[0:07] The municipality of North Cypress
[0:09] Langford is located to the south of
[0:11] Nepoa, bordering the town on three sides
[0:14] and stretching south past Carberry as
[0:17] far as Shiloh to the west and Edins to
[0:19] the east.
[0:21] Total population for the area is 2,860
[0:25] with a land area of 1,762
[0:29] km within six wards.
[0:33] >> Resolution 169 2026 resolve the meeting
[0:37] be convened at 9:00 a.m. with Reason in
[0:39] the chair. Can I have a mover, please?
[0:42] Karen seconder.
[0:44] >> Welcome. All in favor? Opposed?
[0:48] Carried. Thank you.
[0:51] Adoption of the agenda resolution 170
[0:54] 2026 be it resolve the agenda for the
[0:57] regular meeting of June 8th 2026 be
[1:00] adopted as circulated. Can I have a
[1:02] mover please?
[1:03] >> Rob.
[1:04] seconder.
[1:05] >> Okay.
[1:07] >> Any additions to be put down?
[1:09] >> Uh the the uh Dixon
[1:13] crossing.
[1:16] » Yeah.
[1:19] Please invite me.
[1:25] » You um by the time we get there, I'll
[1:27] need the session township ranger row
[1:30] number.
[1:32] >> I missed that. I forget. I forgot all
[1:34] about that.
[1:36] >> Okay. Any other to add? All in favor?
[1:41] Opposed? Thank you. Thanks, Robbie.
[1:46] Adoption of minutes. Resolution 171206
[1:49] be resolved the minutes for the regular
[1:51] meeting of May 11th 2026 and the joint
[1:54] meeting minutes of May 25th 2026 be
[1:58] adopted as circulated mover please
[2:03] >> Rob seconder
[2:06] >> chair
[2:08] any questions
[2:11] all in favor
[2:15] thank Resolution
[2:19] 172, 2026, Mutton. The minutes for the
[2:22] special meetings of May 11th, 2026, May
[2:25] 25th, 2026,
[2:27] and May 26, 2026 be adopted as
[2:30] circulated. Can I have a mover, please?
[2:34] >> Welcome. Seconder,
[2:36] >> Dallas,
[2:37] any questions regarding any of those?
[2:41] All in favor?
[2:44] Post
[2:46] carried. Thank you.
[2:48] Other delegation tax impact.
[2:53] » Morning. Morning.
[2:55] >> Morning. Are you Jill?
[2:56] >> I'm nice to meet you. I'm Valerie.
[3:00] >> Yeah. Let's get you a chair.
[3:09] At
[3:14] least you didn't have pouring rain to
[3:16] come out into this morning.
[3:18] >> No
[3:25] one.
[3:30] » Thank you.
[3:36] Did you hear any rain last night?
[3:43] » Okay,
[3:44] >> we got rain through the night last
[3:46] night.
[3:46] >> Yeah,
[3:48] >> we'll go around the table with the
[3:49] introductions before we start. Go ahead,
[3:51] Robbie.
[3:52] >> Rob,
[3:54] >> Valerie, incred
[4:01] David.
[4:03] >> I am Farah Anderson. So, I'm the
[4:05] district supervisor for the Brandon and
[4:07] Surus Property Assessment Services
[4:09] Office, and we're here today just to
[4:12] discuss the impacts the reassessment
[4:14] 2027 won't have on your municipality.
[4:18] Um, it's nobody's first go at this. So,
[4:21] as you know, I don't read these reports
[4:23] verbatim. I just hit the highlights. You
[4:26] have them in front of you. So, go ahead.
[4:29] >> We'll we'll start with a little bit of
[4:31] housekeeping. So, your border revision
[4:34] is scheduled for November 9th. The
[4:36] appeal deadline for that is October
[4:38] 26th. So, just a reminder to not forget
[4:42] to advertise.
[4:44] Um, you guys are not having an open
[4:46] house, but there is one in the town of
[4:48] Carberry town office on June 23rd.
[4:52] Anyone can attend. Um, there's also a
[4:55] number of virtual open houses. So, if
[4:56] it's easier for rate payers to meet or
[5:00] discuss at night, they can set an
[5:01] appointment and have an evening meeting
[5:04] with an assessor. Um, sorry, what was
[5:07] the date of that open house? October?
[5:09] >> It's June 23rd from 10 to 2.
[5:12] >> Thanks.
[5:14] So, and uh, notices are in the mail
[5:16] today. So,
[5:19] by the end of the week at the latest,
[5:20] rate payers are going to have them. um
[5:23] if they're on my property MB, they'll
[5:25] get an email within the next couple of
[5:26] days saying that their notice is ready
[5:28] to view in their account.
[5:32] So, um we'll just get started. This
[5:35] report provides you council with an
[5:36] overview the impact the reassessment
[5:39] 2027 is going to have on your
[5:41] municipality. And for 27, the assessed
[5:44] values of all properties are updated to
[5:46] the new reference date of April 1st,
[5:48] 2025, which is from the previous
[5:50] reference date of April 1st, 2023. Um,
[5:53] so the properties were last updated
[5:56] generally in 2025.
[6:00] These updated assessments will be used
[6:02] for 27 property taxes. And this report
[6:05] just provides some details on how the
[6:07] taxable assessments have changed within
[6:09] your municipality and across the
[6:10] province and how it will affect your
[6:13] municipal and school taxes. However, the
[6:17] impacts only reflect a 27 modeling. So,
[6:20] we make changes all summer. So, you're
[6:22] still going to have an updated role in
[6:24] the fall. Um, this model is also based
[6:28] on your 25 mil rate. So just keep that
[6:30] in mind that it doesn't know what
[6:33] happened this year for the budget. So
[6:38] reassessment it so it is done to provide
[6:41] equity. So all properties just are
[6:43] regularly reassessed just to ensure
[6:45] they're keeping pace with the market
[6:47] conditions up or down. Um fairness
[6:51] because property taxes are paid
[6:52] according to market value. Keeping the
[6:54] assessments current just ensures
[6:56] everyone is paying their fair share and
[6:59] it makes for greater rate understanding
[7:02] because updated assessments just make it
[7:04] easier for people to evaluate what they
[7:06] have assessed.
[7:09] This reassessment reflects how the
[7:11] property values have changed since the
[7:13] last reassessment. And these changes of
[7:16] course are due to supply and demand for
[7:18] real estate or that is the main thing,
[7:20] the market value, any new construction
[7:22] or improvements to existing properties
[7:24] or any removal or demolition or loss of
[7:28] properties due to fire, things like
[7:30] that.
[7:31] The province's taxable assessment
[7:33] increased by 12.1 billion or 11% and
[7:37] your municipality's taxable assessment
[7:39] increased by $68 million or 10%.
[7:43] That first table that is the change to
[7:46] taxable or portioned assessment that
[7:48] occurred due to reassessment. So your
[7:51] single family residential has gone up
[7:53] 8.9%.
[7:55] Your apartments which are five dwelling
[7:57] units or more has gone up 1.5%. So
[8:00] overall, your residential went up 8.5%.
[8:04] Your farm properties went up 16%.
[8:08] Commercial industrial went up 1.9%.
[8:11] Institutional properties that are
[8:13] subject to tax went up 14.1%.
[8:17] Um, pipeline went up 2.5%, railway went
[8:20] up 1.9% and designated recreation, which
[8:23] is your golf course, went up 7%.
[8:26] Overall, your increase was 9.8. I do
[8:29] want to point out the flip between
[8:31] institutional and apartment is mainly
[8:34] due to properties that were fully
[8:37] taxable as apartments that are now
[8:38] school tax exempt because of the change
[8:41] in the school tax credit. It was in
[8:44] their best interest to go back to being
[8:46] school tax exempt, but they fall under
[8:49] institutional versus apartment. So
[8:51] there's where you're seeing a bigger
[8:53] shift in the
[8:55] change in values.
[9:00] You're talking probably
[9:02] >> care homes or
[9:04] >> not so much care homes but they're like
[9:06] the assisted living anything like that
[9:10] when the education tax credit was
[9:12] applied to everyone regardless. It was
[9:15] in most of their best interest to be
[9:16] fully taxable because they got more
[9:18] back. So apartments pay on a 45% of
[9:22] portioning. When their school tax exempt
[9:24] they pay municipal tax on 65%
[9:26] portioning. So
[9:29] when they no longer qualified because
[9:31] they're not a primary residence, when
[9:33] they changed that, it became in a lot of
[9:36] their best interest to go back to being
[9:37] school tax exempt. And that's where you
[9:39] see a flip. It isn't that new
[9:41] construction or new buildings showed up.
[9:43] It's just that flip in class because
[9:45] they went back for licenses to get that
[9:47] school tax exemption.
[9:49] Is it hard for them to get the
[9:50] exemption? It's not. Most of them had it
[9:53] and they went away from it because it
[9:55] they were paying more in municipal tax
[9:57] and it wasn't in their best interest. So
[9:59] when you start doing the math, it was
[10:00] better to be taxable. They got their
[10:02] school tax back. Um so they already
[10:05] qualified because they already met all
[10:07] the criteria. Nothing had changed.
[10:09] >> It's harder for new ones to become
[10:11] school tax because there's sized
[10:13] restrictions to what can be school tax
[10:15] exam.
[10:16] >> I just remember helping somebody get
[10:17] there and it seemed not that easy.
[10:20] >> Yeah. Once they are, it's just a matter
[10:21] of they had to do the license again. So,
[10:24] um we saw to
[10:26] >> they applied to Manitoba Housing does
[10:28] those licenses. So, yeah.
[10:32] >> So, course assessment increases
[10:34] decreases from reassessment don't
[10:36] necessarily mean the tax increases and
[10:38] decreases. It just provides the basis
[10:40] for taxation.
[10:43] um shifting of the three tax levies does
[10:46] occur between and within property
[10:47] classes, but only properties seeing
[10:50] above average increase assessment
[10:53] increases will likely see an assessment
[10:55] or an increase in taxes.
[10:58] However, just keep in mind this report
[11:01] doesn't take into account any other
[11:04] levies. So, this is solely based on bill
[11:06] rate. It doesn't take in any special
[11:08] levies or service fees or any of that
[11:10] kind of stuff that you have.
[11:13] Um so the general municipal levy was
[11:16] calculated taking your 25 mil rate. So
[11:20] it applies that tax level against your
[11:23] 26 assessment to estimate what your 26th
[11:26] budget would have been and then it
[11:28] applies a little bit of an inflation
[11:30] measure to apply that to 27. So it's
[11:34] more gives you an idea of what's going
[11:36] on. take it with a grain of salt because
[11:39] it really I mean in this day and age a
[11:42] model that's not overly um realistic for
[11:45] inflation and everything else but they
[11:47] have to have somewhere to start. The
[11:49] school division special levy is done the
[11:51] same way. Takes their 25 levy, applies
[11:53] it to and then it comes up with your new
[11:56] share of the school taxes based on all
[11:58] the municipality or all the
[12:01] municipalities subject to that your
[12:03] school divisions levy. And then the
[12:06] support levy does the same thing only it
[12:09] bases it on how property subject to that
[12:12] levy which is only your commercial
[12:13] industrial. So that's your provincial
[12:15] other school tax levy. how they've
[12:18] changed across the board in the
[12:20] province.
[12:23] The next table, this says municipal and
[12:26] school taxes, but this really is where
[12:27] your school tax shift is going.
[12:30] So for single family, residential,
[12:34] they're seeing a 3% drop or reduction.
[12:38] Your apartments are seeing a 7.3%
[12:41] reduction. And overall, your residential
[12:43] is going to see about a 3.2% 2%
[12:45] reduction in school taxes. Your farm
[12:49] properties are seeing a 3.4% increase.
[12:52] Your commercial in industrial a 7%
[12:55] decrease. Your institutional a 3.9%
[12:59] increase.
[13:01] Uh pipeline a 7.8% decrease. Railway an
[13:05] 8.1% decrease. And your designated
[13:08] recreation or golf course a 2.7%
[13:11] decrease. Overall, your municipality
[13:14] responsible for 2.4% less school taxes
[13:17] in 27.
[13:25] » Is that good when they go down?
[13:27] >> Just means it's shifted. So,
[13:29] municipalities within the same school
[13:31] division may have gone up a bit more.
[13:34] So, what they do is they've shifted the
[13:36] burden around to another. So, they often
[13:39] they go up and down all the time.
[13:42] I will say that's not necessarily
[13:44] realistic. School divisions tend to
[13:47] raise their budgets. So, but it gives
[13:49] you an idea that you'll be responsible
[13:51] overall for less towards those municip
[13:54] those school divisions.
[13:54] >> The way they're all suffering for money
[13:56] right now it's
[13:58] >> doesn't make sense.
[13:59] That's one thing
[14:01] that should be up.
[14:01] >> Yeah. So that's where I say take this
[14:04] just kind of gives you an idea on where
[14:06] you sit in relation to the rest of the
[14:10] municipalities around that are in those
[14:12] same school divisions.
[14:16] The next table, this is the table you
[14:18] control. So because of the way it's
[14:20] modeled, it ends up with a total of 0%
[14:23] change because it assumes no change to
[14:24] budget, which is not a realistic
[14:26] expectation in this day and age.
[14:29] Um,
[14:31] so your single family residential is
[14:34] seeing about a.9% reduction or decrease
[14:38] with apartments a 7.6% decrease. Overall
[14:42] residential will see a 1.2% decrease. On
[14:45] page five, your farm properties are
[14:48] seeing about a 5.6% increase. Commercial
[14:52] and instit industrial about a 7.2%
[14:55] decrease.
[14:57] Institutional, a 3.9% increase,
[15:00] pipeline, a 6.7% decrease, railway, a
[15:04] 7.2% decrease, and designated
[15:06] recreational a 2.6% decrease. Um,
[15:11] coming out at zero because again, it
[15:13] assumes no budget change.
[15:17] Properties with assessment increases is
[15:19] less than 9.8%
[15:21] likely will see a municipal tax decrease
[15:23] and anything above that will likely see
[15:25] an increase.
[15:29] Um the next page is just the ways these
[15:32] are the ways council has at their
[15:34] disposal to try and impact any
[15:37] significant impacts that rate payers
[15:40] maybe couldn't handle. So of course
[15:42] there's the phasing tax increases and
[15:44] decreases. So the municipal assessment
[15:46] act does provide you with the
[15:49] flexibility to phase in substantial tax
[15:51] increases property owners would
[15:53] otherwise otherwise find very difficult
[15:55] to absorb. So by bylaw you can phase in
[15:58] increases or decreases in both municipal
[16:01] and education taxes or tax changes for
[16:03] all or some property classes or
[16:05] individual properties. Um you got to
[16:08] keep in mind you can only phase that in
[16:09] over the two years because that's the
[16:11] cycle we're on. So, it's there. It's not
[16:15] used very much since we've gone to a
[16:17] 2-year cycle. The municipal act tax
[16:20] tool. So, this one is the one most
[16:22] municipalities use. This is your special
[16:24] service fees, your levies, your LUDs,
[16:27] things like that. Um
[16:30] your the municipal act provides
[16:32] municipalities with some pretty good tax
[16:34] tools and the bulk of municipalities
[16:37] tend to utilize these to to mitigate any
[16:41] tax shifts because they're maybe the
[16:44] easier way to go about it. Um you can
[16:48] establish a tax credit program. So the
[16:50] municipal act does provide
[16:51] municipalities with that ability
[16:54] um to establish essentially a financial
[16:57] assistance program with by bylaw um and
[17:01] you can provide credit for municipal
[17:03] taxes. So those those programs are
[17:07] fairly flexible. I see them used mostly
[17:10] to encourage development
[17:12] more than anything else. And then you do
[17:15] have the ability to vary class portion
[17:17] percentages. So the municipal assessment
[17:19] act does give you the authority to vary
[17:22] the property class portions for
[17:24] municipal tax purposes only.
[17:27] Um so you can bylaw vary the class
[17:30] portions to mitigate the shifting that
[17:31] occurs between the classes. This is the
[17:34] one that does require provincial
[17:35] regulation.
[17:37] Um our system is set up to accept it. If
[17:40] you wanted to do this, you'd need to
[17:42] start now because there is a lot of work
[17:44] involved and there is no guarantee. At
[17:47] the end of the day, the minister has
[17:48] final say on whether he will accept that bylaw or not. So, um that's one you
[17:55] would talk to an MSO. There
[17:58] municipalities have done lots of work on
[17:59] this. Nobody has implemented it yet
[18:02] because you're just shifting the burden
[18:04] around. So if you change the portion
[18:06] from farm from 26 down to even 25 then
[18:11] you have to make up that other percent
[18:13] everywhere else in all your other
[18:14] classes right so you're just shifting
[18:16] the burden um but it is a lot of work to
[18:20] do so there are m I have we have yet to
[18:24] see it implemented there's been lots of
[18:26] municipalities do the work at the end of
[18:29] the day it hasn't
[18:31] >> is it usually because it's not approved
[18:33] at the end Nope, it has not. They've actually gone to a conclusion
[18:37] that you're just shifting the burden. So
[18:40] regardless of how you do it, you have to
[18:42] justify what you've done to your
[18:43] rateayers.
[18:45] And so most of them have found the tax
[18:48] tools in the municipal act are a better,
[18:51] more efficient way of kind of mitigating
[18:54] those shifts, right? So that's where you
[18:56] see LUDs come into play versus so you
[18:59] have urban and rural areas where you can
[19:01] have a differential mill rate without a
[19:03] differential mill rate. There's
[19:06] different services in those areas. Um
[19:10] tend to be a better way of spreading
[19:12] that tax because
[19:15] you'll always hear complaints from
[19:17] everyone that well towns are subsidizing
[19:20] the rural area and the rural area
[19:21] subsidizing the towns. And the reality
[19:23] is everybody has a little bit in both of
[19:25] those areas to pay for. But maybe in the
[19:28] rural area you have a ton of budget
[19:30] towards gravel that people in town
[19:32] aren't using. Well, maybe in those
[19:35] instances it makes sense where you have
[19:36] an LUD where the services that only town
[19:39] people mostly utilize. It's a mill rate
[19:42] versus Yes. But those are those are
[19:45] where people have gone in the RMS
[19:47] instead of the portioning because
[19:51] you can tailor them to the services each
[19:53] of those areas are getting better than
[19:55] we're going to take this because when
[19:56] you change the portion you're going to
[19:58] have to revisit that every two years
[20:00] also because if you change farm one year
[20:02] and then all of a sudden like here farm
[20:04] has gone up but it's gone up
[20:05] significantly less than the average in
[20:07] the province. another year it might go
[20:10] up like when you start seeing this then
[20:11] you got to start changing your portions
[20:13] every two years so you have to do the
[20:15] work for that bylaw every two years
[20:17] right
[20:17] >> yeah question so for wetlands and like
[20:21] natural bush areas is that a different
[20:22] portion
[20:23] >> it's not a different portion it's a
[20:25] different type of land so it's a
[20:26] non-airable
[20:27] >> right
[20:28] >> if you have like lots of water on your
[20:30] property you will see what's called
[20:32] conservation land on your notice
[20:35] >> because it's rated as water essentially
[20:38] So although it's still portioned at 26%
[20:42] it's maybe $30 an acre for that versus
[20:46] you're upwards of 10,000 an acre for an
[20:48] arable land. Right.
[20:50] >> So that's already built in.
[20:53] >> It's built in by the type of land. So
[20:55] the characteristic of land that it is
[20:57] really
[20:58] >> and you look at that every two years as
[21:00] well. See if anything
[21:01] >> those are those are done generally on a
[21:03] 10year average. Although
[21:06] in the areas where we have irrigation,
[21:08] we tend to try and look at the photos a
[21:10] little more often just to stay on top of
[21:13] things like irrigation,
[21:15] >> right?
[21:16] >> Um or when farmers call, then we will
[21:19] review, but we we tend to go on a
[21:21] 10-year average. So, we don't crank
[21:22] somebody's arable land because they
[21:25] happen to have two good years where they
[21:26] got a and then they have eight years
[21:28] where they have areas where it's too wet
[21:30] they can't get through. We kind of
[21:32] average it. And when we talk to them,
[21:34] we're like, well, on 10 years average,
[21:36] how many acres do you get seated?
[21:39] And usually we're not far off. Usually
[21:41] there's pretty good agreement between
[21:43] like they might say, well, some years I
[21:45] get more, but some years I get less. I'm
[21:47] like, well, on average, would this be
[21:49] about,
[21:51] right? Because there's 500 and almost
[21:54] 600,000 properties in the province. You
[21:57] have maybe a 100 assessors. Not really
[21:59] realistic to try and review every single
[22:03] quarter section every two years.
[22:05] >> Yeah. So in a similar like that but a
[22:09] little different if say municipalities
[22:12] and wersheds got together to want to
[22:14] promote conservation.
[22:16] So is there any change to that?
[22:18] >> So what we do is when people enter into
[22:22] conservation agreements
[22:24] if they provide us a copy of that we
[22:26] will change their land to match whatever
[22:28] that agreement says. So there's there's
[22:30] a bazillion and one different types of
[22:32] conservation agreements out there. Um
[22:36] some most are registered as on as cadets
[22:39] on titles, but we're not provided those,
[22:42] >> right?
[22:42] >> So we don't go hunting for them. So
[22:44] that's where a property owner who enters
[22:46] into an agreement with Ducks Unlimited
[22:48] and it's a no-brain
[22:52] provide us a coffee because those
[22:55] agreements outline exactly what you can
[22:57] and can't do with that land. We will
[22:59] adjust the characteristics to match what
[23:01] that agreement says.
[23:04] OVA though, we don't see any decrease in
[23:06] sale price per acre if it has a
[23:09] conservation agreement at all. It
[23:11] doesn't sell for less,
[23:12] >> but we will adjust the characteristics
[23:14] to match what it says. So, if it has so
[23:16] many acres, it absolutely is not to be
[23:19] drained,
[23:20] >> right?
[23:20] >> And we then we just adjust it to a
[23:22] non-airable land type if we had it as an
[23:25] arable land type.
[23:27] >> Right. Okay.
[23:29] We might be doing that right now.
[23:38] » Continue on. We got another seven
[23:40] minutes. We got another
[23:41] >> the last page is just the the way
[23:45] everyone is being notified or these are
[23:48] the I guess the tax credits. Now, these
[23:51] are not our programs, so I don't know a
[23:53] lot about them, but the homeowners
[23:55] affordability tax credit is the new
[23:58] school tax credit essentially. Um, it is
[24:01] increasing to $1,700 for 27.
[24:05] Again, it's only on primary residents.
[24:07] So,
[24:09] um,
[24:11] and then
[24:13] in 27 is where clear as mud, they're
[24:16] changing it. So, if you have a property,
[24:17] a primary residence valued over a
[24:19] million dollar, once you hit that
[24:21] million dollar, they start stepping down
[24:23] how much of a credit you get towards
[24:25] school taxes by $3.40 for every hund for
[24:29] every,000 of assessed value over 1
[24:32] million.
[24:33] I believe 1.5 million is the threshold.
[24:36] Anything over 1.5, you're not getting a
[24:38] homeowners affordability tax credit
[24:40] anymore. That is the new It was in the
[24:44] news. Um, it doesn't affect a lot of
[24:47] primary residences
[24:49] around here, but there will be some that
[24:52] we may see that
[24:55] around cities.
[24:57] >> Yes, mostly it's it's around the the
[25:00] urban center and around Winnipeg.
[25:02] >> When you say 1.5 million, is that
[25:04] combined land and house or is that just
[25:06] >> but under residential class? So it's not
[25:08] if you live on a farm and you if your
[25:10] residential portion probably isn't 1.5
[25:13] your overall value might be more than
[25:15] that but it's only on your
[25:16] residentation.
[25:20] » Yeah. So and then the renters
[25:23] affordability tax credit is increasing
[25:26] in 27 to 675 plus an additional income
[25:29] tested topup for seniors of 38571.
[25:34] Um the senior school tax rebate is um
[25:38] income tested credit for senior
[25:40] homeowners which is $235.
[25:43] So that that's all done at income tax
[25:45] time. The farmland school tax rebate is
[25:48] a tax credit of 40% of school taxes on
[25:50] farmland to a maximum of $2500.
[25:53] And then there's also the school tax
[25:55] rebate on farm properties which is an
[25:57] additional tax credit for farmland
[25:59] owners which provides a rebate equal to
[26:01] 50% of school taxes on farmland.
[26:04] One of those comes off right away and
[26:06] one they have to apply for. Not sure
[26:08] which one is which, but
[26:13] then the last page is just how people
[26:15] are being notified. So, the provincial
[26:16] website is up to date with the the sales
[26:19] used to set the 27
[26:22] um values
[26:24] probably tomorrow cuz I think they
[26:26] updated on Tuesdays. But anyone within
[26:28] the municipality can then go see the
[26:30] more current sales that set the rates.
[26:33] um the my property MB. So that is how
[26:38] people can sign up to get electronic
[26:40] notices instead of in the mail. They can
[26:43] see all the properties. So if they own
[26:44] multiple properties across multiple
[26:46] municipalities, probably a good way to
[26:48] do it because they can see everything in
[26:49] one spot instead of a whole bunch of
[26:52] notices mailed. Tollfree customer
[26:54] service line so nobody has to incur a
[26:58] longdistance charge to talk to an
[27:00] assessor. Um, people don't seem to have
[27:03] trouble getting a hold of us. So, I
[27:04] don't I'm thinking that number is out
[27:06] there or they don't care. Um, the
[27:09] assessment fact sheets. So, that's the
[27:11] first point of contact. Even we send
[27:13] those out when we talk to people. That's
[27:15] the first thing we do cuz it explains
[27:16] things more easy to understand than
[27:18] maybe any assessor is going to explain
[27:20] it to begin with. They're also on our
[27:22] website so you can direct anyone to go
[27:26] see any of those fact sheets. The
[27:28] assessment notice. So, those are in the
[27:30] mail today. They have a ton of
[27:32] information. I highly encourage people
[27:33] not to just throw them out when they see
[27:35] that this is not a tax bill at the top.
[27:38] Um,
[27:40] I encourage that every year and somebody
[27:41] inevitably is going to throw it out and
[27:43] then call looking for their notice
[27:46] because they realized it wasn't a task
[27:48] and tossed it. But
[27:52] open houses. So, again, there's one in
[27:54] here in town at the town office. Anyone
[27:57] can attend an open house anywhere in the
[27:59] province. They aren't there's no
[28:00] pamphlet this year, like they have to go
[28:03] online to see where they all are, but if
[28:06] they're down east and they happen to be
[28:08] somewhere where there's going to be an
[28:09] open house and they want to talk to an
[28:10] assessor, they can just show up. The
[28:12] assessors all have access to everything
[28:14] across the province. So, no, nobody's
[28:17] going to get turned away because it's
[28:18] not their municipality.
[28:20] Um, and then of course the municipal
[28:23] administrator. So, you guys will feel
[28:25] the first calls. Um, by all means,
[28:28] assessment related issues, send them our
[28:30] way. Please try and handle the tax
[28:32] questions cuz they get really grumpy
[28:34] when we send them back to you the second
[28:36] time.
[28:37] Even if we do try to answer some of
[28:39] them, it's just the reality is that's
[28:41] those aren't our questions to answer.
[28:43] So,
[28:45] that is what your reassessment is doing
[28:47] in a nutshell.
[28:49] >> Thank you very much.
[28:51] You must have done that before. Right on
[28:54] time.
[28:55] >> I I do a lot of them. Although this is
[28:58] only about my third one this time cuz I
[29:00] was off for the first half of them with
[29:01] surgery. So
[29:03] >> that was a little painful.
[29:06] >> It is what it is.
[29:12] » Okay. Pretty sure.
[29:18] » Okay. Any comments? Otherwise, thank you
[29:20] very much for coming out.
[29:22] >> Thank you so much for presentation.
[29:24] >> Thank you.
[29:24] >> By all means, you guys at any time you
[29:26] have a question, I'm more than happy to
[29:28] take a call at any point.
[29:32] >> Thank you.
[29:40] » Hey, come on in.
[29:43] >> Your turn. They're waiting for you.
[29:46] >> That's your chair right there.
[29:48] >> All right.
[29:49] Morning. Morning. Morning. Thank you.
[29:52] >> We'll go around the table and introduce
[29:53] one another here before we get started
[29:55] here. Carol finally got a name to the
[29:58] face now. Talked a few times on the
[30:00] phone.
[30:00] >> Yeah.
[30:02] Davidson
[30:04] Deputy Reef
[30:05] >> Graef
[30:09] Malcolm Murray Robin.
[30:13] Okay.
[30:16] West Thomas.
[30:19] >> I've never been to one before, so I
[30:20] don't know what you're expecting from me
[30:22] or what I need to do. Uh, some little
[30:25] history. I contacted my counselor back
[30:27] in 2014, the summer of 2014, which I
[30:30] believe was March Campbell at the time
[30:32] to get access into my property because
[30:34] the water table on what's happened, but
[30:36] it's come up over the years. So, I was
[30:38] next to impossible get my place. We cut
[30:40] hay there. We sell the hay, stuff like
[30:42] that. So, some of my clients were having
[30:44] a hard time getting in there with their
[30:45] trailers. So, she put it in. She put the
[30:48] road in for me on 53.
[30:51] It's And it's not like miles and miles
[30:52] of road. It's like a quarter mile of
[30:54] road section. It's not
[30:58] like miles and miles of road I'm asking
[30:59] to be maintained.
[31:02] And then the rest is history. It's uh it
[31:04] was great after she done that. It was
[31:06] perfect. She put it in. It's either the
[31:09] last week of August or the first week of
[31:11] September when it got put in. They had
[31:13] trouble putting it in because they
[31:14] contacted some ties there that they
[31:16] wonder if they could use cuz they got a
[31:18] cat stuck or something trying to put it
[31:19] in. So, it's just how wet things were.
[31:22] And uh it was great for several years.
[31:25] 2020 come along, the road started to
[31:27] deteriorate over the years. It was
[31:28] maintained year round. It was two or
[31:31] three times a summer it get graded and
[31:33] winter. And then it was then 2020 come
[31:36] along and it started to deteriorate over
[31:39] time I guess just like roads do because
[31:41] it wasn't uh there wasn't a bunch of uh
[31:44] fill or gravel or whatever put in there.
[31:47] And that's both goes through a little
[31:48] swampy area the section and it's shared
[31:52] by
[31:54] uh 53 shared by four season ranch. What
[31:56] used to be four season ranch George and
[31:58] Barb Fenwick now it's Ken Gear. So
[32:01] there's two of us on that little quarter
[32:02] mile section of road that we would like
[32:05] to get fixed. And uh and I got pictures
[32:09] in the fall last fall after about 3 or 4
[32:11] days after rain how muddy it does get
[32:13] and water just sits in it.
[32:17] Oh, you got him. Yes, that was last
[32:19] fall. That was about And this is this
[32:21] spring.
[32:22] >> Yeah. So,
[32:25] >> so what's trouble getting in? And uh and
[32:27] I was in contact with previous foremans.
[32:30] I got all the emails here as well. I
[32:32] know I know I didn't send Belle that
[32:34] copy of the emails cuz it's quite
[32:36] lengthy. I started with Glenn and then
[32:38] there was a Andrew or an Anthony I think
[32:41] or something and now Matt we've been in
[32:43] contact with and nobody's ever said no
[32:45] we can't fix it and Harold and they said
[32:49] yes we'll look at it and we'll see what
[32:50] we can do and I have to keep contacting
[32:53] them again to see well what's happening last couple last summer
[32:58] I talked to Harold he says oh they
[32:59] haven't done nothing yet cuz I'd phone
[33:00] him he says oh I guess you're phoning
[33:02] cuz they haven't done nothing I said no
[33:05] and And my biggest concern is back in
[33:09] the day when I was younger. May be hard
[33:10] to believe. I look forward to a muddy
[33:12] road back in the 4x4 days. But now that
[33:14] you're older, you have a little more
[33:15] concerns. I have grandchildren. I have
[33:17] kids that we use the place year round.
[33:19] Almost every weekend there's somebody at
[33:21] the cabin being used. Either we're
[33:23] cutting hay or was just recreational and
[33:26] stuff. And I was always worried about
[33:27] the grandkids getting hurt. Well, it
[33:28] ended up being me last summer. Heard
[33:30] fall getting hurt. I had a cutting head
[33:32] there. We had trouble getting out. Lucky
[33:34] enough. in the truck. Had been there
[33:35] with the car or something, we wouldn't
[33:37] have got out. But anyway, so that's
[33:41] pretty much it. I just like to get
[33:43] something done with it.
[33:45] >> So your cabin you mentioned, like is is
[33:47] that a is that a built cabin by spec? Is
[33:50] do you pay tax on the cabin?
[33:51] >> I do.
[33:52] >> You do pay tax to the municipality?
[33:53] >> I do.
[33:54] >> Yeah, I pay uh tax on that. And um yeah,
[33:58] I guess just a cabinet cuz we do have a
[34:00] shop there now, too. small garage and
[34:02] that that be made out of those hoop
[34:04] sheds on stuff like so there's a
[34:06] workshop there.
[34:07] >> It's not like it's just a piece of
[34:08] ground with a greenery on it.
[34:10] >> Just just one fact like just and your
[34:13] the neighbor that's out there as well.
[34:15] Does he have a place that is
[34:17] >> Oh, yes.
[34:18] >> Like it's a home built to by permits and
[34:21] >> Well, I believe when Fenwick's own it,
[34:23] it's a it's a mobile home and there's a
[34:27] big shop there. I don't know what the
[34:29] shop would. It's must be 40 by 60 shop
[34:32] or something like that. And the new
[34:34] neighbors now that are there, Ken
[34:35] Regger, they just use it as a getaway
[34:38] place. But Fenwicks lived there for
[34:40] years and years. They bought it around
[34:43] the same time we bought ours. I've been
[34:45] there for about 40 years now. Part of
[34:48] this community. So I've own that piece
[34:49] of ground.
[34:52] So,
[34:56] » so I know questions there is
[34:58] >> comments there like there was building
[35:00] permit taken in I gather on your
[35:03] buildings that are in there.
[35:05] >> Jeez, I don't know. Well, no, probably
[35:07] not cuz it's on skids. The cabin is on
[35:09] skids. It's not a foundation, but I am
[35:12] paying taxes on it.
[35:14] >> Okay.
[35:15] >> Yeah. Yeah, that's that's the biggest
[35:16] question cuz there are ones we have not
[35:19] fixed in the past is if they're not, you
[35:21] know, a taxable primary home that the
[35:24] access isn't a guaranteed thing if it's
[35:26] not a taxable structure in there.
[35:29] >> We've denied people before fixing back
[35:32] trails when it's not um
[35:34] >> under those circumstances.
[35:36] >> Yeah, that does make a bit of
[35:38] difference.
[35:39] >> True enough. Yes. No, I know I'm paying
[35:40] taxes on on the cabin. I have been I
[35:43] have had a sister come in there twice.
[35:44] Okay.
[35:45] >> Since I own the place.
[35:46] >> Okay.
[35:47] >> And tax on the building. So
[35:49] >> So what would you if you had a say in
[35:52] how that road was built?
[35:53] >> Does it need what would you expect?
[35:57] >> Well, just a crown on it. I need to see
[35:59] the pictures so the water doesn't lay in
[36:00] it. Like my last communication with
[36:02] Matthew was
[36:03] >> it was brought back up in 22. he brought
[36:06] to council back then and they denied me
[36:08] on gravel, but he said he made the
[36:10] comment there that it would be uh he
[36:12] would talk to his greater operator and
[36:13] have a maintain the crowd and not have a
[36:16] wind roll so the water could run off
[36:18] >> and that would be a bonus even just that
[36:20] much. I would really love gravel, but I
[36:24] understand climbs are tough just like
[36:26] everybody else. It's but I'd even be
[36:28] willing to cost share the gravel part of
[36:30] it if because I don't have the equipment
[36:32] to do it, right?
[36:33] >> Yeah.
[36:33] Yeah.
[36:33] >> So, even if I paid for part of it, you'd
[36:36] help me with it or something cuz I just
[36:39] want to get access to my place. Like, we
[36:41] use it year round. Like I said,
[36:42] >> we actually have easier access in the
[36:44] winter,
[36:44] >> right?
[36:45] >> Believe it or not, believe it.
[36:48] >> Did you do you expect it to be graded
[36:51] all the way down to your gate or
[36:52] >> It has been. That's what your day one.
[36:55] >> Okay. Just just checking.
[36:56] >> Yeah. No, sure. I appreciate the
[36:58] questions. Absolutely.
[36:59] >> Cuz I forgot to ask Matt that earlier.
[37:01] >> Mhm. Yeah. I know it was created uh like
[37:04] I said right ever since they put their
[37:06] way in two or three times then like I
[37:09] don't even know if they even buried it
[37:10] once last summer last couple summers.
[37:13] >> Okay.
[37:15] >> But in the winter time they have I
[37:16] talked to Harold last winter there and
[37:19] we got it there was starting to
[37:21] accumulate pretty deep in there and we
[37:22] usually don't have a problem getting in
[37:24] there in the winter even when the snow
[37:25] is deep cuz it's so sheltered. It's no
[37:27] big dish or anything. But like I said, I
[37:30] have more trouble we have more trouble
[37:32] getting in in the summertime than in the
[37:33] winter.
[37:34] >> Yeah.
[37:35] So, it's uh like I say, I'd be
[37:38] more than willing to even pay for part
[37:40] of the traveling if we can come to Green
[37:42] to do that.
[37:43] >> I just would like to have access, safe
[37:45] access,
[37:46] >> 100%.
[37:47] >> And the you guys when they put it in
[37:49] 2014, they built it up. There must be at
[37:51] least 3 ft cuz it is quite swamped
[37:55] low land.
[37:57] I was back in there a month ago with
[37:58] that.
[37:59] >> Oh, you did actually.
[38:01] >> I was back.
[38:01] >> Okay, perfect.
[38:03] >> Good.
[38:04] >> Yeah, it's not like I said, it's not
[38:05] miles and miles of road I'm asking to
[38:07] get maintained. It's just
[38:09] >> quarter mile.
[38:12] >> How big's your cab?
[38:15] >> I think it's about
[38:17] 600 square f feet, something like that.
[38:22] >> You're a nice spot back here. It
[38:24] >> is. Yeah, we got it all. fishing little
[38:26] power is all solar and well and
[38:28] everything in there. So, we enjoy it. We
[38:30] use it a lot. So, sewing hole there and
[38:33] grandkids really like it now. So,
[38:35] >> I bet you actually my grandkids use it
[38:38] more than I do lately, it seems.
[38:40] >> Anyway, it's not something we can
[38:42] promise here right today, but we're now
[38:44] talking about it with everybody.
[38:46] >> I understand. Like I said, it's been
[38:47] going on
[38:50] communications.
[38:50] >> She's been phoning me many times.
[38:55] You did very good for not knowing what
[38:56] you wanted to start at.
[38:58] >> You did good.
[39:00] >> Well, I've been kind of running things
[39:01] through my head for since Val said I was
[39:03] going to have to come to a meeting. So,
[39:04] I've never been invited to a meeting. It
[39:06] was always just through email or phone
[39:08] calls to Harold.
[39:09] >> It's better in here.
[39:10] >> No, it's
[39:12] all on the same page,
[39:13] >> right?
[39:14] >> It's not he said she said and phone
[39:16] calls. And that's why I kind of tend to
[39:18] do things for email cuz you have a
[39:20] record phone call.
[39:25] » All right.
[39:26] >> All righty.
[39:27] Thank you very much for coming in.
[39:29] >> Thank you. Take care. How much rain did
[39:30] you get out there?
[39:32] >> I'm not sure how much we got. I mean,
[39:35] >> quite a bit.
[39:37] >> My son was up there in the weekend and
[39:39] he said there was lots and they don't we
[39:40] don't have a rain gauge. So,
[39:42] >> yeah. But he said he could tell where
[39:43] the grass and the water had run and you
[39:45] can see the glass grass laying flat from
[39:47] the streams of water running. So
[39:51] >> So lots and when I come in this morning,
[39:53] there's a big dark cloud going over that
[39:55] way again to the southwest. So
[39:57] >> he's looking pretty heavy.
[39:59] >> Yeah.
[40:00] >> All right. Take care.
[40:05] » Okay.
[40:07] Joel have to be here for these next two.
[40:09] >> Yeah, I'm sure. You can't start ahead of
[40:11] time, but I
[40:13] >> wait for five minutes. Look for help.
[40:16] >> Um,
[40:18] >> where in the world?
[40:20] >> No, we lucky enough for just a few miles
[40:25] outside.
[40:28] » We had we were close enough. We had like
[40:30] the like the dirt front.
[40:34] >> So, it was crazy. The radar was looking
[40:36] this way, but it was shifting. If
[40:38] there's
[40:40] going up, but the clouds underneath us.
[40:48] » Be careful what you ask for.
[40:58] » I went for a tour visit. Yeah.
[41:01] >> Just a few miles from us. It was 2 and
[41:03] 12 in early.
[41:07] Did you hear our sound?
[41:28] » Yes, it's a tornado.
[41:33] forunately
[41:35] came down south of their yard.
[41:50] » Oh yeah.
[41:53] » How are you?
[41:54] >> Good.
[42:08] Just a reminder of our public hearing
[42:10] protocol.
[42:11] >> Hey guys,
[42:12] >> just a reminder of what public hearing
[42:14] protocol is about. You're sitting here
[42:16] to hear things.
[42:19] >> Hear the facts.
[42:20] Promises.
[42:22] >> Just listen.
[42:23] >> Listen.
[42:26] No direct communication from council
[42:28] right
[42:31] >> communication through
[42:33] to here.
[42:37] » Gotcha.
[42:42] Commissioner last
[42:51] 7 in the morning. So the new unit will
[42:54] be working from
[42:57] >> usually I have something
[43:00] going to be a little less productive.
[43:27] Why would a life shop be about $1,08?
[43:30] $900 for
[43:42] the summer time.
[43:46] The aim is cold.
[43:50] Plus 3 to 15. Yes.
[43:54] >> Yeah.
[43:55] >> I don't know. Like I don't know. We went
[43:57] through the the wall here a while ago
[44:00] cuz we were just through. It was stuck
[44:03] out there too.
[44:04] >> It's a little higher.
[44:05] >> Yeah.
[44:08] Don't know.
[44:15] Kind of want the doors open. door. The
[44:18] whole shop has just because it's that
[44:20] long barrel and big door in front of
[44:23] both graders.
[44:24] >> Yeah.
[44:25] >> Not individuals
[44:27] probably dump
[44:29] heat
[44:31] >> probably.
[44:44] Morning.
[44:49] Good morning.
[44:52] Come in. We're going to start a minute
[44:54] here. Joel
[44:55] >> for me.
[44:55] >> They can come in.
[44:56] >> Yeah. You guys then uh come in and have
[44:59] a seat.
[45:07] » Morning. Morning. There's one more
[45:10] chair. Yeah, there's more chairs.
[45:15] Right, Gaddy.
[45:16] >> Hi, how are you?
[45:17] >> Good. You guys okay sitting back here?
[45:19] >> Yep. That's fine.
[45:26] 9:45 a.m. conditional use hearing
[45:28] Brookfield holding resolution 175 2026
[45:32] be resolved the council adjourn the
[45:34] regular meeting at 9:45 a.m. to open a
[45:38] public hearing for conditional use CU326
[45:43] NCL Brookdale Holding to establish a new
[45:48] wastewater sewage lagoon to treat the
[45:50] domestic and slaughterhouse wastewater
[45:53] sources at Sprucewoods Colony with the
[45:56] AR agricultural rural zone. Can I have a
[45:59] mover, please?
[46:00] >> Thanker.
[46:03] » Harold.
[46:04] All in favor?
[46:06] opposed.
[46:08] Great. Thank you,
[46:10] Joel. You're up.
[46:12] >> Yeah, you pretty much said it all. Uh,
[46:15] initial use.
[46:18] Uh, 03-26-NL
[46:22] Brookdale Holdings to establish a waste
[46:24] water surge lagoon to treat the domestic
[46:28] and slaughterhouse wastewater within the
[46:31] AR zone.
[46:34] Think we go around the table of
[46:36] introductions here too before you
[46:37] forget. Start with Harold Harold
[46:40] >> Council Jar Davidson
[46:44] almost there. Reef
[46:46] >> Ray Grayson Reef
[46:48] >> interim CEO
[46:50] >> Malcolm Murray counselor
[46:52] >> Robber
[46:54] >> Joey Spruz Joel Spru
[46:58] >> sorry can I get your names again
[47:00] >> Joey last Waldner
[47:05] » yeah Joel Waldner
[47:10] » we have a second Yes.
[47:14] >> You sign. Okay.
[47:16] >> Y
[47:18] >> Kathy Dale.
[47:20] >> Ron Dale.
[47:21] >> Was it Kate?
[47:24] >> Joel Penner. Cypress plan district.
[47:29] » I'm sorry. I missed your first name.
[47:31] >> Ron.
[47:33] Thank you.
[47:35] >> So, who wishes to speak for?
[47:37] >> Go ahead. Who would like to speak? Do
[47:39] you want to be Kathy Ron? You want to
[47:42] speak?
[47:44] >> Whoever is here to speak in favor of
[47:47] that's who speaks first.
[47:48] >> Who's speaking in favor?
[47:50] >> Okay.
[47:51] >> So So do we have to talk because we
[47:56] >> we we want it
[47:57] >> if you wish to. Yes.
[47:59] >> You don't have to. But this is your time
[48:02] now to speak on behalf of your
[48:04] application.
[48:05] >> Yes. Because the the reason for this new
[48:09] uh domestic lagoon is the old one was uh
[48:14] out of commission at least
[48:17] 10 years ago. Conservation came along
[48:20] and told us we need to do something
[48:23] and it only has one cell now. So that's
[48:27] improper.
[48:29] So now we got a license from the
[48:32] province
[48:35] and
[48:38] we need to use it because the other one
[48:40] might just give up.
[48:42] >> So you now have a a license in place for
[48:45] the new one.
[48:46] >> Yeah, I bought a copy over just here.
[48:49] Okay, thank you.
[48:54] And also, yeah, those letters have been
[48:56] coming for about closer to 20 years. And
[49:00] finally, when we decided we could afford
[49:02] it, it cost almost 1.3 million to build
[49:06] out of cash flow. And
[49:09] we're also uh working with a company
[49:12] from the US for order control. We just
[49:14] started a program
[49:16] 2 weeks ago, so it's kind of too soon to
[49:19] tell, but according to them, uh they're
[49:23] going to control close to 100% of the
[49:25] odor with the
[49:27] uh solution
[49:28] >> with the additives that we put in.
[49:32] » And then with this new one that's
[49:35] proposed,
[49:37] it's not going to be like as high odor
[49:39] as the other one for the hogs, but we
[49:41] still plan on treating it, too.
[49:46] So,
[49:54] » any other comments on YouTube?
[50:03] » We're opposed opposition. Ron Kathy, you
[50:06] have something you want to say? Go
[50:07] ahead.
[50:09] >> The odor. Can't call it an odor. you
[50:12] have to call it a stench. And it's been
[50:16] ever since they put up that first
[50:18] lagoon.
[50:20] Uh they put in two rows of trees. They
[50:22] put in deciduous trees, which are no
[50:25] leaves in the winter time, so you get
[50:27] the smell in the winter time. Anyway,
[50:30] um
[50:34] they put in fast growing trees and I
[50:36] realize they did that to try to help the
[50:38] still this the smell,
[50:41] but two rows of trees for the smell
[50:44] that's there, I don't think would ever
[50:47] come close to getting rid of that smell.
[50:54] Um, other than putting in the two rows
[50:57] of trees, I'm not sure they've done
[50:58] anything else to try to curb the smell.
[51:02] >> We will have to wait and see if this
[51:04] additive is going to work or not.
[51:06] >> It hasn't. So far,
[51:08] >> well,
[51:09] we're still noticing it.
[51:10] >> I'm noticing it a little bit, a
[51:12] reduction. We'll just let them speak and
[51:15] then you'll have a chance to
[51:18] >> um
[51:21] >> basically the smell and uh risk of
[51:24] contamination on the creek and uh
[51:28] which is very close to it.
[51:30] >> Yeah.
[51:36] » These are two two major complaints or
[51:38] concerns I guess lack for a better word.
[51:42] and our yard site's really not worth
[51:44] anything because nobody would want to
[51:46] buy it.
[51:48] And to me, that's that's huge.
[51:53] And we're getting close to retirement
[51:54] age.
[52:00] All right, that's pretty well covers.
[52:08] » Good. Getting close.
[52:09] >> Yeah, that's it. I think
[52:11] >> that's all you got for now.
[52:12] >> For now.
[52:13] >> Great. Thank you very much.
[52:17] » Now, if you two would like to make
[52:19] comments back towards comments.
[52:23] >> You were you had something. What did you
[52:25] want to say?
[52:26] >> Oh, I was just commenting that I feel
[52:28] the odor control is I've been noticing a
[52:31] slight reduction
[52:33] and like Ron said, it it just needs more
[52:37] time to take effect.
[52:40] So what happens if this doesn't work say
[52:42] in two months time
[52:45] >> or a year from now
[52:49] » the
[52:50] >> then we we worry about it then but but
[52:53] why are we talking about
[52:56] a hog lagoon when we're talking about a
[52:59] domestic lagoon
[53:00] >> because that was even closer to us.
[53:02] >> So so this hearing today is about the
[53:05] new one.
[53:06] >> Okay.
[53:06] So, we are here to today to hear
[53:09] about the facts and to allow a new
[53:12] lagoon to be built. That's what this
[53:15] hearing is for.
[53:16] >> Okay.
[53:16] So, you've had your chance to
[53:19] speak against. You've had your chance to
[53:22] speak for and to respond. We have
[53:24] another hearing in 3 minutes.
[53:32] » So, you've you've both had your
[53:34] opportunities to speak. That was
[53:36] amazing. Okay.
[53:38] >> We're not here to argue back and forth.
[53:41] No,
[53:41] >> we're just here to hear your comments.
[53:43] Go ahead, Ron.
[53:45] >> So, we're we're done. We can go now. Is
[53:47] that what you're saying?
[53:48] >> The hearing will be concluded in a
[53:49] minute or two.
[53:50] >> And then we have another hearing
[53:53] for variation.
[53:55] >> However, that this one will close and
[53:57] then that one will open.
[53:59] >> Correct.
[54:00] >> So, this is a conditional use.
[54:03] >> Variation is a different thing again.
[54:05] Yes.
[54:11] » Is it okay to save this? Um, we're just
[54:13] trying to follow the protocols are laid
[54:15] out to us by the province for for
[54:18] >> and they're pretty set and we're trying
[54:20] to follow those protocols to a tea this
[54:22] time.
[54:23] >> Yeah.
[54:23] >> Okay. We're not trying to be mean or
[54:25] anything. We're just trying to follow
[54:26] those protocols. Okay.
[54:30] >> Okay. Resolution 176 2026 made to
[54:33] resolve the conditional use hearing for
[54:35] Brookdale Holding Lagoon CU326
[54:39] NCL be closed. Can I have a mover,
[54:41] please?
[54:42] >> No.
[54:43] >> Malcolm seconder.
[54:46] >> Dallas. All in favor?
[54:49] Opposed?
[54:51] Carried. Thank you.
[54:57] Okay. 9:55 a.m. Variation Order 30926
[55:02] NCL Brookdale Holding Resolution
[55:05] 177206.
[55:07] Be it resolved that council open a
[55:09] public hearing for a variation order
[55:12] number 0926
[55:15] MCL Brookdale Holding Lagoon to consider
[55:18] the variation to decrease the minimum
[55:21] yard or minimum front yard setback of
[55:24] 125 ft to allow the placement of a
[55:27] wastewater lagoon with the AR
[55:30] agricultural rural zone to 99 ft. Can I
[55:34] have a mover, please?
[55:36] Robert Robert Robbie and Jiren all in
[55:41] favor
[55:45] carried
[55:47] Joel
[55:49] variation order B9-26-NL
[55:56] Joey Wman is acting as applicant of
[55:58] Brookdale Holdings
[56:01] um for the property le you described as
[56:03] Northwest 1712
[56:06] west in the municipality of North
[56:08] Cyprus. Um the variation application is
[56:12] to decrease the minimum front yard
[56:13] setback from 125 ft for the placement of
[56:17] a water wastewater lagoon within the AR
[56:20] zone down to 99 ft.
[56:28] » Same thing for you guys want to talk
[56:30] first on this.
[56:34] I I think I made my comment in the
[56:37] beginning
[56:38] >> with this.
[56:39] >> We're talking about why you need to
[56:40] change the the location. Oh, you're moving it down from 125 is what
[56:44] the rule is, but you're you're you're
[56:46] going closer to the property line by 295
[56:49] >> to to stay away from the creek more
[56:54] and to fit it in for 200 people.
[57:01] We went closer to the road away from the
[57:02] creek. That'd be the reason.
[57:08] >> to stay away from the creek.
[57:09] >> What did you say about 200 people?
[57:11] >> So, we could make it for 200 people.
[57:13] >> Large enough.
[57:14] >> Okay. Gotcha.
[57:17] >> Cuz this day and age, you have to They
[57:19] don't let you make one for 100. Take a
[57:22] happy medium and then you make it for
[57:23] 200.
[57:25] >> How much is your
[57:27] >> 95?
[57:30] Anything
[57:35] else you'd like to say, Joey? Joel,
[57:38] >> Joy explained it pretty good.
[57:44] » Good. You're done for now.
[57:47] >> Okay. Uh Ron, Kathy, comments. Go ahead.
[57:52] >> Um basically the same thing there.
[57:55] proximity
[57:56] >> proximity to the motor and the uh road
[58:00] allowance
[58:01] >> and to us.
[58:06] The first one was too close to the road.
[58:08] This one has to be even closer I would
[58:10] think
[58:11] >> to the main road. I'm sorry.
[58:14] >> It was close. The first one was had to
[58:16] get a variance and this one needs one
[58:19] cuz it's even closer I would think.
[58:28] You don't mind? Yeah, we're in the
[58:31] middle of a public hearing.
[58:38] » Yeah, that's about it. Yeah.
[58:44] » Any other comments, Ron? Kathy.
[58:49] Uh, any more comments, Joe? Joey,
[58:55] » we'd like to use it.
[58:57] >> We'd like to use before the other one
[58:58] gives up and causes us environmental
[59:00] damage.
[59:01] >> So, you haven't been using it yet?
[59:03] >> No,
[59:04] >> it's built though.
[59:05] >> I understand.
[59:07] >> Just clarifying.
[59:16] » No more comments. Either one of you is
[59:18] Joe. Joey or Cassie, Ron? Nothing. more.
[59:22] >> No, we're good.
[59:23] >> Thank you.
[59:26] Okay. Resolution 178 2026 be it resolves
[59:30] a variation hearing for Brookdale
[59:32] Holding Lagoon BU 0926 NCL be closed.
[59:36] Can I have a mover, please?
[59:39] >> Arrow. Seconder.
[59:41] >> Malcolm.
[59:43] All in favor?
[59:45] Opposed?
[59:47] Carried.
[59:49] Thank you very much for attending
[59:51] everybody.
[59:53] >> Thank you for listening.
[59:57] >> Thanks for coming.
[59:57] >> Thank you.
[59:58] >> We're all free to vote.
[59:59] >> Thank you. Thank you. Thank you, Joey.
[1:00:03] >> So, where does it go from here?
[1:00:04] >> We now have another public hearing for
[1:00:06] something else.
[1:00:08] >> Council will meet to discuss later in
[1:00:10] the meeting.
[1:00:10] >> Oh, you'll discuss.
[1:00:12] >> So, you guys will do a vote or
[1:00:15] >> Today, is Yep. Today is the decision.
[1:00:20] >> Thank you guys.
[1:00:21] >> No, I have a copy, but um
[1:00:24] >> we can leave this with council.
[1:00:26] >> Y
[1:00:28] >> Okay. Thanks for all your help.
[1:00:30] >> Thank you guys. Have a good one.
[1:00:39] I have filmed this. I have
[1:00:44] >> You got five minutes here before the
[1:00:47] next one. Okay.
[1:00:48] >> Yeah. Five minutes before the next one
[1:00:50] begins. If you need a copy.
[1:01:15] Yes,
[1:01:17] keep those.
[1:01:21] » Yeah, keep on as long as you have one of
[1:01:24] them.
[1:01:24] >> Okay.
[1:01:34] perfect.
[1:01:35] >> No, this one should be very standard.
[1:01:40] » So, I've got I have these two
[1:01:45] » turns
[1:01:49] and I have gotten so
[1:01:54] the last 20 years that
[1:02:00] got to be honest. That's pretty
[1:02:01] disappointing email.
[1:02:07] » I
[1:02:08] didn't see a thing.
[1:02:53] That's a good mate. That's a doctor. The
[1:02:55] other
[1:02:58] » good
[1:03:00] one is coming through pilot.
[1:03:04] >> Nice guy.
[1:03:04] >> Perfect.
[1:03:07] >> Cattle got processed.
[1:03:08] >> And when's she?
[1:03:10] >> I honestly I up till the end of the end
[1:03:14] of July.
[1:03:15] >> Yeah, it's July.
[1:03:20] Are they going to be moving here? So
[1:03:23] hoping
[1:03:27] » got away from a small truck.
[1:03:30] >> That was
[1:03:44] Thank you.
[1:03:53] going to do it again?
[1:04:25] We make it.
[1:04:27] >> Yes. And she's got a mother now.
[1:04:30] One of my two I had twobody
[1:04:33] here for this one. Okay.
[1:04:37] >> She's a pastor running around. Catching
[1:04:39] up. Beautiful.
[1:04:42] So you deal one minute
[1:04:53] one of the other
[1:04:55] on
[1:05:03] paper.
[1:05:06] » Okay. Be in 10:05
[1:05:08] variation order V 1126 NCL Anger
[1:05:13] resolution 179 2026 be it resolve the
[1:05:17] council open a public hearing for
[1:05:18] variation order number V11
[1:05:22] 26 NCL hunger to vary the minimum front
[1:05:25] yard setback of 125 ft within the AR
[1:05:29] zone to minimum front yard setback of 50
[1:05:32] ft five to of 55 ft within in the AR
[1:05:37] agricultural zone to construct a
[1:05:39] detached garage next to the existing
[1:05:42] house. Can I have a mover, please?
[1:05:45] >> Jiren seconder.
[1:05:50] All in favor?
[1:05:52] Opposed?
[1:05:55] Go ahead. Joel.
[1:05:56] So we have variation or application uh
[1:06:01] 11-26-
[1:06:02] NCL uh Monica and Brady Hunger owners
[1:06:07] leave described as northwest 04-14-15
[1:06:12] lane 87108
[1:06:15] road 79 north they would like to reduce
[1:06:18] the front yard setback from 125
[1:06:22] uh in the AR zone to 55 ft to construct
[1:06:27] a detached garage to an existing house.
[1:06:29] They had purchased this property
[1:06:32] in the fall. It was part of the Bray
[1:06:34] subdivision of 24. Um I have no issues
[1:06:38] with it
[1:06:42] at all. It's kind of You guys seeing the
[1:06:44] site map?
[1:06:46] >> Y
[1:06:46] >> perfect.
[1:06:48] The rest you see the sight too
[1:06:53] have them on there or not.
[1:06:55] >> It was the bottom one and she goes back.
[1:07:11] That's one 55 ft from the
[1:07:14] >> Yes. Oh, it looks like a one, doesn't
[1:07:17] it?
[1:07:18] >> Well, she
[1:07:19] >> just the way it is. Yeah,
[1:07:21] >> she did send this one. She did somewhat
[1:07:23] measured. I measured it on assessment,
[1:07:25] too.
[1:07:25] >> Okay.
[1:07:26] >> And like the house is already closer
[1:07:28] than 125 ft, but it's existing. So,
[1:07:30] >> okay.
[1:07:31] >> It's behind the tree line. Um, they
[1:07:34] don't want to take any more bush away in
[1:07:36] the south. So,
[1:07:39] >> that
[1:07:41] down. I think the road allowance is
[1:07:43] actually
[1:07:45] road is
[1:07:46] >> she might have measured
[1:07:47] >> maybe not quite where the road allowance
[1:07:49] is
[1:07:50] >> how it veers
[1:07:52] >> okay
[1:07:52] >> across
[1:07:55] >> just because of the lay of the land
[1:07:57] >> if you look at the actual property maps
[1:07:59] it's pretty close
[1:08:01] >> Google maps it shows it off a bit
[1:08:04] >> but this isn't a main road either
[1:08:05] >> no it's not a main road
[1:08:11] any other comments That's one goal.
[1:08:14] That's good. Nobody here to speak for or
[1:08:17] against. So
[1:08:19] resolution 1780226
[1:08:22] be resolved at the variation variation
[1:08:25] hearing for hunger BU 11126 MCL be
[1:08:29] closed. Mover please.
[1:08:32] >> Malcolm seconder.
[1:08:34] >> Dallas.
[1:08:36] All in favor? Opposed? Carry. Thank you.
[1:08:49] Move ahead for the last one then. Sh's
[1:08:51] here. Might
[1:08:52] >> as well.
[1:08:53] >> You okay, Ral?
[1:08:54] >> Yeah.
[1:08:54] >> Okay.
[1:08:55] If he's okay.
[1:08:58] >> You okay?
[1:09:00] You come up and go ahead.
[1:09:01] >> Anything further, Joel?
[1:09:02] >> Nope.
[1:09:03] >> That is it. All planning matters as of
[1:09:05] right now. So, thank you very much,
[1:09:07] everyone.
[1:09:08] >> I got something shine down there when I
[1:09:10] get done.
[1:09:10] >> Yes, please.
[1:09:11] >> Yep. Okay, I will. Thank you.
[1:09:13] >> Hey, talk to you later.
[1:09:14] >> Yep. See you later.
[1:09:15] >> See you.
[1:09:22] » Have a chair at the front.
[1:09:23] >> Hi. Good morning.
[1:09:25] >> We'll go around the table here.
[1:09:26] Introductions.
[1:09:27] >> Harold Pton counselor. John, counselor
[1:09:32] deputy.
[1:09:33] >> Dre Grayson Reev.
[1:09:35] >> Valerie Enra interimm CIO.
[1:09:38] >> Welcome counselor. Rob Van Comr
[1:09:40] Counselor.
[1:09:41] >> Nice to meet you guys. I'm Richard Zog
[1:09:43] and um I've been living in the area in
[1:09:46] Fair View for about four years now. I
[1:09:49] live at 61164
[1:09:51] the old Fairview school uh one one mile
[1:09:55] north one mile west of the five. So it's
[1:09:57] like yeah
[1:09:59] by the field if you guys know where that
[1:10:02] is. So back in March like beginning of
[1:10:06] spring when start the the snow start me
[1:10:08] nothing and you can see the grass I came
[1:10:10] here to address a concern and to present
[1:10:13] a solution for it. However I got pushed
[1:10:16] away toward the foreman of the public
[1:10:19] service to contact them directly. So I'm
[1:10:23] too nice. So I'm like okay I contacted
[1:10:25] um
[1:10:27] Mr. Matt I believe Matt. So, and um I
[1:10:32] told him situation and he he kind of
[1:10:35] also shoved me down. I'm like, "Hey, we
[1:10:37] own that part uh before I get to the
[1:10:40] problem. We own it. We maintain it. So,
[1:10:42] you don't have to worry about it." So,
[1:10:43] this kind of the deal. So, the problem
[1:10:46] was that I was coming here to address
[1:10:48] that during the winter season when the
[1:10:50] snow plow can plow the roads, which is
[1:10:53] great. They put that blade way too low
[1:10:56] on the ground and they dig up all the
[1:10:59] gravel and they push it all in the
[1:11:01] ravines on those ditches on the side of
[1:11:03] the road. So if there is too much snow,
[1:11:06] I understand. But if there's no snow, I
[1:11:08] don't know why they plow it. And this
[1:11:10] past season, they plow it every day.
[1:11:12] Even there's no snow, they keep pushing
[1:11:13] and every year those rocks are getting
[1:11:16] more and more. So they keep putting that
[1:11:18] blade low. So my solution was can you
[1:11:22] make sure that the next season and the
[1:11:24] next season put that plate like 1 in or
[1:11:27] 2 in cars still drive you put that
[1:11:30] thickness on the gravel so it doesn't
[1:11:32] make damage to cars and properties and
[1:11:35] you'll be safe so you don't have to
[1:11:36] worry about uh clean up after that.
[1:11:41] So
[1:11:43] Matthew Matt pushed me away and shut me
[1:11:46] down. So I came here another week or two
[1:11:48] and I believe I talked to Miss Valerate
[1:11:51] and he told me send it by email. I'm
[1:11:53] like okay because my job is not to talk
[1:11:56] to the foreman. You have over 2,000
[1:11:58] people in the RM and everybody have a
[1:12:00] complaint talk to the your employees. I
[1:12:03] think those employees going to lose
[1:12:04] their mind and that's not acceptable.
[1:12:06] They come here to address their concern
[1:12:08] and you vet the problems and address
[1:12:10] their employees accordingly. However,
[1:12:14] as Miss Valerie said, I sent an email.
[1:12:16] I'm like, "Here's the concern. Here's
[1:12:18] the picture." I sent the picture. I
[1:12:20] believe I don't know if you have them. I
[1:12:21] didn't print them because you have them
[1:12:22] on the email.
[1:12:24] >> Few weeks later, no answer. So, I I
[1:12:27] replied back. I'm like, "Hey, any update
[1:12:29] on my concern?" No answer. And I don't
[1:12:33] know if you're tracking my email. I
[1:12:35] believe I send it to everybody. So, I
[1:12:37] start sending it to you, sir. And after
[1:12:39] that all the words and then I'm like the
[1:12:44] answer is like oh you get the answer.
[1:12:46] I'm like no I didn't get answer the
[1:12:48] answers that I got or that's unfortunate
[1:12:50] there's rocks in your property.
[1:12:53] So Matt said because that's ground land.
[1:12:55] That's a public land. You guys own it.
[1:12:57] You you maintain it. And he he he mows
[1:13:00] it in the summer. They don't mow it.
[1:13:02] I've been living four years there. I've
[1:13:04] been mowing it every year. And I bet
[1:13:06] anybody live in the countryside wait for
[1:13:09] you guys to mow it. Every residential
[1:13:12] home they take pride of their property.
[1:13:14] They mow that ravine and ditches around
[1:13:17] the house for the the m maintenance of
[1:13:20] their and the view of their property.
[1:13:23] So what I wanted in the beginning is if
[1:13:28] somebody come address these rocks,
[1:13:31] sweep them back on the road. My neighbor
[1:13:33] had to buy a sweeper and another
[1:13:35] neighbor had to rent a sweeper for to
[1:13:37] sweep them. I don't have as much
[1:13:39] chocolate as they have and I try to rake
[1:13:41] it by hand. It's undoable.
[1:13:44] So
[1:13:46] I understand you're not going to please
[1:13:48] everybody. You're not like you have
[1:13:51] maybe small little equipment and a big
[1:13:53] area to cover. But the way the situation
[1:13:56] was handled I believe it's unacceptable.
[1:13:59] I should have been listened to from the
[1:14:00] beginning. Even the answer is not
[1:14:03] doable, at least I should have like I
[1:14:06] said, hey, I'm here to address a
[1:14:08] problem. I should been listened to. Even
[1:14:10] the second time or the third time, I
[1:14:12] should been answered to back because I
[1:14:14] asked for an update on my request
[1:14:16] multiple times. And I have a baby. I
[1:14:18] brought the baby here multiple times and
[1:14:20] she's like 3 months old at that time and
[1:14:22] I shouldn't have to. So that's my
[1:14:25] concern.
[1:14:30] I believe Mr. Rod, you said something in
[1:14:32] the email that you did something in the
[1:14:34] past.
[1:14:34] >> We clarified that this morning. Yes, I
[1:14:36] did. And I was
[1:14:37] >> I don't know what you meant.
[1:14:38] >> Well, it was two two years ago that was
[1:14:42] really soft and the graders made ruts in
[1:14:45] soil and they pushed it up. And that's
[1:14:47] what I was misunder I was I misspoke
[1:14:50] when I said rocks. It was more like saw
[1:14:52] that the guys went out and cleaned up.
[1:14:55] So if you go if you go through any of
[1:14:57] the subdivisions and look, there's
[1:14:59] always rock and like it's right if you
[1:15:02] can leave your blade up.
[1:15:03] >> But when you're traveling in snow with a
[1:15:06] car or a truck or big trucks and your
[1:15:08] road is heavily used truck route through
[1:15:11] there
[1:15:12] >> and that the snow holds the rocks up
[1:15:15] like it doesn't rocks just don't sit on
[1:15:16] the ground all the time when there's
[1:15:18] snow. So they they sometimes they all
[1:15:21] make a mistake for sure, but it's almost
[1:15:24] impossible to keep rocks out of the
[1:15:26] grass. Almost impossible. They can try
[1:15:30] all they want. They can stay up that
[1:15:31] high, but there's still going to be
[1:15:32] rocks in that snow.
[1:15:33] >> So wouldn't that be any other program to
[1:15:36] clean up the rocks back to the road?
[1:15:38] Because you maintain that ditch with
[1:15:40] plowing with the mowing it in the
[1:15:42] season,
[1:15:43] >> but you maintain the side attached to
[1:15:46] the road, not the side to work the
[1:15:48] houses. I see it like I I I live in the
[1:15:50] county. I I take the county road to
[1:15:52] work.
[1:15:52] >> I live very close to you. So, yes, I
[1:15:54] understand.
[1:15:54] >> So, I see it.
[1:15:56] >> So, I we talked about this morning and
[1:15:59] it's hard to it's hard for us to
[1:16:02] >> Well, we don't any other subdivisions
[1:16:05] like where this has occurred. We've
[1:16:07] never gone in and cleaned it up. It's
[1:16:08] been the same response. We don't go and
[1:16:10] clean up the stones. No matter what at
[1:16:12] the end of the fall when they're grading
[1:16:14] the roads, we don't know when the snow
[1:16:15] is going to come. One side of the road
[1:16:17] or the other has to have that wind row
[1:16:19] gravel left. And when the graders are
[1:16:21] traveling at the speeds they do to get
[1:16:23] across the roads cuz they have to
[1:16:24] maintain a certain speed otherwise they
[1:16:26] can't throw the snow back.
[1:16:28] >> The the grater has tendency also to
[1:16:30] bounce and to maintain that perfect
[1:16:31] level to stop the stones. can't help it
[1:16:34] because they're over that road hundreds
[1:16:36] of times over the winter to keep it
[1:16:38] clear. And there may not be a drift in
[1:16:39] front of your house, but there might be
[1:16:40] one at the tree line half mile down. So,
[1:16:42] they got to get they do it all. It
[1:16:43] doesn't matter.
[1:16:45] >> And I
[1:16:46] >> I don't think we can get worry about
[1:16:48] getting into all the excuses and things
[1:16:52] happen. It happens everywhere and it's
[1:16:54] just a fact of life that's out there. So
[1:16:57] I came here with the expectation to hear
[1:16:59] those answers but I offered the solution
[1:17:01] which now I understand the solution is
[1:17:03] not doable either. However the way it
[1:17:05] was handled that my other concern which
[1:17:08] you want to address it now or discuss it
[1:17:10] however you want to improve your
[1:17:12] >> customer service kind of handling in the
[1:17:15] future that I I'll leave this up to you
[1:17:17] that this is all I have to say.
[1:17:20] >> I ask for updates I get shut down
[1:17:22] multiple times and it's all I have to
[1:17:23] say.
[1:17:24] >> Okay.
[1:17:24] >> Great. Thank you very much.
[1:17:27] >> Thank you for coming in. Thank you.
[1:17:29] >> Thanks a lot.
[1:17:39] » Okay, might as well go back to finance
[1:17:41] and accounts here. Resolution 173 2026.
[1:17:45] Be it resolved that the financial
[1:17:47] statement for May 2026 be referred to
[1:17:50] council. Can I have a mover, please?
[1:17:52] Harold.
[1:17:53] >> Harold seconder.
[1:17:55] Rob.
[1:17:56] >> Rob.
[1:17:59] Any questions, comments?
[1:18:03] All in favor?
[1:18:05] Opposed? Carried. Thank you.
[1:18:10] Resolution 174 2026. be resolved the
[1:18:14] accounts check number 32458
[1:18:17] to check number 32524
[1:18:20] totaling $410,46618
[1:18:27] and direct deposits withdrawals totaling
[1:18:30] $63,491.72
[1:18:34] be approved for payment. Can I have a
[1:18:36] mover please?
[1:18:40] Harold seconder milk
[1:18:43] questions
[1:18:47] comments anybody all in favor
[1:18:50] opposed
[1:18:52] carried thank you very much planning
[1:18:54] matters are all done
[1:19:02] business arising from planning matters
[1:19:05] conditional UCU326
[1:19:08] NCL
[1:19:09] Kale holding resolution 181206
[1:19:13] be resolved with council approved
[1:19:15] conditional use application CU326
[1:19:20] NCL for Brookdale Holding whereas Joey
[1:19:24] Walman acting as a applicant on behalf
[1:19:26] of Brookdale Holding Company Limited
[1:19:28] owners of the property legally described
[1:19:31] as Northwest 171215
[1:19:35] WPM
[1:19:37] and the municipality in North Cypress
[1:19:38] Langford and located approximately 2 mi
[1:19:41] south of Oberon along Municipal Road 88.
[1:19:46] Applied to council for council of for
[1:19:50] approval of a conditional use order
[1:19:53] CU326
[1:19:55] NCL
[1:19:56] under zoning bylaw number 72022
[1:20:01] part 3 section 3.6
[1:20:04] table 3.2 to use and requirements in
[1:20:08] quarter to purpose to establish a new
[1:20:12] wastewater sewage lagoon to treat
[1:20:14] domestic and slaughterhouse wastewater
[1:20:17] resources
[1:20:20] at Sprucewoods Colony within the AR
[1:20:22] agricultural girl zone.
[1:20:25] >> I have a mover please.
[1:20:27] >> Jiren seconder
[1:20:29] >> Harold
[1:20:32] questions comments anybody? couple.
[1:20:35] >> Go ahead, Rob.
[1:20:37] >> We're allowed to talk down.
[1:20:40] >> They got a there's got to be some kind
[1:20:42] of guarantee put in place that they
[1:20:44] attempt and and what I write down here.
[1:20:46] How long like how long is it? We can say
[1:20:51] how long it can be 20 years, but who's
[1:20:53] going to maintain it for 20 years,
[1:20:54] right?
[1:20:55] >> So, their license will be covered by the
[1:20:58] environment though.
[1:20:59] >> Yes.
[1:21:01] province has authority over that. They
[1:21:05] in their license, it tells how they act
[1:21:07] that.
[1:21:08] >> Yeah.
[1:21:08] >> Well, yeah, but we we're allowed to add
[1:21:11] stipulations to that license.
[1:21:13] >> Yeah.
[1:21:13] >> Right.
[1:21:14] >> Well, not to the license, but you can
[1:21:15] add to this reservation.
[1:21:17] >> So, like he said, they they've got that
[1:21:19] stuff now they're using. Well,
[1:21:22] >> you would hope that for the neighbors
[1:21:23] sake that are concerned that they would
[1:21:25] be diligent on that. But is there like
[1:21:28] can we
[1:21:29] >> how do we police it and make it work?
[1:21:31] >> Like they still got to put trees in.
[1:21:33] They still whatever they have to do
[1:21:35] >> for mitigation at the
[1:21:36] >> mitigation like do everything they can
[1:21:39] like it's you can go by there and you
[1:21:41] can still I mean it's they feel terrible
[1:21:44] for
[1:21:45] >> Yeah.
[1:21:45] >> Like it's awful. Yeah. So, we can add
[1:21:49] stipulations to this resolution. County
[1:21:51] Valerie.
[1:21:52] >> Yeah. Joel said we can add
[1:21:54] >> Yeah.
[1:21:55] >> So, what would we like to see added
[1:21:58] here? Like
[1:22:00] >> there should be something added. You're
[1:22:01] right, B. To make this
[1:22:03] >> just to Okay.
[1:22:05] Just to
[1:22:08] prove that we care about the situation,
[1:22:10] right? like
[1:22:11] >> Mhm.
[1:22:12] >> I I personally doesn't matter to me how
[1:22:14] long it's taken for this to get going
[1:22:16] because they
[1:22:18] >> they messed up their license right off
[1:22:19] the bat.
[1:22:20] >> So that was on them and we did nothing
[1:22:22] wrong until now. What we do now is we
[1:22:25] need to
[1:22:27] >> put something in it for us and then
[1:22:29] >> rate our own.
[1:22:31] >> Yeah.
[1:22:33] >> How do we phrase something to put down
[1:22:36] here then? Suggestions.
[1:22:39] Well, what a first thing I think would
[1:22:41] be request uh landscaping trees around
[1:22:44] him.
[1:22:47] >> Absolutely.
[1:22:48] >> Y
[1:22:50] >> and maybe more.
[1:22:51] >> How do we
[1:22:53] >> like is there any anybody that you could
[1:22:55] check with like we could look into on
[1:22:59] that does this for a living, you know,
[1:23:02] like
[1:23:02] >> Right.
[1:23:03] >> Yeah. how to fix something or help
[1:23:05] something
[1:23:05] >> to help in the best possible way like
[1:23:08] Landscaping trees is a pretty broad
[1:23:10] spectrum, but I agree with you.
[1:23:12] >> Put a shelter belt in.
[1:23:13] >> How do you
[1:23:14] >> We can help fund the shelter belt.
[1:23:16] >> Yeah, we can fund a shelter belt for
[1:23:19] sure.
[1:23:19] >> Yeah,
[1:23:20] >> but like do
[1:23:22] >> and multiple row, right? Multiple row.
[1:23:25] >> Well, what does multiple mean? Two.
[1:23:29] >> They got two there now.
[1:23:30] >> Yeah, I know.
[1:23:31] >> Yeah. So, I would I would assume like
[1:23:34] the shelter belt the guys put in last
[1:23:36] year was four rows. I put three in this
[1:23:39] year.
[1:23:40] >> I think to the east of this lagoon,
[1:23:43] there's probably room there to put eight
[1:23:46] or 10 rows of shelter belts cuz they're
[1:23:48] not in there.
[1:23:49] >> Yep. And that'll be wasted.
[1:23:51] >> Why Why couldn't that be something like
[1:23:54] the Boy Scouts used to plant their trees
[1:23:55] and have a whole plantation in there?
[1:24:00] That would be
[1:24:01] >> um
[1:24:02] >> And is there a way to word the shelter
[1:24:04] belt so that it is coniferous trees and
[1:24:06] not deciduous?
[1:24:08] >> Well, like you're on they're on the
[1:24:10] corners of that when you put in those
[1:24:12] trees. E like I hate those things, but
[1:24:14] these they grew good e and fast. Those
[1:24:17] are not spruce trees per se, but that
[1:24:19] >> Yeah. Scotch vines. And they grow fast.
[1:24:23] >> And if you put enough of them in there,
[1:24:24] it' be very thick.
[1:24:25] >> They grow well in that type of land,
[1:24:27] too.
[1:24:27] >> Yeah.
[1:24:29] That's something Watershed could help
[1:24:31] with. Could they not on something like
[1:24:32] that, Jiren?
[1:24:34] >> Yeah,
[1:24:35] >> we have our programs and our own
[1:24:37] programs.
[1:24:39] >> Well, they say they're using a new
[1:24:40] treatment, too. So,
[1:24:42] >> I think like they are trying to mitigate
[1:24:44] it. They're putting more oxygen into
[1:24:47] them and stuff like that. So,
[1:24:49] >> and this isn't for the hogs when you're
[1:24:53] >> But they're also treating that, too.
[1:24:55] >> Yeah. Well, that's the one that smells
[1:24:57] the worst.
[1:24:58] >> The orange one is what smells. So,
[1:25:00] that's what's difficult um to keep in
[1:25:03] mind.
[1:25:05] >> But but like Ray said, if we we build
[1:25:08] that east end, like a nice forest in
[1:25:12] there, that'll help a lot.
[1:25:13] >> Could we not do that separately from
[1:25:15] this resolution since this is for the
[1:25:17] other lagoon that's on the
[1:25:20] >> Whatever. Yeah, whatever. However, we do
[1:25:22] it
[1:25:23] >> because I'm not familiar with this area.
[1:25:25] Is this lagoon in the same place as the
[1:25:27] other one?
[1:25:28] >> Yes.
[1:25:29] >> So these trees to the west of it.
[1:25:31] >> They already have some trees in.
[1:25:32] >> So the trees would just need to be
[1:25:34] expanded. Would it also improve
[1:25:36] >> the new improved for the new one? Okay.
[1:25:39] So um
[1:25:41] >> question about the license once this new
[1:25:43] lagoon is in place. This is one thing I
[1:25:44] never caught. Does the old one get
[1:25:46] decommissioned?
[1:25:47] >> No.
[1:25:49] >> Okay. I just check.
[1:25:50] >> And I think they're going to use it as a
[1:25:51] like a backup.
[1:25:53] >> Okay. I think so. Like whether the pig
[1:25:57] manure is going in the first one. I
[1:25:59] think that's probably what they're going
[1:26:00] to do is keep the pig manure going in
[1:26:02] the first one. Yeah.
[1:26:03] >> And the second one's for the the
[1:26:06] >> slaughter house and
[1:26:07] >> overflow. Yeah.
[1:26:08] >> Well, it'll be for the the colony and
[1:26:10] the slaughter house.
[1:26:11] >> Yeah, that's what it's for.
[1:26:14] >> So,
[1:26:16] >> but this was licensed and didn't dry
[1:26:18] stills have the chance to the province
[1:26:21] during all of that. So like,
[1:26:22] >> yeah,
[1:26:23] >> it's not really up to us to enforce
[1:26:25] these type of things. It should be on
[1:26:26] the provincial side.
[1:26:28] >> We can help out with the trees. I think
[1:26:30] we should do that, but I don't know if
[1:26:32] we need to put that in this.
[1:26:34] >> But as far as this what we're talking
[1:26:36] about here, do we need any more than
[1:26:38] what there is
[1:26:39] >> right there right now?
[1:26:40] >> I I it's up there now. And I changed it
[1:26:42] around a little bit. Um so I just said
[1:26:46] it's whereas who you know it's happening
[1:26:49] >> and then therefore be your result of
[1:26:51] council approve subject to the following
[1:26:53] conditions increase rows of trees
[1:26:55] shelter beliferous
[1:26:57] trees do you want to be more
[1:26:59] >> I would accept this as
[1:27:01] >> specific like how many rows of trees
[1:27:04] shelter belt is how much four is it
[1:27:07] standard
[1:27:07] >> well it's you can make it whatever you
[1:27:09] want like and
[1:27:10] >> how much detail do you want in here
[1:27:12] >> well that's it Yeah, I think this is
[1:27:14] enough.
[1:27:16] >> And uh what do you think about
[1:27:17] additives?
[1:27:18] >> Yep.
[1:27:26] » Anybody else got any other suggestions?
[1:27:28] What we like to see in there?
[1:27:31] Proof of that proven use of
[1:27:42] Yeah.
[1:27:43] on a yearly basis
[1:27:45] >> there. That's it.
[1:27:48] >> Would you not have something on there a
[1:27:50] timeline?
[1:27:52] >> Again, like yeah, we can, but how do you
[1:27:54] ever police it,
[1:27:55] >> right? You know, like you could put it
[1:27:57] on there just for the sake, but
[1:28:00] >> I know I'm not going out there and
[1:28:01] saying
[1:28:04] >> we put the next sentence down there. If no proof provided, then
[1:28:09] >> your license is suspended.
[1:28:10] >> Poor.
[1:28:11] >> We can't say that. We can't say that.
[1:28:13] >> It's on their license.
[1:28:15] >> Proof of continued use of additive to
[1:28:17] mitigate odor if requested
[1:28:20] >> by office.
[1:28:21] >> I would just leave it right there
[1:28:23] >> because none of us are going to remember
[1:28:26] to ask for this.
[1:28:27] >> No, but if the neighbors came in
[1:28:28] complaining asking for odor, then we can
[1:28:30] make the request.
[1:28:33] Okay.
[1:28:36] >> Okay. With what we got up there then?
[1:28:38] >> Yeah. Yeah.
[1:28:39] >> Okay.
[1:28:42] All in favor?
[1:28:44] Opposed?
[1:28:46] Call that carried. Thank you.
[1:28:52] The
[1:28:52] >> ideal thing would be a nice lilock hedge
[1:28:54] around it.
[1:28:56] >> Yeah. Great.
[1:28:57] >> All right.
[1:28:59] >> Yeah. After that, but then it's a hedge.
[1:29:01] It's nice and flat.
[1:29:04] Variation order 0926
[1:29:06] NCL Brookdale Holding Resolution 182
[1:29:10] 2026. Be it resolved that council
[1:29:13] approved variation order BO926
[1:29:17] NCL for Brookdale Holding. Whereas Joey
[1:29:20] Walman is acting as the applicant on
[1:29:23] behalf of Brookdale Holding Company
[1:29:25] Limited, owners of the property legally
[1:29:28] described as Northwest 171215
[1:29:32] WPM in the municipality of North Cypress
[1:29:35] Langford and located approximately 2
[1:29:38] miles south of Obron along municipal
[1:29:41] road 88 West. Applied to council
[1:29:45] of for
[1:29:47] >> Yeah. for approval to the
[1:29:50] >> Yeah. to North
[1:29:53] >> council for approval of a variation
[1:29:57] B926
[1:29:58] NCL under zoning bylaw number 7 2022
[1:30:02] part 3 section 3.67 table 3.2 use and
[1:30:08] requirements in order to vary the
[1:30:10] established requirement setbacks as
[1:30:13] follows. purposed to decrease the
[1:30:16] minimum front yard setback of 125 ft to
[1:30:19] allow the placement of a wastewater
[1:30:22] lagoon within the AR agricultural rural
[1:30:25] zone
[1:30:26] from 125 ft within the AR agricultural
[1:30:30] rural zone to 99 ft within the AR
[1:30:34] agricultural rural zone. Can I have a
[1:30:37] mover, please?
[1:30:39] >> Jire second.
[1:30:42] Harold,
[1:30:44] >> questions, comments.
[1:30:47] >> Do we want to put a commission in here
[1:30:48] as well? Considering that my people that
[1:30:51] were stressed about having it close to
[1:30:52] the river,
[1:30:54] >> this is makes it further away from the
[1:30:56] river. Putting it closer to why they put
[1:30:57] it there.
[1:30:58] >> This is just about putting closer to the
[1:31:00] road anyway.
[1:31:01] >> Trying to get away from the creek.
[1:31:05] » Any other comments, questions?
[1:31:09] Might be tougher to get trees in through
[1:31:11] that area with the variance like that,
[1:31:13] but nothing we can do about it.
[1:31:15] >> It's already there.
[1:31:16] >> Do you can there now?
[1:31:20] >> Any other questions, comments?
[1:31:22] >> No, sir.
[1:31:23] >> All in favor? Opposed? Will that carry?
[1:31:27] Thank you.
[1:31:31] Variation order number V1126
[1:31:34] MCL hunger resolution 183206.
[1:31:39] Be it resolve the council approve
[1:31:41] variation order V 1126 NCL or Monica and
[1:31:46] Brady.
[1:31:48] Whereas Monica and Brady, owners of the
[1:31:51] property legally described as lot A and
[1:31:53] B, plan 75660
[1:31:57] Northwest 41415
[1:31:59] WPM
[1:32:01] in the municipality north Cypress
[1:32:03] Langford and located at road 79 North,
[1:32:06] Lane 87108.
[1:32:09] applied to council
[1:32:11] >> just for approval of a variation B126
[1:32:16] NCL under zoning by number bylaw number
[1:32:20] 72022
[1:32:22] part 3 section 3.6 table 3.2 two in
[1:32:26] order to vary the established
[1:32:29] requirements as follows from
[1:32:32] minimum front yard setback of 125 ft
[1:32:36] within the AR agricultural rule zone to
[1:32:39] a minimum front yard setback of 88 or 55
[1:32:43] ft within the AR agricultural rural
[1:32:46] zone. Purpose to construct a detached
[1:32:49] garage next to an existing house. I have
[1:32:53] a mover, please.
[1:32:55] Alice seconder
[1:32:57] >> Rob
[1:32:59] questions comments anyone
[1:33:02] I think Joel explained it to us fairly
[1:33:04] clearly there all in favor
[1:33:08] opposed
[1:33:10] car thank you
[1:33:17] these next ones here I'm not going to
[1:33:18] bother reading all the where as I'm just
[1:33:21] going to go down
[1:33:23] general business noncomp Compliance
[1:33:25] Removal Authority Resolution
[1:33:29] number 184 2026.
[1:33:34] Now therefore, be it resolved that the
[1:33:37] he Association of Manitoba
[1:33:39] Municipalities lobby the province of
[1:33:41] Manitoba, review and amend the municipal
[1:33:44] act as a whole, but with special respect
[1:33:47] to section 1522
[1:33:51] to strengthen municipal authority to mi
[1:33:53] maintain order and safety at council
[1:33:56] meetings while respecting procedural
[1:33:59] fairness and the public's right to
[1:34:01] attend. And further be it resolved that
[1:34:03] such amendments include a graduated
[1:34:06] range of consequences for repeat
[1:34:08] offenders, including escalating
[1:34:11] consequences
[1:34:13] where an individual has a demonstrated
[1:34:16] pattern of improper conduct at council
[1:34:19] meetings. And further be it resolved
[1:34:21] that the province of Manitoba
[1:34:24] consider amendments that would allow
[1:34:26] council by resolution and subject to
[1:34:30] clear criteria and procedural safeguards
[1:34:33] to prohibit ban an individual from
[1:34:37] attending council meetings for an
[1:34:39] extended period where a documented
[1:34:41] history of repeated improper conduct
[1:34:44] exists. And I have a mover, please.
[1:34:47] Malcolm.
[1:34:48] >> Malcolm. Seconder
[1:34:51] Alice
[1:34:52] questions.
[1:34:55] >> So these will be debated probably after
[1:34:57] district meeting.
[1:34:58] >> These will come to the district meeting
[1:34:59] to be addressed. So
[1:35:01] >> So you're are you western?
[1:35:03] >> Yeah.
[1:35:03] >> So June 16th is your meeting.
[1:35:05] >> Yep. And Mela.
[1:35:08] >> Yes.
[1:35:10] >> All in favor?
[1:35:12] Opposed?
[1:35:14] Car. Thank you very much.
[1:35:19] Cino River Basin Initiatives Resolution
[1:35:23] 185 2026.
[1:35:26] Therefore, be it resolved. Therefore, it
[1:35:28] be it be or be it resolved.
[1:35:32] >> Therefore, it be Yeah. Therefore, be it
[1:35:34] resolved.
[1:35:34] >> Therefore, be it resolved. The AMM lobby
[1:35:37] the provincial government to reestablish
[1:35:40] ARBI for the 2027 year and unpredictable
[1:35:45] with unpredictable storms excessive
[1:35:48] drainage legal and illegal
[1:35:52] and before mentioned areas of concern
[1:35:56] concerns the need for those closest to
[1:35:58] the effective areas need to be engaged
[1:36:01] and have a voice. Can I have a mover
[1:36:03] please?
[1:36:05] Jiren and Robbie.
[1:36:09] Any questions? Anyone?
[1:36:12] All in favor?
[1:36:14] Opposed? Carrie. Thank you.
[1:36:22] C. Provincial radon action strategy
[1:36:25] resolution 186 2026.
[1:36:33] Be it resolved that Association of
[1:36:35] Manitoba Municipalities advocate to the
[1:36:37] province of Manitoba to develop and
[1:36:40] implement a comprehensive provincial
[1:36:42] radon action strategy to to address
[1:36:45] radon exposure and support Manitoba
[1:36:49] municipalities in protecting the health
[1:36:51] and safety of their communities.
[1:36:53] Further be it resolved that such a
[1:36:55] strategy include coordinated provincial
[1:36:58] leadership in the areas of public
[1:37:00] awareness, provincewide testing
[1:37:02] initiatives, mitigation supports,
[1:37:06] regulatory modernization and financial
[1:37:09] assistant programs to ensure a
[1:37:11] consistent, equitable and effective
[1:37:14] provincewide approach that res reduces
[1:37:17] financial and operation operational
[1:37:20] pressures on municipalities. Can I have
[1:37:23] a mover, please?
[1:37:25] >> Harold.
[1:37:26] Seconder.
[1:37:28] Welcome.
[1:37:30] Questions.
[1:37:32] All in favor?
[1:37:35] Opposed? Carried. Thank you.
[1:37:40] Joint campground portable washroom
[1:37:43] resolution 187206
[1:37:46] resolve. The council approved the rental
[1:37:49] of a two stall portable washroom trailer
[1:37:51] for the new campground from VIP portable
[1:37:55] restroom rentals for the quoted price of
[1:37:58] $550
[1:38:00] for three months rental plus $184
[1:38:03] delivery and further be resolve the
[1:38:06] joint council's approved payment as per
[1:38:09] the North Cypress Langford capital
[1:38:11] budget. Okay. So, that resolution should
[1:38:14] read 5850,
[1:38:18] right? Well, I have it up there.
[1:38:22] >> Oh, 5,850.
[1:38:23] >> Yeah.
[1:38:24] >> Okay. Correction.
[1:38:27] For a quoted price of 5,
[1:38:29] >> 850
[1:38:32] >> plus delivery.
[1:38:34] >> Yeah. And taxes.
[1:38:35] >> Okay. Can we have a mover for that
[1:38:37] resolution? Oh,
[1:38:39] >> a seconder.
[1:38:42] Rob,
[1:38:43] >> just for clarification, I've got a train
[1:38:49] in writing the resolution.
[1:38:50] >> Any other discussions?
[1:38:52] >> No, it's as for recommendation from the
[1:38:53] campground committee.
[1:38:55] >> Do you want me to write that in there?
[1:38:58] Include that in the resolution. Doesn't
[1:39:01] matter.
[1:39:02] >> Probably have to put it the mold in,
[1:39:04] Val.
[1:39:04] >> Yeah,
[1:39:05] >> I would I wouldn't worry about it.
[1:39:06] >> Thanks.
[1:39:07] >> No. Okay. No, just for clarification.
[1:39:10] All in favor? Opposed?
[1:39:13] Carried. Thank you.
[1:39:17] Joint campground irrigation installation
[1:39:20] resolution 188 2026. Whereas the
[1:39:23] irrigation lines project has been
[1:39:26] discussed at the joint council.
[1:39:28] Therefore, be it resolved that the
[1:39:30] municipality of North Cypress Lanford
[1:39:33] approve the purchase of supplies needed
[1:39:36] for the installation of irrigation pipe
[1:39:38] for the campground from Riley's Home
[1:39:41] Hardware at the quoted price of $6,850
[1:39:47] without GST.
[1:39:49] Further be it resolved the municipality
[1:39:51] of North Cypress Langford approve hiring
[1:39:53] Sand Hills Electric to assist in
[1:39:56] installing the pipe and further be it
[1:39:59] resolved the Municipality North Cypress
[1:40:00] Langford approve payment. Can I have a
[1:40:04] mover please?
[1:40:07] >> Rob a seconder
[1:40:09] >> Dallas questions
[1:40:11] >> is this are we paying for all this or is
[1:40:14] this joint with the town?
[1:40:15] >> Joint joint. Okay. What's the price for
[1:40:19] Sand Hills? Any idea yet? Be nice to
[1:40:21] have a number.
[1:40:22] >> It was a It was in your joint agenda.
[1:40:24] That's why I didn't include it here
[1:40:26] because you saw all this.
[1:40:28] >> This was basically all approved at your
[1:40:30] >> joint meeting. I'm just taking those
[1:40:33] resolutions and making them legal by
[1:40:35] putting them in your meeting.
[1:40:37] >> That hasn't always been done in the
[1:40:39] past. You just approved the minutes.
[1:40:42] I'm thinking that it's nicer for for
[1:40:45] posterity sake for years looking back
[1:40:47] you can see that you know Cypress
[1:40:49] Langford approved it
[1:40:53] >> by putting them in your in your minutes.
[1:40:55] >> Pretty positive like by the work of Bill
[1:40:57] was building it was like labor all
[1:40:59] involved. It was only going to be around
[1:41:00] that 10 grand. Correct.
[1:41:02] >> I I hear
[1:41:04] >> I forget the number but
[1:41:05] >> but they're on the procurement policy
[1:41:07] through the
[1:41:08] >> Yeah.
[1:41:08] >> joint services. So
[1:41:10] >> yeah.
[1:41:11] Bill
[1:41:12] and didn't look back on a
[1:41:15] >> really cost-effective solution compared
[1:41:17] to the post that had come in.
[1:41:19] >> Do you want me to hunt for that?
[1:41:21] >> I don't think the river wants the price
[1:41:22] of it.
[1:41:23] >> No. Okay.
[1:41:25] >> Okay. I believe
[1:41:27] >> but that was that would be my only
[1:41:30] concern. Okay. It's got to get put in
[1:41:32] the ground somewhere. If it's $10,000, I
[1:41:34] guess it is, but it's uh how high do you
[1:41:37] put that number?
[1:41:39] But I'll call the question. All in
[1:41:41] favor?
[1:41:43] Opposed?
[1:41:45] Carried. Thank you.
[1:41:50] Equipment storage container purchase
[1:41:52] resolution 189 2026.
[1:41:55] >> Excuse me.
[1:41:56] >> Where is equipment storage container for
[1:42:00] or at the campground was discussed at a
[1:42:03] joint meeting joint council meeting.
[1:42:06] Therefore, be it resolved that approve
[1:42:09] the purchase of a new 40ft container
[1:42:11] from strong box container for $5,800
[1:42:16] plus PST and $895 shipping as per their
[1:42:20] quote and further be it resolved that
[1:42:22] the North Cypress Langford approve
[1:42:24] payment as per the joint agreement. Can
[1:42:27] I have a mover, please?
[1:42:29] Malcolm seconder
[1:42:34] » Dallas
[1:42:36] questions anyone I see it's out there
[1:42:40] >> no
[1:42:41] >> yep
[1:42:41] >> yes yes
[1:42:44] >> sorry
[1:42:44] >> yeah and there's a very very minimal
[1:42:46] difference between used and new like it
[1:42:48] was a couple hundred bucks like it was
[1:42:51] >> so is this new new or it's not single
[1:42:54] use
[1:42:54] >> just a single use from the way but yeah
[1:42:58] >> yeah
[1:43:00] All in favor?
[1:43:02] Opposed?
[1:43:04] Carry it. Then two.
[1:43:08] Campground office building resolution
[1:43:10] 190 2026. Whereas the joint council
[1:43:13] discussed the purchase of a campground
[1:43:16] office building. Therefore, be it
[1:43:18] resolved, the municipality of North
[1:43:20] Cypress, Langford, approved the purchase
[1:43:23] of a new 10x24 cabin to be used as a
[1:43:27] campground office from Premier Buildings
[1:43:29] in Glenboro at the quoted price of
[1:43:32] $12,95.25
[1:43:36] plus PST. And further be it resolved
[1:43:39] that North Cypress Langford approve
[1:43:42] payment as per the 2026 joint capital
[1:43:46] budget. Can I have a mover, please?
[1:43:50] Rob seconder.
[1:43:53] Welcome.
[1:43:55] Questions.
[1:43:57] >> This was tender.
[1:43:58] >> Absolutely. Well,
[1:43:59] >> yes.
[1:44:00] >> Three quotes for
[1:44:02] there was a tiny problem is it was
[1:44:07] on the on the tender. I changed the date
[1:44:11] online to the 15th of June. Gave them
[1:44:15] the time frame. So when they got when
[1:44:19] Teresa looked online, she found this place in Glimro. Well, this is
[1:44:26] supposed to be done by July 1. There's
[1:44:28] no guarantees. So we wanted everything
[1:44:30] in place by July.
[1:44:32] >> Mhm.
[1:44:32] >> And then we got another quote after that was a little bit lower, but she had
[1:44:37] already awarded this.
[1:44:39] Okay.
[1:44:40] >> So, this is what we're talking about
[1:44:42] right now.
[1:44:42] >> Yeah.
[1:44:42] >> Okay.
[1:44:43] >> Yeah. And it and hopefully it's
[1:44:44] everybody July 1st.
[1:44:46] >> Okay.
[1:44:48] >> Any other comments?
[1:44:50] >> We're not going to be in probably
[1:44:52] because of that, are we?
[1:44:54] >> I don't think so.
[1:44:57] >> Well, the other one came after tender
[1:44:59] closed,
[1:44:59] >> I think. So, yeah. Okay.
[1:45:03] >> Okay. All in favor?
[1:45:05] Opposed?
[1:45:07] Gary. Thank you.
[1:45:10] Fair wages.
[1:45:18] Resolution 191206.
[1:45:20] Whereas the fire department wages were
[1:45:22] discussed at a joint meeting and whereas
[1:45:25] the joint committee provided a
[1:45:27] recommendation. Therefore, be it
[1:45:30] resolved that North Cypress Langford
[1:45:32] hereby approves that that weight wage
[1:45:36] rates for members of the Carberry North
[1:45:39] Cypress Langford Fire Department be set
[1:45:42] in accordance with the office of the
[1:45:44] fire commissioner OFC rate structure and
[1:45:48] further be it resolved the approved OFC
[1:45:51] guided wage rates be applied
[1:45:54] retroactively to January 20 January 1st
[1:45:57] 2020. 26 and further be it resolved that
[1:46:00] the fire department meeting attendance
[1:46:03] be compensated at the OFC hourly rate to
[1:46:07] a maximum of two hours per meeting. Can
[1:46:10] I have a mover please?
[1:46:12] Dallas seconder
[1:46:16] Harold questions comments.
[1:46:21] >> So what was that rate determine that? It
[1:46:24] was what the original recommendation
[1:46:27] came from fire chief and we because it
[1:46:31] was do you have a copy of um the
[1:46:33] spreadsheet that Teresa had given us for
[1:46:36] comparison cuz the proposal we had done
[1:46:40] when it was broken down by what was
[1:46:42] actually paid out compared to the
[1:46:44] proposed. It actually was a very very It was almost heat.
[1:46:49] >> We were what we were proposing was
[1:46:51] actually gonna end up being more
[1:46:53] >> than what Clyde had proposed.
[1:46:55] >> This was $650 cheap or something.
[1:46:58] >> Yeah. And then two, when we were
[1:47:00] thinking about doing like the extra what
[1:47:03] was the proper word, but the actual um
[1:47:05] payment to the fire chief, it was going
[1:47:08] to be tough to break down exactly what
[1:47:12] was listed in there for, you know, keep
[1:47:15] it clear for staff going forward as to
[1:47:18] was this in the payment or is this on
[1:47:22] hourly? It get it gets really overly
[1:47:24] complicated. So the way it was proposed,
[1:47:27] it was that blanket per and like for
[1:47:30] staff doing the payroll, it was um
[1:47:33] really favorably looked upon to keep it
[1:47:35] simple the way it was asked cuz it was
[1:47:37] cheaper in the end for us too.
[1:47:40] And what we had proposed back,
[1:47:43] >> but I was surprised it was that way.
[1:47:46] >> Very surprised.
[1:47:47] >> Yeah.
[1:47:51] No, the
[1:47:53] >> That's not it.
[1:47:53] >> Teresa did it. Yeah. A good job breaking
[1:47:56] it down first.
[1:47:56] >> She had it broke down. Yeah.
[1:47:58] >> Yeah.
[1:48:04] » I think it was forwarded to all of you.
[1:48:07] >> Yep.
[1:48:11] » Sorry. I just
[1:48:12] >> It was a while ago. I remember reading
[1:48:13] it.
[1:48:14] >> It might have been emailed to you,
[1:48:15] Robbie, that night.
[1:48:31] there. Yeah.
[1:48:32] >> Yeah.
[1:48:33] >> Good.
[1:48:34] >> So, current rates are these. And you can
[1:48:37] see they're kind of all over the map
[1:48:38] trying to remember who's at this
[1:48:40] different level.
[1:48:42] And
[1:48:43] >> that's what we proposed.
[1:48:44] >> That's what Yeah. NCL proposed.
[1:48:49] And uh this is what they proposed. And
[1:48:52] so when you look over here,
[1:48:56] the green is what we said it would work
[1:48:59] out to.
[1:49:01] >> Yeah. And there are 600
[1:49:02] >> a little bit less
[1:49:04] >> with lot less attention to detail
[1:49:09] >> when it comes time to doing the payroll.
[1:49:10] >> Yeah. You actually save money there
[1:49:13] >> just in the staff time
[1:49:14] >> in the administration time. Yeah. Any
[1:49:18] other comments, questions?
[1:49:21] >> So, there's going to be no for class
[1:49:24] three air.
[1:49:25] >> Nope.
[1:49:26] >> Okay. Can you go up a little bit,
[1:49:29] please?
[1:49:33] » You see? Okay.
[1:49:34] >> Yeah.
[1:49:36] All the bottom seven or eight or
[1:49:38] 10 were all higher, but there's lower
[1:49:39] ones up at the top there.
[1:49:43] Part of the problem I think was that we
[1:49:46] were considering like indemnities
[1:49:49] >> and and how would you and and not to say
[1:49:52] that this couldn't come part of your
[1:49:55] eventual eventual but what is all
[1:49:59] covered in the indemnities.
[1:50:02] Um and that would have to be really clear. So that would be something
[1:50:05] to consider for
[1:50:07] um more discussion later. Um but
[1:50:14] » yeah I was pleasantly surprised by the
[1:50:16] breakdown
[1:50:17] >> I was yeah I think I
[1:50:22] » okay call the question all in favor
[1:50:25] opposed
[1:50:27] carried thank you
[1:50:32] joint capital purchase P&R cemetery
[1:50:36] truck tender results resolution 192 2020
[1:50:39] 26. Be it resolved that North Cypress
[1:50:42] Langford approved the bid from from
[1:50:44] Philip Bellavansky to purchase a 2010
[1:50:48] GMC Sierra at $13,000
[1:50:52] plus PST and safety.
[1:50:56] And further be it resolved the expenses
[1:50:58] be split 50/50 between the town of
[1:51:00] Carbury and the municipality North
[1:51:03] Cypress Langford and the Carberry Plains
[1:51:05] Cemetery. Can I have a mover, please?
[1:51:10] Rob and Harold.
[1:51:14] Any questions? All in favor?
[1:51:18] Opposed?
[1:51:19] Car. Thank you.
[1:51:23] Term joint utility labor employee
[1:51:26] manager arts and recreation.
[1:51:29] Resolution 193 2026. It resolved that
[1:51:33] North Cypress Langford hire Zayn
[1:51:35] McConnell for the joint utility laborer
[1:51:38] term position effective May 21st, 2026
[1:51:42] at the compensation rate outlined in the
[1:51:45] employment agreement. Can I have a
[1:51:47] mover, please?
[1:51:49] >> Dallas seconder. Malcolm
[1:51:53] questions.
[1:51:56] All in favor?
[1:51:58] Opposed?
[1:52:00] Carried. Thank you.
[1:52:04] Joint Transfer Station quote for cap
[1:52:06] work resolution 194 2026. Whereas the
[1:52:10] joint committee discussed the concrete and burn piles at the joint
[1:52:15] transfer station. Therefore, be it
[1:52:18] resolved the municipality of North
[1:52:19] Cypress, Langford again, accept the
[1:52:22] quote from backyard transfer transport
[1:52:26] to push, burn, and concrete piles at the
[1:52:29] transfer station as presented. Can I
[1:52:32] mover her, please?
[1:52:36] Malcolm and Rob.
[1:52:38] Questions?
[1:52:40] All in favor?
[1:52:42] Opposed?
[1:52:44] Carried. Thank you.
[1:52:50] Ed's Hall bathroom upgrade resolution
[1:52:53] 195 2026. Whereas the Edin's Hall
[1:52:56] committee has requested financial
[1:52:59] assistance to upgrade the hall for new
[1:53:02] and wheelchair accessible washrooms.
[1:53:04] Therefore, be it resolved the council of
[1:53:06] the municipality of North Cypress
[1:53:08] Langford approve the grant of $35,000
[1:53:13] to assist with this renovation
[1:53:15] and further be it resolved that this
[1:53:17] project be funded by the strategic
[1:53:20] infrastructure
[1:53:21] reserve fund. Can I have a mover,
[1:53:23] please?
[1:53:24] >> Love to Dallas seconder.
[1:53:28] >> Harold
[1:53:30] questions.
[1:53:33] It's uh we haven't approved this yet,
[1:53:36] right? The the the grant application you
[1:53:39] sent it to us, Senator Dave, there's a
[1:53:41] few
[1:53:42] >> so technically we can't approve this at
[1:53:44] this point.
[1:53:45] >> So the reason I put this on the agenda
[1:53:47] is because we were receiving information
[1:53:49] from uh from obviously they're looking
[1:53:53] for
[1:53:54] a hope a hope to start.
[1:53:57] >> Yeah.
[1:53:57] >> And so I I can't ignore that this
[1:53:59] information is coming. However, it seems
[1:54:01] it does seem premature because I only
[1:54:03] just created a a grant application. Now,
[1:54:06] you've never required it before of other
[1:54:08] uh of other groups. But what is your
[1:54:11] process that you wish to have? Um do you
[1:54:15] now want to take this grant application
[1:54:19] that should it be approved? Um so, first
[1:54:22] of all, number one, should we approve
[1:54:23] this grant application that I've
[1:54:24] created? Number two, the process around
[1:54:27] it. should it then now be given to the
[1:54:29] eins to fill out so that you begin your new process and then um so
[1:54:39] I I know where you're coming from
[1:54:40] Robbie.
[1:54:41] >> It's just a couple day change over right
[1:54:42] like if we we just have it in here that
[1:54:46] we can we review it and like it and
[1:54:49] prove it. It's just a matter of
[1:54:51] approving whatever and then giving it to
[1:54:54] I think we give it
[1:54:55] >> be like a condition in here upon
[1:54:58] approval of
[1:54:59] >> well the the point of the application is
[1:55:02] to keep them
[1:55:03] >> honest or should we be just tableabling
[1:55:06] this until we get
[1:55:08] >> like how we want to do it all
[1:55:09] >> I hate to see it wait a month like I
[1:55:11] know that there's other projects that
[1:55:12] are are coming that really are
[1:55:15] interested in starting right away so if
[1:55:18] we can approve ASAP
[1:55:22] the grant application. We can hand the
[1:55:24] grant application over and hopefully
[1:55:27] with within 2 or 3 or 4 days we get some
[1:55:29] of those back in
[1:55:31] >> and we could approve them through an
[1:55:32] email, you know, something like that cuz
[1:55:35] we basically already have to a point,
[1:55:37] right?
[1:55:38] >> Like like verbally we have
[1:55:40] >> these are all part of your wish list,
[1:55:42] right?
[1:55:42] >> Yes.
[1:55:43] >> And so so you've you've spoken of it to
[1:55:46] them. They're eager and wanting to grab
[1:55:49] hold of this, but you have not formally
[1:55:52] approved all of those
[1:55:55] amounts and the purposes for because it
[1:55:57] was all a bit of a chicken and an egg
[1:56:00] and who's who's ready and who's not.
[1:56:02] >> Like I think your your proposal you sent
[1:56:05] out the other day is not a bad idea, but
[1:56:07] it's a little late for this year almost.
[1:56:11] >> Well, I think that's what we're talking
[1:56:12] about right here. Is it too late? You
[1:56:13] know, we're a little we I think we could
[1:56:16] almost in my mind I kind of thought
[1:56:18] maybe we could approve what we have
[1:56:19] already pro projected,
[1:56:22] but going forward for the next year, it
[1:56:25] would give people time to fill those
[1:56:27] forms out and get them in on time.
[1:56:30] >> Yeah. Like uh like if Edens does a bud
[1:56:33] have if they did a budget already, then
[1:56:36] they know basically what they're after.
[1:56:38] They have a size, they have this and
[1:56:39] that and you went through it where
[1:56:41] they're getting their all their money,
[1:56:42] right?
[1:56:42] >> Yeah. So you you already know what they
[1:56:45] want.
[1:56:45] >> It's just
[1:56:47] the actual like we should
[1:56:49] >> the formality of signing the paper.
[1:56:51] >> We should be Yeah. Like Bella said to
[1:56:53] me, she said, you know, like we we
[1:56:55] wanted to make sure like it's legit,
[1:56:57] like it's
[1:56:58] >> professional.
[1:56:59] >> Yeah.
[1:57:00] >> So, I mean, I understand the process
[1:57:03] >> and and the like the the museum here,
[1:57:05] like there's a couple that are really
[1:57:07] >> Yeah.
[1:57:08] like and and it'll be no time at all to
[1:57:11] get these couple once we approve this or
[1:57:14] we can approve them without that for
[1:57:16] now. Two or three of them if you want
[1:57:19] and it's here right in the past we've
[1:57:22] approved them like this.
[1:57:23] >> Yes.
[1:57:24] >> I I don't see it being a problem
[1:57:25] approving the ones we've got here now
[1:57:28] and then we ask for these forms to be
[1:57:30] filled out or give them to them for
[1:57:32] future and try to continue forward from
[1:57:35] this point.
[1:57:36] >> It's whatever. Yeah. I don't think it's
[1:57:37] an issue like we could still fill out
[1:57:39] the form for Adrian and just have it in
[1:57:41] the file, right?
[1:57:43] >> It can still it's not an issue of the
[1:57:45] paperwork being done just to keep apples
[1:57:48] to apples and just have it all nice and
[1:57:50] tidy and
[1:57:51] >> it would be nice having form done future
[1:57:53] stuff. already started
[1:57:56] >> but I mean
[1:57:57] >> but for this one I think we could
[1:57:59] >> they are under
[1:58:01] >> it is our building
[1:58:03] >> and
[1:58:04] >> it is our asset is it not in the end
[1:58:06] >> completely
[1:58:06] >> yeah and we've approved stuff for
[1:58:08] Brookdale and other facilities very
[1:58:10] similar to this
[1:58:12] >> it's just the fact that it's coming from
[1:58:13] a new clump and a different little
[1:58:16] project base
[1:58:17] >> so I I I added
[1:58:20] uh approve this grant to assist with
[1:58:23] this Innovation subject to the
[1:58:25] completion of uh grant application with
[1:58:28] the civil grant.
[1:58:31] >> Okay with that Harold edition.
[1:58:33] >> Yeah. Like I kind of thought we were
[1:58:35] putting the cart ahead of the horse as
[1:58:37] they say when you haven't got the kind
[1:58:39] of
[1:58:40] >> haven't sure you've got the grant yet.
[1:58:42] >> Making a wagon as we went here because
[1:58:44] this was a new thing for us to do.
[1:58:46] >> This is our grant. Yeah. It's the money
[1:58:48] we already have been granted to us.
[1:58:50] We're not awaiting approval to get the
[1:58:52] money. It's a it's a kitty that we have
[1:58:54] sitting that we have to use this year.
[1:58:56] Then these are projects that we want to
[1:58:57] see done. So
[1:59:00] >> no excitedly.
[1:59:01] >> Yeah.
[1:59:02] >> With that addition there to everything%.
[1:59:05] >> Yeah.
[1:59:06] >> Any other discussion?
[1:59:08] >> All in favor?
[1:59:10] >> Opposed? Okay.
[1:59:12] >> Very excited to get there.
[1:59:17] RF now internet service at Brookdale and
[1:59:19] Nikqua shops resolution 196 2026
[1:59:24] be it resolved that council approve the
[1:59:25] quote from RF now to install internet
[1:59:28] and subscribe to services at Brookdale
[1:59:31] and Nepa public works shops. Can I have
[1:59:33] a mover please? Malcolm seconder
[1:59:38] >> Sharon
[1:59:39] discussion
[1:59:44] » is it called an equal shop or is it
[1:59:46] called a lang shop?
[1:59:47] >> Oh I don't know this is shoper shop.
[1:59:51] >> Yes that would make
[1:59:54] >> okay I'll change that change
[1:59:55] >> I wouldn't mind that.
[1:59:56] >> No no I don't I totally make that a
[1:59:59] problem.
[2:00:00] Everybody ever get the the price on
[2:00:03] Starlink compared to what RF now is?
[2:00:05] >> It's just different. I I checked into it
[2:00:08] for you as you as you requested. Um it's a different kind of service and uh
[2:00:14] this would be faster faster service for
[2:00:16] them as in speed
[2:00:19] >> and more reliable. It's
[2:00:20] >> and more reliable. Yeah. I forget now
[2:00:22] all the details but I did check
[2:00:25] exploret.
[2:00:28] Well, RF now has taken over exploring
[2:00:30] it.
[2:00:30] >> Yeah.
[2:00:33] » Okay. Any other questions? All in favor?
[2:00:38] Opposed? Carried. Thank you.
[2:00:43] Tiny Ters Child Care request for
[2:00:45] financial assistance resolution 197
[2:00:49] 2026. Whereas a Tiny Tater's Child Care
[2:00:52] has requested financial assistance to
[2:00:56] bring in service to the daycare,
[2:00:58] including installation and/or upgrading
[2:01:01] of essential municipal services such as
[2:01:04] wellwater, sewer, and electrical
[2:01:07] infrastructure. Can I have a moder?
[2:01:10] >> Okay.
[2:01:12] Oh, just wait a minute. I got to read
[2:01:14] the rest of it here. Therefore, be it
[2:01:16] resolved the council approve the
[2:01:19] financial grant in the amount of
[2:01:25] » to be determined.
[2:01:26] >> Yeah. So, to be
[2:01:27] >> to be determined
[2:01:29] >> well in your um your discussion it's the
[2:01:32] same thing as should they be filling out
[2:01:35] a grant application.
[2:01:36] >> Yeah.
[2:01:37] >> Right.
[2:01:37] >> Yeah.
[2:01:38] Well, that's the thing too, like we had
[2:01:40] talked about this in general to put
[2:01:42] towards, you know, tables and chairs or
[2:01:46] whatever originally. So,
[2:01:48] >> but what number did we put there? We
[2:01:49] were talking about 30,
[2:01:53] >> but now with this new info coming in, we
[2:01:56] don't exactly know the number that
[2:01:59] joint.
[2:02:00] >> I don't think we put anything down for
[2:02:02] to be honest with you. Well, back in the
[2:02:04] infrastructure, you you talked about
[2:02:06] tables and chairs and I think it was
[2:02:08] about 25 is what I thought.
[2:02:10] >> But is that is that from the
[2:02:13] >> strategic infrastructure?
[2:02:14] >> But I I didn't think we're going to want
[2:02:16] to do that because that's joint,
[2:02:19] right? Is that not a joint or is that
[2:02:21] >> Yeah, we
[2:02:22] >> So we have
[2:02:24] >> if if it's joint
[2:02:26] and we put money in.
[2:02:28] >> Is the town going to
[2:02:30] >> No,
[2:02:30] >> the town the town is already putting
[2:02:32] they've already put their 150. They've
[2:02:34] committed their 150 so that these
[2:02:37] services can be assured to go in.
[2:02:40] >> And so we did that. We we agreed on half
[2:02:43] of that. Did we not?
[2:02:44] >> We have not because we haven't told the
[2:02:46] actual number. They thought 150 would
[2:02:49] guaranteed to cover whatever it might
[2:02:51] be, but we don't know what that number
[2:02:53] was. So, in my notes from our chats for
[2:02:56] infrastructure,
[2:02:58] >> I thought we had said about the 30.
[2:03:02] >> Yeah. But why would we give money to
[2:03:04] tables and chairs when they're looking
[2:03:05] for money for infrastructure
[2:03:07] >> cuz it was before we hadn't known this.
[2:03:10] We weren't we didn't have a request in
[2:03:11] at the time. So we were considering
[2:03:14] giving towards stuff they're going to
[2:03:16] need to get open and then after the fact
[2:03:19] at joint it had come up that they didn't
[2:03:23] have a request into us for getting the
[2:03:25] services to the building. So instead of
[2:03:28] using for tables and chairs out of the
[2:03:30] strategic infrastructure, use that
[2:03:33] >> towards our potential half of that or
[2:03:36] whatever we plan to do towards that 150
[2:03:40] >> once we get price.
[2:03:43] >> Yeah.
[2:03:44] >> Whatever your portion was. So we could
[2:03:46] instead of giving this as the gift
[2:03:48] towards things they need to open, we
[2:03:51] were I think the chat kind of shifted
[2:03:54] >> to be the infrastructure they need to
[2:03:56] get their RTM picked up.
[2:04:00] >> There's a lot of stuff here should have
[2:04:02] been discussed and put in place
[2:04:06] >> and planning done.
[2:04:07] >> Yeah, this was better. This is
[2:04:09] >> well was two years ago we were told it
[2:04:11] was like a max maybe 40.
[2:04:14] how greedy did that.
[2:04:15] >> Yeah, exactly. So, since then with
[2:04:18] shifting of
[2:04:20] >> folks it was uh the new number is
[2:04:22] potentially the 150 and half of that.
[2:04:24] >> When are they thinking of starting
[2:04:26] putting shovels in the ground?
[2:04:28] >> Um
[2:04:30] concrete should be in this fall. I guess
[2:04:32] this this
[2:04:33] >> what I'm getting at is wants to start
[2:04:35] their ren.
[2:04:37] >> Yeah, there's no issue tableing this a
[2:04:38] month,
[2:04:39] >> but this one we actually get a number of
[2:04:41] what the infrastructure is going to be.
[2:04:43] table and request a grant application be
[2:04:46] filled out with a number.
[2:04:47] >> Yeah,
[2:04:49] >> we're not
[2:04:50] >> it's okay. And if this isn't used from
[2:04:51] that pot, that's fine.
[2:04:53] >> Well, it
[2:04:54] >> but it's going to have to come from
[2:04:56] somewhere.
[2:04:57] >> No, I realize but that
[2:04:59] >> but I know it's not the vision of this
[2:05:00] pot of money. I
[2:05:01] >> like that. That's that's my hard feeling
[2:05:03] on that is that this other money was it
[2:05:06] is for stuff like that, but nothing else
[2:05:08] is joint,
[2:05:10] >> right? like it's just born from Peter to
[2:05:13] pay Paul, but it's principal
[2:05:16] >> to me.
[2:05:18] >> I guess it's just whatever you want that
[2:05:20] strategic infrastructure money to be
[2:05:23] used for.
[2:05:24] >> So that was your wish list. In the
[2:05:27] meantime, you've learned about an
[2:05:29] obligation that you probably have on a
[2:05:31] joint
[2:05:32] >> Yeah.
[2:05:32] >> venture that
[2:05:35] you you now need to provide funds for.
[2:05:38] >> Perhaps you shift. Yeah.
[2:05:40] >> What you want to adhere to that
[2:05:42] >> just so that you have because otherwise
[2:05:44] it's not in your budget,
[2:05:46] >> right?
[2:05:50] » Yeah.
[2:05:51] >> But then there we're only talking of
[2:05:52] taking some of these funds of the from
[2:05:55] this strategic infrastructure reserve
[2:05:57] fund
[2:05:58] >> which was 30,000 we were talking about,
[2:06:00] was it not?
[2:06:02] >> That's what I had as a number.
[2:06:05] » I just don't remember. It's fine.
[2:06:07] >> Yeah.
[2:06:09] But that would be all we're talking
[2:06:11] about is that $30,000.
[2:06:13] >> Yeah. So, I guess there's two things to
[2:06:14] talk about how you want to pay it and
[2:06:17] how much you want to pay it.
[2:06:19] >> Yeah. And we had said we're not really
[2:06:21] going to lock down what we're going to
[2:06:22] pay till we find out what the number's
[2:06:24] going to be. I think worst case scenario
[2:06:26] is the 75
[2:06:29] >> each.
[2:06:30] >> Yeah. each.
[2:06:35] 20. 20 was guard here.
[2:06:44] » Do you want to table this or do you want
[2:06:47] we put 20 in there as a dollar figure
[2:06:49] for now that we're going to go forward
[2:06:52] with from this strategic infrastructure?
[2:06:56] >> No pressure either way. It's got to come
[2:06:57] from somewhere and it just qualifies,
[2:07:00] right?
[2:07:00] >> It's easier that way for 20 anyway,
[2:07:02] right?
[2:07:05] >> Okay. So, uh just for clarity, are you
[2:07:07] saying that this is what you're that's
[2:07:09] how much money you're going to use for
[2:07:12] the obligation for the municipal
[2:07:14] infrastructure?
[2:07:17] >> That's really what this is about.
[2:07:19] >> Yeah. It's not the whole not total
[2:07:20] number that we're willing to give to the
[2:07:22] project if we have to but this is what
[2:07:25] we can give from this
[2:07:27] >> or table is fine too.
[2:07:29] >> I think you should table this.
[2:07:31] >> Okay. Let's table this till next meeting
[2:07:33] then to get it worded how we want it
[2:07:35] then. Okay.
[2:07:36] >> So that it's clear what we were doing.
[2:07:38] >> Okay.
[2:07:40] >> Thank you.
[2:07:42] >> No problem.
[2:07:42] >> Get some more things straightened
[2:07:44] around.
[2:07:46] Okay. Table that one then. Thank you.
[2:07:48] This is based off of this letter that
[2:07:50] was received.
[2:07:51] >> Yes. Which was as uh I believe I
[2:07:54] requested the letter when we were
[2:07:57] >> right when the news came up that there
[2:08:01] was going to be an ask cuz I had found
[2:08:04] out had a daycare meeting that the town
[2:08:06] had promised.
[2:08:10] >> The town is basically promising.
[2:08:13] >> It's a promisary note. So they have
[2:08:14] >> to leave them hanging.
[2:08:15] >> Yeah. So we can continue on with the
[2:08:18] subdivision process and not have a hold
[2:08:20] up. It was a letter of intent.
[2:08:24] >> Okay. Touchwood Park 30th annual golf
[2:08:27] tournament sponsorship
[2:08:30] resolution 198 2026 whereas a Touchwood
[2:08:34] Park has submitted a request for
[2:08:36] sponsorship for their 2026
[2:08:39] annual charity tournament. Therefore, be
[2:08:42] it resolved that council approve the
[2:08:43] donation of $250.
[2:08:47] Can I have a mover, please?
[2:08:48] >> When is that one?
[2:08:51] >> Do we have a date on that? And
[2:08:52] >> July 27th, 2026.
[2:08:55] Right there.
[2:08:56] >> July 27th.
[2:08:57] >> Yep.
[2:09:00] >> Does that
[2:09:01] >> Okay.
[2:09:02] >> The price of a team at the same time or
[2:09:03] >> No, exactly. We we usually do the
[2:09:06] foundation but it would have been
[2:09:08] >> I'll move it
[2:09:10] >> by Malcolm seconder.
[2:09:14] » So I just looked back or nearly looked
[2:09:15] back to see what you had approved last
[2:09:17] year.
[2:09:18] >> And so I just put an amount in for
[2:09:20] discussion.
[2:09:22] >> Okay.
[2:09:23] >> And that would give you a par
[2:09:26] sponsorship.
[2:09:27] >> Yep.
[2:09:27] >> Your team. This does not include the
[2:09:29] $100 for a team.
[2:09:32] >> Okay. Okay. Okay, we're going to do this
[2:09:34] one here. All in favor of that $250
[2:09:37] donation.
[2:09:40] >> Opposed?
[2:09:42] Carried.
[2:09:43] >> I'd also recommend we put a team in
[2:09:44] because we usually do the foundation
[2:09:46] one, but it was would have been so we
[2:09:49] couldn't do both. The community
[2:09:51] foundation.
[2:09:52] >> Yeah, we usually put a team in. So,
[2:09:54] >> you know, for four people if possible.
[2:09:56] >> Yeah, I would propose we put a team in
[2:09:58] as well.
[2:09:59] >> So, we need a motion for something like
[2:10:01] that. We've never ever
[2:10:04] >> Well, we just
[2:10:06] >> I don't know whether ever made a motion
[2:10:07] or not.
[2:10:08] >> Yeah, there there has been motions that
[2:10:09] we go with especially if we're paying
[2:10:11] Yeah.
[2:10:12] >> So, yeah. Like
[2:10:12] >> So, are you going to get paid to Google?
[2:10:14] >> No, they're paying the just
[2:10:23] » Do you want Well, we've passed it. So, I
[2:10:26] don't know what you want to do.
[2:10:28] >> Okay, leave that one and then let's put
[2:10:29] one down at the end here. Another motion
[2:10:31] to
[2:10:33] enter a team.
[2:10:42] » I think you should first ask is there
[2:10:44] anybody available
[2:10:46] for you this
[2:10:48] guaranteed Matt and Tim like they went
[2:10:50] to
[2:10:50] >> they went last year.
[2:10:51] >> They went to the one last year and would
[2:10:53] absolutely go again.
[2:10:56] >> I am camping. I could make it work if no
[2:10:59] one else was, but whoever.
[2:11:02] >> I would probably make it.
[2:11:03] >> Exactly.
[2:11:04] >> This one's a neat ball.
[2:11:06] >> Yeah.
[2:11:07] >> I go play a walk.
[2:11:10] >> Oh, the 27th
[2:11:13] Monday.
[2:11:14] >> You have fun.
[2:11:14] >> Yeah.
[2:11:17] » Sure. Okay. We'll make another motion
[2:11:20] down here to enter on that. Okay.
[2:11:23] >> 2026 rate adequacy report. WTG schedule
[2:11:28] 9 Langford Utility Resolution 199 2026
[2:11:33] where whereas WTG
[2:11:36] consulting has added the adequacy report
[2:11:40] and whereas report indicates a
[2:11:42] forecasted deficit and whereas a
[2:11:45] forecasted deficit indicates that the
[2:11:47] utility rates are inadequate and a full
[2:11:50] utility rate study is recommended and
[2:11:53] whereas WTG has provided provided a
[2:11:57] quote to conduct the rate study.
[2:11:59] Therefore, be it resolved the council
[2:12:00] accept the quote as presented.
[2:12:04] I have a mover, please.
[2:12:10] » Seconder,
[2:12:11] >> Dallas.
[2:12:13] >> Okay. This is our water utility. Uh is
[2:12:16] there anybody else that can do this job
[2:12:18] or
[2:12:20] >> we have for opport or chances to do
[2:12:23] this? we
[2:12:25] >> we've never been able to do one or
[2:12:26] something because our audits never been
[2:12:28] done.
[2:12:29] >> So, he did a rate adequacy review and in
[2:12:33] doing that he has learned sorry it he's
[2:12:38] learned that you're going to need a
[2:12:39] full-on
[2:12:41] rate review. So, he's using that
[2:12:45] information, not charging you for doing
[2:12:48] that, and then using to that towards a
[2:12:53] fullon utility rate review. And I don't
[2:12:56] I seriously don't know anybody else who
[2:12:58] does them.
[2:13:01] >> So, what's it entail?
[2:13:05] >> What does it entail to do a rape study?
[2:13:08] A lot of number crunching.
[2:13:12] Do you want me down?
[2:13:13] >> No, I just
[2:13:15] >> Is there like is there does that get
[2:13:17] paid from the utility?
[2:13:18] >> Yeah.
[2:13:19] >> And then I know that utility is getting
[2:13:21] down in money. Is there enough? Like are
[2:13:23] usually
[2:13:24] >> that's going to probably end up in a
[2:13:26] deficit to get this done. Like
[2:13:29] >> like we've never had a big increase or
[2:13:31] anything because our audits are always
[2:13:33] behind all the time.
[2:13:35] >> So he's charging $3,500.
[2:13:37] >> Y that's it. 3500 bucks
[2:13:39] >> right there. 3,500 bucks to do the whole
[2:13:41] trip or the whole
[2:13:42] >> So, usually he charges 44. He's taking
[2:13:45] the 900 off that he's already done for
[2:13:48] work.
[2:13:48] >> Okay.
[2:13:49] >> And so essentially
[2:13:53] he hasn't charged us.
[2:13:54] >> He did a preload for free.
[2:13:56] >> Yeah.
[2:13:57] >> So he'll go to pub and everything for us
[2:13:59] and do that.
[2:14:00] >> Yeah.
[2:14:01] >> And get the he'll write the bylaw. He'll
[2:14:03] Yeah.
[2:14:04] >> Sold.
[2:14:04] >> So it's got to be done.
[2:14:06] >> Yeah. So we may pay him the 900 like
[2:14:09] totally it's going to be $4,000 or4
[2:14:13] >> but he's saying I've already done all
[2:14:15] this work for you so you only need to
[2:14:16] pay me 3500 more.
[2:14:18] >> Yeah cuz it's not you just expand on
[2:14:19] this
[2:14:21] >> and then this is what he does.
[2:14:24] >> I think it's a
[2:14:25] >> No, it's saying it has to be done this
[2:14:28] alone preparing the schedules for the
[2:14:30] PUB
[2:14:31] like it's a nightmare.
[2:14:35] And they've done this before, has he?
[2:14:36] I'm sure Dale's done lots of these
[2:14:38] before.
[2:14:38] >> That's all Travis does and he can't keep
[2:14:40] up.
[2:14:43] >> Okay. Did we get a mover in second or
[2:14:44] that?
[2:14:46] >> Any other questions?
[2:14:48] >> Dallas.
[2:14:49] >> Yep.
[2:14:53] » Any more questions? All in favor?
[2:14:56] Opposed?
[2:14:57] >> Carrie. Thank you.
[2:14:59] I think you can be rest assured that you
[2:15:01] are getting a little closer to being
[2:15:03] current. Um, you know, we're going to
[2:15:06] work on a 2025 audit very soon. Um, so
[2:15:11] you know, we'll start providing
[2:15:13] information to the accountant or the
[2:15:15] auditor, but um,
[2:15:18] it's time to get caught up on some
[2:15:20] things.
[2:15:21] >> Yes,
[2:15:22] >> your rates are just bit too low.
[2:15:28] Okay. Adriansson Road Crossing
[2:15:30] Resolution 22026.
[2:15:32] Whereas council received a road crossing
[2:15:36] application number RC126
[2:15:39] NCL for Adriansen Farms Venture to allow
[2:15:42] the installation of an 8 in irrigation
[2:15:45] pipe across the municipal road 84 west
[2:15:49] from northwest corner of southwest
[2:15:52] 191214 to the southeast corner of
[2:15:56] northeast 241215
[2:15:58] subject to the following conditions.
[2:16:01] that the road crossing agreement is
[2:16:03] entered into between the municipality
[2:16:05] and Adriansen Farms Venture and that the
[2:16:09] applicants follow the road crossing
[2:16:11] policy as directed. Can I have a mover,
[2:16:13] please?
[2:16:15] >> Rob Delis.
[2:16:18] >> Okay.
[2:16:21] >> Questions.
[2:16:22] >> Is that a push or is that a cut?
[2:16:24] >> A push.
[2:16:25] >> Push.
[2:16:27] >> The agreement.
[2:16:28] >> That's the agreement. road crossing
[2:16:31] policy.
[2:16:32] Any other questions, comments?
[2:16:35] All in favor?
[2:16:37] Opposed?
[2:16:39] Carried. Thank you.
[2:16:44] Brookdale Cemetery Grant increase.
[2:16:46] Resolution 2011 2026.
[2:16:50] We resolved the council approve an
[2:16:51] increase in grant funding for Brookdale
[2:16:54] Cemetery for 2026
[2:16:56] totaling $3,000 to help offset mowing
[2:17:00] expenses. Can we have a mover, please?
[2:17:06] Harold Malcolm
[2:17:08] questions.
[2:17:10] So, is this something they're going to
[2:17:11] keep on coming back every year for then
[2:17:13] if we're going to start with this?
[2:17:16] So, this is where I think your grant
[2:17:18] application will be something that you
[2:17:21] need to get your groups even even those
[2:17:23] ones that get annual. Um,
[2:17:28] we need to know sooner if they need an
[2:17:30] increase than
[2:17:32] >> that's included in their finances that
[2:17:34] they could get in in February.
[2:17:37] >> I'm sorry.
[2:17:38] >> Classically, by four before February
[2:17:40] 1st, we usually have all of our groups
[2:17:43] apply, right? just in general writing
[2:17:45] with their financial statements as to
[2:17:47] what's coming for the year. But I'm
[2:17:48] assuming this is probably just Hi. Um
[2:17:52] sorry in response to um
[2:17:55] like fuel prices, right?
[2:17:59] >> I think so.
[2:18:00] >> Yeah.
[2:18:03] >> Let's crack this.
[2:18:07] » Okay. Any other comments on it?
[2:18:11] >> All in favor? opposed.
[2:18:15] >> I do know likely next year would expect
[2:18:17] the same too. I think in their finances
[2:18:20] that he had sent in um Robert that
[2:18:23] expenses were higher, but I don't think
[2:18:24] the official request was in to come up.
[2:18:27] So next year I'll make sure it's in I
[2:18:30] think the same. They're probably they're
[2:18:31] at the two. They're probably three next
[2:18:33] year as well.
[2:18:37] » Okay. We want to make a motion to enter
[2:18:40] a team in
[2:18:42] Touchwood Park golf tournament on the
[2:18:45] 27th
[2:18:47] of July.
[2:18:49] >> Somebody want to make that motion.
[2:18:50] >> I would make that motion.
[2:18:52] >> Dallas seconder. Robbie,
[2:18:55] questions.
[2:18:56] >> Just a second. You got to let me catch
[2:18:58] up.
[2:18:59] >> Okay.
[2:19:00] >> I write new as we speak. This is a new
[2:19:03] computer. It's driving me crazy.
[2:19:11] >> Sorry.
[2:19:12] >> Crazy.
[2:19:18] I got the information for that one.
[2:19:20] Picks crossing too.
[2:19:21] >> Perfect.
[2:19:22] >> That's a Touchwood uh golf course fundraiser.
[2:19:28] >> Charity tournament.
[2:19:34] >> July 27th.
[2:19:37] January 27 26.
[2:19:42] Okay.
[2:19:46] » Okay. We got a mover in a second there.
[2:19:48] Any other questions?
[2:19:50] >> Hey, sir. Who are the movers? Me and
[2:19:52] Robbie.
[2:19:53] >> Dallas and Robbie.
[2:20:00] » All in favor?
[2:20:02] Opposed? Carried. Thank you.
[2:20:07] added to the agenda. Dixon approach
[2:20:09] there Rob you wanted to talk a bit
[2:20:11] about.
[2:20:11] >> Yes, please. It's on gold line 56
[2:20:17] » and it's southeast 181014.
[2:20:28] He said he would cover the cost. I don't
[2:20:30] know about gravel, but he said he was
[2:20:32] going to build it himself and build it
[2:20:34] to our spec or whatever. Matt tells him
[2:20:36] to.
[2:20:38] >> And this one's something that makes
[2:20:39] sense. It's for a reason for a household
[2:20:41] reason. Family
[2:20:44] >> 56 Norththeast
[2:20:55] 104. Yes.
[2:21:00] The house being built on Don McLaren's
[2:21:02] old yard site.
[2:21:04] >> Okay.
[2:21:05] >> You're putting a big big
[2:21:07] >> Sorry. Um, Mr. Dixon, his first name is
[2:21:10] >> Don.
[2:21:12] He used to work for the province.
[2:21:14] >> Uh, he worked with in mainten
[2:21:22] What is this?
[2:21:24] There you go.
[2:21:35] Um, is there an approach policy?
[2:21:39] >> I would assume. I don't know for sure.
[2:21:42] >> What's that?
[2:21:43] >> Approach policy. Uh I would just say
[2:21:47] >> I I don't know if there is or not but
[2:21:49] there is there is
[2:21:51] >> there's not an approach policy but we do
[2:21:54] have a policy in place that if you have
[2:21:55] a subdivision
[2:21:57] on an existing quarter that has an
[2:22:00] approach the people that
[2:22:04] get the subdivision and or the previous
[2:22:06] owner are responsible for the new the
[2:22:08] second approach
[2:22:09] >> for the cost of it.
[2:22:10] >> Yeah.
[2:22:14] Is it okay what I just said that false?
[2:22:18] >> I'm not sure about the wording how all
[2:22:20] that is, but
[2:22:32] » okay.
[2:22:32] >> Y
[2:22:34] somebody want to make that resolution.
[2:22:40] » Robbie and Malcolm.
[2:22:41] >> Yep. Either way.
[2:22:47] something that makes sense.
[2:22:51] » Other questions, comments?
[2:22:55] All in favor?
[2:22:57] Opposed?
[2:22:59] Carried. Thank you everybody.
[2:23:05] » Communications. EMO plan approved.
[2:23:09] Carbury Chamber of Meeting minutes and
[2:23:13] agenda.
[2:23:16] West Man Regional Library meeting
[2:23:18] minutes.
[2:23:21] Uh Mitchell's fuel response to council.
[2:23:26] Evergreen's financial statement.
[2:23:31] Brookdale Community Club softball
[2:23:33] tournament support letter.
[2:23:36] Did we need to do anything on that or
[2:23:38] not? I'm just telling you that that
[2:23:40] you've given your support.
[2:23:42] >> Yeah.
[2:23:43] >> Um they seem to come.
[2:23:46] >> Some municipalities will have it
[2:23:48] approved by council. Most of the time
[2:23:52] these letters aren't coming in time to
[2:23:54] see council meeting, but I do think it's
[2:23:56] important that council recognize that
[2:23:58] this letter is being done.
[2:23:59] >> Okay.
[2:24:00] >> That you're supporting this.
[2:24:02] >> Okay. Good.
[2:24:02] >> Because it's in order to get their
[2:24:03] liquor license.
[2:24:04] >> Oh yeah. Okay. So that's why I think you
[2:24:07] should have a policy.
[2:24:09] >> Good.
[2:24:10] >> Thank you all the policies.
[2:24:13] >> RCMP report and Carbury Health Action
[2:24:16] Committee report
[2:24:20] the table. Rob
[2:24:25] >> just without the greater man getting
[2:24:27] lots of questions about the roads and
[2:24:30] stuff and
[2:24:32] it'll be where it is if we got time to
[2:24:34] put somebody in place now that's better
[2:24:36] anything's better and
[2:24:39] I like the idea of working 10 hours
[2:24:41] myself but
[2:24:42] >> yeah
[2:24:47] that's what we're doing
[2:24:50] >> uh what should have discussed with Matt
[2:24:53] a little bit about all the rest of them.
[2:24:56] Is there anybody else? Are they
[2:24:57] interested in putting an extra couple of
[2:24:59] hours in or
[2:25:01] you better talk with Matt with something
[2:25:03] like that? Because if they're they're
[2:25:06] going to go out there and there's only
[2:25:07] another mile to go, but you got to get
[2:25:09] back to the shop for 3:30 for quitting
[2:25:11] time. What's wrong with them putting
[2:25:13] another half an hour out?
[2:25:16] I'll go in camera on that. Okay. Thank
[2:25:18] you. Go ahead, Robbie. Anything else?
[2:25:21] >> No. No, I'm I'm good.
[2:25:22] >> Okay.
[2:25:23] >> Welcome.
[2:25:24] >> Uh not much. Uh well with community hall
[2:25:27] meeting tonight. Um
[2:25:30] talking about there's some stuff in the
[2:25:32] community they're talking about. I don't
[2:25:33] think don't know exactly about the
[2:25:35] dumpsters. I just saw on the agenda
[2:25:37] there's some talk about the dumpsters.
[2:25:39] I'll find out more about tonight. But
[2:25:41] they're still having their Canada Day
[2:25:42] celebrations. I believe June 30th. Um
[2:25:45] I'm often going to put the car show on
[2:25:47] this year just cuz I'm an enthusiast and
[2:25:48] that. Um,
[2:25:51] pass the word. Come on down. Good time.
[2:25:54] Fireworks again.
[2:25:56] And then when I have to report together,
[2:25:58] I'll send it in.
[2:26:01] Thank you, Harold.
[2:26:03] Not much I can report other than I got
[2:26:05] all the flowers to the cemetery over the
[2:26:07] weekend.
[2:26:09] Apparently, the school is going to be
[2:26:10] planting them this year. I was hired
[2:26:13] students.
[2:26:14] >> The youth and the philanthropy kids.
[2:26:15] Maybe
[2:26:16] >> the youth and philanthropy program.
[2:26:18] Maybe
[2:26:18] >> probably
[2:26:21] That's about all I can report.
[2:26:22] >> Good. Thank you, J.
[2:26:25] I went to the plaque dedication for the
[2:26:28] archives of Watt May's birthhouse
[2:26:31] yesterday.
[2:26:34] Well attended.
[2:26:36] >> Good. Good time had by all.
[2:26:38] >> Sorry. What was the second thing you
[2:26:40] said?
[2:26:41] >> It was well attended. A good time was
[2:26:43] had by all.
[2:26:44] >> Okay,
[2:26:44] >> good. Thank you very much for doing
[2:26:46] that.
[2:26:48] >> That's it. Yeah,
[2:26:49] >> Alice.
[2:26:51] >> Um, quick thing, uh, just after the
[2:26:53] joint meeting, um, the, uh, fire crew
[2:26:56] actually did note that our own fire
[2:26:59] extinguishers were, um, out of date. So,
[2:27:02] I know for our joint buildings, we have
[2:27:05] procured like 80 westbound fire
[2:27:06] protection. We need to look at doing our
[2:27:09] own building
[2:27:11] um, protective services that are
[2:27:13] recommended for someone to transect
[2:27:14] their buildings and fire equipment.
[2:27:16] Right. So, I'd like to speak to that.
[2:27:18] >> After that meeting, I went and called
[2:27:21] whoever's name is punched on those fire
[2:27:24] extinguishers.
[2:27:25] >> It's Murray's.
[2:27:26] >> Yeah.
[2:27:26] >> Uh they had been told that they were no
[2:27:28] longer our service people.
[2:27:31] >> I says, "Well, I don't know who told you
[2:27:33] that. Uh please come and inspect them."
[2:27:35] >> Yeah.
[2:27:36] >> And uh cuz it needs to be done ASAP.
[2:27:39] >> There was a bit of an assumption made
[2:27:41] that
[2:27:42] >> that it was lumped in with the rest of
[2:27:43] the building. Is that right? town of
[2:27:44] Crberies and they had chosen to go with
[2:27:46] someone different. I says, "Well,
[2:27:48] >> I don't know about all that, but please
[2:27:51] come and do it and then we'll get it
[2:27:52] sorted. If I need to do a tender or
[2:27:55] quotes or whatever, but for now, we
[2:27:57] can't dillydally just schedule it and
[2:27:59] get it."
[2:27:59] >> That's that's great. It wouldn't hurt to
[2:28:00] do a retender cuz we had done it for
[2:28:03] joint buildings because it had been
[2:28:04] forever since it had been done and then
[2:28:07] there was a local option. We got the
[2:28:09] tender for our shops. What about
[2:28:12] >> part of it? still part of their own
[2:28:14] >> so Mary's was doing it up until 2025.
[2:28:19] >> And they and they're only expired by
[2:28:21] April of 2026.
[2:28:22] >> So not just out just
[2:28:25] >> but that was a good little
[2:28:26] >> Y insight. So as long as follow up on
[2:28:28] that little I think
[2:28:30] >> right is that
[2:28:31] >> so have they been out yet Murray then or
[2:28:32] you just got
[2:28:34] >> I just Okay. And then uh just follow up
[2:28:37] um from Eden's meeting like they were
[2:28:38] ecstatic about this bathroom project
[2:28:41] happening. And then a couple quick
[2:28:43] questions. They had had um um a dumpster
[2:28:46] fire there by someone putting some ash
[2:28:48] in. It had some you know classic things.
[2:28:50] So um the locals themselves really don't
[2:28:53] want to see this lost and they want to
[2:28:55] do what they can to keep it. Um so um
[2:28:58] they are going to be putting up a camera
[2:29:00] on their own. So, they were just wanting
[2:29:02] to know if um we would provide a sign to
[2:29:06] saying, you know, these premises are
[2:29:09] under surveillance. Maybe that's what
[2:29:11] woods is about. Maybe something
[2:29:12] somewhere cuz they had some swag stuff
[2:29:14] going in the dump.
[2:29:15] >> Yeah, exactly. So, yeah, they're really
[2:29:17] only requesting a sign to say, you know,
[2:29:19] these North Cypress dumpsters are under
[2:29:21] video surveillance would be a request.
[2:29:25] Um and then they I've been talking with
[2:29:28] planning and stuff that they're really
[2:29:29] have good intentions of putting like a
[2:29:31] fire pit and maybe some and they want to look at some picnic tables. So they
[2:29:35] want to look our office could look at to
[2:29:37] uh who under canoe procurement. Um they should maybe look for pricing
[2:29:44] because they from other w things we've
[2:29:46] looked through there and got
[2:29:48] substantially better pricing for like
[2:29:50] tables and chairs for them. So, um they
[2:29:52] want us to help with that. And then they
[2:29:55] are hoping to still get some private
[2:29:56] donations from the neighborhood. So,
[2:29:58] they would love if their project was uh
[2:30:01] um classified for donations for cash
[2:30:05] receipts. That's something they would
[2:30:06] love to. And then apart from our
[2:30:10] municipal uh appreciation golf day is
[2:30:13] going to be on Friday, June 19th. Golf
[2:30:16] 10:30 and lunch to follow. So, if
[2:30:19] council can let me know uh a week ahead
[2:30:22] if you're coming and if you need a cart,
[2:30:24] that would be awesome.
[2:30:25] >> What day is that again?
[2:30:26] >> Friday, June 19th.
[2:30:29] >> Thanks. Friday.
[2:30:30] >> Yeah,
[2:30:30] >> I know. Yeah.
[2:30:34] >> Somehow is June already. Yes.
[2:30:36] >> It's actually middle week,
[2:30:38] >> right? I know. Yeah.
[2:30:39] >> Friday, June 19th.
[2:30:41] >> 10:30.
[2:30:42] golf lunch to follow.
[2:30:46] >> What else you got?
[2:30:47] >> Good. Okay. Thank you, Dallas.
[2:30:50] >> Indeed.
[2:30:53] >> I attended a doctor's supper here with
[2:30:56] the rest of the the mayor and the town.
[2:30:59] It was very well, very good. There was a
[2:31:01] new doctor that's coming and uh four
[2:31:04] residents that were out. Good deal.
[2:31:07] Looks like a really good guy to be
[2:31:09] getting a hold of, I think.
[2:31:11] And we had Scott Phillips and Mark Savvy
[2:31:14] here on the 25th
[2:31:16] when the Western District came out. I
[2:31:18] think Grant was the only other one here,
[2:31:19] was he not? Grant and I and them had a
[2:31:23] little talk with them. They toured
[2:31:24] Evergreen Environmental with me there,
[2:31:26] too. So, whatever good. They just
[2:31:29] looking around, checking things out.
[2:31:31] Good for them for doing that.
[2:31:34] And the roads are going to be a bit of a
[2:31:35] challenge right now with a little bit of
[2:31:37] moisture and that, but
[2:31:39] from the looks of things, we've got
[2:31:40] another guy coming on and helping a bit,
[2:31:42] so that'll be good. Hopefully works out.
[2:31:47] >> Gust control is supposed to be out this
[2:31:49] week, right?
[2:31:49] >> Wednesday.
[2:31:52] » Other than that, Valerie, you got
[2:31:54] anything?
[2:31:54] >> Uh, you saw my report that I typed up
[2:31:57] yesterday afternoon
[2:31:58] >> and uh the rest I'll talk about on
[2:32:00] camera.
[2:32:01] >> Okay, great. Thank you very much.
[2:32:05] In camera resolution 20226
[2:32:08] be resolved that the council as a
[2:32:09] committee of the whole move into in
[2:32:11] camera to discuss personnel matters. Can
[2:32:14] I have a mover please?
[2:32:16] >> Harold seconder.
[2:32:21] » Welcome. All in favor
[2:32:24] car. Thank you.