1
00:00:02,920 --> 00:00:02,920
10:00 a.m. We'll begin our meeting. Mr. Amabile,
Please lead the salute, please.

2
00:00:08,320 --> 00:00:08,320
thank you

3
00:00:13,880 --> 00:00:13,880
and to the republic for which it stands. One nation under god,
Indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.

4
00:00:22,880 --> 00:00:22,880
okay roll call please. Okay commissioner. Reed.

5
00:00:29,985 --> 00:00:29,985
present. Commissioner amabile. Present. Commissioner and chair bertao.

6
00:00:35,120 --> 00:00:37,880
here. Okay. We do have a quorum for today's business. It's a bare minimum quorum, but we can proceed with business.

7
00:00:43,240 --> 00:00:43,240
okay. Everybody get a chance to look at the minutes or call for approval of the minutes.

8
00:00:50,280 --> 00:00:50,280
if not, I'll give you a minute to look at them.

9
00:00:54,480 --> 00:00:57,520
I'll move to approve minutes from the 17th. Second okay. Motion by commissioner amabile seconded by commissioner reed to approve the minutes
Of july 17th.

10
00:01:03,770 --> 00:01:07,570
any comments on them? All in favor, say aye. Aye. All opposed? Motion passed. Okay, citizen communication.

11
00:01:15,690 --> 00:01:15,690
public opportunity to address the local agency formation commission on items of interest
Over which lafco has

12
00:01:24,730 --> 00:01:24,730
jurisdiction that are not anything that's not on the agenda today.

13
00:01:30,490 --> 00:01:30,490
anyone have any comments or anything they'd like to say?

14
00:01:36,290 --> 00:01:36,290
seeing none and hearing none. We'll proceed. Number 6,
Which is the public hearing, the adoption of the city laws of los banos municipal

15
00:01:46,250 --> 00:01:46,250
service review update, mr. Nicholson. Yeah go over to

16
00:01:54,610 --> 00:01:54,610
we'll have the presentation first, and I'll open the public hearing for comments and then
We'll have action on it.

17
00:02:07,590 --> 00:02:07,590
all right. This is the municipal service review update for the city of los banos.

18
00:02:12,630 --> 00:02:12,630
as you mentioned, and it's an update from the last municipal service review,
Or msr, that was completed in 2012.

19
00:02:20,870 --> 00:02:20,870
and the first one goes back to, I think, 2002.

20
00:02:25,790 --> 00:02:25,790
so just as an introduction on municipal service reviews,
It was a requirement

21
00:02:35,510 --> 00:02:35,510
created in state law under government code section 56340.

22
00:02:40,670 --> 00:02:40,670
and it requires that lafco prepare and approve an msr prior to or in conjunction with an
Update to a city or district's sphere of

23
00:02:50,510 --> 00:02:50,510
influence. The periodically, you would review them even if you didn't have a sphere
Involved.

24
00:02:59,600 --> 00:02:59,600
and we've done that. We're doing that right now for resource conservation districts.
That's been kind of dragging on, but I'll give a report on that later. But for cities,

25
00:03:06,760 --> 00:03:06,760
it typically is initiated when the city updates their general plan,
And it's going to request lafco to update their sphere of influence.

26
00:03:14,320 --> 00:03:14,320
and so in those cases, lafco encourages the city to pay for the consultant costs to update
The municipal service review.

27
00:03:23,120 --> 00:03:25,800
and we did that in that case or in this case. And we've traditionally used a firm of economic and planning systems,
Eps, to prepare our municipal service reviews.

28
00:03:32,680 --> 00:03:32,680
and that's the group that prepared this one with staff support.

29
00:03:40,200 --> 00:03:40,200
and the purpose of the municipal service reviews are promoting more efficient and higher
Quality services.

30
00:03:46,480 --> 00:03:46,480
these are the dictates out of state law by the state legislature required that lafcos
Prepare municipal service reviews,

31
00:03:55,050 --> 00:03:55,050
which was added in 2000 to the state law. It also allows lafco to be the agency where
People

32
00:04:04,650 --> 00:04:04,650
and businesses can go to get information about cities and special districts.

33
00:04:08,930 --> 00:04:08,930
and especially it's important on special districts who are sometimes more hidden than
Hard,

34
00:04:15,010 --> 00:04:15,010
hard to get information from compared to cities which have a lot of public information it
Assesses the adequacy of services and the levels of services that are provided,

35
00:04:25,650 --> 00:04:25,650
and also would identify

36
00:04:35,490 --> 00:04:35,490
as like special district consolidations. There are seven factors in the msr

37
00:04:45,530 --> 00:04:45,530
that you have to look at and include growth and population projections disadvantaged
Unincorporated communities or ducs that are within their contiguous to the

38
00:04:55,310 --> 00:04:55,310
sphere of influence. There's also another low income category,
Very similar to a disadvantaged unincorporated community.

39
00:05:04,350 --> 00:05:04,350
and the word unincorporated is excluded, such as disadvantaged community or we call them
Dac.

40
00:05:10,270 --> 00:05:10,270
and that that has relevance for this msr as you'll see in my presentation.

41
00:05:16,630 --> 00:05:16,630
then you look at planned and present and planned capacity of services and facilities and
Their adequacy the,

42
00:05:23,550 --> 00:05:27,070
the financial ability of agencies to provide the service. And this would be various departments of the city status and opportunities for shared
Facilities,

43
00:05:32,070 --> 00:05:32,070
which there are some for los banos, the accountability for community service needs,
Including governmental structure,

44
00:05:39,190 --> 00:05:39,190
operational efficiencies that can go into consolidations with other entities if you're
Dealing with special districts,

45
00:05:45,470 --> 00:05:45,470
especially, and then any other matter that we might find unique to the situation.

46
00:05:53,360 --> 00:05:53,360
so the again, this is the msr for los banos,
Initiated by the city's request with their new general plan,

47
00:06:03,080 --> 00:06:03,080
their 2042 general plan, and the related utility and service master plans that were
Prepared in conjunction with that.

48
00:06:11,000 --> 00:06:11,000
and it's taken a couple of years to get to this hearing after we entered the contract with
Eps.

49
00:06:18,560 --> 00:06:18,560
so in terms of the projected growth and development of the city the city's 2024 population
Is estimated at

50
00:06:26,560 --> 00:06:26,560
47,419 people. In the general plan that was adopted in 2022,
It had a build out capacity of about

51
00:06:36,200 --> 00:06:36,200
72,500 people, which is the eir environmental impact report.

52
00:06:43,720 --> 00:06:43,720
evaluation of all the land uses and all the residential land uses identified in the plan
Of.

53
00:06:49,370 --> 00:06:49,370
if the densities contemplated, that would be the population.

54
00:06:53,850 --> 00:06:53,850
it wasn't necessarily the city's goal to achieve that population by by 2020,

55
00:07:04,090 --> 00:07:04,090
2042. But that's what the bill that would be.

56
00:07:09,130 --> 00:07:09,130
so the population growth, actually, in the msr document,
There's a chart showing it, but the growth has.

57
00:07:18,570 --> 00:07:18,570
has been very fast historically, but it has slowed down in the recent decades from over 6%
Some years down to 2% during the

58
00:07:28,490 --> 00:07:28,490
2010 decade. And then since 2020, it's been growing at 1.3% per year,
Which is much slower than the historic 6% yeah 6%

59
00:07:38,450 --> 00:07:38,450
rate that they were experiencing in the city was really booming. The as I mentioned,
There's a lot of studies for facilities that the city prepared

60
00:07:49,710 --> 00:07:49,710
for the general plan update, and in those studies,
Some of them are for fees.

61
00:07:57,270 --> 00:07:57,270
the city had assumed a population by 2038. That was like a 20 year horizon of 56,400.

62
00:08:06,950 --> 00:08:06,950
so when you're looking at sewer and water and other facilities,
That was the number that was used to determine especially like fees.

63
00:08:15,470 --> 00:08:15,470
how much do we need to charge over this 20 year plan.

64
00:08:20,190 --> 00:08:20,190
and so that you'll see that that number is much smaller or much lower than the 72,500.

65
00:08:26,110 --> 00:08:26,110
that would be on the colored map of the of the land use diagram that I'll show you next.

66
00:08:32,870 --> 00:08:32,870
but that's so that's kind of the target that the city has over the life of this general
Plan in terms of their expectations and then how they're providing services.

67
00:08:45,880 --> 00:08:49,520
and yes, I just mentioned it's an important focus for the sphere of influence of what. What the growth of the city is more realistic to be than the than the filling out the
General plan boundary by 2042.

68
00:08:58,600 --> 00:08:58,600
not being, not being proposed by the city or necessarily being realistic.

69
00:09:04,360 --> 00:09:04,360
again so here's the general plan. As I mentioned the red line area through the middle is
Commercial,

70
00:09:12,040 --> 00:09:15,840
and that's following highway 152 or pacheco boulevard. And then kind of in the center is mercy springs or highway 165 running to the point on the
North that's got another red,

71
00:09:23,800 --> 00:09:23,800
red commercial area. And the boundary of this,
I refer to it as a goldfish, kind of because it's like a swimming goldfish [laughter] in

72
00:09:32,760 --> 00:09:32,760
the color pointing towards merced or to the east.

73
00:09:36,880 --> 00:09:36,880
that that dark green thick line is the alignment of the,
I'll say, formally proposed 152 bypass.

74
00:09:46,010 --> 00:09:46,010
I'm sure the city still wants that, but it was a major factor in this general plan diagram
Which

75
00:09:57,810 --> 00:09:57,810
because of competing funding across the county.

76
00:10:02,290 --> 00:10:02,290
mcag the merced county association of governments has prioritized regional traffic
Projects,

77
00:10:07,650 --> 00:10:07,650
and they've shifted emphasis from this to the merced atwater area and specifically what's
Called the merced atwater

78
00:10:18,690 --> 00:10:22,290
expressway, which would link buhach, which has started. There's an interchange there and link up to bellevue road in merced and getting a link to
The northern growth and the uc campus.

79
00:10:31,570 --> 00:10:31,570
so one of the issues when we get to this fear stage which isn't today,
Is this large boundary tied to

80
00:10:41,270 --> 00:10:41,270
commercial areas to the north and to the west at interchanges that aren't really planned
In the in the horizon of this general plan any

81
00:10:51,190 --> 00:10:51,190
longer. It was when they started this it was but it's been altered.

82
00:10:56,350 --> 00:10:56,350
so that's that's a consideration. And again,
The other part is the the land use is shown,

83
00:11:03,110 --> 00:11:03,110
the yellow is residential and then there's higher density residential and brown and then
Industrial.

84
00:11:10,030 --> 00:11:10,030
there's purple and commercials red. So this would the build out of all that that's been
Colored would be about

85
00:11:19,270 --> 00:11:19,270
72,000 people. This map, unfortunately, is a little bit hard to read.

86
00:11:24,470 --> 00:11:24,470
you have it in your packet. It's a little easier to see the it's kind of a gold golden
Boundary.

87
00:11:31,470 --> 00:11:31,470
shows the proposed sphere of influence. The black line is the current city limits.

88
00:11:37,910 --> 00:11:37,910
and then there's a dashed line. Again, it might be easier to see on your in your packet.

89
00:11:43,440 --> 00:11:43,440
that's the current sphere of influence. Which is tighter,
Much tighter, closer to the current city limit.

90
00:11:50,320 --> 00:11:50,320
although there's areas for growth, especially on the north,
The north side and a little bit on the south.

91
00:11:59,240 --> 00:11:59,240
and then another component of the msr, which I mentioned was this disadvantaged
Communities or ducs and or disadvantaged

92
00:12:09,040 --> 00:12:09,040
unincorporated. There's also the disadvantaged community which are the difference between
That and a duc is that the u stands for unincorporated,

93
00:12:17,680 --> 00:12:17,680
whereas the dac the dac is just disadvantaged communities that exist.

94
00:12:24,160 --> 00:12:27,920
and they're not they can be in the city. They don't have to be in the county. And so this map highlights the areas that are identified as the state department of water
Resources.

95
00:12:34,840 --> 00:12:34,840
who who administers this. The bright yellow is the lowest income,
And it's a combination of low income

96
00:12:45,180 --> 00:12:45,180
and also having environmental problems. And the the biggest problems cited is water
Quality with

97
00:12:54,940 --> 00:12:54,940
chromium-6 and arsenic being constituents in the,
In the water.

98
00:12:59,620 --> 00:12:59,620
and so that one of the state's efforts is to target areas,
Especially for grant money and for improvements that have underserved communities or low

99
00:13:08,020 --> 00:13:08,020
income communities to get better quality. Don't don't have environmental impacts always
Affecting the lowest income people.

100
00:13:16,340 --> 00:13:18,940
the other effect is air quality, which is not localized. It's the the valley. So they have high, you know,
High particulate matter affecting everybody.

101
00:13:25,940 --> 00:13:25,940
the lighter the lighter brown is also disadvantaged.

102
00:13:30,860 --> 00:13:30,860
and you can see it goes all the way to the west out in the agricultural area.

103
00:13:35,310 --> 00:13:35,310
so their mapping is is by census tracts, block groups,
Not by jurisdictional boundary.

104
00:13:42,510 --> 00:13:45,430
and then the white areas are not disadvantaged. So most of the city 75% of it is, is actually designated as disadvantaged,
With the darker yellow severely disadvantaged.

105
00:13:54,710 --> 00:13:54,710
and then the white areas are not. So it's an important issue for the city.

106
00:13:59,070 --> 00:13:59,070
the msr document identified the disadvantaged issue on a service by service level.

107
00:14:08,550 --> 00:14:08,550
so rather than just do a summary up front, the document talks about how our how our parks,

108
00:14:13,910 --> 00:14:13,910
how our the police protection house fire, how are the different services affected
Affecting these,

109
00:14:20,430 --> 00:14:20,430
these dac, these disadvantaged communities. So it's presented in that in that manner.

110
00:14:27,950 --> 00:14:27,950
and then another global view is just the physical conditions of the city overall.

111
00:14:33,360 --> 00:14:33,360
the city was not so heavily impacted by the covid 19 pandemic,
As many jurisdictions were.

112
00:14:41,480 --> 00:14:41,480
and they actually had a surplus coming out of the pandemic.

113
00:14:47,520 --> 00:14:47,520
but more recently, or actually during 2022-23 and 2023-24 fiscal years,
They had a deficit of $2,500,000.

114
00:14:54,960 --> 00:14:54,960
and our standards for, for the past fiscal year,
I don't know if they've completed the books,

115
00:15:01,200 --> 00:15:01,200
but it was estimated by the consultants that there was a $400,000 surplus this past fiscal
Year.

116
00:15:07,320 --> 00:15:10,600
so it's it's trending in the right direction. And the city actually received almost $72 million in revenue back in fiscal year 2022-23.

117
00:15:18,160 --> 00:15:18,160
so they're doing well with a lot of the commercial and other revenue sources they have.

118
00:15:24,400 --> 00:15:24,400
in terms of funding the government and services,
The city had passed measure h, the city residents passed measure h back in

119
00:15:33,300 --> 00:15:33,300
2019, which is a half cent sales tax devoted to police,
Fire and recreation services, which is allocated through the general fund.

120
00:15:42,620 --> 00:15:42,620
and then back in 2004, many years ago, measure p was passed with another half cent sales
Tax that was devoted to police and fire and 911.

121
00:15:53,100 --> 00:15:56,820
but more on capital improvement expenditures. So those are well supportive of city operations.

122
00:16:01,060 --> 00:16:01,060
and they also have established community facilities districts for ongoing operations and
For certain services.

123
00:16:11,340 --> 00:16:11,340
so now we're going to get into the summary of the services by the the categories that are
In the municipal service review document.

124
00:16:17,860 --> 00:16:17,860
and the first is police service where the city has 48 sworn officers.

125
00:16:22,740 --> 00:16:22,740
and that's approximately a one officer per 1,000 population,
Which is reasonable for a size of the city,

126
00:16:30,750 --> 00:16:30,750
like los banos. The about 50% of the general fund budget goes to the police department
Funding.

127
00:16:39,550 --> 00:16:39,550
so it's a high priority of the city. And takes up a big part of their budget.

128
00:16:46,510 --> 00:16:46,510
and as the impact fee justification study noted,
For police that to maintain that one officer per thousand resident

129
00:16:56,350 --> 00:16:56,350
ratio, they have to have 9 more officers over the 20 year capital or impact fee study
Period,

130
00:17:06,150 --> 00:17:06,150
which is four years shorter than the the 2020 or,
Excuse me, the 2042 general plan horizon.

131
00:17:14,870 --> 00:17:14,870
but it's so it's very close. And then the talk about the measure h sales tax of

132
00:17:24,430 --> 00:17:24,430
5% that goes to support police and fire. So that helps support the in this category.

133
00:17:29,640 --> 00:17:29,640
the police services and then measure p again supports capital facilities for police.

134
00:17:37,560 --> 00:17:37,560
then on to fire the city provides its own fire protection and ambulance service within the
City and has currently two fire

135
00:17:47,160 --> 00:17:51,000
stations, with two more in to be planned in the future. One that's actually in the design phase. The city has 19 career firefighters and five
Volunteer staff,

136
00:17:58,960 --> 00:17:58,960
which results in a firefighter per 1,000 resident ratio of 0.4,
Which is below what the national fire protection association

137
00:18:09,000 --> 00:18:09,000
study in 2022 identified, which would be about double that from maybe 0.84 to 1.3
Firefighters

138
00:18:18,960 --> 00:18:18,960
per 1,000. The previous year budget to 2024-25 budget included funds for two more
Firefighters,

139
00:18:28,780 --> 00:18:28,780
and perhaps the city has hired them by now, so they are trying to address it.

140
00:18:35,260 --> 00:18:39,220
I just, you know, maintaining staff as they grow. The city has a response time of 5 to 6 minutes within one and a half mile radius.

141
00:18:46,300 --> 00:18:46,300
and then they're investigating ways to supplement or to to allow the the firefighting
Staff,

142
00:18:53,180 --> 00:18:53,180
the professional staff to spend more time on actual emergencies,
Response and fires by creating a new funding category that some

143
00:19:03,060 --> 00:19:05,260
cities have called the operational permit fee. And that would be when you're operating businesses that you'd pay an annual fee that's
Used to help provide

144
00:19:14,340 --> 00:19:14,340
inspections and other service that you need to,
To show fire safety that that your career

145
00:19:23,630 --> 00:19:23,630
firefighters take it takes away from their response into the field by doing these tasks.

146
00:19:28,510 --> 00:19:28,510
so this would create new employees that would be under a different department that do
Inspections,

147
00:19:34,230 --> 00:19:37,430
maybe like buildings and safety division or something. So the city is investigating that. And that's kind of how to address the fire staffing
Support in the future.

148
00:19:46,950 --> 00:19:46,950
on to storm drainage. They the city updated which it's a big issue for the city.

149
00:19:52,230 --> 00:19:56,150
the storm drainage master plan was updated in 2023. And it was evaluated the general plan growth,
Of course, and then problems in the older developed parts of the city which have

150
00:20:06,230 --> 00:20:06,230
the, the discharge for wastewater, excuse me,
For stormwater gets into the sewer pipes and causes backup and maybe overflowing of sewer

151
00:20:17,550 --> 00:20:17,550
with, with the stormwater. And again, it affects a lot of the older downtown and a lot of
That's the disadvantaged community area.

152
00:20:24,560 --> 00:20:24,560
so it's been a historic problem that the city has been grappling with.

153
00:20:30,160 --> 00:20:30,160
the city has 17 stormwater detention basins,
And it's routed to a system of drainage canals and catch basins and lift stations.

154
00:20:39,440 --> 00:20:39,440
and the city's historically been working with ccid and grasslands water district to direct
Drainage into their canals and

155
00:20:48,960 --> 00:20:52,920
creeks and trying to reduce studying or flooding. And they're designing a new 500 to 600 acre north east detention basin to help capture
That

156
00:21:03,600 --> 00:21:03,600
water during peak flows. And so it's an ongoing effort,
But in terms of collaboration, the city is collaborating with the irrigation districts.

157
00:21:11,880 --> 00:21:11,880
they have been in the past, and they're continuing to finding joint joint solutions to,
To help reduce this term drainage

158
00:21:21,300 --> 00:21:21,300
impacts. And findings for storm drainage comes from lighting and landscape assessment
Districts,

159
00:21:28,220 --> 00:21:28,220
which are established over kind of neighborhood levels and for new development areas.

160
00:21:33,500 --> 00:21:33,500
and it generates between $100,000 and $200,000 annually.

161
00:21:38,460 --> 00:21:38,460
for wastewater the city's wastewater master plan was 15 years old,
But they they for the general plan update,

162
00:21:46,860 --> 00:21:46,860
there was a supplement prepared management plan in 2019 and that.

163
00:21:52,620 --> 00:21:52,620
12019 [laughter] in compliance with state state requirements for district existing
Problems they had and for more efficient

164
00:22:02,220 --> 00:22:02,220
operations. So they want to increase the discharge capacity to 4.9 million gallons per
Day,

165
00:22:09,220 --> 00:22:09,220
which would accommodate that population identified in the impact fee study of 56,400,
Which again,

166
00:22:15,980 --> 00:22:15,980
just pointing out for the sewer they're not planning on sewer plant expansion for the
General plan build out.

167
00:22:22,350 --> 00:22:22,350
they're doing it based on the expected growth over the 20 years that the fee studies are
Targeted at,

168
00:22:31,510 --> 00:22:31,510
and their fee structure. The current average flow in the recent budget was 3.46 million
Gallons per day,

169
00:22:41,310 --> 00:22:41,310
and the revenues for wastewater enterprise were $9 million.

170
00:22:46,230 --> 00:22:49,870
and so, no, they don't put any city general fund money on tour. It's all enterprise fund money. Then, in terms of water,
The city prepared a water supply assessment for the general plan update

171
00:23:00,430 --> 00:23:00,430
and also an urban water management plan, which was required by the state department of
Water resources.

172
00:23:06,670 --> 00:23:06,670
the current demand is 7,900 acre feet and the city has 13 existing wells,
Which is their current water supply.

173
00:23:17,000 --> 00:23:17,000
the water supply assessment or urban water management plan identified a need for 11,233
Acre feet by 2045.

174
00:23:26,680 --> 00:23:26,680
so that was the life of the urban water management plan went beyond the general plan by a
Few years.

175
00:23:32,840 --> 00:23:32,840
but it basically shows the need for the additional supply.

176
00:23:39,000 --> 00:23:39,000
the challenges that were identified in the msr pointed out that that the merced county
Association of governments,

177
00:23:47,520 --> 00:23:47,520
who did the background studies for the housing element,
Updates of the six cities and the county identified a

178
00:23:57,240 --> 00:23:57,240
problem that the local groundwater sustainability plan for the the area where the city is
Has

179
00:24:07,360 --> 00:24:07,360
a the city is over drafting a sustainable yield by yield by 2,300 acre feet

180
00:24:18,260 --> 00:24:18,260
as of 2019. So right now there are over, over what would be sustainable yield.

181
00:24:25,500 --> 00:24:25,500
and then the growth of the city identified in the water supply assessment would exacerbate
That further.

182
00:24:33,300 --> 00:24:33,300
and of course, ag irrigation districts also have to deal with with groundwater pumping.

183
00:24:38,220 --> 00:24:38,220
so it's a it's a joint effort through the groundwater sustainability plan and both ponds

184
00:24:47,900 --> 00:24:47,900
agency, gsa, but coordinating with with ccid and san luis and grasslands.

185
00:24:55,060 --> 00:24:55,060
so and so they have the water quantity is a challenge.

186
00:25:00,260 --> 00:25:00,260
and the other challenge is water quality. As I mentioned earlier,
There's high arsenic and chromium-6 concentrations.

187
00:25:09,820 --> 00:25:09,820
and and that's part of that disadvantaged community impact cited.

188
00:25:15,030 --> 00:25:15,030
so the city is working with ccid and the grasslands water district to help try to address
That through groundwater

189
00:25:24,150 --> 00:25:24,150
recharge and measures that would help clean,
Clean the groundwater, which has these natural constituents in it.

190
00:25:31,630 --> 00:25:31,630
besides other, you know, other water treatment systems which are expensive.

191
00:25:36,950 --> 00:25:36,950
and the city has a water fund. It's got a $46 million balance.

192
00:25:43,030 --> 00:25:43,030
and the msr points out revenues may not meet that keep that fund in positive balance.

193
00:25:51,350 --> 00:25:51,350
it's it's in the last year, it was going negative in several million dollars.

194
00:25:56,510 --> 00:25:56,510
and so the part of it, I guess, is the city looking at they may have to increase their
Water rates to their customers to maintain a positive balance.

195
00:26:07,790 --> 00:26:07,790
and the, the category of parks and recreation,
Has pointed out that the city has 264 acres of

196
00:26:17,800 --> 00:26:17,800
variety of parks, from neighborhood and community wide parks to little pocket parks,
And they also maintain trails,

197
00:26:24,920 --> 00:26:24,920
some of which are ccid canal banks that the city maintains for for recreational use for
Citizens.

198
00:26:32,440 --> 00:26:32,440
and they have an updated parks master plan, kind of parallel with their general plan
Update.

199
00:26:38,240 --> 00:26:38,240
they have a ratio of 5.6 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents,
Which exceeds the general plan standard of 5 acres.

200
00:26:45,920 --> 00:26:45,920
so they're doing they're doing good in that regard. Staffing levels are more of a
Challenge,

201
00:26:50,720 --> 00:26:50,720
though they have 3.9 full time equivalent employees per 10,000 residents where in the msr
Points out the national average is more like 8.9

202
00:27:00,640 --> 00:27:00,640
staff, so they're about half of what what many cities have managed.

203
00:27:08,040 --> 00:27:08,040
so in response to information from the parks and rec department,
Though, they feel that they are maintaining their parks and trails successfully and

204
00:27:17,780 --> 00:27:17,780
they've upgraded park facilities, including playgrounds.

205
00:27:26,140 --> 00:27:26,140
23% of the parks and recreation funding does come from the general fund,
With a $10 million balance coming from their half cent sales tax measure h that's shared

206
00:27:35,220 --> 00:27:35,220
with police and fire. So that concludes all the different service levels provided by the
By

207
00:27:45,140 --> 00:27:45,140
the city. There was one more section that's briefly mentioned in the msr,
But I didn't highlight it here.

208
00:27:53,500 --> 00:27:53,500
and the msr doesn't have a separate chapter for it,
But it's the city runs the los banos airport,

209
00:27:58,540 --> 00:27:58,540
so that's a major facility that many cities don't have.

210
00:28:02,780 --> 00:28:02,780
and there's no separate chapter on that. But it,
As I understand it, these it's the parks and rec department that that maintains the

211
00:28:11,270 --> 00:28:11,270
airport and mayor amabile if you have during our discussion,
If there's any if you have any clarification to that,

212
00:28:18,550 --> 00:28:18,550
we could modify that that text. I think it's actually public works

213
00:28:25,030 --> 00:28:25,030
public works okay. Okay, great. All right. So on to the the actions for the commission.

214
00:28:31,550 --> 00:28:31,550
the first is in under environmental review. Normally we're we're dealing with annexations
And sphere amendments and things like that.

215
00:28:38,670 --> 00:28:38,670
and they all have a document, environmental document to comply with the california
Environmental quality act.

216
00:28:45,830 --> 00:28:45,830
but an msr is actually considered exempt under section 15306 information collection.

217
00:28:54,950 --> 00:28:54,950
as a as just information gathering with we may have recommendations,
But there's no action coming out of it that you're going to build something or

218
00:29:05,440 --> 00:29:05,440
change the environment anyway. It's more of an analysis of conditions now and in the
Future over the horizon of the of the msr.

219
00:29:13,520 --> 00:29:13,520
so with that the recommendation actions are to make the environmental determination that
Municipal service review is categorically exempt,

220
00:29:23,360 --> 00:29:23,360
categorically exempt from ceqa review under that section 15306.

221
00:29:28,760 --> 00:29:28,760
the msr determinations which are required to seven determinations are presented chapter by
Chapter on each service rather than a summary at the end.

222
00:29:38,040 --> 00:29:41,520
it's what are the conditions of each service level. And those appear on at the end of each section from page 19 all the way to page 60 at the
End of each individual

223
00:29:51,160 --> 00:29:51,160
section. So you make those determinations and then staff recommends that you approve the
Municipal service review based on the four project

224
00:30:00,240 --> 00:30:00,240
determinations that are presented on section four of your executive officer's report
Before you,

225
00:30:07,540 --> 00:30:07,540
which is at the at the end, I think it's page 9.

226
00:30:13,060 --> 00:30:16,180
and that concludes my presentation. And I'll stay here. If you have any questions, I can go back to a page or a map or whatever.

227
00:30:20,620 --> 00:30:20,620
thank you. I'm going to open the public hearing at 10:33 a.m.

228
00:30:28,940 --> 00:30:28,940
if anyone in the audience would like to comment about the public hearing,
The public hearing is open about the presentation.

229
00:30:37,260 --> 00:30:37,260
we'll hear we'll hear that. We'll hear any comments that the commissioners could have
Pertaining to questions or anything the public has and will return

230
00:30:47,180 --> 00:30:47,180
it to the commission for approval. Anyone care to come forward and say anything and
Comment on the report?

231
00:30:59,620 --> 00:30:59,620
okay seeing or hearing none. I'll close it at 10:34 a.m.

232
00:31:04,070 --> 00:31:04,070
and return it to the commission. Commissioners,
Any comments or anything on the on the presentation before we seek approval?

233
00:31:12,190 --> 00:31:12,190
rob

234
00:31:19,070 --> 00:31:19,070
I really when I went over it, it does show what the city council has to look at in the
Next few years.

235
00:31:26,510 --> 00:31:26,510
and it does reinforce a lot of the things we've changed over the last six months so I,
I do like that.

236
00:31:32,510 --> 00:31:32,510
I like it how spheres haven't changed. And, and I do enjoy that.

237
00:31:39,390 --> 00:31:39,390
and I think we're going to be looking at removing that bypass in the future,
Because that's the $1 billion bypass now that

238
00:31:49,390 --> 00:31:52,710
caltrans does not want to see done [laughter] anymore. And so there'll be a lot of changes in the future.

239
00:31:55,830 --> 00:31:55,830
but I appreciate all the help that this staff has given to the city of los banos,
And we know how to move forward now.

240
00:32:04,200 --> 00:32:07,480
okay okay, I do. City, the city of los banos sits at it provides

241
00:32:17,440 --> 00:32:17,440
ambulance service, but I don't see any ambulances around that town and city of los banos
On them are there?

242
00:32:22,640 --> 00:32:22,640
it's the riggs service that. It's the riggs

243
00:32:26,720 --> 00:32:28,800
the riggs the riggs service that provides the? Yeah, the whole county. Okay. We're just that one area from centinela.

244
00:32:32,520 --> 00:32:32,520
yeah all right. That's that's what I thought. I mean,
I think that's kind of a facetious thing here that the city provides.

245
00:32:39,560 --> 00:32:39,560
are you paying? Is the city paying for a specific vehicle

246
00:32:44,080 --> 00:32:47,360
I think the way it's done, it's. We don't pay. The county is paying for county goes out for a bidding process.

247
00:32:56,720 --> 00:32:56,720
all right. We could clarify that chair. And we can do some cleanup edits here.

248
00:33:02,500 --> 00:33:02,500
following so we can clean that that point up that it's not a city staff like it's not city
Fire staff let's say

249
00:33:09,460 --> 00:33:12,020
no well that's what it insinuates though. Yeah. Great. Okay. Second thing about the the water.

250
00:33:18,140 --> 00:33:18,140
water use if you're already pumping, pumping more water than than you're supposed to.

251
00:33:27,620 --> 00:33:27,620
and if the sgma people are going to complain about that.

252
00:33:32,580 --> 00:33:32,580
it brings me back to the to the comment I made with the city of merced when it was time
For the university,

253
00:33:38,300 --> 00:33:38,300
when the young lady was here making the presentation and,
And she said, and they needed more water and this and that.

254
00:33:44,540 --> 00:33:47,380
and it was during a drought and the yards were drying up. And I asked her, well, what's the what's going to happen when they need more water?

255
00:33:51,620 --> 00:33:55,060
her comment was, well, we'll just dig more wells. Well maybe today that's not going to be the thing.

256
00:33:58,190 --> 00:33:58,190
maybe los banos needs to look at that. If they have to dig more wells,
Or if they're going to be into a fight with with the government agencies

257
00:34:08,150 --> 00:34:08,150
about whether they can drill or not and use water instead of restricting,
Putting more restrictions on the residents you already have,

258
00:34:15,110 --> 00:34:15,110
maybe they shouldn't expand as much as maybe the plan is but.

259
00:34:21,230 --> 00:34:21,230
you have a very good point. So we're looking at surface water,
You know, so we're talking to the districts about surface water in the future.

260
00:34:29,950 --> 00:34:29,950
all our wells do have the natural occurring issues that

261
00:34:36,790 --> 00:34:36,790
and so we know there's an issue there. And with the state coming down and changing their,
Their standards,

262
00:34:44,670 --> 00:34:44,670
I should say they just did. It's a it's a big challenge for it's for the whole state.

263
00:34:49,630 --> 00:34:51,950
but we realize we have to figure something out. We're going to probably put a new, tank on the west side of town and start mixing water.

264
00:34:57,890 --> 00:35:00,930
so hopefully we can clean things up but are we getting any water from the from the canals right now or not?

265
00:35:04,090 --> 00:35:07,410
no. No? That's how. Did you in the past? Yes. In the 40s, 50s. It was done that way. Yeah

266
00:35:10,370 --> 00:35:12,650
that madison yard had that but. Okay the city went to wells. Yeah

267
00:35:15,370 --> 00:35:15,370
I had just one other thing. I'd like to see when the time is not for that right now.

268
00:35:20,650 --> 00:35:24,050
but when you do do your sphere. Your sphere deal. I'd still like to see the city north of of pioneer.

269
00:35:29,610 --> 00:35:29,610
and I think there's a little bit projected to go between pioneer and copa de oro.

270
00:35:35,370 --> 00:35:35,370
and I, you know, I don't live in los banos, but personally I always hated to see that
Idea.

271
00:35:41,890 --> 00:35:45,570
and I think I've been opposed to that idea ever since I've been on this commission. So, you know, you guys need to take that into consideration too.

272
00:35:48,730 --> 00:35:48,730
yeah, we we understand that's probably the prime ag

273
00:35:53,940 --> 00:35:53,940
so

274
00:35:58,500 --> 00:35:58,500
with that, I would like to move that the los banos municipal service review is exempt from
Ceqa review under section 15306,

275
00:36:06,980 --> 00:36:06,980
from the information collected of the ceqa guidelines and adopt the municipal service
Review.

276
00:36:14,180 --> 00:36:14,180
I second. Okay. Motion by commissioner amabile,
Seconded by commissioner reed that we adopt the the municipal service review with all the

277
00:36:23,860 --> 00:36:23,860
considerations and stipulations. Any other discussion?

278
00:36:29,380 --> 00:36:29,380
all in favor, say aye. Aye. All opposed? Motion carried.

279
00:36:34,260 --> 00:36:34,260
okay

280
00:36:44,060 --> 00:36:44,060
of a resource conservation msr.

281
00:37:02,310 --> 00:37:02,310
yes thank you, chair. This item is the other municipal service review that's been ongoing
For a couple of years with eps for the

282
00:37:12,030 --> 00:37:12,030
resource conservation districts, and we ran into the problem of finding two of the rcds on
The west side are not active.

283
00:37:20,910 --> 00:37:20,910
and we've been working with east merced and trying to trying to get more information from
Some of the other rcds on the idea of a consolidation.

284
00:37:29,910 --> 00:37:29,910
so it's delayed completion of the msr, although we're getting getting progress.

285
00:37:34,390 --> 00:37:34,390
we're kind of on the final steps here. And so we wanted to have a six month extension of
The contract so that we can detail.

286
00:37:42,390 --> 00:37:42,390
and I'm actually working with eps to keep the costs down to do some of that writing
Myself.

287
00:37:47,790 --> 00:37:47,790
but on the the benefits of the consolidation and the desire for it.

288
00:37:53,170 --> 00:37:53,170
and I just actually recently found out that grasslands,
Because they have a unique the resource conservation district with grasslands,

289
00:38:01,970 --> 00:38:01,970
is tied to the water district in a lot of ways and including,
You know, internal staff they have a different board,

290
00:38:09,570 --> 00:38:09,570
but their, their function being a, a wetlands and duck club oriented district is very
Different than ccid in san luis and all the other pretty much all the other ag districts

291
00:38:19,170 --> 00:38:19,170
in the county. So they don't want to consolidate with the other rcds.

292
00:38:24,130 --> 00:38:24,130
so we will probably work on leaving them out of it and then trying to get the others
Engaged.

293
00:38:29,930 --> 00:38:29,930
so anyway, this this is a simple this doesn't increase the funds,
Is just delaying the date and there's money left to complete the effort.

294
00:38:38,730 --> 00:38:38,730
so we'd recommend support of the amendment. Right

295
00:38:43,890 --> 00:38:47,860
yes, yes motion by commissioner reed. Seconded by. By commissioner amabile that we extend the
Contract with eps for the regarding the review of

296
00:38:57,740 --> 00:38:57,740
the resource conservation districts. All in favor,
Say aye.

297
00:39:01,820 --> 00:39:01,820
aye. Opposed? Motion carried. Okay. B is the update on the current restructuring of
Calafco.

298
00:39:12,500 --> 00:39:12,500
all right yeah. This has been a big process for for a long time now.

299
00:39:21,260 --> 00:39:21,260
and really with a heavy duty involvement of staff from both the.

300
00:39:28,340 --> 00:39:28,340
yeah, the staff of the professional association bringing back under consultant basis.

301
00:39:37,180 --> 00:39:37,180
pamela miller, the former executive director,
And jenny tickler was the the head clerk, and she's back.

302
00:39:44,430 --> 00:39:44,430
and then jose enriquez, who was the executive officer of sacramento,
Lafco, and still is.

303
00:39:50,270 --> 00:39:50,270
and he he stepped in to perform the lafco executive director duties on top of everything
Else he's doing.

304
00:39:58,790 --> 00:39:58,790
and they've done a very good job. Some of the I was going to use the word contentious,
But some of the the directors on the board for calafco have

305
00:40:08,630 --> 00:40:08,630
dropped off who were trying to shift the direction of the association.

306
00:40:14,550 --> 00:40:14,550
it was getting dysfunctional and not cooperative and a lot of infighting and people
Wanting to quit out of frustration.

307
00:40:22,230 --> 00:40:26,230
and actually about 8 lafcos have dropped out of calafco,
Which is historic. It never the only one that dropped out was probably 15,
20 years ago with kern county.

308
00:40:31,870 --> 00:40:35,470
they're the only one who didn't join, and it was completely over budget. But other ones have left for many reasons. And a lot of it is the,
The, the dysfunction.

309
00:40:43,490 --> 00:40:43,490
so they've done a lot of effort to update the bylaws and change them.

310
00:40:49,010 --> 00:40:49,010
and at the conference coming up this in october down in san diego,
That will there will be a vote on those changes.

311
00:40:56,410 --> 00:40:56,410
and I reported over time on some of the changes that I've been involved in,
A lot of the meetings,

312
00:41:01,570 --> 00:41:01,570
you know, attending them and giving input. And it just is getting back to a very good
Place.

313
00:41:07,210 --> 00:41:07,210
and maybe with this turmoil has actually caused kind of an upgrading of things that had
Been done many years ago and needed to be cleaned up.

314
00:41:14,450 --> 00:41:14,450
but it's back to being much more cooperative,
And their goal is to try to get the other lafco to come back.

315
00:41:21,410 --> 00:41:21,410
we're talking some big ones, like los angeles and orange county,
And riverside's in there,

316
00:41:26,930 --> 00:41:26,930
and we have smaller ones. Napa dropped out, el dorado dropped out,
But most of them are willing to come back if they see they get frustrated and just said,

317
00:41:34,290 --> 00:41:38,290
okay, we don't need to be part of this, but they may come back so. They're going to send representatives to the conference as non-voting members and
Observers any of them?

318
00:41:45,260 --> 00:41:47,460
some of them will. Yes, some of them will yeah. Unfortunately, I as I heard, the conference is in san diego and so one of the first to
Drop out was san diego.

319
00:41:53,620 --> 00:41:57,500
and so they're not participating. I don't know if they'll show up,
But they're not on. They're not doing panel work and they're but but in terms of voting yeah all the ones who
Dropped out will not be voting on these bylaws yeah.

320
00:42:04,140 --> 00:42:07,460
they're not entitled to. So yeah. [laughter] so it's good. So hopefully it's it's going in the right direction.

321
00:42:13,860 --> 00:42:13,860
is she still active in this? Oh, yeah. She's she's actually the chair right now.

322
00:42:18,180 --> 00:42:18,180
she's in favor of all these new chairs

323
00:42:24,660 --> 00:42:28,300
a bearcat [laughter]. Yeah. So good. Yeah she's that's the one

324
00:42:31,300 --> 00:42:31,300
yeah. Right. The email saying positive things so.

325
00:42:35,340 --> 00:42:35,340
yeah so that was just more of an update. Just no,
No action but

326
00:42:40,510 --> 00:42:40,510
yeah it does. Yes it does. Okay. Anything else on that subject?

327
00:42:45,230 --> 00:42:45,230
no. Okay. We have the appointment of the voting delegate and alternate for the for the
Conference.

328
00:42:51,430 --> 00:42:51,430
and from what I understand, it's we're going to recommend that commissioner pedrozo is
Going and be the voting

329
00:43:00,990 --> 00:43:03,230
delegate, and you be an alternate. Is that correct? Yes

330
00:43:11,270 --> 00:43:11,270
commissioner amabile, seconded by commissioner reed that we appoint commissioner pedrozo
As the voting

331
00:43:20,870 --> 00:43:20,870
delegate and executive director, bill nicholson as the alternate.

332
00:43:26,670 --> 00:43:30,550
all in favor? Aye. All opposed? Motion is passed. Okay. Any other comments bill? Anything else that could have officer report on anything?

333
00:43:36,770 --> 00:43:40,450
coming up? No it's pretty yeah. Pretty much just getting gearing up. Oh, well, yeah, I would just mention we we don't have any active applications yet,
But there would be plenty on the horizon.

334
00:43:49,490 --> 00:43:49,490
and we have we're completing that, hilmar annexation to the hilmar county water district.
But but many more projects will be will be coming

335
00:43:57,090 --> 00:43:57,090
october meeting? I do not think so. I don't. Because we're down to just one for november,
December.

336
00:44:04,770 --> 00:44:04,770
right we're just down to one. So yeah. So at this point I don't have anything for the
October meeting. So it would be.

337
00:44:09,770 --> 00:44:09,770
yeah november, december. We do we combine those into one meeting and do it in the second
Week.

338
00:44:15,130 --> 00:44:18,970
yeah thanks for bringing that up. Okay

339
00:44:25,210 --> 00:44:25,210
no. Hearing none. I'll adjourn the meeting at time is your thing 10:45 a.m.

340
00:44:33,090 --> 00:44:33,090
thank you very much. All right. Thank you for coming.