[0:20] costly.
[0:28] » But like
[0:31] Yeah, it ruined our secondary water
system.
[0:45] » Yeah.
[0:50] [clears throat]
[1:02] Okay.
[1:12] » Beautiful.
[1:15] [laughter]
[1:24] So, it is 5:31 and since we don't have a
mayor, we need to elect a mayor proamp.
[1:31] Kelly, are you ready
for us to be okay? I'd like to nominate
[1:37] uh David Burton for mayor promp.
>> Better him than me. I second it.
[1:43] » All in favor? I I
>> I
[2:23] Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa.
>> Call the Carin City Council meeting to
[2:30] order. It is now.
>> Can you turn on your microphone or put
[2:34] it to your face?
>> What is that? your microphone.
[2:38] » Nobody can hear me.
>> Okay, it's August. Do I need to start
[2:43] over?
>> No.
[2:44] » Okay, it's August 27th
and it is 5:33
[2:49] p.m.
[2:53] Okay. Do we have some opening
ceremonies,
[2:57] » Michelle?
>> Okay. Our opening ceremonies will be
[3:00] given by Council Member Toppam.
Our
[3:18] father in heaven, we bow our heads
before thee this day to ask a special
[3:21] blessing as we come together as a city
council and a community. Please bless
[3:27] that we may be able to go through these
agenda items with respect to one
[3:32] another, hear everyone out and make the
decisions that are best for our city. We
[3:38] are also so very thank thankful for all
of the moisture that we have received
[3:43] and
pray that we can continue to receive
[3:49] what you think that we need. And we are
so very thankful for this beautiful
[3:53] community that we live in. And I say
these things in the name of Jesus
[3:56] Christ. Amen.
>> And amen.
[3:58] » Please stand.
[4:02] » I pledge alce to the flag of the United
States of America and to the
[4:10] stands one
indivisible.
[4:21] » Thank you, Council Member Toppam.
[4:27] Are [clears throat] there any conflicts
with anyone on the council tonight with
[4:32] anything on the agenda?
>> No.
[4:35] » No.
>> Thank you. Hearing none, we will now
[4:41] proceed with public comments.
Is there anyone that would like to give
[4:47] a comment on something that they have in
concern with the city that isn't on the
[4:53] agenda that they'd like to bring forth
at this time?
[5:02] Well, seeing none,
we will move to the consent agenda. This
[5:08] is regular items that are approved by
the council regularly. Items six and
[5:14] seven. Six is the M minutes from the
special work meeting August 13th
[5:20] and the city council meeting on August
13th of 2026 and the warrant register
[5:26] for August 27th, 2026.
>> Mayor, I move to approve consent agenda
[5:34] items six and seven.
I'll second it.
[5:38] » Okay, it's been moved and seconded.
Approve the consent agenda. All in
[5:42] favor?
>> I
[5:43] » I any Excuse me. Any opposed?
Okay, the consent agenda passes.
[5:52] We'll now move to the action agenda
number eight,
[5:57] which involves a temporary alcohol event
permit for September 19th, 2026 for
[6:05] Sweet Pea Farm and Orchard DA Olrich,
owner. I propose that we uh grant the
[6:13] temporary alcohol event permit for
September 19th, 2026 for Sweet Pea Farm
[6:18] and Orchard uh Daich
owner.
[6:24] » I'll second it.
>> It's been moved and seconded that we
[6:28] approve the temporary alcohol event
permit for Sweet Pea Farms for September
[6:32] 19th, 2026 for Dao Ultridge Oldrich,
excuse me. All in favor? I
[6:40] » I
>> I
[6:41] » Any opposed?
Motion passes to approve the alcohol
[6:46] event permit.
>> Uh item number nine, consider proposed
[6:52] zone change for parcel
A-0026-000027-0000
[7:01] from A1 to R2.
Dan, do you have a presentation on that?
[7:08] Um I don't we did discuss it last um
last time in the work agenda um in
[7:14] detail. So I don't have anything planned
to presentwise but I can certainly
[7:18] answer any questions. The uh
the uh um property is in front of you um
[7:26] for the zone change request.
[7:31] So is there any discussion?
[7:38] Is there someone to answer questions?
>> Okay. [clears throat]
[7:44] Um,
listening to a lot of uh citizens uh
[7:49] both in the green area and the the
little squares on the top of the page on
[7:56] the left. Um, do you know where
I don't know if this proper to ask or
[8:03] not, but they've been asking I don't
know. Um, do you know where the first
[8:09] street would go through to exit that
property?
[8:13] So, [clears throat] there's going to be,
excuse me, going to be the roadway on
[8:18] the north north end the 100 north would
be the first roadway to go in and it
[8:23] also connect to the two roadways to the
north as well. So there'd be three
[8:26] points of access
>> like right off the bat.
[8:31] » Right off the bat, you can see the phase
line in the middle [clears throat] right
[8:34] at the north end of the first one.
[8:40] » So 100 North
and their their plan [clears throat] is
[8:45] to connect it to the existing roadway on
100 North,
[8:52] » but that road's not built yet. No, it's
it ends just in front of that property
[8:58] over in the Aspen Cove subdivision.
>> Yeah,
[9:01] » there's a a little line right there
where the asphalt ends. You can see that
[9:05] kind of a dotted line. It would continue
to that point.
[9:09] » So, it' exit there and roll down to 775
west
[9:14] » and then 660 north.
>> Okay.
[9:16] » So, that's one access point. Then the
other two roadways going northward would
[9:20] be the other two access points.
So the two at the top of the page. Okay.
[9:30] » Is that property secured that's off from
what is that on 100 north through that
[9:38] Aspen Cove subdivision right there where
it joins. There's a little strip that's
[9:43] not owned by them, but they've been
talking to the owner and she's and
[9:48] they've been agreeable to
part ways with it and allow the roadway
[9:52] to pass through.
>> They're agreeable in what way?
[9:57] » To allow the purchase to happen and let
the the roadway pass through. And
[10:02] nothing's happened. The zone change has
to happen first before they finalize
[10:06] agreements and see if everything will
work out.
[10:12] So the two exits,
the concern that citizens have and also
[10:19] myself is the two exits going to going
north [clears throat] with our new 42
[10:27] well 60 foot rideway and 42 foot asphalt
and actually rolls into those streets.
[10:35] Do you know how wide those streets are?
The asphalt part
[10:40] Uh right there at the top it would be 42
feet wide.
[10:47] » Well, I mean
>> asking on the on
[10:49] » going into that property. Oh, to the
north.
[10:52] » How how wide those streets are?
>> I don't I I can't tell you. I know it's
[10:56] it's built for what was standard when
when it was built. Their concern is
[11:02] they're substandard roads um with no
curbon gutter um and they're
[11:07] approximately 28 feet of asphalt.
My last measurements. Yeah. So that's
[11:14] those are the my concerns.
[11:23] Well, and my concern is that that
property hadn't been secured yet for
[11:27] that other access.
It's just a tenative agreement.
[11:33] » We're not considering the subdivision
though. We're considering a zone change.
[11:37] » So, [clears throat] they can develop it
as it sits as an R1 with a few less
[11:41] houses or lots. The question is is
whether R2 or not.
[11:47] » Okay.
[11:54] » Well, I'll make a motion for discussion
that we leave it at an R1.
[11:58] It is an R1.
>> It's an A1 right now.
[12:00] » A A1.
>> Yeah,
[12:03] » that was an R1 when they bought it,
right? Correct.
[12:06] » So, we were here a few city councils ago
when it was going for R3. And at that
[12:11] time, it was recommended by the city
council to make go to R2, which is why
[12:15] we're back here requesting the R2.
[12:24] So, to answer your question, Lyall, it's
it's currently zoned as an R as an A1,
[12:31] » but if they want to do a subdivision
with the current zoning, it will it will
[12:38] treat it like an R1. Does that make
sense? They don't have to reszone in
[12:42] order to subdivide
>> an R1.
[12:46] » It will be treated like an R1.
>> Yeah. So, an R1 and A1 are basically the
[12:50] same
>> when it comes to development. Yeah.
[12:52] » Okay.
And they were trying to get the R3,
[12:56] which is the same, if I'm not mistaken,
it's the same as the neighboring
[13:00] subdivision. They're trying to go for
the same zoning. So now we're doing
[13:04] something a little less dense than
what's neighboring. It's it's a
[13:09] development.
[13:12] » I just think the citizens around
their main concern is like the density
[13:17] of it and putting all of that traffic
through.
[13:21] And this is not your fault. like their
substandard roads, you know, putting all
[13:24] of those homes and everything through
their
[13:28] through their subdivisions.
>> That's I think that's the main thing.
[13:35] Correct me if I'm wrong you guys, but
like the phone calls that I've come that
[13:39] I have fielded is like they would like
not to see as dense as it is around.
[13:48] Uh, I'd like to ask Dan a question about
density. What's the difference in your
[13:54] calculation of density from A1 to R2?
Um, the difference is [clears throat] in
[14:02] the lot size for single family
residences.
[14:08] Um,
[14:11] if if there's R2, so their proposed
subdivision is single family residences.
[14:15] Obviously, they could change it and do
do something else with twin homes or
[14:20] something. From a single family resident
standpoint, if these parcels were were
[14:27] at the minimum of 7,500 square ft, um it
would be one thing. The the reality is
[14:34] is the parcels average probably
somewhere in the neighborhood of 82
[14:39] 8,300. There's parcels that are close to
R1. They're almost 10,000 square feet.
[14:45] There's a bunch of parcels that are
larger than 8,000. There's a few parcels
[14:50] that are smaller, just smaller than
8,000. 78 78 78. And um these
[14:57] [clears throat] are the smallest ones on
this right side.
[15:00] Um these parcels, there used to be four
here. Now there's three. So, um,
[15:05] anyways, my point is is they they're
getting 35
[15:10] parcels in the subdivision
laid out. They could go smaller, but
[15:15] that's the way they've laid it out with
parcels about that large. So, if they if
[15:19] they if we don't approve the zone change
and it stays A1, they're basically going
[15:24] to have to force them to do 10,000
square foot lots instead of like 80,
[15:30] whatever the average is of all those. I
ran the math figuring that see if it
[15:34] averages about 8,200
it basically means um a couple less lots
[15:40] like in the neighborhood of I don't know
four or five lots less but effectively
[15:46] it's going to look pretty similar um if
you just if you add up the acreage
[15:54] divided by 35 then divide it back out by
10,000 um it instead of 35, it's
[16:02] probably, I don't know, 28, 29. I don't
know. I'm not not laying out their
[16:07] subdivision. I'm just trying to do raw
math. So, you may squeeze a little bit
[16:11] of density out of there, but it's
already not as dense as it could be
[16:14] under R2. That's my point.
>> But that's under their [clears throat]
[16:19] proposal now. But it could be denser. I
mean, there is the possibility of that.
[16:25] So, if they were to come back with a
with twin homes, twin homes uh require
[16:30] 10,000 square feet for both homes to sit
on, giving you effective density of
[16:37] 5,000 square feet per lot is the
maximum. Um, obviously that's more homes
[16:42] in there than this. Um, so yeah,
theoretically it could come back with a
[16:48] different thing and be 5,000 square foot
per residential unit.
[16:53] Okay, we have a motion to leave it at A1
with no zone change, but we I don't
[17:00] believe we had a second.
>> I second it.
[17:04] » Okay, we have a motion in a second to
leave it as without zone change is A1.
[17:11] Is there any more discussion?
[17:16] And all those in favor of the motion on
the table, please say I.
[17:23] » I.
>> I.
[17:24] » I.
>> Any opposed?
[17:28] » I.
>> No. I'm I.
[17:33] » Excuse. What was your vote, Council
Member?
[17:35] » It was a no vote. No.
>> Okay. So, three to one. So,
[17:40] » no. I voted with the rest of you.
>> Oh, you vote I.
[17:43] » I voted I. I just
>> that's why I asked for clarification.
[17:47] I'm sorry. So
>> the vote was unanimous. So there will be
[17:52] no zone change. It'll remain A1.
>> Okay.
[17:58] » Thank you.
>> Thank you.
[18:04] Uh the next item for business is item
number 10. Consider cooperative land
[18:12] realignment, road dedication and
property exchange agreement with Lance
[18:17] Shotwell
relating to parcels A-491-
[18:23] 0491-00002
[18:26] and a-492-000014-0000.
[18:33] Okay. [clears throat] Is there any
presentation on this?
[18:39] » Yeah. So, we did have a conversation
about it. Gave a pretty good
[18:42] presentation last time just moving
forward to work. I mean to action, but
[18:48] I'm wondering if anybody had I I did
show the
[18:52] the diagram last time, did I not?
>> Yeah, you did.
[18:55] » Um and and and explained it. I just
wondering if the council has any um
[19:02] has any questions um on this before we
start down the path of all of the steps
[19:08] to do this. At the end, of course, the
council will have the option whether or
[19:11] not to trade the property. We've just
got to do a lot of work to massage it
[19:16] and abandon roads and and define new
roads and redraw property boundaries in
[19:22] order to make it happen. And we just
need to have an agreement as we start on
[19:25] that process. So,
You're not agreeing to trade the
[19:29] property yet. That's the last step.
>> Yeah.
[19:33] » I'll just say I talked to Dan about this
a couple of times because I was
[19:37] concerned and I support this. I I I
looked at all the different situations
[19:44] and all and the the reasoning and and
what would the city would gain and
[19:50] versus and what would be resolved. And
so I I support this exchange.
[20:06] Well, I'll move to approve the
cooperative land realignment road
[20:10] dedication and property exchange
agreement with Lance Shockwell relating
[20:14] to the parcels that were stated.
>> I'll second it.
[20:19] It's been moved and seconded that we
consider cooperative land realignment
[20:24] road dedication and proper exchange
agreement with Lance Shotwell relating
[20:29] to the parcels as stated. All those in
favor
[20:33] » I
>> I
[20:34] » I
>> I
[20:35] » any opposed
it vote is unanimous. So,
[20:41] » Kelly, I'm going to send it back to you.
>> It is approved to consider this land
[20:46] exchange to proceed anyway.
Okay. Uh we will now go to the work
[20:53] agenda
which involves I guess we go right to
[20:58] reports.
So, I don't know. Council member Topham,
[21:04] do you want to start?
>> I would love to start. All right. I I
[21:08] attended a theater board meeting. They
talked about um all of the people who
[21:12] are booking the theater. It seems like
we've got a pretty good list of um
[21:18] events and things that are happening in
the theater with like a homeschool
[21:22] academy and Beacon Academy and such. Um
one thing that I do want to put out to
[21:26] the public is that we're having a really
hard time finding people that want to
[21:30] direct plays in Peruan. Um, and so as of
right now, we don't have another play
[21:36] that is scheduled for this year that's
put on by the community theater board.
[21:42] So if you are somebody who would like to
direct a play or anything, get with me,
[21:48] get with Jet Smith, get with Jennifer
Terry. Um, we'll get you on the
[21:53] uh theater agenda and we will talk about
it. There are a few for the following
[21:58] year, like for 2027 and even in 2028
that we're going to do, but there's
[22:02] nothing for the remainder of this year.
So, um, that's sad. So, I just want to
[22:09] shout that out there. So,
>> hopefully we can get some people.
[22:13] » So, that could change if they
>> It could change if somebody
[22:16] » just didn't realize that they could do
that. Maybe. Um, I know Shelley Porter
[22:22] has reached out to all of her contacts
and and such and she's coming up dry, so
[22:28] we need some good people who want to
direct some plays.
[22:32] » Okay.
>> Anything else?
[22:35] » Um, no.
>> Okay. Thank you, Council Member Barton.
[22:41] » Uh, yeah, just an update. We were able
to attend the UMS. Uh Ronnie rode up
[22:47] with me for a couple of days and Dan and
Jeremy were there and couple of
[22:52] takeaways. We are short short of power
and short of transmission lines moving
[22:58] forward into the next years and there's
a lot of good ideas to solve a lot of
[23:04] those problems. But it's going to take a
lot of work and it's going to be an
[23:08] uphill battle. But the thing I was
amazed about was how well received Dan
[23:13] and Jeremy are. They're very wellliked
and and respected
[23:18] through those channels. So, I think we
got a we got great people in there.
[23:22] » Were you more surprised that I was
wellliked or Jeremy?
[23:25] » Well, Jere I was Jeremy. I was like
everybody knows him, hugging on him and
[23:28] like respect. I mean, not that I was
surprised, but it was just
[23:32] » it was just neat to see. [clears throat]
>> There's a lot that Jeremy does on the
[23:37] various boards of the various projects
and he's a he's a chairman of of a of a
[23:43] UMP's board. That's really important. It
takes a lot of administrative stuff to
[23:48] be involved in Uamps and Jeremy carries
the lion share of it. He he really does.
[23:55] A lot of cities, they will pay a former
mayor or former city manager or somebody
[24:01] that was involved for years just to keep
current with everything going on with
[24:06] you Amps. And we're fortunate to have
Jeremy do that. He does a great I agree.
[24:11] I will say that we need to protect him
because everybody up there wants him
[24:14] back or wants to get him. So anyway,
>> I I can veto his retirement or his being
[24:22] poached. I I tell him that all the time.
Okay. Thank you.
[24:27] » Anything else?
>> That's it for me.
[24:30] » Council member Dean.
>> Uh planning and zoning was cancelled. So
[24:34] I had it pretty easy for the last two
weeks.
[24:38] » That's it.
I don't have anything. I think Dan's
[24:42] going to cover what I, you know, as far
as the water. So,
[24:47] » yeah, I've got a few things. Um, first
thing I'm going to start with, um,
[24:52] hopefully good news. Uh, next Thursday,
um, we will be we're on the agenda for
[24:57] CIB to go up and ask and make our
presentation for um, hopefully grant
[25:03] funds for the library. Um, hopefully
they'll give us grant money. we may have
[25:08] to take a loan or a partial loan,
partial grant.
[25:13] They are they sent a letter out to a
bunch of cities and said, "Please
[25:18] reconsider even applying. We don't have
enough money to to loan grant out." Um,
[25:25] probably better for you to stay home.
And luckily, we didn't get one of those
[25:29] letters, but Marcus, our our you guys
met Marcus when we appointed our
[25:33] municipal adviser, he says he's never
seen an agenda this big with requests
[25:37] from CIB.
Um, and we are number 25 of 27 people
[25:43] that will go in front of that board to
ask for funding. So, we've been game
[25:49] planning that and getting ready. Uh,
Marcus feels good about it. Um,
[25:53] hopefully it it goes well. I will not be
in attendance. I could not believe that
[25:59] it when we got the agenda that it's the
exact same day of my knee surgery and
[26:03] I've been waiting for like eight months.
So, I can't reschedule. So, Molly's
[26:08] going and Molly is the secret weapon
when it comes to
[26:10] » She really is
>> getting getting people to commit stuff
[26:13] to the city.
>> It's true.
[26:14] » And Corey's going and um we we might
have Jerry there. Um if but they only
[26:20] give us two to three minutes. And I mean
I love Molly. This is not a diss on
[26:23] Molly. If you think Molly can keep it to
under three minutes when she talked
[26:26] about passionately about Perwin City and
the community center, I don't know.
[26:30] » Said no one ever.
>> So, um, and Marcus will be there, of
[26:34] course, to steer us. Right. So, that's
happening next week. Um, hopefully,
[26:38] fingers crossed that goes well.
[clears throat] Um, that was positive
[26:41] fun. Hopefully, the next one is the
bridge. I am just really extremely
[26:47] frustrated. um Inbridge the gas company
in case anybody doesn't know keep track
[26:52] of what they've changed their name to
this week. They have decided that they
[26:57] have to get update the um
um stream alteration permit even though
[27:03] there's a stream alteration permit to
cover the prog process that originally
[27:07] they were going to bore the new gas line
under the the road that it is just too
[27:14] many boulders and stuff which is smart.
I didn't know how they were going to
[27:17] ever bore it. I figured they were going
to get midbore and have to trench it.
[27:21] Well, they've now determined after doing
their potholeing and stuff that they are
[27:24] going to have to trench it.
Unfortunately, federal money, UD do
[27:28] process, they now have to modify the
stream alteration permit, which they
[27:33] probably won't get that done until
October.
[27:37] » I'm just beyond frustrated. Um, we're
going to get a bridge, but I can't
[27:42] honestly say exactly when. So, what does
that do with like all of our funding and
[27:45] stuff that we've
>> funding is good. U DOT's already expand
[27:48] extended it. We luckily had a a large
buffer because our we got such good
[27:54] bids, but I'm guessing I mean I who
knows what'll happen if if we didn't
[28:00] have that buffer. I would really be
sweating bullets.
[28:03] We're going to get a bridge and I and
and and it should get done under what
[28:07] the funding that we have. It's just we
want this thing done yesterday and we're
[28:12] just sick of it being delayed. But
that's what we're looking at. Just found
[28:16] out that today. I knew that they were
questioning the stream alteration
[28:19] permit, but I just saw today that that
they are for sure going to have to
[28:23] reapply. And so and the state takes 30
days on an accelerated time frame to get
[28:30] that modified.
Um the diversion, uh we did have a a a
[28:35] scare with the diversion. Actually had
part of the project flood. um in recent
[28:40] floods and um
there was there was a little bit of
[28:46] friction afterwards trying to figure
things out between our engineer and the
[28:50] and the soils um engineer and the the uh
contractor and ourselves, but I think
[28:58] we're back on track. um that they had to
uh go down and remove a bunch of
[29:04] material and put material back on.
Specifically, the the bedding that this
[29:09] the the the filter material that that
keeps um any any dirt from getting into
[29:16] the the drain line because you the drain
line needs to take water out from under
[29:21] the structure, but we don't want any any
sort of dirt to go through because it'll
[29:24] eventually erode. So, they had to make
sure that the the fabric and there's a
[29:28] specific type of sand and everything
that filters all that out. They had to
[29:32] make sure that was okay. They had to
clean out the the lines and and and they
[29:36] had to take out a bunch of material that
had been installed just on the dirt burm
[29:40] or the dirt portion of the dam. So, um
they're back on track. That was going to
[29:44] probably delay them a little bit. Um and
but but but JP was just eager to get
[29:50] going. In fact, some of the frustration
was they wanted to immediately get
[29:54] building and we needed the engineers to
make sure we figured out and which we
[29:59] needed them to press pause and figure
out to do it right. We don't want to
[30:02] have a dam that's leaking or is is
somehow um
[30:08] um not built to the standard it's
supposed to be. So, um we're we're back
[30:13] on track there. Um, the last thing that
I have to share is that the reservoir
[30:18] company turned the Yankee out um, today,
which means we should get water
[30:24] tomorrow. Um, is 20 turns a full
turnout?
[30:28] » It's It's hitting the weird right now.
>> Just barely got a text just now that the
[30:32] weird is a five.
>> So, the water is has got here this
[30:36] evening.
>> So, I think that and obviously there's
[30:41] only a certain amount of water. It only
gained about 3 feet in elevation during
[30:44] the time it was off.
>> Yeah.
[30:46] » Um I I'm guessing the farmers are making
a big push to to get a last big cutting
[30:52] out of it. Aldo and I talked, do we go
back to a two-day a week watering
[30:57] because we'll probably maybe have the
water and I what I told Aldo is I said
[31:01] I'll prepare all the communications and
if we see that it actually starts
[31:06] overflowing and we're at that point we
may as well be using the water that
[31:10] point maybe we'll go back. from a red to
a yellow status. But probably my guess
[31:14] only for a few weeks, three weeks.
>> I think with the rains and whatever and
[31:18] just leave it the way it is for now. I
think it's going to be shortlived. And I
[31:22] really think as far as a the farmer
standpoint, we we're going to try to get
[31:28] across with one good watering and then
shut it off for the season would be my
[31:33] guess. Just just to hedge our bet for
another dry winter.
[31:37] » If if we don't and that's fine. We
cannot do that. People are going to
[31:41] complain that water's pouring over the
overflow and we're on one day a week,
[31:45] but that's the tricky thing. It's moving
fast back and forth and the confusion.
[31:51] We we don't want to move between the
numbers very often. But that's the
[31:55] that's the conundrum. So, for the time
being,
[31:58] » well, that being said, I think you could
probably open it back up to two. I think
[32:01] you I think we'll be two weeks cuz we'll
have Robinson Reservoir and then we'll
[32:06] be able to call for Brian Head Pond
which is not much but it it adds some
[32:10] water.
>> Does it?
[32:11] » So I think we'll have good water for for
two weeks at least
[32:16] » if let's see it's the end of August. If
we get another we stretch it two two
[32:20] three weeks.
>> Yeah.
[32:22] » About when it gets shut
>> about when we shut it off anyways.
[32:24] » Yeah.
>> So so that's the last of my updates.
[32:30] » Okay. Thank you. How about Calie? Do you
have anything?
[32:34] » How about you, Scott?
[32:48] » Okay. Thank Thank you.
>> Is that your report?
[32:56] » Okay. Thank you. [clears throat]
>> Now we're on the record. Scott's being
[32:59] serious.
>> Okay. Um, do we have a close session?
[33:04] » We do. We need to go into close.
>> Oh, well. [clears throat] Okay. Well, I
[33:09] thought we were going to hit a record
here. So,
[33:12] » we we we couldn't hit a record without
Molly here.
[33:15] » Okay. Okay.
>> Throwing a monkey wrench.
[33:18] » Anyway. Okay. Uh, I'll entertain a
motion to go into close session.
[33:24] » Can I ask? need to discuss strategy
sessions to discuss pending or imminent
[33:28] litigation.
>> I'll make a motion to go into close
[33:31] session as Dan has stated.
>> I second it.
[33:37] » Okay, it's been moved and seconded that
we go into close session to discuss the
[33:41] items that Dan has listed. I guess roll
call vote.
[33:47] » Rochelle Top and I. David Burton I Bart
I
[33:51] » John D I
>> Okay, thank you for coming everyone. I'm
[33:56] sorry I didn't invite everyone and
welcome everybody at the beginning like
[34:00] Molly does, but we're glad you