1 00:00:02,790 --> 00:00:03,350 Good 2 00:00:09,370 --> 00:00:09,910 for you, 3 00:00:22,650 --> 00:00:23,990 everyone. 4 00:00:26,690 --> 00:00:27,470 You guys? 5 00:00:30,650 --> 00:00:44,030 I think a lot. I told you, I've been trying to get this guy out on it. 6 00:00:51,930 --> 00:00:53,650 That's right, that's right, that's right, that's right, that's right, that's right, 7 00:00:53,650 --> 00:00:59,270 well thankfully it's the only way to get it on that, so yeah, just a little bit here for sure. 8 00:00:59,270 --> 00:00:59,670 Yeah. 9 00:01:00,010 --> 00:01:04,780 If they're gonna, you know, we're getting a pretty serious. 10 00:01:05,040 --> 00:01:06,440 No, you know, we're getting serious. 11 00:01:06,440 --> 00:01:07,820 They're gonna be happy, slipped anymore. 12 00:01:09,620 --> 00:01:11,260 They just called for public comment. 13 00:01:11,420 --> 00:01:13,640 Full of inhibiting, it's one of the coolest walk-up stories. 14 00:01:14,220 --> 00:01:15,420 So, I don't know if that was the way you got it. 15 00:01:15,600 --> 00:01:17,120 But, you see, you got the tissue mark. 16 00:01:17,340 --> 00:01:17,800 Yeah, I'll show you. 17 00:01:20,460 --> 00:01:20,820 You 18 00:01:28,460 --> 00:01:28,820 got 19 00:01:36,060 --> 00:01:39,580 the 20 00:01:44,790 --> 00:01:46,550 tissue mark. 21 00:01:51,800 --> 00:01:52,980 What do you think, Schaeke? 22 00:01:53,120 --> 00:01:53,240 What do you think, Schaeke, please? 23 00:01:53,660 --> 00:01:56,530 I love you so much. 24 00:01:56,690 --> 00:01:56,830 I love you so much. 25 00:02:52,980 --> 00:02:54,600 Hey, I'll see you, chair. 26 00:02:59,490 --> 00:03:01,210 Oh my, I don't get a cushion. 27 00:03:02,430 --> 00:03:02,790 Wow. 28 00:03:02,950 --> 00:03:04,150 Good thing you got one. 29 00:03:04,490 --> 00:03:05,370 I'm here early. 30 00:03:05,370 --> 00:03:06,430 That's all ladies on the couch. 31 00:03:06,830 --> 00:03:07,670 Good thing I'm not last. 32 00:03:08,190 --> 00:03:08,550 Yeah. 33 00:03:08,810 --> 00:03:09,170 Great. 34 00:03:10,510 --> 00:03:11,210 I'll do that. 35 00:03:25,800 --> 00:03:26,280 No. 36 00:04:10,220 --> 00:04:14,780 Okay, thanks for your patience, everyone, a couple of minutes to start you today. 37 00:04:17,400 --> 00:04:21,640 But I'll call the February 5th, 2026 Planning Commission meeting to order. 38 00:04:23,380 --> 00:04:27,940 Will everyone please stand for the Pledge of Allegiance and will commission a resin, please 39 00:04:27,940 --> 00:04:29,760 as we just in the flag slip. 40 00:04:29,980 --> 00:04:30,360 So 41 00:04:34,610 --> 00:04:37,230 it's a flag of the United States from America. 42 00:04:38,090 --> 00:04:41,190 And I look for which is saying, one nation, 43 00:04:41,590 --> 00:04:45,210 under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all. 44 00:04:47,630 --> 00:04:48,410 Thank you. 45 00:04:50,030 --> 00:04:51,110 Staff roll, call please. 46 00:04:54,340 --> 00:04:56,480 All commissioners are present with the exception 47 00:04:56,480 --> 00:04:58,580 of commissioners, Gazano, and Elmore, 48 00:04:58,820 --> 00:05:00,060 who are excused this evening. 49 00:05:02,500 --> 00:05:03,460 Okay, public comments. 50 00:05:03,700 --> 00:05:05,240 This is the time we take public comments 51 00:05:05,240 --> 00:05:10,960 and items that are not on the agenda tonight, but are generally within the purview of the Planning Commission. 52 00:05:11,240 --> 00:05:13,800 If you wish to speak, please keep your comments to three minutes or less. 53 00:05:14,000 --> 00:05:16,620 So are there any public comments on non-agenda items? 54 00:05:25,370 --> 00:05:28,530 Chair Harris, the members of the Planning Commission, my name is Jim Mosher. 55 00:05:29,150 --> 00:05:35,930 Since you last met the City Council, had a planning session, which they held here. 56 00:05:36,770 --> 00:05:40,490 I don't know how many of you were able to attend or review that meeting. 57 00:05:40,490 --> 00:05:45,970 but one of the slides that was presented by the city staff gave us an update on our progress 58 00:05:45,970 --> 00:05:53,330 meeting or obligations under our housing element that we currently have. And I found that interesting. 59 00:05:54,330 --> 00:05:59,570 As you may know, under our current rena cycle, we have an obligation to plan for 60 00:06:00,490 --> 00:06:06,590 the addition of about 3,000 affordable housing units in Newport Beach. And under our plan, 61 00:06:06,590 --> 00:06:14,190 Then we are promising that we can accomplish that by approving about 8,000 units under 62 00:06:14,190 --> 00:06:18,690 the assumption that those will redevelop at about 40% affordable. 63 00:06:19,830 --> 00:06:28,850 What the slide showed were currently halfway four years into the six-rena cycle and the housing 64 00:06:28,850 --> 00:06:36,270 overlays that were counting on to develop to produce those have so far produced only about 65 00:06:36,270 --> 00:06:44,750 200 out of the 3,000 we're supposed to produce and the disturbing thing about it is that they're being produced at about a rate of 66 00:06:44,750 --> 00:06:54,530 1 affordable unit for 20 market rate units and the math is not too complicated at that rate of production. 67 00:06:55,550 --> 00:07:02,930 We would have to add to our city 60,000 market rate units to meet our Renault requirement. 68 00:07:02,930 --> 00:07:11,060 But it sounds to me like we do not have a realistic plan. 69 00:07:14,360 --> 00:07:17,780 And I think you're from your tentative agenda. 70 00:07:18,000 --> 00:07:22,220 I saw at your first meeting in March, you're going to see a more definitive report from 71 00:07:22,220 --> 00:07:23,400 the city about this. 72 00:07:25,300 --> 00:07:30,720 But I think the lack of affordable housing production is going to come back to haunt us. 73 00:07:33,020 --> 00:07:40,680 And I think the caps that we have are currently not too realistic and we may be forced to raise those. 74 00:07:40,880 --> 00:07:46,600 We certainly will have to meet this in our next rena cycle and add into the complication if you've not heard. 75 00:07:47,240 --> 00:07:56,860 There's a recent California appeals court opinion which the last week the Supreme Court of California decided to not review. 76 00:07:56,860 --> 00:08:07,300 so it is now the law and it makes overlays not in an acceptable way of meeting the affordable 77 00:08:07,300 --> 00:08:13,500 housing requirements and the city will face having to actually zone properties for those so that 78 00:08:13,500 --> 00:08:18,400 if they redevelop they won't have the option of an overlay but will actually have to redevelop in 79 00:08:18,400 --> 00:08:26,760 that way and so I think it should give us all pause when we are considering more housing with 80 00:08:26,760 --> 00:08:29,300 An adequate affordable units. 81 00:08:29,640 --> 00:08:29,960 Thank you. 82 00:08:32,400 --> 00:08:33,000 Thank you. 83 00:08:33,760 --> 00:08:36,060 Any other speakers for non-agenda items? 84 00:08:37,780 --> 00:08:38,000 Okay. 85 00:08:38,960 --> 00:08:40,300 Moving on to the next item. 86 00:08:41,080 --> 00:08:42,480 Request for Continuances, staff. 87 00:08:42,640 --> 00:08:44,000 Are there any requests for continuances? 88 00:08:44,780 --> 00:08:45,560 Either no request. 89 00:08:47,000 --> 00:08:47,560 Okay. 90 00:08:48,940 --> 00:08:51,320 Item number one, the minutes of the January 2022. 91 00:08:52,960 --> 00:08:57,240 20, excuse me, January 22, 2026, planning commission hearing. 92 00:08:57,240 --> 00:09:03,820 Would anyone like from the audience like to comment on the minutes from the January 22nd, 93 00:09:04,040 --> 00:09:04,660 2026 meeting? 94 00:09:05,560 --> 00:09:06,460 So, nobody? 95 00:09:06,740 --> 00:09:07,420 Call for a motion. 96 00:09:07,640 --> 00:09:08,560 I'll make a motion to approve. 97 00:09:10,040 --> 00:09:10,840 I'll second. 98 00:09:12,340 --> 00:09:13,200 Call for a vote. 99 00:09:29,230 --> 00:09:33,450 The motion carries 4-0 with Commissioner Rosy and Epstein. 100 00:09:36,000 --> 00:09:36,540 Okay. 101 00:09:37,080 --> 00:09:37,380 Thank you. 102 00:09:37,460 --> 00:09:38,420 On to item number two. 103 00:09:39,140 --> 00:09:40,200 Dover Town Homes. 104 00:09:40,440 --> 00:09:43,520 It's PA 2025-0135. 105 00:09:43,520 --> 00:09:48,080 5, the site location is 601 Dover Drive, staff? 106 00:09:48,480 --> 00:09:48,780 One at please. 107 00:09:48,840 --> 00:09:49,160 Good evening. 108 00:09:49,400 --> 00:09:50,220 Proceed with your presentation. 109 00:09:51,120 --> 00:09:52,720 Good evening, Chairman and Commissioners. 110 00:09:52,960 --> 00:09:54,160 Melinda Whalen, Planning Division. 111 00:09:55,020 --> 00:09:56,700 This is the Dover Town Homes. 112 00:09:57,600 --> 00:10:00,660 The location is at the corner of Dover Drive and Cliff Drive. 113 00:10:01,480 --> 00:10:04,300 The existing site is developed with medical offices. 114 00:10:05,140 --> 00:10:08,180 And it's downslope from the Cliff Haven residential neighborhood, 115 00:10:08,400 --> 00:10:11,700 across from Castaway's Park and Newport Bay. 116 00:10:11,700 --> 00:10:30,090 The site was identified in the housing element as an opportunity site and has an housing overlay within the 803 Dover Drive among 9 other sites with the intent to provide a variety of additional units for the city. 117 00:10:33,280 --> 00:10:40,180 The project will demolish the existing medical offices and construct a 33 unit for cell town homes. 118 00:10:40,180 --> 00:10:57,160 They will be within seven to attach three-story buildings, approximately 38 feet tall and provide two, three, and four bedroom units with two car garages, trash areas will be within the garages outside of the minimum garage dimensions. 119 00:10:59,950 --> 00:11:01,990 Here's the layout of the proposed project. 120 00:11:02,490 --> 00:11:11,090 It includes landscape buffers along the exterior property lines, public plaza towards the rear of the lot. 121 00:11:11,090 --> 00:11:23,020 It includes two amenity areas for the residents, and it will utilize an existing driveway, and 122 00:11:23,020 --> 00:11:28,280 it includes a hedge and landscape buffer adjacent to the existing residential. 123 00:11:30,880 --> 00:11:38,720 Required approvals are a major site development review, a variance requested to encroach into 124 00:11:38,720 --> 00:11:46,320 the street setbacks, a track map for condominiums, and it qualifies under 125 00:11:46,320 --> 00:11:49,000 sequender AB 130 statutory exemption. 126 00:11:53,570 --> 00:11:56,150 The HO3 sub area has specific 127 00:11:56,150 --> 00:12:01,370 development standards. The project complies with all of these development 128 00:12:01,370 --> 00:12:05,570 standards except for requesting the variance to encroach into the street setbacks. 129 00:12:12,920 --> 00:12:17,580 The design of the site provides interior drive aisles, amenity areas that are 130 00:12:17,580 --> 00:12:24,080 screen from public view. The larger rear setback with the publicly accessible plaza. 131 00:12:26,290 --> 00:12:27,610 The existing 132 00:12:27,610 --> 00:12:34,590 medical office has about 231 greater trips, so this is a significant lower trip generation. 133 00:12:35,810 --> 00:12:41,590 It's well below the height limit and it meets the minimum density. It's well below the maximum 134 00:12:41,590 --> 00:12:45,710 allowed density and provides greater setbacks and landscaping. 135 00:12:50,500 --> 00:12:52,780 A driveway analysis was provided by 136 00:12:52,780 --> 00:13:04,280 LSA Associates. It provided a Cueing Analysis for the proposed driveway operations and a site distance analysis for the safety of the project driveway. 137 00:13:05,750 --> 00:13:19,800 A condition of approval is included where if traffic issues do arise at the driveway, that the developer will have to implement a right in, right out only design. 138 00:13:19,800 --> 00:13:28,360 design. And the design was reviewed and approved and included in the LSA analysis. And this 139 00:13:28,360 --> 00:13:30,940 shows the design of the right turn right out. 140 00:13:36,180 --> 00:13:39,080 This is the view from the neighboring residential 141 00:13:39,780 --> 00:13:47,800 and it shows with the low height limit and the large slope and the landscape area. It provides 142 00:13:47,800 --> 00:13:51,540 a lesser impact if then if it were to maximize the development standards. 143 00:13:57,010 --> 00:13:58,510 This provides a view 144 00:13:58,510 --> 00:14:07,650 from Dover sidewalk. It shows the landscape buffer, the entry courtyards and the entries 145 00:14:07,650 --> 00:14:11,710 to each unit, which mimic typical residential throughout the city. 146 00:14:18,440 --> 00:14:20,080 It shows the public plaza, 147 00:14:20,460 --> 00:14:26,420 which provides a seating and viewing area for residents and the public alike. It also 148 00:14:26,420 --> 00:14:32,360 shows the hedge adjacent to the residential neighborhood to the side of the property. 149 00:14:32,360 --> 00:14:33,140 The 150 00:14:37,940 --> 00:14:42,880 project complies with 47 of the 52 objective design standards. 151 00:14:43,620 --> 00:14:48,680 Minor deviations are requested, but the intent of all the standards are still met. 152 00:14:54,660 --> 00:14:58,660 Here's the project rendering for the 16-minute building alone dover. 153 00:15:04,660 --> 00:15:23,720 Variance is requested due to the physical constraints of the property, to the side property line down slope of the residential above. There is a required slope stability step back that cuts into the buildable area. For a typical lot, this would be a zero setback. 154 00:15:25,860 --> 00:15:29,600 There's a site distance safety corner on Dover and Cliff Drive. 155 00:15:34,180 --> 00:15:40,660 The rear yard exceeds the minimum required setback and provides the required publicly accessible open space. 156 00:15:40,660 --> 00:15:41,460 Since 157 00:15:44,590 --> 00:15:47,870 the site is on the corner, it has two front setbacks, 158 00:15:50,790 --> 00:15:51,790 there are ten feet. 159 00:15:52,530 --> 00:15:57,010 Additionally, it has 20 foot setbacks for the upper levels. 160 00:15:57,450 --> 00:15:59,750 A typical site would have one front setback. 161 00:16:03,300 --> 00:16:06,620 So these constraints greatly cut into the buildable area of the site. 162 00:16:07,920 --> 00:16:14,180 Additionally, it was a priority for the design to provide the minimum 26 foot wide drive 163 00:16:14,180 --> 00:16:17,300 aisles for fire access, circulation, and safety. 164 00:16:17,300 --> 00:16:25,360 The alternative designs were explored to maximize the development standards up to the 65 foot height limit. 165 00:16:25,900 --> 00:16:36,940 But the goal was to be more compatible with the neighborhood and the encroachments were less impactful compared to a different design with the higher height limit. 166 00:16:42,280 --> 00:16:50,460 The Vesting tentative track map is for condo purposes and a park in Luffy will be charged per unit. 167 00:16:50,460 --> 00:16:51,300 The 168 00:16:56,300 --> 00:17:01,020 project was found to be statutorily exempt from CEQA, pursuant to AB 130. 169 00:17:01,720 --> 00:17:11,520 It meets the requirement, the criteria for AB 130 meets the zoning, land use, and no significant environmental resources on site. 170 00:17:12,980 --> 00:17:22,560 Tribal consultation concluded on December 22, 2025, and there are tribal monitoring conditions for two consulting tribes included in the resolution. 171 00:17:22,560 --> 00:17:23,440 There 172 00:17:28,140 --> 00:17:32,460 are some updated conditions, minor changes to conditions of approval that I would 173 00:17:32,460 --> 00:17:33,160 like to go through. 174 00:17:34,280 --> 00:17:40,540 So this adds a time limit or a time frame for recording the track map for the condominiums. 175 00:17:41,940 --> 00:17:45,460 They are required to be recorded prior to the issuance of the building permit. 176 00:17:50,220 --> 00:17:54,940 And this adds some language if the right turn, right out lane is required. 177 00:17:55,760 --> 00:17:57,140 And I would like to read that. 178 00:17:57,140 --> 00:18:02,960 But it says if not installed prior to the developer transferring the project to the homeowner association, 179 00:18:03,400 --> 00:18:07,080 the developer shall pre-fund the HOA reserves for this purpose. 180 00:18:07,680 --> 00:18:10,820 The fund shall be memorialized in the CCNRs. 181 00:18:11,160 --> 00:18:15,780 This condition shall expire five years from the date last unit sold and occupied. 182 00:18:20,880 --> 00:18:27,000 And there were some corrections to some fire conditions that were worked out post-distribution of the staff report. 183 00:18:27,000 --> 00:18:27,640 staff 184 00:18:34,810 --> 00:18:38,090 recommends conducting a public hearing and finding this project's 185 00:18:38,090 --> 00:18:42,110 statutorily exempt from CEQA, pursuant to AB 130, 186 00:18:43,370 --> 00:18:47,750 and it recommends the Planning Commission to adopt the resolution number PC 187 00:18:47,750 --> 00:18:54,370 2026-003, approving the site development review variants and besting tentative track map. 188 00:18:55,210 --> 00:18:59,830 The applicant is here and has a presentation, and I'm available for questions. 189 00:19:00,050 --> 00:19:00,330 Thank you. 190 00:19:00,930 --> 00:19:02,030 Thank you, Ms. Wellen. 191 00:19:02,510 --> 00:19:03,750 Commissioner, is there any questions for staff? 192 00:19:05,880 --> 00:19:06,320 Mr. Rosey? 193 00:19:10,480 --> 00:19:11,880 Thank you for the presentation. 194 00:19:13,160 --> 00:19:18,260 Just quickly in regard to the traffic and especially this condition, 71. 195 00:19:20,480 --> 00:19:31,200 If I understand correctly, the location of the curb cut is generally the same location as where the existing curb cut is. 196 00:19:32,000 --> 00:19:40,360 and if the traffic count is significantly less why are we requiring this condition? 197 00:19:43,420 --> 00:19:47,780 Good evening Chair and members of the Commission. My name is Kevin Riley. I'm the City Trappin Engineer. 198 00:19:48,620 --> 00:19:52,480 To answer your question, Commissioner Rosene. 199 00:19:53,520 --> 00:20:00,780 This is this condition 71 is based on the queuing at the eastbound approach. 200 00:20:01,580 --> 00:20:11,720 Where the driveway is proposed is actually, it's going to be maybe 20 feet west of the existing driveway based on LSA report. 201 00:20:12,860 --> 00:20:29,720 And what that does is it provides, if you have four vehicles queuing in the eastbound left turn lane, it blocks the ability of a driver exiting the private property to turn left, so they have to turn right. 202 00:20:29,720 --> 00:20:35,260 This will likely happen during the morning peak hour, because the morning peak hour 203 00:20:35,260 --> 00:20:43,960 aligns more with the hours of the school drop off at Ensign, but in other cases we 204 00:20:43,960 --> 00:20:51,820 feel comfortable that the left turn pocket will operate well with the with the 205 00:20:51,820 --> 00:20:59,420 proposed driveway curve cut. But we want to have the condition 71, just in case we 206 00:20:59,420 --> 00:21:01,140 be something different in the future. 207 00:21:02,600 --> 00:21:08,040 Okay, and thank you for adding that portion about the language for the mechanism for how this is going to work. 208 00:21:08,960 --> 00:21:15,700 You'll think that it's in a new show condition, but the 20 feet could be 20 feet and that makes the difference. So thank you. 209 00:21:18,810 --> 00:21:19,190 Commissioner. 210 00:21:22,310 --> 00:21:23,710 Thank you chair Harris. 211 00:21:23,710 --> 00:21:29,190 Yes, maybe I'll start with you, traffic engineer Riley, since we're on traffic. 212 00:21:29,650 --> 00:21:36,950 I had a question about the parallel parking on Dover Drive and Clifft Drive. 213 00:21:37,270 --> 00:21:40,770 Currently, neither of them have parking on them. 214 00:21:40,930 --> 00:21:45,450 Do you have plans to open them up for parking or keep them no parking zones? 215 00:21:46,630 --> 00:21:51,870 There's no plans to install offsite parking in the public right away. 216 00:21:51,870 --> 00:21:56,570 Okay, great. Thank you. Miss Whalen, a couple of questions for you if you don't mind. 217 00:21:57,750 --> 00:22:08,710 Is the publicly available, I think you call it a gazebo or park area, is that fulfill 218 00:22:09,130 --> 00:22:12,450 a portion of the applicant's public park land requirement? 219 00:22:14,190 --> 00:22:22,170 No, that is a development or design standard that's found in the multi-unit design standards. 220 00:22:22,670 --> 00:22:27,930 It requires amenities and it additionally requires a publicly accessible open space. 221 00:22:28,430 --> 00:22:33,590 But it's not part of the public part fee if that answers the question. 222 00:22:33,950 --> 00:22:34,750 That answers my question. 223 00:22:35,570 --> 00:22:36,050 Thank you. 224 00:22:36,050 --> 00:22:46,290 So, another question I have is there are often requirements for redevelopments to underground power if it happens to be in front of their property. 225 00:22:47,070 --> 00:22:50,230 Does this applicant have that requirement for this project? 226 00:22:50,770 --> 00:22:53,210 Yes, they will be undergrounding some utilities. 227 00:22:53,850 --> 00:22:55,250 Okay, that's good. 228 00:22:56,910 --> 00:22:59,450 And that is all I've got for now. 229 00:22:59,690 --> 00:22:59,990 Thank you. 230 00:23:11,200 --> 00:23:11,680 I 231 00:23:16,410 --> 00:23:17,490 have a meeting with the applicant. 232 00:23:21,050 --> 00:23:24,530 I spoke on the phone with the representative of the applicant. 233 00:23:25,150 --> 00:23:27,050 I briefly communicated with the applicant. 234 00:23:30,110 --> 00:23:32,090 Okay, I'll open the public hearing. 235 00:23:34,950 --> 00:23:41,210 Thank you. Good evening, Chair Harris, Planning Commissioners, staff. My name is Emily 236 00:23:41,210 --> 00:23:45,370 Samard, Director of Forward Planning with Shea Holmes. It's great to be here with you 237 00:23:45,370 --> 00:23:49,730 tonight. I first want to thank staff for all the work that they've done to get us to this 238 00:23:49,730 --> 00:23:54,990 point of the process. These housing element sites are still relatively new to all of us. 239 00:23:55,450 --> 00:24:00,950 They require quite a bit of work on these info sites and this one's no exception so I wanted 240 00:24:00,950 --> 00:24:06,550 wanted to give special thanks to Melinda Whalen, who has been our quarterback, no pundit-intended 241 00:24:06,550 --> 00:24:11,850 for Super Bowl Week, but she's really done great in guiding this application and this 242 00:24:11,850 --> 00:24:17,570 project forward. So thank you, Melinda. I'm joined tonight by my team at Shea and our 243 00:24:17,570 --> 00:24:21,330 consultants, so we'll be while we're presented for any questions that arise throughout 244 00:24:21,330 --> 00:24:27,230 the hearing tonight. Melinda did a great job covering the technical details, so my goal tonight 245 00:24:27,230 --> 00:24:32,270 is to give you some context on Shea Holmes and walk through the broader intent behind this community. 246 00:24:35,060 --> 00:24:40,120 I wanted to start off by giving a little history on Shea Holmes since we have such unique legacy. 247 00:24:40,600 --> 00:24:48,220 It began in 1881 with a small plumbing company in Oregon and over time the family expanded their construction business 248 00:24:48,220 --> 00:24:56,280 and were able to contribute to some major public works projects, most notably the Golden Gate Bridge as well as Parker and Hoover Dam's. 249 00:24:56,280 --> 00:25:02,420 In 1968, we entered the home building industry and today, Shea Holmes is one of the largest 250 00:25:02,420 --> 00:25:07,060 private home builders in the country operating across 11 states with our Southern California 251 00:25:07,060 --> 00:25:08,760 division based right here in Orange County. 252 00:25:09,960 --> 00:25:14,860 We're proud to be one of the nation's oldest and largest privately held builders with the 253 00:25:14,860 --> 00:25:17,700 Shea family now into its fourth generation of leadership. 254 00:25:22,240 --> 00:25:27,260 This slide is highlighting our most recent new port beach community, the K at Mariner Shores 255 00:25:27,260 --> 00:25:32,760 located off Urbinavenu and Mariners Drive, which was built out in early 2023. 256 00:25:33,860 --> 00:25:38,460 This is a 50-6 unit project that continues to be very well received by the community 257 00:25:38,460 --> 00:25:41,840 and reflects the type of thoughtful developments that we strive for. 258 00:25:44,820 --> 00:25:49,680 Bringing focus back to our current application, and just to reorient everybody, 259 00:25:50,220 --> 00:25:51,900 the sub-excite is outlined here in red. 260 00:25:52,720 --> 00:25:55,380 We're at the intersection of Dover and Cliff Drive. 261 00:25:55,780 --> 00:25:58,680 It's currently developed with a single-story medical office center 262 00:25:58,680 --> 00:26:05,380 and it's essentially positioned at the base of the Cliff Haven neighborhood and directly across from Castaway's Park, 263 00:26:05,840 --> 00:26:10,260 offering walkable access to trails, Newport Bay, retail and restaurants. 264 00:26:10,820 --> 00:26:17,400 You're probably noticing our West property line. We have seven existing homes directly abutting the site. 265 00:26:17,760 --> 00:26:24,820 These homes sit on average about 35 feet higher than our pad elevation and are separated by a 2-to-1 slope. 266 00:26:27,150 --> 00:26:29,710 Here's a ground level view of that condition. 267 00:26:30,330 --> 00:26:35,090 It's showing the existing wall and slope separating our site from the neighboring homes. 268 00:26:40,420 --> 00:26:46,200 On in full sites like this, especially when we have residential direct neighbors, like 269 00:26:46,200 --> 00:26:49,320 you just saw, outreach is very important to us. 270 00:26:49,820 --> 00:26:55,620 We take it as our responsibility to balance interests, not just for ourselves but for the local 271 00:26:55,620 --> 00:26:57,020 community in the city at large. 272 00:26:57,720 --> 00:27:03,740 We began engaging the Cliff Haven community about two months prior to our formal application 273 00:27:03,740 --> 00:27:05,080 into the city. 274 00:27:05,720 --> 00:27:10,520 In our intent of this was really just to open a line of communication early on in the process. 275 00:27:11,160 --> 00:27:16,840 So that neighbors had my direct telephone and email throughout the entire entitlement process with the city. 276 00:27:18,060 --> 00:27:21,680 At our first meeting with neighbors, this was in May of 2025. 277 00:27:22,400 --> 00:27:24,020 There were six neighbors that attended. 278 00:27:24,020 --> 00:27:29,500 and then from that point, our team has been consistent in communication with four direct 279 00:27:29,500 --> 00:27:34,180 neighbors on St. James Place and handling correspondence individually with them, just 280 00:27:34,180 --> 00:27:37,380 to better tailor to needs that come up or questions that arise. 281 00:27:38,240 --> 00:27:42,820 One of them even sends a letter of support this evening, which we really appreciate and 282 00:27:42,820 --> 00:27:47,440 I think speaks to the level of intimate communication that we've had this past year. 283 00:27:51,940 --> 00:27:56,820 When it came to site planning, like Melinda touched on, we were faced with several obstacles 284 00:27:56,820 --> 00:28:02,940 it's in a regular triangular parcel with street frontage on two sides and a slope 285 00:28:02,940 --> 00:28:07,920 condition on the third. Along Dover and Cliff City Code requires ten foot 286 00:28:07,920 --> 00:28:12,200 setbacks at grade and 20 feet for any portion of the building over 20 feet in 287 00:28:12,200 --> 00:28:16,860 height. Along the west side while zoning technically allows a zero setback 288 00:28:16,860 --> 00:28:22,220 California building code requires 15 feet from the toe of the slope. Once you 289 00:28:22,220 --> 00:28:26,320 layer in site distance requirements at the intersection the setbacks and so 290 00:28:26,320 --> 00:28:30,080 slope safety buffers, the buildable area shrinks dramatically. 291 00:28:30,840 --> 00:28:37,560 We go from about 1.6 acres to just over 1.1 buildable acres, which you can see here in 292 00:28:37,560 --> 00:28:37,740 gray. 293 00:28:39,040 --> 00:28:44,180 When it came to selecting product, we really wanted to plan this site with the neighbors 294 00:28:44,180 --> 00:28:45,900 and greater community in mind. 295 00:28:46,440 --> 00:28:52,060 Instead of shrinking the footprint and building taller, we were determined to make a more traditional 296 00:28:52,060 --> 00:28:58,080 road town home product work here. While the overlay would allow up to 65 feet in height 297 00:28:58,080 --> 00:29:03,540 and up to 81 units, we design this community out of minimum density of 20 units per acre 298 00:29:03,540 --> 00:29:10,300 and kept building heights below 38 feet with no rooftop decks here, specifically out of sensitivity 299 00:29:10,300 --> 00:29:12,460 to the adjacent homes and the greater community. 300 00:29:16,240 --> 00:29:18,740 I'll use this site plan to walk you through 301 00:29:18,740 --> 00:29:24,240 the layout of the site design. As you can see, although we have a tight footprint and minimum 302 00:29:24,240 --> 00:29:28,660 does city requirements to hit. The team did a really good job in laying out this community 303 00:29:28,660 --> 00:29:35,660 and utilizing space in a meaningful way. I'll bring you in off Cliff Drive. We are essentially 304 00:29:35,660 --> 00:29:40,980 utilizing the existing access point into the property as they touched on. We're actually shifting 305 00:29:40,980 --> 00:29:45,320 it west, so that's away from the intersection about 12 feet. 306 00:29:47,520 --> 00:29:49,540 You'll see enhanced paving and landscaping 307 00:29:49,540 --> 00:29:55,060 to create a vibrant sense of place for the sentence. The 33 units are arranged across seven buildings 308 00:29:55,060 --> 00:29:57,960 three of which front over drive and one 309 00:29:57,960 --> 00:29:59,820 orienting out towards cliff. 310 00:30:00,000 --> 00:30:29,980 This will really activate the street edge and introduce residential character to the corner. Along the west boundary, we essentially located our outdoor lounge space with seating, a fire pit and barbecue station. From here, there's a meandering landscaped walkway along the west project boundary, leading to passive open space with seating, landscaping, and a turf zone with benches and a waste receptacle. So for dog owners, sometimes you just appreciate not having to go on a full walk to get the job done. 311 00:30:29,980 --> 00:30:32,420 So, this space is really created for that convenience. 312 00:30:33,860 --> 00:30:38,440 And then at the northerly tip of the site, there's a public plaza which Melinda touched 313 00:30:38,440 --> 00:30:38,680 on. 314 00:30:38,740 --> 00:30:42,880 This is part of our 3% requirement of publicly accessible open space. 315 00:30:43,840 --> 00:30:47,860 So this is accessible directly off the right away as well as from the interior of the site. 316 00:30:48,460 --> 00:30:52,940 This space will be nicely landscaped with circular seating around a focal tree to create 317 00:30:52,940 --> 00:30:57,060 a scenic and relaxing environment for homeowners and the greater cleft haven community. 318 00:30:57,060 --> 00:30:58,060 I'll 319 00:31:00,520 --> 00:31:04,920 narrow focus a bit on project specifics and development standards. 320 00:31:05,520 --> 00:31:11,300 We went over most of this, but I'll restate that this site falls under the HO3 section 321 00:31:11,300 --> 00:31:14,640 of the Overly Zoning District in the Certified Housing Element. 322 00:31:15,180 --> 00:31:20,260 We're providing three distinct floor plans and meeting the minimum required density of 323 00:31:20,260 --> 00:31:21,120 33 units. 324 00:31:22,220 --> 00:31:28,400 Despite the tight site constraints, we exceed open space and parking requirements, providing 325 00:31:28,400 --> 00:31:31,260 providing an intentional and refined environment for future homeowners. 326 00:31:32,080 --> 00:31:36,820 It's also worth noting that the land use change from commercial medical to residential 327 00:31:37,400 --> 00:31:39,500 generates much fewer daily trips. 328 00:31:40,400 --> 00:31:44,760 During peak hours, it will generate 13 a.m. and 17 p.m. peak trips. 329 00:31:45,840 --> 00:31:52,000 This overlay district allows for a 65-foot maximum height and a maximum density of 50 units per acre. 330 00:31:52,680 --> 00:31:56,320 As you now know, we're building to the minimum allowed density of 20 units per acre 331 00:31:56,320 --> 00:32:00,920 and are keeping building heights at an average of 35 feet with no rooftop decks. 332 00:32:05,430 --> 00:32:11,390 When we are deciding on architectural direction here, we drew inspiration from the surrounding context. 333 00:32:12,070 --> 00:32:15,850 The project was inspired by mid-century modern design principles, 334 00:32:16,370 --> 00:32:20,330 drawing direct inspiration from both the existing on-site commercial buildings 335 00:32:20,330 --> 00:32:25,330 and the nearby environmental nature center, which features that distinct butterfly reform. 336 00:32:25,330 --> 00:32:26,510 We 337 00:32:28,880 --> 00:32:36,340 liked the idea of continuing that roof design and elongating the visual interest as you pass the ENC and continue south-downed over. 338 00:32:37,100 --> 00:32:44,840 These mid-century influences are also expressed through clean horizontal and vertical massing, deep overhangs, large window groupings, 339 00:32:45,060 --> 00:32:54,380 and a soft material palette that reflects the simplicity and refinement of mid-century architecture while complementing the coastal luxury atmosphere of Newport Beach. 340 00:32:54,380 --> 00:32:58,150 I'll go through some site renderings. 341 00:32:59,190 --> 00:33:00,730 So here are a couple examples. 342 00:33:01,430 --> 00:33:03,810 These buildings are fronting Dover Drive. 343 00:33:04,750 --> 00:33:08,590 So you can see the layer landscaping, focal street trees, 344 00:33:09,050 --> 00:33:11,410 the gates coming to the private courtyards. 345 00:33:15,620 --> 00:33:18,380 And then here are some vignettes of these site details. 346 00:33:19,180 --> 00:33:23,000 So going from left to right, you'll see the community gathering space. 347 00:33:23,260 --> 00:33:26,840 So this is our outdoor lounge area in the center of the community for residents. 348 00:33:26,840 --> 00:33:33,480 has a fire pit, seating and a barbecue and then in the middle you'll see the 349 00:33:33,480 --> 00:33:38,420 open space that we're calling the dog release area but it's really just a 350 00:33:38,420 --> 00:33:43,040 passive open space with seating and landscaping and then you'll see the 351 00:33:43,040 --> 00:33:48,580 public courtyard that's accessible off the public right away and that's really 352 00:33:48,580 --> 00:33:50,980 for the greater community and our residents to enjoy. 353 00:33:54,490 --> 00:33:55,670 Here's some comparison 354 00:33:55,670 --> 00:34:00,210 in street seamen images, so this is at the intersection of cliff and over. 355 00:34:01,610 --> 00:34:07,430 And you can see here just for a point of reference of height, the street light on the corner 356 00:34:07,910 --> 00:34:17,210 of cliff and over, it's 35 feet tall, so you can see that building has a peak height 357 00:34:17,210 --> 00:34:24,650 of 34 feet 11 inches coming in, you know, pretty much right where that light is, and a lot 358 00:34:24,650 --> 00:34:30,650 of the street trees along Dover actually exceed the height of the buildings right now so just to give 359 00:34:30,650 --> 00:34:32,750 a little bit scale of massing here. 360 00:34:35,730 --> 00:34:39,070 Here's a closer image of that intersection photo rendered. 361 00:34:45,830 --> 00:34:52,910 Here is a comparison image coming southbound down Dover Drive. So you'll see on the right hand side of 362 00:34:52,910 --> 00:34:58,570 the rendered image that's our public plaza or portion of it. You'll notice the street trees going 363 00:34:58,570 --> 00:35:05,290 down-dover drive, just going in and out of the buildings, which really makes this a softened 364 00:35:05,290 --> 00:35:07,610 residential feel as you come down the corridor. 365 00:35:09,050 --> 00:35:16,990 Another height reference here, we are removing that power pole as Commissioner Linkford highlighted. 366 00:35:17,630 --> 00:35:20,110 There are four cross arms on that pole. 367 00:35:20,690 --> 00:35:28,090 The bottom cross arm is at 38 feet, and again, the buildings along-dover drive are 34 feet 368 00:35:28,090 --> 00:35:32,830 11 inches so hard to assess scale there but I just wanted to point that out as 369 00:35:32,830 --> 00:35:34,290 you're looking out the street scene here. 370 00:35:37,120 --> 00:35:39,880 And then here's a focused image of 371 00:35:40,460 --> 00:35:42,520 that rendering as you're coming down Dover Drive. 372 00:35:48,680 --> 00:35:49,440 And that wraps up my 373 00:35:49,440 --> 00:35:54,260 presentation tonight. So on behalf of Shea Holmes thank you for your time and your 374 00:35:54,260 --> 00:35:57,880 engagement this evening. We hope that you agree that this project delivers 375 00:35:57,880 --> 00:36:02,560 housing in exactly the manner envisioned by the city housing element while 376 00:36:02,560 --> 00:36:06,700 While remaining sensitive to its residential surroundings, we're excited to bring another 377 00:36:07,190 --> 00:36:11,600 great community to new port beach, and I'll open it up for any questions now. 378 00:36:11,740 --> 00:36:12,000 Thank you. 379 00:36:12,680 --> 00:36:16,840 Do you agree with the conditions as changed and as presented? 380 00:36:17,320 --> 00:36:18,860 Yes, thank you, Chair Harris. 381 00:36:19,540 --> 00:36:25,080 We have worked on the conditions with staff and agreed to the resolution and conditions 382 00:36:25,080 --> 00:36:25,800 as modified. 383 00:36:26,340 --> 00:36:26,640 Thank you. 384 00:36:27,400 --> 00:36:28,880 Commissioner's questions for the applicant? 385 00:36:31,200 --> 00:36:32,720 I'll take the first few feet on mine. 386 00:36:33,360 --> 00:36:33,860 Thank you, Emily. 387 00:36:34,240 --> 00:36:35,360 A couple of questions for you. 388 00:36:36,020 --> 00:36:43,080 Number one, what was the thought process in pushing the project towards Dover and 389 00:36:44,020 --> 00:36:46,620 encroaching on the setbacks to request the variance? 390 00:36:48,020 --> 00:36:48,840 I'm sure there are variances. 391 00:36:49,200 --> 00:36:50,420 Yes, thank you for bringing that up. 392 00:36:50,700 --> 00:36:51,840 So a couple of things. 393 00:36:52,140 --> 00:36:55,960 And it wasn't necessarily a decision of moving it forward. 394 00:36:55,960 --> 00:37:01,420 It was kind of the opportunity cost that we landed on in picking product. 395 00:37:02,200 --> 00:37:07,680 So with the 15-foot setback that we needed off the toe of the slope, and then the unique 396 00:37:07,680 --> 00:37:12,860 situation that the site lent itself, since we have the major street frontage on two sides, 397 00:37:13,320 --> 00:37:18,680 we had that 20-foot setback requirement for anything over 20 feet, and then had the unique 398 00:37:19,200 --> 00:37:24,940 condition to have the 15-foot setback, whereas I'll use Ford Road as an example, just because 399 00:37:24,940 --> 00:37:26,760 as it had just come before you over the summer, 400 00:37:27,400 --> 00:37:29,000 they had two zero setbacks, 401 00:37:29,880 --> 00:37:31,420 Ford Road being one of them. 402 00:37:31,760 --> 00:37:34,200 So they had a six foot setback off 403 00:37:34,200 --> 00:37:35,740 of what would their advantage would be, 404 00:37:36,300 --> 00:37:38,980 but since it wasn't technically on an arterial street, 405 00:37:39,200 --> 00:37:40,700 they didn't have the same requirement. 406 00:37:41,200 --> 00:37:44,120 So our footprint shrunk right away. 407 00:37:44,720 --> 00:37:47,880 And instead of building higher, 408 00:37:48,380 --> 00:37:50,420 we decided to work with the city 409 00:37:50,980 --> 00:37:52,360 on encroaching on the setback 410 00:37:52,360 --> 00:37:54,800 to keep the product as less dense as we can. 411 00:37:55,920 --> 00:38:01,480 So it really was a matter of constraint because of topography. 412 00:38:02,100 --> 00:38:06,400 And then we just worked with staff on what would make the most sense for the site and product. 413 00:38:06,800 --> 00:38:08,880 So it was really product driven. 414 00:38:09,820 --> 00:38:10,520 Got it. 415 00:38:10,940 --> 00:38:17,760 And the second question, was there ever discussion to add a secondary exit on to Dover or to make 416 00:38:17,760 --> 00:38:28,380 Make that the primary versus exiting onto cliff, because as the city highlighted, it's a little unique in that if you're trying to go left, you can only get three or four cars backed up before you can't go left. 417 00:38:28,640 --> 00:38:34,500 So, it gets this particular intersection can get really crowded at certain times and backed up. 418 00:38:34,500 --> 00:38:46,120 We did, so when, again, when we were planning site, our preference was to utilize the existing access as Commissioner Rosine pointed out. 419 00:38:46,340 --> 00:38:54,700 If you have a less impact with residential use and lesser daily trips and it's a full access drive right now, why not preserve that? 420 00:38:54,960 --> 00:39:03,680 But in looking at the site with fresh eyes, I mean, we really did a litany of traffic studies to make sure that that access point was the safest condition 421 00:39:03,680 --> 00:39:07,620 for the community, our community that we're building 422 00:39:07,620 --> 00:39:08,880 and then the community at large. 423 00:39:09,420 --> 00:39:11,980 So we did assess going in off Dover, 424 00:39:12,140 --> 00:39:14,540 which would have been a right out access, 425 00:39:14,840 --> 00:39:15,660 not a full access. 426 00:39:17,020 --> 00:39:19,220 And ultimately it came down to safety 427 00:39:19,220 --> 00:39:24,480 with the traffic speed going southbound down Dover 428 00:39:24,480 --> 00:39:25,560 since we're downgrade. 429 00:39:26,260 --> 00:39:30,460 It did not pass as a primary access point. 430 00:39:30,460 --> 00:40:00,440 We would have to have a right lane to de-escalate traffic to turn into the site, to make that feasible, and so our primary access is actually most safe where it currently is, and then we've shifted it a stated 12 feet west, which creates a little bit looser of a condition since we're moving further from the intersection, and it just didn't lend itself space or requirement to have two points for a 33 years. 431 00:40:00,440 --> 00:40:00,960 in that project. 432 00:40:01,500 --> 00:40:01,760 Thank you. 433 00:40:02,100 --> 00:40:02,440 Thank you. 434 00:40:02,960 --> 00:40:03,880 Appreciate it. 435 00:40:05,520 --> 00:40:06,520 Thank you, Chair Langford. 436 00:40:07,680 --> 00:40:08,020 Thank you, Chair. 437 00:40:09,240 --> 00:40:15,280 Ms. Samard, appreciate all your outreach to the Newport Heights and the Cliff Haven communities. 438 00:40:15,840 --> 00:40:23,600 I'm curious in those communications and open houses and whatnot, what they believed their 439 00:40:23,600 --> 00:40:28,740 preference was for the architectural inspiration if they pointed you towards the mid-century 440 00:40:28,740 --> 00:40:34,560 modern as something to replicate from ENC, whether they like the idea if there was consensus 441 00:40:34,560 --> 00:40:34,940 there. 442 00:40:35,320 --> 00:40:36,100 I'm just curious. 443 00:40:36,700 --> 00:40:36,840 Sure. 444 00:40:38,140 --> 00:40:43,680 The architecture elevation style was not a main part of conversation with the neighbors. 445 00:40:44,880 --> 00:40:52,720 It was mainly height and really just direct impact them individually, and that's really why 446 00:40:52,720 --> 00:40:57,820 a lot of our conversation with the neighbors ended up more individual approach. 447 00:40:57,820 --> 00:41:04,680 because they all had individual concerns with their property and it wasn't 448 00:41:04,680 --> 00:41:11,060 surrounding architectural style. More so, height and impact in that way. 449 00:41:11,740 --> 00:41:17,720 Okay. Yeah, my personal read on it and I'd be curious eventually with all of us 450 00:41:17,720 --> 00:41:21,360 and maybe from the audience what they thought about it. To me it seemed like it was 451 00:41:21,360 --> 00:41:26,300 kind of lending itself. This style made it seem more like part of the commercial 452 00:41:26,300 --> 00:41:34,720 quarter instead of part of the, you know, coastal Cape Cod cliff haven feel. So, I was just 453 00:41:34,720 --> 00:41:39,580 curious if that was intentional, unintentional, you thought you were trying to match the 454 00:41:39,580 --> 00:41:43,660 ENC look, which is its own kind of like goofy use case. 455 00:41:44,240 --> 00:41:53,320 Yeah. No good question. We felt the corner is a pretty transitional part of the town kind 456 00:41:53,320 --> 00:41:58,000 of marrying both commercial and residential, which is upgrade from us. 457 00:41:58,620 --> 00:42:03,840 So when we were playing with elevation styles and the density of the buildings to see 458 00:42:03,840 --> 00:42:12,300 really what would lend itself best to a rotown home style here and fitting coastal kind 459 00:42:12,300 --> 00:42:18,300 of contemporary, new port beach, we met with staff and went over multiple iterations of 460 00:42:18,300 --> 00:42:22,880 this project, and this is what we felt would resonate best for this corner. 461 00:42:24,200 --> 00:42:25,500 Okay, thanks, Mr. Martin. 462 00:42:25,660 --> 00:42:27,640 I really liked the manner of shores, by the way. 463 00:42:27,720 --> 00:42:28,360 I think it looks great. 464 00:42:28,500 --> 00:42:28,700 Thank you. 465 00:42:30,160 --> 00:42:31,000 Can I share? 466 00:42:34,530 --> 00:42:38,550 Do you mind walking through a little bit more of some of the feedback and how it's implemented 467 00:42:38,550 --> 00:42:44,770 in the site plan and the position of buildings or based off communication with neighbors? 468 00:42:45,210 --> 00:42:49,250 You walk us through some of that, or a little more of the back and forth, or some compromises 469 00:42:49,250 --> 00:42:55,150 is potentially that. Yeah absolutely. So just giving an example and if you 470 00:42:55,150 --> 00:42:58,810 don't mind I'll pull up a site plan just so it might be easier to follow the 471 00:42:58,810 --> 00:43:02,130 context of the neighbors or I'll pull up an aerial. 472 00:43:07,300 --> 00:43:10,400 So some of the neighbors have 473 00:43:10,400 --> 00:43:15,000 been utilizing the property because it has been partially vacant for some time. 474 00:43:15,940 --> 00:43:21,980 They've been utilizing that to access the back of their slopes and some have had 475 00:43:21,980 --> 00:43:28,400 gates put in and things for maintenance. So we've been working individually with homeowners to 476 00:43:28,930 --> 00:43:37,880 have something embedded in our CCNRs that would allow them access via pathway to the back of their 477 00:43:37,880 --> 00:43:46,940 slopes to facilitate landscaping. We have a neighbor who didn't necessarily have a suggestion for 478 00:43:46,940 --> 00:43:53,480 site planning for us but since you know we've been collaborating and we're you 479 00:43:53,480 --> 00:43:57,920 know a direct conduit to city staff at this point they have voiced certain 480 00:43:57,920 --> 00:44:02,980 concerns which I can share with you. We mentioned the power poles so we're 481 00:44:02,980 --> 00:44:07,260 conditioned to underground the pole that's directly in front of our property we're 482 00:44:07,260 --> 00:44:13,580 not conditioned to underground poles that are north on Dover and so that's 483 00:44:13,580 --> 00:44:19,300 something that was asked by a neighbor, if there's anything we can do to remove the 484 00:44:19,300 --> 00:44:20,780 poll in front of their property. 485 00:44:21,140 --> 00:44:25,680 So we're in design right now with so-called Edison and it's something that we asked 486 00:44:25,680 --> 00:44:29,360 Edison as if they can evaluate that as part of the design. 487 00:44:30,200 --> 00:44:37,800 What does that do, if we're moving that poll, what does it do to remove the second one? 488 00:44:37,960 --> 00:44:43,120 Is it going to cause us to have to dig up Dover because there's a switch and a transformer 489 00:44:43,120 --> 00:44:48,820 we're on that poll. So it might be more cumbersome than we would think. It's not just removing 490 00:44:48,820 --> 00:44:53,960 a second poll, but the question was asked. So I should know that information soon. And we're 491 00:44:53,960 --> 00:44:59,900 in direct conversation with the neighbors keeping them in a loop on that. Another thing that they 492 00:45:00,000 --> 00:45:07,640 What brought up is the sick of more trees in the center median. The city recently redid that center median on Dover. 493 00:45:08,540 --> 00:45:26,020 The sick of more trees get pretty tall. And when they have all their leaves, it does impede views of the neighbors that are up on St. James Place. So that was another request if we could talk to the city about maybe selecting a more thoughtful type of tree in the median. 494 00:45:27,440 --> 00:45:30,800 So those are the kind of personal things that come up. 495 00:45:31,100 --> 00:45:34,960 There is a home that you see at 702 St. James Place. 496 00:45:34,960 --> 00:45:35,980 It's a new construction. 497 00:45:36,680 --> 00:45:38,000 They're building down the slope. 498 00:45:38,180 --> 00:45:41,540 So that's a unique situation because all the other homes, 499 00:45:42,300 --> 00:45:43,660 a lot of them are original. 500 00:45:44,000 --> 00:45:46,540 They have very mature vegetation on the slopes. 501 00:45:47,080 --> 00:45:49,900 That one in particular, they're building down the slope. 502 00:45:49,900 --> 00:45:52,720 And so we've been working closely with them as they work with buyers 503 00:45:52,720 --> 00:45:59,020 on really just messaging and giving them, you know, what we have as we work through the entitlement process. 504 00:46:00,220 --> 00:46:05,960 Thank you. Can you compare the heights on this project to Mariner Shores? 505 00:46:07,680 --> 00:46:13,580 Yes, Mariner Shores, I believe, hit a peak at about 33 feet. 506 00:46:16,440 --> 00:46:19,700 33 feet, it had a wider footprint. 507 00:46:19,700 --> 00:46:22,660 We actually initially tried to plot that product here. 508 00:46:23,080 --> 00:46:28,820 We did not come close to the yield that we needed to hit the minimum density required for this overlay district. 509 00:46:30,840 --> 00:46:39,360 But we're at about 33 feet at Mariners and then five of our buildings hit a max height of 34 feet 11 inches. 510 00:46:39,740 --> 00:46:47,920 We have two buildings at the interior of the site where the butterfly roof form hits a peak of 37 feet 1 inch. 511 00:46:50,580 --> 00:46:52,540 Thank you. Any other questions, commissioners? 512 00:46:53,680 --> 00:46:55,000 Okay. Thank you. 513 00:46:55,380 --> 00:46:56,200 Oh, I'm sorry. 514 00:46:56,360 --> 00:47:00,760 So it sounds like one of the letters that was sent from the neighbors, they had the two 515 00:47:00,760 --> 00:47:04,140 comments, one on the electrical and the poles, it sounds like you're undergrounding that. 516 00:47:04,260 --> 00:47:05,760 The other was to the sick and more trees. 517 00:47:06,460 --> 00:47:09,460 Were you able to work with the city to do something there or not? 518 00:47:10,100 --> 00:47:19,060 We had risen the question, and the feedback that we got was that it was newly landscaped 519 00:47:19,060 --> 00:47:23,440 and planted, you know, pretty intentionally as part of the city beautification project. 520 00:47:24,060 --> 00:47:27,760 And so that's where it rested. 521 00:47:28,520 --> 00:47:31,700 And you know, we'll keep raising the question and see. 522 00:47:31,940 --> 00:47:37,500 But we did renew the second more trees from our project because we initially had plotted 523 00:47:37,500 --> 00:47:46,080 a couple just for consistency bringing in the new port city selected trees into our site 524 00:47:46,080 --> 00:47:50,540 to have kind of that mirrored effect as you drive down Dover, but because it's a hot 525 00:47:50,540 --> 00:47:54,720 button for the neighbors, we elected to remove those from our site and pick a different 526 00:47:54,720 --> 00:47:55,140 species. 527 00:47:55,520 --> 00:47:56,120 Got it. 528 00:47:56,260 --> 00:47:56,480 Thanks. 529 00:48:00,370 --> 00:48:00,510 Okay. 530 00:48:00,830 --> 00:48:01,070 Thank you. 531 00:48:01,270 --> 00:48:01,510 Thank you. 532 00:48:05,260 --> 00:48:05,740 Okay. 533 00:48:06,680 --> 00:48:09,420 Does anyone from the audience wish to speak on this item? 534 00:48:12,020 --> 00:48:13,020 Please come forward. 535 00:48:13,460 --> 00:48:21,420 If you'd like to give your name, it's just a reminder of three minutes, typically, and it's 536 00:48:21,420 --> 00:48:23,340 Not a time for questions to Q&A, just a reminder, that's all. 537 00:48:23,340 --> 00:48:23,880 Got it, thanks. 538 00:48:25,460 --> 00:48:27,120 Thanks, Chair and commissioners. 539 00:48:27,220 --> 00:48:28,700 My name's Tom Delafi. 540 00:48:30,560 --> 00:48:32,580 You get more time, just give us a second. 541 00:48:32,580 --> 00:48:32,740 Perfect. 542 00:48:33,980 --> 00:48:38,160 I don't need much, so I live at 2532 Vista Drive, 543 00:48:38,280 --> 00:48:39,840 which is just south of this project. 544 00:48:40,340 --> 00:48:42,560 I've been driving and walking by this site 545 00:48:42,560 --> 00:48:45,660 when I'm heading up to walk my dogs at the park 546 00:48:45,660 --> 00:48:47,280 for the last 20 plus years. 547 00:48:47,480 --> 00:48:50,780 It's always looked to me like an obsolete medical office building, 548 00:48:50,780 --> 00:48:56,240 a little out of place with where it's at, and I think that this project is a great reuse 549 00:48:56,240 --> 00:49:00,320 for it. I think adding new housing stock to the city is really important and the ripple 550 00:49:00,320 --> 00:49:05,240 effect for the city with people being able to buy more affordable homes. Maybe the folks 551 00:49:05,240 --> 00:49:10,380 who buy homes here are leaving houses somewhere else and more residents can come into the city. 552 00:49:11,760 --> 00:49:17,580 Well, I could probably never afford to buy my house again. Maybe I could at least hope that my kids 553 00:49:17,580 --> 00:49:19,440 to get some day fined by the house 554 00:49:19,440 --> 00:49:20,720 of someone that moved into this house. 555 00:49:21,020 --> 00:49:22,440 So I think that's real important. 556 00:49:22,680 --> 00:49:24,620 A lot of great amenities in the area for it. 557 00:49:24,760 --> 00:49:28,160 I really like how the front doors face dover. 558 00:49:29,080 --> 00:49:31,360 So it doesn't have just the kind of like the wall look 559 00:49:31,360 --> 00:49:32,880 like you see in a lot of new projects 560 00:49:32,880 --> 00:49:35,860 or existing projects throughout Orange County. 561 00:49:36,120 --> 00:49:38,400 It's really kind of open and I think friendly. 562 00:49:38,760 --> 00:49:40,120 So I'm a big fan of it. 563 00:49:40,200 --> 00:49:41,260 I think it's a great reuse. 564 00:49:41,400 --> 00:49:43,520 I'd love to see more stuff like this happening in the city. 565 00:49:44,080 --> 00:49:44,280 Thanks. 566 00:49:44,880 --> 00:49:45,480 Thank you. 567 00:49:47,270 --> 00:49:47,670 Speaker. 568 00:49:47,670 --> 00:49:47,730 here. 569 00:49:53,500 --> 00:49:59,200 My name is Morgan Craig. I live at 624. It's my grandparents old house. They built 570 00:49:59,200 --> 00:50:05,980 in 1973 and my first point, I didn't want to say anything to Emily that she couldn't 571 00:50:05,980 --> 00:50:10,840 rebuttal, but I was going to bring up, I was going to ask which neighbor wrote a letter of 572 00:50:10,840 --> 00:50:14,740 support because I wouldn't expect anybody to support this really in the neighborhood, but 573 00:50:14,740 --> 00:50:19,780 I'm apparently wrong because the gentleman before me just made a statement in support of 574 00:50:19,780 --> 00:50:22,640 which I don't really understand. 575 00:50:22,900 --> 00:50:26,140 I've grown up in this neighborhood, I grew up in this neighborhood, lived here almost 576 00:50:26,140 --> 00:50:26,680 my whole life. 577 00:50:30,900 --> 00:50:35,120 And, you know, first of all, the traffic that it'll produce, the traffic numbers that 578 00:50:35,120 --> 00:50:37,060 Emily presented to me don't seem correct. 579 00:50:37,740 --> 00:50:41,880 The amount of cars that are going in and out of it now are, the volume is very low. 580 00:50:42,240 --> 00:50:45,840 And I think with that many residences there, it'll go up quite a bit. 581 00:50:46,600 --> 00:50:49,220 and with Ensign and Newport Harbor right there. 582 00:50:49,700 --> 00:50:53,160 And the amount of kids and riding bikes, the amount of people running, 583 00:50:53,440 --> 00:50:56,640 the amount of people walking, the amount of cars every morning going up and down that hill. 584 00:50:57,960 --> 00:51:00,560 I think it'll create quite a problem. 585 00:51:01,660 --> 00:51:05,560 They talk about, you know, shea homes talks about wanting to work with the community. 586 00:51:06,800 --> 00:51:10,340 The third level at 35 feet or whatever it's at, to me. 587 00:51:11,020 --> 00:51:14,480 Sit luckily I get to sit on a beautiful deck and look over the bluffs. 588 00:51:14,480 --> 00:51:19,740 but that level is pretty much right at eye level for all of us there and it's 589 00:51:19,740 --> 00:51:25,020 going to block a lot and she compared she was pointed out the trees being 590 00:51:25,020 --> 00:51:30,140 at pretty much that height and you can't really compare something in nature 591 00:51:30,140 --> 00:51:37,140 to a constructed building a condo in an area that is just surrounded by beautiful 592 00:51:37,140 --> 00:51:45,540 home so to me it's that's pretty disappointing and like I said in its 593 00:51:45,540 --> 00:51:49,460 unfortunate for the gentleman who built the house that beautiful home right 594 00:51:49,460 --> 00:51:56,940 next to us who dug case on spent a lot of money securing that hill to build a 595 00:51:56,940 --> 00:52:02,240 pool at a level that is now basically going to be staring at the back of these 596 00:52:02,240 --> 00:52:05,660 of these homes and I understand that there's a mandate by the state and all that 597 00:52:05,660 --> 00:52:12,140 sort of thing. But in this situation, people that have been there for 40 years, 30 years, 598 00:52:12,140 --> 00:52:20,980 all my neighbors, it breaks my heart, and it's really hard to see happen. And in such a beautiful 599 00:52:20,980 --> 00:52:28,340 area, it doesn't, to me, it doesn't make a lot of sense. A compromise, which would be, I would 600 00:52:28,340 --> 00:52:34,560 understand, is two levels and not three of these, of these homes that don't look like they belong 601 00:52:34,560 --> 00:52:44,640 there and completely stand out, and we'll just create more traffic and with more traffic, more accidents, and more kids in danger with Newport Harbor High School and 602 00:52:44,640 --> 00:52:49,460 an incident right there, and that's all I have to say, so thank you for your time. 603 00:52:50,340 --> 00:52:50,620 Thank you. 604 00:53:00,500 --> 00:53:03,520 Good evening commissioners, my name's Nick. 605 00:53:04,000 --> 00:53:06,940 I'm here to speak in support of building these homes. 606 00:53:08,240 --> 00:53:13,020 I moved to Newport Beach from Manhattan Beach a few years ago, my family. 607 00:53:13,020 --> 00:53:18,360 probably for work, the jobs are down here, but honestly it was more than that. 608 00:53:18,540 --> 00:53:23,680 I heard Newport Beach is where all the young families were, that if I wanted to raise 609 00:53:23,680 --> 00:53:31,200 a family that was similar to the place that I grew up, good schools, safe streets, real 610 00:53:31,200 --> 00:53:33,940 communities, that Newport Beach was the place to go. 611 00:53:34,260 --> 00:53:41,440 So I started house hunting, being a renter now down here, and quickly dawned upon me that 612 00:53:41,440 --> 00:53:43,440 But that was not going to be an option. 613 00:53:44,300 --> 00:53:49,680 It was not an option for me to put down roots, buy a home, move here with my family, unless 614 00:53:49,680 --> 00:53:52,760 I was from here and inherited or lived in my parents' home. 615 00:53:53,800 --> 00:53:59,460 So I started getting creative, then desperate, started trolling through listings that I just 616 00:53:59,460 --> 00:54:01,580 didn't think fit for me and my family. 617 00:54:02,080 --> 00:54:06,020 I even started getting on planning department websites and looking at development pipelines. 618 00:54:06,020 --> 00:54:08,400 That's how desperate I was getting to find something. 619 00:54:08,400 --> 00:54:11,760 Then I come across this project and it's perfect. 620 00:54:12,240 --> 00:54:15,300 It's not a mega mansion, it's not tiny condos. 621 00:54:15,980 --> 00:54:21,320 It's just exactly what I was looking for, good, honest, fair, price housing. 622 00:54:24,540 --> 00:54:27,620 It looks like it actually belongs in the community. 623 00:54:28,220 --> 00:54:36,120 It fits in terms of size, it fits in terms of parking, it fits in terms of open space that you can actually use. 624 00:54:36,120 --> 00:54:41,360 It feels like somebody actually thought about what it would be like to live in these homes 625 00:54:41,360 --> 00:54:46,680 and wasn't just trying to maximize what the law legally allows them to build. 626 00:54:47,380 --> 00:54:51,620 Candidly I'm confused how anybody can in good faith oppose this project. 627 00:54:52,300 --> 00:54:57,240 The developer could have gone taller, they didn't, they could have gone denser, they didn't, 628 00:54:57,480 --> 00:55:02,380 they could have put roof decks on here, they didn't at every turn where they had the right 629 00:55:02,380 --> 00:55:04,280 to take more, they took less. 630 00:55:04,280 --> 00:55:07,680 Yes, so I'm asking the commission to support this project. 631 00:55:08,300 --> 00:55:12,340 This is exactly what a family like mine needs to put roots down here. 632 00:55:12,600 --> 00:55:17,620 Not just my family, but any family that wants to move to Newport Beach and be a part of this community. 633 00:55:18,100 --> 00:55:21,060 Otherwise, it's basically closed off to people like us. 634 00:55:21,640 --> 00:55:21,980 Thank you. 635 00:55:23,180 --> 00:55:24,140 Thank you. 636 00:55:26,620 --> 00:55:32,360 Excuse me, excuse me, excuse me, not appropriate, guys. 637 00:55:32,360 --> 00:55:33,400 Good 638 00:55:35,990 --> 00:55:41,390 evening. My name is Cynthia and I live at 500 Kings Place. 639 00:55:42,110 --> 00:55:42,870 Can you speak in the microphone? 640 00:55:43,750 --> 00:55:44,350 Yeah, more. 641 00:55:46,070 --> 00:55:49,050 My name is Cynthia. Good evening. 642 00:55:49,810 --> 00:55:57,770 I live at 500 Kings Place, which is just up the street and around the corner from this development. 643 00:55:58,450 --> 00:56:02,370 My primary concern is the traffic problem. 644 00:56:02,370 --> 00:56:13,130 I understand that there's statistics on traffic and trips, but I also know that there's two entries. 645 00:56:13,490 --> 00:56:23,310 I walk my dog in that area, I'm in Castaway's Park regularly, and there's two entries into that medical office building. 646 00:56:23,550 --> 00:56:26,850 One off of Dover and one off of Cliff Drive. 647 00:56:26,850 --> 00:56:36,590 I also walk up and down Cliff Drive and I know how busy it is during the morning when 648 00:56:36,590 --> 00:56:42,670 school comes out the elementary school or the high school at lunch time for both the 649 00:56:42,670 --> 00:56:45,630 elementary and high school and at three o'clock. 650 00:56:46,270 --> 00:56:50,870 I also know that people use Cliff Drive for parking. 651 00:56:50,870 --> 00:56:58,750 not regularly residential parking, but they do come and park along cliff drive. 652 00:56:58,970 --> 00:57:05,990 And when you park there, if it's a no parking zone, it's not clear to many people. 653 00:57:06,650 --> 00:57:17,710 And so my concern really is that the traffic on a singular entry exit off of cliff drive 654 00:57:17,710 --> 00:57:24,950 is going to severely impact the traffic for anybody that lives in the immediate area. 655 00:57:25,330 --> 00:57:27,130 Those first few blocks. 656 00:57:27,670 --> 00:57:33,270 If you miss that entry off of Cliff Drive, 657 00:57:33,710 --> 00:57:40,510 you're going to come up and you're going to try to make a U-turn exactly on the corner of 658 00:57:40,510 --> 00:57:46,390 King's Place and Cliff Drive. When you make that U-turn, it's very blind. 659 00:57:46,390 --> 00:57:53,330 It's very difficult for anybody to see when people are crossing the street at that corner. 660 00:57:53,550 --> 00:58:03,630 They're already risking a certain amount of danger because the traffic is very fast on that corner. 661 00:58:04,070 --> 00:58:09,590 That corner could really use a for-way stop in order to get people across it. 662 00:58:09,590 --> 00:58:15,990 And once you start to add the idea that people may be coming up there and doing a U-turn, 663 00:58:16,230 --> 00:58:21,470 or coming into the neighborhood because they miss the drive to come back down and get 664 00:58:21,470 --> 00:58:26,610 into the housing development, you see that there might be a significant problem. 665 00:58:27,110 --> 00:58:32,690 There also might be a lot of people with ten visitor parking spaces and everything else 666 00:58:32,690 --> 00:58:35,610 all the other sight parking in garages, 667 00:58:36,250 --> 00:58:39,150 the ten visitor parking spots may not be enough. 668 00:58:40,730 --> 00:58:46,570 This is my time is up, but my thought really is that it needs 669 00:58:46,570 --> 00:58:53,050 to be clear that you can't park along cliff drive up and down, 670 00:58:53,670 --> 00:58:56,290 so that people don't start parking there 671 00:58:56,290 --> 00:58:58,950 and then start parking into the neighborhood. 672 00:58:58,950 --> 00:59:02,870 I'm in terms of the, I'm sorry. 673 00:59:03,290 --> 00:59:04,130 Okay, that's good. 674 00:59:04,130 --> 00:59:04,570 Thank you so much. 675 00:59:04,650 --> 00:59:06,010 Thank you. 676 00:59:06,190 --> 00:59:07,150 Next speaker please. 677 00:59:14,570 --> 00:59:17,450 Chair Harris, members of the commission, my name is Jim Mosher. 678 00:59:20,770 --> 00:59:25,390 To follow up on my earlier comment about the housing element, I think we're all grateful 679 00:59:26,160 --> 00:59:34,750 that the developer is not proposing to put 81 units in 65 foot tall structures at this 680 00:59:34,750 --> 00:59:35,190 site. 681 00:59:35,190 --> 00:59:42,830 it would be very inharmonious with that neighborhood, however there does seem to be a state 682 00:59:42,830 --> 00:59:49,710 requirement that your resolution because we're not producing the 81 units that we promised 683 00:59:49,710 --> 00:59:56,550 is good should explain how that impacts our housing element because they have to go somewhere else. 684 00:59:57,250 --> 00:59:59,850 So I did not see that in the resolution. 685 01:00:00,000 --> 01:00:07,320 Any analysis of how we make up for the shortfall at this location and how it impacts our ability 686 01:00:07,320 --> 01:00:15,640 to complete our housing element. I agree with Cynthia that intuitively, this seems to be creating 687 01:00:15,640 --> 01:00:22,520 a parking problem. If there's many guests here, I don't know where they're going to park even 688 01:00:22,520 --> 01:00:24,700 and though it meets our technical requirement. 689 01:00:25,780 --> 01:00:31,140 There may be a condition in here if the home owners 690 01:00:31,140 --> 01:00:32,500 are not using their garage, 691 01:00:32,740 --> 01:00:34,460 we have something to keep them from parking 692 01:00:34,460 --> 01:00:37,680 in the dry vials and creating hazardous situations. 693 01:00:39,240 --> 01:00:41,640 And I personally do not live in the area 694 01:00:41,640 --> 01:00:43,940 so I do not understand the parking situation. 695 01:00:44,240 --> 01:00:46,360 On my bicycle, I noticed near the ENC, 696 01:00:47,000 --> 01:00:49,040 there is a sign saying on Dover 697 01:00:49,040 --> 01:00:56,180 that there is no parking along that whole block, but Cliff Drive seems to have some red zones which 698 01:00:56,180 --> 01:01:01,960 imply that the non-red zones you can park, and also if you continue downed over drive there's 699 01:01:01,960 --> 01:01:08,100 no sign, and there are some red zones and it applies you can park there, which I think would be a 700 01:01:08,100 --> 01:01:14,600 dangerous thing to do. As to the finding that this is harmonious with the area, it was good to see 701 01:01:14,600 --> 01:01:20,440 some renderings of what it looks like from some locations. I did not see anything from what it 702 01:01:20,440 --> 01:01:26,620 looks like from Castaways Park to the public. And the rendering I saw looking southbound on Dover, 703 01:01:26,860 --> 01:01:34,160 it is very imposing and very close to the street. And that is what they're asking for a variance for. 704 01:01:35,300 --> 01:01:42,280 And in your resolution there are claims that other sites with the same zoning 705 01:01:42,980 --> 01:01:48,380 are much bigger and non-constrained, but there's actually only two other sites. 706 01:01:48,940 --> 01:01:53,000 One at 1501, 16th Street, and the other at 747 Dover. 707 01:01:53,460 --> 01:01:56,720 And they're both smaller, and they're probably both marked and strained. 708 01:01:57,160 --> 01:01:59,560 So I'm not sure how you can grant the variance for that. 709 01:02:00,100 --> 01:02:03,000 So I would just ask they seem to have three floor plans, 710 01:02:03,620 --> 01:02:07,320 which are mislabeled incidentally on handwritten page 110 and 111. 711 01:02:08,420 --> 01:02:11,500 But to avoid the encroachment, they have another plan 712 01:02:11,500 --> 01:02:15,960 that just makes those units a little bit smaller so that they're not right up 713 01:02:15,960 --> 01:02:20,340 against overdrive. I agree with Commissioner Landford the style does not 714 01:02:20,340 --> 01:02:25,500 really fit in and finally I don't understand at all the trash plan that is on 715 01:02:25,500 --> 01:02:31,120 handwritten page 130. It has no explanation about the trash is going to be handled. 716 01:02:31,620 --> 01:02:35,580 Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Measurer. Thanks, Baker, please. 717 01:02:39,480 --> 01:02:40,600 Hi, my name is 718 01:02:40,600 --> 01:02:43,840 Jody Young and I was born in Newport Beach. 719 01:02:44,120 --> 01:02:47,200 I grew up on Dover Drive at my parents' home 720 01:02:47,880 --> 01:02:50,660 and I live at 604 St. James Place, 721 01:02:51,280 --> 01:02:53,040 directly above this project, 722 01:02:53,380 --> 01:02:54,800 and we've lived there for 40 years. 723 01:02:55,980 --> 01:02:58,360 I have seen the traffic on Dover, 724 01:02:58,840 --> 01:03:02,640 the start with, there wasn't castaways or any place, 725 01:03:02,800 --> 01:03:07,000 and now there's just so many more people 726 01:03:07,000 --> 01:03:15,220 that use that thoroughfare to get to coast highway, they cut up a cliff drive oftentimes 727 01:03:15,820 --> 01:03:23,400 to avoid PCH. So it's not just students at a certain time, but it's people all the 728 01:03:23,400 --> 01:03:29,020 time in that traffic area. And it's going to be dangerous. There are people with their 729 01:03:29,020 --> 01:03:35,580 strollers, they're walking their dogs, Newport Harbor has their cross country team going 730 01:03:35,580 --> 01:03:42,560 up and down the hills. It just, and the project itself seems so out of character for single 731 01:03:42,560 --> 01:03:51,360 homes, family homes. And it's just, it makes me really sad. I feel like it's ruining where 732 01:03:51,360 --> 01:03:54,920 I live in my community. And that's all I have to say. 733 01:03:56,330 --> 01:03:56,760 Thank you. 734 01:04:04,240 --> 01:04:09,240 Good evening. My name is Tom. I live on 418. Snug Harbor Road. I've been a 735 01:04:09,240 --> 01:04:15,660 resident here for 40 years, we didn't get any notification on Snug Harbor, 736 01:04:16,040 --> 01:04:22,420 but I will say that I did use the buildings when the professional buildings, 737 01:04:22,420 --> 01:04:24,700 when the professionals were in those medical spaces. 738 01:04:25,160 --> 01:04:29,320 And it is practically impossible to exit and turn left. 739 01:04:29,980 --> 01:04:35,440 Number one, the cars coming down over are very fast and they make a very quick right turn on the cliff. 740 01:04:35,440 --> 01:04:46,520 just very fast. If you can get out and make a left turn on the cliff, trust me, it just doesn't happen. 741 01:04:47,060 --> 01:04:51,020 I have waited there 10 minutes when it's just at the simple medical building. 742 01:04:51,680 --> 01:04:57,500 You have to turn right, go up the hill, and you would have to make a turn like Cynthia said on that blind corner. 743 01:04:58,000 --> 01:05:01,980 And it is a blind corner. It's where everybody crosses with their dogs, the kids. 744 01:05:01,980 --> 01:05:05,320 Newport Harbor and the high school. 745 01:05:07,040 --> 01:05:12,160 Ensign, the kids are just impacting like crazy all the time. 746 01:05:12,280 --> 01:05:15,840 It's not just after school, it's during school hours, lunch hours, 747 01:05:16,460 --> 01:05:21,420 a cliff drive is now just impacted, very, very heavy with traffic. 748 01:05:22,200 --> 01:05:26,800 And it's backed up all the way to the top of the hill when the school lets out. 749 01:05:27,300 --> 01:05:28,720 And it goes very, very slow. 750 01:05:28,720 --> 01:05:39,020 So, the egress from this project is completely insufficient for this plan. 751 01:05:39,620 --> 01:05:44,480 And additionally, the people in this new development, they're going to have housekeepers. 752 01:05:44,680 --> 01:05:46,180 They're going to have construction trucks. 753 01:05:46,340 --> 01:05:49,620 There's going to be people that are working on their homes. 754 01:05:49,840 --> 01:05:55,460 And there's just no space for these contractors and housekeepers to park their cars. 755 01:05:55,460 --> 01:06:00,080 and it really is busy on my street alone on Stug Harbor. 756 01:06:00,800 --> 01:06:06,840 The whole street is full with just contractors working on homes, house keepers, all during the day. 757 01:06:07,160 --> 01:06:10,920 There's just almost no parking and this is a residential neighborhood with large homes. 758 01:06:11,720 --> 01:06:20,740 So I cannot imagine how this project is going to work packed in so tight with such limited parking. 759 01:06:20,740 --> 01:06:28,500 It's going to be a nightmare and you can just write off this left exit onto Clift Drive. 760 01:06:28,580 --> 01:06:29,420 It just doesn't happen. 761 01:06:31,320 --> 01:06:32,980 So, thank you for your time. 762 01:06:33,680 --> 01:06:34,040 Thank you. 763 01:06:37,690 --> 01:06:40,350 Good evening, Commissioner Harris, members of the commission. 764 01:06:41,330 --> 01:06:42,970 My name is Mark Shinuda. 765 01:06:43,670 --> 01:06:50,550 For the record, I live on 712 St. James Place in Newport Beach right above the project or 766 01:06:50,550 --> 01:06:53,270 just two houses to the north of the project. 767 01:06:55,750 --> 01:07:03,070 In light of the housing element, I will say I am not opposed to this project. 768 01:07:04,110 --> 01:07:05,070 Make no mistake. 769 01:07:05,330 --> 01:07:10,810 I am opposed that it's part of the housing element, but I realize that ship is sailed. 770 01:07:12,350 --> 01:07:15,210 And I understand that the commissioners, your hands are tied somewhat. 771 01:07:15,210 --> 01:07:25,500 But one of the things that I would have liked to see as a community benefit is 772 01:07:26,240 --> 01:07:30,740 undergrounding the power lines that are right on the over. 773 01:07:30,760 --> 01:07:31,900 It's a beautiful street. 774 01:07:32,480 --> 01:07:36,500 Now they're undergrounding the power line that's right in front of their 775 01:07:37,820 --> 01:07:42,800 proposed developments where there's another power line that is just right in front of ours. 776 01:07:42,960 --> 01:07:43,640 I'd like to see that. 777 01:07:43,920 --> 01:07:45,540 And I'd like to see that as a community benefit. 778 01:07:45,540 --> 01:07:50,320 We're not opposed to this project, again, as in light of what's going on. 779 01:07:51,280 --> 01:07:52,920 We like the shades, we like Emily. 780 01:07:53,100 --> 01:07:55,540 She's done a great job in reaching out to the neighbors. 781 01:07:56,220 --> 01:07:57,220 But I would like to see that. 782 01:07:57,780 --> 01:08:00,500 And more particularly, I'd like to see that as a condition of approval. 783 01:08:01,240 --> 01:08:05,720 I know she's doing the best she can to underground, talking with Edison. 784 01:08:07,080 --> 01:08:10,800 But we should get a lot more comfort if it's a condition of approval to do that. 785 01:08:11,880 --> 01:08:12,440 Thank you. 786 01:08:15,600 --> 01:08:16,380 speaker please. 787 01:08:27,170 --> 01:08:32,310 Good evening. My name is Kathy. I live in Newport Heights. I did not receive any 788 01:08:32,310 --> 01:08:36,710 notification of this project and only found out about it a couple of weeks ago and I know my 789 01:08:36,710 --> 01:08:41,090 neighbors did not either because I was telling them we're coming tonight and they didn't know anything 790 01:08:41,090 --> 01:08:46,850 about it. That's irrelevant. What I would say is that I would be very concerned about the traffic 791 01:08:46,850 --> 01:08:49,350 impacts as many people have said. 792 01:08:50,030 --> 01:08:56,390 Cliff Drive is a thoroughfare to avoid PCH people drive at great rates of speed up and down 793 01:08:56,390 --> 01:08:56,870 that hill. 794 01:08:57,670 --> 01:09:02,630 All the time I walk over to Castaway's Park on a regular basis almost probably three or 795 01:09:02,630 --> 01:09:03,270 four times a week. 796 01:09:04,110 --> 01:09:09,550 There are electric bikes and people speeding down Cliff Drive, there are cars speeding up Cliff 797 01:09:09,550 --> 01:09:09,990 Drive. 798 01:09:10,570 --> 01:09:15,090 There at Dover of course is a nightmare at any time of the day just about anymore. 799 01:09:15,290 --> 01:09:15,770 It's so busy. 800 01:09:15,770 --> 01:09:22,510 So, if this is going to happen and if the ship has sailed and this is unavoidable, there 801 01:09:22,510 --> 01:09:26,390 really doesn't need to be some consideration of a stoplight at the top of Cliff Drive 802 01:09:27,150 --> 01:09:33,670 where King's Place hits Cliff Drive because it's a completely blind corner as cars come 803 01:09:33,670 --> 01:09:39,310 from the opposite direction on Cliff Drive going down toward Dover and anybody who's trying 804 01:09:39,310 --> 01:09:43,790 to cross that intersection, you take your life in your hands, you have to run because you 805 01:09:43,790 --> 01:09:46,870 can't see and cars are coming so fast that, you know, it's dangerous. 806 01:09:47,370 --> 01:09:51,730 So I would really recommend that there be some consideration for a stop light there or 807 01:09:51,730 --> 01:09:58,010 a crosswalk, if not a stop light, at least a crosswalk, because with the increase in traffic 808 01:09:58,010 --> 01:10:01,790 that will come with this development, I can guarantee there's going to be some kind of accident. 809 01:10:01,990 --> 01:10:03,210 Somebody's going to get killed or hurt. 810 01:10:05,610 --> 01:10:13,770 I would hope that this project gets done and that our worst fears don't come to further 811 01:10:13,770 --> 01:10:19,850 but I fear that this is a done deal so at least take into consideration the 812 01:10:19,850 --> 01:10:24,590 impacts to neighbors with the parking and one other thing I don't know how all 813 01:10:24,590 --> 01:10:28,670 these big construction vehicles are were they're going to be parking or be 814 01:10:28,670 --> 01:10:32,130 situated while all of this is going on but someone should have a good plan for 815 01:10:32,130 --> 01:10:37,930 that because my home is under construction right now and I know all of the the 816 01:10:37,930 --> 01:10:42,230 crafts people and all the vehicles that they drive and the size of these 817 01:10:42,230 --> 01:10:46,370 vehicles and cement tracks and great halls and all of that. So someone needs to be thinking 818 01:10:46,370 --> 01:10:51,430 about how that's going to impact Cliff Drive as well while it's under construction. So that's 819 01:10:51,430 --> 01:10:56,630 my two cents. Thank you. Thank you. Speak please. 820 01:11:03,840 --> 01:11:08,240 Good evening. I'm at 1101 Kings Road and I think 821 01:11:08,240 --> 01:11:16,900 my neighbors are going to be pissed at me. But life comes full circle. I took my kids to that 822 01:11:16,900 --> 01:11:23,860 pediatric center when they were babies. So that means that that building is 25 823 01:11:23,860 --> 01:11:30,380 years old medical used to be medical. As far as I can tell I dry by there every day 824 01:11:30,380 --> 01:11:37,060 it has not changed one bit they've not paved the parking lot. It is a dying 825 01:11:37,060 --> 01:11:42,960 building that is at least 25 years old and medical office has moved to the 826 01:11:42,960 --> 01:11:48,960 hospital that is never going to be a medical office building and the truth is, my son 827 01:11:48,960 --> 01:11:54,500 lives in Houston and it was really interesting that the young man came up and he was right. 828 01:11:54,940 --> 01:12:01,500 He would be, if I lived on St. James Place, I would be not happy that this was happening. 829 01:12:01,880 --> 01:12:03,720 I'd be happy that it was in 65 feet. 830 01:12:04,460 --> 01:12:08,440 But and his idea of a second story is actually a great idea. 831 01:12:09,220 --> 01:12:12,520 The problem is the state mandates 20 832 01:12:14,160 --> 01:12:16,500 density units, 20 houses per acre. 833 01:12:16,720 --> 01:12:18,380 There is no way you're getting two 834 01:12:18,380 --> 01:12:21,660 story. It's just not physically possible. 835 01:12:22,160 --> 01:12:23,420 This is not possible. 836 01:12:24,260 --> 01:12:25,520 So there's this kind of thing. 837 01:12:25,840 --> 01:12:27,780 You have to meet the state and you have to do this. 838 01:12:28,140 --> 01:12:29,660 I actually like the elevations. 839 01:12:30,160 --> 01:12:31,620 It's interesting that someone was, 840 01:12:31,880 --> 01:12:33,240 you were saying that Christmas, 841 01:12:33,580 --> 01:12:34,120 you're right. 842 01:12:34,460 --> 01:12:36,560 Castaways is here, which is very kick-cud. 843 01:12:36,560 --> 01:12:48,680 But if you look just to the left, the actual houses that are all modern houses and on King's Road, and there's actually a new kind of duplex on Cliff, that's almost identical like type of architecture. 844 01:12:48,900 --> 01:12:52,500 So it's definitely drifting toward a modern architecture. 845 01:12:53,660 --> 01:12:57,960 But it was interesting. There was a lot of conversation about the front setback. 846 01:12:57,960 --> 01:13:03,940 The best thing about the frontseverk, the closer the houses, the units are to the streets, 847 01:13:04,640 --> 01:13:09,220 the farther they are away from the house and in the site plan wasn't pointed out, but 848 01:13:09,220 --> 01:13:14,180 it was the best thing about the site plan was the narrow side of the buildings are facing 849 01:13:14,180 --> 01:13:15,160 the existing residents. 850 01:13:15,880 --> 01:13:21,660 And so they're actually, it's about as amicable as you're going to get as opposed to putting 851 01:13:21,660 --> 01:13:23,280 the long buildings along the slope. 852 01:13:25,860 --> 01:13:33,560 So I actually really want my son to move back here, and that is just not possible unless 853 01:13:34,800 --> 01:13:40,500 this type of product is built, a starter housing, starter town home, it's just not possible, 854 01:13:40,620 --> 01:13:42,460 unless we build it in Newport. 855 01:13:42,880 --> 01:13:47,300 And I've lived in Newport Heights for, I don't know, 30 years or something. 856 01:13:47,300 --> 01:13:55,740 So, but, and if you remember, there isn't any of these none, except the mayor and square 857 01:13:55,740 --> 01:13:59,060 that they built, so we have to do it, we just have to. 858 01:14:02,700 --> 01:14:03,360 Thank you. 859 01:14:06,130 --> 01:14:06,730 Any other speakers? 860 01:14:13,300 --> 01:14:13,800 Good evening. 861 01:14:13,960 --> 01:14:14,780 My name is Georgia Fox. 862 01:14:15,020 --> 01:14:21,240 I live on the boundary of Costa Mesa and Newport Beach, but I'm on Dover and Cliff all the time. 863 01:14:22,000 --> 01:14:27,860 And I'm attending this meeting basically to express my concern to the approval of this construction 864 01:14:27,860 --> 01:14:34,860 project and all these units. I think it's just too much. It's going to add to all the traffic on 865 01:14:34,860 --> 01:14:43,420 Dover and Cliff. And I think what people are not really talking about is in the event of a fire, 866 01:14:44,520 --> 01:14:51,960 how long would it take people to get out of this area? I mean, it would be a danger to the residents 867 01:14:51,960 --> 01:14:57,780 in the event of a fire. How would the residents be able to evacuate in time? Which way 868 01:14:57,780 --> 01:14:58,360 Where would they go? 869 01:14:58,700 --> 01:14:59,780 They would have limited ways. 870 01:15:00,000 --> 01:15:06,640 In and out of that area. So, really, did we not learn anything from the fires and Pacific 871 01:15:06,640 --> 01:15:13,260 Palisades and Los Angeles about a year ago? I'm hoping we did. I guess people have forgotten 872 01:15:13,260 --> 01:15:20,980 too soon about those fires, especially in Pacific Palisades. And there was 12 to 13 people 873 01:15:20,980 --> 01:15:25,780 that died in Pacific Palisades, simply because there was only one way in and one way out of the 874 01:15:25,780 --> 01:15:29,040 and I'm afraid this is going to happen in this area. 875 01:15:29,400 --> 01:15:30,380 That's why I'm speaking out. 876 01:15:31,540 --> 01:15:34,180 So I don't think we want this to happen in Newport. 877 01:15:34,560 --> 01:15:35,880 I think we want a safe area. 878 01:15:36,720 --> 01:15:40,340 And the problem with Dover is, especially on the weekends, 879 01:15:40,340 --> 01:15:43,500 especially on Friday nights and Saturdays, 880 01:15:44,320 --> 01:15:46,440 the traffic there is really congested. 881 01:15:46,680 --> 01:15:47,860 It's not gotten any better. 882 01:15:48,300 --> 01:15:50,340 If you put 33 units more in that area, 883 01:15:50,520 --> 01:15:51,560 it's just going to add to the traffic. 884 01:15:51,980 --> 01:15:55,580 And as somebody said, especially with construction people 885 01:15:55,580 --> 01:15:57,580 All in trucks and things like that, it's going to make it worse. 886 01:15:58,620 --> 01:16:00,740 So that's basically my opinion, thank you. 887 01:16:03,360 --> 01:16:04,000 Thank you. 888 01:16:04,320 --> 01:16:04,780 Any other speakers? 889 01:16:07,840 --> 01:16:11,360 The applicant, would you like to respond to anything or make any other comments? 890 01:16:13,280 --> 01:16:13,520 Okay. 891 01:16:15,950 --> 01:16:18,070 Okay, staff, any comments for the record? 892 01:16:20,960 --> 01:16:21,620 Just chair. 893 01:16:22,460 --> 01:16:26,960 Hi, my name is Leo, Community Development Director, so I just want to touch upon a couple points. 894 01:16:27,400 --> 01:16:32,360 Regarding notification, the project was notified and accordance with our municipal code. 895 01:16:32,360 --> 01:16:39,600 And so we have a minimum distance that we send out mail notices, but we also have other means of providing notice. 896 01:16:40,680 --> 01:16:51,720 With regards to potential construction impacts, we do have a condition of approval that does require the preparation and approval of a construction management plan prior to the issuance of building permits. 897 01:16:52,720 --> 01:17:01,380 With regards to parking concerns, the city's municipal code does prohibit the storage of materials or 898 01:17:01,380 --> 01:17:03,480 anything in a garage that's not a vehicle. 899 01:17:04,220 --> 01:17:08,720 To reinforce that, we do have conditions of approval that requires as part of the CCNRs. 900 01:17:09,000 --> 01:17:11,420 That prohibition being included in the CCNRs. 901 01:17:12,480 --> 01:17:18,300 And with regards to traffic, I know it's hard to compare under today's conditions, 902 01:17:18,300 --> 01:17:22,460 given that the medical office complex is kind of underutilized and 903 01:17:22,460 --> 01:17:24,360 a lot of the existing tenants are vacated. 904 01:17:24,460 --> 01:17:29,040 But based on what's allowed and peak usage of medical office, 905 01:17:29,040 --> 01:17:33,740 That complex is estimated to generate 453 trips per day. 906 01:17:34,200 --> 01:17:43,220 The residential project is projected to generate 222 trips, so it's actually 231 trips less than the law of medical office complex today. 907 01:17:44,280 --> 01:17:48,500 So, with regards to that, we believe there ought to be a reduction in traffic. 908 01:17:54,510 --> 01:17:58,590 Unless there are any specific questions with regards to the validity and happy to answer those. 909 01:17:58,590 --> 01:18:06,370 a question. One of the speakers asked about undergrounding and potentially a condition. 910 01:18:07,270 --> 01:18:13,530 Would we be able to, is that a possibility, you know, assuming that's approved by SC, 911 01:18:13,990 --> 01:18:15,350 if they've applied for it or whatnot? 912 01:18:15,790 --> 01:18:18,890 I think it would be beneficial to hear from the applicant and see if they're amenable 913 01:18:18,890 --> 01:18:19,610 to that condition. 914 01:18:24,620 --> 01:18:29,900 Thank you. So we do have a condition of approval that requires us to underground the power 915 01:18:29,900 --> 01:18:32,060 poll along the project frontage. 916 01:18:32,840 --> 01:18:38,340 So that has been submitted and it's similar conversations that we've had with the neighbors. 917 01:18:38,620 --> 01:18:44,940 So I hope I'm not beating a horse here, but when we submitted it into Addison for the 918 01:18:44,940 --> 01:18:53,080 evaluation of the removal of the poll in front of the project, they have to assess the circuit. 919 01:18:53,080 --> 01:19:02,540 So we had essentially rise on the most northerly pole, which is a subject pole in front of 6-12 St. James place. 920 01:19:03,460 --> 01:19:07,000 That pole has a transformer and a circuit on it. 921 01:19:07,900 --> 01:19:13,360 So while the request was made to Edison, what it would take to underground that pole, 922 01:19:14,000 --> 01:19:17,220 I still have not gotten that design back of what that would take. 923 01:19:17,220 --> 01:19:28,960 We're anticipated to get it, mid to end of next month, which will be shared with the neighbors and further the conversation on what the undergrounding is. 924 01:19:29,180 --> 01:19:34,780 It's hard to commit to a condition when we don't know how far we would need to chase it. 925 01:19:35,620 --> 01:19:44,500 The undergrounding of that poll, if it's something that we can realistically rope in with the removal of the one fronting our site, we'll do it. 926 01:19:44,500 --> 01:19:56,360 If we're having to chase a circuit, really far updover to West 16th Street, I just don't know what scope I'd be committing to at this time. 927 01:19:56,720 --> 01:20:11,300 So for that reason, it's hard to openly commit to broadening the condition, but I will commit that we will be in transparent communication with Edison, the neighbor, and the overall design as we look at removing that poll. 928 01:20:12,140 --> 01:20:14,120 This is a mark that that's very helpful. 929 01:20:14,280 --> 01:20:20,500 Would you be amenable to a condition that's contingent upon getting the information and 930 01:20:20,500 --> 01:20:26,200 if it is viable to underground that the applicant would be willing to approve that? 931 01:20:26,620 --> 01:20:31,600 I think it's something that we can work on with planning on just keeping it very open-ended 932 01:20:31,600 --> 01:20:34,480 and up to the discretion of the applicant. 933 01:20:36,200 --> 01:20:41,660 Well, up to the discussion of the applicant's subject to SEE's determination as to whether 934 01:20:41,660 --> 01:20:43,340 it can be underground reasonably. 935 01:20:44,240 --> 01:20:44,520 Correct. 936 01:20:44,860 --> 01:20:52,740 But I guess reasonable is a kind of an open end to terms, so I just want to make that 937 01:20:55,230 --> 01:20:55,630 clear. 938 01:20:56,050 --> 01:20:58,230 Yeah, I just don't want to extend expectations. 939 01:20:58,710 --> 01:21:03,930 It's something that we will be assessing transparently with the neighbors in the city as 940 01:21:03,930 --> 01:21:05,510 we get more information from Edison. 941 01:21:05,510 --> 01:21:11,190 So, however, we can word that as a condition, we're open to putting that as a condition 942 01:21:11,190 --> 01:21:14,630 as long as we are in control of that language. 943 01:21:15,230 --> 01:21:19,730 And would, if it were, let's say, we're talking about reasonableness, so if it were up 944 01:21:19,730 --> 01:21:24,690 to a certain amount of money, if we could kind of come to an agreement on a reasonable amount 945 01:21:24,690 --> 01:21:27,870 that it would cost for the under grounding, is that something the applicant would be 946 01:21:27,870 --> 01:21:28,430 amenable to? 947 01:21:28,990 --> 01:21:35,270 It's something we can speak further on, it's cost and scope, so it's hard to, I don't 948 01:21:35,270 --> 01:21:41,790 I don't know if any of you have worked with Southern California Edison, but it's very hard to predict what that's going to look like. 949 01:21:41,990 --> 01:21:48,450 So committing to something is difficult because the poll can move so quickly with them. 950 01:21:51,450 --> 01:21:55,730 So it's difficult to commit to language or a condition here. 951 01:21:56,310 --> 01:21:58,770 Anything that we commit to would be fairly open ended. 952 01:22:02,400 --> 01:22:03,600 Okay, thank you. 953 01:22:05,260 --> 01:22:09,100 Are there any other plans for traffic mitigation and cliff drive area? 954 01:22:14,530 --> 01:22:22,850 There are no other plans at this moment that's on our CIP schedule, but I did hear several 955 01:22:22,850 --> 01:22:25,810 little comments about parking on cliff drive. 956 01:22:25,810 --> 01:22:35,490 We can evaluate it to see if we can add more signs or to see what the actual impacts are 957 01:22:35,490 --> 01:22:39,350 initially maybe because you can't park in a bike lane. 958 01:22:39,350 --> 01:22:48,030 So, there's no parking east of Kings between Kings and Dover, so we can look at that. 959 01:22:48,770 --> 01:22:54,170 We can evaluate the intersection at Kings to see if we can add and always stop. 960 01:22:55,310 --> 01:23:00,470 So there's a clear warrant requirements for that, so that's something that I could take 961 01:23:00,470 --> 01:23:03,710 back to my office and we can take a look at that. 962 01:23:03,710 --> 01:23:09,650 Or even consider, you know, methods to slow people down a little bit or something to that effect? 963 01:23:09,670 --> 01:23:10,570 Yes, that's correct, yes. 964 01:23:10,690 --> 01:23:10,910 Thank you. 965 01:23:12,190 --> 01:23:14,250 Any other questions for staff at this time? 966 01:23:14,290 --> 01:23:14,670 Is that okay? 967 01:23:15,210 --> 01:23:16,530 Can we keep the public comment open for a minute? 968 01:23:16,790 --> 01:23:18,630 Yeah, I had two questions for staff. 969 01:23:18,630 --> 01:23:22,650 I think one's a little bit redundant on what you were saying, but just so we're clear, 970 01:23:23,250 --> 01:23:28,890 the visitor right now, the site has I think 66 parking spots, 10 visitor spots. 971 01:23:29,350 --> 01:23:31,870 I think we all know the project of this scale. 972 01:23:31,870 --> 01:23:36,410 You tend to go out of the ten guest spots rather quickly, and you tend to have sprawl 973 01:23:36,410 --> 01:23:41,050 of cars on both sides. In this case, it would be dover, and it would be cliff. 974 01:23:41,430 --> 01:23:45,350 But if I understand today, there is no parking on dover, there is no parking on cliff, 975 01:23:45,590 --> 01:23:46,810 correct? All the way up to the hill. 976 01:23:48,110 --> 01:23:51,410 There is existing parking west of King's Place. 977 01:23:52,410 --> 01:23:53,090 West of. 978 01:23:54,910 --> 01:23:58,390 So you have to get to the top of the hill, into the residential neighborhood, before 979 01:23:58,390 --> 01:23:59,250 you can have parking. 980 01:23:59,590 --> 01:23:59,970 That's got it. 981 01:23:59,970 --> 01:24:06,990 So down below, though, there's no, once those ten spots are full, there's no parking all the way up to the top, and there's no parking up and downed over, correct? 982 01:24:07,190 --> 01:24:07,510 That's correct. 983 01:24:07,810 --> 01:24:08,570 Okay, got it. 984 01:24:09,570 --> 01:24:10,590 That was my first question. 985 01:24:10,690 --> 01:24:17,310 The second question is the, I think you hit on it, but one of the speakers mentioned the stops. 986 01:24:17,670 --> 01:24:22,110 I think she said stoplight, but I think she meant stop sign at King's Place and Cliff. 987 01:24:22,590 --> 01:24:24,930 What is the process to evaluate that with the city? 988 01:24:27,330 --> 01:24:28,050 Time duration? 989 01:24:28,050 --> 01:24:37,130 So we follow the state guidelines to evaluate the intersection for always stop. 990 01:24:37,830 --> 01:24:42,790 So the process would be, so we already received the request here. 991 01:24:43,150 --> 01:24:49,070 And so I can work with the constituent or resident on that request. 992 01:24:49,410 --> 01:24:53,330 We need to obtain traffic counts at the intersection. 993 01:24:53,330 --> 01:25:01,110 and stop signs are based on meeting a certain amount of like value them through the intersection. 994 01:25:01,470 --> 01:25:02,930 I always stop. 995 01:25:04,070 --> 01:25:08,990 The idea is that you have an equal amount of traffic in both directions. 996 01:25:09,190 --> 01:25:16,070 So if that's the case then always stop with help with facilitating the right way at the intersection 997 01:25:16,070 --> 01:25:19,830 with the equal amount of traffic in both directions. 998 01:25:20,890 --> 01:25:25,790 Or it could be warranted based off of collision experiences, 999 01:25:26,030 --> 01:25:30,870 so we could look at the recorded collisions at the intersection. 1000 01:25:33,150 --> 01:25:35,990 Type of collisions that are correctable by always stop, 1001 01:25:36,150 --> 01:25:39,150 it's like a broad side collision, so that would be a type of collision 1002 01:25:39,150 --> 01:25:41,390 that's correctable by always stop. 1003 01:25:42,230 --> 01:25:44,450 And generally, it would require about five collisions 1004 01:25:44,450 --> 01:25:47,890 within a 12-month period to warrant the, to always stop. 1005 01:25:47,950 --> 01:25:50,030 So those are two ways you can warrant based on traffic 1006 01:25:50,030 --> 01:25:52,970 values and based on a collision experience. 1007 01:25:53,350 --> 01:25:54,070 Okay, got it. 1008 01:25:54,210 --> 01:25:59,070 And just one final question, so I'm clear, as it stands today, if this is approved, 1009 01:25:59,550 --> 01:26:03,990 and the 10 visitor spots are full, and you want to park, you're parking up in the 1010 01:26:03,990 --> 01:26:08,410 residential community, walking down cliff into the project, because there's no other parking area. 1011 01:26:08,730 --> 01:26:09,270 That's correct. 1012 01:26:09,530 --> 01:26:10,270 Okay, thank you. 1013 01:26:17,500 --> 01:26:18,800 Any other questions, commissioners? 1014 01:26:20,080 --> 01:26:24,880 Okay, close the public hearing, thank you for all the speakers. 1015 01:26:26,460 --> 01:26:28,540 Bring it back to the commission for discussion action. 1016 01:26:29,680 --> 01:26:32,580 Many general comments or responses, commissioners, 1017 01:26:35,360 --> 01:26:36,460 would you like for it, please? 1018 01:26:38,220 --> 01:26:39,340 Thank you, Chair Harris. 1019 01:26:41,820 --> 01:26:46,380 Yeah, I would have concerns, same concerns as everyone in the room, I think. 1020 01:26:47,120 --> 01:26:52,980 For parking, I know one of our conditions of approval is including in the CCNRs or 1021 01:26:52,980 --> 01:26:57,220 requirements that the garages are used for vehicles. 1022 01:26:58,160 --> 01:27:01,020 And that's hard to police, us at policing it. 1023 01:27:01,240 --> 01:27:04,140 So that ends up being on the HOA to enforce. 1024 01:27:05,140 --> 01:27:12,060 But now I understand new HOA caps that the state has set. 1025 01:27:12,560 --> 01:27:15,820 And maybe that's something that we should put on a future agenda is to understand how 1026 01:27:15,820 --> 01:27:22,980 those HOA caps will influence our decisions on how we condition projects for future approval. 1027 01:27:25,160 --> 01:27:33,260 But it didn't, it said the CCRs would be in there, it didn't necessarily say the HOA would require it or enforce it or something. 1028 01:27:34,280 --> 01:27:36,080 Which would give me a little bit more comfort. 1029 01:27:36,240 --> 01:27:43,200 I forget how we ended up writing it into the Ford Road project, but we had the same concerns there. 1030 01:27:43,920 --> 01:27:53,300 that being my neighborhood in the port streets, so I had special attention on that one also, but it was the same philosophy you would apply here. 1031 01:27:54,180 --> 01:27:58,520 And then, as far as architectural style, I alluded to it earlier. 1032 01:27:58,900 --> 01:28:09,300 If it was my neighborhood, and I used to drive to Newport Harbor every day from the port streets, so this would be my entrance into Cliff Haven and Newport Heights. 1033 01:28:09,300 --> 01:28:14,760 And I find it strange and maybe it's okay because no one brought it up. 1034 01:28:15,000 --> 01:28:22,800 Maybe it's just me that it wasn't really an entryway into the neighborhood to reflect the style of the neighborhood. 1035 01:28:23,540 --> 01:28:38,620 And I know with the for road project that we approved that applicant specifically included design elements as like Port Street style because you wanted it to reflect that neighborhood and 1036 01:28:38,620 --> 01:28:44,500 be kind of and to immediately be part of the neighborhood instead of like this is the commercial 1037 01:28:44,500 --> 01:28:51,000 corridor like multi-family housing project that's outside of the neighborhood and then you get 1038 01:28:51,000 --> 01:28:56,740 into the neighborhood. So to me it doesn't seem completely congruous. It kind of reminds me of some of 1039 01:28:56,740 --> 01:29:08,600 these west side Costa Mesa multi-family projects. Not that there's anything wrong with that it just 1040 01:29:08,600 --> 01:29:16,140 This site being so high profile and you know dover and cliff drive is like such you know everyone's gonna drive by all the time 1041 01:29:16,140 --> 01:29:18,380 It's an entryway into the neighborhood. So 1042 01:29:19,340 --> 01:29:21,180 But if anyone else feels that way then that's fine 1043 01:29:21,680 --> 01:29:27,940 But it's there would be my note to the applicants and and perhaps part of it is you can't design that same 1044 01:29:28,460 --> 01:29:30,680 You know coastal Cape Cod 1045 01:29:31,520 --> 01:29:32,000 style 1046 01:29:33,100 --> 01:29:35,140 And get the same amount of square footage 1047 01:29:35,140 --> 01:29:46,620 I think that's what I heard you saying, trying to match the manner of short look onto this site didn't quite pencil, but those would be my thoughts. 1048 01:29:46,620 --> 01:29:46,700 Yes. 1049 01:29:47,860 --> 01:29:50,380 Thank you. 1050 01:29:50,400 --> 01:29:50,500 Oh. 1051 01:29:51,160 --> 01:29:51,540 You're good. 1052 01:29:52,080 --> 01:29:52,320 Thank you. 1053 01:29:52,440 --> 01:29:52,500 Sorry. 1054 01:29:55,220 --> 01:29:55,860 Forward to start. 1055 01:29:56,700 --> 01:29:59,980 First of all, I think the, I think the, uh, uh, epic. 1056 01:30:00,000 --> 01:30:29,720 It's done a really nice job on the design of it. It's a very constrained site. So I think from an access point, it's really tough to do anything other than what's proposed. Coming down to over, I don't think would be realistic to put an entrance on the dover from a parking perspective. We're offering, I think it's 10 more spaces that are required for the code. You know, certainly based on the underlying zoning, this could be much more aggressively planned. So I appreciate the restraint that the applicant has. 1057 01:30:30,480 --> 01:30:38,000 used in designing this, you know, from a design perspective, you know, I like the diversity 1058 01:30:38,000 --> 01:30:42,220 of doing different things, not just having, you know, it's just an herbine. 1059 01:30:44,100 --> 01:30:49,360 So I mean, I think this is a well thought out, well designed project, and you know, I 1060 01:30:49,360 --> 01:30:53,200 think it's going to be, you know, while I respect the concerns of the people right above it, 1061 01:30:53,200 --> 01:30:57,660 Let's certainly understand that, this is allowed here. 1062 01:30:58,340 --> 01:31:05,280 It's been proposed, it's been known, and I think it's a well-designed project and I'm in support of it. 1063 01:31:12,330 --> 01:31:16,130 So first of all, I heard a couple things tonight that I think we should really consider. 1064 01:31:16,950 --> 01:31:23,350 Number one, there is no nexus for asking the applicant to underground the line further up the hill. 1065 01:31:24,570 --> 01:31:30,150 If you've dealt with Edison, I think that this is unreasonable. 1066 01:31:31,130 --> 01:31:34,090 It's easily a million dollars that you're asking them to absorb. 1067 01:31:34,830 --> 01:31:41,190 And so I think it's dangerous to have that as a potential condition of approval and would not support that. 1068 01:31:42,690 --> 01:31:45,530 Additionally, they were meeting our parking requirements. 1069 01:31:46,470 --> 01:31:51,150 So those are our parking requirements and we need to be comfortable with that. 1070 01:31:51,150 --> 01:31:54,350 that they've been, they've met those guidelines. 1071 01:31:54,670 --> 01:31:59,210 And so I think we need to be aware that we're not talking 1072 01:31:59,210 --> 01:32:02,290 about anything other than the code here. 1073 01:32:05,610 --> 01:32:07,910 Additionally, I'd like to commend the applicant 1074 01:32:07,910 --> 01:32:11,230 because I think that this is a good looking project. 1075 01:32:11,850 --> 01:32:16,330 I think that this architectural style is achievable in construction. 1076 01:32:16,910 --> 01:32:19,570 And I also think that this architectural style protects 1077 01:32:20,090 --> 01:32:26,030 the height limitation with the butterfly roofs that otherwise you're going to end up with a taller building. 1078 01:32:28,230 --> 01:32:31,010 I think it's appropriate and it will be a good looking project. 1079 01:32:33,170 --> 01:32:39,530 The applicant could have gone to a higher density, they could gone to a higher height limitation. 1080 01:32:40,230 --> 01:32:44,990 They had a lot of leeway and they showed what was appropriate for the neighborhood. 1081 01:32:46,230 --> 01:32:53,010 that's our code remember so they're meeting our code and then I do think that 1082 01:32:53,010 --> 01:32:57,830 this will fit into the context of the neighborhood and will be a good looking 1083 01:32:57,830 --> 01:33:04,270 project. On top of that we're bringing four sale housing into our city that 1084 01:33:04,270 --> 01:33:10,170 isn't much more achievable price point so I think that's a fantastic thing and 1085 01:33:11,550 --> 01:33:15,290 I think this is going to be a great project, and I will be supporting it. 1086 01:33:18,630 --> 01:33:19,050 Make sure you read. 1087 01:33:19,930 --> 01:33:20,950 Sure, I'll go. 1088 01:33:22,770 --> 01:33:27,270 Let's see, I'll start off with, I've been a resident of the Heights community for 18 years. 1089 01:33:27,610 --> 01:33:33,090 So I very much know and appreciate the community's concerns. 1090 01:33:33,090 --> 01:33:36,750 I appreciate everyone here tonight to speak for and against the project. 1091 01:33:37,370 --> 01:34:06,510 At the expense of being redundant with my other commissioners to the applicant, I appreciate everything you did with the community outreach, how organized, how thoughtful you were, how would every turn, you could have taken more, you took less, but on the other side of it, I also understand the traffic complexities, and I think there's no, there's no easy answer with our housing needs and our housing goal and our housing plan, it's really tough because you get stuck with these, 1092 01:34:06,510 --> 01:34:11,990 unique parcels where there just isn't the right answer for public parking, there isn't the right. 1093 01:34:13,050 --> 01:34:18,490 A forced right and a right, for example, is not great because they're going to go up the hill and make a U-turn. 1094 01:34:19,290 --> 01:34:21,210 Having them go out at Dover is tough. 1095 01:34:21,490 --> 01:34:28,210 So it's really tricky when we get into these types of lots and we're putting it overlay. 1096 01:34:28,470 --> 01:34:36,230 So, it's a challenge and I understand and that being said, I do think the applicant meets the 1097 01:34:36,230 --> 01:34:38,790 conditions and I will be supporting this project. 1098 01:34:42,200 --> 01:34:43,120 Thank you. 1099 01:34:46,800 --> 01:34:53,080 I think the site plan design was thoughtful considering what they could do. 1100 01:34:53,180 --> 01:34:56,960 We're kind of in a rock and a hard place here with our zoning and this overlay. 1101 01:34:58,300 --> 01:35:03,100 Where it could have been, they can go vertical and get their density. 1102 01:35:03,520 --> 01:35:06,200 They need, they have a minimum of 20 acre such 33 units. 1103 01:35:07,200 --> 01:35:12,620 I think they were thoughtful in trying to push it out, get away from the housing behind 1104 01:35:12,620 --> 01:35:16,460 them, and worked with the neighbors as well, so I can appreciate that. 1105 01:35:17,680 --> 01:35:24,540 Traffic, I do, I've taken my kids here, Harbor Pediatrics for years. 1106 01:35:25,700 --> 01:35:28,140 When it was buzzing, it was buzzing a little bit, it was pretty full. 1107 01:35:28,900 --> 01:35:31,020 I don't think traffic's this big of an issue. 1108 01:35:31,200 --> 01:35:33,720 I do see parking potentially as an issue. 1109 01:35:33,720 --> 01:35:42,480 I like we have a condition that people, you know, have to have their garages clean or empty and have to park inside. 1110 01:35:42,480 --> 01:35:43,360 I hope that's enforced. 1111 01:35:43,680 --> 01:35:45,480 I could foresee there just aren't many. 1112 01:35:45,600 --> 01:35:46,760 There isn't a lot overflow. 1113 01:35:47,020 --> 01:35:52,900 So if you have roommates or some other considerations or kids and, you know, four cars and two spots, you know, 1114 01:35:53,320 --> 01:35:54,840 I don't know if they're parking and cliff walking down the hill. 1115 01:35:54,980 --> 01:35:55,600 I don't know where they go. 1116 01:35:55,780 --> 01:35:57,480 So, you know, they comply. 1117 01:35:57,920 --> 01:35:59,940 That's a problem and I don't know how we solve it. 1118 01:35:59,940 --> 01:36:02,580 So I don't foresee parking on cliff. 1119 01:36:05,000 --> 01:36:08,440 When I look at what alternatives could be built here, 1120 01:36:09,860 --> 01:36:16,700 the community could really be jammed with a really big project that was really tight and tall and be a lot worse. 1121 01:36:17,140 --> 01:36:19,740 And I think there's actually a nice project. 1122 01:36:20,100 --> 01:36:24,840 It offers a different little income level to potentially purchase here and be in the community. 1123 01:36:24,840 --> 01:36:31,800 I, along with Commissioner Langford, don't love the design just to be honest, I would rather 1124 01:36:31,800 --> 01:36:37,280 have seen and would rather see something similar to the Mayor's Shores project. 1125 01:36:37,440 --> 01:36:43,400 I think that would fit in, blend better with the traditional Cape Cod, even a little bit 1126 01:36:43,400 --> 01:36:46,700 of farmhouse community, and blend more as you come up the hill. 1127 01:36:46,860 --> 01:36:54,820 I think it's more an out parcel for the heights in Cliff Haven versus blending as this 1128 01:36:54,820 --> 01:37:01,440 This to me fits in more of a industrial area, or more of a commercial area, where we've done some spot zoning. 1129 01:37:01,600 --> 01:37:08,460 But some overlays where housing has been introducing commercial areas, this is surrounded by residential. 1130 01:37:09,540 --> 01:37:22,300 So I would be open to trying to think of, and I've kind of talked to staff about, you know, you could condition, some sort of condition to soften up some lines, some colors, potentially. 1131 01:37:23,400 --> 01:37:25,480 or that they could come up with a different idea. 1132 01:37:25,680 --> 01:37:28,440 I don't know if that's, I've got the support for that. 1133 01:37:30,120 --> 01:37:32,220 But I would be in favor of something to that effect. 1134 01:37:33,400 --> 01:37:34,620 Another look at the design. 1135 01:37:36,260 --> 01:37:40,080 Also, the underground we talked about, I understand what you guys are saying, 1136 01:37:40,160 --> 01:37:45,280 the argument, we cannot mandate that they underground be on their property. 1137 01:37:45,920 --> 01:37:49,620 I would like to, if the applicant is up to it, and if I could add the sport, 1138 01:37:49,620 --> 01:37:55,180 that they would still, we could put that they would continue working with City as they've said, 1139 01:37:55,440 --> 01:38:00,840 NSE and if it's feasible, at their discretion, clearly we have to leave it, 1140 01:38:00,960 --> 01:38:04,220 then I would like to add that as condition if everyone's in favor. 1141 01:38:05,380 --> 01:38:11,720 So if anyone has any thoughts on the design or ways we could soften that up or change something, 1142 01:38:12,340 --> 01:38:17,800 I'd be open to it, or else if somebody else wants to make a motion as is, 1143 01:38:17,800 --> 01:38:21,220 or with the condition that I'm proposing, we can go from there. 1144 01:38:28,390 --> 01:38:28,610 Rosie? 1145 01:38:31,290 --> 01:38:36,190 I'd like to make a motion to approve, based on the existing conditions of approval, 1146 01:38:36,430 --> 01:38:44,350 the existing architecture, and not add any additional conditions of approval that are outside the nexus for this project. 1147 01:38:47,160 --> 01:38:48,140 I'll second that. 1148 01:39:34,690 --> 01:39:40,250 The motion carries four, one with chair, Harris voting, no. 1149 01:39:40,730 --> 01:39:41,990 Congratulations, thank you. 1150 01:39:43,400 --> 01:39:44,260 Okay. 1151 01:39:46,520 --> 01:39:47,660 Moving on to the next item. 1152 01:39:48,040 --> 01:39:50,340 Item number three, motions for reconsideration. 1153 01:39:50,540 --> 01:39:51,540 Are there any motions staff? 1154 01:39:55,580 --> 01:39:57,860 Okay, item number four, report by the community development 1155 01:39:57,860 --> 01:39:59,480 director or request for matters 1156 01:39:59,480 --> 01:40:01,120 which a planning commission member would like place 1157 01:40:01,120 --> 01:40:02,060 on a future agenda. 1158 01:40:02,980 --> 01:40:04,420 We're going to give a sec for everyone to. 1159 01:40:04,800 --> 01:40:05,500 It's like a lot of things. 1160 01:40:50,860 --> 01:40:52,720 Yeah. Director, are you ready? 1161 01:40:53,920 --> 01:40:55,760 I just want to note for the commission 1162 01:40:55,760 --> 01:40:58,120 that the February 19th planning commission hearing 1163 01:40:58,560 --> 01:40:59,260 will be canceled. 1164 01:40:59,260 --> 01:41:09,280 So no meeting for the second one in February and then our next meeting will be scheduled for March 5th and it'll be a slightly heavier agenda. 1165 01:41:09,720 --> 01:41:15,680 On that agenda we do have scheduled the 300 new ports and our drive condominiums. 1166 01:41:16,420 --> 01:41:18,940 So that's another housing project for your consideration. 1167 01:41:19,440 --> 01:41:25,360 We'll also be sharing the annual General Plan Housing Report for your consideration and recommendations to the City Council. 1168 01:41:26,000 --> 01:41:43,280 We have an ordinance related to streamlining and incentivizing telecom facilities that's an update to our municipal code, and then lastly we have a conditional use permit for a restaurant called the nice guy over at 267 west coast highway. 1169 01:41:43,600 --> 01:41:46,380 So those will be the four items for your consideration. 1170 01:41:47,120 --> 01:41:47,520 That's it. 1171 01:41:48,080 --> 01:41:49,660 Thank you, so long one. 1172 01:41:50,040 --> 01:41:51,780 Does anyone from the audience want to comment on these items? 1173 01:41:51,780 --> 01:41:52,600 motion. 1174 01:41:56,180 --> 01:41:57,900 Thank you again, Chair Harris. 1175 01:42:01,190 --> 01:42:03,470 I want one item pending before you will be the 1176 01:42:03,470 --> 01:42:10,470 general plan update, and I notice if I look on this in the gray areas, I would I see a 1177 01:42:10,470 --> 01:42:15,890 number of the other boards and commissions reviewing the general plan, and then I see an 1178 01:42:15,890 --> 01:42:23,970 April 28 study session before the city council. I don't see on the schedule when you will 1179 01:42:23,970 --> 01:42:29,610 be reviewing the general plan and to the best of my memory you've seen two of the eight 1180 01:42:29,610 --> 01:42:35,170 elements so far you've seen the land use element and the safety element. There's eight other 1181 01:42:35,170 --> 01:42:42,090 elements so there's a lot of stuff and the last time the general plan was updated the planning 1182 01:42:42,090 --> 01:42:48,270 commission spent many, many hours reviewing it before presenting it to the city council so I'm 1183 01:42:48,270 --> 01:42:50,470 not totally sure when that will happen. 1184 01:42:51,510 --> 01:42:54,450 One element that is not being reviewed 1185 01:42:54,450 --> 01:42:55,910 though is the housing element. 1186 01:42:56,730 --> 01:42:58,570 And I made a non-agenda comment 1187 01:42:58,570 --> 01:43:03,750 about our progress on that, but another aspect of that 1188 01:43:03,750 --> 01:43:07,070 is part of our housing element has not been implemented yet 1189 01:43:07,070 --> 01:43:08,770 because it's in the coastal zone. 1190 01:43:09,770 --> 01:43:12,850 And we've been waiting and been hearing for a couple of years 1191 01:43:13,610 --> 01:43:15,970 that were waiting for the Coastal Commission 1192 01:43:15,970 --> 01:43:22,010 to certify our plan for the housing and the overlays and so forth in the coastal zone. 1193 01:43:23,130 --> 01:43:29,990 And that was actually on the Coastal Commission agenda today. 1194 01:43:32,140 --> 01:43:35,440 But before the hearing happened, it was marked as being postponed. 1195 01:43:36,560 --> 01:43:41,460 And on this schedule, it's just on the very last page, it's now pending before the Coastal 1196 01:43:41,460 --> 01:43:46,620 Commission. And so that part of our housing element we can't even act on. 1197 01:43:47,760 --> 01:44:00,860 And so I'm just, maybe you would be wondering that the Coast Commission had finally offered to hear it, that we the city told them we didn't want them to or why is it going off through agenda? 1198 01:44:04,080 --> 01:44:07,360 And when are you going to hear the other elements of the general plan? 1199 01:44:07,960 --> 01:44:09,260 Those are my comments. Thank you. 1200 01:44:16,740 --> 01:44:23,600 Okay, item number five, request for excused absences, anyone March 5th? 1201 01:44:23,600 --> 01:44:24,600 I'll be out March 5th. 1202 01:44:28,400 --> 01:44:28,920 adjourned.