[This transcript was generated automatically from audio using AI and hasn't been reviewed by a person -- it can contain mistakes, including plausible-sounding sentences that were never actually said. Treat it as a starting point, not a verbatim record.] [3:00] OK. Can you say hi, Joanna? [3:11] Hey, everybody. [3:15] All right. Then you can just mute and... [3:18] Yeah, we'll do. [3:20] I can't see my phone when you're here, so maybe text gen or something if you want to say something. [3:27] OK, we'll do. Thanks. [3:29] Yep. [3:59] OK. [4:16] I'm just going to turn everybody on. [4:19] Yes. [4:21] That's you. [4:23] I didn't ask you. [4:25] You just do the electives first? [4:31] I didn't have any, so just my regular whip. [4:49] OK. We're going to get started. [4:51] I'm going to call the meeting in order. [4:53] Pledge of Allegiance. [4:57] Pledge of Allegiance. [5:14] I'm going to call roll. [5:16] Councilwoman Misako. [5:18] Here. [5:19] Councilwoman Bolden. [5:21] Here. [5:23] Councilman Leaman. [5:25] Here. [5:26] Councilman Fabis. [5:27] Here. [5:28] Councilman Maggio. [5:29] Here. [5:30] I am also here. [5:31] We have the Mayor and the Fire Chief and the Burner Manager and our Junior Councilperson, Ian Spoboswood. [5:40] Welcome, everybody. [5:42] We have registered comments from the public tonight. [5:44] Yes, we do. [5:46] of Marcy and Caleb Sturgis, wish to speak about air quality. [5:55] I'll tell you, I grabbed one of those sheets ahead of time stillers. [5:59] Five minutes, I'll give you one minute notice if you need it. [6:04] I assume so, just have to say it. [6:07] We are Caleb and Marcy Sturgis, 3253 Wayne Bell Avenue, [6:11] and our comments are related to air quality. [6:14] First, I just wanted to say we addressed you guys a few months ago [6:17] about the ventilation noise for the Jean-Louis restaurant, [6:20] and Ben, I wanted to thank you publicly. [6:22] They built a plywood structure around it, [6:25] and the noise is a lot less than it used to be. [6:28] Now, granted, we still have ACs going and stuff, [6:30] so we'll see what happens this fall, [6:32] but I just wanted to publicly thank you for taking our concern seriously. [6:36] I appreciate it. [6:37] My pleasure now. [6:38] What we want to do is talk about air quality right now. [6:41] I think everybody here knows that Allegheny County [6:44] has some of the poorest air quality in the nation, actually. [6:48] One of the things that I've noticed in and around Dormont in the past few years [6:53] is how many fire pits are in people's backyards. [6:57] It's fun, it's relaxing, [6:59] it's not when you have houses that are as close together as we do here in Dormont. [7:04] When you burn firewood, [7:06] Allegheny County stipulates that you can only burn dry, seasoned firewood. [7:11] There are people that are burning greenwood and wetwood and plywood. [7:17] We actually had a neighbor through the alley [7:20] that they were burning old paper files in their fire pit. [7:25] There's a bunch of neighbors out. [7:27] We thought some of these houses was on fire. [7:29] This was just a few weeks ago. [7:31] I mean, I see fire pits all over the place [7:34] that are feet away from property lines, [7:36] which is completely against code. [7:38] I see people burning all sorts of things [7:40] that they shouldn't be burning, Matt. [7:42] You probably get a bunch of calls about this. [7:44] I really don't see anybody regulating this. [7:46] I don't see anybody enforcing this. [7:49] We have these older houses that don't have central AC. [7:53] You can't open your windows when you have people at the fire pit. [7:56] It's not like the smoke stays in property lines. [7:59] You know, with the elderly, with children, [8:02] people with respiratory issues, [8:04] everybody is affected by these fire pits. [8:08] I am actually one of the people with respiratory issues myself. [8:11] I'm an asthmatic, and it's not just the smoke. [8:16] It's the particulates that you get from these things. [8:18] The way the houses are built in this area, [8:20] they're still meant to breathe. [8:22] They were some of the definitely early age construction. [8:26] It doesn't matter where you are. [8:29] The materials definitely get inside your house. [8:33] Some of the issues that we keep on coming back to [8:36] is just air pollution in general, [8:39] that we have failing grades across the board [8:43] inside the county for our air pollution and air quality. [8:47] The main thing that we keep on to deal with [8:51] is the smoke coming across property lines. [8:54] Most people inside this borough [8:57] are on a tenth of an acre or less. [9:00] The topography of the area does not permit for smoke [9:04] just to rise directly above the property. [9:08] Any sort of a prevailing... [9:10] Two minutes more. [9:12] This smoke does not rise straight up [9:14] as any sort of prevailing breeze [9:16] will cause it to definitely just drift [9:18] in other people's properties or windows [9:20] on a nice night like tonight. [9:22] We're literally just waiting for somebody [9:24] to start burning something and to fill a browse. [9:27] Just so you know, the clearance that you have to have [9:30] from the outside of a fire pit [9:32] is 15 feet to any structure, any property line, [9:35] or any public access way, including roads, streets, [9:39] sidewalks, and alleys. [9:41] Any lot that is under 35 feet wide [9:43] does not meet this clearance. [9:45] You are literally... [9:47] In order to enforce this, which you have to do, [9:50] you're going to have neighbors [9:52] on fire pit and we can't. [9:54] My suggestion would be to do [9:56] what the City of Ambridge has done. [9:58] They have houses very similar to ours [10:00] without the topography, however, [10:02] and they had a complete ban of fire pits [10:04] within their city limits. [10:06] Everybody's happy, their air quality's better, [10:08] and it's a lot safer of an environment. [10:11] Thanks for listening. [10:13] Thank you. [10:15] It's a health issue, it's a nuisance, [10:17] but it's also a safety issue. [10:19] The proximity to property lines, [10:21] does permit sparks to go [10:23] across other property lines [10:25] and potentially create a fire word, [10:27] which is going to be a lot more disastrous [10:29] than just a normal nuisance. [10:31] Good job. [10:33] Thank you. [10:35] Thank you. [10:37] Any other registered comments? [10:41] No further registered comments. [10:43] Okay. [10:51] Test, test. [10:53] Is it working? [10:55] Can you hear this okay? [10:57] Okay. [10:59] Sorry about that. [11:01] Okay. [11:03] Let's go over the consent agenda. [11:05] We have a change order for motion A. [11:09] Do you want to talk about that a little bit, Ben? [11:11] Yes, so the change order [11:13] for our road and construction alley project, [11:17] the number looks much higher [11:19] than what our actual number is. [11:21] So while it's 152,483, [11:25] this includes the sidewalk work [11:27] that we are doing [11:29] in conjunction with residents. [11:31] So we've tested this [11:33] on a smaller scale last year [11:35] and expanded quite a bit this year. [11:39] And I've spoken to Mr Favis' committee [11:41] about this. [11:43] A lot of people saw [11:45] the program that Brentwood started [11:47] to fix sidewalks [11:49] throughout the community. [11:51] We started in a [11:55] less controversial way [11:57] or a little easier way [11:59] where where we had a construction zone [12:01] that was going to be [12:03] happening for the year, [12:05] code enforcement staff [12:07] went through and assessed all the sidewalks [12:09] in that area. [12:11] And then we provided notice [12:13] to those residents [12:15] with the contract price [12:17] that we had through our contractor [12:19] saying we can replace [12:21] all of your bad sidewalk [12:23] at this price. [12:25] You're going to have to replace it one way or another. [12:27] This is the best time to do it [12:29] because we can get you a much better rate. [12:31] And a lot of people jumped on board with that. [12:33] But then we took it [12:35] a step further and we sent letters [12:37] to everyone else in that area [12:39] whether even if their sidewalks were not [12:41] bad enough to require [12:43] code enforcement action. [12:45] And basically stated [12:47] we know that it's not that bad. [12:49] However, this is one of the best opportunities [12:51] you will have to get nice new sidewalks [12:53] put in at a decent price. [12:55] And a lot of people took us up on that. [12:57] One gentleman [12:59] around Glenmore I think replaced like [13:01] everything in front of his house as well as [13:03] the sidewalk going up to the front door. [13:05] Dr. Schneider is a property [13:07] property place. [13:09] The place everything along [13:11] Glenmore. [13:13] Great. [13:15] So, [13:17] and it's not just in this area. [13:19] We also have this over on ordinance [13:21] in a variety [13:23] of places that we've been doing this [13:25] kind of work. [13:27] So a large section [13:29] of this number is that and will be [13:31] recouped from people paying [13:33] their bills back to us. [13:35] In general, we're [13:37] trying to keep people to one year [13:39] payments to pay back these. [13:41] There are some cases though that we've talked about [13:43] going as far as two years out [13:45] just to help [13:47] with some of the payments that people need to make. [13:49] Trying to keep it as fair as possible [13:51] while improving the borough. [13:53] So [13:55] that inflates our number for our change order [13:57] because anything that is not in the [13:59] actual contract, the original [14:01] contract itself has to show up [14:03] in that change order. [14:05] The largest [14:07] cycle piece to this is [14:09] the [14:11] expected work at the [14:13] end of Dwight Avenue [14:15] that I've been telling council about in my [14:17] weekly reports. [14:19] Once you get down [14:21] to the end of Dwight which is [14:23] scheduled for total reconstruction [14:25] there is nothing [14:27] to hold the road up [14:29] and water is running [14:31] off of our roadway down the hill [14:33] which was not a problem before [14:35] under normal rains [14:37] but with the [14:39] changes to the types of weather [14:41] and with the severe weather that we keep getting [14:43] it has become an issue [14:45] such that there is a lot more water [14:47] which is starting to cause erosion [14:49] at the end of the roadway and we have to be able to support the road [14:51] and take care of that water. [14:53] So [14:55] we've worked with [14:57] the construction company to create a plan [14:59] to put in [15:00] And a catch basin at the end and then create a channel system that will take the water down [15:06] to the creek that it ends up in. But that project alone will cost around $60,000, but it is really [15:14] a necessity at this point. I said this was not an issue before, but this year has really [15:20] shown us some extreme weather more frequently than what we have had in the past. Hence, [15:27] the amount of the change order for that project. Any questions? Other questions on that item? [15:38] The next item, which I just had received that morning, the morning that I put this together [15:46] so I did not have an opportunity to retype the state's contract, but this is a five-year [15:55] agreement that we put together with PennDOT. This is for the winter maintenance along West [16:04] Liberty Avenue and McFarland. The borough does the winter maintenance and PennDOT compensates [16:11] us for the work that we do. They do an annual calculation. Our roads, I believe, are what [16:18] they consider Class B, which, I think, pays out $1938 per mile, something along those lines. [16:35] So it's not a huge amount of money that this brings in for it, but PennDOT does compensate [16:42] us for the work that we do plowing, insulting those areas. However, our agreement has [16:48] expired, so this is to renew with another five-year agreement. [16:52] Is this $1938 per episode or per season? No, no, no, per season. [16:58] Okay. Is that this is not? It's not a lot of money, but it's this or we wait for [17:09] PennDOT to show up to clear. Right, and it's our street anyway, so even if it [17:14] wasn't a state road, we'd be clearing it. So this is... It's nice to get something. [17:20] Yeah, great. Okay, fair enough. That makes a lot of sense. [17:26] Hey, Ben. Well, can I interrupt? Joanna said the video is not working on the [17:31] broadcast. Just FYI. I don't know if there's anything. Can you see if the camera's on? [17:36] Is the light on? Oh, it's not on. [17:44] You can go look at my computer. It should still be up, but... [17:47] Just wanted to let you know in case you were concerned. Thank you. [17:51] Okay, moving on to action items. That's public comment time. [17:56] Does anybody have public comment on the consent agenda motions? [18:01] Okay, action items. So under the action items, we have a motion to approve a memorandum of [18:09] understanding with the Dormant Police Association for the promotion of Clark [18:12] Wataki to Sergeant. We have discussed this item in the past or at the point that [18:19] we need to approve this. So what we have talked about is that we have... [18:31] Don't worry. Two sergeants who could go anytime they want at this point. [18:41] And we have an existing promotional list. However, there's no guarantee that one of [18:49] them will leave before that list expires. So rather than having to go through the entire [18:56] testing process all over again, the union has worked with us and what we'd like to do [19:04] is promote Clark Wataki to Sergeant now with the understanding that he will still be paid [19:11] at his patrolman's rate while he continues to work in that role. However, [19:19] as soon as one of those retirements happen, we will have somebody already [19:22] to fill in to that position without the needs to wait to go through the entire retesting process, [19:29] which is that we've experienced can take some time. Especially for these promotional exams, [19:36] they have to be given several months just of study time before you can even test. [19:46] Mr. Rushford has reviewed the agreement. The union is in favor of this [19:51] Chief Physignani and I are both in favor of this as well. [19:58] When are the dates for the two sergeants who are retiring? [20:00] What are the like the very last dates that they can go to? [20:05] Who are they? [20:06] Officer Zewisha has 17 months left. So whatever 17 months today is. [20:11] And Officer Kelly has 22 months, 21 months. [20:16] Okay, but they could go at any time. [20:18] Those are, well Kelly is a separate issue. Sergeant Briglia is the other one who is not [20:25] in the drop plan, but he does not have to enter it. I believe he's eligible this year. [20:31] Oh, to ask you what time he is, but he's eligible, yes. [20:37] His plans are more up in the air still. He could go at any time, but [20:44] the drop plan means they have to go by that certain date, [20:50] but they can leave before then if they want to. [20:54] So if the right position were to come up elsewhere, [20:58] they could give us a couple of weeks notice and be gone. [21:03] Okay, thank you. [21:07] Okay, any other questions from Council? [21:11] Okay, public comment? [21:14] Okay, do we have any discussion items? [21:23] Anybody? [21:26] We'll use time to announce our [21:33] budget meetings. Let me give you one second to get the right format here. [21:37] So the first budget meeting will be held on September 24th at 6 p.m. [21:46] here in Council Chambers. We will follow the same basic format for the meetings that we did last [21:52] year, so that is essentially pitch night. The department heads will come in for the meeting [22:00] to discuss any requests that they have for their departments. [22:10] We can go over any of those issues. You should have all of the information before then on the [22:16] SharePoint site, but that night they will be here to answer questions and to go over their requests. [22:25] And then I believe we are then at Tuesday the 22nd. [22:31] What about Tuesday, October 1st? [22:32] I'm sorry. [22:34] The 24th. What time is that again? [22:37] 6 p.m. [22:38] 6 p.m. [22:38] Great. [22:40] Yeah. [22:42] Sorry, yes. [22:42] And then [22:43] yeah, Tuesday the 1st is the next session, so that's following last year's model will be when the [22:56] primary decisions are made. And then we will meet again on the 22nd in order to just review [23:08] after everyone has had time to think about the decisions that they have made to see if they [23:11] have second thoughts on anything. [23:14] What's the third date? [23:15] The 22nd. [23:18] All meetings at 6 p.m. I will have food for each of those. [23:29] With that I was, what's that? [23:35] Six o'clock of course. [23:37] Yeah, correct. [23:40] And I was going to make the recommendation that we consider canceling the next agenda meeting [23:49] rather than trying to meet two nights in a row for lengthy periods of time because [23:55] you'll have September the 30th for the agenda meeting, then we would be right back on October [24:00] 1st. It's another thing that we did last year. We canceled one of those agenda meetings [24:06] because it was so close in with our budget schedule. [24:10] So that would be the September 30th meeting. [24:12] Yeah, that's just recommendation. We can still meet then if you want, but [24:18] considering the extra load of the budget schedule, it's just an option. [24:26] Hey Ben, I'm sorry if I missed something in one of your emails. I read the two proposals [24:30] you sent for the zoning rewrite. Are we going to have a chance to talk about those [24:34] before we would need to talk about them for the budget? It looks like we're going to skip [24:39] an agenda meeting that would maybe be the time. [24:42] Council is not the first review of the zoning proposals. That will go through the Planning [24:50] Commission next, and the Planning Commission should be making a recommendation to the Council. [24:57] However, I wanted to make sure that all of Council had that as early as possible. [25:00] Sorry, I might have read it quickly and missed that. I'm sorry. [25:03] No, I may not have had it in there because since I was off at the end of last week, [25:08] I had to rush to get everything out on time. Dover Cole just got me their updated proposal [25:16] that morning as well. Yeah, I saw that, yeah. Okay. [25:22] Does anybody have an issue with canceling the September 30th agenda meeting? [25:28] I say we go ahead and do it. [25:30] I'm sorry, Danielle. I couldn't hear what you said. [25:32] I was just asking if anybody has an issue with canceling the September 30th agenda meeting [25:37] since we're having the October 1st budget meeting the next day. [25:42] I'm cool. [25:47] It's my anniversary, so I'll take that day. [25:51] Okay, so we're going to cancel that meeting. [25:53] That worked out well. [25:55] Not because it's my anniversary, though. [25:57] Yeah, I was unaware of the anniversary before the recommendation. [26:02] I kept a lid on that just because I was waiting to see. [26:07] Okay, so we have all the budget meetings. Any other discussion items at this point? [26:15] Okay. [26:18] Ian, do you have anything that you'd like to say today? [26:20] Well, I'll go back to school. [26:24] Oh, yeah, Danielle. I'm going to start at school again today. [26:27] Start here. [26:28] Hit your button. [26:28] No, he was on.