[This transcript was generated automatically from audio using AI and hasn't been reviewed by a person -- it can contain mistakes, including plausible-sounding sentences that were never actually said. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record.]

[5:37] Good morning. As the clerk, I will call this meeting to order pro tem due to chair Baggett and vice chair Gray being absent.
[5:48] We will need to elect a temporary chair for this meeting. I will now ask for public comment on this temporary election.
[5:58] Seeing none, I will turn it over to the commissioners to elect a temporary chair.
[6:04] Good morning. I elect Denny as the temporary pro tem or chairperson.
[6:16] I'll
[6:16] second. I will now call for the vote. All in favor say aye. Aye. Aye. All opposed. The
[6:26] vote has been passed with three in favor with commissioners Baggett and Gray
[6:30] excused.
[7:10] Good morning. So you've already called this order so we're good to go
[7:14] there so it looks like we will start with the pledge if I can get Lance to lead
[7:20] us in the pledge please.
[7:24] I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
[7:42] Okay at this time of the meeting we will allow for any public comment for any items
[7:48] that are not on the agenda. If there's anyone here that would wish to speak on something
[7:51] that's not on today's agenda. Do we have anybody on the line that wants? Do you guys know?
[7:58] No.
[7:59] No.
[8:00] Okay. Seeing that there's none, then we will move on to the approval of the minutes from
[8:04] the June 26th meeting. Do you guys have any additions or corrections to those meeting
[8:09] minutes?
[8:10] No, Mr. Chairman.
[8:12] Can we get a motion to approve those, please?
[8:14] Will you ask for a public call?
[8:16] Oh, that's new.
[8:17] we do that. Is there any public comment on the minutes from June 26th? Okay, seeing
[8:24] none, I'll look for a motion.
[8:31] I make the motion that we approve the minutes of
[8:35] March 20, 2026.
[8:42] I'm a month behind. There we go. Nope, May 8.
[8:54] Okay, I'll try to do this again. I'll
[8:57] make the motion that we approve the minutes for our June 26, 2026 meeting.
[9:03] Can I get a second, please?
[9:05] I second it.
[9:06] All in favor?
[9:08] Aye.
[9:08] Any opposed?
[9:10] Motion carries unanimously.
[9:14] Okay, our first item on the agenda and only item on the agenda today will be the development
[9:20] code update for Title 16, subdivision ordinance, and I believe our Director Greg is going
[9:25] to speak on that.
[9:25] Thank you, Madam Chairperson and members of the Commission and thank you for your time
[9:30] addressing this matter today.
[9:32] Today before you, we had intended to bring the first section of the development code
[9:36] update to the Commission for your recommendation to the Board of Supervisors to adopt at this
[9:43] point in time due to some absences and scheduled vacations and a technical matter after a
[9:51] conference with the county surveyor, we're asking that the item be continued to the September
[9:56] 18th agenda for a description of our approach and methodology to the separation of the development
[10:06] code and the necessary changes that were made and to address the CEQA compliance for
[10:11] the item.
[10:12] So at this time, what we're asking from the Commission is your continuance of the
[10:16] item to the September 18th at the regularly scheduled meeting of 9 o'clock.
[10:23] Okay. Yeah, I know we were all told that you know something got lost in
[10:27] transition and I know a lot of this was worked on at previous meetings and some
[10:31] of those concerns and comments and items that we had wanted addressed in that
[10:37] section hadn't got folded into this so as long as we can go back and capture
[10:41] those that'd be great as well. We're willing to meet with all of the
[10:45] commissioners actually on your concerns on the matter if you'd like to
[10:48] meet independently. Okay, great. Thank you. Do we need public comment on this?
[10:55] Yes. Okay, do we have anybody in the public wishing to speak on this? If you
[11:00] do, go ahead and come up and state your name, turn on the mic and write your
[11:03] name down, please.
[11:05] Kim Melton. In the extension, and I'm a little gray in
[11:10] this area, but my history goes back a long way and something that we've
[11:16] done used to do and in conjunction with the extension of the public hearing, is it possible
[11:23] to make that slash workshop? Because as you remember, Danny, three minutes to cover sections
[11:33] of this thing or whatever is decided here is absolutely ludicrous to address any issue.
[11:42] I couldn't address probably one or two pages of my list in five minutes.
[11:48] And also, a workshop portion of it allows a two-way communication.
[11:53] It's still public, hearing people still, and you still can regulate how long, if somebody
[11:58] gets off on a tangent or something.
[12:00] But if you have it as a slash workshop, it gives you more open latitude to have a
[12:11] two-way conversation because as you well know last year when I was up there were a
[12:16] lot of questions I made comments that people had a lot of questions on I was
[12:20] able to explain it and that would be my request if that is a possibility. Thank
[12:27] you. Okay so that is something I need to check with Council and everybody on
[12:32] as far as when it is brought back up on the 18th if the document we
[12:39] receive in advance is appears to be missing some things that we felt we
[12:45] thought were in there from previous meetings. Will we be able to revise this
[12:48] at that time or how would we address that?
[12:54] Again we're very staff is
[12:56] absolutely willing to meet with individual commissioners to go over the
[13:00] document in question. Happy to do that we can explain what changes are. The
[13:05] The continuation in what we're seeking from the Commission is your recommendation to the
[13:11] Board for adoption.
[13:14] So between the 18th and now, again, we're willing to meet with every one of them and
[13:21] explain our methodology on this, and then we would give an explanation of our approach
[13:24] and methodology to the Commission.
[13:26] The only thing we would be seeking on the 18th would be your recommendation.
[13:32] Thank you.
[13:39] Sorry.
[13:40] All right, then I will close the public portion.
[13:43] Commissioners, do you have any comments on this?
[13:46] Go over that with questions that I have, or are we going to table that?
[13:51] Yes, okay.
[13:53] Thank you, Madam Chair.
[13:55] Through you, I have a question for the staff regarding the CEQA section 15378B5,
[14:02] which is referenced in the recommendations and justification section of page 7 of
[14:08] the staff report on our report that we have.
[14:13] Could the staff clarify the basis
[14:15] for determination specifically? And my question, sir, is does this ordinance
[14:21] update include any changes to actual land use of development standards?
[14:31] For
[14:31] or other development requirements or is this update limited strictly to the
[14:39] administrative and organizational changes such as reorganizing existing code
[14:44] sections and corrected outdated references. I'd appreciate it if the
[14:51] staff could walk us all through this distinction since it's
[14:58] the basis of this.
[15:00] Local exemption being requested today.
[15:03] Thank you. Madam Chairman, is there any? Okay, thank you. That's an excellent question. And
[15:11] it's primarily the reason that we've separated or segregated what was referred to as the development
[15:17] code back into Title 16 and Title 17, which is zoning and or development standards. As
[15:26] As Commissioner Wardle had pointed out, we had identified a section of the CEQA guidelines
[15:34] 15378B5, which allows for administrative changes and updates.
[15:39] In this particular case, Title 16 is primarily a regulatory instrument on the administration
[15:45] of the Subdivision Map Act by local government.
[15:48] That's what Title 16 does for us, and it is in fact exactly what Commissioner Wardle
[15:53] had suggested an update to the code to identify both statutory and regulatory changes to the
[16:01] way we administrate that act. So in this particular case, anything that would affect density,
[16:08] development standards, any of those things that would be found in Title 17, we have segregated
[16:13] for this purpose so that would allow us to move forward with Title 16 under that administrative
[16:20] section of CEQA identifying this would not be, in fact, a project per se as identified under CEQA
[16:27] and would allow for further environmental evaluation on a project by project basis. So your question,
[16:34] it was in fact a question, but your question was also kind of an answer and it was perfectly stated.
[16:39] That's exactly what we're doing.
[16:43] Okay.
[16:43] Thank you.
[16:45] Any other questions or comments?
[16:48] The only comment I have is that I can't see having a public hearing as a workshop.
[16:54] So I think we just need to stick with the public hearing and do what we're supposed to do
[16:59] at the public hearing is my comment on that.
[17:05] Any other questions, comments?
[17:09] No matter.
[17:10] If not, then I would look for a motion to table this and move it to the 918 agenda as requested by staff.
[17:17] I
[17:22] make the motion, we table this and move it to our September 18th meeting and
[17:27] leave the rest up to staff.
[17:31] I second that. All in favor? Aye. Any opposed? Motion carries
[17:39] unanimously.
[17:45] Our next item would be if there is any Commissioner reports.
[17:50] Okay
[17:51] seeing none. Mr. Thompson, do you have a report for us? I have no report,
[17:59] no
[18:00] future agenda items.
[18:04] Okay, seeing none, we'll be adjourning this meeting at 912.
[18:08] Thank you for everybody that showed up.