[0:35] I'm just finding this committee meeting
[0:36] order at 6:38. Chair Cameron Beck, I am
[0:41] with special person.
[0:43] Are you just saw Sonic?
[0:45] Um
[0:46] We got to get a full presentation from
[0:48] the city manager here.
[0:49] You want to hear too give us your
[0:51] presentation there on the special
[0:53] projects coordinator and what you want
[0:54] to do?
[0:55] >> What we originally put out in the
[0:57] staffing orders the special projects
[0:59] coordinator at an hourly at $22 an hour.
[1:02] Um and with further review of
[1:05] how the job will go is more of a salary
[1:08] position instead of an hourly um due to
[1:12] um
[1:14] the place that she will be or he will
[1:15] be, whoever is coming into the position.
[1:18] So um
[1:19] we are just taking the 22 times the 30
[1:23] 45,760.
[1:25] What you want to
[1:27] 45,008 but it's the same amount of
[1:29] 45,000 but doing it as a salaried
[1:31] position versus an hourly.
[1:34] >> That doesn't change what the city spends
[1:36] in terms of benefit premiums or anything
[1:38] like that. Okay.
[1:39] >> Nothing else changed. It's the structure
[1:41] of how they're being paid.
[1:44] » So she answered my question on
[1:47] and I I wouldn't be able to do it on the
[1:48] same problem.
[1:52] Uh making a motion to adopt the city
[1:55] manager's recommendation for the special
[1:58] projects coordinator salary.
[2:00] >> I'll second. All in favor.
[2:02] >> I.
[2:05] >> And what's
[2:06] What was the uh
[2:08] second one that we had there, ma'am? Oh,
[2:09] was there update on the discussion about
[2:11] the Village of Post Police contract?
[2:13] >> Um it's yes. So, um it was
[2:18] We basically drafted up a document of
[2:21] our um which is basically old contract.
[2:25] Um and sent it off to them to review.
[2:27] What they proposed was that it would
[2:30] stay with $30,000 that they put um
[2:34] per year right now and it go up in
[2:35] increments. So, the second year it'd be
[2:37] higher up to 40, cuz off the third year
[2:39] at $40,000 is the proposal to them. So,
[2:43] we're just waiting for them to review it
[2:45] and to get back to us as to whether or
[2:47] not they would accept it.
[2:49] >> Any questions about
[2:50] >> How long do they have to respond?
[2:54] >> [snorts]
[2:54] >> Since they've been holding them around
[2:55] for
[2:56] >> Uh we we were hoping that we'd hear
[2:58] something, but they didn't It was some
[3:01] Uh Devon went to their last council
[3:03] meeting, was there for 2 hours.
[3:04] Um and didn't quite get everything
[3:06] resolved, and that's what came out of
[3:07] it. So,
[3:09] uh they have until our next meeting to
[3:11] get it resolved, or it doesn't it does
[3:14] not
[3:15] go.
[3:16] Well, there's been some misinformation
[3:18] going around, but I do think that
[3:19] they're showing an interest in working
[3:22] with us um and they're actively
[3:25] you know, And there's [clears throat] a
[3:26] lot of talk around and I think um
[3:29] the council president and I think the
[3:31] um
[3:32] There was three of them I think that
[3:33] were more in were very much wanting to
[3:35] work with everything, including the
[3:37] mayor. So, there was some or not, but
[3:38] that that's what we had going for us is
[3:40] that they were they really wanted it to to to to
[3:42] >> Now, are we providing them service with
[3:45] no contract?
[3:47] >> No.
[3:47] >> Okay. [snorts]
[3:49] >> I'm going to make sure.
[3:50] >> No, the sheriff's department right now
[3:51] is covering it.
[3:56] » Was there any more questions about the
[3:58] book and contract negotiations? Was
[3:59] there any further updates made?
[4:01] >> Not until I hear back from them, but
[4:03] other than that
[4:04] You said they have until their next
[4:06] meeting or August?
[4:07] >> Their next meeting is August 6th, I
[4:09] believe, and then ours is August 10th,
[4:11] so
[4:12] >> Perfect.
[4:12] >> Yeah.
[4:15] » All right, you guys with that then I'll
[4:17] go ahead and call this meeting to a
[4:18] close as we only had the two items that
[4:20] we had
[4:21] >> Nancy, did you have something? Okay.
[4:24] >> Anything else?
[4:25] >> No, I thought she was going to say
[4:27] something.
[4:27] >> All right, she was going to say
[4:28] something.
[4:29] Uh I'll go ahead and call this meeting
[4:30] to a close at 6:42
[4:33] p.m.