1
00:00:12,850 --> 00:00:26,230
4 is a quorum, because we're second, right? Yes. Well, it looks like we have sex, but even then. Yeah. I guess we have a vacancy? I guess.

2
00:00:31,550 --> 00:00:35,970
I think he was probably just not expected to attend it.

3
00:00:38,420 --> 00:00:39,300
Well, are we ready?

4
00:00:39,960 --> 00:00:42,240
Would you please go out at home, if you could look at it at home?

5
00:00:42,300 --> 00:00:42,580
I did.

6
00:00:48,500 --> 00:00:49,080
You ready?

7
00:00:49,800 --> 00:00:56,520
Okay, well, let us call to order the meeting of the Community Development Law Grant Commission.

8
00:00:57,500 --> 00:01:00,420
And could we begin, please, by starting with the roll call.

9
00:01:03,210 --> 00:01:06,190
Okay, Harry Colomore.

10
00:01:06,590 --> 00:01:07,110
Present.

11
00:01:07,770 --> 00:01:10,230
Karina O'Brien, absent.

12
00:01:10,830 --> 00:01:12,930
Walter Rich Richardson.

13
00:01:13,310 --> 00:01:13,470
Here.

14
00:01:13,970 --> 00:01:15,370
Robert Vanderfeld.

15
00:01:15,750 --> 00:01:15,950
Here.

16
00:01:16,530 --> 00:01:18,330
Virginia Young, here.

17
00:01:18,870 --> 00:01:20,290
Richard Tippett, absent.

18
00:01:20,750 --> 00:01:22,450
And Guillermo Rosas, absent.

19
00:01:23,190 --> 00:01:24,170
Staff members present.

20
00:01:25,010 --> 00:01:25,990
Jessica Miras, here.

21
00:01:26,410 --> 00:01:26,970
John Sakamoto.

22
00:01:28,410 --> 00:01:28,930
Here.

23
00:01:29,390 --> 00:01:32,030
Okay. Here.

24
00:01:32,030 --> 00:01:36,650
And we have a quorum, so the first item on our agenda is to review the agenda.

25
00:01:40,080 --> 00:01:45,120
We have a motion to approve the agenda, do we need that?

26
00:01:46,800 --> 00:01:47,660
Anything else?

27
00:01:48,000 --> 00:01:53,980
The only thing I would like to add for the agenda and for today and for future meetings, John,

28
00:01:54,440 --> 00:01:59,740
is I think it'd be helpful for us to have a staff update under the administrative report.

29
00:01:59,740 --> 00:02:08,000
And so for example, what happened with our recommendations last time, I know there have been some changes at least with one of the grant recipients.

30
00:02:08,280 --> 00:02:18,920
And so just a general update, if we could add that into the agenda for this meeting and for future meetings as well, and let us mark Karina as present.

31
00:02:19,640 --> 00:02:22,680
Now public

32
00:02:25,400 --> 00:02:30,020
comments, I don't see any members of the public present any longer, so we don't have any.

33
00:02:30,900 --> 00:02:38,940
Do we have on the consent agenda, we only have one item which is the approval of the minutes of April 27th, 20th, 20th, 26th.

34
00:02:38,980 --> 00:02:48,580
Do we have any changes or suggestions, additions to the minutes of the April 27th meeting?

35
00:02:55,770 --> 00:02:59,750
Well, hearing none. All in favor of approval? Say aye.

36
00:02:59,750 --> 00:02:59,890
Hi.

37
00:03:00,690 --> 00:03:01,170
Hi.

38
00:03:02,150 --> 00:03:03,070
Oh, okay.

39
00:03:03,130 --> 00:03:05,410
I move that we accept the minutes as written.

40
00:03:05,890 --> 00:03:06,530
I'll second it.

41
00:03:06,610 --> 00:03:06,690
Good.

42
00:03:07,010 --> 00:03:07,130
Okay.

43
00:03:08,070 --> 00:03:08,730
Move the second.

44
00:03:08,890 --> 00:03:09,530
All in favor?

45
00:03:09,950 --> 00:03:10,170
Aye.

46
00:03:10,910 --> 00:03:11,210
Opposed?

47
00:03:12,510 --> 00:03:12,710
Okay.

48
00:03:12,990 --> 00:03:13,230
Great.

49
00:03:14,110 --> 00:03:21,490
So on to, as I said, the staff update, could you give us an update, please, John, on the status

50
00:03:21,490 --> 00:03:22,350
of our recommendations.

51
00:03:22,530 --> 00:03:27,170
And also, I believe there have been at least one change with one of the grant recipients.

52
00:03:28,430 --> 00:03:28,910
Yes.

53
00:03:28,910 --> 00:03:37,430
So, recommendations were made to HUD during for the annual action plan for the current year we're in fiscal year 2627, program year 2026.

54
00:03:38,490 --> 00:03:45,670
I have not had a response from HUD yet or grant agreement, but that's typical timing wise it typically won't come until October or November of the soonest.

55
00:03:46,870 --> 00:03:56,090
For the program year that we're reporting on the paper, I could provide the update that on the move who was awarded a public service grant decided to walk away from said grant.

56
00:03:56,090 --> 00:04:13,810
But it came so late for them they had concerns physically about doing journal entries to account for it, even though they could and we advised them that that was definitely possible wouldn't be a violating of any of HUD stance, they had enough private donation funds that they chose to do that rather than make the change.

57
00:04:15,350 --> 00:04:18,790
So I understand there's also been a change with NAPA fair housing.

58
00:04:19,230 --> 00:04:20,450
Are you aware of that?

59
00:04:20,910 --> 00:04:27,250
NAPA fair housing as an entity is changing, changing leadership and going through some changes.

60
00:04:27,450 --> 00:04:30,870
They're still providing service to the Valley, very similar to what they had been doing before.

61
00:04:31,090 --> 00:04:35,430
But they are under a new, working with a new group to provide some of the service.

62
00:04:36,030 --> 00:04:39,010
More on that to come as things flesh out and finish up.

63
00:04:41,470 --> 00:04:47,230
So I have a question about, so I don't recall, I could look it up, but I'd rather just ask.

64
00:04:47,630 --> 00:04:54,770
So we approved how much for on the move and what was done with the funds that we had allocated to them.

65
00:04:56,290 --> 00:04:58,410
I don't have the exact number, but I will look it up shortly.

66
00:05:00,000 --> 00:05:29,960
What is need to be done is it will need to be reprogrammed. Because it's public service, though, and it is, in the year in the past, it'll have to be reprogrammed to some sort of community development type project. We won't be able to meet the criteria in order to stay within the gap to add it to this year's current public service agency. So it'll have to be reprogrammed and so we'll come to you with options. We'll likely try to meet with you again sooner before the end of the year, unlike usual to come up with a plan.

67
00:05:29,960 --> 00:05:30,840
to fix this.

68
00:05:31,340 --> 00:05:32,040
Thank you.

69
00:05:32,200 --> 00:05:33,480
That's very clear.

70
00:05:36,030 --> 00:05:36,870
Any other questions?

71
00:05:39,030 --> 00:05:39,330
Okay.

72
00:05:40,490 --> 00:05:45,250
Moving on to the paper, the Consolidated Annual Performance

73
00:05:45,250 --> 00:05:46,290
Evaluation Report.

74
00:05:47,190 --> 00:05:49,810
John, you want to step us through this, please?

75
00:05:52,300 --> 00:05:56,760
Yes, so this year we still had some fair bit of success.

76
00:05:56,940 --> 00:05:59,780
We were able to complete some projects for owner-occupied housing

77
00:05:59,780 --> 00:06:04,940
rehabilitation. It's seven projects this year with CDBG funds. We did eight with home funds,

78
00:06:05,140 --> 00:06:10,440
so the program's operating well, doing what it's needs to be doing. The public service entities,

79
00:06:10,700 --> 00:06:18,440
they were all the rest of them besides on the move, fully expending, delivering fair numbers,

80
00:06:18,480 --> 00:06:25,900
which was good to see. The two nonprofit capital improvement projects, we are still waiting for

81
00:06:25,900 --> 00:06:30,580
environmental and enough bids to make sure that we can meet the criteria to satisfy HUD before

82
00:06:30,580 --> 00:06:37,740
those can take off and start going under construction. That's the short of it, but were there any

83
00:06:37,740 --> 00:06:43,300
questions that came up in your review this year from the prior? The boys they can

84
00:06:44,980 --> 00:06:52,020
arrange with the report? Yeah, there's a reason I can't find it anymore. There was a listing of

85
00:06:52,020 --> 00:06:56,240
of the types of services, I can't seem to find that.

86
00:06:56,280 --> 00:07:00,180
I thought it was right at the beginning, but anybody

87
00:07:00,180 --> 00:07:01,860
know off the top of their head what page that was?

88
00:07:02,240 --> 00:07:02,760
It's weird.

89
00:07:03,420 --> 00:07:04,580
What is it that you're referring to?

90
00:07:05,420 --> 00:07:08,780
Never mind, it's not critical that I find it to ask my question.

91
00:07:09,580 --> 00:07:11,820
It was a good thorough list that was comprehensive.

92
00:07:12,020 --> 00:07:16,260
All the types of programs and housing that are addressed

93
00:07:16,260 --> 00:07:18,380
in the paper and in community services.

94
00:07:18,600 --> 00:07:21,440
There was one that I felt was missing from what

95
00:07:21,440 --> 00:07:51,420
that I think of as a typical housing continuum of services, which is transitional housing, the 18-month type of housing that's for people who are homeless and at risk of homelessness, and so I didn't see it listed as one of the types of services slash housing that we provide, but I believe we actually at times in the past have, I know that I forget the name of the program, but there was the program for mentally ill adults that was

96
00:07:51,420 --> 00:08:00,120
was up off of redwood road up there, kind of where biographies used to be, that had to close.

97
00:08:00,760 --> 00:08:08,680
It was in the former Motel 6, and I believe that one of the problems was that there were a variety of issues, apparently, with that site.

98
00:08:08,860 --> 00:08:14,000
But I believe that that was operating under a transitional housing umbrella.

99
00:08:14,720 --> 00:08:21,400
So having operated such programs, I would say that they have value with the

100
00:08:21,400 --> 00:08:47,500
And in a continuum, they're useless standing on their own because just what happened to the folks at the Motel 6 is what happens if you don't have enough supported housing stock for folks to move into and then they reach the limit of the time during of 18 months when they can get the support sometimes you can extend it a little bit, but basically you do end up booting right back out onto the street and you're right back to where you started.

101
00:08:49,200 --> 00:08:58,960
Anyway, simple question is, is there any particular policy reason why it was left off the list or was it more just slip the mind kind of thing or something?

102
00:08:59,960 --> 00:09:05,260
No particular policy reason why it probably would have fit under homeless shelters.

103
00:09:05,920 --> 00:09:10,440
I would assume actions taken for institutional in the homelessness section.

104
00:09:11,680 --> 00:09:15,480
We could certainly talk about it in there.

105
00:09:18,350 --> 00:09:21,950
The other area would probably be in

106
00:09:24,830 --> 00:09:30,430
the helping homelessness kind of section would that be page 1113.

107
00:09:33,370 --> 00:09:36,070
I'm sorry, are you referring us to page 13 of the paper?

108
00:09:36,270 --> 00:09:40,890
Of the paper. I know we've got sort of this double numbering thing that always drives me nuts.

109
00:09:41,010 --> 00:09:42,550
Yeah, I do apologize for that.

110
00:09:42,550 --> 00:09:55,810
okay, 13 of the caper which that's okay sorry this always gets me this double

111
00:09:55,810 --> 00:09:59,830
numbered. Okay, that's...

112
00:10:00,050 --> 00:10:29,570
22 of 33. Okay. Yes, that is exactly right. I mean, even the word transition is right there. And I'm just, I just would suggest that as a bode and homeless coordination look at service spectrums over the years, transitional housing is a typical, for one thing, there are under certain administrations. There are funding opportunities that show up for

113
00:10:29,570 --> 00:10:34,110
that specific type of housing that it would be a shame not to go be able to go after.

114
00:10:36,600 --> 00:10:41,640
That's that comment. I have other comments, but I will wait and let other people speak.

115
00:10:43,760 --> 00:10:44,340
What else?

116
00:10:45,380 --> 00:10:49,440
Okay. I will, oh, you'll go ahead because I have two more things, but I can wait.

117
00:10:49,940 --> 00:10:54,060
If you turn your mic off and then we'll, well, I wasn't sure if I was.

118
00:10:55,760 --> 00:11:05,200
Okay. So page five of the paper, 14 of the document that was the PDF. This is the

119
00:11:05,200 --> 00:11:10,800
kind of thing that Harry says I always bought, but in the second column under source, public

120
00:11:10,800 --> 00:11:16,120
is lower case for like the first five, and then uppercase for the bottom two. I just

121
00:11:16,120 --> 00:11:18,500
feel like it should be consistent either way. Oh, thank you, Sam.

122
00:11:22,180 --> 00:11:23,260
Sorry, and then I had a

123
00:11:23,260 --> 00:11:29,440
question, which I feel like I should, this should be evident, but it's just not to me.

124
00:11:29,940 --> 00:11:37,820
The one page earlier, on the top of page four, page 13 of the PDF about the racial and

125
00:11:37,820 --> 00:11:44,360
ethnic composition of families assisted, it has the families 4, 13, 5, 6, and then at

126
00:11:44,360 --> 00:11:47,180
the bottom the amount that's Hispanic and not Hispanic.

127
00:11:47,400 --> 00:11:52,060
And I just don't understand as the top, like those numbers obviously don't add up, what

128
00:11:52,060 --> 00:11:55,140
What is one individual's and one is families or what is that?

129
00:11:57,000 --> 00:11:58,620
Happy to work through this one.

130
00:11:59,040 --> 00:12:05,020
The problem with this particular table as it is provided by HUD is that when it's populating

131
00:12:05,600 --> 00:12:10,240
the race category, it's leaving off other or multiracial.

132
00:12:10,900 --> 00:12:15,420
And so the reason why that number of Hispanic is so high on the bottom one is because some

133
00:12:15,420 --> 00:12:21,880
of our public service agencies, people identify as other or multiracial and not white.

134
00:12:21,880 --> 00:12:26,000
And so it's not captured in this table, and that's why the number shows such a big

135
00:12:26,000 --> 00:12:26,240
variance.

136
00:12:26,360 --> 00:12:29,740
There's that many people selecting other or multiracial rather than white Hispanic.

137
00:12:30,200 --> 00:12:31,540
It's not captured in the top part of the world.

138
00:12:31,760 --> 00:12:33,040
It's captured in the lower part.

139
00:12:33,140 --> 00:12:33,860
But it's captured in the lower.

140
00:12:33,980 --> 00:12:34,100
Okay.

141
00:12:34,300 --> 00:12:34,860
That makes sense.

142
00:12:35,040 --> 00:12:37,200
But the totals don't add up.

143
00:12:37,340 --> 00:12:42,680
And it's because of the way in which the federal government categorizes race and

144
00:12:42,680 --> 00:12:46,140
Hispanic origin as two different categories, right?

145
00:12:46,300 --> 00:12:50,160
So you have a race category, and as you said, they emit other.

146
00:12:50,160 --> 00:13:02,840
But then separately, you have a Hispanic, non-Hispanic, and so I think in the narrative you put in there a very nice explanation this year, I really appreciate that because it is confusing.

147
00:13:03,100 --> 00:13:09,060
It looks like we only had 434 families. When in fact it was 4,500 families.

148
00:13:09,060 --> 00:13:09,680
Right. Exactly.

149
00:13:10,160 --> 00:13:20,720
Yeah, and it's just an unfortunate shortcoming of the way this table populates for them, they could easily solve it by adding other at the bottom and it would all match and be very easy to read.

150
00:13:21,220 --> 00:13:27,860
But when it goes into the caper, when it goes into the system, this is how it will look and we have to have the narrative to explain why the variance is there.

151
00:13:34,250 --> 00:13:42,230
Okay, so on page 9, you talked about zoning standards and barriers to group homes.

152
00:13:42,230 --> 00:13:49,270
I just wanted to make a editorial note about that, which I've actually mentioned to Rob

153
00:13:49,270 --> 00:13:53,590
at Mantis as well, since they've started to finally engage in supported housing.

154
00:13:54,410 --> 00:13:58,830
The key that unlocks that problem is master leasing.

155
00:14:00,570 --> 00:14:07,010
The limit, as you probably know, is the residence is six before you have to call it a licensed

156
00:14:07,010 --> 00:14:08,090
facility.

157
00:14:08,090 --> 00:14:14,690
So, six or below, you can master lease a house with multiple bedrooms anywhere you want

158
00:14:14,690 --> 00:14:16,150
and you can move people in.

159
00:14:16,450 --> 00:14:20,290
It doesn't mean you shouldn't spend some time talking to the neighbors and softening

160
00:14:20,290 --> 00:14:30,370
the ground, but there's not a formal complaint procedure that can block it and it's a mechanism

161
00:14:30,370 --> 00:14:31,690
that's extremely useful.

162
00:14:33,010 --> 00:14:40,330
The key, especially now, is getting funds in order to do the leasing.

163
00:14:40,730 --> 00:14:43,910
I mean, I could get into the whole programmatic structure, I won't do that.

164
00:14:44,430 --> 00:14:47,230
But it is a great work around.

165
00:14:47,490 --> 00:14:52,930
It's harder if the population you're working with does need a license facility,

166
00:14:52,950 --> 00:14:55,430
which is sometimes the case with certain populations.

167
00:14:55,430 --> 00:14:59,130
but with folks who are basically

168
00:15:00,000 --> 00:15:29,820
It's really somewhat independent and can get by with visiting staff, you cannot have an office, you cannot have staff who live on site, but you can have staff visiting a lot to provide support. Which allows you to work with a fairly disabled population. So anyway, it's a model that works. We've just finally started to do a little bit of it in this community. We're about 40 years behind the curve.

169
00:15:29,820 --> 00:15:38,000
on it, but it's still, it's cartoning to see Mentus beginning in particular, dipping their tones of the water.

170
00:15:38,180 --> 00:15:42,340
I think progress knows exactly how this works, but the economics may be a barrier.

171
00:15:42,620 --> 00:15:54,740
But I did want to note that that's the work around, that works when there's understandable NIMBY opposition to licensed group homes in various neighborhoods.

172
00:15:55,520 --> 00:15:57,220
I have only one more.

173
00:15:59,720 --> 00:16:03,680
Oh, it's a request rather than a note.

174
00:16:04,180 --> 00:16:06,380
On page 13 you talk about HMIS stats.

175
00:16:07,400 --> 00:16:09,900
And I know what you guys are new,

176
00:16:10,020 --> 00:16:11,920
so you won't consider me a broken record.

177
00:16:12,820 --> 00:16:17,040
But pretty much every year, I ask if we could please have access to

178
00:16:17,040 --> 00:16:21,600
or be able to see the most recent years HMIS stats.

179
00:16:22,360 --> 00:16:30,700
I find them very informative and helpful to truly understand, you know, how we're doing on all those indicators.

180
00:16:32,440 --> 00:16:39,800
When would it be appropriate time to bring that to the committee, the kind of the early meeting of the year, will we do the calendar?

181
00:16:39,800 --> 00:16:45,920
Yeah, because it's informational, it doesn't necessarily lead to decision-making.

182
00:16:47,740 --> 00:16:50,020
I think I will speak for myself.

183
00:16:50,560 --> 00:16:56,680
It enlarges my understanding of how we are doing that along with things like the point in time count.

184
00:16:57,740 --> 00:17:09,000
It's a snapshot, but there are indicators, at least as I recall, that kind of give a little bit broader idea of how people are actually moving through the system.

185
00:17:09,000 --> 00:17:38,300
Because one thing point in time just tells us that on that day, this is how many people we found over in Kennedy or down by the creek or wherever it's, I think, more useful to have a better picture of, okay, fine and abode staff went out and talk to them and this person, you know, we managed to move seven to this and that, you know, yeah, I can work with the continuum of care to provide the system performance measures when they come out.

186
00:17:39,000 --> 00:17:39,260
Thank you.

187
00:17:39,400 --> 00:17:39,840
Absolutely.

188
00:17:39,980 --> 00:17:40,220
That's it.

189
00:17:40,580 --> 00:17:41,940
I'm done with my comments.

190
00:17:44,420 --> 00:17:45,000
Anything else?

191
00:17:45,160 --> 00:17:45,260
Rich?

192
00:17:45,620 --> 00:17:45,960
Oh, good.

193
00:17:46,100 --> 00:17:46,380
Thank you.

194
00:17:46,520 --> 00:17:51,540
I had on page 22 of the document.

195
00:17:51,540 --> 00:17:59,960
I talked about receiving the public of the paper, page 20, not the PDF, page 22 of the

196
00:17:59,960 --> 00:18:00,220
paper.

197
00:18:00,800 --> 00:18:04,060
It says during the public comment period, this is about the paper.

198
00:18:04,900 --> 00:18:09,340
The city received to be completed in public comments and so you just want to highlight

199
00:18:09,340 --> 00:18:12,060
that that's obviously a blank that you need to fill in?

200
00:18:12,140 --> 00:18:12,800
Yes, absolutely.

201
00:18:13,180 --> 00:18:16,340
And I assume as of today we haven't received any.

202
00:18:16,800 --> 00:18:18,880
Yeah, we haven't received any and it's open

203
00:18:18,880 --> 00:18:20,620
until the city council meeting.

204
00:18:20,900 --> 00:18:22,060
So once council meetings over,

205
00:18:22,200 --> 00:18:24,020
I will fill in that to be completed

206
00:18:24,020 --> 00:18:25,560
with however many comments we've received.

207
00:18:26,060 --> 00:18:26,280
Okay.

208
00:18:27,960 --> 00:18:29,500
September the 15th.

209
00:18:31,970 --> 00:18:35,090
So do you need a motion to approve this

210
00:18:35,090 --> 00:18:36,230
to recommend to council?

211
00:18:36,410 --> 00:18:38,290
Or is this more of an information item?

212
00:18:38,290 --> 00:18:43,870
I believe it's a motion to present the information so I'll entertain a motion to approve

213
00:18:44,730 --> 00:18:47,190
We have a motion approved

214
00:18:48,090 --> 00:18:51,490
Yes, but rich is moving yes, do we have a second?

215
00:18:52,850 --> 00:18:58,350
See we have to go to the sector step now. Yeah, I'll second every second very good any any discussion

216
00:18:58,350 --> 00:19:03,190
All in favor say aye. Hi. Hi

217
00:19:03,190 --> 00:19:07,430
I as well, so it is approved. Thank you

218
00:19:08,290 --> 00:19:09,030
Thank you, Camille.

219
00:19:09,590 --> 00:19:15,070
Jonathan, I have just one kind of side note question to all of this in planning for next

220
00:19:15,070 --> 00:19:21,290
year and I know the city plan is coming up as well, another version of it.

221
00:19:21,930 --> 00:19:30,270
But with the economy, the local economy, and with the wine industry really being challenged

222
00:19:30,270 --> 00:19:33,910
it was when I ran into someone today who just kind of brought it up.

223
00:19:33,910 --> 00:19:40,530
So, are you noticing any impact on some of these issues?

224
00:19:40,710 --> 00:19:51,670
Are you hearing financially any sort of funding by private sources to some of the sources we're looking at being affected at all?

225
00:19:53,500 --> 00:19:55,560
That's a huge question, I don't know.

226
00:19:55,560 --> 00:19:59,960
So, in looking at the financials for some of our nonprofits, I can see that there's a fair bit.

227
00:20:00,000 --> 00:20:28,880
There are a lot of private donations happening out there, but it's not feeling the gap that the federal government left behind on several of our nonprofits. So the need for additional funding, other sources more help still very much exists. In doing some research for this paper, looking at the statistics in our area, I can tell you that the fair market rents since 2019 is skyrocketed and it's almost double. And the average median income is also risen

228
00:20:28,880 --> 00:20:35,740
by 70 something percent. So while those numbers are rising quite rapidly, impacting what's

229
00:20:36,400 --> 00:20:40,840
available on the market, those working folks, which I'd like to see a study on was

230
00:20:41,380 --> 00:20:44,980
I don't think that's changing as rapidly as the average median would indicate.

231
00:20:50,980 --> 00:20:54,740
Okay, do we have anything else for the good of the order?

232
00:20:56,220 --> 00:21:01,920
Yeah, I just wanted to note which I did informally that four of us sitting at this place,

233
00:21:01,920 --> 00:21:03,540
So I think you too, right, Karina?

234
00:21:03,980 --> 00:21:05,580
I have re-applying.

235
00:21:06,120 --> 00:21:08,260
Oh, are we all up?

236
00:21:08,620 --> 00:21:09,860
Yes, all four of us.

237
00:21:09,980 --> 00:21:11,680
Are everyone except Richard?

238
00:21:12,480 --> 00:21:13,580
Richard and Richard.

239
00:21:15,260 --> 00:21:16,640
Richard and Guillermo?

240
00:21:17,060 --> 00:21:17,680
Yeah, and Guillermo.

241
00:21:18,000 --> 00:21:24,200
But the four of us are all, and I believe we've all re-applied,

242
00:21:24,340 --> 00:21:24,460
yes?

243
00:21:25,020 --> 00:21:25,600
I did.

244
00:21:25,780 --> 00:21:27,240
I haven't heard anything beyond the re-applying.

245
00:21:27,380 --> 00:21:28,860
No, I spoke with Tiffany today.

246
00:21:28,860 --> 00:21:37,740
and she was, I guess they just closed a week ago or so, anyway, there are more applicants

247
00:21:37,740 --> 00:21:43,160
than spots, so we will have to go through the interview process to be determined.

248
00:21:43,920 --> 00:21:44,160
Okay.

249
00:21:46,360 --> 00:21:50,220
But I think all of us, our terms expire at the end of the month.

250
00:21:50,220 --> 00:21:54,140
And we know, is Guirama still joining us?

251
00:21:54,280 --> 00:21:55,940
I haven't seen much of him in a couple of meetings.

252
00:21:56,580 --> 00:22:02,620
He did respond to our email, letting us know that he had an appointment come up that he wouldn't be able to.

253
00:22:02,840 --> 00:22:03,880
But he's still interested.

254
00:22:04,280 --> 00:22:04,880
Okay, great.

255
00:22:05,620 --> 00:22:05,740
Good.

256
00:22:06,220 --> 00:22:06,560
Very good.

257
00:22:08,120 --> 00:22:10,640
Well, we have nothing further for the agenda.

258
00:22:10,920 --> 00:22:12,500
I will call the meeting adjourned.

259
00:22:12,840 --> 00:22:13,900
Thank you all very much.

260
00:22:14,100 --> 00:22:14,540
Thank you all.

261
00:22:15,460 --> 00:22:17,420
Our next meeting date is?

262
00:22:17,460 --> 00:22:18,260
Thank you.

263
00:22:21,020 --> 00:22:23,320
I'm going to have to send you guys an email.

264
00:22:23,320 --> 00:22:23,340
No.