[3:54] council
[3:56] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[3:59] Mtc abag community advisory
[4:00] council
[4:04] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[4:07] Mtc abag community advisory
[4:08] council
[4:11] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[4:14] Mtc abag community advisory
[4:15] council
[4:18] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[4:21] Mtc abag community advisory
[4:22] council
[4:25] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[4:28] Mtc abag community advisory
[4:29] council
[4:33] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[4:35] Mtc abag community advisory
[4:36] council
[4:39] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[4:42] Mtc abag community advisory
[4:43] council
[4:47] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[4:50] Mtc abag community advisory
[4:51] council
[4:53] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[4:57] Mtc abag community advisory
[4:58] council
[5:01] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[5:04] Mtc abag community advisory
[5:05] council
[5:08] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[5:11] Mtc abag community advisory
[5:12] council
[5:16] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[5:18] Mtc abag community advisory
[5:19] council
[5:22] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[5:25] mtc abag community advisory
[5:26] council
[5:30] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[5:33] Mtc abag community advisory
[5:34] council
[5:36] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[5:40] Mtc abag community advisory
[5:41] council
[5:44] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[5:47] Mtc abag community advisory
[5:48] council
[5:51] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[5:54] Mtc abag community advisory
[5:55] council
[5:59] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[6:01] Mtc abag community advisory
[6:02] council
[6:05] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[6:08] Mtc abag community advisory
[6:09] council
[6:13] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[6:16] Mtc abag community advisory
[6:17] council
[6:19] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[6:22] Mtc abag community advisory
[6:24] council
[6:27] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[6:30] Mtc abag community advisory
[6:31] council
[6:34] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[6:37] Mtc abag community advisory
[6:38] council
[6:42] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[6:44] Mtc abag community advisory
[6:45] council
[6:48] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[6:51] Mtc abag community advisory
[6:52] council
[6:56] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[6:58] Mtc abag community advisory
[7:00] council
[7:02] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[7:05] Mtc abag community advisory
[7:07] council
[7:10] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[7:13] Mtc abag community advisory
[7:14] council
[7:16] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[7:20] Mtc abag community advisory
[7:21] council
[7:24] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[7:27] Mtc abag community advisory
[7:28] council
[7:31] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[7:34] Mtc abag community advisory
[7:35] council
[7:39] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[7:41] Mtc abag community advisory
[7:42] council
[7:45] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[7:48] Mtc abag community advisory
[7:49] council
[7:53] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[7:56] Mtc abag community advisory
[7:57] council
[7:59] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[8:03] Mtc abag community advisory
[8:04] council
[8:07] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[8:10] Mtc abag community advisory
[8:11] council
[8:14] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[8:17] Mtc abag community advisory
[8:18] council
[8:22] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[8:24] Mtc abag community advisory
[8:25] council
[8:28] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[8:31] Mtc abag community advisory
[8:32] council
[8:36] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[8:39] Mtc abag community advisory
[8:40] council
[8:42] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[8:45] Mtc abag community advisory
[8:47] council
[8:50] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[8:53] Mtc abag community advisory
[8:54] council
[8:57] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[9:00] Mtc abag community advisory
[9:01] council
[9:05] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[9:07] Mtc abag community advisory
[9:08] council
[9:11] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[9:14] Mtc abag community advisory
[9:15] council
[9:19] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[9:21] Mtc abag community advisory
[9:23] council
[9:25] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[9:28] Mtc abag community advisory
[9:29] council
[9:33] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[9:36] Mtc abag community advisory
[9:37] council
[9:39] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[9:43] Mtc abag community advisory
[9:44] council
[9:47] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[9:50] Mtc abag community advisory
[9:51] council
[9:54] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[9:57] Mtc abag community advisory
[9:58] council
[10:02] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[10:04] Mtc abag community advisory
[10:05] council
[10:08] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[10:11] Mtc abag community advisory
[10:12] council
[10:16] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[10:19] Mtc abag community advisory
[10:20] council
[10:22] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[10:26] Mtc abag community advisory
[10:27] council
[10:30] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[10:33] Mtc abag community advisory
[10:34] council
[10:37] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[10:40] Mtc abag community advisory
[10:41] council
[10:45] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[10:47] Mtc abag community advisory
[10:49] council
[10:51] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[10:54] Mtc abag community advisory
[10:55] council
[10:59] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[11:02] Mtc abag community advisory
[11:03] council
[11:05] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[11:09] Mtc abag community advisory
[11:10] council
[11:13] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[11:16] Mtc abag community advisory
[11:17] council
[11:20] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[11:23] mtc abag community advisory
[11:24] council
[11:28] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[11:30] Mtc abag community advisory
[11:31] council
[11:34] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[11:37] Mtc abag community advisory
[11:38] council
[11:42] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[11:45] Mtc abag community advisory
[11:46] council
[11:48] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[11:51] Mtc abag community advisory
[11:52] council
[11:56] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[11:59] Mtc abag community advisory
[12:00] council
[12:03] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[12:06] Mtc abag community advisory
[12:07] council
[12:11] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[12:13] Mtc abag community advisory
[12:14] council
[12:17] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[12:20] Mtc abag community advisory
[12:21] council
[12:25] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[12:27] Mtc abag community advisory
[12:29] council
[12:31] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[12:34] Mtc abag community advisory
[12:35] council
[12:39] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[12:42] Mtc abag community advisory
[12:43] council
[12:46] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[12:49] Mtc abag community advisory
[12:50] council
[12:53] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[12:56] Mtc abag community advisory
[12:57] council
[13:00] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[13:03] Mtc abag community advisory
[13:04] council
[13:08] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[13:10] Mtc abag community advisory
[13:11] council
[13:14] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[13:17] Mtc abag community advisory
[13:18] council
[13:22] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[13:25] Mtc abag community advisory
[13:26] council
[13:28] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[13:32] Mtc abag community advisory
[13:33] council
[13:36] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[13:39] Mtc abag community advisory
[13:40] council
[13:43] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[13:46] Mtc abag community advisory
[13:47] council
[13:51] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[13:53] Mtc abag community advisory
[13:54] council
[13:57] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[14:00] Mtc abag community advisory
[14:01] council
[14:05] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[14:08] Mtc abag community advisory
[14:09] council
[14:11] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[14:15] Mtc abag community advisory
[14:16] council
[14:19] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[14:22] Mtc abag community advisory
[14:23] council
[14:26] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[14:29] Mtc abag community advisory
[14:30] council
[14:34] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[14:36] Mtc abag community advisory
[14:37] council
[14:40] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[14:43] Mtc abag community advisory
[14:44] council
[14:48] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[14:51] Mtc abag community advisory
[14:52] council
[14:54] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[14:57] Mtc abag community advisory
[14:59] council
[15:02] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[15:05] Mtc abag community advisory
[15:06] council
[15:09] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[15:12] Mtc abag community advisory
[15:13] council
[15:17] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[15:19] Mtc abag community advisory
[15:20] council
[15:23] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[15:26] Mtc abag community advisory
[15:27] council
[15:31] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[15:35] Mtc abag community advisory
[15:35] council
[15:37] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[15:40] Mtc abag community advisory
[15:41] council
[15:45] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[15:48] Mtc abag community advisory
[15:49] council
[15:51] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[15:55] Mtc abag community advisory
[15:56] council
[15:59] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[16:02] Mtc abag community advisory
[16:03] council
[16:06] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[16:09] Mtc abag community advisory
[16:10] council
[16:14] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[16:16] Mtc abag community advisory
[16:17] council
[16:20] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[16:23] Mtc abag community advisory
[16:24] council
[16:28] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[16:31] Mtc abag community advisory
[16:32] council
[16:34] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[16:38] Mtc abag community advisory
[16:39] council
[16:43] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[16:47] Mtc abag community advisory
[16:47] council
[16:49] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[16:52] Mtc abag community advisory
[16:53] council
[16:57] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[17:00] Mtc abag community advisory
[17:01] council
[17:04] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[17:07] Mtc abag community advisory
[17:08] council
[17:11] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[17:14] Mtc abag community advisory
[17:15] council
[17:18] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[17:21] mtc abag community advisory
[17:22] council
[17:26] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[17:28] Mtc abag community advisory
[17:30] council
[17:32] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[17:35] Mtc abag community advisory
[17:36] council
[17:41] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[17:43] Mtc abag community advisory
[17:44] council
[17:47] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[17:50] Mtc abag community advisory
[17:51] council
[17:54] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[17:57] Mtc abag community advisory
[17:58] council
[18:01] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[18:04] Mtc abag community advisory
[18:05] council
[18:09] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[18:11] Mtc abag community advisory
[18:12] council
[18:15] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[18:18] Mtc abag community advisory
[18:19] council
[18:23] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[18:26] Mtc abag community advisory
[18:27] council
[18:29] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[18:33] Mtc abag community advisory
[18:34] council
[18:37] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[18:40] Mtc abag community advisory
[18:41] council
[18:44] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[18:47] Mtc abag community advisory
[18:48] council
[18:52] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[18:54] Mtc abag community advisory
[18:55] council
[18:58] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[19:01] Mtc abag community advisory
[19:02] council
[19:06] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[19:09] Mtc abag community advisory
[19:10] council
[19:12] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[19:16] Mtc abag community advisory
[19:17] council
[19:21] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[19:23] Mtc abag community advisory
[19:24] council
[19:27] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[19:30] Mtc abag community advisory
[19:31] council
[19:35] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[19:38] Mtc abag community advisory
[19:39] council
[19:41] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[19:45] Mtc abag community advisory
[19:46] council
[19:49] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[19:52] Mtc abag community advisory
[19:53] council
[19:56] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[19:59] Mtc abag community advisory
[20:00] council
[20:04] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[20:06] Mtc abag community advisory
[20:07] council
[20:10] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[20:13] Mtc abag community advisory
[20:14] council
[20:18] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[20:21] Mtc abag community advisory
[20:22] council
[20:24] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[20:28] Mtc abag community advisory
[20:29] council
[20:32] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[20:35] Mtc abag community advisory
[20:36] council
[20:39] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[20:42] Mtc abag community advisory
[20:43] council
[20:47] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[20:49] Mtc abag community advisory
[20:50] council
[20:53] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[20:56] Mtc abag community advisory
[20:57] council
[21:01] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[21:04] Mtc abag community advisory
[21:05] council
[21:07] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[21:11] Mtc abag community advisory
[21:12] council
[21:15] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[21:18] Mtc abag community advisory
[21:19] council
[21:22] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[21:25] Mtc abag community advisory
[21:26] council
[21:30] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[21:32] Mtc abag community advisory
[21:33] council
[21:36] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[21:39] Mtc abag community advisory
[21:40] council
[21:44] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[21:47] Mtc abag community advisory
[21:48] council
[21:50] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[21:54] Mtc abag community advisory
[21:55] council
[21:58] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[22:01] Mtc abag community advisory
[22:02] council
[22:05] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[22:09] Mtc abag community advisory
[22:10] council
[22:13] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[22:16] Mtc abag community advisory
[22:17] council
[22:19] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[22:23] Mtc abag community advisory
[22:24] council
[22:28] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[22:31] Mtc abag community advisory
[22:32] council
[22:34] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[22:38] Mtc abag community advisory
[22:39] council
[22:42] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[22:45] Mtc abag community advisory
[22:46] council
[22:49] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[22:52] Mtc abag community advisory
[22:53] council
[22:57] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[22:59] Mtc abag community advisory
[23:00] council
[23:03] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[23:06] Mtc abag community advisory
[23:07] council
[23:11] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[23:15] Mtc abag community advisory
[23:15] council
[23:17] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[23:20] mtc abag community advisory
[23:22] council
[23:25] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[23:28] Mtc abag community advisory
[23:29] council
[23:32] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[23:35] Mtc abag community advisory
[23:36] council
[23:40] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[23:42] Mtc abag community advisory
[23:43] council
[23:46] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[23:49] Mtc abag community advisory
[23:50] council
[23:54] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[23:57] Mtc abag community advisory
[23:58] council
[24:00] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[24:03] Mtc abag community advisory
[24:05] council
[24:08] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[24:11] Mtc abag community advisory
[24:12] council
[24:15] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[24:18] Mtc abag community advisory
[24:19] council
[24:23] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[24:25] Mtc abag community advisory
[24:26] council
[24:29] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[24:32] Mtc abag community advisory
[24:33] council
[24:37] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[24:40] Mtc abag community advisory
[24:41] council
[24:44] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[24:47] Mtc abag community advisory
[24:48] council
[24:52] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[24:54] Mtc abag community advisory
[24:55] council
[24:58] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[25:02] Mtc abag community advisory
[25:02] council
[25:06] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[25:09] Mtc abag community advisory
[25:10] council
[25:12] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[25:16] Mtc abag community advisory
[25:17] council
[25:20] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[25:23] Mtc abag community advisory
[25:24] council
[25:41] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[31:17] Mtc abag community advisory
[31:17] council
[31:21] [Meeting will begin shortly]
[32:15] Mtc abag community advisory
[32:33] council
[38:02] amanda.
[38:03] Amanda.
[38:03] >>chair, carina vinh lieu: good
[38:04] morning looks like we have
[38:05] quorum. We're going to get
[38:08] ready to start. Love all the
[38:09] chatter. Happy friday.
[38:11] Everyone feels like a friday
[38:14] doesn't it? So to begin this
[38:15] meeting is being webcast on the
[38:17] mtc and abag websites committee
[38:18] members and members of the
[38:20] public participating by zoom
[38:22] wishing to speak should use the
[38:25] raised hand feature or dial star
[38:28] nine and you will call upon you
[38:29] at the appropriate time.
[38:31] Members of the public
[38:32] participating by zoom who would
[38:35] like to give public comment on
[38:36] any agenda item MAY use the
[38:38] raised hand feature or dial star
[38:39] nine. Members of the public in
[38:41] the boardroom should form a line
[38:43] near the podium. The clerk will
[38:46] call upon you to speak. Roll
[38:48] call vote will be conducted for
[38:50] agenda action items because of
[38:51] remote teleconference
[38:52] participation. I would like to
[38:54] call this regular meeting of the
[38:55] mtc abag community advisory
[38:59] couple to order. Will the clerk
[39:02] call the roll? Confirm quorum?
[39:04] >>clerk, jessica lewis: chair
[39:04] lieu?
[39:05] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[39:05] present.
[39:06] >>clerk, jessica lewis: vice
[39:07] chair benitez?
[39:08] >>v. Chair, diana benitez:
[39:08] present.
[39:09] >>clerk, jessica lewis: madrid,
[39:12] we'll come back. Member chang?
[39:19] Is absent. Duong?
[39:25] >>bryant duong: present.
[39:31] >>clerk, jessica lewis: lavery?
[39:32] Cantrell? We'll come back to
[39:37] member hankerson we'll come back
[39:46] to --
[39:49] member orantes?
[39:51] >>gabriela yamilet orantes:
[39:53] present.
[39:55] >>clerk, jessica lewis:
[39:57] trachtenberg?
[39:57] >>gaetano trachtenberg:
[39:58] present.
[39:58] >>clerk, jessica lewis:
[40:03] saunders? Gerasimenko? Is
[40:05] absent. Nemsick?
[40:06] >>karen nemsick: present.
[40:11] >>clerk, jessica lewis: cha?
[40:13] >>kathleen cha: present.
[40:15] >>clerk, jessica lewis:
[40:21] salazar? We'll come back.
[40:21] Baldini?
[40:22] >>michael baldini: present.
[40:25] >>clerk, jessica lewis: balaji?
[40:27] >>padma balaji: present.
[40:29] >>clerk, jessica lewis:
[40:30] harshfield?
[40:31] >>peter saathodd-harshfield:
[40:33] present.
[40:35] >>clerk, jessica lewis: miles?
[40:36] >>r. Shay miles: present.
[40:37] >>clerk, jessica lewis: come
[40:48] back to shephard. Sbranti?
[40:50] >>speaker: present.
[40:52] >>clerk, jessica lewis:
[40:55] kallins? Is absent. Quorum has
[40:56] been established.
[40:56] >>chair, carina vinh lieu: we
[40:59] have several members requesting
[41:01] remote participation.
[41:08] >>speaker:
[41:09] >>speaker: hi everyone good
[41:10] morning I'm requesting remote
[41:13] participation pursuant to the
[41:15] brown act there isn't anyone
[41:18] age 18 or older in the room with
[41:18] me.
[41:19] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[41:21] thank you council member.
[41:23] Request for remote participation
[41:24] from chuck cantrell.
[41:25] >>chuck cantrell: good morning
[41:26] I'm requesting remote
[41:28] participation pursuant to the
[41:30] brown act and there isn't anyone
[41:33] in the room older than 18 with
[41:34] me.
[41:35] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[41:36] thank you. Council member miles
[41:40] we have a request for remote
[41:41] participation.
[41:44] >>r. Shay miles: hi council
[41:47] member r. Shay miles I'm
[41:48] requesting remote participation
[41:50] pursuant to the brown act.
[41:52] There isn't anyone age 18 or
[41:54] older in the room with me.
[41:56] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[41:57] thank you. Council member
[41:58] salazar?
[41:58] >>marlene salazar: good morning
[42:01] everybody I'm requesting remote
[42:02] participation pursuant to the
[42:03] brown act there isn't anyone age
[42:06] 18 or older in the room with me.
[42:07] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[42:08] thank you council member. We
[42:11] also have a request for remote
[42:12] participation from council
[42:15] member dwayne hankerson.
[42:17] >>dwayne hankerson: I don't
[42:19] have a script but I'm requesting
[42:20] remote participating pursuant to
[42:21] the brown act and there is no
[42:23] one in the room over 18 with me.
[42:24] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[42:25] thank you council member. And
[42:27] we have another request for
[42:28] remote participation from
[42:29] council member mirante.
[42:30] Hirudinea hirudinea hey
[42:33] everyone. Sorry I'm late. I'm
[42:34] requesting remote participation
[42:35] pursuant to the brown act.
[42:37] There is no one over the age of
[42:38] 18 in the room with me.
[42:39] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[42:39] thank you council members. Your
[42:41] requests are noted. You will
[42:45] all be marked as present. Will
[42:47] the clerk read the compensation
[42:47] announcement?
[42:48] >>clerk, jessica lewis: as
[42:50] authorized by state law, I'm
[42:52] making the following
[42:54] announcement. Each member of
[42:56] the mtc abag community advisory
[42:57] council here today will be
[42:59] entitled to receive $100 per
[43:01] meeting attended up to maximum
[43:03] of 500 per month per agency.
[43:04] This amount is provided as a
[43:07] result of convening a meeting of
[43:08] which each member is entitled to
[43:12] collect such amount.
[43:13] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[43:14] thank you, MADAM Clerk. Would
[43:16] you like to use this opportunity
[43:18] to just mention, like, anything
[43:21] about the updated process with
[43:22] stipends or travel
[43:24] reimbursements? Just for
[43:26] everyone to be clear on the
[43:27] process?
[43:28] >>clerk, jessica lewis: yes,
[43:29] chair.
[43:31] We have the reimbursement forms
[43:34] over by the name plates. So, if
[43:35] you have any bridge toll
[43:36] receipts please e-mail them to
[43:40] me, or if you have -- well, yes,
[43:42] e-mail them to me, and if you're
[43:44] parking and you have the receipt
[43:45] in-person you can provide them
[43:47] to me directly or you can scan
[43:48] them and e-mail them to me as
[43:51] well. And also for stipends I
[43:52] mark everyone that's present
[43:54] then provide that to accounting
[43:58] so no need to put that on the
[43:59] reimbursement form I will mark
[44:00] everybody that's present and
[44:02] provide that to accounting and
[44:04] from there they will issue the
[44:04] stipends.
[44:05] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[44:07] thank you so much. We'll move
[44:09] on to agenda item two which is
[44:10] for council members to make
[44:11] announcements. I want to
[44:13] mention that this is a great
[44:15] opportunity for any of our
[44:18] council members in on your
[44:19] geographic region to share
[44:20] activities that are going on in
[44:23] your region and news. So, I
[44:24] encourage everyone to share and
[44:26] speak up. Because your
[44:27] contribution is really valuable.
[44:29] And we like to hear what's going
[44:33] on in your area. So, are there
[44:35] any announcements from council
[44:41] members? I see member cushman,
[44:47] member mensic, and member
[44:50] benitez. I'll start with member
[44:51] cushman.
[44:52] >>warren cushman: sounds like
[45:00] I'm on. Yes, I am. I want to
[45:01] announce that my agency
[45:02] community resources for
[45:04] independent living has a
[45:06] fundraisinger on SEPTEMBER 26th
[45:07] which is saturday afternoon
[45:10] between 12 and 3. If anyone is
[45:13] interested can go up on our
[45:16] website and find donations pages
[45:19] for sponsorships and there are
[45:20] sponsorships if you're
[45:21] interested in coming. The
[45:25] tickets are $15. And again it's
[45:28] kril hayward, and hayward
[45:33] offices are at 439, 8th street
[45:34] in hayward on saturday
[45:36] SEPTEMBER 26th. And I will be
[45:38] there. So come on down and have
[45:40] some fun. Thank you.
[45:40] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[45:42] thank you member cushman.
[45:43] Member nemsick.
[45:46] >>karen nemsick: yeah, I wanted
[45:49] to say that the united way area
[45:50] joining with the bar association
[45:53] of san francisco is holding a
[45:54] community screening in two weeks
[45:56] on SEPTEMBER 14th at the mission
[46:00] bay campus ucsf mission bay
[46:03] campus auditorium this is a
[46:05] screening of the
[46:07] documentary "beyond the bridge."
[46:09] this is a solution to
[46:11] homelessness type of
[46:11] documentary, we're really
[46:14] excited about it we have 26 of
[46:15] the bay area of san francisco
[46:17] housing and homelessness
[46:18] organizations hosting this with
[46:21] us so it's free. But you do
[46:22] need to register so come find me
[46:25] and I will send you an
[46:28] invitation. So you can register
[46:29] SEPTEMBER 14th.
[46:29] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[46:31] thank you member nemsick.
[46:32] Apologies for mispropsing your
[46:35] name that second time. Council
[46:36] member benitez?
[46:37] >>v. Chair, diana benitez: yes,
[46:40] I want to share a quick update
[46:42] and I know ky-nam will give more
[46:44] information but a few weeks ago
[46:47] we had our first cbo partnership
[46:49] exchange where a whole bunch of
[46:50] agencies or things connected
[46:52] here to this building came
[46:55] together as well as over 50
[46:57] participants from different
[47:00] cbo's and non-profit from across
[47:02] the bay area and it was really
[47:03] cool and I want to encourage us
[47:06] all for future events to join in
[47:08] and network and I know ky-nam
[47:09] will share more information but
[47:11] it was great and I'm excited
[47:13] that we're continuing this work
[47:16] and I know I see folks from the
[47:18] public participation team so
[47:21] thank you.
[47:23] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[47:25] thank you member benitez.
[47:27] Member trachtenberg.
[47:28] >>gaetano trachtenberg: yeah I
[47:30] want to share briefly about the
[47:32] upcoming all hands regional
[47:34] convenience have we talked about
[47:36] the regional housing stakeholder
[47:39] committee here yet at this body?
[47:40] No? Okay. Well this is a
[47:42] regional convening that is
[47:44] happening, sort of, in parallel
[47:46] to the formal process at abag
[47:48] mtc to help inform a potential
[47:50] regional housing measure as
[47:53] early as 2028 there is a number
[47:55] of us on the council whose
[47:56] organizations are involved so I
[47:58] wont get into all the details
[47:59] but this is around the
[48:00] possibility of a future bahfa
[48:03] measure so there is a couple of
[48:05] upcoming meetings that are
[48:07] happening one in south bay on
[48:11] friday SEPTEMBER 25th from 10 to
[48:14] 12 and another east bay friday
[48:17] OCTOBER 9th from 2:30 to five.
[48:20] I can send that information out
[48:21] and these are opportunity for
[48:23] anyone to come and provide input
[48:25] about what you would like to see
[48:28] in the future housing measure.
[48:28] Thank you.
[48:29] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[48:33] thank you so much member
[48:33] trachtenberg.
[48:34] Member wong?
[48:36] >>janelle wong: thank you I
[48:37] want to make an announcement to
[48:39] everyone that SEPTEMBER is
[48:42] transit month and mtc is a
[48:45] sponsor of the month it happens
[48:46] in all nine counties and there
[48:48] is to knows of a beingtivities
[48:49] in all of the counties so go and
[48:51] look locally and see if there is
[48:53] any fun transit related happy
[48:55] hours or ride-a-long or others
[48:57] activities happening to
[48:58] celebrate transit all agencies
[49:01] are participating so that's
[49:02] wonderful in our county I want
[49:05] to plug the muni heritage so if
[49:07] you have never seen locally here
[49:09] in san francisco muni heritage
[49:11] weekend that's a wonderful
[49:12] weekend to see the vintage buses
[49:15] and cars here in san francisco.
[49:16] Happy transit month everybody.
[49:16] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[49:18] thank you member wong. Are
[49:21] there other council members?
[49:23] Baldini?
[49:23] >>michael baldini: good
[49:25] morning. Thank you chair. My
[49:28] commute here this morning again
[49:30] 208 car automobiles and trucks
[49:31] passed me that were in the
[49:33] commute lane that I counted and
[49:35] I'm not a traffic enforcement
[49:39] just a note and I do have a
[49:41] counter in the car 181 were in
[49:43] violation meaning they only had
[49:47] one person in the vehicle out of
[49:51] 208 a small% that was from the
[49:53] carquinez bridge to ashby
[49:54] overpass on interstate 80 cars
[49:56] that passed me. Thank you.
[49:57] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[49:58] thank you member baldini. If
[50:00] there are no other announcements
[50:02] from other council members I
[50:04] have one announcement that is
[50:06] just to congratulate member
[50:07] benitez she is going to be
[50:09] receiving an award for emerging
[50:11] planner for the apa northern
[50:14] california chapter this month.
[50:16] Congratulations member benitez.
[50:18] All right. Will the clerk
[50:20] inform us of public comments
[50:21] submitted for this item or
[50:22] whether there are members of the
[50:24] public who wish to give public
[50:24] comment.
[50:25] >>clerk, jessica lewis: we
[50:26] received no public comments for
[50:27] it this item there are no
[50:29] speakers at the podium and no
[50:31] speakers in the zoom space
[50:31] requesting to provide public
[50:32] comment.
[50:32] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[50:33] thank you so much. Next I move
[50:34] to agenda item three, which is
[50:37] the chair's report. And this is
[50:40] just an information item. I
[50:42] want to, again, welcome all of
[50:44] our colleagues to this meeting's
[50:46] -- this morning's meeting.
[50:48] Additionally, I just want to
[50:49] thank everyone for their
[50:51] continued presence and
[50:53] engagement. I think learning
[50:56] about mtc MAY feel like a
[50:58] waterfall of information, and
[51:01] all the work it takes to figure
[51:04] out how this place works and all
[51:06] the information to enable you to
[51:07] meaningfully engage with this
[51:09] body is just a lot. So, I want
[51:10] to thank you all for your
[51:12] continued service on this body
[51:13] as well as your patience and
[51:14] grace. I also want to
[51:16] acknowledge staff. I think that
[51:18] you all have been very
[51:19] responsive to the questions and
[51:21] concerns raised on this dais.
[51:24] And I'm really happy that we get
[51:27] to work together this time. And
[51:29] ky-nam, I want to commend you
[51:35] for a really great staff liaison
[51:37] report. It's very thorough so
[51:40] lots of updates in there. Great
[51:41] information. Thank you so much
[51:43] for that. And jessica I'm not
[51:45] sure that I have thanked you and
[51:47] welcomed on you to this board.
[51:48] But thanks for coming in in the
[51:50] middle of our term and getting
[51:53] things going and keeping things
[51:54] really smooth. Appreciate you.
[51:58] Then on that note, also knowing
[52:01] that this body can have a lot of
[52:02] information, I want to just
[52:04] remind us to participate, so if
[52:07] anything is unclear, or if
[52:08] information is new, I don't
[52:10] think there is any silly
[52:11] questions. I encourage everyone
[52:14] to keep asking questions for
[52:15] clarification. One thing our
[52:17] former clerk martha said that I
[52:19] still remember is you're on this
[52:20] council for your mind and how
[52:23] your mind thinks. So, please to
[52:25] not hesitate to bring all of
[52:27] your mind and all the questions
[52:28] and the ways that your mind
[52:30] works into this council to
[52:32] better this council.
[52:36] There are a couple upcoming
[52:39] opportunities that I want to
[52:41] mention. So, there has been
[52:43] talk on this council about an
[52:46] opportunity to meet our abag
[52:46] executive board members and our
[52:48] mtc commissioners. And so there
[52:51] will be an upcoming opportunity
[52:54] for us to do that on
[52:56] OCTOBER 29th. There is a
[53:04] breakfast convening that will be
[53:05] held here at the bay area metro
[53:05] center. There will be breakfast
[53:09] scheduled for 9:00 A.M.
[53:17] Interested council members
[53:18] should rsvp to the clerk,
[53:18] jessica. There will be
[53:18] opportunities after -- so, the
[53:18] breakfast, you can network with
[53:20] all of the board members and the
[53:22] executive members. And then
[53:23] there will be opportunity to
[53:24] stay and observe the workshop,
[53:27] which will focus on kicking off
[53:29] the planned bay area 2060. And
[53:32] there will be lots of, like,
[53:34] local experts who can kind of
[53:34] share information that will
[53:37] inform the plan. So, it's a
[53:38] really great opportunity to get
[53:39] the same information as the
[53:42] board, as well as network. So,
[53:44] I think staff will be sending
[53:47] out more information about that,
[53:55] as well.
[53:55] And then I -- I also want to
[53:55] mention that the accessible
[53:55] futures report will be released
[53:57] quite soon. I think staff will
[53:59] be e-mailing that out to
[54:01] everyone. And staff has also
[54:03] identified someone to come and
[54:06] present at a future meeting.
[54:08] So, that will be coming up soon.
[54:09] I think we're looking at maybe
[54:11] two or three meetings out from
[54:13] today.
[54:15] Also, we have been talking about
[54:18] housing as a topic, and there is
[54:20] also a housing presenter who has
[54:21] been identified, who will be
[54:24] coming to the council to present
[54:26] about housing.
[54:31] And then, as far as, like, an
[54:35] opportunity to participate at an
[54:38] -- committee level, or to be
[54:41] volunteer to be on an advisory
[54:41] group, there will be
[54:43] opportunities next spring. If
[54:44] that's something you're
[54:46] interested in, definitely feel
[54:48] free to reach out any time
[54:51] between now and DECEMBER. So
[54:53] just let me or vice chair
[54:54] benitez know about your
[54:55] interest.
[54:57] And then, finally, with the
[54:58] equity priority communities, the
[54:59] staff has also expressed an
[55:02] interest in convening a small
[55:04] kitchen cabinet for members who
[55:05] are interested in working on
[55:06] equity priority communities.
[55:09] And, so, that would also convene
[55:11] early next spring. Again, if
[55:13] that's something you feel
[55:14] interested in, and you would
[55:19] like to participate in that, let
[55:22] both, or either of us know, vice
[55:24] chair benitez and myself, and we
[55:26] would be happy to coordinate
[55:27] that.
[55:29] So, this concludes the chair's
[55:31] report. Is there any council
[55:37] member discussion?
[55:49] Council member cushman?
[55:53] >>warren cushman: are we on?
[55:54] Okay. Just a quick question
[55:57] around accessible futures. You
[55:59] had said, chair lieu, that the
[56:00] staff is going to identify
[56:02] someone to present at some
[56:04] point, there has been some
[56:06] confusion around this in the
[56:09] community, so I'm wondering is
[56:10] there a consideration with staff
[56:12] and the chair and vice chair to
[56:15] also to some, sort of, kitchen
[56:16] cabinet or some, sort of,
[56:18] placeholder where the disability
[56:19] community on this council can
[56:20] interact with staff and others
[56:21] in the community around this.
[56:24] It's really important. I hope
[56:25] that is around consideration.
[56:27] Thank you.
[56:29] >>matt maloney: I can respond.
[56:32] Through the chair. Matt maloney
[56:34] deputy executive director metro
[56:35] planning and policy. I think we
[56:39] can bring that back, warren, and
[56:43] discuss. I think that's a good
[56:44] idea at this point in time.
[56:46] What we're trying to do first is
[56:48] to engage the advisory group
[56:51] that was assembled to help guide
[56:53] the first conference, the
[56:54] accessible futures conference,
[56:55] which I think you're a part of
[56:57] that, and so it's a small group
[57:01] of about ten or 12 folks. Sos I
[57:02] think the idea of moving forward
[57:04] right now is to start with that
[57:05] group. Kind of take a look at
[57:07] the report and discuss the
[57:08] report and make sure that the
[57:10] report is, sort of, hitting the
[57:12] right notes and I think moving
[57:14] forward from there I think we
[57:16] should consider how the council
[57:18] is involved in accessibility
[57:19] issues writ large and assembling
[57:21] a kitchen cabinet of members
[57:23] might be one way to do that, but
[57:25] I also suggest we think about
[57:27] what options there are.
[57:28] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[57:30] thank you, matt. Member
[57:31] hankerson, you have your hand
[57:32] up?
[57:34] >>dwayne hankerson: I wanted to
[57:37] ask a quick question. On some
[57:40] of the committees, will both the
[57:42] chair and vice chair recommend
[57:44] people and let them know that
[57:45] they want them to be a part of
[57:46] that committee?
[57:47] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[57:47] thanks for the question. I
[57:48] think the process we're going to
[57:51] look at is, one, we're going to
[57:52] look at the whole council. And
[57:53] if there is somebody who is
[57:55] already on a body, like, for
[57:56] example, regional network
[57:58] management is a body that we
[58:00] have already pointed people to,
[58:02] then we might look at the whole
[58:03] and say, if you are interested
[58:04] in moving off of that committee
[58:07] and joining a different one, we
[58:09] could, you know, look at that.
[58:11] So, the idea that we would want
[58:12] to balance the participation of
[58:14] all council members on the
[58:16] different committees and give as
[58:18] many people an opportunity as
[58:20] possible to participate. So,
[58:23] the idea is if you let us know
[58:26] -- the sooner you let us know,
[58:28] we can kind of get, like, a
[58:30] picture of what people are
[58:32] interested in. We also balance
[58:34] geography and the interest
[58:36] groups that people represent on
[58:39] the different bodies just to
[58:43] make sure that all the
[58:45] perspectives represent on the
[58:47] bodies are balanced in those
[58:49] ways as well.
[58:50] >>dwayne hankerson: one of the
[58:51] reasons I asked the question is
[58:54] because all the committees need
[58:56] to be manned. And some of us,
[58:57] like, have our schedules so that
[59:00] we can attend the meetings. But
[59:03] that was really the reason I
[59:04] askeds are because -- thank you.
[59:05] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[59:06] thank you for the question. I
[59:08] think that's a fair point,
[59:09] especially since some of these
[59:12] MAY not convene until early
[59:18] spring. It's -- we're -- it's a
[59:22] heads up, hi, there maybe some
[59:23] committee opportunities to
[59:25] participate and then I think
[59:26] once more information comes
[59:27] about timing we can share with
[59:30] people. I think as far as I
[59:33] know, the epc subcommittee would
[59:35] meet perhaps once a month for a
[59:37] couple months in 2027. And then
[59:39] not too sure about how the
[59:40] delegates to the housing groups
[59:42] would work, but once we have
[59:43] more information, we'll
[59:45] definitely share back out for
[59:47] transparency sake. We
[59:49] definitely want people to make
[59:51] an informed decision. All
[59:53] right. Any other council
[59:57] members with comments? Okay.
[59:59] Will the clerk let us know if
[1:00:00] there is any public comments
[1:00:02] submitted for this item? Or
[1:00:03] whether any members of the
[1:00:05] public would like to provide
[1:00:08] public comment?
[1:00:08] >>clerk, jessica lewis: we
[1:00:10] received no written public
[1:00:11] comments in item. There are no
[1:00:14] speakers at the podium and no
[1:00:16] raised hands in the zoom space
[1:00:17] requesting to provide public
[1:00:17] comment.
[1:00:18] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[1:00:19] thank you. We'll move on to
[1:00:20] agenda item four, which is the
[1:00:22] consent calendar. This is an
[1:00:25] mtc abag community advisory
[1:00:27] council action item. And this
[1:00:29] includes the approval of our
[1:00:31] minutes from our AUGUST 7th
[1:00:33] meeting. Do I have a motion and
[1:00:40] a second to approve the consent
[1:00:41] calendar?
[1:00:43] >>speaker: move to approve.
[1:00:46] >>michael baldini: baldini
[1:00:46] seconds.
[1:00:47] >>chair, carina vinh lieu: who
[1:00:49] moved it?
[1:00:51] >>joshua saunders: josh.
[1:00:51] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[1:00:53] member saunders made the motion
[1:00:55] seconded by member baldini. Is
[1:00:56] there any council member
[1:00:59] discussion? Okay seeing no hand
[1:01:00] raised. Will the clerk inform
[1:01:01] us if any public comments
[1:01:03] submitted for this item or
[1:01:04] whether there are members of the
[1:01:06] public who wish to give public
[1:01:07] comment?
[1:01:07] >>clerk, jessica lewis: we
[1:01:08] received no written public
[1:01:09] comments for this item there are
[1:01:12] no speakers at the podium and no
[1:01:14] raised hands in the zoom space
[1:01:16] requesting to provide public
[1:01:17] comment.
[1:01:17] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[1:01:20] thank you. Will you please
[1:01:21] conduct roll call vote.
[1:01:22] >>clerk, jessica lewis: motion
[1:01:25] by saunders second by baldini.
[1:01:26] Chair lieu?
[1:01:27] >>chair, carina vinh lieu: yes.
[1:01:27] >>clerk, jessica lewis: vice
[1:01:29] chair benitez?
[1:01:30] >>v. Chair, diana benitez: yes.
[1:01:30] >>clerk, jessica lewis: madrid
[1:01:34] is absent. Chang is absent.
[1:01:37] Madrid?
[1:01:38] >>alexander madrid: yes.
[1:01:41] >>clerk, jessica lewis: duong?
[1:01:44] >>bryant duong: yes.
[1:01:45] >>clerk, jessica lewis: lavery?
[1:01:48] Cantrell? Hankerson?
[1:01:49] >>dwayne hankerson: I abstain.
[1:01:52] I wasn't here.
[1:01:53] >>clerk, jessica lewis: member
[1:01:55] orantes?
[1:01:56] >>gabriela yamilet orantes:
[1:01:56] yes.
[1:01:57] >>clerk, jessica lewis: tract
[1:01:57] app berg?
[1:01:58] >>gaetano trachtenberg: yes.
[1:02:00] >>clerk, jessica lewis: wong?
[1:02:01] >>janelle wong: yes.
[1:02:03] >>clerk, jessica lewis:
[1:02:04] saunders?
[1:02:08] >>joshua saunders: yes.
[1:02:09] >>clerk, jessica lewis:
[1:02:11] gerasimenko? Is absent.
[1:02:12] Nemsick?
[1:02:14] >>karen nemsick: yes.
[1:02:17] >>clerk, jessica lewis: cha?
[1:02:17] >>kathleen cha: yes.
[1:02:18] >>clerk, jessica lewis:
[1:02:19] mirante?
[1:02:20] >>louis mirante: yes.
[1:02:21] >>clerk, jessica lewis:
[1:02:22] salazar?
[1:02:22] >>marlene salazar: yes.
[1:02:24] >>clerk, jessica lewis: member
[1:02:25] baldini?
[1:02:26] >>michael baldini: yes.
[1:02:28] >>clerk, jessica lewis: member
[1:02:29] balaji?
[1:02:30] >>padma balaji: yes.
[1:02:33] >>clerk, jessica lewis: member
[1:02:36] sat of harshfield?
[1:02:37] >>peter saathodd-harshfield:
[1:02:37] yes.
[1:02:38] >>clerk, jessica lewis: r. Shay
[1:02:39] miles?
[1:02:40] >>r. Shay miles: yes.
[1:02:41] >>clerk, jessica lewis:
[1:02:42] shephard?
[1:02:43] >>sonja shephard: yes.
[1:02:45] >>clerk, jessica lewis:
[1:02:48] sbranti?
[1:02:49] >>speaker: yes.
[1:02:52] >>clerk, jessica lewis: arvelo?
[1:02:53] >>victorina arevelo: yes.
[1:02:54] >>clerk, jessica lewis:
[1:02:54] cushman?
[1:02:55] >>warren cushman: yes.
[1:02:56] >>clerk, jessica lewis:
[1:02:58] kallins? Is absent. With one
[1:03:00] abstention, the motion passes.
[1:03:01] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[1:03:02] thank you so much. We'll now
[1:03:05] move on to agenda item 5a, which
[1:03:07] is planned bay area 2060,
[1:03:09] OCTOBER 2026 kickoff. This is
[1:03:12] an information item. I just
[1:03:13] want to mention for the council,
[1:03:18] we -- because we are in the kind
[1:03:22] of opportunity -- opportunist --
[1:03:23] opportunity -- wow -- in the
[1:03:24] phase where we have an
[1:03:26] opportunity to provide comment
[1:03:27] on the shaping of planned bay
[1:03:29] area 2060, we will continuously
[1:03:31] receive various updates on this
[1:03:33] topic. And so today we'll
[1:03:35] receive the report from staff
[1:03:37] member chirag rabari, and I'll
[1:03:46] turn it over to you. Thank you.
[1:03:48] >>chirag rabari: thank you
[1:03:49] chair lieu and good morning
[1:03:51] everyone. Chirag rabari I'm
[1:03:53] assistant director of major
[1:03:56] plans and mtc abag regional
[1:03:57] planning program. Last we came
[1:04:01] to this body in MAY to share key
[1:04:01] opportunities early and planning
[1:04:03] priorities identified for mtc
[1:04:06] abag's long range plan update.
[1:04:07] And the council had thoughtful
[1:04:08] discussion at that time. Since
[1:04:11] then parallel to the public
[1:04:12] participation plan update you're
[1:04:14] going to be hearing more about
[1:04:16] later we have been considering
[1:04:18] feedback from some of our more
[1:04:19] technical partners as well as
[1:04:23] our elected officials as we work
[1:04:25] to finalize a proposed scope.
[1:04:26] So consider this a preview of
[1:04:29] what we plan to share next month
[1:04:32] as part of the formal kickoff of
[1:04:33] planned bay area 2060 to be
[1:04:34] followed by first round of
[1:04:36] engagement and I will definitely
[1:04:37] endorse the chair comment you
[1:04:38] will be seeing our team a lot
[1:04:42] over the next few years. Next
[1:04:42] slide.
[1:04:44] Before we look too far ahead,
[1:04:47] it's worth a quick stop at our
[1:04:49] current long range plan, planned
[1:04:51] bay area 2050+ which was
[1:04:52] approved unanimously by mtc and
[1:04:54] abag just six months ago. On
[1:04:56] that front, we do have good news
[1:04:59] to share, which is that it has
[1:05:03] secured all of the approvals it
[1:05:05] needs to act as our approved
[1:05:08] long range plan. So that
[1:05:10] includes approval by our state
[1:05:13] partners, as well as federal
[1:05:15] partners, and it also passed
[1:05:17] through the ceqa challenge
[1:05:19] window without any lawsuits.
[1:05:21] So, although planned bay area
[1:05:23] 2050+ is now in the rear-view
[1:05:28] mirror as a process, it does and
[1:05:30] will remain our currently
[1:05:32] adopted long range plan through
[1:05:33] the year 2030 and as such will
[1:05:37] be the focus and benchmark for
[1:05:40] mtc abag's ongoing
[1:05:42] implementation efforts. Next
[1:05:45] slide. As we have been working
[1:05:46] to scope planned bay area 2060
[1:05:48] over the last several months we
[1:05:53] have been guided by what I might
[1:05:58] characterize as these statement
[1:06:00] or commitment for this plan
[1:06:03] update which is really about
[1:06:04] finding balance specifically
[1:06:07] between a plan that is
[1:06:09] constrained and grounded in some
[1:06:12] of the key challenges and
[1:06:14] realities where we are today
[1:06:16] what we can realistically
[1:06:17] accomplish in the near-term
[1:06:19] while remaining appropriately
[1:06:20] ambitious and visionary about
[1:06:22] where we want to be as a region
[1:06:24] in the future and this means
[1:06:26] working to develop a plan that
[1:06:29] respond to the intersection of
[1:06:30] pressing issues whether
[1:06:31] affordability public health
[1:06:33] economic opportunity ongoing
[1:06:34] financial challenges key trends
[1:06:37] whether automation or ai, best
[1:06:38] practices across the field
[1:06:40] addressing core regulatory
[1:06:41] requirements and whether
[1:06:44] achieving our climate target or
[1:06:46] accommodating future growth at
[1:06:48] all income levels as well as
[1:06:49] furthering towards a shared
[1:06:51] vision for the year 2060. Next
[1:06:51] slide.
[1:06:53] In terms of some of the feedback
[1:06:55] during the early scoping process
[1:06:58] I want to emphasize we heard a
[1:07:03] lot on the side synthesizing
[1:07:04] messages that came up in various
[1:07:07] different context briefly this
[1:07:08] includes transportation safety
[1:07:09] that topic came up a lot
[1:07:11] particularly in context of
[1:07:13] children and areas around
[1:07:14] schools as well as safety and
[1:07:15] accessibility of our
[1:07:16] transportation system for
[1:07:18] elderly as well as with people
[1:07:19] with disabilities in terms of
[1:07:22] land use and housing there was a
[1:07:24] lot of interest in exploring how
[1:07:26] the region can grow in a way
[1:07:30] that balance equity access,
[1:07:31] opportunity, regional dinism,
[1:07:33] and climate considerations as
[1:07:35] well as resilience to issues
[1:07:37] like wildfire, I think about
[1:07:39] some of the fiscal challenges
[1:07:40] that the region is facing
[1:07:43] leaning into the scenario
[1:07:46] planning as a means to weigh
[1:07:47] tradeoffs and explore
[1:07:49] alternatives and we heard a lot
[1:07:51] about the need to enhance our
[1:07:52] engagement with key partners
[1:07:54] including this body and we'll
[1:07:56] talk more about that a bit
[1:07:58] later. And then emphasizing
[1:07:59] implementation this has been
[1:08:04] ongoing area of focus for us but
[1:08:07] interest in deepening that focus
[1:08:09] in the long range plan. Next
[1:08:10] slide.
[1:08:11] related to the last point, there
[1:08:13] is a lot of interest in
[1:08:15] measuring our progress and doing
[1:08:17] more communications is
[1:08:19] storytelling around what has and
[1:08:21] has not worked through the last
[1:08:25] few plan cycles, as we delve
[1:08:27] into environmental issues, sea
[1:08:28] level rise continues to be a
[1:08:30] topic of interest, including how
[1:08:31] our regional efforts can align
[1:08:39] with local planning. Anden
[1:08:41] then we heard various different
[1:08:43] voices on the issue of adapting
[1:08:45] the region to future sea level
[1:08:47] rise and how much that would
[1:08:48] cost to implement versus
[1:08:49] potentially exploring managed
[1:08:50] retreat. In the transit space,
[1:08:52] there is a lot of interest in
[1:08:54] highlighting the benefits of our
[1:08:56] regional transit system, while
[1:08:58] also considering how projects
[1:09:01] MAY be prioritized in a future
[1:09:03] with fewer resources and
[1:09:05] increased constraints.
[1:09:06] Certainly heard a lot about
[1:09:08] emerging issues like ai,
[1:09:11] automation, and e-bikes, and
[1:09:13] then, of course, very important
[1:09:16] and core to the plan are
[1:09:16] affordability, whether for
[1:09:18] housing or transportation, as
[1:09:21] well as retaining our region's
[1:09:22] diversity and ensuring
[1:09:24] opportunity for all.
[1:09:29] Next slide.
[1:09:32] So, this is a preliminary
[1:09:34] timeline for the plan, from now
[1:09:38] through early 2029. And I will
[1:09:40] talk more about the different
[1:09:40] phases of the plan on the
[1:09:42] subsequent slides, but I do want
[1:09:45] to highlight a few things. You
[1:09:47] know, first, engagement with
[1:09:50] both the public as well as our
[1:09:51] technical partners will be
[1:09:52] continuous throughout the plan
[1:09:55] process. But in general, we can
[1:09:56] expect engagement peaks to be
[1:09:59] happening around the spring and
[1:10:01] fall of every year.
[1:10:04] Through early 2029, you can
[1:10:06] expect at least five significant
[1:10:09] board level actions, including
[1:10:11] the adoption of our public
[1:10:13] participation plan later this
[1:10:16] month. The adoption of the
[1:10:18] plan's vision and fwiegd
[1:10:19] principles in approximately
[1:10:21] spring of 2027. The adoption of
[1:10:23] the regional growth forecast
[1:10:25] methodology in the fall of 2027,
[1:10:27] then the adoption of the plan's
[1:10:29] draft and final blueprint in
[1:10:33] early spring 2028, and spring
[1:10:34] 2029.
[1:10:35] Again, I'll talk more about
[1:10:38] these different phases, but I'll
[1:10:40] just briefly note that the
[1:10:41] foundations phase of the plan is
[1:10:42] kind of where we're starting
[1:10:44] right now, with that work
[1:10:45] expected to run through a good
[1:10:48] chunk of 2027. The outlook
[1:10:49] phase of the plan will run
[1:10:52] through later this year, all the
[1:10:55] way through 2027 as we then
[1:10:56] shift into the blueprint and
[1:11:00] final plan phases in 2028 and
[1:11:03] 2029. With final plan adoption
[1:11:06] anticipated for early 2030, and
[1:11:14] as the footnote says, this is an
[1:11:15] approximate schedule subject to
[1:11:16] change. Next slide.
[1:11:17] So the foundations phase of the
[1:11:19] plan is really about where we
[1:11:21] are right now, as a region,
[1:11:23] where do we want to go, and also
[1:11:24] where are we starting from in
[1:11:28] terms of our existing long range
[1:11:30] plan. So, core to that is our
[1:11:32] vision and guiding principles.
[1:11:33] If you all recall, planned bay
[1:11:35] area has an adopted vision of a
[1:11:37] region that is affordable,
[1:11:40] connected, diverse, healthy and
[1:11:41] vibrant for all by the year
[1:11:43] 2050. And we want to see
[1:11:44] whether, you know, that vision
[1:11:47] still resonates, or maybe should
[1:11:47] evolve.
[1:11:51] We also have, you know, an
[1:11:52] existing set of 35 strategies in
[1:11:55] our long range plan, as well as
[1:11:57] an existing land use framework,
[1:11:59] and really try to look at
[1:12:01] literature review and analysis
[1:12:03] to understand, again, you know,
[1:12:07] what -- what can we say we know
[1:12:09] about what has worked and not
[1:12:11] worked with these existing sects
[1:12:12] of the plan and how should they
[1:12:15] evolve. Next slide.
[1:12:17] The outlook phase of the plan is
[1:12:19] where we're looking ahead and
[1:12:21] working to develop the primary
[1:12:23] planning assumptions that are a
[1:12:25] core part of the plan, many of
[1:12:26] which are required by federal or
[1:12:28] state or other requirements.
[1:12:29] This includes our regional
[1:12:32] growth forecast of population,
[1:12:34] jobs, and households, our
[1:12:37] financial needs and revenue
[1:12:39] estimates, in terms of what
[1:12:41] funds are available to support
[1:12:43] implementation of the plan, as
[1:12:45] well as certain external forces
[1:12:46] that are outside of our direct
[1:12:49] control.
[1:12:50] Importantly, for this plan
[1:12:52] update, this is one of the main
[1:12:54] areas where we really want to
[1:12:56] lean in scenario planning,
[1:12:57] whether different growth
[1:12:58] scenarios, different funding
[1:13:00] scenarios, but also exploring
[1:13:02] certain key emerging issues,
[1:13:05] whether autonomous vehicles, sea
[1:13:07] level rise, remote work, or, you
[1:13:08] know, mode preferences for
[1:13:09] travel.
[1:13:14] Next slide.
[1:13:15] So, the blueprint phase of the
[1:13:20] man, I think this is, you know,
[1:13:23] important, especially for member
[1:13:25] who MAY be new, I really try to
[1:13:27] emphasize, that this is really
[1:13:29] the blueprint is the thing this
[1:13:31] is the core of the plan as a
[1:13:32] planning and policy document
[1:13:34] where different planning
[1:13:35] assumptions, the strategies
[1:13:37] including policies and
[1:13:38] investments, as well as
[1:13:39] associated analysis come
[1:13:42] together to see whether if
[1:13:43] implemented the plan will
[1:13:44] succeed at achieving its key
[1:13:47] targets and goals. So, I think
[1:13:48] as we think about those approval
[1:13:52] items, you know, spring 2028,
[1:13:54] and spring 2029, as those foe
[1:13:56] before the board, this is, you
[1:13:58] know, really the important thing
[1:14:00] that, sort of, sets the
[1:14:01] framework for how long range
[1:14:03] plan is going to move forward.
[1:14:05] So again that's where we
[1:14:07] anticipate leaning into our
[1:14:09] engagement and ensuring everyone
[1:14:11] gets multiple bytes at the apple
[1:14:13] before anything goes before our
[1:14:14] boards for consideration. Next
[1:14:15] slide.
[1:14:17] So, I would say that the draft
[1:14:19] and final plan, you know, this
[1:14:23] is really more of a regulatory
[1:14:25] and communications document.
[1:14:26] You know, this is where we are
[1:14:29] telling the story of the plan in
[1:14:33] a series of documents, as well
[1:14:34] as supplemental reports, that is
[1:14:38] then, you know, considered for
[1:14:39] adoption. It's also where we
[1:14:43] have to do a required ceqa
[1:14:46] process to analyze and disclose
[1:14:46] potentially significant
[1:14:47] environmental impacts of the
[1:14:49] plan. But importantly, this is
[1:14:51] also where we try to figure out
[1:14:54] how to translate these ambitious
[1:14:55] 30-year strategies into
[1:14:57] near-term actions that mtc and
[1:14:59] abag can implement over the next
[1:15:01] five years to implement the
[1:15:01] long-term vision of the plan.
[1:15:04] Next slide.
[1:15:06] So, you're going to hear a lot
[1:15:09] more about the public engagement
[1:15:11] in my colleague veronica's item
[1:15:13] coming up next. But just in
[1:15:16] terms of how we're approaching
[1:15:18] this for the scope of planned
[1:15:20] bay area, specifically,
[1:15:21] obviously creating different
[1:15:22] opportunities for residents,
[1:15:23] workers, and community partners
[1:15:26] to share their perspectives and
[1:15:28] insights, and there are kind of
[1:15:29] three key themes along
[1:15:31] highlights, which is depth over
[1:15:33] breadth, which I know has been
[1:15:35] an ongoing focus of this body in
[1:15:38] terms of emphasizing sustained
[1:15:39] conversations rather than, you
[1:15:42] know, just having these one-time
[1:15:44] efforts. And then on the far
[1:15:45] right, collaboration, elevating
[1:15:48] the role of our cbo partners, as
[1:15:50] we work to engage the region's
[1:15:53] diverse communities. I know,
[1:15:54] again, a long-standing priority
[1:15:56] of this body. In the middle, in
[1:15:59] terms of highlighting, you know,
[1:16:00] exploring new avenues, we're
[1:16:03] very interested in looking at
[1:16:05] gamification, short form video,
[1:16:06] innovative web content to make
[1:16:09] more engaging material for our
[1:16:11] different audiences. And you
[1:16:13] know, in the image in the
[1:16:15] middle, I'll direct -- it's kind
[1:16:19] of like a street grid, that's
[1:16:19] showing some different
[1:16:20] development as well as
[1:16:22] transportation and some green
[1:16:24] fields. And this is a
[1:16:25] screenshot of an actual game
[1:16:27] that has been developed by one
[1:16:29] of our mineta institute
[1:16:31] students, and we're really
[1:16:33] looking at, you know, different
[1:16:35] game options that these students
[1:16:36] have been developed to inform
[1:16:38] some of our scenario planning
[1:16:40] work that we expect to move
[1:16:42] forward next year. So, really
[1:16:44] excited about those types of
[1:16:45] collaboration opportunities.
[1:16:49] Next slide.
[1:16:51] You know, on the -- engaging
[1:16:53] with our more technical
[1:16:54] partners, you know, which does
[1:16:56] include this body, as well as
[1:16:58] our local jurisdictions, are
[1:17:00] transit operators, labor,
[1:17:03] business, cbo's, non-profits,
[1:17:05] you know, I think there are a
[1:17:07] few key themes we want to
[1:17:08] highlight which is, again,
[1:17:10] showing up. So, obviously
[1:17:11] meeting folks and elected
[1:17:12] officials where they are,
[1:17:14] through some of these existing
[1:17:16] networks and meetings. And also
[1:17:20] doing our traditional convenings
[1:17:22] where, you know, we do hold
[1:17:23] webinars, workshops, office
[1:17:25] hours, where we bring people
[1:17:27] together where they can be
[1:17:29] different partners can bring
[1:17:30] different perspectives together
[1:17:32] in the same environment together
[1:17:33] to discuss, share priorities and
[1:17:35] explore tradeoffs. And then
[1:17:36] something that we will make sure
[1:17:39] that you all get access to this.
[1:17:41] It will be an attachment in the
[1:17:44] OCTOBER kickoff item. We are
[1:17:45] developing what we're
[1:17:48] calling "coordination road maps:
[1:17:51] which is if you are a
[1:17:52] transportation stakeholders or
[1:17:54] environmental stakeholder, or
[1:17:56] housing stakeholder, how can you
[1:17:58] navigate this long and complex
[1:17:59] process. And I want to
[1:18:02] highlight for some of our newer
[1:18:03] members, we very much encourage
[1:18:05] council napgz all of the events
[1:18:07] that we convene. So if we're
[1:18:08] holding a workshop at the
[1:18:12] building, or we're doing a
[1:18:14] webinar, you know, we really
[1:18:15] support and hope that you all
[1:18:17] can be some of the voices at the
[1:18:18] table with some of these broader
[1:18:20] -- broader range of partners.
[1:18:23] next slide.
[1:18:24] So, do I want to highlight, you
[1:18:25] know, the plan does not take
[1:18:28] place in a vacuum. There are
[1:18:30] ongoing changes at the state and
[1:18:31] federal level that can impact
[1:18:35] how the plan is going to
[1:18:37] proceed. And this includes
[1:18:39] anticipated updates to the
[1:18:40] greenhouse gas emission
[1:18:41] reduction targets from the
[1:18:43] california air resources boards,
[1:18:45] as well as the associated
[1:18:47] guidelines. And we do
[1:18:50] anticipate those coming
[1:18:51] mid-cycle which could have
[1:18:53] impact on the plan. Senate bill
[1:18:55] 1087, which is the bill to
[1:18:58] modernize our existing long
[1:19:02] range plan framework of sb 375
[1:19:04] is currently on the governor's
[1:19:05] desk, if signed could have some
[1:19:07] significant impacts, and also
[1:19:10] assembly bill 2296 could shift
[1:19:12] timelines for the parallel rhna
[1:19:13] process. And at the federal
[1:19:14] level, I think everyone
[1:19:16] understands that the funding
[1:19:17] environment is quite uncertain
[1:19:18] there which could have
[1:19:19] meaningful impacts on the plan,
[1:19:23] and there are, you know, various
[1:19:24] rulemakings under way, or being
[1:19:26] considered on equity that,
[1:19:28] again, we MAY have to respond to
[1:19:28] if those move forward. Next
[1:19:32] slide.
[1:19:35] This is my last slide. Thank
[1:19:38] you for your patience as I wade
[1:19:40] through some dense materials.
[1:19:43] Some of the immediate next
[1:19:44] steps. The commission will
[1:19:45] consider adoption of the public
[1:19:46] participation plan later this
[1:19:48] month. We anticipate formally
[1:19:50] kicking off the plan at the mtc
[1:19:52] abag -- mtc planning and abag
[1:19:53] administrative committee meeting
[1:19:55] on OCTOBER 9th. The joint
[1:19:58] workshop is on OCTOBER 29th.
[1:20:01] and then we'll kickoff the first
[1:20:03] round of engagement on the plan
[1:20:05] with a particular focus on the
[1:20:06] plan's vision and guiding
[1:20:11] principles. So stay tuned for
[1:20:12] more on that. Then we
[1:20:14] anticipate coming back to the
[1:20:16] council as well as our
[1:20:19] committees for more detailed
[1:20:21] updates on the foundations and
[1:20:23] outlook phases of the work.
[1:20:24] That concludes my presentation.
[1:20:25] You know, always happy to answer
[1:20:27] any questions that you MAY have,
[1:20:28] and you know, just for
[1:20:30] consideration, we do have a
[1:20:31] couple of discussion questions,
[1:20:34] including which phases of the
[1:20:36] planned bay area process are of
[1:20:38] greatest interest to you, and
[1:20:39] whether you have any thoughts
[1:20:40] and perspectives on the proposed
[1:20:41] engagement approach that we
[1:20:45] highlighted. Thank you, again.
[1:20:46] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[1:20:47] thank you so much chirag. This
[1:20:50] was a really great presentation.
[1:20:51] And I just want to respond
[1:20:53] quickly and say, like, I really
[1:20:55] love the gaming option. It's
[1:21:02] like a dream to me, and I really
[1:21:04] lawful that our duong people are
[1:21:07] the ones taking the lead like
[1:21:10] help us reimagine and then so
[1:21:12] appreciate the naming that these
[1:21:14] documents are basically
[1:21:15] communication documents.
[1:21:16] They're opportunities for us to
[1:21:17] learn and digest the information
[1:21:19] this's going to guide our future
[1:21:21] and finally I want to underscore
[1:21:23] what you said about encouraging
[1:21:24] our council members to
[1:21:28] participate in convenings, I
[1:21:30] think that's very valuable and
[1:21:33] so I hope that we take his
[1:21:34] invitation to go and do that.
[1:21:36] Now I would like to see if there
[1:21:38] are council members who would
[1:21:41] like to participate in
[1:21:42] discussion, please raise your
[1:21:43] hands. Actually going to start
[1:21:47] on my right, council member
[1:21:49] wong, council member duong,
[1:21:50] council member trotten berg,
[1:21:52] council member baldini, council
[1:21:54] member saurnlds and council
[1:21:56] member cushman. I'll start with
[1:21:58] you council member wong.
[1:21:59] >>janelle wong: thank you so
[1:21:59] much for this presentation.
[1:22:01] This was good laying out the
[1:22:08] process and the plan. So that's
[1:22:09] one. My question although it's
[1:22:12] not the guiding questions in
[1:22:14] terms of preparing for emerging
[1:22:17] to tells, like ai automation and
[1:22:19] e-bikes, I'm curious as to why
[1:22:21] e-bikes autonomous vehicles were
[1:22:25] grouped together as an emerging
[1:22:25] technology. E likes have been
[1:22:28] around for a while and I know
[1:22:32] there is hot debated discussion
[1:22:35] about different versions of
[1:22:37] e-motos, versus e-bikes and I'm
[1:22:38] curious as to how we're going to
[1:22:40] approach that discussion in this
[1:22:43] plan in terms of infrastructure.
[1:22:44] >>chair, carina vinh lieu: go
[1:22:47] ahead and respond.
[1:22:48] >>chirag rabari: thank you for
[1:22:50] that I think the intention
[1:22:52] wasn't necessarily to
[1:22:53] communicate that these are, sort
[1:22:55] of, going together it's just
[1:22:58] these are kind of topics that we
[1:23:01] have heard and very much agree
[1:23:02] that they have distinct avenues
[1:23:04] for exploration. I will say the
[1:23:07] thing we have heard on e-bikes
[1:23:09] really maybe was more of that
[1:23:10] connection to the safety angle
[1:23:12] because there has been so much
[1:23:13] in the news recently about
[1:23:15] incidents involving duong folks.
[1:23:17] So I think it would probably be
[1:23:20] more with respect to thinking
[1:23:21] about our transportation safety
[1:23:24] strategies whereas you know
[1:23:28] automation is about future
[1:23:31] assumptions about ai adoption do
[1:23:33] we need strategies to help
[1:23:34] address some of those potential
[1:23:36] impact and I think ai writ large
[1:23:39] is kind of a big trajectory of
[1:23:40] the region. Particularly in
[1:23:43] terms of jobs and opportunities.
[1:23:44] So, they all get explored kind
[1:23:46] of through the appropriate plan
[1:23:47] phases. And I think as we
[1:23:49] develop those road maps, we can
[1:23:51] try to spell that out a little
[1:23:54] bit more, like, okay, if you're
[1:23:56] interested in this topic this is
[1:23:58] the phase and work stream that
[1:24:00] we would encourage you to follow
[1:24:03] closely.
[1:24:03] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[1:24:06] thank you. Next we have council
[1:24:08] member duong.
[1:24:09] >>bryant duong: thank you for
[1:24:12] the presentation. Foundations
[1:24:18] for me, is, settled -- but most
[1:24:21] decided. But one thing I would
[1:24:24] encourage us to keep front and
[1:24:26] center is implementation
[1:24:28] feasibility. In my community
[1:24:30] development work I see a gap
[1:24:31] sometimes between setting
[1:24:33] regional goals particularly as
[1:24:35] it relates to housing, and
[1:24:36] having ecosystem needed to
[1:24:38] actually deliver them, whether
[1:24:40] that's project pipeline,
[1:24:42] predevelopment resources,
[1:24:42] organizational capacity, or
[1:24:43] coordination across agencies and
[1:24:46] developers.
[1:24:49] Since the foundations and
[1:24:51] outlook phases will be
[1:24:53] revisiting the land use
[1:24:55] framework, evaluating existing
[1:24:56] strategies, and testing growth
[1:24:59] and fiscal assumptions, I think
[1:25:01] this could be a good point to
[1:25:03] make sure those strategies are
[1:25:05] grounded in what actually it
[1:25:07] takes to deliver housing. I
[1:25:09] would be especially interested
[1:25:12] in lessons about what has and
[1:25:15] hasn't worked in prior plans,
[1:25:17] what informed that analysis.
[1:25:19] Thank you.
[1:25:19] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[1:25:21] thank you council member duong.
[1:25:23] Was there a question -- was that
[1:25:24] question something you want a
[1:25:26] response for? Or was it more
[1:25:31] like a rhetorical, like, broader
[1:25:33] question?
[1:25:34] >>bryant duong: perhaps just a
[1:25:36] comment doesn't exactly get a
[1:25:36] response.
[1:25:37] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[1:25:39] okay. Thank you. Council
[1:25:41] member trachtenberg?
[1:25:41] >>gaetano trachtenberg: thank
[1:25:42] you staff for the presentation
[1:25:44] and the level-setting. It's
[1:25:45] very helpful. And I appreciate
[1:25:47] your comments, as well, council
[1:25:48] member.
[1:25:51] I really like the idea of these
[1:25:52] coordination road maps. That
[1:25:54] feels extremely helpful, and I
[1:25:55] was wondering if you could
[1:25:56] describe a little bit more
[1:25:57] about, you know, what you are
[1:26:00] imagining there, and when we
[1:26:01] might expect seeing some version
[1:26:05] of that, or another opportunity
[1:26:08] to engage and maybe provide
[1:26:13] feedback would be helpful to us.
[1:26:14] >>chirag rabari: yes, I think
[1:26:16] we're hoping to include maybe
[1:26:18] the first iteration of these
[1:26:22] road maps as part of our formal
[1:26:23] kick offer item next month, and
[1:26:25] we can ensure that council
[1:26:26] members receive a copy of that.
[1:26:28] I would just say briefly what it
[1:26:31] will try to do is, through a
[1:26:34] topic based lens, whether
[1:26:36] transportation, housing, land
[1:26:40] use growth, environmental
[1:26:40] resilience, sort of, highlight
[1:26:44] the big picture issues that, you
[1:26:50] know, those particular tracks of
[1:26:51] work are trying to address and
[1:26:52] then provide a detailed
[1:26:55] accounting of, like, which items
[1:26:57] will be coming forward, how it
[1:26:59] was likely to manifest in both
[1:27:01] public and partner engagement
[1:27:03] context. What some of the key
[1:27:06] expected deliverables and
[1:27:08] milestones will be for that --
[1:27:10] those topics, and then, you
[1:27:12] know, what are the kind of
[1:27:14] keyboard level decisions, and
[1:27:15] when. So, that way folks can,
[1:27:18] you know, if -- you were
[1:27:20] particularly interested in how
[1:27:23] we think about the performance
[1:27:26] of transportation strategies or
[1:27:28] projects, for example, you know,
[1:27:31] we're likely in the spring of
[1:27:33] 2027, putting forward, like, a
[1:27:35] draft methodology. We would be
[1:27:36] doing more analysis in the
[1:27:39] spring of 2028. So, I think it
[1:27:41] will hopefully just give folks a
[1:27:44] better sense of, like, okay,
[1:27:45] these are the things I care
[1:27:47] about and these are the things I
[1:27:51] should be paying attention and
[1:27:53] plugging in.
[1:27:53] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[1:27:55] thank you. I noticed that
[1:27:56] council member madrid just
[1:27:58] joined us online. Do we need to
[1:28:01] acknowledge? Or we can -- okay.
[1:28:03] Thank you.
[1:28:05] So we'll move on to the next
[1:28:07] member in the queue member
[1:28:08] baldini.
[1:28:09] >>michael baldini: yes good
[1:28:11] morning and thank you for the
[1:28:13] presentation. And your comment
[1:28:16] to my fellow council members,
[1:28:18] regarding the slide of looking
[1:28:20] at ambitious and visionary
[1:28:23] projects, as well as the
[1:28:27] benefits and the financial
[1:28:32] tradeoffs, and the project
[1:28:35] priorities. Then again, as I
[1:28:36] have participated somewhat over
[1:28:38] the past few years, you're
[1:28:40] looking at what seems to be
[1:28:44] moving ahead without regard to
[1:28:47] any, sort of -- and I'm reminded
[1:28:50] of the conversation between
[1:28:53] admiral kirk and spock in the
[1:28:55] dying moments in the needs of
[1:28:58] the -- many outweigh the needs
[1:29:00] of the few or the one. And
[1:29:03] that's now how we look at the
[1:29:06] disabled population, or even the
[1:29:08] bicycle coalition in many of our
[1:29:11] decisions. But looking at cost.
[1:29:14] And it's difficult for me to
[1:29:16] wrap around, and what I'm
[1:29:18] looking forward as for as my
[1:29:19] answer is how will these be
[1:29:22] addressed as I drill down, like
[1:29:25] spending $6.7 billion to go a
[1:29:28] couple of miles from 4th street
[1:29:31] station in caltrain to
[1:29:34] salesforce tower. The north bay
[1:29:36] could use $6.7 billion, when
[1:29:38] let's say you could walk or take
[1:29:41] a cab for 3 to $11, you could
[1:29:44] take a bus for $2. That's
[1:29:47] enough to pay 600 million
[1:29:49] passengers -- people that were
[1:29:52] going to go to salesforce tower
[1:29:53] anywhere in the city. So then
[1:29:55] you're looking at diridon, as
[1:29:57] well, when you're giving more
[1:29:59] money -- and I don't mean you, I
[1:30:00] mean the mtc, in general, and
[1:30:04] the taxpayers, giving more money
[1:30:09] to connect, you know, six miles
[1:30:10] of bart who already hasn't
[1:30:14] demonstrated that they know how
[1:30:16] to manage money, giving them
[1:30:17] more to manage and operate as
[1:30:19] far as budget. So, are we
[1:30:24] actually going to say, no this
[1:30:29] doesn't work? Or doesn't make
[1:30:32] sense, given our little post
[1:30:34] money. Or do we just ask and
[1:30:37] ask and ask, I haven't had a pay
[1:30:41] raise in three years and I'm a
[1:30:43] general population but do we
[1:30:45] continue to carry the burden of
[1:30:47] these projects that some make no
[1:30:50] sense at all and I understand to
[1:30:52] one or many it means a lot but
[1:30:54] it's difficult to see these
[1:30:55] numbers and actual benefits that
[1:30:58] we have as far as our agencies,
[1:31:00] 27 of them, manage their funds
[1:31:04] and taxpayer money, so I would
[1:31:06] like to see really dig down deep
[1:31:09] as how does this benefit the
[1:31:12] network? I still can't get to
[1:31:15] napa or sonoma from here without
[1:31:16] multiple hours of my day spent
[1:31:18] travelling and non-productive.
[1:31:20] And so looking at these major
[1:31:22] projects and many of the smaller
[1:31:24] projects t doesn't make sense.
[1:31:25] Livermore valley connecting 300
[1:31:27] feet or whatever, that means
[1:31:29] somebody in a wheelchair has to
[1:31:32] have an umbrella get out of the
[1:31:33] train and get on to another
[1:31:35] vehicle and off they go. So
[1:31:37] looking at that last mile. It's
[1:31:40] kind of frustrating to see these
[1:31:42] expenditures and hope this will
[1:31:43] provide some answers when we get
[1:31:44] down to t thank you very much
[1:31:46] for your time.
[1:31:47] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[1:31:48] thank you for your comments
[1:31:52] council member baldini.
[1:31:54] Council member saunders is next
[1:31:55] on the queue.
[1:31:56] >>joshua saunders: thank you.
[1:32:00] I wanted to mention -- and
[1:32:03] thafrngsz thanks for the
[1:32:04] presentation. I'm glad that in
[1:32:05] the presentation you brought up
[1:32:06] the sea level rise and the cost
[1:32:08] of sea level rise, and one of
[1:32:09] the questions I was just going
[1:32:11] to put out there was, I know
[1:32:13] it's hard to quantify, but I'm
[1:32:15] wondering if you have a sense of
[1:32:17] how much these costs are going
[1:32:19] to be, and how much they're
[1:32:21] going to take from other sources
[1:32:23] and other things we could be
[1:32:27] doing with our resources, and
[1:32:31] how much that would impact it?
[1:32:33] And my other question has to do
[1:32:35] with e-bike technology. And the
[1:32:36] reason I bring up this is I live
[1:32:38] in the east bay area, and I walk
[1:32:41] along the ohlone greenway often,
[1:32:44] and I will see -- and I have
[1:32:46] some vision, I'll see zipping
[1:32:48] past me, and I'm wondering
[1:32:49] sooner or later, someone is
[1:32:52] going to hit me. I mean, people
[1:32:53] are people, and they make their
[1:32:55] mistakes. I reached out to the
[1:32:58] poem at the local level, you
[1:33:02] know, my COUNCILMAN And staff,
[1:33:04] in el cerrito, and I'm just
[1:33:07] wondering how that ties into
[1:33:09] what you at mtc are doing with
[1:33:10] that. Thank you.
[1:33:11] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[1:33:12] thank you member saunders just
[1:33:13] because there are two questions
[1:33:15] about cost and then separate
[1:33:16] question about e-bikes and
[1:33:17] disability community, just going
[1:33:20] to pause to see if staff wants
[1:33:22] to respond to those before
[1:33:23] moving on?
[1:33:25] >>chirag rabari: yes, on the --
[1:33:26] thank you for that question
[1:33:27] member saunders. On the sea
[1:33:29] level rise, you know, we have
[1:33:31] been collaborating with bcdc on
[1:33:32] this work over several years,
[1:33:35] and you know, we do -- we have
[1:33:36] developed various cost
[1:33:40] estimates, which is, you know,
[1:33:43] in order to adapt the entire bay
[1:33:46] to up to five feet of water
[1:33:50] rise, you know, it would cost
[1:33:56] approximately $100 billion, or
[1:33:58] thereabouts, looking all the way
[1:34:01] out to 2050, you know, the
[1:34:02] analytical teams have also done
[1:34:04] estimates of what the cost of
[1:34:06] not adapting the bay could be,
[1:34:08] and you know, these are on order
[1:34:12] of 2 to 3 times in magnitude.
[1:34:16] You know, this space, there is
[1:34:16] certainly less available
[1:34:19] resources in terms of how to
[1:34:21] fund that adaptation, and, you
[1:34:24] know, I think that's simple
[1:34:26] y an
[1:34:27] aspect that we want to continue
[1:34:30] to highlight and exploring for
[1:34:31] our, as a region in terms of
[1:34:35] what would it take to pursue
[1:34:37] these different adaptation
[1:34:40] pathways and how might we
[1:34:42] respond if there were not
[1:34:51] greater levels of resources
[1:34:57] available. On the e-bikes the
[1:35:00] plan context certainly an area
[1:35:01] one of the plan strategies
[1:35:03] existing plan strategies has to
[1:35:05] do with speed limits on
[1:35:07] highways, speed limits on
[1:35:09] roadways, perhaps there is
[1:35:11] something related to bike speed
[1:35:12] limits and that could be
[1:35:13] explored and we could
[1:35:14] demonstrate what the potential
[1:35:15] safety benefits of that could
[1:35:19] be. So I think this is
[1:35:21] definitely something that's on
[1:35:22] our radar and we're interested
[1:35:24] in discussing further with our
[1:35:26] different partners who are more
[1:35:27] engaged in this space.
[1:35:28] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[1:35:32] thank you. Member cushman?
[1:35:35] >>warren cushman: okay. So I
[1:35:37] want to talk about three
[1:35:39] categories each one a little
[1:35:41] bit. First with transportation.
[1:35:43] It's a huge category, I think
[1:35:45] the themes I'm thinking of is
[1:35:47] needs and tradeoffs, and how the
[1:35:49] needs and tradeoffs balance out.
[1:35:52] In the realm of transportation,
[1:35:53] one of the things I noticed is a
[1:35:55] lot of funding is spent in the
[1:35:57] rail realm, and I live in
[1:35:58] alameda county where a lot of
[1:36:01] buses are being used. And, so
[1:36:04] one tradeoff that I wonder about
[1:36:07] is how to balance the needs of
[1:36:10] all of the 27 different transit
[1:36:12] agencies, and how some of those
[1:36:14] MAY be more rail focused and
[1:36:16] some MAY be more bus focused,
[1:36:18] and how you balance those needs
[1:36:20] all across communities. With
[1:36:23] regard to the public rights of
[1:36:26] way piece, or the pedestrian
[1:36:29] piece, I do think that there are
[1:36:30] also tradeoffs and needs there.
[1:36:33] I would foe further than
[1:36:36] roadways. I would think about
[1:36:37] the sidewalk as a shared space,
[1:36:39] and thinking about how to
[1:36:42] navigate that. One of the
[1:36:44] struggles that blind folks have
[1:36:46] are around e scooters or
[1:36:49] scooters, and how some of those
[1:36:51] can create safety challenges for
[1:36:52] blind folks and I'm sure other
[1:36:55] folks as well. So, I think the
[1:36:57] whole public rights of way, sort
[1:37:00] of, space, or the pedestrian
[1:37:03] space needs to be looked at.
[1:37:05] And I don't know how to -- some
[1:37:07] women call it active
[1:37:07] transportation. I think that
[1:37:09] space needs to be looked at more
[1:37:10] broadly. In the housing space,
[1:37:13] I just want to say that's a huge
[1:37:16] topic and a huge category. I
[1:37:17] hope we go deeper in housing.
[1:37:19] There are a lot of aspects, and
[1:37:20] I'm not going to be talking
[1:37:22] about all of them here, but I
[1:37:25] think we need to think about
[1:37:26] housing, deeply affordable
[1:37:29] housing for people who struggle,
[1:37:30] and who are either homeless or
[1:37:33] close to it. I think in terms
[1:37:36] of universal design and access,
[1:37:40] that's a big housing issue. And
[1:37:42] then tenant protections. Then
[1:37:44] finally in the realm of
[1:37:45] environmental piece and sea
[1:37:47] level rise and all that, I would
[1:37:49] just SARAs we think about 2060
[1:37:52] that, topic of sea level rise,
[1:37:54] environmental concerns, disaster
[1:37:55] preparedness, and preparing for
[1:37:57] what's to come, is going to be
[1:37:58] so much more important as we
[1:38:00] MARCH on through the years. I
[1:38:02] hope that we will be talking
[1:38:04] about disaster preparedness,
[1:38:05] preparing for fires,
[1:38:07] earthquakes, floods, and also
[1:38:09] thinking about preparing for the
[1:38:11] environmental challenges we're
[1:38:16] all facing. Thank you.
[1:38:16] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[1:38:18] thank you member cushman. Have
[1:38:20] I also third theme come up
[1:38:22] twice, how to balance the
[1:38:28] different 27 transit agencies in
[1:38:30] the plan, can staff -- give
[1:38:32] opportunity to respond to that.
[1:38:33] >>chirag rabari: thank you
[1:38:34] chair lieu thank you member
[1:38:35] cushman for the question, as
[1:38:36] well as member baldini. I think
[1:38:38] one thing I do want to maybe
[1:38:40] point to as something that we're
[1:38:42] hoping to build off of is the
[1:38:45] work that we did in
[1:38:47] collaboration with our transit
[1:38:49] operators in transit 2050+ which
[1:38:51] is part of the most recently
[1:38:53] adopted long range plan. And
[1:38:56] this did really try to lean more
[1:38:59] into a network and service
[1:39:01] oriented vision for the region's
[1:39:03] transit. You know, with the
[1:39:06] idea of in the near-term, we
[1:39:08] really have to prioritize
[1:39:10] service and customer focused
[1:39:11] improvements, while at the same
[1:39:15] time, you know, planning for our
[1:39:17] long-term needs through capital
[1:39:20] in, you know, major capital
[1:39:21] investments. I think we
[1:39:22] understand that the fiscal
[1:39:25] picture is shifting, and is
[1:39:26] likely to be more challenging
[1:39:28] and that is where we hope to
[1:39:29] bring all of our different
[1:39:31] partners and stakeholders
[1:39:33] together to really look at some
[1:39:34] of these different scenarios and
[1:39:36] to think about, well, what are
[1:39:38] our shared priorities in a
[1:39:40] future where there MAY be less
[1:39:42] resources. But, you know, this
[1:39:45] is a topic that has many
[1:39:46] different interests, many
[1:39:48] different priorities, and i
[1:39:49] think to the extent possible, we
[1:39:52] want the plan to be a venue that
[1:39:54] can bring folks together and
[1:39:57] find, like, the best version of
[1:39:59] regional consensus as we can, as
[1:40:06] we develop the long range plan.
[1:40:07] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[1:40:09] thank you. I see three hands in
[1:40:12] the zoom space, member madrid,
[1:40:17] mirante and hankerson. Member
[1:40:17] madrid?
[1:40:19] >>alexander madrid: thank you
[1:40:26] for the presentation. This was
[1:40:32] mentioned, I want to ask the
[1:40:39] question, is it worthy, good for
[1:40:42] the transportation space, but I
[1:40:45] noticed there is a lot of
[1:40:55] accidents in san francisco
[1:40:58] regarding people using
[1:41:01] sidewalks. Scooters and
[1:41:15] sometimes e-bikes, using, some
[1:41:21] people you run over them, we
[1:41:24] talked to people in san
[1:41:26] francisco, and they said they
[1:41:34] cannot cite them unless only
[1:41:37] police department only can do
[1:41:41] that. And I understand you
[1:41:44] mentioned about speed limit, and
[1:41:49] right now it doesn't work. And
[1:41:57] also companies tend to try to
[1:41:59] mitigate and it doesn't work as
[1:42:02] of now. So, I just want to hear
[1:42:12] from you on how do you mitigate
[1:42:21] and how to plan to prevent it
[1:42:21] happening. Of course, you're
[1:42:26] going to talk to partner
[1:42:30] agencies, but, again, but,
[1:42:36] again, talk is cheap, and
[1:42:40] planning implementation is what
[1:42:45] I'm looking to do. Thank you.
[1:42:45] >>chair, carina vinh lieu: I
[1:42:47] thank all our council members
[1:42:49] for highlighting these issues
[1:42:50] around policy and also
[1:42:53] enforcement around, like,
[1:42:54] different modes, especially for
[1:42:56] our communities with disability.
[1:42:58] So, sounds like this was a topic
[1:42:59] that definitely could be
[1:43:01] addressed here. I'm going to
[1:43:02] give staff a chance to respond
[1:43:06] to that.
[1:43:07] >>chirag rabari: certainly.
[1:43:09] Thank you member madrid for the
[1:43:10] comment. We have certainly
[1:43:11] heard a lot about this issue,
[1:43:13] and I think, you know, our
[1:43:16] commitment is to really work
[1:43:19] with our partners to try to
[1:43:21] determine what the best solution
[1:43:22] in the long-range planning
[1:43:25] context is. You know, I want to
[1:43:26] be honest and transparent that,
[1:43:30] you know, the long range plan
[1:43:31] does include a lot of very
[1:43:32] ambitious strategies related to
[1:43:35] safety, related to vision zero,
[1:43:36] related to active
[1:43:37] transportation, related to speed
[1:43:40] limits. I think the challenge
[1:43:42] has been on the implementation
[1:43:44] side. So, you know, I think
[1:43:45] there are certain additional
[1:43:47] things that we can explore in
[1:43:49] the long-range planning context.
[1:43:51] There are summer things we can
[1:43:54] do in terms of communications
[1:43:56] and emphasis. But the challenge
[1:43:58] is always translating that plan
[1:44:00] into reality. And I think
[1:44:02] that's where, as we develop our
[1:44:05] implementation plan and we think
[1:44:07] about near-term priorities, that
[1:44:08] is certainly something that we
[1:44:10] can explore, but, you know, we
[1:44:13] have a vision zero and safety
[1:44:15] program internally. I know many
[1:44:17] of our partners have their own
[1:44:18] programs, and you know, this
[1:44:20] could just be a -- a --
[1:44:22] something that, you know, we
[1:44:24] need to explore through multiple
[1:44:25] avenues, while also finding the
[1:44:29] right kind of angle in a long
[1:44:31] range plan.
[1:44:32] >>alexander madrid: so can you
[1:44:34] tell us a little bit of that
[1:44:40] idea right now? You mentioned
[1:44:44] you are exploring those ideas.
[1:44:45] Can you tell us some of those
[1:44:52] right now, if you MAY?
[1:44:54] >>chirag rabari: yes. So, I
[1:44:56] think, again, in the long-range
[1:44:57] planning context, we think about
[1:45:01] these long-term policies and
[1:45:02] investments that we can
[1:45:06] implement. So, you know, maybe
[1:45:08] there are revisions or
[1:45:10] clarifications that we can make
[1:45:12] to our existing safety
[1:45:15] strategies or existing vision
[1:45:17] zero strategies, as we think
[1:45:19] about our potential investments
[1:45:23] at a programmatic level, in
[1:45:24] active transportation, are there
[1:45:26] additional investments that
[1:45:28] could potentially be highlighted
[1:45:29] that could address some of the
[1:45:30] challenges in this space. And
[1:45:34] then, again, as we develop that
[1:45:34] near-term implementation plan,
[1:45:37] are there maybe, you know,
[1:45:40] further studies or programmatic
[1:45:42] efforts that mtc abag could
[1:45:44] commit to that, again, will
[1:45:45] speak more directly to these
[1:45:47] challenges. So, those are just
[1:45:48] some of the ideas on the table.
[1:45:51] But, you know, we know that a
[1:45:54] lot of our implementing partners
[1:45:56] at the cities and their public
[1:45:58] works departments, at the, you
[1:46:00] know, the various different
[1:46:02] operators, this is something
[1:46:03] that's front of mind for them,
[1:46:05] as well, and do look forward to
[1:46:08] exploring with them over the
[1:46:11] multi-year playing process. --
[1:46:12] planning process.
[1:46:13] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[1:46:14] thank you. Just to be mindful
[1:46:15] that there are two more people
[1:46:17] in the queue, I want to move on
[1:46:20] to member mirante's question,
[1:46:23] and member hankerson's question.
[1:46:25] Member mirante.
[1:46:26] >>louis mirante: thank you. No
[1:46:27] specific question. I'm just
[1:46:29] hoping you can tell us a little
[1:46:30] bit more about the threats you
[1:46:32] have identified to planning for
[1:46:33] race equity in this document
[1:46:35] from the federal government and
[1:46:39] how mtc abag are anticipating
[1:46:44] insulating ourselves from that?
[1:46:44] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[1:46:46] thank you for that member
[1:46:47] mirante. Since we also have
[1:46:49] member hankerson in the queue.
[1:46:51] We'll let you ask your question,
[1:46:53] and see if staff can circle back
[1:46:56] with an answer for both. Member
[1:46:58] hankerson?
[1:46:59] >>dwayne hankerson: I just want
[1:47:02] to know -- oh, thank you for the
[1:47:04] presentation I thought it was
[1:47:05] straightforward and really
[1:47:07] appreciate it. I just wanted to
[1:47:10] know if you could give me an
[1:47:12] update on, you said adapting the
[1:47:15] bay area, is that considering
[1:47:21] highway 37 as a priority?
[1:47:23] Considering the sea level rise
[1:47:24] that floods the highway right
[1:47:26] now, and will eventually flood
[1:47:27] the city of vallejo, can you
[1:47:30] give us an update on that?
[1:47:30] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[1:47:32] thank you member hankerson.
[1:47:33] Let's turn it over to staff to
[1:47:37] respond 50 to member mirante's
[1:47:39] question, and then member
[1:47:40] hankerson's question.
[1:47:41] >>chirag rabari: yes, I think,
[1:47:43] you know, certainly want to
[1:47:46] acknowledge that this is a, you
[1:47:49] know, a dynamic environment and
[1:47:51] there are lots of shifting
[1:47:52] [Laughter]
[1:47:54] -- you know, shifting orders
[1:47:56] coming down. There are various
[1:47:58] lawsuits. So, I think our --
[1:47:59] our perspective has always been,
[1:48:03] you know, we don't want to over
[1:48:05] react, but we also need to, you
[1:48:07] know, be prepared and nimble in
[1:48:09] the event that there are, you
[1:48:10] know, various changes that are
[1:48:14] required. I think, you know,
[1:48:16] centering equity has and will
[1:48:20] continue to be a core aspect of
[1:48:22] the long range plan, and I don't
[1:48:24] think that that is going to
[1:48:27] change, because this is the bay
[1:48:29] area's regional vision for
[1:48:32] transportation, housing, and the
[1:48:35] environment. But the plan does
[1:48:36] have, you know, certain federal
[1:48:38] requirements that it does need
[1:48:41] to address. The feds do certify
[1:48:44] our status as a metropolitan
[1:48:47] planning organization, you know,
[1:48:53] every, I think, four years or
[1:48:54] thereabouts. And as these
[1:48:55] different rulemakings come
[1:48:57] through, we're going to have to
[1:48:58] be thoughtful about how to, you
[1:49:00] know, respond to them in our
[1:49:02] capacity as a federally
[1:49:05] designated mpo. But I don't
[1:49:08] think that our emphasis on, you
[1:49:12] know, equity is going to change
[1:49:23] in the long range plan itself.
[1:49:24] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[1:49:24] thank you. Are there any
[1:49:26] responses to member hankerson's
[1:49:27] question?
[1:49:28] >>chirag rabari: yeah, I think
[1:49:32] the question was just about the
[1:49:35] sr37 and some of the work that's
[1:49:37] moving forward in terms adapting
[1:49:42] the bay area. So, you know, we
[1:49:45] have, in terms of the, you know,
[1:49:46] the transportation projects that
[1:49:50] are included in the long range
[1:49:57] plan, there -- we -- our
[1:50:02] fiscally constrained
[1:50:04] transportation plan does include
[1:50:06] an interim project you know the
[1:50:08] smaller scale project that mtc
[1:50:09] and caltrans and our various
[1:50:11] partners in the north bay are
[1:50:13] looking to implement to deal
[1:50:15] with some of the near-term
[1:50:17] protection needs. The plan also
[1:50:19] has a resilience project list
[1:50:27] which is not a fiscally
[1:50:28] constrained document that does
[1:50:31] identify that longer term need
[1:50:35] to adapt to sr37 to the broader
[1:50:36] range of challenges. So that is
[1:50:38] kind of our starting point for
[1:50:41] our work as we head into planned
[1:50:43] bay area 2060, and as the
[1:50:45] project lists do develop, we
[1:50:46] would anticipate getting new
[1:50:48] information, getting new
[1:50:51] details, and updating those
[1:50:55] project characterses as
[1:50:57] appropriate based on the fiscal
[1:51:00] resources that are available.
[1:51:01] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[1:51:02] matt?
[1:51:03] >>matt maloney: I want to make
[1:51:05] a couple comments about the
[1:51:06] plan. Kind of that we're in
[1:51:08] this period of time, you know,
[1:51:10] beginning a new plan with all of
[1:51:11] you, and you're going to be
[1:51:15] hearing a lot about it over the
[1:51:18] next few years. You know, I
[1:51:20] think these plans are obviously
[1:51:21] very important for the region,
[1:51:23] and we put a lot of staff energy
[1:51:27] into them. But I also think
[1:51:28] foundationally, just for the
[1:51:29] council, is understanding, sort
[1:51:31] of, what the plan is and what it
[1:51:33] isn't. You know, it's a
[1:51:36] long-term vision, and really a
[1:51:40] guide for action for this
[1:51:41] region. It has some
[1:51:43] implementation teeth to it,
[1:51:44] depending on what part of the
[1:51:46] plan we're talking about, but in
[1:51:50] large part, it sets the vision
[1:51:51] and the implementation details
[1:51:52] need to be carried out, usually
[1:51:55] by our partners, whether they're
[1:51:56] local governments, you know,
[1:52:00] transit agencies, the state, the
[1:52:01] feds, you know, everybody is
[1:52:03] involved in kind of getting that
[1:52:05] stuff done.
[1:52:07] I guess what I'm trying to say
[1:52:09] is that it doesn't also legend
[1:52:11] itself to ga going deep and
[1:52:13] granular on every single topic.
[1:52:15] We just comment do it in the
[1:52:16] plan. Sometimes we have to be
[1:52:18] at a certain level, maybe not
[1:52:20] 30,000 feet, but sometimes like
[1:52:21] 5 to 10,000 feet on a lot of
[1:52:25] these issues, you know, and the
[1:52:26] goal being that we're laying out
[1:52:27] strategies for the region to,
[1:52:29] sort of, move forward. So,
[1:52:30] really, the policy making and
[1:52:31] the strategies are really the
[1:52:32] foundation of what makes the
[1:52:34] plan work, but we also have to
[1:52:36] remember that there is so much
[1:52:38] on the implementation side that
[1:52:41] we can't control ourselves.
[1:52:43] And, you know, that it requires
[1:52:45] a lot of action from others.
[1:52:46] And I think that's a theme we'll
[1:52:49] return to throughout this
[1:52:50] process. Thanks.
[1:52:51] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[1:52:53] thank you, matt. Thank you
[1:52:54] council members for your
[1:52:57] discussion. And, also, I just
[1:52:59] want to acknowledge chirag, you
[1:53:01] just took on a lot of hard
[1:53:02] questions on the spot. So,
[1:53:05] thank you. You did a great job.
[1:53:07] Will the clerk please inform us
[1:53:08] if there is any public comment
[1:53:10] submitted for this item and
[1:53:12] whether there are any members of
[1:53:14] the public who wish to give
[1:53:15] public comment?
[1:53:16] >>clerk, jessica lewis: we
[1:53:17] received no public comments for
[1:53:19] this item no speakers at the
[1:53:21] podium and no raised hands in
[1:53:24] the zoom space requesting to
[1:53:25] provide public comment.
[1:53:25] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[1:53:27] thank you.
[1:53:29] We'll move to agenda item five b
[1:53:32] this is the draft 2026 public
[1:53:33] participation plan for the san
[1:53:34] francisco bay area, summary of
[1:53:39] input received. This is an
[1:53:43] information item from veronica
[1:53:45] cummings, and also for
[1:53:46] edification of the council this
[1:53:49] is an item on our work plan and
[1:53:51] so is the planned bay area 2060
[1:53:52] so just acknowledging that we
[1:53:53] are hearing things directly
[1:53:55] about our work plan. So
[1:53:57] veronica cummings will you
[1:54:00] please give us the report?
[1:54:00] >>veronica cummings good
[1:54:01] morning. Thank you very much.
[1:54:04] My name is veronica cummings I'm
[1:54:06] the principal public information
[1:54:08] officer for engagement. I'm
[1:54:11] here today to share what we
[1:54:13] heard during the public review
[1:54:15] of the draft 2026 public
[1:54:16] participation plan or the ppp
[1:54:21] and how that feedback is
[1:54:23] informing the revised plan.
[1:54:26] I'll start with the quick
[1:54:29] refresher on the ppp and the
[1:54:31] federal state requirements it
[1:54:32] fulfills. Then walk through the
[1:54:34] engagement we conducted during
[1:54:36] the 45 day public comment period
[1:54:37] and key themes that emerged
[1:54:40] across these activities. I'll
[1:54:42] close with remaining milestones
[1:54:44] leading to consideration of the
[1:54:45] revised plan by the commission
[1:54:47] later this month. Next slide.
[1:54:49] As you MAY remember, printed the
[1:54:52] draft 2026ppp to you in JUNE, so
[1:54:54] these next couple of slides are
[1:54:56] meant to just be a refresher.
[1:54:59] At its core, the ppp serves as a
[1:55:01] guide for how bay area residents
[1:55:02] and our partners can engage with
[1:55:04] mtc's planning and
[1:55:06] decision-making processes. It
[1:55:08] explains where people can find
[1:55:10] information, how to stay
[1:55:11] informed about participation
[1:55:13] opportunities, how to provide
[1:55:15] input and how public comments
[1:55:17] are documented and reported
[1:55:21] back. The ppp also fulfills
[1:55:22] federal and state public
[1:55:23] participation plan requirements
[1:55:25] for major regional planning and
[1:55:28] funding efforts, including
[1:55:28] planned bay area and the
[1:55:31] transportation improvement plan.
[1:55:33] The document also guides our --
[1:55:35] I'm sorry -- includes our
[1:55:36] guiding principles for
[1:55:39] engagement and our engagement
[1:55:40] framework. Together these
[1:55:41] provide direction for how staff
[1:55:43] plans, convicts, and evaluates
[1:55:46] public engagement. Ultimately
[1:55:47] the goal is to make
[1:55:49] participation clearer, more
[1:55:50] accessible, and more
[1:55:51] transparent, both for members of
[1:55:53] the public who want to
[1:55:55] understand how and when they can
[1:55:56] participate, and for staff
[1:55:58] designing these opportunities.
[1:56:02] Next slide.
[1:56:04] This slide summarizes the
[1:56:05] federal and state requirements
[1:56:07] that provide the legal basis for
[1:56:11] the ppp. Under federal
[1:56:13] regulations, mtc must create
[1:56:16] opportunities for public
[1:56:17] involvement, participation and
[1:56:18] consultation throughout the
[1:56:19] development of the regional
[1:56:20] transportation plan and the
[1:56:20] transportation improvement
[1:56:26] program. Or tip.
[1:56:29] The tip is the region's
[1:56:31] federally required four-year
[1:56:33] list of near-term transportation
[1:56:34] projects and programs expected
[1:56:37] to receive funding. State law
[1:56:39] also requires mtc to develop an
[1:56:41] engagement plan for the
[1:56:42] sustainable community strategy.
[1:56:43] Together the regional
[1:56:44] transportation plan and
[1:56:45] sustainable community strategy
[1:56:47] make up the region's long range
[1:56:50] plan, planned bay area, and I do
[1:56:51] want to clarify one point about
[1:56:54] the scope of the ppp, it is an
[1:56:55] mtc required document adopted by
[1:56:58] the commission. While it does
[1:57:01] not impose legal participation
[1:57:04] requirements of abag, mtc/abag
[1:57:07] staff uses it as a guide -- uses
[1:57:09] it to guide engagement for joint
[1:57:10] planning work, such as planned
[1:57:13] bay area, and the ppp is
[1:57:15] primarily centered on mtc's core
[1:57:16] planning and funding
[1:57:19] responsibilities. It is not
[1:57:22] intended to be a comprehensive
[1:57:25] inventory of every engagement
[1:57:26] activity conducted across mtc
[1:57:27] abag and related authorities.
[1:57:30] Next slide.
[1:57:33] I'll now turn to the engagement
[1:57:35] we conducted during the public
[1:57:37] review and comment period.
[1:57:40] Staff released the draft ppp on
[1:57:42] JUNE 8th for a 45-day public
[1:57:43] comment period that closed
[1:57:45] JULY 23rd. During that period,
[1:57:48] we convened focus groups with
[1:57:49] representatives from
[1:57:50] community-based organizations
[1:57:52] serving a range of bay area
[1:57:54] communities, including older
[1:57:55] adults, immigrants, tribal
[1:57:57] communities, youth, and people
[1:57:59] with disabilities. We also held
[1:58:00] discussion groups with high
[1:58:02] school students participating in
[1:58:06] the normal
[1:58:13] alan -- norman mineta
[1:58:14] bay area summer academy, and
[1:58:15] these conversations focus
[1:58:17] specifically on how mtc can make
[1:58:19] participation more relevant,
[1:58:20] accessible and appealing to
[1:58:21] duong people. More personally
[1:58:23] for today's discussion, we held
[1:58:24] two discussion groups with
[1:58:25] members of this council focused
[1:58:28] on equity, accessibility, trust
[1:58:30] building and community centered
[1:58:31] engagement. Finally staff
[1:58:33] administered an online survey in
[1:58:34] english, spanish, and
[1:58:35] traditional chinese. Together
[1:58:38] these activities gave us both
[1:58:40] broad survey data and more
[1:58:41] detailed feedback from community
[1:58:43] partners, couth, council
[1:58:45] members, and formal commenters.
[1:58:48] in all more than 1300 people
[1:58:50] participated. Next slide. Youth, council
[1:58:51] members, and formal commenters.
[1:58:51] In all more than 1300 people
[1:58:52] participated. Next slide. What
[1:58:55] we heard, this slide gives a
[1:58:57] high-level picture of what we
[1:59:02] heard. All the participants
[1:59:02] represented different
[1:59:04] communities and engaged with us
[1:59:07] in different ways, the feedback
[1:59:08] was remarkably consistent.
[1:59:09] First and foremost, people want
[1:59:11] us to close the feedback loop.
[1:59:13] They want us to report back on
[1:59:14] what we heard and show how
[1:59:16] public input influenced
[1:59:17] recommendations and decisions.
[1:59:19] They also want us to meet people
[1:59:21] where they are, both in trusted
[1:59:25] community spaces and through
[1:59:27] digital channels and
[1:59:28] communication networks they
[1:59:32] already use. Reducing barriers
[1:59:35] to participation was another
[1:59:39] major theme, and participants
[1:59:41] identified language, disability,
[1:59:42] technology, transportation,
[1:59:43] scheduling and child care and
[1:59:46] other practical barriers that
[1:59:48] can make participation
[1:59:49] difficult. We also heard the
[1:59:50] need for plain language and
[1:59:52] clearer connection between
[1:59:54] regional planning and funding
[1:59:54] decisions and issues people
[1:59:57] snrns their daily lives.
[1:59:59] Participants want clearer value
[2:00:01] proposition for their time, they
[2:00:04] want to know why their input is
[2:00:06] needed, what is actually open
[2:00:08] for discussion, and how their
[2:00:10] participation MAY affect a
[2:00:12] decision. Finally they ask us
[2:00:13] to keep our communications
[2:00:15] clear, concise, and accessible.
[2:00:17] What is striking is how closely
[2:00:20] these findings align with what
[2:00:21] we have heard from this couple
[2:00:24] both during our JUNE ppp
[2:00:25] discussion and in your broader
[2:00:27] conversations about community
[2:00:29] engagement. The next slides
[2:00:32] take a closer look at these
[2:00:41] themes. Next slide.
[2:00:43] Increased transparency and
[2:00:44] accountability, participants
[2:00:46] consistently asked mtc to close
[2:00:48] the feedback loop by showing how
[2:00:50] public input influences plans,
[2:00:52] policies programs, invest
[2:00:53] decisions, they want us to
[2:00:56] report back on what we heard,
[2:00:57] share engagement results and
[2:00:58] identify tangible outcomes
[2:00:59] associated with public input.
[2:01:01] Many people told us they would
[2:01:02] be more willing to participate
[2:01:05] if they could see how their
[2:01:08] input led to action or
[2:01:09] meaningfully informed a
[2:01:10] recommendation. Conversely
[2:01:13] frustration grows when people
[2:01:14] never hear what happened after
[2:01:16] inn game activity or feel that a
[2:01:18] decision was already made before
[2:01:19] they were invited to the
[2:01:20] process. And this echoes pint
[2:01:23] that came up in this council's
[2:01:25] discussion as well, that people
[2:01:27] need to understand not only how
[2:01:29] to provide input but what is
[2:01:30] actually within their influence
[2:01:33] and what happens to that input
[2:01:34] afterward. So in practical
[2:01:36] terms that means being clear at
[2:01:38] the beginning about what is open
[2:01:41] for input then reporting back on
[2:01:45] on what we heard and how it was
[2:01:46] considered. When something
[2:01:48] cannot be incorporated and why.
[2:01:49] The bottom line is that closing
[2:01:51] the loop is fundamental to trust
[2:01:52] and people are more likely to
[2:01:54] participate when they could see
[2:01:56] that their time and input
[2:01:58] matter. Next slide.
[2:02:00] Number two meeting people where
[2:02:02] they are participants encouraged
[2:02:04] us to expand engagement beyond
[2:02:05] traditional public meetings and
[2:02:08] government buildings. They
[2:02:09] recommended reaching people in
[2:02:10] familiar trusted places such as
[2:02:12] schools, libraries, senior
[2:02:14] centers, transit hubs, health
[2:02:17] care facilities, cultural
[2:02:18] events, faith based
[2:02:19] organizations, and other
[2:02:20] community space presidency.
[2:02:23] They asked us to use the
[2:02:24] communication channels that
[2:02:26] people already rely on, and
[2:02:28] depending on the audience that
[2:02:30] might be social media, school
[2:02:32] notification systems, community
[2:02:33] organization networks or
[2:02:35] messaging applications. So it's
[2:02:37] more than changing the location
[2:02:39] of a meeting, it's about fitting
[2:02:40] participation into people's
[2:02:42] existing lives rather than
[2:02:45] expecting them to navigate an
[2:02:46] unfamiliar government process.
[2:02:47] This was also very clear in
[2:02:49] terms of messaging from this
[2:02:51] council during last month's
[2:02:53] meeting discussion.
[2:02:55] Members talked about going
[2:03:00] directly to cbo sites and
[2:03:02] existing community events,
[2:03:04] rather than expecting are thes
[2:03:07] to come to us just refreshing
[2:03:09] last month's discussion. So
[2:03:12] this reinforces the value of
[2:03:13] partnering with community
[2:03:15] organizations are that already
[2:03:16] have trusted relationships and
[2:03:17] understand how to reach people
[2:03:19] they serve. The bottom line is
[2:03:21] that engagement is most
[2:03:22] effective when it happens in
[2:03:23] trusted community spaces and
[2:03:25] through channels people already
[2:03:26] use. Next slide.
[2:03:29] Key finding number three, access
[2:03:31] and accessibility. Participants
[2:03:33] identified a number of barriers
[2:03:34] that can prevent people from
[2:03:36] participating even when they
[2:03:38] care about an issue, barriers
[2:03:40] such as language, limited
[2:03:42] mobility, disability access,
[2:03:43] technology, transportation, work
[2:03:45] schedules, child care, and
[2:03:47] family obligations. They called
[2:03:49] for higher I'm sorry -- they
[2:03:51] called for expanded language
[2:03:54] access, including translated
[2:03:55] materials, and high quality
[2:03:57] interpretation, as well as
[2:03:59] accommodations for people with
[2:04:00] disabilities and consistent
[2:04:01] virtual participation options.
[2:04:04] Survey respondents, as well as
[2:04:07] the council also emphasized
[2:04:08] evening and weekend
[2:04:09] opportunities for people whose
[2:04:17] work or family obligations make
[2:04:18] daytime participation difficult.
[2:04:21] Let's see. The practical
[2:04:22] takeaway is that the
[2:04:24] participation method, schedule,
[2:04:25] location, and accessibility
[2:04:27] services need to be considered
[2:04:28] together from the beginning, and
[2:04:31] not addressed separately after
[2:04:34] an aqtively has already been
[2:04:36] designed. Next slide.
[2:04:40] Key finding number four, using
[2:04:42] plain language, as well as
[2:04:45] language this's relevant.
[2:04:46] Participants asked mtc to
[2:04:48] explain our role,
[2:04:49] responsibilities, and decision
[2:04:50] make authority more clearly.
[2:04:53] Many community members do not
[2:04:55] fully understand how mtc differs
[2:04:57] from local governments and
[2:04:58] transit operators, or how
[2:05:00] regional planning and funding
[2:05:03] decisions affect their daily
[2:05:05] lives. They recommend concise,
[2:05:06] non-technical language,
[2:05:08] practical examples, and
[2:05:11] relatable explanations, along
[2:05:14] with simpler surveys, websites
[2:05:17] and other public-facing
[2:05:20] materials. And plain language
[2:05:23] it's about more than just
[2:05:26] removing jargon, it means giving
[2:05:27] people enough context to
[2:05:29] understand why the issues matter
[2:05:30] and what decisions are being
[2:05:31] made, how they can participate.
[2:05:33] The bottom line is that
[2:05:37] residents can engage more
[2:05:39] meaningfully when we explain our
[2:05:42] role, our decisions and their
[2:05:45] impacts in clear relatable
[2:05:46] terms. Next slide.
[2:05:49] Key finding number five.
[2:05:50] Strengthen community partnership
[2:05:52] presidency, community-based
[2:05:53] organizations and this council.
[2:05:55] Emphasize the importance of
[2:05:56] involving community partners
[2:06:00] earlier in the planning process,
[2:06:03] partners when an opportunity to
[2:06:04] help shape engagement
[2:06:06] strategies rather than being
[2:06:07] asked to implement an approach
[2:06:10] after its already been
[2:06:11] developed. Participants
[2:06:15] recommend cocreating these
[2:06:15] outreach strategies improving
[2:06:16] coordination among organizations
[2:06:17] and creating more opportunity
[2:06:19] for community partners to
[2:06:21] convene and learn from one
[2:06:24] another. They also emphasize
[2:06:28] broad geographic representation
[2:06:31] and recognizing the time,
[2:06:34] expertise, and lived experience
[2:06:35] community members contribute.
[2:06:37] Earlier more consistent
[2:06:39] collaboration can help staff
[2:06:40] choose relevant engagement
[2:06:43] methods anticipate barriers and
[2:06:45] avoid duplicating outreach that
[2:06:46] partners or other agencies have
[2:06:48] heard conducted. Let's see.
[2:06:49] Bottom line is that early
[2:06:51] coordinated and ongoing
[2:06:52] collaboration with trusted
[2:06:54] community partners leads to
[2:06:56] broader more equitable and more
[2:06:58] effective engagement. Next
[2:06:58] slide.
[2:07:02] Key finding number six, equity
[2:07:03] centered equity throughout
[2:07:06] engagement across all activities
[2:07:08] participants encouraged mtc
[2:07:10] prioritize communities that have
[2:07:11] historically been underserved or
[2:07:13] excluded from public
[2:07:14] decision-making. They asked us
[2:07:17] to work with trusted
[2:07:19] organizations and messengers and
[2:07:22] ensure broad geographic
[2:07:23] demographic representation and
[2:07:23] design participation
[2:07:24] opportunities that are
[2:07:26] inclusive, culturally responsive
[2:07:29] and accessible. And so this
[2:07:31] means equity should shape who is
[2:07:33] engaged, how engagement is
[2:07:35] designed, what resources are
[2:07:37] provided and how input is
[2:07:39] considered. And it also means
[2:07:40] recognizing that the same
[2:07:41] engagement method will not work
[2:07:44] equally for every community.
[2:07:46] The bottom line is that equity
[2:07:49] needs to be embedded throughout
[2:07:50] engagement, planning and
[2:07:52] implementation, rather than
[2:07:54] treated as a separate or
[2:07:54] standalone objective. Next
[2:07:59] slide.
[2:08:01] This final slide outlines the
[2:08:03] remaining steps in this process.
[2:08:05] Staff is now finalizing
[2:08:06] revisions to the plan based on
[2:08:08] what we heard from this council,
[2:08:11] as well as the feedback we
[2:08:12] received during our public
[2:08:14] comment period, and the revised
[2:08:16] plan will then be presented to
[2:08:18] the joint mtc abag legislation
[2:08:20] committee next friday, with a
[2:08:22] recommendation to forward it to
[2:08:23] the commission for consideration
[2:08:24] of adoption.
[2:08:26] I do want to close by thanking
[2:08:28] you for the feedback that you
[2:08:30] have provided throughout this
[2:08:32] process. Not only during the
[2:08:36] formal ppp review, but through
[2:08:39] the broader conversations the
[2:08:40] council has had about what
[2:08:41] meaningful community engagement
[2:08:43] should look like. The
[2:08:45] consistency between what we have
[2:08:46] heard through the public review
[2:08:48] and what you have been telling
[2:08:51] us reinforces the direction of
[2:08:53] this update. This does conclude
[2:08:56] my presentation, and I would be
[2:08:58] happy to answer any questions.
[2:08:59] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[2:09:00] thank you so much, veronica.
[2:09:01] It's great it see our own
[2:09:02] feedback incorporated into this
[2:09:04] slide deck. Thank you.
[2:09:07] And also just noting that as a
[2:09:09] community organizer, a lot of
[2:09:12] these things sound like
[2:09:12] organizing
[2:09:13] [Laughter]
[2:09:15] -- incorporated into this. So,
[2:09:17] I hope that it does get realized
[2:09:19] and resourced well. Are
[2:09:21] there council members who would
[2:09:22] like to participate in
[2:09:24] discussion? Please raise your
[2:09:26] hand. I'm going to start from
[2:09:32] my left. Member sbranti.
[2:09:46] Member demong. Member duong,
[2:09:49] cha, madrid on zoom. Let's
[2:09:52] start with you member sbranti.
[2:09:53] >>speaker: great. Thank you.
[2:09:54] Great presentation. I think I
[2:09:55] don't know if it's more of a
[2:09:57] question or comment, I guess
[2:09:58] it's a question. So there is a
[2:10:00] lot of rev representatives to
[2:10:01] community-based organizations
[2:10:03] which is fantastic and I
[2:10:04] participate in those. I'm not
[2:10:06] sure about the level of
[2:10:07] engagement with business
[2:10:08] community and I don't know if
[2:10:10] you're just community-based
[2:10:11] organizations is broadly
[2:10:13] incorporating business but a lot
[2:10:16] of times business community
[2:10:18] doesn't proactively think to
[2:10:20] participate in these kinds of
[2:10:21] processes and sometimes doesn't
[2:10:23] think these processes are for
[2:10:25] them. You know it's like
[2:10:27] governments doing this
[2:10:29] community-based organizations,
[2:10:31] ngo's, you know, there is a lot
[2:10:34] of silo effect so I want to make
[2:10:36] sure they're incorporated
[2:10:38] proactively into this process
[2:10:39] and also with the business
[2:10:41] community recognizing that it's
[2:10:45] not monolither so you have
[2:10:47] businesses like bay area council
[2:10:49] east bay commerce level small
[2:10:50] business those might be two
[2:10:53] different perspectives and
[2:10:54] thinking about labor as well
[2:10:56] interest that needs to be a
[2:10:57] participant in this you know,
[2:10:59] those that you know are bringing
[2:11:01] their lunch pail to work they're
[2:11:03] working noon to five or whatever
[2:11:06] their hours are, figuring out
[2:11:09] sometimes how it was alluded to
[2:11:10] that they will be different
[2:11:12] times evening sessions and
[2:11:14] everything else but again being
[2:11:16] intentional and proactive
[2:11:18] because they MAY if something's
[2:11:20] taking place at a community
[2:11:22] center or something they MAY not
[2:11:24] -- we might just need to have a
[2:11:26] bit more tailored outreach just
[2:11:28] something to think about.
[2:11:29] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[2:11:31] thank you member sbranti. I
[2:11:34] think to add to that would be
[2:11:37] nice to see where the consensus
[2:11:38] is if there were challenges of
[2:11:41] meeting people where they are in
[2:11:42] terms of feedback different
[2:11:44] interests angles that benefit
[2:11:47] mtc to find out what's the
[2:11:50] consensus about what we all need
[2:11:52] or something like that.
[2:11:53] >>speaker: amazing presentation
[2:11:55] as always it's great to hear
[2:11:57] about all the great work you
[2:11:59] guys are doing. Particularly
[2:12:02] with working with the mineta
[2:12:03] summer program and getting them
[2:12:07] to participate but I think you
[2:12:08] mentioned already it would be
[2:12:09] good once you guys are done with
[2:12:12] the revisions you submit to the
[2:12:14] commission on connecting back
[2:12:17] with the youth who participated
[2:12:21] and in the process specifically
[2:12:24] or broadly letting them know
[2:12:25] their engagement led to
[2:12:29] something actionable.
[2:12:31] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[2:12:36] thank you. Member?
[2:12:37] >>speaker: thank you for the
[2:12:38] presentation. Two comments and
[2:12:41] question. First what stood out
[2:12:43] most was close of the feedback
[2:12:54] loop when we're asking cbo's and
[2:12:58] and advisory bodies to stay
[2:13:03] engaged over a multi-year
[2:13:04] process
[2:13:05] process.
[2:13:09] >>bryant duong: people need
[2:13:10] to be able to see what happened
[2:13:13] with their input. Second,
[2:13:16] survey more than 1200, 1300
[2:13:17] participants came through it's
[2:13:18] carrying this effort but
[2:13:21] attachment b doesn't report who
[2:13:23] responded so there is no
[2:13:25] language by county income race
[2:13:27] is staff able to release that or
[2:13:29] provide council with that? If
[2:13:31] you know demographics weren't
[2:13:34] collected? I think that's worth
[2:13:36] knowing too worth considering by
[2:13:38] the next cycle. Thank you.
[2:13:38] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[2:13:41] would you like to respond to
[2:13:46] that?
[2:13:50] >>veronica cummings
[2:13:52] >>veronica cummings thank you
[2:13:53] very much for elevates the
[2:13:54] business community as a
[2:13:56] stakeholder which we recognize
[2:13:57] in your public participation
[2:14:00] plan we do have a list of
[2:14:02] stakeholders including chambers
[2:14:04] of commerce we absolutely try to
[2:14:06] be inclusive of all stakeholders
[2:14:09] in the bay area and thank you
[2:14:11] member duong for your suggestion
[2:14:14] to bring back the feedback to
[2:14:15] our high school academy
[2:14:16] participants I agree with you
[2:14:17] that it would be wonderful for
[2:14:19] them to see how their
[2:14:20] contribution to the discussion
[2:14:22] was incorporated into the public
[2:14:23] participation plan and then last
[2:14:25] question in response to the
[2:14:26] survey we do have the
[2:14:29] information of the survey
[2:14:31] respondents, the language
[2:14:33] participation, we also try to
[2:14:35] collect demographic information
[2:14:37] it's voluntary but it's not
[2:14:39] mandatory so that's a challenge
[2:14:40] in providing that information
[2:14:42] because we just tonight
[2:14:43] necessarily receive it.
[2:14:45] Including we're asked a lot of
[2:14:46] times to provide survey
[2:14:47] information at the county level
[2:14:49] which we also include, but again
[2:14:50] it's not required for
[2:14:53] respondents to provide. But we
[2:14:54] can absolutely provide any
[2:14:56] demographic information that we
[2:14:57] collected.
[2:14:58] >>bryant duong: great. Thank
[2:15:00] you.
[2:15:00] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[2:15:05] thank you. Next is member cha?
[2:15:05] >>kathleen cha: I really
[2:15:09] thought a very thorough
[2:15:10] presentation, it really did
[2:15:11] incorporate not only our
[2:15:13] thoughts but quite a few. And
[2:15:16] it did -- and I really under
[2:15:19] score what's been said about
[2:15:20] community-based organizations,
[2:15:22] but it also inspired in me that
[2:15:25] there are two ways to this.
[2:15:27] There is a lot of already
[2:15:28] feeling before this in prior
[2:15:30] plans, which I have participated
[2:15:32] in over the course of time, and
[2:15:34] one of the things that has come
[2:15:37] up is that -- and you have
[2:15:40] addressed this, and it's the
[2:15:42] very fact, so we come,
[2:15:43] participate, give you some
[2:15:44] ideas, but you don't see that
[2:15:49] they actually had, or they are
[2:15:51] come in sense too late in the
[2:15:52] process, things have already
[2:15:53] been decided. So what I'm
[2:15:55] moving to -- and I know that's
[2:15:58] still the challenge to overcome
[2:16:00] that particular feeling or bias,
[2:16:02] or however you want to describe
[2:16:06] it -- but I think there is a
[2:16:10] need to make sure that it would
[2:16:11] the community-based
[2:16:14] organizations, the business, the
[2:16:18] whole group, you need to come
[2:16:23] back to them, and say, you know,
[2:16:24] there is your responsibility as
[2:16:25] someone representing the
[2:16:26] communities to be able to
[2:16:27] present these opportunities and
[2:16:29] be part of that process p they
[2:16:32] have to be a good pipeline. And
[2:16:35] this is their way because it
[2:16:37] will serve our communities if we
[2:16:39] do do that. So I'm just saying
[2:16:41] that really needs to be brought
[2:16:43] up and we need to obviously keep
[2:16:45] bringing in as many
[2:16:47] community-based organizations to
[2:16:49] this process as possible. Just
[2:16:52] something that I think that we
[2:16:53] forget. We think well,
[2:16:56] that's your problem. No,
[2:16:59] actually, I think it's our
[2:17:02] problem as part of whatever
[2:17:10] community
[2:17:12] organization,
[2:17:13] whatever community and how we
[2:17:15] serve our communities.
[2:17:17] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[2:17:18] thank you. Member wong?
[2:17:19] >>janelle wong: thank you so
[2:17:20] much for this presentation.
[2:17:23] This is wonderful to see. Our
[2:17:24] thoughts reflected here, also as
[2:17:29] an organizer, I have been
[2:17:30] screaming into the ether for a
[2:17:33] very long time to have a lot of
[2:17:34] these things be real and have
[2:17:36] people hear why people want to
[2:17:39] be heard. And so we deeply
[2:17:40] appreciate this document
[2:17:41] hopefully it's successful
[2:17:44] because I think that's one thing
[2:17:46] I echo council member lieu is
[2:17:47] that even though a lot us have
[2:17:49] been saying it, we don't
[2:17:50] actually know how successful it
[2:17:53] is. So I hope to see in the
[2:17:55] years to come success on this
[2:17:58] type of communication and
[2:17:59] organizing. The other thing I
[2:18:01] would say in terms of relaying
[2:18:03] back to us the success of these
[2:18:04] types of communications because
[2:18:05] this is the first time I have
[2:18:08] seen the framework publicly be
[2:18:11] inclusive. That maybe there is
[2:18:14] framework for other agencies,
[2:18:18] other local counties to take on
[2:18:21] these things because the topics
[2:18:22] we're talking about both
[2:18:23] transportation and housing can
[2:18:26] be polarizing so even at your
[2:18:28] best efforts to include all the
[2:18:30] voices that sometimes it can be
[2:18:32] challenging to hear that your
[2:18:34] participation MAY not have
[2:18:37] gotten to the place where you
[2:18:40] thought it should be and that's
[2:18:41] on both sides of the I'll in
[2:18:43] terms of housing and
[2:18:45] transportation. So would be
[2:18:46] interesting to see in the future
[2:18:51] how this is working, a case
[2:18:54] study in particular challenging
[2:18:55] topics whether it's housing or
[2:18:56] transportation, pick either of
[2:19:00] the two, in a community where it
[2:19:03] is challenging to see if the way
[2:19:05] you framed it and the way that
[2:19:08] this organizing has been
[2:19:09] executed, not a perfect answer
[2:19:11] but got us to an answer that
[2:19:13] makes the implementation of long
[2:19:15] term vision and the plan better.
[2:19:17] That's what I would like to
[2:19:22] hear, a couple years from now,
[2:19:24] ongoing basis for the public to,
[2:19:26] sort of, understand. It's not
[2:19:28] perfect we're dealing with
[2:19:30] topics that people have lots of
[2:19:32] opinions on so it would be nice
[2:19:36] if this framework from beginning
[2:19:38] to end, it's great start for us
[2:19:40] moving forward in terms of
[2:19:42] advocating in these spaces.
[2:19:43] Thank you.
[2:19:43] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[2:19:46] thank you member wong. Council
[2:19:48] member madrid then continuing
[2:19:51] over to you to respond.
[2:19:52] >>alexander madrid: thank you
[2:19:54] for covering veronica. I think
[2:19:56] we mentioned this already but I
[2:19:59] think it would be good to bring
[2:20:05] back some of the milestones that
[2:20:10] organizations take to the
[2:20:16] community and give them an
[2:20:19] update. That's one thing. And
[2:20:22] the second thing I want to
[2:20:31] strongly suggest that we should
[2:20:38] think about is that this plan
[2:20:42] would change and pivot and I
[2:20:46] want to ask if there is any
[2:20:51] opportunity to push push back to
[2:20:54] those communities that when
[2:20:57] reached out to in the past, and
[2:21:00] I said who had to make a change,
[2:21:03] what do you think about this, or
[2:21:07] any suggestion that MAY suggest
[2:21:09] to
[2:21:11] to do. So, just want to bring
[2:21:15] that up. If there is any
[2:21:19] opportunity to do that.
[2:21:20] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[2:21:21] thank you council member madrid.
[2:21:25] I'll turn it over to you,
[2:21:28] veronica.
[2:21:30] >>veronica cummings okay. Thank
[2:21:33] you for the feedback, the
[2:21:36] continued feedback. And I do
[2:21:39] agree that with this public
[2:21:40] participation plan, the feedback
[2:21:43] loop is important, as well as
[2:21:47] thank you for recognizing the
[2:21:50] inclusivity of this plan, which
[2:21:55] I do -- so, there are, as an
[2:21:57] agency, a lot of projects that
[2:21:59] we're engaging different
[2:22:00] stakeholders, the communities,
[2:22:03] et cetera, and this public
[2:22:05] participation plan is the broad
[2:22:08] plan for the various projects.
[2:22:11] And we are working to coordinate
[2:22:13] internally so that when we are
[2:22:14] out in the community, again,
[2:22:16] we're trying to -- we really
[2:22:20] want to be cognizant of reducing
[2:22:22] the engagement fatigue, and
[2:22:23] duplication, et cetera, et
[2:22:26] cetera. Any time you are
[2:22:28] undertaking an ambitious
[2:22:30] process, you know, there does
[2:22:32] need to be a little bit of grace
[2:22:33] at the beginning. Because it's
[2:22:35] -- it's not as though we can
[2:22:37] stop all of the work on these
[2:22:39] projects so that we could then
[2:22:41] do the engagement, right?
[2:22:43] Especially when we're talking
[2:22:47] about things, the hot topics,
[2:22:48] housing, transportation, et
[2:22:50] cetera. I want to at least say
[2:22:52] to this council that we -- we do
[2:22:54] hear everything that you're
[2:22:56] saying, and that we are
[2:22:57] committed to being responsive
[2:23:01] while recognizing the work is
[2:23:04] ongoing. And so that then to
[2:23:08] member matradition's
[2:23:08] drid
[2:23:11] madrid's feedback and
[2:23:13] question, you know, giving the
[2:23:14] community updates and the
[2:23:16] opportunity for communities to
[2:23:18] respond, this is it go back to
[2:23:21] just there being many projects,
[2:23:24] and so I -- this broad ppp is
[2:23:26] applicable to us as an agency,
[2:23:28] and then we would -- the
[2:23:31] individual project members, you
[2:23:34] know, we would then pass this
[2:23:37] information along to make sure
[2:23:39] that they receive it and are
[2:23:41] also then incorporating the
[2:23:44] feedback from this council into
[2:23:47] it. So, I can't say yes
[2:23:49] absolutely, because I -- it's
[2:23:51] just not me to over promise and
[2:23:54] underdlifrment but I can only
[2:23:54] say that we're absolutely
[2:23:56] hearing what you are saying, and
[2:23:58] would be happy to come back to
[2:23:59] this council to report back on
[2:24:01] the various things that you have
[2:24:03] offered today, as well as in
[2:24:05] previous meetings.
[2:24:06] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[2:24:06] thank you veronica.
[2:24:09] And last we have member -- or
[2:24:13] vice chair benitez. No? Okay.
[2:24:16] Well then, will the clerk please
[2:24:18] inform us of any public comment
[2:24:19] submitted for this item or
[2:24:20] whether there were any members
[2:24:23] of the public wishing to give
[2:24:26] public comment?
[2:24:27] >>clerk, jessica lewis: we
[2:24:28] received no written public
[2:24:29] comment for this item. There
[2:24:31] are no speakers at the podium
[2:24:33] and no raised hands in the zoom
[2:24:34] space wishing to provide public
[2:24:35] comment.
[2:24:35] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[2:24:36] thank you. So now we'll move
[2:24:38] over to agenda item number six
[2:24:40] which is the staff liaison
[2:24:41] report, an overview of the
[2:24:43] recent mtc and abag policy
[2:24:46] decisions and other activities.
[2:24:48] This is an information item.
[2:24:50] Ky-nam miller will you please
[2:24:53] give the report?
[2:24:55] >>ky-nam miller: gladly chair
[2:24:56] lieu. In addition to the
[2:24:57] written report acknowledging
[2:24:59] what you mentioned at the top of
[2:25:02] the meeting that we have the
[2:25:04] upcoming OCTOBER 29th workshop
[2:25:07] which jessica and I will e-mail
[2:25:11] out for our sps purposes along
[2:25:14] with the soon-to-be unveiled
[2:25:16] accessible futures proceedings
[2:25:18] report. Following up on my
[2:25:20] colleague veronica's excellent
[2:25:22] presentation that was made
[2:25:23] manifest took approximate a week
[2:25:26] ago AUGUST 24th when mtc and
[2:25:29] abag hosted the inaugural
[2:25:31] community partnership exchange
[2:25:37] which brought together 50
[2:25:38] representatives from 37
[2:25:41] community-based organizations to
[2:25:42] strengthen relationship and
[2:25:43] explore future collaborations
[2:25:47] my colleagues here on my left,
[2:25:48] matt maloney and my other
[2:25:50] colleagues vice chair diana
[2:25:52] benitez, both spoke at the group
[2:25:54] and staff shared efforts to
[2:25:57] improve cbo engagement including
[2:25:59] partner compensation streamline
[2:26:00] contracting better coordination
[2:26:02] and more continuous cocreation.
[2:26:06] There were 13 mtc abag teams who
[2:26:06] showcased 18 projects and
[2:26:08] programs giving cbo's
[2:26:10] opportunity to connect directly
[2:26:11] with staff and learn about
[2:26:16] current upcoming work. And I
[2:26:18] will send out professional
[2:26:20] photos that were taken from the
[2:26:22] event. There's also an update
[2:26:23] specific for our mind and
[2:26:25] visually impaired council
[2:26:26] members. The agency is moving
[2:26:29] away from granicus. The new
[2:26:31] system will not be granicus, and
[2:26:34] so we want to be aware of how
[2:26:35] that will impact folks who for
[2:26:39] example, don't read pdf's and
[2:26:41] need html based formats so I
[2:26:43] will reach out to members on
[2:26:45] this body to make sure that it's
[2:26:47] working for you all. But just
[2:26:50] giving you a head's up that in
[2:26:53] coming months or so that
[2:26:54] transition is happening and
[2:26:57] we're moving away from granicus.
[2:26:58] And I want to congratulate
[2:27:00] member balaji who I believe just
[2:27:02] started at cal and is going to
[2:27:06] be around. Are you a freshman?
[2:27:08] Yes. So yeah, go bears.
[2:27:09] Looking forward to having you
[2:27:10] for the next four years at least
[2:27:13] around here. That's it.
[2:27:13] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[2:27:16] thank you ky-nam. Is there
[2:27:19] council member discussion?
[2:27:30] Cushman then baldini. Curb cash
[2:27:34] I want to since ky-nam did bring
[2:27:36] up access all features I want to
[2:27:39] say that I do think that when
[2:27:41] matt maloney brought up the old
[2:27:43] working group that happened a
[2:27:46] while ago I hope we look at that
[2:27:47] again we hook add how that might
[2:27:50] be updated because I feel there
[2:27:52] are folks who were on that
[2:27:54] working group that are not as
[2:27:57] engaged as others. Perhaps
[2:27:59] that are engaged more strongly
[2:28:02] so I'm going to recommend that
[2:28:04] we take a look at that in terms
[2:28:06] of mtc is going to look at that
[2:28:07] working group as a touch tone
[2:28:09] moving forward. I really think
[2:28:11] it should be accurately
[2:28:12] reflecting people who are
[2:28:13] engaged at mtc. Thank you.
[2:28:14] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[2:28:15] thank you member cushman.
[2:28:18] Member baldini.
[2:28:20] >>michael baldini: I wanted to
[2:28:21] suggest for future agenda item
[2:28:23] I'll leave it you as board
[2:28:26] chair, but perhaps in our
[2:28:27] earlier discussion, that we
[2:28:29] explore establishing tenants for
[2:28:34] mtc that look at things like,
[2:28:36] you know, benefits, overall
[2:28:39] benefit to the system, to the
[2:28:40] actual transportation of the
[2:28:42] nine bay area counties, as far
[2:28:44] as projects. And, yes, I
[2:28:46] realize that might be outside of
[2:28:49] our scope, but at least some,
[2:28:51] sort of, tenant or pillar that
[2:28:54] we look at these projects from a
[2:28:59] cost benefit and how they add to
[2:29:04] our -- to the system, if you
[2:29:04] will. Thank you.
[2:29:05] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[2:29:07] noted. Thank you member
[2:29:11] baldini. Member madrid?
[2:29:20] >>alexander madrid: yeah, thank
[2:29:20] you
[2:29:25] you. Thank you for the update
[2:29:36] just curious I'm hear you
[2:29:39] correctly discussing the
[2:29:39] conversation with members and
[2:29:43] I'm curious what the staff and
[2:29:46] other work of public inn game
[2:29:56] does, and if you considered
[2:29:58] participation and stipends? I
[2:30:04] just want to have a clarifying
[2:30:08] question. So maybe ky-nam, can
[2:30:13] you clarify on that?
[2:30:15] >>ky-nam miller: sure. Through
[2:30:16] the chair.
[2:30:19] Council member madrid, I'm going
[2:30:22] to restate it as best, if I got
[2:30:25] this right, you asked about
[2:30:26] based on veronica cummings's
[2:30:29] presentation about compensating
[2:30:30] cbo's and group participants and
[2:30:31] how that relates with you being
[2:30:33] a can only member and basically
[2:30:34] different hats you might wear,
[2:30:36] like would you be getting a
[2:30:38] stipend versus paid for that
[2:30:41] experience. Is that right?
[2:30:43] >>alexander madrid: no. No.
[2:30:45] >>ky-nam miller: no?
[2:30:47] >>alexander madrid: no.
[2:30:52] My question was for the
[2:30:57] staffing, and I don't -- to do
[2:31:00] public engagement and outside of
[2:31:04] this events, and with things
[2:31:08] like that, does that consider us
[2:31:14] as participation, constituting a
[2:31:23] stipend? Or -- let me know,
[2:31:24] clarify?
[2:31:25] >>ky-nam miller: I'll restate
[2:31:26] it again now that I understand
[2:31:27] it better. You're asking if
[2:31:29] there is public engagement
[2:31:30] efforts that you are called to
[2:31:32] as a member of council to
[2:31:34] participate in, is that eligible
[2:31:38] for a stipend?
[2:31:41] >>alexander madrid: yes, I'm
[2:31:42] encouraged to participate in.
[2:31:43] >>ky-nam miller: there is
[2:31:45] precedent for that. But there
[2:31:47] would be a little more case by
[2:31:49] case review about which ones
[2:31:51] we're talking about, so
[2:31:52] certainly I'll work with my
[2:31:54] colleagues and legal counsel
[2:31:56] just it make sure we're
[2:31:58] absolutely clear about those
[2:31:59] opportunities and what if
[2:32:02] stipend are eligible for a
[2:32:03] stipend. I don't know if my
[2:32:05] colleagues have anything else to
[2:32:06] add?
[2:32:07] >>alexander madrid: thank you.
[2:32:08] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[2:32:09] okay. Thank you. Will the
[2:32:12] clerk let us know if there is
[2:32:13] any public comments submitted
[2:32:15] for this item or whether there
[2:32:16] are members of the public who
[2:32:17] wish to give public comment.
[2:32:18] >>clerk of the board: we
[2:32:19] received no written public
[2:32:20] comments for this item there are
[2:32:22] no speakers at the podium and no
[2:32:25] raised hands in the zoom space
[2:32:25] wishing to provide public
[2:32:26] comment.
[2:32:27] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[2:32:28] thank you now we will move to
[2:32:31] agenda item seven which is new
[2:32:33] business, this is an information
[2:32:34] item, members of the council can
[2:32:36] add new business. And actually
[2:32:40] would like to start us off with
[2:32:42] a report from member lavery from
[2:32:44] the regional network management
[2:32:47] customer advisory group. And
[2:32:51] then I'll take any hands raised.
[2:32:54] >>charles lavery: sure. Great.
[2:32:58] This is from the AUGUST rnm cag
[2:33:00] group. The meeting focused on
[2:33:04] two primary topics, the transit
[2:33:06] transformation action plan and
[2:33:10] the customer advisory group work
[2:33:16] plan through 20 --
[2:33:18] DECEMBER 2027. On the transit
[2:33:22] plan, the cag brought up
[2:33:24] advancing transit equity
[2:33:25] principles and exploring
[2:33:27] consistency related to safety
[2:33:30] and immigration enforcement
[2:33:32] practices. They looked at
[2:33:34] improving accessibility,
[2:33:35] including mobility management
[2:33:39] and one-seat paratransit
[2:33:40] options. And expressed an
[2:33:43] interest in future network
[2:33:45] planning efforts, including
[2:33:47] mascots and expanded fare
[2:33:50] integration options, similar to
[2:33:54] bay pass. On the customer
[2:33:57] advisory work plan, members
[2:33:59] generally supported the plan and
[2:34:00] recommended stronger
[2:34:01] communication and feedback loops
[2:34:06] between the cag and the rnm
[2:34:09] council. And earlier customer
[2:34:10] advisory group review of items
[2:34:13] before they advance to rnm
[2:34:16] decision-making bodies. More
[2:34:20] customer focused communication,
[2:34:24] and a periodic review of rnm
[2:34:26] performance measures. Greater
[2:34:28] attention to underbanked and
[2:34:31] unbanked populations, and
[2:34:34] consideration of international
[2:34:36] best practices to improve
[2:34:38] regional coordination. Most
[2:34:40] important take-away's, continued
[2:34:42] emphasis on equity,
[2:34:44] accessibility, and paratransit,
[2:34:46] and interest in regional fare
[2:34:48] integration, and desire for
[2:34:50] stronger customer engagement and
[2:34:51] communication.
[2:34:54] The body also approved the work
[2:34:56] plan through 2027.
[2:34:57] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[2:34:58] thank you for that. Appreciate
[2:34:59] it.
[2:35:00] Are there any other council
[2:35:01] members who would like to add
[2:35:06] new business?
[2:35:13] Member sbranti?
[2:35:15] >>speaker: good afternoon.
[2:35:20] It's past the 12:00 hour. This
[2:35:23] relates to our purview maybe
[2:35:25] just getting information and
[2:35:26] offering feedback. But
[2:35:31] reference the at the outset that
[2:35:33] bahfa and obviously critical
[2:35:34] importance that everything that
[2:35:38] we do as it relates to
[2:35:42] everything we do regional
[2:35:43] housing and transportation
[2:35:46] intrar play, and it might be a
[2:35:52] bit premature, I know those
[2:35:53] conversations reniche at this
[2:35:55] timing if possible at some point
[2:35:57] later this fall early next year
[2:35:59] would be good if we can get
[2:36:01] update about where things are
[2:36:02] what's being considered and have
[2:36:03] opportunity to offer some
[2:36:06] feedback or input because
[2:36:10] ultimately to get that adopts
[2:36:12] you're going to need broad
[2:36:13] community engagement support and
[2:36:16] I think being able to
[2:36:18] participate and enage at least
[2:36:20] as part of the process to relay
[2:36:23] maybe it's done through our
[2:36:24] council member sounds like he's
[2:36:25] a representative on that
[2:36:27] committee. But just food for
[2:36:28] thought.
[2:36:28] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[2:36:29] thank you. Any other council
[2:36:31] members with new business to
[2:36:33] add? Will the clerk please
[2:36:34] inform us of public comments
[2:36:35] submitted for this item whether
[2:36:37] there are members of the public
[2:36:39] who wish to provide public
[2:36:39] comment.
[2:36:40] >>clerk, jessica lewis: we
[2:36:41] received no written public
[2:36:42] comments for this item there are
[2:36:44] no speakers at the podium and no
[2:36:45] raised hands in the zoom space
[2:36:47] requesting to provide public
[2:36:47] comment.
[2:36:48] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[2:36:49] thank you. We'll move to agenda
[2:36:51] item eight which is public
[2:36:52] comment. This is an information
[2:36:54] item. Will the clerk please
[2:36:57] inform us if anyone from the
[2:37:00] public would like to submit --
[2:37:03] has submitted a comment or
[2:37:06] whether there are any members of
[2:37:07] the public who wish to give
[2:37:09] public comment?
[2:37:09] >>clerk, jessica lewis: we
[2:37:11] received no written public
[2:37:12] comments. No raised hands in
[2:37:14] the zoom space. We do two
[2:37:17] speaks wishing to approach the
[2:37:21] podium. Jane kraemer. You can
[2:37:22] go first.
[2:37:23] Chair, how many minutes would
[2:37:24] you like to give?
[2:37:25] >>chair, carina vinh lieu: two
[2:37:25] minutes.
[2:37:26] >>clerk, jessica lewis: thank
[2:37:38] you.
[2:37:39] >>jane kramer: I'm not quite
[2:37:42] sure how I want to say this, but
[2:37:45] here it goes. I think I heard a
[2:37:51] lot of people today saying
[2:37:55] communication between and among
[2:37:59] administration and the public is
[2:38:05] a matter of time and energy and
[2:38:08] attendance in membership. And
[2:38:09] that's saying a mouthful.
[2:38:13] Because there is a lot of
[2:38:16] cultural
[2:38:19] cultural, social unstated
[2:38:21] thoughts behind the words that
[2:38:28] are said.
[2:38:30] Everybody has their own
[2:38:33] assumptions and their own
[2:38:39] outlook on a particular issue.
[2:38:44] Something gets lost when it's
[2:38:48] put on the internet, and about,
[2:38:49] maybe, 90% of the communication
[2:38:52] gets lost. That's a barrier.
[2:38:55] And you have to come -- you have
[2:38:57] to overcome it. Because not
[2:38:58] everybody can attend a meeting
[2:39:06] at a given time on a given day.
[2:39:09] I think one person really was
[2:39:12] outstanding to me when she said
[2:39:17] the issue of effective
[2:39:20] communication is you find
[2:39:24] someone who is a pipeline, back
[2:39:26] and forth. And when you find
[2:39:29] that person, make sure that you
[2:39:34] don't unintentionally coopt that
[2:39:38] person. I'm going to leave it
[2:39:48] there. I have to think it's
[2:39:49] where I'm coming from.
[2:39:50] >>clerk, jessica lewis: thank
[2:39:51] you. Aleta dupree. Can you
[2:39:56] approach the podium you have two
[2:39:56] minutes.
[2:39:58] >>speaker: thank you chair for
[2:40:05] the record she and her with team
[2:40:10] folds. Good meeting today. A
[2:40:17] lot of it's abstract. It's very
[2:40:20] important. I'm used to
[2:40:43] operating but this comes. I can
[2:40:48] only share things. But I want
[2:40:49] public transportation to be here
[2:40:52] for me. I want this community
[2:40:54] to be affordable. So I can
[2:40:57] enjoy it when I come here. I
[2:40:59] want our community to be
[2:41:01] accessible. I'm a person with a
[2:41:03] disability. I have a house
[2:41:06] might who has disabilities.
[2:41:10] And I want to be able to use
[2:41:11] elevators and escalators and all
[2:41:14] the other kinds of tools in our
[2:41:16] toolbox. And I would like to
[2:41:19] see us move to a fully clipper
[2:41:22] based system. And we can do
[2:41:25] that and it won't exclude
[2:41:26] cashless. Because find change
[2:41:27] on the ground sometimes and I
[2:41:30] want a vending machine to put it
[2:41:32] in. In new york they're going
[2:41:34] to an all omni based system. I
[2:41:36] have 56 years of using the new
[2:41:37] york city subway, and I hope to
[2:41:39] see that famous transportation
[2:41:41] system soon. And but for now, I
[2:41:46] am here, and we have our subway
[2:41:49] with small s nearby. But
[2:41:51] anyway, I leave you with this.
[2:41:54] You can never have enough grand
[2:41:56] central terminal. Thank you.
[2:41:57] >>chair, carina vinh lieu:
[2:42:02] thank you. And since that was
[2:42:04] our last speaker, we get to move
[2:42:06] to agenda item nine, which is
[2:42:09] adjournment. Our next meeting
[2:42:11] of the regular mtc abag
[2:42:13] community advisory council will
[2:42:15] be held on OCTOBER 2nd. This
[2:42:17] meeting of the mtc abag
[2:42:18] community advisory council is
[2:42:22] adjourned. Thank you everyone.
[2:42:23] [Adjourned]