1 00:04:34,038 --> 00:04:38,177 Morning everyone, thank you for joining us on this morning. 2 00:04:40,098 --> 00:04:42,717 Called this meeting to order, remind those that are intended, 3 00:04:42,717 --> 00:04:45,197 that this meeting is being recorded, web stream and captured, 4 00:04:45,378 --> 00:04:47,757 microphones must be used at all times. The purpose of 5 00:04:47,797 --> 00:04:50,157 this meeting is to consider a staff report related to 6 00:04:51,058 --> 00:04:54,957 a potential acquisition of property for a health sciences building. 7 00:04:56,287 --> 00:04:59,306 The city of Auschwitz situated on lands within the traditional 8 00:04:59,407 --> 00:05:03,306 territories of the Missisagi, Chippewai, Onoshinave, the signatories of the 9 00:05:03,327 --> 00:05:07,706 William Streety, which includes Ms. Saga's Gugag Island curve like 10 00:05:07,807 --> 00:05:12,906 Highwater, Alderville First Nation Chippewas of Georgine Island, Rama Bozola 11 00:05:13,007 --> 00:05:16,086 and First Nations. We are grateful for the Anishinaba, who 12 00:05:16,086 --> 00:05:18,026 have cared for the land and the waters within this 13 00:05:18,127 --> 00:05:23,295 territory. Since time of memorial, we recognise that Osha's steep 14 00:05:23,396 --> 00:05:26,095 and rich indigenous history and has now present day home 15 00:05:26,436 --> 00:05:31,455 to many First Nation Inuied Amatey people. We express the 16 00:05:31,455 --> 00:05:34,335 gratitude of this diverse group of indigenous people who continue 17 00:05:34,375 --> 00:05:36,815 to care for the land and shape and strengthen our 18 00:05:36,855 --> 00:05:41,455 community. As a municipality, we are committed to the understanding, 19 00:05:41,455 --> 00:05:44,335 the truth of our shared history, acknowledging our role in 20 00:05:44,335 --> 00:05:48,975 addressing negative impacts at colonization continues to have on Indigenous 21 00:05:49,076 --> 00:05:53,935 people developing reciprocal relationships and taking meaningful action towards true 22 00:05:54,036 --> 00:05:59,055 reconciliation. We are all treaty people. Declarations of pecuniary interests 23 00:05:59,095 --> 00:06:02,378 that need to be noted at this time. Madam Clerk, 24 00:06:02,378 --> 00:06:04,918 notice that there is it. Council Chapman, good morning. You 25 00:06:04,918 --> 00:06:07,418 have two motions, my understand that you sent to the 26 00:06:07,439 --> 00:06:12,458 clerk on Thursday. So please proceed. It's one and the 27 00:06:12,458 --> 00:06:15,978 same. The first one is the reconsideration on the CNCL 28 00:06:16,159 --> 00:06:20,698 2646, the second pieces would kick in if the reconsideration 29 00:06:20,879 --> 00:06:23,498 is considered. Thank you. Do you have a senator on 30 00:06:23,498 --> 00:06:26,058 it? Yes, Councillor Mayor Patrick. Okay, I'd like a recorded 31 00:06:26,058 --> 00:06:29,578 vote on the reconsideration. Thank you. Could ask a question. 32 00:06:29,578 --> 00:06:32,218 I've sent in a motion related to going into committee 33 00:06:32,258 --> 00:06:36,538 of the hall prior to proceeded. We have a motion 34 00:06:36,538 --> 00:06:39,498 on the floor at this particular time. Okay, so I 35 00:06:39,498 --> 00:06:43,566 now have to discuss that motion. In committee of the 36 00:06:43,606 --> 00:06:45,406 whole. Would the community of the whole motion not need 37 00:06:45,406 --> 00:06:48,526 to be moved first? I've already accepted the motion. But 38 00:06:48,526 --> 00:06:50,446 I'm asking as a procedural matter. If the motion ends 39 00:06:50,446 --> 00:06:54,540 up on the floor. Yes. At that point, would a 40 00:06:54,540 --> 00:06:58,180 committee of the whole, not to my understanding. My understanding 41 00:06:58,201 --> 00:07:03,140 is emotion itself stands by itself? So wouldn't a procedural 42 00:07:03,321 --> 00:07:07,780 motion take precedence? Because whoever sends a thing in first 43 00:07:10,281 --> 00:07:14,500 doesn't answer any question with regards to how procedure will 44 00:07:14,540 --> 00:07:18,260 be approached in the matter. So we've always conduct ourselves 45 00:07:18,300 --> 00:07:22,500 accordingly. My understanding is we have a motion to reconsideration. 46 00:07:22,540 --> 00:07:25,140 Councillor Chapman notified the clerk's office on Thursday that he 47 00:07:25,161 --> 00:07:28,260 had every intent of moving the reconsideration along with the 48 00:07:28,361 --> 00:07:32,660 recommendation so that we could go and discuss the matter. 49 00:07:33,401 --> 00:07:36,180 As you've heard, I've accepted both. And so I'd like 50 00:07:36,220 --> 00:07:38,580 to proceed with the reconsideration. So what would be the 51 00:07:38,601 --> 00:07:40,900 appropriate time to bring a committee of the whole motion? 52 00:07:41,881 --> 00:07:44,420 To be absinthe, we'll have to see where the recommendations 53 00:07:44,460 --> 00:07:50,546 go. So there is no opportunity to go into closed 54 00:07:50,727 --> 00:07:56,896 in committee of the whole without. Okay, so I called 55 00:07:57,157 --> 00:08:00,416 a recorded vote on the reconsideration, Adam Clerk starts. Does 56 00:08:00,456 --> 00:08:03,936 the hand over on the other side? Thank you. There's 57 00:08:03,976 --> 00:08:05,936 a hand waving on the other side. I've already called 58 00:08:06,757 --> 00:08:14,191 the vote. Councillor Nicholson. Yes, the reconsideration first. Yes, sir. 59 00:08:17,274 --> 00:08:24,792 Microphone. I've already told you the question. On the first 60 00:08:24,792 --> 00:08:26,792 one. Is it in order to call a question on 61 00:08:26,792 --> 00:08:29,432 all three parts? I think we have to deal with 62 00:08:30,013 --> 00:08:33,672 part one. So that's what I understand. Okay. And it's 63 00:08:33,672 --> 00:08:37,392 my understanding that we don't debate reconsideration motions. Is that 64 00:08:37,392 --> 00:08:39,792 correct? No, we're just going to vote on it. So 65 00:08:39,792 --> 00:08:43,192 thank you. And can we clarify which vote the yes, 66 00:08:43,192 --> 00:08:45,758 the no works in which way. Yes means that we 67 00:08:45,859 --> 00:08:50,478 are, um, accepting to reconsideration. No means that you don't 68 00:08:50,579 --> 00:08:54,568 accept the reconsideration. Adam clerk, start with me, please. Yes. 69 00:08:55,252 --> 00:08:59,391 Vote on the reconsideration for CNCL 2646 part one Mayor 70 00:08:59,391 --> 00:09:05,336 Carter? Yes. Councillor Chapman? Yes. Councillor Garberson? No. Councillor Grey. 71 00:09:06,555 --> 00:09:12,624 Yes. Councillor Kerr? Yes. Councillor Lee? Yes. Councillor Mayor and 72 00:09:12,624 --> 00:09:18,819 Petra? Yes. Councillor Marx? No. Councillor McConkie's ups and Councillor 73 00:09:18,840 --> 00:09:27,980 Neal is absent. Councillor Nicholson? Yes. That's seven affirmative. Sure. 74 00:09:28,020 --> 00:09:33,260 Okay. So that's two thirds. Um, I've already accepted the 75 00:09:33,521 --> 00:09:36,540 motion from councillor. I'm going to move to call a 76 00:09:36,540 --> 00:09:39,580 question. Okay. Just a minute, please. You moved the recommendation 77 00:09:39,841 --> 00:09:42,660 in regards to it. Your secretary is Councillor Petry. Is 78 00:09:42,660 --> 00:09:46,380 that correct? Okay. I have questions on this. My understanding 79 00:09:46,380 --> 00:09:48,620 is, is that you want to move to call the 80 00:09:48,801 --> 00:09:50,620 question? Do you have a second? Have I not sent 81 00:09:50,660 --> 00:09:52,700 by an email indicating the committee of the whole motion 82 00:09:52,721 --> 00:09:55,240 first? Would I not next have the floor? No, you 83 00:09:55,240 --> 00:09:58,780 wouldn't because I've already got the motion from Councillor Chapman. 84 00:09:58,780 --> 00:10:01,340 Yeah. So the motion on the floor. The motion is 85 00:10:01,340 --> 00:10:02,460 on the floor. But if we want to go into 86 00:10:02,481 --> 00:10:05,900 closed session to ask questions, we could do that. We 87 00:10:05,940 --> 00:10:09,820 could do, we could do that. But I've accepted Councillor 88 00:10:09,860 --> 00:10:12,940 Nicholson's. You received a committee of the whole motion request 89 00:10:12,980 --> 00:10:17,297 prior to that. My understanding is that the committee of 90 00:10:17,297 --> 00:10:20,017 the whole, to move into committee, the whole that motion 91 00:10:20,017 --> 00:10:26,730 would need to be put in before councillor chapments. I've 92 00:10:26,770 --> 00:10:31,610 accepted the recommendation moved by the recommendation. It's been seconded. 93 00:10:31,610 --> 00:10:34,810 So somewhat that's the, that's the procedural practice of this 94 00:10:34,991 --> 00:10:43,130 council that a motion getting moved. Yes. Ken subborn any 95 00:10:43,170 --> 00:10:47,405 ability. And we have not received an update in 16 96 00:10:47,426 --> 00:10:51,024 months on this matter. Okay. I'm going to stop you 97 00:10:51,024 --> 00:10:56,556 there. I've ruled. I've accepted the motion. This is the 98 00:10:56,556 --> 00:10:59,996 motion is to move the recommendation by Councillor Chapman and 99 00:11:00,036 --> 00:11:04,316 second by Councillor Pietri. Councillor Nicholson, you called the question. 100 00:11:04,316 --> 00:11:05,836 Do you have a second during the calling the question. 101 00:11:06,883 --> 00:11:08,302 I'm waiting to find out if I do or not. 102 00:11:08,323 --> 00:11:11,121 Do I have a sector on calling the question. Second 103 00:11:11,161 --> 00:11:14,241 of our council Mayor Pietri. We have to record a 104 00:11:14,241 --> 00:11:18,001 vote on calling the question by Councillor Nicholson, please. So 105 00:11:18,041 --> 00:11:22,010 just chairman. Just hold on. We're going to, it's about 106 00:11:22,050 --> 00:11:24,650 calling the question. If it calls, I want to speak 107 00:11:24,650 --> 00:11:28,267 on the calling the question. Uh, we don't speak on 108 00:11:28,288 --> 00:11:33,787 calling the question. Procedural procedurally. You need four, three votes 109 00:11:34,688 --> 00:11:38,347 or three speakers against it and three speakers for it 110 00:11:38,368 --> 00:11:41,307 before you call the question on the way I always 111 00:11:41,408 --> 00:11:47,387 dealt with in second. We're getting a wee tied up 112 00:11:48,048 --> 00:11:50,587 in procedural and we're not going to get anything done 113 00:11:50,768 --> 00:11:54,187 today that is going to make any sense that anybody 114 00:11:54,528 --> 00:11:57,867 out there in the public. Okay. So you can't speak 115 00:11:59,488 --> 00:12:02,427 calling the question has been moved in secondary. A recorded 116 00:12:02,427 --> 00:12:04,027 vote has been called by. And can we just clarify 117 00:12:04,288 --> 00:12:07,067 that calling the question is to end any debate or 118 00:12:07,088 --> 00:12:09,707 any questions whatsoever. We're not going to go into closed 119 00:12:09,707 --> 00:12:12,827 session to ask questions if this passes. That's correct. Okay. 120 00:12:13,008 --> 00:12:17,467 Okay. For the record recorded vote is being called by 121 00:12:17,648 --> 00:12:25,807 Councillor Nicholson. Okay. Recorded vote by councillor Nicholson? Yes. Councillor 122 00:12:25,847 --> 00:12:32,897 Chapman? Yes. Councillor Garberson? Absolutely not. Councillor Grey? No. Sorry, 123 00:12:32,897 --> 00:12:36,550 you say, can you repeat that? Councillor way. Council Grey. 124 00:12:37,577 --> 00:12:41,335 Sorry. Sorry. I thought I responded. No. Okay. Thank you. 125 00:12:42,078 --> 00:12:47,365 Councillor Kerr? No. Councillor Lee? No. Councillor Marine Petrie? No. 126 00:12:48,168 --> 00:12:55,099 Councillor Marx? No. Councillor McConkie. No. Councillor Neal is absent 127 00:12:55,120 --> 00:12:59,739 Mayor Carter? Yes. That's three affirmative. Losers. Okay. I need 128 00:12:59,920 --> 00:13:02,379 a motion to go on a closed session, please, that 129 00:13:02,379 --> 00:13:07,093 they were on the recommendation as presented as. Yeah. Just 130 00:13:07,133 --> 00:13:08,373 hold on a sec. I have to go through the 131 00:13:08,394 --> 00:13:10,853 procedure. Council Job and you have a motion? Yes, I 132 00:13:10,853 --> 00:13:13,413 do. Move by myself second away, Councillor Mayor Pietri. They're 133 00:13:13,413 --> 00:13:15,333 pursuant to the municipal act this meeting be closed to 134 00:13:15,333 --> 00:13:19,333 the public to consider the following CNCL - 26 - 135 00:13:19,674 --> 00:13:25,573 46 pursuant to sections 239 to see. I and K. 136 00:13:25,573 --> 00:13:29,173 C is proposed or pending acquisition or disposition of land. 137 00:13:29,173 --> 00:13:33,013 I, as information supplied incompetence, which could prejudice, which could 138 00:13:33,194 --> 00:13:37,893 prejudice a competitive position or interfere with negotiations of a 139 00:13:37,994 --> 00:13:42,053 person or organisation. And K is a position plan procedure 140 00:13:42,394 --> 00:13:47,013 criteria or instruction for negotiations. Carried on by or on 141 00:13:47,053 --> 00:13:50,053 behalf of the municipality. Okay. So it's been moved in 142 00:13:50,074 --> 00:13:54,439 second. Any opposition regards to go into close. I am 143 00:13:54,479 --> 00:13:57,159 asking for recorded vote. And I'm in opposition. Thank you. 144 00:13:57,500 --> 00:14:02,042 Okay. Thank you. Start with council McConkie, please. Ricardo fell 145 00:14:02,042 --> 00:14:08,586 to move into close. Councillor McConkie. No. Councillor Neal is 146 00:14:08,586 --> 00:14:16,316 absent. Councillor Nicholson? Yes. Councillor Chapman? Yes. Councillor Guyberson? Yes. 147 00:14:16,417 --> 00:14:20,796 Councillor Grey? Yes. Councillor Kerr? Yes. Councillor B? Yes. Councillor 148 00:14:20,836 --> 00:14:27,018 Marine Petty? Yes. Pastor Mark? Yes. Mayor Carter? Yes. Okay. 149 00:14:29,359 --> 00:14:31,098 So just give us a moment. We've got to close 150 00:14:31,138 --> 00:14:34,331 the doors. Any staff member that it's not. Directly involved 151 00:14:34,512 --> 00:14:36,731 in this discussion. We are going to ask him to 152 00:14:36,752 --> 00:14:39,818 leave. The show. 153 01:50:15,291 --> 01:50:17,750 Thank you for the patience. I greatly appreciate it. We 154 01:50:17,851 --> 01:50:24,247 went into closed session at 910 this morning. Questions and 155 01:50:24,247 --> 01:50:29,214 comments were asked and answered no motions were moved. At 156 01:50:29,254 --> 01:50:32,222 that time. We are now an open session. We have 157 01:50:32,323 --> 01:50:36,942 Councillor Chapman, Councillor Giverson, Councillor Grey, Councillor Kirk, Councillor Lee. 158 01:50:37,942 --> 01:50:42,081 Council Mayor Petri, Council Marx, Councillor McConkie, Councillor Nicholson along 159 01:50:42,121 --> 01:50:45,281 with our team. The doors are open. The motion is 160 01:50:45,281 --> 01:50:51,017 on the floor, the recommendation. I've sent an amendment. Senator 161 01:50:51,017 --> 01:50:53,976 amendment. Mr. Adapt 4. 162 01:51:05,571 --> 01:51:06,590 Just give me a moment, please. 163 01:51:21,567 --> 01:51:25,611 Yes. Do you have a second year for it at 164 01:51:25,611 --> 01:51:29,637 this time. I don't. The ID amendment is quite simple, 165 01:51:29,637 --> 01:51:33,957 though. It's just relating to providing the communication update. I 166 01:51:34,058 --> 01:51:35,717 haven't accepted it yet. I'm trying to make sure that 167 01:51:35,898 --> 01:51:38,117 it's in order, and I want to check all the 168 01:51:38,157 --> 01:51:40,757 boxes, okay? So nothing engage you, it's more on me. 169 01:51:41,597 --> 01:51:47,784 I'll second it. Just. Give me a minute, please. 170 01:52:06,885 --> 01:52:14,045 I want to get. To get. Our legal opinion on 171 01:52:14,066 --> 01:52:21,445 this first. Just, no, not yet. So I'm just going 172 01:52:21,445 --> 01:52:24,214 to give our solicitor a moment to read it. And 173 01:52:24,214 --> 01:52:26,949 make sure I clearly understand it. Thanks. 174 01:53:02,217 --> 01:53:06,443 Yeah. Go ahead. Just to let you know, Councillor Garvi 175 01:53:06,443 --> 01:53:08,923 said, I've been advised that this would break the confidentiality 176 01:53:08,963 --> 01:53:11,163 of the report. So therefore, I have to rule it 177 01:53:11,163 --> 01:53:14,463 out of order. You're more than willing to challenge the 178 01:53:14,503 --> 01:53:17,103 chair. But I've tried to take the best advice I 179 01:53:17,103 --> 01:53:21,823 can. I am quite confident in staff and the other 180 01:53:22,004 --> 01:53:26,552 party's ability to determine what parts would not be. Made 181 01:53:26,653 --> 01:53:33,203 public if there was a communication. Made. So could I 182 01:53:33,203 --> 01:53:36,643 just clarify then? In terms of what goes public and 183 01:53:36,744 --> 01:53:41,449 what doesn't, on matters like these as they progress. Back 184 01:53:41,550 --> 01:53:45,404 in late April. Without any advanced notice to members of 185 01:53:45,585 --> 01:53:51,400 council, a sign appeared outside the building. With a bit 186 01:53:51,400 --> 01:53:56,399 of summary information. I have yet to date to be 187 01:53:56,399 --> 01:54:00,879 given any update on who put the sign there under 188 01:54:01,140 --> 01:54:05,479 which authorization, how that fit into the existing agreements. So 189 01:54:05,479 --> 01:54:08,159 there are a lot of ambiguity as far as when 190 01:54:08,260 --> 01:54:12,253 and what and which stages. Things are communicated to the 191 01:54:12,293 --> 01:54:16,173 public on this. And I understand that. I'm just stating 192 01:54:16,674 --> 01:54:18,813 that based upon the advice I've been given, I'm going 193 01:54:18,813 --> 01:54:20,973 to say that it is out of order and that 194 01:54:21,013 --> 01:54:24,893 we have to protect the confidentiality. So if, again, as 195 01:54:24,893 --> 01:54:30,333 if you disagree with me, I get it. I'm taking 196 01:54:31,154 --> 01:54:33,853 the advice of people that are shorter than you. Yeah. 197 01:54:33,853 --> 01:54:35,853 And I mean, as I've mentioned, I would, I'll have 198 01:54:35,853 --> 01:54:38,413 to challenge the chair because for the very simple point 199 01:54:38,594 --> 01:54:41,453 that I would trust the party's ability to determine what 200 01:54:41,474 --> 01:54:47,293 communication would be appropriate given the current stage of this, 201 01:54:47,314 --> 01:54:51,613 hold on. One thing at a time. So a challenge 202 01:54:51,613 --> 01:54:53,293 has come to the chair. You don't need a secret 203 01:54:53,333 --> 01:54:57,453 deferred challenging to the chair. If you support the chair's 204 01:54:57,453 --> 01:55:01,293 decision, you say yes. If you don't support the chair, 205 01:55:01,293 --> 01:55:03,974 you say, no. And we will take a recorded vote 206 01:55:03,974 --> 01:55:07,894 to be able to make sure that that's the case. 207 01:55:07,894 --> 01:55:09,014 So Madam Clerk. 208 01:55:45,560 --> 01:55:50,099 I have called for, I've called for a recorded vote 209 01:55:50,099 --> 01:55:53,779 on challenging the chair. So please proceed, start myself, please. 210 01:55:54,280 --> 01:55:58,951 Yes. Recorded vote on challenging the chair. Mayor Carter? Yes. 211 01:56:00,898 --> 01:56:07,383 Councillor Chapman? Yes. Councillor Garberson? No. Councillor Grey? Yes. Councillor 212 01:56:07,484 --> 01:56:13,332 Kerr? Yes. Councillor Lee? Yes. Councillor Mayor Petrus? Yes. Without 213 01:56:13,332 --> 01:56:15,412 the benefit of knowing what you received in terms of 214 01:56:15,513 --> 01:56:22,725 legal opinion? No. Councillor McConkie. Yes, but is there any 215 01:56:22,725 --> 01:56:27,125 opportunity to go into closed session further after we vote 216 01:56:27,165 --> 01:56:29,878 on this. Can we go into closed session after this? 217 01:56:30,299 --> 01:56:33,318 We are dealing with challenging with the chair. Right. But 218 01:56:33,318 --> 01:56:40,895 after this challenging the chair. Yes. Councillor Neil is absent, 219 01:56:40,895 --> 01:56:48,300 councillor nickelson? Yes. That is. Nine affirmative. Mayor Carter, could 220 01:56:48,321 --> 01:56:50,620 we take a motion to go into closed session to 221 01:56:50,620 --> 01:56:54,947 look at the motion that comes? How many affirmative. Sorry. 222 01:56:55,048 --> 01:57:00,782 I'm sorry. Hold on a second. Madam Clerk. Sorry, eight 223 01:57:00,782 --> 01:57:08,605 affirmative. So, um, so closed session to look at the 224 01:57:08,626 --> 01:57:15,126 motion that there's no. Motion from Councillor Guyberson that you 225 01:57:15,227 --> 01:57:18,166 ruled out of order. Right. So it's not out of 226 01:57:18,166 --> 01:57:20,646 order because you gave the reason that it should not 227 01:57:20,747 --> 01:57:23,846 be in public session. So can now I move a 228 01:57:23,886 --> 01:57:26,886 motion to go into closed session. No, not to be 229 01:57:26,886 --> 01:57:28,486 able to do it because I don't have a motion 230 01:57:28,526 --> 01:57:30,486 in front of me because it's been ruled out of 231 01:57:30,486 --> 01:57:33,609 order. So the original motions on the floor, recorded vote 232 01:57:33,609 --> 01:57:36,329 on the original motion, Madam Clerk, starting with myself, please. 233 01:57:40,236 --> 01:57:44,002 Motion. Recorded vote. According to vote on the remainder of 234 01:57:44,183 --> 01:57:50,181 the motion. Yep. Mayor Carter? Yes. Councillor Chapman? Yes. Councillor 235 01:57:50,221 --> 01:57:57,330 Garberson. No. Councillor Grey? Yes. Councillor Kerr? Yes. Councillor Lee? 236 01:57:57,330 --> 01:58:05,713 Yes. Councillor Mary Petri. Yes. Councillor Marx? No. Councillor McConkie? 237 01:58:05,713 --> 01:58:14,260 No. Councillor Neal is absent. Councillor Nicholson? Yes. Seven affirmative. 238 01:58:14,281 --> 01:58:18,372 Thank you. Councillor Chapman. Yes, moved by myself, saying no 239 01:58:18,412 --> 01:58:20,932 by Council Mayor and Pietri that the confirming bylaw be 240 01:58:20,972 --> 01:58:28,870 passed. Recorded votes, please. Recorded vote on the confirming bylaw 241 01:58:28,910 --> 01:58:34,693 councillor, sorry, Mayo Carter? Yes. Councillor Chapman? Yes. Councillor Garberson? 242 01:58:34,693 --> 01:58:40,750 Yes. Councillor Grey? Yes. Councillor Kerr? Yes. Councillor Lee? Yes. 243 01:58:41,251 --> 01:58:46,190 Councillor Mary Petri? Yes. Councillor Marx? Yes. Councillor McConkie? Yes. 244 01:58:47,004 --> 01:58:52,794 Councillor Neal is absent. Councillor Nicholson? Yes. Ten affirmative. Motion 245 01:58:52,794 --> 01:58:56,581 of jury. Potion to adjourn. Second, I by Councillor. Petri. 246 01:58:57,801 --> 01:59:01,816 Any opposition. Seeing none. That's it. Thanks folks.