1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:18,360
Okay, okay, let me do this. The Prince George's County Planning Board is now in session. Again,

2
00:00:18,360 --> 00:00:24,400
we had a morning session and that was to do the agenda that would have been held on March

3
00:00:24,400 --> 00:00:31,800
19th, but we completed that agenda now, so we are now commencing with the March 26, 2020

4
00:00:31,800 --> 00:00:39,600
agenda. And I'm going to do roll call pursuant to our legal council. I know the IT folks just

5
00:00:39,600 --> 00:00:48,240
checked, but just for the sake of the public. Madam Vice-Chair, here. Okay, Commissioner Washington.

6
00:00:49,200 --> 00:01:01,200
Present. Commissioner Giroldo. Present. Commissioner Giorno. Yes, I'm here. Okay, thank you. So before we

7
00:01:01,200 --> 00:01:06,960
commence, again, we want to thank everyone for your involvement and for your patience and for your

8
00:01:06,960 --> 00:01:13,360
creativity and for your ingenuity as we navigate this process together. We're able to move the

9
00:01:13,360 --> 00:01:19,520
business of the county forward in an innovative way while still keeping everyone safe and practicing

10
00:01:19,520 --> 00:01:24,240
safe distancing. So thank you so very much. I'm going to ask for a motion to approve the draft

11
00:01:24,240 --> 00:01:32,160
minutes of the planning board meeting of February 27, 2020. So move. That was Commissioner Giroldo.

12
00:01:32,880 --> 00:01:39,200
Commissioner Giroldo. Commissioner Washington, second. Thank you. All in favor, Madam Vice-Chair?

13
00:01:39,360 --> 00:01:49,440
Yeah. Okay. Commissioner Garner. Yes. Commissioner Washington. Yes. Commissioner Giroldo.

14
00:01:50,400 --> 00:01:57,760
Yes. The ayes have it. Thank you. Five zero. We then have the consent agenda. Is there anyone to

15
00:01:57,760 --> 00:02:03,600
oppose the staff's recommendations on items 4b or 4c, which are the plan board resolutions

16
00:02:04,000 --> 00:02:14,000
20-31 for a specific design plan 1202-07 for Cantor Creek, Pays 3 and 4. Also the zoning item

17
00:02:14,000 --> 00:02:19,760
Prince George's County Planning Board number 2020-30 for departure from sign design standards 696

18
00:02:19,760 --> 00:02:27,280
for Collin Book at Rodenhauser. Is there any, is there a motion? The ayes move for civil

19
00:02:27,280 --> 00:02:34,320
all items on the consent agenda. Thank you. Commissioner Washington, second. All in favor,

20
00:02:34,320 --> 00:02:42,400
indicate by saying aye. Vice-Chair? Vice-Chair. Aye. Okay. Commissioner Washington. Aye.

21
00:02:42,400 --> 00:02:49,920
Commissioner Garner. Aye. Commissioner Giroldo. Aye. Thank you. We are going to proceed down

22
00:02:49,920 --> 00:02:59,120
our agenda in this order. We have companion cases, detailed site plan 0403101 for easy

23
00:02:59,120 --> 00:03:04,400
storage capital heights, departure from parking and loading spaces. There's a companion with that

24
00:03:04,400 --> 00:03:12,400
for easy storage capital heights, followed by conceptual site plan CSP19009 for 5600 Agar Road.

25
00:03:12,960 --> 00:03:18,160
And the other one is a detailed site plan, which will be heard after the conceptual site plan

26
00:03:18,160 --> 00:03:27,600
for DSP190535600 Agar Road. Okay. So with that, I'm going to turn to, we're going to proceed

27
00:03:27,600 --> 00:03:33,920
with detailed site plan and departure from parking and loading spaces for easy storage

28
00:03:33,920 --> 00:03:44,800
and capital heights. And that would be Mr. Burke. Yes. Good afternoon, Madam Chair. Everyone

29
00:03:44,880 --> 00:03:51,280
can hear me clearly. Yes. Thank you. Good afternoon, Madam Chair, members of the planning board

30
00:03:51,280 --> 00:03:57,040
for the record, I'm Thomas Burke with the urban design section. Project Before You is listed on

31
00:03:57,040 --> 00:04:06,960
the agenda as detailed site plan DSP0413101 for easy storage capital heights, which includes

32
00:04:06,960 --> 00:04:16,000
type 2 tree conservation plan, TCP2-087-04-01, and the departure from parking and loading

33
00:04:16,000 --> 00:04:23,200
standards, DPLS465. Oh, I'm sorry. You know what? I'm sorry. Let me, I'm so sorry. Before you

34
00:04:23,200 --> 00:04:27,680
finish, Mr. Burke, let me make sure I do a roll call for this case. So I obviously have you,

35
00:04:27,680 --> 00:04:36,880
Mr. Burke. I have Jill Kosak. Yes. Okay. The attorney for the applicant, Brad Ferrar.

36
00:04:43,440 --> 00:04:45,840
You present? I was looking at you, so I know you're here.

37
00:04:46,560 --> 00:04:50,640
We told him to mute his phone, so he probably needs to unmute. Okay. I mute your phone,

38
00:04:50,640 --> 00:04:54,400
Mr. Ferrar, just to let us know that you're here. We were doing a roll call.

39
00:04:58,640 --> 00:05:04,960
Okay. There you are. We're looking at you. We see you.

40
00:05:06,800 --> 00:05:14,080
And his phone is unmuted. There he is. Mr. Ferrar? Can you hear me? Yes. We just want,

41
00:05:14,080 --> 00:05:17,680
we're just doing a roll call to make sure that everyone who has signed up for this case

42
00:05:17,680 --> 00:05:22,800
is actually present. Okay. So we're good there. Okay. And Glen Burton?

43
00:05:22,800 --> 00:05:32,960
Madam Chair, I'm here. I suspect there are others in transportation

44
00:05:32,960 --> 00:05:36,880
that are here also for this case. Okay. Who might that be? Tom Mason?

45
00:05:40,960 --> 00:05:46,480
Brian Barnett Woods? Hi. Good afternoon. This is Brian Barnett Woods. A

46
00:05:46,480 --> 00:05:50,800
Crystal Hancock is online. She is reviewing this case for transportation and is here.

47
00:05:50,800 --> 00:05:55,920
Okay. Thank you, Crystal Hancock. Okay. And Tom Mason is here. Okay. Thank you so much.

48
00:05:55,920 --> 00:06:00,480
And is it Chuck Schneider or Megan Reiser who's here for environmental?

49
00:06:02,080 --> 00:06:07,280
Megan Reiser for environmental planning. Okay. This is not up to date. Okay. Thank you.

50
00:06:07,280 --> 00:06:11,360
Okay. Thank you so much. Okay. Mr. Burke, I'm sorry, but you can continue. Thank you.

51
00:06:14,960 --> 00:06:20,240
Thank you, Madam Chair. The applicant is seeking approval of a detailed site plan

52
00:06:20,240 --> 00:06:24,800
to develop the site with a 50,000 square foot addition to the existing and solidated

53
00:06:24,800 --> 00:06:31,360
storage facility. Staff recommend that the board incorporate the record from these two cases.

54
00:06:32,080 --> 00:06:38,160
They will indeed be incorporated. Thank you. Thank you. So next slide, please.

55
00:06:40,400 --> 00:06:45,920
The site is located in the central part of Prince George's County in planning area 75A

56
00:06:45,920 --> 00:06:53,440
and Council District 6. Next slide, please. More specifically, the site is located

57
00:06:54,160 --> 00:06:58,240
on the east side of Richie Road and Capitol Heights. Next slide, please.

58
00:06:59,920 --> 00:07:05,440
The subject property is zone I1. Consolidated storage facilities are permitted in the I1 zone

59
00:07:05,440 --> 00:07:10,800
but have specific requirements addressed in the findings starting on page 5 of the staff report.

60
00:07:11,440 --> 00:07:18,160
The site is contiguous to other I1 zone and developed properties to the north, south, east,

61
00:07:18,720 --> 00:07:26,320
and west across Richie Road. May I ask all of you who are not presenting now to mute your phones?

62
00:07:28,080 --> 00:07:33,280
Thank you. Thank you. Next slide, please.

63
00:07:33,280 --> 00:07:41,840
The site is also located inside the military installation overlay zone for height in the

64
00:07:41,840 --> 00:07:48,800
north end area V, which this proposal remains well below the maximum height. Next slide, please.

65
00:07:51,120 --> 00:07:54,480
This aerial photo illustrates the current conditions of the property.

66
00:07:54,480 --> 00:08:00,880
The existing building was constructed at a 135,780 square foot easy storage facility

67
00:08:00,880 --> 00:08:07,120
in 2004, pursuant to a detailed site plan, also shown under the surrounding industrial and commercial

68
00:08:07,120 --> 00:08:17,120
uses. Next slide, please. The site is relatively flat, sloping slightly toward the southwest.

69
00:08:17,680 --> 00:08:23,040
There are no regulated environmental features located on or near this property. Next slide,

70
00:08:23,040 --> 00:08:31,440
please. The site access is from Richie Road, a master plan on a curable road. Next slide, please.

71
00:08:34,960 --> 00:08:39,120
This bird's eye view shows the existing conditions on the site and the surrounding uses.

72
00:08:40,240 --> 00:08:41,120
Next slide, please.

73
00:08:44,640 --> 00:08:51,600
This 3.9 acre site is developed with a single three-story 135,780 square foot

74
00:08:52,240 --> 00:08:59,360
building with a total of 1,020 consolidated storage units. The applicant is seeking approval of a

75
00:08:59,360 --> 00:09:04,880
50,000 square foot addition in the rear, which will contain 430 additional units,

76
00:09:06,480 --> 00:09:13,360
shown in the shaded area on the visible plan. The site has a single access point

77
00:09:13,360 --> 00:09:17,360
from Richie Road, which leads to the parking for the office, for customers, and for the

78
00:09:17,360 --> 00:09:22,240
resident manager. As part of the proposal, the applicant is seeking a departure from the

79
00:09:22,240 --> 00:09:27,440
parking loading standards to allow a reduction of one parking space and two loading spaces.

80
00:09:28,320 --> 00:09:33,360
The applicant has redesigned the existing parking layout to incorporate compact spaces,

81
00:09:34,160 --> 00:09:38,800
and the statement of justification indicates that these facilities typically have a lower

82
00:09:38,800 --> 00:09:43,600
parking turnover and are not typically fully utilized with same-time business.

83
00:09:44,480 --> 00:09:49,440
Staff recommends approval of this request based on the findings found starting on page

84
00:09:49,440 --> 00:09:56,080
7 of the staff report. The applicant provided schedules with a landscape plan, demonstrating

85
00:09:56,080 --> 00:10:05,920
that all landscaping is all landscaping as proposed shall be maintained in accordance

86
00:10:05,920 --> 00:10:11,440
with the landscape manual. Existing landscaping to be removed for this project will be

87
00:10:11,440 --> 00:10:14,640
replaced in kind. Next slide, please.

88
00:10:17,520 --> 00:10:23,920
The proposed building will be three stories following the design, roofline, and color scheme

89
00:10:23,920 --> 00:10:29,360
of the existing building, with only a change in materials from the existing concrete masonry

90
00:10:30,080 --> 00:10:35,680
on the existing section to metal panels and exterior insulated finishing systems,

91
00:10:36,400 --> 00:10:39,760
otherwise known as EPIS, for the parapet on the addition.

92
00:10:40,720 --> 00:10:47,200
The existing signage on the site will remain the same for the building and the pre-stand

93
00:10:47,200 --> 00:10:52,720
signs. The European design section recommends that the planning board adopt the findings of

94
00:10:52,720 --> 00:11:04,480
this report and approve detailed site plan DSP04013-01, TCP2-087-04-01,

95
00:11:04,960 --> 00:11:14,960
and DPLS-465 for a reduction of one parking space and two loading spaces from the 35 parking spaces

96
00:11:14,960 --> 00:11:20,480
and seven loading spaces required for easy storage capital heights subject to the conditions

97
00:11:20,480 --> 00:11:26,880
contained in the staff report dated March 10, 2020. This concludes staff's presentation. Thank you.

98
00:11:28,240 --> 00:11:31,600
Thank you. Let me see if there are any questions of Mr. Burke. Madam Vice Chair.

99
00:11:35,360 --> 00:11:40,160
I don't have a question regarding his report, but I do have a question in the

100
00:11:41,280 --> 00:11:47,040
backup. There was some information about a bike lane, and that I knew had to do with

101
00:11:47,840 --> 00:11:57,760
DPW. But when communities notify that there is a bike lane coming, and how does that all happen?

102
00:11:57,760 --> 00:12:02,480
Because it is in one of the older communities, and those of us in the older communities

103
00:12:02,480 --> 00:12:07,600
are not accustomed to bike lanes. So I'm wondering how do we notify the public that that's

104
00:12:07,600 --> 00:12:15,600
something that's going to happen? Mr. Burke? This is Tom Burke with the European Design

105
00:12:15,600 --> 00:12:19,360
Section. I'll refer to the transportation planning section to answer those questions.

106
00:12:21,600 --> 00:12:25,520
I can wait on it, of course, but I'm just curious about that.

107
00:12:25,520 --> 00:12:30,960
As someone from transportation, I know we have Crystal Hancock on the line for that. If

108
00:12:30,960 --> 00:12:34,160
she can address, or perhaps if Mr. Ferrar can address.

109
00:12:35,440 --> 00:12:39,120
Hi. Good afternoon. This is Brian Burnett with the Transportation Planning Section.

110
00:12:41,760 --> 00:12:45,680
So when bike lanes come in, traditionally what happens is the Department of Public Works and

111
00:12:45,680 --> 00:12:51,200
Transportation or the State Highway Administration in the event that the state wrote would end

112
00:12:51,200 --> 00:12:56,080
up doing either a repaving project or a capital improvement project, and then they would

113
00:12:56,080 --> 00:13:03,920
install the bike lane as part of that project. In many cases, if there are changes to the roadway

114
00:13:03,920 --> 00:13:10,720
as part of their process, they would do a notification outreach. For this site,

115
00:13:10,720 --> 00:13:15,200
there is a bike lane that is recommended along the road. However, because of the limited,

116
00:13:16,640 --> 00:13:22,640
I guess, width that the frontage has, a bike lane that only went for a few hundred feet

117
00:13:23,600 --> 00:13:29,120
wouldn't really have the value of a bicycle facility for people biking along the road.

118
00:13:29,120 --> 00:13:38,080
So at this time, we recommend that the applicant provide the bikeway signage fee that would say

119
00:13:38,080 --> 00:13:42,640
share the road for a bike, or share the roads with the bicyclists, and that could be put up.

120
00:13:42,640 --> 00:13:47,200
And they do that by providing the fee to the public parks that work in transportation

121
00:13:47,200 --> 00:13:51,760
who installs a sign on their own. And then at a later time, when this road is either

122
00:13:51,760 --> 00:13:56,720
repaved or there's a capital improvement project, they could strike that bike.

123
00:13:59,680 --> 00:14:06,640
We're basically talking about signage now. At the moment, yes. Okay, okay, that's good.

124
00:14:06,640 --> 00:14:08,800
Thank you. Commissioner Washington, any questions?

125
00:14:11,280 --> 00:14:14,240
None here, Madam Chair. Commissioner Gerardo?

126
00:14:17,280 --> 00:14:20,320
No questions, Madam Chair. Commissioner Dauner?

127
00:14:20,320 --> 00:14:28,000
No, no. Okay. So now we will turn to Council. Mr. Ferrar.

128
00:14:31,840 --> 00:14:39,520
Thank you, Madam Chair and other members of the Board. I want to begin by thanking you all for

129
00:14:39,520 --> 00:14:46,240
having this meeting virtually. And thank you for your innovation and flexibility in doing this

130
00:14:47,200 --> 00:14:49,840
in these times in which we live.

131
00:14:51,200 --> 00:14:52,960
And for the record, your name is?

132
00:14:54,400 --> 00:14:59,360
And I apologize. For the record, Your Honor, for the record, Madam Chair, my name is Brad

133
00:14:59,360 --> 00:15:09,360
Ferrar.

134
00:15:00,000 --> 00:15:06,560
I'm going to turn you with the law offices of Shipland Horn and Largo Mara. And with me

135
00:15:06,560 --> 00:15:17,680
virtually in today is representing Capitol Heights LLLP. We have Craig Fittinger, who's

136
00:15:17,680 --> 00:15:25,760
with E.D. Sorge, John Bondi, who is the engineer of the project, with Bica Engineering, and

137
00:15:26,080 --> 00:15:36,960
John Ferante, who is a land planner who's also with Shipland Horn. We worked with staff

138
00:15:39,280 --> 00:15:48,160
for the past several months to have a plan that we all thought would help to move this project

139
00:15:48,160 --> 00:15:55,440
forward and give us a project that we think that should help the county continues

140
00:15:55,440 --> 00:16:02,960
to grow and provide the type of amenity in terms of some storage that benefits the community.

141
00:16:04,160 --> 00:16:10,240
And so we've reviewed the plans that staff has put forward, their recommendations.

142
00:16:10,880 --> 00:16:16,720
We are in agreement with their recommendations and we would move, we would ask respectfully

143
00:16:16,720 --> 00:16:21,360
to ask the planning board to adopt their recommendations and approve the project.

144
00:16:22,240 --> 00:16:27,120
With that being said, I don't have any further questions or any further comments

145
00:16:27,120 --> 00:16:32,320
and I stand open to answering questions. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Ferrar. Thank you,

146
00:16:32,320 --> 00:16:36,080
Mr. Ferrar. I'm going to turn to our board to see if they have any questions for you, okay?

147
00:16:36,080 --> 00:16:44,960
Madam Vice Chair? No questions. Commissioner Washington? No questions. Commissioner Dorner?

148
00:16:45,280 --> 00:16:48,880
No. Commissioner Gerardo?

149
00:16:50,160 --> 00:16:56,720
For questions. Okay. That completes the sign-up sheet. There's no one else signed up on this case.

150
00:16:56,720 --> 00:17:02,240
Is there a motion? Madam Chair, this is Commissioner Washington and I move that we

151
00:17:02,240 --> 00:17:19,840
adopt the binding to staff and approve DSP-04013-01 and TCP2-087-04-01, along with the associated

152
00:17:19,840 --> 00:17:26,800
conditions as outlined in staff's report in addition to approving DPLS-465.

153
00:17:27,760 --> 00:17:35,760
We have a motion and Vice Chair Bailey seconded. Okay, is Commissioner Washington?

154
00:17:37,840 --> 00:17:40,240
Yes. Vice Chair Bailey?

155
00:17:42,000 --> 00:17:53,040
Yes. Mr. Dorner? Yes. Mr. Gerardo? Yes. The ayes have it, 5-0. Thank you so very much.

156
00:17:53,840 --> 00:17:57,600
Okay, we're moving on to the next case. Coming down the home stretch.

157
00:17:59,120 --> 00:18:06,080
The next items are 5600 Agar Road. They are two separate cases that are combined

158
00:18:06,080 --> 00:18:10,400
in one staff report but will require two separate motions. Okay, this first is

159
00:18:10,400 --> 00:18:20,000
conceptual site plan CSP-19009 and the second is detailed site plan 19053 both for 5600 Agar

160
00:18:20,000 --> 00:18:31,680
Road. I'm going to do a roll call. Adam Bossi? Present. Ms. Kozak? Present. Okay, Chris Hatcher?

161
00:18:31,680 --> 00:18:39,840
Representing the applicant? Present. I have community planning staff, Karen Nero and David

162
00:18:39,840 --> 00:18:52,240
Green. Are you present? I had them listed here. I also have Kate Powers from Hydeville.

163
00:18:57,520 --> 00:19:05,520
Thank you. And Mr. Hatcher? There's feedback. There's an echo.

164
00:19:06,080 --> 00:19:13,040
So if you're not speaking, please turn your mic off. And then Mr. Hatcher, I have

165
00:19:13,840 --> 00:19:19,520
Ryan McCallister, Kevin Mack and Paul Nichols all from Dewberry Engineering. I presume they're here

166
00:19:20,160 --> 00:19:26,640
if there are any questions? If there are any. Yes, my manager. Okay, thank you. Mr. Bossi,

167
00:19:26,640 --> 00:19:32,480
it may proceed. And I should say we have our own counsel, Mr. David Warner,

168
00:19:32,480 --> 00:19:37,760
principal counsel on the phone and perhaps I think we have Deborah Board and our deputy

169
00:19:37,760 --> 00:19:43,200
general counsel on the phone as well. And we have our acting planning director here,

170
00:19:43,200 --> 00:19:50,640
Mr. Derek Berlage. Okay, thank you. Well, thank you, Madam Chairwoman. Good afternoon,

171
00:19:50,640 --> 00:19:54,640
members of the board. For the record, I am Adam Bossi with the Urban Design Section.

172
00:19:55,840 --> 00:20:01,040
As you previously mentioned, this presentation will simultaneously review two cases,

173
00:20:01,680 --> 00:20:08,560
which are item number seven, the conceptual site plan for CSP 1-9009 and item eight,

174
00:20:08,560 --> 00:20:15,840
the detailed site plan for DSP 1-9053. The request that's made in both applications

175
00:20:15,840 --> 00:20:21,280
is to change the list of allowed uses for the subject property. Next slide, please.

176
00:20:22,080 --> 00:20:28,640
So, this subject site is located in Planning Area 68, Council District 2,

177
00:20:28,640 --> 00:20:34,640
and is within the municipal limits of the City of Hyatt'sville. Next slide, please.

178
00:20:37,200 --> 00:20:42,400
Subject property outlined in red is in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of

179
00:20:42,400 --> 00:20:50,240
Ager Road and Jamestown Road, which is also the entrance to the metro station bus loop. The

180
00:20:50,240 --> 00:20:56,240
entrance to the metro station is about 900 feet southwest of this site. Next slide, please.

181
00:20:59,440 --> 00:21:04,560
As you're going on the zoning map, the subject site is Zoned Mixed Use Transportation,

182
00:21:04,560 --> 00:21:13,120
that is the MXT zone. Next slide. The site and surrounding area are within the

183
00:21:13,120 --> 00:21:19,840
West Hyatt'sville Transit District overlay zone. Within the zone, development is required to

184
00:21:19,840 --> 00:21:26,400
be supportive of transit-oriented uses and not focus on auto-centric uses. The Transit District

185
00:21:26,400 --> 00:21:32,720
Development Plan further defines the site is located within the Townhouse 2-4 story preferred

186
00:21:32,720 --> 00:21:39,840
land use category. The applicants filing of CSP and DSP at this time is required by the

187
00:21:39,840 --> 00:21:44,400
Administration and Applicability section of the Transit District Development Plan,

188
00:21:44,400 --> 00:21:49,440
as the uses being requested do not conform with the allowed uses of the Townhouse 2-4

189
00:21:49,440 --> 00:21:53,120
story land use category. Next slide, please.

190
00:21:56,800 --> 00:22:01,440
The area limit shows that the site is located adjacent to the bus drop-off loop for the metro

191
00:22:01,440 --> 00:22:06,640
station and is otherwise abundant by naked land that is proposed for future mixed use

192
00:22:06,640 --> 00:22:11,040
development in the development that's known as Riverfront at the West Hyatt'sville

193
00:22:11,040 --> 00:22:13,600
Metro Station. Next slide, please.

194
00:22:17,040 --> 00:22:23,200
Site map shows topography in the area and on the site is relatively flat. Next slide.

195
00:22:27,040 --> 00:22:32,960
Agar Road, which invites the property to the east, is classified as an arterial roadway.

196
00:22:33,600 --> 00:22:34,560
Next slide, please.

197
00:22:34,560 --> 00:22:44,640
As the bird's eye view shows, there is a single existing 1,134 square foot building on the site.

198
00:22:45,440 --> 00:22:49,120
Metro railcars that are shown in this image are actually no longer there.

199
00:22:49,840 --> 00:22:54,160
The remainder of the site outside of the building is paved. There are no trees,

200
00:22:54,160 --> 00:22:59,680
landscaping, or other major features present. The property was originally developed in the

201
00:22:59,680 --> 00:23:07,680
late 1950s at a gas station and repair shop and that use continued through 1998. Next slide, please.

202
00:23:10,960 --> 00:23:16,400
The CSP and the DSP are not proposing any physical development of the site at this time,

203
00:23:17,120 --> 00:23:23,120
so the site plan does show existing conditions. The building itself was converted to a grocery

204
00:23:23,120 --> 00:23:33,280
store in 2000, which operated into 2010. In 2006, the TDDP and TDOZ for West Hyatt'sville

205
00:23:33,280 --> 00:23:38,320
was approved and placed the property in its present land use category, which actually

206
00:23:38,320 --> 00:23:44,480
largely prohibits commercial uses. The grocery store used ceased in 2010 for a period of

207
00:23:44,480 --> 00:23:49,920
approximately 16 months and the commercial use of the site was then considered non-conforming.

208
00:23:50,640 --> 00:23:54,640
Several commercial operations attempted to operate at the site post-2010,

209
00:23:54,640 --> 00:23:59,280
but were denied permits as the site no longer supported the commercial uses.

210
00:24:00,080 --> 00:24:04,480
The current proposal is to provide for nine additional commercial uses on the site.

211
00:24:05,200 --> 00:24:06,080
Next slide, please.

212
00:24:08,560 --> 00:24:15,040
So as shown on the left, highlighted in blue, the only existing allowed commercial use is for

213
00:24:15,040 --> 00:24:23,200
seasonal decoration displays and the applicant has proposed a total of nine additional commercial

214
00:24:23,200 --> 00:24:29,440
uses as outlined on the slide here. So those consist of eating and drinking establishments,

215
00:24:29,440 --> 00:24:36,640
food of average store, hair salon, barbershop, hardware store, etc. Again, as written on the

216
00:24:36,640 --> 00:24:45,360
slide, any future, I'm sorry, staff supports these uses as they are not automobile dependent

217
00:24:45,360 --> 00:24:50,560
as required by the TDOZ and staff has recommended a series of conditions of approval to ensure

218
00:24:50,560 --> 00:24:56,400
future uses of the site follow this requirement. Any future physical development on the site

219
00:24:56,400 --> 00:25:02,480
may require a new detailed site plan to be reviewed. Staff is conferred with the applicant in

220
00:25:02,480 --> 00:25:07,440
City of Hyattville and all parties are in agreement with the findings and recommendations provided

221
00:25:07,440 --> 00:25:15,200
in the technical staff report. With that, staff recommends approval of both CSP 19009

222
00:25:15,760 --> 00:25:23,360
and DSP 19053 with conditions recommended in the technical staff report. As the chairman noted

223
00:25:23,360 --> 00:25:27,040
at the start of the meeting, please note that board you will need to make separate

224
00:25:27,040 --> 00:25:31,760
motions and votes on each application. That concludes staff's presentation.

225
00:25:32,240 --> 00:25:36,720
Thank you, Mr. Basi. Let me see if any of the board members have questions. Madam Vice Chair?

226
00:25:40,720 --> 00:25:47,840
I was just having Chair try to make sure that we have responded to all of the items

227
00:25:47,840 --> 00:25:55,520
in the letter from the mayor of Hyattville. Yeah, we're going to we have a representative

228
00:25:55,520 --> 00:26:03,280
from Hyattville who's going to speak shortly. Okay, thank you. Commissioner Washington?

229
00:26:04,640 --> 00:26:11,680
No questions, Madam Chair. Commissioner Garner? No, no questions. I think Commissioner Bailey

230
00:26:11,680 --> 00:26:14,960
that we actually we have there's just two things that they suggested that we're doing

231
00:26:14,960 --> 00:26:22,800
slightly different. Okay. Commissioner Gerardo? Madam Chair, I have no questions. Okay,

232
00:26:22,800 --> 00:26:27,920
thank you. So let's start off with a Council for the Applicants. Mr. Hatcher,

233
00:26:27,920 --> 00:26:34,240
please identify yourself first for the record. For the record, my name is Chris Hatcher with the

234
00:26:34,240 --> 00:26:40,160
Law Firm of Lurcher and Bird here on behalf of the applicant. I would first like to

235
00:26:40,160 --> 00:26:45,120
echo the sentiments of my colleagues in the Wendy's Bar. I think it's extremely impressive

236
00:26:45,120 --> 00:26:51,600
what the planning board and the staff have been able to do. I think you guys deserve a lot

237
00:26:51,600 --> 00:26:57,840
of appreciation and accolades for it. I'd also like to thank the City of Hyattville for working

238
00:26:57,840 --> 00:27:05,280
with the applicant on this particular site and sort of expanding the table of uses so that

239
00:27:05,280 --> 00:27:12,880
this site could be used at least in the short term as the area continues to redevelop with that.

240
00:27:13,760 --> 00:27:19,600
The applicant has reviewed the staff report and can end with respect for your requests

241
00:27:19,680 --> 00:27:26,320
at the planning board. I recommend the approval of the conclusions of law and the findings of fact

242
00:27:27,600 --> 00:27:36,400
associated with CSP19009 and ESP19053 and the applicant is prepared to respond to any questions

243
00:27:36,400 --> 00:27:41,520
that you may have. Thank you, Mr. Hatcher. Are there any questions for Mr. Hatcher at this

244
00:27:41,520 --> 00:27:50,800
time from the board? Madam Vice Chair? No. Okay, Commissioner Washington? No, Madam Chair.

245
00:27:50,800 --> 00:27:59,280
Commissioner Gerardo? I have one. Commissioner DeWarner? No. Okay, so let me now turn to

246
00:27:59,280 --> 00:28:08,400
the City of Hyattville. Kate Powers? Hi, yes. Good afternoon, Chairman and members of the

247
00:28:08,400 --> 00:28:14,240
Planning Board. Good afternoon. For the record, my name is Kate Powers. I am the City Planner for

248
00:28:14,240 --> 00:28:21,760
the City of Hyattville and today I'm representing the City regarding both the conceptual site plan

249
00:28:21,760 --> 00:28:30,800
as well as the detailed site plan for 5600 Ager Road. The City is in support of the findings

250
00:28:30,800 --> 00:28:40,240
and recommendations within the park and planning staff report. In addition, the City really appreciates

251
00:28:40,240 --> 00:28:46,880
the park and planning staff addition of specific limitations to the permitted uses,

252
00:28:48,080 --> 00:28:55,440
in particular the elimination of automobile-dependent uses, drive-through services,

253
00:28:55,520 --> 00:29:04,160
as well as cash-in businesses. So, on behalf of the City, I think the Planning Board in advance

254
00:29:04,160 --> 00:29:09,280
for your consideration of our comments. Thank you so much, Ms. Powers. I appreciate it.

255
00:29:10,400 --> 00:29:13,840
I don't know that there are any questions for you from our board members. If so,

256
00:29:13,840 --> 00:29:22,400
someone please indicate. If not, I'll proceed. Madam Chair, I'm sorry, it jilted back here.

257
00:29:23,120 --> 00:29:29,600
I'm sorry to interrupt for the record. I've just synchronized what I hear is maybe to be a

258
00:29:29,600 --> 00:29:38,480
mistake in the staff report. In the slides, it is listed as a hardware, dry goods, or

259
00:29:38,480 --> 00:29:45,680
clothing store. But in the staff report, both under the CSP recommendation and the CSP recommendation,

260
00:29:45,680 --> 00:29:53,840
it just listed as a hardware store. I just wanted to clarify with maybe Mr. Glossy and Mr. Hatcher

261
00:29:53,840 --> 00:29:59,200
that if that should be revised to say hardware, dry goods, or

262
00:30:00,000 --> 00:30:10,000
Retail. Door. Clothing, yeah. Clothing, yeah. Clothing, yeah, sorry. Clothing, yeah, sorry.

263
00:30:10,000 --> 00:30:20,000
Chris Hatcher for the applicant. It should be updated to reflect the uses that Jill referenced,

264
00:30:20,000 --> 00:30:26,000
Ms. Kosak referenced, which I believe is also listed on the table of use as well.

265
00:30:26,000 --> 00:30:34,000
Yes, and it's set forth on page 5 of the technical staff report and with explanation.

266
00:30:34,000 --> 00:30:40,000
Thank you. I'm sorry, Madam Chair. This is Commission of Washington. I'm getting play back.

267
00:30:40,000 --> 00:30:44,000
So I'm not clear about the corrections that are being stated.

268
00:30:44,000 --> 00:30:50,000
Can you turn to page 5 on your staff report? Yes, I'm there.

269
00:30:50,000 --> 00:30:54,000
Okay, so if you look at the bullets that are set forth in the middle of the page,

270
00:30:54,000 --> 00:31:01,000
which is made for the fifth bullet down, it should say part of where you're holding a five-glued drink in here.

271
00:31:01,000 --> 00:31:04,000
Yes. It's in the condition. Yes.

272
00:31:04,000 --> 00:31:06,000
Thank you.

273
00:31:06,000 --> 00:31:09,000
There's actually a bunch of it.

274
00:31:09,000 --> 00:31:11,000
The table at the bottom that are fine.

275
00:31:11,000 --> 00:31:16,000
Okay. All right. Can we hold on a second?

276
00:31:16,000 --> 00:31:18,000
Mr. Berlage has to add a comment. I'm sorry.

277
00:31:18,000 --> 00:31:22,000
So this is Derek Berlage acting deputy planning director.

278
00:31:22,000 --> 00:31:33,000
The list of uses on page 5 of the technical staff report and the list of uses in condition 1D of the technical staff report.

279
00:31:33,000 --> 00:31:39,000
There are actually a number of minor inconsistencies for many of them,

280
00:31:39,000 --> 00:31:45,000
but it is important that we be clear which is the list that staff is recommending.

281
00:31:45,000 --> 00:31:53,000
Clearly, the list of uses as it's stated currently in the recommendation section is what would control,

282
00:31:53,000 --> 00:31:57,000
but we should really clean that up if we can.

283
00:31:57,000 --> 00:32:01,000
Mr. Bossy, can you help us with that?

284
00:32:01,000 --> 00:32:04,000
Yes, sir. Thank you.

285
00:32:04,000 --> 00:32:06,000
You know, I believe you are correct.

286
00:32:06,000 --> 00:32:08,000
The staff report is written.

287
00:32:08,000 --> 00:32:16,000
The findings that are presented are frankly just more detailed than the uses that are outlined in the recommendation section.

288
00:32:16,000 --> 00:32:24,000
But I believe Ms. Kozak and yourself are correct that we should be looking to update those recommendations

289
00:32:24,000 --> 00:32:34,000
and revise those recommendations, excuse me, in both the CSP and DSP staff report to probably read verbatim as they are in the findings

290
00:32:34,000 --> 00:32:37,000
so that things are completely clear.

291
00:32:37,000 --> 00:32:39,000
So it's staff record?

292
00:32:39,000 --> 00:32:42,000
So again, this is Commissioner Washington.

293
00:32:42,000 --> 00:32:48,000
So the definitions as outlined on page 5 are what is controlling?

294
00:32:48,000 --> 00:32:50,000
Would that be accurate?

295
00:32:50,000 --> 00:32:52,000
It should control.

296
00:32:52,000 --> 00:32:56,000
Is that accurate, Mr. Bossy?

297
00:32:56,000 --> 00:32:57,000
Yes, ma'am.

298
00:32:57,000 --> 00:33:04,000
And I believe Mr. Hatcher and Ms. Kozak would also think of that.

299
00:33:04,000 --> 00:33:20,000
So I would make a suggestion then that essentially the motion should include a clear statement that the uses listed in condition 1D

300
00:33:20,000 --> 00:33:26,000
will be replaced with the specific exact language that's on page 5 of the staff report

301
00:33:26,000 --> 00:33:33,000
rather than the language that's currently in condition 1D because of those minor discrepancies.

302
00:33:33,000 --> 00:33:35,000
And everyone, it's the applicant and staff.

303
00:33:35,000 --> 00:33:37,000
That's why we're asking, right?

304
00:33:37,000 --> 00:33:38,000
Okay, perfect.

305
00:33:38,000 --> 00:33:41,000
I guess we're going to go with the use of controlling language.

306
00:33:41,000 --> 00:33:42,000
Okay, perfect.

307
00:33:42,000 --> 00:33:45,000
So, okay, so you heard him then, correct?

308
00:33:45,000 --> 00:33:47,000
That we'll go with what's on page 5.

309
00:33:47,000 --> 00:33:52,000
And then we'll take a closer look at the resolution to it, okay?

310
00:33:52,000 --> 00:33:55,000
Okay.

311
00:33:55,000 --> 00:34:00,000
Is there a motion?

312
00:34:00,000 --> 00:34:03,000
Madam Chair, this is Commissioner Washington.

313
00:34:03,000 --> 00:34:16,000
I move that we adopt the findings of staff and recommend to the district council approval of CSP-19009

314
00:34:16,000 --> 00:34:20,000
along with the conditions as outlined in staff's report

315
00:34:20,000 --> 00:34:25,000
and further augmenting the conditional 1D

316
00:34:25,000 --> 00:34:32,000
to ensure that the permitted uses are detailed to be consistent

317
00:34:32,000 --> 00:34:37,000
with the finding on page 5 of the staff technical report.

318
00:34:37,000 --> 00:34:39,000
Commissioner Gerardo first, second.

319
00:34:39,000 --> 00:34:44,000
Okay, we have a motion by Commissioner Washington, seconded by Commissioner Gerardo

320
00:34:44,000 --> 00:34:48,000
for approval of the conceptual site plan 19009.

321
00:34:48,000 --> 00:34:52,000
Is there any discussion?

322
00:34:52,000 --> 00:34:54,000
I'll do a roll call.

323
00:34:54,000 --> 00:34:57,000
Madam Vice Chair?

324
00:34:57,000 --> 00:34:59,000
I'll roll a call.

325
00:34:59,000 --> 00:35:00,000
Okay.

326
00:35:00,000 --> 00:35:01,000
Yeah.

327
00:35:01,000 --> 00:35:02,000
Okay.

328
00:35:02,000 --> 00:35:04,000
Commissioner Washington?

329
00:35:04,000 --> 00:35:05,000
Yes.

330
00:35:05,000 --> 00:35:07,000
Commissioner Gerardo?

331
00:35:07,000 --> 00:35:09,000
Yes, Madam Chair.

332
00:35:09,000 --> 00:35:11,000
Commissioner Doherner?

333
00:35:11,000 --> 00:35:12,000
Yes.

334
00:35:12,000 --> 00:35:20,000
Okay, the ayes have it, 5-0, and then we need a similar motion for detail site plan 19053.

335
00:35:20,000 --> 00:35:23,000
Madam Chair, this is Commissioner Washington

336
00:35:23,000 --> 00:35:27,000
and I move that we adopt the findings of staff's report

337
00:35:27,000 --> 00:35:34,000
and recommend approval to the district council or DSP-19053

338
00:35:34,000 --> 00:35:40,000
along with the associated conditions as outlined in staff's report.

339
00:35:40,000 --> 00:35:46,000
Further to reflect condition 1D, D is endowment,

340
00:35:46,000 --> 00:35:53,000
D consistent with the finding as outlined on page 5 of the staff technical report.

341
00:35:53,000 --> 00:35:55,000
Commissioner Gerardo?

342
00:35:55,000 --> 00:35:58,000
Okay, so we had two seconds.

343
00:35:58,000 --> 00:35:59,000
Good one.

344
00:35:59,000 --> 00:36:02,000
I think Commissioner Gerardo seconded first.

345
00:36:02,000 --> 00:36:04,000
Okay, I will do the vote.

346
00:36:04,000 --> 00:36:07,000
Madam Vice Chair?

347
00:36:07,000 --> 00:36:08,000
I vote aye.

348
00:36:08,000 --> 00:36:10,000
Commissioner Washington?

349
00:36:10,000 --> 00:36:11,000
Aye.

350
00:36:11,000 --> 00:36:13,000
Commissioner Doherner?

351
00:36:13,000 --> 00:36:14,000
Aye.

352
00:36:14,000 --> 00:36:16,000
Commissioner Gerardo?

353
00:36:16,000 --> 00:36:17,000
Aye.

354
00:36:17,000 --> 00:36:18,000
The ayes have it.

355
00:36:18,000 --> 00:36:20,000
Okay, so let me just say this.

356
00:36:20,000 --> 00:36:26,000
This brings us to the end of our plan and board session for today

357
00:36:26,000 --> 00:36:30,000
and for last week as well, which was added today.

358
00:36:30,000 --> 00:36:34,000
I need to take a moment to commend everyone for your patience,

359
00:36:34,000 --> 00:36:37,000
for your resilience, for your flexibility in working with us

360
00:36:37,000 --> 00:36:40,000
as we try to propel Prince George's County forward

361
00:36:40,000 --> 00:36:44,000
to not try to stop business yet while keeping everyone safe,

362
00:36:44,000 --> 00:36:48,000
practicing safe distancing and letting our public,

363
00:36:48,000 --> 00:36:51,000
our attorneys, our parking planning team,

364
00:36:51,000 --> 00:36:55,000
and everyone know that we care and we are concerned about their safety.

365
00:36:55,000 --> 00:37:00,000
This was a good way to do this while balancing the above.

366
00:37:00,000 --> 00:37:03,000
So I just want to take a moment to say a huge thank you to everyone,

367
00:37:03,000 --> 00:37:05,000
to our planning staff in particular,

368
00:37:05,000 --> 00:37:08,000
to our IT folks who work with us, challenged people here.

369
00:37:08,000 --> 00:37:10,000
So thank you so very, very much.

370
00:37:10,000 --> 00:37:12,000
And then my final question of the day,

371
00:37:12,000 --> 00:37:14,000
I don't know if Mr. Hunt is on or not,

372
00:37:14,000 --> 00:37:18,000
but if Mr. Hunt is not, is Mr. Hunt on?

373
00:37:18,000 --> 00:37:19,000
Yes, ma'am, I'm here.

374
00:37:19,000 --> 00:37:21,000
Okay, Mr. Hunt, I'm here with the gavel.

375
00:37:21,000 --> 00:37:25,000
Is there any additional business to come before planning board two-day?

376
00:37:25,000 --> 00:37:28,000
We're live from Acton-Keith, Maryland.

377
00:37:28,000 --> 00:37:32,000
We've done the pilot before, the planning board is two-day.

378
00:37:32,000 --> 00:37:34,000
Then thank you so much, everyone.

379
00:37:34,000 --> 00:37:37,000
Stay safe, we care, be healthy.

380
00:37:37,000 --> 00:37:40,000
Planning board is adjourned.

381
00:37:40,000 --> 00:37:42,000
Who needs this?

382
00:37:42,000 --> 00:37:44,000
The phrase is, okay, we're signing off,

383
00:37:44,000 --> 00:37:48,000
and we're signing off in here, and...

384
00:37:48,000 --> 00:37:50,000
From you?