1
00:00:08,400 --> 00:00:09,460
2-1.

2
00:00:11,620 --> 00:00:21,580
All right, we'll call to order this regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Antica. September 3rd, 2026. Roll call, please. Commissioner Sock.

3
00:00:23,670 --> 00:00:33,690
Here. Passack. Here. You're here. Vice Chair, he minutes. Chair Coleman. Here. Thank you. That takes us to flag salute. Commissioner Sock, would you lead us today?

4
00:00:55,340 --> 00:01:02,060
Thank you. All right, that takes us to a gender review and supplemental reports. Madam Clerk, are there any chair?

5
00:01:02,060 --> 00:01:04,260
There are no changes to the agenda or supplemental reports tonight.

6
00:01:04,780 --> 00:01:12,720
Chair Coleman, there are no changes to the agenda and there was a total of five supplemental reports provided for item D2 with a supplemental to as well.

7
00:01:13,120 --> 00:01:16,840
Supplemental reports were provided to the Planning Commission prior to the start of the meeting.

8
00:01:17,340 --> 00:01:20,760
Copies are on the table, located to the rear of the council chambers and available to the public.

9
00:01:21,680 --> 00:01:22,320
Thank you.

10
00:01:23,300 --> 00:01:25,060
All right, that moves us on to public comment.

11
00:01:25,060 --> 00:01:34,280
This portion of the agenda is reserved for persons desiring to address the commission on matters not listed on the agenda tonight, but within the subject matter jurisdiction of the planning commission.

12
00:01:34,900 --> 00:01:39,620
Speakers are limited to three minutes consistent with city policy regarding public comment and brown act meetings.

13
00:01:40,320 --> 00:01:48,840
Prior to public comment, the commission by motion and vote may extend or shorten the length of public comment consistent with city policy regarding public comment and brown act meetings.

14
00:01:48,840 --> 00:01:54,480
The law does not permit commission action or any extended discussion on any item not listed on the agenda.

15
00:01:55,000 --> 00:02:00,960
If commission action is requested, the matter may be placed on a subsequent agenda subject to commission consensus.

16
00:02:01,980 --> 00:02:02,260
Madam Clerk.

17
00:02:04,480 --> 00:02:06,560
We did not receive early submissions for public comment.

18
00:02:07,100 --> 00:02:11,800
Chair at this time you may call for public comment via Zoom webinar or in person for items not on the agenda.

19
00:02:12,260 --> 00:02:18,000
Public comments can be made on Zoom webinar by using the raise your hand feature or by pressing star nine on the line.

20
00:02:19,060 --> 00:02:24,180
All right, thank you. Do we have any hands raised on Zoom tonight?

21
00:02:26,670 --> 00:02:32,890
We do have one hand raised on Zoom chair. It's Sitalker. Thank you.

22
00:02:33,590 --> 00:02:34,370
Sorry, Sudakar.

23
00:02:36,970 --> 00:02:38,230
Sudakar, can you hear us?

24
00:02:39,630 --> 00:02:41,870
Yes, are you able to hear me?

25
00:02:45,030 --> 00:02:46,790
Yes, we'll start your three minutes.

26
00:02:47,830 --> 00:02:55,050
Okay. Yeah. Hi. Good evening. Planning Commission and fellow residents. Thank you for the

27
00:02:55,050 --> 00:03:04,690
opportunity. Today, this is regarding the June 18th Planning Commission meeting that happened

28
00:03:04,690 --> 00:03:17,190
for a 0.82 acre of PQP to HDR conversion. At that time the city representative said it was

29
00:03:17,190 --> 00:03:26,670
the school district that is giving the land to the private developer that city is just executing

30
00:03:26,670 --> 00:03:34,550
the agreement between this school district and the planning commission. So I raised a

31
00:03:34,690 --> 00:03:44,550
The public request in the city of Mantika website, but it was requesting that agreement

32
00:03:44,830 --> 00:03:48,750
on what basis the zoning conversion is being happening.

33
00:03:49,650 --> 00:03:57,470
But the request was closed with updating only the agenda item documents, not any agreement

34
00:03:57,470 --> 00:04:03,390
between the school district and the private apartment developers.

35
00:04:03,390 --> 00:04:08,910
and I called the city and reopened it, but it was closed again the same time.

36
00:04:09,510 --> 00:04:19,930
Why is the transparency and accountability missing when in these transactions that is

37
00:04:19,930 --> 00:04:32,350
a public site and also I request to have a new zoning code for MUSD versus the PQP city.

38
00:04:33,070 --> 00:04:39,770
So that people will transparently know what land is actually getting reduced.

39
00:04:40,430 --> 00:04:49,030
It was said that PQP is increasing. If PQP is increasing, it should increase by 2 a care, not by 1 a care.

40
00:04:49,030 --> 00:04:59,670
because fire station is two acre land that means it should be 15.87 plus two 17.87 but what is happening

41
00:05:00,000 --> 00:05:29,980
The PQP of MUSD is getting reduced from 15.87 to 14.87, and then the two acres getting added for the fire station. Since the city always claims that MUSD is a different entity, let's have a different zoning code for PQP MUSD and PQP.

42
00:05:29,980 --> 00:05:38,940
city so that people have a transparent and information that is available. Thank you for your time.

43
00:05:40,440 --> 00:05:41,220
Thank you.

44
00:05:43,660 --> 00:05:45,560
I don't quite do we have any other hands raised on Zoom.

45
00:05:47,320 --> 00:05:52,220
And no Chair, we do not. We have no comment cards. No comment cards, Chair. Okay.

46
00:05:52,660 --> 00:05:56,680
Anyone in the audience wish to address the planning commission on any item not on the agenda?

47
00:05:56,680 --> 00:05:59,900
that may do so right now, all right?

48
00:06:00,460 --> 00:06:04,440
Being no hands, we'll move on to item B,

49
00:06:04,940 --> 00:06:06,500
disclosure of ex-partake communications.

50
00:06:07,660 --> 00:06:10,160
At this time, we ask the members of the Planning Commission

51
00:06:10,160 --> 00:06:12,620
to disclose any communications they have had

52
00:06:12,620 --> 00:06:15,040
with project applicants or members of the public

53
00:06:15,040 --> 00:06:17,220
regarding items on this evening's agenda.

54
00:06:18,700 --> 00:06:19,340
All right, thank you.

55
00:06:20,180 --> 00:06:21,980
Do any commissioners have any items

56
00:06:21,980 --> 00:06:24,500
to disclose as part of ex-partake communications?

57
00:06:25,000 --> 00:06:26,380
We'll start with Commissioner Sock.

58
00:06:28,140 --> 00:06:30,520
No, Commissioner Fiori.

59
00:06:30,860 --> 00:06:30,960
No.

60
00:06:31,480 --> 00:06:32,280
Commissioner Paslach.

61
00:06:32,640 --> 00:06:32,720
No.

62
00:06:33,100 --> 00:06:34,280
Vice Chair Jimenez.

63
00:06:34,740 --> 00:06:34,820
No.

64
00:06:35,240 --> 00:06:36,460
And I have none as well.

65
00:06:36,840 --> 00:06:37,100
Thank you.

66
00:06:38,400 --> 00:06:38,840
All right.

67
00:06:39,800 --> 00:06:41,220
Exist on to consent items.

68
00:06:41,460 --> 00:06:43,780
Matters listed under consent are considered routine

69
00:06:43,780 --> 00:06:45,940
and will be enacted by one motion and one vote.

70
00:06:46,240 --> 00:06:48,200
There will be no separate discussion of these matters.

71
00:06:48,380 --> 00:06:51,020
If discussion is desired, a member of the audience

72
00:06:51,020 --> 00:06:52,560
or a commission member may request

73
00:06:52,560 --> 00:06:54,280
that an item be removed from consent.

74
00:06:54,780 --> 00:06:56,180
And it will be considered separately.

75
00:06:57,040 --> 00:07:01,480
Madam Clerk, do we have any requests from the public to pull the consent item tonight?

76
00:07:01,880 --> 00:07:02,460
No, Chair.

77
00:07:02,540 --> 00:07:02,840
We do not.

78
00:07:03,100 --> 00:07:03,420
Thank you.

79
00:07:04,040 --> 00:07:07,300
Any commissioners wish to pull the consent item tonight for discussion?

80
00:07:11,200 --> 00:07:13,580
I will pull the consent item tonight for discussion.

81
00:07:13,840 --> 00:07:19,560
The consent item is item C1-26-342, review and approve the planning commission meeting minutes

82
00:07:19,560 --> 00:07:21,380
for August 6th, 2026.

83
00:07:22,260 --> 00:07:27,020
Commissioner Sock was not in attendance for that meeting, so I just want to confirm for

84
00:07:27,020 --> 00:07:31,320
the record, Commissioner Sock, and be able to vote on this item, have you confirmed

85
00:07:31,320 --> 00:07:38,820
that you've read the minutes and watched the meeting from August 6? No? Okay. Thank

86
00:07:38,820 --> 00:07:40,060
you for confirming that for the record.

87
00:07:42,440 --> 00:07:44,500
At this time, if there's no other discussion

88
00:07:45,200 --> 00:07:45,820
on this item,

89
00:07:48,000 --> 00:07:51,480
okay. And we'll call for a vote. Is there a motion and a second to approve

90
00:07:51,480 --> 00:07:54,440
all items listed under the consent calendar as presented?

91
00:07:58,720 --> 00:08:07,260
We have a motion by Commissioner Biori and a second by Vice Chair Jimenez to approve the consent item tonight. All those will vote in favor. We'll say aye.

92
00:08:07,740 --> 00:08:08,180
Aye.

93
00:08:09,020 --> 00:08:11,680
Any opposed? Any abstentions?

94
00:08:14,780 --> 00:08:16,540
Commissioner Salkin, you confirm your vote. Sorry.

95
00:08:18,930 --> 00:08:21,810
Okay. Motion passes 5-0. Thank you.

96
00:08:27,430 --> 00:08:30,730
All right. It takes us on to the public hearings. Madam Clerk, item D1.

97
00:08:30,730 --> 00:08:37,970
Item D1 24-416 planning commission conduct a public hearing and adopt a resolution

98
00:08:37,970 --> 00:08:45,530
of proving a one-year extension for site plan and design review SPC 23-04 and conditional

99
00:08:45,530 --> 00:08:53,390
use permit UPJ-23-05 for the Cottage Court storage project located at 1280 Cottage Court

100
00:08:53,390 --> 00:09:00,890
APN 208-260-22, Associate Planner, Tobin Barman will be presenting this item.

101
00:09:01,910 --> 00:09:04,230
Good evening, Chair, Vice Chair, members of the Commission.

102
00:09:05,030 --> 00:09:09,830
Associate Planner, Tobin Barman, the request before you, this evening is a four-a-one-year extension

103
00:09:09,830 --> 00:09:15,830
of an approved entitlement of Site Planner Review and Conditionary Use Permit for the Cottage Court Storage Project.

104
00:09:15,830 --> 00:09:27,560
A quick overview, this is a one year extension request for the approved 311 unit personal storage facility with a manager's office in an RV trailer parking area.

105
00:09:28,020 --> 00:09:36,340
Project site's 4.29 acres 55,000 square feet of structure on that site and it's located at 1-280 cottage court.

106
00:09:36,340 --> 00:09:46,770
should be noted at this time that during the review the entitlement extension request staff identified an administrative discrepancy

107
00:09:46,770 --> 00:09:55,690
between the approved planning commission staff report and resolution and which and pardon me, which was dated June 20th, 2024

108
00:09:55,690 --> 00:09:58,550
and the approved project plans.

109
00:10:00,000 --> 00:10:29,940
After an extensive internal and external review of the plans submitted with this extension application, it is the determination of staff that the plans are identical to the plans that reviewed and approved by resolution of the City of Manthiga Planning Commission on June 20, 2024. And therefore it's in substantial conformance. Further description and analysis of this whole process and the review is available in the agenda report for this item. The requested entitlement, again,

110
00:10:29,940 --> 00:10:34,840
is a one-year extension of an approved site plan and design review, specifically site

111
00:10:34,840 --> 00:10:40,160
plan review 2304 and conditionally used permit UPJ 23-05.

112
00:10:42,280 --> 00:10:44,260
This is a glimpse of the site plan,

113
00:10:44,520 --> 00:10:52,560
it's a personal storage facility with 10 standard parking stalls and 72 RV stalls 311 storage units,

114
00:10:53,440 --> 00:10:56,780
perimeter and frontage landscaping and a motorized front gate for security.

115
00:10:58,240 --> 00:11:11,080
So the recommendation from staff is that the planning commission conduct a public hearing and adopt a resolution approving a one-year extension to the site plan and design review and can initially use permit for cottage court storage project.

116
00:11:11,660 --> 00:11:18,660
That does conclude my presentation. The applicant team are available by Zoom this evening.

117
00:11:18,760 --> 00:11:24,660
They were not able to make it to the chambers but they are attending virtually and staff is here to answer any questions you may have.

118
00:11:24,660 --> 00:11:31,760
Thank you. Thank you. Any commissioners have any clarifying questions for staff tonight before we hear from the applicant?

119
00:11:33,830 --> 00:11:34,230
No questions?

120
00:11:35,810 --> 00:11:40,270
All right. Does the applicant wish to make a presentation via Zoom tonight?

121
00:11:43,660 --> 00:11:45,620
Chair, I don't see them online via Zoom.

122
00:11:46,120 --> 00:11:46,440
Very good.

123
00:11:51,850 --> 00:11:52,770
They are on the other end.

124
00:12:12,720 --> 00:12:19,960
Chair, to my understanding, there are three members of the applicant team who are attending virtually in the waiting room for Zoom.

125
00:12:21,960 --> 00:12:22,360
Do

126
00:12:37,240 --> 00:12:39,420
you pack are you able to hear us

127
00:12:42,210 --> 00:12:43,070
if

128
00:12:49,080 --> 00:12:56,920
the applicant's online if you which just be at this time you may do so we'll begin your five minutes you

129
00:13:07,230 --> 00:13:08,010
don't have to be admitted.

130
00:13:09,190 --> 00:13:16,170
Sorry chair. We're just having issues the hands raised on that screen are not represented on mine so I'm not able to pull them up on my end as it right now.

131
00:13:16,170 --> 00:13:19,870
All right, very good. We'll just hold tight a minute here

132
00:13:59,900 --> 00:14:08,780
Jim David or us if you can hear me there is also a phone number available in the link that you'll provide it. I believe you might be able to call in if you want to try that option.

133
00:14:22,520 --> 00:14:25,660
Okay, we're in receipt of the message saying that they're going to try to call in.

134
00:14:26,560 --> 00:14:27,980
We'll hold on a second here and wait.

135
00:14:34,100 --> 00:14:39,620
here. Perhaps we can move on to comment within the audience and then return to the zoom

136
00:14:39,620 --> 00:14:43,260
if we can facilitate the process.

137
00:14:46,130 --> 00:14:47,910
We can do that. We have to open the public hearing

138
00:14:47,910 --> 00:14:53,330
first before we hear comment from the audience. That correct, city attorney. Yes. Very

139
00:14:53,330 --> 00:14:57,030
good. All right, we'll go ahead and open the public hearing in this item at 6.15 pm while

140
00:14:57,030 --> 00:14:59,930
I'll be waiting for the applicant to get them.

141
00:15:00,000 --> 00:15:06,860
Online. Do we have any, there I ask, hands raised on Zoom for comment or any, any comment, cards?

142
00:15:13,920 --> 00:15:16,460
Sorry, Chair, we have no comment cards for this one. I'm meeting.

143
00:15:22,950 --> 00:15:26,430
All right,

144
00:15:38,500 --> 00:15:50,800
is the applicant available? Can you hear us now? Please enter the meeting passcode, followed by a pound. We can hear you guys, but you guys can't hear us. We can hear you now. Yes.

145
00:15:50,800 --> 00:15:58,520
all right David you're up buddy they can hear us now can you hear me we got you

146
00:15:58,520 --> 00:16:04,820
we'll start your five minutes go ahead okay hi I'm David Spago part of the

147
00:16:04,820 --> 00:16:13,000
applicant team we concur with everything that was presented by staff we are

148
00:16:13,000 --> 00:16:19,860
asking for the one-year extension the project has taken a lot of time it has

149
00:16:19,860 --> 00:16:24,820
has been especially difficult because of the water storage that was there.

150
00:16:25,300 --> 00:16:28,260
We only recently had the plan approved.

151
00:16:28,680 --> 00:16:33,280
We are currently working with Oak Valley Community Bank on a construction loan.

152
00:16:34,040 --> 00:16:36,540
The development team has used them before.

153
00:16:37,260 --> 00:16:41,200
We are highly confident that we'll be able to move forward.

154
00:16:41,820 --> 00:16:44,180
The lender needs all of the approved plans.

155
00:16:44,180 --> 00:16:50,780
remaining project documents before ordering the appraisal. Once the appraisals

156
00:16:50,780 --> 00:16:55,900
received we and all of our paperwork has been turned in for personal

157
00:16:55,900 --> 00:17:01,140
information. We anticipate approximately 90 days to process the construction

158
00:17:01,140 --> 00:17:09,200
loan. We anticipate aggressively fourth quarter, probably more realistic first

159
00:17:09,200 --> 00:17:12,720
quarter of next year to get it done.

160
00:17:14,760 --> 00:17:19,120
In addition to that, we've had, you know, numerous delays

161
00:17:19,120 --> 00:17:25,600
in plan check, complexity of the project, significant underground drainage systems, cross

162
00:17:25,600 --> 00:17:31,340
approximately 50 percent of the property. It took additional engineering, special attention

163
00:17:31,340 --> 00:17:38,800
during the plan review. We've utilized MCR engineering Marshall Swift, who's a local engineer

164
00:17:38,800 --> 00:17:46,640
who is familiar and he was the second one that we use because he has more specialty with

165
00:17:46,640 --> 00:17:54,640
the issues that we had. And after numerous years, we think we're there just subject to

166
00:17:54,640 --> 00:17:57,960
getting the extension from the planning commission.

167
00:18:00,720 --> 00:18:06,080
Very good. Thank you, sir. This is real quickly what we have. You can, you confirm that you've read

168
00:18:06,080 --> 00:18:10,160
the conditions of approval for this project that remain on your agreement with those conditions.

169
00:18:10,780 --> 00:18:17,320
Yes, we are. Very good. Thank you, sir. While we have the applicant, are there any questions from any commissioners for the applicant tonight?

170
00:18:19,040 --> 00:18:27,020
No questions, no questions. Okay, hang on the line, sir. While we open the public hearing for public comment, just in case we need you. Okay, sure. Thank you.

171
00:18:27,580 --> 00:18:33,180
All right, we've already opened the public hearing in this item. So we have any new hands raised on Zoom.

172
00:18:35,270 --> 00:18:37,790
No chair. I have no new hands raised on Zoom. Okay.

173
00:18:38,410 --> 00:18:43,110
Any members of the audience wish to address the commission on this item may do so now.

174
00:18:45,310 --> 00:18:52,150
All right. Seeing no hands, thank you very much. Since there's no hands and no public comment,

175
00:18:52,270 --> 00:18:56,370
we'll go ahead and there's no need for applicant rebuttal so we'll go ahead and close the public hearing

176
00:18:56,370 --> 00:19:03,550
on this item at 6.19 p.m. We'll bring it back to the commission for any other questions for staff

177
00:19:03,550 --> 00:19:08,770
at this time. Any other questions, staff from Ms. Neymar?

178
00:19:10,270 --> 00:19:17,050
Just to confirm, Mr. Bronham for the record, have the conditions of approval changed since the original approval in this project?

179
00:19:18,290 --> 00:19:27,410
There are some amended conditions, primarily formatting and timing language in the planning side.

180
00:19:27,590 --> 00:19:30,990
There are some additional, I believe some additional language from the engineering as well.

181
00:19:30,990 --> 00:19:35,970
All those have all been reviewed by the applicants and agreed upon by the applicants.

182
00:19:37,530 --> 00:19:41,270
So most of the revisions were primarily formatting and timing related.

183
00:19:41,790 --> 00:19:41,870
Okay.

184
00:19:42,570 --> 00:19:43,610
Very good.

185
00:19:43,730 --> 00:19:44,150
Thank you, sir.

186
00:19:44,770 --> 00:19:45,370
Mr. Fiori.

187
00:19:48,380 --> 00:19:55,040
If the scenario comes up again with the app, and there needs to be another extension, what

188
00:19:55,040 --> 00:19:59,960
would be is there of the possibility of another extension, in other words, in how long-

189
00:20:00,000 --> 00:20:29,720
How long would that be? Yeah, thank you, Mr. Fiori. There is, you can only get one, one year extension on your approved entitlement. That's per code. However, it toward the end of that time, if the applicant or developer wanted to modify their site plan to some extent, they could apply for a revised, do a revised site plan, or a modification of the site plan, which would then potentially give them an additional two years.

190
00:20:30,400 --> 00:20:35,460
but that again would have to come for the commission for approval so it's not an administrative

191
00:20:35,460 --> 00:20:41,240
type of a change. So that's the only option beyond the one year for an extension.

192
00:20:41,680 --> 00:20:45,800
Thank you. Thank you. Any other questions for staff?

193
00:20:47,920 --> 00:20:53,480
So, John, the conditions are approval to take access in red. Is that considered a change?

194
00:20:53,840 --> 00:20:58,580
Those are the, that's the revised language, yes, Mr. Baslak. So anything in red would be revised

195
00:20:58,580 --> 00:20:59,260
from the original.

196
00:21:01,720 --> 00:21:06,900
Very good thank you. All right anything else can we call for a vote?

197
00:21:06,900 --> 00:21:09,100
All right

198
00:21:11,850 --> 00:21:12,770
very

199
00:21:16,000 --> 00:21:20,500
good okay thank you very much this time we'll call for a vote

200
00:21:21,000 --> 00:21:25,440
is there a motion in a second to adopt a resolution approving a one-year extension for site plan

201
00:21:25,440 --> 00:21:33,960
the desire review SPC 23-04 and conditional use permit UPJ-23-05 for the cottage court storage

202
00:21:33,960 --> 00:21:46,520
project located at 1280 cottage court APN 208-260-22. All right we have a motion for approval from

203
00:21:46,520 --> 00:21:51,640
Commissioner Paslach and a second from Commissioner Fiori all those in favor of votes say aye.

204
00:21:52,100 --> 00:22:01,080
Aye. Any opposed? Okay motion passes 5-0. Thank you very much. Thank you.

205
00:22:03,240 --> 00:22:04,320
All right Madam Clerk

206
00:22:04,320 --> 00:22:05,760
that takes us on to item D2.

207
00:22:10,440 --> 00:22:16,620
Item D2, 26-418, Planning Commission conduct a public hearing and adopt a resolution

208
00:22:16,620 --> 00:22:24,000
approving a modification to the site plan and design review SPA-21-15 for the Union

209
00:22:24,000 --> 00:22:34,620
Crossing Apartments Project located at 13-08 West Atherton Drive, APN 226-160-44, Associate

210
00:22:34,620 --> 00:22:37,780
We get Planner Tobin-Barnam will be presenting this item.

211
00:22:38,500 --> 00:22:51,420
Good evening again, Chair, Vice Chair, Commission, Associate Planner Tobin-Barnam, this request is a site plan modification of an already approved entitlement that being a force union crossing apartments.

212
00:22:54,070 --> 00:22:58,190
In overview of the project, this is again a request for modification of an approved entitlement.

213
00:22:58,190 --> 00:23:06,110
The site is 12.78 acres with 300 residential units proposed in 15 multi-family buildings.

214
00:23:06,930 --> 00:23:09,750
The site also includes a clubhouse and a fitness center.

215
00:23:10,370 --> 00:23:17,910
The locations at 1308 West Atherton Drive, which is on the Southwest corner of the intersection of West Atherton Drive and South Union Road.

216
00:23:20,580 --> 00:23:28,340
The adjacent uses are seen here, single-family residential to the west, to the south, and across the street to the east, living spaces to the north.

217
00:23:28,340 --> 00:23:38,100
And then to the Northwest would be the Chevron gas station and the prominent shopping center and then further east along Atherton is very toss elementary school.

218
00:23:39,440 --> 00:23:47,800
The general plan designation and zoning are the same HDR general plan and are three high density residential zoning.

219
00:23:47,800 --> 00:23:56,460
They both explicitly call out high density residential as the preferred use so the project is approved and consistent with both zoning and designation.

220
00:23:58,420 --> 00:24:01,780
Requested entitlement, again, site plan modification.

221
00:24:02,320 --> 00:24:20,740
This is a previously approved site plan and design review entitlement SPA 21-15 to allow cosmetic changes to the clubhouse and fitness center exteriors and then to relocate the maintenance building and the dogwashing station from the entrance area to sites within the gated community.

222
00:24:21,980 --> 00:24:26,520
This is a glimpse of the proposed relocations, yellow is the maintenance building moving

223
00:24:26,520 --> 00:24:31,780
it east from its proposed from its approved location, pardon me, to a little bit further

224
00:24:31,780 --> 00:24:35,860
inside and away from the main entrance, and the red is the dogwashing station, which

225
00:24:35,860 --> 00:24:40,260
would move due south right up against where the dog park is located.

226
00:24:41,720 --> 00:24:47,760
And the resulting entrance change will look like this, it will be converted to open space

227
00:24:47,760 --> 00:24:48,780
toward the entrance.

228
00:24:48,780 --> 00:24:49,920
These

229
00:24:52,160 --> 00:24:56,320
are the approved elevations for the clubhouse and the fitness center.

230
00:24:56,680 --> 00:24:59,180
Very similar architecture to the apartments themselves.

231
00:25:00,110 --> 00:25:13,390
And this is what is proposed, sleek, and kind of mid-century modern type style, fresh, and fits with the overall aesthetic and the experience that developers hoping to provide for their residents and tenants.

232
00:25:16,540 --> 00:25:32,060
The project was originally approved by Planning Commission on June 16th, 2022, and extended for one year by Planning Commission on August 15th, 2024. The project and proposed changes are consistent with the general plan, the zoning for

233
00:25:32,060 --> 00:25:38,460
the site and with CEQA Article 10 Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations.

234
00:25:40,920 --> 00:25:47,200
On Tuesday, September 1st, staff received a written objection to the requested entitlement

235
00:25:47,200 --> 00:25:52,000
extension, citing inconsistencies in the resolution and some of the project descriptors.

236
00:25:52,720 --> 00:25:57,060
Staff carefully reviewed this letter and found it contains substantive insights that required

237
00:25:57,060 --> 00:25:58,080
a thorough response.

238
00:25:58,700 --> 00:26:05,880
The staff has provided a revised resolution and a memorandum as a supplement to this agenda item to address these concerns.

239
00:26:06,780 --> 00:26:15,600
The inconsistencies, although worthy of addressing, do not indicate a major change to the site plan or any of its critical elements or to the overall operation of the project.

240
00:26:17,020 --> 00:26:19,700
Additionally, there's no impact on the project's

241
00:26:19,700 --> 00:26:21,900
adopted secret documentation or analyses.

242
00:26:22,280 --> 00:26:25,500
The project, as presented, is consistent with the approved,

243
00:26:25,780 --> 00:26:28,980
with the exception of the requested modifications.

244
00:26:29,760 --> 00:26:34,440
And it meets all the findings to support staff's recommendation or approval.

245
00:26:34,900 --> 00:26:39,320
So with this in mind, staff recommends the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing,

246
00:26:39,880 --> 00:26:42,440
approve a modification to site plan and design review,

247
00:26:42,440 --> 00:26:47,940
SBC 21-15, or the Union Crossing apartments project located at 1308 West

248
00:26:47,940 --> 00:26:54,940
Atherton Drive that is at APN 226-160-44. That concludes my presentation.

249
00:26:55,580 --> 00:26:59,440
Staff is here for any questions you might have and the developer team is in the

250
00:26:59,440 --> 00:27:02,640
chambers with us this evening as well. Thank you, Commissioner.

251
00:27:04,240 --> 00:27:09,720
Thank you, sir. All right, at this time before we hear from the applicant do any

252
00:27:09,720 --> 00:27:12,200
commissioners have any clarifying questions for staff.

253
00:27:20,020 --> 00:27:21,000
I think I'm going to ask a couple

254
00:27:21,000 --> 00:27:23,040
now and then I have more later.

255
00:27:25,100 --> 00:27:27,200
Mr. Barnum, on the conditions of approval,

256
00:27:29,860 --> 00:27:30,600
page one,

257
00:27:30,800 --> 00:27:36,520
it lists the project expiration date of September 14th, 2026. It's in 11 days from now.

258
00:27:39,320 --> 00:27:44,380
And you confirm is that a typographical error? Should it be September 14th, 2028?

259
00:27:48,510 --> 00:27:57,050
the expiration? No, that is that's correct. December, please what it says. Chair, if I may

260
00:27:57,050 --> 00:28:04,350
help Mr. Barnum, that was a typographical error. The intent was that the correct expiration date

261
00:28:04,350 --> 00:28:10,150
would be the 2028 date. Okay, because it did reference that date on page two, I just wanted to confirm

262
00:28:10,150 --> 00:28:15,950
for the record that we have an accurate conditions of approval document. The approval date obviously is

263
00:28:15,950 --> 00:28:23,410
today pending approval of this modification today, but the expiration date will be 914-28.

264
00:28:24,730 --> 00:28:31,310
So if we seek passage of this motion, we will need to pass it with amended conditions of approval with a corrective date.

265
00:28:31,870 --> 00:28:33,130
That is correct, Chair.

266
00:28:33,410 --> 00:28:33,990
Thank you.

267
00:28:37,760 --> 00:28:43,640
You said it in your presentation, but just to confirm, the request here seems to be very narrow in scope.

268
00:28:44,880 --> 00:28:56,940
It keeps the previously approved 15 building apartment projects and tax changes simply the clubhouse and fitness center exterior treatment and relocating the maintenance building on the dog watching a state station.

269
00:28:57,160 --> 00:29:04,260
That's in summary. That's the just that's the essence of this modification. That is correct or cool and there's no there are no other modifications proposed.

270
00:29:04,260 --> 00:29:06,040
Oh, it's okay, very good.

271
00:29:06,920 --> 00:29:08,820
All right, I think those are the ones I want to ask

272
00:29:08,820 --> 00:29:10,320
before we hear from the applicant.

273
00:29:11,060 --> 00:29:12,940
The applicant, if you're available,

274
00:29:13,060 --> 00:29:14,220
we'd love to hear from you at this time.

275
00:29:24,730 --> 00:29:25,090
Thank you, sir.

276
00:29:25,150 --> 00:29:27,030
If you could state your name and title for the record, too.

277
00:29:27,530 --> 00:29:27,970
Appreciate it.

278
00:29:28,210 --> 00:29:32,010
Chris Kelly, architect with LPS Architects,

279
00:29:32,870 --> 00:29:34,030
representing Legacy Homes.

280
00:29:37,210 --> 00:29:40,770
Overall, it's really the same project as in the fact

281
00:29:40,770 --> 00:29:53,320
that it's 300 units yeah very tall overall it's it's similar in the fact that

282
00:29:53,320 --> 00:29:59,760
it's 300 units it's comprised of 15 buildings each with 20 units all with

283
00:29:59,760 --> 00:29:59,900
So

284
00:30:00,000 --> 00:30:27,000
Under garages, organized in much of the same way. We did revamped the entire, I guess, front entry elements, which is the clubhouse fitness building based on current desires from legacy homes as far as how they want to serve their residents. As Tobin stated, we moved the maintenance building to the back of house, and then also co-mingled the pet wash with the dog park.

285
00:30:27,000 --> 00:30:34,460
I think it's been a little while since I worked on it, but we increased the size of the

286
00:30:34,460 --> 00:30:40,300
amenities, we increased the size of the open space, but overall it has the same character.

287
00:30:40,840 --> 00:30:46,940
The architecture is a little different in appearance, there's more color added to it, but it's

288
00:30:46,940 --> 00:30:52,700
still a mix of plaster, exterior plaster, and then horizontal siding.

289
00:30:53,600 --> 00:30:58,420
As Tobin mentioned, the clubhouse building and fitness buildings are radically different.

290
00:30:59,120 --> 00:31:03,120
I didn't necessarily put together before and after, but in some of the documents you

291
00:31:03,120 --> 00:31:06,580
kind of see what was entitled and what was currently stated today.

292
00:31:07,740 --> 00:31:10,260
But we're available to answer any questions you may have.

293
00:31:11,020 --> 00:31:11,260
Thank you.

294
00:31:11,680 --> 00:31:11,880
Okay.

295
00:31:13,380 --> 00:31:18,380
Quickly off, right away, I just want to confirm your agreement with the conditions of approval

296
00:31:18,380 --> 00:31:19,120
for this project.

297
00:31:19,280 --> 00:31:22,240
Have you read them and you're confirmed to be in agreement with us?

298
00:31:24,780 --> 00:31:30,680
Yes, assuming obviously with a modified corrected expiration date of 2028, September.

299
00:31:33,060 --> 00:31:39,700
Can you just elaborate briefly on the reason for the change of the maintenance building and

300
00:31:39,700 --> 00:31:40,940
the dog station?

301
00:31:41,060 --> 00:31:42,220
What was the reason for the modification?

302
00:31:42,880 --> 00:31:43,040
Sure.

303
00:31:43,340 --> 00:31:46,760
I'd say it was originally designed by a different architect.

304
00:31:46,760 --> 00:32:11,500
So, just in conversations with ownership as far as property management, it was best to have the maintenance building kind of back of house away from the front entry away from leasing property management fitness clubhouse kind of your social amenities and to have it as more like a detached garage it's about a 400 square foot building.

305
00:32:11,500 --> 00:32:15,400
So think of it as a two-car garage as far as it made it's built in.

306
00:32:17,420 --> 00:32:20,100
And the original approval was four years ago.

307
00:32:20,300 --> 00:32:24,160
We had an extension and now a modification that will extend the time further.

308
00:32:24,780 --> 00:32:29,360
Is there a timeline for development that you're working with at this point?

309
00:32:29,760 --> 00:32:29,880
It

310
00:32:35,990 --> 00:32:37,510
takes you two of us to answer all the questions.

311
00:32:37,650 --> 00:32:37,770
Sure.

312
00:32:38,450 --> 00:32:39,530
Garrett with GHBR.

313
00:32:40,430 --> 00:32:46,650
For the timeline, I mean, obviously we still have a lot of code updates to do on our construction

314
00:32:46,650 --> 00:32:52,930
and drawings. The plans we currently have, we had full construction drawing sets under

315
00:32:52,930 --> 00:33:00,130
the 2022 code, never submitted them to the city because we obviously ran into some hiccups

316
00:33:00,130 --> 00:33:08,170
with some SSGID relocations. That's taken two seasons now and it took about 18 months to

317
00:33:08,170 --> 00:33:13,110
get a plan approval for that, which was required to be completed before we pulled from it.

318
00:33:13,110 --> 00:33:20,250
So with this modification it would allow us to complete the irrigation work this

319
00:33:20,250 --> 00:33:27,190
winter we would submit for building plans, construction drawings, start site

320
00:33:27,190 --> 00:33:32,390
development hopefully late next year and be able to pull a building permit either

321
00:33:32,390 --> 00:33:34,430
late 27 or early 28.

322
00:33:35,610 --> 00:33:37,130
Okay, thank you, sir.

323
00:33:38,110 --> 00:33:40,950
Any other commissioners have questions for the applicant tonight?

324
00:33:40,950 --> 00:33:41,610
All

325
00:33:45,870 --> 00:33:59,490
right. Very good. You're called. Chair Coleman, could I ask a clarifying question? Could you for my purposes show me exactly where that type of is on to make sure I get that clarified or cleared up on the condition of one in the conditions?

326
00:34:00,370 --> 00:34:04,650
Yeah, it's in the header section where it says approval date and a project expiration.

327
00:34:08,580 --> 00:34:15,240
So it says September 3rd, 2026 is the approval date, the day's date, and then project expiration, September 14th, 2026,

328
00:34:17,480 --> 00:34:19,080
right below the project location address.

329
00:34:30,050 --> 00:34:32,530
Okay, thank you, Chair Coleman, appreciate it. We're able to locate.

330
00:34:34,070 --> 00:34:34,510
Okay,

331
00:34:38,930 --> 00:34:39,890
thank you very much.

332
00:34:41,250 --> 00:34:44,850
This time we're going to go ahead and open the public hearing at 6.34 p.m.

333
00:34:48,630 --> 00:34:52,090
Madam Clerk, do we have any hands raised on Zoom tonight?

334
00:34:55,620 --> 00:34:59,200
Chair, I do have one hand raised on zoom.

335
00:35:00,000 --> 00:35:06,600
Okay. That is. Suit a car again. I will allow him to speak. Suit a car. Can you hear us?

336
00:35:09,230 --> 00:35:12,790
Yes. Are you able to hear me? Your three minutes starts now.

337
00:35:15,390 --> 00:35:30,950
Okay. Good evening. Commission and thank you for the opportunity. So I see that the HDR is located right beside the single family homes.

338
00:35:32,310 --> 00:35:41,450
Like the one on the apartments, I think it's other than apartments beside the Bass Pro

339
00:35:41,450 --> 00:35:49,950
Shop and that has a setback from the single family homes around 125 feet.

340
00:35:51,050 --> 00:35:58,370
This will, I think there should be a redesign of the, I think three or four buildings that

341
00:35:58,370 --> 00:36:08,570
are right beside the single family homes, I think those four should be having a setback

342
00:36:08,570 --> 00:36:19,930
of 125 feet and a redesign would have the privacy issues resolved, otherwise it will be

343
00:36:19,930 --> 00:36:24,510
be a privacy concern for the nearby apart single family homes.

344
00:36:26,650 --> 00:36:27,210
Thank you.

345
00:36:28,790 --> 00:36:29,410
Thank you.

346
00:36:30,790 --> 00:36:31,290
All right.

347
00:36:31,390 --> 00:36:33,190
Do we have any other hands raised on Zoom for this item?

348
00:36:36,610 --> 00:36:37,290
No, Chair.

349
00:36:37,390 --> 00:36:37,690
We do not.

350
00:36:38,230 --> 00:36:39,430
And do we have any comment card?

351
00:36:40,090 --> 00:36:40,570
No, Chair.

352
00:36:40,730 --> 00:36:40,990
I do not.

353
00:36:41,370 --> 00:36:41,970
Okay. Thank you.

354
00:36:42,510 --> 00:36:46,190
Anyone in the audience wishing to address the commission on this item?

355
00:36:46,890 --> 00:36:47,950
May I do so now?

356
00:36:49,730 --> 00:36:50,530
Please come on up.

357
00:36:50,530 --> 00:36:51,170
Hello

358
00:36:56,960 --> 00:37:02,180
everyone, my name is Emma crunchker and I'm in sixth grade and I got a

359
00:37:02,180 --> 00:37:09,200
Verdes Elementary and my concern is where you guys are building the parking

360
00:37:09,200 --> 00:37:16,520
law for the complex is my bedroom area so when I go to sleep the parking

361
00:37:16,520 --> 00:37:22,060
law spotlight will shine through my window and I don't think I'll be able to go

362
00:37:22,060 --> 00:37:22,440
Thank

363
00:37:26,500 --> 00:37:29,260
you very much. Thank you.

364
00:37:30,740 --> 00:37:31,140
Right.

365
00:37:31,880 --> 00:37:34,560
Anybody else wish to address the commission on this item?

366
00:37:34,700 --> 00:37:35,700
Please come on up.

367
00:37:38,920 --> 00:37:39,860
Hello. Good evening.

368
00:37:40,420 --> 00:37:41,500
My name is Avinash.

369
00:37:42,120 --> 00:37:46,520
Basically, we are living in the same community that am I living around?

370
00:37:47,140 --> 00:37:54,380
My concern is because there will be school nearby and a lot of new residents

371
00:37:54,380 --> 00:37:58,140
will be coming into the community that is being built.

372
00:37:58,140 --> 00:38:01,980
There will be a big traffic problems around that.

373
00:38:02,280 --> 00:38:04,640
The schools are in the morning,

374
00:38:04,940 --> 00:38:07,840
it's right now having a lot of traffic problems

375
00:38:08,460 --> 00:38:13,220
and this will go into raise more cows around the community,

376
00:38:13,780 --> 00:38:15,300
around the schools as well.

377
00:38:18,110 --> 00:38:19,190
Thank you, sir, thank you.

378
00:38:22,080 --> 00:38:22,940
Staff for the record.

379
00:38:23,440 --> 00:38:25,600
Again, up for consideration tonight

380
00:38:25,600 --> 00:38:27,540
as a modification of the site plan.

381
00:38:29,100 --> 00:38:32,020
The project to confirm has already been approved

382
00:38:32,020 --> 00:38:32,860
Is that correct?

383
00:38:33,100 --> 00:38:34,840
That's correct, sir Coleman, and extended.

384
00:38:35,260 --> 00:38:38,580
And if I may add as well, on the initial approval,

385
00:38:39,000 --> 00:38:41,800
Mantika Unified School District was a part of the review process.

386
00:38:42,220 --> 00:38:45,100
They assessed the site for compliance, they assessed schools,

387
00:38:45,520 --> 00:38:47,520
assessed schools nearby for capacity.

388
00:38:48,240 --> 00:38:49,560
There were no concerns expressed.

389
00:38:49,980 --> 00:38:53,180
I should add also with the matter of traffic.

390
00:38:53,900 --> 00:38:57,120
The main entrance to the site is condition to be signalized.

391
00:38:57,600 --> 00:39:01,860
So any traffic issue will be mitigated prior to the buildings

392
00:39:01,860 --> 00:39:08,860
things even be occupied. And adding additionally, the entire frontage will be approved with sidewalks

393
00:39:08,860 --> 00:39:16,040
and striping curb gutter sidewalks. So, it will be safer all the way around mitigate traffic.

394
00:39:17,140 --> 00:39:22,360
With regard to light, there's a photometric plan approved as a part of this site plan package.

395
00:39:23,360 --> 00:39:30,040
Landscaping around the perimeter is vertical to help screen and lights are required by code to be

396
00:39:30,040 --> 00:39:35,500
be shielded and downward cast, so light trespass is a significant issue.

397
00:39:35,500 --> 00:39:42,980
It's addressed in the SQL document, so there is no anticipated concern for light trespass

398
00:39:42,980 --> 00:39:46,720
or giving people a tan in their bedroom as they're trying to sleep.

399
00:39:47,560 --> 00:39:51,440
So, and that signal is that, Atherton, is the main entrance point?

400
00:39:51,580 --> 00:39:52,380
Atherton, yes.

401
00:39:52,940 --> 00:39:53,020
Very good.

402
00:39:53,280 --> 00:39:53,540
That's correct.

403
00:39:53,700 --> 00:39:57,860
It'll be due south of the living space's project for property.

404
00:39:58,240 --> 00:39:58,420
Okay.

405
00:39:58,980 --> 00:39:59,620
Thank you, sir.

406
00:40:00,050 --> 00:40:03,030
All right, anyone else in the audience, wish to address this? Please come on up.

407
00:40:09,890 --> 00:40:36,170
Good evening, sir. This is Mahesh. I live into the same community. We purchased this house about, you know, three years back, looking at, you know, where it has school is nearby. And also, you know, we travel to work and along with this project, right, what we are seeing it around 300 houses, right, or the 300 apartments, considering one kid per apartment, where it has, or maybe you

408
00:40:36,170 --> 00:40:44,170
know at least 0.75. It will bring you to the total of about 200 kids getting added into

409
00:40:44,170 --> 00:40:49,930
where it is which is really difficult right now as well where it is to extend with the

410
00:40:49,930 --> 00:40:54,910
current population and the development what we have seen into the full day, West Arthur

411
00:40:54,910 --> 00:41:01,410
and as well on to the side of the West Woodward. It is already bringing us into the complications

412
00:41:01,410 --> 00:41:07,150
where we are not able to accommodate or the quality of the kids education is hampered right now.

413
00:41:09,070 --> 00:41:13,910
And with this, I recommend kind of, you know, this things need to be kind of postponed

414
00:41:13,910 --> 00:41:19,650
and being set back to the proper MUSD, considering these governing bodies are different,

415
00:41:19,790 --> 00:41:24,850
different holding patterns, they have different approval rating, they have different ways to study this.

416
00:41:25,270 --> 00:41:30,710
We need to send this message to them as well and wait for their due diligence to be done.

417
00:41:32,760 --> 00:41:33,980
Thank you, sir. Thank you.

418
00:41:37,550 --> 00:41:40,730
All right. Anybody else in the audience wish to address? Please come on up.

419
00:41:47,760 --> 00:41:54,520
Good evening, Chair Koleman. Thanks for giving this opportunity. I sent a written email with 31 points

420
00:41:54,520 --> 00:42:03,920
objections and here is a confirmation from Deputy Director, Justice Orakos. I hope somebody from

421
00:42:03,920 --> 00:42:09,320
the commission is going through all those 31 points. My name is Ravi Kiran Karanchukur. I'm the

422
00:42:09,320 --> 00:42:15,480
resident of 1662 Centrelinger venue, which is the boundary with the applicant's property,

423
00:42:15,760 --> 00:42:16,460
which is coming in.

424
00:42:18,260 --> 00:42:23,320
I have a couple of questions based on the attachment we have for today's changes.

425
00:42:26,420 --> 00:42:35,980
The first one is if I look at the landscape plan, sheet L.1A, it labeled as CMU wall along

426
00:42:35,980 --> 00:42:36,780
the property line.

427
00:42:37,900 --> 00:42:42,160
If you look at that property line, there are 10 houses, first two houses has the

428
00:42:42,160 --> 00:42:52,180
legendary wall, rest of the houses has fins, but in the .1AL, it has CMA wall along the

429
00:42:52,180 --> 00:42:52,760
property line.

430
00:42:53,240 --> 00:42:58,700
But condition of approved number 34, it requires only 24-inch box trees.

431
00:42:59,860 --> 00:43:03,600
I have read every condition and I cannot find a wall anywhere in the term.

432
00:43:03,600 --> 00:43:12,760
So, my question is, is a masonry wall required along the property line? Yes or no? If yes, which

433
00:43:12,760 --> 00:43:20,720
condition number requires it and at what height? Usually the masonry line or the walls are supposed

434
00:43:20,720 --> 00:43:26,900
to be 8 feet tall from the tallest point of the base, I do not see that anywhere in the plan.

435
00:43:28,570 --> 00:43:35,050
And if it is required to be built, I would expect that to be done first before any activity

436
00:43:35,050 --> 00:43:40,670
start including grading, because all the dust particles, noise and everything we want

437
00:43:40,670 --> 00:43:44,130
that to be stopped first, even before any work starts.

438
00:43:47,000 --> 00:43:48,140
I still have one minute.

439
00:43:49,040 --> 00:43:53,140
I had a point about the dates which you already asked to correct, so thanks for that.

440
00:43:54,700 --> 00:44:00,760
As some follow-up items on the illumination point of view, I don't see any study in

441
00:44:00,760 --> 00:44:05,500
all the attachments about the lighting. And I think what the question that little boy raised,

442
00:44:05,900 --> 00:44:10,700
I really worry how many small kids would be impacted because of that because the height of the

443
00:44:10,700 --> 00:44:18,940
buildings is 40 feet and there is a pathway in between which has the parking lots. And I don't know,

444
00:44:19,280 --> 00:44:23,400
we cannot control at what time people come to their homes and go, we definitely don't want

445
00:44:23,400 --> 00:44:26,500
younger kids to awaken the middle of the night.

446
00:44:29,460 --> 00:44:30,480
I still have it in seconds.

447
00:44:30,480 --> 00:44:37,080
When last question is about the five phases, the project was originally approved in 2019,

448
00:44:38,300 --> 00:44:43,500
then some entitleness were brought in 2021, 2022, and now we are extending to 2028.

449
00:44:44,100 --> 00:44:48,840
So I don't encourage this, and then we won't be able to continue this forever.

450
00:44:49,320 --> 00:44:50,280
We need to have some deadline.

451
00:44:51,340 --> 00:44:53,380
And there are more questions in my email.

452
00:44:53,640 --> 00:44:56,140
I will take questions on email reply.

453
00:44:56,380 --> 00:44:56,460
Thank you.

454
00:44:56,560 --> 00:44:56,780
Thank you.

455
00:44:56,780 --> 00:44:57,400
Thank you.

456
00:45:00,270 --> 00:45:10,510
A question for staff. The public commenter does note that there's no CMU wall requirement in

457
00:45:10,510 --> 00:45:15,350
the conditions of approval. However, on the project plan set on attachment five, it does

458
00:45:15,350 --> 00:45:22,070
specifically state CMU wall in part of the design. So can you clarify, is a CMU wall part

459
00:45:22,070 --> 00:45:27,610
of this project? CMU wall, thank you Chair Coleman. CMU wall, my code is not a requirement

460
00:45:27,610 --> 00:45:31,090
between housing, between multi-family and single-family.

461
00:45:31,230 --> 00:45:32,030
It's not a requirement.

462
00:45:32,950 --> 00:45:36,230
It is a nice amenity where the folks who live in those single-family homes,

463
00:45:36,230 --> 00:45:40,010
especially if they were there first, but it is not a requirement.

464
00:45:40,310 --> 00:45:44,590
If the developer has provided a CMU wall on the plans and the plans are approved,

465
00:45:44,590 --> 00:45:48,630
then that is what the developer will be held to construct a CMU wall.

466
00:45:48,810 --> 00:45:53,270
Per code, the maximum height for CMU wall in the city of Antigas 7 feet,

467
00:45:53,270 --> 00:45:59,170
unless it is a sound attenuation wall next to a severe noise

468
00:45:59,170 --> 00:46:01,610
a generator like a highway, for example.

469
00:46:02,250 --> 00:46:05,270
But in this case, a 7-foot wall would be the maximum height allowed.

470
00:46:07,580 --> 00:46:10,300
Thank you, sir. And then there was a comment made about

471
00:46:11,480 --> 00:46:16,280
what ostensibly amounts, I believe, light pollution adjacent to the property.

472
00:46:17,180 --> 00:46:22,200
You had referenced lighting earlier in the clarification comment

473
00:46:22,200 --> 00:46:28,220
And it was addressed, I believe, in the original SQL evaluation with the original project approval.

474
00:46:28,500 --> 00:46:28,780
That's correct.

475
00:46:29,000 --> 00:46:30,000
That is correct, Chair Coleman.

476
00:46:30,280 --> 00:46:34,680
And there is a photometric plans, a mandatory part of every site plan review application.

477
00:46:34,680 --> 00:46:42,020
So it would be in the original plan set that is assessed as a standard part of every site plan review.

478
00:46:42,360 --> 00:46:48,280
The requirements per code or that, but foot candles as measured from the property line should be essentially zero.

479
00:46:48,280 --> 00:46:55,540
or the equivalent to the brightness of a full moon on a cloud this night, not

480
00:46:55,540 --> 00:47:01,720
poetic, but that's the measure at the property line and again the standard

481
00:47:01,720 --> 00:47:07,300
for lighting fixtures is shielded downward cast with a cone no greater than 60

482
00:47:07,300 --> 00:47:15,160
degrees in spread. So I can tell you staff is on top of these things recently we

483
00:47:15,160 --> 00:47:19,560
We had a project that was a self-sourced facility that was adjacent to homes that installed

484
00:47:19,560 --> 00:47:25,680
fixtures that was blasting the homes behind it with light and we went out to the site

485
00:47:25,680 --> 00:47:31,660
and we required them to replace every single light on the facility and that was a lot

486
00:47:31,660 --> 00:47:32,360
of light fixtures.

487
00:47:33,160 --> 00:47:35,280
So we are on top of those things.

488
00:47:36,800 --> 00:47:42,900
And as part of that approval, should the development be in violation of the approval, the conditions

489
00:47:42,900 --> 00:47:47,200
of approval with respect to the lighting, this is an example of what the city can do to enforce that

490
00:47:47,200 --> 00:47:53,260
state. That's correct. Absolutely, Chair Coleman. We go out on site typically if a planner who

491
00:47:53,260 --> 00:47:58,820
gets a, takes a project to hearing is still on staff at the time that the construction is completed

492
00:47:58,820 --> 00:48:04,200
and inspection occurs, that planner then goes back out. That was the case for me with that,

493
00:48:04,560 --> 00:48:09,980
because that self-sort facility I took it to planning commission. I then was the planner to go out

494
00:48:09,980 --> 00:48:14,100
do the inspections on site and found those light fixtures was able to work with the neighbors

495
00:48:14,100 --> 00:48:16,380
and get those light fixtures changed.

496
00:48:16,760 --> 00:48:20,920
So it is very much planning is very much involved in the process before, during and after

497
00:48:20,920 --> 00:48:21,600
construction.

498
00:48:21,980 --> 00:48:22,100
Okay.

499
00:48:22,960 --> 00:48:23,680
Thank you, sir.

500
00:48:24,740 --> 00:48:25,320
All right.

501
00:48:25,660 --> 00:48:26,020
A question.

502
00:48:26,080 --> 00:48:26,260
Go ahead.

503
00:48:26,360 --> 00:48:26,480
Sorry.

504
00:48:27,780 --> 00:48:30,780
A little bit clarification for the wall.

505
00:48:31,480 --> 00:48:33,160
It's in the plans, the plans are approved.

506
00:48:33,920 --> 00:48:36,280
Should that be then in the conditions of approval?

507
00:48:36,280 --> 00:48:56,360
It can be but again, it's not a requirement per code, so the time when planning would condition it if we felt there was a substantial reason to require it say, for example, if there were a hazard on the other side of the property line, a reason to create such a substantial barrier.

508
00:48:56,880 --> 00:49:04,820
It is a big cost increase for the developer to require a wall in addition to the construction cost.

509
00:49:04,820 --> 00:49:14,280
There's the engineering involved so to oblige them to something that is not required by code is not a practice we like to we like to get into

510
00:49:15,500 --> 00:49:21,980
But if the applicant the developer wants to provide a wall that is definitely something that we appreciate

511
00:49:22,540 --> 00:49:25,440
Development is better for it the neighborhood is better for it

512
00:49:26,060 --> 00:49:34,240
But it is not conditioned because it is not a requirement and there is no inherent danger or reason to create a more substantial barrier between the site and the adjacent

513
00:49:37,550 --> 00:49:38,430
Thank you.

514
00:49:38,910 --> 00:49:43,410
Any other members of the audience that haven't spoken yet wish to address us on this item may do so.

515
00:49:47,800 --> 00:49:47,920
Okay.

516
00:49:48,960 --> 00:49:49,540
All right.

517
00:49:49,880 --> 00:49:50,820
Seeing no more hands.

518
00:49:51,640 --> 00:49:55,580
We'll go ahead and have our applicant rebuttal period begin at this time.

519
00:49:55,580 --> 00:49:59,440
You're welcome to come back up if you'd like to address any of the concerns that were brought up.

520
00:50:00,000 --> 00:50:01,600
From any of the comments, tonight.

521
00:50:06,080 --> 00:50:33,600
I think the biggest thing was the wall. There is a wall shown on the approved landscape plans part of the application submittal. And that's what our construction drawings actually show. Can I tell you exactly how high, but it is a senior wall. Okay. Very good. Thank you, sir. Mr. Fury, if you may, a point of clarification. In addition to that fence, what is a requirement by code between multi-family and single-family?

522
00:50:33,600 --> 00:50:36,440
is a 10-foot wide landscaping buffer with vertical trees.

523
00:50:37,320 --> 00:50:42,960
So that is there in, against between the parking area that the young man spoke of and the

524
00:50:42,960 --> 00:50:43,780
property line.

525
00:50:43,920 --> 00:50:48,840
There's a 10-foot wide minimum landscape barrier with vertical trees that over time will

526
00:50:48,840 --> 00:50:49,340
get taller.

527
00:50:49,560 --> 00:50:54,880
So could that combine with the light shielding, the downward casting, and so on will provide

528
00:50:54,880 --> 00:50:57,600
them with no light trespass onto their properties?

529
00:50:58,420 --> 00:50:59,160
Thank you.

530
00:50:59,960 --> 00:51:05,580
Well, the public here is still open. Do we have any other questions for the applicant before we close it?

531
00:51:11,480 --> 00:51:17,640
Okay. All right. At this time, we'll go ahead and close the public hearing on item D2 at 651 p.m.

532
00:51:19,260 --> 00:51:24,080
We're bringing back to the commission for any follow-up questions for staff or discussion amongst us.

533
00:51:26,180 --> 00:51:27,360
The other follow-up questions for staff.

534
00:51:27,360 --> 00:51:28,300
All

535
00:51:36,620 --> 00:51:39,500
right, no one else does anything.

536
00:51:39,620 --> 00:51:43,120
I'll go ahead and start a few things that I just want to clarify for the record.

537
00:51:47,550 --> 00:51:53,250
Just to confirm, there was some talk about items related to the original sequel approval, especially lighting.

538
00:51:53,970 --> 00:51:59,630
And there was a mention in the public comment, a supplemental we received as to the EIR being stale.

539
00:52:01,110 --> 00:52:08,690
Is it correct that the age of the EAR does not necessarily buy any relevance here at this point?

540
00:52:09,170 --> 00:52:12,090
All the protections from the original EAR are still in effect.

541
00:52:13,090 --> 00:52:15,530
Yes, sir.

542
00:52:15,790 --> 00:52:17,470
Sure. If I may answer that question.

543
00:52:18,390 --> 00:52:27,250
Yes. The SQL remains valid up until the project is deemed expired since the commission is considering action on this project.

544
00:52:28,170 --> 00:52:34,350
As long as any of the original provisions remain in place, the secret in this is an effect.

545
00:52:36,580 --> 00:52:38,260
Chair Kohl, if I could add to that too.

546
00:52:39,320 --> 00:52:45,120
That should be noted, the secret document is not pertinent specifically to just this site.

547
00:52:46,060 --> 00:52:50,160
This part, this property is part of a plan development, which is a much larger area.

548
00:52:50,280 --> 00:52:53,860
It includes the land to the north and some land to the east as well.

549
00:52:53,860 --> 00:53:14,660
So the EIR document is a large document covering a large area of land and this is just one piece of that so all those other developments that are happening that are a part of that are also covered in that EIR document the addendum that's right that's identified as specific to this project due to an increase in the number of

550
00:53:14,660 --> 00:53:20,020
of apartment units with this application versus what was originally approved.

551
00:53:20,380 --> 00:53:23,460
So there was an increase from 281 to 300 units.

552
00:53:23,880 --> 00:53:27,740
The addendum came to account for those additional apartment units.

553
00:53:28,120 --> 00:53:28,260
Okay.

554
00:53:28,860 --> 00:53:29,380
Thank you, sir.

555
00:53:30,680 --> 00:53:32,780
There was a part of the supplemental.

556
00:53:32,780 --> 00:53:38,320
There was some confusion about exactly what kind of plan set was being proposed or approved.

557
00:53:38,320 --> 00:53:50,080
I think if I'm, if I'm understanding correctly, attachment five in the publicly disclosed item for D2 tonight has the proposed modifications plan says that correct.

558
00:53:50,540 --> 00:54:05,900
Yes, Chair Coleman, that's correct. There is a site plan showing the relocation of the two accessory structures and then there are architectural color rendering showing the color changes and the architectural changes to the pool house and the community building.

559
00:54:05,900 --> 00:54:11,380
Okay. And that's the document I was referencing earlier that list to CMU wall that the applicant

560
00:54:11,380 --> 00:54:17,100
spoke about that is listed in those proposed modification documents. It does list the title

561
00:54:17,100 --> 00:54:23,640
of Trillium Apartments on that plan set. Is that a previous name for this project or that name

562
00:54:23,640 --> 00:54:29,900
is actually just a new brand that it was originally approved as union crossing. Therefore we brought

563
00:54:29,900 --> 00:54:34,260
the extension forward as union crossing because that is the name that was on the approval, the initial

564
00:54:34,260 --> 00:54:42,320
approval, trillium is just kind of a brand. And so that I'm assuming is connected to the

565
00:54:43,180 --> 00:54:47,540
freshening up of the two accessory structures and the color changes. Okay.

566
00:54:48,720 --> 00:54:53,500
There was concern about the project boundary. Did the project boundary change from the original

567
00:54:53,500 --> 00:54:59,120
approval on this? Or is it the same exact boundary? No, Chair Cole, there's no Coleman, there's no change to any

568
00:55:00,000 --> 00:55:29,620
The boundaries, any of the points of ingress, egress, number of units, height of building, placement of the buildings, internal circulation, landscaping, other than more landscaping where the accessory structures will be moved from. Okay, thank you very much. So yeah, thank you. The original project was when this was originally approved, was this lot zoned as general commercial and did it change to HDR after approval?

569
00:55:29,620 --> 00:55:36,560
your knowledge. That is correct. It did change to HDR at some point down the road.

570
00:55:36,740 --> 00:55:37,080
Actually,

571
00:55:40,260 --> 00:55:49,300
it was actually zoned PD before, which is kind of a not ideal way to handle PD zoning,

572
00:55:49,460 --> 00:55:57,180
but that's the way it was handled before. We had it was actually zoned PD, and then it was changed when we did a zoning cleanup later on to HDR,

573
00:55:57,180 --> 00:56:01,280
which is what's consistent with the general plan and the approved uses.

574
00:56:02,100 --> 00:56:06,500
So our approval tonight on modification would be consistent with the general plan today,

575
00:56:06,680 --> 00:56:11,060
which is the NHDR, bad scratch or cold and good. Very good.

576
00:56:13,480 --> 00:56:14,800
Let me see if I have anything else.

577
00:56:24,180 --> 00:56:31,100
In the response by the planning department to the supplemental item number four,

578
00:56:31,240 --> 00:56:35,660
there was discussion about phasing or this being a phase development up to five phases.

579
00:56:35,660 --> 00:56:44,080
Is there any expectation on a timeline for those phases at this time, or is it too preliminary

580
00:56:44,080 --> 00:56:46,120
to understand the timing for phasing?

581
00:56:48,240 --> 00:56:51,180
Chair Coleman, I would defer to the developers for that question.

582
00:56:51,180 --> 00:56:54,260
I have not been informed of any timing, but I would let them answer that question.

583
00:56:54,380 --> 00:56:54,720
We can't.

584
00:56:54,840 --> 00:56:55,520
Public hearings close.

585
00:56:55,880 --> 00:56:56,200
That's right.

586
00:56:56,340 --> 00:56:56,760
I apologize.

587
00:56:56,760 --> 00:56:57,460
I apologize.

588
00:56:57,820 --> 00:56:58,120
Thank you.

589
00:56:58,340 --> 00:57:00,100
I should have asked it with the public hearings open.

590
00:57:00,180 --> 00:57:00,580
That's okay.

591
00:57:01,480 --> 00:57:02,240
My apologies.

592
00:57:03,820 --> 00:57:13,260
no problem. This was curious. The revised resolution was received by the Planning Commission.

593
00:57:13,720 --> 00:57:21,600
The revised resolution from my interpretation substantially clarifies this project,

594
00:57:21,840 --> 00:57:27,700
this specific approval in a meaningful way. And it does specifically list the proposed modifications

595
00:57:27,700 --> 00:57:35,600
included as attachment five of the agenda report to confirm the updated modified site plan and design.

596
00:57:36,580 --> 00:57:44,580
So I, at least with that, it kind of removes that discrepancy that was existing, I think, with the original resolution that was published.

597
00:57:46,840 --> 00:57:48,140
Or that was a comment, not a question.

598
00:57:52,220 --> 00:57:54,400
There's one more I have. Let me find it.

599
00:57:54,400 --> 00:57:56,240
There was

600
00:58:07,060 --> 00:58:11,640
a discrepancy on, but I just wanted to clarify for the record to make sure I'm

601
00:58:11,640 --> 00:58:18,160
understanding correctly as it relates to, I can find it in my large sheet of notes here.

602
00:58:23,050 --> 00:58:29,590
The revised conditions refer to a January 24th, 2021 plan set, and then it was dated December

603
00:58:29,590 --> 00:58:31,170
22nd, 2022.

604
00:58:33,730 --> 00:58:42,890
And now we have modified proposed conditions with or excuse me, proposed modifications with today's date.

605
00:58:44,070 --> 00:58:52,700
Is there a discrepancy between the 2021 and 2022 modifications or conditions?

606
00:58:53,320 --> 00:58:54,080
Thank you, Chair.

607
00:58:54,080 --> 00:59:00,520
The difference is the original plan set has the 21 date on it.

608
00:59:00,780 --> 00:59:06,680
Okay, the approved the modified site plan has the 22 date on it.

609
00:59:06,940 --> 00:59:13,780
Okay, so although they were not originally submitted together with the original approval and title and approval,

610
00:59:14,060 --> 00:59:21,000
they are now combined, provided the commission should approve, they would be combined.

611
00:59:21,060 --> 00:59:23,260
And so the dates wouldn't quite match.

612
00:59:23,260 --> 00:59:25,020
That's actually not a very uncommon thing

613
00:59:25,020 --> 00:59:27,000
when you have plan sets submitted.

614
00:59:27,240 --> 00:59:28,400
You'll have the landscape plan,

615
00:59:28,620 --> 00:59:30,660
design the landscape architect with one date on it,

616
00:59:30,760 --> 00:59:32,420
and you'll have the photometric plan,

617
00:59:32,600 --> 00:59:37,200
you'll have the, all the different pages,

618
00:59:37,320 --> 00:59:40,220
many different pages will have different people

619
00:59:40,220 --> 00:59:42,140
who draw them so the dates might be different,

620
00:59:42,300 --> 00:59:43,660
but that's the discrepancy.

621
00:59:44,700 --> 00:59:45,000
Very good.

622
00:59:47,260 --> 00:59:50,560
Are there any other questions by any commissioners or staff?

623
00:59:51,620 --> 00:59:59,820
No. Good? Okay. I empathize with the impact.

624
01:00:00,000 --> 01:00:29,220
That's the fact of, you know, the quantity of children that will be part of this development. You know, I think Manticca Unified has 25,000 plus students right now. That's essentially a quarter of the population of the city goes to one of our schools. It continues to be a challenge. It is absolutely not within the purview of the planning commission to consider any of that. Unfortunately, I do believe that.

625
01:00:30,140 --> 01:00:43,040
This project timeline still seems multiple years out as far as further development and I'm optimistic we obviously we can't predict the future, but I'm given the fact that my ticket unified did not present any concerns.

626
01:00:44,060 --> 01:00:55,280
I'm hopeful that they will continue to address the need south of the 120 as someone that lives south of the 120 myself I understand with a child in school south of the 120.

627
01:00:55,280 --> 01:01:24,300
So, with that being said, if there's no other comments or deliberation, I think we can call for a vote, is there a motion in a second to adopt an amended resolution submitted as supplemental item five item number five approving a modification to the site plan and design review SPA-21-15 for the Union Crossing apartments project located at 1308 West Atherton Drive APN 226-160-446.

628
01:01:24,300 --> 01:01:32,400
4-4 as amended with amended conditions of approval project expiration date as September 14th, 2028.

629
01:01:36,800 --> 01:01:37,980
In motion to approve.

630
01:01:38,960 --> 01:01:40,160
Your e-seconds.

631
01:01:40,820 --> 01:01:41,120
All right.

632
01:01:41,660 --> 01:01:46,460
We have a motion for approval from Vice Chair Jimenez and a second from Commissioner Fury.

633
01:01:47,100 --> 01:01:48,620
All those of vote in favor say aye.

634
01:01:49,460 --> 01:01:49,740
Aye.

635
01:01:50,480 --> 01:01:51,100
Any opposed?

636
01:01:52,500 --> 01:01:53,240
All right.

637
01:01:53,420 --> 01:01:53,940
Motion passes.

638
01:01:54,460 --> 01:01:55,060
5-0.

639
01:01:55,380 --> 01:01:55,780
Thank you.

640
01:01:57,650 --> 01:01:58,250
All right.

641
01:01:58,250 --> 01:02:00,270
That takes us on to staff comments tonight.

642
01:02:04,340 --> 01:02:11,960
Good evening chair commissioners. I just want to thank all of you who were able to attend last evenings recognition dinner.

643
01:02:12,900 --> 01:02:28,300
We were all pleased city staff was all pleased to see many of the various volunteers from various boards being attendance. We appreciate that and I just want to update you that we will be meeting on the 17th of this month.

644
01:02:28,300 --> 01:02:30,640
That completes my report.

645
01:02:32,420 --> 01:02:33,160
Thank you, sir.

646
01:02:34,160 --> 01:02:34,460
All right.

647
01:02:34,580 --> 01:02:35,160
Commissioner comments.

648
01:02:35,940 --> 01:02:37,160
Anything from the commission tonight?

649
01:02:39,320 --> 01:02:39,920
Yes, I do.

650
01:02:40,260 --> 01:02:40,800
Commissioner Fiori.

651
01:02:41,400 --> 01:02:43,940
I'd like to thank everyone that came in attendance here.

652
01:02:44,180 --> 01:02:50,380
I appreciate that you show up and you voice your concerns and it's always impactful for us to

653
01:02:50,380 --> 01:02:54,260
hear because we don't and we don't want to get the comments from social media.

654
01:02:54,900 --> 01:02:57,080
So thank you for taking the time out of your day to show up.

655
01:03:00,770 --> 01:03:01,370
Any other comments?

656
01:03:02,750 --> 01:03:05,210
I'd like to thank Commissioner Sock for stepping in tonight.

657
01:03:05,770 --> 01:03:06,890
Appreciate you being here.

658
01:03:07,270 --> 01:03:09,730
I want to thank the staff for,

659
01:03:11,840 --> 01:03:16,260
again, continuing to be outstanding support for us and answering

660
01:03:16,260 --> 01:03:21,060
all of our questions and professional and we appreciate all the hard work that you guys

661
01:03:21,060 --> 01:03:21,920
do for the city.

662
01:03:22,880 --> 01:03:26,560
And we truly appreciate being a part of the dinner last night.

663
01:03:26,560 --> 01:03:27,780
It was a wonderful experience.

664
01:03:30,020 --> 01:03:32,620
We'll see you on September 17th in two weeks.

665
01:03:34,340 --> 01:03:37,000
We'll adjourn the meeting tonight at 7.03 p.m., thank you.