[0:00] Resolution 267205.
Uh, meeting was called to order by Gary
[0:05] Bartell at 6:00 p.m.
Um, attendees, Gary Bartell, Deputy
[0:11] Reeve. Derek Bartell, counselor. Uh,
Clint Johnson, counselor. Ken Reer,
[0:16] counselor. Leanne Hutman, counselor.
Gail Wagner, counselor. Trevor Woke,
[0:20] chief administrative officer. Uh,
welcome Sher Tall. First meeting,
[0:25] municipal clerk. and absent with notice.
Um, Reed Larry Mahalchek. Could I have a
[0:31] mover and a seconder, please? Derek
Clint. All in favor? Carried. You
[0:50] have a little thing for Carrie typically
or just a sign? Just sign. Just sign.
[0:54] Okay, perfect.
[0:59] Okay. Approval of the agenda
uh resolution 268 2025.
[1:06] Uh be it resolved that the meeting for
the regular council meeting of be it
[1:12] resolved that the meeting agenda for the
regular council meeting of July 2nd 2025
[1:17] be approved as presented. Move in a
second here. Lean Gale. Any discussion?
[1:25] Go for the vote. All in favor? Carried.
[1:39] Okay. The minutes from
June 17th. Everybody have a chance to
[1:45] look at those?
[1:51] Read the resolution then. Resolution
2692025
[1:55] be it resolved that the meeting minutes
of the regular meeting of council on
[1:58] June 17th, 2025 be approved as
presented. Moved by Derek, seconded by
[2:06] Kim.
Any further discussion?
[2:10] All in favor? Carried.
[2:23] Okay. The special meeting of council on
June 20th.
[2:29] Chance to go through that one.
[2:36] Okay. Already the resolution 270-2025.
be resolved that the meeting minutes of
[2:42] the special meeting of council on June
20th, 2025 be approved as presented.
[2:47] Move by. Yeah.
Seconded. Can all in favor? Car.
[3:03] Okay. We have no protective services
tonight. We have no uh public works. we
[3:09] want to finance.
[3:12] I had a chance to come in and look at
the uh financial package. So, if anybody
[3:17] had any questions, it's a larger amount
this time, so
[3:21] I could uh explain some of that.
[3:27] Take a minute on it. What do we need
here?
[3:34] Our
[3:43] greater repair was in there. That was a
little larger than we anticipated to. I
[3:47] was going to ask by about 20,000. Yeah.
That was also quicker, right? It was.
[3:53] Yes. So, we didn't have to utilize the
uh the uh customs services. So, in the
[3:59] long run, we're probably ahead of the
game, but the repair itself was was more
[4:04] money than we thought. I think it ended
up 70 some odd thousand 70,47.
[4:10] Yeah.
Right.
[4:14] And then we had kind of calculated the
yardage for the uh gravel hauling
[4:18] contract. That is not quite the halfway
mark. Yeah. for yardage like that.
[4:26] There's around 10,000 yards from the
slips that I looked at there. So, we can
[4:32] probably double that and then a little
on that yet before we're done.
[4:44] Give everybody another minute or two if
there's anything. Did you have anything
[4:49] there?
Okay.
[4:52] Gale. No.
[4:57] because it's easier to read it like this
on my phone
[5:03] um in your truck.
[5:09] What did they find in the inspe?
[5:16] Yeah. Yep.
Did you want that included on his report
[5:22] next week? You could just Yeah. copy of
each of them. Sure. Want a copy or just
[5:27] a summary that you can write up? Maybe a
summary would be fine. Sure. Summary. I
[5:31] think good with the summary.
Question. How come in this?
[5:41] She's a contractor.
Yeah, she's a contractor.
[5:49] So, we'll just get a little summary from
Ken with his report if we can.
[6:02] Good. Thank you. Anything else from
anybody or I'll read the resolution.
[6:07] We're going for it. Resolution 271-2025.
Be it resolved that accounts payable
[6:14] checks number 14130 to 14187 for the
total amount of 314,394.30
[6:23] be accepted as presented and approved
for payment.
[6:27] Moved by Leanne, seconded by Gail.
All in favor? That is carried.
[6:45] Okay, we're on to pay period 13 here
for 2025 for payroll.
[6:53] uh resolution 272-2025
be it resolved that payroll pay period
[6:59] 13 2025 for the period from June 7th to
June 20th 2025 and in the amount of
[7:05] $27,000
$27,50.96
[7:12] be accepted as presented and approved
for payment by Ken
[7:18] seconded by Clint.
Further discussion on that? All in
[7:23] favor? That is carried.
[7:38] Okay. This is uh resolution 273-2025
be resolved that the per council DMs
[7:44] from June 1st to June 30th 2025 in the
amount of $9716
[7:50] even be accepted as presented and
approved for payment moved by
[7:56] Derek
seconded by
[8:01] Ken.
Further discussion.
[8:06] All in favor? That is carried.
[8:21] Okay, this is bank account change.
[8:27] Just going to flip through the paperwork
for that.
[8:39] I can speak to that if you want. Yes, I
was just going to ask Trevor. Sorry.
[8:43] Sorry. Yeah. So, uh, with the
resignation of a chief administrative
[8:47] officer, I myself, uh, we need to have
staff that have the ability to inquiry
[8:51] access, uh, I bank accounts, all of the
accounts operating as well as reserve.
[8:57] And this will let them actually inquire
on transactions, work with them directly
[9:00] for bank reconciliations as well as, uh,
print uh, bank statements as required.
[9:05] So this resolution is to provide the
administrative clerk one uh currently
[9:10] administrative clerk one and the manager
of finance accounting uh both inquiry
[9:14] about the access uh to our swap valley
uh bank account uh portal. Okay. That
[9:21] would include the credit card and the
whole everything that we have there. Uh
[9:25] no credit card's different because
that's under a different organization.
[9:28] Oh okay. Well that's Catalis or
something. Yes. Yeah. And you've already
[9:31] provided that by a former resolution.
Operation has that access. Great. Okay.
[9:37] Any more discussion or questions on
that? Okay. We'll read the resolution.
[9:42] Resolution 274-2025.
Be it resolved that the municipality of
[9:47] Maton dispose provide bank account
inquiry access permission to the
[9:51] administrative clerk 1 employee and
manager of finance and accounting
[9:56] contract employee. Moved by Derek.
Seconded by Leanne. All in favor?
[10:02] carried.
Thanks for that report there too.
[10:13] Okay, we are on to
[10:21] summersuit. Yeah, this is what I was
looking for though. A period
[10:28] kind of ticking off on the package as I
go along here. So yes, the summer
[10:34] student um hourly wage rate change. Do
you want to speak a bit on that too, Sh?
[10:39] Uh so historically the municipality uh
whenever had a summer student employee
[10:43] returned for a follow-up season, uh
we've already paid always paid them
[10:47] either the greater of the minimum wage
which required to uh by law or uh $1
[10:53] more than what they were being paid from
the previous uh hourly rate. Uh for this
[10:57] year we have one student that has
returned uh for second season which is
[11:01] great. The benefit there being they've
already been trained, they already have
[11:05] all the gear because we've already
bought them all the gear and it just
[11:08] it's good to have those people there
rather than starting off from scratch
[11:10] with a brand new green person. And in
the project that we did uh last year for
[11:16] our uh payroll bands and the actual step
for the bands, we had put the summer
[11:21] student as just basically minimum wage
rate because this item didn't come up uh
[11:25] in a discussion. So be that we're aware
of it now, what this resolution does
[11:29] enables us to revise our actual payroll
bands and hourly rates to say that
[11:34] returning summer students are the
greater of minimum wage rate at the time
[11:38] of hire or the um uh prior hourly rate
plus $1 close to $1. So you'll see in
[11:44] the attachments the previous uh payroll
u payans and steps and one that's
[11:50] revised, they're identical except for
towards the bottom where it talks about
[11:53] returning summer students.
Sounds good.
[11:59] Anybody have anything they'd like to add
or question on it? Pretty
[12:03] straightforward, I think.
Okay, we will go with the resolution
[12:08] then. Resolution 275-2025.
Be it resolved that the wage rate for
[12:14] the returning summer student employees
be revised to the greater of the prior
[12:19] hourly wage rate plus a dollar for the
Manitoba minimum wage rate. Moved by
[12:27] Kim
seconder.
[12:32] All in favor?
[12:42] Okay,
we are on to municipal clerk
[12:46] compensation change.
Would you like to read the
[12:51] recommendation now, Trevor? Uh, sure.
The recommendation is that the news
[12:55] condimental disposment increase the news
clerk's employees wage rate from step
[13:01] three, which is a rate of $25.68, 58 to
step five which will be a rate of $26.71
[13:07] per hour effective July 7th. Uh this
works out to be an hourly rate increase
[13:13] of $1.3 per hour. Uh also all
recommended is that the mun provide
[13:18] municipality clerk overtime for evening
hours worked provided during to support
[13:23] council during his meetings. And the
reason being is that the municipal clerk
[13:27] would originally hire supposed to be
working two and a half days per week
[13:31] regular time. Uh but my absence uh
following uh this be my last meeting. Uh
[13:36] basically the new school clerk will be
actually supporting council in the
[13:40] evening hours uh for these meetings and
this would only be in fact until uh the
[13:45] chief administrative officer is hired
and then of course that person will take
[13:49] over this role and then clerk.
[13:56] Thank you. Anybody
have anything they'd like to add or
[14:04] good? I don't see anybody saying
anything or seeing anybody hand
[14:09] anybody's hands up. I guess we'll read
the resolution.
[14:12] 276-2025.
Be it resolved that the municipal clerk
[14:17] employee wage rate be increased from the
step three rate of 2568
[14:21] per hour
to the step five rate of 2671 per hour.
[14:27] effective July 7th, 2025.
Moved by Derek,
[14:34] seconded by Clint.
Any further discussion? All in favor?
[14:54] Next one is administrative clerk to
appointment.
[14:58] Uh would you like to do the same thing
for that one chair please? Sure. Um the
[15:02] recommendation is that the municipal
boss uh increase the pay for clerk
[15:06] employees uh wage rate from actually
[15:12] actually disregard that uh there's an
error on the actual
[15:17] um I just spotted it now. So in a
nutshell what the actual resolution is
[15:23] just jump back to that.
[15:30] Okay.
[15:45] Okay. How about we go to announcements?
I'm just going to do an update on this.
[15:48] I was just going to suggest maybe we'll
take this one a bit down the road here.
[15:52] Then we need
two seconds.
[16:03] or even if you want to do it after the
have it ready for after the uncertainty.
[16:28] Okay. Pretty quite a little span there.
Okay. Garrett,
[16:33] I don't think I have a whole bunch
either.
[16:38] No, nothing. Thoughts on the G4? Oh, G4.
I guess we attended a few of us. Eh,
[16:44] who wants to talk about that? Ken, what
have you got?
[16:48] I was curious to see what you thought.
[16:54] Did you have anything or just one topic
out of the G4 you found interesting or
[16:58] want to talk about or not particularly
you're leaving it to Can I leave it to I
[17:05] see that already.
Okay. Nothing else.
[17:10] Sherry, I include everybody. So, did you
have anything you'd like to
[17:16] say at all? Okay. Thank you. Uh,
clinched. I'm gonna leave it to Ken,
[17:22] too. I totally forgot.
I don't think we had any meetings. I
[17:28] hope Ken remembers now. Yeah. Really
putting the pressure on. Putting the
[17:31] pressure. Okay, Gail. I got nothing.
Okay. I wasn't there.
[17:40] Be a real quick round the table thing.
Uh, the thing that stood out to me was,
[17:45] uh, there was a police officer there. I
forget what his position was exactly,
[17:50] but uh he had a pretty good
understanding about this new police
[17:56] force that we're the GIS GIS that we're
trying to get and uh yeah, it was just
[18:02] interesting to hear from him the
roadblocks towards putting people behind
[18:08] bars and and also some of the things
that are working. So, I got to admit I
[18:14] was I'm still a little bit skeptical
about all the money we're paying for
[18:19] these new police officers and whether
they're going to really do that much
[18:23] good, but listening to him, it sounds
like maybe it's going to be money well
[18:27] spent. Good. And that was the crest, the
guy, the crest. Is that the title for
[18:33] that? Yeah. Okay, good. Well, that
sounds positive then. And yeah, it was
[18:38] good. Perfect.
Anything else? No, that's all I got.
[18:43] Okay. Thank you. Trevor, are you working
on that or do you have anything you need
[18:47] to report on here? I have no
announcements, but I've got the right
[18:50] documents up now. If you want to flip
back to the previous item or Yeah, I'll
[18:53] just give my little report. I had one or
a couple maybe two things here. Uh I had
[19:00] uh watershed meeting, just a typical
board meeting, nothing crazy on that
[19:05] one, just uh routine of the financials
and that type of thing. So we had that
[19:09] last week and then just a little report
on the July 1st event here. Went off
[19:14] very good. We had a good representation
from the fire department like those
[19:19] numbers are getting higher every year
which is nice. We had uh some council
[19:23] members and some council members
spouses. We had um some volunteers from
[19:28] the community again. So that was nice
and went smooth. Served about 450 people
[19:34] and didn't have to run for anything. We
had a little bit of stuff left over and
[19:38] so it went really good and a lot of good
comments. I think Gail was at at the
[19:42] greeting table there. She maybe heard
some stuff too or hopefully it was all
[19:47] positive. All good. Yeah. No what? No
pens this year. That was the only one I
[19:51] heard a few times. Okay. Special. Yeah.
But no, the event went good. So I just
[19:57] wanted to give a little report on that.
That's all I had. So we'll go back to
[20:02] the um administrative clerk to
appointment. Okay. Uh so the
[20:07] administrative clerk 2 appointment
agenda item uh is a recommendation to
[20:12] take our current administrative clerk
one employee and transfer her into a
[20:17] position which is the administrative
clerk 2 employee and this she's
[20:21] currently at step one on the
administrative clerk uh pay and she'd be
[20:25] moving to step one of the administrative
clerk to position. Uh the reason is for
[20:30] this is that um this person was hired uh
green with no municipal government
[20:36] experience uh at all. But she you could
tell during the interview uh basically
[20:41] there was good potential there. You
could tell during the interview that
[20:44] basically there was uh a willingness to
actually invest the time and effort to
[20:48] learn as well as provide u service and
those expectations she's actually
[20:52] exceeded those expectations. So with the
uh myself not being in the position and
[20:57] the fact that she's taken on extra
project work even when I was here as
[21:01] well as uh learned and became a central
part of our customer service front desk
[21:06] very knowledgeable at the front um if we
do hiring uh we have not been previously
[21:11] successful in hiring a new
administrative two person um I what we
[21:15] basically done is we've developed this
one into admin 2 and my recommendation
[21:19] is that we approve that transition to an
admin two role at the step one And
[21:24] basically if the council so choose the
future you can then recruit easier for
[21:28] the bid one position if you so choose to
in the future. So the recommendation
[21:32] that the newest pallet to boseman
appoint the current administrative clerk
[21:36] one employee to the administrative clerk
position at the step one wage rate of
[21:41] $2716.
[21:45] Sounds reasonable to me as far as you
know searching down the road. 19 cents.
[21:50] I don't know if the 3 cents will make a
difference, but
[21:56] on the last page it says clerk 2 is
2719. Oh, I was looking at the
[22:01] recommendation. Sorry, I didn't. Yeah,
make that 19 cents. So 3 cents more.
[22:06] Just so you don't have to type it for a
third time.
[22:10] So the resolution is is it 16 or 19? 19.
Okay, please.
[22:19] Okay, thanks for that, Trevor. Read the
resolution. Resolution 277-2025
[22:25] be it resolved that the municipality of
Maton's Boseman appoint the current
[22:29] administrative clerk one employee to the
administrative clerk to position at the
[22:33] step one wage rate of 2719 per hour.
Moved by Gail,
[22:41] seconded by Keny.
Any further discussion?
[22:46] All in favor? Carried.
[22:58] Okay, this is to go to camera now.
Uh resolution 278 2025
[23:08] be it resolved that pursuant to section
152 section 3 of the municipal act
[23:13] despite subsections one and two council
shall meet as a committee of the whole
[23:19] to close the meeting and continue
discussion in camera regarding employee
[23:22] land legal and matter that is in its
preliminary stages and respecting with
[23:27] discussions in public with prejudice the
municipality of Minnesota Boseman's
[23:31] ability to carry out its activities or
negotiations. Pursuant to section 83,
[23:38] section 1, paragraph D, council members
shall keep in confidence a matter
[23:42] discussed at a meeting closed to the
public under subsection
[23:46] 152 section 3 until a matters discussed
at a meeting conducted in public.
[23:52] Pursuant to section 94 paragraph 1
section H, a council member becomes
[23:57] disqualified for breaching the
requirement of confidentiality
[24:00] confidentiality under clause 83 section
1 paragraph D and time Trevor time is
[24:08] 6:24 6:24
Could I have a mover and a second to go
[24:14] into camera please? Can uh can Derek
and
[24:20] Leanne
All in favor carried. Resolution
[24:25] 279-2025
be it resolved that pursuant to section
[24:30] 152 section 4 of the municipal act this
meeting shall be reopened to the public
[24:34] at 859. Moved by Eric seconded by
Clint. All in favor carried.
[24:49] Okay. Resolution number 280-2025
be it resolved that this regular meeting
[24:56] of council be adjourned at 9:00 moved by
Gail and seconded by Leanne. All in
[25:05] favor that is carried. Good meeting and
thank you all.