1
00:00:18,990 --> 00:00:36,950
I think he was probably just not expected to attend it.

2
00:00:38,620 --> 00:00:39,700
are we ready?

3
00:00:40,360 --> 00:00:42,680
I did.

4
00:00:48,860 --> 00:00:49,220
You ready?

5
00:00:50,080 --> 00:00:50,260
Okay.

6
00:00:50,480 --> 00:00:55,660
Well, let us call to order the meeting of the community development

7
00:00:55,660 --> 00:00:56,740
Black grant commission.

8
00:00:58,020 --> 00:00:58,800
And could we begin?

9
00:00:58,840 --> 00:01:01,020
Please by starting with the roll call.

10
00:01:04,390 --> 00:01:04,750
Okay.

11
00:01:05,310 --> 00:01:06,490
Harry Colomar.

12
00:01:06,850 --> 00:01:07,270
President.

13
00:01:08,030 --> 00:01:09,330
Karina O'Brien.

14
00:01:10,130 --> 00:01:10,470
absent.

15
00:01:10,970 --> 00:01:13,030
Walter Rich Richardson.

16
00:01:14,670 --> 00:01:15,650
Robert Vanderveld.

17
00:01:15,650 --> 00:01:24,690
here. Virginia Young, Richard Tippett, Absent, and Guillermo Rosas, Absent, staff members present,

18
00:01:25,110 --> 00:01:27,150
Jessica Miras here, John Sakamoto.

19
00:01:31,950 --> 00:01:35,390
And we have a quorum. So the first item on our agenda

20
00:01:35,390 --> 00:01:36,850
is to review the agenda.

21
00:01:40,260 --> 00:01:47,800
We have a motion to approve the agenda. We need that. Anything else

22
00:01:47,800 --> 00:01:53,760
The only thing I would like to add for the agenda and for today and for future meetings

23
00:01:53,760 --> 00:01:59,560
John is I think it'd be helpful for us to have a staff update under the Administrative

24
00:01:59,560 --> 00:02:04,760
Report and so for example what happened with our recommendations last time I know there

25
00:02:04,760 --> 00:02:10,180
have been some changes at least with one of the grant recipients and so just a general update

26
00:02:10,180 --> 00:02:16,020
if we could add that into the agenda for this meeting and for future meetings as well

27
00:02:16,020 --> 00:02:20,340
and let us mark Karina as present, no.

28
00:02:25,260 --> 00:02:27,760
Public comments, I don't see any members of the public

29
00:02:27,760 --> 00:02:33,020
present any longer, so we don't have any, do we have on the

30
00:02:33,020 --> 00:02:36,140
consent agenda, we only have one item which is the approval of the

31
00:02:36,140 --> 00:02:40,980
minutes of April 27, 2026, do we have any changes or

32
00:02:43,760 --> 00:02:49,420
suggestions to the minutes of the April 27th

33
00:02:55,570 --> 00:02:55,570
meeting.

34
00:02:55,980 --> 00:02:58,810
Well, hearing none, all in favor of approval.

35
00:02:59,650 --> 00:03:00,150
Say aye.

36
00:03:01,070 --> 00:03:01,310
Aye.

37
00:03:02,470 --> 00:03:05,490
Okay, I move that we accept the minutes as written.

38
00:03:05,950 --> 00:03:06,010
Aye.

39
00:03:06,010 --> 00:03:06,670
I'll second it.

40
00:03:08,270 --> 00:03:09,650
All in favor.

41
00:03:10,950 --> 00:03:11,590
Opposed.

42
00:03:12,650 --> 00:03:12,790
Okay.

43
00:03:13,110 --> 00:03:13,310
Great.

44
00:03:13,970 --> 00:03:27,330
So, on to, as I said, the staff update, could you give us an update, please, John, on the status of our recommendations, and also I believe there have been at least one change with one of the grant recipients.

45
00:03:29,110 --> 00:03:37,270
Yes, so recommendations were made to HUD during for the annual action plan for the current year we're in for school year 2627 program year 26.

46
00:03:37,890 --> 00:03:42,410
I have not had our response from HUD yet or our grant agreement, but that's typical timing-wise.

47
00:03:42,750 --> 00:03:46,410
It typically will come until October or November at the soonest.

48
00:03:47,570 --> 00:03:52,430
For the program year that we're reporting on at the paper, I could provide the update that on the move,

49
00:03:52,610 --> 00:03:56,290
who was awarded a public service grant, decided to walk away from that grant.

50
00:03:57,450 --> 00:03:59,170
It came so late for them.

51
00:03:59,230 --> 00:04:04,770
They had concerns, fiscally, about doing journal entries to account for it, even though they could,

52
00:04:04,770 --> 00:04:08,330
and we advised them that that was definitely possible wouldn't be a violating of any

53
00:04:08,330 --> 00:04:08,910
HUD stance.

54
00:04:09,130 --> 00:04:12,850
They had enough private donation funds that they chose to do that rather than make

55
00:04:12,850 --> 00:04:14,050
the change.

56
00:04:15,790 --> 00:04:18,910
So, I understand there's also been a change with NEPA for housing.

57
00:04:19,330 --> 00:04:20,870
Are you aware of that?

58
00:04:21,130 --> 00:04:27,330
NEPA for housing as an entity is changing, changing leadership and going through some changes.

59
00:04:27,470 --> 00:04:29,150
There's still providing service to the valley.

60
00:04:29,450 --> 00:04:33,770
There's similar to what they had been doing before, but they are under a new working with

61
00:04:33,770 --> 00:04:39,770
a new group to provide some of the service more on that to come as things flesh out and finish up.

62
00:04:41,890 --> 00:04:47,610
So I have a question about so I don't recall I could look it up for that rather just ask.

63
00:04:48,090 --> 00:04:56,050
So we approved how much for on the move and how what was done with the funds that we had allocated to them.

64
00:04:56,650 --> 00:04:58,570
I don't have the exact number but I will look it up shortly.

65
00:04:58,570 --> 00:04:58,930
Um

66
00:05:00,000 --> 00:05:12,140
What is, well, need to be done is it will need to be reprogrammed. Because it's public service though, and it's in the year and the past, it'll have to be reprogrammed to some sort of community development type project.

67
00:05:12,780 --> 00:05:24,040
We won't be able to meet the criteria in order to stay within the gap to add it to this year's current public service agencies. So it'll have to be reprogrammed and so we'll come to you with options.

68
00:05:24,040 --> 00:05:31,280
We'll likely try to meet with you again sooner before the end of the year on like usual to come up with a plan to fix this.

69
00:05:31,560 --> 00:05:33,600
Ah, thank you. That's very clear.

70
00:05:36,350 --> 00:05:37,050
Any other questions?

71
00:05:39,270 --> 00:05:39,470
Okay.

72
00:05:40,930 --> 00:05:47,690
Moving on to the caper, the consolidated annual performance evaluation report, John.

73
00:05:48,530 --> 00:05:49,970
You had a step aside this, please?

74
00:05:52,040 --> 00:05:56,900
Yes, so this year we still had a fair bit of success.

75
00:05:57,040 --> 00:06:01,460
We were able to complete some projects for owner occupied housing rehabilitation, did 7 projects

76
00:06:01,460 --> 00:06:02,240
this year.

77
00:06:02,480 --> 00:06:03,400
We're CDBG funds.

78
00:06:03,420 --> 00:06:08,600
We did eight with home funds so the program is operating well doing what it needs to be doing.

79
00:06:09,460 --> 00:06:15,020
The public service entities, they were all the rest of them, besides on the move, fully

80
00:06:15,020 --> 00:06:23,440
expanding delivering fair numbers, which was good to see, the two non-profit capital improvement

81
00:06:23,440 --> 00:06:28,540
projects. We are still waiting for environmental and enough bids to make sure that we can meet

82
00:06:28,540 --> 00:06:33,240
the criteria for to satisfy HUD before those can take off and start going under construction.

83
00:06:35,080 --> 00:06:40,260
That's the short of it, but were there any questions that came up in your review this year

84
00:06:41,260 --> 00:06:42,660
from the fire?

85
00:06:42,700 --> 00:06:44,260
The boy's aching.

86
00:06:45,160 --> 00:06:46,160
Erring through the report?

87
00:06:48,360 --> 00:06:50,260
Some reason I can't find it anymore.

88
00:06:51,040 --> 00:06:53,440
There was a listing of the types of services.

89
00:06:55,040 --> 00:06:56,280
I can't seem to find that.

90
00:06:56,280 --> 00:06:57,240
I thought it was right at the beginning,

91
00:06:59,360 --> 00:06:59,360
but

92
00:06:59,360 --> 00:07:01,260
I just didn't know if I had to talk to their head.

93
00:07:01,420 --> 00:07:02,320
What page that was?

94
00:07:02,820 --> 00:07:03,140
It's weird.

95
00:07:03,680 --> 00:07:04,540
What is it that year?

96
00:07:05,340 --> 00:07:05,940
Never mind.

97
00:07:06,840 --> 00:07:08,880
It's not critical that I find it to ask my question.

98
00:07:08,880 --> 00:07:14,740
It was a good thorough list that was comprehensive, but all the types of programs and housing that

99
00:07:15,440 --> 00:07:18,460
are addressed in the paper in the community services.

100
00:07:18,620 --> 00:07:23,780
There was one that I felt was missing from what I think of as a typical housing continuum

101
00:07:23,780 --> 00:07:26,220
of services, which is transitional housing.

102
00:07:27,020 --> 00:07:33,240
The 18-month type of housing that's for people who are homeless in that risk of homelessness.

103
00:07:33,240 --> 00:07:40,200
this. And so I didn't see it listed as one of the types of services slash housing that we

104
00:07:40,200 --> 00:07:47,820
provide, but I believe we actually at times in the past have. I know I forgot the name of

105
00:07:47,820 --> 00:07:54,420
the program, but there was the program for the mentally ill adults that was up off of Redwood

106
00:07:54,420 --> 00:08:02,500
road up there, where my ear goes used to be, that had to close. It was in a form of motel six,

107
00:08:03,700 --> 00:08:07,540
and I believe that one of the problems was there. There were a variety of issues, apparently,

108
00:08:07,840 --> 00:08:13,540
with that site, but I believe that that was operating under a transitional housing umbrella.

109
00:08:15,860 --> 00:08:22,260
So, having operated such programs, I would say that they have value within a continuum.

110
00:08:22,260 --> 00:08:29,940
They're useless standing on their own because just what happened to the folks is at the motel six is what happens if you don't have enough

111
00:08:29,940 --> 00:08:37,040
Supportive housing stock for folks to move into and then they reach the limit at the time during

112
00:08:37,040 --> 00:08:42,000
You know, of 18 months when they can get the support sometimes you can extend it a little bit but

113
00:08:42,000 --> 00:08:47,800
Basically you do end up booting right back out onto the street and you're right back to where you started

114
00:08:49,340 --> 00:08:59,900
Anyway, simple question is is there any particular policy reason why it was left off the list or was it more just slip the mind kind of thing or something?

115
00:09:00,700 --> 00:09:05,480
No particular policy reason why it probably would have fit under homeless shelters.

116
00:09:05,480 --> 00:09:10,860
I would assume a lot of actions taken for institutional in the homelessness section.

117
00:09:12,340 --> 00:09:21,830
We could certainly talk about it in there the other area would probably be

118
00:09:24,710 --> 00:09:25,290
in the helping

119
00:09:25,290 --> 00:09:34,930
homelessness kind of section with that be page 113 page which I'm sorry you were referring us

120
00:09:34,930 --> 00:09:39,750
to page 13 of the paper of the paper I know we've got sort of this double numbering thing

121
00:09:39,750 --> 00:09:47,250
Always drives me nuts. Yeah, I do apologize for that. I'm okay. 13 of the caper

122
00:09:47,250 --> 00:09:50,070
Which that's okay

123
00:09:51,030 --> 00:09:56,310
Sorry, this always gets me this double numbered

124
00:09:57,810 --> 00:09:59,490
Okay, that's

125
00:10:00,050 --> 00:10:08,270
22 of 33, okay. Yes, that is exactly right. I mean, even the word transition is right there. And I'm

126
00:10:08,270 --> 00:10:17,030
just, I just would suggest that as of a bold and homeless coordination look at service spectrums

127
00:10:17,030 --> 00:10:24,090
over the years, transitional housing is a typical, for one thing, there are, under certain

128
00:10:24,090 --> 00:10:31,350
administrations. There are funding opportunities that show up for that specific type of housing

129
00:10:31,350 --> 00:10:34,490
that it would be ashamed not to go be able to go after.

130
00:10:36,980 --> 00:10:38,760
That's that comment. I have other

131
00:10:38,760 --> 00:10:42,100
comments but I will wait and I will let the people speak.

132
00:10:44,060 --> 00:10:44,660
Anything else?

133
00:10:45,660 --> 00:10:49,520
Okay, I will go ahead because I have two more things but I can wait.

134
00:10:50,240 --> 00:10:52,980
If you turn your mic off and then we'll...

135
00:10:52,980 --> 00:10:55,840
Well, I wasn't sure if I was genuine putters on.

136
00:10:56,520 --> 00:11:03,600
OK, so page 5 of the paper, 14 of the document that was the PDF.

137
00:11:04,860 --> 00:11:06,560
This is the kind of thing that Harry says I always

138
00:11:06,560 --> 00:11:06,820
spot.

139
00:11:07,100 --> 00:11:13,160
But in the second column, under source, public is lowercase for the first

140
00:11:13,160 --> 00:11:15,660
one, and then uppercase for the bottom two.

141
00:11:15,960 --> 00:11:17,820
I just feel like it should be consistent either way.

142
00:11:17,860 --> 00:11:19,280
Oh, thank you, though.

143
00:11:22,220 --> 00:11:28,180
Sorry, and then I had a question, which I feel like I should, this should be evident,

144
00:11:28,560 --> 00:11:35,440
but it's just not to me that one page earlier, on the top of page four, page 13 of the

145
00:11:35,440 --> 00:11:41,740
PDF, about the racial and ethnic composition of families assisted, it has the families,

146
00:11:42,120 --> 00:11:48,000
the 413, 56, and then the bottom amount of Hispanic and not Hispanic, and I just don't

147
00:11:48,000 --> 00:11:53,980
is the top, like those numbers obviously don't add up what is is one individuals and what is

148
00:11:53,980 --> 00:12:01,160
families or what is that? Happy to work through this one. The problem with this particular table

149
00:12:01,160 --> 00:12:08,240
as it is provided by HUD is that when it's populating the race category it's leaving off

150
00:12:08,820 --> 00:12:13,980
other or multiracial and so the reason why that number of Hispanic is so high on the bottom one

151
00:12:13,980 --> 00:12:20,980
because some of our public service agencies, people identify as other or

152
00:12:20,980 --> 00:12:24,780
multibacial and not white. And so it's not captured in this table, and that's

153
00:12:24,780 --> 00:12:27,740
why the number shows such a big variance. Is there's that many people selecting

154
00:12:27,740 --> 00:12:29,860
other or multibacial rather than white Hispanic?

155
00:12:30,260 --> 00:12:33,100
It's not captured in the top part of the whole part, but it's captured in the lower part.

156
00:12:33,100 --> 00:12:34,320
But it's captured in the lower part.

157
00:12:34,340 --> 00:12:35,020
That makes sense.

158
00:12:35,620 --> 00:12:40,120
But the totals don't add up, and it's because of the way in which the federal

159
00:12:40,120 --> 00:12:47,060
government categorizes race and Hispanic origin as two different categories, right? So you have

160
00:12:47,060 --> 00:12:53,200
a race category, and as you said, they emit other, but then separately you have a Hispanic

161
00:12:53,200 --> 00:12:59,980
non-Hispanic. And so I think in the narrative, you put in there a very nice explanation

162
00:12:59,980 --> 00:13:04,520
this year. I really appreciate that, because it is confusing. It looks like we only had

163
00:13:04,520 --> 00:13:09,200
It was 4,500 families when, in fact, it was 4,500 families.

164
00:13:09,500 --> 00:13:09,680
Exactly.

165
00:13:10,400 --> 00:13:10,460
Yeah.

166
00:13:11,020 --> 00:13:14,280
And it's just an unfortunate short coming of the way this table

167
00:13:14,280 --> 00:13:15,180
populates for them.

168
00:13:15,560 --> 00:13:18,460
They could easily solve it by adding other at the bottom in it.

169
00:13:18,620 --> 00:13:20,900
It would all match and be very easy to read.

170
00:13:21,580 --> 00:13:24,200
But when it goes into the caper, when it goes into their system,

171
00:13:24,540 --> 00:13:25,500
this is how it will look.

172
00:13:25,740 --> 00:13:28,220
And we have to have the narrative to explain why the variance is there.

173
00:13:34,590 --> 00:13:44,430
So on page 9, you talked about zoning standards and barriers to group homes, and I just wanted

174
00:13:44,430 --> 00:13:50,330
to make a tutorial note about that, which I've actually mentioned to Rob at Memphis as

175
00:13:50,330 --> 00:13:53,650
well, since they've started to finally engage in support of housing.

176
00:13:55,470 --> 00:13:59,010
The key that unlocks that problem is master leasing.

177
00:14:00,250 --> 00:14:08,170
The limit, as you probably know, is a residence, is six before you have to call it a licensed facility.

178
00:14:08,990 --> 00:14:16,370
So six are below, you can master lease a house with multiple bedrooms, anywhere you want, and you can move people in.

179
00:14:16,670 --> 00:14:23,150
It doesn't mean you shouldn't spend some time talking to the neighbors in the softening the ground, but you don't have to.

180
00:14:23,150 --> 00:14:31,210
there's not a formal complaint procedure that can block it and it's a mechanism that's extremely

181
00:14:31,210 --> 00:14:41,670
useful. The key, especially now, is getting funds in order to do the leasing. I can get

182
00:14:41,670 --> 00:14:50,030
into the whole programmatic structure. But it is a great work around. It's harder if the population

183
00:14:50,030 --> 00:14:54,890
or you're working with does need a license facility, which is sometimes the case with certain

184
00:14:54,890 --> 00:14:55,430
populations.

185
00:14:56,750 --> 00:14:59,210
But with folks who are basically...

186
00:15:03,560 --> 00:15:16,980
We have a lot to do a little bit of it. In this community, we're about 40 years behind the curve.

187
00:15:18,780 --> 00:15:29,940
It's a model that works, we've just finally started to do a little bit of it in this community, we're about 40 years behind the curve.

188
00:15:29,940 --> 00:15:35,120
on it, but it's still, it's cartoning to see

189
00:15:35,120 --> 00:15:37,720
mentors beginning, in particular, dipping their tones

190
00:15:37,720 --> 00:15:38,100
of the water.

191
00:15:38,240 --> 00:15:40,440
I think progress knows exactly how this works,

192
00:15:40,560 --> 00:15:42,420
but the economics may be a barrier.

193
00:15:42,680 --> 00:15:46,420
But I did want to note that that's the work around that works

194
00:15:47,800 --> 00:15:50,660
when there's understandable, nimioposition

195
00:15:51,420 --> 00:15:54,820
to licensed group homes in various neighborhoods.

196
00:15:55,580 --> 00:15:58,700
I have only one more.

197
00:16:00,380 --> 00:16:03,780
Oh, okay, it's a request rather than a note.

198
00:16:04,160 --> 00:16:06,780
On page 13, you talk about HMIS stats.

199
00:16:07,500 --> 00:16:10,040
And I know what you guys are new,

200
00:16:10,200 --> 00:16:12,080
so you won't consider me a broken record.

201
00:16:13,580 --> 00:16:14,660
But pretty much every year,

202
00:16:14,860 --> 00:16:18,820
I ask if we could please have access to or be able to see

203
00:16:19,360 --> 00:16:21,820
the most recent years HMIS stats.

204
00:16:21,820 --> 00:16:30,800
I find them very informative and helpful to truly understand how we're doing on all those indicators.

205
00:16:32,320 --> 00:16:39,880
When would it be appropriate time to bring that to the committee, the early meeting of the year, will we do the calendar?

206
00:16:40,460 --> 00:16:46,140
Yeah, because it's informational, it doesn't necessarily lead to decision making.

207
00:16:47,660 --> 00:16:56,920
I think, I will speak for myself, it enlarges my understanding of how we are doing that along with things like the point in time count.

208
00:16:58,040 --> 00:17:09,100
It's a snapshot, but there are indicators, at least as I recall, that give a little bit broader idea of how people are actually moving through the system.

209
00:17:09,100 --> 00:17:14,200
because one thing point in time just tells us that on that day this is how many people we found

210
00:17:14,200 --> 00:17:20,320
over in Kennedy or down by the creek or wherever. It's I think we're useful to have a better

211
00:17:20,320 --> 00:17:27,180
picture of. Okay, fine. And a bold staff went out and talked to them and this person, you know,

212
00:17:27,300 --> 00:17:34,620
we managed to move seven to this and that, you know. Okay, yeah, I can work with the continuing

213
00:17:34,620 --> 00:17:38,880
of care to provide the system performance measures when they come out.

214
00:17:39,200 --> 00:17:39,400
Thank you.

215
00:17:39,740 --> 00:17:39,880
Absolutely.

216
00:17:39,960 --> 00:17:40,560
That's it.

217
00:17:40,700 --> 00:17:42,320
I'm done with my comments.

218
00:17:44,320 --> 00:17:45,100
Anything else?

219
00:17:45,900 --> 00:17:46,500
Thank you.

220
00:17:47,860 --> 00:17:51,620
The only other thing I had on page 22 of the document,

221
00:17:51,840 --> 00:17:57,060
I talked about receiving the public of the paper,

222
00:17:57,500 --> 00:18:00,520
page 20, not the PDF page 22 of the paper,

223
00:18:01,440 --> 00:18:03,080
it says during the public comment period,

224
00:18:03,080 --> 00:18:08,920
this is about the paper. The city received to be completed public comments and so you just

225
00:18:08,920 --> 00:18:12,900
want to highlight that that's obviously a blank that you need to fill in. Yes absolutely.

226
00:18:13,520 --> 00:18:18,960
And I have soon as of today we haven't received any. Yeah we haven't received any and it's open

227
00:18:18,960 --> 00:18:24,080
until the city council meeting so once council meetings over I will fill in that to be completed

228
00:18:24,080 --> 00:18:30,060
with whatever many comments we receive. Okay September the 15th.

229
00:18:32,170 --> 00:18:34,570
So do you need a motion to

230
00:18:34,570 --> 00:18:38,650
prove this to recommend to council where it's just a more of an information item.

231
00:18:38,930 --> 00:18:41,050
I believe it's a motion to present the information.

232
00:18:41,750 --> 00:18:43,990
So, all entertain a motion to approve.

233
00:18:45,470 --> 00:18:46,670
We have a motion.

234
00:18:47,810 --> 00:18:48,330
Approved?

235
00:18:48,370 --> 00:18:48,810
Yes.

236
00:18:49,050 --> 00:18:49,170
Approved.

237
00:18:49,370 --> 00:18:50,170
Rich is moving.

238
00:18:50,850 --> 00:18:50,930
Yes.

239
00:18:51,010 --> 00:18:51,610
Do we have a second?

240
00:18:52,710 --> 00:18:52,890
Okay.

241
00:18:53,410 --> 00:18:54,890
Let's see if we have to go to the sector step now.

242
00:18:55,210 --> 00:18:55,730
I'll second.

243
00:18:56,230 --> 00:18:56,910
Thank you very much.

244
00:18:57,450 --> 00:18:58,470
Any discussion?

245
00:19:00,530 --> 00:19:01,110
All in favour?

246
00:19:01,390 --> 00:19:01,830
Say aye.

247
00:19:02,450 --> 00:19:02,590
Aye.

248
00:19:03,010 --> 00:19:03,170
Aye.

249
00:19:04,230 --> 00:19:04,330
Aye.

250
00:19:04,330 --> 00:19:08,550
as well. So it is approved. Thank you.

251
00:19:08,650 --> 00:19:08,930
Thank you.

252
00:19:09,550 --> 00:19:12,450
Jonathan, I have just one kind of side note

253
00:19:12,450 --> 00:19:15,970
question to all this in planning for next year.

254
00:19:17,210 --> 00:19:19,730
And I know the city plan is coming up as well,

255
00:19:20,050 --> 00:19:21,830
another version of it.

256
00:19:22,850 --> 00:19:26,430
But with the economy, the local economy,

257
00:19:27,430 --> 00:19:28,890
and with the wine industry,

258
00:19:29,610 --> 00:19:31,110
really being challenged, it was whenever

259
00:19:31,110 --> 00:19:40,310
in to someone today who just kind of brought it up. Are you noticing any impact on some of these

260
00:19:40,310 --> 00:19:48,570
issues? Are you hearing financially any sort of funding by private sources to some of the sources

261
00:19:48,570 --> 00:19:58,280
we're looking at being affected at all? That's a huge question. I don't know. In looking at the

262
00:19:58,280 --> 00:19:59,960
so I can see that there's a fair bit.

263
00:20:02,500 --> 00:20:13,560
It's not filling the gap that the federal government left behind on several or non-profits. The need for additional funding, other sources, more help, still very much exists.

264
00:20:14,720 --> 00:20:24,340
In doing some research for this paper, looking at the statistics in our area, I can tell you that the fair market rents since 2019 is skyrocketed, it's almost double.

265
00:20:24,340 --> 00:20:30,720
And the average median income is also risen by 70 something percent.

266
00:20:31,100 --> 00:20:37,680
So while those numbers are rising quite rapidly impacting what's available on the market,

267
00:20:38,480 --> 00:20:40,760
those working folks, which I'd like to see a study on,

268
00:20:41,000 --> 00:20:45,060
I don't think that's changing as rapidly as the average median would indicate.

269
00:20:52,060 --> 00:20:53,940
Do we have anything else?

270
00:20:54,120 --> 00:20:54,760
Should we go to the order?

271
00:20:56,300 --> 00:21:02,060
Yeah, I just wanted to note, which I did informally, that four of us sitting at this place.

272
00:21:02,160 --> 00:21:05,760
I think you, too, right, Karina, have re-applying?

273
00:21:06,280 --> 00:21:08,500
Oh, are we all up?

274
00:21:08,740 --> 00:21:09,120
Yes.

275
00:21:09,460 --> 00:21:10,100
All four of us.

276
00:21:10,280 --> 00:21:12,140
Everyone, except Richard.

277
00:21:12,620 --> 00:21:13,900
Richard and Richard.

278
00:21:15,280 --> 00:21:16,820
Richard and Guillermo.

279
00:21:17,100 --> 00:21:17,740
Yeah, and Guillermo.

280
00:21:18,980 --> 00:21:24,240
But yeah, the four of us are all, and I believe we've all re-applied.

281
00:21:24,240 --> 00:21:27,320
Yes, I did. I haven't heard anything beyond the plan.

282
00:21:27,440 --> 00:21:36,300
No, I spoke with Tiffany today and she was, I guess they just closed a week ago or so.

283
00:21:36,600 --> 00:21:43,340
Anyway, there are more applicants than spots, so we will have to go through the interview process to be determined.

284
00:21:44,240 --> 00:21:44,280
Okay.

285
00:21:46,670 --> 00:21:49,470
But I think all of us are terms expired.

286
00:21:49,470 --> 00:21:56,130
And as much as we know, is Giroa still joining us, I haven't seen much of the meetings.

287
00:21:57,110 --> 00:22:02,830
He did respond to our Rick email, letting us know that he had an appointment come up that he wouldn't be able to.

288
00:22:02,910 --> 00:22:03,990
But he's still interested.

289
00:22:04,310 --> 00:22:04,530
Okay.

290
00:22:05,530 --> 00:22:05,830
Good.

291
00:22:06,310 --> 00:22:06,590
Very good.

292
00:22:07,530 --> 00:22:10,870
Well, we have nothing further for the agenda.

293
00:22:11,170 --> 00:22:12,570
I will call the meeting adjourned.

294
00:22:13,150 --> 00:22:14,110
Thank you all very much.

295
00:22:14,470 --> 00:22:14,750
Thank you all.

296
00:22:15,590 --> 00:22:17,470
Our next meeting date is...

297
00:22:17,470 --> 00:22:18,210
Thank you.

298
00:22:21,210 --> 00:22:23,430
I'm going to have to send you guys an email.