TODAY IS WEDNESDAY, MAY 13TH, 2026, AND I WILL NOW CALL THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING TO ORDER AT 630. ROLL CALL. LOOKS LIKE WE MADE IT BY WITH THE QUORUM, SO WE'RE OKAY. AGENDA ITEM NUMBER THREE. WE'RE GOING TO GO INTO CLOSED EXECUTIVE SESSION. THE TIME IS 630 AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION WILL NOW GO INTO CLOSED EXECUTIVE SESSION PURSUANT TO SECTION FIVE FIVE, 1.07, ONE OF THE TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE. THE TIME IS NOW 648. AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION WILL NOW RECONVENE INTO REGULAR SESSION. OKAY. WE'RE ON AGENDA ITEM NUMBER FIVE. THAT'S CONSIDER APPROVING THE MINUTES OF THE APRIL 8TH, 2026, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING. IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE APRIL 8TH, 2026 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING? LOOKS LIKE THERE'S BEEN A MOTION AND A SECOND. CAN VOTE. OKAY. MOTION CARRIES. AGENDA ITEM FIVE BE. CONSIDER APPROVING THE MINUTES OF THE MAY 6TH, 2026 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING. IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE THOSE MINUTES? MOTION. AND SECOND OUT THERE. OKAY. MOTION AND SECOND. EVERYBODY VOTE. MOTION CARRIES. AGENDA ITEM NUMBER SIX. COMMISSION REPORTS. I JUST WANT TO TAKE THIS OPPORTUNITY, SINCE IT'S ACTUALLY MY FIRST REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING. AS YOUR CHAIRMAN, I JUST WANT TO SAY IT'S AN HONOR TO BE THE CHAIRMAN OF THE MISSOURI CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. AND I JUST WANT TO THANK MY FELLOW COMMISSIONERS FOR VOTING, GIVING ME A VOTE OF CONFIDENCE. I DO APPRECIATE THAT. I KNOW THAT PLANNING AND ZONING IS OFTEN A THANKLESS, COMPLEX JOB, BUT WE ARE TASKED WITH BALANCING GROWTH AND PRESERVATION. AND I KNOW AND YOU GUYS KNOW THAT THAT'S NOT EASY, BUT I AM VERY EXCITED TO WORK WITH YOU GUYS IN THIS CAPACITY. MY COMMITMENT AS A CHAIRMAN IS TO ONE RESPECT. I WILL ENSURE EVERY VOTE, EVERY VOICE IS HEARD, WHETHER IT'S ANOTHER COMMISSIONER OR THE PUBLIC. TWO. PREPARATION. I PROMISE TO COME PREPARED TO EVERY MEETING, AND I ENCOURAGE YOU GUYS TO DO THE SAME THING. AND NUMBER THREE, THE PROCESS. WE WILL ABIDE BY OUR RULES AT ETHICALLY AND BASE OUR DECISIONS ON OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND LEGAL STANDARDS, NOT OUR EMOTIONS. I ENCOURAGE ALL OF YOU TO BRING YOUR BEST IDEAS TO THE TABLE, ASK TOUGH QUESTIONS, CHALLENGE US TO THINK CREATIVELY ABOUT THE FUTURE OF OUR CITY. AND ONCE AGAIN, I JUST WANT TO SAY THANK YOU. ANY OTHER REPORTS? COMMISSIONERS? NONE. OKAY. WE WILL MOVE. WHERE ARE WE? SEE ITEM C? YEAH, I'M LOOKING HERE. WE'RE AT AGENDA ITEM C, RECOGNIZE FORMER COMMISSIONERS JOHN O'MALLEY AND JAMES BAILEY FOR THEIR YEARS OF SERVICE. SO NOW I'LL MOVE AND I'LL INVITE JENNIFER THOMAS GOMEZ TO PROVIDE THE RECOGNITION. THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER CHAIR. I WOULD ASK COUNCIL MEMBER SONIA BROWN MARSHALL IF SHE COULD JOIN US. AND, COMMISSIONER JOHN O'MALLEY, IF YOU COULD STAND FOR THE AUDIENCE. AND I'M GOING TO READ IN CHAIR PEARSON, IF YOU CAN COME DOWN, I'M GOING TO READ A LITTLE STATEMENT. WE HAVE A SMALL TOKEN OF APPRECIATION. AND THEN IF WE COULD TAKE SOME PICTURES. OKAY. SO TONIGHT WE RECOGNIZE AND CELEBRATE COMMISSIONER JOHN O'MALLEY FOR 22 YEARS OF DEDICATED SERVICE ON THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MISSOURI CITY. SERVING ON THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION IS AN IMPORTANT RESPONSIBILITY THAT REQUIRES TIME PREPARATION, THOUGHTFUL CONSIDERATION AND A STRONG COMMITMENT TO THE FUTURE OF THE
COMMUNITY. OVER THE PAST 22 YEARS, COMMISSIONER O'MALLEY HAS HELPED GUIDE DECISIONS RELATED TO LAND USE, DEVELOPMENT, ZONING PLANNING, PARKLAND, LONG RANGE PLANNING, ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN STANDARDS, LANDSCAPING, SIGNAGE, SCREENING, AND MANY OTHER ASPECTS. THROUGHOUT HIS SERVICE. COMMISSIONER O'MALLEY HAS CHAMPIONED RESIDENTS AND NEIGHBORHOODS AS WELL AS THE GROWTH AND SUCCESS OF THE BUSINESS COMMUNITY. THE COMMUNITY WE SEE TODAY REFLECTS THE INPUT AND COMMITMENT COMMISSIONER O'MALLEY HAS PROVIDED THROUGH HIS YEARS OF SERVICE, THROUGH COUNTLESS MEETINGS, PUBLIC HEARINGS, AND DEVELOPMENT DISCUSSIONS. COMMISSIONER O'MALLEY HAS CONSISTENTLY PROVIDED A VALUED PERSPECTIVE WHILE HELPING SHAPE THE GROWTH AND CHARACTER OF MISSOURI CITY. THE LEVEL OF LONG TERM VOLUNTEER PUBLIC SERVICE REFLECTS A DEEP COMMITMENT TO CIVIC ENGAGEMENT AND COMMUNITY STEWARDSHIP. TONIGHT, WE EXTEND OUR SINCERE APPRECIATION AND GRATITUDE TO COMMISSIONER O'MALLEY FOR 22 YEARS OF SERVICE AND DEDICATION TO THE CITY OF MISSOURI CITY. PLEASE JOIN US IN CONGRATULATING AND THANKING COMMISSIONER JOHN O'MALLEY. JOHN, YOU WERE SO YOUNG. WOW. I HOPE THAT IT WASN'T THIS COMMISSION THAT DID THAT. CONGRATULATIONS. YOU'VE STILL GOT THE SAME SMILE. YOU SEE THE. COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONER COME OVER. YES, SIR. HURRY, HURRY, HURRY! ALL RIGHT. ALL RIGHT. AND THEN ONE MORE WITH JUST THE COMMISSIONERS. IT'S A LITTLE WEIRD. OH. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. AND, CHAIR. JUST ONE MORE. OKAY. NOW, WE ALSO WOULD LIKE TO RECOGNIZE FORMER COMMISSIONER JAMES BAILEY FOR HIS YEARS OF SERVICE. SO WE ALSO RECOGNIZE COMMISSIONER JAMES BAILEY FOR SEVEN YEARS OF DEDICATED SERVICE ON THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. ALTHOUGH COMMISSIONER BAILEY WAS UNABLE TO JOIN US THIS EVENING, WE WANT TO EXPRESS OUR SINCERE APPRECIATION FOR HIS TIME, COMMITMENT AND SERVICE TO THE COMMUNITY THROUGH HIS CONTRIBUTIONS AND DEDICATION. COMMISSIONER BAILEY HAS HELPED SUPPORT THE GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF MISSOURI CITY. PLEASE JOIN US IN THANKING COMMISSIONER JAMES BAILEY FOR SEVEN YEARS OF SERVICE AND COMMITMENT TO THE COMMUNITY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. MOVING RIGHT ALONG. AGENDA ITEM NUMBER SEVEN. STAFF REPORTS. GOOD EVENING. GOOD EVENING. I DO NOT HAVE A REPORT TONIGHT. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. CITY ENGINEER. GOOD EVENING. CHAIR. I DON'T HAVE A REPORT EITHER. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. WE'LL MOVE ON TO AGENDA ITEM SEVEN C ONE. HISTORIC PRESERVATION MONTH. AND I'LL TURN IT OVER TO STAFF TO MAKE THE PRESENTATION. OKAY. SO GOOD EVENING EVERYBODY. MY NAME IS ADAM TRAIN AND I'M WITH THE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT. TONIGHT I'LL BE GIVING A BRIEF OVERVIEW RELATED TO HISTORIC PRESERVATION MONTH AND SOME ONGOING PRESERVATION RELATED EFFORTS IN MISSOURI CITY.
SO YOU MIGHT BE ASKING, WHAT IS HISTORIC PRESERVATION MONTH? HISTORIC PRESERVATION MONTH IS A NATIONAL OBSERVANCE CELEBRATED EVERY MAY AND LED BY THE NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION. ITS PURPOSE IS TO RECOGNIZE HISTORIC PLACES, CULTURAL HERITAGE, AND THE STORIES THAT HELP SHAPE COMMUNITIES OVER TIME. MANY CITIES USE THE MONTH AS AN OPPORTUNITY TO HIGHLIGHT LOCAL HISTORY, INCREASE PUBLIC AWARENESS, AND STRENGTHEN COMMUNITY IDENTITY. SO WHY DOES THIS MATTER FOR MISSOURI CITY? FOR MISSOURI CITY SPECIFICALLY, WE HAVE A RICH AND OFTEN UNRECOGNIZED UNDERRECOGNIZED HISTORY THAT INCLUDES PLACES LIKE FREEDOM TREE PARK, HISTORIC CEMETERIES AND EARLY SETTLEMENTS, AND MISSOURI CITY'S ROLE AS ONE OF THE REGION'S EARLIEST EXAMPLES OF MASTER PLANNED COMMUNITIES, AS WELL AS HISTORIC DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS ALONG HIGHWAY 90. PRESERVATION EFFORTS HELP TELL THOSE STORIES WHILE ALSO SUPPORTING EDUCATION, CULTURAL AWARENESS, AND PLACEMAKING WITHIN THE COMMUNITY. THIS ALSO ALIGNS WELL WITH MISSOURI CITY'S NEW 2040 VISION, PARTICULARLY GOALS RELATED TO COMMUNITY IDENTITY AND QUALITY OF PLACE. RECOGNIZING AND PRESERVING LOCAL HISTORY HELPS STRENGTHEN THE CITY'S IDENTITY AND ENSURES CULTURAL AND HISTORIC RESOURCES REMAIN PART OF LONG TERM PLANNING CONVERSATIONS AS OUR CITY CONTINUES TO GROW. I ALSO WANTED TO SHARE HOW THIS RELATES TO WHAT OTHER CITIES ARE DOING AND WHAT THIS MEANS. AS FAR AS OPPORTUNITY FOR MISSOURI CITY ACROSS TEXAS AND THROUGHOUT THE HOUSTON REGION. MANY CITIES PARTICIPATE IN HISTORIC PRESERVATION MONTH AND USE IT AS A STARTING POINT FOR BROADER COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION AWARENESS EFFORTS FOR MISSOURI CITY. THIS CREATES AN OPPORTUNITY TO CONTINUE BUILDING AWARENESS OF LOCAL HISTORIC RESOURCES WHILE ALSO SUPPORTING FUTURE PLANNING EFFORTS, INCLUDING ONGOING DISCUSSIONS RELATED TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, UPDATE AND PRESERVATION PRIORITIES. SO ONE IMPORTANT CLARIFICATION IS THAT HISTORIC PRESERVATION MONTH RECOGNITION IS PRIMARILY EDUCATIONAL AND AWARENESS BASED. IT HELPS ACKNOWLEDGE THE IMPORTANCE OF LOCAL HISTORY AND SIGNALS SUPPORT FOR PRESERVATION EFFORTS, BUT DOESN'T CREATE ADDITIONAL REGULATIONS OR IMPACT PROPERTY RIGHTS OR REQUIRE FUNDING COMMITMENTS. CITY COUNCIL RECOGNIZED FORMERLY HISTORIC PRESERVATION MONTH THIS MONTH FOR MAY, AND STAFF WILL CONTINUE WORKING ON PUBLIC EDUCATION AND AWARENESS EFFORTS RELATED TO MISSOURI CITY'S HISTORY AND CULTURAL RESOURCES THROUGHOUT THE MONTH. THAT REALLY CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS, IF THERE ARE ANY. I JUST HAVE ONE QUICK QUESTION. YES, SIR. THE CITY ON THE WEBSITE BE HIGHLIGHTING. YES. SO THAT'S A GREAT QUESTION. SO THANK YOU FOR BRINGING THAT UP. SO I'M WORKING IN PARTNERSHIP WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AND WITH THE COMMUNICATIONS DEPARTMENT TO SHARE SOME THINGS PROBABLY ON A, ON A WEEKLY BASIS, SHARING SOME POSTS FIRST ON THE PLANNING SITE, SORRY, FIRST ON THE CITY SITE AND THEN WE'RE GOING TO OUR, THE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT. WE'RE WORKING ON A VIDEO THAT WILL GO OUT TOWARDS THE END OF THE MONTH. THIS IS THE FIRST YEAR THAT WE ARE DOING THIS. SO THIS IS KIND OF ON, YOU KNOW, RELATIVELY SHORT NOTICE. THE, THE, THE THOUGHT IS THIS IS GOING TO SPEARHEAD A LARGER EFFORT. AND I'M LOOKING FORWARD TO 2027 PROBABLY HAVING A MORE COMPREHENSIVE WAY TO CELEBRATE THE MONTH. THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU GUYS. WE'RE GOING TO MOVE ALONG TO AGENDA ITEM NUMBER EIGHT. IT'S PUBLIC COMMENTS. THIS IS AN OPPORTUNITY FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ON AGENDA ITEMS OR CONCERNS THAT ARE NOT ON THE AGENDA. THOSE WISHING TO SPEAK MUST HAVE COMPLETED AND PRESENTED THE COMMENT FORM TO THE DESIGNATED CITY STAFF, AND THEY MUST OBSERVE A THREE MINUTE TIME LIMIT PER INDIVIDUAL. DO WE HAVE ANY INDIVIDUALS SIGNED UP TO SPEAK? YES WE DO. MISS CHERYL CRAVEN. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD AND ADHERE TO THE THREE MINUTE TIME LIMIT. GOOD EVENING. GOOD EVENING. MY NAME IS CHERYL CRAVEN. I LIVE AT 1310 BAILEY COURT. MISSOURI CITY, TEXAS 77489. SO I REVIEWED THE PLANNING AND ZONING REPORT TODAY. AND SINCE P AND Z IS RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF THE PROPOSED SITE, I BELIEVE THIS PRESENTS AN OPPORTUNITY TO CONSIDER BUSINESSES THAT WOULD GENUINELY
BENEFIT THE COMMUNITY. I WILL NOT REPEAT WHAT I SAID ON APRIL 27TH BECAUSE IT WAS ALREADY IN THE REPORT. SO THE BUSINESSES THAT I WOULD LIKE TO SEE ARE MAYBE SOME OTHER ONES WOULD BE A HEALTH HEALTH FOCUSED DEVELOPMENT, WHICH COULD BE LIKE A RESTAURANT OFFERING NUTRITIOUS FOOD OPTIONS, ESPECIALLY SINCE MANY OF THE ESTABLISHMENTS ALONG FM 2234 ARE PRIMARILY FAST FOOD RESTAURANTS. ADDITIONALLY, AMENITIES COULD INCLUDE AN AFFORDABLE LIKE PILATES OR YOGA STUDIO, A SMOOTHIE AND ALKALINE WATER BAR IT AND COMMUNITY. I MEAN COMPUTER SERVICES, CONTINUING EDUCATION SERVICES, MAYBE A FLORAL SHOP OR EVEN A HANDYMAN SERVICE. THESE TYPES OF BUSINESSES WOULD ENHANCE THE QUALITY OF LIFE FOR RESIDENTS AND SUPPORT THEIR OVERALL WELL-BEING. MANY RESIDENTS IN THE AREA ARE OVER THE AGE OF 50, AND ARE LIKELY INTERESTED IN MAINTAINING THEIR INDEPENDENCE AND LIVING HEALTHY, ACTIVE LIVES. THESE BUSINESSES LISTED ABOVE THAT I ALREADY THAT I LISTED, WOULD PROVIDE VALUABLE RESOURCES TO HELP THEM TO BE INDEPENDENT AND BE HEALTHY. AS SCRIPTURE REMINDS US, GIVE AND IT WILL BE GIVEN UNTO YOU. GOOD MEASURE, PRESSED DOWN, SHAKEN TOGETHER, RUNNING OVER. THERE ARE MORE THAN. THERE ARE MORE THAN ENOUGH PEOPLE IN THE SURROUNDING COMMUNITIES WHO WOULD APPRECIATE AND BENEFIT FROM THE BUSINESSES DESIGNED TO SERVE AND STRENGTHEN THE COMMUNITY BY INVESTING IN SERVICES THAT PROMOTE HEALTH, CONVENIENCE AND PERSONAL GROWTH. WE CAN CREATE DEVELOPMENT THAT GIVES BACK TO THE COMMUNITY AND GENERATES MEANINGFUL RETURNS FOR EVERYONE INVOLVED. AND THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. MISS JESSICA HILL. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD AND ADHERE TO THE THREE MINUTE TIME LIMIT. GOOD EVENING. MY NAME IS JESSICA HILL. I RESIDE AT 1452 WEST APRIL REIGN COURT 77489. I AM A 23 YEAR RESIDENT OF QUAIL GREEN SOUTH AND VICE PRESIDENT OF THE HOA. I STAND BEFORE YOU TODAY IN OPPOSITION TO THE PROPOSED GAS STATION AND STRIP CENTER DEVELOPMENT AT THE NORTH END OF TEXAS PARKWAY AND CARTWRIGHT ROAD AT THE ENTRANCE OF QUAIL GREEN SOUTH. THIS PROPOSAL IS NOT ALIGNED WITH THE VISION OUTLINED IN MISSOURI CITY'S CURRENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE REPORT. THE REPORT CLEARLY EMPHASIZES THE IMPORTANCE OF STRATEGIC AND EFFICIENT LAND USE PLANNING DUE TO THE CITY'S LIMITED, REMAINING UNDEVELOPED LAND. ON PAGE THREE OF THAT REPORT, THE CITY IDENTIFIED ORGANIZATIONAL PRIORITIES THAT INCLUDE RETAINING EXISTING PROPERTY VALUES, INCREASING COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT, AND CREATING VALUE ADDED SERVICES. THE PLANS BEING PRESENTED TONIGHT ARE OUT OF ALIGNMENT WITH THOSE PRIORITIES. ANOTHER GAS STATION AT THE ENTRANCE OF AN ESTABLISHED RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD DOES NOT REPRESENT THE TYPE OF INTENTIONAL, VALUE ADDED DEVELOPMENT RESIDENTS AND CITY LEADERSHIP ENVISION FOR THIS CORRIDOR. PAGE 20 OF. THE PLAN SPECIFICALLY DISCUSSES THE TEXAS PARKWAY FOCUS AREA AND RECOMMENDS DEVELOPMENT THAT SUPPORTS A WALKABLE, VIBRANT COMMUNITY THROUGH MIXED USE RETAIL, COMMERCIAL HOUSING, ENTERTAINMENT ZONES AND CIVIC PARTNERSHIPS. THAT VISION IS THOUGHTFUL, FUTURE FOCUSED, AND COMMUNITY CENTERED. A GAS STATION AND DENSE STRIP RETAIL CENTER AT THIS LOCATION DOES NOT MOVE US TOWARDS THAT VISION. IT MOVES US FURTHER AWAY FROM IT. THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ALSO HIGHLIGHTS THAT THE PUBLIC FEEDBACK SUPPORTED AMENITIES SUCH AS SPECIAL GROCERY STORES, FINE DINING, ENTERTAINMENT VENUES, PROFESSIONAL OFFICES AND MIXED USE DEVELOPMENTS. RESIDENTS DID NOT ASK FOR AN ADDITIONAL FUEL STATION AT THE NEIGHBORHOOD GATEWAYS. I WANT TO REMIND COUNCIL THAT DURING THE TEXAS PARKWAY AND CARTWRIGHT ROAD FOCUS GROUP MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 28TH, 2024, RESIDENTS EXPRESSED THE SAME CONCERNS AND SENTIMENTS. THE COMMUNITY HAS ALREADY SPOKEN CLEARLY ABOUT. THE DESIRE FOR INTENTIONAL REDEVELOPMENT THAT IMPROVES ESTHETICS, PROTECTS NEIGHBORHOOD INTEGRITY, ENHANCES THE QUALITY OF LIFE. AS A COMMUNITY, WE ARE NOT OPPOSED TO DEVELOPMENT. WE WOULD WELCOME DEVELOPMENT THAT IS TRULY IN ALIGNMENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, WITH THE VISION. OUR ELECTED LEADERSHIP HAS ASKED RESIDENTS TO HELP SHAPE AND SUPPORT. WE WANT THOUGHTFUL COMMERCIAL INVESTMENT THAT STRENGTHENS PROPERTY VALUES, ENHANCES THE CORRIDOR AND REFLECTS THE VOICES OF THE RESIDENTS WHO LIVE THERE EVERY DAY. I RESPECTFULLY ASK THE COUNCIL TO DENY THE REQUEST AND INSTEAD PURSUE DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES THAT TRULY ALIGN WITH MISSOURI CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND FUTURE VISION
FOR OUR CITY. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND CONSIDERATION. THANK YOU. NATASHA WORDSWORTH. I THINK SHE'S IN THE RESTROOM. OH, OKAY. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD AND ADHERE TO THE THREE MINUTE TIME LIMIT. GOOD EVENING. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSIONERS. I'M DOCTOR NATASHA WORDSWORTH, 1518 WEST APRIL REIGN COURT 77489. I'M THE PRESIDENT OF QUAIL GREEN SOUTH SUBDIVISION, AN ELECTED OFFICIAL SERVING ON FORT BEND MUD 26, A NURSE PRACTITIONER AND A FORMER MEMBER OF THE TEXAS PARKWAY CORRIDOR ADVISORY COMMITTEE. I'M VERY FAMILIAR WITH THE PLANS OF THE THE CORRIDOR. I'M HERE TONIGHT TO STRONGLY OPPOSE THE SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR THE PROPOSED SUNRISE GAS STATION AT TEXAS PARKWAY. I ALSO WANT THE RECORD TO REFLECT THAT THERE ARE OVER 50 PROTEST FORMS SUBMITTED IN OPPOSITION TO THIS PROPOSED GAS STATION. THIS IS NOT ONE PERSON'S CONCERN. THIS IS A NEIGHBORHOOD CONCERN. THE PROPOSED GAS STATION WOULD SIT DIRECTLY IN FRONT OF OUR SUBDIVISION. THIS IS THE ENTRANCE TO OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. THIS IS WHERE OUR RESIDENTS DRIVE IN AND OUT OF EVERY DAY. THIS IS WHERE FAMILIES, CHILDREN, OLDER ADULTS, AND HOMEOWNERS ALREADY LIVE. I WANT TO BE CLEAR I'M NOT AGAINST DEVELOPMENT. I SUPPORT THOUGHTFUL DEVELOPMENT. BUT THESE TYPES OF DEVELOPMENTS ARE NOT IN LINE WITH OUR 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR THE LONG TERM VISION FOR TEXAS PARKWAY. ANOTHER GAS STATION DOES NOT MOVE THIS CORRIDOR FORWARD. TEXAS PARKWAY ALREADY ALREADY HAS PLENTY OF GAS STATIONS. IN FACT, THE APPLICANT ALREADY OWNS A GAS STATION RIGHT ACROSS THE STREET. AND BASED ON WHAT RESIDENTS CAN SEE, THAT PROPERTY IS NOT BEING MAINTAINED TO THE STANDARDS THE CORRIDOR DESERVES. IF THE EXISTING GAS STATION ACROSS THE STREET IS ALREADY WHAT NOT WELL TAKEN CARE OF, THEN I HAVE SERIOUS CONCERNS ABOUT APPROVING ANOTHER ONE DIRECTLY IN FRONT OF OUR SUBDIVISION. IF THE GOAL IS TO IMPROVE TEXAS PARKWAY, ADDING ANOTHER GAS STATION IS NOT THE ANSWER. WE SHOULD BE RAISING THE STANDARDS OF DEVELOPMENT, NOT REPEATING THE SAME PATTERNS THAT HAS CONTRIBUTED TO BLIGHT, CONGESTION AND THE VISUAL DECLINE AMONG PARTS OF THE CORRIDOR. THE GAS STATION IS NOT SIMPLY ANOTHER RETAIL USE. IT BRINGS CONSTANT TRAFFIC, FUEL DELIVERIES, IDLING VEHICLES, BRIGHT CANOPIES. MOST CONCERNING IS UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE, A POTENTIAL LATE NIGHT ACTIVITY, AND I AM CONCERNED ABOUT THE SAFETY CHARACTER OF OUR ENTRANCE AS A NURSE PRACTITIONER. I ALSO VIEW THIS AS A PUBLIC HEALTH THROUGH A PUBLIC HEALTH LENS. RESIDENTS SHOULD NOT BE UNNECESSARILY EXPOSED TO INCREASED VEHICLE EXHAUST. THE REQUEST IS FOR A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT. THAT MEANS IT'S NOT AUTOMATIC. THE APPLICANT IS ASKING FOR PERMISSION TO PLACE THIS USE HERE, AND THIS COMMISSION HAS THE AUTHORITY TO SAY NO WHEN THE USE IS NOT APPROPRIATE FOR THE LOCATION. I ASK YOU TO VOTE. NO NO NO NO NO. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. JAMES HUNT. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD AND ADHERE TO THE THREE MINUTE TIME LIMIT. MY NAME IS JAMES HUNT AND I LIVE AT 2027 WETHERBY LANE, FRESNO, TEXAS. IN NEW POINT ESTATES IN 2018, MY WIFE AND I DID OUR RESEARCH BEFORE PURCHASING OUR HOME. WE MET WITH TEXDOT, FORT BEND COUNTY AND MISSOURI CITY REPRESENTATIVES CHECKING FLOOD MAPS, THOROUGHFARE PLANS, AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS. I CAN ASSURE YOU THE THOROUGHFARE REVISIONS BEING DISCUSSED TODAY WOULD HAVE CHANGED OUR DECISION TO BUY. THOUGH I AM GLAD TO SEE THE PLAN NO LONGER SHOWS A PROPOSED BRIDGE CROSSING THE GULF COAST WATER CANAL FROM MCKEEVER TO NEW POINT DRIVE. I AM STILL CONCERNED ABOUT IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROPOSED NORTH SOUTH ROUTES ONE AND TWO. FOR EXAMPLE, THE CITY MENTIONS OVERPASSES ALONG ROUTES ONE AND TWO TO CROSS THE RAILROAD NEAR STEEP BANK TRACE. NOW, ONE WOULD ALSO NEED TO ELEVATE STEEP BANK TRACE TO INTERSECT ROUTES ONE AND TWO IN THE AIR. I CAN'T IMAGINE THE HOMEOWNERS ALONG STEEP BANK TRACE BEING THRILLED ABOUT OVERPASSES NEAR THEIR HOMES. COSTLY INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS WOULD ALSO BE NEEDED ON MANY OF THE EXISTING FACILITIES TO MANAGE THE ALTERED TRAFFIC PATTERNS RESULTING FROM ROUTES ONE AND TWO. MY CONCERN WITHIN A FEW YEARS OF CONSTRUCTING ROUTES ONE AND TWO, THE NEW TRAFFIC PATTERNS WILL CAUSE THE CITY TO RECONSIDER A BRIDGE OVER THE GULF COAST WATER CANAL CONNECTING MCKEEVER ROAD TO NEW POINT DRIVE, CREATING A CUT THROUGH ROAD WITHIN THE NEW POINT ESTATE NEIGHBORHOOD. APPEARS TO ME THAT COUNCIL IS BEING ASKED TO ADOPT A PLAN WITHOUT A THOROUGH EVALUATION.
AS I UNDERSTAND, TWO RECENT EVENTS HAVE TRIGGERED THIS THOROUGHFARE DISCUSSION THE RECENT GAS LINE LEAK BREAK AND THE ACTIVE SHOOTER EVENT IN SIENNA. AS I UNDERSTAND, THE CONCERNS FOCUSED ON EMERGENCY RESPONSE AND MOBILITY FOR THE SOUTHEAST SECTION OF SIENNA, SO WHY NOT CONSIDER A NEW POLICE AND FIRE SUBSTATION ON OR AROUND THE SOUTHEAST SECTION OF SIENNA? THAT WOULD ADDRESS THE FIRST CONCERN NEXT YEAR. BY THE WAY, TEX-DOT PLANS TO START CONSTRUCTION WIDENING OF FM 521 FROM STATE HIGHWAY SIX TO BRAZORIA COUNTY, INCLUDING A BRIDGE OVER THE RAILROAD. THUS ADDRESSING THE SECOND CONCERN. THE CITY IS ALSO ACKNOWLEDGING ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS, WITH ROUTES ONE AND TWO AFFECTING BRUSHY AND CLEAR LAKE. NOW, LET'S PAUSE FOR A MINUTE AND DETERMINE THE FULL EXTENT AND COST ASSOCIATED WITH THESE IMPACTS. NOW, I ASK THAT YOU CONSIDER PROPERTY VALUES AND THE LIVELIHOOD IMPACTS OF HOMEOWNERS WHO HAVE ALREADY PURCHASED BASED ON THE CURRENT THOROUGHFARE PLAN. IT IS NOT APPROPRIATE TO CREATE ZIG ZAG TRAFFIC ROUTES, CUTTING THROUGH ESTABLISHED NEIGHBORHOODS TO ADDRESS TRAFFIC CONCERNS WITHIN SIENNA. ONE FINAL NOTE IF YOU ARE CONCERNED ABOUT THE CURRENT TRAFFIC WITHIN SIENNA, WHY ARE YOU WILLING TO ALLOW SIENNA TO DEVELOP ANOTHER TEN 000 PLUS HOMES? SEEMS TO ME THE DEVELOPER IS MAXIMIZING PROFIT WITHOUT ACCOUNTABILITY. LEAVING IT UP TO THE CITY AND CURRENT RESIDENTS OF SIENNA AND NON SIENNA NEIGHBORHOODS TO CLEAN UP AND RESOLVE THE IMPACT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. THANK YOU. BARRY. BRAZIL. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD AND ADHERE TO THE THREE MINUTE TIME LIMIT. THANK YOU MA'AM. COMMISSIONERS BARRY, BRAZIL 5019 NEW POINT DRIVE, NEW POINT STATES. JIM PRETTY MUCH COVERED EVERYTHING THAT WE REALLY WANT TO TALK ABOUT, SO I WON'T GO BACK INTO THAT. I DO WANT TO HIGHLIGHT A COUPLE THINGS, THOUGH, THAT ONE IS THE MAYOR AND THE MAYOR PRO TEM WERE VERY CAUTIOUS ABOUT SUGGESTING THAT WE LOOK AT A LOT OF OTHER ALTERNATIVES BEFORE WE EVEN CONSIDER GOING THROUGH AND ZIGZAGGING THROUGH NEIGHBORHOODS, AS JIM PUT IT. SPECIFICALLY TO THE NEW POINT SIDE, THOUGH, I WANT TO FORMALLY INTRODUCE A PROPOSAL THAT YOU MAY WANT TO CONSIDER IN THE FUTURE OR EVEN THE NEAR TERM FUTURE IS THERE'S BEEN VERY FEW DOLLARS GO INTO REPAIRING OUR ROADS THROUGH NEW POINT ESTATES. NOW THERE HAS BEEN THE BRIDGE THAT'S GONE THROUGH. NICE LITTLE BOONDOGGLE. DIDN'T DO ANYTHING FOR US, ESPECIALLY WITH THE WATER AUTHORITY NOT GOING THROUGH THERE ANYMORE. BUT THERE REALLY HASN'T BEEN ANYTHING DONE. JOSH AND I HAVE HAD SEVERAL CONVERSATIONS ABOUT THAT, SO IT'S NOTHING NEW. WHAT I'M GOING TO SUGGEST AND PROPOSE IS WHY DON'T YOU ABDICATE THOSE ROADS BACK TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND THE BOARD FOR NEW POINTE ESTATES? LET US TAKE THOSE OVER. GET THEM OFF OF MISSOURI CITY'S BOOKS, AND THEN WE CAN NOT ONLY MAINTAIN THE ROADS, BUT DO THE THINGS THAT WE NEED TO DO TO ESTABLISH THAT GOOD TRAFFIC FLOW FOR OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. SO THAT'S SOMETHING I'D LIKE FOR YOU ALL TO CONSIDER. LASTLY, I DO WANT TO ECHO TWO THINGS THAT CAME OUT OF THE LAST MEETING. ONE IS THAT, YOU KNOW, THE, YOU KNOW, JOHNSON'S PUT ONE PUT 10,000 NEW HOMES IN THERE, LET THEM FLIP THE BILL FOR SOME OF THIS STUFF. I MEAN, THEY'VE, THEY'VE DONE REALLY WELL WITH THIS COUNCIL REALLY WELL WITH THE CITY AND THEY'VE PROFITED OVER THAT. LET'S PUT. LET'S LET THEM PUT SOME MONEY IN THE KITTY. AND, YOU KNOW, DO A LITTLE ROAD DEVELOPMENT FOR US TOO, BECAUSE WE NEED IT, ESPECIALLY IN SEEING. I WAS A SIENNA RESIDENT FOR 20 YEARS. SO I DO UNDERSTAND SIENNA AS WELL AS NEW POINT. AND THEN THE LAST THING IS YOU KNOW, ONE OF THE THINGS THAT SASHI BROUGHT UP LAST MEETING WAS THAT TEX DOT WAS GOING TO DO THE 521 IMPROVEMENTS IN 3 TO 5 YEARS, POSSIBLY EVEN SEVEN. MY INFORMATION IS AND MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN IN A YEAR, YEAR AND A HALF. SO I DON'T KNOW IF YOU GUYS ARE ON THE SAME PAGE AS TEX DOT. I'M SURE YOU ARE, BUT YOU MIGHT WANT TO CHECK THOSE NUMBERS AND MAKE SURE THAT, YOU KNOW, HEY, LET'S COORDINATE WITH THEM BECAUSE THAT'S GOING TO, THAT'S GOING TO BE ONE OF THE BIGGEST IMPACTS SHORT TERM TO THE TRAFFIC PATTERN, GETTING THOSE FOLKS, YOU KNOW, SOUTH OF THE TRACKS OUT OF THERE, GOING THROUGH NEIGHBORHOODS AIN'T GOING TO BE NOTHING FOR ANYBODY. AND I THINK YOU ALL KNOW THAT. AND THAT'S REALLY IT. THANK YOU SO MUCH. THANK YOU. DAVID BREMER. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD AND ADHERE TO THE THREE MINUTE TIME LIMIT. THANK YOU. MY NAME IS DAVID BREMER AND I LIVE AT 2303 MILLER ROAD, ROSHARON, TEXAS. AND I STRONGLY OBJECT TO THE PROPOSED DESIGN OF WATERS LAKE ROAD TERMINATING INTO MILLER ROAD. AND IN FACT, I LIVE AT THE JUNCTION OF THE PROPOSED JUNCTION BETWEEN WATERS LAKE AND MILLER ROAD, WHICH IS, OF COURSE, OUTSIDE YOUR ETJ. CURRENTLY, MILLER ROAD IS TWO LANES. AS AN AGRICULTURAL WATERWAY ON ONE SIDE, IT HAS HOMES ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THAT ROAD ITSELF. THERE ARE NO TURN LANES AND THERE ARE NO STOP SIGNS.
THIS IS JUST A QUIET LITTLE ROAD OUT THERE IN THE COUNTRY. THE COMPLETION OF THE 521 EXPANSION WILL ELIMINATE A NORTHBOUND TURN INTO ARCOLA FROM MILLER ROAD. THE MILLER ROAD IS NOT THE SOLUTION TO DECOMPRESSING THE TRAFFIC IN SIENNA. WE ALL RECOGNIZE THAT'S A BIG PROBLEM. I USED TO LIVE IN SIENNA. IT IS ONLY A TRANSFER OF A PROBLEM. THE PROBLEM OF TRAFFIC WILL BE DUMPED ONTO MILLER ROAD. IT MAKES NO SENSE. NO SENSE TO END A FOUR LANE BOULEVARD INTO A TWO LANE COUNTRY ROAD. THAT'S NOT EVEN IN YOUR ETJ. NOW WHAT? THESE MAPS THAT WE HAVE DEPICTED BEFORE US SHOW. THEY SHOW ROADS, THEY SHOWED ETJ. BUT WHAT THEY DON'T SHOW AND THEY DON'T IDENTIFY THE 300 ACRES OF WETLANDS THAT'S IMMEDIATELY NORTH OF THE AGRICULTURAL WATERWAY, BETWEEN THE AGRICULTURAL WATERWAY AND THE SOUTH SIDE LEVEE OF SIENNA. THE MILLER ROAD CONNECTOR WILL HAVE TO TRAVERSE THIS AND CROSS THESE WETLANDS BEFORE THEY DUMP INTO MILLER ROAD. BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY, LET ME JUST ADD, THESE MAPS DON'T SHOW DRAINAGE. THE DRAINAGE FOR SIENNA IS MILLER ROAD. AFTER HURRICANE HARVEY, FLOWING WATER CONTINUED TO RISE FOR NINE DAYS AFTER FLOODING ON MILLER ROAD. WE MADE IT THROUGH HURRICANE HARVEY FINE. THE NINE DAYS LATER WAS THE HIGH POINT OF THE WATER. MILLER ROAD WAS NOT PASSABLE FOR ANOTHER 14 DAYS. I COULD NOT GET DOWN MILLER ROAD. I COULD NOT GET INTO MY DRIVEWAY FOR ABOUT 23 DAYS AFTER THE HURRICANE HARVEY. IT MAKES NO SENSE TO PUT A LOT OF MONEY INTO A BOULEVARD THAT IS GOING TO DUMP OUT INTO A AREA THAT IS GOING TO FLOOD WITH HURRICANES, OR EVEN THE MAY THE MEMORIAL, I'M SORRY, THE MEMORIAL DAY FLOOD, WHICH WAS ONE YEAR BEFORE. HARVEY, I ENCOURAGE YOU TO LOOK AT ALTERNATIVE ROUTES. I KNOW YOU HAVE A BIG PROBLEM HERE, BUT AVAILABLE THERE, AVAILABLE ROUTES NEAR THE POWER LINES. IT SHOULD BE LOOKED AT OR MAYBE EVEN POSSIBLY JUST SOUTH OF THE LEVEE, WHICH WOULD ALSO DUMP INTO IN MIDDLE ROAD. I THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. THANK YOU, KATHY BRAMMER. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD AND ADHERE TO THE THREE MINUTE TIME LIMIT. HELLO, MY NAME IS KATHY BRAMMER. I LIVE AT 2303 MILLER ROAD, AND I JUST WANT TO SUPPORT WHAT MY HUSBAND JUST SAID. I SPOKE TO YOU LAST TIME AND I DON'T HAVE A LOT TO ADD EXCEPT FOR JUST TO. PLEASE CONSIDER THE EFFECT THAT THAT IS GOING TO. IF IF YOU APPROVE THAT ROAD GOING ON TO MILLER ROAD, THAT IS GOING TO AFFECT MY LIFE AND MY CHILDREN'S LIFE, MY GRANDCHILDREN'S LIFE, AND THE OTHER PEOPLE ON MILLER ROAD. AND WE ARE NOT A LOT OF PEOPLE. WE DON'T HAVE THE NUMBERS LIKE NEWPOINT OR SOME OF THE OTHER NEIGHBORHOODS THAT ARE AFFECTED, BUT WE ARE STILL. WE LIVE THERE IN A PLACE THAT IS QUIET AND WE. WE MOVED OUT OF SIENA TO HAVE THAT. AND YOU WILL BE DESTROYING THAT. SO I THINK THERE'S ALSO TO REITERATE ABOUT THE THE THE CONGESTION. I DON'T THINK GOING SOUTH OUT OF SIENA IS GOING TO HELP. IT MAY PROVIDE AN EMERGENCY ROUTE, BUT IT'S NOT GOING TO RESOLVE THE CONGESTION THAT THEY'RE HAVING IN SIENA AND A MORE NORTH SOUTH ROUTE OR GOING OUT, BECAUSE TRAVERSING 521 IS VERY TIME CONSUMING, PARTICULARLY GOING NORTH. SO IF PEOPLE ARE COMING SOUTH TO COME OUT OF MILLER, TO COME OUT OF SIENA AND THEN HAVE TO GO NORTH ON ON 521 THERE, THE CONGESTION DOES NOT END. SO I JUST WANTED TO REITERATE THAT. SO I APPRECIATE YOUR TIME. THANK YOU. WE HAVE NO ONE ELSE SIGNED UP TO SPEAK. THANK YOU. WELL, WE WILL MOVE TO AGENDA ITEM NINE, WHICH IS THE CONSENT AGENDA. WE ONLY HAVE ONE ITEM ON THAT PART OF THE AGENDA. IT'S CONSIDER AN APPLICATION OF A FINAL PLAT OF SIENNA BEES CREEK COMMERCIAL PARK, PHASE TWO PARTIAL REPLAT NUMBER FOUR. I WANT TO MAKE A MOTION. MOTION. SECOND. I DON'T SEE A SECOND. THERE'S A SECOND.
OH, IT'S NOT SHOWING UP. OKAY. OKAY. WELL, A MOTION AND A SECOND VOTE. OKAY. MOTION CARRIES. THANK YOU. WE'LL MOVE ON TO AGENDA ITEM NINE B ONE. CONSIDER AN APPLICATION OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT OF SIENNA SECTION 91. STAFF HAS A PRESENTATION. GOOD AFTERNOON. GOOD EVENING SIENNA. SECTION 91 IS BEING RECOMMENDED FOR DISAPPROVAL BECAUSE THERE IS NO ASSOCIATED CONCEPT PLAN. THIS IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 82-32B OF THE CITY'S CODE OF ORDINANCES. HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. ANY QUESTIONS? OKAY. ALL RIGHT. WANT TO MAKE A MOTION? A MOTION AND A SECOND. OKAY. MOTION IS TO DISAPPROVE. JUST. JUST. OKAY. JUST TO AGREE WITH STAFF'S. YES. OKAY. MOTION CARRIES. AGENDA ITEM NINE B TWO. CONSIDER A REQUEST TO EXTEND THE 30 DAY PERIOD TO APPROVE, APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS OR DISAPPROVE. SIENA TOWN CENTER COMMERCIAL SITE REPLAT NUMBER ONE. GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS. WE HAVE RECEIVED A REQUEST TO EXTEND THE ACTION ON THIS PLOT AND THIS VOTE WOULD. STAFF IS RECOMMENDING TO APPROVE EXTENDING THAT ACTION AND IT WOULD BE PLACED ON THE JUNE PSC AGENDA. OKAY. SOMEONE WANT TO MAKE A MOTION? I SEE IT SECOND VOTE. MOTION CARRIES TO EXTEND. MOVING ALONG TO AGENDA ITEM NUMBER TEN. ZONING MAP. AMENDMENTS. SUNRISE. GAS STATION. PACIFIC. USE PERMIT. CONSIDER A RECOMMENDATION AND FINAL REPORT ON A REQUEST BY MASIMO DESIGN, LLC FOR A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR A GAS STATION AND TO EXTEND SUCH ZONING DEVIATES FROM THE FUTURE LAND USE AND CHARACTER MAP OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO PROVIDE FOR AN AMENDMENT. OKAY, APPLICANT IS HERE AND THEY WANT TO DO A PRESENTATION. SORRY. GOOD EVENING. NICE TO MEET YOU GUYS. THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR HAVING ME AGAIN. I BELIEVE THIS IS MY THIRD TIME APPEARING IN FRONT OF YOU GUYS. WANT TO BRING SOME HISTORY BACK TO THIS PARTICULAR TRACK HERE. SO WE ARE EVENTUALLY ACQUIRED AND ACCEPTED THIS LOT BACK IN 2000 OF DECEMBER. PRIOR TO PURCHASING THE LOT, WE HAD MET WITH THE CITY OFFICIALS. RECEIVED IN WRITING THE ZONING AND WHAT WE'RE ABLE TO BUILD INTO THIS LAND HERE, AND WE WERE ABLE TO GO AHEAD AND GET THE APPROVAL, WHICH HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OFFICIALS WITH A LETTER OF PROOF GIVING US THE AUTHORITY TO DO SO. FAST FORWARDING A LITTLE BIT HERE, OBVIOUSLY, WE COULD HAVE OBVIOUSLY BUILT ON THIS PARTICULAR LOT, THE GAS STATION THAT WE'RE LOOKING TO BUILD NOW. AT THAT TIME, THE CITY BACK IN 2000 WAS NEARLY NOT AS MATURE AS IT IS NOW WITH THE DEVELOPMENT PLANS. WE WERE THEN MADE AWARE BACK IN 2011, TEX-DOT WAS GOING TO BE DOING AN EXPANSION OF THAT ROAD, THAT CORRIDOR. WE FELT THE NEED TO KIND OF WAIT FOR THAT TO HAPPEN, JUST DIDN'T SEE THE VIABLE REASON ECONOMICALLY TO DEVELOP SOMETHING HERE ON TOP OF A ROAD CONSTRUCTION AND EXPANSION HAPPENING AT THE SAME TIME PER SE. THEREAFTER, WE WAITED FOR THAT. AND UPON TXDOT COMING IN WE DID APPLY FOR THE PERMITS TO BE ABLE TO GO AHEAD AND PUT UP A SIGN ALONG WITH A ROAD ENTRANCE DRIVEWAY THAT WAS ALSO PERMITTED HERE WITH THE CITY AS WELL, ALONG WITH TEX DOT TO WHICH THEN THE LAND DID. WENT AHEAD AND ADD IN TWO ADDITIONAL ENTRANCES TO PURSUE FORWARD AS FAR AS CONTINUATION OF THIS PROJECT. WITH THAT BEING SAID, 2015 ONWARDS WE LOOKED AT THE ECONOMICS OF DETAILS. WHAT WAS GOING ON WITH THE ECONOMICS. VIABLE ECONOMIC CHOICES WERE MADE. WE HAD OTHER PROJECTS IN PLACE. WE ALL RAN INTO AN UNFORTUNATE SITUATION BACK DURING COVID, WHICH DELAYED OUR PROJECTION PLANS AND HOPING THE FACT THAT WE COULD HAVE DEVELOPED SOMETIME IN 2000 BEING THE FACT THAT PANDEMIC HAPPENED LASTED ABOUT TWO YEARS. WE FELT THE NEED TO PAUSE ON OUR DEVELOPMENT PLANS JUST BASED ON THE FACT THAT WE WERE ALL IMPACTED GLOBALLY AND THEREAFTER POST, POST COVID MY MOM AND MY PERSONAL FAMILY
MEMBERS BECAME VERY ILL. UNFORTUNATELY, MY MOM RECENTLY PASSED AWAY DUE TO THE FACT OF CARRYING OVER FROM THE COVID AND PANDEMICS. AT THAT TIME, I WAS NOT IN THE RIGHT FRAME OF MIND TO DEVELOP SOMETHING RIGHT AWAY, ESPECIALLY AFTER LOSING. MY MOM DIDN'T SEE THE NEED OF THAT IMPORTANCE, ESPECIALLY WITH THE FACT OF ME HAVING SOMETHING IN WRITING FROM THE CITY ALREADY STATING THE FACT THAT I'VE BEEN ALREADY GRANTED APPROVAL TO BUILD A GAS STATION. AND WHEN I CAME INTO THE CITY TO GO AHEAD AND WORK ON GETTING THIS THING DEVELOPMENT IN PLACE, I WAS MADE AWARE LAST YEAR THAT A RECENT AUGUST CHANGE WAS MADE TO WHERE AN SCP WAS REQUIRED. OBVIOUSLY WENT AHEAD AND SUBMITTED ALL REQUIREMENTS IN PLACE. BUT WHAT'S IMPORTANT HERE IS THAT THERE'S A HISTORY TO AS TO WHY WE ARE WHERE WE ARE. AND SCP WAS REQUIRED RECENTLY AS LAST YEAR, I WAS ALREADY GIVEN AN APPROVAL IN WRITING FROM THE CITY HERE, ALREADY GIVING ME AN OPEN BLANKET STATEMENT STATING THE FACT THAT THERE WAS NO EXPIRATION DATE ON THIS WRITING TO SAY I NEED TO BUILD ON A SPECIFIC TIME FRAME OR THIS LETTER IS NULL AND VOIDED. I HAVE I HAVE THE LETTER. I'VE ALREADY PROVIDED THAT TO THE APPROPRIATE MEMBERS OF THE PNC DEPARTMENT HEADS, AND I ASK THAT YOU PLEASE DO CONSIDER ALL THE FACTS THAT HAVE BEEN PUT IN PLACE HERE. I'VE BEEN IN THE CITY FOR NOW, 35 YEARS. HAVE THAT SHOPPING CENTER ACROSS THE STREET. WE LOOK TO DEVELOP OUR PLANS, AS YOU GUYS CAN SEE BEHIND US. THAT'S WHAT I INTEND TO DO HERE. OKAY. OKAY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. STAFF HAS A PRESENTATION. YES, COMMISSIONERS. I'M GOING TO GIVE AN OVERVIEW OF THE REQUESTED ZONING. THIS SITE IS LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF TURTLE CREEK DRIVE AND TEXAS PARKWAY. CURRENT ZONING FOR THE PROPERTY IS LC THREE. AS MENTIONED THE CITY AND THE COMMISSION WAS PART OF PASSING REGULATIONS THAT REQUIRE, IF A PROPERTY IS ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL AREAS THAT FOR A GAS STATION, USE A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT, APPROVAL IS REQUIRED. SO JUST A LITTLE ON THE APPLICATION THAT'S BEING PRESENTED THE PROPERTY OWNER IS PROPOSING TO DEVELOP A ONE STORY, 33FT IN HEIGHT BUILDING THAT WOULD CONSIST OF 7200FT² CONVENIENCE STORE AND TEN FUEL PUMPS. AND I DO WANT TO MAKE A CLARIFICATION IN THE STAFF REPORT AS PRESENTED ON THE BUILDING HEIGHT, THE STAFF REPORT REFERENCES THAT THE BUILDING HEIGHT IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH LC THREE. THE 33 33FT WOULD BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH LC THREE ZONING. SO BUILDING HEIGHT FOR LC THREE MUST MATCH THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL AREA. OR THERE'S A CALCULATION PROVIDED SO THAT 33FT BUILDING HEIGHT WOULD BE UP UNDER THAT MINIMUM. SO I JUST WANT TO MAKE THAT POINT OF CLARIFICATION. THANK YOU. SO AS MENTIONED THE SP APPROVAL THERE ARE CONDITIONS FOR THE APPROVAL OF A SUP FOR GASOLINE STATIONS. AND SO FOR THIS PARTICULAR PROPERTY THOSE REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE IT MUST BE WITHIN 200FT OF INTERSECTING STREETS, WHICH IT DOES MEET THAT REQUIREMENT OF TURTLE CREEK AND TEXAS PARKWAY. THERE IS A REQUIREMENT OF A MAXIMUM OR A LIMITATION ON A MAXIMUM OF TWO CORNERS OF AN INTERSECTION OF TWO ARTERIALS OR ONE CORNER OF A LOCAL STREET. AND TURTLE CREEK IS BOTH AN ARTERIAL AND A LOCAL STREET. AND AS HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED, THERE IS AN EXISTING GAS STATION AT THIS INTERSECTION. ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE. ADDITIONALLY, THOSE REQUIREMENTS HAVE RESTRICTIONS ON THE PLACEMENT OF AIR PUMPS AND VACUUMS. BEING POSITIONED AT LEAST 150FT FROM RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY LINES. THE POSITIONING OF THAT ON THE CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN AS SUBMITTED IS NOT CLEAR. HOWEVER, IT APPEARS TO BE LOCATED ON THE TURTLE CREEK, TEXAS PARKWAY SIDE. BUT BASED ON THAT POSITIONING, IT MAY NOT MEET THAT 150 FOOT REQUIREMENT. SO STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE CONCEPTUAL PLAN AS SUBMITTED AND PROVIDES THIS FOR ANALYSIS. AGAIN, THE CLARIFICATION THAT AS PROPOSED, THE 33 FOOT BUILDING HEIGHT DOES MEET THE MAXIMUM. HOWEVER AS PRESENTED, THE CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN HAS DISCREPANCIES ON SIDE YARD REQUIREMENTS THAT IT IS NOT MEETING MINIMUM SIDE YARD REQUIREMENTS AND ALSO LANDSCAPING AND BUFFERING. FULLY AROUND THE SITE. SO TWO PORTIONS OF THE SITE ARE DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL AND THEN TWO PORTIONS ARE STREET VIEW. AND SO THIS CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN DOES NOT MEET BOTH OF THOSE CONDITIONS. AND STATED BEFORE AIR PUMPS APPEAR TO BE ON THAT TURTLE CREEK SIDE.
BUT IF THAT IS THE LOCATION OR, YOU KNOW, PRETTY MUCH, YOU KNOW, VERY IT'S VERY LIMITED ON THAT SITE. TO MEET THAT 150 FOOT DISTANCE REQUIREMENT. AND THEN I JUST WANT TO EMPHASIZE, I KNOW IT WAS MENTIONED ON THE TECH SIDE PERMIT. THE DRIVEWAY LOCATION ON TURTLE CREEK HAS NOT BEEN APPROVED AT THIS TIME. OKAY. FOR OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AS HAS BEEN MENTIONED TONIGHT. THIS LOCATION IS PART OF OUR TEXAS PARKWAY CORRIDOR, WHICH IS REFLECTED IN OUR 2017 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THE RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THAT PLAN WOULD NOT SUPPORT THE TRANSITION OF THIS DEVELOPMENT. THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THAT PLAN LOOK FOR AMENITIES THAT ARE DESIRED BY RESIDENTS TO ENJOY LOCALLY. AND SO FOR THE PARTICULAR, THE PROPOSED USE STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS, IS IT'S NOT SUPPORTED BY THAT 2017 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. NOTICE HAS BEEN PROVIDED FOR THIS PROPERTY AND AS STATED, WE HAVE RECEIVED AS OF TODAY 59 WRITTEN PROTESTS THAT HAVE BEEN PROVIDED TO THE COMMISSION. AND THOSE PROTESTS ARE REFLECTED IN THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO DISAPPROVE THIS SUP. THE NEXT STEP FROM THE COMMISSION WOULD BE CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL, AND THAT'S TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR MONDAY, JUNE 15TH. THAT COMPLETES THE REPORT. IF THERE'S ANY QUESTIONS I CAN TAKE THOSE NOW. THANK YOU. ANY COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. THEN WE'RE GOING TO MOVE ON TO LOOKING AT MAKING A MOTION, WHICH WOULD BE TO EITHER FOR A POSITIVE RECOMMENDATION OR A NEGATIVE RECOMMENDATION. LOOKING FOR A MOTION. A MOTION WOULD BE A NEGATIVE RECOMMENDATION ON THIS SUPKCA MOTION AND A SECOND. I'LL VOTE. MOTION CARRIES TO DISAPPROVE. OKAY. AGENDA ITEM TEN B WAS REMOVED FROM THE AGENDA. SO WE WILL MOVE ON TO AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 11 ZONING TEXT AMENDMENTS, WHICH IT LOOKS LIKE WE HAVE NONE. SO WE'LL MOVE ON TO AGENDA ITEM NUMBER TEN. CONSIDER AND POSSIBLE ACTION PROPOSED PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE MAJOR THOROUGHFARE THOROUGHFARE PLAN OF THE MOBILITY MASTER PLAN REGARDING SIENA AREA CIRCULATION. DON'T ASK ME TO SAY THAT AGAIN. OH, HELLO. ALL RIGHT. GOOD EVENING. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. MY NAME IS VINCENZO CAROZZA, YOUR CITY ENGINEER. I'LL BE PRESENTING THIS ITEM TO UPDATE THE MAJOR THOROUGHFARE PLAN. WE'RE LOOKING FOR PROPOSED ALTERNATIVE ROUTES TO SCENIC PARKWAY, AS WELL AS CONNECTING EXISTING ROADS TO FACILITATE MOBILITY. THIS PRESENTATION IS VERY SIMILAR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING AT THE APRIL 27TH, 2026 JOINT SESSION WITH CITY COUNCIL AND THE PNC SPECIAL MEETING ON MAY 6TH, 2026. SO CHAIRMAN PEARSON, WOULD YOU LIKE ME TO REPEAT THE MAY 6TH PRESENTATION OR JUST HIGHLIGHT THE FEW MINOR CHANGES? I THINK IN THIS CASE JUST HIGHLIGHT THE CHANGES. OKAY, SO THEN WE'LL GO TO SLIDE TWO AND THREE. HERE'S THE MAP. OKAY. SO THIS IS BASICALLY THE MAP TO COMMISSIONER HANEY'S COMMENT LAST, LAST TIME. SO THIS, I UPDATED THIS MAP. IT SHOWS WHAT AREAS ARE TO BE AMENDED. SO WE ADDED THE TWO ITEMS IN THE LEGEND. YOUR SOLID MAGENTA OR SOLID BURGUNDY COLOR IS WHAT WE'RE PROPOSING AS A MAJOR THOROUGHFARE DESIGNATION. SO REMEMBER THE LAST MEETING YOU TALKED ABOUT THE EXTENSIONS, WHICH ARE THE DOTTED, THE DASHED RED LINES. SO THOSE ARE THE ALTERNATE ROUTES THAT WE ARE PROPOSING TO BUILD OR THEY'RE NOT THERE YET. AND SO THE SOLID BURGUNDY LINES ARE EXISTING ROADWAYS THAT WE WANT TO DESIGNATE MAJOR THOROUGHFARES. AND THEN THE DASHED LINES ARE THE EXTENSIONS OF THOSE MAJOR THOROUGHFARES. SO THEN THOSE ARE THE DECISIONS THAT YOU'LL BE VOTING ON TONIGHT. OKAY. OH, ANOTHER UPDATE IS WE HAD HEARD AT THE MAY 6TH MEETING,
SPECIAL MEETING WITH CONSTITUENTS, TALKING ABOUT MILLER ROAD. AND TONIGHT WE HEARD SEVERAL MORE. I DID VISIT WITH THEM AT THE AFTER THE MAY 6TH MEETING. THEY HAD SOME IDEAS. AND, YOU KNOW, I WAS OPEN TO THAT. BUT I ALSO WENT AND FURTHER LOOKED AND I FOUND OUT THAT MILLER ROAD CONNECTOR, WHAT WE'RE DRAWING HERE HAS ALREADY BEEN APPROVED ON THE FORT BEND COUNTY'S MAJOR THOROUGHFARE PLAN IN MAY OF 2022. AND THEY ACTUALLY HAVE MILLER ROAD AS A MAJOR THOROUGHFARE ALREADY CONNECTING TO COUNTY ROAD 57. AND FOR THE MILLER ROAD CONNECTOR, IT ACTUALLY GOES EVEN FURTHER SOUTH, AND IT CURVES AROUND. AND THEY WANT TO KEEP GOING FURTHER SOUTH BECAUSE TXDOT HAS A THE GRAND PARKWAY STATE HIGHWAY 99, SEGMENT C, BASICALLY GOING OVER THERE. SO THE COUNTY HAS PLANS ALREADY IN PLACE TO DESIGNATE THE MAJOR, THE MILLER ROAD AND THE MILLER ROAD CONNECTOR AND EVEN BEYOND. SO I KNOW THAT A LITTLE BIT OF IT IS OUTSIDE THE COUNTY. SO WE'RE ESSENTIALLY REFLECTING WHAT THE COUNTY HAS ALREADY BEEN APPROVED FOR YEARS AGO. OKAY. AND WHAT ELSE DO WE HAVE UPDATES. AND ESSENTIALLY THAT'S MY UPDATES FROM THE DIFFERENCES. THANK YOU. WELL IT'S TIME YOU HAVE A QUESTION. YEAH. JUST JUST ONE. DOES DESIGNATING SOMETHING A MAJOR THOROUGHFARE MAKE IT EASIER TO GET FUNDS FOR IT OR IMPLY THAT SOMETHING ADDITIONAL IS GOING TO BE DONE TO IT? BECAUSE YOU'VE TAKEN AN EXISTING ROAD THAT YESTERDAY WASN'T A MAJOR THOROUGHFARE, BUT TOMORROW WILL BE. WHAT DOES THAT MEAN? THAT'S A GREAT QUESTION. SO BEFORE, WHEN YOU SEE THE EXISTING ROADWAY THEY ARE USUALLY EITHER A MINOR COLLECTOR OR A LOCAL ROAD. OUR DEFINITION IN MISSOURI CITY OF MAJOR THOROUGHFARE MEANS MAJOR COLLECTOR MINOR ARTERIAL OR MAJOR ARTERIAL. AND THOSE ARE THE FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATIONS FROM THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION. SO ESSENTIALLY WHEN WE DESIGNATE SOMETHING AS A MAJOR THOROUGHFARE, WE CAN GO AND ASK FOR FEDERAL FUNDING. THE FEDS DON'T WANT TO PAY FOR LOCAL ROADS BECAUSE THEY THINK THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT SHOULD SHOULD MAINTAIN THOSE. BUT BY DESIGNATING THESE AS MAJOR THOROUGHFARES, WE CAN GO TO H, G, A, C AND PROPOSE GRANTS OR ASK UNCLE SAM FOR HELP. SO THAT THAT TELLS THE WORLD THAT OUR COMMUNITY WANTS THESE TO BE MORE OF A HEAVIER DUTY NONRESIDENTIAL ROADS. THEY FACILITATE A LITTLE BIT MORE TRAFFIC THROUGH THESE. THANK YOU. SURE. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? YES. I'M LOOKING AT THAT SHIPMENTS LANDING DRIVE. ARE YOU SAYING THAT IS A PROPOSED MAJOR THOROUGHFARE THAT WE HAVE, I GUESS, HOW IS THAT? WHAT DOES THAT IMPACT? OH, SORRY. WHAT IS THAT? I'M LOOKING AT THE SHIPMENTS. LANDING DRIVE. PROBABLY BECAUSE I USED TO LIVE OVER THERE, SO I KNOW HOW THAT AREA IS. OKAY. WHAT IS THAT IMPACT TO THE RESIDENTS? HAVE WE THOUGHT ABOUT THAT OR CONSIDERED. IT'S JUST WONDERING. SO ACCORDING TO THIS, WE REALLY DON'T HAVE AN EAST WEST ROUTE. MOST PEOPLE THAT LIVE IN THAT AREA, WHEN THEY HAVE TO GET OUT, THEY HAVE TO GO BACK TO SEEING, A PARKWAY. SO PART OF THE CONNECTOR TO FENN ROAD IS ACTUALLY FROM THAT WAS THE IDEA PRESENTED FROM THE LEVEE IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT. THAT'S PART OF THEIR EVACUATION ROUTE. SO WHEN WE WENT AND SOLICITED COMMENTS ONE OF THE AWESOME CONNECTORS WOULD BE THE PIECE THAT IS AT THE END, I THINK IT'S CALLED LONDON LANE AFTER THAT. BUT SO THEN IF WE CONNECT THAT WE HAVE UP DESIGNATED THE SHIPMAN'S LANDING AS A MAJOR THOROUGHFARE AND WE'RE EXTENDING IT ACROSS TO CONNECT TO FENN. AND THEN SO YOU WOULD HAVE ESSENTIALLY A WAY TO GO TO THE EAST THROUGH THROUGH FENN ROAD TO GO TO 521. AND ALREADY THERE'S A TRAFFIC SIGNAL THERE. AND THERE'S A LOT OF DEVELOPMENT ON FM. 521 SO THAT USUALLY WHEN YOU HAVE A TRAFFIC SIGNAL, IT MEANS THAT THEY ALSO WANT TO HAVE FEN ROAD AS A MAJOR THOROUGHFARE. SO YOU BASICALLY ARE CONNECTING AND WE WANT TO MOVE TRAFFIC EAST AND WEST THROUGH THE CONNECTION OF FEN ROAD CROSSING AND ALSO THE SHIPMAN'S LANDING AREA. OKAY. AND LIKE I SAID, THANK YOU FOR THE EXPLANATION BECAUSE I KNOW THERE'S A LOT OF WETLAND AREA BACK THERE AND HAS THE EASEMENT BACK THERE AS WELL FOR RUNNING RUNNING ON OUR TRANSMISSION LINES. SO I'M JUST WONDERING. YES. YOU MENTIONED THE WETLANDS AND WHATNOT. SO AFTER THIS, THIS PERIOD, I THINK I HAVE THE STEPS RIGHT HERE. SO THE STEPS WOULD BE TO HAVE A CONCEPTUAL STUDY. YOU'D HAVE CONSULTANTS WHO GO THROUGH AND LOOK AT THINGS LIKE WETLAND SOILS, CONDITIONS TO SEE IF IT'S EVEN FEASIBLE TO CONSTRUCT TO THERE. BUT, BUT NOW IF WE HAVE THE PLAN, WE SAY, GO THROUGH THIS ROUTE AND LOOK AT IT AND SEE IF YOU CAN CONSTRUCT IT. OKAY. I'M SORRY. THANK YOU. SURE.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? I HAVE A QUICK QUESTION. MAYBE ON THE NEXT SLIDE. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU'RE GOING TO GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE OR NOT. OKAY. THE STEPS, MAYBE THE NEXT STEPS. OH THIS ONE. RIGHT. THE NEXT STEPS. AT WHAT POINT ARE WE GOING TO NOTIFY THE RESIDENTS OR CITIZENS ABOUT THIS ADOPTION OR CHANGES? I KNOW WE HAVE SOME RESIDENTS HERE, BUT ARE WE GOING TO I KNOW THERE ARE MCKEEVER ROAD CONNECTED UP THERE BY THE HIGHWAY SIX. THERE IS A NEIGHBORHOOD. I MEAN, I DON'T EVEN KNOW HALF OF THE PEOPLE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD KNOWS ABOUT WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN OVER THERE. I MEAN, I KNOW WE'RE GOING TO MAKE A DECISION TODAY OR IN THE COUNCIL MEETING, BUT AT WHAT POINT ARE WE GOING TO NOTIFY OUR RESIDENTS? WELL, DO WE HAVE A PLAN FOR THAT OR WHAT DO THE THE PLANNING PROCESS. YOU KNOW, WE, WE GO THROUGH OUR PUBLIC HEARING AND NOTIFICATION PERIOD THROUGH ANY KIND OF PLANNING DOCUMENT, WHETHER IT'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR MAJOR THOROUGHFARE PLAN UPDATES. BUT WHEN YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT MAYBE IN THE NEXT STEP, WHEN THE COUNCIL ADOPTS IT FULLY, WE AMEND IT. IT GETS ONLINE. ANYBODY CAN LOOK AT IT. ANYBODY CAN LOOK AT OUR CURRENT ONE AS WELL. SO THEN WHEN THERE ARE PROCESSES WHERE WE START LOOKING AT A CONCEPT OR FEASIBILITY EVERY STEP OF THE WAY, THE, THE PUBLIC IS ALWAYS WELCOME TO, YOU KNOW, PARTICIPATE, GIVE THEIR FEEDBACK. YOU KNOW, LIKE WHEN WE'RE LOOKING AT DESIGNING OR FEASIBILITY STUDIES, THEY CAN JUST SAY, HEY, THIS AREA, I KNOW THAT'S VERY WETLAND AND YOU CAN'T REALLY BUILD HERE. YOU SHOULD BUILD OVER THERE. SO THERE'S, THERE'S ALWAYS A PROCESS FOR PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT. OKAY, ONE LAST BACK ON THE MAJOR THOROUGHFARE, FEN ROADS, NOT INSIDE THE CITY LIMITS OR THE ETJ. RIGHT. SO CAN WE DESIGNATE THE COUNTY'S ROAD AS A MAJOR THOROUGHFARE. YES WE CAN. IN TERMS OF SAYING TO THEM, WE WANT THIS TO BE DESIGNATED ON OUR PLAN AS A MAJOR THOROUGHFARE PLAN, BECAUSE IT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE IF WE'RE DESIGNATING SHIPMAN'S LANDING AND GOING ACROSS. AND THEN IT'S. SO THEN WHEN WE HAVE THIS IN OUR PLAN, WE CAN GO TO THE COUNTY AND SAY, HEY, COUNTY, WE WANT THIS BECAUSE WE NEED THAT MOBILITY. YOU KNOW, YOU STILL NEED THEM TO PUT IT INTO THEIR PLAN. YES. JUST BECAUSE YOU CALL IT SOMETHING DOESN'T MAKE IT SO THEY HAVE TO WRITE. YES. OR ACTUALLY IN THIS CASE, IT'LL BE OUR CALL AS ETJ. SO WE WOULD DEFINITELY BE CONVERSING WITH THEM. GOT IT. TO, TO TALK AND SEE IF WE CAN COLLABORATE BECAUSE IT'S ALSO IN THEIR BEST INTEREST TO THEY HAVE A LOT OF HOUSES BEING BUILT OVER THERE. PERFECT. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? OKAY, NOW WE COME TO THE TASK OF MAKING A MOTION. MOTION TO. APPROVE. THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS ARE. CAN YOU GO. CAN YOU THROW UP THE PAGE THAT'S GOT WHAT YOU'RE PROPOSING? THE MAP. THE MAP IN OUR PACKAGE WAS A WAS AN ADDITIONAL PAGE LIKE WAS HANDED OUT AT THE THE PUBLIC HEARING. DO YOU HAVE THE ABILITY TO THE MATRIX UP OR. IT'S, IT'S ON THE AGENDA, BUT IT'S NOT ON THE SLIDES. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE MAJOR THOROUGHFARE PLAN OF THE MOBILITY. HE'S TALKING ABOUT THE SPECIFIC. THERE WAS THERE WAS SHORT TERM LONG. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE REFERENCE SOMETHING THAT WE'RE APPROVING. THAT'S WHAT I WAS LOOKING FOR. WELL, EFFECTIVELY WE WOULD BE APPROVING THIS MAP. COMMISSIONER HANEY, IS THAT YOUR MOTION TO APPROVE AS PROPOSED BY STAFF? CORRECT. OKAY. SO THAT'S THE MOTION. MY MOTION WOULD BE APPROVED. THE STAFF REPORT, I GUESS. YES. THE MOTION AND A SECOND VOTE. MOTION CARRIES. THANK YOU. NO OTHER BUSINESS. LAST ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS TO JOIN THE MEETING. OKAY. WE ADJOURN THIS MEETING AT 740. WE NEED TO VOTE. WE HAVE TO FINISH THE VOTING. OH, WE DIDN'T FINISH IT. NOPE. NO, WE DIDN'T VOTE YET. OH, WAIT. WAIT. OKAY. COMMISSIONER SILVA, IF YOU CAN VOTE, PLEASE. THANK YOU. I'M SORRY. MOTION CARRIES. THANK YOU. OKAY.