1 00:01:02,069 --> 00:01:03,023 Start early. 2 00:01:11,058 --> 00:01:12,033 I know I do. 3 00:01:15,048 --> 00:01:18,066 Oh, really, you are on these kind of things. Counting 4 00:01:21,009 --> 00:01:29,007 Yeah. I think, OK, it is, uh, 9:59 and I'm gonna call 5 00:01:29,007 --> 00:01:35,018 the orders. Recording in progress interview board meeting. Town of Mountain Village. 6 00:01:35,053 --> 00:01:43,008 It is October 1st, 2026. And with that, uh, Amy, you would like to start with the 7 00:01:44,038 --> 00:01:46,036 review of board voting procedures. 8 00:01:48,087 --> 00:01:53,073 Yeah, so, um, there's been a couple of cases where we're reviewing the recording 9 00:01:53,075 --> 00:01:57,049 after a meeting and it's difficult to tell, especially when we have members online, 10 00:01:57,079 --> 00:02:04,042 um, who's voting what so I would like to, um, just suggest that when we have folks 11 00:02:04,042 --> 00:02:11,043 that are online voting that they do a roll roll call vote. A roll call vote so that 12 00:02:11,043 --> 00:02:15,058 we have the folks that are here that we can see and verify in person who's voting 13 00:02:15,006 --> 00:02:21,087 yay or nay but then online that they state their name and then their vote for individual 14 00:02:21,087 --> 00:02:22,046 items. 15 00:02:35,009 --> 00:02:42,091 August 6, 2026, the design review board meeting. And this item was continued to the 16 00:02:42,091 --> 00:02:50,004 October 1, 2026 Design Review Award meeting, so. Make a motion to approve the minutes 17 00:02:50,068 --> 00:02:58,067 of 60. DOB meeting. Thanks for the changes. Maybe we can also clarify 18 00:02:58,067 --> 00:03:05,011 about, about the alternative alternative, uh, voting procedure. So if everybody is 19 00:03:05,045 --> 00:03:12,021 what is it um oh yeah sorry there was one extra yeah yeah. Yeah, so, um, I think 20 00:03:12,021 --> 00:03:16,009 at the beginning of the meeting, Banks, if I could ask the chair to verify who are 21 00:03:16,009 --> 00:03:19,043 voting members and who are not voting members for that meeting, that would also be 22 00:03:19,043 --> 00:03:25,031 appreciated. And if it changes through the meeting. Exactly, yeah, yeah, to note 23 00:03:25,031 --> 00:03:30,073 those changes. And so is it 5 people who are here that that's the quorum that meets 24 00:03:30,073 --> 00:03:35,024 the threshold for a quorum and voting, or how does that work? No, the quorum is 4, 25 00:03:35,076 --> 00:03:40,076 and then the board in the voting members in the board are 7. OK, so we have 7 regular 26 00:03:40,076 --> 00:03:45,027 members. We have 2 alternates for a total board of 9. if there's 7 regular members 27 00:03:45,027 --> 00:03:50,019 here, then the alternates don't vote. If there's 6 members here, then the first alternate 28 00:03:50,019 --> 00:03:55,055 votes, and if they're, you know, they're, they're on so. Um, so maybe while we're, 29 00:03:55,076 --> 00:03:59,078 we're, while we're on this agenda item, can we establish the voting, uh, for today? 30 00:04:01,047 --> 00:04:08,094 And as I said, we have 5 regular members here. And we have Alternates online by chance? 31 00:04:09,037 --> 00:04:13,008 Who's online? Um, member Kramer is online as well as member Austin. 32 00:04:15,011 --> 00:04:20,051 Member Kramer is online as well as member Austin. So who is our first alternate on 33 00:04:20,051 --> 00:04:24,047 the line and Jim is the first alternate, so Jim would be voting. 34 00:04:26,051 --> 00:04:29,008 Ellen's present. So Jim will be voting. Yep, present. 35 00:04:31,011 --> 00:04:35,025 Congratulations, Jim. And, and, and if Adam does show up, then we'll need to just 36 00:04:35,027 --> 00:04:38,009 pause for a second and note a change in the voting if, if. 37 00:04:42,046 --> 00:04:49,061 With that. We actually had emotion on the floor. There's your 38 00:04:49,061 --> 00:04:57,052 2nd. Any discussion on that item? Not all ask for the vote. Would 39 00:04:57,052 --> 00:05:02,001 you like a roll call on each of these since Jim's online? Um, we could just, we can 40 00:05:02,003 --> 00:05:06,086 do the in-house vote and then, and thanks, when we call for the vote, if you could 41 00:05:06,086 --> 00:05:12,039 then call for the online vote and do a roll. OK. Great, I'll ask for a vote then 42 00:05:12,039 --> 00:05:13,054 I'll and. 43 00:05:15,074 --> 00:05:17,096 Did you, yes or no? 44 00:05:20,068 --> 00:05:28,006 And Mr. Austin. Bye. Great, thank you very much. Thank you. Doesn't Ellen get a vote? 45 00:05:28,019 --> 00:05:35,034 Yeah, Ellen. Oh, I'm sorry, and Ellen and Ellen. Hi. OK. 46 00:05:36,079 --> 00:05:40,094 Great. Uh, our next agenda item, this is a reading approval summary of motions of 47 00:05:40,094 --> 00:05:47,076 the September 3, 2026 designer review board meeting. I might get a notion. 48 00:05:59,054 --> 00:06:06,065 I'll make a motion to approve the DRB minutes for September 3, 2026 meeting. 49 00:06:07,006 --> 00:06:11,062 Great, thank you. Is there, you got a second. Is there any further discussion? 50 00:06:13,094 --> 00:06:19,037 If not ask for a vote all in-house. Hi. Ellen 51 00:06:24,057 --> 00:06:28,084 Jim Uh Ellen 52 00:06:32,006 --> 00:06:39,037 You're muted. You're muted, but you're waving. I'll take the waviness. You're so 53 00:06:39,037 --> 00:06:46,033 actually I I eyed twice, but that's OK. Thank you. Can a non-voting member make a 54 00:06:46,033 --> 00:06:46,088 motion? 55 00:06:52,091 --> 00:06:57,086 Um, I, you typically, yeah, in Robert's rules that, yup, they just can't vote on 56 00:06:57,086 --> 00:07:00,092 it. Just to, just to clarify. 57 00:07:02,099 --> 00:07:10,078 So, Toby, feel free. OK. All right. Our next agenda item is consideration 58 00:07:10,078 --> 00:07:14,038 of design review. This is final architectural review for a multi-family building 59 00:07:14,038 --> 00:07:21,078 containing 15 employee apartments at Lot 640A 306 Adams Ranch Road pursuant to CDC 60 00:07:21,078 --> 00:07:29,051 Section 17411. This item was continued from the September 3rd Design Review Board 61 00:07:29,051 --> 00:07:30,006 meeting. 62 00:07:32,063 --> 00:07:34,022 And Amy, your, your pleasure. 63 00:07:37,096 --> 00:07:39,086 I'll be uh taking the presentation today. 64 00:07:55,074 --> 00:07:56,013 OK. 65 00:08:01,006 --> 00:08:05,051 All right, thank you, chair. So this will be the final architecture review for Lot 66 00:08:05,051 --> 00:08:10,007 640A 306 Adams Ranch Road, AKA the Mountain View Apartments. 67 00:08:12,015 --> 00:08:16,033 I think everybody's familiar with this project by now. Um, but, um, the, the applicant 68 00:08:16,033 --> 00:08:22,065 is John Miller from Hondrosa Planning and, um, on behalf of Telski, TSG Ski and Golf. 69 00:08:23,022 --> 00:08:29,046 Uh, the zoning is multi-family. It's an existing parcel with, uh, 30 units on it, 70 00:08:29,078 --> 00:08:35,032 um, with, uh, the proposed use being uh 15 more units for a total of 45 units. 71 00:08:38,045 --> 00:08:42,076 Um, so, uh, obviously this case has been around for a few months now. Um, there's 72 00:08:42,076 --> 00:08:47,064 lots of background on it, so I'll run through that first. Um, the, as I just mentioned, 73 00:08:47,069 --> 00:08:53,064 it's a multi-family, uh, zoning with the existing 30 unit employee apartment complex 74 00:08:53,064 --> 00:08:59,013 owned by Telski. It also includes a, uh, service parking lot and open space that 75 00:08:59,013 --> 00:09:05,023 is, uh, used as a park. It's also owned by Telski. Um, in 2019 there was an entitlement 76 00:09:05,023 --> 00:09:09,028 for 19 density units that entitlement has expired. Since then there's been several 77 00:09:09,028 --> 00:09:15,031 work sessions to work out this, uh, site plan. Um, also there was a citizen initiated 78 00:09:15,031 --> 00:09:19,009 ordinance that limits the overall density on the lot to 45 units, so that equals 79 00:09:19,009 --> 00:09:27,005 15 additional. Including, sorry, cut out there for a second, including uh the um 80 00:09:27,034 --> 00:09:34,095 existing. Or 45 total of 15 additional. Anyway. Um So, the applicant has 81 00:09:34,095 --> 00:09:40,047 supplied three applications as part of this project, a density transfer and rezone 82 00:09:40,008 --> 00:09:46,004 that was approved by council at the July 16th town council meeting, a minor subdivision 83 00:09:46,008 --> 00:09:50,067 that would be heard by the town council subsequent to the results of this, um, class 84 00:09:50,067 --> 00:09:55,091 three design review, and then the class three design review which is before you today. 85 00:09:56,000 --> 00:10:00,052 The initial architecture review was, uh, initially heard in I believe May and then, 86 00:10:00,056 --> 00:10:07,019 um, approved unanimously in July. Um, see, and so as part of the density transfer 87 00:10:07,019 --> 00:10:12,059 and rezone that was approved by council, they did include a condition that the final 88 00:10:12,059 --> 00:10:17,087 design, site plan, parking plan match the concept that was, um, that was presented 89 00:10:17,087 --> 00:10:22,059 at the density transfer and rezone hearing. So, as you'll see that, uh, that design 90 00:10:22,059 --> 00:10:28,042 has been carried forward into this final architecture review. So, the proposal itself 91 00:10:28,042 --> 00:10:35,023 includes a 3-story, 11,148 square square foot structure including 15 two-bedroom 92 00:10:35,023 --> 00:10:40,099 apartments. They are proposing 65 total parking spaces, an expanded graded field 93 00:10:40,099 --> 00:10:47,087 area, landscape area, relocated trash, and uh the uh the minor subdivision to redraw 94 00:10:47,087 --> 00:10:48,078 the lot lines. 95 00:10:51,038 --> 00:10:55,081 These are the existing conditions, the existing survey showing uh the basketball 96 00:10:55,081 --> 00:11:01,028 court, the existing lot line which cuts kind of curves across the property here that 97 00:11:01,034 --> 00:11:06,075 would be relocated for this proposal. There's also a uh previous wetland delineation 98 00:11:06,078 --> 00:11:12,061 that has now been relocated based on the newly provided wetland delineation. 99 00:11:17,094 --> 00:11:21,082 So, there's been some significant changes since the July initial architecture review. 100 00:11:22,006 --> 00:11:26,089 If you were following the density transfer hearing, a lot of this was reflected in 101 00:11:26,089 --> 00:11:31,085 that, uh, most recent proposal as part of the density transfer, um, but I'll go through 102 00:11:31,085 --> 00:11:37,099 the significant changes since the pre uh most recent design review. Um, they've removed 103 00:11:37,099 --> 00:11:43,011 the entire parking area in front of the building that was directly to the south of 104 00:11:43,011 --> 00:11:48,073 the building, um, and, um, they've reduced the overall parking to 65 spaces that 105 00:11:48,073 --> 00:11:52,079 will require design variation for an alternative parking requirement. We'll get into 106 00:11:52,079 --> 00:11:58,035 that later, um, but that is, um, dramatically changing the site plan, uh, removing 107 00:11:58,035 --> 00:12:03,063 that additional parking area and reducing the overall footprint of the parking, um, 108 00:12:03,076 --> 00:12:08,075 at the request of town council. Um, they've also subsequently relocated the trash 109 00:12:08,075 --> 00:12:15,045 enclosures, uh, associated with that reduction in parking. Um, they've relocated 110 00:12:15,045 --> 00:12:19,029 or they've added a gravel path on the western side of the building. We have a condition 111 00:12:19,029 --> 00:12:23,037 of approval associated with that. They've also added a photometric study for the 112 00:12:23,037 --> 00:12:29,003 lighting plan, updated the wetland delineation, um, they're depicting snow storage 113 00:12:29,003 --> 00:12:33,041 for the parking area. They're, and then they've updated the landscape and wildfire 114 00:12:33,041 --> 00:12:38,006 mitigation plans. Uh, revise their high calculations and remove, remove some of the 115 00:12:38,006 --> 00:12:39,063 G encroachments. 116 00:12:43,025 --> 00:12:49,064 So going over the um Top-level zoning requirements, um, things that have changed 117 00:12:49,064 --> 00:12:54,028 since the initial architecture review, the height calculations have been revised. 118 00:12:54,041 --> 00:13:01,008 Um, they're well under the maximum height for a multi-family unit with gables. Um, 119 00:13:01,026 --> 00:13:05,084 I also, the stone percentage I believe was increased slightly, but it still requires 120 00:13:05,084 --> 00:13:12,036 a design variation and the parking, excuse me, has been reduced to below the required 121 00:13:12,036 --> 00:13:18,042 68 spaces. Which requires the alternative parking requirement, design variation as 122 00:13:18,042 --> 00:13:23,069 well. Um, otherwise, there were some general easement encroachments approved as part 123 00:13:23,069 --> 00:13:29,036 of the initial architecture review. Um, some of these have been minimized or removed, 124 00:13:29,098 --> 00:13:36,001 uh, but, uh, but those approvals are still in place. There's also a, uh, design variation 125 00:13:36,001 --> 00:13:39,096 for the hardy board siding that's, that was also approved at the initial architecture 126 00:13:39,096 --> 00:13:46,093 review and has not changed. They've updated their renderings. I believe this is the 127 00:13:46,093 --> 00:13:50,093 same design that you saw at the July hearing. It's just looking a little brighter, 128 00:13:51,004 --> 00:13:57,017 look, and including some landscaping. Um, so, that's updated. The floor plans are 129 00:13:57,017 --> 00:14:03,005 not updated. Those, those remain the same two-bedroom apartments. They have provided 130 00:14:03,005 --> 00:14:09,007 their elevations, uh, height elevations to depict the proposed and, uh, existing 131 00:14:09,007 --> 00:14:15,089 grade, um, showing here that they're well below that proposed grade, um, height limitation 132 00:14:15,099 --> 00:14:20,002 that was a request as a condition of approval at the initial review, so it's been 133 00:14:20,017 --> 00:14:26,023 met with these revised calculations and diagrams, also providing the roof diagram 134 00:14:26,023 --> 00:14:29,003 showing all of the height calculation points for the average roof height. 135 00:14:31,067 --> 00:14:37,098 Um, they provided a revised roof plan. Uh, there was a public comment with concerns 136 00:14:37,098 --> 00:14:43,054 regarding drainage, especially around the, um, building itself and in the courtyard. 137 00:14:44,000 --> 00:14:48,053 I, I just want to point out with the roof plan, it does show the, the snow fencing 138 00:14:48,065 --> 00:14:54,042 around the courtyard as required by code as well as down sprouts and gutters. Um, 139 00:14:54,096 --> 00:14:59,029 however, if, if there's still concerns about drainage around the building. The DRB 140 00:14:59,068 --> 00:15:05,003 may request that a revised plan be provided with additional details for drainage. 141 00:15:05,057 --> 00:15:06,089 Uh, in and around the building. 142 00:15:11,091 --> 00:15:17,087 The overall building form materiality hasn't changed, uh, significantly. They still 143 00:15:17,095 --> 00:15:23,029 need to provide a specification for the soccer materials. Otherwise, the materials 144 00:15:23,037 --> 00:15:27,057 are meant to match the existing Mountain View apartments, and I believe they have 145 00:15:27,057 --> 00:15:33,034 provided a, a, um, aerials board which I'm sure John will bring up during his presentation. 146 00:15:37,008 --> 00:15:42,031 OK. So, getting into the updated site plan, um, this is where you'll see the most 147 00:15:42,031 --> 00:15:47,015 significant changes since the initial review as, as I mentioned, uh, the big changes 148 00:15:47,015 --> 00:15:51,094 they removed this additional parking area here in the middle, uh, in front of the 149 00:15:52,032 --> 00:15:59,079 building, uh, that was to accommodate the preservation of as much open space as possible, 150 00:16:00,004 --> 00:16:05,086 which achieves uh request from town council, um, to, to preserve this recreational 151 00:16:05,088 --> 00:16:12,009 space. Um, and they've also removed any parking from this area here, which, uh, had 152 00:16:12,009 --> 00:16:17,003 previously been shown to go all the way to the road to preserve these three trees 153 00:16:17,003 --> 00:16:22,041 again at the request of council. So, um, in order to achieve this parking plan, they 154 00:16:22,043 --> 00:16:28,002 did have to reduce the parking to 65 spaces, which is below the CDC required 68 spaces, 155 00:16:28,027 --> 00:16:33,025 which is why they're requesting the alternative parking requirement. Um, um, I have 156 00:16:33,025 --> 00:16:38,059 a slide about that specifically, uh, in a sec. Just want to point out this is where 157 00:16:38,059 --> 00:16:45,008 the basketball court was or is, and in the future, uh, there would be um new parking 158 00:16:45,008 --> 00:16:52,013 here, so there's, that's also additional parking um that would be new. Um, other 159 00:16:52,015 --> 00:16:55,034 things that are new is with the site plan, they've, this is the gravel path that 160 00:16:55,034 --> 00:17:00,074 they've proposed, uh, which connects to the parking lot through a crosswalk. This, 161 00:17:01,069 --> 00:17:06,034 uh, we have a slide about this, but, um, staff is requesting that this be paved. 162 00:17:07,051 --> 00:17:11,007 Uh, otherwise, as you can see, instead of the parking lot, they provided this kind 163 00:17:11,007 --> 00:17:17,006 of pavilion area which seems nice, and then also relocated the trash enclosures to 164 00:17:17,006 --> 00:17:20,003 be closer to the road and just has this little drive-in. 165 00:17:24,008 --> 00:17:30,008 OK, yeah, so as I mentioned, there is uh this gravel path here and Uh, staff is requesting 166 00:17:30,008 --> 00:17:37,029 that this be upgraded to a paved path to, uh, to match with the proposed or the future 167 00:17:37,065 --> 00:17:43,068 sidewalk that is going to be built along Adams Ranch Road. Um, that's just for improved 168 00:17:43,068 --> 00:17:51,032 accessibility and, and, uh, maintenance of that path. Um, as you can see, both planning, 169 00:17:51,045 --> 00:17:56,043 public works, and transit have all requested that this, uh, path be be provided, 170 00:17:57,005 --> 00:18:01,037 um, and we've confirmed with public works that a future sidewalk would, would connect 171 00:18:01,041 --> 00:18:06,016 and they have requested that it be paved because connecting to a paved path would 172 00:18:06,016 --> 00:18:07,004 be easier than a gravel path. 173 00:18:12,099 --> 00:18:16,054 OK, so now looking at the alternative parking requirement in more detail, as you 174 00:18:16,054 --> 00:18:23,061 can see from this uh parking civil drawing here, um, the blue parking or the shaded 175 00:18:23,061 --> 00:18:28,085 parking is the new parking as part of this project. Uh, as you can see where the 176 00:18:29,002 --> 00:18:33,054 where the basketball court was, as well as over here in the corner and the new path. 177 00:18:34,046 --> 00:18:41,025 Um They're also showing snow storage on the field. However, this does seem to possibly 178 00:18:41,083 --> 00:18:46,032 conflict with the landscape plan which shows landscaping all along the parking here, 179 00:18:46,043 --> 00:18:53,012 so we did ask as a condition of approval that that conflict be um resolved. As for 180 00:18:53,012 --> 00:19:00,011 the uh parking requirement request itself, um, as I've mentioned, um, To achieve 181 00:19:00,011 --> 00:19:04,013 their 65 spaces, they would need to meet the criteria for the alternative parking 182 00:19:04,013 --> 00:19:09,039 requirement, which are these alternative parking requirements shall shall be uh sufficient 183 00:19:09,039 --> 00:19:13,075 to meet the parking demand of the proposed uses and shall not be detrimental to the 184 00:19:13,075 --> 00:19:19,042 public health, safety and welfare. It also requires a parking demand study from a 185 00:19:19,042 --> 00:19:25,011 parking expert. That study was provided uh and through a memo and essentially it, 186 00:19:25,002 --> 00:19:32,003 it conducted a study where it Um, counted the existing demand of Mountain View at 187 00:19:32,003 --> 00:19:39,067 different times of the day, uh, finding a, um, parking per unit ratio that, um, 188 00:19:40,002 --> 00:19:48,001 that calculated out would equal approximately 60 parking spaces for all 45 units. 189 00:19:48,007 --> 00:19:55,011 Um, so their finding was that 65 spaces would be sufficient to, uh, support the proposed 190 00:19:55,011 --> 00:19:59,081 use and. Um, staff reviewed the memo and concurs with the findings. We also believe 191 00:19:59,081 --> 00:20:02,034 that 65 spaces should be sufficient. 192 00:20:06,005 --> 00:20:10,076 OK, moving to the landscape and fire mitigation plan. This was updated since initial 193 00:20:10,076 --> 00:20:17,017 review. Um, there's 38 trees, 15 total trees removed, um, as you can see with the 194 00:20:17,017 --> 00:20:24,004 red dots there. Um, as I mentioned, there are these trees along the, uh, parking 195 00:20:24,042 --> 00:20:29,021 area that will probably need to be revised to allow for some sort of access for snow 196 00:20:29,021 --> 00:20:34,097 storage or just at least showing that there's enough space there to, uh, push a plow 197 00:20:34,097 --> 00:20:40,045 through. Um, but as you can see, they're providing shade along the, um, picnic area 198 00:20:40,045 --> 00:20:47,078 and, and throughout this, um, Kind of recreational area. Um, in terms of fire mitigation, 199 00:20:47,095 --> 00:20:54,038 they're showing a 15 ft buffer outside of um the trees that are adjacent to the building. 200 00:20:55,059 --> 00:21:02,099 This does likely meet the exemption. Uh, criteria in the fire mitigation plan. However, 201 00:21:03,006 --> 00:21:06,097 we do want the town. Forester to review this plan and he's been out on leave for 202 00:21:06,097 --> 00:21:11,009 a couple of weeks. So we just added condition here that the uh fire mitigation get 203 00:21:11,009 --> 00:21:15,089 final approval by the town forester for prior to building permit, but as far as I 204 00:21:15,089 --> 00:21:20,042 understand, this plan was worked out between the applicant and the forester, so I 205 00:21:20,042 --> 00:21:22,071 believe it um should meet our new code. 206 00:21:25,072 --> 00:21:29,071 And then, uh, their irrigation plan is not something we typically talk about at DRB 207 00:21:29,071 --> 00:21:31,059 but because there is 208 00:21:34,043 --> 00:21:40,073 Hello. OK. Um, Yeah, uh, because there's this recreation component, we wanted to 209 00:21:40,073 --> 00:21:45,099 flag this. Um, so, in this, in this irrigation plan, the red is a temporary drip 210 00:21:45,099 --> 00:21:50,065 line for establishing, uh, landscaping and the blue would be permanent. As you can 211 00:21:50,065 --> 00:21:58,033 see, neither of those lines extend out into the field, which is here. Um The applicant 212 00:21:58,033 --> 00:22:02,077 has proposed to partially regrade the field and make it flatter and expand it, which 213 00:22:02,077 --> 00:22:07,065 is great. However, without irrigation, staff is concerned that, you know, it will 214 00:22:07,065 --> 00:22:13,061 be dry as it has been this summer. Um, there is apparently towns owned irrigation 215 00:22:13,061 --> 00:22:18,074 in that field. However, with the regrading, it probably would need to be relocated 216 00:22:18,086 --> 00:22:25,033 or removed. So, this is just something we wanted to flag in case DRB feels that um 217 00:22:25,039 --> 00:22:29,074 this should be part of the approval for irrigation of the field or otherwise maintaining 218 00:22:29,074 --> 00:22:37,007 that field as a um recreational asset. Mm OK, and then I believe this is the last 219 00:22:37,007 --> 00:22:40,059 slide. Um, looking briefly at the lighting, it's pretty straightforward. There's 220 00:22:40,059 --> 00:22:47,077 only two fixtures, um, recessed cans and some, uh, wall-mounted sconces for 26 total 221 00:22:47,077 --> 00:22:55,069 fixtures throughout the, um, complex. Um, the recessed cans are on the balconies 222 00:22:55,069 --> 00:23:02,022 and stairwell areas while the Excuse me, the sconces are, um, mounted outside the 223 00:23:02,022 --> 00:23:08,057 main entrance of the, uh, facility. All the fixtures meet code in terms of lumens, 224 00:23:08,071 --> 00:23:13,054 uh, temperature, um, that sort of thing, mounting height, so staff has no concerns 225 00:23:13,054 --> 00:23:14,034 about the lighting plan. 226 00:23:16,098 --> 00:23:21,045 OK. So, with that staff um does recommend approval of the final architecture review 227 00:23:21,045 --> 00:23:25,000 for this project, including the previously approved general easement encroachments, 228 00:23:25,034 --> 00:23:29,089 as well as the design variations for hardy board siding and fascia, the alternative 229 00:23:29,089 --> 00:23:36,091 parking requirement, and the reduced stone percentage of 28%. Um, and with the following 230 00:23:36,091 --> 00:23:41,019 conditions, some of these are a little more meaty and different than our typical. 231 00:23:41,089 --> 00:23:48,056 So, just to review, the final parking plan needs to be a not, not a draft. Um, we 232 00:23:48,056 --> 00:23:54,086 need to see the updated wetland delineation, uh, specify this, um, software material, 233 00:23:55,001 --> 00:24:02,039 provide a paved connection to the road. All gravel paths, um, shall meet TMV standards, 234 00:24:02,062 --> 00:24:09,061 um. Fire mitigation plan shall be approved by town forester. Install compliant lighting 235 00:24:09,061 --> 00:24:14,009 and existing dress monument, and I believe those are all of them that are different 236 00:24:14,009 --> 00:24:16,061 than normal. OK. Thank you. 237 00:24:20,033 --> 00:24:25,034 Great, thank you. Uh, Ward questions for staff. 238 00:24:27,094 --> 00:24:35,089 Here, please. Uh, yeah, and this may already have But I did see it 239 00:24:35,089 --> 00:24:43,076 mentioned in the material. Um, is this apartment only for Telsky and Yes, 240 00:24:44,021 --> 00:24:49,045 it's owned by Telski. It'll be deed restricted. Um, I'm not sure if that deed restriction 241 00:24:49,045 --> 00:24:54,004 will have any requirement that they're Telski employees, but seeing that it's owned 242 00:24:54,004 --> 00:24:58,051 by Telski, I don't see why they would rent it to anybody else. OK, uh. 243 00:25:01,025 --> 00:25:01,086 Um 244 00:25:05,038 --> 00:25:10,093 The roof material was that finalized because there was kind of a question in the 245 00:25:10,093 --> 00:25:17,065 materials we got about it said silver at one point and another. Yeah, I believe they 246 00:25:17,065 --> 00:25:23,085 did update the uh roof material to be dark charcoal staining seam so the yeah, in 247 00:25:23,085 --> 00:25:28,055 the initial review there was a question of It was specified as metallic, which could 248 00:25:28,055 --> 00:25:33,067 be shiny, which is not allowed. So, um, I, I think we'll see in the materials board 249 00:25:33,067 --> 00:25:36,099 it is not shiny. OK, great, thank you. That's all I have. 250 00:25:39,024 --> 00:25:45,051 David, uh, Daniel, thank you for the presentation and thoroughness of that. Um, one 251 00:25:45,051 --> 00:25:51,059 thing that I was hoping to pick up on was, uh, loading unloading zones and requirements 252 00:25:51,059 --> 00:25:56,045 on a multi-family. Has that been resolved in this application and or addressed? 253 00:26:00,001 --> 00:26:02,092 Do, do you have any comments on that? Cause I, I don't think that's something we, 254 00:26:03,009 --> 00:26:06,005 we addressed in this last review. So 255 00:26:08,008 --> 00:26:16,001 Um So multi-family is, I, I'd have to check. So I, I believe it's just in 256 00:26:16,001 --> 00:26:20,022 the code where it says you have to have a loading zone that's like within your parking 257 00:26:20,022 --> 00:26:26,018 garage and that's why for Little Rose we had to do a uh specific approval for relocating 258 00:26:26,018 --> 00:26:29,005 that, but I don't believe that's for all loading zones, so I'd have, we'd have to 259 00:26:29,005 --> 00:26:35,077 check. I guess the other thing to consider is that this is um. Other nonconforming 260 00:26:35,099 --> 00:26:40,079 because the property existed before that requirement was likely put into the CDC, 261 00:26:41,019 --> 00:26:46,009 um, and this is in addition to that property whether or not DRB wanted to require 262 00:26:46,009 --> 00:26:51,075 that, um, I think that this, you know, there. Really primarily relates to the village 263 00:26:51,075 --> 00:26:57,067 center and delivery trucks for retail, uh, you know, for uh, sorry, restaurant, commercial, 264 00:26:57,069 --> 00:27:04,004 etc. um, in this case a loading zone there's certainly plenty of area for a FedEx 265 00:27:04,004 --> 00:27:08,034 or you. UPS truck to be able to deliver here this property would not, it doesn't 266 00:27:08,034 --> 00:27:11,097 have a restaurant, it doesn't have any of those retail serving things that would 267 00:27:11,097 --> 00:27:16,089 require that type of loading zone. Um, I'm, I feel fairly comfortable just leaving 268 00:27:16,089 --> 00:27:21,005 it as grandfathered nonconforming if DRB wants to discuss that they can take that 269 00:27:21,005 --> 00:27:22,037 up during their deliberations. 270 00:27:24,053 --> 00:27:30,068 Thank you. Let's move down the, the line here. Daniel, can you go show your uh slide 271 00:27:30,068 --> 00:27:33,021 again with the irrigation? Yes. 272 00:28:00,037 --> 00:28:07,074 Um And my question is gonna be about irrigating the field. OK. 273 00:28:08,046 --> 00:28:12,058 And I'm gonna wait to hear. I didn't quite understand the third point there. The 274 00:28:12,058 --> 00:28:17,044 regrade of the field likely means removing, relocating existing town-owned irrigation. 275 00:28:18,061 --> 00:28:24,012 Right. So, My understanding is that there, the town owns irrigation lines in that 276 00:28:24,012 --> 00:28:31,049 field, however, we've been asked to not use them. Um And seeing as they're regrading 277 00:28:31,049 --> 00:28:36,077 that entire field. Likely those irrigation lines would have to be removed to achieve 278 00:28:36,077 --> 00:28:42,065 the regrading because they're gonna be in there with site work machines. So it's, 279 00:28:42,007 --> 00:28:47,028 it's unresolved at this point. What if it's unresolved at this point whether or not 280 00:28:47,081 --> 00:28:54,053 um the town would irrigate, Telski would irrigate, nobody irrigates. That's, that's 281 00:28:54,053 --> 00:28:59,002 where we're at. Well, that's, that's a rub for me. I know in our initial review. 282 00:29:00,073 --> 00:29:07,056 There's lip service paid to maintain in the field is local play area, and there's 283 00:29:07,056 --> 00:29:11,048 nothing in this, and I think the same thing happened to town council, but there's 284 00:29:11,048 --> 00:29:17,095 nothing in this. Yeah, I, I that says anything about it. Yeah, there was discussion, 285 00:29:18,008 --> 00:29:23,022 uh, I'll just say that there was no condition or anything binding, uh, at council 286 00:29:23,032 --> 00:29:28,051 saying that they have to irrigate this field. However, the DRB may find that to be 287 00:29:28,051 --> 00:29:35,027 necessary. OK. Uh, and could you also clarify that one of the walkways is gonna be 288 00:29:35,027 --> 00:29:43,004 paved, and that's from the, the. The crosswalk in the parking area to Adams Ranch. 289 00:29:43,066 --> 00:29:50,025 So, my understanding is both of these paths are currently specified as gravel. Both 290 00:29:50,025 --> 00:29:55,025 this one here, which is kind of replacing the existing path up to Mountain View from 291 00:29:55,025 --> 00:30:01,021 the road, and then this smaller path is also specified as gravel. Staff is asking 292 00:30:01,021 --> 00:30:08,019 that this particular path be Upgraded to paved. Interior, the parking lot itself. 293 00:30:09,055 --> 00:30:16,006 Yeah. OK. And that is one of our conditions. Baby Nevada. Yes, staff has added that 294 00:30:16,006 --> 00:30:21,016 condition, yes. Great. And to clarify, there's no deed restriction with this property. 295 00:30:21,074 --> 00:30:27,048 No, there is. There will be, yeah, they'll be using the, I believe it's the 1997 296 00:30:27,052 --> 00:30:32,061 deed restriction that we use, uh, for, for all deed restriction units in Mountain 297 00:30:32,061 --> 00:30:36,067 Village. OK, great. Thank you so much. Scott anything? 298 00:30:39,013 --> 00:30:46,071 I'm just looking at the uh lighting fixtures, um, do they Um, there's a couple of 299 00:30:46,071 --> 00:30:52,095 different lumen specifications. Do they have one, picked out and does that meet our 300 00:30:52,095 --> 00:31:00,042 new code? Yes, um, so first of all, because this was submitted prior to the adoption 301 00:31:00,042 --> 00:31:06,006 of the new code, the new new code, um, it would be under the code as of prior to 302 00:31:06,006 --> 00:31:13,009 July. Um, secondly, yes, they have specifications in their, um, plan set. These, 303 00:31:14,003 --> 00:31:18,094 these spec sheets don't show, but they're in their plan set they do, um, specify 304 00:31:18,094 --> 00:31:24,087 the lumen count, the temperature for each of these, um. Fixtures and they they do 305 00:31:24,087 --> 00:31:32,068 meet the code. Yeah Yeah, and so the, um, so although this was submitted prior, 306 00:31:32,078 --> 00:31:34,096 there was a, a little dilemma on my part about. 307 00:31:37,005 --> 00:31:43,062 Required to be retrofitted, um, but with the edits that council has made to. This 308 00:31:43,062 --> 00:31:50,014 would be considered, um, the, there was an exception basically for, for, uh, for 309 00:31:50,014 --> 00:31:55,009 soffit and, and, um, recessed lighting that existed under a certain lumen and this 310 00:31:55,009 --> 00:31:58,008 would meet that, so there would be no need for a retrofit in the future. 311 00:32:00,028 --> 00:32:07,004 OK, thank you. Liz, anything OK. Uh, Ellen 312 00:32:08,039 --> 00:32:16,008 Questions, comments? Actually, no comments. Jim, questions. Yeah, uh, 313 00:32:17,000 --> 00:32:21,024 Daniel, thank you very much for this complete presentation, um, and, and I hope this 314 00:32:21,024 --> 00:32:25,004 doesn't duplicate what Banks just asked, but could you pull up again that picture 315 00:32:25,004 --> 00:32:31,076 of the irrigation plan, because I was a little confused as to what is the open space 316 00:32:32,005 --> 00:32:38,008 to be used as a park, and was there prior, any prior commitment to how that was to 317 00:32:38,008 --> 00:32:39,028 be maintained. 318 00:32:42,027 --> 00:32:42,068 One sec. 319 00:32:51,069 --> 00:32:53,042 I was wondering if they could make me look less. 320 00:32:56,054 --> 00:33:03,044 What's up? OK. You're, you're, yeah, we've got a very large screen here and 321 00:33:05,078 --> 00:33:12,027 Um Uh, remember Austin, uh, so this, this is the diagram showing the irrigation lines. 322 00:33:12,075 --> 00:33:18,032 Um, if you see these kind of hatched areas or lighter hatched areas out here, that's 323 00:33:18,032 --> 00:33:22,008 meant to be like, I don't know if it's turf grass, but certainly not like a long 324 00:33:22,008 --> 00:33:29,071 grass for a recreation field. Um, you may be familiar, there's been About a lot of 325 00:33:29,071 --> 00:33:36,056 back and forth about the management of this space and um Telski wants to maintain 326 00:33:36,072 --> 00:33:41,003 ownership of it and has not indicated that they're willing to convey any sort of 327 00:33:41,003 --> 00:33:46,011 easement um or and we haven't had a management agreement or anything like that put 328 00:33:46,011 --> 00:33:52,058 in place. So as I mentioned, as it stands now, it's it's essentially gonna be unmanaged, 329 00:33:52,006 --> 00:33:58,055 uh, maybe the applicant can. Indicate any plans they have for management, uh, but 330 00:33:58,055 --> 00:34:04,059 clearly there's no irrigation which would keep it green. OK, so, and that could be 331 00:34:04,089 --> 00:34:10,012 a condition that that we add on to this application, is that right, Daniel? That's 332 00:34:10,012 --> 00:34:13,004 what, that's what we're saying, yes. Good, thank you. 333 00:34:15,065 --> 00:34:17,068 Thanks, Jim. Any other questions for staff? 334 00:34:20,037 --> 00:34:25,098 Uh, if not, I'll ask for presentation by the applicant. You'd be kind enough to come 335 00:34:25,098 --> 00:34:30,027 forward, introduce yourself, and Walk us through 336 00:34:37,029 --> 00:34:37,043 Oh 337 00:34:39,061 --> 00:34:39,091 Good day. 338 00:34:42,004 --> 00:34:44,000 Just gonna share my screen quickly. 339 00:34:50,008 --> 00:34:54,077 Right. So I think, you know, I was kind of thinking about what the best way to approach 340 00:34:54,077 --> 00:34:55,093 this meeting would be today. 341 00:34:58,037 --> 00:35:01,032 Might just be better to kind of go over the things that have changed since the last 342 00:35:01,032 --> 00:35:05,036 meeting, recognizing staff just went into a lot of detail about those things and 343 00:35:05,036 --> 00:35:08,006 then talk about some of the conditions because I feel like we have accomplished some 344 00:35:08,006 --> 00:35:12,015 of those things since we've submitted the packet. So I'd just like to show you that, 345 00:35:12,004 --> 00:35:19,013 show you guys those items. Um, In terms of where we were at last time we discussed 346 00:35:19,013 --> 00:35:24,073 this, we went to town council and there were some items that town council, uh, felt 347 00:35:24,073 --> 00:35:30,041 like were important as it relates to not just livability for the residents in this 348 00:35:30,041 --> 00:35:34,045 complex, but the neighborhood in general, right? And those things really related 349 00:35:34,045 --> 00:35:39,033 to the park, mainly that was the big conversation. But also some things around how 350 00:35:39,033 --> 00:35:43,093 we screen the building correctly with the existing vegetation that's in place now 351 00:35:43,093 --> 00:35:48,061 versus what we're proposing. And so what we're seeing today with the site plan that's 352 00:35:48,068 --> 00:35:53,007 On the screen is really a reflection of that. Um, things like the parking reduction 353 00:35:54,007 --> 00:36:00,018 was a direct correlation from town council saying we want to keep these 3 trees on 354 00:36:00,018 --> 00:36:04,091 the corner of the lot. That necessitated those three spaces being removed. And I 355 00:36:04,091 --> 00:36:07,087 can go through that parking study in a little bit more detail now that I have the 356 00:36:07,087 --> 00:36:14,008 final draft, and we can discuss if we need to. Um, Dave, your comment at the last 357 00:36:14,008 --> 00:36:18,015 meeting was related to the trail. We had talked about the general easement and the 358 00:36:18,015 --> 00:36:23,008 location of the trail in general. Um, town council had a different view. Town council 359 00:36:24,036 --> 00:36:28,035 wanted us to put the trail back by the building in the general easement. So we were 360 00:36:28,035 --> 00:36:34,081 kind of trying to balance multiple different, I guess, perspectives on Not just the 361 00:36:34,081 --> 00:36:39,015 use of the space, but also how it's seen from the right of way and from the rest 362 00:36:39,015 --> 00:36:44,064 of the community. Um, I will say some of the big changes that staff went over really 363 00:36:44,064 --> 00:36:49,003 related to the parking. We shifted that entire parking away from the open space. 364 00:36:49,029 --> 00:36:52,092 We felt like it was a better design, but it allowed us to keep more of that green 365 00:36:52,092 --> 00:36:58,024 space intact. Um, some of the other comments town council had related to parking, 366 00:36:58,033 --> 00:37:01,071 they wanted us to shift that parking closer to the building so that we were able 367 00:37:01,071 --> 00:37:07,055 to preserve some clusters of trees that were on site. Um, and then the build, the, 368 00:37:07,064 --> 00:37:13,023 the, the fire mitigation plan itself, again, is a really a function of town council 369 00:37:13,023 --> 00:37:17,031 saying we want to keep these trees along the street. We want to have as much screening 370 00:37:17,031 --> 00:37:21,091 as possible. So, I guess what I'm trying to just really push is that we were balancing 371 00:37:21,091 --> 00:37:27,007 a lot of different, um, I guess perspectives on what this site should look like, 372 00:37:27,072 --> 00:37:32,007 and we do truly feel like this resulted in a better design. So we appreciate the 373 00:37:32,007 --> 00:37:39,049 reiterative steps through the process. Um, The access path, so we do have the two 374 00:37:39,051 --> 00:37:44,022 paths, right? We have one that staff recommended be paved, and I discussed that with 375 00:37:44,022 --> 00:37:48,054 Alex and Telski, and I think we're OK with that. That does add a little bit of cost, 376 00:37:48,063 --> 00:37:52,053 but it really is minimal and it will create that connection. So we're good with that 377 00:37:52,053 --> 00:37:57,085 condition. As it relates to the path on the top, the the gravel path that would go 378 00:37:57,087 --> 00:38:02,077 from the building down. When I worked with our landscape designer, that path was 379 00:38:02,077 --> 00:38:07,009 intended to be created in a way that somebody could push a stroller up that path. 380 00:38:07,063 --> 00:38:11,034 Right? So we wanted to keep good grades, we didn't want it to be too steep, we didn't 381 00:38:11,034 --> 00:38:16,006 want it to have too sharp, too sharp of a turn as it comes around. So the way this 382 00:38:16,006 --> 00:38:21,033 is designed right now, it's not ADA accessible, but again, somebody with a stroller 383 00:38:21,043 --> 00:38:25,062 could push their stroller up this hill and access the green space and that was really 384 00:38:25,062 --> 00:38:32,033 the goal. How do we get people into the park? Um, snow storage. I think you guys 385 00:38:32,035 --> 00:38:35,005 know how snow storage goes around here, right? Like you put it where you can put 386 00:38:35,005 --> 00:38:39,003 it, and when it gets too much, you take it somewhere else. And I think that was our 387 00:38:39,003 --> 00:38:43,033 perspective. We wanted to recognize that we do have a lot of space that we could 388 00:38:43,039 --> 00:38:48,033 put snow and if we need to revise the landscape plan or demonstrate it in a different 389 00:38:48,035 --> 00:38:53,034 way, we're happy to do that. But I think the reality of how it works here is when 390 00:38:53,034 --> 00:38:57,093 the snow gets too deep, A truck comes and it gets removed and takes, it gets taken 391 00:38:57,093 --> 00:39:04,014 somewhere else. And so that's really how it's gonna probably work. Um, again, we 392 00:39:04,014 --> 00:39:09,027 moved the trash. When I looked at the trash rates and how much trash would be generated, 393 00:39:09,036 --> 00:39:13,005 I addressed those things in the narrative, so I hope that got that condition resolved. 394 00:39:13,078 --> 00:39:18,079 Um, the parking study, I'm just gonna switch tabs real quick. I hope I can do it 395 00:39:18,079 --> 00:39:19,067 without stop sharing. 396 00:39:23,028 --> 00:39:29,013 So again, the parking study. It was a result of town council wanting to keep 3 trees. 397 00:39:29,042 --> 00:39:34,025 And when I reached out to the parking study, um, engineer, what he basically asked 398 00:39:34,025 --> 00:39:38,061 me to do, I'm just gonna quickly explain how this all works. He said, I need to see 399 00:39:38,061 --> 00:39:44,075 how many cars are there. At a time that would generally have full occupancy of the 400 00:39:44,075 --> 00:39:49,063 units, right? So that's either 6:30 in the morning or like 9:30 at night. Right? 401 00:39:49,072 --> 00:39:55,019 So 3 nights we had somebody go out and count the cars in the parking lot. That information 402 00:39:55,019 --> 00:40:00,046 was conveyed to the engineer. And that was based on the total number of occupied 403 00:40:00,046 --> 00:40:06,001 units in Mountain View, which is 100%, it's fully occupied, right? So we got Whatever 404 00:40:06,012 --> 00:40:09,079 the numbers were for each night, I don't have them on the top of my head. And he 405 00:40:09,079 --> 00:40:13,086 basically looked at it compared to this parking study and how parking is generated, 406 00:40:14,036 --> 00:40:20,074 and the result was Essentially agreeing with a reduction of the space count that 407 00:40:20,074 --> 00:40:25,054 it would be minimal and it wouldn't cause any negative impacts in terms of. So again, 408 00:40:25,059 --> 00:40:29,082 we felt like from the beginning, the nature of the location, given how close it is 409 00:40:29,082 --> 00:40:33,062 to the gondola, how our parking is managed currently, we didn't think that it would 410 00:40:33,062 --> 00:40:37,001 be a problem, but this is something that we just wanted to document as part of the 411 00:40:37,001 --> 00:40:43,082 requirements. Um. We also worked with a wetland engineer. So we did our wetland study, 412 00:40:43,009 --> 00:40:48,031 which is a requirement that's come up a number of times throughout the process. But 413 00:40:49,017 --> 00:40:54,000 Staff had asked for some additional information about the weapons, right? And really 414 00:40:54,000 --> 00:41:00,093 the goal of this, I guess we could call it a supplement was To address how the construction 415 00:41:00,093 --> 00:41:05,001 is gonna work, right? We have this construction that's happening, we have wetlands 416 00:41:05,001 --> 00:41:09,007 that are close by, you know, we're not impacting the wetlands, but they're close 417 00:41:09,007 --> 00:41:13,021 by. And the goal is to say, OK, if we're gonna do this, what is the impact to the 418 00:41:13,021 --> 00:41:18,053 wetlands through the construction project. So, Terra firm came out, they worked with 419 00:41:18,053 --> 00:41:24,049 our engineer, um, and I'm just gonna switch to this first. You can see the wetlands 420 00:41:24,049 --> 00:41:30,007 in the red dash on the screen. So there's the wetland. That's where the beavers are 421 00:41:30,007 --> 00:41:37,075 at here. And then there's also a small wetland between the parking area and 422 00:41:37,075 --> 00:41:45,044 Timberview. Um, so, Fisher worked with David Balo. Essentially, what their 423 00:41:45,044 --> 00:41:51,027 job was, was to beef up the construction mitigation, the CMPs for the wetland area. 424 00:41:51,065 --> 00:41:56,024 And so, when you go down, I'm just gonna kind of paraphrase here, but this is kind 425 00:41:56,024 --> 00:42:04,006 of the Cliff Notes of this document. I'm just gonna read it abbreviated. Parking 426 00:42:04,006 --> 00:42:07,035 lot drainage from Mountain View appears to coalesce in the northwest corner of the 427 00:42:07,035 --> 00:42:10,083 parking lot, enter a storm invert, and drain into the wetland community west of the 428 00:42:10,083 --> 00:42:14,095 project area. No direct wetland impacts from construction or installation of the. 429 00:42:17,006 --> 00:42:23,065 Nor shown on the plant set. Indirect impacts may include the following. This one's 430 00:42:23,065 --> 00:42:27,066 interesting, increased hydraulic input resulting in a net benefit to wetland function 431 00:42:27,066 --> 00:42:32,007 and values. So what this is saying is that by capturing that water, putting it through 432 00:42:32,007 --> 00:42:36,082 the right processing before it goes into the wetland, you're going to have more water 433 00:42:36,082 --> 00:42:40,007 available for the wetland community, especially in dry years. So you're going to 434 00:42:40,007 --> 00:42:47,006 see a net function increase of that wetland. Potential increased sedimentation and 435 00:42:47,006 --> 00:42:51,042 salt introduction. So that's just given, you know, when you, when you have snow that 436 00:42:51,042 --> 00:42:54,007 melts, you have cars that drive on roads, they get a little salt. I think that's 437 00:42:54,007 --> 00:42:58,006 pretty typical what you see that around here. And then potential trash introduction 438 00:42:58,063 --> 00:43:03,046 just because of how trash moves when it rains. So, at the end of the day, it says 439 00:43:03,046 --> 00:43:07,053 the opinion of the project will not negatively impact either wetland community adjacent 440 00:43:07,059 --> 00:43:13,088 or Excuse me, it will not negatively impact either wetland community adjacent to 441 00:43:13,088 --> 00:43:19,000 the site. So I hope that kind of settles that conversation, but really again, like 442 00:43:19,000 --> 00:43:23,006 our goal was never to impact the site, the wetlands on the site. We wanted to keep 443 00:43:23,006 --> 00:43:27,057 enough space. We wanted to always be respectful of those communities given the long 444 00:43:28,001 --> 00:43:35,008 history. In the town of Mountain Village. And we think We get there with this plan, 445 00:43:35,061 --> 00:43:36,015 um. 446 00:43:38,043 --> 00:43:44,004 Lighting considerations, um, I think Jim brought up lighting. I wanted to mention 447 00:43:44,098 --> 00:43:48,061 the way these soft, regardless of the lighting change code, right? Let's think about 448 00:43:48,061 --> 00:43:53,049 this practically. You have soffit lights on the interior courtyard of this building, 449 00:43:53,007 --> 00:43:59,012 and then on the stair, excuse me, on the outside of this walkway, you have slatted 450 00:43:59,014 --> 00:44:03,076 wood, right? Like It would be different, I think, if the building was turned and 451 00:44:03,076 --> 00:44:08,073 there were no slats and the soffits were up 30 ft in the air, but they're not. They're 452 00:44:08,073 --> 00:44:12,039 really shielded in this courtyard already and then you have this additional layer 453 00:44:12,041 --> 00:44:17,048 of slatted wood keeping the light from spilling. So, we really tried to go with the 454 00:44:17,048 --> 00:44:22,043 most basic lighting plan that we could go with. I think really you could do more, 455 00:44:22,045 --> 00:44:27,014 but we were just trying to be sensitive of everything. Um. 456 00:44:29,085 --> 00:44:33,068 And then there were some public comments. I think Kath commented on some of the drainage 457 00:44:33,068 --> 00:44:37,094 stuff, and I just really quickly wanted to Well, uh 458 00:44:41,068 --> 00:44:46,007 The plan set and I'm just gonna go to the roof plan. And 459 00:44:50,033 --> 00:44:55,097 You can see on the roof plan how the roof is proposed to drain. Right, the roof is 460 00:44:55,097 --> 00:45:02,097 draining to the rear. This is Adam's ranch on this side. And the arrows kind of indicate 461 00:45:02,099 --> 00:45:08,054 which way it's gonna drain. This is the courtyard. You have the snow fencing here. 462 00:45:09,073 --> 00:45:14,036 So really the goal of this was anywhere where you have water. Coming this direction, 463 00:45:14,049 --> 00:45:21,037 so really these roof planes. I'm moving my mouse. All drains into an interior gutter 464 00:45:21,037 --> 00:45:25,047 system and down into that courtyard, there's some planting boxes and we're trying 465 00:45:25,047 --> 00:45:30,032 to augment some of the water used through the drainage. Obviously, in the wintertime, 466 00:45:30,068 --> 00:45:34,023 you're probably gonna have to heat tape those drains, right? That's how you have 467 00:45:34,023 --> 00:45:40,022 to do it. Um I wanna switch over just so we can see an aerial view. I think that 468 00:45:40,022 --> 00:45:43,014 might be more helpful for this next part of this discussion. 469 00:45:53,064 --> 00:45:58,075 So, obviously drainage is a concern in the mountains in the wintertime, you have 470 00:45:58,075 --> 00:46:01,009 water that comes down and it melts, and then it goes somewhere and it freezes again, 471 00:46:02,012 --> 00:46:08,049 potentially. Um. I think given the setbacks of this building to the road. 472 00:46:10,094 --> 00:46:15,057 I mean, are you going to see ice dams building up all the way down to the road? I, 473 00:46:15,007 --> 00:46:20,097 I don't know if that's an answer that I, or question I can really truly answer 100%. 474 00:46:21,014 --> 00:46:26,004 But I think given that the building is over 16 ft away from the pathway, the sidewalk, 475 00:46:26,078 --> 00:46:31,005 that you're not gonna see ice dams that are going that far. And if you are, what 476 00:46:31,005 --> 00:46:33,041 would you do anywhere else in the mountain village? You would go out and you would 477 00:46:33,041 --> 00:46:37,025 chip it away and you'd remove it. It's just part of regular maintenance in the wintertime. 478 00:46:37,072 --> 00:46:43,092 Um. I was a little confused about the drainage coming from off-site, from downhill. 479 00:46:44,001 --> 00:46:48,005 I know that there have been in the past some drainage issues with Timberview and 480 00:46:48,005 --> 00:46:54,018 how the water drains down this hillside into here. But by the time you get to our 481 00:46:54,018 --> 00:46:59,014 entrance, you're, you're pretty flat. The ground is flattened out and so I'm not 482 00:46:59,014 --> 00:47:06,053 sure how water would migrate onto the site from off-site. Um, And generally speaking, 483 00:47:06,062 --> 00:47:11,025 the site's pretty flat, right? So the water from the parking lot is going to go through 484 00:47:11,025 --> 00:47:16,024 the drains. The water from the building is going to be directed. Away from the building 485 00:47:16,024 --> 00:47:21,008 as it's supposed to be. So, I think we've addressed all of the criteria for grading 486 00:47:21,008 --> 00:47:26,004 and drainage. If there are additional things around that, that the town would want 487 00:47:26,004 --> 00:47:29,084 to see, we'd be happy to provide those, but I don't think from a CDC perspective 488 00:47:29,084 --> 00:47:37,000 that we're out of compliance with how our drainage is proposed. Um, the engineer 489 00:47:37,000 --> 00:47:42,036 that designed the drainage works in this region and does a lot of projects here. 490 00:47:42,045 --> 00:47:48,005 So I would assume he would be able to address Ice buildup and drainage in a way that's 491 00:47:48,005 --> 00:47:54,024 adequate. Um, I think the last thing I wanna touch on. Relates to the irrigation. 492 00:47:54,099 --> 00:48:00,005 And I wanna just remind everybody that when this gets regraded, it's gonna have to 493 00:48:00,005 --> 00:48:07,007 be revegetated and the town requires. At least temporary irrigation for I think 2 494 00:48:07,007 --> 00:48:14,000 years after you reestablish that vegetation. So The question is how is it gonna look 495 00:48:14,000 --> 00:48:18,098 in 5 years, right? I understand that's the question. And I think 496 00:48:21,028 --> 00:48:28,092 Given the history of this site, given kind of the Maybe, maybe the differing opinions 497 00:48:28,092 --> 00:48:34,005 on how it should be used or what it's called. I think the goal for everybody is for 498 00:48:34,005 --> 00:48:39,073 this to be maintained as a field, but the question is who is maintaining the irrigation, 499 00:48:39,087 --> 00:48:43,069 who's doing it? If you guys want to put a condition that says we're gonna do those 500 00:48:43,071 --> 00:48:47,062 things and then Tulski can work with the town to figure out if there's some opportunity 501 00:48:47,062 --> 00:48:51,065 to work together to make it better, we could do that. I just want to recognize that 502 00:48:51,067 --> 00:48:54,098 like it's gonna be irrigated for 2 years, whether it's temporary or not because that's 503 00:48:54,098 --> 00:48:58,018 a requirement of the code. You have to establish the irrigation. You're not just, 504 00:48:58,023 --> 00:49:02,062 we're not just gonna be able to leave it as a dirt mound. Right, it has to be revedged. 505 00:49:02,096 --> 00:49:09,087 So I think we're OK with that concept of, of irrigation. Recognizing that ultimately 506 00:49:09,087 --> 00:49:12,095 I think Chelsea is gonna end up working with the town to figure out what's the best 507 00:49:12,095 --> 00:49:20,051 use of this space long term. Um, So Just really quickly, I want 508 00:49:20,051 --> 00:49:25,004 to. Just make sure I touched on all the staff's conditions. 509 00:49:29,054 --> 00:49:33,028 So the parking study signed by an engineer, not in draft. I just went over that, 510 00:49:33,034 --> 00:49:38,006 that's been emailed to staff. We're good on that piece, I think. Um, the document 511 00:49:38,006 --> 00:49:43,057 I just showed relates to the CMP and the wetland delineation, the document from Fisher 512 00:49:43,057 --> 00:49:47,061 and David. So I can provide that to staff. I don't believe they have that yet because 513 00:49:47,061 --> 00:49:52,068 I just received it, but we're OK with that condition, we believe it's been met. Um, 514 00:49:52,078 --> 00:49:57,005 I do think the software material was specified. It, it might have been skipped on 515 00:49:57,005 --> 00:50:01,091 the final plan set, but I believe it was specified in the, the initial review, and 516 00:50:01,091 --> 00:50:06,049 I do think Richard's on the call, the architect, so maybe maybe after I go through 517 00:50:06,049 --> 00:50:07,032 these conditions. 518 00:50:10,066 --> 00:50:14,057 But we can call that out in the building permit plan set if it's not been called 519 00:50:14,057 --> 00:50:19,081 out yet, we're good on that. Um, again, the, the gravel path was designed, I think 520 00:50:19,081 --> 00:50:25,097 with TS with, with town specifications and sta standards in mind. We want it to be 521 00:50:25,097 --> 00:50:30,029 a really nice path. We're good with that. Um, we'll work with the town to figure 522 00:50:30,029 --> 00:50:34,065 out which way to resolve this snow, snowmaking, or excuse me, the, the snow storage 523 00:50:34,065 --> 00:50:40,091 issue. And then We believe that we're meeting the, um, the fire mitigation plan as 524 00:50:40,091 --> 00:50:44,075 shown, but we're happy to continue to work with the forester to make sure that carries 525 00:50:44,075 --> 00:50:48,059 through to building growth. So I think, I think that's everything. I'm happy to pause 526 00:50:48,059 --> 00:50:55,089 for questions, um, and thank you very much for your time. Thank you. Much appreciated. 527 00:50:56,038 --> 00:51:04,011 Uh, board questions for the applicant. I have a question Um, you, 528 00:51:04,038 --> 00:51:10,068 you do not show enough parking for ADA in this lot. You have 65 spaces. You need 529 00:51:10,007 --> 00:51:18,003 3. Um, parking for handicapped and the one, I mean, if it's delineated by 530 00:51:18,003 --> 00:51:26,002 those. Lines, the one between 41 and 42 is too narrow. You 531 00:51:26,002 --> 00:51:30,005 need, you know, there are certain specifications for the size required, so you need 532 00:51:30,005 --> 00:51:36,014 another space. You need one for every 25 spaces. Is there a way to switch back to 533 00:51:36,014 --> 00:51:41,007 my screen from the agenda? I don't know why I switched. Um, thank you. I, I appreciate 534 00:51:41,007 --> 00:51:47,054 that. I Maybe we can discuss this a little bit more. I, on this site plan that I'm 535 00:51:47,054 --> 00:51:51,086 looking at, it does show 3. 88 spaces and there may be. 536 00:51:54,036 --> 00:51:57,015 Let's get this fixed so I can pull, we can go through it cause this was the one that 537 00:51:57,015 --> 00:52:03,076 was in the packet for the. What I'm looking at. Yeah, maybe we, I could have specified 538 00:52:03,076 --> 00:52:10,086 there's 3 ADA spaces that are included in the total 65. So, 539 00:52:11,076 --> 00:52:12,015 There you go. 540 00:52:15,017 --> 00:52:22,023 Oh, OK. The one there is not very wide. And if you, if you look, we do push up against 541 00:52:22,025 --> 00:52:29,038 the building here slightly. Um, with this little walkway where it says 46, but 542 00:52:30,029 --> 00:52:34,027 Theoretically, if this is too small and you'd like to see this a little bigger, this 543 00:52:34,029 --> 00:52:37,025 could shift, you know, a foot. It looks like there's a little bit. 544 00:52:40,047 --> 00:52:43,074 Yeah, but we're happy if, if we're not meeting any kind of parking dimension for 545 00:52:43,074 --> 00:52:47,008 80. I think we have the space to do it. 546 00:52:49,073 --> 00:52:53,009 Great. Is there anything else? No. Scott. 547 00:52:56,022 --> 00:52:56,006 David 548 00:52:58,008 --> 00:53:03,039 John, thanks, uh, very much for bringing this back before us. Um, I was looking at 549 00:53:03,039 --> 00:53:09,078 your lighting plan and I was trying to, um, Understand a few aspects of it. Uh, as 550 00:53:09,078 --> 00:53:14,046 I looked at it, I was, I had the question, is your, are your balconies, uh, drip-through 551 00:53:14,046 --> 00:53:22,023 decking or are they a solid, a solid structure? The reason I ask is we have Can 552 00:53:22,023 --> 00:53:28,027 lights proposed on those uh 2nd and 3rd levels. You, we call them out at 10 ft. Um, 553 00:53:28,004 --> 00:53:32,083 on the 3rd level, it looks like you do have some vaulted ceilings. So, I think we 554 00:53:32,083 --> 00:53:38,094 may be getting If we're looking at the elevation, you know, I'm not sure that you're 555 00:53:38,094 --> 00:53:44,056 still maintaining that 10 ft. Um, because you have that sloped roof element, you're, 556 00:53:44,068 --> 00:53:50,019 you're saying that this soffit lighting under the 312 dimension could be out of compliance 557 00:53:50,019 --> 00:53:54,074 because of the could be, yeah, exactly, I'm wondering. And I was wondering if they're 558 00:53:54,074 --> 00:53:59,017 also, if they're being constructed as drip-through. Typically for cost-effective 559 00:53:59,017 --> 00:54:05,062 approach, they might be that as opposed to a um waterproof decking system. You know, 560 00:54:05,071 --> 00:54:09,062 I honestly don't know the answer to the second question. Richard is on the call. 561 00:54:09,067 --> 00:54:12,007 He might be able to answer that. The architect, I don't know if he wants to. Richard, 562 00:54:12,075 --> 00:54:18,046 do you want to chime in and see? Yeah, I can, I can chime in. Thank you. Um, these 563 00:54:18,046 --> 00:54:24,043 were not designed to be dripped through, um, for purposes of dripping from one patio 564 00:54:24,043 --> 00:54:31,035 down to the next, uh, so they would have some type of drainage off, um. The edge 565 00:54:31,035 --> 00:54:36,091 of the drip edge of the of the balconies and then John about your comment about the 566 00:54:36,091 --> 00:54:39,055 facial material that was that's called out on the roof plan. 567 00:54:41,068 --> 00:54:42,002 The sofa 568 00:54:45,057 --> 00:54:49,052 Right, but there's a comment about the fascia material, I believe, that's called 569 00:54:49,052 --> 00:54:54,073 out on the roof plane. OK, do you know what the software material is? Oh, soften 570 00:54:54,073 --> 00:55:00,095 material, yeah, it's the um same hardy board. OK, perfect. I have to go back and 571 00:55:00,095 --> 00:55:05,029 look at it. I have to go back and look, we either call the hardy border or tongue 572 00:55:05,029 --> 00:55:13,001 and groove. Um, Richard, when you get onto your L3 level with that, uh, roof 573 00:55:13,001 --> 00:55:18,045 structure becoming your soffit, um, your lighting will no longer be at a 10-foot 574 00:55:18,045 --> 00:55:23,009 elevation. Do you know what elevation that would be at? And, uh, part two of my question 575 00:55:23,009 --> 00:55:30,025 is, is there a reason why we, or could we consider, um, wall sconces on these decks 576 00:55:30,025 --> 00:55:35,095 just to Minimize the elevation of that light fixture so that from a public right 577 00:55:35,095 --> 00:55:41,063 away you're not looking up at a light fixture while it's being set back and recessed 578 00:55:41,063 --> 00:55:46,083 into the structure a little bit more. The angle repose may may cut off that direct 579 00:55:46,083 --> 00:55:51,021 view. Before he answers that question, a point of clarification, David, this application 580 00:55:51,021 --> 00:55:56,064 was received prior to the new lighting ordinance, and so we do not currently have 581 00:55:56,008 --> 00:56:02,099 a restriction on heights for soffit lighting. But I, I will say though that like. 582 00:56:04,005 --> 00:56:10,013 OK, we're not. Intrinsically opposed to not having soffit lighting, right? Like the 583 00:56:10,013 --> 00:56:14,021 point of us not wanting to change it mid-design review was because it was gonna take 584 00:56:14,021 --> 00:56:17,097 a lot of time to change it, but we're gonna have a little bit of time between this 585 00:56:17,097 --> 00:56:21,001 and building permit. And if you guys don't want to see, especially on that third 586 00:56:21,001 --> 00:56:25,079 level, soffit lighting, That's not a big change and we're fine accommodating you 587 00:56:25,079 --> 00:56:29,083 even if we are grandfathered under the time that we submitted the document. It was 588 00:56:29,083 --> 00:56:33,071 purely like a timing issue for us and to go through and revise the whole lighting 589 00:56:33,071 --> 00:56:38,078 plan while we're trying to also revise other pieces was too much. All right. Thanks 590 00:56:38,078 --> 00:56:43,027 for that clarification, John. That's all I have. Appreciate it. It's a great career 591 00:56:43,027 --> 00:56:43,085 or anything? 592 00:56:45,095 --> 00:56:52,002 Ellen, sorry, Toby. No, no questions. Dan 593 00:56:56,012 --> 00:57:03,088 Not a OK, unfortunately, I do. Uh, and this is, uh, back to the 594 00:57:03,088 --> 00:57:10,057 water. So in the courtyard area, you have gutters and down spouts. Which means there's 595 00:57:10,057 --> 00:57:17,006 a fair amount of water coming down the downspouts, and that's just going where? Richard, 596 00:57:17,069 --> 00:57:21,064 do you wanna, do you wanna speak on the, the drainage in the courtyard? I know you 597 00:57:21,064 --> 00:57:22,047 guys worked on that. 598 00:57:29,022 --> 00:57:34,001 Sorry, I couldn't get my mic unmuted. Um, John, we never actually did address that. 599 00:57:34,006 --> 00:57:39,053 I was taking it to the site and was hoping I was gonna get coordinated into the drainage 600 00:57:39,053 --> 00:57:47,005 and landscaping. We had, we had internally discussed. We had 601 00:57:47,005 --> 00:57:53,023 internally discussed either. Interior or exterior guttering, whether it's uh I'll 602 00:57:53,023 --> 00:57:57,059 jump in there. We definitely steered away from interior, um, drainage. It's all exterior, 603 00:57:57,008 --> 00:58:02,009 um, gutter and down spouts just where it when it hits the site, um. I don't believe 604 00:58:02,009 --> 00:58:09,048 has been Completely figured out, yeah. We had discussed, we had talked about this 605 00:58:09,048 --> 00:58:14,037 with our landscape architect. I'm gonna switch back over to the site plan. Um, and 606 00:58:14,037 --> 00:58:19,032 initially when we had been planning this with the landscaper, these are going to 607 00:58:19,032 --> 00:58:23,096 be landscaped boxes and so really the goal was like how can we take some of the water 608 00:58:23,096 --> 00:58:28,088 coming out of these drains and put them into these spaces. And so I still believe 609 00:58:28,088 --> 00:58:33,093 that is the intent. Um, rather than having to irrigate and do these things, do these 610 00:58:33,093 --> 00:58:39,088 as more of like stormwater capture, natural planter boxes with native plantings. 611 00:58:40,015 --> 00:58:44,093 Um, and so if that's something that we're still kind of hung up on, it sounds like 612 00:58:44,093 --> 00:58:49,021 we have to figure it out internally as well. We're fine with that being an added 613 00:58:49,021 --> 00:58:53,084 condition that it gets resolved for building permit. It's not a problem. Thanks, 614 00:58:54,003 --> 00:59:01,042 uh. And the uh irrigation and the the play area open space if you will. I appreciate 615 00:59:01,042 --> 00:59:08,008 that 2 years is required. But I'd like to hope that we have a little bit longer vision 616 00:59:08,008 --> 00:59:14,075 than 2 years about community use and everything so we can condition it that you. 617 00:59:16,017 --> 00:59:20,055 However you do it with what other entities can preserve that, that would be great. 618 00:59:21,049 --> 00:59:26,036 We don't have an issue with that either. OK. Uh, then on the trash, which by the 619 00:59:26,036 --> 00:59:33,023 way, I, I liked your studies on trash and parking, by the way. Good, um, but it was 620 00:59:33,023 --> 00:59:39,069 referenced to TSG will, if it needs removed more often, can accommodate that. That's 621 00:59:39,069 --> 00:59:43,095 strictly a TSG. It's just the management. It's like any other complex. If you look 622 00:59:43,095 --> 00:59:47,074 around the mountain village, certain complex, especially ones that you see a lot 623 00:59:47,079 --> 00:59:54,002 of Airbnbs. Um, I served on HOA boards for a number of different buildings around 624 00:59:54,002 --> 00:59:58,006 here, and each trash management plan is different in terms of the frequency. So when 625 00:59:58,006 --> 01:00:02,002 you have a lot of units that are turning over a lot and a lot of short-term guests, 626 01:00:02,029 --> 01:00:05,076 you tend to produce a lot more trash, and those buildings are seeing 3 pickups a 627 01:00:05,076 --> 01:00:10,007 week. Yeah, so it's really we'll, we'll manage it, but obviously if we need more 628 01:00:10,072 --> 01:00:18,068 trash pickups then we we all love HOAs. That's good. Um Like 629 01:00:18,068 --> 01:00:22,075 I said, I really appreciate the car, the, uh, the parking study and the car count. 630 01:00:23,009 --> 01:00:27,044 I did have one question when you went out and car counted cars. What time of year 631 01:00:27,044 --> 01:00:32,012 was that? It was, let me look, I actually have the email. I can, um, I can tell you 632 01:00:32,012 --> 01:00:37,019 when we did it thereabouts, well, just so it wasn't offseason. No, it was, it was, 633 01:00:37,021 --> 01:00:45,015 um, counts to him on August 15th. So we did it on the 14th, 634 01:00:45,053 --> 01:00:52,078 the 13th, and the 12th. OK, great, of August. OK, good deal. Um, those are included 635 01:00:52,078 --> 01:00:56,038 in the memo, by the way, the parking memo, and they were taken in the record. 636 01:00:59,048 --> 01:01:06,076 Yeah, no, that makes good sense. Uh, I'm glad you're willing to pave that one pathway. 637 01:01:06,089 --> 01:01:10,036 I think it'd be great if you would pave both pathways. I was sitting here with a 638 01:01:10,036 --> 01:01:16,074 little. Disconnect strollers on a gravel pathway and going like. We have to specify 639 01:01:16,074 --> 01:01:23,063 the size of the wheels on the strollers or what kind of gravel's in there. Uh, it 640 01:01:23,063 --> 01:01:29,019 seems to me it'd be great if both of those could be paved. I, I appreciate there's 641 01:01:29,019 --> 01:01:33,027 an expense, but expense isn't our issue. Yeah, no, I, I totally understand that's 642 01:01:33,027 --> 01:01:37,086 not in your guys' purview. I think, um. You know, our goal, again, our goal was to 643 01:01:37,086 --> 01:01:42,053 build something that didn't, that wasn't too steep and that was surfaced in a way 644 01:01:42,053 --> 01:01:45,042 where you could, I mean, you, you see the strollers that people have around here. 645 01:01:45,054 --> 01:01:50,089 They're, they're like the off-roads. They have to build. Yeah, so I, it was planned 646 01:01:50,089 --> 01:01:54,065 for crusher finds. I think like really what we're talking about, whether it's irrigation 647 01:01:54,065 --> 01:01:59,038 or the connection path or the signage for the park or the amenities of the park, 648 01:01:59,094 --> 01:02:04,032 it's, it's still, we're still like trying to negotiate. I'm just being frank with 649 01:02:04,032 --> 01:02:09,044 you guys of like how this park is going to be used, what is it gonna look like, what 650 01:02:09,044 --> 01:02:14,023 are the amenities in the park going to be? And I think there is opportunity to work 651 01:02:14,025 --> 01:02:19,081 together with the town and with TMVOA. They've told Telski that. What it looks like 652 01:02:19,081 --> 01:02:24,041 right now, I'm not sure. I, I think it would be hard for me to say, thanks, I can 653 01:02:24,041 --> 01:02:29,065 commit 100% to paving this access path coming up when there's already the paved connection. 654 01:02:30,006 --> 01:02:34,094 People, if they wanted to walk on a paved surface, especially with this new condition, 655 01:02:35,034 --> 01:02:39,057 would be able to walk the whole way on a paved surface to this part. So, it does 656 01:02:39,057 --> 01:02:43,049 seem like an extra expense, but we're not opposed to it, but we, we want to figure 657 01:02:43,049 --> 01:02:48,058 out the best way, I think, to work with council. And the town, the, you know, the 658 01:02:48,058 --> 01:02:53,089 town in general and TMBOA on what works best for the space. I appreciate it. Thanks, 659 01:02:54,001 --> 01:02:59,083 thank you, John. Uh, if there's no other questions from the board, I'd like to open 660 01:02:59,083 --> 01:03:05,007 this up to public comment. We have received public comment in our packets, which 661 01:03:05,007 --> 01:03:10,026 were distributed. Uh, a lot of it very, very thoughtful. Uh, so if anybody would 662 01:03:10,026 --> 01:03:14,026 like to make public comment, the microphone is yours. Uh, keep in mind there will 663 01:03:14,026 --> 01:03:17,041 be a time limit, which I know is tough. 664 01:03:20,002 --> 01:03:25,002 So when the thing starts beeping. You're done. So. 665 01:03:29,035 --> 01:03:32,007 Thanks. Um, I'll try and keep this brief. Um, I've been taking notes, so it's gonna 666 01:03:32,007 --> 01:03:37,038 be a little bit jumbled. Um, I have two related concerns about this architectural 667 01:03:37,038 --> 01:03:42,063 review. The first is the public comment record. So, you guys saw on May 2nd some 668 01:03:42,063 --> 01:03:47,031 public comment during the rezoning and density transfer. That public comment was 669 01:03:47,031 --> 01:03:52,038 not carried into this architectural application, and a lot of it was relevant to 670 01:03:52,038 --> 01:03:56,005 the application, so it's kind of been forgotten. It's included in this packet now, 671 01:03:56,067 --> 01:04:00,027 but I think it may have affected your decisions for your, you know, for the initial. 672 01:04:00,072 --> 01:04:06,004 Um, I understand that these are separate applications, but typically, in my experience 673 01:04:06,004 --> 01:04:10,023 as a town councilor and also as a DRB member, they're all talked about at the same 674 01:04:10,029 --> 01:04:15,076 time, right? Because they're all relevant to each other. And again, that, that disjointedness 675 01:04:15,076 --> 01:04:20,024 may have changed. How you approved your, your initial architecture. The other thing 676 01:04:20,024 --> 01:04:23,092 I want to remind everybody is having to go back through the record, please speak 677 01:04:23,092 --> 01:04:28,032 into your microphones. I couldn't hear about a third of the recording, so it's really 678 01:04:28,032 --> 01:04:32,012 difficult for me to do research and, and sound like I know what I'm talking about 679 01:04:32,012 --> 01:04:37,045 here. Um, my second concern really is the winter shade and snow melt. I'm out in 680 01:04:37,045 --> 01:04:41,044 that area at 5 o'clock in the morning in the winter, in the summer, and a building 681 01:04:41,044 --> 01:04:46,003 of this size is gonna create issues with snow melt and ice on the road and on the 682 01:04:46,003 --> 01:04:51,073 pathways. Um, this is a 3-story building, 44 ft 9 inches high, located close to the 683 01:04:51,073 --> 01:04:58,087 road. Um, This isn't simply whether drainage is is proper. A sunny roof, snow bank, 684 01:04:59,002 --> 01:05:04,006 or heated surface can produce meltwater while pavement in the building's shadow remains 685 01:05:04,006 --> 01:05:08,078 cold. This creates ice. This creates slippery conditions. This creates dangerous 686 01:05:08,008 --> 01:05:14,038 position. Even Mountain Village's own regulations recognize snow and ice as safety 687 01:05:14,038 --> 01:05:18,098 issues and there's stuff in the, in the CDC about how to manage that. So I have three 688 01:05:18,098 --> 01:05:23,008 requests that I would appreciate to be considered or added as conditions. One, review 689 01:05:23,008 --> 01:05:29,008 the earlier public comment and see if that would affect your first initial decision. 690 01:05:29,045 --> 01:05:33,044 Ask the applicant to specifically evaluate the interaction between the building's 691 01:05:33,044 --> 01:05:38,052 winter shadows and snow melt freezing. On adjacent pedestrian and vehicular surfaces, 692 01:05:38,064 --> 01:05:43,081 not simply whether the site drains properly. 3, consider whether deed restricted 693 01:05:43,081 --> 01:05:48,041 workforce housing is receiving a different standard of review for building mass, 694 01:05:48,057 --> 01:05:54,059 scale, pedestrian impacts, and winter safety. Um, I understand that this is deed 695 01:05:54,059 --> 01:05:58,000 restricted workforce housing and I do support it. I was on the council when this 696 01:05:58,000 --> 01:06:02,064 was voted on and I, I, I, I agree with it, but what I think we need to separate density 697 01:06:02,064 --> 01:06:08,004 and affordability incentives from design and safety incentives. If this were a private 698 01:06:08,004 --> 01:06:15,003 residence, I believe the DRB would look. Very carefully at a 3 story 44 ft building 699 01:06:15,021 --> 01:06:19,068 this close to a neighborhood road. So my question is whether deed restrictions should 700 01:06:19,068 --> 01:06:24,048 result in a lower standard for mass scale pedestrian impacts, drainage, snow, and 701 01:06:24,048 --> 01:06:29,007 ice safety. I don't think those are affordability issues. I think those are design 702 01:06:29,007 --> 01:06:35,049 review issues. Thanks. Thank you very much. Appreciate it. Other public comment please. 703 01:06:37,081 --> 01:06:43,002 That would be you right now. What's that? That's you right now. OK. Um, can we put 704 01:06:43,002 --> 01:06:47,097 up the um The drawing that has the green around it, please. 705 01:06:55,005 --> 01:06:58,005 I don't see it up there, so. This one? 706 01:07:00,065 --> 01:07:08,041 OK. You're welcome. Um, OK. Um, I'm still 707 01:07:08,056 --> 01:07:13,099 Jonathan Greenspan, 103 Spring Creek. I am in the Meadows. So, I have, um, a lot 708 01:07:13,099 --> 01:07:19,023 of concerns about this driving past it every time I leave or come to the Meadows. 709 01:07:19,032 --> 01:07:24,003 So, I am a resident down there. Johnny, I know how difficult it is to draw something 710 01:07:24,003 --> 01:07:31,046 nice and fit in when you have a difficult client. OK? So, um, nevertheless, I am 711 01:07:31,048 --> 01:07:37,049 very much stuck on the fact that I would rather see this building turned so it's 712 01:07:37,049 --> 01:07:43,012 parallel with the existing building and actually have 4 to 6 more units inside of 713 01:07:43,012 --> 01:07:50,008 it and because of the quality of the uh impact on the open space is not a 714 01:07:50,008 --> 01:07:56,006 public benefit and I'm gonna get to that in a second here. Um, but you don't really 715 01:07:56,006 --> 01:08:02,042 want people walking by your window. How many of you like people walking by your window 716 01:08:02,071 --> 01:08:06,009 as you're trying to get to another location? There's nobody in this room that likes 717 01:08:06,009 --> 01:08:12,062 that. Furthermore, they're gonna think it's a trespasser of some sort or worse, OK? 718 01:08:13,024 --> 01:08:17,027 The trees that are right there along the boulevard and the sidewalk, they're all 719 01:08:17,027 --> 01:08:23,035 gonna die. There's too much concrete in between the two zones for them to survive. 720 01:08:23,068 --> 01:08:29,023 All right, so the building, as far as vegetation goes, is gonna have to be backed 721 01:08:29,023 --> 01:08:36,053 up a little bit, OK, backed up towards, um. The um North Star side of things. 722 01:08:37,024 --> 01:08:42,019 Let's see here. I just got some hockey scores at the same time. Um, the, uh, affordable 723 01:08:42,019 --> 01:08:49,069 housing aspect of it is not a public benefit. It's benefiting one group and one group 724 01:08:49,069 --> 01:08:54,082 only. Let's, let's be honest. If that person takes multiple jobs, which a lot of 725 01:08:54,082 --> 01:09:01,003 people do, they take multiple jobs and they lose their job at Telski, they're gonna 726 01:09:01,003 --> 01:09:05,005 lose their housing. It doesn't matter where else they work, OK? That's not gonna 727 01:09:05,005 --> 01:09:08,046 happen here. You might as well put a revolving door in the front of this building 728 01:09:08,046 --> 01:09:13,078 because that's the way it works over there. Oops. Lastly, the, the park. Here is 729 01:09:13,078 --> 01:09:18,045 also not a public benefit because people are gonna be walking by. You don't have 730 01:09:18,047 --> 01:09:25,002 a ADA access with all due respect, ADA and pushing a buggy are similar. Not all of 731 01:09:25,002 --> 01:09:31,078 those units have big wheels out there. And lastly, there's a sign out there that 732 01:09:31,078 --> 01:09:38,002 says Welcome to Meadows. We invested a lot of money there to put that sign up. Where's 733 01:09:38,002 --> 01:09:44,084 it going? It's gonna have to be taken out. OK, so the irrigation plan, if nobody 734 01:09:44,094 --> 01:09:49,089 maintains it, it's not a park. Thank you very much. Thank you, much appreciated. 735 01:09:50,003 --> 01:09:56,024 Any other public comments? Do we have anybody online? OK. Uh, applicant, if you'd 736 01:09:56,024 --> 01:10:03,016 like to rebut it all, please feel free. I, I appreciate the comments, um. 737 01:10:05,007 --> 01:10:10,037 I think the reality is that through this process, this board, town council has asked 738 01:10:10,037 --> 01:10:15,023 a number of things from Tuskegee. You've seen the mass change. You've seen the scale 739 01:10:15,023 --> 01:10:20,055 change. You've seen the building be analyzed for different locations. We looked across 740 01:10:20,057 --> 01:10:25,036 the street. We did a sitewalk with town council after we surveyed the entire site 741 01:10:25,036 --> 01:10:29,064 for the corners of the buildings to see how it would feel in the location that it's 742 01:10:29,064 --> 01:10:30,006 in right now. 743 01:10:32,087 --> 01:10:37,077 What I have noticed is that the public comments have shifted from one issue to another, 744 01:10:37,083 --> 01:10:43,094 and each issue that we address, another issue comes up. Um, we do feel like we have 745 01:10:43,094 --> 01:10:47,004 met the requirements of the code, and we feel like we've done it in a way that's 746 01:10:47,004 --> 01:10:54,072 been, um, reiterative with the different bodies and the public, and we feel like 747 01:10:54,094 --> 01:11:00,066 the net result is going to We're gonna still have the space that people have used 748 01:11:00,096 --> 01:11:06,063 traditionally in the past to throw a football or do whatever. Um, so, respectfully, 749 01:11:06,072 --> 01:11:11,054 we do ask for your approval and we feel like the comments have been addressed through 750 01:11:11,054 --> 01:11:18,002 our submitted documents. Thank you. Great. Thank you. Uh, I'll close that section 751 01:11:18,022 --> 01:11:20,013 and I ask for board deliberation. 752 01:11:23,018 --> 01:11:27,067 Talk to each other, please. I'll start. Um, I, I feel like this project's had a lot 753 01:11:27,067 --> 01:11:33,013 of eyes on it and a lot of different, um, different types of eyes on it. Um, and 754 01:11:33,013 --> 01:11:37,045 I'm, I'm generally comfortable. I do think the irrigation thing is a big deal. I 755 01:11:37,045 --> 01:11:42,021 went down there today and I recognize that this building is gonna have a significant 756 01:11:42,021 --> 01:11:47,061 impact in the area and yet that the remaining open space there is pretty valuable 757 01:11:47,061 --> 01:11:52,053 one way or the other, uh, it's probably the last remaining open green space down 758 01:11:52,053 --> 01:11:57,056 there, so. Um, I think that it should be irrigated in perpetuity going forward, not 759 01:11:57,056 --> 01:12:01,008 just on a temporary basis, and that the property owner should be responsible for 760 01:12:01,008 --> 01:12:06,028 that, which is Telski. Um, and so I don't understand that conflict, but I don't know 761 01:12:06,028 --> 01:12:10,083 the history with the town stuff, but I would make that a condition in terms of the 762 01:12:10,085 --> 01:12:17,007 pathway to the east. I, I disagree with um. With banks on that, I mean if it's compacted 763 01:12:17,014 --> 01:12:23,000 to me it blends in better with the open space nature and the adjacency of the wetlands 764 01:12:23,000 --> 01:12:28,093 than a hard scape going cutting through there, but I wouldn't die on that. So those 765 01:12:28,093 --> 01:12:32,065 are my two comments. Thanks. Hey, thanks. 766 01:12:37,043 --> 01:12:37,047 I 767 01:12:39,051 --> 01:12:46,084 Surgery with Jonathan, I think. I think it's limited, it's not a benefit to. Choir 768 01:12:47,011 --> 01:12:54,009 for Chelsky enclosed. Chelsea has, you know, an opportunity to invite him to. 769 01:12:56,031 --> 01:12:57,036 Housing shortage 770 01:13:00,093 --> 01:13:01,072 It's 32. 771 01:13:04,095 --> 01:13:12,054 Chair I've, I've, I found it a challenge to navigate and I can't imagine even having 772 01:13:12,054 --> 01:13:17,061 a stroller, you know, a, a portable stroller going on that gravel. I think you could, 773 01:13:17,091 --> 01:13:22,026 you could pave it tastefully and not make it look like extreme hardscape. I mean, 774 01:13:22,028 --> 01:13:27,005 not talking asphalt, maybe a, a green tint to the cement or something, but that's 775 01:13:27,005 --> 01:13:35,004 my, my thoughts there. Great. Thanks, Scott. Um, thank you for all the changes you've 776 01:13:35,004 --> 01:13:39,072 made. I think it's a good plan to definitely. 777 01:13:42,029 --> 01:13:42,098 Irrigation. 778 01:13:46,011 --> 01:13:52,057 OK, Cath, let me start over. I forgot to push the button, um. By the way, we did 779 01:13:52,057 --> 01:13:57,073 get new um audio, so that should help in future meetings. Doesn't? 780 01:14:00,075 --> 01:14:05,078 When they're not, um, thank you for all the changes that you've made in addressing 781 01:14:05,078 --> 01:14:11,075 items that we've just. Uh, prior meetings, um, I totally agree with Toby on, uh, 782 01:14:11,084 --> 01:14:18,009 revising the, um, irrigation plan for the, the park or field area that that needs 783 01:14:18,092 --> 01:14:26,032 to be, um, irrigated and a, an agreement with TSG and the town needs to. Uh, part 784 01:14:26,032 --> 01:14:32,064 of this, um, uh, condition of the approval for long-term maintenance of that park 785 01:14:32,064 --> 01:14:40,058 area. Um, the pathway on the, um, that north section, um, I've 786 01:14:40,058 --> 01:14:45,086 seen a lot of paths in, in town and different, even the uh new path along Mountain 787 01:14:45,086 --> 01:14:51,003 Village Boulevard, um, that's got a uh surface of like a crushed granite that seems 788 01:14:51,003 --> 01:14:57,046 to be pretty good even for um wheelchair and handicap access. So I think that should 789 01:14:57,046 --> 01:15:05,035 be. Um, used, uh, the soffits are OK. Like Banks was saying, I think that the 790 01:15:05,035 --> 01:15:11,033 drainage from the courtyard downspouts needs to be addressed. Um, and I think that 791 01:15:11,033 --> 01:15:18,047 could be dealt with, with With staff and definitely it's gonna be a part of the building 792 01:15:18,047 --> 01:15:26,004 permit. Um Other issues, you know, I I understand the 793 01:15:26,004 --> 01:15:32,004 uh challenges of the shade that's created and, and privacy and whatnot, but I think 794 01:15:32,004 --> 01:15:39,098 this is the Best location on this site for the um density that, that is allowed 795 01:15:39,098 --> 01:15:46,093 and, and from that uh citizens initiative makes sense. Um that's all I have for now. 796 01:15:47,007 --> 01:15:49,007 Thank you. All right, thank you, Scott, David. 797 01:15:52,024 --> 01:15:53,062 All right, share with us. 798 01:15:56,000 --> 01:16:03,000 There you go. Um Appreciate everybody's uh working together to get a better product 799 01:16:03,000 --> 01:16:10,068 down here um regarding the. Benefit of, of housing, you know, I think that regardless 800 01:16:10,068 --> 01:16:15,006 of the ownership, if we have employees in the region, they're gonna have impacts 801 01:16:15,006 --> 01:16:21,072 to the resources, whether it's owned and operated by Telski or if it's just a deed 802 01:16:21,072 --> 01:16:26,092 restricted unit that otherwise we still have a person to put into the housing piece 803 01:16:26,092 --> 01:16:34,004 and so to bring more housing to, to the community, I think is, is beneficial either 804 01:16:34,004 --> 01:16:41,001 which way you look at it. Um, I did wanna be sensitive about the relationship of 805 01:16:41,001 --> 01:16:48,076 the structure to Um, to the public right away, and I think that some good effort's 806 01:16:48,076 --> 01:16:54,002 been here. I do believe that, you know, vegetation is gonna grow here. We got not 807 01:16:54,002 --> 01:17:00,048 only the 16 ft GE well preserved on that elevation, we have the structure even offset 808 01:17:00,048 --> 01:17:06,016 even farther and just the same, that property does not, what the alignment of Adams 809 01:17:06,016 --> 01:17:12,075 Ranch Road, the Uh, walkway is not immediately adjacent to that property line, so 810 01:17:13,005 --> 01:17:17,004 I think we do have a fair bit of buffer, more, um, more than you initially would 811 01:17:17,004 --> 01:17:23,063 anticipate. Um, I would love to see the applicant reevaluate the, um, 812 01:17:25,008 --> 01:17:29,092 Socket lighting and maybe take a sconce approach because pulling them from the center 813 01:17:29,092 --> 01:17:36,019 of a of a deck. Um, and pulling them back to the face of the structure in that, in 814 01:17:36,003 --> 01:17:43,096 little alcove could reduce. The visible light from down on the sidewalks as you pass 815 01:17:43,096 --> 01:17:47,064 by when you drive down through. So I think there's some concessions that could be 816 01:17:47,064 --> 01:17:53,008 made and I appreciate their consideration on that. Um, I'm a big advocate of decomposed 817 01:17:53,008 --> 01:17:58,008 granite, uh, paths. I can't, I can't pass up not jumping on the path that it wasn't 818 01:17:58,008 --> 01:18:04,036 on my radar, but if everybody wants to talk about it, what's that, um. Well, when, 819 01:18:04,046 --> 01:18:09,033 when put in place, they do soften, soften the overall texture of the landscape and, 820 01:18:09,038 --> 01:18:15,034 and I think uh the flexible aspect of them, yet the density provides a good Use for 821 01:18:15,034 --> 01:18:21,036 the end user so um. I'm really much in favor of moving this forward. I think that 822 01:18:21,036 --> 01:18:28,035 we've had some good public comments and um But I think this strikes a, a fine balance 823 01:18:28,035 --> 01:18:35,094 between the needs and rights of the applicant and, and also the, the community at 824 01:18:35,094 --> 01:18:37,067 a large. So, thank you. 825 01:18:39,096 --> 01:18:47,063 Career if you would. OK, uh, I'm in agreement with most. What they said, I 826 01:18:47,089 --> 01:18:50,041 find myself agreeing, uh. 827 01:18:52,053 --> 01:18:59,087 I like the idea that the town wanted to preserve some trees. Whether that could actually 828 01:18:59,087 --> 01:19:06,011 happen after construction, I'm not sure, but even if it didn't, wouldn't it be great 829 01:19:06,021 --> 01:19:11,096 if trees were planted, if they didn't survive, so I just wanna throw that out there. 830 01:19:12,006 --> 01:19:19,039 That's always an issue with all properties we look at. Uh. The gravel 831 01:19:19,039 --> 01:19:25,013 walkway. Actually, I like the idea of a gravel walkway, but there is no way you would 832 01:19:25,013 --> 01:19:31,024 push a stroller on that. I can verify that. I can't imagine how that would work. 833 01:19:31,043 --> 01:19:38,077 It looks attractive, I agree, but, uh, you know, as Liz said with the wheelchair, 834 01:19:38,009 --> 01:19:46,005 I mean, it, it might not work for every scenario. It's, there's kind of a, I think 835 01:19:46,005 --> 01:19:50,089 something needs to be looked at. Maybe you could take the gravel and pound it down 836 01:19:50,089 --> 01:19:56,094 so much that you could push something with wheels on it, so just something to think 837 01:19:56,094 --> 01:20:04,012 about. Um, I'm not sure, I, I realized this is a Telski property 838 01:20:04,005 --> 01:20:10,002 and I'd never thought about the fact that if somebody lost a job that was living 839 01:20:10,026 --> 01:20:17,077 there, Would they have to move out? I mean, I guess that, you know, I'm like, 840 01:20:18,015 --> 01:20:22,014 how does that work? I, I wanna remind you guys the town of Mountain Village has the 841 01:20:22,014 --> 01:20:26,034 same standard for their employees at Village Court Apartment. So you the people have 842 01:20:26,034 --> 01:20:34,006 to move out immediately. OK, well, it gives one pause. OK, 843 01:20:34,071 --> 01:20:41,014 uh, otherwise I'm comfortable with it. Uh, I like the materials. I'm glad to see 844 01:20:41,014 --> 01:20:48,074 that, um. And I can't, I'm not, there's nothing else with the lighting. I think comments 845 01:20:48,074 --> 01:20:55,088 by the board were good, so I'm in agreement with that and uh Uh, otherwise, anyway 846 01:20:55,088 --> 01:21:03,007 to increase trees or the greenery would be greatly appreciated by me anyway. Thanks, 847 01:21:03,017 --> 01:21:09,091 that's all. OK, Greer, thanks. Can we see our members online, please? As much as 848 01:21:09,091 --> 01:21:16,078 I love the agenda up there, can we see people? Here we go, Ellen. Share with us, 849 01:21:16,091 --> 01:21:18,066 please. You're muted on. 850 01:21:22,054 --> 01:21:29,045 You're still muted. How about now? That's good. OK, great, and everybody can hear 851 01:21:29,045 --> 01:21:37,018 me, yes. Um, so I agree that I'd like to see that field be irrigated, um, 852 01:21:37,072 --> 01:21:45,003 into the future, um, and I think that the, um, drainage issue in the interior courtyard 853 01:21:45,003 --> 01:21:51,015 is significant and should be a condition of approval with staff that they address 854 01:21:51,015 --> 01:21:57,071 that. They don't even draw gutters on, on their elevation, so I, I, I think that 855 01:21:57,071 --> 01:22:03,005 really needs to be addressed or it will become a problem. Um, I, I also agree with 856 01:22:03,005 --> 01:22:10,003 David about the sconces on the balconies versus, um, recess lighting, and one more 857 01:22:10,003 --> 01:22:14,091 thing that nobody's brought up, uh, I am in favor of them increasing the amount of 858 01:22:14,091 --> 01:22:22,068 stone to 35%. There are many places on this building where they can, um, go vertically, 859 01:22:23,036 --> 01:22:29,003 symmetrically about the courtyard on those two rock holes. Symmetrical pieces right 860 01:22:29,003 --> 01:22:34,074 against that or on any of the elevations, there is a symmetrical ability to add more 861 01:22:34,074 --> 01:22:39,024 stone, and I think it would actually be attractive on the building, so I'm in favor 862 01:22:39,024 --> 01:22:45,009 of adding more stone to increase and then meeting that percentage or getting much 863 01:22:45,009 --> 01:22:46,045 closer. 864 01:22:48,095 --> 01:22:55,008 And that's all I have. Great, I'm so glad you brought those things up, Jim. 865 01:22:57,035 --> 01:23:01,035 No, I, I support all the earlier comments, particularly Alan's last comments on the 866 01:23:01,035 --> 01:23:06,005 percent of stone. I think there should be more opportunity for that. I also want 867 01:23:06,005 --> 01:23:10,022 to come back to David's comment about we all need, I think we would all agree we 868 01:23:10,022 --> 01:23:17,096 need employee housing. And finally, the open space, I think there should be an agreement 869 01:23:17,096 --> 01:23:23,036 right now. I worry about just where all of us will be 2 years from now, not much 870 01:23:23,036 --> 01:23:29,068 less where Telski will be 2 years from now. And so, let's, let's agree it today, 871 01:23:29,089 --> 01:23:34,012 who's responsible for that irrigation and make sure it is irrigated and so the open 872 01:23:34,012 --> 01:23:40,079 space really functions as a. So thank you. Great. Thanks, Jim. Uh, my two cents, 873 01:23:40,093 --> 01:23:47,056 uh, I'll reiterate what Jim just said, uh. I do think that irrigation in that area 874 01:23:47,056 --> 01:23:53,055 is Really, really important. It's part of the Meadows community for sure, always 875 01:23:53,055 --> 01:23:59,045 has been, and I would make it a TSG responsibility if they can partner with people 876 01:23:59,045 --> 01:24:04,051 down the road. That's great, but I think our condition has to be that the responsibility 877 01:24:04,051 --> 01:24:11,023 is for TSG. It's not, oh, maybe if they can make a deal. Do you, are you looking 878 01:24:11,023 --> 01:24:16,091 for a suggestion? Uh, yeah, I would just suggest that irrigation of that opens. Fired 879 01:24:17,025 --> 01:24:21,096 and then it would put the onus on the applicant if they can get an agreement in place 880 01:24:21,096 --> 01:24:27,088 that that meets that um but if it's you know just keep it simple you can't you got 881 01:24:27,088 --> 01:24:33,032 the the the DRB can't really compel town council to agree to something I I I I appreciate 882 01:24:33,032 --> 01:24:37,096 that but uh since we get to talk to each other that's my public record comment if 883 01:24:37,096 --> 01:24:44,098 you will uh. And I'm thrilled that Ellen brought up the stone since you're not gonna 884 01:24:45,002 --> 01:24:52,058 pave that. Pathway now you can put that money into increasing the stone capacity 885 01:24:53,000 --> 01:25:00,069 and I do have I would have one. Request with that as well. The stone to me 886 01:25:01,037 --> 01:25:08,001 is more important along an Adams Ranch road to break up. The the mass of the building, 887 01:25:08,056 --> 01:25:13,059 uh, I think the courtyard on the other side already does that nicely, but if I could 888 01:25:13,059 --> 01:25:19,019 see once a couple of those elements on the branchway increased in stone, I think 889 01:25:19,019 --> 01:25:26,046 that would be great, uh, and I am absolutely in favor of conditioning. The lighting 890 01:25:26,052 --> 01:25:31,043 to get rid of the socket lighting and disconces, such as it. 891 01:25:33,051 --> 01:25:40,008 It's a community benefit driving down or looking across. Directive light when it's 892 01:25:40,008 --> 01:25:47,008 needed, not just on all the time. So, uh, that would be my other thing. Uh, and so 893 01:25:47,008 --> 01:25:54,081 that's uh And where I'd like to be with stuff. Mr. Chairman, before the motion, can 894 01:25:54,081 --> 01:25:59,073 I ask a clarifying question? Uh, do you guys wanna, you wanna see the full 35% stone, 895 01:25:59,078 --> 01:26:01,062 is that what I'm hearing? Or? 896 01:26:04,017 --> 01:26:09,092 You know, for me, forever wild, um, can I, can I offer a counterpoint to if you guys 897 01:26:09,092 --> 01:26:15,048 are interested, I mean, the, the base of the building is wrapped completely and to 898 01:26:15,048 --> 01:26:21,003 me that's where sort of stone makes sense and belongs and it comes out at 28%. I 899 01:26:21,003 --> 01:26:26,002 mean we could randomly have some stone creeping up somewhere and that sometimes to 900 01:26:26,002 --> 01:26:31,098 me that looks sort of like out of kilter with the foundational aspect of stone. So 901 01:26:32,064 --> 01:26:36,077 you were saying, you know, if they don't have to pave the eastern walkway they save 902 01:26:36,077 --> 01:26:44,049 some money. I'm like maybe they can, you know, save that 7% of. Put it toward, um, 903 01:26:44,067 --> 01:26:49,053 you know, a robust irrigation system for the open space. So I, I, I don't really 904 01:26:49,073 --> 01:26:54,094 care about the stone being just under, to me, it looks good the way they've drawn 905 01:26:54,094 --> 01:27:01,003 it and happens to come out at 28 28%, but that's just another point. But it's unfortunately 906 01:27:01,003 --> 01:27:06,073 I put my designer hat on. If I were an architect, I would grade more stone elements, 907 01:27:07,007 --> 01:27:10,074 quite frankly, so I'm, I'm OK. Like at the end of the day it's a little bit of stone. 908 01:27:10,079 --> 01:27:14,026 It's not that I don't care about the percentage if, if, if you could go over, that's 909 01:27:14,026 --> 01:27:18,045 fine too. OK, we'll mess with it, right? We can. And I think, I, I think that going 910 01:27:18,045 --> 01:27:25,013 vertical on some of the face of that building will, will help to ground that building 911 01:27:25,013 --> 01:27:30,061 more because when you just do a little like arbitrary line around the base, it, it 912 01:27:30,061 --> 01:27:36,044 doesn't always do what we intended to do. I, I agree with you, Ellen. I think given 913 01:27:36,046 --> 01:27:37,009 the, the roof form. 914 01:27:43,062 --> 01:27:47,041 The structure together vertical with the horizontal nature of the decks and the wind. 915 01:27:48,045 --> 01:27:52,094 Exactly. And I do believe there's already some vertical stone elements in the area. 916 01:27:53,098 --> 01:27:59,049 We can figure that out anyhow. Anything else anybody wants to, yeah, just to play 917 01:27:59,049 --> 01:28:05,024 devil's advocate instead of. Devil's advocate, uh, as opposed to talking about irrigation 918 01:28:05,024 --> 01:28:10,033 all the, all these days our droughts that we endure, you know, should, should we 919 01:28:10,033 --> 01:28:14,005 be thinking about artificial turf out there and look at the benefits that the school 920 01:28:14,005 --> 01:28:20,077 has where the extended usage, uh, comes out, but you remember what you remember what 921 01:28:20,077 --> 01:28:21,087 a fight that was, 922 01:28:24,005 --> 01:28:31,042 but, uh, anybody, anything else, uh, if not, I will ask. Somebody to formulate a 923 01:28:31,042 --> 01:28:37,037 motion, uh, if you'll accept help from the rest of the members. If I can make a small 924 01:28:37,037 --> 01:28:41,005 recommendation, if we are gonna ask for an increased stone, specify a percentage 925 01:28:41,005 --> 01:28:49,005 or a benchmark that they need to meet other than just increased stone, 35%, 35% if 926 01:28:49,007 --> 01:28:51,044 that's what you want, then that's what we'll do. 927 01:28:54,087 --> 01:28:55,034 Right. 928 01:29:02,034 --> 01:29:04,016 We're such an outspoken group. 929 01:29:07,006 --> 01:29:08,045 Can we have a motion, please? 930 01:29:11,095 --> 01:29:12,054 Thanks for 931 01:29:30,077 --> 01:29:36,007 Ellen, do you feel like making a motion? Sure, hold on, I just threw my paper on 932 01:29:36,007 --> 01:29:37,014 the floor already. 933 01:29:39,093 --> 01:29:41,013 I'm gonna step away. Thank you guys. 934 01:29:43,069 --> 01:29:50,009 OK. Uh, I moved to I move to approve the final architecture review for a new multi-family 935 01:29:50,009 --> 01:29:57,086 building consisting of 150 employee apartments located at Lot 640A 306 Adams Ranch 936 01:29:57,086 --> 01:30:02,026 Road based on the evidence provided within the staff report of record dated September 937 01:30:02,026 --> 01:30:10,005 21, 2026 with the following design variations and specific approvals. DRB 938 01:30:10,009 --> 01:30:17,068 specific approvals, 1, A, B, and C. Design variations, 1 and 2. 939 01:30:18,054 --> 01:30:25,046 With the addition and the condi the table 3, which is 1 through 940 01:30:26,034 --> 01:30:34,002 14, and with the additional conditions of uh increasing the stone percentage to 941 01:30:34,002 --> 01:30:41,095 meet our 35% requirement. And changing the recess lights to 942 01:30:41,095 --> 01:30:44,007 sconces on the balconies. 943 01:30:46,085 --> 01:30:54,052 Did I miss anything? Irrigation. On staff staff approval 944 01:30:54,077 --> 01:31:01,075 for the irrigation of, oh no, the irrigation, continued irrigation in what we're 945 01:31:01,075 --> 01:31:05,027 calling the park or the field, um. 946 01:31:07,051 --> 01:31:11,073 If we want to address the drainage issue, was that a recommended condition or no? 947 01:31:13,007 --> 01:31:19,083 And the Yeah, the drainage issue in the courtyard to be reviewed by staff. 948 01:31:22,005 --> 01:31:27,095 Great, thank you. Um, and wait, just one point of clarity with the design variations 949 01:31:27,095 --> 01:31:33,006 because you're requiring condition of the stone we can remove that design she specified 950 01:31:33,073 --> 01:31:36,025 she removed it, yeah, I did it. I removed that. 951 01:31:38,033 --> 01:31:43,071 I'll second that. Great. Uh, we have a second. Uh, any further discussion changes? 952 01:31:43,085 --> 01:31:48,071 I've, I've, uh, just to clarify because it felt a little garbled from, on the, on, 953 01:31:49,001 --> 01:31:55,085 on the, that the, that the, uh, that the applicant will ensure, um, you know. 954 01:31:57,029 --> 01:32:04,033 Um Permanent um irrigation of the open space areas, you know, of all the green space 955 01:32:04,033 --> 01:32:11,054 areas, not, yeah. Another clarification, um, for the 956 01:32:11,006 --> 01:32:17,000 sconces instead of the recessed lighting, are you talking about just the third floor 957 01:32:17,000 --> 01:32:21,063 or all three floors? I would like to see all 3. 958 01:32:24,012 --> 01:32:30,002 Ellen Yes, agreed. All three. I said balconies, all of them, yes. And are you comfortable 959 01:32:30,002 --> 01:32:35,056 with Kobe's changes to the irrigation language? Uh, yes, if the rest of the board 960 01:32:35,056 --> 01:32:42,094 is. OK, great. Uh, with those changes, Toby, does your second stay in effect? Yes, 961 01:32:43,027 --> 01:32:50,004 great. Uh, with that, I'll ask for a vote. All in favor? Hi hi 962 01:32:51,032 --> 01:32:58,093 Mr. Austin represented I and Elena represented the as well. Motion carries. Thank 963 01:32:58,093 --> 01:33:03,028 you guys. And John, thank you. Appreciate it. 964 01:33:14,087 --> 01:33:20,057 Next agenda item. Consideration design review. This is final architectural review. 965 01:33:21,009 --> 01:33:28,068 For new multi-family units at Lot 726-R1100 Pennington Place pursuant to 966 01:33:28,068 --> 01:33:34,083 CDC Section 17.4.11. And can I ask the board, is there any 967 01:33:37,047 --> 01:33:43,000 Ex parte communication or conflict of interest. With this application 968 01:33:45,028 --> 01:33:46,009 Not great, thank you. 969 01:33:50,008 --> 01:33:54,027 And Daniel had to run to the restroom. We'll just give it 2 minutes. Daniel ran to 970 01:33:54,027 --> 01:33:57,013 the restroom. He'll be back here ahead of anybody else like to go. 971 01:34:03,001 --> 01:34:04,053 Yeah, that's probably good. 972 01:34:31,034 --> 01:34:31,099 With turf 973 01:35:01,008 --> 01:35:05,011 You have to do drainage and all that. You have to do some specific drainage and yeah. 974 01:35:10,016 --> 01:35:12,095 I'm sure you did. Yeah. 975 01:35:26,008 --> 01:35:26,045 Yeah. 976 01:35:31,025 --> 01:35:31,026 Oh. 977 01:35:37,062 --> 01:35:43,006 Thank you for putting up with our break. Much appreciated. Uh, and Daniel, if he 978 01:35:43,008 --> 01:35:45,047 will. Present please. 979 01:36:08,048 --> 01:36:15,017 All right. Is everybody ready? Looks like it. Thank you, Chair. This will be the 980 01:36:15,017 --> 01:36:22,006 final architecture review for lot 726R-1 TPD Pennington Place. 981 01:36:23,069 --> 01:36:29,096 The applicant is here, Chris Hawkins, um, for a proposed additional 4 multi-family 982 01:36:29,096 --> 01:36:36,056 condominiums on a lot with 6 existing condominiums for a total of 10 condominiums. 983 01:36:36,065 --> 01:36:43,047 Uh, the lot's 1.92 acres. The gross score footage of the proposed addition is 18,843. 984 01:36:44,024 --> 01:36:49,003 Um, this is located on Pennington Drive, adjacent to the golf course and other, um, 985 01:36:49,056 --> 01:36:54,075 single-family homes. So, it's uh been a minute since we talked about this one and 986 01:36:54,075 --> 01:36:58,084 there's some background on it, so I'll go through that quickly. Uh, so, as I mentioned, 987 01:36:58,088 --> 01:37:04,055 there's the existing Pendington lodge with 6 units inside. The proposal is for 3, 988 01:37:04,064 --> 01:37:09,039 uh, 3-level, 4 unit additional development that's separated from the existing lot. 989 01:37:10,012 --> 01:37:16,029 Um, in 2023 there was a subdivision or a, uh, platte supplement recorded with San 990 01:37:16,029 --> 01:37:21,079 Miguel County that subdivided a lot 789, and 10 as well as an LCE. However, it was 991 01:37:21,079 --> 01:37:28,021 not approved by Mountain Village, so that, sorry. That's a single family home at 992 01:37:28,021 --> 01:37:34,001 the end of Pennington. Oh, my apologies. Yeah, that's not the, uh, Pennington Lodge. 993 01:37:34,027 --> 01:37:38,008 OK, my, my apologies. I think it was hard to find a Pennington Lodge photo, so there's 994 01:37:38,008 --> 01:37:45,092 a, there's a mistake there anyway, um. It threw me off here. Let's see. Um, so, 995 01:37:45,094 --> 01:37:53,021 the condo is not valid, um, however, the, um, and the applicant will be required 996 01:37:53,021 --> 01:38:00,057 to, uh, submit a, uh, a, a condo map amendment subsequent to the approval of the 997 01:38:00,057 --> 01:38:05,081 initial review. Um, the DRB voted unanimously to approve the initial architecture 998 01:38:05,081 --> 01:38:13,035 and site review at the August 6th hearing. Uh OK. So, the existing conditions. 999 01:38:14,009 --> 01:38:19,002 Um, as you can see, there is the Pennington Lodge to the south, uh, and then Steve 1000 01:38:19,002 --> 01:38:23,052 Madden made slopes to the west and, uh, of the property line here, so it's kind of 1001 01:38:23,052 --> 01:38:25,031 a triangular shaped lot. 1002 01:38:28,053 --> 01:38:34,016 Um, the specific approvals that, uh, has not, the DRB specific approval for, for 1003 01:38:34,016 --> 01:38:40,032 the secondary curb cut is still in place, um, and they've secondary, uh, specific 1004 01:38:40,032 --> 01:38:44,052 approval for the lighting associated with the outdoor living space. Uh, we'll get 1005 01:38:44,052 --> 01:38:49,062 into the lighting slide later on in the presentation. Otherwise, their overall zoning, 1006 01:38:49,069 --> 01:38:54,084 um, hasn't changed, um, significantly. I believe there was some small changes to 1007 01:38:54,084 --> 01:39:00,006 the lot coverage. Um, they're still meeting their materials requirements and parking 1008 01:39:00,006 --> 01:39:00,089 requirements, etc. 1009 01:39:03,082 --> 01:39:11,019 Um, OK. So, This is a photo of the proposal 1010 01:39:11,057 --> 01:39:18,004 viewed from the north looking south um towards the existing lodge and showing in 1011 01:39:18,004 --> 01:39:24,018 context uh with the new proposal. Surrendering, I believe this is Same rendering 1012 01:39:24,024 --> 01:39:25,081 from the initial review. 1013 01:39:27,083 --> 01:39:35,008 Siteplane remains unchanged. Um, there was not a, um, we decided as part of, as 1014 01:39:35,008 --> 01:39:39,028 part of the initial review that a fire truck turnaround is not necessary. They updated 1015 01:39:39,028 --> 01:39:47,003 the It's very disorienting when I, when I cut out like that, sorry. Um, they, um, 1016 01:39:47,083 --> 01:39:52,005 updated the driveway plan to show, uh, turn movements and that sort of thing that 1017 01:39:52,005 --> 01:39:58,014 are in compliance. Um, as I mentioned, uh, there was a secondary curb cut approved 1018 01:39:58,014 --> 01:40:03,088 at the initial architecture inside. Um, because this is technically one development, 1019 01:40:04,005 --> 01:40:08,055 typically there's one curb cut per development for multi-family, however, because 1020 01:40:08,057 --> 01:40:15,009 this is a funky lot with a separate, separated development, this seems reasonable. 1021 01:40:17,006 --> 01:40:19,032 Elevations haven't changed. 1022 01:40:21,052 --> 01:40:26,035 Building form and materiality also remains the same. It's generally matching the 1023 01:40:26,035 --> 01:40:31,077 existing. Building, but obviously with an updated contemporary architectural form, 1024 01:40:32,013 --> 01:40:36,083 um, using some corrugated metal, standing same roof matching the existing building, 1025 01:40:37,013 --> 01:40:39,027 telluride, golden stone, etc. 1026 01:40:42,001 --> 01:40:46,007 Uh, the landscape and fire mitigation plan has been updated as part of the final 1027 01:40:46,007 --> 01:40:52,067 architecture review. This is a, uh, condition of approval of the initial review. 1028 01:40:53,005 --> 01:41:00,006 The updated plan is depicting 27 new trees, uh, along with 4 removed. Uh, the applicant, 1029 01:41:00,073 --> 01:41:06,075 uh, does show shrubs and grass in zone one, which is allowed as long as there's another 1030 01:41:06,075 --> 01:41:13,042 5 ft vegetation-free buffer zone outside of that. Um, zone, uh, those shrubs and, 1031 01:41:13,046 --> 01:41:19,046 um, grasses that appears to be in met. Um, the only area of concern that we have 1032 01:41:19,046 --> 01:41:25,041 is this little section here, uh, which is directly adjacent to the building. Uh, 1033 01:41:26,042 --> 01:41:31,075 another criteria of the exemption is that it's not planted directly beneath windows 1034 01:41:31,097 --> 01:41:37,073 or under vents, uh, or, or deck, um, or under decks. It wasn't immediately clear 1035 01:41:37,073 --> 01:41:42,053 from the elevations if there were any vents or windows directly adjacent to that. 1036 01:41:42,062 --> 01:41:48,021 So, just clarifying that small point, it's part of the, um, building permit, uh, 1037 01:41:48,058 --> 01:41:54,043 application is a condition of approval. Moving to the lighting plan, there are 4 1038 01:41:54,043 --> 01:42:00,007 fixture types and 77 total fixtures. Uh, the recess, there's recessed cans around 1039 01:42:00,007 --> 01:42:05,051 the front entry entries, step lights around the exterior of the building, um, it's 1040 01:42:05,051 --> 01:42:10,071 just the predominant fixture type. Uh, and then an LED strip light at the address 1041 01:42:10,071 --> 01:42:17,003 monument for illumination. All the fixtures need the code. Um, again, this does, 1042 01:42:17,044 --> 01:42:24,011 uh, have, uh, it would be under the previous, uh, lighting code, although any, um, 1043 01:42:24,083 --> 01:42:29,073 Certain, certain elements may have to be brought into compliance. Uh, however, I 1044 01:42:29,073 --> 01:42:36,054 believe all of the fixtures meet the current new code as well. Um, maybe the applicants 1045 01:42:36,054 --> 01:42:43,077 can specify on that. Um, the one, the one specific approval here is that the the 1046 01:42:43,077 --> 01:42:49,057 limited common element terrace and the unit 7 deck qualify as outdoor living space 1047 01:42:49,057 --> 01:42:54,061 because they have like an outdoor dining and some kitchen, uh, appliances. Therefore, 1048 01:42:54,066 --> 01:43:00,092 they would need a specific approval for the lighting. Um, one, maybe small clarification, 1049 01:43:01,001 --> 01:43:07,007 uh, about the, the, the outdoor deck is specified as a limited common element. Um, 1050 01:43:07,033 --> 01:43:12,011 typically we see limited common elements for individual units. However, in this case, 1051 01:43:12,013 --> 01:43:17,096 it's limited for the use of all four units, just want to clarify that. Um, so, it's 1052 01:43:17,096 --> 01:43:22,092 not a general common common element that would be for the use of the residents at 1053 01:43:22,092 --> 01:43:30,019 the existing complexes would be for the use of the Residents at these 4 units here. 1054 01:43:33,042 --> 01:43:41,019 OK. Uh, so with that in mind, um, uh, I recommend, the staff recommends approval 1055 01:43:41,021 --> 01:43:47,076 of the Uh, proposal with the specific approval for secondary curb cut and lighting 1056 01:43:47,076 --> 01:43:50,057 associated with outdoor living space. I'll take any questions. 1057 01:43:56,066 --> 01:44:02,062 Questions for staff. I just have one quick question. Um, I see you included the previous 1058 01:44:02,062 --> 01:44:08,038 some public comments and um by seeing this we haven't had any come in since that, 1059 01:44:08,064 --> 01:44:14,072 I think August 5th or something was the last one. No, we did not have any new public 1060 01:44:14,072 --> 01:44:15,037 comment. Right. 1061 01:44:20,045 --> 01:44:25,026 Do you have cut sheets for the lighting that we can look at? We'll present those 1062 01:44:25,033 --> 01:44:30,000 with ours. Yeah, I believe they're in the packet. Um, we don't usually print them 1063 01:44:30,000 --> 01:44:33,096 out because they expand the packet by a lot, but they should be on the online, uh, 1064 01:44:34,001 --> 01:44:35,024 version. OK. 1065 01:44:37,034 --> 01:44:43,054 Can I ask, was there A driveway plan. I didn't see it. Yeah, again, it, it should 1066 01:44:43,054 --> 01:44:48,096 be in the packet and should be printed out as well, um. It's the same driveway plan 1067 01:44:48,096 --> 01:44:55,023 as the initial, um, they just added some of the training, uh, calculations. It's 1068 01:44:55,023 --> 01:44:59,095 part of the final architecture review just to clarify any access issues, but it is 1069 01:44:59,097 --> 01:45:06,011 in there. I had no access issues. I was my my question was materials. Materials for 1070 01:45:06,073 --> 01:45:14,033 like a retaining wall. There was a retaining wall indicated. Um, never saw anything 1071 01:45:14,039 --> 01:45:14,083 about it. 1072 01:45:17,059 --> 01:45:21,058 Believe, yeah, I believe it was specified as stone, but maybe the applicant can clarify. 1073 01:45:23,075 --> 01:45:30,028 What that retaining. All material is Says concrete retaining wall with guard rail 1074 01:45:30,063 --> 01:45:37,034 faced with DRB approved material, so that would be stone, right? So maybe we can 1075 01:45:37,056 --> 01:45:42,006 ask them to specify that rather than just saying DR me Daniel, I like pictures. I 1076 01:45:42,006 --> 01:45:49,054 don't pictures, so. OK. Uh, other questions for you for staff, please. 1077 01:45:51,094 --> 01:45:59,062 All good? Great, uh, well, if the applicant would introduce themselves and, uh, present, 1078 01:45:59,072 --> 01:46:03,078 please. Sure, sorry, Zoom disappeared. 1079 01:46:06,096 --> 01:46:09,055 Hi, uh, Chris Hawkins with Alpine Planning. 1080 01:46:13,084 --> 01:46:15,032 Shane Jordan, Jordan Architects. 1081 01:46:18,017 --> 01:46:20,017 Katie Sapp and wedding design. 1082 01:46:22,027 --> 01:46:28,027 Laura Jordan, Jordan Architects. And Natalie Petty John Planterra Landscape architecture 1083 01:46:28,027 --> 01:46:28,058 online. 1084 01:46:33,011 --> 01:46:35,009 I got bumped out of the meeting, so I'm rejoining. 1085 01:46:38,028 --> 01:46:42,011 While he's reconnecting, I just wanna give a big thank you to Katie for doing a really 1086 01:46:42,011 --> 01:46:46,007 thorough review. And she made some really great suggestions that we did incorporate 1087 01:46:46,007 --> 01:46:51,062 into the final, um, and I'll go over those later today. Daniel, can you let me in 1088 01:46:51,062 --> 01:46:59,062 the meeting please? Um, to answer your question, is the stone face wall. Um, I also 1089 01:46:59,062 --> 01:47:02,047 just wanted to clarify, let me share my screen. 1090 01:47:06,018 --> 01:47:06,041 A 1091 01:47:14,051 --> 01:47:17,027 Um, just a point of clarification on the 1092 01:47:19,051 --> 01:47:21,086 The new Colorado Wildfire Resiliency Code. 1093 01:47:25,075 --> 01:47:32,019 But, um, and it is encroaching into the G. Um, quite frankly, the code should be 1094 01:47:32,019 --> 01:47:35,079 amended to just allow those by right, so you're not having to ask for an encroachment 1095 01:47:35,079 --> 01:47:41,067 every time. We, we, we do, OK, yeah, so there's, there is an exception for fire, 1096 01:47:41,084 --> 01:47:45,075 uh, hard escape for fire mitigation, and that's why we didn't call it out as something 1097 01:47:45,075 --> 01:47:49,099 that I just wanted to make clear, thank you for that clarification, um, with that, 1098 01:47:50,008 --> 01:47:52,063 um, the main, our main presentation is. 1099 01:47:55,008 --> 01:48:02,046 Um, first up is landscaping and Online if you wanna hop on. Wonderful. Thank you 1100 01:48:02,046 --> 01:48:07,066 guys um for your time today. Um, so just uh from a design perspective, a quick recap 1101 01:48:07,066 --> 01:48:13,007 of what we're trying to do here, um, you know, most of this property, uh, is called 1102 01:48:13,007 --> 01:48:17,048 out as, you know, native seed mix that's, you know, clearly written out in your code. 1103 01:48:17,063 --> 01:48:22,057 It's a great mix, um, and so we wanted to use that at all of our revegetation areas 1104 01:48:22,082 --> 01:48:30,058 and bring that, um, in towards the. 5 ft um pardon zone buffer um and then use a 1105 01:48:30,058 --> 01:48:35,042 handful of tree clusters in that zone too to help soften that building elevation 1106 01:48:35,071 --> 01:48:42,001 um a good majority of those are single stem or multi-stem aspens um and then a few 1107 01:48:42,003 --> 01:48:47,001 key areas that we really wanna pull some focus to um and have a little bit more seasonality, 1108 01:48:47,031 --> 01:48:53,019 uh, are there's a crab apple, so slight different, um. Slight variation in the tree, 1109 01:48:53,051 --> 01:48:59,082 but both are approved on your um approved tree and shrub list. And Natalie, if you 1110 01:48:59,082 --> 01:49:04,046 introduce yourself for the record. Oh yes, absolutely. uh Natalie Pettijon, Plantera 1111 01:49:04,046 --> 01:49:11,072 Landscape architecture, um, phoning in online. Um, thank you for that. So, again, 1112 01:49:11,085 --> 01:49:16,009 we have the approved seed mix as our revegetation mix, bringing that closer to our 1113 01:49:16,009 --> 01:49:22,042 5 ft hardened zone. Um, using trees in the allowable clusters with the required 30 1114 01:49:22,042 --> 01:49:28,015 ft tree canopy distance, um, between those, uh, to make sure we're meeting that requirement 1115 01:49:28,051 --> 01:49:34,007 and then specific areas, you know, at the entry of this, um, and, and specific spaces 1116 01:49:34,007 --> 01:49:38,066 even just outside of the units that we want to soften those and make those a little 1117 01:49:38,066 --> 01:49:45,002 bit more special, bringing in. Um, some, some grasses that are either, uh, variety 1118 01:49:45,002 --> 01:49:50,064 adjacent to what is already approved or are on your approved list, um, and approved 1119 01:49:50,064 --> 01:49:56,056 list also includes Colorado Firewise, um, low flammability planting, and some handful 1120 01:49:56,056 --> 01:50:00,091 of native wildflowers, um, so we wanna just concentrate those a little bit closer 1121 01:50:00,091 --> 01:50:07,024 to some of your building entry and exit points, um. Nice visual here to show you, 1122 01:50:07,038 --> 01:50:13,084 um, again, trees and shrubs are all from your approved list. Um, any wildflowers 1123 01:50:13,086 --> 01:50:18,029 or grasses that you see here are from that Firewise plant list here. Uh, the goal 1124 01:50:18,029 --> 01:50:22,089 is that this feels really native and natural and blends into the surrounding neighborhood, 1125 01:50:23,006 --> 01:50:28,049 the surrounding landscape. Um, and then if you go back to that slide real quick. 1126 01:50:29,009 --> 01:50:34,099 At the bottom left there are two photos there that kind of show the difference of 1127 01:50:34,099 --> 01:50:40,005 what we're imagining that mode versus unmowed native grass space, um, you know, not 1128 01:50:40,052 --> 01:50:46,002 wanting to introduce an excessive amount of hardscape here, um, but give people an 1129 01:50:46,002 --> 01:50:50,018 opportunity to have some. Mode path that could potentially change over time depending 1130 01:50:50,018 --> 01:50:55,034 on where mowing happens and doesn't, um, and then using boulders, landscape boulders 1131 01:50:55,034 --> 01:51:00,093 to kind of punctuate that that 5 ft hardened zone, um, and also just provide some, 1132 01:51:00,095 --> 01:51:06,003 some nice verticality in the landscape around some of the planting. We're imagining 1133 01:51:06,003 --> 01:51:11,018 any of the plants that are in that 5 ft hardened zone are irrigated, um, you know, 1134 01:51:11,004 --> 01:51:15,043 you guys have great standards on what irrigation systems need to be like out here. 1135 01:51:15,072 --> 01:51:21,058 Um, I know that the, the vegetation zone needs to be irrigated for a year for establishments 1136 01:51:21,084 --> 01:51:26,015 and anything a little bit closer to the building, um, should be something that's 1137 01:51:26,015 --> 01:51:31,024 more. Permanently irrigated, keep things a little bit greener, um, and, and just 1138 01:51:31,024 --> 01:51:32,022 more established. 1139 01:51:38,037 --> 01:51:42,004 OK. Great. Now we'll move on to the exciting lighting discussion. 1140 01:51:49,023 --> 01:51:55,002 Um, just as a general overview, we wanted, um, the design intent was to meet the 1141 01:51:55,002 --> 01:52:00,098 code we're under, which is the one before the last revision, um, but also be able 1142 01:52:00,098 --> 01:52:07,074 to transition in 31 when we need to. Um, this is the lighting schedule. You'll notice 1143 01:52:07,074 --> 01:52:14,005 that the color temperature is 2700 Kelvin, so that meets the code, the The recess 1144 01:52:14,005 --> 01:52:21,009 slide, I wanted to point out that um It's a lower lumen level than you, it's much 1145 01:52:21,009 --> 01:52:26,089 lower than what you allow, but you'll see on the plans we wanted to at the entryways 1146 01:52:26,089 --> 01:52:32,089 is where we use these and a lot of them we use 2 and we wanted to just create a soft, 1147 01:52:33,001 --> 01:52:39,026 more even light. So that's why we went with a lower lumen output light so that we 1148 01:52:39,026 --> 01:52:45,098 could use 2 and create that aesthetic that we wanted. Um, the XM is a step light 1149 01:52:45,098 --> 01:52:47,097 that we're using. It's 1150 01:52:50,043 --> 01:52:55,069 This isn't quite very well. It's that one, yeah, and we're using that on the metal 1151 01:52:55,069 --> 01:53:03,069 surfaces and it's, um, it meets the lumen limit and then the other step light we're 1152 01:53:03,069 --> 01:53:11,056 using is actually a Uh It's a mounted in stone like, like 1153 01:53:11,056 --> 01:53:16,036 you see, and we're doing a couple, I'll expound on that, but it's meets the lumen 1154 01:53:16,036 --> 01:53:21,036 limit also. And then the other light is the address monument light. 1155 01:53:24,045 --> 01:53:30,081 Um, this, um, this is more about the hardscape masonry mounted step light, um. 1156 01:53:33,036 --> 01:53:39,043 The main thing I want to point out here is sometimes we're gonna mount it under the 1157 01:53:39,043 --> 01:53:45,051 cap, like you see here. Um, and sometimes we're mounting it just on the stone wall 1158 01:53:45,051 --> 01:53:53,019 like this one because the stone goes all the way up. Um Here, this picture 1159 01:53:53,038 --> 01:53:58,057 depicts it very well. These are, these are mounted under the cap. Ours are typically 1160 01:53:58,057 --> 01:54:03,066 at 26 inches. It kind of depends on, sometimes grade is moving away and it's a little 1161 01:54:03,066 --> 01:54:10,038 higher, but, and then on the other side of the stone wall, the point is how black 1162 01:54:10,038 --> 01:54:17,063 it is, how dark it is. And our detail on a lot of our decks, this one, this picture 1163 01:54:17,063 --> 01:54:24,013 demonstrates that really well. There's actually a railing above the cap and then 1164 01:54:24,013 --> 01:54:29,059 our light is below that on the inside. Of the decks. 1165 01:54:33,016 --> 01:54:34,003 OK. Um, 1166 01:54:36,012 --> 01:54:38,001 Let me just make sure everything. 1167 01:54:47,019 --> 01:54:53,001 OK. So then our plans, we show, um, I don't want to spend too much time on this because 1168 01:54:53,001 --> 01:54:57,083 I think we're going to hit it harder when we get to the photometrics page, but Each 1169 01:54:57,083 --> 01:55:03,085 entryway has a couple of recess cans, um, and then mostly step lights around the 1170 01:55:03,085 --> 01:55:10,051 perimeter and the garages and at some of the exterior doors, we have step lights. 1171 01:55:10,056 --> 01:55:17,041 This is the first level. And depending on the material, if it's stone, the step light 1172 01:55:17,041 --> 01:55:22,089 is the masonry mounted one, and then if it's metal, it's the XM which is just the 1173 01:55:22,089 --> 01:55:29,049 regular step light. And then we have the LCE on now we're on the 2nd level. 1174 01:55:32,006 --> 01:55:38,023 Asking for the variants for outdoor living. Um, and this is lit mostly with step 1175 01:55:38,023 --> 01:55:45,008 light, all with step lights. But it's just kind of a perimeter. Way of finding, you 1176 01:55:45,008 --> 01:55:46,095 know, safety kind of situation. 1177 01:55:50,004 --> 01:55:56,027 And then we have other decks on that level that are lit also with the interior step 1178 01:55:56,027 --> 01:56:04,026 light. And then this is the 3rd level and we have some It wasn't outlined 1179 01:56:04,026 --> 01:56:09,009 exactly on the um brief, but on this level, we also have some outdoor living areas, 1180 01:56:09,095 --> 01:56:17,085 realistically, cause there's Barbecue, hot tub situation. So there we have step 1181 01:56:17,085 --> 01:56:24,029 lights. We're, we're using step lights which The reason for that is also to, you 1182 01:56:24,029 --> 01:56:30,004 know, come 31, we wanna kind of be in line with. What you guys allow on upper levels, 1183 01:56:30,054 --> 01:56:36,024 but also create some wayfinding to, for the outdoor living areas and the hot tubs 1184 01:56:36,024 --> 01:56:41,007 and that sort of thing. And this is the elevations, um. 1185 01:56:44,003 --> 01:56:51,088 Here we have 8 and 77 is, so where you see the, I don't know, I think it's pretty 1186 01:56:51,094 --> 01:56:58,069 visible, but where you see the aqua. That is on the interior side of that deck. So, 1187 01:56:58,094 --> 01:57:04,033 on the other side of that stone is where that step light is. And out here on the 1188 01:57:04,033 --> 01:57:10,037 left where we have uh the 7 outdoor living area, those are also on the other side 1189 01:57:10,037 --> 01:57:18,034 of the stone. And then, Here we have, this is the, this is 10 which um the lower 1190 01:57:18,004 --> 01:57:24,019 ones that were the windows marked 4, those are on the inside of that terrace and 1191 01:57:24,019 --> 01:57:29,091 I want to point out something here, that's the 2nd level. But it's still below grade 1192 01:57:30,017 --> 01:57:35,089 where those shine at the door that comes out. And then at the sec at the 3rd level, 1193 01:57:36,049 --> 01:57:41,064 which looks like the 2nd on this elevation, those are on the Outdoor living area 1194 01:57:41,064 --> 01:57:42,052 of 8. 1195 01:57:44,089 --> 01:57:45,059 Um 1196 01:57:47,074 --> 01:57:49,004 And this is 1197 01:57:54,069 --> 01:58:02,022 Yeah, so then this is the um Well, that's, is that 10, Laura? 1198 01:58:02,084 --> 01:58:09,058 Yeah, 10. And so that'll be the upper level of 10. And then the LCE, which is the 1199 01:58:09,096 --> 01:58:17,022 sort of communal terrace, um, We have the stone, you know, 1200 01:58:17,035 --> 01:58:24,073 stone-mounted, um, Lights on the inside, but then from this view, the yellow 1201 01:58:24,075 --> 01:58:31,006 ones, you'll, um, those are facing the golf course, but, you know, there's gonna 1202 01:58:31,006 --> 01:58:35,046 be furniture and stuff in there too. But those are, you know, shining down, still 1203 01:58:35,046 --> 01:58:42,034 very shield, but those are step lights out there at that um terrace. And then over 1204 01:58:42,034 --> 01:58:49,033 on the far side here, um Well, I, I think we could explain it real quick. 1205 01:58:52,004 --> 01:58:59,086 And then on the far side, um, Again, in Aqua at some of the other units. Um, even 1206 01:58:59,088 --> 01:59:07,031 this door that comes out from the lower bedroom, um, of 8, there's a step light on 1207 01:59:07,031 --> 01:59:13,006 the other side of that stone, so you don't see it, but it's there. And then at the 1208 01:59:13,008 --> 01:59:19,009 7 deck out here where the 2 is. Those are on the inside. That's a metal, um. 1209 01:59:20,085 --> 01:59:25,008 railing wall. Um, so it's totally solid, but on the inside of that, we have our step 1210 01:59:25,008 --> 01:59:32,091 lights. That was the XM, um, designation. And then on the lower level 1211 01:59:33,012 --> 01:59:38,096 here, we, you can see those step lights, they're at the cap of that stone wall, but 1212 01:59:38,096 --> 01:59:44,063 they're outside of a door leading to the grave there. It, there's gonna be a little 1213 01:59:44,063 --> 01:59:51,089 step, but Probably. OK. Yeah. And this one 1214 01:59:51,089 --> 01:59:59,031 has um. Just the one at 7 on the side of that. 1215 02:00:00,024 --> 02:00:07,084 So that's another part of that uh outdoor living space. And then this one is um 7 1216 02:00:07,084 --> 02:00:14,044 and 8. The lower step lights outside the garage, that's an example of them mounted 1217 02:00:14,044 --> 02:00:22,041 on the stone wall. Um, as step lights just At the garages and then 1218 02:00:22,051 --> 02:00:26,002 at the upper decks on the inside in the aqua color. 1219 02:00:31,079 --> 02:00:39,026 That's just a And that's the LCE from the driveway. So at the communal, like storage 1220 02:00:39,026 --> 02:00:46,003 garage, we have them low and then On the inside of that stone wall from the driveway 1221 02:00:46,036 --> 02:00:48,035 where where we have the furniture and stuff. 1222 02:00:52,085 --> 02:00:54,001 And then, um 1223 02:00:56,009 --> 02:01:01,083 So this is uh 9 and 10 and um 1224 02:01:04,034 --> 02:01:08,097 We have them at the garages. This first garage at 9 is metal, so it gets the step 1225 02:01:08,097 --> 02:01:10,009 bites on the metal and then. 1226 02:01:12,015 --> 02:01:17,093 And these are, these step lights are also kind of to create a path to that public 1227 02:01:17,095 --> 02:01:25,073 area being LC. And um On the inside of this first little 1228 02:01:25,073 --> 02:01:32,053 door at 9, there's just a little terrace in there on the inside of that terrace, 1229 02:01:32,082 --> 02:01:37,037 and then at the upper level on the inside of that one outdoor, one of the outdoor 1230 02:01:37,037 --> 02:01:45,021 living areas. And then, um, at 10, there's one at that patio up 1231 02:01:45,021 --> 02:01:53,012 there. And then or deck I guess, and then the other deck at 10. I guess 1232 02:01:53,012 --> 02:01:59,002 one thing I should point out is the one place where some things are higher, the excess 1233 02:01:59,002 --> 02:02:04,044 at the bottom of the steps going up to the LCE we wanted to keep those at the cap, 1234 02:02:04,053 --> 02:02:09,083 so they're a little bit higher. Most of them are at 20%. 6 inches, but these specific 1235 02:02:09,085 --> 02:02:15,028 ones, we just kind of wanted to keep that look at the cap and also have a little 1236 02:02:15,028 --> 02:02:19,025 bit more of a pool of light there because also we have the door to the storage and 1237 02:02:19,025 --> 02:02:23,064 the beginning of the stairs, kind of something to lead people that direction. 1238 02:02:26,007 --> 02:02:30,085 And then, um, this is the address monument light. It's really quite shielded. It's 1239 02:02:30,085 --> 02:02:35,081 only gonna shine through. This is hard to model in the photometrics, but, um, it's 1240 02:02:35,081 --> 02:02:41,045 only gonna shine through the cutout numbers in the metal. And it does have, what's 1241 02:02:41,045 --> 02:02:47,076 not shown here is it does sit in an extrusion, which is something you guys like. 1242 02:02:47,092 --> 02:02:55,003 Um. And then on the next page we have the. The phototrics, um. 1243 02:02:56,036 --> 02:03:00,011 We have a couple of things going on here. One is it feels. 1244 02:03:02,056 --> 02:03:03,055 The one is or. 1245 02:03:05,069 --> 02:03:11,008 Um, one is that the, uh, at each light fixture we have the isometric lines that you 1246 02:03:11,008 --> 02:03:18,004 guys are used to. Um, the internal line that's red is where you're at the edge of 1247 02:03:18,004 --> 02:03:23,023 2 ft candles. The orange line is where you're at the edge of 1 ft candle, and then 1248 02:03:23,023 --> 02:03:29,005 the aqua line shows where we have a half foot candle. Um Then the other thing we 1249 02:03:29,005 --> 02:03:35,083 have going on. I, um, I've gone ahead and done, um, 1250 02:03:36,069 --> 02:03:43,000 Like an AGI lighting calculation, so that's every 3 ft, it's giving you what the 1251 02:03:43,000 --> 02:03:49,000 light level is at that point. One thing to be aware of is, um, you know, I can't 1252 02:03:49,000 --> 02:03:53,035 choose like where that lands. Sometimes it lands like right under a light and it's, 1253 02:03:53,073 --> 02:04:01,001 you know, gonna be nine-foot candles or something. Um If you want, like if there's 1254 02:04:01,001 --> 02:04:05,013 a particular area of concern or something like that, I could give you an average 1255 02:04:05,015 --> 02:04:10,001 of that area, let's say for a living space or something like that. But here, it's 1256 02:04:10,001 --> 02:04:17,003 just a point in a moment in time of how much light is reading on the ground. 1257 02:04:19,009 --> 02:04:26,013 Um, and then, so there at 9 at the entryway is an example of where we have, you know, 1258 02:04:26,062 --> 02:04:33,028 two recessed cans of the lowest lumen we could get to just kind of softly, evenly 1259 02:04:33,028 --> 02:04:39,021 light that area. At an entryway, you typically want 10 to 15-foot candles and we're 1260 02:04:39,021 --> 02:04:45,014 kind of landing at that mark um in some of those areas. I think at 9, we have like 1261 02:04:46,008 --> 02:04:53,099 Couple of spots that there's 13 or something. And then um same at 10. We're, 1262 02:04:54,017 --> 02:05:01,095 we're getting, you know, one spot right under reading about 12, um. And then um we 1263 02:05:01,095 --> 02:05:08,048 have also 2 at 8 and then we have a longer entryway at 7, so we kind of just wanted 1264 02:05:08,048 --> 02:05:15,066 that soft. Even lighting there. So we'd spread them out a bit. Um, that's the key 1265 02:05:15,066 --> 02:05:18,094 thing I think for that level, and then moving. 1266 02:05:21,053 --> 02:05:22,008 Yeah, yeah. 1267 02:05:25,007 --> 02:05:29,045 I'm gonna jump in really quick. I think you might have said this, but the big picture 1268 02:05:29,045 --> 02:05:35,009 concept here was we wanted to show the four entryways, nice, like safe. That's the 1269 02:05:35,009 --> 02:05:41,066 door I'm going to with a little bit of low lighting pathway to the LCE. Make sure 1270 02:05:41,066 --> 02:05:46,038 we can see our way through, but not a ton of bright light everywhere in this entry 1271 02:05:46,038 --> 02:05:54,001 level. Let's focus the book. Yeah. And around and for kind of general lighting around 1272 02:05:54,001 --> 02:05:54,083 the motor cord. 1273 02:05:59,042 --> 02:06:05,069 On the second level, um, I think the key thing is, you know, here's an example at 1274 02:06:05,069 --> 02:06:13,056 9 of the, of the exterior deck, um, Where we have two of the masonry mounted 1275 02:06:13,056 --> 02:06:20,027 step lights. Just general lighting out there, inviting safe lighting, but outside 1276 02:06:20,027 --> 02:06:26,067 of that, where you see the gray, those are all zeros. So you're getting 0 ft candles 1277 02:06:26,067 --> 02:06:33,051 outside of that deck. And that's true. For all the decks, whereas, um, and then like 1278 02:06:33,051 --> 02:06:41,034 over at 10, um, that's actually that below grade terrace, but again, um, those are 1279 02:06:41,034 --> 02:06:47,048 just pooling right inside that terrace. And the LC maybe we should look at that real 1280 02:06:47,009 --> 02:06:55,001 quick just to Um, showed, you know, in the middle of that terrace, we're at 0.1 1281 02:06:55,013 --> 02:07:01,014 and really important when we're at, when we get to that setback line, we're at At 1282 02:07:01,014 --> 02:07:07,002 a 10 of a foot candle. So we're meeting that. You know, we're not getting a lot of 1283 02:07:07,002 --> 02:07:12,044 light lead, but we're getting some good safe path lighting around that. 1284 02:07:19,074 --> 02:07:25,038 And then I guess um We should look at 7 since that was specified, but I think we 1285 02:07:25,038 --> 02:07:30,099 have other outdoor living areas where we need approval, but 7 was specified, um. 1286 02:07:31,068 --> 02:07:37,015 We just have the interior step lights um for the sort of outdoor living space and 1287 02:07:37,015 --> 02:07:44,093 path to the hot tub and then um the ones on the Um, top part are, uh, the XM 1288 02:07:45,017 --> 02:07:49,016 that are going in a metal railing as I showed on the elevation and then the other 1289 02:07:49,018 --> 02:07:50,021 ones are on the stone. 1290 02:07:52,097 --> 02:07:53,004 And I think 1291 02:08:00,012 --> 02:08:05,051 I mean this is kind of uh more of the same we're using those side mounted um step 1292 02:08:05,051 --> 02:08:13,022 lights at the stone and we are getting zeros outside of all those decks. Mhm. Except 1293 02:08:13,022 --> 02:08:16,059 for at 8, we have metal walls and those are the XM. 1294 02:08:18,062 --> 02:08:19,002 Um 1295 02:08:22,008 --> 02:08:26,055 So. It's just the upper level, same thing, it's already been repeated, so we're glad 1296 02:08:26,055 --> 02:08:29,019 to answer any questions you might have at this time. Thank you. 1297 02:08:43,073 --> 02:08:51,051 Any questions to the app? Yeah, that's what they just said. I had a I 1298 02:08:51,072 --> 02:08:53,003 have a question to be asking. 1299 02:08:55,073 --> 02:09:03,071 Uh, all of the live pictures, you're showing. Will they always be on at the same 1300 02:09:03,071 --> 02:09:11,006 time, all of them? Or is it variable? Yeah, a lot of what you saw will be controlled 1301 02:09:11,006 --> 02:09:19,001 inside each unit. Um, so in other words, if some units were empty, some 1302 02:09:19,001 --> 02:09:24,023 of that light would not be on. Is that what? OK, yeah, OK, thank you. 1303 02:09:26,048 --> 02:09:31,009 Um, Katie, I appreciate you taking the time to go over that pretty thoroughly. Um, 1304 02:09:31,004 --> 02:09:35,047 looking at the, I think when I fall back and I look at our regulations, it talks 1305 02:09:35,047 --> 02:09:41,042 about two-foot candles as a threshold, maximum average threshold on On an entry and 1306 02:09:41,042 --> 02:09:48,014 stairway. Um, and I appreciate you providing that clarification where the isoput 1307 02:09:48,016 --> 02:09:54,035 candle, uh, red circle represents a two-foot. Uh, we got a lot of those overlapping 1308 02:09:54,035 --> 02:10:01,008 and it seems like we got some elevated levels at Uh, particularly, uh, 7 where we 1309 02:10:01,008 --> 02:10:09,002 get some higher point, point, uh, calcs at 1513, 12. I mean, 7 seems 1310 02:10:09,002 --> 02:10:16,073 like it's gonna be fairly bright with those 4, Or luminaires um up 1311 02:10:16,073 --> 02:10:23,009 there. And I think by, you know, by and large, We do get a fair overlap on your 2-foot 1312 02:10:23,009 --> 02:10:29,081 ISO on both, all 4 of the units. I'm just wondering if there's a, a strategy that 1313 02:10:29,081 --> 02:10:30,046 can bring it. 1314 02:10:35,037 --> 02:10:40,084 Yeah, we could. I mean, I did look at using 3 recess camps, for example, at that 1315 02:10:40,084 --> 02:10:48,001 entryway, um. It was a little low, but I mean, and, and like I said, it had an 1316 02:10:48,001 --> 02:10:55,076 entryway where we wanted to like sort of Show people where the entryways were, we're 1317 02:10:55,076 --> 02:11:01,084 going for like 1510 to 15 ft candles. I think on your, on the pathway lighting, which 1318 02:11:01,084 --> 02:11:09,033 was more for like um Like a landscape kind of pathway. I think you guys said 1319 02:11:09,033 --> 02:11:17,025 average no more than 2 ft candles. But that, I feel like an entryway might not be 1320 02:11:18,019 --> 02:11:21,086 Under the pathway, but, uh, but I guess that's a question. 1321 02:11:25,044 --> 02:11:30,041 And they actually say exterior door shall be eliminated out of back. A minimum, well, 1322 02:11:30,005 --> 02:11:36,021 minimum 1 ft candle. Um, OK. Um, that's all I have. 1323 02:11:38,032 --> 02:11:39,028 Other questions do we have? 1324 02:11:42,075 --> 02:11:44,005 Jim, Ellen, all good. 1325 02:11:48,034 --> 02:11:54,082 Have you guys sprayed the thistle yet? It's come up. We haven't, but the neighbors 1326 02:11:54,082 --> 02:12:01,011 have requested it multiple times. And speaking of which, Uh, you know, you have to 1327 02:12:01,011 --> 02:12:08,046 have a special application to more than the 30%. Slope disruption, but this was man-made. 1328 02:12:08,071 --> 02:12:12,067 This was man-made. Can you give us a little history of how that got man-made? 1329 02:12:15,072 --> 02:12:22,027 Yeah, I, I wasn't here, but elaborate, please. Yeah, it was, it's, I mean, we're 1330 02:12:22,027 --> 02:12:24,071 associating it with the road grading cause it's on that side. 1331 02:12:27,039 --> 02:12:31,098 Going lower down to the cul-de-sac. So that's, you know, I wasn't here either, but, 1332 02:12:32,036 --> 02:12:35,047 you know, when you see those kind of cuts in the village, it's mostly attributable 1333 02:12:35,047 --> 02:12:37,007 to the roadway. Thanks. 1334 02:12:39,071 --> 02:12:45,054 Uh, were there any other questions for the? Uh, if not, I'll close this section. 1335 02:12:46,005 --> 02:12:49,097 Uh, we did definitely receive some public comment. Uh, a couple of those questions 1336 02:12:49,097 --> 02:12:56,084 have been addressed. Uh, I'm assuming you've seen those. Comments 1337 02:12:58,042 --> 02:13:02,009 We saw what was submitted at initial, but I haven't seen anything for final. OK. 1338 02:13:03,038 --> 02:13:08,092 I won't ask you to rebut then. We rebutted at the initial review meeting um on those 1339 02:13:08,092 --> 02:13:09,006 comments so. 1340 02:13:11,093 --> 02:13:14,036 Uh, with that, let's move on to board discussion. 1341 02:13:19,073 --> 02:13:24,037 I'll be happy to start. I think, uh, I think they've done an amazing job of marrying. 1342 02:13:25,027 --> 02:13:32,011 Uh, architecture that bridges both the, some of the existing palette as well as, 1343 02:13:32,052 --> 02:13:37,045 uh, introducing some new forms. So, pretty excited about what they're doing here. 1344 02:13:37,095 --> 02:13:45,064 Um, The only, the only thing I was really focusing on. Uh, looking at that, 1345 02:13:46,021 --> 02:13:51,098 what, what are we gonna see from afar? And that entrance to 7 is kind of the, the 1346 02:13:51,098 --> 02:13:57,013 one piece that seems to be exposed when you look, when you're looking up into there, 1347 02:13:57,017 --> 02:14:00,008 and I'm just wondering if we focus a little bit on that, but I thought the light 1348 02:14:00,008 --> 02:14:05,084 levels in all the other areas were really soft and subdued, even those public outdoor 1349 02:14:05,084 --> 02:14:11,077 areas. And so, I thought she did, they did an amazing job and very Good use of the 1350 02:14:11,077 --> 02:14:16,053 site. So I'd love to see this thing move forward and maybe they can just take a second 1351 02:14:16,053 --> 02:14:17,013 look at the. 1352 02:14:20,028 --> 02:14:27,002 Bright spot. I agree with that. I like how they. Take the materials, the original 1353 02:14:27,043 --> 02:14:33,095 lodge, modified them some, and I actually think the architectural forms actually 1354 02:14:33,095 --> 02:14:40,061 helped transition. The entry to Pennington Boulevard, and we have some pretty contemporary 1355 02:14:40,061 --> 02:14:45,096 houses at the entrance, and this helps, I think, blend things together nicely, so. 1356 02:14:46,069 --> 02:14:47,002 I like it. 1357 02:14:49,067 --> 02:14:54,086 I like your point of blending. I think it, it, it fits nicely into the neighborhood 1358 02:14:54,086 --> 02:15:00,014 and it softens some of the other houses that are around. And I think, I think the 1359 02:15:00,014 --> 02:15:04,058 design, I like the design. I'm a little concerned about the number of lights. We've 1360 02:15:04,058 --> 02:15:11,074 got 77 for 4 units where we just approved 26 for 15 units. So even though there's 1361 02:15:11,074 --> 02:15:15,005 outdoor kitchens, I think we could maybe, well, they're not gonna turn them on all 1362 02:15:15,005 --> 02:15:20,062 the time either, but I'd like to see them softened. That that's less than 20 lights 1363 02:15:20,062 --> 02:15:21,068 per unit. Come on. 1364 02:15:24,071 --> 02:15:30,083 That I, I share with you on that. I, I took a hard look at that. And it's It's amazing 1365 02:15:30,083 --> 02:15:36,011 how low the the level of light is for the amount of fixtures that they put there. 1366 02:15:36,048 --> 02:15:42,001 So it's gonna be very even keel and kind of the outer like band of that even better 1367 02:15:42,016 --> 02:15:47,031 it's not even gonna be that glowing. So yeah, I agree with Liz. Uh, I was concerned 1368 02:15:47,031 --> 02:15:53,092 and that's why I asked about. With all the lights be on at the same time, which that 1369 02:15:53,092 --> 02:16:00,036 seemed a bit overpowering, but they won't all be on, but they're reasonably at a 1370 02:16:00,036 --> 02:16:07,054 low level, so it won't look like something large lit up. I like the structure. 1371 02:16:08,081 --> 02:16:14,078 I liked it the first time I saw it. I think it's well done. I think care has been 1372 02:16:14,008 --> 02:16:21,056 given to try to look at the lighting and not have it feel too overwhelming. And so 1373 02:16:21,056 --> 02:16:23,096 I appreciate that. Thanks. 1374 02:16:27,069 --> 02:16:30,006 Dan, Ellen, could you put the people back on the screen, please? 1375 02:16:32,072 --> 02:16:38,043 Sorry, what do you wanna see? Our our members, oh, that would be here we go. 1376 02:16:41,088 --> 02:16:48,002 Uh, any comments? And emotions. Um, I would, I would, I have one comment. 1377 02:16:49,091 --> 02:16:54,099 First of all, beautiful design, Shane. Thank you. We miss you on the board. And um 1378 02:16:55,075 --> 02:17:01,062 Unless we've changed our requirements, I, I heard them mention that the Address monument 1379 02:17:01,099 --> 02:17:08,000 was cut out and lit from behind and We still do not allow that. Is that correct, 1380 02:17:08,009 --> 02:17:09,008 or have we changed that in the new lighting? 1381 02:17:13,098 --> 02:17:21,049 Anybody? Katie, is that detail that the LED is down, down or is it behind? Yeah, 1382 02:17:21,062 --> 02:17:26,008 so it's downlit, not backlit, Ellen. OK, great. All right, I thought she said backlit. 1383 02:17:27,002 --> 02:17:32,069 All right, so that, yeah, that's all I have. Oh, wait, one other thing, I, I know 1384 02:17:32,069 --> 02:17:40,032 that everybody who lives on that street is In construction for so many years. I don't 1385 02:17:40,032 --> 02:17:46,056 know if there's any way to try to expedite this building, but if the contractor could 1386 02:17:47,005 --> 02:17:49,068 have a fire lit under him, that would be great. 1387 02:17:54,058 --> 02:18:02,052 Um, thank you, Shane and team. Um, great design. I really like it. Um, love the materials. 1388 02:18:02,009 --> 02:18:09,039 Uh, the biggest concern I have is lighting. Um, number one, number of fixtures, even 1389 02:18:09,042 --> 02:18:16,081 on the inside of the, uh, patios and decks, but especially in the LCE, uh, deck area 1390 02:18:16,081 --> 02:18:24,037 which is And walks out to it, um, and then the deck on 6, or sorry, 1391 02:18:24,007 --> 02:18:31,008 unit 7, and the entry on unit 7, especially because of the uh How visible it 1392 02:18:31,008 --> 02:18:37,052 is from the um from Pennington Place Drive. Um, I think that one could be reduced 1393 02:18:37,052 --> 02:18:43,012 to 3 easily and still have good lighting at the entrance. Otherwise, I think it's 1394 02:18:43,012 --> 02:18:46,007 good. Thank you. That's on unit 7. 1395 02:18:48,018 --> 02:18:50,061 Unit 7, is that? Yeah, OK. 1396 02:18:59,025 --> 02:19:02,027 Anybody else? I'd like to make a motion. 1397 02:19:06,068 --> 02:19:07,075 You guys are tough today. 1398 02:19:14,098 --> 02:19:15,079 Great, thank you. 1399 02:19:19,034 --> 02:19:26,013 I move to approve the final architecture review for multi-family development located 1400 02:19:26,013 --> 02:19:33,055 at lot 726R-1. Uh, TBD Pennington Place 1401 02:19:33,084 --> 02:19:39,019 based on the evidence provided within the staff report of record dated September 1402 02:19:39,019 --> 02:19:46,099 21, 2026 with the following specific approvals as listed, uh, 1403 02:19:47,008 --> 02:19:55,007 the secondary curb cut and the lighting associated with outdoor living spaces and 1404 02:19:55,007 --> 02:20:00,002 with the following conditions. 1 through 6. 1405 02:20:05,004 --> 02:20:12,053 Great. We have a motion. Is there a second? Second, uh, any discussion, any changes, 1406 02:20:12,062 --> 02:20:20,037 any, can I ask for the, um, outdoor lighting to, for unit 7 entry to be 1407 02:20:20,037 --> 02:20:27,063 reduced to 3? Um, fixtures and the LCE terrace to be reduced to 1408 02:20:28,078 --> 02:20:29,096 7 fixtures 1409 02:20:33,096 --> 02:20:41,055 We all have to agree to that. Well, I can, OK, OK, and amending the 1410 02:20:41,055 --> 02:20:49,015 motion, uh, as Scott has suggested. OK, and I'll second that. Any further 1411 02:20:49,015 --> 02:20:50,011 discussion about this. 1412 02:20:52,045 --> 02:21:00,018 No. Great. I'll ask your vote. All in favor. All right, bye. Both of our voters 1413 02:21:00,018 --> 02:21:05,086 online have assented as well. Much appreciated. Thank you guys. Thank you all. Great 1414 02:21:05,086 --> 02:21:09,036 looking, great looking project. Thank you. 1415 02:21:17,008 --> 02:21:23,043 OK, before lunch, our next Mhm What's that? 1416 02:21:25,075 --> 02:21:30,084 Quick break. 2 minute break. OK. You better run No. 1417 02:21:34,028 --> 02:21:35,061 Nothing like a little. 1418 02:21:40,004 --> 02:21:46,003 Such a big deal. We're gonna start the stopwatch for you. I will be. 1419 02:22:16,006 --> 02:22:21,051 And I'd like to next agenda item. This is a review and recommendation to town council 1420 02:22:22,022 --> 02:22:28,003 regarding the renewal of a conditional use permit for the Walk of Joy food trailer 1421 02:22:28,006 --> 02:22:35,079 on Lot OS-3-XRR-1 Conference Center Plaza. This is 1422 02:22:35,079 --> 02:22:42,054 pursuant to CDC Section 17.4.14. Uh, does anybody have any conflict of interest or 1423 02:22:42,054 --> 02:22:47,071 ex parte discussions? If not, let's proceed. 1424 02:22:54,004 --> 02:22:57,026 Thank you, Chair. I'm gonna go ahead and present this one as well on behalf of Elise 1425 02:22:57,026 --> 02:23:02,003 who's out, but she did present, prepare the memo and presentation. So, this is a 1426 02:23:02,003 --> 02:23:09,058 conditional use permit uh renewal for lot OS 3XRR-1 Conference Center Plaza 1427 02:23:09,095 --> 02:23:16,000 for the Walk of Joy Food Truck. Um, the applicant is Jason Smith of the Walk of Joy. 1428 02:23:16,046 --> 02:23:20,004 I think everybody's familiar with the location here in the Village Center. Um, it's 1429 02:23:20,004 --> 02:23:26,033 it's on Village Center open space. Um, it's a food truck which is already existing. 1430 02:23:26,042 --> 02:23:30,097 This would just be a renewal of the existing conditional use permit. Um, and it's 1431 02:23:30,097 --> 02:23:34,006 in the conference Center Plaza, adjacent to the Pond Plaza, adjacent to the conference 1432 02:23:34,006 --> 02:23:41,041 Center, etc. Um, the location would remain the same, uh, over by 1433 02:23:41,041 --> 02:23:48,025 Communion Wine Bar with the option of moving it for special events, um, kind of in 1434 02:23:48,025 --> 02:23:50,021 the center of the conference center plaza. 1435 02:23:52,044 --> 02:23:57,015 Again, I think everybody's familiar with the Walk of Joy. It's been there for, I 1436 02:23:57,015 --> 02:24:04,012 guess, 3 years now and um it's successful once it continues, so it would be the same 1437 02:24:04,012 --> 02:24:09,096 setup. The only change is that uh staff is asking for a condition of approval to 1438 02:24:09,096 --> 02:24:15,094 install skirting around the base of the trailer to cover uh any visual impact of 1439 02:24:16,000 --> 02:24:21,044 storage underneath. That was a request from Uh, town staff just to clean up the area, 1440 02:24:21,065 --> 02:24:27,056 make it look a little um neater. And I believe the applicant is fine with this. 1441 02:24:30,051 --> 02:24:36,042 Um Yeah, not much to it. So, with that, um, we recommend approval for, uh, we recommend 1442 02:24:36,054 --> 02:24:41,049 that the uh DRB recommend to town council the approval of the conditional use permit 1443 02:24:41,049 --> 02:24:49,008 renewal for food truck, uh, on MOTOS 3XRR1, um, for 3 years expiring upon the 1444 02:24:49,008 --> 02:24:54,032 seasonal closure date of the gondola in fall 2029. That was specifically requested 1445 02:24:54,038 --> 02:25:02,003 by The applicant and the um I think it was Malian economic development so that they're 1446 02:25:02,003 --> 02:25:07,023 not coming in the middle of the season like they are now um based on the staff report 1447 02:25:07,023 --> 02:25:13,083 and with the following conditions and with with conditions, um, there's a few new 1448 02:25:13,083 --> 02:25:20,073 ones in here. Um, so, scheduling a building permit for all of the electrical, installing 1449 02:25:20,073 --> 02:25:25,093 the skirting which I discussed, um, compliance with fire code, renewal of the plaza 1450 02:25:25,093 --> 02:25:30,013 license which would be required regardless. Um, the other thing I want to point out 1451 02:25:30,013 --> 02:25:36,063 is, uh, future, uh, reapplications will be renewed at a staff level. Um, that's something 1452 02:25:36,089 --> 02:25:41,084 that, uh, we're introducing for this application just because, um, you know, after 1453 02:25:41,084 --> 02:25:46,076 two approvals of the condition use permit, assuming they want to come back in 2029, 1454 02:25:46,089 --> 02:25:51,096 we feel confident that staff can approve this. However, if there are new issues, 1455 02:25:52,025 --> 02:25:56,008 staff can always elevate it to DRB or be requested to elevate it by town council 1456 02:25:56,008 --> 02:26:02,006 or whomever, um, who has the jurisdiction to elevate that to, um, to review by DRB 1457 02:26:02,006 --> 02:26:08,091 and town council. Um, so with that, I'll take any questions. Thanks, Daniel. Questions. 1458 02:26:13,087 --> 02:26:18,095 If not, we will ask the applicant to make any presentation he'd like. 1459 02:26:22,093 --> 02:26:30,087 I think Daniel summed it up pretty well. Um, we wanna continue. As it is For at least 1460 02:26:30,087 --> 02:26:37,029 another 3 years. Um, yeah, it's been successful and the locals and tourists seem 1461 02:26:37,029 --> 02:26:43,000 to enjoy it, so I think it fulfills a role. Great, thank you. Uh, board, any question 1462 02:26:43,000 --> 02:26:43,085 for the applicant? 1463 02:26:47,035 --> 02:26:54,043 Nada, we don't have any public comment in our packets. Nobody online Great. I will, 1464 02:26:54,048 --> 02:26:56,009 uh, That's for emotion. 1465 02:27:01,038 --> 02:27:08,015 You want any, do you want any board deliberation or thoughts? Mr. Chairman, oh yeah, 1466 02:27:08,023 --> 02:27:08,086 I'm sorry. 1467 02:27:11,084 --> 02:27:16,015 Yeah, thoughts. I, I can tell you it's some of the best food in the Mountain Village 1468 02:27:16,015 --> 02:27:21,079 core and it's a critical, critical, it plays a critical role, uh, when we don't have 1469 02:27:21,079 --> 02:27:27,087 a lot of restaurant choices. So, um, so I think it's like a, a staple. I mean, I 1470 02:27:27,087 --> 02:27:32,096 will make a motion, um, I move to recommend approval to town council for the. Conditional 1471 02:27:32,096 --> 02:27:40,003 use permit renewal for a food truck at Lot OS 3XRR-1 owned by the town of Mountain 1472 02:27:40,003 --> 02:27:45,002 Village for a period of 3 years expiring upon the seasonal closure date of the gondola 1473 02:27:45,002 --> 02:27:51,028 in fall 2029 based on the evidence provided within the staff report of record dated 1474 02:27:51,053 --> 02:27:59,006 September 9, 2026 with the following conditions 1 through 5. 2nd, we have a second. 1475 02:27:59,066 --> 02:28:07,025 Any further discussion? Um, yes, a couple of thoughts. One, I want to go back to 1476 02:28:07,025 --> 02:28:12,096 something Toby said back in the August discussion when this issue came up of Telsky 1477 02:28:12,096 --> 02:28:17,027 wanting to use, wanting to put some administrative offices in some of the buildings, 1478 02:28:17,057 --> 02:28:21,016 and Toby made the very strong point, Wait a minute, we want to be using these buildings. 1479 02:28:21,025 --> 02:28:25,004 So when I first listened to the, uh, when I first reviewed this, I thought, why should 1480 02:28:25,004 --> 02:28:31,074 we allow a food truck? Why don't we have the Activity inside one of the buildings. 1481 02:28:31,083 --> 02:28:37,005 Well, now I understand, uh, there's some personal issues, there's some economic issues, 1482 02:28:37,095 --> 02:28:43,058 so I absolutely support a 3 year extension at the same time I have two qualifications. 1483 02:28:43,071 --> 02:28:48,009 Qualification number 1, I think at the end of 3 years, let's hope the Four Seasons 1484 02:28:48,009 --> 02:28:54,082 development is functional. And we should have a broader review of that conference 1485 02:28:54,082 --> 02:29:00,039 center area, which to me is still a dead area and it and it really could be upgraded. 1486 02:29:00,074 --> 02:29:08,055 0.1. 0.2 I don't agree with the idea of putting skirting around what's clearly 1487 02:29:08,055 --> 02:29:14,004 a, a trailer. I mean, so why are we forcing them to do that now if we want to say. 1488 02:29:14,093 --> 02:29:19,086 Please don't have any trash, immediately obvious. That's another thing, but it just 1489 02:29:19,088 --> 02:29:24,039 seems to me you're putting lipstick on a pig to say, we want skirting on the thing. 1490 02:29:24,052 --> 02:29:26,063 So those are my two comments. Thank you. 1491 02:29:28,068 --> 02:29:32,063 And I would uh differ on both points. I think the skirting actually is good and it's 1492 02:29:32,063 --> 02:29:39,057 uh nice for the community not to see what's under the trailer and I think it brings 1493 02:29:39,057 --> 02:29:46,033 so much vitality being outside, not in some hole in some building that has been really, 1494 02:29:46,043 --> 02:29:52,095 really important to the community. Uh, to have things going on outside that you can 1495 02:29:52,095 --> 02:30:00,009 see and interact with. I, I think I appreciate Jim's forceful, um, opinion issue. 1496 02:30:01,012 --> 02:30:06,018 I would counter with it's, um, I know that they have an incredibly constrained operating 1497 02:30:06,018 --> 02:30:11,043 space and so storing some stuff under their trailer is really, you know, that's their 1498 02:30:11,043 --> 02:30:17,043 storage area and I do think it's probably better to see the the uniform skirting 1499 02:30:17,043 --> 02:30:23,068 than, you know. Detris and junk underneath the trailer. So unless it's a real burden 1500 02:30:23,068 --> 02:30:28,083 to the applicant, I think we should just go for it. Does anybody want to like specify 1501 02:30:28,083 --> 02:30:32,068 what color it is? Like it should be reggae colors or just black or? 1502 02:30:38,026 --> 02:30:46,008 Owner's discretion. OK. Uh, any other comments? Conditions changes. If not, I'll 1503 02:30:46,008 --> 02:30:53,094 ask for a vote. All in favor. A pose Great motion carries. Thank you. Good luck. 1504 02:30:54,015 --> 02:31:00,011 Thanks for being there. You didn't get Ellen in, no. I did. Yeah, but I acknowledged 1505 02:31:00,065 --> 02:31:03,095 video wise. Yeah 1506 02:31:06,003 --> 02:31:13,045 So we can follow. OK. Uh, our next agenda item is lunch. So Ellen and Jim. 1507 02:31:18,028 --> 02:31:18,054 Right. 1508 02:31:24,024 --> 02:31:26,041 Again, again. 1509 02:31:28,056 --> 02:31:28,057 Um 1510 02:31:31,055 --> 02:31:36,058 And I encourage you to just go to that recording that you can capture and listen 1511 02:31:36,058 --> 02:31:41,049 to one of our meetings one time at a vote to see that to see why some of the work. 1512 02:31:44,055 --> 02:31:48,039 Yeah. We all think we're gonna be doing Yeah 1513 02:31:53,079 --> 02:32:00,009 OK, ready? Are we gonna keep going? Yeah, so, so, um, Soren is coming back with lunch. 1514 02:32:01,041 --> 02:32:05,081 But she's also presenting the next case, so why don't we just, can we, I think she 1515 02:32:05,081 --> 02:32:10,068 should be here soon. She said she was on her way 15 minutes ago, so it's should only 1516 02:32:10,068 --> 02:32:16,017 take 15 minutes even from town. Um, what do you think? Take a break for lunch. Yeah, 1517 02:32:16,026 --> 02:32:19,089 let's take a break for lunch. Hopefully she's here in a few minutes and then we'll 1518 02:32:19,089 --> 02:32:26,077 do lunch and she's presenting the next case. Or do we wanna go to the uh Um 1519 02:32:28,011 --> 02:32:31,021 Announcements and um oh yeah GRB schedule. 1520 02:32:35,024 --> 02:32:37,075 We don't have food yet. Give you guys. 1521 02:32:40,003 --> 02:32:41,004 We can do that. 1522 02:32:44,005 --> 02:32:45,092 Let me just pull it up. Sorry, I wasn't prepared. 1523 02:32:54,021 --> 02:32:55,064 I'm not even in the zoom, am I? 1524 02:32:57,084 --> 02:32:59,066 I was gonna do all this at lunch, you guys. 1525 02:33:05,029 --> 02:33:08,053 I've gotten a, you know, I have all these amazing planners to do all the presentations 1526 02:33:08,053 --> 02:33:11,008 and I've gotten a little lazy, um. 1527 02:33:14,062 --> 02:33:22,037 Wait, before you start. Then we go to item number 10. And I would make a motion to 1528 02:33:22,037 --> 02:33:28,089 continue this, uh, that final architectural review for, uh, single-family home at 1529 02:33:28,089 --> 02:33:35,079 Lot 224B TBD Snowdrift. Swift Lane to the December 3, 1530 02:33:35,092 --> 02:33:39,067 2026 DOV meeting. A second. 1531 02:33:41,086 --> 02:33:49,075 The spot in the December. Yep. Yes, we do. OK. We have the motion we have to 1532 02:33:49,075 --> 02:33:54,072 second any further discussion. Um, and I'll just mention also on that I believe because 1533 02:33:54,076 --> 02:33:59,052 that case has been around for a while, they actually have to have a decision by December 1534 02:33:59,052 --> 02:34:03,061 in order to meet their, um, the code requirement that it's approved within a year 1535 02:34:03,061 --> 02:34:08,041 or not approved, but, uh, um, there's a decision within a year. Is that our issue? 1536 02:34:09,061 --> 02:34:13,068 It's, I'm just saying that there's, there's really no choice if in terms of when 1537 02:34:13,068 --> 02:34:19,061 it can go. OK, so they will be, they will be here on that agenda today. All right, 1538 02:34:19,078 --> 02:34:25,042 I wave motion. All in favor. Aye, aye, aye, can I see the people online, please? 1539 02:34:28,000 --> 02:34:33,008 Online folks, can you please say affirmatively thumbs up and Ellen thumbs up not 1540 02:34:33,011 --> 02:34:36,095 just because we don't always see you. Please don't interrupt. Yes, sorry. 1541 02:34:39,003 --> 02:34:44,012 Yes, we, I affirm it. I support it. Thank you guys 1542 02:34:47,006 --> 02:34:48,065 The number 11 1543 02:34:54,082 --> 02:35:00,081 So, that one is actually being requested to be tabled. Um, because it's several months 1544 02:35:00,081 --> 02:35:06,069 in the future, uh, we felt that a continuance wasn't, uh, maybe the best choice here 1545 02:35:06,069 --> 02:35:12,022 and we, they would actually table it and re-notice. Because, um, again, because it's 1546 02:35:12,022 --> 02:35:17,037 so far in the future. Would you differentiate tabling versus continuing? Of course, 1547 02:35:17,046 --> 02:35:22,029 um, so, uh, continuing is, uh, the, the main difference is for tabling you have to 1548 02:35:22,029 --> 02:35:29,045 re-notice. So a continuance is just saying, um, this notice applies to whatever feature. 1549 02:35:29,089 --> 02:35:36,008 Uh, version of, of feature hearing of that item, uh, versus the tabling is, uh, they, 1550 02:35:36,013 --> 02:35:40,036 they would have to re-notice, so it's kind of like putting it away, taking. OK, great, 1551 02:35:40,042 --> 02:35:47,078 thank you for that. OK, uh, need a motion on that? I'd like to make a motion to for. 1552 02:35:48,051 --> 02:35:56,046 The single-family home on lot 1171R. Uh, TBD San Joaquin Road are sent to 1553 02:35:56,046 --> 02:36:03,038 CDC section 174.11 that this is, uh, tabled. 1554 02:36:04,045 --> 02:36:10,048 To the February 4th, 2027 design review board meeting. Great, thank you. This is 1555 02:36:10,048 --> 02:36:18,034 her second. I'll, I'll 2nd. We're with a 2nd. Any further discussion? Uh, if not, 1556 02:36:18,039 --> 02:36:20,001 I'll also vote. All in favor. 1557 02:36:22,004 --> 02:36:29,015 Let me acknowledge that Ellen Kramer and Jim Osniff both voted online in the 1558 02:36:29,015 --> 02:36:30,007 affirmative. 1559 02:36:33,004 --> 02:36:38,052 Now we can do the lighting All right, are you guys ready? Ready. 1560 02:37:00,049 --> 02:37:02,032 Why isn't it letting me click share? 1561 02:37:13,051 --> 02:37:21,015 OK. OK. So, um, I just wanted to kind of do a broad overview of the code, the, 1562 02:37:21,028 --> 02:37:28,006 the final lighting code as adopted. Um, You know, we obviously worked on it for a 1563 02:37:28,006 --> 02:37:34,072 really long time and I appreciate all of your diligence on that work. And, um, I 1564 02:37:34,072 --> 02:37:38,056 also understand the position of council where they were hearing from residents that 1565 02:37:38,056 --> 02:37:44,034 they felt like the code as, you know, as recommended by the design review board was 1566 02:37:44,048 --> 02:37:49,026 Going to be a burden on our applicants and so I just wanted to kind of go through, 1567 02:37:49,032 --> 02:37:53,059 you know, some wins that we had with this code and then some some other things that 1568 02:37:53,059 --> 02:38:00,055 you know that may have changed um and and not have come through the way DRB originally 1569 02:38:00,055 --> 02:38:07,021 intended for it to um. I'm happy to go through certain sections of the code if you 1570 02:38:07,021 --> 02:38:10,069 know if you guys have questions on that or we can schedule another work session to 1571 02:38:10,069 --> 02:38:17,057 do so but um overall I do think that for new construction this code really represents 1572 02:38:17,057 --> 02:38:22,081 a a big step forward for the town we've cleaned up a lot of things um we've, you 1573 02:38:22,081 --> 02:38:26,074 know, brought lighting down levels we've put some sort of restrictions on that soffit 1574 02:38:26,074 --> 02:38:33,097 lighting, etc. um, the changes that the council made generally related to. The compliance 1575 02:38:33,097 --> 02:38:40,008 on existing structures um and so I'll just kind of run through but basically for 1576 02:38:40,003 --> 02:38:44,085 you know for new construction we've cleaned up you know the definition of architectural 1577 02:38:44,085 --> 02:38:50,089 lighting um a definition of outdoor living spaces and the the very specific requirement 1578 02:38:50,089 --> 02:38:56,077 that DRB review those outdoor light living spaces um we did this is a little different 1579 02:38:56,077 --> 02:39:03,057 from the way it went through um DRB but we did allow for. Motion activated lighting 1580 02:39:03,088 --> 02:39:09,099 in um primary entrance pathways and primary entrances and previously the code was 1581 02:39:09,099 --> 02:39:13,095 silent so I still consider this a win. I think it's a safety issue. People can have 1582 02:39:13,095 --> 02:39:17,007 a light to their front door, but they can't have motion activated lighting all around 1583 02:39:17,072 --> 02:39:22,096 their property, um. Um, clarity, you know, just sort of clarity on the prohibition 1584 02:39:23,013 --> 02:39:29,023 and the definition of landscape lighting, um, that uplighting in trees, the, um, 1585 02:39:30,031 --> 02:39:34,049 Prohibition of the illumination of glass. Balustrades which again the code previously 1586 02:39:34,049 --> 02:39:39,093 was silent on but we have prohibited in in a number of cases um so now we have that 1587 02:39:39,093 --> 02:39:45,013 in in writing um and then this is this is a big one and this is the one that we are 1588 02:39:45,013 --> 02:39:50,001 focusing on right now which is the seasonal lighting restrictions so um so this is 1589 02:39:50,001 --> 02:39:56,037 a huge change in our code. And just to let the board know, you know, I'm not, I'm 1590 02:39:56,037 --> 02:40:01,089 not asking staff to go out there and do a huge compliance on this right now. I think 1591 02:40:01,089 --> 02:40:06,037 we need to do a lot of education with our community around this. Um, we're starting, 1592 02:40:06,042 --> 02:40:10,049 we're gonna send, uh, you know, we're starting with newsletters, flyers, etc. and 1593 02:40:10,049 --> 02:40:16,045 then come spring, you know, come, you know, February, March, um, when people still 1594 02:40:16,045 --> 02:40:20,005 have their seasonal lighting up is when we're gonna start kind of lightly doing some 1595 02:40:20,005 --> 02:40:24,069 compliance work on that. Um, but that feels like a big win to me. I think that the 1596 02:40:24,069 --> 02:40:30,092 timers from 10:00 p.m. to 6 a.m. is just gonna be unbelievably, um, obvious and, 1597 02:40:30,094 --> 02:40:35,013 and different from the way that we've traditionally lit. Um, just as a reminder, 1598 02:40:35,042 --> 02:40:39,049 the seasonal lighting does not apply to the town installed lighting on our road right 1599 02:40:39,049 --> 02:40:45,029 of ways and in our plazas, and partially that's because we don't have a comprehensive 1600 02:40:45,029 --> 02:40:49,073 lighting plan outside of that. So if we removed that, there would be some safety 1601 02:40:49,073 --> 02:40:55,068 issues in terms of. Uh, finding street lights, you know, etc. So, um, you know, when 1602 02:40:55,068 --> 02:41:01,000 we have talked about doing upgrades to the town of Mountain Village entrance and 1603 02:41:01,000 --> 02:41:04,004 those kinds of things, we will make sure that lighting is part of that discussion, 1604 02:41:04,049 --> 02:41:09,048 but for now, it does feel important to me that we keep that lighting scenario. Um. 1605 02:41:10,054 --> 02:41:16,005 We added a table which kind of is a nice resource for our applicants to find, uh, 1606 02:41:16,001 --> 02:41:21,093 you know, one stop shop at different fixture types and the a level the um. The various 1607 02:41:21,093 --> 02:41:27,005 limits on those, um, we have prohibited dimming control as a means to control lumen 1608 02:41:27,005 --> 02:41:31,063 output. Obviously this is just a new construction. There are gonna be a number of 1609 02:41:31,063 --> 02:41:38,005 old, you know, uh, previous installations of those prior to when it was easy to find 1610 02:41:38,005 --> 02:41:42,092 those fixtures that met our lumen capacities, um, but those ultimately as they get 1611 02:41:42,092 --> 02:41:48,004 replaced would have to come into compliance with the new code, um. We did clarify 1612 02:41:48,042 --> 02:41:54,029 in the old code, the uh parking area lighting was only discussed as it related to 1613 02:41:54,029 --> 02:41:58,041 parking garages, which doesn't make sense. So we did actually add some language in 1614 02:41:58,041 --> 02:42:04,027 there that does require some level of parking area lighting on multi-family um parking 1615 02:42:04,038 --> 02:42:12,035 surface parking lots. Um, uh, allows wall-mounted fixtures above the garage in 1616 02:42:12,037 --> 02:42:16,092 a little greater height than the previous allowed 7 ft. Um, and this is just, you 1617 02:42:16,092 --> 02:42:21,047 know, used primarily in cases where it's, there is not a great location for, uh, 1618 02:42:21,073 --> 02:42:26,024 wall-mounted sconce next to a garage, and if you can put it over the garage door, 1619 02:42:26,026 --> 02:42:32,021 in some cases, that's a more elegant solution. Um. The soffit lighting, the restriction, 1620 02:42:32,005 --> 02:42:38,016 I think when we left from DRB it might have been at that 10 ft level and based on 1621 02:42:38,018 --> 02:42:44,015 some comments from lighting designers as well as kind of the um The desire of town 1622 02:42:44,015 --> 02:42:50,043 council, we did up that limit a little bit to 12 ft. Um, it better defines what a 1623 02:42:50,043 --> 02:42:56,087 qualified lighting designer is. Um, we had just clarifying that we need that, uh, 1624 02:42:56,095 --> 02:43:01,006 the submittal of full size specification sheets for fixtures so we can, so we don't 1625 02:43:01,006 --> 02:43:06,002 have to continually go back to applicants and ask for that. Um, we've got some other 1626 02:43:06,002 --> 02:43:11,002 clarifications regarding the submittal requirements and, um, and I think another 1627 02:43:11,002 --> 02:43:16,018 really big win here is to show fixtures on those exterior elevations. It was interesting 1628 02:43:16,018 --> 02:43:21,028 the. Presentation that we just saw Katie actually, you know, she wasn't a um a picture 1629 02:43:21,028 --> 02:43:24,072 of the fixture itself which doesn't need to be, but I think for the board to be able 1630 02:43:24,072 --> 02:43:30,052 to to understand in an elevation view where fixtures are located and she went above 1631 02:43:30,052 --> 02:43:35,056 and beyond because she showed the interior fixtures on those decks. So, um, that 1632 02:43:35,056 --> 02:43:41,008 was a great, you know, sort of exercise in getting ahead of the code there, um. The, 1633 02:43:42,043 --> 02:43:47,096 the, uh, let's see where are we at, um, AGI studies, so we're, we're gonna be requiring 1634 02:43:47,099 --> 02:43:53,018 AGI studies for projects anything that has 25 or more fixtures, anything that exceeds 1635 02:43:53,018 --> 02:43:57,086 5000 square feet, and any commercial application. Lighting is gonna require that 1636 02:43:57,086 --> 02:44:03,007 AGI study. There is kind of a carve out there obviously that um that I can make a 1637 02:44:03,007 --> 02:44:07,004 decision that that AGI study isn't required. Let's say a commercial project is just, 1638 02:44:07,006 --> 02:44:12,027 you know, replacing a fixture or two. We're not gonna require an AGI study on that, 1639 02:44:12,068 --> 02:44:17,045 um. And then this is something that we had missed actually when it went through the 1640 02:44:17,045 --> 02:44:22,059 DRB but uh realized that it wasn't clear that someone might be able to make a case 1641 02:44:22,059 --> 02:44:25,092 that because they had the lights in the trees before this ordinance went into effect 1642 02:44:26,012 --> 02:44:30,046 that they didn't have to come into compliance for 5 years so we added a section around 1643 02:44:30,048 --> 02:44:37,007 that um. I was, I, I, I've, I've been through so many arguments with, with, with, 1644 02:44:37,078 --> 02:44:42,041 um, some owners around, you know, gray area that I started to get really clear on 1645 02:44:42,041 --> 02:44:47,056 some things, um, and then we did make some informed edits, uh, some of those were 1646 02:44:47,056 --> 02:44:52,036 just sort of cleaning up language because in my mind the language made perfect sense, 1647 02:44:52,042 --> 02:44:56,056 but maybe to some of our lighting designers, Katie being an example, um, she said, 1648 02:44:56,058 --> 02:44:59,049 I don't know, you know, I don't exactly understand what this means, so we just made 1649 02:44:59,049 --> 02:45:04,097 some sort of clerical and it's there, um. But then we did go ahead and we did increase 1650 02:45:04,097 --> 02:45:10,047 the lumen allowed on that uh lighting fixture with the glass element below a 90 degree 1651 02:45:10,086 --> 02:45:16,009 and um I can explain that a little bit. So Katie sent me a whole book full of, of 1652 02:45:16,009 --> 02:45:21,028 lighting um fixtures that are typical that, you know, that. You know, from typical 1653 02:45:21,003 --> 02:45:27,057 companies, etc. and they were just above that 350 lumen mark and so since we're already 1654 02:45:27,057 --> 02:45:32,033 restricting it just to the primary entrance, um, it felt like that was a reasonable 1655 02:45:32,033 --> 02:45:38,054 give on that fixture so that did get bumped up, um. And We cleaned up the language 1656 02:45:38,054 --> 02:45:44,038 again around the height above grade and then this was an additional edit about surface 1657 02:45:44,038 --> 02:45:50,098 mounted step lights um for new construction requires specific approval and for existing 1658 02:45:50,098 --> 02:45:56,046 contract construction are approvable by staff and so the the reason for this is that 1659 02:45:56,046 --> 02:46:01,001 I. I think the intent with these, you know, kind of step lights is in, in a lot of 1660 02:46:01,001 --> 02:46:08,014 cases we would prefer that recessed, um, fixture and, and or not, but there's, there's 1661 02:46:08,014 --> 02:46:12,065 some really bad surface mounted fixtures out there, so I shouldn't say bad, maybe 1662 02:46:12,065 --> 02:46:20,025 not, not aesthetically pleasing. So, so, um, I wanted to 1663 02:46:20,025 --> 02:46:24,057 basically say that, hey, if we're looking at a surface-mounted fixture, let's make 1664 02:46:24,057 --> 02:46:28,073 sure that the board takes a good look at it and it's, and it's a decent fixture and 1665 02:46:28,073 --> 02:46:34,044 it's high quality. Um, in a, in a, um, compliance issue where we're retrofitting, 1666 02:46:34,066 --> 02:46:42,057 it's a little more difficult to, you know, to, to replace fixtures. If they're interior 1667 02:46:42,057 --> 02:46:47,002 mounted, etc. when you're, you know, a 20 year old project and the wiring's gone 1668 02:46:47,002 --> 02:46:50,009 bad, etc. it might be a case where we want to look at an exterior mounted fixture 1669 02:46:51,006 --> 02:46:57,052 and giving staff the authority to do so, um. So then there was some compromise at 1670 02:46:57,052 --> 02:47:05,044 the very last hearing where, um, you know, the, the biggest Issues seem to 1671 02:47:05,044 --> 02:47:12,069 be the financial burden on homeowners who have extensive soffit lighting and 1672 02:47:12,069 --> 02:47:18,097 extensive wall-mounted fixtures that would need to be replaced and so the council 1673 02:47:18,097 --> 02:47:26,008 did um want to exclude existing recess soffit lighting where it was 1674 02:47:26,086 --> 02:47:34,063 under a deck or under a roof, um. And then the wall mounted fixtures, 1675 02:47:34,076 --> 02:47:40,011 they did not want those to have to be replaced if they were under 850 lumens, and 1676 02:47:40,011 --> 02:47:41,078 if they did not, um, 1677 02:47:44,000 --> 02:47:47,019 It might, I, I have to check the language on that. It might have been if it's under 1678 02:47:47,019 --> 02:47:53,074 850 women and doesn't cross the property boundaries. Um, and then I just wanted to 1679 02:47:53,074 --> 02:47:58,094 review a little bit because I can't remember if this was in your version or not. 1680 02:47:59,002 --> 02:48:04,038 Uh, maybe someone can correct me. We, did we have the lighting, the lighting variants 1681 02:48:04,038 --> 02:48:06,094 as part of it when you, when you all reviewed it? 1682 02:48:09,008 --> 02:48:12,082 So, I think we did, I think we did at the end because I think it was a requirement 1683 02:48:12,082 --> 02:48:19,078 of the town attorney, um, but that also got tweaked a little bit as well where, um, 1684 02:48:20,019 --> 02:48:28,019 the, the council did not want, you know, 20 applications a year to come to 1685 02:48:28,019 --> 02:48:32,095 council for lighting variants. They wanted to give the ability for staff to approve 1686 02:48:32,095 --> 02:48:37,078 some of these lighting variances at a staff level. Um, I had suggested. 3 fixtures 1687 02:48:37,078 --> 02:48:43,038 or less they bumped it up to 10 so that's the way it is now and I guess there is 1688 02:48:43,038 --> 02:48:48,089 an out on staff and that if we can't determine that the following criteria has been 1689 02:48:48,089 --> 02:48:53,074 met we can then elevate it but at least it gives us an opportunity to work with the 1690 02:48:53,074 --> 02:48:58,036 homeowner and we will, we will work with them we're not gonna just. Give blanket 1691 02:48:58,036 --> 02:49:03,032 variances. Did you try to the best of your ability to meet this code? You know, here 1692 02:49:03,032 --> 02:49:06,067 are some solutions. What, you know, can you do this? Can you do this? Can you do 1693 02:49:06,067 --> 02:49:10,024 this? Can you do this? When we get to a point where they say we can't do anymore 1694 02:49:10,004 --> 02:49:14,022 and there's still existing pictures that aren't in compliance, then we decide whether 1695 02:49:14,024 --> 02:49:16,099 we're comfortable approving that at a staff level or if we're gonna bump it up to 1696 02:49:16,099 --> 02:49:22,063 town council. So With that, any questions? 1697 02:49:38,002 --> 02:49:41,046 That it's already in the table. It's, yeah, it, it's, yup. 1698 02:50:02,051 --> 02:50:07,037 Uh, it's flipping me right now. Amy, I, I know you're gonna, you're going slow on 1699 02:50:07,037 --> 02:50:12,061 the seasonal, um, like draconian enforcement, but are you gonna notify people like 1700 02:50:12,061 --> 02:50:16,044 in the Mountain Village Newsletter or something like that, hey, heads up this winter? 1701 02:50:16,068 --> 02:50:20,045 Yeah, so we have a mailer coming out hopefully in the next week or two as people 1702 02:50:20,045 --> 02:50:24,034 are putting their seasonal lighting in with a really heavy recommendation to obviously 1703 02:50:24,034 --> 02:50:28,021 put those also on a timer so that they don't have to manually turn them off every 1704 02:50:28,021 --> 02:50:32,008 night. Um, and then it'll be going out, it's going out as a press release. We'll 1705 02:50:32,008 --> 02:50:37,024 be putting it in the newsletter. We'll be kind of continuing. We'll do another batch 1706 02:50:37,024 --> 02:50:42,068 of that as we get close to the end of the, um, seasonal period as well. Kevin, you 1707 02:50:42,068 --> 02:50:46,085 actually hit on what I was thinking about. Uh, I've had clients that put them onto 1708 02:50:46,085 --> 02:50:52,058 their lighting control system. And it's on complete cruise control. So I think the 1709 02:50:52,058 --> 02:50:57,054 earlier we can communicate that because uh on those old like touch and neutron systems 1710 02:50:57,054 --> 02:51:03,078 and some of those, um, not only do you have a clock function, you also have a calendar 1711 02:51:03,078 --> 02:51:08,079 function. If they engage their lighting programmers early enough, so they can get 1712 02:51:08,079 --> 02:51:16,073 that criteria built in. Great. Just one other comment, um. You know, the, the, the 1713 02:51:16,073 --> 02:51:21,049 existing folks with older homes and a lot of non-compliant lights and things like 1714 02:51:21,049 --> 02:51:26,085 that, a way and you're trying to be, you know, navigate that, that, you know, that 1715 02:51:26,085 --> 02:51:32,021 whole experience for them. You could have it though where you're accommodating but 1716 02:51:32,021 --> 02:51:38,033 upon the sale of the property, um, it, it needs to be rectified and you, you know. 1717 02:51:38,054 --> 02:51:42,077 There's, you can use a device, you know, like an escrow or something like that from 1718 02:51:42,077 --> 02:51:48,065 a sale that's where it, it happens, you know, subject to the sale of the property 1719 02:51:48,065 --> 02:51:52,057 because that's when, you know, a lot of money is exchanging hands and people feel 1720 02:51:52,057 --> 02:51:56,073 a little more flush on their way out. So something to think about. Yeah, I mean that's 1721 02:51:56,073 --> 02:52:00,038 something that we could certainly bring forward as a further amendment. It was not, 1722 02:52:00,044 --> 02:52:06,053 um, we were sort of, it was, it was, this was, this was an attempt to get something 1723 02:52:06,053 --> 02:52:12,069 passed versus nothing. Um, and yeah, there can, obviously the code is, is elastic 1724 02:52:12,069 --> 02:52:17,055 and can always be looked at further, you know, down the road when, when maybe people 1725 02:52:17,055 --> 02:52:22,041 see how impactful the current version is. I mean I would say that, you know, there 1726 02:52:22,041 --> 02:52:27,011 are some things within the compliance. That still are gonna be really great so you 1727 02:52:27,011 --> 02:52:34,099 know for example in 5 years there's a number of folks that have um you know their 1728 02:52:34,099 --> 02:52:38,095 driveways lit up like it's the airport kind of a thing and those those will have 1729 02:52:38,095 --> 02:52:42,007 to be turned off so I know it's hard to wait 5 years but. 1730 02:52:45,029 --> 02:52:50,028 When is, I, I was just actually downloading the CDC off the website just to see if 1731 02:52:50,028 --> 02:52:56,036 it was there. Yep, so it's not there. It's, you have to, um, it's, it's was it linked 1732 02:52:56,036 --> 02:52:59,099 in my memo? I can send it to all of you. It's separately on the website. It's not 1733 02:53:00,009 --> 02:53:05,022 within the. The uh code consulting version, the online version, it takes them a while 1734 02:53:05,022 --> 02:53:10,072 to get through it. So we have it on the website, but it's not um correct in the, 1735 02:53:10,083 --> 02:53:18,038 in the full CDC. It's on the planning page under lighting regulation. So also all 1736 02:53:18,038 --> 02:53:22,062 the adopted ordinances are in the uh archive center of the website and that's where 1737 02:53:22,062 --> 02:53:26,007 you can find it. But they, they do eventually meld them into this, the total. Yeah, 1738 02:53:26,075 --> 02:53:32,006 it just takes a little bit of time. Uh, just thinking for applicants that benefit, 1739 02:53:32,073 --> 02:53:33,004 yeah. 1740 02:53:36,038 --> 02:53:41,084 Any other questions? No, but I will say that that. In so many ways makes things easier 1741 02:53:41,084 --> 02:53:46,064 for us. It really does. Yeah, I feel a little terrifying. 1742 02:53:49,017 --> 02:53:52,032 Yeah, I'm sure we'll clean it up again, but it was a, it was a good, it was a good 1743 02:53:52,032 --> 02:53:59,000 effort. OK, um, let's take a break. Everybody can get their lunch and if the next 1744 02:53:59,000 --> 02:54:06,051 applicant's comfortable with us eating during their. Great, thanks, thanks. I have 1745 02:54:06,051 --> 02:54:13,012 a question. I have a question. Amy, two things. One, with the seasonal lighting, 1746 02:54:13,017 --> 02:54:19,033 I see it says that there's an additional 2-week period. What does that mean? Um, 1747 02:54:20,001 --> 02:54:25,004 for the sake of equity because not everybody celebrates, you know, the typical winter 1748 02:54:25,042 --> 02:54:29,093 holidays, and there are, there were folks on council that felt strongly that we needed 1749 02:54:29,093 --> 02:54:34,087 to. Include other holidays that fell outside of that zone. You can put up holiday 1750 02:54:34,087 --> 02:54:37,095 lights for two weeks. You can for. 1751 02:54:40,054 --> 02:54:42,008 I, I mean, I'm not gonna ask you what your holiday is. 1752 02:54:44,035 --> 02:54:47,082 So like if you wanted to put up red, white, and blue lights for 4th of July, you 1753 02:54:47,082 --> 02:54:51,082 could do it for 2 weeks. Correct. If you want to hang up Halloween lights, you can 1754 02:54:51,082 --> 02:54:59,002 do it for 2 weeks. OK, yeah. OK. And then the other question is, because I am 1755 02:54:59,035 --> 02:55:05,049 visual, uh, I'm not sure that I quite understand the glass element of a sconce below 1756 02:55:05,049 --> 02:55:10,046 90 degree cutoff. Do you have a picture of what that means? I have provided it in 1757 02:55:10,046 --> 02:55:16,002 the past. I don't, um, I can send you one, Ellen, but it's that decorative sconce 1758 02:55:16,002 --> 02:55:21,091 where the bulb is up inside the casing. But the glass projects and what happens is, 1759 02:55:21,093 --> 02:55:28,074 is the bulb illuminates the glass itself as if it is a bulb, right? So it's that, 1760 02:55:28,008 --> 02:55:33,055 um, I, I'll send you an example after the meeting. We, we, I did have it when we 1761 02:55:33,055 --> 02:55:37,035 were originally going through those lighting changes. I don't have it prepared today. 1762 02:55:37,084 --> 02:55:43,006 So those are allowed or they're not allowed. They are allowed at a primary entrance 1763 02:55:43,008 --> 02:55:50,009 only. Um, and that needs to be 450 lumens or below. And again, that's if the the 1764 02:55:50,009 --> 02:55:55,004 actual bulb, you can't see it. You can't see the bulb, you can only see the glass, 1765 02:55:55,018 --> 02:56:00,017 but the glass does illuminate a little bit. It has a glow to it. But if you can see 1766 02:56:00,017 --> 02:56:06,019 the bulb, you can't have that at all. Exactly. OK, so we'll make an exception for 1767 02:56:06,019 --> 02:56:13,005 when you can't see the bulb even though the glass is being. Lanterned on, right. 1768 02:56:13,072 --> 02:56:18,058 OK. Yeah, because in the past we've, you know, we've sort of, we have a working interpretation 1769 02:56:18,083 --> 02:56:24,038 that those were, you know, not full cutoff. When you look at Dark Sky International, 1770 02:56:24,043 --> 02:56:29,001 etc. they will call that fixture dark, you know, dark sky cutoff. What we didn't 1771 02:56:29,001 --> 02:56:31,094 want to see is I didn't want to see those all the way around the building because 1772 02:56:31,094 --> 02:56:37,002 it will look just like light bulbs from far away. Um, but it does make sense. People 1773 02:56:37,002 --> 02:56:41,037 love those fixtures at a primary entrance, and it sort of, you know, brings people 1774 02:56:41,039 --> 02:56:47,019 to the primary entrance of a property, so. And historically, thank you. We had those 1775 02:56:47,067 --> 02:56:50,066 with opaque and a 40 watt bulb. Yeah. 1776 02:56:53,055 --> 02:56:54,047 All right, all good. 1777 02:56:57,054 --> 02:57:02,085 If so, we, we will break for lunch and then reconvene in 5 minutes for our next agenda 1778 02:57:02,085 --> 02:57:03,025 item. 1779 02:57:13,006 --> 02:57:21,002 Pursuant to the DC section. Excuse me. 173 14. May I ask, 1780 02:57:21,025 --> 02:57:26,012 is there any conflict of interest or ex parte discussion? Uh, Mr. Chair, I have a 1781 02:57:26,012 --> 02:57:34,006 conflict of interest as a partner in Proset construction and But it's uh presenting 1782 02:57:34,006 --> 02:57:35,000 here, so. 1783 02:57:37,033 --> 02:57:41,006 Great. Thank you so much for that. Well we can move on with The 1784 02:57:46,014 --> 02:57:52,097 Yeah, thank you, Chair Bing Chair Brown. Um, I'm going to be presenting on a specific 1785 02:57:52,097 --> 02:57:57,009 approval for General Easeman encroachments at Lot 220B, 113 Palmyra Drive. 1786 02:57:59,034 --> 02:58:06,072 Yes. 00, sorry. Here, I'll go back. That was my, my first slide. Um, right, this 1787 02:58:06,072 --> 02:58:11,034 application is from Ben Elliott of Proset Construction, um, and the owner of the 1788 02:58:11,034 --> 02:58:17,042 property is 113 Palmyra LLC. Um, the property is currently under construction as 1789 02:58:17,042 --> 02:58:22,042 a single-family residence and it is zoned as a single-family. Um, the application 1790 02:58:22,042 --> 02:58:27,036 is for general easement encroachments on the east and north side of the lot. Um, 1791 02:58:27,045 --> 02:58:34,087 it's a 0.62 acre lot that's 29,700 square feet, and its gross square footage is 8,414 1792 02:58:34,087 --> 02:58:40,098 square feet. Um, the adjacent land uses, um, to the north, south, and west are all 1793 02:58:40,098 --> 02:58:45,091 single family, and then over on the east will be active open space with the bridges 1794 02:58:45,091 --> 02:58:46,052 ski run. 1795 02:58:50,053 --> 02:58:55,056 Um, this request is for, um, approval to allow two retaining walls to encroach into 1796 02:58:55,056 --> 02:59:00,052 the general easement on the north and east side of the lot, and currently they have 1797 02:59:00,052 --> 02:59:01,049 already been installed. 1798 02:59:05,005 --> 02:59:10,004 To provide some context, uh, the DRB approved the design review application for a 1799 02:59:10,004 --> 02:59:16,064 new single-family home located at Lot 220B, um, during the July 7th, 2022, uh, DRB 1800 02:59:16,064 --> 02:59:21,032 meeting. Um, and the previous approval of the single-family home included General 1801 02:59:21,032 --> 02:59:25,028 Eastman encroachments of a retaining wall on the south side of the lot. 1802 02:59:29,089 --> 02:59:34,029 Before discussing, uh, encroachment locations, I wanted to point out that this updated 1803 02:59:34,029 --> 02:59:40,001 civil sheet shown on the screen was submitted by the applicant on Monday. Um, in 1804 02:59:40,001 --> 02:59:44,069 my memo, I did include a condition for the updated and engineer approved civils to 1805 02:59:44,069 --> 02:59:50,064 be provided, um, prior to the certificate of occupancy being issued. Um, however, 1806 02:59:50,098 --> 02:59:57,001 this condition may be removed now. Um, for retaining wall one, let me get my mouse 1807 02:59:57,001 --> 03:00:01,007 over here. Retaining wall one right here on the east side of the lot is a boulder 1808 03:00:01,007 --> 03:00:07,003 retaining wall located, oh, as I said, on the east side of the lot. Um, as the applicant 1809 03:00:07,003 --> 03:00:12,054 pointed out in their narrative, uh, the site's natural, um, grades and slopes over 1810 03:00:12,076 --> 03:00:18,087 in this portion of the lot, um, was causing excess excessive amounts of water to 1811 03:00:18,087 --> 03:00:23,063 drain towards the rear of the property. Um, due to this, retaining wall one's extension 1812 03:00:23,065 --> 03:00:28,008 and encroachment was deemed a necessary intervention by the applicant to redirect 1813 03:00:28,008 --> 03:00:33,079 drainage for preservation of the foundation, rear of the patio, and then rear of 1814 03:00:33,079 --> 03:00:40,046 rear landscaping. Um, for retaining wall too, that is over in the north side of the 1815 03:00:40,046 --> 03:00:47,006 lot, um, it is Over by the installed hot tub, right, oh, my mouse disappeared. Right 1816 03:00:47,006 --> 03:00:51,078 here. Um, according to the applicant's narrative, the varying depths of the natural 1817 03:00:51,078 --> 03:00:57,006 stone used, um, those courses resulted in the wall stepping back to retain the soil. 1818 03:00:57,035 --> 03:01:02,003 Um, this result in the base course extending slightly farther into the general easement, 1819 03:01:02,055 --> 03:01:07,046 uh, than the courses above, which created the encroachment. Um, at this stage, removal 1820 03:01:07,046 --> 03:01:12,046 of retaining wall two would require significant disturbance to the site and relocation 1821 03:01:12,046 --> 03:01:13,007 of existing landscaping. 1822 03:01:16,002 --> 03:01:21,003 Um, on screen, I've provided a recommended motion if the DRB chooses to approve the 1823 03:01:21,003 --> 03:01:25,086 general easement encroachments, um, with the following conditions on the next slide. 1824 03:01:27,025 --> 03:01:31,063 And then just as a quick reminder, uh, staff receives the uh updated. 1825 03:01:33,068 --> 03:01:38,017 That were approved by an engineer. Um, we received those on Monday. So again, if, 1826 03:01:38,024 --> 03:01:42,035 uh, DRB would like to remove condition one, thank you. 1827 03:01:45,089 --> 03:01:52,085 Great. Thank you. What questions for staff. Do you have any photos showing those 1828 03:01:52,099 --> 03:01:56,011 um retaining walls? Yeah, I do. Let me grab them really quick. 1829 03:02:26,087 --> 03:02:31,005 OK. Once I share my screen, um, I'm gonna provide uh drone photos that the applicant 1830 03:02:31,005 --> 03:02:33,098 provided to us with the updated civils. 1831 03:02:45,023 --> 03:02:49,033 Oh, let me see if I can get this too. Bigger 1832 03:02:54,066 --> 03:02:59,097 And so that this is retaining wall one on the east side of the lot, um, and so right 1833 03:02:59,097 --> 03:03:04,055 where my mouse is is where the original retaining wall ends and then to the left 1834 03:03:04,055 --> 03:03:09,012 hand side is going to be that encroachment that we see for retaining wall one. and 1835 03:03:09,012 --> 03:03:15,018 so the slopes, um, in natural grade up here. The drainage was just getting too excessive 1836 03:03:15,018 --> 03:03:19,093 towards the foundation and rear of the property. Um, so the applicant deemed it necessary 1837 03:03:19,095 --> 03:03:25,021 to install this portion of the retaining wall to then encroach. Um, and then on the 1838 03:03:25,023 --> 03:03:32,002 opposite side over on the north, if it will. Load. Come on. 1839 03:03:35,042 --> 03:03:37,073 And then when it shows, this will be a retaining wall too. 1840 03:03:44,089 --> 03:03:46,048 Sorry, just taking a moment to load. 1841 03:03:48,056 --> 03:03:52,063 And then right here would be retaining wall to use encroachment. 1842 03:04:04,007 --> 03:04:04,098 Yes, it is. 1843 03:04:07,067 --> 03:04:07,071 Mhm 1844 03:04:37,003 --> 03:04:44,084 So do I hold it? So Got it. All right. Thanks, Mr. Chairman and, and 1845 03:04:44,009 --> 03:04:48,085 the entire board. Appreciate your time today. Uh, uh, my name is Ben Elliott. I'm 1846 03:04:48,085 --> 03:04:52,092 a project manager with Prosec Construction, uh, responsible for the construction 1847 03:04:53,000 --> 03:04:55,025 of 113 Palmyra Project. 1848 03:05:00,002 --> 03:05:02,064 And sorry, was I just introducing or? 1849 03:05:05,024 --> 03:05:10,015 Was this, sorry, was this my time to add anything to the, or I didn't, OK. So to 1850 03:05:10,015 --> 03:05:14,027 make it work. Sounds good. I appreciate it. Well, thank you, Soren, for the, um, 1851 03:05:14,036 --> 03:05:18,091 the summary, and I think she covered it really well. Um, the only thing I wanted 1852 03:05:18,091 --> 03:05:24,005 to add, um, was kind of going back to that picture on the east side of the house. 1853 03:05:25,002 --> 03:05:31,002 Um, in addition to improving the overall drainage of the site, uh, one thing we noticed 1854 03:05:31,002 --> 03:05:36,037 upon final backfill was that it actually constricted the egress of the house out 1855 03:05:36,037 --> 03:05:41,052 of that exterior exit. And then can we excuse me, can we have the pictures when he 1856 03:05:41,052 --> 03:05:44,067 says he's sad, I'm not sure which. China is which 1857 03:05:46,085 --> 03:05:48,052 Yeah, so it stopped that side right there. 1858 03:05:51,064 --> 03:05:59,023 Yeah, so, so by incorporating the retaining wall there, um, that did allow that egress 1859 03:05:59,023 --> 03:06:04,083 path to stay consistent kind of around the house and facilitate a little bit better 1860 03:06:04,083 --> 03:06:12,056 movement around the house. Um, and then the only other thing I was going to add on 1861 03:06:12,056 --> 03:06:20,003 the, um, the retaining wall at the hot tub. Um, with the depth of those boulders, 1862 03:06:20,045 --> 03:06:25,043 um, kind of like Soren explained, they're actually, the spec on them was about 2 1863 03:06:25,043 --> 03:06:33,001 ft deep. Um, so they're actually pretty large on there. So that, um, uh, that depth 1864 03:06:33,007 --> 03:06:38,016 in relation to the civil details, uh, following the stepback requirements from the 1865 03:06:38,016 --> 03:06:45,051 civil engineer, um, is, is kind of what, uh, what drove the Placement there and not 1866 03:06:45,051 --> 03:06:53,034 being exactly uh along the easement line right there. So, um. Well, no doubt, uh, 1867 03:06:53,059 --> 03:06:58,018 learning experience for the installing contractor as well as us, I do think it provides 1868 03:06:58,018 --> 03:07:02,066 a little bit better landing area right off the step from the hot tub deck as you 1869 03:07:02,066 --> 03:07:07,025 come off of that plan east side, which would be the closest side to the picture being 1870 03:07:07,025 --> 03:07:12,039 taken right there. Um, to give a little bit more space before the edge of the wall, 1871 03:07:12,091 --> 03:07:13,003 so. 1872 03:07:16,006 --> 03:07:23,029 Anything else? That's all. OK, great. Uh, board questions for the applicant. Can 1873 03:07:23,029 --> 03:07:29,026 I ask one real quick one on the hot tub side, how is that, uh, exterior ground finished? 1874 03:07:29,059 --> 03:07:34,033 Will it be finished to be lawn, or it's, yeah, it's lawn and landscaping, OK, yeah. 1875 03:07:35,065 --> 03:07:40,006 And so there is some off of that west side, which is the closest side towards the 1876 03:07:40,006 --> 03:07:45,024 picture, there's black stone steps that go back uh towards the patio right there. 1877 03:07:51,068 --> 03:07:52,035 I can, yeah. 1878 03:07:55,007 --> 03:07:56,017 Let's see 1879 03:08:32,032 --> 03:08:35,049 Sure Does it, does it automatically upload? 1880 03:08:44,005 --> 03:08:47,024 Then if you wanna send them to me as well, I can pull them up, yeah. 1881 03:08:58,067 --> 03:08:59,067 All right, just sent it 1882 03:09:48,073 --> 03:09:51,048 Did it send then. Yeah. 1883 03:10:06,007 --> 03:10:08,055 It did, it's kind of File. 1884 03:10:13,041 --> 03:10:16,014 It's, uh, it's fully, the grass is growing, 1885 03:10:22,035 --> 03:10:23,008 Exclusive 1886 03:10:42,085 --> 03:10:44,073 Well, I'm sorry I asked. 1887 03:10:49,084 --> 03:10:50,089 Yeah, 2 seconds. 1888 03:10:53,067 --> 03:10:56,001 I reduced the file size so that one should come through. 1889 03:11:20,052 --> 03:11:24,079 I'm gonna say in the interest of time, can everybody imagine that looks like with 1890 03:11:24,079 --> 03:11:25,032 Juan? 1891 03:11:27,037 --> 03:11:33,078 Yeah There it is. OK, here we go. Outlook wanted to take its time. 1892 03:11:53,077 --> 03:12:00,024 Right on the corner. You don't get to say anything. Come on. Oh, is it not? Why is 1893 03:12:00,024 --> 03:12:01,012 it not going up? 1894 03:12:04,037 --> 03:12:07,096 There we go. And then you can, yeah, there should be more attached if you scroll 1895 03:12:07,096 --> 03:12:13,032 down on that. I was gonna say it's a nice looking backyard. Oh. 1896 03:12:15,038 --> 03:12:18,024 Sorry, Ben, Outlook is having a meltdown on me. 1897 03:12:37,041 --> 03:12:42,032 Yes, please. Um, did you receive any, um, the neighbor to the north on Lot 211 and 1898 03:12:42,032 --> 03:12:47,017 the one on 220A north and south of you? Did you get any, um, Pushback or any kind 1899 03:12:47,017 --> 03:12:52,025 of comments, any public comment from those? Not that I'm aware of, no. Nothing is 1900 03:12:52,034 --> 03:12:54,045 OK. Did send the noticing out. 1901 03:13:03,011 --> 03:13:05,018 Any other questions for the applicant? 1902 03:13:18,078 --> 03:13:20,049 Are there any pictures from above? 1903 03:13:26,011 --> 03:13:29,064 OK. Yeah, just those ones from the side. 1904 03:13:38,003 --> 03:13:40,062 I do have more though that we could look at. 1905 03:13:46,093 --> 03:13:47,058 Chavels 1906 03:13:55,008 --> 03:14:02,089 OK. OK. OK, if that's what we have, that's what we have. We'll move on. 1907 03:14:03,074 --> 03:14:05,057 Uh, any further questions for the applicant? 1908 03:14:08,024 --> 03:14:14,044 We've received no public comment. No public comment. Baghdad. So we can uh go to 1909 03:14:14,044 --> 03:14:15,067 board deliberation. 1910 03:14:19,011 --> 03:14:22,058 I'll start. I think that, you know, this is one of those cases, it's better to ask 1911 03:14:22,058 --> 03:14:28,002 for forgiveness, uh, you know, on the back end than, than have the plan, uh, you 1912 03:14:28,002 --> 03:14:33,007 know. Probably demonstrate that it, it might have been needed upfront, but you can 1913 03:14:33,007 --> 03:14:38,037 never know. I don't really have a, a real problem with these types of encroachments. 1914 03:14:38,069 --> 03:14:45,002 Um, they're like the as built for a better product. It faces the ski run, it's well 1915 03:14:45,002 --> 03:14:50,066 sits well above it. Neither neighbor to the north or south has objected. Those houses 1916 03:14:50,066 --> 03:14:53,031 are already built. I, I'm fine with it. 1917 03:14:59,081 --> 03:15:00,084 I agree with Toby 1918 03:15:02,088 --> 03:15:06,043 I agree with Toby as well, but you guys weren't here when there was a board member. 1919 03:15:07,093 --> 03:15:15,091 Any encroachment into a setback. With Punishable by death. I, I, I think 1920 03:15:15,091 --> 03:15:20,015 it's the, the applicant is fortunate that one of the board members had to recuse 1921 03:15:20,015 --> 03:15:25,059 himself that is most, most against this kind of thing. It's pretty unusual. And I, 1922 03:15:25,072 --> 03:15:29,075 and I actually will say the, the one wall I went through the retention because of 1923 03:15:29,075 --> 03:15:32,026 the steep slopes, yes, the other one seems like kind of a. 1924 03:15:34,035 --> 03:15:37,003 Landscaping feature to make my hot tub nicer, but. 1925 03:15:39,091 --> 03:15:45,051 But the encroachments so slight, I not that that's like slightly pregnant, but The 1926 03:15:45,051 --> 03:15:48,072 encroachment is so slight that I can, I can live with that. 1927 03:15:50,085 --> 03:15:56,062 I think also public works approved it, so. You know, there seems to be a reasonable 1928 03:15:56,062 --> 03:16:01,007 assumption that that's OK, and I mean I wouldn't wanna go toe to toe with public 1929 03:16:01,007 --> 03:16:08,064 works, so if they say it's OK, I'm OK. OK. If there's no other 1930 03:16:08,064 --> 03:16:13,001 motions or, I mean, discussion, I'll ask for motion, please. 1931 03:16:19,074 --> 03:16:25,001 I moved to approve the um Gotta get my glasses on again. 1932 03:16:28,073 --> 03:16:34,081 I move to approve the specific approval for general easement encroachments at lot 1933 03:16:35,008 --> 03:16:43,002 220B 113 Palmyra based on evidence provided in the staff memo of record dated September 1934 03:16:43,002 --> 03:16:49,011 20 September 18, 2026 and the findings of this meeting with following conditions 1935 03:16:49,011 --> 03:16:56,051 one. Great, thank you. 0 2nd. I'll second it. Great. Any further discussion? 1936 03:16:58,032 --> 03:17:03,084 May we see the people on the screen, please? I think Jim has left the, the meeting, 1937 03:17:04,044 --> 03:17:10,047 so I'll be voting, uh, and with that I'll ask for a vote. All in favor. Aye, aye. 1938 03:17:10,092 --> 03:17:15,014 But the record show that Ellen Kramer voted affirmatively. 1939 03:17:18,054 --> 03:17:26,009 She said, I, I, I. OK, great. We'll continue moving along here too. All right. 1940 03:17:27,029 --> 03:17:34,014 Thank you. Thank you. Thanks. So glad we could be your first appearance. 1941 03:17:36,081 --> 03:17:43,008 Uh, our last, well, not the last agenda item, but, uh, next agenda item is reading 1942 03:17:43,008 --> 03:17:50,016 approval of the 227 design review board meeting schedule. So, that would be you. 1943 03:17:50,033 --> 03:17:53,004 That will be, yes. Um, here we are. 1944 03:18:08,022 --> 03:18:14,035 Um, all right, I'll be presenting the, uh, reading and approval of the 2027 DRB schedule. 1945 03:18:14,086 --> 03:18:20,068 Um, so up on the screen, uh, is the full schedule for 2027, um, the first Thursday 1946 03:18:20,068 --> 03:18:25,086 of each month next year, starting at 10:00 a.m. Um, in my memo, I did point out two 1947 03:18:25,086 --> 03:18:30,088 dates that I wanted, um, DRB to look at, which would be July 1st, which is gonna 1948 03:18:30,088 --> 03:18:35,084 be the Thursday prior to Independence Day, as well as Thursday, September 2nd, which 1949 03:18:35,084 --> 03:18:40,008 will be in the middle of the Telluride Film Festival. So I wanted to see if we need 1950 03:18:40,008 --> 03:18:44,041 to move either, should one be remote. And just 1951 03:18:47,038 --> 03:18:51,096 I'll just note that the um Thursday, September 2nd, if it is during the film festival, 1952 03:18:53,021 --> 03:18:59,012 We would Oh my mic's on, yeah, um, we would anticipate that it will be a remote only 1953 03:18:59,012 --> 03:19:05,004 meeting because, um, because they use the, not that we have a contract for them for 1954 03:19:05,004 --> 03:19:08,039 next year, but we're assuming that they would wanna come back and use council chamber. 1955 03:19:14,052 --> 03:19:14,064 OK. 1956 03:19:17,009 --> 03:19:23,029 Do we need to take action on this? Um, yes. Recommended motion here unless any of 1957 03:19:23,029 --> 03:19:24,018 the dates needed. 1958 03:19:29,083 --> 03:19:33,075 I'm a little confused though. Do you have two new dates proposed in there? I didn't 1959 03:19:33,075 --> 03:19:38,038 see them. Um, no, they're not proposed. It's up to, uh, the design review board if 1960 03:19:38,038 --> 03:19:45,005 they would like to move them or change them. I think the July 1st meeting is fine, 1961 03:19:45,044 --> 03:19:53,004 um, but like we move in the, um, September to the 9th instead of the 2nd, so we get 1962 03:19:53,004 --> 03:19:58,007 back into the room. I think we're more functional inside the room instead. Yes, yeah, 1963 03:19:58,093 --> 03:20:02,064 understood. So instead of September 2nd going virtual, you would like to move it 1964 03:20:02,064 --> 03:20:04,048 to September 9th, correct? OK. 1965 03:20:06,077 --> 03:20:09,071 To approve the design review meeting scheduled for. 1966 03:20:14,089 --> 03:20:21,075 23rd, 26 with the modification of the September meeting being moved to 1967 03:20:22,065 --> 03:20:25,081 September 9th, 2027. I'll second it. 1968 03:20:28,033 --> 03:20:30,044 You have a motion to second any further discussion. 1969 03:20:32,093 --> 03:20:39,064 If not, I'll ask for a vote. A favor. Aye aye. The records show that Ellen Kramer 1970 03:20:39,064 --> 03:20:47,038 has voted in the affirmative. Thank you, Ellen. Welcome. Great. And uh we can move 1971 03:20:47,038 --> 03:20:55,036 on now to staff updates. Staff. I'm starting with you. Oh, go ahead. Um, 1972 03:20:55,062 --> 03:21:01,092 yes, the main update is just about the Palm Plaza project. Which you guys uh saw 1973 03:21:01,094 --> 03:21:07,029 at an informational session. It was it, I think it was last meeting. We did have 1974 03:21:07,029 --> 03:21:13,001 a an informational session with council as well. They gave us a thumbs up to continue, 1975 03:21:13,019 --> 03:21:18,022 didn't give us a whole lot of direction about which concept they were choosing. Well, 1976 03:21:18,062 --> 03:21:22,005 each councilor had their own opinions and they were pretty split. So, that'll be 1977 03:21:22,005 --> 03:21:25,096 interesting, but what we are uh going to go ahead and do is move forward with the 1978 03:21:25,098 --> 03:21:31,005 um alternative review for governmental projects process, which I think I outlined 1979 03:21:31,005 --> 03:21:36,027 in our informational session. It includes, um, at this next council meeting. Presenting 1980 03:21:36,027 --> 03:21:41,043 a resolution that sets up a task force and a process for the eventual entitlement 1981 03:21:41,043 --> 03:21:49,038 of the design. Um, that Um Excuse me, the task force is gonna meet probably 1982 03:21:49,038 --> 03:21:55,023 in November and we probably will come back to the DRB for a recommendation on a final 1983 03:21:55,023 --> 03:22:00,039 preferred alternative, um, probably in November or December, but that needs to be 1984 03:22:00,039 --> 03:22:04,051 identified as part of this resolution which is we're obviously gonna drafted the 1985 03:22:04,051 --> 03:22:07,087 staff but it will be passed by council, so ultimately up to them what that process 1986 03:22:07,087 --> 03:22:11,095 looks like exactly. So, anyway, you will see it at least one more time, most likely, 1987 03:22:12,004 --> 03:22:16,096 um, and we're also will look be looking for. A couple of DRB members to uh participate 1988 03:22:16,096 --> 03:22:21,036 in the task force assuming that's the direction council wants to go. So, um, if you 1989 03:22:21,036 --> 03:22:25,079 have any, anybody wants to volunteer, let us know. Otherwise, we might start picking 1990 03:22:25,085 --> 03:22:27,075 folks volunteering. 1991 03:22:30,004 --> 03:22:35,077 Yeah, um, and I just wanted to give an update, um, on a procedural note. I was asked 1992 03:22:35,077 --> 03:22:42,041 by a member of the board about public comment and what happens when a member of the 1993 03:22:42,041 --> 03:22:49,006 public reaches out directly to DRB members, um, via email, so, um. You know you guys 1994 03:22:49,006 --> 03:22:54,083 are are well known in the community. Members certainly will email you about applications. 1995 03:22:55,025 --> 03:23:01,044 Um, I think the important thing to note is that you, this, you know, any application 1996 03:23:01,044 --> 03:23:05,084 that's before the board is generally a quasi-judicial item and so it needs to be 1997 03:23:05,084 --> 03:23:11,025 discussed inside of a public meeting. Um, you can respond to the responder that you 1998 03:23:11,025 --> 03:23:15,093 received their comment, but there shouldn't be any back and forth engagement with 1999 03:23:15,093 --> 03:23:20,097 that, um, with that member of the public, and that is due to our open open meeting 2000 03:23:20,097 --> 03:23:25,017 laws. So if you have any questions on that, if you have concerns, if you're being 2001 03:23:25,017 --> 03:23:31,053 contacted by, um, a member of the public, not just via email. This also applies to, 2002 03:23:31,071 --> 03:23:36,074 you know, out on the street or at a, at a cocktail party or anything like that. Um, 2003 03:23:36,091 --> 03:23:41,086 the, the response needs to be, hey, I understand you have concerns about this. This 2004 03:23:41,086 --> 03:23:45,062 is a quasi-judicial item and I'm not to be speaking about this outside of a public 2005 03:23:45,062 --> 03:23:50,000 hearing. Not that anyone broke any of those rules. It's just a nice reminder the 2006 03:23:50,000 --> 03:23:54,044 question was asked. And so that I thought that I would, you know, just kind of reiterate 2007 03:23:54,068 --> 03:23:59,037 to everybody that you guys do hold a position of, you know, trust in this community 2008 03:23:59,068 --> 03:24:05,003 and it's important that we have the, the, you know, substantive discussions around 2009 03:24:05,003 --> 03:24:10,003 these active applications inside the public meeting so that everybody is aware of 2010 03:24:10,003 --> 03:24:11,023 the discussions that are happening. 2011 03:24:14,009 --> 03:24:21,072 Great, thanks. Anybody have anything else? Motion to adjourn. We have a motion on 2012 03:24:21,072 --> 03:24:23,016 the floor. Is there a second? 2013 03:24:29,049 --> 03:24:36,032 We have a second further discussion. All in favor to adjourn. I, I, I can't, I can't 2014 03:24:36,032 --> 03:24:42,012 see Ellen's recruiter, Ellen. Thank you. Thank you all. Affirmative. Bye.