is perfectly correct. Absolutely.

149
00:19:23,180 --> 00:19:24,620
Terrific. Thank you very much. Appreciate it.

150
00:19:24,760 --> 00:19:26,660
Thank you. Thanks for your support.

151
00:19:26,660 --> 00:19:32,400
I'm going to ask a question, you know, to that, to kind of piggyback a little bit off

152
00:19:32,400 --> 00:19:38,160
of the Councilman Piaugetini's point though, do you've gotten half of this list already

153
00:19:38,160 --> 00:19:38,540
completed?

154
00:19:39,260 --> 00:19:40,040
No, in progress.

155
00:19:40,040 --> 00:19:40,700
In progress.

156
00:19:41,440 --> 00:19:47,060
What does, why do we need to move something forward as far as a resolution if you're already

157
00:19:47,060 --> 00:19:47,640
doing the work?

158
00:19:50,450 --> 00:19:56,710
Well, that's a good question, it's, I think, a show of support to get the other half done

159
00:19:56,710 --> 00:19:59,190
Is part of it?

160
00:19:59,410 --> 00:19:59,430
Okay.

161
00:19:59,670 --> 00:19:59,970
And I-

162
00:20:00,000 --> 00:20:19,460
I think, I mean, this is a comprehensive plan that Metro Council requested. And so, and we did a great job getting it done. It was a lot of hard work, and I think there's a lot to be said for that acknowledgement that this is a good plan and that you're behind it.

163
00:20:19,460 --> 00:20:26,160
would you like to touch maybe a little bit on on some of the financial barriers that you're going to

164
00:20:26,160 --> 00:20:32,500
and roadblocks that you may not have with this current plan and what needs to be done to execute?

165
00:20:33,400 --> 00:20:41,460
Well, let me say one thing in regard to financial barriers that when we're the one thing that's really quite important is

166
00:20:41,460 --> 00:20:50,060
is a tree's Louisville, we realize that improving canopy is extremely difficult when people

167
00:20:50,060 --> 00:20:57,000
have high risk trees or mature trees that look scary and dangerous that are dropping branches.

168
00:20:58,240 --> 00:21:02,520
That is a real and serious barrier to canopy improvement.

169
00:21:02,760 --> 00:21:09,180
No one wants new trees when they think of trees as being dangerous and shady and causing

170
00:21:09,180 --> 00:21:10,000
them a lot of work.

171
00:21:10,000 --> 00:21:28,520
So one of the things that trees Louisville, one of the action items that trees Louisville has implemented is implementing is we got we have a grant from a local foundation to help private citizens with trees on their property deal with those trees.

172
00:21:28,520 --> 00:21:39,700
So our team of certified arborists will evaluate those trees using the tree risk assessment qualifications that we have from ISA and if the tree needs to come down

173
00:21:39,700 --> 00:21:45,880
We will pay for that out of these funds if the tree needs to be pruned we will pay for that out of these funds

174
00:21:45,880 --> 00:21:49,880
So that is action item. Let me see if I can find it

175
00:21:53,320 --> 00:21:59,980
Because I'm not looking at it. I have to cut my glasses on to do this a point one

176
00:22:04,180 --> 00:22:10,720
Just for clarification though when they a homeowner agrees to say taking out a tree through that grant program

177
00:22:10,720 --> 00:22:19,870
They have to promise to plant one or two trees in replacement and that's facilitated by

178
00:22:20,240 --> 00:22:23,960
trees level and their native species and they're

179
00:22:23,960 --> 00:22:28,720
They have a care plan is that correct that is correct. It's not a tree removal initiative

180
00:22:28,720 --> 00:22:43,600
It is a tree canopy improvement project, so we will help you if you've got a bad tree, but you have to sign a contract that you're going to maintain the new trees.

181
00:22:44,400 --> 00:22:54,000
And then the second part of that grant is also to find ways to repurpose that urban wood to try and help put more funding into our community forest.

182
00:22:54,000 --> 00:23:04,720
So there are lots of higher purposes for urban wood than just mulch and animal petting, furniture, lumber, biochar.

183
00:23:04,900 --> 00:23:14,580
There's lots of things that you can utilize to, you can use that wood for to a higher purpose and perhaps create a funding stream.

184
00:23:14,580 --> 00:23:15,720
Thank you.

185
00:23:15,920 --> 00:23:16,580
Councilmember Piazji.

186
00:23:18,860 --> 00:23:19,820
Thank you.

187
00:23:20,260 --> 00:23:26,640
Cindy, I want to get your thoughts on a hopefully what is considered a minor clarifying

188
00:23:26,640 --> 00:23:31,760
amendment for the resolution, but before I make it, and I'm not making a motion, just

189
00:23:31,760 --> 00:23:32,140
to be clear.

190
00:23:32,200 --> 00:23:36,700
I'm really running a by-you, and I want to see if you have any significant objections

191
00:23:36,700 --> 00:23:38,200
to the way I'm wording this, right?

192
00:23:38,700 --> 00:23:44,400
Because when I read the, again, we did talk about how I think in the past, my concern as

193
00:23:44,400 --> 00:23:51,880
always been that, in some cases, the administration will take resolutions and then start doing things

194
00:23:51,880 --> 00:23:56,660
without having a plan, having a budget, having support of council, on tactically how they're doing it,

195
00:23:56,680 --> 00:24:01,480
and all of these things. Like for example, in my humble opinion, we need to implement all of this on

196
00:24:01,480 --> 00:24:07,940
metro property in a right of way and then we can phase it out to areas of need, right where there's

197
00:24:07,940 --> 00:24:12,800
financial aid or disproportionate impact in all of these other things. So we can do this in a very,

198
00:24:12,800 --> 00:24:19,560
smart way over a period of time. Section 3 is an example. Focus on Section 2 and Section

199
00:24:19,560 --> 00:24:22,720
3 of your resolution. If you want to pull it up, if you've got it in front of you.

200
00:24:26,180 --> 00:24:29,700
I went to the actual resolution. I don't have a copy of that.

201
00:24:31,240 --> 00:24:36,020
So the right now reads Section 2. The Council urges that, so Section 1, the Council fully

202
00:24:36,020 --> 00:24:41,120
supports the level of tree plant strategies. No question. The, at least for me, no question.

203
00:24:41,120 --> 00:24:46,080
The Council urges the necessary measure agencies to move forward with implementation of the

204
00:24:46,080 --> 00:24:47,280
Louisville tree plan.

205
00:24:48,200 --> 00:24:53,580
I might say something like move forward with planning for the implementation of the Louisville

206
00:24:53,580 --> 00:24:54,480
tree plan.

207
00:24:54,920 --> 00:24:59,040
And then in section three something like, is it your reads, the Council request the administration

208
00:24:59,040 --> 00:24:59,900
followed the Louisville.

209
00:25:00,000 --> 00:25:06,400
Tremus, strategies, 100%, but we know there's a financial impact the way I might reward this to say the Council

210
00:25:06,400 --> 00:25:10,920
request the administration for all the local tree plan strategies, and it's planning with implementation

211
00:25:10,920 --> 00:25:17,440
contingent on future approval through a Metro Council budget or operating plan. Again, I'm the spitballing

212
00:25:17,440 --> 00:25:22,500
something that I've come up with. I wanted to hear from you if this still aligns with what your intention

213
00:25:22,500 --> 00:25:27,900
here is because I think it's important to communicate to the people that worked on this, that we appreciate

214
00:25:27,900 --> 00:25:33,260
this work and we do want to adopt this plan. I know I do. But I also want to be realistic with

215
00:25:33,260 --> 00:25:37,940
people about, you know, look, there is a financial impact. This is not going to happen overnight.

216
00:25:38,280 --> 00:25:44,320
I think we all realize that. And all of everything in Metro is contingent upon budgeting and all

217
00:25:44,320 --> 00:25:53,260
that stuff. Any thoughts about some of the recommended or my idea on amending that section here?

218
00:25:53,820 --> 00:25:58,300
those language changes, I think, are absolutely fine with me. You're spitball.

219
00:25:59,200 --> 00:25:59,620
Hit right there.

220
00:25:59,760 --> 00:26:00,420
Okay, great.

221
00:26:00,520 --> 00:26:01,460
I think that's perfect.

222
00:26:01,920 --> 00:26:02,740
Because that's the intent.

223
00:26:03,640 --> 00:26:04,520
Yeah. And I think so too.

224
00:26:04,720 --> 00:26:10,500
And I think it's something that's the only concern I have is that it's

225
00:26:10,500 --> 00:26:16,440
it's misconstrued as itself being the authorizing document versus this is the authorization

226
00:26:16,440 --> 00:26:19,600
for us to say we are adopting this and we're going to work to implement it,

227
00:26:19,800 --> 00:26:22,880
but we still need to go through the regular process to make sure all this is implemented.

228
00:26:22,880 --> 00:26:24,760
So, but I appreciate it.

229
00:26:24,760 --> 00:26:25,760
We should work on this.

230
00:26:25,840 --> 00:26:28,140
You could make those language changes,

231
00:26:28,440 --> 00:26:29,700
and then you would also be a sponsor.

232
00:26:30,020 --> 00:26:30,380
A co-sponsor.

233
00:26:30,540 --> 00:26:30,940
There we go.

234
00:26:31,480 --> 00:26:32,240
Thank you very much.

235
00:26:35,000 --> 00:26:36,120
Councilwoman Vass.

236
00:26:41,900 --> 00:26:44,040
Turnery Mone notes over here.

237
00:26:45,580 --> 00:26:51,600
So, part of this plan, I know that, is any of this

238
00:26:51,600 --> 00:26:55,620
look to be contracted out in order to get it done?

239
00:26:56,140 --> 00:26:58,240
Or is this all going to be done in house?

240
00:26:58,480 --> 00:26:58,900
Do you know?

241
00:26:58,900 --> 00:27:04,200
Oh, no, sure. There's contractual agreements in place right now, and I think that those

242
00:27:04,200 --> 00:27:05,280
are definitely going to continue.

243
00:27:06,340 --> 00:27:07,520
So, we are contract.

244
00:27:07,520 --> 00:27:08,540
I get it then.

245
00:27:09,440 --> 00:27:14,880
That's not to say that on page six, I had wrote down where you all were talking about the

246
00:27:14,880 --> 00:27:18,160
dark red areas with the higher percentage of areas.

247
00:27:18,660 --> 00:27:24,890
Is there something that shows, like, can we get where it shows, like, exactly what the

248
00:27:24,890 --> 00:27:30,230
results of that was how they came up with that, like the decrease in those areas or what

249
00:27:30,230 --> 00:27:31,410
the calls was.

250
00:27:31,810 --> 00:27:32,410
Yes, definitely.

251
00:27:32,690 --> 00:27:37,670
I'm glad you asked that, too, Councilwoman Bass, because you can get all the information

252
00:27:37,670 --> 00:27:46,910
from the Urban Forest Master Plan on the website LouisvilleTreePlan.org, so that it will have

253
00:27:46,910 --> 00:27:54,870
information on the Urban Tree canopy assessment where these data came from, as well as, you

254
00:27:54,870 --> 00:27:57,730
and the research that our team did.

255
00:27:58,570 --> 00:27:59,790
LouisvilleTreePlan.org.

256
00:28:00,210 --> 00:28:04,810
It will also have a listing of the action items

257
00:28:04,810 --> 00:28:08,990
and who actually is working on them and what the progress is being made.

258
00:28:10,470 --> 00:28:15,890
And then just to kind of touch off of what Councilman Piaugentini said about

259
00:28:15,890 --> 00:28:21,550
our own properties are in dire need of tree canopy work

260
00:28:21,550 --> 00:28:24,510
that has been years and years in the making.

261
00:28:25,630 --> 00:28:28,770
And some of the examples of pictures of trees you showed

262
00:28:28,770 --> 00:28:31,070
in residential areas that we are going

263
00:28:31,070 --> 00:28:34,710
after the adjacent property owners for our own properties

264
00:28:34,710 --> 00:28:35,830
look like that.

265
00:28:36,130 --> 00:28:40,330
So I'm just trying to figure out how do we, as council,

266
00:28:41,050 --> 00:28:45,290
pass along to this person that they're responsible for this tree

267
00:28:45,290 --> 00:28:48,810
that looks this way, yet our own trees look this way.

268
00:28:48,930 --> 00:28:50,230
I think it's a bad practice.

269
00:28:50,230 --> 00:28:56,410
I think it don't look good, so I just think we need to figure out our own properties first,

270
00:28:57,090 --> 00:29:01,930
then we can educate and help with the others.

271
00:29:02,370 --> 00:29:08,170
And I think that that's actually item 1.3, we'll address that over time.

272
00:29:08,310 --> 00:29:13,450
I think that it is important for Louisville Metro government to take over the maintenance

273
00:29:13,450 --> 00:29:17,090
of right-of-way trees to set a good example for one thing, as you say.

274
00:29:17,090 --> 00:29:29,090
And it improves the equity and it also puts that in the hands of professionals, the maintenance and the care of those trees.

275
00:29:29,810 --> 00:29:30,250
Yeah.

276
00:29:30,330 --> 00:29:32,010
Because I mean, we know it's expensive.

277
00:29:32,430 --> 00:29:43,610
We have a lot of big older trees in our area that are, unfortunately, in right ways, in seniors' yards that are on set-in comes that they just don't have the funding.

278
00:29:43,610 --> 00:29:52,110
And I think that's a lot of the problem with the, with the tree cannabis in our area that, you know, I mean the last big storm we had

279
00:29:52,110 --> 00:29:59,970
Hit my area very, very hard and a lot of it was old big trees that haven't been maintained and maintenance over the years that caught

280
00:30:01,060 --> 00:30:28,820
And one of the things that I have preached my entire career is that if you've got trees that you are maintaining regularly, if you can get a tree professional to come in every two or three years to do some maintenance, you will have a tree that will definitely be strong and will live as long as it possibly can, you know, complete its life cycle and give us all of the ecosystem services that trees do provide.

281
00:30:28,820 --> 00:30:32,200
I mean, that is so important because it could agree with you more.

282
00:30:32,280 --> 00:30:38,040
And I agree, but when you're trying to talk to an 83-year-old that's on a setting

283
00:30:38,040 --> 00:30:44,440
come that, you know, some of these tree quotes they're getting are seven to $10,000

284
00:30:44,440 --> 00:30:45,940
for these massive trees.

285
00:30:46,560 --> 00:30:49,200
So it's a tough pill to swallow.

286
00:30:49,620 --> 00:30:53,840
Yeah, and I think I've asked every one of you guys to keep a running list

287
00:30:53,840 --> 00:30:55,640
of your constituents that call in.

288
00:30:55,640 --> 00:31:05,300
We had to your point a couple of weeks ago, we looked at a 72-inch oak in a neighborhood in District 3, I think.

289
00:31:05,760 --> 00:31:11,740
And the estimate to remove it was $30,000 because of where it was and how big it was.

290
00:31:13,120 --> 00:31:14,220
Who could afford that?

291
00:31:15,360 --> 00:31:17,480
So we need to figure it out.

292
00:31:17,680 --> 00:31:17,880
Sure.

293
00:31:18,320 --> 00:31:18,540
All right.

294
00:31:18,600 --> 00:31:20,220
Thank you.

295
00:31:20,660 --> 00:31:22,280
And maybe that's, go ahead.

296
00:31:22,280 --> 00:31:26,300
I was going to say maybe that's a good segue and to having parks come up.

297
00:31:27,500 --> 00:31:28,200
Councilwoman Berber.

298
00:31:29,240 --> 00:31:29,340
Okay.

299
00:31:30,800 --> 00:31:32,860
Do you find down those notes on how to change that language?

300
00:31:34,740 --> 00:31:35,680
Yeah, I'm very curious.

301
00:31:35,840 --> 00:31:36,660
Thank you.

302
00:31:36,820 --> 00:31:39,660
Councilman, Pigeon, Tina, for your obvious support of this.

303
00:31:40,420 --> 00:31:42,140
And thank you, Cindy and everybody.

304
00:31:42,340 --> 00:31:44,380
It's reasonable for all you work on this.

305
00:31:44,840 --> 00:31:46,340
And this is really important.

306
00:31:46,520 --> 00:31:50,680
And as we're finding from the discussion over here it seems like one of the most important

307
00:31:50,680 --> 00:31:57,940
steps here and ultimately probably the most expensive one is taking over street trees and being

308
00:31:57,940 --> 00:32:03,000
able to maintain them and keep them healthy because that's also part of changing the mindset

309
00:32:03,000 --> 00:32:07,780
because a lot of people they don't want to put a tree in because yeah it comes down to it

310
00:32:07,780 --> 00:32:13,240
then how do I pay for taking it out or managing it and so yes we have to have a funding stream

311
00:32:13,240 --> 00:32:21,400
I'm just curious, you talk about developing a funding stream with dead tree parts.

312
00:32:23,320 --> 00:32:28,960
So, do you, and I know one of the issues that we've got with trees that are street trees

313
00:32:28,960 --> 00:32:32,000
and stuff is too many times to get things nailed in them.

314
00:32:32,500 --> 00:32:38,800
Do we have the technology available in a saw mill nearby that can detect that so we don't

315
00:32:38,800 --> 00:32:39,780
screw up blades?

316
00:32:41,020 --> 00:32:47,140
That is a challenge when you're working with Urban Trees, absolutely, and yes, we are working on that.

317
00:32:47,720 --> 00:32:54,560
I mean, part of the team at Trees Louisville is going up to Baltimore and D.C. at the end of the month.

318
00:32:54,840 --> 00:33:00,880
And we're going to look at the Urban Wood Reuse project that they have there.

319
00:33:00,880 --> 00:33:04,120
and they actually sell urban wood to

320
00:33:06,440 --> 00:33:11,800
room in board, you know, that they used to make furniture, and that's, you know, a national furniture company.

321
00:33:12,560 --> 00:33:14,020
So, it is possible,

322
00:33:18,260 --> 00:33:21,060
if it can be done, we can get it done.

323
00:33:22,280 --> 00:33:23,680
I would love to see that.

324
00:33:23,760 --> 00:33:27,040
Yeah, it's pretty exciting. And I will say too, that, I mean,

325
00:33:30,220 --> 00:33:35,020
The Morton Harbor Readam is a bit of a different situation because they're not talking about urban trees,

326
00:33:35,120 --> 00:33:41,860
but when they lose trees in the Harbor Readam, they cut slabs and cookies and they've made hundreds of thousands of dollars from those sales.

327
00:33:42,460 --> 00:33:45,040
So, fingers crossed we can get something done.

328
00:33:46,100 --> 00:33:49,860
Okay, thank you very much and I look forward to the voting else on this.

329
00:33:49,920 --> 00:33:50,500
Thank you.

330
00:33:50,820 --> 00:33:52,120
Thank you, no further questions.

331
00:33:52,120 --> 00:33:53,500
Thank you, Cindy, for your presentation.

332
00:33:54,840 --> 00:33:57,480
Up next is item number two.

333
00:33:57,720 --> 00:34:03,800
We have ID 26126136 Financial Impact Statement Overview,

334
00:34:04,140 --> 00:34:08,660
Michelle King, and Dr. Masuda, a Global Parks and Recs.

335
00:34:16,730 --> 00:34:18,030
Good afternoon, everyone.

336
00:34:18,510 --> 00:34:21,290
I'm Michelle King, I'm Executive Director of Louisville Parks

337
00:34:21,290 --> 00:34:23,510
and Recreation, and I'm here with.

338
00:34:27,960 --> 00:34:29,200
I'm Ms. Sudo's director,

339
00:34:29,200 --> 00:34:33,140
So let us send Director Oversing Urban Post for the Division at the Liberal Parks and

340
00:34:33,140 --> 00:34:34,060
Recreation Department.

341
00:34:35,520 --> 00:34:41,720
So we are here today to give a presentation walking through the financial impact study

342
00:34:41,720 --> 00:34:49,180
that was prepared at the Council's request and I'll start out with an MS today and I will

343
00:34:49,180 --> 00:34:51,740
be kind of transitioning and tag teaming throughout the presentation.

344
00:34:51,740 --> 00:34:59,960
But I want to just set the stage for what we're presenting here today, the Financial Impact Study.

345
00:35:01,180 --> 00:35:12,940
We're talking about what we are presenting, and what we're not here today doing. First of all, we want to make sure that we are explaining the study that was prepared for your request.

346
00:35:13,520 --> 00:35:29,820
We'll identify which of those urban forest master plan actions were included in the request and why that was, as Cindy just informed you all there are 33 actions, and obviously you can see that we're not nearly that many included in the impact study.

347
00:35:30,000 --> 00:35:36,580
We'll also describe what are the assumptions and the types of resources that we included in our analysis.

348
00:35:37,620 --> 00:35:46,300
And we're hoping that what we can provide for you today gives you some context for your consideration of the plan and its potential future implementation.

349
00:35:47,140 --> 00:35:55,600
What we're not here today to do is to represent any specific endorsement of the plan or an implementation strategy for the plan.

350
00:35:57,320 --> 00:36:02,500
Often, when departments bring you this kind of information with all of these dollars and figures attached,

351
00:36:02,520 --> 00:36:07,100
it's an appropriation discussion or a budget discussion, obviously, that's not why we're here today,

352
00:36:07,240 --> 00:36:13,780
so just reminding folks that we're here at your request because you asked us for information,

353
00:36:14,200 --> 00:36:15,460
so that you could inform your discussion.

354
00:36:15,700 --> 00:36:20,420
And that is our number one goal here today is to make sure that we're providing clear information

355
00:36:20,420 --> 00:36:27,560
and making ourselves available to answer your questions about what some potential strategies

356
00:36:27,560 --> 00:36:29,360
for implementation would look like.

357
00:36:29,800 --> 00:36:34,720
We are not necessarily here to recommend any specific model of adoption, so we've mentioned

358
00:36:34,720 --> 00:36:41,680
before, there could be different ways to implement the strategies and actions that are contained

359
00:36:41,680 --> 00:36:47,000
in the plan, so we want to talk you through what it looks like when we tried to put some

360
00:36:47,000 --> 00:36:49,420
figures to those actions.

361
00:36:52,440 --> 00:36:58,840
So, as we mentioned, the financial impact study, we worked with the

362
00:36:58,840 --> 00:37:05,220
action items in the plan that one would have responsibilities for low-vomitro government,

363
00:37:05,420 --> 00:37:11,500
as Cindy talked through, this is a community-wide canopy plan, a community-wide for a street plan.

364
00:37:11,500 --> 00:37:25,160
So, not all of those recommendations are ones that require action by Metro government or even with those that do require action, they don't necessarily all incur a financial impact.

365
00:37:25,420 --> 00:37:39,580
So, we went out that down to looking at seven different actions. Six of those are included in the total resources, the dollar figure that we ultimately came to at the end.

366
00:37:39,580 --> 00:37:43,780
Those are ones where we know that there would be financial,

367
00:37:43,840 --> 00:37:46,320
identifiable financial impacts to Metro government.

368
00:37:46,840 --> 00:37:50,200
One of those, we also said, hey, this is a financial impact

369
00:37:50,200 --> 00:37:52,480
to little bit of Metro government, but we've already

370
00:37:52,480 --> 00:37:56,240
incurred it because it's one of those actions of 17 actions

371
00:37:56,240 --> 00:37:57,740
that is already underway.

372
00:37:58,320 --> 00:38:01,820
It's already been funded and is nearly complete.

373
00:38:01,880 --> 00:38:03,160
We'll talk about that later.

374
00:38:03,640 --> 00:38:08,360
So those other 26 out of the 33 actions, they are not included in this

375
00:38:08,360 --> 00:38:13,280
financial impact study, they either weren't our responsibility or they wouldn't have

376
00:38:13,280 --> 00:38:14,780
quantifiable financial impacts.

377
00:38:18,700 --> 00:38:30,820
So just as an overview here, we included some existing resources, so personnel in particular

378
00:38:30,820 --> 00:38:36,520
that are already budgeted and part of our operations, local parks and recreation, of course,

379
00:38:36,820 --> 00:38:38,320
houses the urban forestry division.

380
00:38:38,320 --> 00:38:43,580
We have the charge to care for parks and parkway trees.

381
00:38:43,820 --> 00:38:50,180
We also have a team of quarter-culture professionals that care for our natural spaces within

382
00:38:50,180 --> 00:38:55,040
our parks, our landscaping beds, and also take care of the thousands of young trees

383
00:38:55,040 --> 00:38:59,620
that we have planted across parks in parkways over the last several years.

384
00:39:00,120 --> 00:39:04,780
So those 2.1 million dollars is included in the total.

385
00:39:04,780 --> 00:39:16,660
We'll spend a lot of time here today talking about what new resources need to be added in order to meet the charge of these six different actions that we were included.

386
00:39:17,240 --> 00:39:32,580
So this is just a bit of a summary slide. There will be new costs that recur annually. There will also be new equipment needed to fulfill the charge in particular the street tree maintenance and care in action item 1.3.

387
00:39:34,120 --> 00:39:42,500
So those, we've included here, they show up as a total, but they don't necessarily have to be a cost that is incurred all at one time.

388
00:39:43,160 --> 00:39:46,700
So just want to make that note as you step through this.

389
00:39:47,040 --> 00:39:55,300
And then there is one impact that we said would be periodic, and that was the recommendation for an updated canopy assessment every five to ten years.

390
00:39:56,040 --> 00:39:59,180
So it's not a one time cost, but it's also not an annual cost.

391
00:40:02,290 --> 00:40:29,610
So, this is just a quick overview slide before we start diving into each of these. These are those action items that we looked at. Action item 1.3 is obviously the one that has the largest financial impact. As we stepped through these, we're going to save that one to the end. As we talk through, just because I think that's probably the one that is the most complex in its analysis and certainly the one with the largest impact.

392
00:40:30,330 --> 00:40:34,930
The cost that you'll see on this slide, you'll notice that that doesn't all add up to that 13 million.

393
00:40:35,430 --> 00:40:38,290
These are all the new costs that would be incurred.

394
00:40:38,650 --> 00:40:41,150
So again, we're really going to highlight those new costs,

395
00:40:41,430 --> 00:40:44,670
but we will show you where those existing costs come in.

396
00:40:46,470 --> 00:40:52,610
I'm going to turn this over to Masuda now to take us through some of the specifics.

397
00:40:53,590 --> 00:40:54,570
Sure. Thank you, Michelle.

398
00:40:57,420 --> 00:41:03,120
So, like Michelle mentioned, we are going to start with the easy action items.

399
00:41:04,300 --> 00:41:11,760
So, one of them is action 2.1 to add higher level urban forestry to the system.

400
00:41:12,620 --> 00:41:19,460
The plan is not necessarily pointing out what the part meant, but the main idea here is to

401
00:41:19,460 --> 00:41:30,020
able to have a professional expertise when it's about capital projects or street designs from

402
00:41:30,020 --> 00:41:37,100
the beginning of the projects to make sure that trees are included in those projects and

403
00:41:37,100 --> 00:41:41,120
for the future, the maintenance plan is also considered.

404
00:41:41,120 --> 00:42:10,640
So, one higher level urban forestry is being recommended and we, in the model that we developed, we told an administrator position would be appropriate for that purpose and then we are hoping that, you know, coordination across planning and infrastructure efforts throughout Metro government agencies and connecting to urban forestry plan with the implementation and the partners.

405
00:42:10,640 --> 00:42:15,240
would be also a task of this position to perform.

406
00:42:16,740 --> 00:42:21,660
And that is the cost of $130,000 to Metro.

407
00:42:21,920 --> 00:42:25,860
I just have this is the annual cost operating cost.

408
00:42:27,360 --> 00:42:34,280
Action. 3.1 is calling for a code enforcement capacity increase.

409
00:42:34,280 --> 00:42:35,220
So,

410
00:42:37,500 --> 00:42:48,080
the project that in Arborist would perform this kind of task, and again, the purpose here is to

411
00:42:48,080 --> 00:42:56,000
add a field inspection component to existing codes and regulations for development plan implementation.

412
00:42:57,020 --> 00:43:00,240
So, the plan is understanding their occurrences.

413
00:43:00,240 --> 00:43:06,220
There are staff members to review the plans, the development plans, but not necessarily do

414
00:43:07,040 --> 00:43:15,720
have staff members to follow up with the implementation and make sure the plan is being implemented

415
00:43:15,720 --> 00:43:19,080
correct at the way that it was developed.

416
00:43:21,320 --> 00:43:27,060
I'll just add at that point because we are talking about development plan review with that position

417
00:43:27,060 --> 00:43:31,160
that was a cost that was incurred, but there were a number of action items included in the

418
00:43:31,160 --> 00:43:34,120
strategy that talked about code reviews.

419
00:43:34,340 --> 00:43:36,740
So those weren't included in the fiscal impact,

420
00:43:36,940 --> 00:43:39,380
because that wasn't something that we could identify.

421
00:43:40,180 --> 00:43:43,660
But that position that looks at the implementation

422
00:43:43,660 --> 00:43:47,180
of development plans and ensures compliance

423
00:43:47,180 --> 00:43:50,120
with the development plans that are approved

424
00:43:50,120 --> 00:43:54,680
is part of a larger discussion in the forced master plan

425
00:43:54,680 --> 00:43:58,280
around codes and the lane development code, particularly.

426
00:43:59,520 --> 00:44:01,320
Correct, thank you, Michelle.

427
00:44:02,560 --> 00:44:08,120
Action 5.1 is calling for a workforce development program.

428
00:44:10,750 --> 00:44:13,230
We were back and forth with this action item.

429
00:44:13,650 --> 00:44:17,930
It doesn't have to be Metro government implementing this action item.

430
00:44:18,230 --> 00:44:24,590
It can be Metro government or partners or combination of Metro government and partners working together.

431
00:44:24,590 --> 00:44:33,150
So we have a great experience with this kind of program. Currently we are managing our leafy grant.

432
00:44:34,310 --> 00:44:44,490
As you may remember, we received $15 million in 2024 and workforce development program was a part of that grant.

433
00:44:44,490 --> 00:44:59,690
So, this is a Turk here. We are in that program and the program is running two sessions in a year with 60-10 people in each session and we kind of took that model.

434
00:45:00,000 --> 00:45:08,840
And put that into our proposed, well, our model here, and the cost annually is going to be somewhere

435
00:45:08,840 --> 00:45:15,740
on $550,000 with two sessions between people total in that program.

436
00:45:17,340 --> 00:45:26,900
So, action 6.2 is canopy assessment. We so far, we have done two of them, as I mentioned earlier.

437
00:45:26,900 --> 00:45:37,000
The first one was it just like tracking the canopy differences between 2004, 2008 and 2012.

438
00:45:38,080 --> 00:45:44,860
And then the second study was to see the difference between 2012 and 2019.

439
00:45:45,620 --> 00:45:54,860
And current the trees level is also conducting the third one to track the differences between 2019 and on.

440
00:45:54,860 --> 00:46:04,080
So, the $150,000 cost estimate here is based on the first assessment done in 2015, because

441
00:46:04,080 --> 00:46:07,260
was $150,000 to Metro government.

442
00:46:07,740 --> 00:46:14,140
But we also do understand that the technology is improving, and the cost might be much

443
00:46:14,140 --> 00:46:18,380
than what is mentioned here.

444
00:46:22,120 --> 00:46:29,620
6.3 is tree inventory, which is not included on the slide.

445
00:46:31,400 --> 00:46:38,860
As we speak, we are conducting our metro's first-ever tree inventory digital smart inventory.

446
00:46:40,000 --> 00:46:47,080
that inventory is being done, they will resource group and we are very proud of using high

447
00:46:47,080 --> 00:46:54,900
technology and that inventory is going to be wrapped up within a few months but it's

448
00:46:54,900 --> 00:47:08,840
very nice to know how much work we have so far it was reported that they already

449
00:47:08,840 --> 00:47:13,300
possible is 70,000 more trees to be skinned.

450
00:47:14,280 --> 00:47:21,460
So we will see somewhere on 150,160,000 trees in our system,

451
00:47:22,480 --> 00:47:24,420
both parks and streets.

452
00:47:26,360 --> 00:47:34,660
Action 8.1 is suggesting a systems fund for private properties.

453
00:47:35,800 --> 00:47:41,520
We put $100,000 in the model that we developed.

454
00:47:42,300 --> 00:47:46,020
This number is again a study number.

455
00:47:46,780 --> 00:47:57,100
In 2020, Metro Council budgeted $200,000 for public tree assistance.

456
00:47:58,000 --> 00:48:02,220
So currently, unfortunately, we have run out of that fund.

457
00:48:02,220 --> 00:48:14,860
But between 2021 and 2021 and 2006, we were able to help 50 residents somewhere for the

458
00:48:14,860 --> 00:48:22,780
factories to be removed and all of those trees to be removed also had replacements and we

459
00:48:22,780 --> 00:48:24,040
is some streaming work,

460
00:48:26,080 --> 00:48:28,300
so based on what we experienced,

461
00:48:28,820 --> 00:48:34,620
we estimated $4,000 average per assistance per person,

462
00:48:34,780 --> 00:48:38,800
which is very modest, yes.

463
00:48:40,080 --> 00:48:43,520
But we told, maybe, with $100,000,

464
00:48:43,800 --> 00:48:49,020
we could help 25 residents with that kind of average cost.

465
00:48:49,780 --> 00:48:51,500
Obviously, as we heard from the conference,

466
00:48:52,120 --> 00:48:56,860
Obviously, we heard from the conversation earlier that range, that cost can range quite a bit.

467
00:48:57,300 --> 00:49:05,080
So this is just, I guess, based on previous experience with that, we'll also point out as Cindy mentioned.

468
00:49:05,860 --> 00:49:14,380
Trees' lovel has a grant. They are doing this kind of work. So this is another one of those actions that an implementation could be a Metro government led action.

469
00:49:14,440 --> 00:49:20,380
It could be a community organization and partner led action or some partnership between those two.

470
00:49:22,520 --> 00:49:29,160
So, I'm going to start with this one and then hand the numbers over to Musute A. So, actually

471
00:49:29,160 --> 00:49:37,020
1.3 is obviously the big ticket item here. And I just wanted to make sure to review what

472
00:49:37,020 --> 00:49:44,040
we're talking about here. This is going from our current responsibility, where a street tree,

473
00:49:44,360 --> 00:49:50,200
according to the plan, is, as it's defined, is the responsibility of the Jason property owner.

474
00:49:50,200 --> 00:49:59,960
I just wanted to point out the plan refers to street trees, but in its discussion it is clear that the plan street tree is the equivalent to what our...

475
00:50:00,000 --> 00:50:08,080
Metro code of ordinances refers to as a public tree. So that is a tree with a base wholly or in part situated on

476
00:50:08,080 --> 00:50:13,460
Louisville Metro government owned or controlled land or in public rights of way controlled by Louisville Metro,

477
00:50:13,880 --> 00:50:20,000
excluding parks and parkways that are under the jurisdiction of Louisville Metro parks. So I just wanted to make sure that

478
00:50:20,620 --> 00:50:26,320
we understood that when we say street trees in the context of the master plan discussion, that is the equivalent of what

479
00:50:26,320 --> 00:50:28,720
our ordinances refer to as public trees.

480
00:50:29,860 --> 00:50:32,440
So according to action 1.3, the responsibility

481
00:50:32,440 --> 00:50:34,680
of the street tree care and maintenance

482
00:50:34,680 --> 00:50:37,200
would shift from that adjacent property owner

483
00:50:37,200 --> 00:50:40,160
as it is now and to Louisville Metro government.

484
00:50:41,460 --> 00:50:44,940
So obviously there's a lot of different ways to look at that.

485
00:50:45,160 --> 00:50:48,040
And so Masude and her team put together a plan

486
00:50:48,040 --> 00:50:51,600
that would implement that and we'll step through that

487
00:50:51,600 --> 00:50:53,460
in a couple of different ways and then we'll talk

488
00:50:53,460 --> 00:50:58,520
about the potential ways that may be considered for implementation.

489
00:51:00,460 --> 00:51:10,000
Michelle, do you mind on showing that slide with the division of the areas so that we have some kind of idea what we're talking about when we put it in there?

490
00:51:10,280 --> 00:51:12,960
Let me go back up. Sorry. Sorry.

491
00:51:12,960 --> 00:51:31,930
So the plan, the model we studied is based on three different management zones, regions,

492
00:51:32,110 --> 00:51:34,370
sub-everybody named them.

493
00:51:34,530 --> 00:51:37,590
This is almost like public works model.

494
00:51:38,550 --> 00:51:54,210
And the team and I just really took our time to project what is needed to implement the care and management of street trees.

495
00:51:54,890 --> 00:52:05,010
So as a site note, currently in Parks and Parkways tree inventory, which was done years ago as we work on those trees, we developed our own inventory,

496
00:52:05,010 --> 00:52:14,230
But it is limited to parks and parkways only, we do have 35,000 trees in the system, just parks and parkways.

497
00:52:15,670 --> 00:52:30,570
So as I mentioned earlier, we will be looking into having the responsibility of 152,100,000 trees, combination parkways and street trees.

498
00:52:30,570 --> 00:52:59,890
So, the model we developed is basically calling for three different districts for street management and expansion of parks and parkways in each district for streets, only having two teams and each team consists of three arborists, one supervisor, and then one manager.

499
00:52:59,890 --> 00:53:07,410
So, when you multiply it with three different regions, we will have with the administrator managing

500
00:53:07,410 --> 00:53:11,910
the entire program, there will be a sum of around two-to-one positions.

501
00:53:12,870 --> 00:53:17,390
I just want to point out that all of those details that Masuda is going through right now,

502
00:53:17,470 --> 00:53:24,550
including this map and these data points and more are all in the spreadsheet that was attached

503
00:53:24,550 --> 00:53:27,770
to the memo that you received from internal audit.

504
00:53:27,770 --> 00:53:32,630
So all of the details about the positions that would be included in those teams,

505
00:53:33,470 --> 00:53:40,790
the districts that were identified, basically it's how this model was built out to quantify costs.

506
00:53:41,310 --> 00:53:43,950
So I'm correct. So we can go back to that slide.

507
00:53:44,250 --> 00:53:45,190
We shall if you don't mind.

508
00:53:57,770 --> 00:53:59,490
With the entire program,

509
00:54:01,190 --> 00:54:01,990
with streets,

510
00:54:02,510 --> 00:54:07,170
street trees and parks and park race trees and horticultural program,

511
00:54:07,170 --> 00:54:14,130
The new recurring annual operations is going to be $4.8 million.

512
00:54:15,170 --> 00:54:22,970
And again, this includes Street 3 Maintenance Personal Cost, Contractor Planting, and

513
00:54:22,970 --> 00:54:30,050
3-year Establishment Work, and Expanded Parks, Parkways, and Horde Cultural Operations.

514
00:54:31,070 --> 00:54:40,130
So, for this model, the new initial equipment is going to cost 5.44 million.

515
00:54:40,890 --> 00:54:50,170
And again, we have divided it between current park park resource cultural operation and street operation as well.

516
00:54:50,170 --> 00:54:59,690
So basically, action 1.3 total new cost with recurring expenses.

517
00:55:00,000 --> 00:55:06,040
And initial equipment expenses, it's going to be total into 10.3 million.

518
00:55:07,720 --> 00:55:17,300
So what it means, this means is recurring, you know, new recurring expense being 4.8 million.

519
00:55:17,760 --> 00:55:25,460
And when we add our current recurring 2.1 million at the top of it, we're talking about 6.9 million

520
00:55:25,460 --> 00:55:31,300
other recurring expense to be able to run both parks, park-free source

521
00:55:31,300 --> 00:55:34,440
cultural creation and street-trial creation.

522
00:55:34,700 --> 00:55:36,980
Did you say $9 million reoccurring?

523
00:55:38,080 --> 00:55:39,620
$6.97.

524
00:55:41,640 --> 00:55:43,000
On an annual basis.

525
00:55:43,820 --> 00:55:44,480
In the project?

526
00:55:45,040 --> 00:55:52,400
That would be the total personnel contractor work for an entire urban forest

527
00:55:52,400 --> 00:55:58,360
division that includes all three trees plus that expansion of parkways, parks, and horticulture.

528
00:55:59,680 --> 00:56:09,400
When we specifically look at the only street tree maintenance operation, it's going to be

529
00:56:09,400 --> 00:56:17,400
the new recurring cost annual cost is going to be 3.83 million, again, including personnel

530
00:56:17,400 --> 00:56:21,760
and contractor to replanting and establishment work.

531
00:56:22,480 --> 00:56:25,460
Just for that section, on the street tree maintenance,

532
00:56:25,820 --> 00:56:28,660
the new initial street equipment is going to be

533
00:56:28,660 --> 00:56:33,640
a 4.3 million totaling $7.96 million,

534
00:56:33,680 --> 00:56:35,200
somewhere around $8 million.

535
00:56:35,700 --> 00:56:40,120
Again, just when we take out extension of parks and parkways

536
00:56:40,120 --> 00:56:41,840
and how the horticultural operation,

537
00:56:42,440 --> 00:56:45,620
only focusing on developing a street tree program,

538
00:56:45,620 --> 00:56:50,980
basic the metro government taking over the care and management of those trees is going to

539
00:56:50,980 --> 00:56:52,900
close somewhere on eight million dollar.

540
00:56:56,380 --> 00:57:00,480
So as we talked about, there's a lot of different ways

541
00:57:00,480 --> 00:57:06,220
that we could achieve those goals. So we wanted to put some ideas here for discussion.

542
00:57:07,140 --> 00:57:14,260
These aren't, this is by no means of implementation plan and we aren't advocating any of these

543
00:57:14,260 --> 00:57:17,120
specific ways to prioritize or to implement,

544
00:57:17,380 --> 00:57:20,600
but we wanted to give you all some ways to look at this

545
00:57:20,600 --> 00:57:23,340
to think about that large number

546
00:57:23,340 --> 00:57:27,560
and how you might get there from where we are here today,

547
00:57:27,900 --> 00:57:31,520
which is a urban forestry team covering parks and parkways

548
00:57:31,520 --> 00:57:37,120
and horticulture and parks that is $2.1 million a year.

549
00:57:38,120 --> 00:57:42,080
So some ways that we could phase this in

550
00:57:42,080 --> 00:57:44,360
or prioritize as it may be.

551
00:57:44,520 --> 00:57:49,180
There may be what service area is chosen to begin in.

552
00:57:49,600 --> 00:57:52,860
That might be, for example, you could start with,

553
00:57:53,380 --> 00:57:56,540
maybe, business districts, those kind of things.

554
00:57:56,860 --> 00:57:58,980
You might start with what kind of tree service

555
00:57:58,980 --> 00:58:05,620
is taken on by city removals versus the regular pruning

556
00:58:05,620 --> 00:58:13,320
and things that we know may help add to longevity of those street trees.

557
00:58:13,860 --> 00:58:15,600
You also might just pace this out.

558
00:58:16,000 --> 00:58:21,500
This gives you a dollar figure as if this was all going to drop in one year and that is

559
00:58:21,500 --> 00:58:24,420
not necessarily a feasible implementation plan.

560
00:58:24,660 --> 00:58:26,720
So it might be a gradual implementation.

561
00:58:28,200 --> 00:58:30,120
How this is done could also look different.

562
00:58:30,340 --> 00:58:32,660
This is contemplates a lot of in-house work.

563
00:58:32,820 --> 00:58:33,940
There could be more contractors.

564
00:58:33,940 --> 00:58:42,040
there's some combination thereof. We also can look at prioritizing areas. We saw in the urban forest

565
00:58:42,040 --> 00:58:47,760
master plan that there are some parts of town that have greater canopy need, greater risk, due to heat,

566
00:58:48,580 --> 00:58:55,120
and those health impacts you could also prioritize it due to available funding. And then you can also just take a

567
00:58:55,120 --> 00:59:02,920
look at what our existing operations are and how those might face to grow to meet more of these different

568
00:59:02,920 --> 00:59:13,300
needs or you may look into the current leafy grant implementation model that $12 million is

569
00:59:13,300 --> 00:59:23,020
being spent on tree maintenance in DV areas. So far, we are in the third year implementing

570
00:59:23,020 --> 00:59:32,380
that grant and 1,400 trees removed from public properties when we say removed on those trees

571
00:59:32,380 --> 00:59:38,520
dead or declining trees that we definitely helped so many people and then somewhere

572
00:59:38,520 --> 00:59:49,120
on 1,400, 150 stems have been removed and then we had 2,700 trees stream so it's a lot of work

573
00:59:49,120 --> 00:59:57,620
But that leafy area is representing only 23% of the entire material area.

574
00:59:58,000 --> 00:59:59,960
It can be a good model to feed.

575
01:00:02,000 --> 01:00:06,080
Thank you. I have a question and I'm going to turn it to my colleagues.

576
01:00:08,720 --> 01:00:13,960
Can you give me an estimate

577
01:00:13,960 --> 01:00:21,340
a total of what do we have currently in deferred maintenance that we need to address

578
01:00:24,570 --> 01:00:29,330
in urban

579
01:00:29,330 --> 01:00:37,190
The question, email ash borer has been issue for our department for that.

580
01:00:37,210 --> 01:00:44,110
Email ash borer is the insect basically, you know, attacking our trees and then killing

581
01:00:44,110 --> 01:00:52,070
all of the ash trees. So there is a big backlog of those ash trees still gradually declining

582
01:00:52,070 --> 01:01:00,150
or dying that we have a huge workload to catch up with and then so I don't have quantified

583
01:01:00,150 --> 01:01:05,890
numbers with the storm damages but we do experience pretty often storm damages that

584
01:01:05,890 --> 01:01:12,710
may take us from one week to even six months to work on those damages to be cleaned up

585
01:01:12,710 --> 01:01:18,710
and taking care of like for example 2007 I storm took us six months to clear all of those

586
01:01:18,710 --> 01:01:28,650
damages that was created, and then we do receive some around 200 metro calls monthly.

587
01:01:29,690 --> 01:01:39,830
These are requests coming from our partners, government agencies, residents, to asking some type of work to be performed by urban forestry.

588
01:01:40,850 --> 01:01:45,770
So, all of them together, I would assume this would be our deferred maintenance.

589
01:01:45,770 --> 01:02:01,130
in the perfect world, and it's the last thing I'll end it with, in the perfect world, if we were to fully fund this today, and with your deferred maintenance that you already are in a backlog is too cruising enough.

590
01:02:03,280 --> 01:02:11,560
Two crews per district. So total of six crews for Street 3 maintenance. We will

591
01:02:12,100 --> 01:02:20,520
mirror the same program for our Parks Park Resort Pration as well. Currently, we have only 11

592
01:02:21,280 --> 01:02:31,860
personnel in our forestry parks forestry. So is it enough? Well, I think, I don't know how to answer that question.

593
01:02:31,860 --> 01:02:40,800
I wish in an ideal word we would absolutely need more resources, but we also understand the difficulties.

594
01:02:41,500 --> 01:02:49,500
In your own analysis, I think you told me how many passes, how frequently a tree would be made by those.

595
01:02:49,920 --> 01:03:01,780
Yes, the plan is urban forestry master plan is suggesting that we need to have proactive maintenance with a 15 to 20 year rotation.

596
01:03:01,860 --> 01:03:09,400
The model we developed is basically, hopefully, going to be

597
01:03:09,400 --> 01:03:12,880
proactive in managing street trees every 10 years.

598
01:03:14,560 --> 01:03:21,820
So, each team will have 2,000 trees in a year to maintain.

599
01:03:22,360 --> 01:03:24,040
I hope it's going to give you an idea.

600
01:03:25,060 --> 01:03:31,660
So, a team of four people, three workers and one supervisor will be

601
01:03:31,660 --> 01:03:38,180
conducting maintenance program with two thousand trees for their own, you know, areas.

602
01:03:38,460 --> 01:03:43,280
So the idea is that every tree within each of these three zones, districts, whatever

603
01:03:43,280 --> 01:03:49,900
you would call it, of the city would, that tree would be visited once every 10 years for proactive

604
01:03:49,900 --> 01:03:50,460
maintenance.

605
01:03:50,700 --> 01:03:52,900
And then, of course, on top of that, there would be the reactive.

606
01:03:53,660 --> 01:03:59,040
And this is based on 120,000 trees, street trees.

607
01:03:59,800 --> 01:04:00,940
Thank you.

608
01:04:01,160 --> 01:04:01,780
Councilman Piaziting.

609
01:04:02,800 --> 01:04:03,080
Thank you.

610
01:04:04,080 --> 01:04:06,400
If you can go to slide nine, please.

611
01:04:08,400 --> 01:04:17,840
So first of all, I mean, like 90% of this cost is wrapped up in one recommendation in all of these recommendations, which is 1.3.

612
01:04:18,560 --> 01:04:26,000
The even in 1.3, and again, coming to my point earlier, I think there's an important line here,

613
01:04:26,200 --> 01:04:31,200
the very bottom, these figures describe one possible operating model, not a requested appropriation.

614
01:04:31,260 --> 01:04:35,100
We know it's not a requested appropriation, but it's also one possible operating model,

615
01:04:35,200 --> 01:04:39,380
which is like all in right now in this one idea that they've come up with.

616
01:04:40,040 --> 01:04:47,080
I think this is my point about, you know, particularly modifying the section three of the resolution just to be clear on this,

617
01:04:47,080 --> 01:04:49,940
like, you know, I think in an ideal world,

618
01:04:50,280 --> 01:04:52,020
I think it is reasonable, we say,

619
01:04:52,240 --> 01:04:53,860
hey, we can manage these trees.

620
01:04:54,560 --> 01:04:56,000
It's just not gonna happen tomorrow.

621
01:04:56,540 --> 01:04:58,840
I mean, we're not gonna have this money tomorrow,

622
01:04:59,520 --> 01:04:59,980
but they're all-

623
01:05:00,000 --> 01:05:07,960
Our parts of this, I mean, just to, you know, you've said it, but we're already spending 2.1 million, right?

624
01:05:08,020 --> 01:05:16,340
We already have some infrastructure for this, right? We're already doing some of this. We're not everything that's outlined here, not the full modi.

625
01:05:16,920 --> 01:05:27,000
But the point is, I'm sure, as we think through this more, as we, you know, we're going to have to get creative because we're not going to have that much money sitting in the budget this next year.

626
01:05:27,000 --> 01:05:32,300
Like, as we start to get creative about this, there might be, for example, the new initial equipment.

627
01:05:32,720 --> 01:05:36,580
I know we're spending a lot in the parks department generally on new equipment.

628
01:05:36,940 --> 01:05:43,100
How much overlap is there where we can leverage some of that to work with what we're trying to do here, right?

629
01:05:43,380 --> 01:05:51,000
Are there areas where there's real need and problem where we can, you know, do some short-term work, right?

630
01:05:51,380 --> 01:05:52,840
Where, yes, it's not city-wide.

631
01:05:52,840 --> 01:06:11,600
So I appreciate that we've come up with and first of all, I appreciate you clarifying what the financial impact statement actually says because I think in other areas, you know, there's either no impact or, you know, minimal impact and comparison with the whole budget.

632
01:06:12,080 --> 01:06:16,600
This is one section which it's a lot of money and it's one way of doing it.

633
01:06:16,600 --> 01:06:20,740
But I think we can all acknowledge that this is not going to be,

634
01:06:20,740 --> 01:06:22,900
nobody is coming here today saying,

635
01:06:23,280 --> 01:06:27,840
we need to spend nine to ten million dollars in this next fiscal cycle

636
01:06:27,840 --> 01:06:30,980
to get all this equipment and all of these people and all this stuff.

637
01:06:31,260 --> 01:06:34,380
But it is a, look, it's a good knowledge meant

638
01:06:34,380 --> 01:06:38,360
if we were to do everything, including 1.3 immediately,

639
01:06:38,520 --> 01:06:43,200
this is what it would cost. So, which is again my point about,

640
01:06:43,200 --> 01:06:45,380
I think we need to get creative, right?

641
01:06:45,900 --> 01:06:48,280
And I think there is progress.

642
01:06:48,660 --> 01:06:49,840
We can make toward this.

643
01:06:50,340 --> 01:06:53,580
And I don't know if one program that we've done,

644
01:06:53,660 --> 01:06:55,120
I'm going to pick on sidewalks, as an example.

645
01:06:55,220 --> 01:06:57,220
We took over what sidewalks used to be managed

646
01:06:57,220 --> 01:06:58,720
by the adjacent property owner.

647
01:06:58,740 --> 01:07:00,180
We took that over years ago.

648
01:07:00,660 --> 01:07:02,220
Well, we had absolutely no plan.

649
01:07:02,420 --> 01:07:03,560
No idea when it was going to cost.

650
01:07:03,580 --> 01:07:04,800
We kind of did it.

651
01:07:05,280 --> 01:07:07,820
And then we're like 10 plus years into it.

652
01:07:07,920 --> 01:07:10,320
And we're still figuring out how to catch up

653
01:07:10,320 --> 01:07:11,740
and budget for it and all this stuff.

654
01:07:12,600 --> 01:07:21,100
But we have made progress. Things have gotten better because we started moving in that direction.

655
01:07:22,460 --> 01:07:26,840
So I appreciate the work that's been done here.

656
01:07:27,280 --> 01:07:29,880
But I just wanted to highlight particularly for my colleagues.

657
01:07:30,480 --> 01:07:34,300
This is the big number on this particular slide of this whole presentation.

658
01:07:35,280 --> 01:07:42,140
But there's a major, major caveat here that I don't think can be understated enough about

659
01:07:42,140 --> 01:07:43,400
how important it is.

660
01:07:43,800 --> 01:07:49,140
But I do think there's latitude for progress and improvement, but this will all need to

661
01:07:49,140 --> 01:07:50,260
be budgeted, right?

662
01:07:50,280 --> 01:07:55,120
And as we have budget, we make priorities, which we do every one to cycle, you know, we

663
01:07:55,120 --> 01:07:59,220
will say, okay, how does this work into the next set of priorities and how can we continue

664
01:07:59,220 --> 01:07:59,920
to make progress?

665
01:08:00,140 --> 01:08:04,000
So I think we can make progress on this, I think, because we're not going to get all

666
01:08:04,000 --> 01:08:08,140
money right up front. I think everybody's going to be very creative and I'm looking forward

667
01:08:08,140 --> 01:08:12,080
to the creativity that everybody's going to bring to how can we make even more impact

668
01:08:12,080 --> 01:08:17,840
and not just assume that $10 million is going to be appropriate tomorrow. Because I think

669
01:08:17,840 --> 01:08:21,840
that will also have impact on what we're talking about here and how much we can do in the

670
01:08:21,840 --> 01:08:27,260
immediate term. So again, I think that's why I was recommending the amendment earlier to

671
01:08:27,260 --> 01:08:32,420
acknowledge that there are great things in this plan. We want to adopt many of these great things,

672
01:08:32,420 --> 01:08:43,580
But we're also going to acknowledge the reality that this is not going to happen tomorrow, yet we should be striving for a better management of this piece of public infrastructure.

673
01:08:44,400 --> 01:08:45,620
Thank you very much, Mr. Chair.

674
01:08:45,700 --> 01:08:48,320
Thank you. Councilwoman Ruby.

675
01:08:51,630 --> 01:08:55,530
Thank you very much. So I've got three questions.

676
01:08:55,530 --> 01:09:03,390
easy one actually probably was not easy to count, but how on earth did you determine a number of trees in a forestal area?

677
01:09:05,170 --> 01:09:08,230
The inventory is not going to be including those natural areas.

678
01:09:08,830 --> 01:09:15,050
It's only the trees that we either planted or they do have some kind of historical aesthetic value,

679
01:09:15,170 --> 01:09:20,410
or those are the trees around some targeted amenities.

680
01:09:20,410 --> 01:09:27,670
So that when you're talking we do may perform regular maintenance on those trees, not natural areas.

681
01:09:28,250 --> 01:09:31,850
Yes, so when you're talking about parks, you're talking about the trees out in the open.

682
01:09:32,270 --> 01:09:32,510
Correct.

683
01:09:32,910 --> 01:09:33,170
Okay.

684
01:09:33,370 --> 01:09:34,310
That's fine.

685
01:09:34,790 --> 01:09:35,030
Okay.

686
01:09:37,030 --> 01:09:39,970
Next question, newly planted trees.

687
01:09:40,350 --> 01:09:45,290
I've heard it said that the most important thing that you can do after you plant a tree

688
01:09:45,290 --> 01:09:49,470
and get it to survive the first couple of years is to go back and give it good pruning.

689
01:09:50,150 --> 01:09:55,450
in the first 10 years, I believe, and that after that it keeps the tree

690
01:09:55,450 --> 01:09:56,430
will be much healthier.

691
01:09:57,550 --> 01:09:59,970
So, full-pucks and parkways, we do-

692
01:10:00,000 --> 01:10:06,580
You have a three year establishment period, up to three years, we go back and order those

693
01:10:06,580 --> 01:10:13,540
trees and attend other third year. We do prune them, and the three year pruning cycle goes on

694
01:10:13,540 --> 01:10:18,660
until they are 10 years old, depending on the species and height, then forestry operation

695
01:10:18,660 --> 01:10:24,260
take them over for mature tree maintenance. So, but street trees, we don't have such a program.

696
01:10:24,260 --> 01:10:32,220
It's only urban forestry's position is only in coordination position, just to be able to inspect

697
01:10:32,220 --> 01:10:39,560
those trees that we receive calls on and provide permit to adjacent homeowners.

698
01:10:40,860 --> 01:10:45,120
Okay, so that proactive purring would be part of the street tree point, and then we're

699
01:10:45,120 --> 01:10:45,700
inactive.

700
01:10:46,180 --> 01:10:46,540
Correct.

701
01:10:47,120 --> 01:10:53,040
Okay, next one doesn't have anything to do with planting trees per se, but I couldn't help

702
01:10:53,040 --> 01:10:59,120
notice on one of the fairly newly planted trees on Southern Parkway about a month ago, there's

703
01:10:59,120 --> 01:11:05,200
a lovely oak tree with about that big around and it just fell over and went upon inspection

704
01:11:05,200 --> 01:11:13,740
of what I found was a scar from a lawnmower hit probably. There's right at ground level. Is

705
01:11:13,740 --> 01:11:20,700
any training being done to ensure that these investments are cared for by our mowing and other

706
01:11:22,120 --> 01:11:34,000
Yes, it is, though, also a constant refresher need and those accidents do happen, but when we hear about them, they are helpful examples for our next training.

707
01:11:34,000 --> 01:11:36,780
I'll be happy to come to patients because I took them.

708
01:11:36,880 --> 01:11:39,560
It is unfortunate that that does occasionally happen.

709
01:11:40,060 --> 01:11:49,080
I know in our tree planting efforts we do try to create space around those trees because it is really hard to get through all of that mobile area.

710
01:11:49,080 --> 01:11:53,000
if there isn't a buffer around that newly planted tree.

711
01:11:53,260 --> 01:11:56,400
So sometimes those buffer strategies do fail,

712
01:11:56,460 --> 01:11:59,060
sometimes moors do get a little too close,

713
01:11:59,660 --> 01:12:03,800
but we absolutely have training and a policy

714
01:12:03,800 --> 01:12:05,860
to not modell our newly planted tree.

715
01:12:06,040 --> 01:12:08,900
Okay, so as representative for Southern Parkway,

716
01:12:09,000 --> 01:12:10,960
I will be happy to work with you on initiative

717
01:12:11,290 --> 01:12:13,660
to get mulch rings around those trees.

718
01:12:16,000 --> 01:12:16,260
Sure.

719
01:12:17,020 --> 01:12:24,500
Those screen wells that you see around new plant trees are helping to prevent physical damages.

720
01:12:24,900 --> 01:12:27,380
So we used to use those water bags, screen bags.

721
01:12:28,260 --> 01:12:31,220
They're great, but they are not keeping the movers out.

722
01:12:31,920 --> 01:12:35,620
So this is a new implementation that we adopted two, three years ago.

723
01:12:35,780 --> 01:12:36,900
We're putting those screen wells.

724
01:12:37,180 --> 01:12:42,540
As long as they are put well, they are supposed to protect those trees

725
01:12:42,540 --> 01:12:45,180
plus keeping the water within the root system.

726
01:12:45,180 --> 01:12:49,620
Yes, so I would be happy to help you accomplish that. Thank you.

727
01:12:52,140 --> 01:12:53,180
Councilwoman Bass.

728
01:12:56,640 --> 01:13:01,720
You kind of teeter-totted it around this a little bit, but I didn't quite get the answer. I think I was looking for.

729
01:13:02,700 --> 01:13:10,020
So, the current workload that we have with the amount of people that we currently have.

730
01:13:10,060 --> 01:13:16,100
Do you feel like we are making a dent in what we have or are we just sustaining what's there?

731
01:13:16,100 --> 01:13:25,940
So, our current system in urban forestry, that's represented by that 2.1 million in personnel

732
01:13:25,940 --> 01:13:32,720
costs, that covers care and maintenance of our park trees of parkways that we have responsibility

733
01:13:32,720 --> 01:13:33,320
for.

734
01:13:33,540 --> 01:13:38,860
So, you think of those only said parkways are a pretty good example, there are a handful of others.

735
01:13:39,640 --> 01:13:43,360
And then the care and maintenance of those newly planted trees falls to our political

736
01:13:43,360 --> 01:13:46,020
team along with our landscape beds.

737
01:13:48,160 --> 01:13:53,000
As with I think most any resource we could do more with more,

738
01:13:53,560 --> 01:14:02,120
but the team does have a incredible system of planning and prioritization to get to the needs that they do see.

739
01:14:02,440 --> 01:14:12,500
What you see in the fully built out fiscal impact study does include and in that spreadsheet you can see

740
01:14:12,500 --> 01:14:17,440
what are new positions and what division they would go to. It does include some enhancement

741
01:14:17,440 --> 01:14:23,900
to the existing parks and parkway team as and the horticulture team with the idea that in order

742
01:14:23,900 --> 01:14:28,880
to meet all of the goals of that urban forest master plan, we would need to have more resources

743
01:14:28,880 --> 01:14:35,740
in those areas as well as adding completely new resources for street trees. I hope that answers your question.

744
01:14:35,740 --> 01:14:44,620
Um, no, let me reword maybe, um, currently not, not this, but the

745
01:14:44,620 --> 01:14:49,120
quarantine with people have in the amount of backlog that we have of deferred

746
01:14:49,120 --> 01:14:55,000
maintenance, and current tree maintenance. Do you all feel we're making a

747
01:14:55,000 --> 01:14:58,440
in anything currently or we're just sustaining.

748
01:15:00,880 --> 01:15:15,660
We are in a position that we have to prioritize the work. That would be my answer. I can't say that we are responding every single call immediately.

749
01:15:15,660 --> 01:15:33,380
The system is currently operating on inspecting trees and then making work orders based on the prior to ranking and schedule and those request and our own inspections.

750
01:15:33,380 --> 01:15:37,220
The only exception to this is Parkways.

751
01:15:38,860 --> 01:15:45,120
Just because this is an old model that we developed and we really implemented well.

752
01:15:45,840 --> 01:15:51,140
Every year, in winter, in four months, we do inspect all of the parkway trees.

753
01:15:51,560 --> 01:15:54,820
We again prioritize what is high risk.

754
01:15:55,280 --> 01:16:03,360
And then try to make sure that we do maintain all of those parkway trees just because of the high risk.

755
01:16:03,360 --> 01:16:11,960
public because of the flow of traffic. In parks, we don't have that regular inspection system.

756
01:16:12,580 --> 01:16:21,020
The operation is based on the cost system and prioritization. And at the top of this, we

757
01:16:22,600 --> 01:16:29,400
are following our three planting and young tree maintenance program. Like I mentioned, every

758
01:16:29,400 --> 01:16:36,180
six, nine years, they go through a pruning cycle, and then when you put all of this together,

759
01:16:36,960 --> 01:16:39,340
we do understand the importance of prioritization.

760
01:16:41,700 --> 01:16:49,740
Okay, because I feel like history is showing us that we are reactive and not proactive.

761
01:16:50,700 --> 01:16:57,980
So I think I'm just not convinced that we can sustain financially or with personnel

762
01:16:57,980 --> 01:17:04,840
this plan as it's being presented today. But as we've said,

763
01:17:05,180 --> 01:17:11,660
Dasec, didn't pull it in a part, making tiny steps toward the right direction. I just

764
01:17:11,660 --> 01:17:19,760
know firsthand being new to council and new to my district. I see years and years of

765
01:17:19,760 --> 01:17:25,840
issues that still have not been addressed. And so that's kind of where I was going with

766
01:17:25,840 --> 01:17:31,080
current workload. So thank you for that. And yes, to clarify, the current workload that we

767
01:17:31,080 --> 01:17:37,160
talk about does not include any of that proactive street tree work. Our leafy grant has enabled

768
01:17:37,160 --> 01:17:44,700
us to do street tree work that we would not otherwise be funded to do. And leafy workforce

769
01:17:45,440 --> 01:17:54,020
added five personnel to work on that only 23% of the metro area, five additional people,

770
01:17:54,020 --> 01:17:59,130
just focused on inspecting plus working with the contractor they were able to do

771
01:18:00,380 --> 01:18:05,350
maintenance on thousands of trees and those costs are not included in the current

772
01:18:06,960 --> 01:18:13,330
Discussion that at that 2.1 that doesn't include the grant funded positions because those wouldn't continue beyond the grant

773
01:18:14,880 --> 01:18:19,380
Thank you. Council on the chapel. We are add for 16

774
01:18:19,380 --> 01:18:23,960
I understand the person that has a name tag that says the law racks right now

775
01:18:24,020 --> 01:18:28,320
You're probably scared it's going to be some long-winded remarks, but I'll save those.

776
01:18:28,920 --> 01:18:31,600
But I do have a request of urban forestry as well as the chair.

777
01:18:31,980 --> 01:18:36,520
I think Councilwoman Bass has some good questions.

778
01:18:36,920 --> 01:18:43,500
And as a member of the Tree Advisory Commission, we were recently given a presentation

779
01:18:43,500 --> 01:18:48,740
by Kate Carl with the Division of Urban Forestry about the amazing work that you all do.

780
01:18:48,740 --> 01:19:13,040
And so I would make a request that whether or not this passes today and I really, really hope that it does that in a future meeting we can have that same presentation given to this body because I think that it will help us understand more of the work that you do and address some of those questions that obviously Council members have so hopefully that can be something that we can set on the agenda in the future.

781
01:19:13,520 --> 01:19:16,120
Yeah, we would be very happy to do so.

782
01:19:16,120 --> 01:19:18,460
That's it? Thank you.

783
01:19:18,560 --> 01:19:18,900
You're welcome.

784
01:19:19,100 --> 01:19:19,320
All right.

785
01:19:19,460 --> 01:19:20,720
So that's moving on.

786
01:19:20,860 --> 01:19:26,200
We have a held legislation item number three.

787
01:19:26,900 --> 01:19:32,120
We are going to go to resolution R142-25 resolution.

788
01:19:32,480 --> 01:19:37,140
Urging the implementation of the urban forestry master plan strategies actions to ensure

789
01:19:37,140 --> 01:19:42,840
local Jefferson County Metro government tree canopy is resilient, protected, and sustainable.

790
01:19:43,500 --> 01:19:44,420
I'm sorry.

791
01:19:45,400 --> 01:19:45,860
Sorry.

792
01:19:45,880 --> 01:19:46,700
This is Sonio Harwood.

793
01:19:46,880 --> 01:19:47,080
The clerk.

794
01:19:47,260 --> 01:19:47,440
I'm sorry.

795
01:19:47,600 --> 01:19:48,300
I don't have my camera on.

796
01:19:48,480 --> 01:19:49,400
I'm getting ready to walk out.

797
01:19:49,760 --> 01:19:52,240
I thought that we were going to have P.

798
01:19:52,240 --> 01:19:55,640
Argentina was going to work on getting some amendments made for this.

799
01:19:57,560 --> 01:19:58,000
Yes.

800
01:19:59,280 --> 01:19:59,980
For some reason.

801
01:20:00,000 --> 01:20:06,000
We'll be waiting here in Thursday or do you want to go ahead and pass it out and make the amendments by Thursday?

802
01:20:07,240 --> 01:20:10,540
He has the amendments available at the moment.

803
01:20:10,980 --> 01:20:13,180
Okay, that's all. Thank you.

804
01:20:13,240 --> 01:20:13,640
Thank you.

805
01:20:16,440 --> 01:20:19,160
Do we need to...

806
01:20:33,940 --> 01:20:36,440
I need a motion to return to the table.

807
01:20:38,140 --> 01:20:39,240
And motion moves.

808
01:20:40,020 --> 01:20:48,040
We are available, of course, work, please, all of favor, and we are back on the table.

809
01:20:49,260 --> 01:20:55,220
So we have Anthony Piagitini and I thank you.

810
01:20:55,500 --> 01:20:56,320
Thank you, Mr. Chair.

811
01:20:57,100 --> 01:21:01,520
Again, I think the conversation or the special discussion sort of highlighted this that

812
01:21:02,300 --> 01:21:07,440
there's, I think the vast, certainly vast majority, whether or not everybody agrees with

813
01:21:07,440 --> 01:21:12,880
even actually 1.3, but the rest of these actions, I heard zero people complain about or say

814
01:21:12,880 --> 01:21:18,660
that there's some problem here. And even action 1.3, I don't hear people saying they disagree

815
01:21:18,660 --> 01:21:23,860
with it. It's concerned about implementation. It's concerned about paying for it. So what we

816
01:21:23,860 --> 01:21:33,020
have here is a resolution that is saying we're going to adopt this and try to get this done. It

817
01:21:33,020 --> 01:21:37,240
does not say it will happen overnight. It does not say we are budgeting for this overnight. And

818
01:21:37,240 --> 01:21:39,280
So I think it's just fair that we amend it.

819
01:21:39,380 --> 01:21:42,920
I'm just going to amend section three after reviewing section two.

820
01:21:42,960 --> 01:21:48,560
I don't think there's a reason to amend it because section two really doesn't say anything

821
01:21:48,560 --> 01:21:50,980
that's, that I think gives that wrong impression.

822
01:21:51,640 --> 01:21:56,920
But section three, what I'd like to amend to, so I'm going to strike the existing section

823
01:21:56,920 --> 01:21:59,180
three and substitute with the following language.

824
01:21:59,460 --> 01:22:04,480
It will read section three, it will be quote section three, and just for the clerk in the

825
01:22:04,480 --> 01:22:09,120
attorney, I'll get you this language after the meeting, so you don't have to write it down.

826
01:22:10,220 --> 01:22:15,540
The Council requests the administration follow the level tree plan strategies in its planning

827
01:22:15,540 --> 01:22:21,120
comma with implementation contingent on future approval through a Metro Council budget

828
01:22:21,120 --> 01:22:26,480
or operating plan, period, and quote, keep the rest of the resolution as is.

829
01:22:26,540 --> 01:22:32,960
I think it's fair to that this then communicates to the public to the administration that

830
01:22:32,960 --> 01:22:38,200
certainly want to continue moving forward on all these strategies, but we also expect them

831
01:22:38,200 --> 01:22:43,140
to come to Council with budgeting, with implementation plan, with hopefully more creative

832
01:22:43,140 --> 01:22:49,160
ideas to get some of this done, and not just one idea, so I'd like to make that in

833
01:22:49,160 --> 01:22:49,820
the forum motion.

834
01:22:50,460 --> 01:22:50,800
Thank you.

835
01:22:51,560 --> 01:22:54,020
And we have Emotion and Second.

836
01:22:54,560 --> 01:22:55,900
All in favor say aye.

837
01:22:59,900 --> 01:23:00,580
Aye.

838
01:23:00,580 --> 01:23:02,520
Now do we need to,

839
01:23:05,980 --> 01:23:10,300
now we need to make a voice vote on the resolution, all in favor to say,

840
01:23:10,880 --> 01:23:10,940
aye.

841
01:23:12,000 --> 01:23:13,040
Anybody opposed?

842
01:23:14,100 --> 01:23:15,220
And the resolution moves.

843
01:23:15,260 --> 01:23:18,860
This will go to old business because we have an amendment on it.

844
01:23:19,040 --> 01:23:19,800
Thank you all.

845
01:23:19,820 --> 01:23:21,920
Have a great day for 20.

846
01:23:22,140 --> 01:23:22,840
We're done.

847
01:23:31,120 --> 01:23:36,460
Then invested in Parkland for more than 25 years in building housing for the