[0:00] for you.
[0:01] University of miami education
[0:03] and human development.
[0:05] Also have florida international
[0:06] university, the institute for
[0:11] civic leadership.
[0:13] Miami dade college institute
[0:14] for civic engagement and
[0:17] democracy.
[0:22] The clio institute.
[0:28] Miami workers center.
[0:42] Hispanic unity of florida.
[0:44] Again, the mexican american
[0:46] council for getting the youth
[0:46] engaged.
[0:48] And we also have the prosperity
[0:50] social and community
[0:51] development group.
[0:52] Thank you to the community
[0:54] partners for making this
[0:54] happen.
[0:56] The mayor and the chair, the
[0:57] mayor will read it for you so
[1:04] you know what it says.
[1:06] >>mayor cava: for the photos
[1:08] you can take off your yellow
[1:10] stickers, that was to get you
[1:11] in the building and guess what?
[1:13] You arrived so that's great.
[1:14] To each of these fine
[1:20] organizations we say many
[1:21] appreciation, much
[1:22] appreciation, this is our
[1:24] certificate of appreciation, on
[1:25] behalf of the board and
[1:32] residents of miami dade county
[1:34] +3 million I take pleasure in
[1:35] presenting the certificate to
[1:37] you in recognition of your
[1:39] valuable contributions to our
[1:41] community and for your support
[1:42] and dedication in bringing
[1:44] miami-dade county next academy
[1:45] to life on this first day of
[1:47] the month of SEPTEMBER 2026
[1:49] miami dade county florida
[1:51] signed by commissioner bastien,
[1:53] CHAIRMAN Anthony rodriguez and
[2:55] myself as mayor.
[2:57] >>mayor cava: so where did
[2:58] these classes take place, how
[3:00] many of you attended in person?
[3:02] And where did you go?
[3:12] And what's the common
[3:13] denominator?
[3:14] Libraries.
[3:15] All right, and we are so
[3:17] pleased our library director
[3:19] lydia lopez is with us, please
[3:19] join us up here.
[3:21] Because our libraries are truly
[3:27] our most democratic
[3:27] institutions.
[3:29] And our libraries are always
[3:31] available to support our
[3:32] community so let's give a round
[3:34] of applause again to our
[3:35] libraries.
[3:35] Great, okay.
[4:04] All of our graduates.
[4:05] [Inaudible]
[4:07] >>mayor cava: all right all you
[4:19] wonderful graduates, so good.
[4:20] We will take it.
[4:21] Are we going to need 2, shall
[4:23] we put all people behind?
[4:25] You tell us, there is armando,
[4:27] she will direct us what we need
[5:12] away, like al did this change
[5:13] your life or your approach or
[5:15] your plans, what was your
[5:17] biggest take away, anyone want
[5:17] to offer?
[5:18] Okay, awesome.
[5:20] My name is tanisha paul and I
[5:21] lead a company called civico
[5:23] due to the flexibility of
[5:25] miami-dade county I had my
[5:31] little ones, but that being
[5:33] said one of the great takeaways
[5:34] for me was section 2. When we
[5:36] talk about community from a
[5:38] design standpoint that being
[5:40] the infrastructure, the
[5:41] institution, the people and I
[5:43] laugh a little because one of
[5:45] the great exercises was asset
[5:45] mapping.
[5:47] With the asset mapping which I
[5:54] did twice, but with the asset
[5:56] mapping it allowed me to map
[5:57] out something we're working on
[5:59] about place-based investment
[6:00] and redevelopment.
[6:06] So I won't go too much into
[6:07] that because I love the elders
[6:09] feedback but the program is
[6:10] great, all sections were cool
[6:12] but section 2 is near and dear
[6:22] to me.
[6:24] >> my name is arianna, a public
[6:26] servant and I work with the
[6:27] department of transportation
[6:30] and I also am part of nonprofit
[6:31] organizations, one of them
[6:33] being women in transportation
[6:34] where we work with the youth,
[6:43] k-12 students and lead them
[6:45] through career pathways and the
[6:46] most significant part of this
[6:48] civics academy was the
[6:49] networking with other people
[6:50] that attended.
[6:53] I believe the relationships I
[6:54] created during the civics
[6:56] academy will help me build a
[6:57] better future and to lift up
[7:00] the nonprofit organizations I
[7:03] work with.
[7:05] >> I'm bone needed jones
[7:12] peabody it was an amazing
[7:13] program.
[7:14] I was already involved in the
[7:16] brownsville civic neighborhood
[7:17] association, I have a
[7:19] non-for-profit, education means
[7:22] more access for pregnant teen
[7:24] moms but what it did for me was
[7:26] I had run for office, I did not
[7:26] win.
[7:28] I was discouraged when the
[7:30] opportunity came when someone
[7:31] asked me again having been part
[7:35] of this, I relished the
[7:37] opportunity to do it so now I'm
[7:38] running for office.
[7:40] Thank you so much.
[7:45] I'm in the runoff so see you in
[8:03] NOVEMBER, thank you.
[8:04] >> were going to move to
[8:06] breakfast but this is the
[8:07] perfect opportunity.
[8:11] So for those who are able to
[8:12] stay if there are issues you
[8:16] are speaking on show them all
[8:21] the amazing things.
[8:29] All right, thank you.
[11:14] >>
[17:03] mary, are you good morning,
[17:05] thank you for being here.
[17:06] Oday of course is SEPTEMBER 1
[17:08] which kicks off many things
[17:10] including childhood cancer
[17:12] awareness month and we have 2
[17:14] incredible organizations here
[17:15] this morning and we will start
[17:17] with mystic forest.
[17:19] As we know, the mystic forest
[17:21] foundation was founded 18 years
[17:27] ago in honor of salvador funny
[17:29] and is dedicated to supporting
[17:31] children and families affected
[17:33] by pediatric cancer through
[17:35] advocacy awareness amenity
[17:36] outreach programs that provide
[17:38] hold assistance and comfort
[17:42] throughout their cancer
[17:42] journey.
[17:44] Mystic forest foundation
[17:46] continues to raise awareness on
[17:47] childhood cancer, provide
[17:49] support for families and
[17:50] inspire communities to fight
[17:52] against pediatric cancer
[17:54] through compassion service and
[17:57] advocacy so therefore on behalf
[17:59] of our mayor whose right here
[18:01] our entire board of county
[18:03] commissioners and the community
[18:06] here we do proclaim, the month
[18:07] of SEPTEMBER 2026 as childhood
[18:09] cancer awareness month in
[18:12] miami-dade county.
[18:13] Why don't you come up here and
[18:15] I'll have the mayor say a few
[18:17] words and we would like to hear
[18:18] from you as well.
[18:21] >>mayor cava: I'm very pleased
[18:22] to join our wonderful
[18:24] commissioner mickey steinberg
[18:25] with this presentation and let
[18:27] me say mysteriously behind us
[18:29] as arrived this glorious
[18:33] bouquet which was presented to
[18:34] me and I had no idea it was
[18:38] this big.
[18:40] I said to bring it down but I
[18:40] think it's very fitting we
[18:45] should have this beautiful,
[18:47] vibrant bouquet of life and I'm
[18:51] wearing my butterfly for a
[18:52] ascendance so that is what this
[18:53] great program does.
[18:55] I didn't know about this
[19:05] program as I said earlier.
[19:07] What a wonderful way to help
[19:08] our children on their way to
[19:10] provide support because we know
[19:12] it's not just the medicine,
[19:13] it's the heart, it's the
[19:14] caring.
[19:16] It's the pouring love to those
[19:17] who've gone through challenging
[19:19] times that helps them on their
[19:23] way to fight back and win so
[19:25] thank you and congratulations
[19:26] and to the two young men who
[19:28] are here celebrating their own
[19:30] journey we congratulate you, we
[19:33] celebrate you and we give
[19:34] thanks to those who are here to
[19:36] embrace you on the way, thank
[19:48] you commission.
[19:50] >>commissioner steinberg: thank
[19:51] you for supporting our
[19:53] children, my journey started 18
[19:54] years ago when my baby was
[19:55] diagnosed with cancer.
[19:57] It was a long 3 and a half
[19:59] years, a devastating and
[20:00] torturous treatment for him but
[20:02] the one thing you always, his
[20:14] spirit was about always having
[20:16] fun and being able to enjoy
[20:17] life every moment that he
[20:18] could.
[20:19] For that us that is what we
[20:21] bring to our children,
[20:23] celebrating every day, giving
[20:25] them back some of the childhood
[20:26] that is always lost to a
[20:28] childhood cancer diagnosis and
[20:29] our children are in the
[20:31] hospital for a day or two,
[20:33] these children battled cancer
[20:34] for years they become part of
[20:35] our own family.
[20:37] The support we get from our
[20:39] community is truly exceptional
[20:41] and not seen anywhere in the
[20:41] country.
[20:47] Miami dade county, south
[20:49] florida is the most caring and
[20:50] wonderful community literally
[20:52] in the world and we are so
[21:19] thankful for all the support we
[21:20] receive.
[21:29] Since
[21:30] .
[22:07] >>.
[22:08] >>commissioner steinberg: our
[22:10] next presentation is also to a
[22:31] wonderful organizationand
[22:33] childhood cancer awareness week
[22:35] is observed each SEPTEMBER and
[22:36] the live like bella childhood
[22:38] cancer foundation was
[22:40] established in memory of bella
[22:41] rodriguez torres and is
[22:43] dedicated to changing childhood
[22:44] cancer from a terminal
[22:46] diagnosis to a treatable and
[22:47] curable disease by funding
[22:49] research, providing financial
[22:50] emotional support to families
[22:52] and advocating for children
[22:53] affected by cancer.
[22:55] The live like bella foundation
[22:56] has made up around profound
[22:58] impact supporting families
[23:00] through their cancer journey,
[23:01] advancing cancer research
[23:03] raising awareness and insuring
[23:05] children and their families
[23:07] have access to resources care
[23:09] and support they need so
[23:10] whereas miami dade counties
[23:12] does proclaim on behalf of the
[23:14] mayor, county commission and
[23:16] everybody SEPTEMBER 2026 as
[23:17] childhood cancer awareness
[23:19] month in honor of the live like
[23:20] bella and with that I will pass
[23:22] it to the mayor as well.
[23:24] >>mayor cava: thank you for
[23:25] making sure we pay tribute to
[23:27] the organizations that take
[23:29] care of our children during
[23:30] their greatest time of need.
[23:32] I have been part of this great
[23:34] organization for many years,
[23:36] bella was a resident of
[23:37] district 8 as well and of
[23:39] course we named a park in honor
[23:41] of bella in again district 8,
[23:42] these were things I got to do,
[23:44] so proud to do during my time
[23:46] as commissioner and since then
[23:48] we know the organization is
[23:50] grown to be a tremendous force
[23:51] for not only family support,
[23:53] child support but research and
[23:55] has been able to raise dollars
[23:57] and have breakthroughs for our
[23:59] children through that research
[24:08] so providing so much hope and
[24:10] every year with the run and the
[24:12] gala, many other events people
[24:13] are joining the movement
[24:15] because they see and are
[24:16] inspired by the great work of
[24:18] the family and the organization
[24:21] so congratulations.
[24:22] >> just want to say thank you
[24:24] again so much mayor and to
[24:25] reiterate what some of you
[24:29] mentioned miami is thankful
[24:31] your for your support efforts
[24:33] and awareness for our children
[24:38] battling cancer.
[24:40] Bella fought for 6 years before
[24:42] she passed away in 2013 and the
[24:44] support while she was fighting
[24:45] was so overwhelming and a
[24:53] blessing and the fact that the
[24:55] city and community are still
[24:57] supporting pediatric cancer
[24:59] awareness and funding and
[25:01] research is humbling and we are
[25:03] thankful and appreciative and i
[25:05] think bella's sister reynaud
[25:09] wants to say something.
[25:11] >> it's incredible to be here
[25:13] to stand alongside my mom and
[25:14] it's incredible what you're
[25:16] doing and we will continue to
[25:18] build and continue to live like
[25:20] bella until we find a cure.
[25:22] >>mayor cava: for anyone who
[25:23] knew bella, it was her spirit
[25:28] that moved people, so and
[25:29] really she is looking down on
[25:31] all of us this week on behalf
[25:37] of our children who make great
[25:39] progress and she's a special
[26:16] spirit, thank you and GOD
[26:17] bless.
[26:19] >>commissioner steinberg: a
[26:21] picture with both amazing
[26:22] organizations, why don't you
[26:25] tell us what's happening.
[26:26] >> this week we have our ninth
[26:28] annual childhood awareness gold
[26:30] ribbon parade, it's the largest
[26:34] parade in the world.
[26:35] Dedicated to childhood cancer.
[26:37] We have over 100 gold ribbon
[26:47] police cars, 50 police
[26:47] motorcycles.
[26:49] It is a police escorted caravan
[26:51] from nicholas children's
[26:52] hospital past hold children's
[26:54] hospital and alex's place,
[26:56] ronald Mcdonald house and joe
[26:57] dimaggio children's hospital.
[27:04] It's police escorted so you can
[27:05] see it on cbs news but also
[27:07] check out our social media and
[28:01] finally viewing routes.
[28:03] >>commissioner steinberg: now
[28:04] our final presentation, where
[28:06] acknowledging hunger action.
[28:10] So miami-dade county is
[28:12] altering well, feeding south
[28:13] florida for those who MAY not
[28:23] know I've been around since
[28:23] 1981.
[28:25] And have worked to address food
[28:27] and hunger insecurity in
[28:29] miami-dade county providing the
[28:30] community with immediate access
[28:32] to nutritious food and other
[28:34] vital resources and support.
[28:36] Feeding south florida weaves on
[28:38] their efforts while
[28:39] transforming lives through
[28:41] innovative programming and
[28:42] provides economic growth and
[28:44] overall well-being so SEPTEMBER
[28:46] is also hunger action month on
[28:48] behalf of our mayor and county
[28:49] commission we do proclaim
[29:14] SEPTEMBER as hunger action
[29:15] month.
[29:17] >>mayor cava: in a former life,
[29:19] I my work was about connecting
[29:21] people to resources they needed
[29:22] especially in times of great
[29:24] need and food obviously is
[29:25] number one.
[29:27] Feeding south florida is our
[29:28] premier south florida
[29:31] organization located in the
[29:32] south day providing those
[29:33] services and it also provides
[29:36] it not just in miami-dade but
[29:37] around the state so we are very
[29:39] proud of the work and of the
[29:41] partnership between miami-dade
[29:42] county and feeding south
[29:44] florida and we know that
[29:46] whenever help is needed feeding
[29:47] south florida steps up,
[29:49] congratulations and thank you.
[29:50] >> good morning everyone.
[29:52] My name is cosmo and I'm the
[29:54] director of strategic efforts
[29:56] in miami-dade county and on
[30:01] behalf of our team I'd like to
[30:02] thank the city commissioners
[30:04] for recognizing SEPTEMBER.
[30:06] Feeding south florida is the
[30:08] relieving relief organization
[30:09] in palm beach broward
[30:10] miami-dade.
[30:15] E serve 1.7
[30:17] million individuals and here in
[30:19] miami-dade we provide
[30:21] nutritious services for 553,000
[30:22] households.
[30:23] through our new direct
[30:24] programs.
[30:26] Our work goes beyond food
[30:27] distribution, the community
[30:29] pantries ensure families have
[30:31] access to nutritious food, our
[30:32] school pantries for kids make
[30:34] sure children don't go hungry
[30:36] in the classroom, for older
[30:41] adults our benefits in outreach
[30:43] stretch two brothers, we invest
[30:45] in long-term stability to
[30:58] prepare individuals for careers
[30:59] in housing and logistics.
[31:01] These programs reflect our
[31:03] commitment not just to feeding
[31:05] families today but also to live
[31:06] a stronger hunger free south
[31:07] florida.
[31:09] We are grateful to the city of
[31:11] miami for this recognition and
[31:13] for your ongoing partnerships
[31:16] and helping us move closer to a
[31:17] community where no one will
[31:19] wonder where their next meal
[31:20] will come from.
[31:22] >>mayor cava: some might not be
[31:24] aware but there are changes at
[31:25] the federal level in the snap
[31:27] program and many families are
[31:30] losing their snap formerly
[31:31] called food stamp benefits so
[31:33] our food banks are more
[31:34] critical than ever to assist
[31:36] our families and it really
[31:50] needs our support, thank you.
[32:33] Since
[32:34] >>.
[33:04] [Break]
[33:06] >> we will start in spanish
[33:08] with catalina.
[33:53] [Speaking spanish]
[33:57] >> I'm one of the elders and
[34:00] this weekend we did the parade
[34:12] in wynnewood.
[34:13] It's a facility that takes
[34:15] place every year in the city of
[34:17] columbia where we will end
[34:18] actually this arrangement is
[34:20] made by people in the forums
[34:21] outside the city where they
[34:23] used to come and carry their
[34:25] products to the city but later
[34:27] on the they proceed with doing
[34:29] a festivity with them and be
[34:30] recognized because of their
[34:32] hard work.
[34:32] So they do this arrangement
[34:34] once a year so they go through
[34:36] the streets of the city and
[34:38] it's an honor for us to be here
[34:40] presenting this arrangement
[34:42] that was especially made for
[35:08] the mayor of miami-dade county.
[35:10] >> this was a surprise, they
[35:12] contacted me and said the
[35:13] flowers were not going to last
[35:14] much longer.
[35:16] They wanted to give me flowers
[35:18] and I said I would be here
[35:19] today, I have no idea.
[35:20] What this was.
[35:22] I'm really so honored and
[35:22] grateful.
[35:25] So we know what's happening in
[35:26] columbia right now.
[35:26] E are
[35:28] doing our best to recover from
[35:40] the devastating earthquake.
[35:42] This country, this county
[35:44] especially as was said for
[35:46] children with cancer is always
[35:47] showing care and we have been
[35:49] sending care and relief to
[35:50] columbia but we know it will be
[35:51] a long recovery.
[35:53] The city of medellin was not
[35:55] affected but the whole country
[35:57] is in mourning and we stand
[36:01] with the colombian people and I
[36:03] want to acknowledge on saturday
[36:05] I attended the 50th anniversary
[36:07] of the colombian american
[36:17] chamber of commerce in miami.
[36:38] [Speaking spanish] So
[36:39] incredible, did we get enough
[36:41] pictures of this beautiful
[36:41] display?
[36:50] Thank you armando and I don't
[36:51] know what we are going to do
[36:53] now because obviously this will
[36:55] dominate the morning if it's
[36:57] left here so we need to find an
[36:58] appropriate place.
[37:01] Maybe we could put it in the
[37:03] hallway to greet people as they
[37:05] come in and they will see this
[37:06] beautiful display, you have
[37:49] something here?
[37:58] And you know, columbia produces
[37:59] most of the flowers that come
[38:01] into the united states.
[38:06] Mother's day, valentine's day
[38:07] and I think it was something
[38:09] like 90% of the flowers for
[38:11] those holidays come through
[38:15] miami international airport.
[38:19] So it's a great joy for us to
[38:32] celebrate columbia's flowers.
[38:37] I think so, I'm not in the
[38:39] charge of this space but in the
[38:40] hallway outside, I will go with
[38:43] you to show.
[38:45] I think the rest of the meeting
[59:03] [Break]
[59:14] >>chair: all right guys, take
[59:20] your seats, find a seat.
[59:22] Unless you are press or law
[59:24] enforcement you should not be
[59:25] standing up.
[59:27] And I need the podiums placed
[59:32] where they go.
[59:41] All right clerk please call the
[59:41] roll.
[59:44] >> clerk's office has received
[59:46] notification commissioner
[59:47] bastien will be absent from
[59:48] today's meeting.
[59:50] Cohen higgins period yay.
[59:51] >>senator garcia:
[59:54] >>commissioner gilbert:
[59:58] >>commissioner gonzalez:
[1:00:00] >>commissioner hardemon:
[1:00:01] >>commissioner lopez:
[1:00:04] >>commissioner milian orbis:
[1:00:06] >>commissioner regalado:
[1:00:08] >>commissioner steinberg:
[1:00:19] >>commissioner mcghee:
[1:00:20] >>chair: present.
[1:00:22] >> we only have six members
[1:00:31] present, we don't have a quorum
[1:00:31] um.
[1:00:33] >>chair: while we wait for a
[1:00:34] quorum I'm going to ask you all
[1:00:42] to pleasell to please stand up
[1:00:44] quietly for that invocation
[1:00:46] this morning given by pastor
[1:00:47] carson of the granada church at
[1:00:49] the invitation of commissioner
[1:00:51] milian orbis followed by the
[1:00:53] pledge of allegiance led by
[1:00:55] commissioner r gilbert.
[1:00:57] Thank you for the invitation to
[1:00:59] pray with you today.
[1:01:00] Let's close our eyes, bow our
[1:01:01] heads and let's pray.
[1:01:20] We heads and let's pray.
[1:01:21] We seek your faith today on
[1:01:23] behalf of our community
[1:01:25] miami-dade county for all the
[1:01:27] live work and serve here, we
[1:01:28] give you thanks for this
[1:01:30] beautiful place we call home
[1:01:32] and for all who give themselves
[1:01:34] for the good of our community.
[1:01:36] Especially we pray for our
[1:01:37] mayor, for family, for our
[1:01:39] commissioners, thank you for
[1:01:41] their willingness to serve for
[1:01:43] the e responsibilities they
[1:01:43] lities they
[1:01:44] carry and the
[1:01:46] families who support lies who
[1:01:47] support them.
[1:01:49] Lord as they undertake the
[1:01:50] difficult work today especially
[1:01:52] the work of preparing for a
[1:01:54] budget grant them wisdom,
[1:01:55] patience and discernment.
[1:01:57] When resources are limited help
[1:01:59] them recognize what matters.
[1:02:01] Give them courage to make
[1:02:02] difficult decisions, humility
[1:02:04] to listen well and the grace to
[1:02:06] when compromise will serve the
[1:02:07] common good.
[1:02:08] Help them work together with
[1:02:10] respect even when they
[1:02:10] disagree.
[1:02:12] We pray also for all who have
[1:02:14] come today to speak, to listen,
[1:02:16] to participate, help us see one
[1:02:18] another not as opponents but as
[1:02:20] neighbors and fellow members of
[1:02:21] this community each seeking
[1:02:23] it's good and when today's work
[1:02:25] is done help us to entrust what
[1:02:27] has been decided to you, MAY
[1:02:29] the work done one here
[1:02:31] contribute to peace,
[1:02:32] flourishing in the well-being
[1:02:34] of all who call miami-dade
[1:02:35] county home.
[1:02:36] For this place, for these
[1:02:38] people, for the privilege of
[1:02:39] serving one another we give you
[1:02:41] thanks so lord and we pray in
[1:02:41] your name, amen.
[1:02:43] >> I pledge of allegiance to
[1:02:45] the flag of the united states
[1:02:47] of america and to the republic
[1:02:49] for which it stands, one nation
[1:02:51] under GOD indivisible with
[1:02:53] liberty and justice for all.
[1:02:57] >>chair: you MAY be seated.
[1:03:02] All right.
[1:03:04] Welcome back guys, do we have
[1:03:06] quorum now?
[1:03:08] Let me see, before we do the
[1:03:31] quorum call?
[1:03:35] All right clerk, please call
[1:03:37] the rule.
[1:03:42] >>commissioner bermudez:
[1:03:43] present.
[1:03:45] >>commissioner cohen higgins:
[1:03:46] present.
[1:03:48] >>senator garcia:
[1:03:50] >>commissioner gilbert:
[1:03:52] >>commissioner gonzalez:
[1:03:54] >>commissioner hardemon:
[1:03:57] >>commissioner lopez: here.
[1:03:59] >>commissioner milian orbis:
[1:04:01] >>commissioner regalado:
[1:04:02] present.
[1:04:04] >>commissioner steinberg:
[1:04:06] >>commissioner mcghee:
[1:04:09] >>chair: I'm here.
[1:04:11] >> we have nine members
[1:04:12] present, we have a quorum.
[1:04:14] >>chair: thank you, madam
[1:04:21] attorney, is it in order to
[1:04:23] admit reasonable opportunity at
[1:04:24] this time.
[1:04:30] >> yes MR. Chair, good morning.
[1:04:32] >>chair: I will open up
[1:04:34] reasonable opportunity for the
[1:04:35] public to be heard, please
[1:04:37] state your name and address and
[1:04:39] the item on which you are
[1:04:40] speaking of and you will have 1
[1:04:44] minute to speak.
[1:04:45] Victor antennas, please line
[1:04:47] up, approached the podium and
[1:04:49] as I call your name line up
[1:04:50] beside each file.
[1:04:55] [Reading names] None of these
[1:04:58] people are here.
[1:05:02] They are here.
[1:05:19] Need you guys to approach the
[1:05:30] podium.
[1:05:37] >>public speaker: hello, my
[1:05:39] name is nicole, I live at 795
[1:05:40] southwest. 110th avenue.
[1:05:42] I'm a student at florida
[1:05:53] international university,
[1:05:55] sustainability meeting we are
[1:05:57] protecting the environment for
[1:05:58] future generations which this
[1:06:00] item does the exact opposite of
[1:06:02] that, paving over wetlands or
[1:06:03] our own convenience.
[1:06:05] And I believe we should stop
[1:06:05] all this.
[1:06:07] I believe all of us can agree
[1:06:09] we don't need any more houses,
[1:06:11] we don't need any more homes,
[1:06:13] there are so many vacant homes
[1:06:15] in florida and warehouses and
[1:06:16] beige buildings and as I miami
[1:06:18] born represent resident we
[1:06:19] don't want any more money going
[1:06:22] to this so thank you.
[1:06:24] >>public speaker: I am elena
[1:06:25] lopez, 23rd avenue and I'm
[1:06:29] speaking on this item, 4b which
[1:06:30] proposes altering the
[1:06:42] construction of our city.
[1:06:44] We have to be very aware of the
[1:06:46] overwhelming construction that
[1:06:47] has already been happening and
[1:06:49] all the taxpayer dollars, where
[1:06:51] that has been going to.
[1:06:53] The community is listening, the
[1:06:54] youth is paying attention to
[1:06:55] your every decision.
[1:06:57] I came here on behalf of my
[1:06:59] students, family members, loved
[1:07:01] ones that share the same
[1:07:05] opinions as me.
[1:07:07] Please make responsible
[1:07:09] decisions, use taxpayer dollars
[1:07:10] responsibly and listen to the
[1:07:12] what the people have to say
[1:07:13] will give you your positions
[1:07:16] and thank you.
[1:07:18] >>public speaker: my name is
[1:07:19] dave ian, 54791 northwest.
[1:07:21] Second street, we are here to
[1:07:31] speak on 4b.
[1:07:33] We want to talk about general
[1:07:35] development happening in
[1:07:36] florida especially over nature
[1:07:38] and taking our trees and the
[1:07:40] community does not want this.
[1:07:41] O matter what development it
[1:07:43] is, the amount of jobs do not
[1:07:45] reverse the damage that would
[1:07:46] happen to our animals,
[1:07:48] especially in the everglades.
[1:07:56] We just want our community to
[1:07:57] benefit and our future
[1:07:59] generations are just going to
[1:08:01] look over a concrete jungle and
[1:08:03] wonder what happened so your
[1:08:04] honor, the position to
[1:08:05] represent us so represent us
[1:08:07] and our needs over the
[1:08:08] corporations wants, thank you
[1:08:09] for your time.
[1:08:11] >>public speaker: hello
[1:08:12] commissioners and CHAIRMAN,
[1:08:14] sophia mayor, 1172 fountain
[1:08:17] blue boulevard miami florida
[1:08:18] and I wanted to speak about
[1:08:20] item at 4b and warden board
[1:08:21] members to be educated about
[1:08:23] our agenda item being voted on,
[1:08:25] every vote matters because we
[1:08:27] need positive impacts that will
[1:08:29] benefit residents, great power
[1:08:31] comes responsibility.
[1:08:33] Taking accountability with
[1:08:34] integrity and compassion is
[1:08:36] vital for making an impact
[1:08:38] whether that's creating
[1:08:39] affordable housing, protecting
[1:08:42] first amendment expressions and
[1:08:44] preserving our environment from
[1:08:46] harmful developments such as
[1:08:48] kelly tractors and etc. The
[1:08:49] existing udp boundaries there
[1:08:51] to protect the last remaining
[1:08:53] wetland so what does that send
[1:08:55] from elected officials,
[1:08:57] businesses can drive but it
[1:08:58] shouldn't be at the expense of
[1:09:04] wildlife and wetlands we need
[1:09:05] and benefit from.
[1:09:07] If there's something I want
[1:09:09] commissioners to remember is
[1:09:10] that we can all work together
[1:09:12] and reach a common ground, we
[1:09:14] don't have to see each other as
[1:09:16] a burden but an outlet for
[1:09:16] change.
[1:09:17] It's never too late to care
[1:09:19] about each other and rc.
[1:09:21] >>chair: is that it?
[1:09:22] I have joseph and victor.
[1:09:24] Going once, going twice.
[1:09:31] Then I have our tax collector,
[1:09:33] dario fernandez who is not able
[1:09:35] to have made it but he has a
[1:09:36] prepared video to share during
[1:09:38] his moment of opportunity.
[1:09:53] Do you want to say something
[1:09:54] first.
[1:09:54] Go ahead.
[1:09:56] > met on that mayor my name
[1:09:58] is andrew lopez, director of
[1:10:00] motor services at the office of
[1:10:01] the miami-dade county tax
[1:10:03] collector and on behalf of the
[1:10:04] dario fernandez we have an
[1:10:06] important video message we like
[1:10:16] to share with this board.
[1:10:18] >> good morning mayor and
[1:10:19] residents of miami dade county,
[1:10:21] I have miami-dade county tax
[1:10:22] collector.
[1:10:24] german rodriguez thank you for
[1:10:25] working with me.
[1:10:26] And my team on this important
[1:10:27] issue.
[1:10:29] Today I am confirming that our
[1:10:30] roadways commission under the
[1:10:32] approved school board millage
[1:10:34] for the year 2026 2027.
[1:10:35] This will save miami-dade
[1:10:37] county residents more than 30
[1:10:37] million.
[1:10:40] I asked the commission to use
[1:10:41] this savings for property tax
[1:10:46] relief and to protect police
[1:10:48] fire rescue and emergency
[1:10:49] response and other essential
[1:10:50] services.
[1:10:51] His year we expect
[1:10:54] 97 million to be returned to
[1:10:56] all taxing authorities
[1:10:58] including 84 million that will
[1:10:59] benefit miami dade county
[1:11:00] residents.
[1:11:03] This includes that 20 million
[1:11:09] returned hourly in APRIL and 64
[1:11:10] million expected to be returned
[1:11:13] at the end of the fiscal year.
[1:11:14] Miami's financial management
[1:11:17] has allowed us to operate
[1:11:19] without requesting up to 24
[1:11:24] million in advances that we
[1:11:26] were entitled to receive.
[1:11:28] Our office also does not
[1:11:31] collect the 2% commission of
[1:11:33] incorporated areas under
[1:11:36] municipalities.
[1:11:38] 3% is 40 million in savings for
[1:11:39] miami-dade county residents.
[1:11:43] Let me be very clear, no other
[1:11:45] tax collector in florida does
[1:11:46] this.
[1:11:48] And all of these savings are
[1:11:55] being achieved without
[1:11:56] affecting our services.
[1:11:59] I believe it's important to do
[1:12:01] everything we can to help our
[1:12:07] residents while continuing to
[1:12:08] provide a quality service they
[1:12:09] depend on.
[1:12:11] To the residents of miami-dade
[1:12:13] county, we are coming here to
[1:12:15] lower your taxes supporting our
[1:12:17] public schools, protecting our
[1:12:18] police and keeping the
[1:12:23] important service you depend on
[1:12:25] 300 thank you GOD bless
[1:12:26] miami-dade county and GOD bless
[1:12:32] the united states of america.
[1:12:34] >> we submitted a letter to the
[1:12:36] clerk to distribute to everyone
[1:12:39] of you detailing everything MR.
[1:12:41] Fernandez covered in the video
[1:12:42] and if you have questions we
[1:12:44] are here to respond.
[1:12:46] >>chair: the mayor and myself
[1:12:47] have been speaking with the tax
[1:12:49] collector and we wrote him a
[1:12:51] letter to try to get him and
[1:12:52] he's agreed so this as you
[1:12:57] mentioned is $13 million that
[1:12:59] will be outlined in the the
[1:13:00] mayor's change memo.
[1:13:02] So personally I'd like to thank
[1:13:04] the tax collector for his
[1:13:05] partnership and commitment as
[1:13:07] he did last year working with
[1:13:08] the county to deliver the
[1:13:09] savings.
[1:13:10] Thank you MR. Tax collector.
[1:13:12] MADAM Attorney is it in order
[1:13:17] to set the agenda at this time.
[1:13:19] >> I apologize but I have just
[1:13:21] received some additional
[1:13:22] requests and need a few
[1:13:23] minutes.
[1:13:40] >>chair: take your time.
[1:13:41] >>chair: I also need director
[1:13:45] lord is to read a statement.
[1:13:46] >> that can be read now.
[1:13:51] >> is the director in the
[1:13:51] building.
[1:13:55] While we have the attorneys
[1:13:58] summarize the agenda changes.
[1:14:04] Director I know it's just a
[1:14:05] protocol stating you need to
[1:14:07] read, if you could go ahead and
[1:14:12] put that notice on the record.
[1:14:14] >> lourdes gomez, rer, 6.800
[1:14:16] florida statutes requires a
[1:14:18] notice of public hearing on a
[1:14:20] resolution designating a
[1:14:21] brownfield area be announced at
[1:14:23] a scheduled meeting before the
[1:14:25] actual public hearing.
[1:14:29] This announcement serves as
[1:14:31] notice a public hearing on the
[1:14:32] resolution relating to a
[1:14:34] proposed brownfield area
[1:14:35] designation is being planned
[1:14:37] for this board's OCTOBER 6
[1:14:38] meeting.
[1:14:40] The proposed designation is for
[1:14:41] the property at 7248 southwest
[1:14:45] 42nd terrace, miami-dade
[1:14:45] county.
[1:14:50] All right, met an attorney I'm
[1:15:11] ready when you're ready.
[1:15:15] And while we wait.
[1:15:22] While we wait I want to
[1:15:24] recognize vice-mayor rhonda
[1:15:25] anderson from coral gables, I
[1:15:27] believe she's in the chamber,
[1:15:28] welcome to our chamber.
[1:15:30] I'm sure you're here for a
[1:15:31] specific item are you in
[1:15:37] support or against an item.
[1:15:39] >> in support of an item and if
[1:15:40] I MAY, rhonda anderson.
[1:15:42] Vice-mayor city of coral gables
[1:15:44] business address 284 minard
[1:16:14] avenue, 2015 hernando street.
[1:16:16] Thank you chair for the
[1:16:17] recognition, mayor and
[1:16:18] commissioners for the
[1:16:19] opportunity to speak.
[1:16:21] I came here to thank
[1:16:22] commissioner orbis for
[1:16:24] entertaining the resolution I
[1:16:26] brought to extend the life of
[1:16:27] trolleys in our city and for
[1:16:29] other municipalities as well.
[1:16:31] As the daughter of an airline
[1:16:33] mechanic and automotive
[1:16:34] mechanic unaware of the test
[1:16:36] used to develop the viability
[1:16:38] of engines beyond the 15 year
[1:16:40] previous mark and I would
[1:16:41] appreciate your support in
[1:16:43] helping our city of taxpayer
[1:16:45] dollars by extending them to 20
[1:16:46] years, thank you for your time
[1:16:47] all right.
[1:16:49] I think we have another meeting
[1:16:51] do on thursday so I won't get a
[1:16:53] head of my colleague but wish
[1:16:54] everybody a happy rosh
[1:16:54] hashanah.
[1:16:56] We still have another meeting
[1:16:58] before it starts officially.
[1:16:59] We still see each other before
[1:17:00] then.
[1:17:13] Yes, sure.
[1:17:15] MADAM Clerk, if you'd like to
[1:17:17] make the announcement at this
[1:17:19] time as we await the attorney.
[1:17:24] >> the villalobos award
[1:17:25] recognizes parents who been
[1:17:27] inspired by the memory of a
[1:17:29] lost child and have it taken
[1:17:31] action to influence the munity.
[1:17:32] Pursuant to the award
[1:17:34] procedures for the second
[1:17:35] nomination for 2026 vice
[1:17:37] CHAIRMAN Mcgee nominates tracy
[1:17:39] lyons and commissioner
[1:17:41] steinberg nominates sherry
[1:17:42] silverman on behalf of the
[1:17:44] organization we play for.
[1:17:45] The presentations of the
[1:17:47] vilomah awards will take place
[1:17:51] tuesday, OCTOBER 6.
[1:17:54] >>chair: thank you MADAM Clerk.
[1:18:04] MADAM Attorney are we almost
[1:18:05] there?
[1:18:06] Let me welcome also our MADAM
[1:18:10] Sheriff to our chamber.
[1:18:12] Thank you for being here for a
[1:18:14] special recognition we have
[1:18:16] today and hopefully we will be
[1:18:17] passing it as an item in short
[1:18:18] order.
[1:18:20] MADAM Sheriff I wonder whenever
[1:18:21] there is business that needs to
[1:18:24] be done here you really fill
[1:18:27] this room with your officers
[1:18:28] and I cannot help but think who
[1:18:35] is safeguarding our streets
[1:18:37] because every officer in miami
[1:18:39] seems to be in this chamber
[1:18:43] right now.
[1:18:45] >> thank you MR. Chair.
[1:18:47] >>chair: MADAM Attorney go
[1:18:49] ahead.
[1:18:50] >> we have a number of
[1:18:52] requested changes to your
[1:19:05] agenda, item 3a1, senator
[1:19:07] garcia and commissioners
[1:19:08] bermudez and milian orbis are
[1:19:10] adding this item to the whole
[1:19:12] list, 382 ended supplements
[1:19:14] senator garcia and bermudez add
[1:19:15] their names to the pull list.
[1:19:17] Item 4c, prime sponsor has
[1:19:19] requested deferral of this item
[1:19:21] to the OCTOBER 6 commission
[1:19:21] meeting.
[1:19:23] Have some requests
[1:19:31] to bifurcate public hearing
[1:19:31] items.
[1:19:33] 5e substitute, senator garcia
[1:19:36] and commissioners bermudez and
[1:19:37] regalado wish to bifurcate and
[1:19:39] that is true for 5e substitute,
[1:19:41] 5f substitute, 5g substitute
[1:19:43] and 5h substitute, 5m,
[1:19:52] commissioner tran seven, 5p and
[1:19:54] 5u just bifurcate,
[1:19:56] commissioners gonzalez and
[1:19:57] regalado wish to bifurcate as
[1:20:01] well as 5y ended supplement, a
[1:20:03] request to bifurcate items
[1:20:16] first second reading, 7a, 7d,
[1:20:18] senator garcia is requesting to
[1:20:20] bifurcate but the sponsor has
[1:20:22] requested deferral to know date
[1:20:23] certain so the board would
[1:20:25] decide how it wishes to
[1:20:26] proceed, that's item 7d.
[1:20:29] 7e and supplements commissioner
[1:20:30] gonzales and lopez wish to
[1:20:31] bifurcate this item.
[1:20:34] 7f and supplements commissioner
[1:20:36] regalado wishes to bifurcate.
[1:20:38] 8a3, commissioner regalado adds
[1:20:41] this item to the pull list.
[1:20:47] 8a4 ended supplement and 8a5
[1:20:50] ended supplement commissioner
[1:20:51] bermudez is adding these items
[1:20:53] to the pull list.
[1:20:58] 8g1, senator garcia pulls this
[1:20:58] item.
[1:21:00] 8k1, commissioner gilbert is
[1:21:04] pulling this item.
[1:21:06] 8n5, commissioner regalado is
[1:21:12] adding this item to the pull
[1:21:13] list.
[1:21:15] 8p1, commissioners bermudez and
[1:21:16] milian orbis at this item to
[1:21:19] the pull list.
[1:21:21] 11a1, commissioner bermudez is
[1:21:23] pulling the item.
[1:21:26] 11a3, commissioner steinberg is
[1:21:31] pulling the item and 11a4,
[1:21:32] commissioner regalado is
[1:21:34] pulling this item and I have a
[1:21:36] request for cosponsorship, 3a2
[1:21:38] commissioner regalado, 5c
[1:21:44] commissioner steinberg, 5x and
[1:21:47] 5y, commissioner regalado.
[1:22:01] 8h2, commissioner regalado and
[1:22:03] 10a2 commissioner lopez, items
[1:22:05] to be considered on today's
[1:22:07] meeting will be those listed in
[1:22:08] the final printed agenda with
[1:22:09] additions deferrals and
[1:22:11] scriveners errors noted in the
[1:22:13] CHAIRMAN's memorandum and the
[1:22:15] items I mentioned we had
[1:22:16] commission will approve all
[1:22:18] items by a single low setting
[1:22:20] the agenda except ordinances
[1:22:22] for first reading, public
[1:22:23] hearings, item 6a1 to reduce
[1:22:25] inefficiencies at procurement,
[1:22:27] ordinances set for second
[1:22:29] reading, items 8p2 and 8p3,
[1:22:30] airport contracts which must be
[1:22:32] voted on separately and are not
[1:22:34] on your pull list on the
[1:22:38] following pull list items.
[1:22:43] 3a1 ended supplement, 3a2 ended
[1:22:44] supplement.
[1:22:49] Requests to bifurcate our 5e
[1:22:52] substitute, 5f substitute, 5g
[1:23:06] substitute, 5m, 5u, 5y ended
[1:23:07] supplements, 7d and on 7d
[1:23:09] senator garcia wishes to
[1:23:10] bifurcate but there is a
[1:23:13] deferral requested to know date
[1:23:14] certain.
[1:23:16] he's released his request so
[1:23:17] with the setting of the agenda
[1:23:19] 7d will be deferred, 7e ended
[1:23:23] supplements, 7f.
[1:23:31] 8a3 ended supplements, 8g1,
[1:23:38] 8k1, 11a1, 11a4, I will read
[1:23:39] that item with the other first
[1:23:45] readings, 14a2, 14a3 is a
[1:24:01] public hearing and 14a4, a
[1:24:03] motion to set the agenda is in
[1:24:04] order.
[1:24:06] >>chair: motion by commissioner
[1:24:07] gonzalez, second by
[1:24:08] commissioner steinberg, those
[1:24:10] in favor of setting the agenda
[1:24:12] with every single item being
[1:24:14] pulled, signified by saying
[1:24:14] aye.
[1:24:16] Opposed, nay. Should show the
[1:24:17] agenda hereby set.
[1:24:19] >>commissioner gilbert: I had a
[1:24:20] question on 8k1 I had my
[1:24:22] question answered so I will
[1:24:22] release.
[1:24:24] >> it will pass as soon as you
[1:24:25] take a motion.
[1:24:27] >>chair: we all voted.
[1:24:29] >>commissioner gilbert: I move
[1:24:31] 8k1.
[1:24:32] >>chair: all in favor signify
[1:24:34] by saying aye.
[1:24:36] Opposed, nay., show 8k1 past as
[1:24:36] well.
[1:24:49] I'm going to go into first
[1:24:49] reading items.
[1:24:51] At this time since this should
[1:24:52] be quick.
[1:24:54] So MADAM Attorney please read
[1:24:56] the first reading items.
[1:25:00] And any bifurcations we have.
[1:25:12] >> 4a establishes section 2 436
[1:25:13] of the code creating a
[1:25:15] behavioral health advisory
[1:25:17] board trust fund and providing
[1:25:19] severability inclusion in the
[1:25:21] code and an effective date, 4b
[1:25:23] relates to comprehensive
[1:25:25] development master plan
[1:25:55] providing disposition of
[1:25:57] application cdmp 2021 between
[1:25:59] southwest 272 street and 278
[1:26:00] street and between southwest
[1:26:02] 157 avenue and 159 avenue filed
[1:26:04] by lennar homes llc and the
[1:26:06] cycle to an end the counties
[1:26:08] comprehensive delegate master
[1:26:10] plan providing severability
[1:26:12] exclusion from the code and an
[1:26:14] effective date, 4 deed grants
[1:26:16] petition of acacia grove
[1:26:17] community development district
[1:26:19] generally bounded as amended on
[1:26:21] the north by southwest 336
[1:26:22] street on the east by southwest
[1:26:24] 192 avenue and on the sxsw 340
[1:26:26] street and on the west by
[1:26:28] southwest 197 avenue amending
[1:26:29] the boundaries of the district
[1:26:31] to expand its total acreage by
[1:26:33] approximately 9.88 acres
[1:26:35] providing severability,
[1:26:37] exclusion from the code and an
[1:26:38] effective date.
[1:26:39] 4e grants petition of newton
[1:26:42] road community development
[1:26:48] district bounded on the north
[1:26:50] amending the boundaries of the
[1:26:51] district to expand its total
[1:26:53] acreage by approximately 20.87
[1:26:56] acres providing severability
[1:26:58] exclusion from the code and an
[1:26:59] effective date and 14 a one
[1:27:01] relates to zoning and
[1:27:02] out-of-the-way plan in the
[1:27:04] incorporated area amending
[1:27:05] section 133 of the code
[1:27:07] providing reduced minimum
[1:27:09] street with requirements in the
[1:27:10] right-of-way plan for southwest
[1:27:12] 47 avenue from southwest 72
[1:27:14] street to southwest 82 street
[1:27:16] providing severability
[1:27:18] exclusion in the code and an
[1:27:20] effective date, those are your
[1:27:22] first reading items.
[1:27:23] >>chair: any bifurcations,
[1:27:25] seeing no bifurcations we have
[1:27:26] a motion.
[1:27:28] Moved by commissioner gonzalez,
[1:27:30] second by commissioner regalado
[1:27:32] cohen higgins, clerk please
[1:27:34] call the roll.
[1:27:36] >>commissioner bermudez:
[1:27:38] >>commissioner cohen higgins:
[1:27:38] for.
[1:27:40] >>senator garcia:
[1:27:42] >>commissioner gonzalez: for.
[1:27:44] >>commissioner gilbert:
[1:27:46] >>commissioner hardemon: for.
[1:27:48] >>commissioner lopez: yes.
[1:27:50] >>commissioner milian orbis:
[1:27:52] >>commissioner regalado: yes.
[1:27:54] >>commissioner steinberg:
[1:27:55] >>chair: I vote yes.
[1:27:57] >> motion passes unanimously.
[1:27:59] >>chair: show first reading
[1:28:00] items past, I'm going to get
[1:28:02] into public hearing items and
[1:28:04] take them a little bit out of
[1:28:04] order.
[1:28:06] We will do public hearing as
[1:28:07] though order comes as well
[1:28:08] rather than in front.
[1:28:10] I'm going to start if you can
[1:28:21] read 5x and five
[1:28:23] >> yes MR. Chair, 5x is a
[1:28:24] resolution code designating
[1:28:26] that portion of southwest 132nd
[1:28:28] avenue between 104th street and
[1:28:30] south colusa club drive as
[1:28:32] deputy sheriff devon matthew
[1:28:33] way and it supplement.
[1:28:35] And 5y names the football field
[1:28:37] at devon airpark as the deputy
[1:28:38] sheriff devon matthew field and
[1:28:39] it supplement.
[1:28:41] And this is a public hearing
[1:28:46] items, I do have requests to
[1:28:47] bifurcate.
[1:28:48] >>chair: I will open public
[1:28:50] hearing at this time, don't
[1:28:57] have anyone signed up to speak
[1:28:59] but if the sheriff wants to say
[1:29:00] a few words.
[1:29:01] If the family wants to say a
[1:29:03] few words this would be the
[1:29:05] opportunity for you all to say
[1:29:07] a couple words, MADAME Sheriff.
[1:29:09] >> good morning CHAIRMAN, good
[1:29:10] morning all commissioners
[1:29:12] elected officials and everyone
[1:29:14] who came here this morning.
[1:29:20] This is an important moment for
[1:29:21] us and our agency and our
[1:29:22] community.
[1:29:23] Devon jaramillo gave his life
[1:29:25] in service to this community
[1:29:27] and this is a small moment we
[1:29:28] can honor him, honor his
[1:29:30] family, honor his sacrifice and
[1:29:31] his memory for years to come.
[1:29:44] We are very grateful for this
[1:29:46] board to consider this
[1:29:46] proposal.
[1:29:48] And I humbly ask on behalf of
[1:29:50] the family, on behalf of every
[1:29:52] man and woman who works for the
[1:29:54] miami-dade sheriff's office
[1:29:55] that you approve and move
[1:29:57] forward with the naming of the
[1:29:58] street and of the park for
[1:30:00] devon jaramillo, thank you very
[1:30:01] much.
[1:30:03] >>chair: does anyone from the
[1:30:04] family want to say anything.
[1:30:06] >> good morning, my name is
[1:30:10] david jaramillo, the father of
[1:30:11] devon matthew jaramillo.
[1:30:15] CHAIRMAN Rodriguez and
[1:30:19] commissioner regalado, I want
[1:30:21] to thank you all for taking
[1:30:29] this motion into consideration,
[1:30:31] and ask the support you guys
[1:30:33] and the community have given to
[1:30:35] the family in keeping my son's
[1:30:40] spirit alive and I just want to
[1:30:44] say thank you on behalf of his
[1:30:46] mother and the rest of our
[1:30:50] family here and our brothers
[1:30:52] and sisters in the back, thank
[1:30:54] you so much and I hope you will
[1:30:58] pass this unanimously, thank
[1:30:58] you.
[1:31:04] >>chair: thank you david.
[1:31:06] So public hearing is officially
[1:31:12] closed, I'm sure that your
[1:31:13] cosponsor, I will recognize you
[1:31:14] in a minute.
[1:31:18] I want to say devon wasn't just
[1:31:23] born here and raised here but
[1:31:25] he ultimately gave his life
[1:31:27] protecting this community that
[1:31:28] he so very loved.
[1:31:29] Service was in his blood.
[1:31:34] He grew up in law enforcement
[1:31:36] they law enforcement family and
[1:31:38] followed in the footsteps of
[1:31:39] his father david a retired
[1:31:44] police detective and devon went
[1:31:45] on to proudly wear his father's
[1:31:47] badge number 1765.
[1:31:49] That david, you carried your
[1:32:05] whole career.
[1:32:07] His heart for helping others
[1:32:09] started early before becoming a
[1:32:10] deputy volunteer in this
[1:32:12] community including helping
[1:32:14] collect and distribute
[1:32:15] christmas toys to kids in need,
[1:32:17] he served with distinction at
[1:32:19] the coral gables police
[1:32:21] department before joining the
[1:32:22] sheriff's office where he came
[1:32:24] home to serve the kendall
[1:32:26] community where he grew up but
[1:32:27] devon was more than a deputy,
[1:32:29] he was a loving son, a brother,
[1:32:31] friend and colleague and he was
[1:32:33] someone people could count on,
[1:32:34] someone who looked out for the
[1:32:35] people he loved.
[1:32:37] Those who knew him remember the
[1:32:39] simple moments that made him
[1:32:40] who he was.
[1:32:41] Riding motorcycles with his
[1:32:58] dad, stopping for a cafecito
[1:32:59] and spending time with family
[1:33:00] and friends.
[1:33:01] Is life was far
[1:33:02] beyond social work and his
[1:33:04] impact will last forever.
[1:33:05] He represented the best of
[1:33:07] miami-dade, a young man who
[1:33:08] honored his family, loved his
[1:33:10] community and made the ultimate
[1:33:12] sacrifice protecting the place
[1:33:13] he called home.
[1:33:15] We will remember his service,
[1:33:17] remember and honor his service
[1:33:19] and never forget him really we
[1:33:21] unfortunately hear about
[1:33:22] passings of law enforcement
[1:33:24] officers, first responders more
[1:33:25] often than we'd like, the
[1:33:27] sheriff was at the forefront
[1:33:29] and it impacts the entire
[1:33:30] community when something
[1:33:32] happens and for me devon was
[1:33:33] the first since I've been
[1:33:35] elected that I knew and called
[1:33:37] friend so it was more personal
[1:33:38] and special to me and he
[1:33:40] definitely hit a different part
[1:33:42] of my heart so that's why
[1:33:44] commissioner regalado and
[1:33:45] myself and this board and this
[1:33:47] commission is honoring him,
[1:33:49] naming a street and a football
[1:33:54] field devon jaramillo away and
[1:33:56] with your support we will get
[1:33:58] that past and with that I will
[1:34:00] transfer to my cosponsor
[1:34:01] commissioner regalado, thank
[1:34:03] you for doing this.
[1:34:04] >>commissioner regalado: thank
[1:34:06] you for your support and to the
[1:34:08] family and all the officers
[1:34:10] here and the residence, one of
[1:34:12] the saddest things we do is
[1:34:21] name streets.
[1:34:23] It's usually not for happy
[1:34:23] reasons.
[1:34:25] And for us it's such a
[1:34:26] tremendous loss and as the
[1:34:28] CHAIRMAN Mentioned for those of
[1:34:30] us who knew devon and his
[1:34:31] family he was such an amazing
[1:34:32] light.
[1:34:33] It's an honor to honor him with
[1:34:35] this street and the field and
[1:34:37] my hope is when people drive
[1:34:39] down and see the name on the
[1:34:43] street they will google it and
[1:34:44] learn about him and future
[1:34:46] generations will also honor his
[1:34:48] service and for all the kids
[1:34:49] that play on that same field
[1:34:51] they will grow up knowing who
[1:34:53] he was and the great sacrifice
[1:34:54] he made.
[1:34:56] i know nothing can make this
[1:34:58] easier but you have respect and
[1:35:00] admiration for your sacrifice
[1:35:02] and for your families
[1:35:03] dedication to public service.
[1:35:22] He was an outstanding human and
[1:35:24] his parents, that's all we can
[1:35:26] do is raise good humans and
[1:35:28] hope we make the world a better
[1:35:29] place and in this case you did
[1:35:31] that and so much more because
[1:35:33] not only make the world a
[1:35:34] better place, he reminds us all
[1:35:36] of the sacrifice and love and
[1:35:38] heart that goes into serving
[1:35:39] the community so thank you, it
[1:35:40] is an honor.
[1:35:42] District 7 is blessed to have
[1:35:43] seen him grow up and honor him
[1:35:45] and his legacy.
[1:35:46] >>chair: do you want to make
[1:35:48] the motion to move 5x and 5y?
[1:35:50] Seconded by commissioner
[1:35:52] steinberg, commissioner
[1:35:54] gonzalez you are recognized.
[1:35:55] >>commissioner gonzalez: I like
[1:35:58] to thank the sponsoring
[1:35:59] commissioner and I would like
[1:36:01] to ask to be included as a
[1:36:02] co-prime sponsor on this and
[1:36:04] I'm sure my colleagues would
[1:36:04] like do the same.
[1:36:06] >commissioner regalado:
[1:36:08] anyone who wants to join as
[1:36:09] cosponsor raise your hand there
[1:36:17] are already 2 co-prime's so
[1:36:18] cosponsor.
[1:36:23] >>chair: if it can be cosponsor
[1:36:24] I'm okay but I'm not sure if
[1:36:25] you can have more than one
[1:36:30] co-prime, so unanimously.
[1:36:31] >>commissioner regalado: if we
[1:36:33] are going to make one more
[1:36:35] person co-prime that didn't
[1:36:40] draft we should make everybody
[1:36:41] co-prime.
[1:36:42] He whole purpose of
[1:36:43] co-prime is you are drafting
[1:36:45] but it's fine if everyone wants
[1:36:52] to be co-prime.
[1:36:53] >>chair: I'm fine with it, this
[1:36:56] is personal to the community so
[1:36:57] everybody who wants to be a
[1:36:58] cosponsor for sure.
[1:37:00] If someone wants to be a
[1:37:07] co-prime, I'm okay with it.
[1:37:08] >>commissioner regalado:
[1:37:10] everyone is co-prime, that's
[1:37:10] fine.
[1:37:12] We all agreed and we should
[1:37:14] just vote.
[1:37:15] >>commissioner gonzalez: if I
[1:37:17] can have a point of personal
[1:37:17] privilege.
[1:37:19] Here's a lot I
[1:37:21] want to say.
[1:37:22] And I wish this would have came
[1:37:24] up sooner.
[1:37:33] I see a lot of deputies here
[1:37:35] today.
[1:37:44] And devon was a young man that
[1:37:45] gave everything.
[1:37:48] For this community.
[1:37:51] Today, we honor his legacy by
[1:37:58] naming a street after a hero.
[1:38:04] But we are not just honoring a
[1:38:04] street.
[1:38:06] We are honoring a legacy that
[1:38:08] he is instilling into this
[1:38:11] community, into this county and
[1:38:12] into every single deputy that
[1:38:13] wears the badge.
[1:38:17] Because bravery doesn't mean
[1:38:21] that you're not afraid.
[1:38:27] Bravery does not mean that you
[1:38:29] don't recognize the risks that
[1:38:34] you take every single day that
[1:38:39] you wear the badge.
[1:38:43] I think the best example of
[1:38:48] that is in the bible.
[1:38:50] Christ is praying in the garden
[1:38:50] of gethsemane.
[1:38:53] This is GOD.
[1:38:54] He's praying.
[1:38:56] Nd he's asking
[1:38:58] that if this cup can be taken
[1:39:04] from him, that it please be
[1:39:05] taken.
[1:39:07] But that GOD's will be done.
[1:39:12] And then he goes on to do what
[1:39:13] is necessary.
[1:39:15] That's what it means to wear
[1:39:17] the badge.
[1:39:29] It doesn't mean you're not
[1:39:30] afraid.
[1:39:32] It means despite being afraid
[1:39:34] you run towards danger because
[1:39:35] it's the right thing to do.
[1:39:37] Because it's what the job calls
[1:39:37] for.
[1:39:39] That is a legacy that will
[1:39:40] forever carry on.
[1:39:42] It's not just a street naming.
[1:39:48] Devon will forever be
[1:39:49] remembered because he lived
[1:39:50] that legacy.
[1:39:52] As every single officer that is
[1:39:54] here is in miami-dade and
[1:39:56] across the country and monies
[1:39:58] that legacy and learns from
[1:39:59] that legacy and lives that
[1:40:00] legacy.
[1:40:08] To the family, we mourn with
[1:40:08] you.
[1:40:15] We love you.
[1:40:16] And we will forever be indebted
[1:40:17] to devon sacrifice.
[1:40:20] Od bless
[1:40:20] you.
[1:40:28] And thank you.
[1:40:30] >> having a motion and the
[1:40:32] second on the table, all in
[1:40:39] favor of approving 5x and five
[1:40:41] line which names the street and
[1:40:47] part signify by saying aye.
[1:40:48] Opposed, nay. Show the item
[1:40:50] passed unanimously,
[1:40:51] congratulations.
[1:40:53] This is not something to
[1:40:56] extremely be happy about find
[1:40:58] happiness in the fact that this
[1:41:05] community honors devon
[1:41:06] jaramillo.
[1:41:08] Don't leave because I'd like to
[1:41:10] see you before you guys leave,
[1:41:11] I will step aside, we love you
[1:41:12] guys.
[1:41:13] Next item that I want to call
[1:41:15] met an attorney if you would
[1:41:27] read it into the record, item
[1:41:27] 5c.
[1:41:29] >> resolution code designating
[1:41:32] that portion of southwest 84th
[1:41:33] street between west 97th road
[1:41:35] southwest 103rd avenue as
[1:41:43] sergeant david caruso way.
[1:41:45] >>chair: I need to go ahead and
[1:41:47] open up public hearing at this
[1:41:47] time.
[1:41:49] Registered to speak on public
[1:41:56] hearing but sergeant caruso's
[1:41:58] wife eileen is present, did you
[1:41:59] want to say anything.
[1:42:00] You don't have to.
[1:42:02] But I will take this
[1:42:07] opportunity and I'll recognize
[1:42:08] commissioner gonzalez who is
[1:42:10] my: prime sponsor on this
[1:42:20] side.
[1:42:21] But I was proud to sponsor this
[1:42:23] item as it's in my district.
[1:42:25] Honoring the life and service
[1:42:26] of sergeant caruso.
[1:42:28] Who was tragically killed
[1:42:29] OCTOBER 28, 2025 in a
[1:42:30] motorcycle crash.
[1:42:30] E was just
[1:42:34] 33 years old.
[1:42:36] Still had his whole life ahead
[1:42:36] of him.
[1:42:38] He probably served the miami
[1:42:39] beach police department 10
[1:42:41] years and was known for his
[1:42:43] professionalism compassion and
[1:42:52] commitment to his community.
[1:42:54] His fellow officers remember
[1:42:56] him as someone who always
[1:42:58] helped others, offered guidance
[1:42:59] and went the extra mile.
[1:43:01] He understood public safety is
[1:43:03] about more than enforcement,
[1:43:05] it's about trust dignity in
[1:43:06] this very community.
[1:43:08] And beyond the badge he was a
[1:43:10] devoted husband father son
[1:43:12] brother and a friend who left a
[1:43:13] lasting impact.
[1:43:15] This resolution code designates
[1:43:16] southwest 84th street between
[1:43:18] 97th road southwest 103rd
[1:43:26] avenue and commission district
[1:43:27] 10 and nine asked sergeant
[1:43:28] david caruso way.
[1:43:30] This is a lasting tribute to a
[1:43:32] man who dedicated his life to
[1:43:34] serving others and ensuring
[1:43:36] service sacrifice and legacy
[1:43:37] will never be forgotten.
[1:43:40] And with that my team has every
[1:43:42] opportunity to visit with the
[1:43:43] family and the beautiful girls,
[1:43:44] is it 2 girls?
[1:43:47] One girl and a boy, I saw them
[1:43:54] riding their bikes.
[1:43:56] We keep track through social
[1:43:58] media, that's a powerful tool
[1:43:59] these days.
[1:44:03] Beautiful children that I know
[1:44:04] he was raising very well.
[1:44:06] He will be missed.
[1:44:09] Commissioner gonzalez.
[1:44:11] >>commissioner gonzalez: thank
[1:44:14] you MR. Chair.
[1:44:17] Eileen, I didn't know david.
[1:44:24] I didn't know him.
[1:44:26] But he impacted my life and I'm
[1:44:28] going to tell you why because I
[1:44:29] think you need to know.
[1:44:32] To me personally, the most
[1:44:34] important thing is to try to be
[1:44:44] a good man.
[1:44:45] In the bible it says there is
[1:44:47] no good men but GOD but to try
[1:44:49] to be a person that tries, that
[1:44:52] is a life worth living.
[1:44:54] I'm not going to talk about
[1:44:55] dave's career.
[1:44:57] I'm going to talk about the
[1:44:58] impact he made with many people
[1:45:04] that called me and told me how
[1:45:06] he led them to christ.
[1:45:13] Not by forcing them, not by
[1:45:14] citing bible verses like I do
[1:45:18] but simply by being a good man.
[1:45:22] That's a legacy for his kids.
[1:45:25] That's legacy for this world.
[1:45:29] And as a man, that's the type
[1:45:35] of legacy I would love to leave
[1:45:40] when I get a chance to go to
[1:45:40] christ.
[1:45:45] there's a story in the bible
[1:45:46] about stephen.
[1:45:51] He's very young.
[1:45:53] He's only mentioned for like 2
[1:45:54] chapters, act six and act
[1:45:56] seven.
[1:45:57] And he makes one of the
[1:46:01] greatest speeches sharing the
[1:46:01] gospel.
[1:46:04] And in the crowd right before
[1:46:09] he passes is a man named saul
[1:46:13] who later becomes paul.
[1:46:17] Writes about 60% of the new
[1:46:19] testament and brings both jews
[1:46:21] and gentiles and romans to
[1:46:21] christ.
[1:46:29] 2 chapters.
[1:46:30] That's impact.
[1:46:31] Dave had impact.
[1:46:36] We feel you, we love you.
[1:46:38] And we will forever be grateful
[1:46:42] for his sacrifice, thank you.
[1:46:47] >>chair: thank you commissioner
[1:46:50] and with that commissioner
[1:46:54] gonzalez would you move the
[1:46:55] item.
[1:46:56] >>commissioner gonzalez: so
[1:46:56] moved.
[1:46:59] >>chair: second by commissioner
[1:47:00] steinberg, you want to
[1:47:01] cosponsor as well?
[1:47:04] The entire dais are cosponsors.
[1:47:06] You guys can prime this one
[1:47:06] too.
[1:47:08] With that all in favor signify
[1:47:12] by saying aye.
[1:47:19] Opposed, nay. Show the item
[1:47:20] past and street naming approved
[1:47:22] by unanimous vote.
[1:47:28] With that, I'll have the
[1:47:30] attorney move into the rest of
[1:47:32] the five is but I want to thank
[1:47:33] both for being present, I know
[1:47:35] the drive is not easy to come
[1:47:36] up town but it's very
[1:47:38] meaningful that you all drove
[1:47:44] down here so I appreciate it
[1:47:45] and if I'm able to catch a
[1:47:51] couple minutes if I could step
[1:47:53] aside to say goodbye to you
[1:47:54] before you leave.
[1:47:55] Work your way towards the back
[1:47:59] or start, you could stay
[1:48:01] whatever you guys want we will
[1:48:04] be moving on.
[1:48:07] Thank you guys, GOD bless you
[1:48:14] all and I'm glad you guys made
[1:48:14] it.
[1:48:16] MADAM Attorney, should I do
[1:48:17] public hearing for the rest of
[1:48:19] the fives at this time.
[1:48:20] >> would you like me to read
[1:48:25] all the titles?
[1:48:26] MR. Chair, 5a substitute
[1:48:28] relating to hospital mandatory
[1:48:30] payments amending article 4 and
[1:48:33] chapter 18 revising definitions
[1:48:44] authorizing electronic delivery
[1:48:45] of documents, recognizing
[1:48:47] waivers granted by the center
[1:48:49] for medicaid services expanding
[1:48:51] scope of medicaid supplemental
[1:48:52] payment programs revising
[1:48:54] addition review authorizing
[1:48:56] payment plans, authorizing
[1:48:58] suspension or termination of
[1:49:00] payments by resolution making
[1:49:01] technical and conforming
[1:49:03] changes and providing
[1:49:04] severability and an effective
[1:49:06] date and supplement, 5b bruce
[1:49:08] issuance by capital trust
[1:49:09] authority of its revenue bonds
[1:49:11] in an amount not to exceed $155
[1:49:13] million for the benefit of bh
[1:49:15] wellness foundation southern
[1:49:17] wins hospital, southern wins
[1:49:18] hospital llc and 4225 llc to
[1:49:20] fund a plan to finance which
[1:49:22] includes acquisition of sinai
[1:49:24] wins hospital, 5d declares
[1:49:26] counties a surplus to include
[1:49:30] such properties authorizing
[1:49:32] conveyance to habitat for
[1:49:33] humanity of greater miami and
[1:49:35] lead equity development
[1:49:37] incorporated for the purpose of
[1:49:39] developing affordable housing
[1:49:40] to be sold to low low or
[1:49:43] moderate income households.
[1:49:45] funny e substitute relates to
[1:49:48] county procurement implementing
[1:49:50] in whole or part multiple
[1:49:51] recommendations for the final
[1:49:53] report of the special task
[1:49:55] force to reduce inefficiencies
[1:49:57] in procurement relating to bid
[1:49:58] protest amending section 2 b
[1:49:59] 84
[1:50:00] of the code, directing the
[1:50:02] mayor or designee to create or
[1:50:04] maintain and update a
[1:50:05] centralized portal for use in
[1:50:07] the protest process, in
[1:50:09] coordination with the clerk of
[1:50:10] court, requiring a report
[1:50:12] report providing severability,
[1:50:14] inclusion in and exclusion from
[1:50:15] the code, and an effective
[1:50:16] date.
[1:50:18] 5f substitute relates to county
[1:50:20] procurement implementing in
[1:50:25] whole or part recommendations
[1:50:27] from the final report of the
[1:50:29] special task force to reduce
[1:50:31] inefficiencies in procurement
[1:50:32] relating to small business and
[1:50:35] local preference requirements
[1:50:36] amending sections to-8.1.1,
[1:50:52] two-8.1.1.2 relating to small
[1:50:54] business architecture and
[1:50:56] engineering program
[1:50:56] requirements, small business
[1:50:58] enterprise service program
[1:50:59] requirements, small business
[1:51:01] enterprise goods program
[1:51:03] requirements local business
[1:51:04] preference, locally
[1:51:06] headquartered business
[1:51:08] preference, local preference
[1:51:09] eligibility and verification,
[1:51:11] small business remedies and
[1:51:13] related procurement policies
[1:51:15] erecting and authorizing the
[1:51:16] mayor to make conforming
[1:51:19] changes and providing providing
[1:51:21] severability, inclusion in and
[1:51:23] exclusion from the code, and an
[1:51:24] effective date.
[1:51:26] 5g implements recommendations
[1:51:27] from the final report of a
[1:51:30] special task force to reduce
[1:51:32] inefficiencies in procurement
[1:51:33] amending 211 of the code
[1:51:35] relating to the conflict of
[1:51:37] interest and code of ethics
[1:51:38] ordinance, to-eight relating
[1:51:40] to fair subcontracting
[1:51:41] processes, section 28.1.1 of
[1:51:43] the code relating to the small
[1:51:45] business enterprise services
[1:51:47] program section 28.1.1.2 of the
[1:51:48] code relating to the small
[1:51:50] business enterprise goods
[1:51:51] program, section 2-8.1 of the
[1:51:53] code relating to bids from
[1:51:55] related parties and section 10
[1:51:57] -30.2 of the code relating to
[1:51:58] bids precluded from related
[1:52:00] parties repealing resolution
[1:52:02] are 63-14 requiring certain
[1:52:05] due diligence affidavits in
[1:52:07] procurement, providing
[1:52:09] severability, inclusion in and
[1:52:11] exclusion from the code, and an
[1:52:12] effective date and requiring a
[1:52:15] report, 5h substitute relates
[1:52:17] to multiple recommendations
[1:52:19] from the final report of the
[1:52:21] special task force to reduce
[1:52:23] inefficiencies in procurement
[1:52:25] amending section 2-11.1 of
[1:52:27] the code of miami-dade county
[1:52:29] relating to the cone of silence
[1:52:31] to permit closed recorded oral
[1:52:33] presentations in competitive
[1:52:35] procurements consistent with
[1:52:37] exemption in florida law
[1:52:42] amending and plummeting orders
[1:52:44] three-34 and three-39
[1:52:46] establishing requirements for
[1:52:48] competitive selection committee
[1:52:50] appointments, composition
[1:52:52] scoring training and conflict
[1:52:53] checks creating large lawyer
[1:52:55] employer category relating to
[1:52:57] evaluation scoring and
[1:52:59] acquisition and providing
[1:53:00] providing severability,
[1:53:02] inclusion in and exclusion from
[1:53:04] the code, and an effective date
[1:53:06] 5I as a resolution amending
[1:53:07] resolution are 795 tend to
[1:53:09] revise the co-designation of
[1:53:11] that portion of the nation away
[1:53:13] from east san marino island and
[1:53:17] west rivo alto island and
[1:53:19] supplement, 5k establishes a
[1:53:21] special taxing district in the
[1:53:23] county bounded on the north by
[1:53:25] theoretical southwest 325
[1:53:27] street on the east by southwest
[1:53:32] 194 avenue and on the south by
[1:53:34] southwest 328 street lucy
[1:53:35] street and on the west by
[1:53:37] southwest 197 avenue richard
[1:53:39] road known and described as
[1:53:41] harmony homes multipurpose
[1:53:43] maintenance and street lighting
[1:53:46] special tasking district and
[1:53:47] affiant identifying services to
[1:53:50] be provided and provide for the
[1:53:52] installation of streetlights,
[1:53:53] approving a street lighting
[1:53:55] agreement with florida power
[1:53:57] and light and authorizing mayor
[1:53:59] or designee to execute the
[1:54:00] agreement waiving revolutions
[1:54:02] of our one 3006 and providing
[1:54:04] exclusion from the code and an
[1:54:06] effective date and 8k1 approves
[1:54:07] a preliminary assessment role
[1:54:09] for the district, 5l grants
[1:54:11] sunset opportunities and sunset
[1:54:13] c1 llc for establish on of a
[1:54:14] community bounded district on
[1:54:16] the north side harriet tubman
[1:54:18] highway and on the south by
[1:54:20] south 58th avenue sunset drive
[1:54:22] creating and establishing
[1:54:24] downtown so me community
[1:54:32] development district inviting
[1:54:33] name powers and duties
[1:54:35] providing description of
[1:54:37] boundaries, providing initial
[1:54:39] members of the board of
[1:54:40] supervisors, accepting
[1:54:42] proffered declaration of
[1:54:44] restrictive covenants,
[1:54:46] providing severability,
[1:54:47] inclusion in and exclusion from
[1:54:49] the code, and an effective
[1:54:50] date.
[1:54:51] Five and approves 6301
[1:54:53] southwest. 27th street, a
[1:54:55] resolution approving the waiver
[1:54:57] of plat of claudio ortiz garcia
[1:54:59] and giselle betancourt, 5p is a
[1:55:01] resolution approving the waiver
[1:55:03] plat of mosaic andres gonzales,
[1:55:05] 5q approves the waiver of plat
[1:55:07] of alliance northwest 60th
[1:55:08] street llc.
[1:55:09] Five are approves the plat of
[1:55:18] lions trail subdivision, 5s
[1:55:20] approves the plat of west palm
[1:55:21] villas, five you is a
[1:55:23] resolution approving the plat
[1:55:24] of sunset oaks south, 5v
[1:55:46] approves the plat rumasa
[1:55:48] subdivision, 5x designates that
[1:55:50] portion of southwest 132 second
[1:55:52] avenue between 104th street and
[1:55:54] south colusa club drive, I'm
[1:55:55] sorry, we did that, 1483
[1:55:57] approves as a governmental
[1:55:59] facility development of certain
[1:56:01] new facilities for an
[1:56:03] integrated correctional campus
[1:56:04] at 7000 northwest. 41st street
[1:56:06] and in compliance with section
[1:56:08] 33-303 of the code subject to
[1:56:09] certain conditions, those are
[1:56:11] your public hearing items.
[1:56:13] >> public hearing is open, we
[1:56:15] have to that have signed up for
[1:56:16] quasijudicial items 5m and 5s,
[1:56:17] swear in josc
[1:56:18] and sir j to the
[1:56:19] clerk, swear in those
[1:56:20] witnesses.
[1:56:22] >>> do you solemnly swear or
[1:56:24] affirm the testimony you are
[1:56:25] about to give is the truth
[1:56:27] whole truth and nothing but the
[1:56:29] truth so help you GOD, thank
[1:56:31] you you MAY be seated.
[1:56:35] >> if I call your name please
[1:56:36] approach the podium and line up
[1:56:38] in the order your name is
[1:56:40] called, give us your name and
[1:56:42] address and you will have one
[1:56:44] minute, MR. Jared simon,
[1:56:46] jennifer harrison, tom carney,
[1:56:48] eddie arroyo, michelle vargas,
[1:56:50] nina trachtenberg.
[1:57:01] [Reading names] Please state
[1:57:05] your name, you will have one
[1:57:05] minute.
[1:57:07] >>public speaker: jared simon,
[1:57:50] 3900 crawford avenue in coconut
[1:57:52] grove and I'm a jewish resident
[1:57:54] of miami-dade born and raised.
[1:57:56] I believe my tax dollars should
[1:57:58] be kept safe and working to
[1:58:00] benefit my community and I also
[1:58:01] believe in democracy, I hoped
[1:58:03] these were values we shared a
[1:58:05] few minutes ago you voted
[1:58:06] unanimously to allow the county
[1:58:08] to invest 5% of its portfolio
[1:58:09] of local tax dollars in the
[1:58:11] underrated debt of the israeli
[1:58:12] government.
[1:58:14] An extremely controversial
[1:58:15] choice.
[1:58:17] Take a look at the 700 comments
[1:58:19] on the miami herald article
[1:58:21] that came out yesterday and you
[1:58:23] didn't even allow public
[1:58:24] comment before voting.
[1:58:26] You didn't even discuss it,
[1:58:27] many of you are not even
[1:58:28] listening to me right now.
[1:58:30] Your constituents do not want
[1:58:32] their tax dollars on thing the
[1:58:33] functions of the israeli
[1:58:35] government, they want their
[1:58:37] taxes working for them in this
[1:58:37] county.
[1:58:39] You are here to serve the
[1:58:40] public, you seem to forget it.
[1:58:42] >> next speaker please state
[1:58:43] your name and address.
[1:58:44] Chambers, chambers.
[1:58:45] Hank you
[1:58:47] for those of you joining us for
[1:58:49] the first time, we don't
[1:58:51] applaud, we raise our hands and
[1:58:52] support, thumbs down if we
[1:58:54] don't support but we don't
[1:58:55] allow applause.
[1:58:57] Your name address and the item
[1:58:59] you are speaking on and I will
[1:59:00] remind you we are here on
[1:59:02] public hearing items, 4b is
[1:59:03] listed for you a lot of you as
[1:59:05] the item you are speaking on
[1:59:07] but it is not and I repeat 4b
[1:59:08] is not, the israeli bonds item.
[1:59:10] F you start your commentary
[1:59:12] regarding the israeli bonds
[1:59:14] item that already passed, 11a
[1:59:16] you will not be permitted to
[1:59:18] speak, that item has already
[1:59:20] passed, keep your commentary
[1:59:22] limited to the item you are
[1:59:23] honest to speak on which is
[1:59:23] item 4b.
[1:59:25] > 024 cortez street, 33134
[1:59:27] here to address item 4b.
[1:59:27] Hile
[1:59:29] I would need information about
[1:59:30] this item before I could give
[1:59:32] my full support it appears to
[1:59:34] be an excellent example of
[1:59:35] miami-dade county investing its
[1:59:37] money in the local bonds that
[1:59:38] serve the community.
[1:59:39] Rather than the risk risky
[1:59:41] liquid bonds of a foreign
[1:59:43] government in a volatile region
[1:59:44] of the world.
[1:59:46] Following hamas heinous attack
[1:59:48] OCTOBER 7 mayor, increased the
[1:59:49] counties investment to
[1:59:51] demonstrate its support for the
[1:59:52] people of israel.
[1:59:54] I respectfully request this
[1:59:57] commission to demonstrate their
[1:59:58] support for the people of
[2:00:01] palestine in future investments
[2:00:01] decisions.
[2:00:03] >> next speaker, name and
[2:00:05] address and you will have one
[2:00:05] minute.
[2:00:11] >> eddie arroyo, 33127 and died
[2:00:13] in district 5 here to speak on
[2:00:14] senator garcias county
[2:00:15] investment policy.
[2:00:17] >> that item has already
[2:00:21] passed, it's 11a2, you signed
[2:00:25] up to speak on 5b, 11a2 has
[2:00:32] already passed.
[2:00:34] >>public speaker: I still want
[2:00:36] to speak on the item that has
[2:00:44] passed as well.
[2:00:45] >> that's not how it works
[2:00:47] here, the public hearing on the
[2:00:49] item has been opened and closed
[2:00:51] which that instruction was
[2:00:53] given to you downstairs, you
[2:00:54] need to the item you registered
[2:00:56] for, we almost follow the same
[2:00:57] rules, item 5b is what you
[2:00:59] registered to speak on, please
[2:01:00] proceed with 5b.
[2:01:02] >>public speaker: I do not
[2:01:03] approve of this policy and I
[2:01:07] think it is reprehensible that
[2:01:09] the public is forbidden from
[2:01:10] speaking even though it's
[2:01:12] passed, I want to put that on
[2:01:19] the record and I find it
[2:01:20] reprehensible.
[2:01:22] >> to our sergeants, we will
[2:01:23] have to order in the chambers.
[2:01:25] If you are standing in the back
[2:01:27] I need you to find a seat.
[2:01:29] I need you to find a seat now.
[2:01:30] Lease find a seat within the
[2:01:30] chamber.
[2:01:32] Hese keep order in
[2:01:35] our chambers and please be
[2:01:38] respectful of everyone.
[2:01:43] Are you wrapping up, are you
[2:01:43] finished?
[2:01:49] >> before we move forward.
[2:01:51] >> commissioner, can you please
[2:01:59] ask to be recognized.
[2:02:01] >>commissioner hardemon: we can
[2:02:03] be asked to follow procedures
[2:02:05] of this board but we are not
[2:02:06] doing that, we're not going to
[2:02:08] stand here and allow anyone to
[2:02:10] be intimidated on this day us
[2:02:11] and I don't care what you're
[2:02:13] talking about, what subject it
[2:02:15] is you don't like, what you
[2:02:16] care for or don't care for.
[2:02:18] what we are not going to stand
[2:02:20] for or people who want to make
[2:02:21] anyone in this room feel
[2:02:23] uncomfortable about where they
[2:02:25] are which they are in this
[2:02:26] place, if you make people
[2:02:32] unsafe you will be removed
[2:02:33] immediately.
[2:02:35] Immediately, we don't care what
[2:02:36] GOD you serve, who your child
[2:02:38] is or not, we don't care if
[2:02:39] you're the mayor or
[2:02:41] commissioner, whoever you are,
[2:02:43] if you try to intimidate
[2:02:44] someone on this day us, in this
[2:02:46] crowd, in this place you will
[2:02:48] be removed from this space and
[2:02:49] if you don't understand that,
[2:02:57] please try us.
[2:02:59] >> thank you commissioner
[2:03:00] hardemon, I don't think it was
[2:03:02] caught on the microphones but
[2:03:03] someone spoke out of turn
[2:03:05] without registering and I
[2:03:06] couldn't agree more.
[2:03:08] We will have to order in our
[2:03:09] chambers, welcome back MR.
[2:03:10] CHAIRMAN.
[2:03:11] >>chair: go ahead.
[2:03:13] >>public speaker: I wanted have
[2:03:15] time to speak about that
[2:03:16] particular israeli bond that
[2:03:17] has been passed.
[2:03:18] >>chair: you already spoke,
[2:03:20] thank you.
[2:03:32] >> I want to speak also to the
[2:03:34] egregious nature and fiscal
[2:03:36] misappropriation of agenda item
[2:03:38] 11a2 that you unanimously
[2:03:38] passed.
[2:03:39] Ou clearly don't have
[2:03:41] the fiscal responsibility to
[2:03:43] pass item 5b, they should be
[2:03:47] used for miami-dade county.
[2:03:49] >>chair: we need to speak on
[2:03:51] items on public hearing right
[2:03:52] now.
[2:04:00] So thank you so much.
[2:04:02] I stepped out for 2 seconds and
[2:04:04] I caught the tail end of
[2:04:06] commissioner hardemon's
[2:04:08] comments and commissioner cohen
[2:04:09] higgins and they are right,
[2:04:24] we've got to stay on subject.
[2:04:26] Let's stay on the agenda, guys.
[2:04:27] Let's be courteous and
[2:04:29] respectful of the people that
[2:04:30] drove all the way down here to
[2:04:32] speak on the items on the
[2:04:34] agenda following the rules and
[2:04:35] following what they are
[2:04:36] supposed to do.
[2:04:38] >>public speaker: rochelle
[2:04:39] vargas, 21st street district 5,
[2:04:41] item 4b on bonds and
[2:04:41] investment.
[2:04:43] I'm here to speak about just
[2:04:45] asking the board to consider
[2:04:53] how policies are amended and
[2:04:54] written for bonds and
[2:04:55] investments.
[2:04:56] Especially as your duty is to
[2:04:58] protect taxpayer funds.
[2:05:05] Keep them liquid and to protect
[2:05:07] our taxpayer money and
[2:05:08] prioritize this taxpayer money
[2:05:10] and its liquidity over the rate
[2:05:11] of return.
[2:05:23] Ith bonds, always
[2:05:25] want to remind you all we work
[2:05:27] in miami dade county, we work
[2:05:28] with and enjoy miami-dade
[2:05:30] county and we should keep bonds
[2:05:32] local, keep our investments
[2:05:32] local.
[2:05:34] There are many things right now
[2:05:36] being cut in the county budget
[2:05:37] that will benefit the local
[2:05:39] community instead of investing
[2:05:46] in foreign governments, thank
[2:05:46] you.
[2:05:48] >>public speaker: my name is
[2:05:49] mina trachtenberg, northwest
[2:05:58] 15th street, florida statutes
[2:05:59] and the investment policy
[2:06:01] itself specifically state their
[2:06:03] top priority is the safety of
[2:06:04] public funds and liquidity of
[2:06:06] public funds above all else yet
[2:06:08] the resolution achieves the
[2:06:10] opposite of that opening the
[2:06:12] door to the purchase of high
[2:06:13] risk even jump quality bonds of
[2:06:15] a foreign entity which is the
[2:06:17] only foreign government miami
[2:06:19] is invested in, items like
[2:06:20] resolution 5b or a resolution
[2:06:22] of how we can handle public
[2:06:30] funds, please divest from
[2:06:31] apartheid.
[2:06:32] >>public speaker: 1617
[2:06:34] southwest. 1/33 street here to
[2:06:35] speak on item 5b, miami's
[2:06:37] investment portfolio, the
[2:06:38] county finds itself in a budget
[2:06:40] crisis and instead of figuring
[2:06:43] out how we can best afford the
[2:06:44] services essential for the
[2:06:46] residence of miami-dade county
[2:06:48] the commission has passed an
[2:06:50] item that would allow for
[2:06:52] further investment in a foreign
[2:06:54] country, investments that
[2:06:55] should have ended long ago.
[2:06:57] This decision puts another
[2:06:57] county-
[2:06:59] >chair: that's not what this
[2:07:00] item is.
[2:07:01] Ma'am,
[2:07:02] >>public speaker: 2141 south
[2:07:16] terrace on item 5b, I'll speak
[2:07:17] be speaking to the investments,
[2:07:19] item 5b exists within the
[2:07:21] confines of a budget crisis as
[2:07:23] well as a genocide against
[2:07:24] palestinians in gaza backed by
[2:07:26] the united states.
[2:07:28] >>chair: we are going to do
[2:07:29] something.
[2:07:30] They are not listening so
[2:07:31] sergeants, if they continue
[2:07:32] just escort them.
[2:07:35] Ask them to kindly exit the
[2:07:36] chamber.
[2:07:38] >>public speaker: esteemed
[2:07:39] commissioners and mayor, I'm
[2:07:43] now concerned because I'm a
[2:07:49] palestinian resident here and
[2:07:51] I'm already worried I'm going
[2:07:53] to be escorted out just for
[2:07:54] being palestinian.
[2:07:56] I came here to get information
[2:07:59] on 5b.
[2:08:01] >>chair: you have to follow the
[2:08:02] order and speak on the item, if
[2:08:05] you speak on 5b, if you're
[2:08:07] going to speak on 5b, you can
[2:08:10] speak for your entire minute.
[2:08:12] >>public speaker: I wanted to
[2:08:16] thank the pastor gave this
[2:08:17] lovely christian right at the
[2:08:19] beginning of the commission
[2:08:20] hearing when he said I think
[2:08:22] it's about the humility of
[2:08:22] listening.
[2:08:27] Our tax dollars pay for this
[2:08:30] building, it pays for all your
[2:08:30] salaries.
[2:08:34] And in that case I will say
[2:08:41] that 11a2 is an absolute
[2:08:42] disgrace.
[2:08:48] >>chair: sergeants.
[2:09:04] They want their minutes of
[2:09:04] fame.
[2:09:06] >>public speaker: james
[2:09:08] fishback, 177 southwest. Orange
[2:09:08] avenue.
[2:09:10] I assure you I am not here to
[2:09:12] talk about israel, I'm not here
[2:09:14] to talk about the fact this
[2:09:16] commission this morning voted
[2:09:31] unanimously to give $450
[2:09:32] million to the israeli
[2:09:33] government.
[2:09:34] Am not here to
[2:09:35] talk about the fact this
[2:09:37] commission has struggled to pay
[2:09:38] the deputies in this county,
[2:09:40] the teachers in this county
[2:09:42] while the fact the commission
[2:09:44] unanimously voted to give $450
[2:09:45] million of money to israel, I
[2:09:47] assure you I am not talking
[2:09:49] about that today because I
[2:09:50] don't want to be escorted out
[2:09:52] by these great men in uniform.
[2:09:54] What this is about simply is
[2:09:55] who do you serve?
[2:09:56] Do you serve the people of
[2:09:57] hialeah?
[2:09:58] do you serve the people of
[2:09:59] aventura or tel aviv?
[2:10:01] Do you serve the people of the
[2:10:02] city or jerusalem?
[2:10:04] This money should be invested
[2:10:06] in this community, it should be
[2:10:11] invested in miami-dade county.
[2:10:12] >>public speaker: the people
[2:10:24] here deserve better.
[2:10:26] >>public speaker: america
[2:10:27] first!
[2:10:37] America first!
[2:10:39] >>commissioner gilbert: MR.
[2:10:40] CHAIRMAN.
[2:10:42] >>chair: you are recognized
[2:10:45] commissioner gilbert.
[2:10:52] >>commissioner gilbert: senator
[2:10:54] garcia, we should probably take
[2:11:02] a moment to address a couple of
[2:11:03] things.
[2:11:04] First of all when people say
[2:11:06] things like america first, the
[2:11:10] very first amendment in the
[2:11:11] constitution allowed us to
[2:11:13] speak so that's what we allow
[2:11:15] and it allows you to petition
[2:11:17] your government, that's why we
[2:11:18] have procedures but when
[2:11:20] commissioner hardemon spoke he
[2:11:22] spoke the way he did because at
[2:11:23] times we are so involved with
[2:11:27] what we believe, we don't
[2:11:28] understand there are folks on
[2:11:30] the other side who believe
[2:11:31] something different.
[2:11:37] We can disagree.
[2:11:37] Civilly.
[2:11:39] E need to disagree
[2:11:40] civilly.
[2:11:41] That conversation can be had,
[2:11:43] the discussion can be had but
[2:11:46] it has to be had in a civil
[2:11:46] manner.
[2:11:48] Because when civil discourse
[2:11:53] breaks down we are no longer
[2:11:53] america.
[2:11:54] We can't be all america first
[2:12:00] at the same time when it is to
[2:12:01] shout everybody else down.
[2:12:05] This meeting has to operate in
[2:12:06] a way that allows all of us to
[2:12:13] discuss items, hear
[2:12:14] information, make decisions and
[2:12:15] exist afterwards as a
[2:12:16] community.
[2:12:17] That includes information
[2:12:18] that's correct.
[2:12:23] Our board today didn't vote to
[2:12:26] give any money to anyone?
[2:12:29] We said investment criteria.
[2:12:34] So without regard to the
[2:12:35] soundbite you might want to
[2:12:44] generate with your social media
[2:12:45] latform, that's not what
[2:12:45] happened.
[2:12:47] We need to be clear about those
[2:12:49] things because we can have
[2:12:50] different opinions but facts
[2:12:56] are facts.
[2:12:58] The vote didn't give money to
[2:13:00] anyone, it didn't buy anything,
[2:13:02] we established criteria and
[2:13:04] changed percentage and while I
[2:13:06] appreciate everyone's opinion,
[2:13:08] it is important you disagree
[2:13:09] civilly.
[2:13:14] Because I know I speak for my
[2:13:15] colleagues when I say no one on
[2:13:17] this board intends to let this
[2:13:19] meeting evolve into anything
[2:13:21] remotely similar to some of the
[2:13:22] stuff we see online.
[2:13:24] That won't be here in
[2:13:25] miami-dade county so we should
[2:13:27] all just probably called down.
[2:13:30] Thank you MR. CHAIRMAN.
[2:13:32] >>chair: senator garcia.
[2:13:37] >>senator garcia: we don't want
[2:13:39] to belabor it and the item
[2:13:40] already past and there was
[2:13:45] opportunity to testify on this
[2:13:47] item given to the public and I
[2:13:49] understand we are using another
[2:13:51] item to testify but I want to
[2:13:53] be clear what this is, the
[2:13:56] reality is they passed a new
[2:13:58] regulatory scheme for
[2:13:59] investments, we are following
[2:14:01] state law based on what was
[2:14:01] passed.
[2:14:02] i have a hold on a lot of these
[2:14:08] state requirements
[2:14:10] implementations which therefore
[2:14:12] that's why we're sponsoring
[2:14:12] this.
[2:14:21] When we look at investments we
[2:14:22] tried to tell the public we
[2:14:24] should not be investing in one
[2:14:25] fund or another fund, the
[2:14:27] county has $9 billion.
[2:14:29] Our pension is invested in the
[2:14:29] frs.
[2:14:30] We use these investments to
[2:14:32] make sure we have a greater set
[2:14:34] of money in the bank account so
[2:14:37] we can fund our police and
[2:14:38] firefighters and fund the
[2:14:40] operation of governments as
[2:14:40] well.
[2:14:42] So to call out and say just for
[2:15:01] soundbites I agree with you
[2:15:03] commissioner oliver gilbert.
[2:15:04] Let's get stick to the facts
[2:15:06] and say what this is and what
[2:15:07] this isn't.
[2:15:08] The reality is we are running
[2:15:10] these investments and I want to
[2:15:12] make sure what we have here
[2:15:13] working with the clerk gives
[2:15:15] more flexibility and more
[2:15:17] liquidity to some of our
[2:15:17] investments.
[2:15:19] It doesn't mandate us doing one
[2:15:20] thing.
[2:15:21] It gives a clerk and our
[2:15:23] investment personnel of
[2:15:24] flexibility to pick the best
[2:15:26] return on heels for this
[2:15:28] community and that's all this
[2:15:29] does, thank you MR. Chair.
[2:15:31] >>vice chair mcghee: senator
[2:15:33] let me take my hat off because
[2:15:34] everyone knows this was already
[2:15:36] made public knowledge and
[2:15:41] individuals had the knowledge
[2:15:42] that we discussed today at this
[2:15:44] particular meeting and I agree
[2:15:45] with my colleagues, to take
[2:16:06] this particular item to make a
[2:16:08] political position to do what i
[2:16:10] believe is an active engagement
[2:16:11] to click is in my humble
[2:16:13] opinion one of the most
[2:16:14] disgraceful things we can do so
[2:16:16] you continuously stand by what
[2:16:18] you believe and this board is
[2:16:19] standing with you and the
[2:16:21] reality is they had issues with
[2:16:23] this before they would have
[2:16:24] made their position known early
[2:16:26] on so thank you so much.
[2:16:27] >>commissioner bermudez: ditto
[2:16:29] to all the comments of my
[2:16:31] colleagues to make sure these
[2:16:32] meetings are run efficiently
[2:16:34] the right way and obviously
[2:16:36] america was based on respecting
[2:16:38] other people's opinions even
[2:16:40] when we disagree with you but
[2:16:42] for thursday night because
[2:16:44] everybody's going to be back
[2:16:45] that we are all taxpayers, all
[2:16:47] of us are taxpayers of miami
[2:16:49] dade county sometimes I think
[2:16:51] individuals that come to see us
[2:16:52] forget we pay taxes.
[2:16:54] Unless one of you served in the
[2:16:56] military and had an exemption
[2:16:57] you pay property taxes to so if
[2:16:59] you don't let me know because
[2:17:01] that's incredible but the
[2:17:02] suffering that everybody feels
[2:17:04] in this community we feel and
[2:17:06] I'm saying this because
[2:17:07] thursday night while
[2:17:09] everybody's home watching T.V.
[2:17:11] Or we are getting into college
[2:17:12] football season we will be on a
[2:17:14] from 6:00 P.M. Until one in the
[2:17:16] morning and we had a number of
[2:17:17] people say I'm a taxpayer and I
[2:17:19] hope we remind them we are
[2:17:24] taxpayers two.
[2:17:26] >>chair: the first 10 were
[2:17:26] called.
[2:17:55] I've got geneva class, [Reading
[2:18:03] names] You MAY approach the
[2:18:04] well, say your name and address
[2:18:06] and you have a minute to speak
[2:18:08] and as you wait list, please
[2:18:09] stay on topic.
[2:18:11] >>public speaker: my name is
[2:18:12] rachel, 1865 79th street
[2:18:13] causeway.
[2:18:18] I want to point out that the
[2:18:19] display was from someone not
[2:18:21] called and was not registered
[2:18:26] to speak.
[2:18:28] His name was not called by the
[2:18:30] chair, I believe he's also
[2:18:31] running for public office and I
[2:18:41] don't think anyone wants to be
[2:18:43] associated with that kind of
[2:18:44] heinous display.
[2:18:46] I want to comment on hospitals.
[2:18:48] I think they are a great thing
[2:18:49] for public investment of our
[2:18:51] taxpayer dollars and as the
[2:18:53] commissioners said you all are
[2:18:55] taxpayers, we are taxpayers
[2:18:57] investing in hospitals, that's
[2:19:04] the kind of things bonds can
[2:19:06] fund, municipal bonds can fund
[2:19:07] roads, these are the things we
[2:19:09] want to be investing in common
[2:19:10] you further things.
[2:19:12] Want to be investing in so I
[2:19:14] want to ask the question who is
[2:19:16] calling your offices, what are
[2:19:17] they asking for and if you
[2:19:19] think when people are asking
[2:19:20] you and this time when people
[2:19:22] are struggling and can't afford
[2:19:24] to live hear what are the kinds
[2:19:26] of things positively and want
[2:19:28] you to invest in both with the
[2:19:29] pensions that we want the money
[2:19:31] we invest to make money, of
[2:19:32] course we want that.
[2:19:34] We can do that ethically,
[2:19:35] financially responsibly.
[2:19:37] We can do that so I want
[2:19:39] everyone to reflect on what
[2:19:40] your constituents want you to
[2:19:42] invest in and I know it's not
[2:19:46] foreign governments.
[2:19:47] >>public speaker: peace be with
[2:19:49] you all, my address is 18810
[2:19:50] northwest 78 way.
[2:20:05] My family has lived and paid
[2:20:07] taxes in miami-dade county the
[2:20:08] last 50 years.
[2:20:09] I'm also an alumni of fiu and
[2:20:11] an active member at the islamic
[2:20:13] center of greater miami glad to
[2:20:15] be back here at the annual
[2:20:16] budget meeting and we have
[2:20:18] always made our positions
[2:20:18] clear.
[2:20:20] We have shown up, this isn't
[2:20:22] the first time we've spoke on
[2:20:23] 5b, bonds and investments.
[2:20:25] And I agree with the beautiful
[2:20:27] prayer made earlier today that
[2:20:29] the decisions you make today
[2:20:34] should bring peace to all the
[2:20:37] miami-dade residents here today
[2:20:38] and our neighbors.
[2:20:41] We are not sleepless to know
[2:20:43] the investments being made by
[2:20:57] this commission are $151
[2:20:59] million of our taxpayers are
[2:21:01] going to israeli bonds which
[2:21:02] are funding a genocide in gaza
[2:21:04] and you want to talk facts on
[2:21:06] the investment end of it, this
[2:21:07] is not a sound bite, it's a bad
[2:21:08] investment.
[2:21:09] >>chair: appreciate it.
[2:21:18] Go ahead.
[2:21:20] >>public speaker: good morning,
[2:21:22] my name is sebastian gill, a
[2:21:23] high school junior and my
[2:21:25] address is protected from
[2:21:35] disclosure.
[2:21:37] I'm here in support of item 5d
[2:21:38] which can transfer certain
[2:21:40] county owned properties for $10
[2:21:42] to habitat for humanity greater
[2:21:44] miami and delete equity
[2:21:46] development to build affordable
[2:21:47] homes for lower income and
[2:21:49] moderate income families.
[2:21:50] As a high school student I'm
[2:21:53] not buying a house today but my
[2:21:55] generation will live with the
[2:21:56] housing decisions you make
[2:21:56] today.
[2:21:58] I support using public lands
[2:22:11] for affordable homeownership a
[2:22:13] $10 transfer should come with a
[2:22:15] clear public return.
[2:22:16] Homes built on a clear timeline
[2:22:18] and kept affordable for the
[2:22:20] people this program is meant to
[2:22:20] serve.
[2:22:22] Because the resolution also
[2:22:24] waives normal property transfer
[2:22:25] procedures I asked the board to
[2:22:27] ensure strong deadlines, clear
[2:22:29] affordability requirements and
[2:22:30] real accountability.
[2:22:32] I don't want to live with my
[2:22:34] parents until I'm 30 years old
[2:22:36] so please support item 5d so
[2:22:37] for years from now we can see
[2:22:39] real homes built for real
[2:22:41] people, thank you.
[2:22:42] >>commissioner gilbert: thank
[2:22:44] you MR. Gill.
[2:22:45] >>chair: sebastian gill.
[2:22:47] I have dorothy brown.
[2:23:21] [Reading names] You are
[2:23:22] recognized.
[2:23:23] >>public speaker: thank you
[2:23:25] chair and mayor, I'm here on
[2:23:28] items 5b, 5x, 5g and 5h, I'm
[2:23:35] against all of those yet I know
[2:23:37] you stripped the task force but
[2:23:39] I wish you appointed small
[2:23:52] business advocates such as
[2:23:54] myself, 4649 northwest. Second
[2:23:55] avenue miami florida.
[2:23:57] I believe as a small business
[2:23:58] advocate we've been advocating
[2:24:00] for decades for positive change
[2:24:02] for small businesses which
[2:24:04] included increasing the limited
[2:24:06] revenues for trade contractors
[2:24:08] from 5 million to 10 million,
[2:24:10] same thing for general
[2:24:11] contractors from 10 million to
[2:24:13] 50 million but now with the
[2:24:15] strict recommendation is
[2:24:17] increasing it from 250 up to 8
[2:24:17] million.
[2:24:19] The other thing we have been
[2:24:20] advocating for is positive
[2:24:22] changes in the construction
[2:24:23] industry for small businesses
[2:24:31] where we don't have any rights
[2:24:31] anymore.
[2:24:33] We can have contracts taken
[2:24:35] from us by general contractors,
[2:24:37] we also have been advocating
[2:24:39] for payment for decades through
[2:24:41] various administration
[2:24:42] including software, that has
[2:24:44] not happened and in the local
[2:24:46] preferences where you have
[2:24:48] small businesses that are micro
[2:24:49] small businesses where they MAY
[2:24:51] only have the owner and one
[2:24:52] employee now that
[2:24:53] recommendation is saying they
[2:24:55] have to have a minimum of three
[2:24:55] employees.
[2:24:57] Ask you to not
[2:24:58] move forward with this, we
[2:25:00] should have had input with
[2:25:02] small businesses in thank you.
[2:25:04] >>public speaker: brenda
[2:25:10] bettencourt, I am referencing 5
[2:25:12] eat to reduce inefficiencies in
[2:25:13] procurement.
[2:25:15] Something we need to make sure
[2:25:16] is when we apply to be a
[2:25:18] provider or to ask for an sb
[2:25:22] for the county, sometimes it's
[2:25:24] too many steps to follow.
[2:25:26] I have applied from the
[2:25:28] provider as a primary care and
[2:25:29] we've been trying, the system
[2:25:30] doesn't work.
[2:25:34] You go to check what is what
[2:25:36] you need and the system doesn't
[2:25:36] work.
[2:25:43] You call and sometimes you get
[2:25:45] somebody who answers the phone
[2:25:47] but most of the time you don't
[2:25:48] get an answer.
[2:25:50] You do events of procurement
[2:25:52] .You bring other cities or
[2:25:54] other departments it's not
[2:25:56] actually a procurement when you
[2:25:58] need as a small business as an
[2:25:58] organization.
[2:26:01] So is this new legislature
[2:26:09] actually going to work?
[2:26:11] 100% I am for the person before
[2:26:12] me, you need small businesses
[2:26:15] to be part of that committee to
[2:26:16] understand what we have to go
[2:26:21] through for us to apply, thank
[2:26:21] you.
[2:26:26] >> ralph ferrera, 7520 south
[2:26:28] railroad miami and we are also
[2:26:33] certified small business
[2:26:34] enterprise having been quoted
[2:26:36] in miami-dade county and I
[2:26:38] respectfully express our strong
[2:26:43] opposition to items 5f, g and h
[2:26:45] which is scheduled for second
[2:26:45] reading today.
[2:27:08] The proposed elimination of the
[2:27:10] firm level commitments and
[2:27:12] small business advisory boards
[2:27:14] would significantly reduce
[2:27:16] opportunities and protections
[2:27:17] for small businesses.
[2:27:19] These measures have long
[2:27:20] insured accountability,
[2:27:22] meaningful participation and a
[2:27:24] voice for the small business
[2:27:25] community and counties
[2:27:27] procurement process, finally we
[2:27:29] know no certified small
[2:27:31] business representative served
[2:27:32] on the task force that
[2:27:33] developed these
[2:27:34] recommendations.
[2:27:36] Changes of this magnitude would
[2:27:38] include input from the
[2:27:39] businesses most directly
[2:27:40] affected by it.
[2:27:42] We respectfully urge the board
[2:27:43] of county commissioners, the
[2:27:45] mayor to reject this ordinance
[2:27:47] on second reading and engage
[2:27:49] the small business community in
[2:27:50] any future reform efforts.
[2:27:52] >>chair: anyone speaking in the
[2:27:54] same line, anyone speaking in
[2:27:56] the same line make sure you all
[2:27:57] read the substitute item
[2:27:59] because I've removed everything
[2:28:01] referencing, anything that is
[2:28:03] against or not in favor of
[2:28:05] small businesses, that's been
[2:28:06] removed from the item so make
[2:28:08] sure you read the latest
[2:28:09] version of the item.
[2:28:11] Because I don't think you would
[2:28:12] be up here asking for us to
[2:28:14] oppose it if you saw this item
[2:28:16] and it makes no reference to
[2:28:18] the a lot of the things you
[2:28:19] guys have mentioned.
[2:28:21] But ma'am.
[2:28:23] >>public speaker: I am with js
[2:28:25] door installations, a certified
[2:28:28] small business specialty
[2:28:28] contractor.
[2:28:30] And I support making the county
[2:28:32] procurement faster and more
[2:28:41] efficient but I am concerned
[2:28:43] the file 26 1351 eliminates the
[2:28:44] small business advisory board.
[2:28:46] And the small business project
[2:28:59] review functions.
[2:29:02] For a large county construction
[2:29:04] project our specialty trade
[2:29:05] might be a small percentage of
[2:29:07] the total contract but that
[2:29:09] percentage can represent a
[2:29:11] significant opportunity for a
[2:29:13] local small business, an
[2:29:14] opportunity that creates local
[2:29:16] jobs and keeps dollars in our
[2:29:17] community.
[2:29:18] For these projects go to the
[2:29:20] market someone needs to ask are
[2:29:23] there qualified miami-dade
[2:29:24] certified small businesses
[2:29:26] capable of doing this work?
[2:29:27] An we create a fair
[2:29:29] opportunity for them to
[2:29:29] compete?
[2:29:31] If the current process is
[2:29:33] inefficient please improve it,
[2:29:35] consolidated it, established
[2:29:36] deadlines we had used
[2:29:38] technology and hold the process
[2:29:38] accountable.
[2:29:40] >> rick brooks, waterford
[2:29:42] district drive miami florida.
[2:29:44] I am a proud graduate of
[2:29:45] miami-dade county small
[2:29:47] business program so I'm here to
[2:29:54] speak in favor of maintaining
[2:29:56] the small business advisory
[2:29:58] board as well as hearing some
[2:30:00] of their other concerns, these
[2:30:02] substitutes did address some of
[2:30:03] the issues but there are still
[2:30:04] issues pending.
[2:30:06] I want to applaud you all for
[2:30:07] the substitute that removed
[2:30:09] strict recommendation 33 and
[2:30:09] 35.
[2:30:11] Those affect locally
[2:30:13] headquartered businesses like
[2:30:14] myself and that's it, thank you
[2:30:18] very much.
[2:30:22] >>public speaker: good morning,
[2:30:24] armando rodriguez and I support
[2:30:32] your principal to incentivized
[2:30:34] headquarters in district 7 in
[2:30:35] miami-dade county.
[2:30:40] I have not created any changes
[2:30:42] but I want to make sure you
[2:30:43] understand what is happening.
[2:30:45] I'm here to oppose f, g and h,
[2:30:47] these organizations have a
[2:30:52] negative impact on our goals,
[2:30:54] eliminating their commitment in
[2:30:56] dissolving a small business
[2:30:57] advisory board and opening
[2:30:59] locally business benefits to
[2:31:03] nonlocal firms.
[2:31:10] That will overpower our local
[2:31:10] businesses.
[2:31:13] This was composed entirely for
[2:31:15] non-fee representatives I have
[2:31:18] strict protections from local
[2:31:19] maintenance.
[2:31:23] Not a single local business
[2:31:25] representative was invited to
[2:31:28] participate despite the county
[2:31:29] being a local business.
[2:31:37] That is placing a conflict of
[2:31:38] interest where recommendations
[2:31:39] can-
[2:31:45] >>chair: thank you sir, ma'am.
[2:31:46] >>public speaker: my name is
[2:31:48] maria and I live at 2271
[2:31:49] southwest. 122nd court and I'm
[2:31:55] here to speak on behalf of of
[2:31:56] that small business community
[2:31:58] because this particular
[2:31:59] ordinance is very detrimental
[2:32:03] to us, particularly the part
[2:32:05] where it eliminates basically
[2:32:07] the locally headquartered part
[2:32:11] of the ordinance and also it
[2:32:13] reduces the participation of
[2:32:14] small business to a specified
[2:32:16] number but it doesn't give any
[2:32:23] leeway and lastly I want to
[2:32:25] talk about the issue where if
[2:32:27] you have less than three
[2:32:30] employees you don't count it as
[2:32:32] being at all which is
[2:32:33] detrimental to me because I
[2:32:35] have less then three employees
[2:32:37] and that's just an operation.
[2:32:39] You need to think about whether
[2:32:40] you're trying to help the
[2:32:42] community or help large
[2:32:43] businesses from some other area
[2:32:45] of the country, thank you.
[2:32:49] >>chair: thank you, sir.
[2:32:51] >>public speaker: I'm a
[2:32:52] principal with maduro group.
[2:32:57] A PRESIDENT Of miami county
[2:32:59] 9935 northwest. 28th terrace.
[2:33:04] I'm here to speak in support of
[2:33:05] the sbe and locally
[2:33:07] headquartered business
[2:33:07] community.
[2:33:09] I don't know if you know about
[2:33:11] the majority of the employment
[2:33:14] in miami-dade county is medium
[2:33:29] to small sized firms.
[2:33:31] So that strict committee
[2:33:32] recommendations that impact
[2:33:35] sbe's as well as the locally
[2:33:37] headquartered business are
[2:33:39] effective in destroying your
[2:33:41] locally headquartered
[2:33:41] businesses.
[2:33:43] Why would you do that?
[2:33:45] It's a question I asked you
[2:33:46] please consider.
[2:33:48] Why are we making the
[2:33:49] requirements harder for
[2:33:51] companies that are already
[2:33:53] headquartered, chose to be
[2:33:54] headquartered in miami-dade
[2:33:56] county and creating a more
[2:33:58] accessible pathway for firms
[2:33:59] headquartered elsewhere.
[2:34:01] You are one of the major
[2:34:02] counties in the nation, you
[2:34:04] want to attract big companies
[2:34:06] to become locally headquartered
[2:34:08] here, this is the big game and
[2:34:10] if this as it is stands today
[2:34:12] it will destroy your local
[2:34:13] headquartered businesses as
[2:34:18] well and is your sbe's.
[2:34:20] As well as the production
[2:34:28] capacity of your system.
[2:34:30] >>public speaker: good morning
[2:34:32] staff, my name is franco
[2:34:38] antonio, regional director for
[2:34:39] engineering.
[2:34:40] I want to talk to you about a
[2:34:42] locally headquartered firms and
[2:34:44] respectfully ask you to reject
[2:34:55] recommendations 16, 25, 33,
[2:34:57] 3435 and 37, thank you and I'm
[2:34:57] an engineer.
[2:34:59] The small business cannot
[2:35:00] survive on 10 or 15% number
[2:35:05] one, number two the locally
[2:35:06] headquarters are a bridge for
[2:35:08] small businesses, I used to be
[2:35:10] a small business and when you
[2:35:12] are small business
[2:35:14] undergraduate nobody wants to
[2:35:16] work with you anymore because
[2:35:17] the big companies compete in
[2:35:19] the little ones don't want you
[2:35:30] to compete so there's a little
[2:35:32] sized where the locally
[2:35:33] headquartered was created and
[2:35:35] that's a bridge to go from a
[2:35:36] small business to a midsized
[2:35:38] business and hopefully in the
[2:35:40] future grow into a large
[2:35:40] business.
[2:35:42] And I'm an engineer so I've got
[2:35:44] to do the numbers rip current
[2:35:47] locally headquartered ordinance
[2:35:49] we have in place works perfect.
[2:35:51] Let me tell you how it works,
[2:35:53] it's perfect, whoever did it
[2:35:55] did and excellent job.
[2:35:56] It's 55% for the large
[2:35:58] companies, they only have to
[2:35:59] give to the local and small
[2:36:00] 55%.
[2:36:02] Small companies 25% and locally
[2:36:03] headquartered 20 and it's
[2:36:05] perfect, everybody works and we
[2:36:07] grow local headquarters, thank
[2:36:07] you.
[2:36:15] >>chair: MR. Zach,
[2:36:17] >>public speaker: 235 north
[2:36:19] miami avenue on behalf of my
[2:36:20] client jen moore and
[2:36:21] associates.
[2:36:23] Janet moore was my first client
[2:36:24] in my business and I've been
[2:36:35] representing him since we
[2:36:36] started.
[2:36:37] And I'm proud to represent them
[2:36:38] for that time.
[2:36:39] Hey started
[2:36:41] their business in south florida
[2:36:42] miami-dade and broward county.
[2:36:44] Hey had an atr in miami-dade
[2:36:45] county for the entirety of the
[2:36:47] time and existed and there very
[2:36:49] proud to have started in your
[2:36:51] small business program and
[2:36:52] graduated from it.
[2:36:54] What I encourage you to do if
[2:36:55] you look at all these changes
[2:36:57] and not only these changes but
[2:36:59] your current ordinances on the
[2:37:00] books, some of them need to be
[2:37:02] changed to really think about
[2:37:04] whether or not they actually
[2:37:05] increase efficiency in the
[2:37:07] procurement process, I submit
[2:37:07] they don't.
[2:37:09] They probably invite preemption
[2:37:18] from the state.
[2:37:19] And the people you are leaving
[2:37:21] behind are the ones that
[2:37:23] started their businesses here.
[2:37:24] Graduate from the program as
[2:37:26] you intend them to do as they
[2:37:28] are supposed to do and then
[2:37:29] grow.
[2:37:29] >>chair: thank you.
[2:37:30] Ll right.
[2:37:39] I have let me see, this is
[2:37:40] tricky because a lot of them
[2:37:41] tried to sign up twice.
[2:37:48] Deborah swain.
[2:37:58] Did I already call alejandra?
[2:37:58] Angel.
[2:38:30] [Reading names]
[2:38:32] >>public speaker: deborah
[2:38:34] swain, pages business addresses
[2:38:35] 20625 southwest. 32nd avenue
[2:38:37] and I'm here to speak on three
[2:38:39] different items, 5f, 5g and 5h
[2:38:41] and I wonder if I need to do
[2:38:42] them all at the same time or
[2:38:43] can I continue?
[2:38:45] I'll be as brief as possible
[2:38:49] risk with respect to the entire
[2:38:51] process that came up with the
[2:38:53] recommendations from the strict
[2:38:54] committee to reduce
[2:38:56] inefficiency in procurements,
[2:38:58] as you heard there were no sbe
[2:38:59] firms and no locally
[2:39:01] headquartered firms represented
[2:39:02] on the task force but however
[2:39:04] many recommendations are on the
[2:39:06] back of those particular types
[2:39:07] of firms here.
[2:39:09] I want to address
[2:39:11] recommendation number nine for
[2:39:13] example, elimination of firm
[2:39:15] level commitments eliminates
[2:39:16] protections in place to
[2:39:18] individual firms in the event
[2:39:23] they failed to honor their
[2:39:24] commitments to these firms,
[2:39:26] there is no consequence.
[2:39:27] My recommendation is to
[2:39:29] eliminate it and work with the
[2:39:30] small business community to
[2:39:32] come up with a way to address
[2:39:35] this, recommendation number 10
[2:39:37] eliminates the process for
[2:39:38] establishing small business
[2:39:40] goals reading this a standard
[2:39:42] was put in place I understand
[2:39:43] from staff it was intended to
[2:39:45] be a minimum, can I go to the
[2:39:46] next item.
[2:39:47] >chair: that was your time,
[2:39:48] thank you.
[2:39:50] >>public speaker: my name is
[2:39:52] juan presley, northeast 26th
[2:39:54] terrace and I'm the owner of an
[2:39:56] sp firm and today I'm speaking
[2:39:59] as a chairperson with the sbe
[2:40:00] architectural engineering
[2:40:00] applied board.
[2:40:05] This board consists of has been
[2:40:07] in existence for five years and
[2:40:08] consists of 14 members,
[2:40:11] presently there's three same
[2:40:13] architects, for practicing
[2:40:15] engineers and one fiu engineer
[2:40:17] professional we have successful
[2:40:20] rated advanced sounding boards
[2:40:23] sbe issues and recommendation,
[2:40:27] solutions to spd spd prepares
[2:40:34] outreach certifications and
[2:40:36] unit utilization as we advised
[2:40:37] people on those reports.
[2:40:43] On our last board meeting JULY
[2:40:44] 29 I'd like to point out about
[2:40:47] the certified directory.
[2:40:54] There are a total of 247.
[2:40:58] >>chair: your minute is up.
[2:40:59] The clock is they are, you are
[2:41:01] over by 15 seconds.
[2:41:34] Sir, hello.
[2:41:36] >>public speaker: good morning,
[2:41:38] mayor, distinguished
[2:41:39] commissioners, my name is
[2:41:41] angel, I'm a humble architect.
[2:41:42] Will abide by the rules
[2:41:44] today just in case, thank you
[2:41:45] to our officers for our
[2:41:47] service, I'd like to keep
[2:41:49] things simple, that's the way
[2:41:50] I've been since I've been a
[2:41:52] young man, since I had dark
[2:41:53] hair in those days.
[2:41:54] Y office
[2:41:55] is at 1236-year-old southwest
[2:41:57] 132nd court and this weekend
[2:41:59] I'm a grandfather of one little
[2:42:01] boy but this weekend I was told
[2:42:03] both my daughters are pregnant
[2:42:04] with two little girls a month
[2:42:05] apart.
[2:42:06] I've got to tell you, the
[2:42:08] reason I'm here to talk about
[2:42:09] these small business
[2:42:11] administration or enterprise
[2:42:12] deals is because you're going
[2:42:14] to need more milk in the house.
[2:42:16] A lot of you have seen me
[2:42:16] around.
[2:42:18] I am as a small business
[2:42:19] architect here in the county
[2:42:21] for 55 years, second generation
[2:42:23] architect and I am the
[2:42:24] architect of the westchester
[2:42:26] library health and wellness
[2:42:28] center which commissioner
[2:42:29] rodriguez was there on the
[2:42:31] grand opening and architect of
[2:42:33] the james e scott restoration,
[2:42:34] tremendous project,
[2:42:35] commissioner hardemon was
[2:42:36] there.
[2:42:37] Ery emotional, fire
[2:42:43] station 71 which mayor cava was
[2:42:43] there.
[2:42:45] I thought you were following
[2:42:46] the rules, you'd better say
[2:42:48] thank you, you got us excited.
[2:43:03] We will be making a difference.
[2:43:04] >>public speaker: I am a high
[2:43:07] school senior and cofounder of
[2:43:09] miami-dade commission watch and
[2:43:11] my address is protected from
[2:43:12] disclosure, here to support
[2:43:14] item 5f, 5f improves
[2:43:15] accountability for small and
[2:43:17] big businesses like across the
[2:43:19] county, for example the county
[2:43:21] has the ability to audit if a
[2:43:23] company is local, expanding the
[2:43:25] process for companies across
[2:43:26] the county but one rule is
[2:43:27] missing, 5f deletes the line
[2:43:29] that reserves contracts over
[2:43:31] 250,004 small businesses, the
[2:43:34] introduction says a new rule
[2:43:36] will replace it but lacks a
[2:43:37] clear deadline and since 2024
[2:43:39] the county doesn't publish any
[2:43:41] of those awards so my ask is
[2:43:43] simple, codify it and accounted
[2:43:45] but put a deadline in the
[2:43:46] ordinance in the same matter
[2:43:49] today's public hearings provide
[2:43:50] transparency and accountability
[2:43:52] to local governments I ask you
[2:43:54] uphold counties to the same
[2:43:56] standards, thank you for your
[2:43:57] time and please listen to the
[2:43:59] words of your residence, thank
[2:44:00] you.
[2:44:01] >>commissioner gilbert: point
[2:44:02] of order.
[2:44:04] The point of order is I want
[2:44:05] everybody to be quiet.
[2:44:07] He was speaking and making some
[2:44:09] great points and there's a lot
[2:44:17] of conversations.
[2:44:19] I know we haven't seen each
[2:44:21] other in a wild, calm down so
[2:44:23] we can pay attention to the
[2:44:28] speakers, thank you.
[2:44:29] >>chair: ma'am.
[2:44:31] >>public speaker: thank you
[2:44:33] commissioners, mayor kava, my
[2:44:35] address is 1431 ne. 201st
[2:44:41] terrace miami florida and I'm
[2:44:43] the owner of grimes consulting
[2:44:44] and sbe certified firm in
[2:44:46] miami-dade county and I issued
[2:44:47] a statement summary for your
[2:44:49] review, you should have in
[2:44:49] front of you.
[2:44:50] Our ask is simple.
[2:44:52] On this item we urge you to
[2:44:54] defer it and require a public
[2:44:56] small business analysis,
[2:44:57] efficiency matters and I
[2:45:04] support that but so does
[2:45:06] injuring local businesses have
[2:45:08] meaningful access to county
[2:45:08] contracts.
[2:45:10] Before changing these
[2:45:11] protections small business
[2:45:13] owners need to understand who
[2:45:21] benefits, who loses opportunity
[2:45:22] and how accountability will be
[2:45:23] maintained.
[2:45:25] Do not consider 5f until the
[2:45:26] county releases a small
[2:45:28] business impact analysis and
[2:45:30] hold meaningful consultations
[2:45:32] with affected businesses.
[2:45:32] thank you.
[2:45:34] >>chair: thank you ma'am.
[2:45:36] I've got mark drummond.
[2:45:40] Mark and marianna.
[2:45:40] Josc
[2:45:44] [Reading names] Those are my
[2:45:54] last 4. Mark drummond, sir.
[2:45:59] >>public speaker: mark drummond
[2:46:01] , we are a certified small
[2:46:06] business in the county.
[2:46:08] We want to express our strong
[2:46:09] opposition to the proposed
[2:46:11] ordinance impacting amd forms.
[2:46:14] I've publicly spoken about it,
[2:46:15] 5g.
[2:46:17] I think it would be detrimental
[2:46:20] to small business.
[2:46:22] While it's presented the
[2:46:24] measure to improve procurement
[2:46:25] efficiency and many of its
[2:46:27] provisions will have the
[2:46:33] opposite effect creating
[2:46:35] significant disadvantages for
[2:46:37] local small businesses while
[2:46:38] disproportionately benefiting
[2:46:40] large multinational
[2:46:41] organizations, most concerning
[2:46:43] is those changes appear to
[2:46:44] undermine decades of successful
[2:46:47] small business participation on
[2:46:48] county projects.
[2:46:51] It's particularly worrisome of
[2:46:53] the composition of the task
[2:46:53] force.
[2:46:55] Not a single member of the
[2:46:57] 246th certified amd small
[2:46:59] businesses or on that committee
[2:47:00] and only three of its four key
[2:47:02] members currently represent amd
[2:47:02] firms.
[2:47:05] We hope you would consider this
[2:47:22] and vote to eliminate those
[2:47:23] provisions.
[2:47:25] >>public speaker: good morning
[2:47:26] everyone, delta consultants, I
[2:47:28] am a small business owner in
[2:47:29] miami-dade county.
[2:47:31] Home address is 4841 northwest.
[2:47:33] First avenue and I come here to
[2:47:35] second basically I think my
[2:47:36] colleagues have mentioned the
[2:47:38] small business community and a
[2:47:40] and the world in this county.
[2:47:41] It's extremely important.
[2:47:43] Not only to develop the local
[2:47:44] workforce but also it helps
[2:47:46] keep and maintains and
[2:47:48] accessibility to the county for
[2:47:49] local firms that are
[2:47:51] knowledgeable of the issues
[2:47:52] within miami-dade county
[2:47:54] itself, more than any other
[2:47:55] company that can come from
[2:47:57] outside of the local county.
[2:47:59] We as the sp community together
[2:48:08] months ago a letter to all of
[2:48:09] you that was sent out and
[2:48:10] signed by over 100 firms.
[2:48:12] I urge you to look into those
[2:48:14] letters and read it carefully.
[2:48:22] This was sent back in MARCH 11
[2:48:24] it was signed by over 100
[2:48:24] firms.
[2:48:26] Today I asked we both know or
[2:48:28] at least defer items 5f, 5g and
[2:48:28] 5h.
[2:48:30] These items should not pass
[2:48:32] without meaningful impact from
[2:48:33] the sp community.
[2:48:34] >>.
[2:48:36] >>public speaker: josc process
[2:48:37] here for item 5m.
[2:48:42] This is a plot waiver.
[2:48:44] This is started three years
[2:48:45] ago, the first time the public
[2:48:47] gets to hear about it read
[2:48:49] every time I've asked about it
[2:48:51] and I've knocked on all the
[2:48:52] doors as some of you I'm proud
[2:49:07] to see you in front of this
[2:49:09] dais and I'm proud you are up
[2:49:11] here and I thank you for your
[2:49:13] service because I know this is
[2:49:14] difficult but I've knocked on
[2:49:16] doors and nobody wants this
[2:49:18] development and this
[2:49:19] development is basically a
[2:49:21] condo association in the middle
[2:49:23] of a single-family own
[2:49:24] community, they say it's two
[2:49:26] duplexes but these units are up
[2:49:26] or $1.85 million each townhome.
[2:49:28] On the corner of 63rd avenue
[2:49:30] and 27th street, this is total
[2:49:32] villains, this is total terrace
[2:49:34] as we like to call it
[2:49:35] eastchester.
[2:49:36] This is a single-family home
[2:49:37] community over 100 years old
[2:49:39] built by veterans.
[2:49:41] We would ask that you keep it
[2:49:42] single-family.
[2:49:43] I am so happy all of you voted
[2:49:45] against this plot waiver in
[2:49:45] JULY.
[2:49:47] The gentleman asked what is
[2:49:49] proverbial but with this board
[2:49:50] and go ahead and continued
[2:49:52] building until it's off, thank
[2:50:01] you for being on time.
[2:50:03] >> survey palm beach speaking
[2:50:04] about the blue nest
[2:50:06] developments, obviously lunesta
[2:50:07] has developed a lot of areas
[2:50:09] around here, wild florida
[2:50:30] growth has a lot of concerns
[2:50:32] but massive builds, whatever it
[2:50:34] is, blue nest is at the core of
[2:50:36] that but not the only one.
[2:50:37] It's unfortunate there is
[2:50:39] limited opportunity to speak on
[2:50:41] the elements like this,
[2:50:42] furthermore item of kelly
[2:50:44] tractor as we talked about for
[2:50:45] the eighth time but technically
[2:50:47] we are not allowed to talk on
[2:50:48] it but it's a huge development
[2:50:50] in the everglades and
[2:50:51] functioning everglades.
[2:50:53] We have clean water over there,
[2:50:55] it cleans herons, gators, all
[2:50:57] that beautiful wildlife and
[2:50:59] kelly tractor is going on the
[2:51:00] wrong side of the urban
[2:51:02] development boundary item
[2:51:03] should never have been
[2:51:05] considered because it's on the
[2:51:06] wrong side of the boundary
[2:51:08] should have been look on the
[2:51:10] other side where you have
[2:51:12] permitted development and
[2:51:13] residential dense housing and
[2:51:15] not just put the wild
[2:51:16] everglades at risk of rural
[2:51:18] areas and it must not happen as
[2:51:19] bc wild florida develop it
[2:51:21] should not be approved today,
[2:51:21] thank you.
[2:51:23] >chair: your name.
[2:51:25] >>public speaker: I registered
[2:51:27] but for some reason I wasn't
[2:51:28] called.
[2:51:29] >>chair: did I call sean?
[2:51:30] You can approach as well.
[2:51:32] >public speaker: CHAIRMAN,
[2:51:34] mayor and as I said my name is
[2:51:36] andrea's, 5875 77th terrace in
[2:51:36] south miami.
[2:51:38] I am also a member of
[2:51:41] leadership miami class xlviii,
[2:51:43] I came to miami to earn my
[2:51:44] masters degree at fiu so I've
[2:51:47] been part of the community, I
[2:51:52] settled my roots here and not
[2:51:53] experienced what these
[2:51:55] humidities have done from my
[2:51:58] growth and that's why I
[2:51:59] recognizemaking a long-term
[2:52:01] impact for some of the large
[2:52:03] companies is a benefit for the
[2:52:05] community and I am one example
[2:52:07] of those, I contributed back
[2:52:10] and I continue to do it so I
[2:52:11] support the large local
[2:52:13] designation and I ask you to do
[2:52:13] the same, thank you.
[2:52:22] >>chair: thank you, sir.
[2:52:24] >> sean lozano, I reside at
[2:52:26] 9160 royal palm boulevard and
[2:52:38] is speaking about 5h, financial
[2:52:40] equity is the equivalent of
[2:52:42] financial responsibility and as
[2:52:43] a former police officer I'd
[2:52:45] like to remind this commission
[2:52:47] and people of dade county of
[2:52:49] the 210 disaster which was the
[2:52:51] improper invocation of
[2:52:52] financial urgency.
[2:52:54] It cost first responders
[2:52:56] thousands if not hundreds of
[2:52:58] thousands in benefit and income
[2:52:59] and they are still picking up
[2:53:01] the pieces of that today and I
[2:53:03] urge this powerful commission
[2:53:06] to do more than platitudes,
[2:53:07] something I would say all the
[2:53:09] time I would hear politicians
[2:53:11] say we back the blue but how do
[2:53:13] you back the blue red the
[2:53:14] commissioners on this council
[2:53:16] and that the blue by taking
[2:53:18] action to invest locally in the
[2:53:20] best of us which is our first
[2:53:21] responders men and women in
[2:53:23] blue and red and those who will
[2:53:24] do what others cannot.
[2:53:26] >>chair: those are the names I
[2:53:27] have, anybody that I did not
[2:53:28] call their name?
[2:53:37] So public hearing is now
[2:53:37] closed.
[2:53:39] Does anyone wish to bifurcate
[2:53:42] any items?
[2:53:43] Commissioner cohen higgins,
[2:53:50] which ones.
[2:53:52] >>commissioner cohen higgins: I
[2:53:53] bifurcate 5d for a motion.
[2:53:55] If the attorneys can please
[2:54:00] read my motion on 5d.
[2:54:02] >>chair: I was going to but
[2:54:03] give me a second.
[2:54:19] Any, commissioner regalado.
[2:54:21] >>commissioner regalado: there
[2:54:22] was a request at the beginning
[2:54:24] of the meeting to bifurcate
[2:54:26] some of the fives so if we can
[2:54:28] have the attorneys repeat that,
[2:54:30] specifically I think we've
[2:54:31] divided all the procurement
[2:54:33] ones up so we can go through
[2:54:34] them one by one.
[2:54:36] >> I had request to bifurcate
[2:54:38] 5d just now by commissioner
[2:54:39] cohen higgins, 5f substitute,
[2:54:41] 5g substitute, 5h substitute,
[2:54:43] 5m, 5p, 5u so those would be
[2:54:51] the ones that are bifurcated.
[2:54:56] 5m, the five are bifurcated, 5m
[2:55:00] as in mary, and 5u.
[2:55:13] >> that is just to vote no.
[2:55:14] >> I have 5m and I like to
[2:55:20] speak on.
[2:55:21] So commissioner gilbert moves
[2:55:24] 5p and youth, seconded by
[2:55:26] commissioner higgins, clerk
[2:55:36] please call the gold.
[2:55:43] Please call the roll on 5p and
[2:55:43] 5u.
[2:55:49] >>senator garcia: no.
[2:55:51] >>commissioner hardemon:
[2:56:13] >>commissioner lopez: motion
[2:56:14] passes 11 to 1.
[2:56:16] >>chair: I will entertain a
[2:56:18] motion on the remainder of the
[2:56:21] items not bifurcated.
[2:56:22] We have a motion by
[2:56:26] commissioner cohen higgins.
[2:56:30] >> I thought 5e.
[2:56:36] Those were all bifurcated MADAM
[2:56:37] Attorney, were they not?
[2:56:40] >> I read those as bifurcated.
[2:56:48] >> I said the non-bifurcated
[2:56:49] items so we have a motion,
[2:56:51] second by commissioner gilbert.
[2:56:53] A clerk please call the roll.
[2:56:55] >> senator garcia.
[2:57:14] Commissioner gilbert.
[2:57:18] Motion passes unanimously.
[2:57:26] >>chair: you are recognized on
[2:57:27] 5d.
[2:57:29] >>commissioner cohen higgins: I
[2:57:30] want to recognize the young man
[2:57:32] that came, the 11th grader
[2:57:34] sebastian gill, thank you for
[2:57:35] your testimony in support of 5d
[2:57:37] and I want to reassure the
[2:57:39] young man who did an excellent
[2:57:41] job that 5d does have strong
[2:57:44] deadlines and accountability in
[2:57:45] accordance to offering some
[2:57:48] real affordable homeownership
[2:57:49] opportunities in district 8 so
[2:57:51] thank you to the young man MR.
[2:57:53] Sebastian gill to the attorney
[2:57:59] can you read my motion on 5d.
[2:58:01] >> moved to amend agenda item
[2:58:02] 5d to remove the property
[2:58:04] currently bearing folio number
[2:58:08] 1078 1200706 40 from
[2:58:10] consideration for conveyance
[2:58:16] habitat for humanity of greater
[2:58:18] miami and of florida not for
[2:58:19] profit and delete all
[2:58:21] references to such folio to the
[2:58:22] end of the item and make any
[2:58:30] necessary conforming changes.
[2:58:32] >>commissioner cohen higgins:
[2:58:34] there are other folios, they
[2:58:36] requested removal of this
[2:58:37] particular parcel which became
[2:58:39] difficult for them to construct
[2:58:40] on so they requested this
[2:58:42] particular folio you removed
[2:58:44] from consideration, thank you
[2:58:54] MR. Chair.
[2:58:56] >>chair: seconded by
[2:58:57] commissioner gilbert, roll
[2:58:58] call.
[2:58:59] Ll in favor signify by
[2:59:01] saying aye, opposed, nay. Show
[2:59:02] the item past.
[2:59:03] Ommissioner on
[2:59:15] 5 and.
[2:59:17] >> is came to my attention in
[2:59:19] APRIL at which time I requested
[2:59:21] a deferral because I got a lot
[2:59:22] of feedback.
[2:59:23] I went myself by this
[2:59:25] neighborhood schenley park, I'm
[2:59:27] familiar with his neighborhood
[2:59:28] and when I found out it was a
[2:59:30] proposal were two duplexes on
[2:59:32] these small parcels of land it
[2:59:34] didn't make sense or conform to
[2:59:36] the neighborhood so I asked for
[2:59:38] a deferral we could figure out
[2:59:40] what we could do and in doing
[2:59:41] my research I found out where
[2:59:43] along the line there was an
[2:59:45] ordinance change that allowed
[2:59:47] this type of use to be done
[2:59:49] administratively and basically
[2:59:50] doesn't give us any
[2:59:52] jurisdiction over the matter so
[2:59:54] I want to ask the county
[2:59:55] attorneys can you explain why I
[2:59:57] keep being told this has to
[2:59:58] pass and I have a few
[3:00:00] questions, can we defer it
[3:00:01] today and if not, why and what
[3:00:06] is the appropriate cause for
[3:00:06] denial.
[3:00:08] >> class items under florida
[3:00:10] law must be approved unless
[3:00:11] there is evidence showing they
[3:00:13] don't comply with the criteria
[3:00:15] in the statutes and this is
[3:00:17] pursuant to florida supreme
[3:00:18] court decision this is
[3:00:19] quasijudicial so that limits
[3:00:30] how many times it will be
[3:00:31] deferred.
[3:00:32] >> what is the proper evidence.
[3:00:34] >> evidence showing it doesn't
[3:00:36] comply with the criteria in
[3:00:37] chapter 28 of the county code.
[3:00:39] And I defer to our er to
[3:00:40] explain those technical
[3:00:42] criteria but they relate to
[3:00:43] public improvements and
[3:00:45] dedications of right-of-way.
[3:00:47] >>commissioner cohen higgins:
[3:01:03] can we have our er expand?
[3:01:04] >> good morning commissioners.
[3:01:06] For this plan generally for a
[3:01:08] plat the rules relate to the
[3:01:09] subdivision of land sold
[3:01:11] confirm the size of the
[3:01:12] property meets code and confirm
[3:01:29] the utilities are in place.
[3:01:30] >>commissioner cohen higgins:
[3:01:32] I'm asking these questions
[3:01:34] because we have a resident
[3:01:35] who's against this and I've
[3:01:37] received numerous phone calls
[3:01:39] and emails against this plat.
[3:01:41] I wanted the resident to
[3:01:43] understand I have been the last
[3:01:44] couple of months trying to
[3:01:46] figure out how we can do right
[3:01:46] by them.
[3:01:48] My question to the attorneys is
[3:01:50] what happens today if we vote
[3:01:51] this down?
[3:01:53] >> that could be grounds for an
[3:01:55] appeal of the board's decision.
[3:01:56] It could be the applicant or
[3:01:58] anyone else who has appeared at
[3:02:00] this hearing and objected.
[3:02:02] >> the 11th judicial circuit
[3:02:03] appellate division.
[3:02:04] >>.
[3:02:06] >>commissioner cohen higgins: I
[3:02:10] am not comfortable with this
[3:02:12] and hearing our residents are
[3:02:13] against this I know I've spoken
[3:02:15] on this before as this item has
[3:02:16] come up, shelby park is
[3:02:18] entirely single-family homes.
[3:02:20] Although the designs proposed
[3:02:22] are beautiful I don't think
[3:02:24] they conform with the
[3:02:25] neighborhood I am okay with it
[3:02:27] going through the process and I
[3:02:28] would motion to deny it.
[3:02:30] >> there is a motion and there
[3:02:31] is a second.
[3:02:33] So motion and a second to deny,
[3:02:34] you are recognized.
[3:02:37] >> thank you MR. Chair, I think
[3:02:39] I raise an interesting issue
[3:02:49] because nowhere in the item has
[3:02:51] anyone the administration, the
[3:02:53] attorneys articulated this very
[3:02:55] important piece of information
[3:02:57] shared with us on the
[3:02:57] microphone.
[3:02:59] I.E. This is not a
[3:03:00] discretionary item for us to
[3:03:02] vote up or down, we're saying
[3:03:04] if it needs statutory
[3:03:05] requirements we are mandated by
[3:03:06] law to approve this.
[3:03:09] I'm not sure why that critical
[3:03:10] information is not included in
[3:03:22] the item because our residents
[3:03:24] read these items, they organize
[3:03:26] the petitioner office as they
[3:03:28] should do and we are here to
[3:03:29] reflect the voices of our
[3:03:31] residents which is what the
[3:03:32] district is trying to do so
[3:03:34] this puts us in an awkward
[3:03:36] position and I don't understand
[3:03:38] why that level of critical
[3:03:39] information is not included in
[3:03:40] an item like this.
[3:03:42] Why are we learning of this
[3:03:43] requirement at this juncture.
[3:03:45] The final hearing to the
[3:03:46] attorneys.
[3:03:48] >> happy to work with you and
[3:03:49] menstruation moving forward to
[3:03:51] ensure approval for items like
[3:03:52] this.
[3:03:54] >>commissioner cohen higgins: I
[3:03:56] don't know that needs to be a
[3:03:57] policy decision or an item,
[3:03:59] that's just the level of
[3:04:00] transparency our residents
[3:04:02] deserve so they can understand
[3:04:04] what the position we're in and
[3:04:06] the discretion we have or don't
[3:04:08] have which is applicable in
[3:04:09] this instance, I support the
[3:04:11] district commissioner and her
[3:04:13] decision to say this is not
[3:04:14] conforming with the
[3:04:16] neighborhood or appropriate in
[3:04:18] the neighborhood, I'm not sure
[3:04:19] where it takes us legally and
[3:04:21] it's not advisable for us to
[3:04:23] have conversations on the
[3:04:24] microphone but if the
[3:04:26] commissioner doesn't support it
[3:04:27] I don't either.
[3:04:29] >> I wanted to add I've been
[3:04:30] working with the county
[3:04:32] attorneys on legislation that
[3:04:34] would change this in the future
[3:04:36] so that it would come to us so
[3:04:37] we can have jurisdiction for
[3:04:39] these types of flats.
[3:04:40] I'm working on already for the
[3:04:42] county attorney's office
[3:04:43] because to me it was offensive
[3:04:45] to find out about this just on
[3:04:47] the agenda and to be told
[3:04:48] there's nothing you can do
[3:04:50] about this, it has to go
[3:04:51] forward when all these
[3:04:52] residents are not okay with it
[3:04:54] and it doesn't with the
[3:04:54] neighbor.
[3:04:56] >>chair: thank you,
[3:04:57] commissioner regalado.
[3:04:59] >>commissioner regalado: thank
[3:05:01] you MR. Chair. I have questions
[3:05:02] in terms of compliance and I
[3:05:04] agree with my colleagues, i
[3:05:05] don't want to get into a whole
[3:05:07] conversation about our rules
[3:05:09] and quasijudicial but in terms
[3:05:10] of another deferral or a
[3:05:12] denial, are we limited in the
[3:05:14] number of deferrals since the
[3:05:16] maker has mentioned that she's
[3:05:23] working on something?
[3:05:24] And if so can we leave it
[3:05:26] because it's our rule.
[3:05:28] If there is a limitation on
[3:05:29] federal can we waive our rule
[3:05:31] to defer it again as she
[3:05:33] continues to work on an item
[3:05:34] instead of a denial that would
[3:05:35] trigger court action?
[3:05:37] >> there is no limitation in
[3:05:39] this board's procedures
[3:05:40] limiting the number of
[3:05:41] procedures.
[3:05:43] >>commissioner regalado: just
[3:05:44] putting that out there since
[3:05:46] you're working on something, it
[3:05:48] will come up again and again
[3:05:50] but you could defer it for a
[3:05:51] period of time depending on
[3:05:53] what you're working on and then
[3:05:55] it's not foreclosed completely,
[3:05:57] it's still difficult but not
[3:05:58] foreclosed.
[3:05:59] >> I'd be happy to entertain a
[3:06:07] motion to defer and I want to
[3:06:08] add my staff brought up to me
[3:06:10] and I did notice because I
[3:06:12] drive by there all the time
[3:06:13] these developers have already
[3:06:15] begun construction, they've
[3:06:18] begun laying the foundation for
[3:06:19] this property and without
[3:06:21] knowing if they were going to
[3:06:22] get an approval or not.
[3:06:24] That is astounding.
[3:06:26] It is terrible we are basically
[3:06:27] bound by this and we have no
[3:06:28] say.
[3:06:29] That speaks volumes of what the
[3:06:31] expectations are for these
[3:06:33] applications, they are assuming
[3:06:37] we are going to approve it.
[3:06:39] >> have these two second
[3:06:40] approval.
[3:06:43] >>chair: commissioner bermudez.
[3:06:44] >>commissioner bermudez: I'm
[3:06:46] going to support the county but
[3:06:54] I am a little bit, actually I'm
[3:06:55] very confused.
[3:06:57] A lot of times and we got a
[3:06:58] friend to your right that says
[3:06:59] no to every plat.
[3:07:01] A lot of times that plat is
[3:07:03] just administrative.
[3:07:04] How did we get here to
[3:07:06] something that changes the
[3:07:07] community and changes the
[3:07:09] makeup of the community, how
[3:07:10] did we get to the plat before
[3:07:12] we got to a decision on that.
[3:07:14] I'd like to know how that
[3:07:14] happened.
[3:07:16] Did this get through before or
[3:07:19] what's the reasoning there?
[3:07:22] >> commissioner the zoning was
[3:07:24] previously approved for this
[3:07:28] property.
[3:07:29] >>commissioner bermudez: when
[3:07:30] was it?
[3:07:32] >> I defer to rer on that.
[3:07:34] >> this property is in a
[3:07:35] neighborhood that's zoned re-1
[3:07:39] but this application came
[3:07:41] through which allows for a
[3:07:45] duplex on the property.
[3:07:46] >>commissioner bermudez: so it
[3:07:49] was approved administratively.
[3:07:51] In general I think as we move
[3:07:59] forward and I'm in support of
[3:08:00] commissioner milian orbis but
[3:08:02] there are plaques who are just
[3:08:03] plat and truthfully there is
[3:08:05] not much we can do about it but
[3:08:07] the reality is they are just
[3:08:08] plats, there's others like this
[3:08:10] one that are apparently was
[3:08:13] approved administratively but
[3:08:14] the commissioner of the
[3:08:17] district I'm sure were not
[3:08:18] aware until it got in front of
[3:08:19] us.
[3:08:21] When you work on the policy if
[3:08:23] anything pops up like that the
[3:08:24] administration and director
[3:08:26] should at the very least let
[3:08:28] the commissioner know when it's
[3:08:30] in the process so I'll leave my
[3:08:32] piece at that one and support
[3:08:33] you.
[3:08:35] >>chair: commissioner hardemon.
[3:08:37] >>commissioner hardemon: is
[3:08:41] this in an unincorporated area
[3:08:43] and I don't know if you are
[3:08:46] aware of this but when I was
[3:08:53] serving as the city of miami
[3:08:54] commissioner we about the
[3:08:56] county so the county made
[3:08:57] changes long before any of us
[3:09:03] were on the dais but they made
[3:09:04] changes where in the
[3:09:06] unincorporated areas it allowed
[3:09:07] for the development of duplexes
[3:09:09] and the single-family zoned
[3:09:11] areas which sounds like that's
[3:09:13] exactly what this is.
[3:09:14] Although they are a program
[3:09:19] that's transferred, etc. But
[3:09:21] that was a big thing to have
[3:09:23] been done especially in areas
[3:09:25] where you have communities that
[3:09:26] look for a way where most
[3:09:30] people would like to stay sort
[3:09:33] of as natural as possible.
[3:09:38] The single-family zoned areas
[3:09:40] probably are the most
[3:09:41] protective space we have in
[3:09:45] miami-dade county, most of our
[3:09:47] lots are 5000 feetb2, you have
[3:09:48] single zoned areas much larger
[3:09:50] and people want to make changes
[3:09:53] to that and it involves lots of
[3:09:54] discussion when you intensify
[3:09:56] the use of single-family zoned
[3:09:57] areas where you have 5000 feetb2
[3:10:02] and you allow for cafc
[3:10:03] or
[3:10:05] whatever new terminology that's
[3:10:07] been made you intensify use,
[3:10:09] more people, more parking, etc.
[3:10:14] So if we are to consider for
[3:10:16] instance what you're going
[3:10:17] through right now we probably
[3:10:23] should consider the law that we
[3:10:25] have on the books right now
[3:10:26] that makes those types of
[3:10:29] changes because I can tell you
[3:10:30] for instance in my district we
[3:10:32] have a lot of vacant
[3:10:33] single-family zoned lots.
[3:10:35] And many of those spots we give
[3:10:52] to people to develop so they
[3:10:54] are going to intensify those
[3:10:56] communities and sometimes in
[3:10:57] these neighborhoods people
[3:10:58] don't have voices.
[3:11:00] Certainly when those things
[3:11:01] were passed I had no voice in
[3:11:03] the matter, I wasn't a resident
[3:11:05] of those unincorporated areas
[3:11:07] and the commission at the time
[3:11:08] was all for what was happening.
[3:11:10] T didn't change necessarily,
[3:11:12] we didn't get a bunch of houses
[3:11:14] built but when we did get
[3:11:15] houses built they were duplexes
[3:11:18] and now it's a different
[3:11:19] experience for the people
[3:11:21] living there so there's a space
[3:11:23] for all types of development,
[3:11:24] there's a space for duplexes
[3:11:26] and tall buildings and short
[3:11:26] buildings.
[3:11:28] And no buildings at all but if
[3:11:29] we don't, if this matters to
[3:11:31] all of us we should probably
[3:11:33] reconsider the entirety of the
[3:11:35] ordinance we have in place that
[3:11:36] allows this to occur naturally
[3:11:38] and by right.
[3:11:41] >>chair: commissioner gilbert.
[3:11:42] >>commissioner gilbert: thank
[3:11:44] you MR. Chair. This is not as
[3:11:46] simple for me and I'll support
[3:11:48] the district commissioner but
[3:11:56] let's just be mindful that the
[3:11:58] housing affordability problem
[3:12:00] that essentially occurs because
[3:12:02] of supply and demand didn't
[3:12:15] happen overnight.
[3:12:18] It's single determinations so
[3:12:19] if we stand by the principle
[3:12:22] that neighborhoods should never
[3:12:23] change in character and
[3:12:25] anything that's a change to the
[3:12:26] character shouldn't be built,
[3:12:28] then we lock ourselves into an
[3:12:30] affordability quagmire that's
[3:12:31] very difficult to overcome.
[3:12:33] So I think that's why I
[3:12:34] promoted the rtc density and
[3:12:36] high faa ours on our major
[3:12:38] corridors because ultimately we
[3:12:40] have to increase supply.
[3:12:41] So these policies were put in
[3:12:43] place so that with some degree
[3:12:45] of certainty people could buy
[3:12:50] properties of a certain size in
[3:12:52] a certain area and instead of
[3:12:53] building one house, not build
[3:12:55] an apartment but build 2,
[3:12:56] that's why the policies were
[3:12:58] put in place and I'm not
[3:13:00] defending the policy is perfect
[3:13:01] I understand why it exists yet
[3:13:03] if this board wants to be in
[3:13:04] the business of saying hey,,
[3:13:06] we're going to say that policy
[3:13:08] doesn't exist, okay, we can do
[3:13:09] that but let me suggest those
[3:13:12] are the types of decisions that
[3:13:14] makes tallahassee come in with
[3:13:16] stuff like live local.
[3:13:18] Those are the types of
[3:13:19] decisions because ultimately we
[3:13:25] are safeguarding what was and
[3:13:27] we are foreclosing our self
[3:13:28] from what can be.
[3:13:31] What in isolation this duplex,
[3:13:36] I'm okay with, you know the
[3:13:37] district better than I do and
[3:13:39] I'll see to that.
[3:13:42] But understand the gravity of
[3:13:44] the aggregated effect of the
[3:13:49] decisions we make as this body
[3:13:50] because people who came here
[3:13:52] before us made decisions just
[3:14:01] like this.
[3:14:03] So I'm always cognizant of
[3:14:05] decisions we make that are just
[3:14:06] like this because we are a
[3:14:08] different board than prior
[3:14:10] commissions but to the extent
[3:14:12] we make decisions that allow,
[3:14:13] and kind of require us to
[3:14:15] maintain whatever is and what
[3:14:17] isn't can't become then we are
[3:14:18] perpetuating a problem created
[3:14:25] by someone else.
[3:14:27] So if we need to have a
[3:14:28] conversation about what our
[3:14:30] plan is for housing overall
[3:14:30] than
[3:14:30] .
[3:14:33] If we want to reinvest in some
[3:14:35] people have complied with the
[3:14:41] rtc, others have not.
[3:14:42] The rtz is a great way to
[3:14:44] protect wetlands and stuff out
[3:14:52] west and it's a great way to
[3:14:54] protect the sanctity of our
[3:14:55] single-family homes because we
[3:14:58] are building along commercial
[3:14:59] corridors but let me suggest we
[3:15:01] can't have it both ways.
[3:15:02] We are going to allow and
[3:15:07] require density and high faa
[3:15:08] are along those corridors along
[3:15:11] all of the county not just the
[3:15:12] unincorporated parts, the
[3:15:14] cities also or at some point
[3:15:16] that urban sprawl will spill
[3:15:18] out into our pristine
[3:15:20] agricultural areas and into
[3:15:21] single-family homes but
[3:15:23] somewhere supply has to be met
[3:15:25] or this becomes, further
[3:15:31] becomes a community that people
[3:15:33] cannot afford to live in.
[3:15:35] We are a tourism-based economy
[3:15:37] fueled by small businesses.
[3:15:38] People don't make a lot of
[3:15:38] money.
[3:15:40] We need more supply.
[3:15:42] Thank you.
[3:15:44] >>chair: I have the vice chair
[3:15:50] and senator garcia.
[3:15:52] >>vice chair mcghee: if I'm
[3:15:54] hearing the commissioners
[3:15:56] position if I'm hearing this
[3:15:57] correctly two things happen.
[3:15:59] A decision was made 1 and
[3:16:01] number two notice was never
[3:16:02] given to her to have input and
[3:16:04] i'm wondering to the county
[3:16:17] attorney as relates to her
[3:16:19] issue because it seems it would
[3:16:20] now apply or has always applied
[3:16:23] to all the commission districts
[3:16:25] especially when we are making
[3:16:27] the intent to honor the wishes
[3:16:29] of a particular commissioner or
[3:16:31] petitioner district.
[3:16:32] Is there a way where we can
[3:16:34] mandate notice to be given to
[3:16:36] the particular commissioner of
[3:16:38] that district whenever there's
[3:16:40] an administrative decision as
[3:16:42] relates to this particular type
[3:16:44] of item?
[3:16:46] >> as commissioner milian orbis
[3:16:48] mentioned she has legislation
[3:16:50] that would require notice for
[3:16:52] workforce housing density bonus
[3:16:53] applications.
[3:16:55] >>vice chair mcghee: if I heard
[3:16:56] you correctly these are
[3:16:58] important enough where it has
[3:17:02] to go through based upon state
[3:17:02] law.
[3:17:04] >> that is for plat items, not
[3:17:09] for the density workforce.
[3:17:11] >> thank you MR. CHAIRMAN and
[3:17:20] commissioner milian orbis thank
[3:17:21] you for bringing this item and
[3:17:24] I agree with your stance and
[3:17:25] positioning and I understand
[3:17:27] the argument we have about
[3:17:29] ensuring that the community is
[3:17:30] changing and we need more
[3:17:32] workforce housing or more
[3:17:33] housing in general but the
[3:17:35] reality is we have to be
[3:17:36] careful how we proceed with
[3:17:37] some of these items.
[3:17:39] Seeing what commissioner milian
[3:17:47] orbis brought to us will
[3:17:49] really, does not go along with
[3:17:51] the integrity of that community
[3:17:53] itself, it's not along a rapid
[3:17:54] transit zone.
[3:17:56] It doesn't go along with some
[3:17:57] of the rules we have as relates
[3:17:59] to housing, this is why we have
[3:18:04] to be careful, commissioner
[3:18:05] gilbert on how we proceed
[3:18:06] forward.
[3:18:07] Not too long ago we passed an
[3:18:16] ordinance allowing for in the
[3:18:18] law corridors in unincorporated
[3:18:20] dade and we talked about this
[3:18:22] and this could be a problem
[3:18:23] because we're going to add more
[3:18:26] people into these single-family
[3:18:33] residence communities that we
[3:18:33] all cherish.
[3:18:35] So that is an issue we went
[3:18:36] through and I still think it
[3:18:38] was the wrong policy for us but
[3:18:40] when we have those policies in
[3:18:41] one area this is what it
[3:18:43] affects in other areas and this
[3:18:45] is why we have to be careful
[3:18:46] how we do this and I'm all
[3:18:48] about density along the rapid
[3:18:49] transit zone and I think we
[3:18:51] should encourage that but we
[3:18:52] have to take a pause when we
[3:18:54] look at our residential
[3:18:55] communities and we do need to
[3:18:57] speak up and voice it because I
[3:18:59] get growth happens, we have to
[3:19:01] have responsible growth but at
[3:19:02] what expense are we going to
[3:19:05] now start saying, not saying
[3:19:07] this issue is doing that or any
[3:19:08] else are saying that.
[3:19:10] But we have to try to protect,
[3:19:14] have some conservative ideals
[3:19:25] and values when it comes to
[3:19:26] properties, we should do our
[3:19:29] best to protect some of these
[3:19:31] neighborhoods, some of these
[3:19:32] neighborhoods are the fabric
[3:19:34] and existence of our people so
[3:19:36] I was happy to seconded, to not
[3:19:38] only defer it but to deny the
[3:19:40] item but I understand the
[3:19:41] policy that exists here right
[3:19:43] now but I still stand by my
[3:19:44] second and we will let the
[3:19:57] courts decide.
[3:19:58] >>commissioner milian orbis:
[3:20:00] I'm happy to do the deferral as
[3:20:02] i'm working on the legislation
[3:20:04] and I would request it to the
[3:20:05] second meeting in OCTOBER to
[3:20:07] allow time to work on that and
[3:20:09] to commissioner gilberts, what
[3:20:11] he just said I agree we need to
[3:20:16] work on the affordability
[3:20:18] process 100% but these are not
[3:20:20] affordable homes, these are
[3:20:21] million-dollar duplexes so I
[3:20:23] don't know that we are helping
[3:20:24] anybody in this case.
[3:20:26] We are not helping a first-time
[3:20:28] family buying a hold because
[3:20:29] nobody can afford that.
[3:20:31] This is a different situation
[3:20:33] but I agree and I do think we
[3:20:35] need to look at it overall in
[3:20:36] general and fix this, thank you
[3:20:38] MR. CHAIRMAN.
[3:20:40] >>chair: we are going to be
[3:20:41] deferring it so you are
[3:20:43] withdrawing your motion and
[3:20:44] making a motion to defer to
[3:20:46] know date certain, second
[3:20:48] OCTOBER meeting seconded by
[3:20:49] commissioner regalado so on the
[3:20:50] deferral.
[3:20:52] >>commissioner regalado: I want
[3:20:54] to add really quick since he is
[3:20:55] working on the item and we have
[3:20:57] sunshine issues and I'm glad
[3:20:59] she brought up the point these
[3:21:00] are not affordable.
[3:21:02] And it 761 of the situations
[3:21:03] we're seeing as buying
[3:21:05] single-family homes and buying
[3:21:06] duplexes that are
[3:21:08] multi-million-dollar duplexes,
[3:21:09] not affordable homes.
[3:21:11] I live in the pines, in a
[3:21:13] single-family home surrounded
[3:21:15] by duplexes for the same reason
[3:21:16] and I don't know if she's been
[3:21:18] invaded by the sugar cubes like
[3:21:21] I have been but that's the
[3:21:22] deal.
[3:21:23] The other thing I would say is
[3:21:25] when we look at this to
[3:21:27] consider for comp plan purposes
[3:21:34] that you look at the adjacent
[3:21:35] properties and the one across.
[3:21:37] What we are seeing is if you
[3:21:39] have a series of duplexes and
[3:21:40] your adding another duplex then
[3:21:42] that MAY be a buffer of
[3:21:56] duplexes as you go from our 1
[3:21:58] to something more substantial
[3:22:00] but if you have an area where
[3:22:01] you only have single-family
[3:22:04] homes and now you're buying a
[3:22:05] single-family home and tearing
[3:22:07] it down and using this to put a
[3:22:09] duplex there you have
[3:22:11] substantially changed the
[3:22:12] character of that block so
[3:22:14] similar to what you do for live
[3:22:15] local which is you looked at
[3:22:17] both sides live local should
[3:22:19] look across the street that's a
[3:22:20] story for another day.
[3:22:22] I think a comp plan change that
[3:22:24] has you looking at what is
[3:22:25] adjacent and what is across in
[3:22:27] terms of the change would
[3:22:28] alleviate some of the concerns.
[3:22:30] As we comply in a way that is
[3:22:32] aligned with the states
[3:22:34] requirement to provide more
[3:22:35] affordability.
[3:22:37] >>chair: commissioner lopez.
[3:22:39] >>commissioner lopez: I want to
[3:22:41] applaud commissioner milian
[3:22:42] orbis because in my district
[3:22:44] you'll see all these duplexes
[3:22:46] in the middle of these old
[3:22:48] characteristic neighborhoods in
[3:22:49] district 5 and they are so out
[3:22:51] of character and you're right,
[3:22:53] they are over $1 million.
[3:22:55] I called to see because there
[3:22:57] was a group of duplexes for
[3:22:58] sale in my district and they
[3:23:00] where a million, 4 and it was
[3:23:02] shocking because I said first
[3:23:04] of all their out of character,
[3:23:06] they are two stories, not just
[3:23:07] duplexes that look like
[3:23:08] single-family homes read they
[3:23:10] are literally buildings that
[3:23:11] have somewhat destroyed not
[3:23:13] only the character of the block
[3:23:20] but the character of the
[3:23:21] neighborhood so I'm so
[3:23:21] grateful.
[3:23:23] I remember this item thinking
[3:23:25] how did we not know this
[3:23:26] beforehand and I know you did
[3:23:28] not know that and that's why
[3:23:30] you were forced to defer it but
[3:23:31] I'm grateful for your
[3:23:33] leadership taking on this
[3:23:34] project because in fact it has
[3:23:36] really impacted district 5
[3:23:38] which is some of the oldest
[3:23:40] neighborhoods in the city of
[3:23:42] miami so thank you for that.
[3:23:44] >>commissioner milian orbis: to
[3:23:45] the attorneys are they doing
[3:23:47] work on the property already
[3:23:49] and if so this is deferred
[3:23:52] until mid OCTOBER.
[3:23:54] I'm not sure they are doing the
[3:23:56] construction appropriately but
[3:23:57] what I don't want especially if
[3:23:59] that skips appealed is for them
[3:24:03] to incur expenses and then come
[3:24:05] back to us and have an issue
[3:24:07] created there getting to these
[3:24:08] details so is it appropriate
[3:24:10] for them to have begun
[3:24:12] construction on this property,
[3:24:13] that's question number one.
[3:24:15] >> construction has started but
[3:24:17] they're required to enter into
[3:24:19] a hold harmless with the
[3:24:20] county, they are tentative at
[3:24:21] the plat stage.
[3:24:23] >> can we enforce that so
[3:24:25] further construction does not
[3:24:27] commence to preserve the status
[3:24:28] quo.
[3:24:29] >>commissioner bermudez: my
[3:24:31] point was going to be the same
[3:24:33] as commissioner cohen higgins
[3:24:35] but moving forward the fact
[3:24:37] that someone start construction
[3:24:38] without a final decision
[3:24:41] knowingly approved by this body
[3:24:44] is, and I know it's permitted,
[3:24:46] we need to look at that and
[3:24:49] also make sure these things
[3:24:52] don't happen so I'm hoping you
[3:25:03] guys review it and finally I'm
[3:25:04] going to do a plug for what I
[3:25:06] said earlier on this dais talk
[3:25:08] about affordable housing, we
[3:25:10] need to talk about your
[3:25:11] affordable housing boundary
[3:25:13] from aventura to florida city
[3:25:15] and let us have everybody stop
[3:25:20] getting us testimony that isn't
[3:25:21] accurate.
[3:25:22] >>chair: we have a motion to
[3:25:23] defer, second.
[3:25:25] All in favor of the deferral
[3:25:27] signify by saying aye.
[3:25:28] Opposed, nay. Show the item
[3:25:34] deferred until the mid OCTOBER
[3:25:34] meeting.
[3:25:36] So now I'm going to take up
[3:25:38] together if anybody needs to
[3:25:39] split afterwards for voting
[3:25:41] purposes we can and I'm going
[3:25:43] to take together the strict
[3:25:44] task force items which is 5f,
[3:25:50] 5f and 5h substitute.
[3:25:51] At the appropriate time to make
[3:25:56] it easier I've heard all of the
[3:25:58] concerns and discussions of
[3:25:59] those that came up to speak.
[3:26:01] And so at the appropriate time
[3:26:06] I'll ask the attorneys to guide
[3:26:11] me so I can bifurcate or remove
[3:26:13] 5f, number nine, 10, 11 which
[3:26:16] will essentially fix the few
[3:26:19] concerns that were spoken
[3:26:19] about.
[3:26:21] I had already removed prior to
[3:26:27] today in the substitute but we
[3:26:29] will go ahead and remove nine,
[3:26:33] 10 and 11 from item 5f and work
[3:26:35] on that with the sp community
[3:26:37] and bring it back as a separate
[3:26:37] item.
[3:26:46] But when we created the task
[3:26:47] force, the special task force
[3:26:49] year to reduce inefficiencies
[3:26:51] and procurement or strip as we
[3:26:53] call it back in MAY 2025, the
[3:26:55] goal was to take a hard look at
[3:26:56] our procurement system and
[3:27:00] identify opportunities to
[3:27:01] improve, develop practical
[3:27:03] solutions that make the process
[3:27:06] more efficient, transparent,
[3:27:08] competitive and accountable and
[3:27:10] after months of work and many
[3:27:11] meetings this task force had
[3:27:16] with public hearing to come
[3:27:17] from the public as well the
[3:27:19] task force has completed its
[3:27:20] charge and it delivered to my
[3:27:23] office 59 final recommendations
[3:27:29] that provides this board with a
[3:27:31] roadmap for meaningful
[3:27:33] procurement reform, something
[3:27:34] that has not been done in
[3:27:35] years.
[3:27:36] We've touched procurement
[3:27:38] throughout the years but not in
[3:27:40] a holistic overall reform.
[3:27:46] Most importantly these 59
[3:27:47] recommendations when applied
[3:27:57] into law and is passed will be
[3:27:57] measured.
[3:27:59] It will have a measurable
[3:28:01] impact on the procurement
[3:28:02] timeline.
[3:28:04] Currently the estimated
[3:28:05] procurement process takes 349
[3:28:06] days.
[3:28:07] That's the average and as we
[3:28:10] know sometimes it goes way over
[3:28:11] that number, rarely does it go
[3:28:13] beyond 349 days is a
[3:28:14] conservative average number.
[3:28:16] By implementing these items
[3:28:18] that came out of strip that
[3:28:20] will bring it down and reduce
[3:28:22] it to somewhere between 120 to
[3:28:28] 100 50 days, that's over 60%
[3:28:29] reduction in time savings and
[3:28:31] as we discussed before when the
[3:28:33] strip committee was passed time
[3:28:35] reduction also means taxpayers
[3:28:42] save money, costs stay of the
[3:28:44] original price, it does not
[3:28:45] continue to raise.
[3:28:47] Unless change orders, less
[3:28:48] price adjustments.
[3:28:50] It maintains transparency,
[3:28:53] competition and accountability.
[3:28:54] I want to thank every member of
[3:28:56] the task force for their time,
[3:28:57] expertise and dedication.
[3:28:59] I know some people mentioned
[3:29:03] there was sbe on there, there
[3:29:05] was a locally headquartered
[3:29:06] companies on their.
[3:29:08] I know for a fact there were
[3:29:10] three locally headquartered
[3:29:12] companies but at least three
[3:29:16] that I remember.
[3:29:18] But I want to commend them for
[3:29:31] striking a balanced work
[3:29:31] product.
[3:29:33] Demanding professionalism,
[3:29:35] professional schedules and
[3:29:36] professional recommendations
[3:29:38] and it's difficult when you're
[3:29:40] there and you work for a
[3:29:41] company and it's hard to be
[3:29:43] unbiased but I think they did a
[3:29:46] decent job at doing that, every
[3:29:48] member and I want to give a
[3:29:49] special thanks to our
[3:29:51] CHAIRWOMAN Diana mendez who is
[3:29:53] here today I believe, thank you
[3:29:54] for chairing the committee and
[3:29:56] I have some members of the
[3:29:58] committee present so I want to
[3:30:00] specifically thank those that
[3:30:01] made it out today.
[3:30:02] I have aaron, let me see, I
[3:30:03] have my list here.
[3:30:14] I have aaron, thank you for
[3:30:14] being here.
[3:30:16] I see rudy from afar, thank you
[3:30:17] for being here.
[3:30:19] Anyone else from the committee
[3:30:19] here?
[3:30:21] Thank you for coming out today
[3:30:25] and thank you for having
[3:30:25] served.
[3:30:27] I know all your time and those
[3:30:31] of the committee are very
[3:30:32] impressed yet you still make it
[3:30:34] to the committee and make it
[3:30:36] happened and I had faith in
[3:30:40] you, MADAM Mayor.
[3:30:41] >>mayor cava: I wanted to add
[3:30:44] we thank the staff members I
[3:30:48] will wait.
[3:30:50] >>chair: I want to take a
[3:30:59] moment and thank namita, are
[3:31:00] you here, I'm sure you are.
[3:31:02] Thank you as well because I
[3:31:10] know even for yourself it was
[3:31:12] difficult and challenging to
[3:31:14] deal with all the committee
[3:31:15] members, striking a balance
[3:31:17] between of course the
[3:31:18] administrations priorities with
[3:31:20] some of the recommendations and
[3:31:22] honestly I could not think more
[3:31:24] highly of you after this strip
[3:31:26] has concluded so thank you for
[3:31:28] being honest, being balanced
[3:31:32] and neutral in your work.
[3:31:34] I appreciate you and of course
[3:31:36] your entire team, to the
[3:31:37] mayor's point all the staff
[3:31:39] that worked on this including
[3:31:40] staff at the office of the
[3:31:42] chair and the bcc that was
[3:31:44] involved from thea to jasmine
[3:31:46] to christina and I know I'm
[3:31:47] missing a few but thank you all
[3:31:49] that played a role in this.
[3:32:03] These recommendations will help
[3:32:05] create clear timelines, reduce
[3:32:07] unnecessary delays and
[3:32:09] bureaucracy, increase
[3:32:10] transparency and
[3:32:11] accountability, make the
[3:32:13] process easier and more
[3:32:14] predictable for businesses,
[3:32:16] make it easier for businesses
[3:32:18] to do business with miami-dade
[3:32:20] county and at the same time I
[3:32:22] have heard as mentioned
[3:32:23] directly from the small
[3:32:25] business community I've spoken
[3:32:27] to them prior to today's
[3:32:29] meeting and received several
[3:32:30] calls and emails and heard them
[3:32:32] come up to the podium so as I
[3:32:33] said I will be removing from 5f
[3:32:35] those three numbers that sbe's.
[3:32:37] i want to bring that back once
[3:32:39] we can connect with them and
[3:32:40] engage some of the strip
[3:32:42] committee members to assist
[3:32:44] with that and reengage on that
[3:32:45] but I want to make sure we
[3:32:47] finalize a complete package of
[3:32:55] procurement reform.
[3:32:57] I've always talked about this,
[3:32:59] many of us say this, something
[3:33:00] you here often but small
[3:33:02] businesses are the backbone of
[3:33:03] our community and I believe
[3:33:05] that as a small business owner
[3:33:07] myself so the last thing I want
[3:33:09] to do is change anything in the
[3:33:11] item that has any unintended
[3:33:12] consequences so we will
[3:33:14] continue working on it but I
[3:33:16] want to make sure we pass the
[3:33:17] stuff that does not affect it
[3:33:19] because we can get to work
[3:33:21] right away, save time right
[3:33:22] away and cut down on the
[3:33:24] timeline and I.E. Start saving
[3:33:26] taxpayer dollars right away.
[3:33:28] Our reforms should never
[3:33:30] unintentionally create barriers
[3:33:32] that make it harder for small
[3:33:33] businesses to succeed and
[3:33:35] that's what I want to work on
[3:33:36] it carefully.
[3:33:38] These recommendations are an
[3:33:40] important first step towards a
[3:33:42] clear and more user-friendly
[3:33:43] procurement manual, one that
[3:33:48] provides better guidance, make
[3:33:49] those easier to understand and
[3:33:51] gives business greater clarity
[3:33:53] about working with the county.
[3:33:54] This is about more than
[3:33:56] changing a process on paper,
[3:33:58] it's about saving time reducing
[3:34:00] bureaucracy increasing
[3:34:02] accountability and making
[3:34:03] miami-dade county easier to do
[3:34:05] business with you and I look
[3:34:06] forward to work with my
[3:34:08] colleagues and share the next
[3:34:09] steps in the months ahead.
[3:34:11] with that I'd like to call up
[3:34:13] first CHAIRWOMAN Diana mendez
[3:34:14] to share a few remarks about
[3:34:16] the task force and its final
[3:34:18] report and if you wanted to be
[3:34:20] recognized of course we can
[3:34:22] recognize you as well.
[3:34:23] MADAM CHAIRWOMAN collects good
[3:34:26] morning commissioners, diana
[3:34:27] mendez at the government
[3:34:29] contracts group and for the
[3:34:33] past year I've had the honor of
[3:34:35] chairing the special task force
[3:34:37] to reduce inefficiencies in
[3:34:38] procurement and also I'm part
[3:34:42] of the association model
[3:34:45] procurement revision so both
[3:34:46] projects have been very
[3:34:47] important for me the past year,
[3:34:49] bringing knowledge from the
[3:34:54] nation to miami-dade county and
[3:34:55] likewise bringing the
[3:34:57] experience of miami-dade county
[3:35:05] to the water procurement
[3:35:05] community.
[3:35:07] So following the mandate given
[3:35:14] to us by this board, and the
[3:35:16] resolution that of course was
[3:35:18] sponsored by CHAIRMAN Anthony
[3:35:20] rodriguez, for about a year the
[3:35:22] task force on average twice a
[3:35:24] month to learn from each other,
[3:35:26] collaborate from each other and
[3:35:27] of course from staff to
[3:35:29] recommend changes to the
[3:35:31] counties procurement process
[3:35:33] that enhanced the efficiency
[3:35:39] without sacrificing the
[3:35:41] fairness and transparency which
[3:35:42] is the ultimate goal of any
[3:35:44] public procurement framework.
[3:35:46] That requires as the chair
[3:35:47] mentioned a lot of balance.
[3:35:55] As you can see from the task
[3:35:56] force members who are here
[3:35:58] today, our task force members
[3:36:00] come from many different
[3:36:00] industries.
[3:36:02] We have members that came from
[3:36:05] the development industry,
[3:36:07] procurement attorneys with
[3:36:09] decades of experience in
[3:36:12] procurement, consultants and of
[3:36:13] course members of the
[3:36:15] architects and engineering
[3:36:16] community, some of which have
[3:36:18] grown from being small
[3:36:19] businesses to large businesses
[3:36:20] today.
[3:36:22] And while we had many different
[3:36:23] views and a lot of disagreement
[3:36:25] there is something I know we
[3:36:27] all share and that is an
[3:36:28] appreciation for the importance
[3:36:30] that procurement has in
[3:36:32] everything our county does.
[3:36:39] From staff to industry we all
[3:36:40] understand how important that
[3:36:42] is and for that reason we are
[3:36:44] very thankful to you CHAIRMAN
[3:36:46] Rodriguez for creating this
[3:36:50] initiative, to mayor cava for
[3:36:52] sharing all the resources you
[3:36:54] are able to give us, the
[3:36:55] knowledge that staff was able
[3:36:57] to provide us, director namita
[3:36:59] and staff were there each way
[3:37:02] of the process and their
[3:37:04] dedication and concern for
[3:37:05] improving the county
[3:37:30] procurement process was visible
[3:37:32] and its visible not only
[3:37:33] through all the accolades that
[3:37:35] are procurement department
[3:37:37] receives from national
[3:37:38] organizations but it was
[3:37:40] visible to us throughout this
[3:37:41] procurement even in times when
[3:37:42] we disagreed.
[3:37:44] The recommendations you will
[3:37:46] find in our report, many of
[3:37:47] which were included in the
[3:37:49] items sponsored by the chair
[3:37:51] were the result of a careful
[3:37:52] examination of each phase of
[3:37:54] the procurement process.
[3:37:56] That means that we studied
[3:37:58] issues that go beyond
[3:37:59] architectural engineers items
[3:38:01] or small businesses and we had
[3:38:03] really went from each, we
[3:38:04] studied each part of the
[3:38:05] procurement process.
[3:38:07] We analyzed how this focus
[3:38:09] develops, that's a part that
[3:38:10] sometimes is not as visible but
[3:38:13] it's one of the important parts
[3:38:14] because it's the foundation of
[3:38:16] the whole procurement.
[3:38:17] So we studied the scope,
[3:38:19] studied the evaluations
[3:38:20] process, what improvements we
[3:38:22] can make all the way through
[3:38:24] how we look at the issues that
[3:38:25] came up through at issues that
[3:38:27] came up in procurement as well
[3:38:29] as improvements we can make to
[3:38:31] the award process and beyond
[3:38:34] which is the performance of
[3:38:38] vendors and contractors during
[3:38:43] their contract years with the
[3:38:44] county.
[3:38:46] So with that we hope you will
[3:38:47] find these recommendations
[3:38:52] useful and I'm happy to answer
[3:38:54] any questions any of the
[3:38:56] commissioners MAY have about
[3:38:57] this process, not an mayor
[3:39:01] anyone please use us as a
[3:39:02] resource and we are happy to
[3:39:04] provide our knowledge and
[3:39:06] resource, thank you.
[3:39:08] >> I alluded to it earlier but
[3:39:14] I will reiterate all the
[3:39:22] members here from strikeforce
[3:39:23] are included in this comment
[3:39:25] and some not here as well but
[3:39:27] one of my biggest fears that
[3:39:28] want to make sure my team kept
[3:39:37] tabs on is that at no time many
[3:39:39] of the strip committee members
[3:39:41] would put their personal
[3:39:42] interests before that of the
[3:39:44] county and I will tell you not
[3:39:48] just because they've told me,
[3:39:50] because of hearsay but I've
[3:39:52] seen it first hand in the item
[3:39:52] that's in here.
[3:39:54] But all these committee members
[3:39:56] and the vast majority of them
[3:39:58] supported recommendations out
[3:40:07] of strip that were unfavorable
[3:40:09] to their organizations.
[3:40:11] But they all agreed it was the
[3:40:13] right thing to do for the
[3:40:14] county as a whole so I thank
[3:40:17] you and I think everyone has as
[3:40:18] much faith in you all as
[3:40:20] perhaps we did over here and
[3:40:21] those that were nominated, some
[3:40:23] of you but you guys did an
[3:40:25] excellent job so thank you for
[3:40:26] doing that twice a month and
[3:40:33] next time well spent on what's
[3:40:34] been an important issue so
[3:40:36] thank you MADAM CHAIRMAN.
[3:40:43] >> thank you to you for taking
[3:40:44] on this ambitious task,
[3:40:45] certainly something I will be
[3:40:47] for the benefit of not only our
[3:40:48] administration, the
[3:40:55] commissioners and the public in
[3:40:56] facilitating the process.
[3:40:58] As you think the members to
[3:41:00] acknowledge it was a tremendous
[3:41:02] amount of work, they took it on
[3:41:03] diligently, our staffs
[3:41:05] expertise very critical to the
[3:41:07] process and especially to the
[3:41:08] CHAIRWOMAN.
[3:41:24] Facilitated with grace and
[3:41:24] great skill.
[3:41:26] To get to the finish line.
[3:41:28] I want to thank you as well for
[3:41:30] acknowledging some of the items
[3:41:32] that need to be considered
[3:41:32] further.
[3:41:33] I do want to also
[3:41:35] acknowledge some of the items
[3:41:36] were already underway
[3:41:38] administratively through our
[3:41:39] staffs efforts and the staff is
[3:41:41] eager to proceed to turn all
[3:41:42] these into a single volume if
[3:41:44] you will that will make it easy
[3:41:46] leave, readily accessible to
[3:41:48] everyone to understand the
[3:41:50] myriad rules that we do have.
[3:41:52] Overall this will save us time,
[3:41:53] save us money and lead to
[3:41:55] better outcomes so thank you
[3:41:59] very much MR. Chair.
[3:42:01] >>chair: I guess two or three
[3:42:03] members bifurcated items but
[3:42:05] start I'll entertain a motion
[3:42:06] on the, all the items.
[3:42:13] >> I move 5 feet through 5h.
[3:42:15] And its substitute in the
[3:42:18] removal of 5f, 910 and 11.
[3:42:20] >>chair: motion, second by
[3:42:29] commissioner orbis.
[3:42:30] Commissioner, I'm going to go
[3:42:31] to you last.
[3:42:33] Happy to go first but I don't
[3:42:34] want you to jump back in later,
[3:42:35] it's your decision.
[3:42:38] I want to start with you then,
[3:42:39] commissioner lopez.
[3:42:41] >> I want to thank you first of
[3:42:42] all for hearing some of the
[3:42:43] concerns, certainly this
[3:42:45] committee did an amazing job
[3:42:49] and it's undertaking anything
[3:42:51] like this isn't always fixed
[3:43:07] one time and I love that you're
[3:43:08] going to continue to work
[3:43:10] particularly with my small
[3:43:11] businesses and in district 5
[3:43:13] small businesses are not only
[3:43:15] the foundation but I profiled
[3:43:16] them every week.
[3:43:17] I tried to find a small
[3:43:19] business because government
[3:43:21] shouldn't be an event to small
[3:43:23] businesses, it should be a
[3:43:25] motivating small businesses not
[3:43:27] only to begin but to grow.
[3:43:28] I want to thank you for the
[3:43:30] removal of nine, 10, 11, 33,
[3:43:31] 3435 and 37, great job that
[3:43:33] those are things that I have a
[3:43:35] lot of concerns about and I
[3:43:36] want to thank you for your
[3:43:44] leadership on that but I do
[3:43:46] want my small businesses to
[3:43:47] know I will continue to work
[3:43:49] with them in this commission
[3:43:51] because it's the one thing I
[3:43:53] want to do and have emphasized
[3:43:55] since I became commissioner.
[3:43:57] my support for small businesses
[3:43:58] is a high priority in district
[3:44:00] 5 so I'm looking forward to
[3:44:02] continuing to work with you but
[3:44:03] this is the start of many good
[3:44:05] things to come so thank you.
[3:44:07] >>chair: on this side,
[3:44:09] commissioner.
[3:44:11] >>commissioner gilbert: I guess
[3:44:12] 15h could we delete the
[3:44:13] requirement to drop the lowest
[3:44:16] selection committee score from
[3:44:17] procurement.
[3:44:18] Because that's one of the
[3:44:20] things that in case you're
[3:44:20] with.
[3:44:22] >>chair: if the director could
[3:44:22] come up.
[3:44:24] Can you address.
[3:44:26] >> through the chair,
[3:44:28] commissioner the yes, the
[3:44:30] requirement to draw the low
[3:44:49] score for architecture
[3:44:51] engineering solicitations is no
[3:44:53] longer the requirement so we
[3:44:54] won't be dropping if this
[3:44:56] passes, the reason being is as
[3:44:58] a part of the efficiency we are
[3:44:59] reducing the number of members
[3:45:01] from 5 to 3. Up to $20 million
[3:45:03] so if you drop the scores the
[3:45:04] lowest there would be only two
[3:45:06] people whose scores would be
[3:45:07] counted.
[3:45:08] And still we are going to do
[3:45:10] the variation study of if the
[3:45:11] scores deviate by 30% people
[3:45:13] have to justify on the record.
[3:45:15] So I think the safeguards are
[3:45:17] in place to not to do that.
[3:45:19] >>commissioner gilbert: you
[3:45:20] said this but the answer is no
[3:45:22] it has not been deleted.
[3:45:23] So removal from the item.
[3:45:27] I have an issue with that, plus
[3:45:29] it's one of the things I think
[3:45:31] we put in recently.
[3:45:33] Because previously those
[3:45:37] procurements, sometimes they
[3:45:38] are extraordinary outliers.
[3:45:40] not to say that anyone would do
[3:45:43] it on purpose.
[3:45:45] But sometimes people are taking
[3:45:47] a score on purpose so there's a
[3:45:48] reason we put that in.
[3:45:51] So I wouldn't want to
[3:45:52] disapprove of that and also on
[3:45:54] the sunset small business
[3:45:59] enterprise advisory board I'll
[3:46:01] keep looking at that later but
[3:46:03] it's my understanding that's
[3:46:05] the board that sets the goals.
[3:46:07] >> that's the board that sets
[3:46:09] periodically, they just look at
[3:46:11] how small businesses are doing,
[3:46:13] what can they do differently to
[3:46:15] give suggestions and ideas.
[3:46:17] >>commissioner gilbert: who
[3:46:19] would do that if they didn't do
[3:46:21] it.
[3:46:22] >> the german has withdrawn
[3:46:24] that requirement but absent
[3:46:26] that what we committed was we
[3:46:29] will still need with industry
[3:46:30] leaders, whoever does this
[3:46:32] every month, every two months,
[3:46:35] one meeting for any, one
[3:46:37] meeting for construction to get
[3:46:39] their ideas and feedback and
[3:46:40] continue to work
[3:46:42] collaboratively to implement
[3:46:43] those.
[3:46:44] >>commissioner gilbert: I'm
[3:46:46] fine with that and I appreciate
[3:46:48] you all being willing to meet
[3:46:49] the reason why we have systems
[3:46:51] and a lot of things.
[3:46:53] That's not required with the
[3:46:56] benevolence of administration.
[3:46:58] So I would think that it's kind
[3:47:02] of difficult to value our small
[3:47:03] businesses that we actually
[3:47:09] talk to them and they meet so I
[3:47:11] think those are challenging
[3:47:12] things to say together but
[3:47:15] those are my observations MR.
[3:47:15] CHAIRMAN.
[3:47:17] I understand reducing the
[3:47:18] amount of people.
[3:47:20] I don't know reducing them is
[3:47:22] the right move either but to
[3:47:24] the extent, having been here
[3:47:31] for a while you can see people
[3:47:33] with scores life let's give
[3:47:34] examples of 80, 80, 21.
[3:47:38] That's just kind of crazy.
[3:47:41] So that's why we put that in
[3:47:43] there so I think that's
[3:47:45] probably something that needs
[3:47:46] to be addressed.
[3:47:49] >>chair: when we went over
[3:47:53] something that's something I
[3:47:54] addressed.
[3:47:55] The reason we added that in I
[3:48:00] do understand it is reducing
[3:48:03] from five members to three so
[3:48:07] it's two numbers and that's why
[3:48:08] they wanted to account for 3 so
[3:48:13] in theory I agree with dropping
[3:48:17] the last or lowest score but
[3:48:22] bringing it down to three
[3:48:23] members it's challenging to
[3:48:26] drop one of them.
[3:48:28] >>commissioner gilbert: what if
[3:48:32] you have an outlier?
[3:48:39] >> the current safeguard is we
[3:48:40] do the average scores and if
[3:48:43] somebody scores 33% or more
[3:48:44] deviated from the average score
[3:48:45] we ask that committee member to
[3:48:54] either explain what the
[3:48:55] rationale is and have a
[3:48:57] discussion and sometimes they
[3:48:58] MAY realize I made a mistake or
[3:49:02] MAY say we keep it but the
[3:49:04] deviation analysis is done for
[3:49:12] all committee members.
[3:49:13] >>commissioner gilbert: if
[3:49:15] that's the option then I'd
[3:49:17] rather stay with five members
[3:49:18] because were saying if there is
[3:49:21] an outlier we ask them about it
[3:49:22] and they can't explain it, they
[3:49:27] can stick to that score.
[3:49:29] But it takes a lot to submit
[3:49:30] these proposals.
[3:49:32] So the reason why it's in
[3:49:36] their, like you don't want
[3:49:41] those scores that are
[3:49:42] significantly below to be
[3:49:45] counted because that one person
[3:49:52] can tank somebody's entire
[3:49:53] submittal.
[3:49:54] And the reason why it exists is
[3:49:56] because we saw it happening.
[3:50:04] That's why that was in there.
[3:50:06] >>commissioner cohen higgins:
[3:50:07] MADAME CHAIRWOMAN, diana.
[3:50:12] I know the specific portion
[3:50:21] past 8 to 0. Can you walk us
[3:50:22] through why we're we were
[3:50:28] reducing it and the second
[3:50:29] piece was reduced but the
[3:50:31] reason for the objection is
[3:50:32] it's so hard to get.
[3:50:35] >> that's right MR. Chair.
[3:50:47] It takes a lot to assemble an
[3:50:49] evaluation committee.
[3:50:50] Sometimes it's the little
[3:50:52] procedural things nobody thinks
[3:50:54] of that takes so much time but
[3:50:56] they do and I see it all the
[3:50:57] time, making public records
[3:50:59] request and it's trying to
[3:51:01] schedule one meeting because
[3:51:02] everything of course needs to
[3:51:04] be done under the sunshine so
[3:51:06] we selected it based on that
[3:51:08] certain thresholds for larger
[3:51:10] contracts but you still have
[3:51:13] the five-member committee, for
[3:51:15] smaller contracts we concluded
[3:51:16] that a three panel committee
[3:51:17] would suffice.
[3:51:22] But that entailed MR. Chair as
[3:51:25] you mentioned we couldn't drop
[3:51:27] the lowest score at that point
[3:51:37] because then at that point the
[3:51:39] selected proposer would be
[3:51:40] selected based on the scores of
[3:51:42] only 2 evaluation committee
[3:51:44] members which defeats the whole
[3:51:46] purpose of having one third
[3:51:48] evaluation committee member
[3:51:48] there.
[3:51:50] >>chair: are we only if it's if
[3:51:52] it's one there for the five as
[3:51:52] well?
[3:51:57] And probably namita should stay
[3:51:59] at one podium, this is a big
[3:52:01] package so we're going to have
[3:52:04] a lot of questions.
[3:52:06] >> the requirement is getting
[3:52:08] eliminated from all
[3:52:09] procurements.
[3:52:18] Regardless of the threshold.
[3:52:20] >>chair: would you feel
[3:52:21] comfortable to remove it from
[3:52:24] the smaller procurements, add
[3:52:25] it back to the small
[3:52:27] procurements but keep it off
[3:52:28] from the bigger ones and have
[3:52:32] five numbers.
[3:52:34] >>commissioner gilbert: I was
[3:52:35] interested in what you said
[3:52:37] because you said we could
[3:52:38] remove it, you'd be dropping
[3:52:40] the third one and you couldn't
[3:52:42] just have it based on the 2 but
[3:52:43] even in that scenario if it
[3:52:45] were larger you'd be dropping
[3:52:47] the 50 it would still be
[3:52:48] happening just on 4, still an
[3:52:50] average of those scores so that
[3:52:52] in and of itself it was a fake
[3:52:54] company that it was some
[3:52:56] unfairness, it really didn't
[3:52:57] actually change anything.
[3:52:59] It's still significant and let
[3:53:01] me add those small contracts
[3:53:03] small procurements are really
[3:53:04] big to small businesses.
[3:53:08] It's small in comparison to our
[3:53:11] multibillion-dollar budget.
[3:53:12] But not to them.
[3:53:18] That would make me more
[3:53:18] comfortable.
[3:53:20] I think probably I'm okay with
[3:53:22] that average, dropping it and
[3:53:31] taking the average of 2.
[3:53:33] I'm okay with that because what
[3:53:34] we're saying is this person was
[3:53:36] way out of line and in some
[3:53:37] instances they dropped the
[3:53:38] highest and the lowest.
[3:53:40] In some instances that's what
[3:53:56] happens in procurement, you
[3:53:58] require more people so that's
[3:53:59] different.
[3:54:00] I understand the scheduling,
[3:54:02] also if what we're saying is we
[3:54:04] make this accommodation because
[3:54:06] it difficult to get people in
[3:54:08] place and together I understand
[3:54:09] that.
[3:54:10] Let me suggest to the
[3:54:12] ministration since that time
[3:54:13] these are the times you would
[3:54:14] do a procurement.
[3:54:16] You block these times off, they
[3:54:17] worked here for us.
[3:54:19] Show up, it's part of your job.
[3:54:21] This is where you report to
[3:54:21] them.
[3:54:23] This is where you report, this
[3:54:24] is what you do today.
[3:54:26] That's not that complicated.
[3:54:27] I did at miami gardens.
[3:54:29] If you're going to be here
[3:54:30] you're going to do this and
[3:54:32] whatever your normal duty is
[3:54:33] this is your normal duty today
[3:54:35] but to rewrite the system based
[3:54:37] on the calendar availability
[3:54:39] it's almost something we should
[3:54:40] be hesitant to admit in public.
[3:54:48] >>chair: can't we amend, it's a
[3:54:50] lot more than just their
[3:54:51] calendar.
[3:54:56] It's qualifications, and then
[3:54:58] that adds time to procurement
[3:54:59] so that's how we are able to
[3:55:01] reduce, that MAY not be the 60%
[3:55:04] reducing but that's 5%.
[3:55:06] It all adds up, a lot of little
[3:55:08] things we're changing at up to
[3:55:11] the 60% time reduction.
[3:55:13] So that's why we need to bring
[3:55:16] it down to the three member
[3:55:17] evaluation committee.
[3:55:22] Small procurement and I agree,
[3:55:24] they are big procurements but
[3:55:25] smaller in the grand scheme of
[3:55:26] all the contracts.
[3:55:32] So I agree with both sides.
[3:55:33] It's a question of can we maybe
[3:55:38] drop it to commissioner
[3:55:40] gilbert's point, drop it if
[3:55:44] it's only that 33% that we
[3:55:44] discussed.
[3:55:48] >> we could do that.
[3:55:50] >> instead of having them
[3:55:51] explain, just drop it at least
[3:55:56] if it goes over 33.
[3:55:57] >> if your score is beyond the
[3:56:00] 33% deviation, yes that could
[3:56:09] be a recommendation.
[3:56:10] And that would be standard
[3:56:12] practice across all
[3:56:13] procurements I guess,
[3:56:18] regardless of the dollar value.
[3:56:20] >>commissioner gilbert: that is
[3:56:22] substantially better and I want
[3:56:23] us to remember we are looking
[3:56:25] at categories here and some
[3:56:27] things like what I've noticed
[3:56:28] about one of our procurements
[3:56:30] right now is there shouldn't be
[3:56:33] that type of deviation in
[3:56:34] certain categories so for
[3:56:36] instance if you have the price
[3:56:36] is a category.
[3:56:37] The cost is a category.
[3:56:43] So if you are the cheapest then
[3:56:45] you get all the points, if you
[3:56:47] are the next cheapest you get
[3:56:48] less points but you shouldn't
[3:56:52] have people getting the same
[3:56:53] amount of points for instance
[3:56:55] for cost because the other
[3:56:59] stuff is also a category like
[3:57:00] experience and quality, all
[3:57:02] that stuff is also a category
[3:57:04] but if you can factor all those
[3:57:06] things into whether this costs
[3:57:07] more because we think it's
[3:57:09] better than the other
[3:57:11] categories you're counting that
[3:57:11] twice.
[3:57:15] So the fact that there is that
[3:57:17] type of deviation, I say that
[3:57:19] to mean it's relative to where
[3:57:28] the points deviated.
[3:57:30] Because some things are just
[3:57:30] numbers.
[3:57:32] It's just it should be if you
[3:57:53] charge $100 and think you are
[3:57:55] confident in submittal and you
[3:57:56] charge $100 and that's the
[3:57:58] cheapest price and you get all
[3:58:00] those points the next person
[3:58:01] charges $105.
[3:58:02] Those things can be
[3:58:04] standardized, there should be
[3:58:04] deviation.
[3:58:06] Those are things we should look
[3:58:06] at.
[3:58:08] As for 33% how did you come up
[3:58:10] with that number, I would be
[3:58:11] substantially more comfortable
[3:58:12] with 25%.
[3:58:14] I'm thinking I break everything
[3:58:16] into dollars because I don't
[3:58:17] have a lot of money so 75,
[3:58:18] that's 25, 50 $75.
[3:58:20] I'm saying if something is on
[3:58:21] dollar and someone else is
[3:58:23] saying that it's 45, 55, 65
[3:58:23] $0.70 under.
[3:58:27] Those deviations are way out of
[3:58:28] range.
[3:58:29] And so I just want to be
[3:58:30] mindful because I know what's
[3:58:32] going to happen and GOD willing
[3:58:36] I won't be here when it
[3:58:36] happens.
[3:58:38] But there's going to be a small
[3:58:41] business that's harmed by this
[3:58:41] process.
[3:58:43] And they're going to come here
[3:58:45] and complain about these bids
[3:58:47] and we're going to feel very
[3:58:49] sympathetic because it's going
[3:58:50] to affect their business and
[3:58:52] it's a decision we are making
[3:58:57] right now.
[3:58:58] This decision will live on
[3:59:00] beyond this moment, it will be
[3:59:02] something written in paper but
[3:59:04] something written in somebody's
[3:59:05] bank account.
[3:59:07] Or their mortgage payment.
[3:59:09] And it's going to exist in
[3:59:10] different ways so I would be
[3:59:14] more comfortable with 25%.
[3:59:16] >>chair: I'm good with doing
[3:59:17] that, for the three members you
[3:59:19] keep it for the three unless
[3:59:24] it's over, you're suggesting
[3:59:25] 25% is your reason.
[3:59:31] so the committee claps to
[3:59:32] clarify 20% over and below is
[3:59:47] that the intention.
[3:59:49] >> I have to check back, I
[3:59:51] think it's low scores but
[3:59:52] deviation could be offered
[3:59:54] lower usually is on the lower
[3:59:56] side but I have to check back.
[3:59:57] >> if it's over 25% deviation
[3:59:58] and is not counted.
[4:00:01] Go ahead.
[4:00:02] >> to clarify this was an
[4:00:04] amendment to recommendation 16
[4:00:07] so what I have down here is
[4:00:09] keep eliminating dropping low
[4:00:11] scores except if the lowest
[4:00:16] score deviates 25% or more
[4:00:19] average score for all committee
[4:00:19] members.
[4:00:21] That's the recommendation
[4:00:30] currently over 65, then that we
[4:00:31] are changing the recommendation
[4:00:33] to keep and drop the lowest
[4:00:35] score except the score deviates
[4:00:36] 25% or more.
[4:00:39] >>chair: senator garcia.
[4:00:40] >>senator garcia: thank you MR.
[4:00:44] Chair. And by the way I
[4:00:47] appreciate what you're doing
[4:00:47] here.
[4:00:49] I'm just throwing that out to
[4:00:51] thank you for bringing up some
[4:00:53] of those and resolving some of
[4:00:59] those issues that are
[4:01:00] outstanding that will go a long
[4:01:02] way to help our small
[4:01:03] businesses, I have one more
[4:01:05] question if I MAY and it has to
[4:01:06] do with the startup businesses.
[4:01:14] E have moved, we went from,
[4:01:20] we should not have a
[4:01:22] requirement on timing staff
[4:01:23] members for startup businesses.
[4:01:27] When you have started
[4:01:29] businesses especially since we
[4:01:31] talked about engineering and
[4:01:32] architecture firms, that's
[4:01:34] usually one employee, is there
[4:01:35] a rationale for that, can we
[4:01:37] look into that as well because
[4:01:39] when we are the neck right now
[4:01:41] of startups.
[4:01:43] Inviting private investors to
[4:01:46] come up here and usually most
[4:01:52] of these startups are 1 or two
[4:01:57] employees, help me with that
[4:01:58] rationale.
[4:01:59] >> through the chair, senator
[4:02:01] we did not change any
[4:02:05] requirements to be a small
[4:02:06] business from one employee or
[4:02:08] two employees are three
[4:02:09] employees, there is no
[4:02:09] requirement.
[4:02:11] Like you have to have three
[4:02:29] employees to certify a small
[4:02:30] business.
[4:02:31] The three employee requirement
[4:02:34] has been the long-standing
[4:02:35] policy to get local preference.
[4:02:37] And if you want to qualify for
[4:02:39] local preference you have to
[4:02:41] have three employees, that was
[4:02:42] the policy adopted eight or 10
[4:02:44] years ago by the board but if
[4:02:46] you're a small business you
[4:02:47] don't have to do that either.
[4:02:50] You need three employees to be
[4:02:51] local preference so that
[4:02:53] requirement has not changed.
[4:02:55] >>chair: I am becoming more
[4:02:56] confused right now so for,
[4:02:58] let's talk about local
[4:02:59] preference.
[4:03:00] The definition of the small
[4:03:01] business is what?
[4:03:03] >> there is a dollar threshold
[4:03:13] for your business income, gross
[4:03:15] income and you don't need
[4:03:15] employees.
[4:03:17] There is a confusion in
[4:03:19] industry, their thinking we are
[4:03:20] changing the requirement to be
[4:03:21] a small business.
[4:03:23] We did not so the requirement
[4:03:25] stays as is, you can have one
[4:03:27] employee or your owner
[4:03:28] yourself.
[4:03:29] >>senator garcia: that's for
[4:03:31] the small business and now for
[4:03:33] local preference, local
[4:03:34] preference what is it?
[4:03:36] Claps to qualify for local
[4:03:37] preference you have to have a
[4:03:39] business tax receipt issued by
[4:03:41] miami-dade counties tax
[4:03:42] collector's office and you have
[4:03:44] to have three employees.
[4:03:46] If you are a small business
[4:03:48] already you don't need that
[4:03:49] three employees.
[4:03:50] >>senator garcia: you can
[4:03:52] qualify as a small business and
[4:03:52] local.
[4:03:54] That's fair, I think that
[4:03:56] addresses my concerns and I'm
[4:03:57] fairly comfortable.
[4:03:57] Hank you
[4:03:59] for what you are doing.
[4:04:03] >>chair: commissioner steinberg
[4:04:03] .
[4:04:05] >>commissioner steinberg:
[4:04:07] clarification on the local
[4:04:09] preference, generally speaking
[4:04:10] we have a core eligibility
[4:04:13] issue and we know one of them
[4:04:16] is supporting local jobs, so
[4:04:22] what are we doing to advance
[4:04:23] belief because we have two
[4:04:25] different versions of this
[4:04:26] relief, can you please give me
[4:04:37] some clarification.
[4:04:39] Claps to qualify for local
[4:04:40] preference or enhance
[4:04:42] encouraging business with the
[4:04:47] local company?
[4:04:49] Commissioner, I think in 2016,
[4:04:51] 20 17th this board or the prior
[4:04:52] board adopted changes to the
[4:04:54] local preference program which
[4:04:56] changed the requirement to have
[4:04:58] one employee to a three
[4:04:59] employees you have to have a
[4:05:01] local business tax receipt and
[4:05:03] contribute to the local economy
[4:05:05] in miami-dade by either renting
[4:05:07] or by renting office space so
[4:05:14] you have to have local
[4:05:15] preference but in addition to
[4:05:17] that there's locally
[4:05:19] headquartered programs where if
[4:05:20] you are nerve center business
[4:05:22] is in miami-dade county then
[4:05:24] you also get additional
[4:05:25] preference whether regardless
[4:05:27] of the type of procurement and
[4:05:29] in certain architecture
[4:05:31] engineering procurements there
[4:05:32] are more, if you subcontract
[4:05:34] with a locally headquartered
[4:05:36] firm you are eligible for more
[4:05:38] points as a scoring criteria
[4:05:39] and in addition we have
[4:05:40] invested under the mayor a lot
[4:05:46] of resources in creating
[4:05:48] training programs through our
[4:05:49] vendor academy we launched
[4:05:51] under the mayor in 2023 to give
[4:05:53] local companies and small
[4:05:54] companies resources they need
[4:05:56] to do business with miami-dade
[4:05:58] county other it's we do
[4:05:59] registration boot camps,
[4:06:07] walking in through different
[4:06:09] classes, free classes.
[4:06:10] English, spanish and creole,
[4:06:12] we've created a youtube
[4:06:13] training program so they can
[4:06:15] watch their own time and we
[4:06:17] have opened offices in the
[4:06:17] south.
[4:06:19] We go there and also cater to
[4:06:21] the businesses himself so there
[4:06:22] are efforts we are coming up
[4:06:24] with and recently we also
[4:06:25] launched the comprehensive
[4:06:27] small and local business
[4:06:28] development program which there
[4:06:30] are departments in the county
[4:06:32] have benefits or the they
[4:06:34] offered to small local
[4:06:35] companies so we are
[4:06:36] incorporating that there is a
[4:06:38] single resource or single
[4:06:40] document for any small and
[4:06:43] local company to see what kind
[4:06:45] of benefits they could get from
[4:06:47] the county in addition to doing
[4:06:49] business with the county.
[4:06:51] >>chair: vice chair, did you
[4:07:07] have anything?
[4:07:09] >>vice chair mcghee: let me say
[4:07:10] to both of you thank you so
[4:07:11] much.
[4:07:12] It's obvious the work that went
[4:07:14] into this produced a great
[4:07:16] product where we can hang our
[4:07:18] hats on it and appreciate the
[4:07:20] system even more and to the
[4:07:22] administration thank you for
[4:07:23] making sure this is something
[4:07:25] that again would right the
[4:07:26] ship, get us where we need to
[4:07:28] be as relates to procurement
[4:07:30] and thank you for your
[4:07:31] leadership in pushing us
[4:07:31] forward.
[4:07:33] Have a few
[4:07:34] concerns, I'd like to address
[4:07:36] but address it technically,
[4:07:38] each line by line and I would
[4:07:40] issue some statements and asked
[4:07:42] for clarity as I make my
[4:07:42] position.
[4:07:44] The first thing that strikes me
[4:07:46] the most is the fact that you
[4:07:47] all have been working on this
[4:07:49] for over a year.
[4:07:50] Meeting twice a month, giving
[4:07:52] up your time, your quality time
[4:07:54] with your family and just wing
[4:07:55] time in.
[4:07:56] What bothers me the most though
[4:07:58] is the fact that there were
[4:08:00] substitutes filed on these
[4:08:01] items.
[4:08:04] At the very last minute.
[4:08:11] And when you look at the
[4:08:12] substitutes as they work file
[4:08:14] as it pertains to each one of
[4:08:19] the items, these are no small
[4:08:20] items to overlook.
[4:08:22] It takes time to flesh it out
[4:08:23] to see how is it going to
[4:08:24] affect this or that.
[4:08:26] I would have preferably
[4:08:28] requested, and I'm I haven't
[4:08:30] said yet but I think I will, I
[4:08:33] would prefer to defer these
[4:08:34] items to give me an opportunity
[4:08:38] to really meet with
[4:08:39] stakeholders to see if in fact
[4:08:43] this is what they had bargained
[4:08:44] for or they are willing to
[4:08:45] bargain for.
[4:08:49] What I heard from those podiums
[4:08:50] earlier, I didn't hear them say
[4:08:57] they had a comfort level with
[4:08:58] the substitutes.
[4:09:00] What I heard was that they
[4:09:04] needed more time to review the
[4:09:05] substitute so they could make
[4:09:07] an informed decision about the
[4:09:21] proposed changes that they just
[4:09:22] received midnight.
[4:09:23] Including your self.
[4:09:25] I was prepared to vote one way
[4:09:27] based on the original waivers
[4:09:29] because I had it all lined up,
[4:09:29] we had it.
[4:09:31] But it just strikes me as odd
[4:09:33] to receive these substitutes,
[4:09:35] midnight on something that is
[4:09:37] so huge that's going to change
[4:09:39] the trajectory of business and
[4:09:41] procurement in miami-dade
[4:09:42] county, it strikes me and
[4:09:45] forces me to ask the question
[4:09:47] why not simply the furthest to
[4:09:48] the next meeting so we can have
[4:09:50] time to flesh out the issues we
[4:09:52] heard from that podium.
[4:09:53] And I'm wondering and asking
[4:09:55] this question MISS Mendez, is
[4:10:13] there a reason why we should
[4:10:15] actually move forward right now
[4:10:17] as opposed to waiting till the
[4:10:19] next meeting to give those of
[4:10:20] us who are entrenched and
[4:10:22] really supportive of small
[4:10:24] businesses, is there a reason
[4:10:25] why we can't wait until the
[4:10:27] next meeting so we can flesh
[4:10:29] out these things and meet with
[4:10:30] the stakeholders, will
[4:10:32] something got lost in the fray,
[4:10:34] will there be a cost that we
[4:10:35] must bear if we were to just
[4:10:37] simply push this to the next
[4:10:38] meeting, just asking that one
[4:10:39] question.
[4:10:41] >>chair: I think that's for
[4:10:41] diana.
[4:10:43] >vice chair mcghee: whoever
[4:10:45] wants to answer the question
[4:10:46] but if you want to that would
[4:10:47] be great.
[4:10:49] >>chair: you can't wait until
[4:10:50] next meeting because this is
[4:10:52] real people's money we are
[4:10:54] talking about, taxpayers money
[4:10:56] we are talking about and then
[4:10:57] the only thing that was removed
[4:10:59] is those substitutes is a
[4:11:01] removal of anything pertaining
[4:11:02] to small business, nothing was
[4:11:04] changed so the same item about
[4:11:06] a week ago you have before you
[4:11:07] today was just removed, nothing
[4:11:09] was changed.
[4:11:10] There were no games so you've
[4:11:12] embedded it's true then you
[4:11:14] have it all, the numbers called
[4:11:15] out were just extracted from
[4:11:18] the items so here we have it,
[4:11:19] senator garcia often brings
[4:11:21] that point up in the other
[4:11:23] items in it makes sense, things
[4:11:24] are dramatically changed.
[4:11:26] It was just removed from the
[4:11:28] item to further elaborate on
[4:11:29] discussions on what they spoke
[4:11:34] about at the podium today but I
[4:11:36] see no reason it cannot wait
[4:11:36] another month.
[4:11:38] The reason that it skipped
[4:11:40] committee is because we are
[4:11:42] having this discussion amongst
[4:11:43] the entire board.
[4:11:45] And I want the entire board to
[4:11:49] discuss it and there were in
[4:11:50] excess of 20 to 25 meetings
[4:11:57] held at any time, they were
[4:11:58] sunshine meetings at any
[4:12:00] commissioner could have taken
[4:12:01] time if they had an interest in
[4:12:03] showing up and spoken to the
[4:12:12] committee at that time.
[4:12:14] >>vice chair mcghee: appreciate
[4:12:16] my position not to say there
[4:12:18] was funny business going on
[4:12:19] behind the scenes or someone at
[4:12:21] a position that would benefit
[4:12:25] another person.
[4:12:27] My position has always been the
[4:12:29] same and it will be the same,
[4:12:31] it's really about transparency
[4:12:33] at this point because at the
[4:12:34] end of the day we prepared, we
[4:12:36] were briefed but at the last
[4:12:37] minute we feel as if things
[4:12:39] were injected into a
[4:12:40] conversation and it forced
[4:12:42] those to come to the podium
[4:12:43] without adequately being
[4:12:45] prepared with the new changes
[4:12:46] so you're asking not you but we
[4:12:48] are asking individuals who MAY
[4:12:50] or MAY not be affected to
[4:12:51] on-the-fly look at this with
[4:12:56] the lens of you know, whether
[4:12:58] it's the corridor work or
[4:12:59] whether it hurts the business
[4:13:01] or whether or not it moves the
[4:13:05] agenda forward away it is, I'm
[4:13:06] simply asking the question if
[4:13:08] we've already waited a year and
[4:13:12] to wait an additional 20 days,
[4:13:14] would it really cost that much
[4:13:16] money to give comfort to the
[4:13:44] people who came to the podium
[4:13:46] who raised the concerns that
[4:13:48] there MAY be something there
[4:13:49] that they need to understand
[4:13:51] and let's be clear, I am an
[4:13:52] attorney.
[4:13:52] By trade.
[4:13:54] That's what I do, I read
[4:13:55] documents quickly, I get to the
[4:13:57] point, identify the issues, do
[4:13:59] the analysis and do the
[4:14:00] conclusion but we are talking
[4:14:02] about small business for who
[4:14:03] are as equally intelligent as
[4:14:05] we are but they're asking for
[4:14:07] more time so they can make sure
[4:14:09] what they're reading is what
[4:14:11] they're reading because if they
[4:14:12] have an issue with it and we
[4:14:14] work for them we are simply
[4:14:16] saying give them more time to
[4:14:17] read it, just defer till the
[4:14:21] next meeting and if that's not
[4:14:21] something the board wishes to
[4:14:23] do I'm okay but I want to make
[4:14:25] sure I put this on the record
[4:14:27] and I will be voting no on all
[4:14:29] these items, the ones that have
[4:14:30] had the substitute applied to
[4:14:32] it at the very last minute
[4:14:34] because I do not believe that
[4:14:35] the good faith I can hang my
[4:14:37] vote on something that very
[4:14:39] well MAY screw over the small
[4:14:41] businesses down the road
[4:14:42] because this has not been
[4:14:43] properly invented and I do
[4:14:45] believe there is a world where
[4:14:47] small businesses are going to
[4:14:50] be screwed because we rushed
[4:14:50] this at the last minute when in
[4:14:52] fact we could have easily
[4:14:54] postponed it for one month to
[4:14:55] give everybody a comfort level
[4:14:57] so they can meet with folks and
[4:14:59] get their issues out of the
[4:14:59] way.
[4:15:00] So those are my positions on
[4:15:02] the record MR. CHAIRMAN so is
[4:15:04] nothing against you, nothing to
[4:15:06] suggest something funny went
[4:15:08] behind the scenes, it's simply
[4:15:09] saying you don't, we don't drop
[4:15:11] this amount of change at
[4:15:12] midnight on and tell us it's
[4:15:14] okay, these are the things we
[4:15:16] want to remove without knowing
[4:15:18] whether or not it's going to
[4:15:20] affect monetarily those small
[4:15:21] businesses who are the
[4:15:23] backbones of our community so
[4:15:25] those are my positions for the
[4:15:26] record so thank you to the
[4:15:28] ladies and the administration
[4:15:29] and to you MR. CHAIRMAN, you
[4:15:31] did a great job and that's a
[4:15:33] lot of work that you all did on
[4:15:35] this project and again I take
[4:15:36] my hat off to you.
[4:15:37] >> commissioner.
[4:15:38] >> thank you MR. Chair, I want
[4:15:40] to be brief in my remarks and
[4:15:41] thanking you for your
[4:15:48] leadership on this.
[4:15:50] I was running my first campaign
[4:15:52] and I think the business
[4:15:54] communities loudest complaint
[4:15:55] was procurement.
[4:15:57] We need to get procurement in
[4:16:09] order in miami dade county and
[4:16:11] when the ambassador and my
[4:16:13] friend forever commissioner
[4:16:14] cabrera was here we took a stab
[4:16:16] at it and this is an issue
[4:16:18] we've dealt with for a very
[4:16:19] long time and I'm very grateful
[4:16:21] to you MR. Chair and your
[4:16:23] leadership in putting together
[4:16:25] such a comprehensive approach.
[4:16:27] I'm grateful to our
[4:16:28] administration, if you've not
[4:16:30] seen namita binder of the
[4:16:32] procurement ordinances that we
[4:16:33] have passed as a board that she
[4:16:35] and her team are required to
[4:16:37] follow then every procurement
[4:16:39] it would blow you away.
[4:16:41] The binder is about this being
[4:16:42] and I know the task force
[4:16:44] tackle that and hopefully it
[4:16:45] will substantially reduce that
[4:16:47] binder making things more
[4:16:49] streamlined and efficient and
[4:16:50] hopefully finding more
[4:16:52] businesses to do business with
[4:16:53] miami-dade county and I want to
[4:16:55] thank the task force members.
[4:16:57] Meeting twice a month for 12
[4:16:58] months is not a small ask.
[4:17:00] I know a number of board
[4:17:02] members are parents, have young
[4:17:03] children in school, some lives
[4:17:05] out of the county so you're not
[4:17:07] doing this for compensation,
[4:17:09] you're doing this because you
[4:17:11] care and I'm grateful for you
[4:17:13] investing that much time to
[4:17:14] sit, govern, chair meetings and
[4:17:16] volunteer your time to get to
[4:17:17] the point where we are today.
[4:17:19] t is greatly appreciated so
[4:17:25] thank you for that and
[4:17:27] regarding the small business
[4:17:29] concerns I'm grateful for the
[4:17:30] efforts made to remove
[4:17:32] provisions our community said
[4:17:33] where a concern.
[4:17:34] That's the fair thing to do and
[4:17:41] if there is an amended item I
[4:17:43] look forward to that but this
[4:17:44] needs to pass today so we can
[4:17:46] get the ball rolling.
[4:17:47] Appreciate the savings of
[4:17:49] dollars are community will pass
[4:17:56] on to our residents and
[4:17:58] appreciate the reduction in
[4:17:59] procurement time, 60% is not a
[4:18:02] small number so congratulations
[4:18:03] to all of you and I'm happy to
[4:18:05] support the item, thank you MR.
[4:18:06] Chair.
[4:18:08] >>chair: commissioner milian
[4:18:09] orbis.
[4:18:10] >>commissioner milian orbis:
[4:18:12] thank you MR. Chair. I
[4:18:21] obviously agree with the task
[4:18:22] force recommendations.
[4:18:24] You've worked diligently the
[4:18:26] past year on hopefully fixing
[4:18:27] our procurement system.
[4:18:28] E get
[4:18:29] so many complaints, one of
[4:18:31] those we've received as
[4:18:33] commissioners and I'm glad we
[4:18:35] were able to address those, I'm
[4:18:36] glad we were able to assist
[4:18:38] them so thank you for moving
[4:18:39] this forward.
[4:18:42] >>chair: commissioner bermudez.
[4:18:44] >>commissioner bermudez: I have
[4:18:46] a lot to say, let me start by
[4:18:47] thanking you because your
[4:18:49] efforts are efforts that I
[4:18:51] think a number of us share but
[4:18:52] you all shared which is to make
[4:18:54] things more efficient in the
[4:18:56] county not only for the large
[4:18:58] businesses but small businesses
[4:19:00] and I applaud your effort and
[4:19:02] thank you for even though i
[4:19:03] agree with the vice chair but I
[4:19:05] don't like things being dropped
[4:19:07] at 11 o'clock I appreciate the
[4:19:09] fact you've taken steps to
[4:19:10] clarify some of those things
[4:19:18] and it's appreciate.
[4:19:19] But effectiveness and
[4:19:21] efficiency we've always shared
[4:19:23] that and I applaud you as chair
[4:19:24] for trying to move us in that
[4:19:25] direction.
[4:19:27] Not always as we had somebody
[4:19:29] here earlier was a candidate
[4:19:31] for lieutenant governor and
[4:19:32] used the words nobody wants to
[4:19:34] repeat, nobody was removed so
[4:19:37] don't worry about it.
[4:19:39] I probably want to support the
[4:19:42] others and I'll tell you why.
[4:19:44] When you were kind enough to
[4:19:48] create the committee, namita
[4:20:01] which by the way is an
[4:20:02] improvement, she said 72 days
[4:20:04] was the average and now it's 39
[4:20:06] so it's a bit of an increase.
[4:20:07] He also pointed out there
[4:20:09] were 177 to 179 ordinances that
[4:20:11] they tried to make the changes.
[4:20:12] To decrease it to fewer
[4:20:18] ordinances so it would be more
[4:20:19] effective.
[4:20:21] Increasing transparency and
[4:20:23] decreasing bureaucracy and
[4:20:25] being more efficient is always
[4:20:26] something that is very very
[4:20:37] important but looking at 5g in
[4:20:39] particular, transparency is a
[4:20:41] word used by many people.
[4:20:42] Accountability is used by many
[4:20:44] people especially in politics.
[4:20:46] We are removing the collusion
[4:20:47] portion.
[4:20:50] From our ordinance.
[4:20:52] So what type of message do we
[4:20:54] send to the public, the
[4:20:55] citizens at large and small
[4:20:57] business we remove the
[4:20:58] collusion portion?
[4:20:59] Of the ordinance?
[4:21:03] And don't think I didn't catch
[4:21:04] it namita because I did, it's
[4:21:06] not on the recommendations
[4:21:07] because it wasn't a
[4:21:09] recommendation and thank you to
[4:21:11] the committee, appreciate the
[4:21:12] work all you did.
[4:21:14] We have a small business owner
[4:21:16] to my left and I know bills
[4:21:18] isn't a small business but we
[4:21:21] are appreciative but the
[4:21:23] collusion portion, removing
[4:21:24] that bids precluded from
[4:21:33] related parties.
[4:21:34] Really?
[4:21:35] If you're going to talk the
[4:21:37] talk you've got to walk the
[4:21:37] walk.
[4:21:44] This department needs to be
[4:21:44] changed.
[4:21:46] Namita is a wonderful lady, the
[4:21:48] administration has done a great
[4:21:49] job but as many times as we say
[4:21:51] it doesn't mean anything you do
[4:21:53] the right job because at this
[4:21:55] point my concern which is
[4:21:57] whether you are large or small,
[4:22:00] that we do things right.
[4:22:02] The CHAIRWOMAN And many of
[4:22:06] those members which by the way
[4:22:15] they should be, they should
[4:22:16] talk the talk, they should
[4:22:18] really walk the walk after they
[4:22:19] talk the talk.
[4:22:22] We are sending the message and
[4:22:24] I'm going to leave it with this
[4:22:25] because I'm going to vote no on
[4:22:27] the last three but I will
[4:22:30] support you on the first one.
[4:22:32] I think 20 days does not make a
[4:22:32] difference.
[4:22:34] 20 days gives the opportunity
[4:22:39] to all these people that spoke
[4:22:41] on behalf of small businesses
[4:22:42] and by the way the gentleman
[4:22:48] who got a little bit emotional,
[4:22:50] it's a second-generation small
[4:22:52] business in miami-dade county,
[4:23:01] needs an architect and I
[4:23:02] thought senator garcia talks
[4:23:04] about those startups, that's
[4:23:06] great, we can get startups but
[4:23:08] let's get people that can start
[4:23:09] their own law firms, people
[4:23:11] that construct their own
[4:23:12] businesses going.
[4:23:14] I have a problem with really
[4:23:15] truthful like a problem with
[4:23:18] the lack of transparency and
[4:23:19] accountability on the issues
[4:23:21] that make it more transparent
[4:23:23] and accountable and he's not
[4:23:25] sitting there now but I know
[4:23:27] he's listening.
[4:23:28] Commissioner soon to be
[4:23:30] congressman gilbert, I'm going
[4:23:30] to MISS Him.
[4:23:32] I'm going to MISS Him a lot
[4:23:34] because he's one of the guys I
[4:23:35] count on that always checks
[4:23:37] those details with the
[4:23:38] administration.
[4:23:39] Because we get told in the six
[4:23:41] months later nothing has
[4:23:42] happened but he's the one guy I
[4:23:44] can count on that will say wait
[4:23:53] a minute, did this happen, you
[4:23:55] said this so I'm going to MISS
[4:23:57] You because when you're gone
[4:23:59] and I know the gentleman who
[4:24:00] replaces you is a wonderful guy
[4:24:02] but your zealousness to make
[4:24:04] sure when the administration
[4:24:05] talks the talk they should walk
[4:24:06] the walk.
[4:24:08] Has always been important to
[4:24:09] this commission.
[4:24:14] So oliver, I hope it's not just
[4:24:16] a matter of you're going to
[4:24:17] have other problems but I hope
[4:24:23] that this commission if we keep
[4:24:27] on using this term is
[4:24:28] effective, and yes, if it can
[4:24:31] be reduced I'm fine but we have
[4:24:37] to monitor that whether in the
[4:24:38] public it looks like it's going
[4:24:41] to pass or whether there is an
[4:24:43] extension, it's going to pass
[4:24:44] eventually but I would like to
[4:24:46] make sure we monitor this,
[4:24:47] really monitor this.
[4:24:50] i can't now that oliver is
[4:24:52] going either that or I'm going
[4:24:54] to have to get a cost and sit
[4:24:57] in my office over here and it's
[4:24:58] crazy so I want to make sure
[4:25:00] these things get done and the
[4:25:08] removal of section 2 11, I
[4:25:10] don't think it's a good thing.
[4:25:11] It sends the wrong message to
[4:25:13] all the businesses, small
[4:25:22] medium and large that the game
[4:25:24] is, I don't know.
[4:25:26] Everybody understands there's a
[4:25:29] process and I've always been
[4:25:29] confused.
[4:25:31] All I want is fairness and
[4:25:31] clarity.
[4:25:33] The world is not perfect.
[4:25:36] It isn't, not everybody's fair
[4:25:38] but this is not just about us
[4:25:39] as a commission, it's about the
[4:25:40] administration.
[4:25:41] We saw earlier today the
[4:25:43] commission of a district could
[4:25:51] have been facing tremendous
[4:25:53] backlash and that just popped
[4:25:53] up.
[4:25:55] So I'm going to vote no on the
[4:25:56] three others, I applaud you
[4:25:59] again and don't take it
[4:26:00] personally love the things I
[4:26:02] said but I applaud the fact you
[4:26:04] at least were willing to tackle
[4:26:06] this subject, it's an important
[4:26:07] subject and it just so happens
[4:26:09] I'm not going to do three of
[4:26:11] the items.
[4:26:17] >>chair: you need to do
[4:26:18] something?
[4:26:20] >>commissioner gonzalez: if I
[4:26:23] can remove cosponsorship 8 k5.
[4:26:30] >>chair: anyone else?
[4:26:35] Hardemon, are you getting?
[4:26:42] I mean,
[4:26:43] >>commissioner hardemon: you
[4:26:47] know we can talk.
[4:26:49] >>chair: I'm trying to say if
[4:26:52] raquel speaks first and you say
[4:26:53] something that triggers her
[4:26:56] she's going to want to speak
[4:26:57] twice.
[4:26:59] >>commissioner hardemon: that's
[4:27:00] how this works, we each other
[4:27:02] and say what we believe, we
[4:27:03] don't create a game and call
[4:27:07] the player.
[4:27:09] >>commissioner regalado: thank
[4:27:11] you to my colleagues, I wish
[4:27:13] glad some of my concerns were
[4:27:14] mentioned and I'm going to
[4:27:15] start with the easy stuff.
[4:27:19] In 5g there is one of the
[4:27:21] recommendations is to develop a
[4:27:22] standard ground lease
[4:27:22] agreement.
[4:27:30] I would like this to have
[4:27:31] parity with what we did for
[4:27:31] hud.
[4:27:33] What we did is we said where
[4:27:35] going to have a standard ground
[4:27:36] lease and when you apply
[4:27:37] whatever you don't object to
[4:27:39] you are barred from objecting
[4:27:43] to it.
[4:27:45] So I think you should add that
[4:27:46] on here because that's really
[4:27:47] when we study why broward and
[4:27:49] other places do it faster it's
[4:27:54] because we have a template,
[4:27:55] whatever you disagree with in
[4:27:57] that template if you do not
[4:28:12] submit your objection when you
[4:28:14] submit your response, you are
[4:28:16] foreclosed from bringing it up
[4:28:17] during negotiations so that
[4:28:19] would be my recommendation for
[4:28:20] parity with what we do in
[4:28:22] affordable housing so
[4:28:23] everything kind of lines up the
[4:28:24] same way.
[4:28:26] We spent a lot of time doing
[4:28:27] that so I don't know, you are
[4:28:29] cool with that, that's an easy
[4:28:29] one.
[4:28:31] The other one I wanted to
[4:28:33] mention unfortunately I can
[4:28:34] never forget and item.
[4:28:36] I appreciated the five day
[4:28:37] objection period.
[4:28:39] And the changes to the
[4:28:40] objection period.
[4:28:41] But I can think off the top of
[4:28:43] my head of seven procurements
[4:28:47] where there was not an
[4:28:47] objection.
[4:28:49] Yet when it came to the board
[4:28:51] of county commissioners we were
[4:28:53] inundated with letters drafted
[4:28:54] exactly like objections.
[4:28:56] So I think we need to draw a
[4:28:58] hard line here because what we
[4:29:00] MAY be doing is incentivizing
[4:29:04] people to not object and then
[4:29:05] send a letter and turn us into
[4:29:07] the selection committee.
[4:29:09] It's happened too many times
[4:29:14] and I did watch by the way,
[4:29:16] they were fascinating, a lot of
[4:29:18] the points that were made were
[4:29:20] great points but this was not
[4:29:21] tackled because it's not
[4:29:23] something you all see, it's
[4:29:24] something we see.
[4:29:26] So I don't know if you want to
[4:29:28] deal with that now, I have
[4:29:29] suggestions.
[4:29:29] I think again
[4:29:31] similar to what I'm saying
[4:29:33] about the contracts, if there
[4:29:35] has to be a determination, if
[4:29:36] you send a letter when this
[4:29:39] comes to the board and there is
[4:29:41] a determination that whatever
[4:29:54] arguments you are making could
[4:29:56] help make an objection those
[4:29:57] arguments should be stricken
[4:29:59] when it is presented to the
[4:30:00] board because you're choosing
[4:30:02] not to go down one path so you
[4:30:04] can take a second bite at the
[4:30:10] apple or worse you know both
[4:30:12] and all we are doing is delete
[4:30:13] relitigating the objection and
[4:30:15] complicating things more.
[4:30:17] I think if we are going to draw
[4:30:19] a line that it should cover
[4:30:20] everything and not create
[4:30:22] unintended consequences by
[4:30:24] incentivizing people not to
[4:30:24] object.
[4:30:26] >>chair: I agree, how do we?
[4:30:28] >>commissioner regalado: how we
[4:30:35] effectuate would be when we get
[4:30:37] a letter, when the agenda item
[4:30:38] publishes we get the letters.
[4:30:40] When we get the letters they
[4:30:41] are made part of the record
[4:30:43] here and usually passed out.
[4:30:44] What I would say is, and
[4:30:46] usually procurements is copied.
[4:30:48] When they get those letters
[4:30:49] then they have to give it to
[4:30:51] our legal department and they
[4:30:53] have to say these arguments
[4:31:03] could have been.
[4:31:04] An objection to the
[4:31:04] procurement.
[4:31:05] O those
[4:31:07] arguments are taken out because
[4:31:09] you had your chance to object.
[4:31:11] And you didn't object and your
[4:31:12] placing those objections in a
[4:31:14] correspondence so you can have
[4:31:16] a second bite at the apple
[4:31:16] here.
[4:31:17] In the same way when we
[4:31:19] function because I judicially
[4:31:21] that things are stricken then
[4:31:22] that should be stricken.
[4:31:24] That would be my legal advice.
[4:31:26] >>chair: do you see an issue
[4:31:40] with that?
[4:31:42] >> it sounds fair but the whole
[4:31:43] idea is the further you advance
[4:31:45] into the process the more
[4:31:47] entrenched you are into the
[4:31:48] process so the idea of creating
[4:31:50] another level of an objection
[4:31:52] is precisely to do that, if
[4:31:54] there's anything that needs to
[4:31:55] be changed about the process
[4:31:57] that staff and the
[4:31:58] administration have the
[4:31:59] opportunity to do so before it
[4:32:01] is another year before it comes
[4:32:02] here for you.
[4:32:04] >>chair: you're saying
[4:32:05] specifically just to arguments
[4:32:07] that could have been.
[4:32:09] >>commissioner regalado: things
[4:32:10] that should have been, what
[4:32:18] could have fallen within an
[4:32:20] objection to that procurement
[4:32:21] which now they are relitigating
[4:32:23] in correspondence to the lord
[4:32:25] of county commissioners instead
[4:32:27] of officially filing an
[4:32:29] objection or they did file an
[4:32:30] objection, it was rejected and
[4:32:32] now we are bringing it up
[4:32:32] again.
[4:32:34] >>chair: I'm fine with it, but
[4:32:36] let's say we implement that,
[4:32:37] they send us the letter.
[4:32:39] We it becomes part of the
[4:32:40] record, we give it to the
[4:32:41] attorney.
[4:32:42] They say what you just said
[4:32:50] that it could have been
[4:32:50] objective.
[4:32:52] What happens after that because
[4:32:54] as commissioners you can still
[4:33:06] bring it up, they still kind of
[4:33:07] accomplish.
[4:33:08] >>commissioner regalado: yes
[4:33:10] but on the record it will be
[4:33:12] said this argument could have
[4:33:13] been part of an official
[4:33:15] objection and they chose not to
[4:33:15] do that.
[4:33:17] If we still want to go down
[4:33:19] that rabbit hole we can but at
[4:33:21] least there is on the record a
[4:33:22] statement that they chose to
[4:33:24] not use the vehicle provided to
[4:33:26] them by our procurement.
[4:33:27] >>chair: I don't see an issue
[4:33:32] with it.
[4:33:34] >> as mayor you reserve the
[4:33:36] right to listen to it but you
[4:33:38] acknowledge it was something I
[4:33:39] could have been cured in an
[4:33:41] earlier portion of the board
[4:33:43] was given the opportunity at
[4:33:43] that time.
[4:33:45] >>chair: it doesn't change the
[4:33:47] outcome on our end at least but
[4:33:49] I'm fine with it because it
[4:33:50] doesn't change what the
[4:33:51] committee puts on the record
[4:33:55] and they could have objected.
[4:33:56] >>commissioner regalado: what
[4:33:58] I'm saying is I think the
[4:34:00] restrictions we are placing on
[4:34:01] objections, I don't want people
[4:34:03] to then send letters as a
[4:34:06] because I objection.
[4:34:08] I'm trying to hold everyone to
[4:34:10] that rule and I think this
[4:34:12] allows us then to look at those
[4:34:14] arguments in the context of not
[4:34:15] choosing to object.
[4:34:17] >>chair: she still has the
[4:34:18] floor.
[4:34:19] >>commissioner gilbert: I
[4:34:21] follow what you say
[4:34:23] commissioner regalado but the
[4:34:24] CHAIRMAN's point is well taken
[4:34:26] because you're saying that
[4:34:28] would just be cosmetic because
[4:34:36] we could still always consider
[4:34:38] and any other thing would be a
[4:34:39] limitation on our ability to
[4:34:41] take whatever comes into
[4:34:42] purview into making our
[4:34:44] decisions and we have that
[4:34:45] discretion unless it's because
[4:34:46] I judicial.
[4:34:54] I think it's just cosmetic.
[4:34:56] >>commissioner regalado: it's a
[4:34:58] clarification on the record
[4:34:59] because I can think of three
[4:35:01] times it's happened where we
[4:35:02] put our attorneys in a
[4:35:04] difficult spot because then we
[4:35:06] asked the question could this
[4:35:13] have been an objection?
[4:35:14] If it's already comes to us
[4:35:16] with the determination saying
[4:35:18] they didn't file an objection
[4:35:19] or they did file an objection
[4:35:21] and what's in this letter is a
[4:35:23] repeat of that objection or
[4:35:24] they could have filed, maybe
[4:35:26] they mentioned five things,
[4:35:28] they could have filed
[4:35:30] objections for 1, 2 and three
[4:35:31] they didn't and now four and
[4:35:32] five that would have fallen
[4:35:34] outside the scope, we can
[4:35:35] consider all of it but at least
[4:35:37] the record is clear as to their
[4:35:39] decision to not file an
[4:35:41] objection to be held to the
[4:35:42] existing standard and if we
[4:35:44] want to then step into that
[4:35:45] space we do so knowingly
[4:35:47] without turning it into a
[4:35:48] commissioner has to ask the
[4:35:50] question in order to have that
[4:35:51] clarified.
[4:35:52] >>commissioner gilbert: but
[4:35:54] that's why it's cosmetic
[4:35:55] because it doesn't actually
[4:35:57] change anything, that's almost
[4:35:59] the definition of cosmetic.
[4:36:01] It doesn't change anything so
[4:36:03] what they can say.
[4:36:04] >>commissioner regalado: I hope
[4:36:07] it does incentivizing them.
[4:36:09] >>commissioner gilbert: so it's
[4:36:10] lipgloss and not lipstick, I
[4:36:12] don't get that but you accepted
[4:36:13] it, let's roll.
[4:36:15] >>chair: commissioner bermudez
[4:36:17] to that point.
[4:36:18] >>commissioner bermudez: I
[4:36:20] agree with commissioner
[4:36:22] gilbert, it's totally cosmetic
[4:36:23] because some of the people on
[4:36:25] that committee do this all the
[4:36:27] time, we get a letter and an
[4:36:28] elective decision was taken by
[4:36:30] the committee and they might
[4:36:32] lose a procurement here and
[4:36:34] then they come in front of us,
[4:36:35] I have no problem with it.
[4:36:37] My only suggestion would be
[4:36:38] since I believe legally they
[4:36:45] still have the ability to bring
[4:36:47] it in front of us whether we
[4:36:49] like it or not it's up to us to
[4:36:51] say you didn't follow the rules
[4:36:53] and what I suggest is we also
[4:36:55] add some language the county
[4:36:56] attorney's office has to put a
[4:36:58] line or a copy of it is in an
[4:36:59] instance that they did not
[4:37:06] appeal x, y, and z here.
[4:37:08] But put it in writing because
[4:37:09] we all know how the game is
[4:37:11] played, they didn't get it,
[4:37:12] they hired ex-, x lobby sauce
[4:37:14] and tries to change the
[4:37:15] decision.
[4:37:16] If we are clear at the very
[4:37:18] least we do it as a body and
[4:37:19] accepted because you have a
[4:37:21] right to come in front of us.
[4:37:23] But I want the attorneys to add
[4:37:29] least put it in writing.
[4:37:31] >>commissioner regalado: this
[4:37:32] would allow us to quantify it
[4:37:34] and if people keep doing it we
[4:37:37] can do something about it
[4:37:39] because right now it's kind of
[4:37:40] left to our memory to remember
[4:37:42] how many times it's happened
[4:37:44] because it's not something we
[4:37:45] considered.
[4:37:45] Next one.
[4:37:50] To commissioner gilbert's point
[4:37:52] about deviations, one of the
[4:37:53] things I was hoping to find
[4:37:56] here and I didn't find was more
[4:37:57] accountability in terms of
[4:38:11] change orders.
[4:38:13] I would separate change orders
[4:38:14] into 2 buckets.
[4:38:16] Change orders as a result of a
[4:38:17] change in scope which don't
[4:38:19] concern me because that is a
[4:38:21] department driven change order
[4:38:22] versus change orders that you
[4:38:24] didn't really know the market.
[4:38:26] And now you're coming back.
[4:38:27] Guess somewhere in the middle
[4:38:29] there is change orders as a
[4:38:45] result of time.
[4:38:47] This board has already dealt
[4:38:48] with that him and the majority
[4:38:50] of our contracts saying if
[4:38:51] there is a delay and a change
[4:38:53] in pricing of materials or
[4:38:55] labor we will add that to the
[4:38:56] price so we've already done
[4:38:58] that in the majority of our
[4:39:00] departments so that doesn't
[4:39:01] concern me nor does the scope
[4:39:03] because sometimes the scope
[4:39:04] changes and you get a scope
[4:39:06] change order but in the case of
[4:39:08] change orders that are, their
[4:39:10] nature is derived from their
[4:39:12] inability to quote the price
[4:39:13] correctly, I think that there
[4:39:15] should be an accounting of that
[4:39:17] in our procurement system when
[4:39:19] you look at these deviations.
[4:39:20] I don't think you should look
[4:39:22] at the deviations of that
[4:39:23] contract, I think there should
[4:39:25] be some information provided
[4:39:27] regarding is this a serial
[4:39:29] change order situation and
[4:39:30] namita you and I have talked
[4:39:32] about the serial change orders.
[4:39:34] There are some people this is
[4:39:34] their mo.
[4:39:36] I would suggest as we look at
[4:39:37] dropping the lowest we also
[4:39:39] have some information about the
[4:39:41] change order history of the
[4:39:57] people that are being right
[4:39:58] because if it's a scope thing
[4:40:00] we change the scope, if it's a
[4:40:02] time thing we've already dealt
[4:40:03] with it but if this is a
[4:40:05] situation in which you are
[4:40:07] consistently underpricing in
[4:40:09] order to hit us with change
[4:40:10] orders this is the time to deal
[4:40:12] with that and not later in the
[4:40:14] process.
[4:40:15] >>chair: namita, how can we
[4:40:15] address that?
[4:40:18] >> when the selection committee
[4:40:20] is scoring you want them to
[4:40:21] have information about the
[4:40:23] change order history for each
[4:40:30] of the companies?
[4:40:31] >>commissioner regalado: when
[4:40:33] we look at dropping the lowest,
[4:40:35] I think that's when you should
[4:40:37] look at change order history.
[4:40:39] I'm happy to include it also as
[4:40:41] a selection committee but they
[4:40:42] will say that's different.
[4:40:44] If you include it in the
[4:40:46] selection committees decision
[4:40:47] making regarding that, it might
[4:40:49] be prejudicial but as you
[4:40:51] decide to drop folks, that's
[4:40:52] something you might want to
[4:40:54] consider and definitely
[4:40:55] something the board should have
[4:40:57] access to as we look at those
[4:40:58] decisions.
[4:41:00] >>chair: can we lower our
[4:41:02] voices, it's getting louder in
[4:41:03] the background.
[4:41:04] Guys in the back,
[4:41:05] commissioners, staff.
[4:41:22] Go ahead.
[4:41:24] >> I'll have to look how we can
[4:41:26] implement this, I don't want to
[4:41:28] commit because collecting that
[4:41:30] information means if there's 10
[4:41:31] companies I have to collect
[4:41:33] that information from
[4:41:35] departments monitoring those
[4:41:36] contracts and come back to
[4:41:38] either selection committee so
[4:41:40] it could be adding more time.
[4:41:41] I'm happy to work with you
[4:41:43] separately apart from the items
[4:41:45] to incorporate how we make sure
[4:41:47] the change orders are only as a
[4:41:49] result of the county changes
[4:41:50] and things like that but not
[4:41:52] vendor driven.
[4:41:53] >>commissioner regalado: I
[4:41:55] would say maybe go back five
[4:41:56] years and just look at the
[4:41:58] vendor driven and when it comes
[4:41:59] to the board, not as part of
[4:42:01] the selection process but when
[4:42:03] it comes to the board because
[4:42:05] that's when the rubber meets
[4:42:05] the road.
[4:42:07] I don't want to jam up the
[4:42:08] selection committee process but
[4:42:09] that's information we need to
[4:42:11] make a final determination.
[4:42:13] If it's a serial change because
[4:42:14] we are the ones that have to
[4:42:16] approve the change order not
[4:42:18] the selection committee claps
[4:42:19] that could be done.
[4:42:21] >>commissioner regalado: thank
[4:42:23] you, now to the board a complex
[4:42:23] one.
[4:42:24] So one of the things we've
[4:42:28] talked about that are part of
[4:42:29] this is how we make up the
[4:42:41] selection committee and I've
[4:42:42] talked about this before.
[4:42:44] Selection committees were
[4:42:46] created by this board over two
[4:42:48] decades ago when there was an
[4:42:49] administration that did not
[4:42:51] trust staff and over the years
[4:42:53] we now have selection
[4:42:54] committees made up of staff.
[4:42:56] So the interesting, how the
[4:42:58] pendulum has moved is very
[4:42:59] interesting.
[4:43:02] One of these changes changes
[4:43:04] the makeup and I think that
[4:43:06] there's been a lot of concerns
[4:43:07] about the makeup of selection
[4:43:09] committee in terms of their
[4:43:09] expertise.
[4:43:11] I appreciate that but at the
[4:43:20] same time as someone who gets
[4:43:21] frustrated when you're waiting
[4:43:24] for something to get through a
[4:43:25] department because the human
[4:43:27] who has to approve it is on a
[4:43:29] selection committee and another
[4:43:31] selection committee and as a
[4:43:33] result of the vacation time we
[4:43:34] give them there are situations
[4:43:36] in which the humans that are
[4:43:37] supposed to be at their desk
[4:43:39] are gone for a long time.
[4:43:40] One of the things I discussed
[4:43:42] that obviously we couldn't do
[4:43:48] because of strip with namita
[4:43:50] and staff was instead of
[4:43:52] randomly picking individuals to
[4:43:54] serve on the selection
[4:43:56] committees and giving them
[4:43:57] vacation time for it and having
[4:43:59] them go out and come back,
[4:44:01] tracking it and people are gone
[4:44:02] for a long time as a result of
[4:44:04] this process, consider having
[4:44:06] the department select a group
[4:44:08] of people that are there
[4:44:09] selection committee people.
[4:44:11] These are there experts and to
[4:44:12] commissioner gilbert's point,
[4:44:14] it is their job to show up.
[4:44:29] And their workload is adjusted
[4:44:31] as a result of that.
[4:44:32] And we eliminate this vacation
[4:44:34] time nonsense because it's not
[4:44:36] working out for us.
[4:44:37] Although only thing giving them
[4:44:40] more vacation time is doing is
[4:44:42] incentivizing a small group of
[4:44:44] people to participate in
[4:44:46] selection committees and they
[4:44:47] go on vacation.
[4:44:48] I would rather have a group of
[4:44:50] people that we know are going
[4:44:52] to be spending time in
[4:44:54] selection committees and we
[4:44:55] adjust their work accordingly
[4:44:57] so I don't have something
[4:44:59] sitting on their desk for five
[4:45:01] months as we wait for them to
[4:45:01] return.
[4:45:03] And I think that we are losing
[4:45:05] not winning on this vacation
[4:45:06] time thing.
[4:45:07] I would, we tried it.
[4:45:07] Don't
[4:45:09] think it's necessarily working.
[4:45:11] We have people showing up at
[4:45:13] selection committees saying I
[4:45:14] didn't read this or have the
[4:45:16] chance to read it, that happens
[4:45:17] all the time.
[4:45:19] So I think we need to really
[4:45:21] look at who's serving on these
[4:45:23] selection committees, let the
[4:45:24] department pick the people best
[4:45:25] suited for this.
[4:45:27] Create a pool, remove the
[4:45:29] vacation time situation and
[4:45:30] adjust their work accordingly
[4:45:32] so if they are not available to
[4:45:34] do that work it can be given to
[4:45:36] someone else and we don't have
[4:45:37] to wait two or three months to
[4:45:39] get something signed.
[4:45:41] >>chair: we addressed this to
[4:45:42] some level, which everyone,
[4:46:02] this was talked about.
[4:46:04] >> the selection committee
[4:46:06] process has been revamped since
[4:46:07] we last discussed and part of
[4:46:09] the consideration as we
[4:46:10] developed an ai tool that's
[4:46:12] looking into the expertise of
[4:46:13] the county.
[4:46:14] We dumped the scope of work in
[4:46:16] that ai tool that takes the
[4:46:17] names of the people who have
[4:46:19] expertise and takes into
[4:46:20] account if they are serving on
[4:46:22] another selection committee,
[4:46:24] they are active county
[4:46:26] employees and if they have done
[4:46:27] the training so the workload
[4:46:29] balance, there was a time when
[4:46:31] people are getting appointed
[4:46:32] multiple selection committees
[4:46:34] so that has been addressed and
[4:46:36] if I'm serving into selection
[4:46:38] committees I'm not going to be
[4:46:40] put in one third one because we
[4:46:41] are trying to balance their
[4:46:43] regular work with the selection
[4:46:44] committee so that process, I
[4:46:46] used to receive a lot of
[4:46:47] complaints but now it has
[4:46:49] smoothed over I haven't heard
[4:46:51] any complaints where people are
[4:46:53] saying I'm overdone on this
[4:46:55] because we are spreading the
[4:46:56] work on all departments plus
[4:46:58] department directors are
[4:46:59] recommending names for the
[4:47:01] committee so let's say if it's
[4:47:02] a five person selection
[4:47:04] committee three people are
[4:47:06] recommended by departments and
[4:47:08] we try to find sometimes four
[4:47:09] but trying to find the
[4:47:11] remaining expertise from other
[4:47:12] county departments so the
[4:47:13] process is working much better
[4:47:15] ever since we implemented the
[4:47:17] ai tool and taken into account
[4:47:21] their workload.
[4:47:22] >>commissioner regalado: but
[4:47:24] what about the vacation time
[4:47:26] and cost of that and the loss
[4:47:27] of that employee for that?
[4:47:30] >> we were struggling with the
[4:47:42] participation but I think it's
[4:47:43] an incentive because people are
[4:47:45] reading these proposals either
[4:47:47] during their work or they keep
[4:47:48] taking home there are five
[4:47:50] proposals, eight proposals.
[4:47:52] If you ask me I have no choice
[4:47:53] but to take them home and read
[4:47:55] them on the weekend so this is
[4:47:57] to incentivize people, you do
[4:47:58] get one day whether it's five
[4:48:00] proposal rates, it has changed
[4:48:02] the mindset that there's
[4:48:03] something in return.
[4:48:04] I think it's working.
[4:48:06] >>commissioner regalado: but
[4:48:08] namita, to my point we have
[4:48:10] cases where people are walking
[4:48:11] in saying they haven't even
[4:48:13] read the executive summary,
[4:48:14] that is a thing.
[4:48:15] We get complaints about it all
[4:48:17] the time it's not a new
[4:48:21] complaint, is an ongoing
[4:48:23] complaint and I appreciate the
[4:48:24] directors are now participating
[4:48:26] in the selection but it's
[4:48:28] challenging for us to know that
[4:48:29] they are not there desk.
[4:48:31] There getting vacation time and
[4:48:33] say they are not prepared or
[4:48:36] they haven't read.
[4:48:38] >>chair: instance we should
[4:48:39] keep record in the person that
[4:48:44] says they cannot read or review
[4:48:46] the information should never be
[4:48:48] part of one again for sure
[4:48:49] because they said it on the
[4:48:50] record.
[4:48:51] They said it and it's recorded
[4:48:53] so I agree with at least
[4:48:54] keeping record but the other
[4:48:56] thing what I would suggest on
[4:49:01] the rest of it is let this play
[4:49:02] out for a couple months, see if
[4:49:04] it works a lot of these things
[4:49:06] we MAY not need to revisit but
[4:49:07] it's changed a little bit,
[4:49:09] let's see what works now and if
[4:49:15] not we revisit it.
[4:49:17] >>commissioner regalado: there
[4:49:19] certain departments we need
[4:49:21] these people to approve these
[4:49:22] so they need to get back to
[4:49:24] their desk read the procurement
[4:49:25] part is important but so is the
[4:49:27] everyday work of miami dade
[4:49:29] county and when you combine all
[4:49:32] these things it gets a little
[4:49:32] complex.
[4:49:34] I hope, I think this idea of
[4:49:35] reporting back on this and
[4:49:37] saying how it's working is a
[4:49:37] good idea.
[4:49:40] I think having the directors
[4:49:51] participate, having some
[4:49:52] accountability and making sure
[4:49:54] someone is not overly
[4:49:56] participating in selection
[4:49:58] committees because some of the
[4:49:59] complaints I got is the same
[4:50:01] people not reading, not knowing
[4:50:03] but racking up all the vacation
[4:50:05] time and disappearing so I'm
[4:50:07] glad the ai or however we are
[4:50:08] doing will try to curtail that
[4:50:10] but I think the board should
[4:50:12] also be aware of the reporting
[4:50:14] on this in case we need to
[4:50:15] course correct.
[4:50:19] That's it.
[4:50:25] >>chair: any other discussions?
[4:50:27] Commissioner steinberg said she
[4:50:30] wants double, you want to time
[4:50:31] commissioner regalado?
[4:50:32] I know there was a motion
[4:50:33] already.
[4:50:35] To move them all but I think I
[4:50:45] don't know, I will take them up
[4:50:46] separately.
[4:50:52] Okay, go ahead commissioner
[4:50:53] steinberg.
[4:50:54] >>commissioner steinberg: I
[4:50:56] think it's very important since
[4:50:57] we are making some changes
[4:50:59] today we get a lot of feedback
[4:51:01] and I appreciate some of the
[4:51:02] amendments that this does come
[4:51:06] back in some form of a further
[4:51:07] update.
[4:51:09] I don't know if you feel six
[4:51:10] months or a year is enough time
[4:51:21] so we can incorporate and
[4:51:23] fine-tune to make sure we are
[4:51:25] cognizant of everything we are
[4:51:26] doing so we can try to
[4:51:28] eliminate as many unintended
[4:51:29] consequences as possible so I
[4:51:31] make that into a recommendation
[4:51:33] or amendment into what we do.
[4:51:35] >>chair: commissioner cohen
[4:51:36] higgins.
[4:51:38] >>commissioner cohen higgins: I
[4:51:40] move 5e and any amendments.
[4:51:41] >>chair: seconded by
[4:51:43] commissioner gonzalez.
[4:51:45] >>commissioner regalado:
[4:51:47] commissioner steinberg made a
[4:51:48] good point, we need a report,
[4:51:50] are we running it staff through
[4:51:51] all of them?
[4:51:52] I'm happy to second her
[4:51:56] friendly amendment.
[4:51:59] >>chair: what did you suggest?
[4:52:02] Procurement takes a bit so I
[4:52:05] think that the 12 month mark
[4:52:07] and just because procurement
[4:52:10] takes a bit so at 12 months we
[4:52:17] need namita a report and make
[4:52:19] the adjustments as needed so as
[4:52:20] amended for all of them with
[4:52:23] the reporting so there is a
[4:52:25] motion which was it?
[4:52:32] Seconded by commissioner
[4:52:33] gonzalez.
[4:52:38] So item 5e substitute,
[4:52:40] >>chair: likely amendment on
[4:52:41] the floor.
[4:52:46] >> amend 5e to require
[4:52:48] disclosure of whether a
[4:52:49] protester objected to issues
[4:52:51] raised during a procurement
[4:52:52] process.
[4:52:54] >>chair: yes, okay, call the
[4:52:57] roll.
[4:53:06] >>commissioner gilbert:
[4:53:07] >>commissioner gilbert: this is
[4:53:10] a cosmetic change, yes.
[4:53:13] >>commissioner gonzalez: for.
[4:53:15] >>commissioner hardemon:
[4:53:17] >>commissioner lopez:
[4:53:19] >>commissioner milian orbis:
[4:53:20] >>commissioner regalado: yes,
[4:53:23] and it's data, not cosmetic.
[4:53:24] >>commissioner gilbert:
[4:53:25] lipgloss.
[4:53:27] >>commissioner steinberg:
[4:53:29] >>commissioner bermudez:
[4:53:31] >>commissioner cohen higgins:
[4:53:32] >>senator garcia:
[4:53:34] >>vice chair mcghee:
[4:53:35] >>chair: I vote yes.
[4:53:38] >> motion passes unanimously.
[4:53:40] >>chair: commissioner cohen
[4:53:42] higgins.
[4:53:43] >>commissioner cohen higgins:
[4:53:45] 5f and any agreed-upon
[4:53:48] amendments.
[4:53:50] >>chair: second by commissioner
[4:53:52] lopez, want to be the
[4:53:52] amendments?
[4:53:56] Want to read the amendments.
[4:53:58] >> amended to remove
[4:53:59] implementation recommendations
[4:54:05] 910 and 11, currently sections
[4:54:07] 12 and three of the item were
[4:54:09] amended to amend the
[4:54:11] corresponding code provisions
[4:54:12] implementing those
[4:54:13] recommendations.
[4:54:15] They also have reporting
[4:54:16] requirements.
[4:54:18] >>chair: please call the roll.
[4:54:20] >>commissioner gonzalez: for.
[4:54:22] >>commissioner hardemon:
[4:54:24] >>commissioner lopez: yes.
[4:54:26] >>commissioner milian orbis:
[4:54:28] >>commissioner regalado: yes.
[4:54:30] >>commissioner steinberg:
[4:54:32] >>commissioner bermudez: no.
[4:54:34] >>commissioner cohen higgins:
[4:54:34] for.
[4:54:37] >>senator garcia:
[4:54:40] >>commissioner gilbert: yes.
[4:54:42] >>vice chair mcghee: no.
[4:54:44] >>chair: yes.
[4:54:49] >> motion passes 1010 2.
[4:54:51] >> we move 5g substitute and
[4:55:02] agreed-upon amendments.
[4:55:04] >> amend section 1 to require
[4:55:06] applicants for the leasing of
[4:55:08] county owned property to object
[4:55:09] to terms of the counties
[4:55:11] standard ground lease where the
[4:55:13] applicant has foreclosed
[4:55:15] releasing objections during
[4:55:16] negotiation and adding a
[4:55:18] one-year requirement.
[4:55:20] >>chair: clerk please call the
[4:55:22] roll, moved and seconded by
[4:55:25] commissioner regalado.
[4:55:26] >>commissioner hardemon:
[4:55:27] against.
[4:55:29] >>commissioner lopez: yes.
[4:55:31] >>commissioner milian orbis:
[4:55:33] >>commissioner regalado: yes.
[4:55:35] >>commissioner steinberg:
[4:55:36] >>commissioner bermudez:
[4:55:41] english no, spanish no, no.
[4:55:43] >>commissioner cohen higgins:
[4:55:45] >>senator garcia:
[4:55:48] >>commissioner gilbert: yes.
[4:55:51] >>vice chair mcghee: no.
[4:55:56] >>chair: yes.
[4:56:02] >> motion passes 8 to 4.
[4:56:04] >> move 5h substitute and any
[4:56:06] agreed-upon amendments.
[4:56:15] >>chair: seconded by gonzalez.
[4:56:17] >> eliminating dropping the
[4:56:18] lowest score, keep that
[4:56:20] recommendation a set if the
[4:56:21] lowest score deviates 25% or
[4:56:23] more from the average score
[4:56:24] awarded this score shall be
[4:56:26] dropped, also having a
[4:56:30] reporting requirement within a
[4:56:31] year.
[4:56:33] >>commissioner regalado: we
[4:56:34] talked about providing
[4:56:36] information to the board
[4:56:38] regarding change orders in this
[4:56:45] one when it comes to the board.
[4:56:47] >> it was directed to staff to
[4:56:50] approve the agenda to include
[4:56:53] it in the agenda.
[4:56:56] >>chair: clerk please call the
[4:56:57] roll.
[4:56:59] >>commissioner lopez: yes.
[4:57:01] >>commissioner milian orbis:
[4:57:03] >>commissioner regalado: yes.
[4:57:05] >>commissioner steinberg:
[4:57:07] >>commissioner bermudez: no.
[4:57:09] >>commissioner cohen higgins:
[4:57:11] for.
[4:57:13] >>senator garcia:
[4:57:16] >>commissioner gilbert: yes.
[4:57:19] >>commissioner gonzalez: for.
[4:57:20] >>commissioner hardemon:
[4:57:23] >>vice chair mcghee: yes.
[4:57:27] >>chair: yes.
[4:57:31] >> motion passes 9 to 3.
[4:57:33] >>chair: is that concluding our
[4:57:36] public hearing items?
[4:57:37] MADAM Attorney or MR. Attorney
[4:57:39] if you can read now second
[4:58:09] reading items.
[4:58:11] >> you'd like for me to read
[4:58:14] them all?
[4:58:16] >>chair: yes please if you have
[4:58:18] any bifurcation requests you
[4:58:19] can read those as well.
[4:58:22] >> seven a relates two for hire
[4:58:37] motor vehicles amending 3183
[4:58:39] and 304 of the code revising
[4:58:40] provisions relating to the
[4:58:42] temporary permanent removal of
[4:58:44] chauffeurs from the ambassador
[4:58:45] cab program providing
[4:58:47] eligibility requirements
[4:58:49] providing conditions under
[4:58:50] which chauffeurs removed from
[4:58:52] the ambassador cab program MAY
[4:58:54] regain eligibility to apply to
[4:58:56] operate and ambassador cab,
[4:58:58] making technical and conforming
[4:59:00] changes providing separability
[4:59:02] inclusion in the code and an
[4:59:03] effective date, 7b relates to
[4:59:05] rules of procedure amending
[4:59:13] section 2-one revising
[4:59:15] requirements related to
[4:59:17] notification provided by the
[4:59:18] mayor's designee to all
[4:59:20] district commissioners of
[4:59:22] matters originating with the
[4:59:24] administration providing
[4:59:26] separability inclusion in the
[4:59:28] code and an effective date, 7c
[4:59:30] relates to passenger motor
[4:59:31] carrier vehicles amending
[4:59:33] section 31 102 and 31 107 of
[4:59:35] the code revising vehicle age
[4:59:36] requirements for certain
[4:59:38] passenger motor vehicles
[4:59:40] amending definitions making
[4:59:41] technical and conforming
[4:59:44] changes providing separability
[4:59:46] inclusion in the code and an
[4:59:46] effective date.
[4:59:48] 7e is an ordinance relating to
[4:59:50] fire prevention amending
[4:59:51] chapter 14 of the code,
[4:59:53] updating title, amending
[4:59:55] definitions, changing
[4:59:56] requirements for an owner
[4:59:58] statement, amending procedures
[4:59:59] for reveals of fire code
[5:00:01] violations, providing for the
[5:00:03] recording of consent agreements
[5:00:05] and notices of violation,
[5:00:07] requiring building owners and
[5:00:08] occupants notify the chief
[5:00:10] official for correction of
[5:00:11] certain violations, authorizing
[5:00:13] the chief fire official to
[5:00:15] order disconnection of
[5:00:19] utilities and structures,
[5:00:20] upending fire code violations
[5:00:23] under specific circumstances,
[5:00:24] making technical amendments to
[5:00:26] the fire prevention code
[5:00:28] updating the fire alarm
[5:00:29] ordinance providing for the
[5:00:31] sale of exempt fireworks in
[5:00:32] accordance with section 791.04
[5:00:34] of the statutes, providing for
[5:00:36] the designation and posting to
[5:00:38] identify structures sharing a
[5:00:40] street address updating
[5:00:42] requirements for submittal and
[5:00:43] review of emergency action
[5:00:45] plans, providing for the
[5:00:47] testing of lighting equipment,
[5:00:49] providing for the reporting of
[5:00:51] required maintenance activities
[5:00:53] for fire protection systems,
[5:00:54] fighting for the installation
[5:00:57] of emergency power systems and
[5:00:58] installation of water supply
[5:01:00] for firefighting outside the
[5:01:02] urban development boundary,
[5:01:04] making technical and conforming
[5:01:06] changes amending section 8 ml
[5:01:08] and vote imposing civil
[5:01:10] penalties and providing
[5:01:12] separability inclusion in the
[5:01:14] code and an effective date and
[5:01:34] 7 a supplements, 7f relates to
[5:01:36] the comprehensive development
[5:01:38] master plan providing
[5:01:39] disposition of application see
[5:01:41] dmv 2113 located west of
[5:01:43] northwest 137 avenue and sr 836
[5:01:45] interchange and north side of
[5:01:47] theoretical northwest 6th
[5:01:48] street filed by kelly tractor
[5:01:50] in the MAY 2023 cycle to amend
[5:01:53] the counties comprehensive
[5:01:54] development master plan
[5:01:56] providing separability
[5:01:58] exclusion from the code and an
[5:01:59] effective date and supplements
[5:02:00] 1, 2 and 3.
[5:02:02] Those are your second reading
[5:02:04] items and I have a request to
[5:02:05] bifurcate items 7e and did
[5:02:07] supplements as well as 7a.
[5:02:08] Then the only requests are 7e
[5:02:09] and 7f.
[5:02:11] >>chair: do I have a motion on
[5:02:13] the remainder of non-bifurcated
[5:02:14] items, second by gonzalez,
[5:02:17] clerk please call the roll.
[5:02:19] >>commissioner milian orbis:
[5:02:21] >>commissioner regalado:
[5:02:23] >>commissioner steinberg:
[5:02:25] >>commissioner bermudez:
[5:02:29] >>commissioner cohen higgins:
[5:02:29] for.
[5:02:31] >>senator garcia:
[5:02:36] >>commissioner gilbert: yes.
[5:02:38] >>commissioner gonzalez: for.
[5:02:40] >>commissioner hardemon:
[5:02:42] >>commissioner lopez: yes.
[5:02:44] >>vice chair mcghee:
[5:02:46] >>chair: I vote yes.
[5:02:52] >> motion passes unanimously.
[5:02:53] >>commissioner gilbert: show me
[5:02:56] as cosponsor on 7a.
[5:03:00] >>chair: 7e was bifurcated by
[5:03:04] commissioner lopez.
[5:03:06] You are recognized.
[5:03:08] >>commissioner lopez: thank you
[5:03:15] MR. Chair. I have an issue with
[5:03:17] the supplement that removes the
[5:03:19] proposed recordkeeping
[5:03:21] requirement that was intended
[5:03:23] to ensure certain fireworks
[5:03:24] sales are being conducted in
[5:03:31] accordance with the florida
[5:03:33] statute, I was in the house
[5:03:34] when we decided it was
[5:03:35] important to ensure
[5:03:37] accountability because we have
[5:03:39] exemptions of the types of
[5:03:40] fireworks that can be sold and
[5:03:43] it's only through recordkeeping
[5:03:45] we can keep people accountable
[5:03:47] so I'd like to, I can't vote on
[5:03:48] the item if they don't replace
[5:03:50] the record-keeping document
[5:03:52] which is the big accountability
[5:03:53] provision.
[5:03:56] >>chair: commissioner gonzalez.
[5:03:58] >>commissioner gonzalez: first
[5:04:00] to the county attorney's office
[5:04:02] there's an amendment or
[5:04:04] something you need to add.
[5:04:06] >> commissioner gonzalez as an
[5:04:08] amendment and he moves to amend
[5:04:10] agenda item 7e to this item and
[5:04:13] adopt agenda item 7e as
[5:04:14] amended.
[5:04:16] >>commissioner gonzalez: to
[5:04:17] commissioner lopez, I don't
[5:04:19] disagree, I think you're right
[5:04:21] thank you for bringing it up.
[5:04:22] The reason we took it out
[5:04:24] initially, we had extensive
[5:04:28] conversations with fire along
[5:04:30] with the county attorney's
[5:04:32] office and they can explain it
[5:04:33] better than I but it seems
[5:04:35] there might be a preemptive
[5:04:36] issue here it seems like it
[5:04:39] might arise litigation because
[5:04:40] of some clarity that's needed
[5:04:41] in the statute.
[5:04:43] That's the reason we took it
[5:04:45] out, I don't disagree with you
[5:04:46] and I be happy to put it back
[5:04:48] in but I'm told it could cause
[5:04:50] possible litigation, that's
[5:04:51] what I've been told.
[5:04:57] I'm sure they can explain
[5:04:57] further.
[5:04:59] >> we've been together with the
[5:05:01] fire department in
[5:05:03] conversations with different
[5:05:05] stakeholders on this issue.
[5:05:15] The statute is less then clear
[5:05:17] about what the department as in
[5:05:18] this particular area, 99% of
[5:05:21] this ordinance is unrelated to
[5:05:22] fireworks, it's local fire code
[5:05:24] so this is just one piece where
[5:05:26] as of today I don't want to get
[5:05:33] into the different litigation
[5:05:35] strategies but the only two
[5:05:36] things the statute is clear
[5:05:38] about number one it's law
[5:05:40] enforcement tasked with
[5:05:41] enforcing statute, number two
[5:05:43] you can use not a model of
[5:05:44] clarity but we want to be clear
[5:05:46] what the regulatory authority
[5:05:46] is.
[5:05:49] We differ to the warm-up to
[5:05:52] talk about this issue but
[5:05:55] that's where we are on the
[5:05:55] legality.
[5:05:58] >> I can't imagine asking
[5:06:00] someone to keep records of
[5:06:03] their litigation, that is what
[5:06:19] the legislative intent was.
[5:06:21] It's all because we have
[5:06:23] exemptions of certain types of
[5:06:24] fireworks that can be sold so
[5:06:26] in order for us to understand
[5:06:29] whether or not they are going
[5:06:30] to do the right thing
[5:06:31] record-keeping is the thing so
[5:06:34] I disagree wholeheartedly with
[5:06:41] the county attorney's
[5:06:42] perception or the fire
[5:06:43] department's perception.
[5:06:45] i know what the legislature
[5:06:47] meant and I believe asking
[5:06:49] someone to keep records so we
[5:06:51] can ensure they are selling the
[5:06:53] appropriate fireworks and not
[5:06:53] those that are illegal
[5:06:55] shouldn't arise to any kind of
[5:06:57] mitigation and if that were the
[5:06:59] case we have to get rid of all
[5:07:00] record-keeping for anyone,
[5:07:03] that's absurd in my opinion.
[5:07:05] >>chair: so what are we doing
[5:07:06] here, you want to say it for
[5:07:12] all the commissioners.
[5:07:14] >>commissioner gonzalez: I'm
[5:07:16] happy to work with fire in the
[5:07:18] county attorney's office to
[5:07:19] figure out because she makes a
[5:07:21] valid point she was in
[5:07:22] tallahassee when this was
[5:07:23] getting done.
[5:07:25] But per the conversation we had
[5:07:27] I will move it as is, would
[5:07:29] love to work with commissioner
[5:07:31] lopez office to make sure we
[5:07:32] remedy the record-keeping at
[5:07:39] some point.
[5:07:42] >>chair: clerk please call the
[5:07:42] roll.
[5:07:47] >>chair: we don't have a quorum
[5:07:47] .
[5:07:51] >>chair: second by commissioner
[5:07:53] cohen higgins, call the roll,
[5:07:55] commissioner hardemon.
[5:07:57] >>commissioner hardemon: is the
[5:08:02] amendment accepted?
[5:08:04] But they are required to do it
[5:08:05] right now, they are required to
[5:08:08] keep records now.
[5:08:10] >>chair: you MAY, yes, just
[5:08:14] answer.
[5:08:15] >> there is no requirement
[5:08:17] under state law for companies
[5:08:19] selling under this exemption to
[5:08:21] keep any records at all.
[5:08:28] Relating to this.
[5:08:30] >> how are you removing it
[5:08:45] then?
[5:08:47] >>commissioner hardemon: I will
[5:08:48] allow commissioner lopez to
[5:08:50] engage further because as I
[5:08:52] understand if they are allowed
[5:08:53] now and I have an issue with
[5:08:55] keeping the record because in
[5:08:57] the district I represent we
[5:08:58] have a lot of things that go
[5:09:00] bang in the middle of the night
[5:09:01] that cause great injury to
[5:09:02] people.
[5:09:04] And we have a proliferation of
[5:09:07] tenants that are put up and
[5:09:09] they sell what is deemed to be
[5:09:11] fireworks or explosive devices.
[5:09:13] So it's a mystery for me as an
[5:09:15] individual and the people who
[5:09:17] live in the community to have
[5:09:20] to deal with this especially
[5:09:22] having these illegal things
[5:09:26] that go bang in the night if
[5:09:28] that's your technical
[5:09:30] definition but people use them
[5:09:33] in ways in which they are
[5:09:35] deleterious to our community
[5:09:36] because they throw them at
[5:09:38] houses, cars and things of that
[5:09:38] nature.
[5:09:40] If we knew where they were
[5:09:49] buying them from or we knew
[5:09:50] people selling these things
[5:09:52] that go bang in the middle of
[5:09:54] the night if they kept proper
[5:09:56] record we checked those records
[5:09:57] because I was told the fire
[5:09:59] department checks but if they
[5:10:00] are checking it doesn't really
[5:10:01] do us any good.
[5:10:03] This part of it really concerns
[5:10:03] me.
[5:10:05] I too share the same sentiment
[5:10:07] that MISS Lopez shares and I
[5:10:10] want to have that added to
[5:10:10] this.
[5:10:15] >>chair: commissioner steinberg
[5:10:16] .
[5:10:17] >>commissioner steinberg: I
[5:10:19] understand this is 1% of the
[5:10:21] overall item, however I don't
[5:10:27] know that it's, I haven't heard
[5:10:30] we are absolutely preempted or
[5:10:30] required.
[5:10:32] i haven't heard that.
[5:10:32] Would
[5:10:35] say we keep it in their.
[5:10:38] And you know, let them figure
[5:10:43] it out.
[5:10:45] But what is tallahassee going
[5:10:54] to do, I'm asking for
[5:10:55] record-keeping.
[5:10:56] >>commissioner gonzalez: can I
[5:10:57] be recognized?
[5:10:59] I'm not opposed to it.
[5:11:00] I mean, I would like to leave
[5:11:03] it in but I'm deferring to the
[5:11:08] county attorney's office.
[5:11:10] >>commissioner regalado: if I
[5:11:12] could proffer a solution we all
[5:11:14] agree is not expressed but
[5:11:15] that's their legal opinion so
[5:11:16] I'd tell you to leave it in.
[5:11:18] You could maintain or enhance
[5:11:22] reporting unless expressly
[5:11:24] prohibited by existing state
[5:11:24] law.
[5:11:28] And then your good.
[5:11:30] Because if it's expressly
[5:11:30] prohibited by state law, but
[5:11:33] give yourself the flexibility
[5:11:38] of being able to do that.
[5:11:40] >>chair: cho it amended and I
[5:11:48] will call commissioner lopez.
[5:11:50] Seconded, it was already
[5:11:54] seconded I guess.
[5:11:56] >>commissioner bermudez: I
[5:11:57] agree with the amendment and
[5:12:02] also commissioner lopez.
[5:12:04] >> we are including it with the
[5:12:05] caveat as long as it's allowed
[5:12:06] by the state.
[5:12:11] For as long as it's legal.
[5:12:13] >>commissioner regalado: as
[5:12:15] long as it's not expressly
[5:12:17] prohibited, it has to be
[5:12:26] expressly prohibited.
[5:12:28] >>commissioner bermudez: the
[5:12:30] governor and his buddies can do
[5:12:32] a lot of things so I've got to
[5:12:33] make sure it's expressly stated
[5:12:35] here that it allowed, we have a
[5:12:37] former state representative
[5:12:38] here and if she feels
[5:12:40] comfortable I will be more than
[5:12:42] happy to support it I have the
[5:12:44] same concerns as commissioner
[5:12:46] hardemon and that commissioner
[5:12:48] lopez had which is if it's not
[5:12:49] there, okay, that's fine but
[5:12:51] just to be clear because it
[5:12:53] comes to tallahassee doesn't
[5:12:54] make it right.
[5:12:56] >>chair: clerk please call the
[5:12:57] roll.
[5:12:57] No, no.
[5:13:04] Hold on, it's gilbert.
[5:13:06] >>commissioner gilbert: I'm
[5:13:07] curious because when this issue
[5:13:09] was put to me earlier I asked
[5:13:11] the attorney about that vary
[5:13:12] solution and the attorney's
[5:13:14] office I think had a problem
[5:13:15] with that as a solution.
[5:13:17] Because it wasn't that
[5:13:20] difficult to get to.
[5:13:22] So I asked about that solution
[5:13:23] and they had a problem so I
[5:13:25] want to make sure we are clear
[5:13:27] and I don't know whether part
[5:13:28] of the language they read
[5:13:34] didn't say if there was
[5:13:36] preempted but we are being told
[5:13:38] we are preempting so is there a
[5:13:39] general preemption with regard
[5:13:41] to fireworks or what is the
[5:13:42] preemption?
[5:13:45] There is preemptive language
[5:13:46] somewhere.
[5:13:47] Where is the preemptive
[5:13:48] language because I'm pretty
[5:14:01] sure they're not just making it
[5:14:01] up.
[5:14:02] >> there is language, if I MAY.
[5:14:04] Nytime that we take action
[5:14:06] or we put something in code
[5:14:06] there is risk.
[5:14:08] Here is no
[5:14:09] express preemption on this in
[5:14:11] our opinion, there is language
[5:14:13] in the statute that says a
[5:14:15] county or municipality cannot
[5:14:16] directly interfere with the
[5:14:18] city on fireworks, that is in
[5:14:20] statute, whether record-keeping
[5:14:21] falls into that relation is an
[5:14:24] open question.
[5:14:26] >>commissioner gilbert: thank
[5:14:27] you commissioner lopez.
[5:14:27] Hat's
[5:14:29] not a preemption.
[5:14:35] That's not a preemption to
[5:14:36] record-keeping.
[5:14:37] This sale is not a preemption,
[5:14:39] that shouldn't be acknowledged
[5:14:43] so I think we can hand it back
[5:14:43] in.
[5:14:50] >>chair: clerk call the roll.
[5:14:51] As excluded.
[5:14:54] Clerk call the roll please.
[5:14:56] >>commissioner regalado:
[5:14:58] >>commissioner steinberg:
[5:15:00] >>commissioner bermudez: as
[5:15:02] amended as commissioner
[5:15:03] steinberg said.
[5:15:05] >>commissioner lopez:
[5:15:08] >>senator garcia: aye.
[5:15:10] >>commissioner gilbert:
[5:15:13] >>commissioner gonzalez:
[5:15:15] >>commissioner hardemon: for as
[5:15:16] amended.
[5:15:18] >>commissioner lopez:
[5:15:21] >>commissioner milian orbis:
[5:15:23] >>vice chair mcghee: yes, as
[5:15:24] included according to nikki
[5:15:24] steinberg.
[5:15:26] >>chair: I vote yes.
[5:15:41] >> motion passes unanimously.
[5:15:43] >>commissioner bermudez: can I
[5:15:45] release, my question about
[5:15:46] square footage was answered, we
[5:15:49] will talk about that later.
[5:15:50] >>commissioner regalado: I
[5:15:52] would like to release 2.
[5:15:54] >>chair: are you guys leaving
[5:15:54] or something?
[5:15:59] So 7f.
[5:16:01] Does the director need to read
[5:16:02] anything?
[5:16:03] Anything needs to be read on
[5:16:03] the record?
[5:16:09] Public hearing has already been
[5:16:09] had.
[5:16:11] Motion to approve, all right, i
[5:16:13] have a motion.
[5:16:21] Motion to reset, hold on.
[5:16:25] >> I want to clarify, I have a
[5:16:32] tooth fusing stat.
[5:16:34] >>chair: what do you want to do
[5:16:36] first?
[5:16:38] >> I defer to commissioner
[5:16:45] bermudez.
[5:16:47] >>chair: there is a motion to
[5:16:48] move the item, gilbert
[5:16:49] seconded.
[5:16:56] Commissioner steinberg.
[5:16:58] >>commissioner steinberg: I was
[5:16:59] saying at the conclusion of
[5:17:01] this item I would like to be
[5:17:01] recognized.
[5:17:08] >> my understanding is it's a
[5:17:10] motion to approve the staff
[5:17:11] report and changes reference
[5:17:13] with exceptions for covenant.
[5:17:15] And standard conditions that
[5:17:17] the applicant would be prepared
[5:17:18] to submit the executed covenant
[5:17:20] and sufficient opinion of
[5:17:20] title.
[5:17:22] Any necessary rejoinders within
[5:17:30] seven days of the application.
[5:17:31] >>chair: that's one motion for
[5:17:34] the supplements.
[5:17:36] All right, so it's been moved,
[5:17:37] it's been seconded.
[5:17:39] T
[5:17:40] commissioner.
[5:17:41] >>commissioner regalado: I want
[5:17:44] to clarify a few things with
[5:17:52] staff because we've made
[5:17:54] changes to the application and
[5:17:56] get something on the record so
[5:17:57] I want to thank everyone that
[5:17:59] came out and has reached out to
[5:18:00] talk about this, I want to
[5:18:04] thank the applicant in its
[5:18:05] current form it is best in
[5:18:07] class in terms of wetland
[5:18:08] protection and for the folks
[5:18:10] who have spoken against this I
[5:18:21] want to say concern is not
[5:18:22] conservation.
[5:18:24] Talking about preserving
[5:18:25] wetlands and actually
[5:18:26] preserving wetlands are two
[5:18:28] very different things.
[5:18:30] The covenant does the second
[5:18:31] one and that's why
[5:18:33] uncomfortable supporting it
[5:18:34] today.
[5:18:35] It puts 80 acres of wetlands
[5:18:37] into public ownership on any
[5:18:39] new program permanently with
[5:18:41] the money to maintain it and it
[5:18:43] does it on the record with an
[5:18:45] enforceable instrument only
[5:18:46] this board can change.
[5:18:48] The designation based on the
[5:18:50] wetland protection is a wish
[5:18:52] and a parcel with an owner,
[5:18:54] maintenance plan in perpetuity
[5:18:55] and funding mechanism is a
[5:18:57] management plan and that's what
[5:18:59] we need here is a management
[5:19:00] plan.
[5:19:01] This land is not christine,
[5:19:03] commissioner cohen higgins has
[5:19:04] told us time and again, part of
[5:19:07] it is under covenant, city and
[5:19:08] privately held with no public
[5:19:10] assets and no dedicated
[5:19:12] maintenance dollars, the rest
[5:19:13] is being torn up by atvs every
[5:19:15] weekend and nobody is
[5:19:16] accountable for the damage
[5:19:17] being done.
[5:19:18] Last time we talked about this
[5:19:20] we had so many people speak on
[5:19:22] it and I wanted to give an
[5:19:23] example that drives home what
[5:19:27] condition this land is in.
[5:19:29] So I offer to you the exempt
[5:19:30] item, bird island is a
[5:19:31] cautionary tale.
[5:19:34] Nobody disputes it deserves
[5:19:36] protection, and it's being this
[5:19:38] void anyway by jet skis because
[5:19:40] protection without funding and
[5:19:45] enforcement is dust a talking
[5:19:46] point and not preservation.
[5:19:48] What this application does
[5:19:50] after our amendments I think is
[5:19:51] very important to highlight.
[5:20:10] We are talking about 63 acres
[5:20:12] preserved on site, right of way
[5:20:14] does not count towards it, if a
[5:20:15] road or expressly eats into it
[5:20:17] we have to add acreage on the
[5:20:18] property.
[5:20:20] Of these 21 acres are preserved
[5:20:21] off-site and when we talked
[5:20:23] about mitigation credits we
[5:20:24] changed it so it would be
[5:20:26] within miami-dade county and
[5:20:28] this doesn't end up somewhere
[5:20:29] else, conveyance is important
[5:20:33] in terms of the program and at
[5:20:35] no cost to the county because
[5:20:37] it comes with maintenance in
[5:20:37] perpetuity.
[5:20:39] I don't think moving forward we
[5:20:41] have should have conversations
[5:20:43] about wetlands without
[5:20:44] including ownership of these
[5:20:46] wetlands and if there's
[5:20:48] anything we've learned time and
[5:20:50] again that a covenant is just
[5:20:52] that, something someone can
[5:20:54] overturn but the ownership is
[5:20:55] something that is
[5:20:56] transformative and a standard
[5:20:58] we should move forward.
[5:21:00] One of the things included on
[5:21:02] here that is important is a
[5:21:02] conveyance.
[5:21:04] This is not a promise but
[5:21:06] something we will hold them to
[5:21:07] before they open their doors.
[5:21:09] We have a funding mechanism
[5:21:11] that funds maintenance and we
[5:21:13] know we have issues with eo, I
[5:21:14] look forward to that
[5:21:15] conversation.
[5:21:16] We're going to maintain it in
[5:21:18] its natural state free of any
[5:21:20] exotic vegetation under the
[5:21:22] maintenance plan or er would
[5:21:22] approve that.
[5:21:24] We have illegally a
[5:21:26] conservation easement
[5:21:27] requirement for the
[5:21:28] preservation area pursuant to
[5:21:30] section 204.06 of florida
[5:21:31] statute and the preservation
[5:21:34] area is carved out for district
[5:21:34] boundaries.
[5:21:36] We've also dealt with the
[5:21:38] possibility of it being an
[5:21:41] archaeological site and
[5:21:42] confirmed that there's going to
[5:21:45] be no physical alterations to
[5:21:46] that piece that was one of the
[5:21:47] requirements I think was
[5:21:49] mindful and this is the first
[5:21:51] time we approved a wildlife
[5:21:53] underpass, I think it's very
[5:21:53] thoughtful.
[5:21:55] We spent a lot of time figuring
[5:21:57] out how to do it but I think
[5:21:58] moving forward it's something
[5:22:00] we will be able to require in
[5:22:02] future applications and you can
[5:22:04] check that out in exhibit e.
[5:22:05] The offset acreage goes first
[5:22:07] to the north trail basin second
[5:22:09] to the tribe basin, priority
[5:22:10] order keeps the land under
[5:22:11] lease.
[5:22:13] We've talked so much about this
[5:22:15] and with this ownership we can
[5:22:27] go to the government and talk
[5:22:28] about this and not just wish
[5:22:30] the federal government will
[5:22:31] give us money.
[5:22:32] O one of the
[5:22:33] things we also talked about is
[5:22:35] not exporting our mitigation
[5:22:36] anywhere else.
[5:22:38] We have a signed and sealed
[5:22:40] master plan, threatened and
[5:22:41] endangered species survey
[5:22:43] before any permit or
[5:22:44] development order were
[5:22:45] reviewed.
[5:22:46] The full site plan review for
[5:22:48] the property in all phases
[5:22:50] before any new permits which I
[5:22:51] think is important and no
[5:22:56] commercial vehicle restored
[5:22:57] within 25 feet of wetlands.
[5:22:59] There is no residential units
[5:23:01] except for one unit for
[5:23:02] maintenance and security and
[5:23:06] the ratio is.5.
[5:23:08] the covenant runs with the land
[5:23:10] for 30 years auto renewing and
[5:23:11] it can only but be modified by
[5:23:14] this board and the county can
[5:23:24] pull permits if it is violated,
[5:23:25] that addresses a lot of the
[5:23:27] concerns we have as to what's
[5:23:28] happened not in this
[5:23:30] application what other
[5:23:32] applications and beyond the
[5:23:34] environmental protections we
[5:23:35] will also add some very
[5:23:37] thoughtful protections for our
[5:23:39] county for all our residents
[5:23:41] and I'm proud of the workforce
[5:23:42] training including neuro-
[5:23:43] divergent students and
[5:23:45] emergency access to heavy
[5:23:51] equipment is a game changer.
[5:23:53] I was in broward talking with
[5:23:54] some folks and they had an
[5:23:56] issue with this, broward wanted
[5:23:58] to know why miami-dade was
[5:24:00] going to have better access to
[5:24:01] kelly but during a declared
[5:24:03] emergency miami-dade county
[5:24:05] gets access and first priority
[5:24:06] access to the tractors, not
[5:24:08] their contractors, not their
[5:24:10] vendors, miami dade county,
[5:24:12] this is heavy equipment on the
[5:24:13] ground the day after a storm
[5:24:15] this is something that will be
[5:24:17] important as we deal with
[5:24:18] natural disasters.
[5:24:19] The last thing is there is
[5:24:21] another property in one of the
[5:24:31] additions that's mindful given
[5:24:33] what has happened to this board
[5:24:34] in recent history in terms of
[5:24:36] ownership of parcels that MAY
[5:24:37] meet our expansion, before
[5:24:39] listing the current
[5:24:41] headquarters which is 41 x 24
[5:24:42] acres plus the 9.43 acres
[5:24:43] adjacent to the parcel,
[5:24:45] miami-dade county mayor will be
[5:24:47] giving notice at 120 days and
[5:24:49] copying for the listing, that's
[5:24:51] important what's happened to us
[5:24:53] that we are also modifying this
[5:24:55] to include if that property
[5:24:56] does move forward miami-dade
[5:24:58] county has the ability to
[5:24:59] purchase that first.
[5:25:00] So I think all these changes
[5:25:03] have dramatically changed this
[5:25:05] application and I hope everyone
[5:25:06] will consider what staff has to
[5:25:08] say and how different it was
[5:25:09] from what was first proposed
[5:25:11] but I'm happy to support it.
[5:25:13] >>chair: clerk, please call the
[5:25:15] roll.
[5:25:16] >>commissioner steinberg: no.
[5:25:18] >>commissioner bermudez: yes.
[5:25:20] >>commissioner cohen higgins: I
[5:25:21] vote no.
[5:25:22] >>senator garcia:
[5:25:24] >>commissioner gilbert: yes.
[5:25:26] >>commissioner gonzalez: for.
[5:25:28] >>commissioner hardemon:
[5:25:30] >>commissioner lopez: no.
[5:25:33] >>commissioner milian orbis:
[5:25:36] >>commissioner regalado: yes.
[5:25:38] >>commissioner bastien: yes.
[5:25:43] >>chair: yes.
[5:25:47] >> motion passes 9 3.
[5:25:49] >>chair: congratulations, you
[5:25:57] MAY be recognized.
[5:25:58] >>commissioner steinberg: I
[5:26:00] have a motion I would like the
[5:26:02] attorney to read into the
[5:26:03] record and it's not just
[5:26:04] general funds.
[5:26:06] >>chair: redraw motion onto the
[5:26:15] record.
[5:26:17] >> commissioner steinberg moves
[5:26:19] to direct the county mayor's
[5:26:21] designee to conduct a wetlands
[5:26:22] study to accomplish the
[5:26:24] following goals, one quantify
[5:26:25] and qualify wetland values, to
[5:26:27] evaluate the efficacy of
[5:26:29] regulations intended to protect
[5:26:30] wetland systems, analyze the
[5:26:32] value of functions including
[5:26:34] but not limited to ecosystem
[5:26:36] aquifer recharge, water supply
[5:26:37] and flood mitigation among
[5:26:38] others as well as whether
[5:26:40] particular geographic areas MAY
[5:26:42] be needed to carry out any
[5:26:51] particular benefit or function
[5:26:53] or where those instructions are
[5:26:55] to a greater extent based on
[5:26:57] wetlands as a whole and make
[5:26:59] recommendations related to
[5:27:01] regulatory provisions in the
[5:27:02] policy/proprietary steps to
[5:27:04] retain wetlands needed to
[5:27:05] ensure long-term wetland values
[5:27:07] are sustained including but not
[5:27:08] limited to those values.
[5:27:10] The county mayor's directed to
[5:27:12] develop a scope of services and
[5:27:14] pursue funding for such
[5:27:15] resources other than general
[5:27:17] fund such as federal or state
[5:27:18] grants or other funding
[5:27:20] sources, after completion
[5:27:22] county mayor or designee shall
[5:27:24] prepare a written report and
[5:27:25] recommendations pursuant to
[5:27:27] rule 506j and leave the
[5:27:28] completed report on an agenda
[5:27:30] of the full board.
[5:27:31] >>chair: second by the vice
[5:27:34] chair, commissioner bermudez.
[5:27:35] >>commissioner bermudez: I
[5:27:42] don't want to channel my inner
[5:27:43] mickey steinberg as this was
[5:27:45] proposed by her but the bottom
[5:27:47] line is don't we know where the
[5:27:48] wetlands are or do we not
[5:27:50] known, is it in cdmp, can the
[5:27:52] administration enlighten me?
[5:27:54] Okay, let's see class through
[5:28:02] the chair we will have our part
[5:28:04] er director answer this but I
[5:28:06] want to say it's not just where
[5:28:07] they are, it's the quality of
[5:28:09] the wetlands and the importance
[5:28:11] of maintaining them adequately
[5:28:12] so they will xplain.
[5:28:14] >>commissioner bermudez: if I
[5:28:16] MAY I'm going to try to treat
[5:28:18] you guys, do we know where the
[5:28:21] wetlands are?
[5:28:23] >> there are maps and surveys
[5:28:25] that through the development
[5:28:27] process are reassessed and
[5:28:27] updated.
[5:28:29] There are existing maps.
[5:28:33] >>chair: that is a yes.
[5:28:35] >>commissioner bermudez: you
[5:28:36] provide maps to the 13 people
[5:28:37] on this days?
[5:28:44] My second question would be
[5:28:45] while I have great faith in
[5:28:47] both of you and in the mayor, I
[5:28:49] would like this to be fair and
[5:28:51] not just cited to the people
[5:28:53] that MAY be followers of the
[5:28:54] environmental world.
[5:29:02] As such, I believe especially
[5:29:04] if you're talking about valuing
[5:29:06] the wetlands that you need to
[5:29:10] bring in other sectors of this
[5:29:11] community that can also be a
[5:29:13] part of this process because
[5:29:20] what I would not like to see is
[5:29:22] a committee of individuals made
[5:29:24] up of individuals looking at it
[5:29:25] from one perspective, not
[5:29:27] taking into account other
[5:29:29] aspects that MAY impact this
[5:29:30] county so my question would be
[5:29:34] do you have any ideas or are we
[5:29:35] leaving it up for the mayor who
[5:29:37] will decide who will be on this
[5:29:38] board?
[5:29:39] Oliver will tell you the
[5:29:42] answer, go ahead.
[5:29:45] >> they asked me to bring this
[5:29:45] forward.
[5:29:49] Believe rer, if
[5:30:01] you're up there.
[5:30:03] >> it would be too bring back a
[5:30:04] scope contracted with a
[5:30:05] university entity.
[5:30:07] As part of our evaluations,
[5:30:08] there would be a public
[5:30:15] involvement component and
[5:30:17] consultations with affected
[5:30:19] industries, stakeholders so we
[5:30:21] can certainly be sure that is
[5:30:22] included in the draft scope
[5:30:24] brought before you.
[5:30:25] >>commissioner bermudez: are
[5:30:27] you telling me the scope will
[5:30:29] include all interested parties,
[5:30:31] not just one sector of the
[5:30:32] community that MAY have an
[5:30:34] opinion, as I saw on the prior
[5:30:35] item that MAY have an opinion
[5:30:37] that's already set in stone
[5:30:39] while we are working at the
[5:30:40] wetlands, is that a common
[5:30:45] refrain on the record today?
[5:30:47] >> it would be modeled after
[5:30:49] the agricultural study which
[5:30:51] included outreach to industry
[5:30:53] and stakeholders and of course
[5:30:54] whatever the process is in
[5:30:56] terms of the results will come
[5:30:58] before you and there is always
[5:31:04] further opportunity for that as
[5:31:05] well.
[5:31:06] >>commissioner bermudez: I'll
[5:31:09] be supportive of commissioner
[5:31:11] steinberg motion because I feel
[5:31:19] comfortable I have an answer,
[5:31:21] that this will include all the
[5:31:22] parties that could be impacted
[5:31:24] and concerned, the only other
[5:31:26] thing I would say is when you
[5:31:27] have those maps could you give
[5:31:30] it to 13 AUGUST members of this
[5:31:32] body, 12 AUGUST members and one
[5:31:33] individual.
[5:31:35] >>chair: now he's got all the
[5:31:36] parties, it is officially a
[5:31:37] party.
[5:31:39] >>commissioner gilbert: at the
[5:31:40] risk of being a sidekick here,
[5:31:42] they are going to take all
[5:31:43] input and it's going to come
[5:31:45] back and say exactly what you
[5:31:46] think it's going to say.
[5:31:48] This is going to be written by
[5:31:50] termites so I want to be clear,
[5:31:52] I know what's about to happen
[5:31:52] here.
[5:31:54] This is one of those times I
[5:31:55] can see it.
[5:31:56] And it's completely fine.
[5:31:59] That's what's going to happen.
[5:32:03] But it's going to happen.
[5:32:05] You are trying to guard against
[5:32:16] it and by the record I believe
[5:32:17] you.
[5:32:18] I actually believe you.
[5:32:20] This is not to cast aspersions
[5:32:21] on your honesty, you want to
[5:32:24] include everybody and what's
[5:32:25] going to come that is the
[5:32:27] opinion that we already know
[5:32:32] they have.
[5:32:34] >>chair: I agree but why do you
[5:32:36] need a motion, do you have the
[5:32:42] authority to do this?
[5:32:44] >>mayor cava: through the chair
[5:32:46] I'd like to go back to this
[5:32:55] agricultural study that took
[5:32:57] the board's request to do a
[5:32:58] significant study.
[5:33:00] We do believe we have the funds
[5:33:02] within our proprietary
[5:33:03] departments so we won't have to
[5:33:05] draw from the general fund,
[5:33:11] that's our intention.
[5:33:14] By the way it's information for
[5:33:16] you, it doesn't dictate your
[5:33:16] decisions.
[5:33:18] Just like the agricultural
[5:33:20] report which took many years
[5:33:22] because it didn't move forward,
[5:33:24] it provides you a backdrop so
[5:33:26] when you're making decisions
[5:33:28] you have the information.
[5:33:30] >>chair: I would ask to do a
[5:33:31] friendly amendment now that the
[5:33:33] mayor said something to trigger
[5:33:35] it to make sure it is 100%
[5:33:36] covered, the cost of
[5:33:37] proprietary funds.
[5:33:39] At the time when we are already
[5:33:40] crunching pennies because we're
[5:33:42] doing the budget to go to a
[5:33:44] study that I mean, we know what
[5:33:46] the outcome is going to be so I
[5:33:48] don't want to pay as a taxpayer
[5:33:49] something that I know isn't
[5:33:56] going to be said.
[5:33:57] >>commissioner steinberg:
[5:33:59] specific to the motion no
[5:34:00] general funds will be used
[5:34:02] towards this and attaining any
[5:34:04] federal and state grants as
[5:34:05] well for the offset of any
[5:34:06] additional costs.
[5:34:08] >>chair: as long as that the
[5:34:10] case, I'm good, commissioner
[5:34:11] gonzalez.
[5:34:12] >>commissioner gonzalez: to see
[5:34:15] if we can get both commissioner
[5:34:17] gilbert and commissioner
[5:34:18] bermudez on board I don't know
[5:34:20] if this can be a friendly
[5:34:21] amendment but what if we made
[5:34:23] it so the commission had input
[5:34:25] on who does the study?
[5:34:27] Because the administration
[5:34:29] wants to study, once the study
[5:34:34] to move forward then perhaps
[5:34:38] everybody can be sufficiently
[5:34:40] happy with the fact that
[5:34:44] everybody's included class the
[5:34:45] scope will come before you
[5:34:47] through the interlocal
[5:34:48] agreement so you will be able
[5:34:55] to review it.
[5:34:57] >>commissioner gonzalez: that's
[5:34:59] not what I'm talking about, I'm
[5:35:00] talking about the entity
[5:35:02] because you cited universities
[5:35:03] so the actual entity, if we
[5:35:08] could have a final say as to
[5:35:10] who does that it could be fiu,
[5:35:11] university of miami, it could
[5:35:13] be berkley, 1000 different
[5:35:15] people with 1000 different
[5:35:16] universities but if we could
[5:35:18] have a say as to who does it,
[5:35:21] perhaps more folks would be on
[5:35:21] board.
[5:35:23] >>chair: commissioner regalado,
[5:35:25] I'm sorry.
[5:35:29] >>commissioner regalado: I
[5:35:30] think it's a good item.
[5:35:32] My only concern is whenever we
[5:35:40] do, first of all all love each
[5:35:41] dermites but when we do this we
[5:35:43] don't take into consideration
[5:35:44] ownership so I'm all for a
[5:35:45] valuation but at the heart of
[5:35:48] our problem is holmes so I
[5:35:52] think we make these decisions
[5:35:55] on other people's property and
[5:36:08] i think it needs to the
[5:36:09] ownership.
[5:36:10] And it also needs to the cost
[5:36:12] for restoring the wetlands.
[5:36:14] Because we know that's going to
[5:36:16] be one of the navy issues.
[5:36:23] I'm happy to do an audit so we
[5:36:25] can figure out where the
[5:36:26] wetlands are.
[5:36:27] I'm sure when we get to the
[5:36:29] scope we will talk about its
[5:36:30] basins and its importance to
[5:36:32] the basins but who does it
[5:36:33] belong to, how is it being
[5:36:35] used, what is the current
[5:36:36] condition and what is the cost
[5:36:38] of restoring it because these
[5:36:40] are all factors I think we have
[5:36:42] to discuss and I actually think
[5:36:44] it would be good for the board
[5:36:45] to see that a lot of what is,
[5:36:47] from the common plan
[5:36:49] perspective wetlands is not in
[5:36:51] good shape and needs to be
[5:36:51] restored.
[5:36:53] That's one of the problems
[5:36:54] we're having here in terms of
[5:36:56] the disconnect is there is not
[5:36:58] a complete understanding of the
[5:37:00] quality of the wetlands and the
[5:37:01] money that needs to be put
[5:37:03] towards restoring them and how
[5:37:04] do we preserve them because
[5:37:06] that's the other piece.
[5:37:08] So I'm happy to support
[5:37:11] commissioner steinberg I think
[5:37:13] you should the ownership and
[5:37:14] restoration cost.
[5:37:15] And I appreciate proprietary
[5:37:19] but I don't want it to come
[5:37:20] from the award so as long as
[5:37:23] because it's under proprietary,
[5:37:29] as long as that's not happening
[5:37:31] I'm good and while we're at
[5:37:32] this why don't we consider
[5:37:34] financing mechanisms and other
[5:37:41] options to purchasing,
[5:37:42] maintaining.
[5:37:44] Because what's the point of the
[5:37:45] study if it's going to tell us
[5:37:47] we have these grandiose plans
[5:37:53] for other people's property?
[5:37:55] If we have a plan they are
[5:37:57] valuable to us that proffer us
[5:37:59] some ideas as to how we could
[5:38:00] purchase them, how we could
[5:38:11] covenant them and maintain them
[5:38:13] because that's the second
[5:38:14] conversation we don't have and
[5:38:16] what I don't want is to pay
[5:38:18] money for a study and it gets
[5:38:19] put on some shelf and we MAY or
[5:38:21] MAY not refer to it so that
[5:38:23] would be another friendly
[5:38:24] amendment in terms of the
[5:38:26] financing and purchasing of it.
[5:38:28] >>chair: commissioner cohen
[5:38:29] higgins.
[5:38:30] >>commissioner cohen higgins:
[5:38:32] when was the last time we did a
[5:38:34] wetlands study in miami-dade
[5:38:35] county collects I'm not aware
[5:38:37] we've done one.
[5:38:38] >>commissioner cohen higgins:
[5:38:40] this whole idea came to me one
[5:38:42] time when I was talking about a
[5:38:43] project, I don't think it was
[5:38:45] this project and I was told our
[5:38:47] lead on contamination that it
[5:38:51] would be helpful to have a
[5:38:53] wetlands study that is how the
[5:38:54] idea did not even have to do
[5:38:56] with this particular
[5:38:58] application and that it just
[5:39:04] helps to inform us in our
[5:39:05] decision-making.
[5:39:07] >>commissioner cohen higgins:
[5:39:09] considering we haven't had one
[5:39:10] done in the recent history are
[5:39:12] not sure why there's so much
[5:39:23] pushback on getting information
[5:39:24] reports on the current status
[5:39:26] of wetlands in miami-dade
[5:39:27] county.
[5:39:28] We are flanked by the
[5:39:29] everglades and biscayne bay,
[5:39:31] these decisions affect our
[5:39:32] drinking water and flooding in
[5:39:34] our county of which many
[5:39:36] residents complain all the time
[5:39:38] yet we continue to pay and
[5:39:38] pave.
[5:39:40] I would like to see a wetlands
[5:39:42] study done so we can have the
[5:39:43] information since we haven't
[5:39:45] done one in sense forever to
[5:39:46] add least have a starting point
[5:39:48] on what these wetlands are,
[5:39:49] where they are and we can make
[5:39:52] a firm decision so I'm happy to
[5:39:54] support it commissioner.
[5:39:56] >>chair: my district needs new
[5:39:58] haven, it has potholes
[5:39:59] everywhere.
[5:40:01] >>commissioner cohen higgins:
[5:40:03] that's why we passed the
[5:40:05] improvement ordinance, thank
[5:40:06] you so much.
[5:40:08] >>chair: yes bermudez, second
[5:40:09] bite at the apple.
[5:40:10] >>commissioner bermudez: I'm
[5:40:12] going to vote for it and accept
[5:40:14] for the fact I do think we have
[5:40:16] everybody incorporated in this
[5:40:18] process, there are proprietary
[5:40:19] rights, we need to also include
[5:40:21] them and the final one because
[5:40:23] everything here is political,
[5:40:28] do them dermites or dermians?
[5:40:30] I was watching a taxi episode
[5:40:37] saying are they delaware or
[5:40:38] delawarites?
[5:40:41] Let me know.
[5:40:44] >>chair: we have a second, as
[5:40:48] amended, make sure we are using
[5:40:49] proprietary funds, all in favor
[5:40:53] signify by saying aye.
[5:40:55] Opposed, nay. Show the item
[5:40:55] past.
[5:40:57] Are we in the pulled items at
[5:40:59] this time?
[5:41:06] >> there are a few releases.
[5:41:08] >> we will take the releases in
[5:41:10] a second, I'm going to call 84
[5:41:12] and 85 together if possible, it
[5:41:14] was released by d 13 but I
[5:41:20] still have the 12th.
[5:41:26] So then you already got out of.
[5:41:28] >> I have a possible conflict
[5:41:30] on 85.
[5:41:36] i want to excuse myself.
[5:41:38] Okay, so separate from the
[5:41:38] cosponsorship.
[5:41:45] Got you.
[5:41:47] So we will take a separate but
[5:41:50] discuss them together.
[5:41:50] Commissioner.
[5:42:05] >> I'm not going to discuss 85.
[5:42:07] >>commissioner bermudez: I will
[5:42:09] save the time, I support both
[5:42:09] items.
[5:42:10] He only thing I'd like
[5:42:12] to do is don't do this county
[5:42:13] when somebody admits to doing
[5:42:15] something we must have a
[5:42:16] tracking mechanism.
[5:42:17] His
[5:42:19] administration are all the ones
[5:42:21] I know one of you is involved
[5:42:23] where a future administration
[5:42:25] this needs to be monitored as
[5:42:26] we move forward.
[5:42:28] Because that's the only thing
[5:42:29] I'll say, that was all my
[5:42:31] statements and I'm in support.
[5:42:32] >>chair: 804 moved by
[5:42:34] commissioner cohen higgins,
[5:42:37] seconded by commissioner lopez,
[5:42:38] all in favor say aye.
[5:42:40] Opposed, nay. You can be
[5:42:54] excused now.
[5:42:55] >>commissioner gonzalez: I'm
[5:42:57] going to read this for the
[5:42:59] record, although I have
[5:43:01] discussed it with the county
[5:43:02] attorney's office and they do
[5:43:04] not believe there is a conflict
[5:43:06] of interest I am recusing
[5:43:08] myself on this item in an
[5:43:09] abundance of caution, I MAY
[5:43:11] have conflict of interest
[5:43:13] regarding 85, I'm in business
[5:43:14] with a possible affiliate and
[5:43:16] that is the counties proposed
[5:43:19] tenant, item 8a5 would
[5:43:21] authorize the county to enter
[5:43:22] into a lease agreement and in
[5:43:24] an abundance of caution to
[5:43:26] avoid any appearance I will be
[5:43:28] abstaining from voting on this
[5:43:29] matter and removing myself from
[5:43:32] the chambers when the matter is
[5:43:33] discussed.
[5:43:35] >>chair: commissioner cohen
[5:43:37] higgins moves, second by
[5:43:39] commissioner gilbert, all in
[5:43:41] favor signify by saying aye.
[5:43:43] Opposed, nay. Show 8a5 past and
[5:43:45] commissioner gonzalez can
[5:43:46] reenter the chamber.
[5:43:48] Now, MR. Attorney you can see
[5:43:51] what was released.
[5:43:54] >> commissioners and bermudez
[5:44:00] released 8p1, regalado releases
[5:44:04] 8p5 and cosponsor on 11a4.
[5:44:13] >> co-prime.
[5:44:15] >>commissioner regalado: thank
[5:44:18] you, I accept.
[5:44:20] >>commissioner bermudez: was
[5:44:28] that 3a1 and 2?
[5:44:35] What were the releases again,
[5:44:35] please?
[5:44:37] >> commissioner bermudez and
[5:44:39] milian orbis released 8p1 and
[5:44:46] regalado released 8n5.
[5:44:48] >> second, all in favor, all
[5:44:50] against, show the item passes,
[5:44:56] next MADAM Attorney we are at
[5:44:56] 3a1.
[5:44:58] >> district 13 you are pulling
[5:45:03] first.
[5:45:05] >>senator garcia: this is the
[5:45:06] naming of a street and just for
[5:45:09] the record for everyone's
[5:45:10] information again what I said
[5:45:13] earlier a lot of these I have a
[5:45:14] state hold so these
[5:45:15] designations will come through
[5:45:18] our office.
[5:45:20] >> were we on 3a1 or 3a2.
[5:45:28] >>senator garcia: 3a1 so this
[5:45:29] is celia cruz, and enduring
[5:45:36] symbol of strength and coming
[5:45:43] together for the community.
[5:45:45] Her voice broke barriers and
[5:45:47] her legacy remains a beacon of
[5:45:52] what it meant to lead with
[5:45:53] artistry, authenticity and
[5:45:54] heart.
[5:45:56] Her trademark phrase became an
[5:46:03] empowering cultural system
[5:46:05] symbol with the afro-cuban
[5:46:05] identity.
[5:46:07] MR. CHAIRMAN that is the
[5:46:09] resolution passed by the
[5:46:10] florida state legislature and
[5:46:12] is before you on this road
[5:46:14] designation designating celia
[5:46:15] cruz away of 103rd street.
[5:46:17] >>vice chair mcghee: do we have
[5:46:18] a second?
[5:46:19] All right.
[5:46:21] >>commissioner bermudez: the
[5:46:24] discussion we can have.
[5:46:26] >>vice chair mcghee: you want
[5:46:34] to coprime or cosponsor?
[5:46:36] MADAM Attorney are you getting
[5:46:38] an entire day us, all of us for
[5:46:39] both of them.
[5:46:41] Is that correct for everyone?
[5:46:42] It's okay.
[5:46:44] And so we are going to call
[5:46:48] them at the same time, 3a1 and
[5:46:49] 3a2.
[5:47:02] Let's push 3a1, all in favor.
[5:47:03] Give me one second.
[5:47:05] Seeing the motion the
[5:47:06] resolution was moved do we have
[5:47:08] a second, all in favor.
[5:47:09] All against.
[5:47:10] That item moves and passes.
[5:47:13] > I had a statement by the
[5:47:14] celia cruz estate they asked me
[5:47:15] to read.
[5:47:17] On behalf of the celia cruz
[5:47:27] estate I extend our deepest
[5:47:29] gratitude to senator rizzo and
[5:47:31] the legislature, city of
[5:47:32] hialeah CHAIRMAN Anthony
[5:47:34] rodriguez and every member of
[5:47:36] the miami-dade board of county
[5:47:37] commissioners for honoring
[5:47:39] celia cruz with the designation
[5:47:53] of celia cruz way, this for all
[5:47:56] who cherish her legacy, hialeah
[5:47:57] south florida represent the
[5:47:59] heart of the community cuban
[5:48:01] exile experience and embrace
[5:48:03] her with great love, this last
[5:48:04] thing on earth celebrate not
[5:48:06] only her artistic achievements
[5:48:08] but the joy pride and
[5:48:09] perseverance she represented
[5:48:11] for hispanic and african
[5:48:12] heritage communities.
[5:48:14] We are grateful to everyone who
[5:48:16] MAY distribute possible.
[5:48:18] This is on behalf of omar the
[5:48:19] deal, thank you so much MR.
[5:48:20] Chair.
[5:48:22] >>vice chair mcghee: would you
[5:48:23] like to file that with the
[5:48:25] clerk of court, thank you,
[5:48:27] heading over to 3a2.
[5:48:28] >>commissioner milian orbis:
[5:48:30] thank you, so this is a code
[5:48:32] designation form and obviously
[5:48:33] MR. Reyes left a tremendous
[5:48:35] legacy, he was a fierce
[5:48:37] advocate for the community and
[5:48:39] literally left us while still
[5:48:40] fighting for his community, he
[5:48:42] was loved by all his family
[5:48:44] was, is very special to me, to
[5:48:45] my family myself and I saw his
[5:48:47] son here earlier, I don't know
[5:48:49] if easier but he is a dear
[5:48:51] friend this street closing
[5:48:52] designation is so well-deserved
[5:48:54] and I am so delighted it is in
[5:48:56] district 6. In my research I
[5:48:58] found out all things that come
[5:49:00] from tallahassee that
[5:49:01] commissioner garcia has a hold
[5:49:04] on everything that comes into
[5:49:05] tallahassee and it was
[5:49:07] concerning because I was a
[5:49:12] little concerned that a code
[5:49:14] designation in district 6 was
[5:49:16] handed over to another
[5:49:17] commissioner but nonetheless
[5:49:19] honored to work on this.
[5:49:21] It is literally down the street
[5:49:27] from my district office and I
[5:49:28] did file legislation to make
[5:49:31] sure this doesn't occur anymore
[5:49:32] because it should go to the
[5:49:34] district commissioner when we
[5:49:36] are doing it, he's a big part
[5:49:38] of our community so thank you
[5:49:39] and with that I would love to
[5:49:41] be part of this, so thank you
[5:49:42] so much MR. Chair.
[5:49:44] >>vice chair mcghee: we also
[5:49:46] see district 12 you pull this
[5:49:47] along with district 13.
[5:49:49] >commissioner bermudez: I
[5:49:51] don't know if many is here but
[5:49:52] MR. Reyes was an example of,
[5:49:54] there's a lot of good people in
[5:49:56] politics, ultimately included
[5:49:58] but was very unique in that he
[5:49:59] called it the way it is.
[5:50:01] If you was with you he tell you
[5:50:02] he was always an honest man.
[5:50:04] That's all he's done for any
[5:50:06] ulterior reasons for this one
[5:50:08] is in my opinion even before he
[5:50:09] was an elected official he was
[5:50:12] a fair guy and I also
[5:50:13] understand and I'm going to
[5:50:15] support it, like I said
[5:50:21] hopefully we can co-prime it
[5:50:23] but it is her district and is
[5:50:26] important and we have similar
[5:50:27] feelings on holds.
[5:50:35] Because to me I'm surprised
[5:50:36] because I even doubt the
[5:50:38] constitutionality of multiple
[5:50:40] holes but either way that's the
[5:50:41] rules, I didn't set them.
[5:50:48] I think it's important that and
[5:50:50] again, a lot of good things
[5:50:52] come out of tallahassee,
[5:50:53] senator garcia being one of
[5:50:54] them.
[5:50:55] But through tallahassee.
[5:50:57] But I do think it's important
[5:51:00] that we deal with things in the
[5:51:03] proper way.
[5:51:20] >>chair: give me a second, you
[5:51:21] okay?
[5:51:22] >> I wanted to ask if you can
[5:51:24] clarify and let us know
[5:51:26] specifically that the hold that
[5:51:28] everything that comes out of
[5:51:29] tallahassee goes to one
[5:51:31] commissioner and it has to go
[5:51:32] to that commissioner even if
[5:51:34] it's in her district.
[5:51:36] >> senator garcia has a hold on
[5:51:38] implementing language locally
[5:51:39] for bills that come from
[5:51:41] tallahassee, that's required
[5:51:42] for your rules.
[5:51:44] I know you have a legislative
[5:51:45] request to modify in this
[5:51:46] particular case.
[5:51:48] >>vice chair mcghee: thank you,
[5:51:51] commissioner regalado.
[5:51:53] >>commissioner regalado: I will
[5:51:55] agree with commissioner celia
[5:51:58] cruz, that being said I talked
[5:52:00] to manny and the family about
[5:52:05] it and we are also excited, he
[5:52:07] so deserving of it, such a
[5:52:09] wonderful man but street
[5:52:09] naming's and my district are
[5:52:12] very delicate.
[5:52:29] So I really think that
[5:52:30] upholding the rule that we get
[5:52:32] to decide even when it's a
[5:52:34] tallahassee decision would be
[5:52:35] best because we are the ones
[5:52:37] that have to deal with
[5:52:38] neighbors and the blowback,
[5:52:40] this one is not controversial
[5:52:42] at all, it's fantastic and I
[5:52:44] don't think anyone disagree but
[5:52:45] I've had some in my district
[5:52:47] and I've had to take names off
[5:52:49] streets in my district and
[5:52:50] there's been pushback on
[5:52:51] certain requests.
[5:52:53] On this one not to be
[5:52:54] territorial but we are the ones
[5:52:56] that have to deal with it, we
[5:52:57] are the ones best suited to
[5:52:59] make a decision regarding
[5:53:00] naming.
[5:53:01] So I'm happy to support this
[5:53:03] one, I hope we all get invited
[5:53:05] so we can celebrate with his
[5:53:06] family I think in terms of all
[5:53:08] hold that's that broad, at some
[5:53:10] point you draft and you no
[5:53:13] longer have the hold if it's
[5:53:15] every single implementing that
[5:53:16] never ends, that's the gift
[5:53:17] that keeps giving.
[5:53:19] normally we have to be more
[5:53:24] detailed in our legislative
[5:53:25] request so I hope we can get to
[5:53:27] that at some point because it
[5:53:29] MAY intersect with other
[5:53:30] legislative requests.
[5:53:32] >>vice chair mcghee:
[5:53:34] commissioner gilbert.
[5:53:35] >>commissioner gilbert: I want
[5:53:38] to echo everybody's sentiment
[5:53:42] on manolo reyes, he drove
[5:53:55] through district 1 once or
[5:53:55] twice.
[5:53:56] But he was a good guy.
[5:53:58] Good public servants,
[5:53:59] definitely worthy and we get
[5:54:01] invited to the street naming I
[5:54:03] would appreciate it so thank
[5:54:05] you for allowing me to be
[5:54:06] whatever it is but definitely
[5:54:08] it's do so that's one thing in
[5:54:10] the second thing is I know the
[5:54:11] county attorney said that
[5:54:13] there's a hold on this but I
[5:54:15] think that decision probably
[5:54:17] needs to be something that
[5:54:18] comes from the chair because
[5:54:20] when something is that broad
[5:54:21] where the hold never gets
[5:54:23] exhausted, so typically it's a
[5:54:24] legislative hold, we call it a
[5:54:26] hold but it's a drafting
[5:54:26] request.
[5:54:28] So there's no way to ever draft
[5:54:29] out of this.
[5:54:34] So it literally is an infinity
[5:54:34] door.
[5:54:36] So I don't know if this fits
[5:54:44] within our structure in a way
[5:54:46] that the rule actually
[5:54:47] contemplates.
[5:54:48] And I think some of the holes
[5:54:49] are overbroad and senator
[5:54:51] garcia actually doing this puts
[5:54:53] a finer point on it but it
[5:54:55] needs to be a way because it's
[5:54:55] not a hold.
[5:54:58] You're not holding it, your
[5:54:58] drafting.
[5:55:05] So we use them as holds but
[5:55:06] they are meant to be used as
[5:55:08] drafting so if you can't draft
[5:55:10] your way out of it then it
[5:55:12] might not fit within us, it's
[5:55:14] something you ought to look at
[5:55:15] after JANUARY.
[5:55:25] >> commissioner lopez.
[5:55:27] >>commissioner lopez: I want to
[5:55:28] say manolo reyes was probably
[5:55:35] one of the consonant elected
[5:55:37] officials, I won't even call
[5:55:38] him a politician, his beloved
[5:55:40] in district 5 which he shared
[5:55:42] with me as well not only when I
[5:55:43] was steakhouse member for
[5:55:45] district 13 but I did not get a
[5:55:47] chance to work with him as a
[5:55:48] county commissioner because he
[5:55:50] passed away but I have to say
[5:55:52] that I'm grateful that there
[5:55:53] would be any effort to
[5:55:55] celebrate and honor this
[5:56:05] incredible man.
[5:56:06] So much has been said about
[5:56:07] him.
[5:56:08] He is the one who came to my
[5:56:11] office in tallahassee to remind
[5:56:12] me when I was doing housing
[5:56:14] that the ami in little havana
[5:56:16] was not the same as in her
[5:56:17] field and he had a vision
[5:56:19] around policy that was lost
[5:56:20] amongst many of us and that
[5:56:22] created for me the ability to
[5:56:24] look into something we've
[5:56:25] discussed now recently with
[5:56:33] commissioner bastien's
[5:56:34] leadership on the ami report
[5:56:36] that she's requested so this
[5:56:38] was a man that cared deeply.
[5:56:39] There are still his campaign
[5:56:41] signs in my district as I
[5:56:42] walked up the houses and have
[5:56:44] not and they said there never
[5:56:46] taking it down because of the
[5:56:47] impact he made on the community
[5:56:49] and in particular areas he
[5:56:50] represented so thank you so
[5:56:51] much, I guess renc
[5:56:52] but
[5:56:54] certainly commissioner celia
[5:57:10] cruz, I know how deeply
[5:57:12] impacted your district was and
[5:57:12] how close it is.
[5:57:14] I could not agree more.
[5:57:16] These street meetings happen in
[5:57:17] our districts and asked
[5:57:19] commissioner regalado said we
[5:57:20] are the ones that have to deal
[5:57:22] with the community who wants to
[5:57:24] be involved and if we are not
[5:57:26] involved the commission outside
[5:57:28] the district where the naming
[5:57:30] will take place is leading the
[5:57:30] charge.
[5:57:32] It seems a bit of a disconnect
[5:57:34] but I feel certain we can
[5:57:36] clarify all this so everybody's
[5:57:38] district is at least respected
[5:57:40] these are the things that are
[5:57:42] that deep in the community.
[5:57:44] >>vice chair mcghee: thank you
[5:57:45] senator garcia, I saw your
[5:57:46] hand.
[5:57:47] >>senator garcia: thank you
[5:57:49] CHAIRMAN And I want to tell you
[5:57:50] something that manolo reyes was
[5:57:52] an amazing individual.
[5:57:52] Ll of
[5:57:54] us in the hispanic community
[5:57:55] knew who he was, he was someone
[5:57:57] who stood up for what was right
[5:58:03] and he worked within the rules,
[5:58:05] he's not someone that when he
[5:58:06] made a decision or he took a
[5:58:08] vote you knew where that vote
[5:58:09] was coming from and it was
[5:58:12] coming from a place of honesty
[5:58:13] integrity and making sure he
[5:58:15] stood up for his community.
[5:58:16] He was a man I admired and
[5:58:18] respected just like all of us
[5:58:20] here and when we talk about a
[5:58:21] person that was a voice for the
[5:58:23] voiceless, that was manolo
[5:58:23] reyes.
[5:58:25] He stood up for all those that
[5:58:27] did not have a voice, did not
[5:58:33] care about the color of their
[5:58:34] skin, where you came from,
[5:58:36] where you lived or the amount
[5:58:38] of money you had, that's what
[5:58:39] made him an amazing public
[5:58:41] servant and he 41 every time we
[5:58:43] would take votes in the county
[5:58:44] commission he would come so I
[5:58:46] admired him for the positions
[5:58:48] he took in the city of miami,
[5:58:50] he took some strong positions
[5:58:51] against the powers to be and he
[5:58:55] really always spoke his mind
[5:59:13] and did not care to be on the
[5:59:14] side of those with money and
[5:59:15] power.
[5:59:16] You always stood on the side of
[5:59:18] the people in the city of miami
[5:59:20] was so grateful to have him.
[5:59:22] And one of the biggest lessons
[5:59:23] he left with me and you for
[5:59:25] this many times before, doesn't
[5:59:28] matter who gets the credit.
[5:59:30] It just matters that it gets
[5:59:36] done and if you rule with
[5:59:38] integrity and respect and it
[5:59:41] doesn't matter so to manolo
[5:59:43] reyes and his family wherever
[5:59:44] you are thank you for your
[5:59:46] service to this community.
[5:59:58] You're definitely missed and
[5:59:59] commissioner, know that this
[6:00:01] did not come from any nefarious
[6:00:03] place, it came by following the
[6:00:05] rules in this county commission
[6:00:06] established and I look forward
[6:00:08] to you leading the charge and
[6:00:10] making sure we get this because
[6:00:11] it's not in my district, this
[6:00:13] is exactly where he is.
[6:00:14] Thank you MR. CHAIRMAN and
[6:00:16] thank you commissioners for
[6:00:17] allowing me this opportunity.
[6:00:25] >>.
[6:00:27] >> I believe he died around 80
[6:00:28] years old so he lived a very
[6:00:30] full life there are many people
[6:00:36] who knew him for a long time.
[6:00:38] For he turned 80 years old.
[6:00:39] I was not one of those
[6:00:41] individuals that had the
[6:00:42] pleasure of knowing him in his
[6:00:44] younger years but it was
[6:00:45] awesome to hear his friends
[6:00:47] from then describe him.
[6:01:02] I know, we should live for our
[6:01:03] friends that told us stories
[6:01:05] for us and allow our friends do
[6:01:07] tell terrible stories of us to
[6:01:08] keep us honest.
[6:01:10] You have to add a little bit of
[6:01:12] truth and fiction when you tell
[6:01:14] stories of your friends but one
[6:01:16] thing I remember perfectly
[6:01:17] clear because I was serving on
[6:01:19] the city of miami at the time
[6:01:21] he was elected is he chose his
[6:01:22] office and he chose his office
[6:01:24] he had to do some renovations.
[6:01:26] So when he goes to do the
[6:01:28] renovations he's tearing down
[6:01:29] walls inside of the office.
[6:01:31] And in miami when you start
[6:01:32] ripping down walls sometimes
[6:01:34] you find money, sometimes you
[6:01:37] find rodents.
[6:01:39] You find quite a number of
[6:01:40] things but this much of the
[6:01:42] time there were newspapers
[6:01:43] stuffed into the wall.
[6:01:45] So as he's going through all
[6:01:47] the newspapers stuffed into the
[6:01:49] wall one of the articles
[6:01:59] written in the newspaper was
[6:02:00] about him running for office.
[6:02:02] So if you know him you know he
[6:02:04] ran many times for his
[6:02:04] positions.
[6:02:06] An event like my uncle roy he
[6:02:06] finally won.
[6:02:08] O he was in
[6:02:10] office for a long time, we were
[6:02:12] discussing him as he was this
[6:02:18] perennial lifelong elected
[6:02:18] official.
[6:02:19] He was not that.
[6:02:21] But he worked hard to get where
[6:02:21] he was.
[6:02:23] And I think with how he got to
[6:02:25] where he was, he used his time
[6:02:30] to advocate for people that and
[6:02:32] for people for people that
[6:02:36] where a little unkind.
[6:02:37] So he was a great person to
[6:02:39] work with, you did great things
[6:02:41] during this time but I think
[6:02:42] largely the thing people
[6:02:45] remember most about him is not
[6:02:46] necessarily the highlight of
[6:02:48] his public service it was
[6:02:54] really how he was family, when
[6:02:55] you look at the way his family
[6:02:57] looked on him, I think that's
[6:02:59] the best legacy you could ever
[6:03:02] have so many of us choose to do
[6:03:04] things differently, like I
[6:03:05] would have done things
[6:03:07] differently if I work in
[6:03:08] manolo's choose.
[6:03:12] But what I would wish for my
[6:03:24] life is what manolo reyes had
[6:03:26] which is a family that loved
[6:03:28] him dearly no matter what
[6:03:29] decisions you made so I know
[6:03:31] the people who lost him, or
[6:03:34] family to manolo smile when
[6:03:35] they think about his life over
[6:03:36] the time they had.
[6:03:39] So this is befitting of someone
[6:03:40] who lived a good life.
[6:03:42] So as someone who served within
[6:03:47] I went to say at times we
[6:03:48] agreed, at times we disagree
[6:03:50] but always walking on the right
[6:03:51] path.
[6:03:57] >> commissioner cohen higgins.
[6:04:01] >>.
[6:04:03] >>commissioner bermudez:
[6:04:04] commissioner gilbert
[6:04:06] enlightened us on the definite
[6:04:08] vision of a hold, I'd like to
[6:04:10] make sure we can have that
[6:04:11] discussion based on that the
[6:04:13] second thing MR. CHAIRMAN I
[6:04:16] like to be the first guy to
[6:04:18] declare a hold on all holds but
[6:04:20] commissioner gilbert
[6:04:27] subsequently to generate 2027.
[6:04:29] >> do you want the county
[6:04:31] attorney to answer the first
[6:04:31] question.
[6:04:33] >> I think he made a very valid
[6:04:36] point but the second one I'm
[6:04:36] serious.
[6:04:44] I was the first.
[6:04:46] >> can we get someone to move
[6:04:54] the item amended supplement,
[6:04:54] second.
[6:04:55] Do we have a second?
[6:04:56] All in favor.
[6:04:57] All against.
[6:04:59] Show that item passes, next
[6:05:03] item up is 8a3, commissioner
[6:05:17] from district 7 you pulled this
[6:05:18] item.
[6:05:19] >>commissioner regalado: I
[6:05:21] wanted the director to ed, I'm
[6:05:23] glad we are finally getting to
[6:05:24] the jet fuel storage.
[6:05:26] Ralph has been working on it
[6:05:28] for some time but I believe
[6:05:29] it's worth a quick mentioned.
[6:05:33] >>vice chair mcghee: is there a
[6:05:34] specific question or do you
[6:05:36] want tim to give an overview of
[6:05:40] this item.
[6:05:42] >>commissioner regalado: we
[6:05:43] don't have to get into
[6:05:45] redundancy but just a general
[6:05:46] overview in terms of how it
[6:05:48] gets us closer to compliance
[6:05:50] from an infrastructure
[6:05:51] perspective.
[6:05:58] >> last year we processed 4.3
[6:05:59] billion gallons of jet fuel at
[6:06:11] mia which is a record year for
[6:06:13] us and we currently function 3
[6:06:14] and a half days of reserve so
[6:06:16] if something goes wrong with
[6:06:18] the port everglades pipeline we
[6:06:20] go on reserves for however long
[6:06:20] that takes.
[6:06:22] We have nine tanks which help
[6:06:24] us maintain those reserves and
[6:06:26] this project does all those
[6:06:28] nine tanks yield a 12 billion
[6:06:29] capacity in storage under this
[6:06:31] project does phase one of the
[6:06:33] two-phase project, it adds an
[6:06:38] additional 4 million gallon
[6:06:40] tank that will increase our
[6:06:41] capacity by 4 million gallons
[6:06:43] the following thing phase 2
[6:06:45] will add 2 4 million tanks
[6:06:46] which is 8 million total when
[6:06:48] you add it up it will double
[6:06:54] our storage capacity, phase 1
[6:06:55] and phase 2 which goes a long
[6:06:58] way towards us maintaining our
[6:06:59] reserves and increasing our
[6:07:01] fuel capacity which we
[6:07:06] desperately need and we can't
[6:07:07] talk about the redundancy
[6:07:09] because that's on other
[6:07:10] projects but this as an
[6:07:12] important project because of
[6:07:13] the amount of fuel we are
[6:07:18] processing every year.
[6:07:19] >>commissioner regalado: there
[6:07:21] was going to be a piece of the
[6:07:23] vic so that's why this item is
[6:07:25] different because the bank
[6:07:26] wasn't able to do this piece
[6:07:28] and we've received an item that
[6:07:30] dissolved the electrical and
[6:07:31] all this other stuff so this
[6:07:33] was the missing component in
[6:07:35] terms of infrastructure so
[6:07:35] thank you ralph.
[6:07:37] >>commissioner gonzalez: it
[6:07:39] moved by commissioner regalado
[6:07:41] do we have a second, all in
[6:07:43] favor you all against, show the
[6:07:44] item passes, let's move to 8
[6:07:46] g1, we're almost done, district
[6:07:47] 13 you pulled this item.
[6:07:49] >> is a quick question, we
[6:07:50] recently a couple months ago
[6:07:52] passed this budget.
[6:07:54] Because we were having budgets
[6:07:58] coming to us, I want to ask a
[6:07:59] question for the
[6:08:00] administration, if we have what
[6:08:19] is the status of the budgets.
[6:08:21] We had a big sneeze back here.
[6:08:23] >> through the chair george
[6:08:24] fernandez office of management
[6:08:36] and budget, yes we did hold two
[6:08:38] training sessions for the cra
[6:08:40] someone recently as last week
[6:08:41] so that 2627 budgets will
[6:08:42] indeed everything in the
[6:08:44] resolution we've approved.
[6:08:46] >> by then we will have them
[6:08:48] all standardized, all the
[6:08:49] details you asked for.
[6:08:51] >> if not they will not be
[6:08:52] placed on the agenda.
[6:08:53] >> I approve the item.
[6:08:54] > MR. Lopez.
[6:08:56] >> I'll second it but I have a
[6:08:58] question, does that include how
[6:09:00] to create a budget narrative?
[6:09:02] >> you've asked them to include
[6:09:04] additional information in the
[6:09:05] budget.
[6:09:07] >> but have they been told how
[6:09:08] to do a budget, do they
[6:09:09] understand what a budget
[6:09:11] narrative is, do they
[6:09:12] understand when you're
[6:09:14] explaining it such as let's
[6:09:16] take travel and list every
[6:09:18] travel you intend to make, what
[6:09:20] the costs are for airfare,
[6:09:21] hotels, taxis etc. Have they
[6:09:22] learned that.
[6:09:24] >> I don't know if it will be
[6:09:25] that detailed but we did ask
[6:09:28] for additional details on your
[6:09:29] expenditures.
[6:09:34] >> I would like very much for
[6:09:36] someone to show me what a
[6:09:37] budget narrative looks like.
[6:09:39] If you think it's acceptable
[6:09:41] because it's probably not going
[6:09:42] to be acceptable to me.
[6:09:44] > do you mind reaching out
[6:09:46] and setting up an appointment,
[6:09:48] does that work for you?
[6:09:49] Show the item moved and
[6:09:51] seconded by commissioner lopez,
[6:09:53] all in favor signify by saying
[6:09:53] aye.
[6:09:55] All right, coming home to the
[6:09:56] home stretch, item 11 a1
[6:09:57] district 12.
[6:09:58] Commissioner I believe you
[6:10:00] pulled this item.
[6:10:02] >> I'm supportive, I would like
[6:10:06] to a resolution to be in
[6:10:08] district 12 because we have a
[6:10:09] lot of illegal dumping in
[6:10:21] district 12 so I'd like to take
[6:10:23] a look, if you're looking at
[6:10:25] district 2 and district 12.
[6:10:27] >>vice chair mcghee: it's
[6:10:28] getting loud, we are almost
[6:10:29] done.
[6:10:31] Commissioner gonzales I do
[6:10:32] believe this is your item.
[6:10:34] Trends fives item?
[6:10:35] >>commissioner gonzalez: I
[6:10:37] coprime but she is the main
[6:10:40] sponsor.
[6:10:41] >>commissioner bermudez: I'm
[6:10:43] glad it was cosponsored by
[6:10:44] commissioner gonzalez because
[6:10:46] on the other side it's my
[6:10:48] district, we get encampments so
[6:10:50] she's not here but I be
[6:10:51] surprised if she was bothered
[6:10:52] and if not I will bring one
[6:10:55] next month.
[6:10:57] >>vice chair mcghee: show the
[6:10:59] item amended to include it will
[6:11:01] get a nod from her office,
[6:11:03] commissioner steinberg.
[6:11:05] >>commissioner steinberg: I
[6:11:06] bought out a lot of the
[6:11:08] district to boundaries.
[6:11:10] >>vice chair mcghee: include
[6:11:12] commissioner steinberg in this
[6:11:13] report, anyone else?
[6:11:15] Maybe everybody.
[6:11:17] Commissioner hardemon is
[6:11:18] district also to be included,
[6:11:21] anyone else needs to be
[6:11:23] included, commissioner includes
[6:11:25] her, does anyone else need to
[6:11:26] be included.
[6:11:27] >>commissioner regalado: I am
[6:11:29] good but we will talk about
[6:11:31] this on thursday.
[6:11:39] >>chair:
[6:11:41] >>vice chair mcghee: include
[6:11:42] district 9 also.
[6:11:43] Someone make a motion to
[6:11:45] approve the item, second.
[6:11:46] All in favor of the amended
[6:11:48] version of this item signify by
[6:11:49] saying aye.
[6:11:51] show the item passes, 11a3, I
[6:11:52] believe this was you
[6:11:56] commissioner steinberg.
[6:11:58] >>commissioner steinberg: we
[6:11:59] did not discuss this at
[6:12:01] committee thoroughly, we have
[6:12:03] another item at that committee
[6:12:12] meeting so as I had a chance to
[6:12:14] further dive into this item I
[6:12:15] think the intent is good and I
[6:12:17] have a lot of concerns.
[6:12:19] In my district particularly I
[6:12:20] don't know that we can have a
[6:12:22] blanket more intense use since
[6:12:24] we already have a lot of
[6:12:25] intensity in the district and I
[6:12:27] know the level is very high but
[6:12:29] I am concerned about what
[6:12:30] pandora's box we are going to
[6:12:32] be opening and what constitutes
[6:12:37] this vertical ag use.
[6:12:39] They could all be hydroponic in
[6:12:46] the future, who knows and that
[6:12:47] maybe a good thing or a bad
[6:12:48] thing.
[6:12:52] It's not necessarily regarding
[6:12:53] that but there are a lot of
[6:12:55] unknowns in this and I don't
[6:12:56] know what the parameters will
[6:12:58] be so I know we are asking them
[6:13:06] to bring back something to our
[6:13:07] cdmp and I want to know if we
[6:13:09] can exclude my district because
[6:13:11] I don't think we need to have
[6:13:13] more intensity uses just
[6:13:14] blanketed, that is something we
[6:13:16] are concerned with number two,
[6:13:18] who's going to decide the
[6:13:18] parameters?
[6:13:20] I don't know who can answer
[6:13:21] that.
[6:13:23] >>vice chair mcghee:
[6:13:24] commissioner gonzalez, I
[6:13:26] believe this is your item, are
[6:13:27] you amenable to having her
[6:13:29] district excluded and also
[6:13:30] understanding what the second
[6:13:39] question was, who falls to it.
[6:13:41] >>commissioner gonzalez: I
[6:13:43] would defer to the department,
[6:13:45] do we have someone to speak on
[6:13:46] this item as the request was
[6:13:49] made by commissioner gonzalez.
[6:13:51] >>commissioner steinberg: great
[6:13:53] concept but I don't know how it
[6:13:55] translates to reality.
[6:13:56] >>mayor cava: through the chair
[6:13:58] we are looking for the our er
[6:14:00] director MISS Gomez.
[6:14:13] >> let's, commissioner.
[6:14:14] >>commissioner regalado:,again
[6:14:16] I would like to be excluded, I
[6:14:18] read the item also with some
[6:14:19] concern from a price point a
[6:14:21] few of us might already be
[6:14:21] excluded.
[6:14:23] But that being said I don't
[6:14:24] think it's compatible with the
[6:14:26] uses I have in my district.
[6:14:27] I will say also when reading
[6:14:29] the item I have concerns about
[6:14:31] kind of the intersection of the
[6:14:32] state law on this.
[6:14:43] Like, what is ag for the state
[6:14:45] and designation by the property
[6:14:46] appraiser.
[6:14:47] There's a lot of different
[6:14:49] things, I know when we were
[6:14:50] working on agri-tourism we all
[6:14:54] learned a lot about they wanted
[6:14:56] to do like a high-rise with
[6:14:57] fish, I don't know if you guys
[6:14:59] rumor that there was a fish
[6:15:00] high-rise in there.
[6:15:02] We ended up taking out because
[6:15:03] it was just what it was some of
[6:15:05] this in terms of using height
[6:15:07] so we actually took this out of
[6:15:08] agri-tourism.
[6:15:09] I want to make sure all these
[6:15:11] pieces move together so that
[6:15:13] when staff looks at this they
[6:15:19] look at agri-tourism, the
[6:15:21] property appraiser's definition
[6:15:23] county state designation to
[6:15:25] make sure whatever we are
[6:15:27] agreeing to also matches up
[6:15:29] with the regulations of
[6:15:31] agriculture and specifically
[6:15:33] agri-tourism because there's a
[6:15:34] lot of ways it could go
[6:15:35] sideways.
[6:15:36] And if we are excluding
[6:15:38] districts we will gladly bow
[6:15:42] out of this one.
[6:15:44] >> to clarify the actual
[6:15:45] resolution says where
[6:15:46] compatible.
[6:15:56] With the surrounding areas.
[6:15:58] And I'd still like to defer to
[6:16:00] the department for the
[6:16:01] explanation.
[6:16:02] This was taken word for word
[6:16:04] from the agricultural study,
[6:16:06] this is specifically from the
[6:16:07] agriculture study.
[6:16:09] >> I'll move commissioner
[6:16:11] gilbert while we are waiting
[6:16:12] for lourdes to come to the
[6:16:13] podium.
[6:16:15] >>commissioner gilbert: I was
[6:16:22] there with the commissioner and
[6:16:24] the reason why is I don't know
[6:16:25] that excluding is the answer
[6:16:27] but if something is not
[6:16:29] compatible it should say that
[6:16:30] it's not compatible.
[6:16:32] It is less compatible than
[6:16:32] others.
[6:16:34] If you start excluding
[6:16:36] geographic areas, because
[6:16:38] before they even do the study
[6:16:39] we determined it's not
[6:16:40] compatible.
[6:16:41] Then you're saying to the rest
[6:16:43] of us, they can only do it in
[6:16:43] our areas.
[6:16:47] So if me, I think it's probably
[6:16:49] a better practice for us to
[6:16:50] make them list the criteria and
[6:16:58] say why, and I agree on the
[6:17:00] beach and the gangways will be
[6:17:01] incompatible but list these
[6:17:07] things as practice and why they
[6:17:09] become less compatible so we
[6:17:11] get to see the information as
[6:17:12] it's ranked against the rest of
[6:17:14] the other districts.
[6:17:15] >> thank you, so what you
[6:17:24] missed is there were questions
[6:17:27] as relates to exclusion and
[6:17:28] compatibility and so what I
[6:17:30] would do is turn the floor back
[6:17:32] over to commissioner steinberg
[6:17:34] so she can ask the question
[6:17:35] directly.
[6:17:36] >> so this item I know it's
[6:17:38] about vertical agriculture.
[6:17:40] I already have, we go district
[6:17:42] by district, we don't have
[6:17:44] sprawl and that's okay, we
[6:17:45] balance all of that but in this
[6:17:47] there could be more intense
[6:17:49] uses that I have concerns about
[6:18:06] and also who will be deciding
[6:18:08] the parameters ultimately?
[6:18:10] What is it you are comparing
[6:18:12] with this item to bring back to
[6:18:13] us because everything we read
[6:18:15] whether it was in this
[6:18:16] agriculture study, whether in
[6:18:18] the memo was all very high
[6:18:18] level.
[6:18:20] So I don't know if the reality
[6:18:22] of what we are trying to put
[6:18:23] forward is going to translate
[6:18:24] correctly.
[6:18:26] >> it would ultimately come to
[6:18:27] you for adoption, this is
[6:18:29] directing us to do an analysis
[6:18:31] and to make an evaluation so we
[6:18:32] would prepare a report with our
[6:18:34] findings that any changes would
[6:18:36] come before you in the form of
[6:18:38] comprehensive plan amendments.
[6:18:39] So you would have full
[6:18:41] information as to what
[6:18:42] parameters are being
[6:18:43] recommended, if there were any
[6:18:45] geographic areas, all that
[6:18:46] would come before you for
[6:18:47] action.
[6:18:48] >>.
[6:18:49] >> I understand, so in terms of
[6:18:51] the type of vertical, can you
[6:18:52] give me an example because when
[6:18:55] you're talking about
[6:18:57] compatibility, where exactly,
[6:18:59] obviously is not going to be
[6:19:01] compatible in an area that does
[6:19:05] not have vertical environments.
[6:19:06] Or will it?
[6:19:08] I'm trying to understand what
[6:19:13] the vision is potentially.
[6:19:14] >> I think in the ag study
[6:19:16] there are some industrial
[6:19:17] vertical farming operations
[6:19:21] that I don't know that they
[6:19:22] take in the whole here.
[6:19:24] So it's one way of potentially
[6:19:26] supporting proliferation of
[6:19:30] agriculture in more compact
[6:19:31] spaces which could be
[6:19:32] compatible with different uses,
[6:19:35] we have to look at is this
[6:19:37] something that's more
[6:19:40] appropriate in an industrial
[6:19:41] area, could it be commercial
[6:19:43] areas, that's the purpose of
[6:19:46] the analysis.
[6:19:57] >> vertical farming is
[6:19:58] referenced to be a style of
[6:20:00] growing usually done indoors
[6:20:02] with many levels and it can go
[6:20:04] as high or as low, it's just
[6:20:06] not in the dirt.
[6:20:07] Hydroponic is generally the
[6:20:09] type of farming that occurs.
[6:20:11] It is done now in an
[6:20:12] agricultural area and the scale
[6:20:14] is very expensive.
[6:20:15] We've seen a lot of
[6:20:17] proliferation of that through
[6:20:19] the county and one thing to
[6:20:23] understand is this will have
[6:20:24] impacts with regard to state
[6:20:29] statutes so that does
[6:20:30] preemption if the jurisdiction
[6:20:40] once the property becomes
[6:20:41] agriculture.
[6:20:43] >>commissioner steinberg: is
[6:20:44] another concern I have because
[6:20:46] once we zone areas for these
[6:20:48] uses we can no longer generate
[6:20:50] or curtail or have a say if the
[6:20:51] function is still on the books.
[6:20:57] So I wanted to again,
[6:20:58] conceptually I get where you're
[6:20:59] coming from.
[6:21:01] I just have concerns about the
[6:21:02] reality.
[6:21:04] >> as it relates to sparing
[6:21:06] your district, are you okay
[6:21:06] with that now?
[6:21:07] Kay.
[6:21:26] Commissioner, was your question
[6:21:26] answered,
[6:21:28] >> I'm happy, if we're not
[6:21:29] going to carve out good.
[6:21:31] We will do it altogether.
[6:21:32] I wanted to make sure this came
[6:21:34] up when we were doing
[6:21:35] agri-tourism and remember we
[6:21:36] took it out.
[6:21:38] So I just want to make sure
[6:21:39] that when this comes back to
[6:21:41] us, there's some analysis as to
[6:21:43] all the different triggers.
[6:21:45] So this compliance with the
[6:21:46] state is this, to comply with
[6:21:48] our rules and property
[6:21:51] appraiser's designation says
[6:21:53] this and potentially
[6:21:54] agri-tourism just so we have
[6:21:56] clarity because you'll remember
[6:21:58] this was one of the things that
[6:22:00] was thrown into the
[6:22:01] agri-tourism that we had to
[6:22:02] take out.
[6:22:03] Would like it
[6:22:04] separated into those buckets so
[6:22:06] we know how it intersects with
[6:22:09] all the existing agricultural
[6:22:11] designations, that's all.
[6:22:13] >>vice chair mcghee:
[6:22:15] commissioner gonzalez would you
[6:22:17] like to move the item?
[6:22:18] >>commissioner gonzalez: just
[6:22:20] to be sure you will include
[6:22:20] that?
[6:22:22] I will move the item.
[6:22:24] >>vice chair mcghee: all in
[6:22:25] favor, all against.
[6:22:26] Hank you.
[6:22:31] Item passes, the next item is
[6:22:33] 1184, I believe you pull that
[6:22:34] item.
[6:22:36] >>commissioner regalado: I just
[6:22:45] have some questions.
[6:22:47] When we look at our portfolio,
[6:22:49] the iod should be doing this
[6:22:51] already but when we look at our
[6:22:52] portfolio I want to make sure
[6:22:54] that if it's on the master plan
[6:22:58] so for example water and sewer,
[6:23:00] the fact that it is vacant does
[6:23:02] not mean we don't have a plan.
[6:23:04] That's my only issue with the
[6:23:05] way it's written because we
[6:23:07] have a tendency to say vacant
[6:23:10] plan but it MAY be vacant.
[6:23:12] We MAY be using it in three or
[6:23:14] four years and it's part of our
[6:23:14] expansion.
[6:23:18] I think in the case of the
[6:23:19] sheriff and I mention this to
[6:23:26] the sheriff when she spoke
[6:23:28] about her budget, we have an
[6:23:29] oversaturation of sheriff
[6:23:30] assets in that area.
[6:23:35] I think we need to look at
[6:23:37] geographically placing some of
[6:23:38] these things in different parts
[6:23:40] of the county just because that
[6:23:42] is very far from my
[6:23:44] unincorporated area and other
[6:23:45] incorporated areas and while
[6:23:47] there are opportunities there
[6:23:48] particularly with land held by
[6:23:53] solid waste, as long as there
[6:23:55] is compensation to that
[6:23:57] department because that's an
[6:23:59] enterprise department where the
[6:24:00] ratepayers are paying for those
[6:24:02] assets so as long as there is
[6:24:03] compensation I am fine and in
[6:24:05] the case of solid waste water
[6:24:07] and sewer is different because
[6:24:10] of limitations but there should
[6:24:12] be a consideration of other
[6:24:14] areas in the county where some
[6:24:22] of these things could be done.
[6:24:25] I understand proximity is
[6:24:27] important but we have an
[6:24:28] oversaturation in certain areas
[6:24:30] when it comes to public safety
[6:24:32] and as traffic and congestion
[6:24:34] gets more complex maybe it
[6:24:35] would make sense to break this
[6:24:36] up a little bit.
[6:24:38] i did it at the school
[6:24:39] district, I'm not saying
[6:24:41] something I haven't already
[6:24:42] done in terms of transportation
[6:24:44] and policing, just so people
[6:24:46] could respond better.
[6:24:48] Everything from a bus depot to
[6:24:49] policing so I would hope as
[6:24:51] they do this, they look at all
[6:24:53] parcel throughout miami-dade
[6:24:56] county and not just continue to
[6:25:11] concentrate in one geographic
[6:25:12] area.
[6:25:14] >> if we can get chief palmer
[6:25:15] to clarify, I saw the mayor
[6:25:17] raise her hand or their chiefs,
[6:25:19] if they can address that we're
[6:25:20] looking at the county as a
[6:25:22] whole and not looking only at
[6:25:23] doral.
[6:25:25] >> thank you for the question
[6:25:29] and your concerns commissioner.
[6:25:31] What we do understand is this
[6:25:32] is a report we would bring back
[6:25:34] to this board on what
[6:25:36] properties in miami-dade county
[6:25:37] are available for purposes to
[6:25:38] find by the sheriff.
[6:25:43] Those would not only include
[6:25:44] counties assisted properties
[6:25:46] but anything else that MAY or
[6:25:48] MAY not be available based on
[6:25:49] the request she has made.
[6:25:50] I do want to note if we were to
[6:25:51] find something, build something
[6:25:53] or create something for the
[6:25:55] sheriff, even if it's
[6:25:58] proprietary we pay them that
[6:26:00] that money is coming from the
[6:26:01] general fund to cover the
[6:26:02] costs.
[6:26:03] So our desire is always going
[6:26:04] to be too leverage assets.
[6:26:07] That we are already paying for
[6:26:09] so we are not accruing new or
[6:26:13] additional expenses so we meet
[6:26:17] the needs of the sheriff so
[6:26:19] they can continue and
[6:26:28] proliferate their business.
[6:26:30] >>commissioner gonzalez: to
[6:26:32] clarify because commissioner
[6:26:33] regalado pointed this out,
[6:26:35] you're not looking at land
[6:26:36] utilized right now via
[6:26:38] miami-dade county and you're
[6:26:39] not going to look at lamp
[6:26:41] there's a plan for right now in
[6:26:43] miami-dade county collects
[6:26:44] through the chair, per the
[6:26:46] resolution it is available so
[6:26:48] we presume it's available.
[6:26:50] >>vice chair mcghee:
[6:26:52] commissioner hardemon.
[6:26:53] >>commissioner hardemon:
[6:26:55] property is owned by the
[6:26:57] sheriff's office distinct among
[6:27:02] dade county.
[6:27:04] >> through the chair according
[6:27:07] to amendment 10 sheriff is not
[6:27:10] allowed to own real property.
[6:27:11] The county owns any of the
[6:27:13] properties that the sheriff is
[6:27:18] currently utilizing.
[6:27:20] >> so for instance this study
[6:27:22] we are doing, who pays for the
[6:27:22] study?
[6:27:31] >> the county.
[6:27:33] >> so the county charges me to
[6:27:34] pay my facility like I want to
[6:27:36] pave the office that county
[6:27:38] charges me and I know the
[6:27:39] sheriff charges us to utilize
[6:27:42] the sergeant-at-arms, I think
[6:27:42] so.
[6:27:51] So is is within reason to
[6:27:53] charge their sheriff's office
[6:27:55] as well for the services we are
[6:27:55] providing her?
[6:27:57] >>mayor cava: through the
[6:27:59] chair, it's all the same pot of
[6:28:02] money because it's all comes
[6:28:04] from the general fund.
[6:28:06] We do include those things also
[6:28:07] in our agreements with the
[6:28:09] county and we do keep track of
[6:28:11] those things they are part of
[6:28:20] the budget.
[6:28:22] >> I'm trying to conceptualize
[6:28:24] what you're saying, there is a
[6:28:25] budget, it's a pot.
[6:28:29] and in the spot cover a it's a
[6:28:30] certain way, give say for
[6:28:32] instance certain departments or
[6:28:33] offices like the sheriff's
[6:28:35] office as a service of that pot
[6:28:36] which means then we have less
[6:28:40] percentage to use towards other
[6:28:40] things.
[6:28:42] So if we give the sheriff a
[6:28:45] percentage of this time, and
[6:28:49] then we say we're going to do
[6:28:59] this but not charge you, it
[6:29:01] costs money but not from their
[6:29:02] sheriff's portion of the pie so
[6:29:04] the sheriff's got a certain
[6:29:06] percentage plus more because we
[6:29:08] are not using her percentage so
[6:29:09] there's less for other people
[6:29:11] who have the, who don't have as
[6:29:11] much.
[6:29:13] Like when you say to me it's
[6:29:14] all the same fund, but it's not
[6:29:19] coming from her pocket so your
[6:29:20] spending more of the funds that
[6:29:27] we have.
[6:29:29] This is all coming from the
[6:29:30] same pot, is not charging me
[6:29:32] because it's all coming from
[6:29:33] the same pie.
[6:29:35] We've already funded through
[6:29:36] administration to do certain
[6:29:38] things, why charge me from my
[6:29:39] pie to reimburse you for your
[6:29:40] reply so you get more.
[6:29:43] I feel like as commissioner now
[6:29:44] I'm getting the short end of
[6:29:46] the stick because as the
[6:30:07] sheriff raises, she's getting
[6:30:08] branches on her stick.
[6:30:10] That makes no sense.
[6:30:11] You all don't get anything, I'm
[6:30:13] okay with it but I want to make
[6:30:15] sure we are on the same page.
[6:30:16] If you want to make this free
[6:30:18] that's fine, we can do that but
[6:30:20] I want a general understanding
[6:30:22] of when we decide to charge
[6:30:24] people and not because I've
[6:30:26] seen multiple instances where
[6:30:27] certain entities that can
[6:30:28] purport to pay don't pay.
[6:30:30] The entities that can afford to
[6:30:31] pay pay.
[6:30:33] And it just shouldn't be that
[6:30:33] way.
[6:30:35] We should at least be more
[6:30:36] transparent about how we are
[6:30:38] going to go about doing this.
[6:30:40] >>vice chair mcghee: I
[6:30:41] understand click clearly, is
[6:30:43] there a particular question.
[6:30:45] >> I've already asked all the
[6:30:46] charges.
[6:30:48] >> to the administration
[6:30:49] please, we're about to wrap it
[6:30:50] up.
[6:30:52] >> through the chair we do keep
[6:30:53] track of the cost and expenses
[6:31:01] for each department.
[6:31:03] Including those that are
[6:31:04] charged to commissioners.
[6:31:06] Any expenses that are accrued
[6:31:07] by the sheriff we track.
[6:31:09] There are things that are in
[6:31:11] their sheriff's budget like
[6:31:12] there are things in the
[6:31:22] commissioners budgets that we
[6:31:23] then do a cost allocation
[6:31:23] towards.
[6:31:25] Here are often times
[6:31:27] things, that have not been
[6:31:29] budgeted and we make a decision
[6:31:31] based on our financial
[6:31:33] accounting principles on
[6:31:34] whether or not that's something
[6:31:36] we charged to the department or
[6:31:38] is charged to the general fund,
[6:31:40] funds are available to the
[6:31:42] county to address expenses that
[6:31:44] were not previously land so we
[6:31:45] do keep track.
[6:31:47] We keep track of the in-kind
[6:31:49] contributions we make to the
[6:31:50] sheriff's office.
[6:31:52] We keep track of the expenses
[6:31:53] incurred by the county for any
[6:31:55] work we do for the
[6:31:56] constitutional that's not
[6:31:58] budgeted and we keep track of
[6:32:00] course of whether or not they
[6:32:02] are meeting the budget they
[6:32:02] were assigned.
[6:32:05] We do not have the authority to
[6:32:06] say what they do with the money
[6:32:08] they budgeted, they have
[6:32:10] complete authority to use the
[6:32:12] money they've been budgeted the
[6:32:13] way they see fit.
[6:32:15] If there's something overbudget
[6:32:19] then we would accrue those
[6:32:21] funds or apply those funds
[6:32:22] according to where there is
[6:32:24] money available to cover that
[6:32:24] expense.
[6:32:26] This is a report, many times we
[6:32:28] are directed to do reports and
[6:32:30] then we have to find the
[6:32:31] resources to do the reports.
[6:32:33] This does not require us to
[6:32:34] make an expense outside of the
[6:32:36] work it would cost us to do
[6:32:39] this report.
[6:32:41] >>vice chair mcghee:
[6:32:43] commissioner gilbert is next,
[6:32:44] unfollow you but I don't
[6:32:46] believe the question was
[6:32:48] answered away the post but
[6:32:50] commissioner gilbert.
[6:32:52] >>commissioner gilbert: I don't
[6:32:53] think it was either but let me
[6:32:55] say we can't decide when doing
[6:32:57] reports and the human resource
[6:33:05] function of what we do is extra
[6:33:05] allocation.
[6:33:07] I'm thinking back to the cra
[6:33:09] meeting we talked about, I'm
[6:33:09] going to ask the question of
[6:33:11] those items anyway anymore like
[6:33:12] yes so okay, if it is it is.
[6:33:22] It's a human cost, if it's not
[6:33:23] human cost it isn't but
[6:33:24] independent of that this does
[6:33:26] not apply because it is by a
[6:33:31] vote this is happening.
[6:33:33] The commission is sponsoring an
[6:33:35] item that requires staff to do
[6:33:37] a report, it's not something
[6:33:38] that sheriff, it might be
[6:33:40] something she wants but it's
[6:33:46] not something she's having us
[6:33:46] do.
[6:33:48] So you're having us do it.
[6:33:49] It's just like any other thing
[6:33:51] we are having us do, she came
[6:33:53] and said you all have the
[6:33:55] ability to do reports on real
[6:33:56] property in this property I
[6:33:58] want you all to look at and she
[6:34:12] asks us to do that.
[6:34:14] Then yes, we probably have a
[6:34:15] conversation about what we
[6:34:17] should be paying but we are not
[6:34:18] having that conversation.
[6:34:20] This conversation though
[6:34:21] reminds me of I think the item
[6:34:23] of the cars when you invited
[6:34:24] vehicles.
[6:34:25] We go out and buy vehicles
[6:34:27] sometimes we buy vehicles for
[6:34:29] the sheriff's department also.
[6:34:31] So we buy the vehicles for the
[6:34:33] sheriff's department and the
[6:34:35] sheriff's department doesn't
[6:34:36] only vehicles in our general
[6:34:37] bond offerings.
[6:34:39] But we don't we work
[6:34:41] necessarily allocating that
[6:34:42] money as a part of the
[6:34:43] sheriff's budget.
[6:34:45] So I want to make sure we did
[6:34:46] correct that, that we are now
[6:34:48] so if there portion of that
[6:34:49] vehicle by his $70 million,
[6:34:51] that $70 million is included in
[6:34:53] the number we say is in the
[6:34:55] sheriff's budget because they
[6:34:56] are exclusive users of the
[6:34:58] vehicle so I want to make sure
[6:34:59] we fix that first.
[6:35:00] >> I'm not sure I understand
[6:35:02] what you're asking us to fix
[6:35:04] because if there is an expense
[6:35:05] that sheriff has an expense
[6:35:07] that is in their budget that's
[6:35:08] accounted for in their budget.
[6:35:10] >> I know it's an expense in
[6:35:20] their budget but when we buy
[6:35:21] vehicles we are accounting in
[6:35:23] our budget so we were
[6:35:24] accounting for it on our side
[6:35:26] but it wasn't reflective of
[6:35:27] money being used for them.
[6:35:32] If we are doing something for
[6:35:33] them and it might be a
[6:35:35] difference between the
[6:35:36] sheriff's budget is 900,000,900
[6:35:37] 70 million.
[6:35:39] But that's 70 million I
[6:35:41] understand it all comes from a
[6:35:43] general fund but it needs to be
[6:35:45] accurately reflected that's for
[6:35:47] our law enforcement function.
[6:35:49] >> absolutely, we are trying to
[6:35:51] create as much transparency on
[6:35:53] how funds are used to support
[6:35:54] the sheriff that would be above
[6:35:56] and beyond the money that's in
[6:35:58] that budget and that is an
[6:36:11] excellent example.
[6:36:12] >>commissioner gilbert: I want
[6:36:14] to make sure we're doing that
[6:36:16] from a financial perspective, I
[6:36:18] want to make sure when we
[6:36:19] identify these real properties
[6:36:22] we keep in mind you ought to be
[6:36:23] indexing, much it costs us to
[6:36:26] the best extent possible to
[6:36:27] maintain, build because the
[6:36:29] sheriff doesn't own real
[6:36:31] property and the sheriff has a
[6:36:32] checkbook written out of the
[6:36:34] general fund so if we're going
[6:36:36] to acquire property or even
[6:36:37] transfer property there is a
[6:36:39] value coming from proprietary
[6:36:39] fund.
[6:36:41] What is it going to take to
[6:36:43] build it out, whatever it takes
[6:36:45] we have to pay for it, whatever
[6:36:46] it takes to ensure it or turn
[6:36:48] electricity we have to do it so
[6:36:50] that want to be a component of
[6:36:52] everything so we understand if
[6:36:53] we do these things eyes wide
[6:36:55] open this is what it costs
[6:36:57] because we are facing general
[6:36:57] fund restrictions.
[6:37:11] >> that's absolutely right and
[6:37:13] the budgets that are approved
[6:37:15] for each constitutional office
[6:37:17] shows what they have control
[6:37:18] overspending but to your point
[6:37:20] there are expenses the county
[6:37:22] occurs in support of each one
[6:37:24] of them specifically that
[6:37:25] sheriff when it comes to
[6:37:27] property that is accounted for
[6:37:29] on the county side of the books
[6:37:30] book attributed to the sheriff
[6:37:32] to fulfill their duties.
[6:37:34] >>vice chair mcghee:
[6:37:35] commissioner regalado then go
[6:37:38] to commissioner gonzalez.
[6:37:39] >>commissioner regalado: while
[6:37:41] I appreciate your answer you
[6:37:43] didn't answer my question
[6:37:44] because I know how the game
[6:37:44] works.
[6:37:46] We are concerned about the
[6:37:47] general fund.
[6:37:48] The portfolio of solid waste,
[6:37:50] there is a large part of that
[6:37:52] portfolio that sits in
[6:37:55] unincorporated miami-dade near
[6:37:57] doral and clearly that
[6:37:58] portfolio is in play which is
[6:38:00] why my question was if you're
[6:38:02] going to take property from an
[6:38:04] enterprise fund, will you be
[6:38:07] reimbursing that enterprise
[6:38:08] fund and your answer was it's
[6:38:10] all the same money.
[6:38:11] It's not because that comes
[6:38:18] from the trash cans and this is
[6:38:20] why we had a consent decree in
[6:38:21] water and sewer so that's why I
[6:38:23] said we don't have to worry
[6:38:25] about that in water and sewer
[6:38:26] because if the government came
[6:38:28] and told us to stop siphoning
[6:38:30] money for the ratepayers,
[6:38:31] they've yet to do that on the
[6:38:33] solid waste side and I've been
[6:38:35] trying to prevent it though I
[6:38:37] want clarity and that I don't
[6:38:39] have a problem with those solid
[6:38:41] waste sites being included,
[6:38:43] there just has to be a monetary
[6:38:44] determination as to the use of
[6:38:45] those properties.
[6:38:47] i think that there's a lot of
[6:38:49] other properties that right now
[6:38:51] we have that we should consider
[6:38:53] in terms of placement without
[6:38:55] poisoning the well and saying
[6:39:04] because it belongs to the
[6:39:05] county and we could make money
[6:39:07] another way and maybe we
[6:39:08] shouldn't consider it, I think
[6:39:10] we should consider the entire
[6:39:12] portfolio because countywide,
[6:39:13] even though it MAY cost us a
[6:39:15] little bit more right now, the
[6:39:17] placement of that outside of
[6:39:19] the general area where it all
[6:39:21] lives right now MAY be too the
[6:39:23] benefit of the public in the
[6:39:23] future.
[6:39:34] I'm just saying, kionne needs a
[6:39:35] response time like the rest of
[6:39:37] us so let's be dynamic and
[6:39:38] honest about the cost and let
[6:39:39] us decide.
[6:39:43] Trash in, trash out and if we
[6:39:44] go in with this mindset of we
[6:39:46] are so concerned about the
[6:39:48] general fund we're not going to
[6:39:49] come out with proper actions
[6:39:55] and I want clarity on the solid
[6:39:57] waste because solid waste is in
[6:39:59] play, it's going to be the
[6:40:00] formula that I predict is most
[6:40:02] in play.
[6:40:04] >>vice chair mcghee: do you
[6:40:06] need answers to those questions
[6:40:08] right now, do you answer those
[6:40:09] questions so we can get this
[6:40:12] out of the way.
[6:40:14] >> the answer to your question
[6:40:16] is yes, sir okay in that there
[6:40:19] were proprietary properties
[6:40:21] explored, we would have to pay
[6:40:22] or reimburse appropriately
[6:40:30] based on the value of that
[6:40:30] land.
[6:40:32] >>vice chair mcghee:
[6:40:34] commissioner regalado does that
[6:40:36] satisfy your request?
[6:40:38] Commissioner gonzalez then
[6:40:42] milian orbis.
[6:40:43] >>commissioner gonzalez: I want
[6:40:45] to thank commissioner regalado
[6:40:47] because that's the broad
[6:40:49] perspective here, the broad
[6:40:50] perspective is to analyze all
[6:40:53] the properties throughout
[6:40:54] miami-dade county, not
[6:40:56] specifically, to commissioner
[6:40:57] gilbert's point specifically
[6:40:59] for the sheriff's function but
[6:41:01] really for a countywide
[6:41:03] response time in public safety
[6:41:04] benefit which is why we are
[6:41:06] doing the study because for
[6:41:08] example I concur with
[6:41:10] commissioner regalado where a
[6:41:11] primary section of what is
[6:41:13] covered by the sheriff and
[6:41:16] services countywide exists in
[6:41:20] doral but to your point it's
[6:41:22] for somebody from your district
[6:41:26] or commissioner cohen higgins's
[6:41:28] district or mickey's district
[6:41:34] to make their way to doral.
[6:41:36] By identifying these plots of
[6:41:38] land we can begin to plan for
[6:41:40] the future so that is the
[6:41:42] overarching concept year.
[6:41:52] >>chair: commissioner milian
[6:41:53] orbis.
[6:41:54] >>commissioner milian orbis: I
[6:41:57] and obviously supportive of the
[6:41:58] item, I asked to cosponsor it
[6:42:00] and would you accept the
[6:42:01] distinction is made in the
[6:42:03] report that commissioner
[6:42:04] regalado essay, the funding is
[6:42:06] coming from so we can keep
[6:42:08] share of those different
[6:42:10] distinctions and parcels being
[6:42:11] identified.
[6:42:12] >>vice chair mcghee: did you
[6:42:21] get that MR. Attorney?
[6:42:23] Seeing no other questions
[6:42:25] commissioner gonzalez would you
[6:42:26] like to move the item?
[6:42:27] Seeing it as moved and
[6:42:29] seconded, all in favor, all
[6:42:29] against.
[6:42:30] Item passes.
[6:42:33] >> we have a cosponsorship
[6:42:35] request.
[6:42:37] >>vice chair mcghee:
[6:42:38] commissioner lopez, cosponsor,
[6:42:39] thank you.
[6:42:41] We have four items left ladies
[6:42:43] and gentlemen we will be out of
[6:42:43] here.
[6:42:45] Two airports items, hp 283 we
[6:42:46] have to call those
[6:42:47] individually.
[6:42:48] Because those are aviation
[6:42:52] items for statute.
[6:42:54] Do we have someone who wants to
[6:42:56] move hp two.
[6:42:57] Someone added, we have a motion
[6:43:04] on the second, all in favor.
[6:43:06] All against, item passes, hp
[6:43:08] three we have a motion and it's
[6:43:13] moved and seconded, all in
[6:43:14] favor.
[6:43:16] >>commissioner regalado: if I
[6:43:17] could have a motion real quick,
[6:43:19] we've already moved.
[6:43:25] Motion for hp three, signify by
[6:43:30] saying gay.
[6:43:30] Against.
[6:43:31] Item passes.
[6:43:37] Your motion.
[6:43:39] >>commissioner regalado: if not
[6:43:39] I will read it.
[6:44:07] Your there.
[6:44:09] >> moved to direct the county
[6:44:11] mayor or designee to organize a
[6:44:13] charrette or similar planning
[6:44:14] exercise for the portion of the
[6:44:16] east kendall area located in
[6:44:18] district 7 approximately bound
[6:44:20] by southwest 88 street kendall
[6:44:21] drive on the north, 120th
[6:44:23] street on the south, southwest
[6:44:24] 97th avenue on the west and
[6:44:26] dixie highway and estate road
[6:44:28] 826 on the east and in
[6:44:30] accordance to land-use matters
[6:44:32] these exercises should have
[6:44:34] included an assessment of
[6:44:35] infrastructure improvements
[6:44:37] needed to the area for further
[6:44:39] meetings for such exercises
[6:44:40] shall not extend beyond a
[6:44:42] formal duration shall be
[6:44:43] permitted to be conducted
[6:44:45] virtually in accordance with
[6:44:46] all applicable law.
[6:44:47] Ommissioner moves to direct
[6:44:49] the county mayor or designee
[6:44:51] after the completion of the
[6:44:53] charrette or similar planning
[6:44:55] exercises to prepare a written
[6:44:57] report to recommendation
[6:44:58] regarding after mentioned
[6:45:00] directive place a completed
[6:45:01] report on an agenda without
[6:45:03] committee review within six
[6:45:05] months of the effective date
[6:45:07] pursuant to rule 5.0 6j of the
[6:45:08] board's rules of procedure.
[6:45:09] >> all in favor.
[6:45:11] All against, item passes, last
[6:45:13] two items, commissioner I
[6:45:14] believe it's 14 a2 which is
[6:45:15] your interlocal.
[6:45:17] Do we have a second, all in
[6:45:17] favor.
[6:45:19] All against, joe this item
[6:45:21] passes and that's the last one
[6:45:22] on the agenda is 1484, that
[6:45:24] belongs to commissioner
[6:45:25] hardemon, catering renovation
[6:45:27] seconded by commissioner colin
[6:45:28] higgins, all in favor.
[6:45:30] Joe this item passes, MR.
[6:45:31] Attorney any other issues
[6:45:32] before this board?
[6:45:33] Any motions?
[6:45:36] Motion, commissioner gilbert.
[6:45:38] >>commissioner gilbert: county
[6:45:41] attorney as to motions, commit
[6:45:43] mayor turner to the commission
[6:45:45] on enterprise and the third is
[6:45:46] to convey real property in opa
[6:45:48] locka to the county so we could
[6:45:50] see if we can work with their
[6:45:52] cra redevelopment, can be read
[6:45:53] those motions.
[6:45:55] >> moves that this board can
[6:45:56] they stay on real property
[6:45:58] within the city of opa locka to
[6:46:00] miami-dade county for purpose
[6:46:02] of redevelopment, to direct the
[6:46:04] clerk to transmit a certified
[6:46:05] copy of the resolution to the
[6:46:07] governor, PRESIDENT Of the
[6:46:09] senate house speaker and chair
[6:46:11] and members of the legislative
[6:46:13] mission, three direct the state
[6:46:15] lobbyist to advocate for the
[6:46:17] intergovernmental affairs to
[6:46:18] include this item in a 2026
[6:46:20] legislative package when it is
[6:46:22] presented to the board.
[6:46:24] >>vice chair mcghee: second,
[6:46:25] can I have a second, second by
[6:46:27] commissioner trent 25 regalado,
[6:46:29] second motion, MADAM Attorney.
[6:46:36] >>.
[6:46:37] >>commissioner gilbert: I moved
[6:46:39] to appoint jessica meyerson to
[6:46:41] the committee on human rights,
[6:46:43] >>vice chair mcghee: are there
[6:46:45] motions set before this board.
[6:46:45] You have one?
[6:46:51] Senator garcia.
[6:46:53] >> amend resolution are 3526
[6:46:55] which was adopted by this for
[6:46:59] JUNE 16 and women thing certain
[6:47:01] state law changes to the rer be
[6:47:03] scheduled to make the following
[6:47:12] corrections to the influencing
[6:47:13] order which was attached as
[6:47:15] exhibit a to the resolution,
[6:47:17] one a bottom number page 4 of
[6:47:17] the b
[6:47:19] 42 include the provisions
[6:47:21] of subsection 2c inadvertently
[6:47:23] shown as deleted as a new
[6:47:24] subsection and on the bottom of
[6:47:26] page 10 amend subsection 6d to
[6:47:28] add the word not so that
[6:47:29] subsection 60 shall read work
[6:47:31] with the canal right-of-way not
[6:47:33] requiring hydraulic analysis
[6:47:34] including analysis or
[6:47:36] evaluation of impacts to canal
[6:47:37] conveyance, staged velocity
[6:47:39] storage, tail water conditions
[6:47:47] or water surface elevations.
[6:47:48] >>vice chair mcghee: do I have
[6:47:50] a second?
[6:47:52] >>commissioner bermudez: I will
[6:47:52] second but
[6:47:54] give me a written report.
[6:47:56] >>vice chair mcghee: all in
[6:47:58] favor, all against, item passes
[6:48:00] and any other motions at this
[6:48:02] particular time.
[6:48:03] >>commissioner regalado: I have
[6:48:05] an appointment.
[6:48:06] >>vice chair mcghee: give me
[6:48:11] one second.
[6:48:13] >>mayor cava: I need to address
[6:48:13] that last item.
[6:48:15] As a reminder we like any
[6:48:17] copies of amendments, it's
[6:48:18] difficult for us to evaluate it
[6:48:20] if we do not see it but I have
[6:48:22] better news which is to thank
[6:48:24] commissioner hardemon and lopez
[6:48:25] who worked together to obtain
[6:48:27] the funding to complete the
[6:48:29] caleb center renovation.
[6:48:30] Appointments.
[6:48:31] >>commissioner regalado: I want
[6:48:33] to appoint erin caesar to the
[6:48:35] biscayne bay shoreline
[6:48:44] development review.
[6:48:46] >>commissioner cohen higgins: I
[6:48:47] have appointments on the behalf
[6:48:49] of CHAIRMAN Rodriguez, amending
[6:48:51] our six 3226 relating to fiscal
[6:48:52] year 2026 action plan funding
[6:48:53] recommendations for funding
[6:48:54] from the united states urban
[6:48:59] development increase
[6:49:02] recommendations on mdc 001 from
[6:49:20] 198 thousand $501 to $198,560.
[6:49:21] Four miami-dade county housing
[6:49:24] and urban development economic
[6:49:25] development public facilities
[6:49:28] and capital improvements, if I
[6:49:29] read that correctly it's a
[6:49:31] motion to correct a scriveners
[6:49:33] error or a difference of a
[6:49:40] whopping $50.
[6:49:42] And I have another motion on
[6:49:43] behalf of CHAIRMAN Rodriguez,
[6:49:45] moves pursuant to rule 5.064 of
[6:49:47] this board's rules of procedure
[6:49:49] to extend indefinitely approval
[6:49:51] period for all legislative
[6:49:52] requests eligible for an
[6:49:54] extension made by the CHAIRMAN
[6:49:56] And I have exact same motion so
[6:49:57] I make the same motion pursuant
[6:50:00] to the same rule, thank you.
[6:50:02] >>vice chair mcghee: do we have
[6:50:04] a second, commissioner lopez
[6:50:05] seconds the item.
[6:50:07] Let me get through this motion
[6:50:08] first, all in favor, all
[6:50:10] against, motion is passed.
[6:50:12] MADAM Attorney.
[6:50:14] >> we have two more, pursuant
[6:50:16] to rule 5.026 of the rules of
[6:50:27] procedure vice CHAIRMAN Mcghee
[6:50:29] and commissioner bermudez and
[6:50:31] commissioner gilbert,
[6:50:32] commissioner lopez,
[6:50:34] commissioner cdmp moved to
[6:50:36] extend indefinitely approval
[6:50:37] period for all legislative
[6:50:39] requests for axis extension
[6:50:42] made by each group perspective
[6:50:43] commissioner.
[6:50:44] >>commissioner bermudez: I'm
[6:50:46] sorry but everyone is included
[6:50:47] in this one.
[6:50:50] Motion to pass it.
[6:50:52] >>vice chair mcghee: there are
[6:50:54] actual rules, seeing the items
[6:50:56] are moved do we have a second?
[6:50:58] Second by commissioner lopez.
[6:50:59] Ll against, show the item
[6:51:00] passes.
[6:51:05] Any other motions.
[6:51:07] >> on commissioner gilberts
[6:51:09] motion that would apply to both
[6:51:12] the 26 and 2027 calendar years.
[6:51:14] >>vice chair mcghee: thank you,
[6:51:15] any other issues or business
[6:51:17] before the board before we
[6:51:17] adjourn.
[6:51:59] Motion to adjourn.
[6:52:03] Since