[0:13] >> don't
[0:15] >> really city we read and a
[0:21] good today is wednesday JULY
[0:25] 26 is finals ago. We're at the
[0:26] city chambers and I call a
[0:26] city commission special
[0:30] meeting to order.
[0:32] Commissioners smiler emerged
[0:35] vice mayor like commissioner
[0:35] petro there is a core
[0:38] PRESIDENT For this made. Also
[0:39] part our city manager
[0:40] pleasures of the attorney for
[0:43] leno city clerk falls we've
[0:44] got police and fire chief
[0:49] titus in the back. I'm
[0:51] requesting participants and
[0:51] staff maintain were in the
[0:55] throughout this meeting, city
[0:58] commission policy 2021 0, 3,
[1:01] states attend the show been
[1:03] gauging in personal attacks
[1:03] and boisterous immaterial
[1:08] implants seen profane or was
[1:08] conduct. Additionally meeting
[1:12] attendees must refrain from
[1:14] obscene profane or disorderly
[1:14] conduct including hand,
[1:19] clapping and yelling and
[1:20] similar demonstrations. Always
[1:20] disturbs the peace and good
[1:24] order the meeting thank you.
[1:25] Commissioner dipietro with the
[1:26] lead us in the playoffs serve.
[1:38] >> united states of stands one
[1:40] nation under GOD indivisible
[1:40] with liberty and justice for
[1:42] all.
[1:52] >> thank you sir. To bring the
[1:53] commissioner stow seconded by
[1:53] vice mayor to approve agenda.
[2:06] Please that passes 5 to 0.
[2:10] Probably go to court.
[2:14] >> robin thomas entail good
[2:16] evening commissioners as you
[2:18] are all assistance citizen do
[2:20] not want any type of data
[2:21] center, especially I first
[2:23] online in our city you're
[2:23] tired angry to continuously
[2:24] hear about the lack of
[2:26] commercial and industrial
[2:28] enterprises. You have rezoned
[2:29] our city in such a way that
[2:29] you are removing our quality
[2:31] of life and right to quiet
[2:32] enjoyment. Understand the need
[2:34] for change but not at our
[2:36] expense. We will rise up and
[2:38] do everything we can to ensure
[2:39] this doesn't happen. We will
[2:40] organize together and use our
[2:43] voices and every available way
[2:44] order to have our voices heard
[2:45] and achieve our ultimate goals
[2:48] which puts the citizen
[2:49] citizenry and environment
[2:51] first there are city organized
[2:51] town halls for media
[2:55] saturation that will change
[2:56] our minds. Commissioners who
[2:58] are supposed to represent the
[2:59] citizens. We expect you to do
[2:59] what is in our best interest
[3:05] and that center's or not.
[3:06] Carmen miranda commissioner
[3:07] posted about center and and
[3:09] the fact that he feels he can
[3:11] talk about it because he
[3:12] didn't sign I agree that
[3:13] residents have every right to
[3:14] understand how decisions are
[3:15] made and that florida's public
[3:18] records parts closure are not
[3:20] exempt information. However, I
[3:21] think important point is ever
[3:22] left the question is whether
[3:23] discussing important
[3:24] information connected to an
[3:25] act of economic development
[3:31] perspective. Prospect. Process
[3:33] runs. Its course serves the
[3:37] public interest statue 2 88.0
[3:38] 75 protects more brits it
[3:38] protects a couple companies
[3:40] plans intentions and interest
[3:40] on that and locating or
[3:45] expanding in florida because
[3:45] the legislature recognized
[3:47] that premature disclosure can
[3:48] jeopardize projects in place
[3:51] communities at a competitive
[3:53] disadvantage. Part of a center
[3:54] MAY have a legitimate
[3:55] expectation that is interest
[3:56] in the city remains
[3:58] confidential during the
[3:59] recruitment phase. Temporary
[4:00] that she only does not
[4:00] eliminate the club public's
[4:03] right to know. It's a late
[4:04] disclosure until the process
[4:05] reaches a stage for the
[4:06] information can be released
[4:08] without harming the covid
[4:09] company's interest for the
[4:09] community's ability to compete
[4:12] for economic opportunities.
[4:13] Residents deserve
[4:14] transparency. They also
[4:16] deserve a city that can
[4:17] successfully complete compete
[4:17] for jobs and investment those
[4:20] goals are not mutually.
[4:21] Exclusive but they do require
[4:25] careful judgment about timing
[4:25] its staff and consultants are
[4:26] falling all and honoring
[4:30] envelop confidentiality
[4:31] request. They MAY have limited
[4:32] ability to disclose
[4:33] information until the
[4:34] statutory confidentiality
[4:37] period expires for the company
[4:37] authorizes release.
[4:38] >> the issue is not whether
[4:39] information should become
[4:40] public the issue is whether it
[4:41] should become public before
[4:45] the legal process and economic
[4:46] development process having
[4:47] completed and the broader
[4:48] responsibility elected
[4:48] officials have when dealing
[4:53] with active perspective
[4:56] >> thank you moving on to
[4:57] general business item a 26
[4:59] dash 9, 6, 8, city manager,
[5:03] this is your item.
[5:06] >> it is made as discussed a
[5:08] possible action regarding the
[5:09] 2026 certification of taxable
[5:10] value proposed millage
[5:13] scheduled days for public
[5:14] hearings. We do have a short
[5:14] presentation to go through
[5:18] with you today and starting.
[5:19] There's a lot talk about the
[5:21] maximum rate so we are
[5:22] recommending to the boy or
[5:28] rate of 3 point 7, 6, 6, 7,
[5:31] been the same rate since 2021
[5:34] producing revenue that
[5:38] 41 million 697. $1000.
[5:39] >> you look at the history of
[5:40] our millage rate this will be
[5:45] the.
[5:48] >> year in a row of keeping a
[5:48] really great the which is
[5:49] probably talk about a little
[5:53] bit during our conversation
[5:54] earlier today meaning that
[5:57] other fully know is that and
[5:59] rate is not the only tax or
[6:01] fee that the city's control of
[6:04] that is the largest one in our
[6:06] revenues green one that people
[6:08] most associated with so
[6:09] keeping the snow rain say to
[6:10] this law is in the coffin of
[6:13] the rays have increased not
[6:14] have increased. Has increased
[6:20] in that time period. Looking
[6:23] taxable valuation going 2
[6:25] years where we have been on a
[6:26] porch swing and we continue
[6:28] that way growth of our city
[6:32] has been locally nationally we
[6:33] have been very much praise for
[6:34] the growth in our tax
[6:37] violations of our city. We
[6:39] know that it can last at the
[6:40] same rate forever, but we do
[6:41] believe that people are going
[6:42] to want to continue to come
[6:45] and moved here that is based
[6:46] on the quality of life the
[6:49] successes that we have and
[6:50] will leave by people who
[6:52] either moved here 3 years or
[6:52] 30 years ago they have seen
[6:53] the growth and appreciate
[6:57] where we are as I mentioned
[7:03] some of the so what the tactic
[7:03] proposing is that you are
[7:07] allowed to use a role our room
[7:11] but raised 3.82 for it to make
[7:14] a which is higher than our
[7:16] current rate so that would
[7:17] bring $42,000 revenue for an
[7:22] extra $680,000 wires a
[7:23] majority of the vote 3 of the
[7:26] 5 of you to do that that means
[7:27] you know your that could be
[7:28] the starting point of where
[7:31] you start to look at how tall
[7:34] said some of the cost of going
[7:35] to it does need to be able to
[7:35] layered approach to the
[7:37] situation and not just looking
[7:40] all expenses all the time.
[7:46] Also the rollback rate as
[7:51] possibility as you move role
[7:53] that at one and 2% would be
[7:56] 4.2 1, 2 or 46.6 million
[8:00] dollars for extra 4.9 million
[8:01] dollars and that will require
[8:01] a two-thirds vote for a battle
[8:07] of the board order to pass
[8:08] that do have one or that that
[8:12] it was does look aggressive
[8:13] most likely it is, but I think
[8:14] they put that you know that
[8:15] you would have rates we would
[8:20] have in order to I mean the
[8:20] need. Right here. We are
[8:29] looking in. But of the
[8:30] rollback rate and as you can
[8:31] see you know public safety is
[8:35] still above that what we look
[8:37] at when you look at the
[8:38] revenue the current millage in
[8:40] the rollback rate when are
[8:45] told that you can see the
[8:46] public safety fired you is a
[8:47] boat that mean that still have
[8:48] somebody to go in order to
[8:49] make sure that we make up for
[8:55] that part of general fund.
[8:57] Here you see red that are
[8:59] right on my farm your
[9:00] division. Police and fire
[9:05] making up roughly 89% of the
[9:12] actual. So which is the but we
[9:13] know that that can't be the
[9:13] target of what we're trying to
[9:16] accomplish we deal with
[9:17] whatever second forward
[9:18] everybody an assault or even
[9:21] if it doesn't happen so we're
[9:23] always trying to make that he
[9:26] made today a lot of partners
[9:27] should you're deciding how to
[9:28] make sure that we could take
[9:30] care and tackle this problem
[9:31] together as a city and not
[9:31] heisley anyone department or
[9:40] division. It's a the existing
[9:42] service level. Many 0.2
[9:44] million dollars budget
[9:46] proposal for 2.3 million
[9:47] dozens were 2 million dollars
[9:50] in our cip was an additional 4
[9:54] to 46. $1000 totaling 9 e
[10:00] 953 million dollars. When you
[10:02] get know what poll 2.3 million
[10:06] you can see that 802 that was
[10:10] through the fire department.
[10:13] Then you do services at a
[10:16] million dollars a few other
[10:17] funds for efficient technology
[10:18] city managers and small parks
[10:25] and recreation. What this
[10:26] right here about 2 dozen that
[10:30] up 2.0 72 million dollars.
[10:32] Here's where and how we got to
[10:35] love 5% of the barn size. The
[10:38] problem is it is will be I'm
[10:42] in year's exercise a 10%. Even
[10:43] though we MAY not take that 2%
[10:47] we have to perform exercise by
[10:49] by law and you have to publish
[10:49] it what you do it you can't
[10:53] just do it and keep it to
[10:54] yourself so we are going to
[10:56] see next how 10% of the budget
[11:02] reduction impacts our.
[11:03] Services the quality services
[11:06] that we provide. It's
[11:07] something like I said really
[11:11] want to talk about take it out
[11:12] exactly what the us to do as
[11:15] far I want to use an dealers
[11:17] and how we move forward, but
[11:18] we we will those conversations
[11:20] that I knew back recess from
[11:23] recess in AUGUST and SEPTEMBER
[11:24] we should have more
[11:25] information to share with you
[11:27] just a pathway forward.
[11:28] Commissioner, a federal region
[11:32] earlier not waiting too. Get
[11:33] out in front of the things
[11:34] that's something that we talk
[11:34] about what do. Earlier as
[11:41] well. So next steps is of
[11:43] course the certifications of
[11:46] taxable due to county
[11:49] appraiser AUGUST 17 the
[11:50] mileage. The estimated
[11:51] building of the chain noses
[11:52] will happen. SEPTEMBER to be
[11:56] your first public. Budget
[11:57] hearing meeting attended doing
[12:01] that with rate will be and I
[12:04] don't is going for to be a
[12:05] second public to adopt the
[12:11] budget in rates. That is all
[12:12] we have the question to the
[12:16] board we have. Get into have
[12:29] anything. And the budget. Have
[12:31] any public not. And all of
[12:34] emotion.
[12:41] I guess so make it.
[12:43] >> moved to direct city
[12:47] manager to submit the 2026
[12:48] certificated certificate, a
[12:49] taxable value would pose
[12:53] millet rate of 3.7 6, 6, 7,
[12:54] >> have a motion on the floor
[12:56] made commissioner stow's city
[12:59] manager to submit the 2026
[13:00] certificate of taxable value
[13:01] with the proposed millage rate
[13:04] 3.7 6, 6, 7, made by
[13:04] commissioner stella seconded
[13:06] by vice mayor.
[13:07] >> there's nothing to that
[13:13] please bow. Passes 5, 0, and
[13:15] you know the motion.
[13:21] >> for the dates you.
[13:22] >> I mean know I move to
[13:24] approve the days of SEPTEMBER
[13:30] 10th 2026 at 5 oh 01:00pm and
[13:31] SEPTEMBER 24th 2026 at 5 oh
[13:32] 01:00pm for the budget
[13:36] hearings.
[13:38] >> motion on the floor made
[13:39] vice mayor to approve the
[13:41] dates of SEPTEMBER 10th 2026 5
[13:43] oh 01:00pm SEPTEMBER 24th 2026
[13:48] at 5 oh 01:00pm for the budget
[13:48] hearings made vice mayor and
[13:50] seconded by commissioner
[13:59] nothing to that please vote.
[14:00] Not pass is 5 to 0 moving on
[14:05] to item 26 dash. 0, 4, sitting
[14:09] does your
[14:11] >> is that JULY 21st meeting
[14:15] commission took action
[14:16] >> directed the city manager
[14:17] schedule a special meeting for
[14:18] data center moratorium in the
[14:21] month of AUGUST in clearing
[14:22] the commissioners I could not
[14:24] find a date that all
[14:24] commissioners could be present
[14:29] in the month of AUGUST so I
[14:30] have provided states that the
[14:32] majority of the commission can
[14:32] be present for you all
[14:34] determine what date would work
[14:34] best for you or if we should
[14:35] push until the SEPTEMBER
[14:41] meetings.
[14:42] >> and just a reminder. We're
[14:44] just discussing that days
[14:47] before the meeting in this
[14:48] conversation we are not
[14:49] discussing any of the unders
[14:50] just to set up this meeting so
[14:53] commissioner steps. Question
[14:56] for seeing that today. Is
[15:01] there any impact on. Strength
[15:06] of any legal arguments. We
[15:10] schedule this like. It's a
[15:12] parolee and this week and for
[15:13] first week of SEPTEMBER there.
[15:16] I mean just that period of
[15:21] time. Any on how the court may
[15:24] look this.
[15:24] >> I don't think it's going to
[15:25] have much of a difference
[15:30] either way. Commissioner spoke
[15:36] up. Admire.
[15:37] >> I'm just and and looking my
[15:38] calendar we wanted to try to
[15:43] adhere to the letter of the
[15:45] law. Monday is AUGUST 31st and
[15:49] we are all back in we could
[15:53] schedule with and still be in
[15:55] otherwise my only concern
[15:58] would be for city with with
[15:59] never done anything like this
[16:05] we do have some good examples
[16:07] without AUGUST 31st, give you
[16:07] enough time to do a good job
[16:10] on ordinance.
[16:16] >> that's the first.
[16:17] >> but that we're looking at
[16:18] SEPTEMBER alternative what's
[16:20] the difference in the week.
[16:22] Think that would be much you
[16:28] so that that's anybody else.
[16:35] We have the public
[16:36] >> it is extremely important
[16:37] that any meeting the schedule
[16:37] thus far in advance as
[16:38] possible. So that public
[16:41] comment can the most simple
[16:43] public comment can be the most
[16:44] important at this time, none
[16:45] of the request dealing with
[16:45] the disasters have been
[16:49] responded to by the city. Rob
[16:51] thomas sent good evening
[16:52] commissioners with the
[16:53] citizens citizens of north
[16:54] port would like to first the
[16:58] first reading of the or more
[16:59] 06:00pm meeting in order to
[17:01] allow for full participation
[17:02] of the citizens, this is too
[17:03] much of an important topic to
[17:04] have it held at 10:00am when
[17:06] the majority of our citizens,
[17:06] our work. Please consider this
[17:07] a sense first in your
[17:13] decision. Carmen miranda.
[17:14] Commissioner posted about this
[17:15] is the exact same public
[17:17] comment that we received for
[17:18] the last one do you want me to
[17:22] read into the record again I
[17:22] just.
[17:25] >> for legality purposes I
[17:28] suspect for both commissioner
[17:29] about the data center and the
[17:30] and the fact that he feels he
[17:31] can talk about it because he
[17:32] didn't sign it.
[17:32] >> I have everybody to
[17:36] understand how decisions are
[17:41] made in that parks non-exempt
[17:42] information. Think an
[17:42] important point is that real
[17:43] up the question is whether
[17:44] discussing information
[17:45] connected to an act of
[17:46] economic development prospect
[17:46] before the statutory process
[17:47] runs its course serves the
[17:50] public interest. Florida
[17:55] statute 2 88.0 7, 5, protects
[17:56] more than trade secret to
[17:57] protect company's plans
[17:58] intentions, an interest
[17:59] locating or expanding in
[18:03] florida because the legislator
[18:03] legislature recognized that
[18:04] premature disclosure
[18:05] jeopardize projects in place
[18:08] communities at a competitive
[18:08] disadvantage.
[18:10] >> company evaluating front
[18:11] center MAY have a legitimate
[18:11] expectation that its interest
[18:12] in the city remains
[18:14] confidential during the
[18:15] recruitment face temporary
[18:16] mentioning confidentiality
[18:19] does not eliminate. The
[18:21] public's right to if the
[18:21] latest closure until the
[18:22] process reaches the stage for
[18:24] the information can be
[18:25] released without harming the
[18:26] company's interest for the
[18:26] community's ability to compete
[18:29] for economic opportunities.
[18:31] residents deserve
[18:32] transparency. Deserve city
[18:32] that can successfully compete
[18:35] for jobs and investment.
[18:36] Vessels are not mutually
[18:38] exclusive, but they do require
[18:41] careful judgment about timing
[18:42] if staff and so those are
[18:44] honoring about confidentiality
[18:45] request, they MAY have limited
[18:46] ability to disclose
[18:47] information to the statutory
[18:48] confidentiality period expires
[18:51] where the company authorizes
[18:52] release the issue is not
[18:53] whether information should
[18:54] become public. The issue is
[18:56] whether it should be become
[18:57] public before the legal
[18:58] process and economic
[18:59] development process have been
[19:01] completed and the broader
[19:01] responsibility elected
[19:02] officials have been dealing
[19:03] with active prospects models
[19:08] all there.
[19:10] >> all right, I'm going
[19:14] request a motion mayor if I is
[19:15] a scheduled for 10:00am
[19:22] meeting. Which is a problem I
[19:23] think I don't any problem with
[19:24] public comment to set that
[19:27] should be an evening meeting
[19:27] so.
[19:28] >> you know I don't know how
[19:33] we handle if we. You to push
[19:34] it out for SEPTEMBER but
[19:35] unless we can switch time of
[19:38] that meeting from 10 flooded
[19:42] before. Well one.
[19:44] >> one local city clerk, you
[19:45] know when the next meeting
[19:47] would be the 6 o'clock that's
[19:55] quite a ways down the road.
[20:00] >> ok back to city attorney
[20:01] delay in that would that have
[20:03] any effects to what we're
[20:05] trying to do legally I know
[20:09] would like to do it as soon as
[20:10] possible what that was today
[20:14] and it was 22nd, I believe she
[20:14] predator.
[20:18] >> tell you I think now the
[20:21] report about you MAY start
[20:24] running into some problems
[20:25] there.
[20:26] >> we also MAY be suggestions.
[20:27] We have the day meeting just
[20:28] schedule, a special meeting at
[20:28] city managers are paid for
[20:29] 06:00pm just for that one
[20:32] item.
[20:37] >> and we can do
[20:44] >> we will
[20:45] >> got put down or city
[20:46] manager we couldn't be here
[20:47] today on the 22nd because we
[20:48] have a court about vision
[20:49] hearing that's the. Creep into
[20:54] that very quickly 22nd that
[21:01] we're you being the day
[21:02] because to do the opposite
[21:05] correct.
[21:06] >> now we're talking about not
[21:07] waiting until the end of
[21:11] SEPTEMBER having it on the
[21:12] case. Having a special meeting
[21:13] at 6 o'clock you can so what I
[21:23] do have a scheduled for right
[21:25] now right sitting blocking
[21:26] they're saying they keep a
[21:29] 10:00am meeting on SEPTEMBER 8
[21:30] regular special meeting at
[21:31] 06:00pm for just the one item.
[21:32] >> first reading of the
[21:39] ordinance. And keep the 22nd
[21:41] where is according to I mean
[21:42] we've changed to more city
[21:45] clerk to where.
[21:46] >> we've done our best to do
[21:47] it a day and night meeting but
[21:52] we have. Donald meetings to
[21:53] where it's both daytime and
[21:54] both nighttime so why would
[21:55] this differ in that category
[21:58] we could still the 6 o'clock
[21:59] at night and then the 6
[22:00] o'clock in the 20 seconds
[22:05] still yes, get it done nothing
[22:06] to say.
[22:08] >> I don't want to vote you
[22:09] the practice I want the past
[22:15] before for. Citizen
[22:16] consumption we just both not
[22:17] that that's even better for
[22:21] the citizens.
[22:21] >> it's just one of during the
[22:22] day which is why you have to
[22:23] practice understand that sir.
[22:24] I just want
[22:34] >> I
[22:34] >> the times and do the
[22:39] meeting on 8th. At 6 and do
[22:41] the meeting on the 20 whatever
[22:45] it is at 10 and you what the
[22:47] times you know there you can
[22:50] even be here for that we can
[22:53] do so we won't have the
[22:54] official poor you that would
[23:03] be or simply schedules second
[23:04] reading during a special
[23:06] meeting as well to both in a
[23:08] special meeting and not have
[23:11] to spring all I mean the years
[23:12] while there I questions of
[23:13] city attorney because I want
[23:15] to make sure that there
[23:15] wouldn't be any legal
[23:16] prejudice in terms of the port
[23:20] of but there's also.
[23:23] >> the fact that we want this
[23:25] before us we don't want this
[23:27] can kick down the road for a
[23:29] month 2 months 3 months people
[23:29] are concerned about this and
[23:30] the sooner we address it the
[23:34] sooner. In my personal opinion
[23:37] we put a moratorium in place
[23:38] you're all so if we could do
[23:40] it tomorrow, I'd be happy to
[23:40] do with them so if earliest is
[23:44] the 8th of SEPTEMBER. So be
[23:45] it. Let's do a special
[23:45] meeting, let's just get it
[23:46] done.
[23:47] >> mayor if I MAY.
[23:52] >> I'll call on
[23:58] >> here you've got a city
[23:58] preference.
[24:01] >> I'm if you want I think the
[24:02] vice used to second. We are
[24:09] all second meeting morning 10
[24:10] days before publication of the
[24:15] final.
[24:18] >> it you know be 9 days if
[24:23] you how we just thought.
[24:24] >> you know it's going to say
[24:30] same attorney was that we do
[24:32] it in the month of AUGUST so
[24:36] plea let's let's stick to
[24:36] motions.
[24:37] >> and not going all the way
[24:40] till SEPTEMBER. Maybe we can
[24:43] do it earlier and one of us is
[24:43] missing and the quarter was
[24:46] there.
[24:48] >> and unanimously
[24:53] >> the motion so. Percy know
[24:58] major changes on hand. As far
[25:00] as actual ordinance to the I
[25:03] see trying to get isn't
[25:04] working.
[25:04] >> I see trying to get there
[25:08] but with that said you know,
[25:09] everybody makes plans and
[25:12] stuff like that so if I don't
[25:14] think it's fair that we have a
[25:15] meeting without full bore I
[25:16] don't think it's for I mean we
[25:17] have to make concessions to
[25:20] where we can meet when
[25:21] everybody comey I mean you
[25:23] that stuff that you are going
[25:24] on. Just met without you it
[25:27] wouldn't be fair to you. So we
[25:28] that's why we need discuss
[25:32] haven't a speeding and in for
[25:34] everybody, so commissioner
[25:36] vice mayor yeah, I just think
[25:37] that this topic is too
[25:38] important to not have a full
[25:39] board thank
[25:41] >> person would work. As a
[25:57] city attorney. Which first.
[25:57] And this is that need correct
[25:58] city manager here and that you
[26:02] just for your consideration.
[26:03] >> when when we thought was
[26:03] going to go and I don't think
[26:06] we can really change it too
[26:10] much around anyway just based
[26:10] on electability we workshop
[26:15] for housing for this topic
[26:16] SEPTEMBER the 3rd which was
[26:16] going to be in advance of you
[26:19] or your first meeting of the
[26:23] day that meeting that will be
[26:24] important to you as a workshop
[26:29] in here you comment public
[26:30] comment. And then represen to
[26:34] talk about the power side of
[26:36] the conversation. Peace
[26:36] represent what we can talk
[26:38] about the worst of the
[26:44] conversation. Made it a dana
[26:45] this within range from the
[26:48] outside that window that will
[26:48] recommend that if you want to
[26:51] go see one go visit him before
[26:52] that time. So you're going to
[26:55] see yourself staff will do the
[26:58] same and that way down first
[27:00] time that you'll actually have
[27:01] some more independent
[27:02] observations and data in order
[27:02] to help you mission begin the
[27:05] topic of conversation. I don't
[27:06] think even the choose to make
[27:09] your fertile 31st is going to
[27:11] impact that in a very negative
[27:12] way just making sure that
[27:13] you're aware of it and you
[27:15] make your decision on your
[27:16] day.
[27:16] >> thank you yeah, but it MAY
[27:20] impacted too with prosser was
[27:23] the thinking about different
[27:25] avenues and what what's being
[27:26] projected to side rather have
[27:27] more information prior to this
[27:28] meeting less which is
[27:30] appreciate that. I want a
[27:35] motion. Believe in towards the
[27:39] 8 oh I think
[27:39] >> I make a motion that we
[27:43] schedule the first on the 31st
[27:44] at 6 o'clock be a special
[27:46] meeting. Second.
[27:50] >> motion on the floor made by
[27:51] commissioner stokes to have
[27:55] the first AUGUST 31st at
[27:56] 06:00pm seconded commissioner
[28:01] pedro. There's nothing to that
[28:15] please
[28:16] and passes 3 to myself
[28:18] and vice mayor dissenting vice
[28:23] and do yeah and just say if.
[28:27] >> if we don't take advantage
[28:27] of for more information and my
[28:29] concern is we are running on
[28:34] emotion and not on facts. So
[28:36] I'm way more inclined to go
[28:41] back to the asa and have an
[28:41] opportunity to have a workshop
[28:44] and I would very much like to
[28:45] visit ahead for scale data
[28:46] center and see it for myself
[28:50] have not had that opportunity.
[28:51] >> and I think it would be
[28:52] good for all of us to have
[28:55] that opportunity learn really
[28:55] important that we make our
[28:58] decisions based on facts.
[29:00] >> there would be appropriate.
[29:04] >> to comment on because
[29:04] between first and second
[29:05] reading plenty of time to do
[29:09] that.
[29:12] >> politician just commented
[29:13] on same yeah and now get my
[29:13] reasons why and then you can
[29:14] comment on the ticket. If you
[29:19] choose. No I was on the same
[29:21] boat of this I wanted more
[29:22] information prior to that and
[29:22] one thing I was going to ask
[29:27] city manager though
[29:28] >> MAY need to wear prior to
[29:33] the AUGUST 31st. If get some
[29:34] not not scheduled workshop or
[29:36] anything like that would I
[29:37] would be.
[29:42] >> available that have on one.
[29:43] >> time with either some of
[29:43] these vendors or just a brief
[29:47] synopsis with the oil and
[29:47] staff.
[29:48] >> one-on-one prior to the
[29:51] 31st about any new. Stuff
[29:52] that's coming out, you know
[29:58] different types technology
[29:59] that the reason and also with
[30:01] the onsite visit was I going
[30:02] to be plans AUGUST if we could
[30:03] possibly go to the on site
[30:06] plan.
[30:10] >> was going to for you to
[30:11] schedule so you can all go
[30:12] most like to independently
[30:19] owned and there. Leaders.
[30:19] >> the.
[30:20] >> the independent information
[30:21] that will commit feel directly
[30:21] of peace river we will not
[30:24] have before they come to our
[30:25] site we have to talk about
[30:27] what we know as you requested
[30:28] you the #
[30:28] #
[30:28] #
[30:28] #
[30:28] #
[30:29] to help you in
[30:34] any way we can I think rivers
[30:35] and ability to present and
[30:38] answer questions from you in
[30:39] the community is going to be
[30:42] extremely helpful in your
[30:42] decision MAY.
[30:43] >> yeah, I understand
[30:44] commissioner stop saying
[30:45] >> you know between first and
[30:48] second reading this that other
[30:50] but you know I'd like to have
[30:51] information prior to the first
[30:51] reading is just a front that's
[30:52] my own personal. Yes, certain
[30:56] point but. Anybody else got
[31:05] anything to city attorney.
[31:05] >> so have this second really
[31:11] has a temper
[31:13] >> it's not that's not 10 we
[31:13] get to another special
[31:19] meeting. After the 10 days is
[31:20] a look at what the what the
[31:22] statute requires is a second
[31:23] 10 days after publication.
[31:29] Speight. So if we pass time.
[31:29] >> we could publish it before
[31:32] frustrating have time. Some of
[31:36] the title doesn't change
[31:42] >> changes in joe. If you're
[31:47] reached. Make that we can
[31:50] schedule
[31:51] >> and that would be
[31:52] throughout the day time
[31:56] meeting specialist because
[31:58] we're going to do the 31st at
[32:00] do the daytime on okay look
[32:04] for a motion for that.
[32:09] Somebody make a motion.
[32:10] >> you know make a motion on
[32:12] the whole the entire just for
[32:13] the ace of the game for the
[32:13] secondary make a motion that
[32:15] the second reading for on the
[32:21] 8. As part of the regular.
[32:21] Ordinance procedure. Yeah.
[32:26] >> okay got a motion on the
[32:29] floor made by commissioner
[32:30] stokes too confirmed the day
[32:30] of the a's for the second
[32:34] reading of the ordinance do I
[32:35] have second second seconded
[32:36] by commissioner ponchos
[32:44] there's nothing to that lead
[32:45] >> it's good solution by just
[32:50] 0. You know anything else.
[32:50] City attorney city manager
[32:53] city clerk. Everything good on
[33:02] the yeah, I think alright is 5
[33:05] old. I'm sure meeting.
[33:10] >> at wheels greece things
[33:12] that don't belong in the
[33:12] system.
[33:16] >> see a lot