[4:10] clock and I'd like to call this meeting
[4:13] to order.
[4:14] Um
[4:15] I will seek a motion that
[4:19] uh
[4:19] the August 13th, 2026 meeting of the
[4:22] Committee of Adjustment be opened, time
[4:24] being 5:00.
[4:26] Catherine.
[4:29] Moves and seconder?
[4:32] Oh, choices, choices. Sarah.
[4:34] >> [laughter]
[4:35] » [laughter]
[4:35] [gasps]
[4:36] >> All those in favor.
[4:38] » All those in favor.
[4:38] Thank you.
[4:40] I'd like to uh let everyone know that
[4:42] this meeting is being video recorded and
[4:45] live streamed.
[4:47] Uh
[4:48] I will seek a motion. Uh wait, second.
[4:54] Yeah. I will seek a motion to approve
[4:57] the agenda unless there are changes.
[5:00] Arnold.
[5:02] Seconder?
[5:03] Sandy.
[5:07] All those in favor.
[5:09] Thank you. That carries as well.
[5:12] All right. Are there any disclosures of
[5:15] interest
[5:18] from the committee?
[5:20] No. Are there any people in the audience
[5:23] that would like to have a deputation at
[5:25] some point?
[5:28] Would like to speak to
[5:31] to something that's coming up?
[5:34] I otherwise I will call I will ask at
[5:36] the during the different
[5:38] uh
[5:40] Speak?
[5:41] Perfect.
[5:42] Maybe?
[5:44] Okay. We will we will see when we get to
[5:46] the uh the motion or the different lot
[5:50] items. Thank you.
[5:52] All right. With that then, we will head
[5:55] into applications and I'm actually going
[5:58] to suggest A, B, C, and D together, yep,
[6:01] which are the Koch
[6:04] lots.
[6:05] Koch.
[6:06] >> Okie dokie. So, four applications have
[6:09] » Okie dokie. So, four applications have
[6:09] been received from Walter Koch, trustee
[6:11] for the estate of Anna Koch, for the
[6:13] property
[6:14] legally described as Concession 7, North
[6:16] Half of Lot 15, being Parcel 1820,
[6:20] located at the intersection of Miller
[6:21] Heights Drive and Sorry Road in Oliver
[6:24] Paipoonge.
[6:25] This parcel of land is naturally severed
[6:27] by Sorry Road and Weeden Road, which
[6:29] already creates three legal parcels of
[6:32] land.
[6:33] Two of those parcels are large enough
[6:34] that they can be subdivided through the
[6:37] Planning Act and the municipal zoning
[6:38] bylaw, which permits
[6:40] two severances each.
[6:43] So, that's the subject of these
[6:44] applications this evening.
[6:46] All applications that we have before us
[6:48] tonight were circulated to neighboring
[6:50] properties within 60 m of the subject
[6:52] lands. Notice was posted on the
[6:54] properties and agencies required through
[6:56] the Planning Act were circulated 14 days
[6:58] prior to this evening.
[7:00] So, the subject property has frontage on
[7:02] Sorry Road, Miller Heights Drive, and
[7:04] Weeden Road. Each of the proposed lots
[7:06] would front on one or two of the three
[7:09] maintained roads with the address
[7:10] ultimately being determined at the time
[7:12] entrance permits are applied for.
[7:14] Subject property is designated as rural
[7:16] in the official plan and zoned rural in
[7:18] the zoning bylaw.
[7:20] So, the subject property is abutted by
[7:22] rural lots to the west, general
[7:24] agriculture and rural residential to the
[7:26] south, and rural and rural residential
[7:28] to the north and the east.
[7:29] The proposed new and retained lots all
[7:31] exceed the minimum frontage requirements
[7:33] in the rural zone on the maintained
[7:35] road,
[7:36] being either Miller Heights Drive, Sorry
[7:37] Road, or Weeden Road. The area of each
[7:39] parcel meets the requirements of the
[7:41] zoning bylaw.
[7:43] Um both the official plan and zoning
[7:44] bylaw of Oliver Paipoonge support the
[7:46] creation of these lots as all related
[7:48] requirements are being met. The
[7:50] provincial
[7:51] The provincial planning statement
[7:52] encourages lot creation in appropriate
[7:54] areas and so this application is
[7:56] consistent with all provincial
[7:57] documents. The applicant has already had
[8:00] the property surveyed which is in your
[8:01] packages this evening.
[8:03] Um so the application is
[8:05] showing the actual measurements and full
[8:07] proposals for the original parcel.
[8:10] Um no interdepartmental comments were
[8:11] received. Agency comments were received
[8:13] from the Lakehead Region Conservation
[8:15] Authority as well as the Ministry of
[8:17] Mines.
[8:18] Um both stating no objections or
[8:20] concerns with the proposed. Those
[8:22] comments were sent to the um applicant.
[8:25] Uh no public comments have been received
[8:28] so far and council resolution um council
[8:31] has not had a meeting. They're having a
[8:33] meeting next Wednesday so they were not
[8:35] um able to review these the applications
[8:37] tonight. Um nevertheless, it is my
[8:40] recommendation that each of the four
[8:41] applications be approved with our usual
[8:43] conditions.
[8:47] » Thank you. Uh there is there any
[8:51] um
[8:52] input from those attending the meeting
[8:54] tonight?
[9:01] All right. Is there any discussion from
[9:03] the committee on this?
[9:09] All right. With that then, not seeing
[9:11] any comments from either, I will
[9:15] potentially seek a motion and as normal,
[9:18] we will go through each one one at a
[9:20] time.
[9:21] Um so seeking a motion that application
[9:25] for consent 1B 1526
[9:28] Kutch for the new property on the
[9:30] property
[9:31] for the new lot on the property legally
[9:34] described as concession seven north half
[9:37] lot 15, PCL 1820, located at the
[9:42] intersection of Miller Heights Drive and
[9:44] Sorry Road in the municipality of Oliver
[9:47] Paipoonge, geographic district of
[9:49] Thunder Bay, be approved with
[9:51] conditions. Sandy.
[9:53] Moving it.
[9:54] Arnold will second that.
[9:56] Is there any further discussion on the
[9:58] motion?
[10:01] Seeing none, all those in favor.
[10:04] Thank you. That carries.
[10:10] Seeking a motion that application for
[10:12] consent 1B 1626
[10:15] Kuch
[10:16] for the new lot on the property legally
[10:18] described as concession 7, North half
[10:21] lot 15
[10:24] parcel 1820. It's parcel
[10:27] Yep. Located at the intersection of
[10:29] Miller Heights Drive and Sorry Road in
[10:31] the municipality of Oliver Paipoonge,
[10:33] geographic district of Thunder Bay, be
[10:36] approved with conditions.
[10:39] Catherine and Sarah.
[10:45] Any further discussion on the motion?
[10:48] Catherine.
[10:49] >> Um I'm just
[10:50] » Um I'm just
[10:50] on the
[10:51] surveys
[10:53] which says the following roads will be
[10:55] transferred to the municipality of
[10:57] Oliver Paipoonge, Miller Heights Drive
[10:58] and Sorry Road being
[10:59] >> Yep.
[11:00] » Yep.
[11:00] >> This has been pre
[11:03] » This has been pre
[11:03] pre
[11:04] >> approved.
[11:05] » approved.
[11:05] >> Yeah. Uh yeah, so it's circulated to all
[11:07] » Yeah. Uh yeah, so it's circulated to all
[11:07] the
[11:08] internal managers for comment if they
[11:10] have any roads. It has no issues.
[11:13] >> Okay, so they're
[11:14] » Okay, so they're
[11:14] >> It's the same as kind of accepting road
[11:16] » It's the same as kind of accepting road
[11:16] frontage anytime we do a severance if
[11:18] the road doesn't already belong to us
[11:19] legally.
[11:20] Um so yeah, the roads are already
[11:22] maintained by the municipality.
[11:27] » Any further discussion on this one?
[11:30] All right.
[11:32] Then will call the
[11:35] call it. All those in favor?
[11:39] Thank you. That carries.
[11:42] >> I think the paper was sent to the
[11:43] » I think the paper was sent to the
[11:43] weekend this one.
[11:44] >> Okay. We'll come back to that one.
[11:47] » Okay. We'll come back to that one.
[11:47] And they're still the same
[11:48] >> Yeah, they're both in the same spot.
[11:49] » Yeah, they're both in the same spot.
[11:49] >> We missed one.
[11:51] » We missed one.
[11:51] Um
[11:51] that appli- I'm seeking a motion again.
[11:53] That application for consent 1B 1426
[11:58] Puch for the new lot on the property
[12:00] legally described as Concession 7 North
[12:03] Half Lot
[12:04] uh 15 Parcel 1820 located at the
[12:08] intersection of Part Miller Heights
[12:10] Drive and Sorry Road in the Municipality
[12:13] of Oliver Paipoonge
[12:15] Geographic District of Thunder Bay be
[12:17] approved with conditions.
[12:19] Sandy
[12:21] and Arnold.
[12:24] Any further discussion on the motion?
[12:28] All those in favor?
[12:30] Thank you. That carries.
[12:33] And
[12:35] that application for consent 1B 1726
[12:39] Puch for the new lot on the property
[12:41] legally described as Concession 7 North
[12:44] Half Lot 15 Parcel 1820 located at the
[12:48] intersection of Miller Heights Drive and
[12:50] Sorry Road in the Municipality of Oliver
[12:52] Paipoonge Geographic District of Thunder
[12:55] Bay be approved with conditions.
[12:58] Moved by Catherine
[13:00] seconded by Sarah.
[13:04] Any further discussion from the
[13:05] committee?
[13:09] Hearing none. All those in favor?
[13:12] Opposed none. That carries.
[13:18] Thank you. We will move on to the next
[13:21] two lots.
[13:22] Uh Toiger
[13:24] page 68 in the package.
[13:28] >> Okay. Uh two applications have been
[13:29] » Okay. Uh two applications have been
[13:29] received from Andre Toyger for the
[13:31] property legally described as concession
[13:33] four
[13:34] NW 1/4 north half lot 10 locally known
[13:39] as 127 Wrigley Drive in the municipality
[13:41] of Oliver Paipoonge. These applications
[13:43] are each for the creation of one new lot
[13:45] with four hectares in area leaving a
[13:47] retained lot of eight hectares.
[13:50] >> [clears throat]
[13:51] » [clears throat]
[13:51] >> The portion of the subject property
[13:52] » The portion of the subject property
[13:52] subject to these applications is
[13:53] designated as natural resources in the
[13:55] official plan and zoned general
[13:57] agriculture in the zoning bylaw.
[14:00] >> Woah.
[14:01] » Woah.
[14:01] >> The subject property is abutted by
[14:02] » The subject property is abutted by
[14:02] additional rural rural residential and
[14:04] general agricultural lots in all
[14:07] directions.
[14:08] >> Just a moment, Carrie. Can you be a
[14:09] » Just a moment, Carrie. Can you be a
[14:09] little bit quieter in the crowd?
[14:13] Thank you.
[14:14] Continue.
[14:15] >> Thank you.
[14:16] » Thank you.
[14:17] The proposed new lots will meet all area
[14:18] and frontage requirements of the zoning
[14:20] bylaw and an entrance permit is required
[14:22] from the municipality of Oliver
[14:23] Paipoonge if one does not already exist
[14:25] for each of the new lots.
[14:28] We did not receive any interdepartmental
[14:29] comments. Agency comments were received
[14:32] from the Lakehead Region Conservation
[14:33] Authority as well as the Ministry of
[14:35] Mines again stating no objections or
[14:37] concerns
[14:38] and Council did not meet so there's no
[14:41] comments from Council.
[14:43] So it would be my recommendation that
[14:44] these applications both be approved with
[14:46] the usual conditions.
[14:50] >> Thank you.
[14:53] Any comments from those in attendance?
[14:56] >> I think you have a question.
[14:58] » I think you have a question.
[14:58] >> You're welcome to come to the mic and
[14:59] » You're welcome to come to the mic and
[14:59] just state your name, push the button to
[15:02] say
[15:03] to make the mic turn on and state your
[15:05] name before you start.
[15:09] » Okay, I'm Andy Toyger, I'm the
[15:10] applicant. I
[15:12] I'm not I'm unsure of where my west
[15:15] property line is.
[15:17] My neighbor to the west, Rick McDonald,
[15:19] he He a property severed off his,
[15:22] adjacent to mine,
[15:24] and it seems they left a road allowance
[15:29] or
[15:29] a lot between the between the two lots.
[15:31] Now, I asked at the planning department
[15:33] here, and they said there was no road
[15:35] allowance.
[15:39] » That's correct.
[15:41] Yeah, I pulled up his survey when you
[15:43] were with me, and there's no road
[15:45] allowance.
[15:45] >> Yeah.
[15:47] » Yeah.
[15:47] Okay, it's just that the on there was
[15:49] there was a lot directly
[15:51] lot that was severed directly behind my
[15:53] place on John Street Road, and there it
[15:56] showed a road allowance.
[16:00] » Okay.
[16:01] >> Their survey actually showed a road
[16:02] » Their survey actually showed a road
[16:02] allowance, and they had acquired the
[16:03] road allowance from the municipality.
[16:06] >> Okay, a road allowance doesn't exist
[16:08] » Okay, a road allowance doesn't exist
[16:08] between you and your neighbor.
[16:10] >> Okay, that's that's the only question I
[16:12] » Okay, that's that's the only question I
[16:12] had.
[16:13] Wonderful. Thank you.
[16:14] >> Yeah.
[16:16] » Yeah.
[16:16] All right, any further
[16:19] uh
[16:20] comments? Yes, if you do come to the
[16:23] mic, and state your name.
[16:26] And please ensure that the green light's
[16:28] on.
[16:31] » [clears throat]
[16:43] » Yes.
[16:55] Yeah.
[16:55] Um so, because the committee voted in
[16:58] favor of each of your applications,
[16:59] you're going to receive the notice of
[17:01] decision. It's It's going to outline all
[17:02] of those for you.
[17:04] Yeah. Yeah, it'll it'll include things
[17:06] like uh
[17:07] an executed transfer deed of land form,
[17:10] and a photocopy for our records, etc.
[17:13] But, you will receive that in a package.
[17:19] » Yeah, everything's listed as part of
[17:20] your survey and and everything like
[17:22] that. Yeah. No worries.
[17:26] Anything further on the Toyger property?
[17:31] All right, I'll go to our table then. Go
[17:33] ahead, Sandy.
[17:34] >> Did we I
[17:35] » Did we I
[17:35] just
[17:37] Who did we get comments from?
[17:40] Did we get comments from Lakehead
[17:43] Conservation?
[17:45] >> Uh Lakehead Region Conservation
[17:46] » Uh Lakehead Region Conservation
[17:46] Authority and the Ministry of Mines. No
[17:48] one had any concerns or objections.
[17:49] >> Okay.
[17:50] » Okay.
[17:50] That's all I wanted to know.
[17:53] Thank you.
[17:54] >> Anything further from the committee?
[17:59] All right.
[18:02] Then, I am potentially seeking a motion
[18:06] that application for consent 1B 1826
[18:10] Toyger for the creation of one new lot
[18:13] on the property legally described as
[18:15] concession four, northwest quarter
[18:19] uh north half lot 10, known locally as
[18:22] 127 Wrigley Drive in the municipality of
[18:26] Oliver Paipoonge, geographic district of
[18:29] Thunder Bay, be approved with
[18:30] conditions.
[18:32] Do I have a mover?
[18:35] Catherine and Arnold.
[18:38] Mover and seconder.
[18:40] Any further comments?
[18:42] >> Motion.
[18:44] » Motion.
[18:44] It was two.
[18:45] >> Yes. Yes. We we must do them one at a
[18:48] » Yes. Yes. We we must do them one at a
[18:48] time.
[18:49] All good. Yeah.
[18:51] Uh
[18:53] seeing no other questions from the
[18:54] committee. All those in favor.
[18:57] Thank you. That carries.
[18:59] And I'm also seeking a motion that
[19:03] application for consent 1B 1926
[19:07] Toyger for the creation of one new lot
[19:10] on the property legally described as
[19:12] concession for Northwest quarter North
[19:15] half lot 10 known locally as 127 Wrigley
[19:19] Drive in the municipality of Oliver
[19:21] Paipoonge geographic district of Thunder
[19:23] Bay be approved with conditions. Thank
[19:26] you Sandy and Arnold seconds that.
[19:31] Any further comments?
[19:35] Right. All those in favor.
[19:38] Thank you. That carries.
[19:40] All right.
[19:41] We are on to
[19:43] pages 69 to 82 new lot Husain.
[19:49] >> Okay. So an application has been
[19:51] » Okay. So an application has been
[19:51] received from Stephen Husain for the
[19:53] property um known locally as 5034 Dawson
[19:56] Road in Oliver Paipoonge. Um this
[19:59] application is proposing the creation of
[20:00] one new lot being approximately 2.9
[20:03] hectares in area leaving a retained lot
[20:05] of 6.4 hectares as well as an easement
[20:07] through the proposed new lot for a
[20:09] shared driveway being approximately 150
[20:11] m by 10 m.
[20:13] Um the subject property is designated as
[20:15] rural in the official plan and zoned
[20:17] rural residential in the zoning bylaw.
[20:20] Uh the subject property is abutted by
[20:21] additional rural residential to the
[20:23] south and the west general agriculture
[20:25] to the north and the city of the Thunder
[20:27] Bay to the east.
[20:28] Uh the proposed new lot meets all area
[20:30] and frontage requirements of the rural
[20:32] residential zone in our zoning bylaw. Um
[20:35] an entrance permit is required from the
[20:36] Ministry of Transportation for the
[20:38] shared driveway.
[20:39] Um no interdepartmental comments were
[20:42] received. Agency comments again were
[20:44] received from the Lakehead Region
[20:45] Conservation Authority as well as the
[20:47] Ministry of Mines both stating no
[20:49] objections or concerns to the proposed
[20:52] um and no council resolution this
[20:53] meeting. Um so it would be my
[20:55] recommendation that the application be
[20:58] approved with usual conditions
[21:01] um also including a condition with
[21:03] respect to
[21:04] um I'm confirmation from the MTO uh in
[21:07] writing that a shared driveway is
[21:09] acceptable
[21:11] on the property as well as a condition
[21:13] with respect to that easement being
[21:15] registered as well.
[21:17] >> Thank you.
[21:19] » Thank you.
[21:19] Are there any comments or questions from
[21:22] our audience?
[21:25] Or guests?
[21:27] All right.
[21:29] Hearing none.
[21:31] To the committee, are there any comments
[21:32] or questions? Catherine.
[21:34] >> Um, there's two different maps in this
[21:36] » Um, there's two different maps in this
[21:36] package. Um,
[21:38] one called the site plan service with
[21:41] the yellow
[21:42] and one with the blue called two map.
[21:45] And they don't have
[21:47] uh, 74 and 77.
[21:52] >> You mean the actual application?
[21:53] » You mean the actual application?
[21:53] >> Yeah.
[21:57] Yes. Um, and I just it's it they read
[22:00] differently when you look at the
[22:04] um,
[22:07] they say 254 on the west limits.
[22:11] And then on this um,
[22:15] jagged line on the other side, the first
[22:17] one says 77 m and then 77 and then 100.
[22:22] And the
[22:23] blue one says 96, 77, and 100, which
[22:27] adds up
[22:28] to a lot more than
[22:30] 254. So, which one's correct when the
[22:33] driveway's represented differently on
[22:34] both of these drawings?
[22:37] >> So, the
[22:38] » So, the
[22:38] the in my planning report, we're going
[22:41] with that sketch.
[22:42] >> Which one?
[22:44] » Which one?
[22:44] >> In the planning report.
[22:46] » In the planning report.
[22:46] >> AJB.
[22:46] » AJB.
[22:46] >> Okay.
[22:48] » Okay.
[22:49] >> So, that's the proposed when we actually
[22:51] » So, that's the proposed when we actually
[22:51] go to our program and measure, they
[22:53] don't match up with the numbers that
[22:54] were provided by the applicant, which is
[22:56] fairly common.
[22:58] Um, it's when the surveyor goes through,
[23:00] those numbers will likely change again.
[23:03] Um,
[23:03] but it's
[23:04] it's well within what is required, the
[23:07] 2.9 acres, so it's not really a concern.
[23:10] At least that's why we always say
[23:11] approximate.
[23:12] >> Okay, cuz I just I was just getting
[23:14] » Okay, cuz I just I was just getting
[23:14] different information in different
[23:15] graphics. So, okay.
[23:19] So, when that gets reviewed when it gets
[23:22] processed or it gets
[23:23] >> That's right.
[23:27] » Thank you. Any further comments or
[23:30] questions?
[23:36] Would you
[23:38] just come to the mic and say your name.
[23:40] >> She's going to talk about the glitch.
[23:45] » No.
[23:47] I don't even know what lot you're
[23:48] talking about by this description. You
[23:50] I know this I would have wondering.
[23:52] >> Hi darling.
[23:54] » Hi darling.
[23:54] Hi.
[23:55] >> Okay. I'm wondering
[23:56] » Okay. I'm wondering
[23:56] >> Are you talking about the Kutch about
[23:58] » Are you talking about the Kutch about
[23:58] the Kutch severance?
[24:01] >> Yes, that's what we're here to visit.
[24:02] » Yes, that's what we're here to visit.
[24:03] >> We've We did. We did that one already.
[24:05] » We've We did. We did that one already.
[24:05] >> Okay, so can I actually ask a question?
[24:07] » Okay, so can I actually ask a question?
[24:07] I just wondered the size. Are these like
[24:09] 5-acre lots?
[24:10] >> Well,
[24:11] » Well,
[24:12] we'll go through it after the meeting.
[24:13] We've already gone through them. Um,
[24:16] they have been approved, but you're
[24:17] welcome to come and ask afterwards.
[24:20] Right now we're going we're working
[24:21] through a different lot.
[24:23] >> Just hang hang there, darling.
[24:27] » Thank you.
[24:29] All right. Any further comments on the
[24:31] Husain property?
[24:36] All right.
[24:37] Hearing none, then I will seek a motion
[24:41] potentially that application for consent
[24:44] 1B 2026 Husain for the creation of one
[24:48] new lot on the property legally
[24:50] described as Concession 7 part north
[24:53] half lot 1 parcel 3998
[24:57] known locally as 5034 Dawson Road in the
[25:01] municipality of Oliver Paipoonge
[25:04] geographic district geographic district
[25:07] of Thunder Bay be approved with
[25:09] conditions. And that includes the
[25:11] condition of the MTO and permit, yes.
[25:17] Arnoulds is
[25:19] making that motion. Sandy is seconding
[25:21] it.
[25:22] Any further discussion from the
[25:23] committee?
[25:27] Hearing none. All those in favor.
[25:31] Thank you. That carries.
[25:33] All right. And we are up to a
[25:35] cancellation certificate for Le Page.
[25:40] >> Okay, so as everyone here is aware at
[25:42] » Okay, so as everyone here is aware at
[25:42] the last
[25:44] meeting we discussed the approval of a
[25:46] new lot for Le Page,
[25:48] which is conditional on
[25:50] getting a certificate of cancellation.
[25:53] There was a lot that was created
[25:55] previously
[25:57] in 2009 that was registered incorrectly.
[26:01] So it was registered as a new lot rather
[26:03] than a lot addition.
[26:05] This certificate of cancellation will
[26:08] remove that initial consent
[26:10] so that the parcel is one larger parcel
[26:13] which was required in order for that
[26:14] severance to be approved.
[26:16] Um
[26:18] So if anyone has any questions about it,
[26:20] I'm happy to answer. But I did
[26:23] Um I think everyone is mostly aware of
[26:26] what's happening there. Um and again
[26:28] this doesn't get uh
[26:30] uh sent out [clears throat] to anyone.
[26:31] There's no notification period or
[26:33] anything like that. So
[26:35] >> Thank you.
[26:36] » Thank you.
[26:36] Is there any
[26:38] uh
[26:39] input from our audience?
[26:44] Thank you. Then from the committee any
[26:48] questions or comments?
[26:53] All right.
[26:54] Then I will seek a motion.
[26:57] Uh this is a long one.
[27:01] Um
[27:02] that seeking a motion that the Committee
[27:05] of Adjustment receive the planning
[27:07] report dated August 6th respecting an
[27:10] application for a cancellation of
[27:12] consent for the property directly west
[27:15] of municipally addressed
[27:17] uh
[27:19] 4th 4010 Oliver Road legally known as
[27:23] Oliver Concession 2 part lot 1 RP 55R
[27:29] 13040
[27:31] part 2 Oliver Papoong.
[27:34] Number two, that the Committee of
[27:35] Adjustment approve the application to
[27:37] cancel consent 1B 2709
[27:42] in accordance with subsection 5345
[27:45] of the Planning Act RSO 1990.
[27:50] Number three, that the Committee of
[27:51] Adjustment deem that the land that is
[27:54] the subject of the consent cancellation
[27:56] certificate is not land that was
[27:59] previously conveyed by way of a deed or
[28:01] transfer with a consent and that the
[28:04] Committee of Adjustment deem that
[28:06] subsection 53 part 12 of the Planning
[28:10] Act RSO 1990 does not apply in respect
[28:14] to Oliver Concession 2 part lot 1 RP 55R
[28:20] 13040
[28:22] part 2 Oliver Papoong and that section
[28:25] 53
[28:27] applies to a subsequent conveyance or
[28:30] other transaction involving Oliver
[28:33] Concession 2 part lot 1 RP 55R
[28:38] 13040 part 2 Oliver Papoong.
[28:42] Number five, that the cancellation of
[28:44] consent 1B 2709
[28:47] be subject to the following condition.
[28:49] Number one, a submission to the
[28:52] secretary-treasurer
[28:54] written confirmation
[28:57] Let me repeat that.
[29:00] A
[29:01] submission to the secretary-treasurer
[29:04] written confirmation that all of our
[29:06] concession two part lot one RP 55R 13040
[29:12] part two
[29:13] Oliver Papoong and concession two part
[29:16] south half lot one RP 55R 4486
[29:22] part two Oliver Papoong are in common
[29:26] ownership. And finally, that the
[29:28] secretary-treasurer is hereby authorized
[29:30] and directed to execute a certificate of
[29:33] cancellation.
[29:37] Thank you. That's moved by Catherine.
[29:41] Oh, seconded by Arnold.
[29:44] All right. We're open to questions.
[29:47] >> Um
[29:48] » Um
[29:48] recommendation number three
[29:50] um
[29:53] it is not land that was previously
[29:55] conveyed by way of deed or transfer with
[29:58] a consent. How was it conveyed?
[30:00] >> Well, it wasn't. We're eliminating that.
[30:03] » Well, it wasn't. We're eliminating that.
[30:03] Historically, it will be removed. It
[30:05] never happened.
[30:06] That's the intent.
[30:07] >> So, we're erasing history.
[30:10] » So, we're erasing history.
[30:10] >> Yes.
[30:11] » Yes.
[30:11] >> Okay.
[30:14] » Um
[30:15] following wording
[30:17] I totally understand that.
[30:20] >> It came directly from a lawyer.
[30:23] » It came directly from a lawyer.
[30:23] That's No, I just didn't know that's why
[30:25] it's reading that way because
[30:27] >> legal reasons.
[30:28] » legal reasons.
[30:28] >> Yes.
[30:28] » Yes.
[30:28] >> That wasn't you.
[30:29] » That wasn't you.
[30:29] >> [laughter]
[30:31] » Any further questions from the
[30:33] committee?
[30:35] All right. Then
[30:37] um all those in favor.
[30:41] Thank you. That carries.
[30:44] We are up to the minutes of July 9th.
[30:47] And hopefully you've had a chance to
[30:49] review them as well in your package.
[30:52] Uh, are there any errors or omissions?
[30:57] All right, hearing none. I'll seek a
[30:59] motion that the minutes of July 9th,
[31:01] 2026 meeting be approved as presented.
[31:04] Arnold.
[31:10] Thank you, Sarah.
[31:11] All in favor.
[31:13] Thank you, that carries.
[31:16] And we I believe
[31:19] there is no new business or unfinished
[31:21] business.
[31:24] Then I seek a motion that the August
[31:27] 13th, 2026 meeting of Committee of
[31:29] Adjustment be adjourned. The time being
[31:32] 5:27.
[31:35] I saw you, Arnold.
[31:38] And Sandy.
[31:40] All in favor.
[31:42] Thank you, that carries.
[31:44] Thanks, guys.