1 00:00:09,650 --> 00:00:38,590 Hello, and welcome to this special board meeting of Placer Hills Union School District. Today is February 25th, 2020-6. I'm calling this meeting to order at 5.02 p.m. President R. Trustee Lopez, Trustee Anderson, Trustee Harvey, Trustee Caldas, and Trustee MacIr. As a reminder, the audio of this board meeting will be recorded. Additionally, the public has access to this meeting, both in-person and via Zoom. Can everyone please stand? 2 00:00:56,150 --> 00:00:57,250 We 3 00:01:04,740 --> 00:01:17,000 are now on to item 5 which is Agenda approval. I would like to make a change to our agenda 4 00:01:17,000 --> 00:01:23,340 and that was easy to remove item 7.3, which is the tender-bred in-place round topic. 5 00:01:24,300 --> 00:01:30,180 We have yet to hear back from legal and synthesis that I would like to just remove it until we're 6 00:01:30,180 --> 00:01:38,040 able to get some further insight from them. Does anyone else interested in making changes 7 00:01:38,040 --> 00:01:44,880 or would like to make a motion? I just like to get a little clarity on removing that from action. 8 00:01:44,880 --> 00:01:53,460 Do we have individual care to give a presentation on the playground or is it just to answer questions? 9 00:01:56,410 --> 00:01:59,430 I believe they wanted to share some information about the playground. 10 00:02:00,010 --> 00:02:05,990 And so to share more before the board, just because they had been able to get around. 11 00:02:05,990 --> 00:02:11,830 Um, but um, Trustee Lopez is correct, is, is the, the point you want to, uh, that we're 12 00:02:11,830 --> 00:02:17,990 waiting to get in. We had, we asked, um, Comin to, uh, to, uh, sorry, if I did better 13 00:02:17,990 --> 00:02:22,070 wrong, if I don't do a recent bit to meet some CMS requirements and so we're just waiting 14 00:02:22,070 --> 00:02:28,070 for our legal team to finish that review, but I don't review of that bit. Um, and thus, we 15 00:02:28,070 --> 00:02:33,970 just don't, we don't have something to approve tonight. It's an actually. Okay. So I don't 16 00:02:33,970 --> 00:02:37,490 I don't know if you want to address how you address if people do want to share information 17 00:02:37,490 --> 00:02:38,170 or not. 18 00:02:39,150 --> 00:02:45,270 I would be willing to hear so on this item, but then just not have it as an action item. 19 00:02:45,510 --> 00:02:47,030 I don't know how the rest of it goes about that. 20 00:02:47,950 --> 00:02:56,770 I think I would also like to hear what the individuals who came to present have to say, but so I have 21 00:02:56,770 --> 00:03:02,250 no problem keeping it on action, and then we can decide at that time whether we want 22 00:03:02,250 --> 00:03:11,090 to take action or not, and we could probably just, you know, if there's a motion to, 23 00:03:12,870 --> 00:03:16,630 I want to say a postcard, that's not the table, but the right term. Thank you, table. 24 00:03:17,090 --> 00:03:22,130 Then we get tables to the next meeting or when we have information from the attorney's office. 25 00:03:22,490 --> 00:03:27,330 That's what I would propose we do. We leave it on so we can hear, and then we can decide 26 00:03:27,330 --> 00:03:28,990 that time when we want to take action. 27 00:03:31,250 --> 00:03:35,030 That sounds good. What any other trustees like to make 28 00:03:35,030 --> 00:03:43,710 it changes to be agenda or is there a motion to approve this? We'll make a motion to approve 29 00:03:43,710 --> 00:03:49,930 the agenda. Okay, I'll go ahead and second that then. Trustee Anderson will call vote please. 30 00:03:49,930 --> 00:03:57,690 I trustee Harding. I trustee Halded. I trustee McIntyre and trustee Lopez. I 31 00:03:57,690 --> 00:04:05,390 motion passes. Next one move on to item six for the consent agenda. Would any 32 00:04:05,390 --> 00:04:08,110 board members like to pull an item off of consent? 33 00:04:11,990 --> 00:04:13,590 Is there anyone who would like to 34 00:04:13,590 --> 00:04:20,440 make a motion to approve the consent agenda as is? I think we just make it check 35 00:04:20,440 --> 00:04:23,580 the public once in a while. Yeah, I think so. 36 00:04:26,340 --> 00:04:29,100 What do any public like to pull something off their 37 00:04:29,100 --> 00:04:30,180 agenda for consent? 38 00:04:33,340 --> 00:04:33,620 No. 39 00:04:36,720 --> 00:04:39,580 All right. Then I will go ahead and make a motion to approve their consent. 40 00:04:39,820 --> 00:04:47,520 agenda as is. Is there a second? I'll second that. Thank you. Let's do a roll. Paul, 41 00:04:47,520 --> 00:04:55,720 Well, again, I was so trusty-hiding, trusty-cada of sites, trusty-macata, trusty-well-peds-of-eye, 42 00:04:55,920 --> 00:04:59,960 and then trusty-anderson, motion passes again. 43 00:05:00,420 --> 00:05:07,660 So we'll go ahead and move on to action items and 7.1 is regarding each school site's 44 00:05:07,660 --> 00:05:12,780 comprehensive school safety plan, and Mr. Bigley can please present this item for us. 45 00:05:12,780 --> 00:05:19,280 Absolutely. So last month or that or less regular schedule board meeting the board improved the site's confidence of school safety plan 46 00:05:19,280 --> 00:05:26,120 There has been additional language on specifically Senate bill 848 that as it was added post 47 00:05:26,700 --> 00:05:29,480 School site councils approval their comprehensive safety plans 48 00:05:29,480 --> 00:05:34,020 So it's not something ways of district or district office would you know, literally just add into those safety plans? 49 00:05:34,320 --> 00:05:42,100 So that's we're bringing back to say in one page update for those safety plans as any as an appendix 50 00:05:42,780 --> 00:05:48,680 to have your ad information on file updated in our board policies, but the ones you just kind of 51 00:05:48,680 --> 00:05:53,460 approved and the ones that are coming up this month also add to this language. It'll be then 52 00:05:53,460 --> 00:05:57,680 written into the actual safety plans in their next cycle, an next year and their adoption 53 00:05:57,680 --> 00:06:03,640 faces appetites. Specifically, this one addresses a lot of the child abuse, sexual misconduct, 54 00:06:04,160 --> 00:06:09,640 and boundaries trainings, and boundary information, and how we would go about reporting it, 55 00:06:09,640 --> 00:06:16,760 hours keeping people safe. It also includes looking at classrooms set up in arrangements to minimize 56 00:06:16,760 --> 00:06:23,640 the ability for any negative to happen inside classrooms in school environments. 57 00:06:26,280 --> 00:06:26,840 The fiscal 58 00:06:26,840 --> 00:06:31,640 impact this is very minimal. You know, our school works program will provide some information on 59 00:06:31,640 --> 00:06:35,720 here. Our board policy's already done and so really it's just around training time and we are 60 00:06:35,720 --> 00:06:40,420 planning on having a boundaries training at the beginning of our next year and our pre-service 61 00:06:40,420 --> 00:06:42,140 say is all right, we've already started 62 00:06:42,140 --> 00:06:45,200 arranging that with SIGS trainer. 63 00:06:49,440 --> 00:06:50,540 Thank you, Mr. Finkley. 64 00:06:51,260 --> 00:06:56,360 Are there any more comments or questions about 7.1? 65 00:06:58,400 --> 00:06:59,600 Yeah, OK. 66 00:07:00,910 --> 00:07:03,940 Are there any public comments on this particular item? 67 00:07:05,920 --> 00:07:07,820 I'm so fired for. 68 00:07:09,420 --> 00:07:12,440 OK, what any board members like to make a motion 69 00:07:12,440 --> 00:07:21,600 to prove this. I will move to approve the comprehensive rules that you see plan update. 70 00:07:22,300 --> 00:07:29,700 Okay, is there a second? No second. Thank you. Let's go ahead and do our roll call 71 00:07:29,700 --> 00:07:33,420 about them. So Trustee Calvis. Hi. Trustee McIntyre. 72 00:07:33,420 --> 00:07:33,720 Right. 73 00:07:34,120 --> 00:07:35,300 Trustee Lopez is I. 74 00:07:35,520 --> 00:07:36,440 Trustee Anderson. 75 00:07:37,160 --> 00:07:37,420 All right. 76 00:07:37,820 --> 00:07:38,940 And Trustee Hartman is I. 77 00:07:39,320 --> 00:07:40,860 Motion passes. 78 00:07:42,620 --> 00:07:44,120 Moving on now to items. 79 00:07:44,640 --> 00:07:45,480 Point two. 80 00:07:45,780 --> 00:07:47,720 This is regarding the e-rate program. 81 00:07:48,020 --> 00:07:50,640 Dr. Sanders, can you please present this item? 82 00:07:54,560 --> 00:07:55,500 This is office. 83 00:07:56,560 --> 00:08:02,860 The C2RFP, basically, is a request from a proposal. 84 00:08:02,860 --> 00:08:09,880 from infinity who is our contracted vendor to do these proposals for us and C2 is simply 85 00:08:09,880 --> 00:08:17,620 just a data part of our internet communications and each year or five year cycle of the 86 00:08:17,620 --> 00:08:22,400 issue is awarded funding from the federal government based on our free reduce lunch counts 87 00:08:23,000 --> 00:08:29,280 and we get a percentage of last year I think it was 60 percent and the phase paid 60 and 88 00:08:29,280 --> 00:08:34,100 pay for it. I'm not sure what it is this year because we're going to the cycle for funding. 89 00:08:35,580 --> 00:08:40,500 What it is, they're going to, they've done an R.P., vendors will take a look at the R.P., 90 00:08:40,500 --> 00:08:45,320 they will bid on the R.P., and it's up to the district at that point, if they want to move 91 00:08:45,320 --> 00:08:50,640 forward with the funding that's proposed within R.P., but all of this is related to data circuits 92 00:08:51,640 --> 00:08:56,240 upgrading our internet infrastructure in the district so that the students and the teachers 93 00:08:56,240 --> 00:08:58,720 can stay connected with instructional answers and purposes. 94 00:09:05,420 --> 00:09:07,620 Do any board members have comments or 95 00:09:07,620 --> 00:09:14,540 questions on this item? We're sure we have a couple questions before you because this is kind of 96 00:09:14,540 --> 00:09:15,940 right on my alley of expertise. 97 00:09:18,060 --> 00:09:22,700 Usually when CRP is like this in my professional background, 98 00:09:23,000 --> 00:09:29,320 not usually quite so specific down to the individual pieces of hardware and a lot of times it's more of 99 00:09:29,320 --> 00:09:35,560 base solution so that you get multiple solutions so that they can compete against different hardware 100 00:09:35,560 --> 00:09:42,660 vendors and different solutions for best price and best solution versus a specific set of hardware. 101 00:09:43,080 --> 00:09:47,000 Is there a reason why we're going for just that specific recipe hardware? 102 00:09:47,240 --> 00:09:53,880 Today, so since it's federally funded, we have to show meaning. So let's just say that 103 00:09:53,880 --> 00:09:59,500 that our servers are old, then we have to identify the type of infrastructure that the 104 00:09:59,500 --> 00:10:03,500 district currently has and upgrade that current infrastructure. 105 00:10:04,360 --> 00:10:10,960 So what infinity does, infinity looks at what is available through e-rate, and then based 106 00:10:10,960 --> 00:10:16,160 on that availability that the federal government will fund, then those types of equipments 107 00:10:16,160 --> 00:10:21,240 I've then put out in the six and there's an idea on that. 108 00:10:21,700 --> 00:10:25,040 But it's based on the current need of the industry. 109 00:10:26,730 --> 00:10:30,870 Just to clarify, it's based on what's available within the ERAC program. 110 00:10:30,870 --> 00:10:33,110 Not just off the need of the industry. 111 00:10:33,150 --> 00:10:33,270 Right. 112 00:10:33,610 --> 00:10:39,810 So if 100% of the time we have, with infinity, 113 00:10:40,190 --> 00:10:44,610 a meeting every year, and our technology specialist will say, 114 00:10:44,610 --> 00:10:51,370 This is what's updated in our edition within infinity goes and see what's available and then that's what's available 115 00:10:51,370 --> 00:10:58,870 But most of the time what we're beating on is the services those that hardware has a hard price with a lot of vendors 116 00:10:58,870 --> 00:11:05,210 But when they go out to create they still have to give us a price on the whole package because that makes sense 117 00:11:05,210 --> 00:11:12,950 The services sometimes is is that outlier because e-rate cannot determine what a vendor would charge for installation 118 00:11:12,950 --> 00:11:18,450 But e-rate does have a package price that we can look at for the equipment, but that's 119 00:11:18,450 --> 00:11:26,330 not always the cost that the industry would pay because supplies and shipping and all 120 00:11:26,330 --> 00:11:27,870 of that sometimes can be an issue. 121 00:11:28,310 --> 00:11:31,230 And all of the cost of that is within the entire package. 122 00:11:31,630 --> 00:11:34,150 It's up to the bidder to bid on a price. 123 00:11:34,810 --> 00:11:38,630 And then the federal government always goes with the lowest bidder. 124 00:11:47,760 --> 00:11:53,300 Dr. Sanders, then, the federal funding, is this additional funding you get just for 125 00:11:53,300 --> 00:11:53,880 the program? 126 00:11:54,640 --> 00:11:58,700 So, this is a per-state funding life we receive from the feds. 127 00:11:58,700 --> 00:12:05,080 This is a percentage all, so what happens is, let's just say we qualify again 60-40, so 128 00:12:05,080 --> 00:12:11,140 the federal government you said was saying that 60% check straight to out vendor, they cut 129 00:12:11,140 --> 00:12:11,480 us out. 130 00:12:11,820 --> 00:12:13,100 That's the way we prefer it. 131 00:12:13,100 --> 00:12:14,700 We don't want to handle that part. 132 00:12:14,920 --> 00:12:18,340 We could do the whole thing, but we don't want to do that. 133 00:12:18,520 --> 00:12:21,720 Like last year, they paid for 60% and the district paid 134 00:12:21,720 --> 00:12:22,540 to 40%. 135 00:12:22,540 --> 00:12:24,120 It's a part of the technology budget. 136 00:12:24,620 --> 00:12:26,040 So it could pass through the district, 137 00:12:26,280 --> 00:12:27,600 but I didn't want to do that. 138 00:12:28,100 --> 00:12:29,860 It's easier for the base to pay their part 139 00:12:29,860 --> 00:12:31,080 and for us to pay ours. 140 00:12:31,720 --> 00:12:34,760 So it's not any kind of allocation that we receive. 141 00:12:35,100 --> 00:12:36,780 We receive a percentage of, 142 00:12:36,940 --> 00:12:38,960 based on our free-reduced lunch hands. 143 00:12:40,870 --> 00:12:41,410 Thank you. 144 00:12:41,510 --> 00:12:43,330 I think what I'm asking Laura, 145 00:12:43,330 --> 00:12:48,550 Because the financial impact in here talks about how there's no immediate impact, but this 146 00:12:48,550 --> 00:12:55,050 is going to come out of our general fund, or what hypothesis come from, and how can 147 00:12:55,050 --> 00:12:55,930 that money be spent? 148 00:12:56,190 --> 00:12:57,990 It's what I'm really passionate about. 149 00:12:57,990 --> 00:12:59,710 So yes, it does come from the general fund. 150 00:12:59,930 --> 00:13:03,670 The technology budget is 100% general fund. 151 00:13:04,910 --> 00:13:09,190 Some of our title for money can be spent, but only a very small amount. 152 00:13:09,190 --> 00:13:14,970 Now, most of the title for money has to be spent on co-curricular safety for the district. 153 00:13:15,550 --> 00:13:18,050 But our tech budget is 100% funded from general. 154 00:13:19,710 --> 00:13:24,350 I think to expand on that from my perspective is this is the request for beds to get the 155 00:13:24,350 --> 00:13:24,850 information. 156 00:13:25,430 --> 00:13:29,170 So it tells us how much it would cost us, not that we have to spend that amount of money. 157 00:13:29,390 --> 00:13:35,730 So we would say, if you choose to participate and you needed new data circuits, you would 158 00:13:35,730 --> 00:13:41,310 maybe $40,000 new, you know, those new $100,000 data circuits doesn't say you have to, 159 00:13:41,350 --> 00:13:44,730 it's just giving us that information should we be able to choose to. 160 00:13:45,230 --> 00:13:47,970 And then we miss the funding window, then we miss the funding. 161 00:13:48,350 --> 00:13:51,930 So that's that's why it's on the, the funding window is closing. 162 00:13:54,260 --> 00:13:59,160 But and this funding is for like families, not for the school districts use, 163 00:13:59,880 --> 00:14:05,800 like because it talks about how this program is to provide Wi-Fi at a discount and it would be 164 00:14:05,800 --> 00:14:09,380 based on the district's free-reduced lunch program counts. 165 00:14:09,880 --> 00:14:13,540 So is this for our internet or to provide internet to families? 166 00:14:14,080 --> 00:14:14,600 I'm not, guys. 167 00:14:14,740 --> 00:14:15,360 For the school district. 168 00:14:15,820 --> 00:14:16,060 OK. 169 00:14:16,420 --> 00:14:17,720 It's entirely for the school district. 170 00:14:18,140 --> 00:14:23,000 But the percentage of is calculated 171 00:14:23,600 --> 00:14:26,700 by the number of free-reduced lunch counts 172 00:14:26,700 --> 00:14:27,800 that the district has. 173 00:14:28,300 --> 00:14:30,700 So that's a formula that the federal government uses. 174 00:14:35,060 --> 00:14:37,200 Based on what that does, I think this is an upgrade of the 175 00:14:37,200 --> 00:14:38,600 that we're working with. 176 00:14:38,700 --> 00:14:39,780 That's exactly what it is. 177 00:14:39,900 --> 00:14:42,600 So it's not any circuits like our internet connections 178 00:14:42,600 --> 00:14:43,380 or things like that. 179 00:14:43,580 --> 00:14:46,740 It's the stuff that runs the wires up in the walls 180 00:14:46,740 --> 00:14:48,960 and the connections between all the access points. 181 00:14:49,440 --> 00:14:50,840 So it's exactly what it is. 182 00:14:51,220 --> 00:14:52,600 You know, I assume we need to upgrade. 183 00:14:53,080 --> 00:14:54,060 Yeah, that's the question I have. 184 00:14:54,180 --> 00:14:56,320 It's what's the current status of the environment. 185 00:14:57,020 --> 00:14:59,420 Is this a nice to have? 186 00:14:59,620 --> 00:14:59,940 Is this neat? 187 00:15:03,880 --> 00:15:23,700 We haven't had this, we've had upgrades over the years when James was here, but not in this area. Like last year, we upgraded servers, which were old. We didn't get a chance to update all that we had, but we updated what we're going to afford to update through e-rate. This time, we're choosing to do the communication, but data part of it. 188 00:15:26,640 --> 00:15:29,880 That means that within the last five years, the district has 189 00:15:29,880 --> 00:15:36,780 not upgraded in service. It has not upgraded those data points since COVID more than five years 190 00:15:36,780 --> 00:15:42,700 over. Yeah. Do you know, do you know, do you know, do you know, do you know, many of this is like out of 191 00:15:43,540 --> 00:15:48,200 what's the right term out of life for beyond lifespan or in the library, the libraries. 192 00:15:49,280 --> 00:15:58,740 So I can't speak to that because I'm not sure. With my background in technology, it just depends 193 00:15:58,740 --> 00:16:04,180 on the infrastructure that's in place. And from what I understand, even with the previous 194 00:16:04,180 --> 00:16:10,920 technology specialist, we were on borrowed time at that time. And he just needed in phases. 195 00:16:11,140 --> 00:16:15,860 And this is another part of the phase. Because he couldn't afford to do it all at one time. 196 00:16:19,010 --> 00:16:23,050 So if that's been done in five years, I think we run environments that are 10 years old. So 197 00:16:23,050 --> 00:16:26,550 just being five years old doesn't necessarily mean to be that it's... 198 00:16:26,550 --> 00:16:29,490 I have no idea how old it is. I just know it's more than... 199 00:16:29,490 --> 00:16:36,430 Sure. And as Mr. Pigley said, it is no direct impact on the district. It's an R&P. It's a request for these. 200 00:16:36,970 --> 00:16:43,170 So the district can decide to move forward or not, but if we don't get inside of the funding window, 201 00:16:43,250 --> 00:16:44,710 we lose the opportunity for funding. 202 00:16:46,370 --> 00:16:59,470 So my question is, is if we approve this, does that immediately approve the project? Or does that 203 00:16:59,470 --> 00:17:06,570 So, once the bid are in, and the person is awarded the bid, the district can, and anytime 204 00:17:06,570 --> 00:17:12,770 she's not designed a contract, does it come in the front of the board again as well 205 00:17:12,770 --> 00:17:13,170 I'm asking? 206 00:17:14,630 --> 00:17:19,270 Yes, if that's what you want, like it's not required she wants you to approve it, but 207 00:17:19,270 --> 00:17:22,870 if that's what you want, then of course the superintendent will do what the board asks. 208 00:17:25,730 --> 00:17:30,350 So, yes sir, that's what you want, I mean, you're asking the same questions I asked, I mean, 209 00:17:30,350 --> 00:17:34,870 I mean, I asked my specific question with this is am I committing money with this, no? 210 00:17:36,150 --> 00:17:42,910 And just idea really simple, does this RFP process, am I committing money, am I committing 211 00:17:42,910 --> 00:17:43,070 money? 212 00:17:43,110 --> 00:17:43,970 I'm going to be buying something. 213 00:17:44,130 --> 00:17:44,870 I just want to apply that. 214 00:17:45,110 --> 00:17:50,310 And so, and the short answer is well, I'm not committing money, I'm just requesting bids. 215 00:17:50,910 --> 00:17:54,450 Like a car, a car, you know, it should be telling us how much costs I can drive away, right? 216 00:17:54,890 --> 00:17:58,110 So that was where my first piece was used, I don't have money to commit. 217 00:17:58,810 --> 00:18:03,690 So, but to have the bidding process need to be inside the window because I believe the 218 00:18:03,690 --> 00:18:08,190 window is like a five-year window on e-rate so, you know, it could be multiple years before 219 00:18:08,190 --> 00:18:10,030 we get a chance to look at e-rate again. 220 00:18:10,670 --> 00:18:14,430 Well, our budget though might be multiple years before it had afforded an e-rate product 221 00:18:14,430 --> 00:18:19,030 too, but it doesn't have to know what we have available to know what's available. 222 00:18:20,050 --> 00:18:25,810 And if we choose not to do it this fiscal year, it doesn't expire as long as you stay within 223 00:18:25,810 --> 00:18:29,790 the window you can see a little forward when you can afford to do it, but you have to get into 224 00:18:29,790 --> 00:18:39,020 funding window. My biggest concern right now is getting in a big infrastructure project that's 225 00:18:39,020 --> 00:18:44,080 going to cost a significant amount of money with the current physical, current physical situation 226 00:18:44,080 --> 00:18:49,060 we're in. Right. It doesn't seem like a necessarily smart move unless we're having significant outages 227 00:18:49,060 --> 00:18:54,200 or issues with the network right now. So I can assure you that it's not like a regular 228 00:18:54,200 --> 00:18:59,060 or construction project, a public budget, it's not like that. 229 00:18:59,820 --> 00:19:02,500 So, you don't have to worry about change orders 230 00:19:02,500 --> 00:19:05,280 that will cost you more, not with this type of project. 231 00:19:06,020 --> 00:19:09,260 And because the federal government is backing whatever percent 232 00:19:09,260 --> 00:19:11,740 that it's going to back, those are guaranteed funds 233 00:19:11,740 --> 00:19:14,640 to the district and we've had no problems in the past. 234 00:19:15,400 --> 00:19:19,780 But let's just say that it cost 120,000 dollars. 235 00:19:19,940 --> 00:19:22,460 Let's just say that the district has to pay 46,000 236 00:19:22,460 --> 00:19:23,600 and just arbitrary numbers. 237 00:19:24,400 --> 00:19:26,340 You don't have to do this now. 238 00:19:26,880 --> 00:19:28,720 It can be done next this school year, 239 00:19:29,100 --> 00:19:30,720 but if you missed the funding window, 240 00:19:30,980 --> 00:19:32,240 you missed the funding window. 241 00:19:32,640 --> 00:19:35,900 So I guess the imperative of putting it on the agenda 242 00:19:35,900 --> 00:19:37,740 is to get inside of the funding window. 243 00:19:37,840 --> 00:19:39,640 So when the district isn't in a position 244 00:19:39,640 --> 00:19:40,940 within the next year or two, 245 00:19:41,320 --> 00:19:44,020 we could move forward if the district decides to do that. 246 00:19:44,400 --> 00:19:45,580 But if you missed the funding window, 247 00:19:45,840 --> 00:19:46,440 you can't do anything. 248 00:19:51,850 --> 00:19:53,790 The Russell Ford feels that, you know, 249 00:19:53,790 --> 00:19:57,090 I'm okay with, you know, approving an RFP, 250 00:19:57,290 --> 00:19:59,090 but considering our current situation, 251 00:19:59,450 --> 00:20:02,510 I don't know that I would be okay with us going forward 252 00:20:02,510 --> 00:20:05,710 with spending $46,000 in that case without, 253 00:20:06,250 --> 00:20:08,750 at least knowing that we're having major issues 254 00:20:08,750 --> 00:20:11,150 with our network and that it's truly justified 255 00:20:11,850 --> 00:20:14,230 having some evidence based on that 256 00:20:14,230 --> 00:20:16,910 and I don't know if we need our technologists come in 257 00:20:16,910 --> 00:20:18,290 and talk about it or something like that 258 00:20:18,290 --> 00:20:21,090 but I would prefer it to come back in front of a board 259 00:20:21,090 --> 00:20:24,970 or approval of the decision that's on approval tonight. 260 00:20:25,410 --> 00:20:27,070 He's talking more than I'm talking about. 261 00:20:27,530 --> 00:20:28,930 I'm talking about exactly equally approval. 262 00:20:29,570 --> 00:20:31,270 Okay, I got you. 263 00:20:33,960 --> 00:20:35,760 Hey, Gritty, and just to clarify, 264 00:20:36,220 --> 00:20:38,100 you're talking about getting in the funding window, 265 00:20:38,240 --> 00:20:40,640 that just means approving the RFP. 266 00:20:40,840 --> 00:20:41,020 Yes. 267 00:20:41,100 --> 00:20:42,300 It's not committing to a contract. 268 00:20:42,380 --> 00:20:42,840 Yes, ma'am. 269 00:20:43,000 --> 00:20:43,180 Okay. 270 00:20:47,850 --> 00:20:51,290 For me, if I'm wrong, we have board policy on expenditures 271 00:20:51,290 --> 00:20:54,590 and what expenditures come before the board, 272 00:20:54,590 --> 00:20:59,090 definitely super intense. We do I could take the not price and I'll tell you that right now, 273 00:20:59,790 --> 00:21:06,850 but only 10,000. Yeah, I feel like it's not all that high. I mean, I think a lot comes before 274 00:21:06,850 --> 00:21:13,490 a board and then we always approve contracts. We hold one board, yeah. 275 00:21:16,850 --> 00:21:18,090 Many of them, especially 276 00:21:18,090 --> 00:21:23,130 the ones that don't even hit that window are put in a consent under NOU contracts and agreements. 277 00:21:23,130 --> 00:21:23,450 Yes. 278 00:21:28,560 --> 00:21:34,360 Are there any additional board comments on this or questions? Are there any public 279 00:21:34,360 --> 00:21:35,840 comments on this? 280 00:21:38,440 --> 00:21:43,700 No. Okay, would any board members like to make a motion regarding this item? 281 00:21:48,900 --> 00:21:59,380 I'll make a motion to approve the RFPS submitted so long as no contracts will be bound without 282 00:21:59,380 --> 00:22:08,180 award approval. Is there a second? I will second. Thank you. I will do a real call vote. 283 00:22:08,460 --> 00:22:15,600 Trustee McIntyre? Aye. Trustee Loeb has his eye. Trustee Anderson? Aye. Trustee Harvey? Aye. 284 00:22:16,200 --> 00:22:25,500 Trustee Calves? Aye. Motion passes. We now move on to item 7.3, which is regarding the 285 00:22:26,060 --> 00:22:29,460 I know this topic came up just a couple weeks ago. 286 00:22:30,240 --> 00:22:32,220 Mr. Bigley, I will go ahead and have a few. 287 00:22:32,220 --> 00:22:34,100 Kind of open up our discussion on this night. 288 00:22:34,220 --> 00:22:36,200 I do have a comment later, too. 289 00:22:38,340 --> 00:22:41,520 So, as you stated, this came to the board 290 00:22:41,880 --> 00:22:43,640 at our last four meeting in February, 291 00:22:43,960 --> 00:22:45,460 our first four meeting in February, 292 00:22:46,320 --> 00:22:49,880 to look at the approval using our developer fee funds 293 00:22:50,300 --> 00:22:52,700 for the best part of their developer fee project 294 00:22:52,700 --> 00:22:59,160 to KTK, or to KTK project, where we've been seeing patterns in the playground, the playground 295 00:22:59,160 --> 00:23:05,740 being the first phase within that. When we've had, there have been a lot of PTC especially 296 00:23:05,740 --> 00:23:12,040 meetings with many, with different vendors, for playgrounds, and last meeting we're presented 297 00:23:12,040 --> 00:23:20,720 and is attached to this. Through work with parents, and not with parents, with the teachers, 298 00:23:20,720 --> 00:23:26,240 with the staff on what the playground could and what ideally look like and you know what would be 299 00:23:26,240 --> 00:23:32,120 included in that. So that's that's the information there. This was on agenda tonight to seek 300 00:23:32,120 --> 00:23:40,000 board approval. But as I stated earlier on we have not yet fully had our our legalized and fully 301 00:23:40,000 --> 00:23:45,780 committed to read our documents and play reviewed the CNS bid right now. The bid to make sure it meets 302 00:23:45,780 --> 00:23:50,260 all the requirements and so we want to make sure that it doesn't it stands up to any challenges 303 00:23:50,260 --> 00:23:52,380 those come in the future because we are using 304 00:23:52,380 --> 00:23:54,340 Pat taxpayer money and they could challenge 305 00:23:54,340 --> 00:23:55,600 I think it's for up to 20 years 306 00:23:55,600 --> 00:23:57,320 that those those funds could be challenged 307 00:23:57,880 --> 00:23:58,600 if they were used, 308 00:23:58,780 --> 00:24:00,500 help somebody felt they were used in a corporate. 309 00:24:00,940 --> 00:24:02,700 So we want to make sure it stands up to legal scrutiny. 310 00:24:10,200 --> 00:24:10,520 Thank you. 311 00:24:13,240 --> 00:24:15,980 I'm curious here with this particular item. 312 00:24:16,320 --> 00:24:18,980 Would the board like to hear from our 313 00:24:18,980 --> 00:24:22,420 presentation prior to our discussion on this tonight? 314 00:24:22,940 --> 00:24:25,300 I also will share that's part of that question. 315 00:24:25,420 --> 00:24:27,420 Another question for board is Dr. Sanders 316 00:24:27,420 --> 00:24:33,020 to put together some notes on bell for fees in general, like how to spend how we collect 317 00:24:33,020 --> 00:24:36,720 and what they can be spent on, like in time frame, there's some things like that just 318 00:24:36,720 --> 00:24:41,000 as some normal arrangement for the board because it's not every day and not often that 319 00:24:41,000 --> 00:24:42,820 we are working with the bell for fees. 320 00:24:44,600 --> 00:24:46,020 If they choose it, here's some of you. 321 00:24:46,140 --> 00:24:50,580 Yeah, what would you mind going ahead in person to some of that for someone we can hear 322 00:24:50,580 --> 00:24:52,100 and then we can chat more? 323 00:24:52,660 --> 00:24:52,820 Sure. 324 00:24:53,980 --> 00:24:57,480 Getting started, just explaining what the developer fees are. 325 00:24:57,640 --> 00:25:01,860 These are fees paid to school districts by property owners and developers, and they 326 00:25:01,860 --> 00:25:05,040 are to mitigate the impact created by new development. 327 00:25:05,340 --> 00:25:10,360 So we have a lot of people moving in our area, it's going to bring more students to our area, 328 00:25:10,500 --> 00:25:10,800 we hope. 329 00:25:11,300 --> 00:25:19,880 The fees are there to mitigate the impact of enrollment on the facilities so that the 330 00:25:19,880 --> 00:25:22,780 the district can upgrade or modernize the facilities 331 00:25:23,510 --> 00:25:25,840 to align with the enrollment of the district. 332 00:25:26,340 --> 00:25:27,620 There are three types of fees. 333 00:25:28,120 --> 00:25:29,940 We have level one, two, and three school districts. 334 00:25:29,940 --> 00:25:31,260 You use level one fees. 335 00:25:32,340 --> 00:25:34,980 Level one fees are to fund the construction 336 00:25:35,630 --> 00:25:37,840 and reconstruction of school facilities 337 00:25:38,270 --> 00:25:40,420 that are necessary to address the impact 338 00:25:40,420 --> 00:25:42,620 of new development or more students. 339 00:25:43,200 --> 00:25:45,720 The rate is set by the state allocation board 340 00:25:45,720 --> 00:25:47,760 and it's done in even number years 341 00:25:47,760 --> 00:25:53,540 in the month of January. The taxes are netted on residential and commercial properties within 342 00:25:53,540 --> 00:25:59,760 the school districts area. And all of this is under the purview of Ed Code and government code. 343 00:26:00,160 --> 00:26:10,000 Ed Code 17620, government code 6595. Some use of developer fees. In general, the law requires 344 00:26:10,000 --> 00:26:17,140 that school districts show a reasonable relationship between the impact of the fee and the use of the fee. 345 00:26:17,140 --> 00:26:19,380 So, it can be used for refurbishment. 346 00:26:20,240 --> 00:26:23,920 Most questions regarding permissible expenditures of 347 00:26:23,920 --> 00:26:27,820 the development fees can be answered just by simply asking to questions. 348 00:26:28,240 --> 00:26:34,760 The first one, does the work include construction or reconstruction of a school facility? 349 00:26:35,740 --> 00:26:43,080 The second one, would the same work have to be done in the absence of student growth? 350 00:26:43,080 --> 00:26:46,200 if so, development fees cannot be used. 351 00:26:46,480 --> 00:26:47,640 That's just regular maintenance. 352 00:26:52,960 --> 00:26:55,800 The law allows fees to include the cost of, 353 00:26:56,180 --> 00:26:58,380 attributable, the cost attributable 354 00:26:58,380 --> 00:27:00,900 to the increased demand on the facilities 355 00:27:00,900 --> 00:27:03,420 by the increased enrollment of the student body. 356 00:27:04,440 --> 00:27:08,460 Fees can be imposed to refurbish existing facilities 357 00:27:08,460 --> 00:27:11,400 to maintain the existing level of service 358 00:27:11,400 --> 00:27:15,260 or achieve an adopted level of service 359 00:27:15,260 --> 00:27:18,420 that is consistent with the general plan. 360 00:27:20,100 --> 00:27:24,560 Developers may also be used to modernize existing facilities. 361 00:27:25,120 --> 00:27:29,480 Yes, if refurbishment is tied to increased demand 362 00:27:29,820 --> 00:27:33,800 and necessary to maintain existing levels of service, 363 00:27:34,180 --> 00:27:38,820 due to the increased demands caused by increased student enrollment. 364 00:27:38,820 --> 00:27:44,880 And the reminder is, it may not be used for routine or deferred maintenance. 365 00:27:51,210 --> 00:27:58,030 Yes, and since hours, we've brought it to you all for approval, was tied to increased 366 00:27:58,030 --> 00:27:59,230 enrollment of CK. 367 00:28:00,010 --> 00:28:06,010 Our new development study includes that, but also the one that the attorney is looking 368 00:28:06,010 --> 00:28:06,270 at. 369 00:28:06,450 --> 00:28:11,750 The attorneys are aligning that with our former study since they started before the development 370 00:28:11,750 --> 00:28:13,410 of our pre-steaded son of us. 371 00:28:13,950 --> 00:28:18,890 So it is tied to enrollment of TK modernizing those areas 372 00:28:18,890 --> 00:28:23,170 and also tied to increased enrollment at WeMark, 373 00:28:23,370 --> 00:28:25,750 but that's going to be under the new study, 374 00:28:25,930 --> 00:28:27,250 not under our old study. 375 00:28:32,340 --> 00:28:33,020 What's up with you? 376 00:28:33,100 --> 00:28:33,520 What's up with you? 377 00:28:34,080 --> 00:28:34,920 What's up with you? 378 00:28:34,940 --> 00:28:35,480 Thank 379 00:28:38,100 --> 00:28:40,060 you for sharing. 380 00:28:40,500 --> 00:28:43,460 At this point, I would like to have this potter 381 00:28:43,460 --> 00:28:44,300 go up to the podium. 382 00:28:44,420 --> 00:28:45,580 You have a comment card for me. 383 00:28:45,780 --> 00:28:47,760 I would like to share more with us. 384 00:28:57,200 --> 00:29:02,740 My name is Shoshani Potter and I understand the superintendent is recommending this item 385 00:29:02,740 --> 00:29:08,620 you've tabled to March 4th and I need the board to understand clearly March 4th is 386 00:29:08,620 --> 00:29:14,700 the vendor confirmed last date to secure the summer to the 2026 installation. 387 00:29:15,560 --> 00:29:18,380 Tabling to that date is not a neutral delay. 388 00:29:19,120 --> 00:29:22,800 It's functionally a no vote on this playground in 2026. 389 00:29:22,800 --> 00:29:25,480 There's no margin for error on that date. 390 00:29:26,540 --> 00:29:28,200 This is a show already project. 391 00:29:28,680 --> 00:29:32,520 It's fully funded, legally compliant, and ready to break ground. 392 00:29:33,240 --> 00:29:37,680 Menobus to families has spent four years raising over $40,000. 393 00:29:37,940 --> 00:29:46,740 Our PTC has voted unanimously to contribute $48,582 as a gift in place. 394 00:29:46,740 --> 00:29:52,680 We've done the work, we're simply asking the board to approve this project before the installation window closes. 395 00:29:54,960 --> 00:29:59,980 Any of the state clearly for the record? Any reducing of... 396 00:30:00,000 --> 00:30:29,820 That budget. It's not a lower tier option. This would be a project failure. Our vendor has confirmed our current material to labor breakdown. The 184,307 in materials is just over the 50% of the total. Cutting the surfacing flips that ratio, pushing labor over 50% threshold, stripping the district of the same mass eligibility and triggering a mandatory 12 month public bidding 397 00:30:29,820 --> 00:30:36,040 cycle. So again, no playground in 2026. The superintendent has also acknowledged that the 398 00:30:36,040 --> 00:30:42,200 bathroom organization that was discussed would trigger a GSA review a six to 12 month process. 399 00:30:43,060 --> 00:30:48,380 We should not hold a show already community-funded playground hostage to a bathroom project 400 00:30:48,380 --> 00:30:54,300 that can't legally begin for a year. I'm asking you to approve them separately if bathrooms 401 00:30:54,300 --> 00:31:01,640 is still hard to legal to make. Two things that may come up which have been 402 00:31:01,640 --> 00:31:07,200 discussed. First on the budget I want to be clear on how we arrived we being 403 00:31:07,200 --> 00:31:13,080 the playground project ever arrived at the scope. Superintendent Fidley set 404 00:31:13,080 --> 00:31:17,880 the playground budget at 350,000 and just number and communicated that 405 00:31:17,880 --> 00:31:24,100 figure to me directly so that I could give our vineyards an accurate target to 406 00:31:24,100 --> 00:31:33,500 designed toward. Our current proposal came in under that at $342,856 pre-tax. This is not a 407 00:31:33,500 --> 00:31:38,480 community group asking for more than was planned. This is a project that Superintendent himself 408 00:31:38,480 --> 00:31:47,060 scoped and budgeted and is now being reduced essentially moving the goal post. Second, on the 409 00:31:47,060 --> 00:31:52,100 pending legal review, my understanding was that that review existed to determine whether the 410 00:31:52,100 --> 00:31:53,820 superintendents proposed diversion, 411 00:31:54,180 --> 00:31:58,640 staff rooms, fencing are legally compliant at use of fund 25. 412 00:31:59,500 --> 00:32:01,340 Again, we should not hold a fully vetted, 413 00:32:01,500 --> 00:32:03,640 seam mass-approved, playground hostage 414 00:32:03,640 --> 00:32:06,660 to a legal review of a completely different set of projects. 415 00:32:07,620 --> 00:32:09,980 I'd also ask the board to consider this. 416 00:32:10,560 --> 00:32:11,720 Throughout this process, 417 00:32:12,140 --> 00:32:14,780 the computing priorities have shifted from bathrooms 418 00:32:14,780 --> 00:32:17,800 and fencing to portables to classroom refurbishment. 419 00:32:18,280 --> 00:32:21,200 Whatever form they take, these are future projects. 420 00:32:22,720 --> 00:32:27,200 No design, no bid, no DSA approval, no timeline. 421 00:32:27,780 --> 00:32:31,380 The playground has all of these things right now, tonight. 422 00:32:32,600 --> 00:32:35,000 Ultimately, I want to remind the board of something simple. 423 00:32:35,100 --> 00:32:40,480 The families of Sierra Hills have voted with their time, their dollars, for four years in a 424 00:32:40,480 --> 00:32:40,760 row. 425 00:32:41,280 --> 00:32:41,980 They have shown up. 426 00:32:42,080 --> 00:32:42,940 They have raised money. 427 00:32:43,120 --> 00:32:44,300 They've fought for this playground. 428 00:32:44,760 --> 00:32:48,160 That is the clearest vote of confidence any project can have. 429 00:32:48,700 --> 00:32:50,280 I'm asking the board to honor that. 430 00:32:51,160 --> 00:32:57,440 We also have a legal duty here under the ADA and Section 504 in the district must approve 431 00:32:57,440 --> 00:33:00,380 an equivalent experience for students with disabilities. 432 00:33:00,600 --> 00:33:01,160 Excuse me. 433 00:33:01,400 --> 00:33:02,280 I hate to interrupt. 434 00:33:02,500 --> 00:33:05,360 It's just that with public comment, we can only allow for three minutes. 435 00:33:05,820 --> 00:33:12,660 So I will have to, I will have to go ahead and end your comment if there's someone else 436 00:33:12,660 --> 00:33:16,280 who would like to speak or go any time, then that's it. 437 00:33:16,540 --> 00:33:17,460 Can I give her my sign? 438 00:33:17,820 --> 00:33:17,980 Yes. 439 00:33:21,640 --> 00:33:27,880 We have a legal duty here, under the ADA and Section 504, this district must provide 440 00:33:27,880 --> 00:33:30,400 an equivalent experience for students with disabilities. 441 00:33:31,060 --> 00:33:33,400 Our playground is over 40 years old. 442 00:33:33,740 --> 00:33:38,680 It's a documented safety liability and a daily physical barrier for our most vulnerable 443 00:33:38,680 --> 00:33:39,400 students. 444 00:33:39,400 --> 00:33:43,440 functional bathrooms law useful are not an 88 barrier. 445 00:33:44,080 --> 00:33:47,480 The laws of clear removed barriers before adding amenities. 446 00:33:48,360 --> 00:33:50,880 This outdoor classroom was designed by our teachers 447 00:33:50,880 --> 00:33:55,980 to support student regulation at a time when programs and staff have been cut. 448 00:33:56,740 --> 00:33:59,660 I'm asking the board to approve the full project scope tonight 449 00:33:59,660 --> 00:34:03,260 as a standalone item to secure the installation window, 450 00:34:03,560 --> 00:34:07,540 honor four years of community work, and ensure that every child can play 451 00:34:07,540 --> 00:34:09,320 alongside their peers this August. 452 00:34:10,900 --> 00:34:16,220 I also have a letter that was signed by all of our T.K. and 453 00:34:16,220 --> 00:34:21,280 candlestats that I'd like to read, but teachers, I'm sorry, not just the staff. 454 00:34:22,200 --> 00:34:27,120 Dear trustees, we the undersigned educators are writing to express our urgent and 455 00:34:27,120 --> 00:34:31,020 unanimous support for the kindergarten playground modernization project as 456 00:34:31,020 --> 00:34:35,280 currently proposed. After four years of collaborative planning, this project 457 00:34:35,280 --> 00:34:40,020 represents the essential outdoor classroom required to support the development and safety needs 458 00:34:40,020 --> 00:34:45,880 of our youngest learners. When professional efficacy and classroom extension, the selected 459 00:34:45,880 --> 00:34:50,520 design including the toddler garden house created workshop and inclusive play zones was chosen 460 00:34:50,520 --> 00:34:55,720 with direct input from our teachers to serve as a high functioning extension of our indoor classrooms. 461 00:34:56,600 --> 00:35:02,200 Student regulation by creating distinct interest zones, the design reduces congestion 462 00:35:02,200 --> 00:35:07,600 and peer-to-peer conflict, allowing students to return to the classroom regulated and ready to learn. 463 00:35:08,340 --> 00:35:12,640 Social and emotional learning, the work stations are sensory-rich quiet zones provide 464 00:35:13,160 --> 00:35:17,220 useful environments for students to practice essential social-emotional skills. 465 00:35:18,240 --> 00:35:22,880 To safety, liability, and aging infrastructure, our current playground equipment is four years 466 00:35:22,880 --> 00:35:27,340 old, doubling its intended lifespan. While we understand that there are other campus needs, 467 00:35:27,340 --> 00:35:31,120 such as bathrooms and fencing, we must emphasize that liability. 468 00:35:31,940 --> 00:35:33,280 Addressing four-year-olds infrastructure 469 00:35:33,280 --> 00:35:34,740 is a safety and maintenance priority 470 00:35:34,740 --> 00:35:37,320 that must take precedence over amenities. 471 00:35:38,000 --> 00:35:39,340 Functionality. Our current bathrooms 472 00:35:39,340 --> 00:35:41,180 are located near feet from the yard 473 00:35:41,180 --> 00:35:42,760 and are fully functional. 474 00:35:43,000 --> 00:35:44,780 However, place structures are obsolete 475 00:35:44,780 --> 00:35:46,980 and present an ongoing safety risk. 476 00:35:48,100 --> 00:35:49,820 Three, the fiduciary risk of delay. 477 00:35:50,140 --> 00:35:52,480 We are concerned that diverting funds at this stage 478 00:35:52,480 --> 00:35:54,460 will force a project back to square one, 479 00:35:54,640 --> 00:35:56,220 reducing the budget or delaying the vote 480 00:35:56,220 --> 00:36:00,860 past the March 4th price-lock deadline will lead to a significant inflationary cost 481 00:36:00,860 --> 00:36:06,120 resulting in the district paying more for a smaller, less-effective play-grown next year. 482 00:36:06,700 --> 00:36:13,720 The PTC and the broader community have demonstrated their commitment with the $48,582.73 gift-in-place 483 00:36:13,720 --> 00:36:18,840 for the black top. We've urged the board tonight to honor that commitment and are professional 484 00:36:18,840 --> 00:36:24,340 leads by approving the full, this part I apologize isn't correct, but the amount for the project 485 00:36:24,340 --> 00:36:29,400 School tonight. Respectfully this year, it kills TK and Kendra Gordon's teaching staff 486 00:36:29,400 --> 00:36:34,340 and it's signed by all of the teachers and the TK and Kendra teachers and you have that 487 00:36:34,340 --> 00:36:42,180 in your path. Thank you. Are there additional public comments on this topic? 488 00:36:49,680 --> 00:36:56,240 Brie Austin or I just wanted to one thing you guys were bringing this back on agenda. As you 489 00:36:56,240 --> 00:37:01,780 heard Shoshani we are on a very tight deadline this might seem like a really 490 00:37:01,780 --> 00:37:08,360 rushed project for you. For us this is not this is four years of communication, 491 00:37:08,980 --> 00:37:15,780 of fundraising, of talking to families and asking them what they want. This I 492 00:37:15,780 --> 00:37:21,560 think is a perfect opportunity. We are in a phase in our district where things 493 00:37:21,560 --> 00:37:27,880 are not going how we want them to. This can change that. Yes, can we save all of our staff? No. 494 00:37:28,540 --> 00:37:34,920 Can we give our community an amazing playground to set forth a really great 495 00:37:35,520 --> 00:37:42,020 precedent of how amazing we are to increase enrollment? All of those things that we keep talking about, 496 00:37:42,460 --> 00:37:47,760 how we bring people in and how are we showing those people that are not in our district? How amazing 497 00:37:47,760 --> 00:37:50,660 and we are one better way than an amazing playground 498 00:37:50,660 --> 00:37:52,440 that everybody can see as they drive back. 499 00:37:53,780 --> 00:37:59,580 Also, I really am concerned that the safety issue 500 00:37:59,580 --> 00:38:00,820 has not been brought up more, 501 00:38:01,200 --> 00:38:03,660 and the fact that that playground is absolutely 502 00:38:04,400 --> 00:38:06,140 not ADA compliant at all. 503 00:38:07,240 --> 00:38:09,920 I think it's great that it hasn't been brought up, 504 00:38:10,200 --> 00:38:12,020 but I think it's only a matter of time 505 00:38:12,540 --> 00:38:14,880 that that is going to be a big issue. 506 00:38:14,880 --> 00:38:22,320 We have several children that cannot access our play structures, but we have children that 507 00:38:22,320 --> 00:38:25,420 have hurt themselves on those old play structures. 508 00:38:26,860 --> 00:38:33,440 So I would say we're kind of on borrowed time if you're looking at it in that regard. 509 00:38:33,780 --> 00:38:35,400 This should have happened years ago. 510 00:38:35,520 --> 00:38:40,700 If we're talking about upgrading things that are maybe five years old compared to upgrading 511 00:38:40,700 --> 00:38:42,340 things that are 40 years old. 512 00:38:42,340 --> 00:38:47,500 If not longer because that was essentially maybe moved from this playground, who knows 513 00:38:47,500 --> 00:38:49,080 how all the structures are. 514 00:38:49,680 --> 00:38:54,480 But I think the biggest issue is this is something that our community and our families have 515 00:38:54,480 --> 00:38:55,140 asked for. 516 00:38:55,440 --> 00:39:01,100 If you're asking me what's important that the board talks about, if we want people to attend 517 00:39:01,100 --> 00:39:06,940 our board meetings, we want buy-in from our community, taking a subject that started so 518 00:39:06,940 --> 00:39:12,920 small and the smallest little dream of a PTC to this amazing potential like 519 00:39:12,920 --> 00:39:16,840 that's what families want that is what is going to get people to be like wow 520 00:39:16,840 --> 00:39:22,000 our district is listening to what we're saying and we are asking to approve 521 00:39:22,000 --> 00:39:28,240 this playground thank you thank you there comment are there any additional 522 00:39:28,240 --> 00:39:30,260 on how but on the issue. 523 00:39:33,130 --> 00:39:34,210 You better push the button. 524 00:39:34,510 --> 00:39:34,650 Okay. 525 00:39:37,070 --> 00:39:39,550 So I'm Mark with Compan, the vendor. 526 00:39:39,750 --> 00:39:42,970 But is there something that I could provide as far as? 527 00:39:43,350 --> 00:39:45,370 You can bring the thing up a question. 528 00:39:45,690 --> 00:39:48,090 I mean as far as what the legal review. 529 00:39:49,010 --> 00:39:51,930 Is it something is there anything I'd provide or offer? 530 00:39:53,810 --> 00:39:55,410 More of what they're looking for. 531 00:39:55,730 --> 00:39:57,930 Do you know what they're looking for specifically? 532 00:40:01,590 --> 00:40:05,210 I'm Mark, I mean, you know, at this point, the date you sent you the email about, you 533 00:40:05,210 --> 00:40:09,810 know, just those, you, we, you got the information about the last bit, right? 534 00:40:09,950 --> 00:40:14,710 And so that that date I sent it on, I'm going to follow up with Garry, so literally, they're 535 00:40:14,710 --> 00:40:18,270 just, like they did the first time they were doing that line by line to make sure all, all 536 00:40:18,270 --> 00:40:20,850 the calculations, because they want to make sure it stands up to legal scrupping, because 537 00:40:20,850 --> 00:40:25,010 they're the, the other side of this is that maybe, you know, this and the flip-flip 538 00:40:25,010 --> 00:40:29,270 doesn't necessarily is if that gets challenged in the future and somebody says yeah you didn't use those 539 00:40:29,270 --> 00:40:32,710 you know for fees appropriately the district then becomes responsible for those fees and must pay 540 00:40:32,710 --> 00:40:37,270 those back so I'm gonna make sure that it would stand up for legal scrutiny and so we're just 541 00:40:38,670 --> 00:40:42,490 we're just trying to make sure because you know we put in my time the district then you know the time 542 00:40:42,490 --> 00:40:48,730 I've been in district 12 13 years we've done a CNS one other time project and I wasn't okay I was 543 00:40:48,730 --> 00:40:53,010 involved in whatsoever so we're just making sure it's it's not a it's not a project that we did 544 00:40:53,010 --> 00:40:58,210 a lot of. So it's not something where it's fluent in 10 years. You are, um, yeah. I'm 545 00:40:58,210 --> 00:41:06,430 like, I'm not in question for Mark, but should this, uh, should this go to the March 4th 546 00:41:06,430 --> 00:41:10,650 board meeting? You did, you did bear by with me that in March 4th day. So like that evening, 547 00:41:10,650 --> 00:41:17,410 if we shot you an email and said, yeah, to go, we, we would, we would be, we would guess. 548 00:41:17,410 --> 00:41:21,710 Yes. I understand. I understand skitter teeth. 549 00:41:22,010 --> 00:41:23,650 No, I'm just going to be very quick. 550 00:41:24,350 --> 00:41:24,970 Thank you. 551 00:41:25,010 --> 00:41:25,990 You're stern or Pacific. 552 00:41:28,850 --> 00:41:30,790 But I'm going to be very important. 553 00:41:31,270 --> 00:41:32,590 We're going to have a lot of fun. 554 00:41:33,810 --> 00:41:34,170 Are 555 00:41:37,440 --> 00:41:41,120 there more comments or questions on this item? 556 00:41:45,430 --> 00:41:53,890 You guys are going to have a lot of fun. 557 00:41:56,690 --> 00:42:06,390 So I mean, I feel a little bit uneasy just because of maybe how the process and how it's being presented is a little bit confusing. 558 00:42:07,130 --> 00:42:13,710 So normally if a project comes up, you know, we'll get information from the district. 559 00:42:14,010 --> 00:42:22,210 It will be in the board agenda and then there's a recommendation from the district about what action the district thinks we should take. 560 00:42:22,210 --> 00:42:29,950 And so knowing that we have some pot of these developer fees and it has, you know, restrictions 561 00:42:29,950 --> 00:42:36,070 on what it should be used for, I understand all of that, but, I mean, just in the letter, 562 00:42:36,210 --> 00:42:40,470 there's a couple things that fencing, which has also been brought up as a safety concern 563 00:42:40,470 --> 00:42:41,610 and as a priority. 564 00:42:41,890 --> 00:42:47,730 And we've had teachers and staff come talk about fencing, we afford to say that too. 565 00:42:47,730 --> 00:42:55,430 And so, but we could afford fencing before so like fencing has been brought up and then also the bathrooms. 566 00:42:55,930 --> 00:43:02,610 I guess I would fill a lot more comfortable with more information about the development fund. 567 00:43:02,950 --> 00:43:15,270 And if there's, there were other projects referred to, if there's like a list of what has been prioritized or what we're spending the money on and where this falls on that list for the developer fund. 568 00:43:15,270 --> 00:43:18,130 and then also what the district recommendation is, 569 00:43:18,270 --> 00:43:21,130 because right now we have the PTC, which I love, 570 00:43:21,530 --> 00:43:22,850 and I appreciate it very much, 571 00:43:23,010 --> 00:43:24,270 but they're coming forward, 572 00:43:24,490 --> 00:43:26,290 presenting this information to the board, 573 00:43:26,850 --> 00:43:28,870 but we're not getting a district recommendation. 574 00:43:29,830 --> 00:43:33,130 And so, like, this is district money, 575 00:43:33,490 --> 00:43:35,970 school district money that we have to spend, 576 00:43:36,150 --> 00:43:37,370 and I don't know what this is, 577 00:43:37,870 --> 00:43:41,790 the top priority project based on need and maintenance 578 00:43:41,790 --> 00:43:50,010 and or whatever projects are planned or we afford them all and then the other thing I guess is 579 00:43:50,010 --> 00:43:57,190 none of the costs were in the agenda at all and so we have a packet that was provided to us 580 00:43:57,190 --> 00:44:03,570 from the PTC which looks like it's helpful but it was waiting for us here tonight and none of it 581 00:44:03,570 --> 00:44:10,270 was put in the agenda for the public. So for us to spend that much money without it being in the 582 00:44:10,270 --> 00:44:19,230 agenda has like a transparency issue I think. And so I had no idea that there was, it was on the 583 00:44:19,230 --> 00:44:27,290 table to approved like 330,000 I think is what it is. I had no idea that was on the table tonight. 584 00:44:27,590 --> 00:44:35,750 I think it's even more. I think it's like 360 something. Okay, so the taxes. So I guess how it's come 585 00:44:35,750 --> 00:44:43,210 to us hasn't been the clear normal path. And so it's making me question what's going on. And why? 586 00:44:44,570 --> 00:44:51,930 And then I also have lots of questions about the funding from donations. And so I don't really 587 00:44:51,930 --> 00:44:56,790 know how this whole project's being funded. There's 48,000 from the TTC, 588 00:44:56,790 --> 00:44:59,550 360-360-S or so. 589 00:45:00,000 --> 00:45:16,720 We might be asked to fund, but I thought there was another donor out there. And like, what happens if that falls through? What's the status of that? Like, I feel like I need a breakdown of all the funds and whatever, where everything's coming from. I 590 00:45:20,530 --> 00:45:32,810 think that those are kind of the main things, but I feel uncomfortable with it right now. Not that I don't think it's a good project. If very well could be. I just, it's a lot of money. 591 00:45:32,810 --> 00:45:38,430 And I know this has been something that has been worked on for a long time and I really 592 00:45:38,430 --> 00:45:39,110 appreciate it. 593 00:45:39,150 --> 00:45:46,470 But we have to look at all of the district spending and our budget and so I just have some 594 00:45:46,470 --> 00:45:52,070 questions and concerns that I feel like I need some more comfort to feel good about this 595 00:45:52,070 --> 00:45:52,410 project. 596 00:45:56,780 --> 00:46:04,240 Echo, some of your sentiments, I honestly wasn't aware that this was a project that was 597 00:46:04,240 --> 00:46:11,760 going to come to the board with a request for a major amount of funding. I may have heard 598 00:46:11,760 --> 00:46:20,340 echoes of it as a PTC fundraisers and, you know, me not knowing how much a playground 599 00:46:20,340 --> 00:46:26,740 costs of like, okay, PTC is going to raise all the funds for a playground. So I wasn't aware 600 00:46:26,740 --> 00:46:31,780 that it was going to come before the board and tell, you know, as of the last couple of months. 601 00:46:31,780 --> 00:46:59,720 And it also makes me a little nervous because I also would like to have a little bit more transparency, I think, as to the amount that the district is being asked to spend and how those developed rupees could potentially be spent on things that are already addressed in some of our improvement plans and we have long term infrastructure plans that we've been looking at. 602 00:46:59,720 --> 00:47:06,700 we have been talking about safety items for years now and those have come before the board like 603 00:47:06,700 --> 00:47:07,180 fences. 604 00:47:09,240 --> 00:47:15,100 And so, and I totally recognize and understand that this particular item, 605 00:47:15,850 --> 00:47:22,420 we have an opportunity to have it funded under developer fees because we have a unique situation 606 00:47:22,420 --> 00:47:28,700 where we have an influx of students through our new TK program. That's not lost on me and I think 607 00:47:28,700 --> 00:47:34,620 it could be a great opportunity. I just want to make sure that we're currently vetting all 608 00:47:34,620 --> 00:47:41,680 opportunities and uses for development developer fees, maybe even type that in flux of students 609 00:47:41,680 --> 00:47:46,100 and that we are addressing the priorities that we've already set within our districts 610 00:47:47,520 --> 00:47:54,660 and meet those needs and this could be it but I don't know that I can I can't make the decision tonight 611 00:47:54,660 --> 00:48:04,820 not especially not about our legal team approving it, it's a big ask and I had heard you know 612 00:48:04,820 --> 00:48:10,540 I think in the last meeting and again tonight this is a publicly funded project but I you know 613 00:48:10,540 --> 00:48:15,640 14% of the project is coming from the public and the rest is coming from our developer fees. 614 00:48:16,120 --> 00:48:21,340 So this is a district funded project that we have to think pretty long and hard about 615 00:48:21,340 --> 00:48:24,380 whether or not it's the appropriate use of our funds, I think. 616 00:48:28,000 --> 00:48:30,240 Dr. Sandra, I have a couple of questions. 617 00:48:30,540 --> 00:48:37,020 So regarding the funds that exist, I hear that there's kind of two things that are in place. 618 00:48:37,020 --> 00:48:42,900 One, that was submitted because of the enrollment increase in ZK and then you've also 619 00:48:42,900 --> 00:48:48,160 sure that a separate proposal has gone forward with we more because of the increase in enrollment there. 620 00:48:48,600 --> 00:48:51,880 That's not tied to this current existing money that we're talking about. 621 00:48:52,100 --> 00:48:52,260 That's not. 622 00:48:52,260 --> 00:48:58,440 Okay. So based on that, are you able to share with the board? I personally don't even know 623 00:48:58,440 --> 00:49:03,980 how much total is in this fund. Are you able to share that? That was about $1.9 million. 624 00:49:04,600 --> 00:49:11,320 Okay. And all of that money, as it is currently written, is allocated specifically to the increase 625 00:49:11,320 --> 00:49:19,740 with TK? No. No. Okay. So is there a breakdown within that? So that part of money is district 626 00:49:19,740 --> 00:49:29,740 money. There can be spent, there can be spent for modernization and reconstruction or construction 627 00:49:29,740 --> 00:49:38,680 that is within the legal parameters of egg-coated government code. When we brought the idea 628 00:49:38,680 --> 00:49:47,140 of the finishing and the toilets and all of that, we've said no more than 500,000 miles for 629 00:49:47,140 --> 00:49:55,080 the whole thing. And that was the conversation that we brought to the board. At the time, I personally 630 00:49:55,080 --> 00:50:02,840 wasn't aware of anything else that was going on with the playground. I wasn't aware. And that was 631 00:50:02,840 --> 00:50:08,640 something that this would be intended. I had discussed good use for the funds if we could get it 632 00:50:08,640 --> 00:50:15,740 approved through legal and it was an alignment with ed code and government code. But the totality of the 633 00:50:15,740 --> 00:50:20,260 fun is that the discretion of the board in alignment with the people. 634 00:50:31,740 --> 00:50:34,220 Are there other board comments on this? 635 00:50:35,080 --> 00:50:39,620 I know we're going to, you know, it's going by legal and stuff that I think we're hearing about the, 636 00:50:40,200 --> 00:50:46,180 when you were talking about the standards about the uses of the fun that it was about, 637 00:50:46,260 --> 00:50:49,520 you know, cannot be used for routine or deferred maintenance. 638 00:50:50,260 --> 00:50:54,200 And I keep talking here in about it's a 40-year-old playground and my question is, 639 00:50:54,200 --> 00:50:57,680 This is just a pertinence that we've been doing all the time ago to get an obeying aid 640 00:50:57,680 --> 00:50:58,060 compliant. 641 00:50:58,860 --> 00:51:01,580 And is it something that we're not going to be able to get approved? 642 00:51:02,080 --> 00:51:03,660 That's why legal is looking at it. 643 00:51:04,160 --> 00:51:06,640 That is the purpose that we take you to legal. 644 00:51:07,140 --> 00:51:09,280 There's also another purpose that it goes to legal. 645 00:51:09,800 --> 00:51:13,720 Whenever funds 25 is used, it's highly audited and audited. 646 00:51:14,260 --> 00:51:22,000 And so the auditors want every single piece of documentation to support those funds that 647 00:51:22,000 --> 00:51:22,580 were spent. 648 00:51:22,580 --> 00:51:32,240 So it does have to go to legal. That's one piece they want to see, but they also want to make sure that the district has handled those funds with integrity. 649 00:51:32,580 --> 00:51:37,880 So there has to be a purchase order. It has to be district made because they are district funds. 650 00:51:51,190 --> 00:51:51,910 Yes, thanks. 651 00:51:57,770 --> 00:52:01,890 I'm going to do my best to address as many of those as possible. 652 00:52:02,070 --> 00:52:03,850 I think Dr. Sanders just addressed some of them. 653 00:52:04,750 --> 00:52:10,110 In December 10th, board meeting, we had our developer fees report to share with the board, 654 00:52:10,330 --> 00:52:13,290 and which shared the amount of money that was in our developer fees fund. 655 00:52:13,490 --> 00:52:15,970 But at the same time, there was also projects in there, 656 00:52:15,970 --> 00:52:22,450 for upcoming projects that we like to project and are basically two major, two categories 657 00:52:22,450 --> 00:52:26,530 of projects that we might hold as a visual performing arts projects and the Sierra Hills 658 00:52:26,530 --> 00:52:31,810 TKK, Sierra Hills TKKKK project. 659 00:52:32,530 --> 00:52:37,670 And so those are the two major projects that were proposed on that December 10th Board meeting. 660 00:52:38,410 --> 00:52:44,530 Would they cost, would they cost that we said to not exceed $500,000 of the almost $2 million 661 00:52:44,530 --> 00:52:45,870 dollars in the development of these funds. 662 00:52:47,170 --> 00:52:54,810 So once the board approved that, we sent that document to our legal to get it approved 663 00:52:54,810 --> 00:52:59,630 is does it meet the requirements of can we show increased enrollment, increased use 664 00:52:59,630 --> 00:53:04,050 of facilities, does it meet that scrutinization, is this a, is this deferred maintenance, is 665 00:53:04,050 --> 00:53:08,890 this a routine maintenance issue or is this a modernization and they did it and they sent 666 00:53:08,890 --> 00:53:14,450 back through their opinion and get it to the legal opinion that for the TK can require 667 00:53:14,450 --> 00:53:19,110 project for within that GKKinter project, we identified three specific 668 00:53:19,110 --> 00:53:25,470 spacing bathrooms and playgrounds. So within that whole project there, we identified 669 00:53:25,470 --> 00:53:30,010 those three things within it. So does it meet, does, do these projects meet that 670 00:53:30,010 --> 00:53:34,230 screenization? And they said it doesn't, does meet the screenization of it not being 671 00:53:34,230 --> 00:53:37,290 a deferred maintenance project. This would be a modernization of that playground. 672 00:53:37,650 --> 00:53:41,370 So, above all those. So we've got the criteria from our, from our, the open 673 00:53:41,370 --> 00:53:47,610 the legal standpoint for modernization on the TK-Kinder side of it. She said that she 674 00:53:47,610 --> 00:53:52,030 did not feel that our WIMAR Hills, the original performing arts project didn't need that 675 00:53:52,030 --> 00:53:57,030 scrutinization, so we were no longer pursuing that one because it just didn't need that 676 00:53:57,030 --> 00:54:01,590 scrutinization using those developer fee funds. What we were trying to demonstrate in terms 677 00:54:01,590 --> 00:54:06,410 of increased activity and use in that was not enough to meet those scrutinizations. 678 00:54:06,410 --> 00:54:12,270 So I'm just trying to go down all the questions I've been down on, and I think it's on the current. 679 00:54:13,030 --> 00:54:15,910 I think the current development, because the next one is in our next board meeting. 680 00:54:16,190 --> 00:54:18,930 So I'm just trying to speak to what we have done. 681 00:54:21,370 --> 00:54:26,430 As was stated by Trustee Harvey, and I quote, that, you know, Fencing has been something, 682 00:54:26,650 --> 00:54:29,550 I want to say, probably six years ago, that was brought up, and we were, 683 00:54:29,790 --> 00:54:33,590 it was right before COVID, is we were actually looking and we were walking sites 684 00:54:33,590 --> 00:54:36,950 to do more safety fencing and doing it at that time, 685 00:54:36,950 --> 00:54:39,270 then COVID hit and that shut that down a lot of funds 686 00:54:39,270 --> 00:54:41,070 that we're going to use for that got spent elsewhere. 687 00:54:41,670 --> 00:54:44,530 So the fact that, and that was coming out of our ESR fund, 688 00:54:44,750 --> 00:54:45,830 no, that was pre- ESR. 689 00:54:46,030 --> 00:54:48,150 So that was just coming out of general funds we had funds. 690 00:54:48,790 --> 00:54:51,170 And so since then, you know, we've used funds in other ways. 691 00:54:51,410 --> 00:54:52,230 We've not had to do that. 692 00:54:52,910 --> 00:54:54,750 And with our budget where it's at, you know, 693 00:54:54,770 --> 00:54:57,530 we just not have the ability to spend an extra $50,000 694 00:54:57,530 --> 00:54:59,270 on fencing and a site. 695 00:54:59,350 --> 00:55:02,130 So the fact that we could use and develop a fee for this 696 00:55:02,130 --> 00:55:06,310 was a great opportunity to do a project that the board's been looking to do for, you know, 697 00:55:06,550 --> 00:55:09,470 six, seven years, six years, one and six years now. 698 00:55:10,330 --> 00:55:13,570 So that was a part of why that was put in there and saying, you know, it can be part of 699 00:55:13,570 --> 00:55:17,610 that, but the revitalization piece or that modernization of bringing safety piece for our 700 00:55:17,610 --> 00:55:19,350 little, into that project as well. 701 00:55:20,530 --> 00:55:23,770 The cost not being in the agenda was done purposefully. 702 00:55:24,290 --> 00:55:28,350 It was a thoughtful choice of mine because it had not yet been approved by legal counsel. 703 00:55:28,450 --> 00:55:31,410 I didn't want to give the perception that this was already approved and I was ready to 704 00:55:31,410 --> 00:55:37,550 ago. My purpose in there was it had the information about the action this little bit of look at, 705 00:55:38,090 --> 00:55:41,790 but we were waiting for legal counsel and I'm trying to give it to as far as I could that I did not 706 00:55:41,790 --> 00:55:47,530 and I mean I did share it with this moderate and she she you know and before that I'm going to 707 00:55:47,530 --> 00:55:52,510 recommend that this did not be voted on tonight because when I could make a conscious say that you 708 00:55:52,510 --> 00:55:58,330 had time to review the full proposal and just a few hours before we received it. I have an email 709 00:55:58,790 --> 00:56:03,570 Today, if I don't get back tomorrow, I'm going to do a phone call again just to see where 710 00:56:03,570 --> 00:56:06,970 that is and then what we can expect for a timeline to get that back from legal counsel. 711 00:56:07,190 --> 00:56:10,450 So I did purposely not include it for that reason. 712 00:56:10,490 --> 00:56:14,010 So I did not want to give a perception that this is good, it's already no report whatsoever. 713 00:56:15,590 --> 00:56:18,710 And then I would have had it ready for me and I would have updated the community through 714 00:56:18,710 --> 00:56:19,490 our board of genus. 715 00:56:19,890 --> 00:56:23,390 I know we tried to have all our documentation on our genus before we put them out, but I 716 00:56:23,390 --> 00:56:25,910 and not want to have misleading information or it's like 717 00:56:25,910 --> 00:56:27,150 that wasn't fully ready. 718 00:56:32,940 --> 00:56:33,560 So the 719 00:56:35,640 --> 00:56:39,160 ADA compliance piece that it knows, 720 00:56:39,780 --> 00:56:43,160 I mean, there's some validity to those as terms of, 721 00:56:43,160 --> 00:56:45,400 we've had to cut barriers into our, 722 00:56:45,800 --> 00:56:48,040 cut the holes into the barriers that go around that playground 723 00:56:48,040 --> 00:56:49,720 to allow for mobility pieces. 724 00:56:50,360 --> 00:56:52,100 The bark that's in there was actually replaced 725 00:56:52,100 --> 00:56:55,560 seven, eight years ago to bring it to an ADA compliance. 726 00:56:55,560 --> 00:57:01,360 You know, it's not ideal, ideal, but it is, it still does it, it does bring that, it brings that up. 727 00:57:01,740 --> 00:57:05,120 But again, the welds on some of that equipment is probably older than I am. 728 00:57:05,660 --> 00:57:10,740 That's not lost on some of the equipment, came from plaster holes in the welds until that equipment is older than I am. 729 00:57:12,860 --> 00:57:15,740 You talk about the money, the developer's fees, how much is total in there. 730 00:57:18,960 --> 00:57:23,960 And then I think part of the reason this is feeling to use words here is that that rushed 731 00:57:23,960 --> 00:57:29,740 or that just such a short time frame that turned around is we only got access to this project 732 00:57:29,740 --> 00:57:32,000 in those developer speeds in December, you know. 733 00:57:32,100 --> 00:57:36,520 So it was one of those pieces where we were approached by PTC and had some great conversations 734 00:57:36,520 --> 00:57:40,840 like, you know, they were talking about using prop 2 money, which doesn't fit our needs. 735 00:57:41,140 --> 00:57:45,040 It was able to make work and so it's like happy to make this flush and I said, well you 736 00:57:45,040 --> 00:57:50,180 know, we are looking at our, because we don't know that with county, um, financial 737 00:57:50,180 --> 00:57:53,260 people, and they share with us some of the different ways that other counties are 738 00:57:53,260 --> 00:57:56,460 accessing their development, under other school districts are accessing their 739 00:57:56,460 --> 00:58:00,020 development fees, and not looking at total enrollment population, but we have specific, 740 00:58:00,380 --> 00:58:05,140 like small portions of population enrollment, which was like, okay, that does, that is 741 00:58:05,140 --> 00:58:09,940 something that we're, that we're seeing is like a special ticket going from 20 to 40 742 00:58:09,940 --> 00:58:12,460 We've been on 65 over a year, a period of five years. 743 00:58:13,260 --> 00:58:15,960 That's a significant increase, and a significant drop in age. 744 00:58:16,060 --> 00:58:17,600 And this was shared glass board meeting in Illinois. 745 00:58:18,240 --> 00:58:21,620 We now are having, it used to just have to serve some four, 746 00:58:21,760 --> 00:58:24,280 but mostly five year olds, but now it's serving some three year old, 747 00:58:24,300 --> 00:58:26,420 you know, four or five year old students. 748 00:58:26,940 --> 00:58:31,060 So, since we only got that access to that money, 749 00:58:31,940 --> 00:58:35,120 that makes us feel more rushed because it was something that, 750 00:58:35,220 --> 00:58:36,840 you know, PTC has been looking at, I mean, 751 00:58:36,840 --> 00:58:40,320 I mean, this is the $40, $40 plus thousand of those dollars 752 00:58:40,320 --> 00:58:42,980 in from two years of John DeFonts. 753 00:58:43,320 --> 00:58:45,000 So this is something that they've been trying to look at 754 00:58:45,000 --> 00:58:47,220 for years, and I was in a, 755 00:58:47,480 --> 00:58:49,300 I'll use, I'll blame myself, but in I evitate 756 00:58:49,300 --> 00:58:51,180 in terms of cost of playgrounds. 757 00:58:51,420 --> 00:58:54,020 You know, like, oh, hey, you know, $40,000 a year, 758 00:58:54,140 --> 00:58:56,160 $40,000 next year, we're buying a new playground. 759 00:58:56,780 --> 00:58:58,600 You know, and then they install one of the park, 760 00:58:58,680 --> 00:58:59,680 you can start talking to people, 761 00:58:59,700 --> 00:59:00,980 you start looking at catalogs, you go, 762 00:59:01,620 --> 00:59:03,080 I can afford like a very good round. 763 00:59:03,440 --> 00:59:03,820 You get a problem. 764 00:59:03,980 --> 00:59:05,380 You think so, don't really behave like a, 765 00:59:05,380 --> 00:59:09,300 This is going to take a lot more in a lot of different pieces and obviously we don't have 766 00:59:09,300 --> 00:59:11,160 a general fund that can do that. 767 00:59:11,600 --> 00:59:17,000 For example, another look at this aspect is look at movements right now, like the school 768 00:59:17,000 --> 00:59:17,500 district there. 769 00:59:17,960 --> 00:59:22,120 They had a big community development that's being built, like they're building a whole 770 00:59:22,120 --> 00:59:22,620 development. 771 00:59:22,820 --> 00:59:27,720 So they're actually, they're landlords right now, they're getting a whole new school because 772 00:59:27,720 --> 00:59:31,860 of this huge influx of students because they get into that, but it's to meet that need 773 00:59:31,860 --> 00:59:32,640 of students, right? 774 00:59:32,640 --> 00:59:38,040 We can't meet the population that we're going to be projected to have to serve. 775 00:59:38,940 --> 00:59:43,460 So we are having bigger population out on our TK, and that's what this is doing is to 776 00:59:43,460 --> 00:59:45,820 help serve that population. 777 00:59:47,040 --> 00:59:53,800 But there is an incentive that we, as a board, or I think comment, or even a PCC, can do 778 00:59:53,800 --> 00:59:59,680 about, there is that window, just as we did with our solar and our solar environment. 779 01:00:01,720 --> 01:00:29,560 There are some timelines. If you want to get it installed by a day, you've got to have it accrued by a day. If you want to get this time by a day, you've got to get this accrued by a day. So there's a rush or there's not. There's the other side of whatever happens to that decision. So I think I think I played on project. I'm fully supportive. You asked for a district recommendation. I'm fully in support of it. We've already been in communication with some other builders to look at possible costs. 780 01:00:29,560 --> 01:00:32,760 of fencing possible costs like just round numbers 781 01:00:33,660 --> 01:00:35,680 of bathrooms not that it's directly. 782 01:00:36,000 --> 01:00:38,260 It indirectly affects this because I need to know that 783 01:00:38,920 --> 01:00:42,200 within the other $137,000 that is left 784 01:00:42,200 --> 01:00:45,860 in that $500,000 can I get the, 785 01:00:46,040 --> 01:00:48,460 what I envision is the bathroom needs that's needed 786 01:00:48,460 --> 01:00:51,000 over there and can I get the, 787 01:00:51,100 --> 01:00:53,040 and the fencing that has been a district priority 788 01:00:53,040 --> 01:00:55,740 for safety for six plus years. 789 01:00:56,600 --> 01:00:58,020 And so making sure that that can fit in there. 790 01:00:58,020 --> 01:01:05,020 So, I think it'll be tight, but I think the fact that we don't have the Walmart project in there, I think it is something that is doable. 791 01:01:05,740 --> 01:01:09,580 We're talking about maintenance, you know, the things as well. 792 01:01:11,100 --> 01:01:15,840 So, that's where we're planning. We're scheduling any walkthrough, purchasing, just to get, like, again, an idea. 793 01:01:16,700 --> 01:01:26,140 I have, I have our aims to back and forth with a company that does pre-built, set in place, bathrooms, that way you just connect electricity, connect to it. 794 01:01:26,140 --> 01:01:29,700 The difference between the bathroom center there, currently, and the bathroom center, we're 795 01:01:29,700 --> 01:01:34,300 projecting is right now the bathrooms are on the outside, like the external bathrooms 796 01:01:34,300 --> 01:01:34,860 are outside. 797 01:01:35,100 --> 01:01:35,700 You have to go around. 798 01:01:35,780 --> 01:01:37,360 We don't have our t-cares in danger of that. 799 01:01:37,460 --> 01:01:41,980 They go into this classroom to use the restrooms, which could possibly take eyes off the 800 01:01:41,980 --> 01:01:42,280 yard. 801 01:01:42,940 --> 01:01:47,680 And if that's not what happened anymore, when we're on recess, we send them directly to the 802 01:01:47,680 --> 01:01:47,980 bathroom. 803 01:01:48,580 --> 01:01:54,400 I used to call the first name of the bathroom, so they're further away, and part of the TK, 804 01:01:54,400 --> 01:01:58,240 And fortunately in the classroom we have TK size that one because that's a part of 805 01:01:58,240 --> 01:02:01,200 the code now that we have type of facilities that need the size requirements. 806 01:02:02,380 --> 01:02:06,680 So this would lower how I envision this as it goes in the grass between the two buildings. 807 01:02:07,000 --> 01:02:12,640 And it directly opens onto the playground so there's not that gap of sitting around it directly. 808 01:02:12,880 --> 01:02:14,220 It opens on to where the playground would be. 809 01:02:14,600 --> 01:02:19,840 But again, I'm not I'm not tying those up any of these three together and it is correct that 810 01:02:19,840 --> 01:02:24,840 know with these other projects, it could trigger DSA looking at it and know other ADA increments. 811 01:02:25,440 --> 01:02:30,440 It doesn't have that, and I'm not expecting it. I the part that is affecting me in this is 812 01:02:30,440 --> 01:02:34,540 I'm looking at the total budget size of it and making sure that I feel comfortable with that. 813 01:02:34,760 --> 01:02:38,720 And so I love this, I really love the process that gone through to put it together, 814 01:02:39,000 --> 01:02:42,520 the input that they've sought, they've reached out to multiple vendors, you know, they've gotten 815 01:02:42,520 --> 01:02:44,260 and perform a lot of different sources. 816 01:02:44,700 --> 01:02:47,340 So, you know, it is a lot of money to do, 817 01:02:47,560 --> 01:02:50,140 and it's a $300,000, $60,000 piece, 818 01:02:50,580 --> 01:02:52,860 but it's coming also out of a bunch that's $1.9 million. 819 01:02:53,400 --> 01:02:56,540 It could be, you know, you could go over that $500,000, 820 01:02:56,640 --> 01:02:57,560 you know, with like change order, 821 01:02:57,760 --> 01:02:59,540 and you would be allowed to, you're not limited 822 01:02:59,540 --> 01:03:01,500 to that $500,000, I'm not asking you to. 823 01:03:02,380 --> 01:03:04,400 I'm just stating that as a fact. 824 01:03:06,120 --> 01:03:07,740 So, I died in the fight, 825 01:03:07,880 --> 01:03:09,720 and if you guys wanna look at your list of questions, 826 01:03:09,720 --> 01:03:12,580 if I get the dressing, I try to get through them all, it's perfect. 827 01:03:13,160 --> 01:03:18,680 Yeah, I just had a follow-up question. I know that our last meeting we did have a conversation 828 01:03:18,680 --> 01:03:24,780 that there was a potential community member who was looking to donate some money and I'm just 829 01:03:24,780 --> 01:03:30,400 curious in terms of the amount of money if there's a cap like where that stands. 830 01:03:32,000 --> 01:03:36,840 So, I'm not the one who's been in directly communication with that. I was in an early 831 01:03:36,840 --> 01:03:41,100 communication. There's been other direct communication outside. We've not been able to get something 832 01:03:41,100 --> 01:03:46,640 in writing that says we will, we will. But they already certain amount, they're doing certain 833 01:03:46,640 --> 01:03:52,940 amount. When I did reach out to the PTC and said if we had to fund it at a lower level, would 834 01:03:52,940 --> 01:03:57,580 that person be willing to? And I'm just going to summarize the words and you tell me if I'm wrong, 835 01:03:57,580 --> 01:04:01,660 but basically that was a bigger amount than they were expecting. But they're still working through 836 01:04:01,660 --> 01:04:04,980 like PG&E contacts in their own piece 837 01:04:04,980 --> 01:04:08,520 to want to fill a gap, but there's a gap. 838 01:04:08,680 --> 01:04:10,360 But we don't have anything specific in writing 839 01:04:10,360 --> 01:04:12,620 that would say that they will absolutely do it. 840 01:04:12,740 --> 01:04:16,060 So at this point, besides what PTC is already there, 841 01:04:16,180 --> 01:04:18,400 you guys already committed to this project. 842 01:04:19,060 --> 01:04:22,520 As you stated, it would be ages to maybe $5.25 843 01:04:23,140 --> 01:04:23,900 of funded project. 844 01:04:26,680 --> 01:04:29,160 And we've heard tonight, legal data 845 01:04:29,160 --> 01:04:35,080 prove the playground it met the criteria for modernization. So what is with legal currently 846 01:04:35,080 --> 01:04:42,700 is the use of the CMAS contract and is that correct? The specific bit itself doesn't meet the, 847 01:04:43,020 --> 01:04:50,740 there has to be a 51, 49% you know difference of materials versus labor and how to have it and 848 01:04:50,740 --> 01:04:56,220 that's how the majority and the way and how I understand it and again the spake speak this but the way 849 01:04:56,220 --> 01:05:01,680 it was explained to me and I understood it was the way the chunk of it was grouped, specifically 850 01:05:01,680 --> 01:05:07,920 the ground covering, made it appear at least that there was a labor went up more like 64, 851 01:05:08,200 --> 01:05:14,800 it was a 64, and the labor side of it. So it was re-explained and put out and basically 852 01:05:14,800 --> 01:05:19,320 read that. So we just have been having the bid in front of them again just to make sure that 853 01:05:19,320 --> 01:05:23,920 they're going lie down in my lie, I am making sure that it matches with the CMS contract 854 01:05:23,920 --> 01:05:30,480 again and meets those criteria. But if the CVS itself is in my limited knowledge is not the issue, 855 01:05:30,480 --> 01:05:34,720 it's just making sure that the bid meets the requirements of being a CMS which allows you to 856 01:05:34,720 --> 01:05:39,220 bypass some bidding processes and piggyback and doing all that kind of stuff. 857 01:05:39,740 --> 01:05:48,600 Okay, so we're waiting on Neagle to review what we've submitted under the CMS to ensure that we're 858 01:05:48,600 --> 01:05:53,000 submitting it correctly and it follows the correct criteria. That is correct. 859 01:05:53,000 --> 01:05:53,580 Okay. 860 01:05:57,090 --> 01:06:03,530 I would like to make a motion. I appreciate you answering a lot of 861 01:06:03,530 --> 01:06:08,090 those questions because that solved a lot of the questions that I had really 862 01:06:08,090 --> 01:06:13,990 good to this project. I would like to make a motion that's the board approved 863 01:06:13,990 --> 01:06:22,030 this project pending legal review meaning if legal comes back and says what we 864 01:06:22,030 --> 01:06:28,650 have submitted, meets the criteria that we need under CMAS, then we can go ahead and 865 01:06:28,650 --> 01:06:32,390 move forward, and then we don't have to be up against it at length. So my 866 01:06:32,390 --> 01:06:37,630 motion would be to approve, so long as legal approves the contract, that's 867 01:06:43,410 --> 01:06:55,590 So my concern is the amount of involvement that the district has not had in a project. 868 01:06:56,670 --> 01:07:00,550 So I love the project and I support the project. 869 01:07:00,930 --> 01:07:05,330 But it does need to be a lot more hands on with the district. 870 01:07:05,330 --> 01:07:12,330 So, I understand that you have a vendor that you can order from, well nothing should 871 01:07:12,330 --> 01:07:13,750 be followed without a purchase order. 872 01:07:14,590 --> 01:07:19,950 I understand that PTC has funds that they're willing to donate, the money needs to be donated 873 01:07:19,950 --> 01:07:22,790 upon approval of the project once legal comes back. 874 01:07:23,210 --> 01:07:25,010 It doesn't need to be just sitting out there. 875 01:07:25,490 --> 01:07:30,490 So if we are going to move forward with the project pending legal approval, then there are 876 01:07:30,490 --> 01:07:32,670 other things that need to happen as well. 877 01:07:32,670 --> 01:07:38,690 And some things we can get, like, stick it in insurance, and we can get that link all 878 01:07:38,690 --> 01:07:38,970 of that. 879 01:07:39,090 --> 01:07:44,590 But I'm really concerned that the district needs to have a really more involved effort 880 01:07:45,310 --> 01:07:49,330 in the project and not be so much in the background. 881 01:07:50,070 --> 01:07:51,710 And we say, like, a purchase order. 882 01:07:51,930 --> 01:07:52,950 I mean, they approved it. 883 01:07:53,030 --> 01:07:57,290 And like, we came back and said it and said, yes, we couldn't just develop a purchase order 884 01:07:57,290 --> 01:07:59,150 then because there are other meat. 885 01:07:59,150 --> 01:08:06,150 So I'll just say what you said so the legal says it's okay that's fine, but a 886 01:08:06,150 --> 01:08:12,390 purchaser because of the cost of it and our processes and policies that we 887 01:08:12,390 --> 01:08:18,590 have in place in the industry, if it's more than $500, it provokes a 888 01:08:18,590 --> 01:08:23,950 purchaser and it is. So for whatever it is that needs to be ordered, it needs to be 889 01:08:25,210 --> 01:08:29,690 communicated to the district so that the district can issue a purchase or a 890 01:08:29,690 --> 01:08:33,170 purchase order is a promise to pay if you order something without a purchase 891 01:08:33,170 --> 01:08:37,690 order the district is not obligated to pay for. So that's all I'm saying. Like we 892 01:08:37,690 --> 01:08:41,050 need to know what we're paying for 100% of the time. 893 01:08:43,670 --> 01:08:44,310 Does it make sense? 894 01:08:47,570 --> 01:08:54,390 Honestly no. So I'm a little confused because I know that we have had many 895 01:08:54,390 --> 01:09:00,750 projects. I'll go to HVAC, for example, right. HVAC came to us as a proposed cost, but I don't 896 01:09:00,750 --> 01:09:07,250 know how much each white, you know, I saw estimates, but I don't know how much each line, bold, 897 01:09:07,710 --> 01:09:16,170 nut, unit cost, right? And when we make the motion here to move forward with the project we knew, 898 01:09:16,170 --> 01:09:21,090 it's going to cost us X number of dollars, right? Which is the same thing that we have here. 899 01:09:21,090 --> 01:09:31,450 So, what I understand is that the board would make a motion to move forward with an expenditure 900 01:09:31,450 --> 01:09:42,670 of $342,856 plus tax and then we would move forward based on that motion, get the purchase 901 01:09:42,670 --> 01:09:47,990 order, sign the contract, do all of that, but the board has already approved the district 902 01:09:47,990 --> 01:09:56,550 administration to do that option. So I am confused when David asks you is that 903 01:09:56,550 --> 01:10:01,150 what we need to move forward and you're saying no what do we need that. So what 904 01:10:01,150 --> 01:10:04,210 I'm saying you're correct. Okay I think we said the same thing say that differently. 905 01:10:04,750 --> 01:10:12,190 So what I would not want the vendor to place an order without a purchase order from 906 01:10:12,190 --> 01:10:17,510 the district. That's all I'm saying. That's it. That's it. So the border proves it but 907 01:10:17,510 --> 01:10:20,210 But I wouldn't want the benefit to say, okay, the board is approved, let's just go forward. 908 01:10:20,650 --> 01:10:22,690 It needs to come through the proper search and the check. 909 01:10:23,410 --> 01:10:24,850 I don't think so. 910 01:10:25,030 --> 01:10:25,550 I don't think so. 911 01:10:25,650 --> 01:10:26,190 I got it. 912 01:10:26,490 --> 01:10:26,890 I got it. 913 01:10:27,290 --> 01:10:33,190 So my question right looking at you is now they approved this, if you, I'm not even saying 914 01:10:33,190 --> 01:10:35,570 this project is going to approve, you know, and there's a lot of people that talk. 915 01:10:36,030 --> 01:10:44,950 But let's say they, they make this, you, we have the line item who order, right, right, 916 01:10:45,790 --> 01:10:51,470 we have all this and it's up. If they do that tonight, we hear back from legal tonight. 917 01:10:51,690 --> 01:10:57,270 So tomorrow, and we have email, we're good to know, with that, you could build a purchase 918 01:10:57,270 --> 01:11:01,310 order, correct, that we could sign, and then we would send to the vendor and that's what 919 01:11:01,310 --> 01:11:02,170 that would be. 920 01:11:02,330 --> 01:11:05,030 So the vendor use will give us a pay-up, you know what a pay-up means, right? 921 01:11:07,330 --> 01:11:08,650 You may call it invoice. 922 01:11:09,010 --> 01:11:09,470 Yeah, okay. 923 01:11:09,470 --> 01:11:18,330 So projects, projects that you can't know, project usually come in pay applications usually like like the big project that we did with solar and the hands. 924 01:11:18,990 --> 01:11:20,570 So the usually vendor gives us a pay up. 925 01:11:20,710 --> 01:11:24,330 We ensure a purchase order off the pay up or invoice whatever you want to call it. 926 01:11:24,510 --> 01:11:34,470 But yes, it is a process that happens along with an approved maximum amount unless there's a change that has to come back to the board for proof. 927 01:11:34,970 --> 01:11:38,930 So, yes, you're saying the same thing, it's just, I didn't want to give the impression that 928 01:11:38,930 --> 01:11:42,830 it's okay to go ahead and start ordering without a purchaser. 929 01:11:43,570 --> 01:11:45,510 Very tight with this, which is good. 930 01:11:45,710 --> 01:11:46,210 That's just fair. 931 01:11:46,530 --> 01:11:50,070 I like it when you've got my eyes and cross my teeth, that's good. 932 01:11:51,790 --> 01:11:53,950 All right, so we have a motion that's been made. 933 01:11:54,030 --> 01:11:55,470 I just wanted to share with the board. 934 01:11:55,630 --> 01:12:03,690 I believe that the total with tax is 360,000, 56,000, so just putting that out there. 935 01:12:03,690 --> 01:12:07,990 Is there a second to testing Harvey's promotion? 936 01:12:09,470 --> 01:12:12,870 I'm not writing a second, but I do have additional comment and 937 01:12:12,870 --> 01:12:15,090 session like before you do the roll call, please. 938 01:12:15,810 --> 01:12:15,910 Okay. 939 01:12:19,420 --> 01:12:26,220 I think I feel like Mr. Figley answered a lot of my questions, too. 940 01:12:27,880 --> 01:12:32,480 I think what I'm still feeling held up about is I don't feel like this was 941 01:12:32,480 --> 01:12:38,740 ready for approval tonight. And like what Mr. Figgley had said, he doesn't need to put the cost 942 01:12:38,740 --> 01:12:45,060 in the agenda on purpose. And it sounds like a good project, having the comfort of district 943 01:12:45,060 --> 01:12:50,340 involvement and a district recommendation on the agenda, saying that district recommends 944 01:12:50,340 --> 01:12:56,720 approval of this is more in line with everything else we approve. And I feel like I need that 945 01:12:56,720 --> 01:13:02,120 backing, but it's the main thing is the cost. We did not have that in the agenda at all, 946 01:13:02,600 --> 01:13:09,580 and so I don't feel like that is just for transparency purposes. I would feel more comfortable 947 01:13:09,580 --> 01:13:11,400 if we waited. 948 01:13:13,900 --> 01:13:20,380 It's not a project at all. Just for the correct process, I feel like we would still 949 01:13:20,380 --> 01:13:24,060 We'll make it through the next board meeting, which is next week. 950 01:13:27,640 --> 01:13:30,140 We're going back to the motion at hand. 951 01:13:30,180 --> 01:13:36,780 Is there someone who would like to second the existing motion that Trustee Harvey has put in place? 952 01:13:40,960 --> 01:13:43,840 Would someone instead like to amend the motion? 953 01:13:45,540 --> 01:13:46,880 We don't have a second. 954 01:13:47,960 --> 01:13:48,740 It just fails. 955 01:13:48,740 --> 01:13:49,320 It just fails. 956 01:13:49,600 --> 01:13:49,880 Okay. 957 01:13:52,220 --> 01:13:53,980 Would someone like to create a new motion? 958 01:13:54,860 --> 01:13:56,520 I will make a motion to table this 959 01:13:56,520 --> 01:13:58,920 until the next board meeting. 960 01:13:59,820 --> 01:14:02,020 Okay, so second floor is back to motion. 961 01:14:13,490 --> 01:14:16,810 Is there, if there's something missing from that 962 01:14:16,810 --> 01:14:18,330 that you guys want to see, let me know. 963 01:14:18,770 --> 01:14:20,250 I'm open to amending it. 964 01:14:20,530 --> 01:14:22,630 Do we, yeah, or maybe we need to have more discussion. 965 01:14:23,050 --> 01:14:23,550 I think we may. 966 01:14:23,690 --> 01:14:24,450 Like we're not moving. 967 01:14:24,730 --> 01:14:26,530 So like we're still using some conversation. 968 01:14:26,830 --> 01:14:29,050 And I definitely don't disagree 969 01:14:29,050 --> 01:14:46,110 that there's a transparency issue here with the not being in the agenda, and that's, that's my one sticking point from moving forward with the motion tonight, and I don't know what, I don't know exactly, you know, how to, how to move beyond that. 970 01:14:46,230 --> 01:14:53,410 And I also don't want to put us in a position where we're not approving a project that we shouldn't be forward with if we so choose. 971 01:14:53,410 --> 01:14:59,970 That being said, it does sound to me like if we did table it. 972 01:15:00,500 --> 01:15:15,740 Today, next week, and we approved it next week, so if we chose, that we could still get the order in, that it's going to our teeth, and still be okay for this year. And so, 973 01:15:17,760 --> 01:15:27,400 I think we should prep all purposes of transparency, probably table it for next week and make sure that we do things properly. 974 01:15:34,600 --> 01:15:37,900 All right, so we have a second at this point. 975 01:15:38,220 --> 01:15:49,460 I am going to do a role call for this motion, which is again to pay all this to our Wednesday 976 01:15:49,460 --> 01:15:53,820 March, Wednesday meeting for discussion and action to be honest. 977 01:15:54,740 --> 01:16:01,400 Um, I will start our roll call vote on this and um, Trustee Lopez is I, Trustee Anderson. 978 01:16:01,980 --> 01:16:02,520 All right. 979 01:16:03,160 --> 01:16:03,920 Trustee Harvey. 980 01:16:04,180 --> 01:16:04,340 Hi. 981 01:16:05,000 --> 01:16:05,780 Trustee Calvis. 982 01:16:06,080 --> 01:16:06,220 Hi. 983 01:16:06,700 --> 01:16:07,740 And Trustee McIntyre. 984 01:16:08,100 --> 01:16:08,260 It 985 01:16:11,170 --> 01:16:11,670 doesn't really matter. 986 01:16:13,890 --> 01:16:14,830 On the stage. 987 01:16:14,950 --> 01:16:15,610 Oh, please. 988 01:16:16,190 --> 01:16:16,710 Yeah. 989 01:16:16,810 --> 01:16:17,550 Just written the thing. 990 01:16:17,710 --> 01:16:18,170 We said that. 991 01:16:18,330 --> 01:16:18,570 Okay. 992 01:16:18,670 --> 01:16:19,090 We do that. 993 01:16:19,690 --> 01:16:21,410 All right. 994 01:16:21,530 --> 01:16:23,070 So motion passes. 995 01:16:23,070 --> 01:16:25,750 is four votes and one. 996 01:16:27,070 --> 01:16:28,090 I have a sentence. 997 01:16:29,930 --> 01:16:31,170 Thank you. 998 01:16:31,510 --> 01:16:38,340 We will go ahead and move on to item eight in our agenda, which is board pending comments. 999 01:16:38,830 --> 01:16:40,930 Do any board members have comments? 1000 01:16:41,950 --> 01:16:42,190 I do. 1001 01:16:42,930 --> 01:16:50,290 For our March 4th meeting or next meeting, I'd like to request, I believe, our second interim is going to be in the agenda. 1002 01:16:50,290 --> 01:17:11,530 And I'd like to request on the second interim presentation that we have numbers that not only reflect what of course we have already loaded on which are the layoffs, but I would like to see a second interim report if the rest of the board members also would like to see it with some different perspectives. 1003 01:17:11,530 --> 01:17:35,910 So if we could get a second interim report showing one wellness employee brought back in and then I would like to see another one showing wellness one wellness and one library FTE brought back in and then I'd like to see a report with all of wellness and library brought back in. 1004 01:17:36,530 --> 01:17:58,610 So that we at least have some idea of how that would impact our numbers based on where we're at second interim, because I believe that our second interim would be presented based on what the board has approved, which would be all of the layoffs that we had approved, but I would like to see what it would look like if we brought some of those positions back in. 1005 01:17:59,410 --> 01:18:03,630 So, that's what I would like to see if everyone else would like to as well. 1006 01:18:03,850 --> 01:18:06,470 Before we get consensus, if I knew it would be a clarification, 1007 01:18:06,850 --> 01:18:11,650 if there is a consensus, I could do not a whole second error, 1008 01:18:11,850 --> 01:18:14,230 but just a multi-year projection with those numbers in it, maybe? 1009 01:18:14,450 --> 01:18:15,170 Yeah, sorry. 1010 01:18:15,950 --> 01:18:17,150 We just hold both. 1011 01:18:17,950 --> 01:18:20,610 With the second and from numbers, can we see? 1012 01:18:21,250 --> 01:18:21,950 Multi-year. 1013 01:18:22,030 --> 01:18:22,590 Multi-year. 1014 01:18:22,850 --> 01:18:28,130 Yeah, so we can see how it impacts our budget and how it would impact our reserves, really. 1015 01:18:31,260 --> 01:18:37,100 I really like hearing to you. I'm wondering if the rest of the board is comfortable with that as well. 1016 01:18:38,820 --> 01:18:51,940 I think that's a great idea. Great request. And then if Mr. Figley has anything else he wants to show us, like if you know for positions or recommendations, I'm glad to see that as well. 1017 01:18:52,560 --> 01:18:55,180 So as much info we can get about budget would be print. 1018 01:18:56,080 --> 01:18:58,020 Thank you for that flexibility to add those up. 1019 01:18:58,020 --> 01:18:58,300 Yes. 1020 01:19:04,580 --> 01:19:05,320 All right. 1021 01:19:05,560 --> 01:19:08,120 Any other additional board comments? 1022 01:19:09,660 --> 01:19:19,320 I have one item that I would like to bring up a few months ago we discussed talking about 1023 01:19:19,320 --> 01:19:25,220 having an audit of our special education program and taking a look at how we were running 1024 01:19:25,220 --> 01:19:30,320 know what we're doing and potentially bringing in an outside company to review that. 1025 01:19:32,240 --> 01:19:38,840 And I believe that that certainly did look at that and there was some decent expense with that 1026 01:19:38,840 --> 01:19:44,900 and we haven't looked at it since and I think it would be worth our while to kind of take a look at 1027 01:19:44,900 --> 01:19:51,360 that, look at some potential other options. I think we have a lot of expense going into our special 1028 01:19:51,360 --> 01:19:55,680 education that is hurting our general budget. And I think it's something that we shouldn't 1029 01:19:56,380 --> 01:20:01,880 drop. Not necessarily recommend it, we spend a ton of money on that, but I think it's something 1030 01:20:01,880 --> 01:20:06,460 that we should continue to look into and try to optimize it. And I think it's something we should 1031 01:20:06,460 --> 01:20:10,380 bring back to discuss and potentially give Mr. Douglas the direction. 1032 01:20:12,260 --> 01:20:18,760 Trustee Anderson, would you want that to be as more of an informational type of thing or on an action? 1033 01:20:18,760 --> 01:20:19,480 I know. 1034 01:20:19,880 --> 01:20:20,060 It 1035 01:20:23,510 --> 01:20:29,930 would be more about informational to understand what the, what Mr. Bigley got back from his 1036 01:20:29,930 --> 01:20:34,410 investigation on that, that way we can then potentially provide some feedback on additional 1037 01:20:34,410 --> 01:20:42,030 information that we can get by believe I'm understanding the process right, provide direction 1038 01:20:42,030 --> 01:20:45,290 on further actions down the road. 1039 01:20:46,990 --> 01:20:50,690 How does the rest of the floor feel about that coming to agenda? 1040 01:20:55,110 --> 01:20:55,590 Okay. 1041 01:20:57,050 --> 01:21:05,190 Then we will add that as a informational item signature meeting or if any other board members 1042 01:21:05,190 --> 01:21:06,130 should have comment. 1043 01:21:06,690 --> 01:21:06,790 What 1044 01:21:12,520 --> 01:21:13,040 is that said? 1045 01:21:13,540 --> 01:21:17,740 We are moving on to our final item, which is to adjourn item 9. 1046 01:21:19,060 --> 01:21:21,900 We are at the conclusion of our meeting and then we are going to adjourn. 1047 01:21:23,340 --> 01:21:25,580 I'll make a vote for the adjournment. 1048 01:21:25,580 --> 01:21:26,360 Is there a second? 1049 01:21:26,640 --> 01:21:27,140 I will second. 1050 01:21:27,880 --> 01:21:31,200 Okay, let's go ahead and do a roll call vote. 1051 01:21:31,780 --> 01:21:32,640 Trustee Anderson. 1052 01:21:33,720 --> 01:21:34,580 Trustee Harvey. 1053 01:21:34,700 --> 01:21:34,860 Aye. 1054 01:21:35,400 --> 01:21:36,060 Trustee Powell does. 1055 01:21:36,300 --> 01:21:36,440 Aye. 1056 01:21:36,820 --> 01:21:37,880 Trustee Mackentenner. 1057 01:21:38,060 --> 01:21:38,180 Aye. 1058 01:21:38,780 --> 01:21:40,400 Trustee Lopez is also. 1059 01:21:40,580 --> 01:21:40,700 Aye. 1060 01:21:40,980 --> 01:21:42,060 Motion passes. 1061 01:21:42,580 --> 01:21:45,900 Meeting is adjourned at 6.24 p.m.