[0:39] - Mesdames et Messieurs,
[0:40] bonsoir. Pour cette première
[0:41] séance en 2025, les membres du
[0:43] conseil, moi-même vous
[0:45] souhaitons une très bonne année.
[0:47] Qui a 2025 puisse apporter santé
[0:50] et succès à vous et vos proches.
[0:54] Nous espérons que le congé des
[0:56] Fêtes vous a permis de faire le
[0:58] plein d'énergie et d'avoir de
[1:00] bons moments en famille. C'est
[1:05] avec immense tristesse que nous
[1:06] avons appris au début de l'année
[1:09] le décès de l'ancien maire,
[1:14] monsieur William Franklin
[1:15] McMurchie. Une figure
[1:16] emblématique de notre communauté
[1:17] avec un héritage de services
[1:20] publics inspirants. Nous lui
[1:24] rendrons un premier hommage au
[1:25] cours de cette séance. Encore
[1:29] cette année, la ville propose
[1:31] aux jeunes citoyens et
[1:35] citoyennes
[1:36] (---)
[1:37] scolaires du trois au 7 mars,
[1:38] les inscriptions sont déjà en
[1:43] cours. Rendez-vous dès
[1:46] maintenant sur la plate-forme
[1:47] pour réserver votre place. Au
[1:49] courant du mois de décembre,
[1:51] c'est avec tristesse que nous
[1:52] avons appris le décès de madame
[1:56] Jocelyne Déziel. Madame Déziel a
[1:59] travaillé de 82 à 2018 au
[2:02] Service des affaires juridiques
[2:04] et de graves de la Ville de
[2:06] Pointe-Claire. Ses anciennes
[2:08] collègues et les citoyens
[2:09] pourront se souvenir de son
[2:12] engagement et de son approche
[2:17] attentionné envers personne.
[2:18] Nous la remercions pour les 36
[2:21] années à la ville. Tous nos soit
[2:23] de condamner Anse à sa famille
[2:25] et ses proches. La programmation
[2:30] hiver 2025, encore cette saison,
[2:33] la ville propose une grande
[2:36] variété d'activités et
[2:38] d'événements culturels de
[2:39] loisirs sportif. Visitez le site
[2:42] Web de Pointe-Claire pour
[2:44] découvrir les différentes
[2:45] options qui s'offrent à vous.
[2:50] Mettez dès maintenant la date du
[2:53] samedi 1er février à votre
[2:55] agenda pour le
[2:56] (---)
[2:57] venait en famille de profiter
[2:58] des plaisirs des verts lors de
[3:00] ce traditionnel événement qui se
[3:02] tiendra au parc North vieux.
[3:07] Alors que l'hiver s'installe
[3:10] enfin, les amateurs de planeur
[3:12] pourront se divertir dans les
[3:14] différentes installations
[3:15] sportives hivernales de la
[3:17] ville. Vous pratiquez la
[3:20] regrettée aimait les marches en
[3:21] pleine nature? Les sentiers de
[3:23] Terra-Cotta sont accessibles
[3:25] toute l'année. Pour être plus
[3:28] actifs et actives, les
[3:30] nombreuses patinoires
[3:31] extérieures sont les lieux tout
[3:33] désigné pour patiner en famille
[3:36] ou jouer une partie de hockey
[3:37] entre amis. Dès que les
[3:40] accumulations de neige le
[3:42] permettront, les sentiers de ski
[3:43] au club de golf Guilde et les
[3:46] dix entiers hivernaux seront
[3:48] aménagés dans différents parcs.
[3:51] Surveillez les comptes médias
[3:53] sociaux et les situaient de la
[3:55] ville pour les annonces de leur
[3:57] ouverture. Good evening, ladies
[3:58] and gentlemen, for this first
[4:01] meeting of 2025, the councillor
[4:03] and I would like to wish you a
[4:04] happy new year. May 2025 bring
[4:07] happiness, health and success to
[4:08] you and your loved ones. We hope
[4:10] that the holiday season provided
[4:11] you an opportunity to recharge
[4:14] your batteries and spend some
[4:15] quality time with your families.
[4:18] As the new year began, we were
[4:19] deeply saddened to learn that
[4:21] former Mayor William Franklin
[4:23] McMurchie had passed away. He
[4:25] was an iconic figure in our
[4:27] community and leaves an
[4:28] inspiring legacy of public
[4:29] service. We will be paying our
[4:31] first tribute to him during this
[4:33] meeting. Once again, this year,
[4:36] the city is offering the youth
[4:39] of March break camp from March
[4:41] 3rd to March 7th. Registrations
[4:43] are already underway. Visit the
[4:46] looted platform now to reserve
[4:47] your spot. In December, we were
[4:52] very sorry to learn about the
[4:54] passing of Mrs. Jocelyne Déziel
[4:57] from 19 82 to 2018. Miss Déziel
[5:01] work for the City of
[5:03] Pointe-Claire. The City of
[5:04] Pointe-Claire's legal affairs
[5:05] department and clerk's office.
[5:07] Former colleagues and citizens
[5:08] will remember her for her
[5:10] unwavering commitment, genuine
[5:12] consideration she had for
[5:14] everyone. We are grateful to
[5:16] miss Déziel for 36 years of
[5:18] service to the city. Our sincere
[5:20] sympathies go out to her family
[5:21] and friends. Winter programming
[5:26] 2025. Once again, this season,
[5:27] this city is offering a wide
[5:28] variety of cultural, leisure and
[5:30] sports activities and events.
[5:32] Visit the Pointe-Claire website
[5:33] to discover the various options
[5:35] available to you. Save the date
[5:37] of Saturday, February 1st for
[5:39] winter carnival. Bring the whole
[5:41] family to enjoy winter fun at
[5:43] this traditional event in
[5:44] Northview Park. As winter
[5:47] finally sets in, outdoor
[5:49] enthusiasts can enjoy the city's
[5:51] various winter sports
[5:52] facilities. If you enjoy
[5:53] snowshoeing and walking in the
[5:54] great outdoors, the terracotta
[5:56] trails are accessible all year
[5:59] round. For the more active
[6:00] among, you skating rinks are the
[6:04] perfect place to enjoy families
[6:06] gaining out being or enjoy
[6:08] hockey with friends. If there is
[6:10] enough snow, and maybe there
[6:11] might be after tonight, the
[6:13] Beaconsfield ski trails and 12
[6:14] winter trails will be open in
[6:15] all the various parts. Keep an
[6:17] eye on the City social media
[6:19] accounts and website to find out
[6:20] more about when they will be
[6:23] opening. Madame Thibault?
[6:30] - Adoption de l'ordre du jour.
[6:34] Adoption of the agenda.
[6:35] >> For adoption of the general,
[6:37] I have a mover?
[6:41] >> District 6. The
[6:42] >> Senator?
[6:46] >> District 2.
[6:47] >> All in favour? Probably the
[6:49] most important part of this
[6:52] meeting Le conseil municipal
[6:53] rend hommage à monsieur William
[6:55] Franklin McMurchie, décédé le
[6:56] 1er janvier 2025 avant, en
[7:01] Ontario. Ancien maire et figure
[7:04] emblématique de notre
[7:05] communauté, il laisse derrière
[7:08] lui... un héritage durable et
[7:10] une empreinte indélébile sur
[7:12] notre ville. Ce soir, nous
[7:15] exprimons notre reconnaissance
[7:17] pour tout ce qu'il a fait pour
[7:18] notre ville. Didier, travailleur
[7:23] acharné et passionné, William
[7:26] Franklin McMurchie a consacré
[7:27] près de 57 ans de sa vie à
[7:30] servir Pointe-Claire. Il a servi
[7:33] comme conseiller municipal de 90
[7:36] à 98, avant d'être à lui maire
[7:38] de la ville en 98 à 2001.
[7:44] (---)
[7:45] Le 2001 à 2005, lors des fusions
[7:47] avec la Ville de Montréal et à
[7:50] nouveau maire de 2005 à 2013,
[7:54] devenant l'un des élus qui a
[7:56] servi le plus longtemps dans
[7:58] l'ouest de l'île de Montréal.
[8:01] Sous sa direction, la ville a
[8:03] connu des avancées
[8:05] significatives dans les domaines
[8:07] environnementaux, sociaux et
[8:11] culturels. Mais en Saskatchewan,
[8:13] monsieur McMurchie a déménagé à
[8:15] Montréal en 56, où il a commencé
[8:17] à travailler pour la Ville de
[8:19] Pointe-Claire comme
[8:20] (---)
[8:21] . Ce premier emploi marquera le
[8:24] début d'une carrière exemplaire
[8:26] dans l'administration publique
[8:28] est en politique municipale. En
[8:31] tant que maire, il a soutenu des
[8:34] initiatives telles que: la
[8:38] réduction
[8:39] (---)
[8:40] dans la ville, la réglementation
[8:41] des émissions des foyers à bois,
[8:46] l'ouverture du premier écocentre
[8:48] de l'ouest de l'île, elle a
[8:49] diffusions de points clairs de
[8:51] la Ville de Pointe-Claire. Il a
[8:54] également été un fervent
[8:55] protecteur des berges et du
[8:57] Bordeleau de Pointe-Claire. En
[9:00] investissant dans l'acquisition
[9:01] et la protection de ces
[9:03] écosystèmes fragiles, il permet
[9:06] aux citoyens aujourd'hui et les
[9:09] générations futures de profiter
[9:11] d'espaces publics donnant sur le
[9:14] Lac-Saint-Louis. Toutefois, il
[9:16] est surtout connu pour avoir été
[9:18] le fer de lance de la diffusion
[9:20] de Pointe-Claire, de la Ville de
[9:24] Montréal. En 2001, il a été élu
[9:27] représentant de Pointe-Claire au
[9:28] sein du nouveau conseil
[9:30] municipal de Montréal en tant
[9:32] que membre
[9:34] (inaudible)
[9:35] des citoyens de l'île de
[9:37] Montréal de Gérald Tremblay. Un
[9:40] parti politique qui a promis de
[9:42] décentraliser la nouvelle
[9:43] mégapole et de permettre aux
[9:45] membres de son caucus de faire
[9:49] (inaudible)
[9:50] la diffusion, si jamais le
[9:51] gouvernement provincial
[9:53] autoriser les citoyens à voter
[9:54] pour cette option lors du
[9:56] référendum local. Cette province
[10:00] n'a pas été... cette promesse
[10:03] n'a pas été tenue. McMurchie a
[10:06] été le premier conseiller
[10:08] municipal à quitter le caucus de
[10:10] Tremblay. Il a pris la tête de
[10:12] la Compagnie de l'ouest de l'île
[10:13] en faveur de la diffusion
[10:16] municipale. Ce faisant, il a
[10:19] fait preuve d'un véritable jeu
[10:24] courage politique face à
[10:25] l'ensemble de la
[10:26] (---)
[10:27] structure d'agglomération
[10:30] injuste et un processus
[10:33] référendaire tout aussi
[10:34] inéquitable visant à maintenir
[10:36] les banlieues fusionner à
[10:39] l'intérieur de Montréal. Il a
[10:40] pris cette décision à un moment
[10:43] où la plupart de ses collègues
[10:46] des autres banlieues avait soit
[10:48] changé de position pour soutenir
[10:49] la nouvelle mégapole, soit
[10:51] choisi de rester neutre.
[10:54] Aujourd'hui, le niveau
[10:57] d'autonomie dont jouit
[10:58] Pointe-Claire est en grande
[11:00] partie dû à sa vision et à sa
[11:05] direction. Au fil des échanges
[11:07] que j'ai eues avec monsieur
[11:09] McMurchie, j'ai toujours
[11:12] apprécié sa sagesse, son sens de
[11:14] l'humour et la facilité avec
[11:16] laquelle les citoyens ordinaires
[11:17] peuvent s'adresser à lui. Je lui
[11:21] suis particulièrement
[11:23] reconnaissant d'avoir soutenu
[11:25] l'idée de donner au YMCA
[11:28] nouvellement acquis le nom de
[11:30] Lancet... ancienne mairesse,
[11:33] Olive-Urquhart. Le rôle qu'il a
[11:36] joué dans
[11:37] (---)
[11:38] l'histoire de notre vie,
[11:39] j'espérais que nous pourrions
[11:40] lui faire la distinction
[11:43] particulière de lui donner un
[11:44] parcours un bâtiment public en
[11:45] son honneur de son vivant. Ma
[11:50] préférence Halle et va toujours
[11:52] au parc situé à l'angle des rues
[11:55] Cartier et Lake Shore. Lorsque
[12:00] j'ai invoqué cette idée avec
[12:01] lui, il a insisté qu'il
[12:04] n'accepterait cet honneur que si
[12:05] le vote était unanime. Cela
[12:09] témoigne de son caractère et du
[12:11] niveau d'humilité que l'on
[12:13] trouve rarement chez les hommes
[12:15] politiques ou les personnes
[12:17] politiques. J'espère que nous
[12:18] pourrons arriver à cette
[12:21] unanimité quant Pointe-Claire
[12:22] lui doit littéralement son
[12:25] existence et lui sera toujours
[12:28] redevable. La Ville de
[12:30] Pointe-Claire présente ses plus
[12:31] sincères condoléances à la
[12:33] famille et aux proches de
[12:34] monsieur McMurchie. Nous sommes
[12:36] reconnaissants pour tout ce
[12:38] qu'il a accompli et nous nous
[12:40] souviendrons toujours de son
[12:42] dévouement envers notre
[12:44] communauté. Municipal council
[12:47] pays tribute to Mr. William
[12:50] Franklin McMurchie who passed
[12:51] away on January 1st, 2025 in
[12:54] von, Ontario. Former mayor and a
[12:57] cherished figure in our
[12:58] community, leave behind a
[12:59] lasting legacy and mark in our
[13:02] city. Tonight we honour him for
[13:04] all he has done for our city.
[13:07] Dedicated, hardworking and
[13:10] passionate, William McMurchie
[13:13] devoted 26 years of his life to
[13:14] serving Pointe-Claire. He served
[13:15] as a city council from 1990 to
[13:18] 1998 before being elected mayor
[13:20] and serving from 1998 to 2001.
[13:24] He would become borough mayor
[13:25] from 2001 to 2005 during the
[13:28] municipal mergers with the City
[13:29] of Montréal and before regaining
[13:32] his post as mayor of
[13:34] Pointe-Claire from 2005 to 2013.
[13:37] His tenure in office would make
[13:39] him one of the longest serving
[13:40] elected officials in the West
[13:42] Island of Montréal. Under his
[13:44] leadership, the City achieve
[13:46] significant progress in
[13:48] environmental, social and
[13:49] cultural sectors. Born in
[13:52] Saskatchewan, Mr. McMurchie
[13:53] moved to Montréal the 1956 where
[13:55] he began working for the City of
[13:57] Pointe-Claire as a student with,
[14:00] actually, all over. This first
[14:03] job marked the start of an
[14:04] exemplary career in public
[14:07] administration and municipal
[14:09] politics. As mayor, he led
[14:10] initiatives such as reducing
[14:12] speed limits in the city,
[14:14] regulating wood burning
[14:15] fireplace emissions, opening the
[14:17] West Island's first ecocentre
[14:21] and, of course, spearheading
[14:23] Pointe-Claire is the merger from
[14:24] the City of Montréal. He was
[14:25] also devoted protector of the
[14:28] shoreline and waterfronts of
[14:30] Pointe-Claire by investing in
[14:31] the acquisition and protection
[14:33] of these delicate ecosystems, he
[14:35] has ensured that today citizens
[14:37] and future generations can enjoy
[14:39] public spaces overlooking
[14:43] Lac-Saint-Louis. Bill would be
[14:44] best known for spearheading
[14:45] Point cleanse the merger from
[14:47] the City of Montréal. In 2001,
[14:49] he was elected to represent
[14:51] Pointe-Claire on the newly merge
[14:52] Montréal City Council as a
[14:54] member of Gerard Tremblay's
[14:56] Montréal Island citizens unit. A
[14:58] party which promised to
[15:00] decentralize the new major city
[15:02] and allow its caucus members to
[15:04] campaign for the merger if ever
[15:06] the provincial government
[15:07] allowed citizens to vote for
[15:08] that option in local
[15:11] referendums. When that promise
[15:12] was broken, Bill McMurchie was
[15:15] the first City Council to lead
[15:17] Trump's caucus and become a
[15:18] leader of the West Island
[15:19] campaign for the merger. In
[15:21] doing so, he demonstrated
[15:23] genuine political courage in the
[15:25] face of the entire political or
[15:27] provincial political
[15:29] establishment, which created
[15:30] both the unfair conglomeration
[15:32] structure and an equally unfair
[15:34] referendum process into keeping
[15:35] merged suburbs within Montréal.
[15:38] He also did this at a time when
[15:39] most of his colleagues among the
[15:41] former suburban mayors have
[15:42] either changed positions to
[15:44] support the new major city or
[15:45] had chosen to remain neutral.
[15:48] The level of autonomy that
[15:50] Pointe-Claire enjoys today is in
[15:52] large part due to Bill
[15:55] McMurchie's vision and
[15:56] leadership. In exchange as I had
[15:57] with bill over the years, I
[15:58] always appreciated his wisdom,
[16:00] his sense of humour and how
[16:02] easily approachable he was
[16:04] toward ordinary citizens. I was
[16:06] particularly grateful for his
[16:08] support for naming the newly
[16:09] acquired YMCA after former mayor
[16:13] Olive-Urquhart. He actually
[16:14] teared up when I spoke to him
[16:15] about it, it was quite touching.
[16:17] Given the important role he
[16:18] played in our city's history, my
[16:20] hope was that we could do have a
[16:22] special honour of naming a
[16:23] public park or building after
[16:25] him during his lifetime. My
[16:27] preference wasn't remain the
[16:29] unnamed park at the corn of car
[16:31] chain lakeshore. I think it
[16:32] spoke to his character and a
[16:35] level of humidity really found
[16:38] among politicians. When I raised
[16:39] the idea with, and he insisted
[16:40] that he would only accept the
[16:42] honour if the vote were
[16:44] unanimous. I hope we can find
[16:45] that unanimity. Pointe-Claire
[16:48] may literally owe him its
[16:50] existence and will always be in
[16:52] his debt. The City of
[16:53] Pointe-Claire extends its
[16:55] deepest condolences to Mr.
[16:57] McMurchie's family and loved
[16:58] ones. We are profoundly grateful
[17:00] for all he has accomplished and
[17:01] will always remember his
[17:03] unwavering dedication to our
[17:05] community. Thank you.
[17:07] >> 3.1, to approve the minutes
[17:09] of the regular meeting of
[17:10] December, third, 2024 in the
[17:12] Special meetings of December,
[17:13] 16th and December 18th, 2024.
[17:16] >> 4.1 do I have a mover?
[17:21] >> Eric Stork district 7.
[17:22] >> Seconder?
[17:24] >> Tara Stainforth. District 4.
[17:26] >> All in favour? Question
[17:30] period. Période des questions.
[17:31] Je m'excuse, Madame Thibault. As
[17:37] usual Pour laquelle période de
[17:38] questions, vous avez été
[17:39] accueilli à l'entrée pour vous
[17:41] inscrire à la période des
[17:42] questions afin de vous permettre
[17:43] de demeurer à vos places jusqu'à
[17:45] l'appel de votre nom. Nous
[17:46] garderons 90 minutes pour la
[17:48] période des questions. Une
[17:50] personne à la fois au micro.
[17:52] Nous vous remercions d'attendre
[17:54] que le citoyen ait terminé de
[17:56] poser sa question et que vous
[17:58] soyez appelés avant de vous
[18:00] lever pour poser votre question.
[18:03] Nous accordons la priorité aux
[18:05] résidents et aux résidentes de
[18:08] Pointe-Claire. Les non-résidents
[18:09] pourront poser leurs questions
[18:10] par la suite, si le temps n'est
[18:12] pas écouler. For question
[18:16] period, you are greeted for the
[18:18] period so you can remain seated
[18:20] until your name is called. We
[18:22] shall stick to the 90 minute
[18:23] time limit for question period.
[18:25] One person at a time at the
[18:27] microphone. Thank you for
[18:28] waiting for a citizen to finish
[18:30] asking their question to be
[18:31] called before you get up to ask
[18:33] yours. We will give priority to
[18:36] Pointe-Claire residents and
[18:39] nonresidents can ask darkness
[18:40] afterward if time has run out.
[18:44] First person up
[18:51] .
[18:54] >> Hi, everyone. I would just
[18:55] like to start off by saying
[18:57] thank you to the City Council,
[18:58] the mayor and the administration
[19:00] for approving Athens Park last
[19:03] year. I also saw that it has
[19:04] been approved by the commission
[19:07] of Québec. So I'm very happy
[19:08] with that. My question is just,
[19:11] is there an estimated timeline
[19:13] for the next steps like the
[19:16] public consultation process for
[19:19] the land use an inauguration of
[19:21] the park?
[19:22] >> Very good questions. All of
[19:24] them.
[19:26] - Madame Verdun, est-ce qu'on a
[19:27] un horaire pour le parc?
[19:31] >> Estimated.
[19:32] À peu près? >> We do not, you
[19:34] have to do the signage so it
[19:35] would probably be during the
[19:37] [Inaudible]
[19:38] >> With the integration of the
[19:39] park be done before the
[19:42] consultation process to decide
[19:43] if there's going to be a
[19:44] playground or anything else
[19:45] added like that?
[19:46] >> That is what we have to
[19:47] decide with the City Council
[19:48] but, yes we can do the
[19:50] inauguration of the name of the
[19:53] park.
[19:54] >> Perfect.
[19:55] >> The name is solid.
[19:56] >> Thank you. Just a second
[19:58] question, I was also reading the
[20:01] 2023 parks and green spaces
[20:03] report that Pointe-Claire
[20:04] produced last year. I saw the
[20:08] park at the entrance of the
[20:09] village was referred to as class
[20:13] Cartier.
[20:14] >> That is the name we all call
[20:15] it.
[20:16] >> I did not see an official
[20:17] name published.
[20:18] >> It's not.
[20:19] >> Is there a reason for that?
[20:20] >> It has not been named yet.
[20:21] The park has not been named yet,
[20:23] officially. Which is what I was
[20:25] proposing. One of my proposed --
[20:28] propositions for my speech in
[20:29] Mr. McMurchie.
[20:30] >> Thank you.
[20:31] >> Thank you. I am.
[20:42] Ryan Derek.
[20:43] >> Good evening. I did not know
[20:45] how this process works. I am 6.1
[20:48] on the agenda. It's hard to ask
[20:49] a question about something that
[20:51] we have not talked about yet.
[20:53] >> I believe Mr. Derek gets an
[21:00] opportunity 6.1? No? Go ahead.
[21:04] >> 6.1. I am 191 Lakeshore, of
[21:05] easy I'm here to see if there is
[21:07] a decision on my house but I
[21:08] guess we are going to have to
[21:09] sit and wait until we hear about
[21:11] 6.1. It's hard to ask questions
[21:13] about something that we cannot
[21:14] --
[21:15] >> We have not yet voted on it.
[21:16] That is correct.
[21:20] >> It's hard to argue it because
[21:21] I have contested the original
[21:24] demolition decision so we do not
[21:25] know where we are at so I do not
[21:27] know what to argue about.
[21:28] >> Do you want to make an
[21:29] impassioned plea?
[21:30] [Laughter]
[21:32] >> Sure. I live in that house, I
[21:34] know the first demolition
[21:36] committee that they felt that
[21:37] the house was not deemed in that
[21:40] enough shape to be demolished
[21:42] but I believe the report was
[21:45] done -- was not done properly.
[21:46] They did not take into the
[21:48] proper consideration. They also
[21:49] inspected the house for 1963 in
[21:51] the middle of summer where the
[21:52] whole conditions in the winter
[21:54] changed. I can tell you my
[21:55] bedroom is minus five and this
[21:58] house is 63 years old. For me to
[22:00] take a house and unfortunately
[22:05] tearing down to build a new one,
[22:06] which is almost the same look as
[22:07] the new neighbourhood we have
[22:09] proposed. The cost of that to
[22:12] doing the renovations to bring
[22:13] the same thing that is going to
[22:14] cost me double. I can give you
[22:17] one estimation. On the general
[22:19] contractor, I know the
[22:20] estimation to do my house. If I
[22:21] build a house into a new house
[22:22] is gonna be 1 million dollars.
[22:24] To renovate its gonna cost me $2
[22:26] million and going to take me
[22:28] twice, if not three years,
[22:29] because I do not have to fight
[22:30] all. Have 1 million dollars to
[22:31] the house. I'm going to disturb
[22:33] the whole neighbourhood because
[22:34] it takes three years in my
[22:36] current house is in poaching on
[22:38] the property lines and stuff
[22:39] like that. I do not think there
[22:42] is a lot of things to consider
[22:44] besides walking around my house
[22:45] and saying that it's in good
[22:48] condition. When I moved into the
[22:49] house, it was from 1963 inside
[22:51] and a half or a young children
[22:53] and it was not safe to live in
[22:55] that style house. Since I'm a
[22:57] contractor, I spend my weekends
[22:58] and stuff renovating the
[23:00] bathroom and stuff like that to
[23:01] bring it up to standard some in
[23:02] my children get hurt. The fact
[23:04] that, yes, the house kind of
[23:06] looks in good shape cosmetics,
[23:07] there's tons of structural
[23:08] problems and electrical problems
[23:09] that you cannot see unless you
[23:11] have ex revision or you open up
[23:12] the walls like I did. It's
[23:15] really hard to fight something
[23:17] that you cannot talk about.
[23:18] >> Well spoken, Mr. Derek. Thank
[23:21] you.
[23:22] >> This is my attorney that is
[23:23] with me.
[23:25] >> You could sit down and she
[23:27] can take over, if you'd like.
[23:29] >> Hi, sorry. Thank you, I did
[23:31] not mean to interrupt him but I
[23:32] just feel like he forgot to
[23:34] mention an important point is
[23:36] that the previous decision from
[23:38] -- I read the decision of the
[23:42] committee. It seems it has been
[23:44] based solely on a report that
[23:46] asked the complete cost of the
[23:49] renovation $64,000. With all due
[23:51] respect, that is completely
[23:53] unrealistic. We have reports
[23:54] that say otherwise. Even the
[23:59] inspection before numbers, a
[24:01] very expensive list of things
[24:02] that need to do and it seems to
[24:05] me that the decision was fully
[24:07] based on that, on the 64,000
[24:09] dollar cost of reconstruction
[24:11] and considering the reports
[24:14] contradict that report, I think
[24:15] the committees could take that
[24:16] into consideration as well. At
[24:18] the end of the day, all the
[24:21] other requirements that we find
[24:23] in the bylaw, respect to the
[24:28] demolition of the movable, have
[24:30] been met. I think that is the
[24:32] only point that we need to take
[24:34] into consideration right now. In
[24:36] the report that says that the
[24:38] cost of demolition is only
[24:41] $64,000. He says, and I
[24:43] mentioned that in the appeal
[24:44] that we filed and I do not know
[24:47] if anyone had a chance to review
[24:49] it but we do mention that he
[24:51] mentioned several times that
[24:53] supplemental reports and
[24:55] analysis should be done in order
[24:56] to compliment this report
[24:58] because it is not complete so I
[24:59] would like for the committee to
[25:02] take that into consideration as
[25:03] well.
[25:04] >> Thank you.
[25:11] Philippe Pare.
[25:14] >> Good afternoon. My question
[25:16] is as follows, we are currently
[25:18] in 2025 and we are getting our
[25:21] to run your Mitchell stations
[25:22] later this year and our new bus
[25:28] system. Light metro, light rail,
[25:31] something. My question is as
[25:33] follows, both the Saint-Jean
[25:35] Industry Highway 40 crossings
[25:37] are still kind of extremely
[25:39] dangerous for pedestrians and
[25:41] cyclists to cross due to the
[25:43] sidewalks and all the car
[25:45] traffic. Can we please get
[25:47] somewhat of an update for the
[25:50] plan pedestrian crossing at St.
[25:52] John's and the restructuring
[25:53] that is going to be happening on
[25:58] Des Sources four be able to
[25:59] cross Highway 40 safely?
[26:03] >> Madame Vendôme do we have
[26:05] plans for improvement of the
[26:10] crossings?
[26:11] En avant des stations de renom?
[26:13] >> That we have in the CIP, we
[26:15] have a project with the and PQ.
[26:18] I do not have the timeline,
[26:21] unfortunately, but it's supposed
[26:22] to be a little bit after that
[26:25] the REM station is open but we
[26:26] are working on it.
[26:28] >> Thank you. For my sub
[26:29] question, if it's possible, --
[26:33] >> Just intervene, I do not mean
[26:34] to interrupt, there is a
[26:35] potential overpass.
[26:37] >> I know there is some --
[26:39] >> A pedestrian bicycle
[26:41] overpass, potentially. If all
[26:43] goes well, knock on wood, there
[26:44] is potential.
[26:46] >> For my second question, can
[26:49] we please ask you as you are a
[26:51] member of the Anglo council
[26:53] meeting in Montréal, to please
[26:56] ask the STM to get the ball
[26:59] rolling so we actually know how
[27:01] our bus network will be
[27:02] affected. They have been silent
[27:03] and silent and silent and
[27:06] nothing.
[27:07] >> They have actually got their
[27:08] plans ready and they have
[27:09] actually started proposing them
[27:11] to us. We are meeting with that
[27:13] as we speak.
[27:15] >> Thank you very much.
[27:16] >> And they are interesting
[27:18] Claude. Pat McGee.
[27:26] >> Hello, I'm Patrick McGee the
[27:29] architect filed for 191. I don't
[27:33] have a whole lot but to make
[27:34] sure that the demolition
[27:36] committee read the engineers
[27:38] report, my report as well as the
[27:41] independent contractors report
[27:42] on the costing analysis of
[27:44] bringing the home up to current
[27:47] standards. I do not believe they
[27:48] have read all the doctors prior
[27:50] to the last meeting. I want to
[27:52] know if they have prior to the
[27:53] decision that has been made
[27:56] first.
[27:57] >> I cannot answer that. Anybody
[27:59] on the demolition committee
[28:00] choose to answer that?
[28:03] >> Yes, yes and yes?
[28:06] >> Thank you Mr. McGee. Linda
[28:13] Dumas.
[28:17] [Inaudible]
[28:30] We had it once and
[28:32] [Inaudible]
[28:38] >> I personally love podiums
[28:42] myself.
[28:43] >> When your legs are wobbly.
[28:45] Good evening. Once again, I am
[28:53] here always regarding --
[28:56] >> Madam Dumas, if I can just
[28:59] ask you speaking to the
[29:00] microphone.
[29:01] >> I'm sorry. Is it working?
[29:02] >> Yes.
[29:03] >> Regarding the forest, the
[29:05] force being the Fairview forest,
[29:07] but when one is here for the
[29:10] Fairview forest, we are here for
[29:13] biodiversity, we are here for to
[29:19] try to make sure that the lack
[29:23] of this biodiversity does not
[29:25] become less. My preamble but I
[29:32] will be asking Mr. Eric Stork
[29:36] and Mr. Brent Cowan a question.
[29:39] I, in 2018, I moved here, there
[29:41] was the election when I found
[29:44] out about the forest. I have had
[29:47] a sign saved the first ever
[29:50] since but it was only two years
[29:53] ago, exactly, January 2023, that
[29:55] I first came to a council
[29:57] meeting ever in my life and I
[29:59] have since found out that a few
[30:01] other people are not necessarily
[30:05] long council meeting goers or
[30:12] speakers. This entity, this
[30:18] longer, I am now calling it a
[30:21] hospital, the forest is a
[30:24] hospital. Recently there has
[30:25] been doctors who have been
[30:28] prescribing that people --
[30:31] giving them a prescription to
[30:33] visit a forced. It's new in the
[30:35] news. I think it was from
[30:37] Ontario in the last number of
[30:38] weeks. When I first came in 2023
[30:42] to a special council meeting
[30:45] this was to get Madam Verdon to
[30:51] get to be able to speak to
[30:53] Cadillac Fairview. Cadillac
[30:58] Fairview I certainly want to say
[31:00] is being -- has been a
[31:04] decades-long contributor to our
[31:07] society. The corporation would
[31:08] not be here if not profitable.
[31:13] One, almost never mentions the
[31:14] name Cadillac Fairview and even
[31:17] less the Ontario teachers
[31:19] pension plan. With that
[31:24] preamble, I wish to talk a lot
[31:26] more about buying this. I have
[31:31] sent letters a year and a half
[31:33] ago to the OTTP saying let's
[31:39] negotiate this. You are
[31:41] educators, you are informed
[31:42] people, why on earth in the 24
[31:45] century something so sustainable
[31:50] for the human species. I have
[31:53] recently come to judge that we
[31:55] are not in a -- the planet is
[32:01] not in crisis, the climate is
[32:03] not in crisis, it's the human
[32:05] species, the plant species, the
[32:07] animal species. We are in
[32:09] crisis. Of course, most of us
[32:12] know that the abundance of what
[32:18] mankind, remnants of mankind did
[32:19] for over century has accelerated
[32:22] the situation that we are all in
[32:25] and even those who don't read
[32:28] about it certainly, if they put
[32:30] on the television or a friend or
[32:34] someone, an acquaintance, will
[32:35] say oh my goodness have you
[32:37] heard about the latest disaster?
[32:41] Disasters will always happen.
[32:42] They always have through the
[32:46] ages but it is over 40 years
[32:50] more well documented, worldwide
[32:53] by collaboration of scientists
[32:57] who forward their data that
[33:02] mankind and plants and animals
[33:06] are in a very, very tenacious
[33:11] situation. In the October 9th
[33:18] 1510 west, Mr. Eric Stork, you
[33:20] were quoted and you are asking
[33:23] and I heard maybe in December
[33:26] that you wish to have a formal
[33:29] evaluation of this forest. With
[33:36] all the information that is so
[33:43] apparent, more than a parent, it
[33:45] is logical, it is objective.
[33:49] Those people who are passionate
[33:51] about this, they bring their
[33:52] passion because of the logic and
[33:54] the objectivity of this
[33:59] existential crisis that we are
[34:01] faced with. I would like to
[34:04] know, Mr. Stork, why your
[34:07] interest has come about only
[34:09] three years in to this four-year
[34:16] mandate? Why you have come up
[34:20] with this now so late and never
[34:26] having spoken about really
[34:29] coming up ideas to keep this
[34:33] forest alive.
[34:36] >> I will answer. First, it
[34:39] sounds like a very politically
[34:41] motivated question.
[34:42] >> It is not. It is absolutely
[34:45] not.
[34:46] >> May I speak?
[34:47] >> Well, yes, first of all, it's
[34:48] not political.
[34:49] >> Perfect. My position on the
[34:50] Fairview force has not changed
[34:51] since day one. Not since day
[34:54] one. Anybody who lives in my
[34:55] district, who I've spoken to, my
[34:57] position has not changed. It
[34:59] came about because at 1.7
[35:01] citizens reached out to me.
[35:03] She's not in the room today. We
[35:05] were working an email so I had
[35:06] to address it. I came out with
[35:08] somewhat of a formal position on
[35:10] this and that was my position.
[35:11] My position has not changed from
[35:12] day one. It is a citizen's
[35:17] decision. We have to have the
[35:18] facts and we have to make this
[35:20] decision together as a city. My
[35:23] position has not changed and it
[35:24] came out of necessity to finally
[35:27] take the elephant out of the
[35:28] room in terms of cost,
[35:31] environment, impact, all those
[35:33] variables have to be put
[35:35] together, digested, something
[35:38] said in a decision made because
[35:39] it was going on for too long and
[35:40] I took the courage to come out
[35:42] and actually take that position.
[35:45] >> Am I able to speak?
[35:49] >> It's not a debate. Do you
[35:51] have a subsequent question for
[35:54] Council Brent Cowan? Madame
[35:56] Dumas, you are allowed to
[35:58] question.
[35:59] >> Can I reply? I cannot reply?
[36:01] >> You can simply reply but not
[36:03] address your subsequent question
[36:05] would have to be if you have a
[36:07] follow-up question. You
[36:10] suggested one to Senator count
[36:12] as well. If you use the
[36:13] subsequent question it could be
[36:14] to Councillor Stork but you lose
[36:16] the opportunity to question
[36:18] Councillor Cowan.
[36:19] >> It's not a subsequent
[36:21] question. You are deeming that
[36:22] I'm up here politically. I am
[36:25] not. You wonder if you are still
[36:29] wondering in the 21st century
[36:30] where have you been? Do you
[36:31] read? Do you study? Do you
[36:34] listen?
[36:35] >> Madame Dumas, these are all
[36:37] questions.
[36:38] >> Fine. I find it very, very
[36:39] weak. That is not a question.
[36:40] Extremely weak.
[36:41] >> You have a subsequent
[36:43] question?
[36:44] >> Yes. A bit of a preamble. The
[36:49] force needs to be paid for.
[36:53] Perhaps we have to convince
[36:54] Cadillac Fairview that it is --
[37:00] it is in their best interest in
[37:03] their own families interest and
[37:05] their progeny, et cetera, et
[37:07] cetera and our progeny to save
[37:10] what we have around us
[37:13] especially it's not the golf
[37:17] course and the golf course will
[37:21] probably or Beaconsfield golf
[37:22] course will probably come up one
[37:25] day but it is a much larger
[37:26] green space and it is not
[37:30] surrounded by a stranglehold of
[37:34] the island in pyramid billet-y.
[37:37] Mr. Cowan, in that October 9th
[37:43] 1510 west, you actually had an
[37:45] entire letter to the editor. I
[37:48] believe you ended it with «
[37:51] let's sum up the courage and the
[37:54] content of it  » was paying for
[37:58] the forest. 20 million here, 10
[38:01] million there, et cetera, et
[38:03] cetera. I am wondering why,
[38:08] talking about elephants in the
[38:09] room, Cadillac Fairview being
[38:12] one, paying for this forest. In
[38:14] needs to be paid for, it is
[38:15] owned by somebody but there are
[38:20] ways of achieving it and
[38:23] certainly not dialoguing with
[38:24] the opponent. Cadillac Fairview
[38:27] is not the enemy, it is provided
[38:30] so much to this community over
[38:32] so many decades and some people
[38:36] call it Mecca I'm wondering why
[38:42] instead of only question or
[38:45] statements, Mr. Cowan, why don't
[38:48] you have some ideas, as I do,
[38:52] and I believe Madam Tara
[38:56] Stainforth has mentioned to me
[38:58] just in passing that she has had
[39:00] ideas. Why is that never
[39:02] discussed and could you -- I
[39:05] have ideas. What are your ideas
[39:08] for raising this money given
[39:11] that entire hospital complex all
[39:14] raised by fundraising? I will
[39:17] just and, I realize, the forest
[39:21] is a hospital. It is already
[39:23] built. We do not have to wait
[39:24] five or ten years for it. We
[39:27] just have to pay for it. Thank
[39:30] you.
[39:31] >> Thank you for the question. I
[39:32] think in that same letter that I
[39:35] did actually make a proposition
[39:38] and where I could see money come
[39:40] from. I said I thought
[39:41] Pointe-Claire could afford $10
[39:43] million. I said I believe there
[39:45] was a federal government program
[39:47] to support this kind of
[39:49] initiative. I cannot remember if
[39:50] it was ten or $20 million or
[39:52] something. I figured that the
[39:54] Agglo could match that will
[39:56] Pointe-Claire was putting in and
[39:57] I figured that the province of
[39:59] Québec could put in the balance.
[40:00] I wrote that on the letter.
[40:02] There is a concept of where the
[40:05] money could possibly come from.
[40:07] The challenge would be to try to
[40:10] convince them and those
[40:12] challenges are not in
[40:15] significant. That does not mean
[40:16] that they are insurmountable.
[40:18] One of the letter was to
[40:21] actually say two things. One,
[40:23] you have to pay for it. I do not
[40:25] see any alternative to preserve
[40:27] the land in the entirety and
[40:29] number two, I came up with what
[40:31] I could see is a way to fairly
[40:34] share the cost and then we could
[40:37] -- the city could possibly
[40:39] organize, the mayor could
[40:40] possibly organize then to
[40:42] approach these levels of
[40:43] government and build up the
[40:44] support. As far as I know. We
[40:46] have done very little, the city
[40:48] has done very little. That is
[40:51] the Mayor's responsibility to
[40:52] follow up on that and what I
[40:55] know that we have done is we
[40:57] sent a letter to Valérie Plante.
[40:59] I do not think she responded to
[41:00] it. I know that there was a
[41:02] meeting with the metropolitan
[41:06] community of Montréal and they
[41:07] were very not warm to the idea
[41:08] of doing anything with the
[41:10] force. These are the challenges.
[41:15] I acknowledge them.
[41:16] >> If we start the process, we
[41:18] can get there. Thank you.
[41:21] >> Just to clarify, I did speak
[41:25] to the CMM and the response was
[41:30] negative. CMM is the
[41:32] organization in the Montréal
[41:33] administration that is
[41:34] responsible for the acquisition.
[41:35] The question was asked to the
[41:36] right authorities and was
[41:38] actually done.
[41:39] >> When was that done?
[41:42] >> Two years ago. A year and a
[41:45] half, two years ago.
[41:46] >> I understand they have spent
[41:47] --
[41:48] >> One of the first things I did
[41:49] it was probably six months in,
[41:51] nine months in. Some around
[41:52] there that we got an answer. I
[41:54] was quite disappointed. I remain
[41:57] quite disappointed with the
[41:59] administration and it has some
[42:00] bearing on how I perceive them
[42:03] because they have uttered a
[42:06] program that I felt they did not
[42:08] substantiate in that response.
[42:10] That is my feeling on that. I
[42:11] was not pleased with that
[42:12] decision.
[42:13] >> I think they have run very
[42:17] low saving Hypertec and
[42:19] extremely other important and we
[42:20] are just as important because we
[42:22] are all part of that
[42:25] biodiversity.
[42:26] >> To speak to the elephant in
[42:27] the room, it's hard to put a
[42:29] price on survival. For me, we
[42:31] have spent more than 10 million
[42:33] on the Olive-Urquhart Sports
[42:37] facility. We have spent $21 on
[42:39] our public works. All of which I
[42:40] agree with. 10 million seems to
[42:43] be a pittance for our survival.
[42:46] I'm just putting in the grand
[42:48] scheme of things. That is the
[42:49] Mayor's interpretation of it.
[42:54] Ralph?
[43:00] Would you like to speak to some
[43:01] of the questions?
[43:03] >> I just wanted to say that the
[43:06] elephant is not in the room,
[43:08] it's in the parking. It's a very
[43:10] big elephant -- come closer.
[43:20] It's in court. You can do any
[43:24] kind of gestures.
[43:27] >> We are not going to have an
[43:28] exchange from the audience. We
[43:30] do not have exchanges from the
[43:33] audience.
[43:34] >> It's in court. Yesterday it
[43:36] was going to the court of
[43:39] Québec. It has been delayed
[43:44] again. We are in this situation,
[43:48] both sides of this conundrum, I
[43:53] will say it in French Les deux
[43:56] côtés sont à la merci de la
[43:59] Cour. Vous avez choisi de donner
[44:04] la décision à un autre parti.
[44:09] Alors, on peut spéculer. Mais
[44:13] c'est un jeu, un troisième parti
[44:15] qui va décider, regrettablement.
[44:19] Vous pouvez faire tous les
[44:21] signes de noms que vous voulez,
[44:24] c'est ça. Merci.
[44:27] >> Just as a preface, Mr. Claude
[44:30] Cousineau, I think you have a
[44:31] look at Bill 39 and what St.
[44:34] Bruno did, you will see there is
[44:35] actually very easy way out of
[44:36] that. It's not easy, it still
[44:37] takes time, of course but there
[44:38] is a method out of that and you
[44:40] have forgotten to consider that.
[44:44] Good evening.
[44:46] >> Please, and light me.
[44:49] >> It's been in the press. I am
[44:52] sure the city officials can tell
[44:53] you about Bill 39 allows you to,
[44:57] regardless of previous ownership
[44:59] or other cases, legal cases
[45:01] allows you to circumvent that
[45:03] and rate new bylaws for
[45:06] ecologically sensitive areas.
[45:07] >> Again, last comment on this,
[45:10] a judge is going to tell us what
[45:11] to do.
[45:12] >> The judge already has. Good
[45:17] evening, folks, tonight I want
[45:18] to ask you again about Fairview
[45:21] forest but I want to focus on
[45:23] the new PMAD. The revised one of
[45:32] the CMM. I'm curious to see what
[45:34] the City appreciates the greater
[45:36] obligation under the new PMAD
[45:42] and considering its usage in
[45:43] obligations under it. The
[45:46] organization I am a member of,
[45:48] say Fairview forest, and also
[45:49] Cadillac Fairview, both made
[45:52] submissions to the CMM and
[45:55] participated in its recent
[45:57] consultation on the PMAD
[45:59] revised. I want to first say I
[46:02] am very, very thankful to the
[46:05] Pointe-Claire City Councillors
[46:07] who wrote favourable comments on
[46:11] the CMM website advocating
[46:13] saving Fairview forest and
[46:16] supporting our submission. Was
[46:17] profoundly appreciated. I want
[46:19] to address the revised PMAD and
[46:22] it's greater assertion of that
[46:25] bylaw. The agglomerations, the
[46:27] regions and the municipalities
[46:31] must, must and here to the PMAD.
[46:35] And implemented faithfully. It
[46:38] is not a fuzzy guideline anymore
[46:41] but it's an explicit requirement
[46:43] of Pointe-Claire just like every
[46:46] other member of the CMM. The
[46:51] guidelines, objectives and
[46:54] criteria of the PMAD revised are
[46:58] inscribed as being required by
[47:01] law in the perspective of
[47:03] sustainable development and also
[47:06] aim, overall, to contribute to
[47:07] the fight against an adaptation
[47:09] of climate change and the
[47:11] protection of biodiversity. All
[47:13] things, of course, that Fairview
[47:15] forest does. I want to quote the
[47:20] PMAD revised exactly. Sorry,
[47:24] it's not exactly because I did a
[47:26] Google translation.
[47:29] [Laughter]
[47:30] A quote, « the compliance
[47:32] process provided for by the and
[47:38] shows that metropolitan planning
[47:40] is implemented in regional
[47:41] planning tools and a local
[47:45] example municipal planning
[47:47] tools. The SAD's or the RCM's
[47:56] must comply with the PMAD. They
[48:02] provide this metropolitan plan
[48:04] must be reviewed periodically
[48:07] ». And I quote. The PMAD goes
[48:09] on to say, in terms of the
[48:11] environment, the revised PMAD
[48:13] retains the choices of the first
[48:15] PMAD and reinforces them
[48:18] particularly with regard to the
[48:19] number one issue that it's in
[48:23] particularly in regard to his
[48:24] number one, increasing the
[48:26] target for the protection and
[48:28] conservation of woods of
[48:31] metropolitan interest. Forest,
[48:34] corridors and natural
[48:37] environments to 30% of the
[48:38] metropolitan territory by 2046
[48:42] in line with the commitments
[48:43] made that the 15th Congress of
[48:45] the party, example, COP15. It
[48:51] has been explicitly covered all
[48:53] the criteria Fairview forest
[48:55] meets. I know that of course
[48:57] Fairview forest issues are under
[48:59] study. I am thankful for that.
[49:00] That is great. However, this
[49:04] PMAD now is very clear. It
[49:08] demands compliance. And now
[49:12] supersedes many of the concerns
[49:13] and details that we get muddled
[49:15] up in and struggle with. My
[49:20] question for Pointe-Claire City
[49:22] Council is very simply, will the
[49:24] city comply with its obligations
[49:27] and then the newly revised PMAD?
[49:29] We'll use the tools in
[49:31] advantages given by the
[49:32] government of Québec, la 39, and
[49:36] the CMM with its freeze on
[49:38] Fairview for specifically and
[49:40] the revised PMAD and save the
[49:43] Fairview forest because it's
[49:45] actually obliged to? That's it.
[49:50] >> My answer is, I hope so. I
[49:52] certainly -- I certainly would
[49:54] like to. Yes?
[50:00] >> By the way, your analysis is
[50:02] very good. It's basically what
[50:04] the challenges are. If you look
[50:05] at the PMAD I think it's trying
[50:09] to blow and stop at the same
[50:11] time. If you look at the tree
[50:13] canopy, the 30%, listen I'm
[50:15] offer tree canopy all across
[50:17] Montréal. You talk about
[50:18] different areas that can be
[50:20] affected but I've actually sent
[50:21] an email and I still have not
[50:22] gotten a reply to what that 30%
[50:24] is because based upon what they
[50:26] want to do in terms of
[50:28] densification, in terms of
[50:30] housing and put that 30% on top
[50:32] of it, mathematically, when I
[50:35] look at it, how it can be
[50:38] achieved it's counter intuitive.
[50:41] It knocks its own head together.
[50:43] I ask a question, what is the
[50:45] 30% mean? I have not got an
[50:47] answer yet. If you digging
[50:48] deeper, you will see certain
[50:49] elements or it says they do not
[50:52] know where it's deemed as
[50:53] private, public. Could be
[50:55] parking lots and shopping
[50:58] centres. It could be a backyard.
[50:59] They have not given a pure
[51:01] definition of what that 30% is.
[51:02] That is what I'm really trying
[51:03] to find out because yes, we
[51:05] should comply and we can to
[51:07] comply but it's going to be --
[51:09] first of all they have to give
[51:10] that definition. It's going to
[51:11] be one of a challenge to balance
[51:13] that I think the PMAD revised,
[51:17] if you try to get everything
[51:18] done on their, something is
[51:19] going to fall through the
[51:22] cracks. I really do not
[51:23] appreciate them doing that.
[51:27] That's a law, they are not going
[51:28] fuzzy on that. There is no base
[51:29] in terms, of all, you can maybe
[51:30] do this, maybe do that.
[51:34] Densification the parking lot at
[51:36] Cadillac Fairview was a minimum
[51:38] of 60. Now they are going to
[51:39] blow in and come in and say it's
[51:41] going to be -- it has to be at
[51:43] least what? 20 to 50. They are
[51:45] putting the hard line in the
[51:47] sand now and I think what
[51:48] they're asking us to do, without
[51:50] giving us a proper definitions
[51:51] to give it a feasibility
[51:53] opportunity to see if it's
[51:54] actually feasible is unfair.
[51:57] It's unfair.
[51:58] >> They do mention other aspects
[52:02] besides canopy such as
[52:04] biodiversity, Browns, expats,
[52:05] all the different species, the
[52:07] 35 endangered species that are
[52:09] in Fairview forest. There are
[52:12] also criteria's beyond canopy.
[52:13] The canopy is one reference but
[52:14] they specifically refer to
[52:16] biodiversity and other issues as
[52:19] well.
[52:21] >> Thanks.
[52:22] >> If I could just give my own
[52:25] take on the 30% number. We are
[52:29] below 30% in Pointe-Claire so
[52:31] what that effectively tells me
[52:33] is we cannot build on green. We
[52:35] can build somewhere else but we
[52:36] cannot build on green. That is
[52:38] my take.
[52:41] >> The PMAD explicitly denied
[52:43] that especially for the areas
[52:44] that they froze. There are other
[52:47] legislations like 39 and other
[52:49] things that they have put in
[52:50] place for the city to take
[52:51] advantage of.
[52:54] >> Point taken. Point taken.
[52:57] Very well taken. Thank you very
[52:59] much. Councillor Tremblay?
[53:01] >> Thank you for your question.
[53:03] I think the important thing
[53:05] behind this issue is we do not
[53:06] want to get lost in quibbling
[53:11] overinterpretation and confusion
[53:12] over whether or not a and B
[53:14] means B. The ultimate problem
[53:16] that we have today is we are
[53:18] witnessing again another
[53:20] disaster in California is these
[53:22] kinds of issues are pervasive
[53:24] now throughout the world. I
[53:26] think the important thing we
[53:28] need to do, regardless of
[53:29] whether 30% or not, the
[53:32] important thing for this council
[53:33] to do is to be thinking of the
[53:35] future and its citizens, its
[53:37] health and safety. Ultimately,
[53:39] we need to be working towards,
[53:41] as I have said many, many times
[53:42] with the intention of aiming to
[53:46] solve this problem rather than
[53:49] whether we are complying or not
[53:51] an outing confusion to the whole
[53:52] picture. I think if these
[53:54] constructs the issue at hand and
[53:56] I think it's important to
[53:57] underline the fact that what we
[53:59] need today is a mental and
[54:02] economic, social paradigm shift
[54:04] in these areas. In order to be
[54:08] able to obtain those things, we
[54:10] need to start getting creative
[54:12] in every level. Political,
[54:14] business and social as well. I
[54:19] appreciate the question. I would
[54:20] not want to get to lost in those
[54:23] technicalities in that they are
[54:26] important in that they are not
[54:28] negligible aspects and what we
[54:29] are going through. The rule of
[54:30] law and all the qualifications
[54:32] that behind that is obviously
[54:34] important. Nothing's proceeds
[54:36] natural law. Until we learn to
[54:38] be able to work within those
[54:40] constraints, we are going to
[54:41] contingency difficulties that we
[54:42] have in the world today. Thanks.
[54:45] >> Thank you for the replies.
[54:49] >> Susan Weaver?
[55:00] >> It's about Council meetings.
[55:03] I'm not going to ask you again
[55:05] about cost and current City
[55:08] lease car so I will submit seven
[55:10] pages with that. I was
[55:14] concerning last November's -- I
[55:18] will go like that -- concerning
[55:20] last November's council meeting,
[55:22] I was curious as to why you made
[55:25] up a story during that meeting.
[55:28] It was a sort of a cocking-able
[55:31] story. It had said nothing it
[55:33] would've been the end of it.
[55:35] Actions and words are important.
[55:36] Your storyline was different
[55:38] from the insurance report. I
[55:40] decided to look at your Facebook
[55:42] page to check out digs. April
[55:45] 6th, you are on a cocktail and
[55:48] dinner gala in the evening. Then
[55:49] you went up north but after that
[55:55] the accident reported only next
[55:59] day. That is it. I am just going
[56:01] to hand in my seven page.
[56:04] >> Okay. I do not know what was
[56:07] met by caulk in bull. Miss
[56:11] Weaver, we do not yammer from
[56:12] the audience, we speak politely
[56:14] from the microphone. The
[56:19] accident happened with a car was
[56:21] recorded by the police and
[56:24] documented. I will go with
[56:25] whatever written documentation
[56:27] they submitted because that
[56:28] obviously is the truth. I never
[56:30] said anything other than the
[56:32] date I was -- it was a morning
[56:34] and I drove, I hit a deer, the
[56:36] police recorded the accident and
[56:38] that was the end of it. There is
[56:41] no conflict and there is no
[56:42] problem at all. It was in the
[56:44] morning on my way up to my
[56:46] mother in the hospital in the
[56:48] morning. Thank you, Miss Weaver.
[57:01] - Bonjour, Conseil. L'année
[57:07] passée, je me suis présenté à la
[57:09] consultation publique pour
[57:12] l'agglomération de Montréal.
[57:13] J'ai présenté quelque chose
[57:16] concernant les milieux vides. Et
[57:18] pour le village de
[57:19] Pointe-Claire. Après, ça on m'a
[57:21] invité pour représenter...
[57:24] - Parler un peu plus fort.
[57:26] - Vous m'entendez mieux?
[57:29] - Merci.
[57:33] - Après ça, ils m'ont invité à
[57:35] venir me présenter aux CMM pour
[57:37] la consultation publique au mois
[57:38] de décembre. J'ai présenté deux
[57:41] mémoire, un pour la forêt
[57:45] Fairview et pour les lieux
[57:47] humides, et un pour le village
[57:48] de Pointe-Claire, pour le
[57:51] patrimoine, qui n'est pas
[57:52] reconnu dans le C.A. Même à
[57:55] Montréal. J'ai répondu à madame
[58:02] Stainforth, elle avait commenté
[58:05] sur les mémoires. Madame
[58:07] Saint-force, je vous remercie
[58:08] pour ça.
[58:17] In the 1970s which was from two
[58:20] high schools, Saint-Jean, Thomas
[58:24] the city of Pointe-Claire to buy
[58:26] the great park that if a
[58:28] terracotta. Today, our planet is
[58:30] facing a bigger challenge,
[58:32] climate change. The effect are
[58:36] present all over the world in
[58:37] and around us and catastrophic
[58:41] events are present everywhere.
[58:42] We, as a society, we cannot be
[58:45] like ostriches and put our head
[58:46] in the sand. We must stand up
[58:49] against the society who wants to
[58:53] destroy ecological system and go
[58:55] against the climate change for
[58:57] profit only and make pressure
[59:00] with a lobbyist to different
[59:02] environment for their district.
[59:05] Like you mentioned in your
[59:08] comment, I quote, you force are
[59:11] the official role in mitigation
[59:13] and air pollution and producing
[59:18] oxygen. While the canopy cover
[59:20] helped regulate urban
[59:22] temperature by reducing the
[59:25] effect. The natural space are in
[59:28] disposable -- responsible for
[59:30] foreseeing and creating the
[59:33] city. And comment. The
[59:35] protection of the forest is
[59:38] supporting ecological balance
[59:41] and the use as a sanctuary for
[59:46] [Inaudible]
[59:47] Diversified species that may
[59:49] otherwise be displacement by
[59:53] urbanizing like the brown snake
[59:55] when the REM station erected on
[59:58] the southeast section of the
[1:00:00] force. We are asking to please
[1:00:04] support to save the Fairview
[1:00:05] forest like we did in 1970 with
[1:00:07] the City to protect the forest
[1:00:12] and for the one who cannot talk
[1:00:14] and for our children and future
[1:00:16] generation. My question is
[1:00:19] Est-ce que le Conseil des
[1:00:20] membres du conseil vont
[1:00:22] supporter la protection de la
[1:00:23] forêt Fairview comme leurs
[1:00:26] confrères ont fait dans les
[1:00:28] années 1970? Pour leur
[1:00:32] protection? In person Une
[1:00:34] réponse de tout le monde.
[1:00:35] - C'est à tout le monde, merci,
[1:00:37] Monsieur Lapointe. Pour
[1:00:39] moi-même, je trouve que la
[1:00:41] meilleure solution pour débuter
[1:00:43] et de faire des consultations.
[1:00:47] To speak to the people which we
[1:00:48] were supposed to do regarding
[1:00:49] the future the forest and what
[1:00:50] they thought and listen to their
[1:00:52] ideas and that would be a good
[1:00:53] way to get the ball rolling. As
[1:00:55] a Council, that would be a good
[1:00:56] way for us to show our
[1:00:59] willingness and to get the ball
[1:01:00] rolling in these regards. That
[1:01:01] is my answer to your question,
[1:01:03] sir. Hopefully it's a sufficient
[1:01:07] one.
[1:01:08] - La Ville de Pointe-Claire a
[1:01:09] fait le plan stratégique de 2023
[1:01:12] à 2030. Les réponses, les
[1:01:15] sondages des citoyens.
[1:01:17] Protection et restauration de la
[1:01:18] nature des environnements
[1:01:20] naturels. 23% ont répondu pour
[1:01:24] ça. Habitation, 14%.
[1:01:26] Infrastructures et mobilité
[1:01:28] active, 13%. La réponse des
[1:01:33] employés, les personnes... 18%
[1:01:36] ont répondu augmenter le
[1:01:39] verdissement dans les zones
[1:01:41] urbaines. Adopter une politique
[1:01:43] environnementale audacieuse.
[1:01:45] Appuyé des mesures d'efficacité
[1:01:50] (---)
[1:01:51] dans les bâtiments. Alors ça,
[1:01:53] c'est déjà défait, les
[1:01:56] questionnaires qui ont été
[1:01:57] faites par la Ville. Et on voit
[1:02:00] que les gens veulent la
[1:02:04] protection, la protection des
[1:02:07] changements climatiques. Est-ce
[1:02:10] que quelqu'un d'autre veut
[1:02:12] répondre?
[1:02:13] - Moi, je veux bien.
[1:02:15] - Allez-y.
[1:02:18] - Pour répondre à votre
[1:02:21] question, c'est sûr que la Ville
[1:02:23] va suivre la loi. Quoiqu'en dise
[1:02:28] monsieur Stokes avec, c'est vrai
[1:02:32] que c'est clair ici, il y a un
[1:02:36] juge qui a un ou plusieurs juges
[1:02:38] qui a décidé c'est quoi les
[1:02:41] responsabilités des villes, la
[1:02:43] possibilité d'exproprier ou quoi
[1:02:44] que ce soit. Là, à savoir en si
[1:02:50] l'interprétation de Fairview est
[1:02:52] correcte ou interprétation de
[1:02:57] Fairview Forrest est correcte.
[1:02:59] On va suivre les règles. Merci.
[1:03:04] - C'est les citoyens qui
[1:03:05] décident, c'est pas un... ils
[1:03:07] ont un vote comme nous autres.
[1:03:08] On a chacun un vote, comme une
[1:03:11] élection.
[1:03:12] - Je parle pas d'un vote. Je
[1:03:13] parle du juge de la Cour
[1:03:15] supérieure qui va décider
[1:03:20] d'interpréter qui a raison.
[1:03:22] - Mais il a déjà jugé...
[1:03:25] - Merci. There has already been
[1:03:28] a judgment on Bill 39? Hasn't
[1:03:31] there? It's already been
[1:03:32] president and it was favourable
[1:03:33] to the protection. There has
[1:03:35] already been -- I do not know
[1:03:36] how many cases -- at least one.
[1:03:37] Has there not?
[1:03:41] >> They were supposed to go be
[1:03:44] in court yesterday. It was
[1:03:49] delayed. I don't know who
[1:03:51] demanded but it was accepted by
[1:03:53] the judge to put it back. We
[1:03:57] will find a date soon. Who made
[1:04:02] the request, maybe it's
[1:04:03] Fairview, maybe it's the CMM. I
[1:04:06] do not know.
[1:04:08] >> It was Cadillac Fairview.
[1:04:10] There was an appeal, I am
[1:04:12] presuming, and there has been a
[1:04:14] judgment and there has been an
[1:04:15] appeal from what I understand.
[1:04:21] Was there not a judgment? And
[1:04:23] St. Bruno. Absolutely. There is
[1:04:24] precedent already. I know, that
[1:04:27] is my interpretation.
[1:04:30] >> I will actually write
[1:04:31] something. I think there is one
[1:04:32] little thing. The definition of
[1:04:37] a high ecological value and that
[1:04:39] is a definition that has to be
[1:04:40] determined. It was determined
[1:04:42] St. Bruno, but it has not been
[1:04:44] determined in St. Bruno -- St.
[1:04:46] play where. That's exactly what
[1:04:48] we have to, to investigate, to
[1:04:49] get our facts and then we can
[1:04:52] move forward. That is the crux
[1:04:53] of the argument. It has to be
[1:04:56] deemed environment of high
[1:04:57] ecological value. I think your
[1:04:58] legal department would support
[1:05:00] me on that.
[1:05:02] - Vous n'avez pas répondu à ma
[1:05:04] question.
[1:05:05] - Une autre question?
[1:05:06] - Ma question: est-ce qu'il va
[1:05:08] supporter de sauver la forêt
[1:05:10] Fairview?
[1:05:11] - Je vais supporter la décision
[1:05:13] du juge.
[1:05:15] - Mais je pense que monsieur
[1:05:16] Lapointe demandait à nous de
[1:05:19] répondre, pas le juge.
[1:05:24] - Monsieur Lapointe, bien, il y
[1:05:26] a quelques minutes, je m'exprime
[1:05:28] sur le sujet. Donc, vous
[1:05:30] comprenez un peu ma position
[1:05:31] là-dessus.
[1:05:33] - Je crois que vous connaissez
[1:05:34] ma position aussi. Depuis cinq
[1:05:38] ou 6 ans, j'ai toujours
[1:05:43] supporté... j'est toujours
[1:05:44] supporté qu'on conserve cette
[1:05:48] forêt-là. C'est plus une
[1:05:49] question de trouver comment le
[1:05:51] faire avec les sous, au lieu de:
[1:05:55] est-ce qu'on devrait le faire?
[1:05:59] >> My answer, Mr. Lapointe, is I
[1:06:01] would like to hear from people
[1:06:03] as much as anything because I
[1:06:06] believe they deserve to speak on
[1:06:07] this and I think there is an
[1:06:10] immense amount of talent in our
[1:06:13] population that is knowledgeable
[1:06:14] and that can bring enhanced
[1:06:17] ideas and enhance our decisions
[1:06:19] and make a stink better and
[1:06:22] perform at a higher level. I
[1:06:24] think we owe to the population
[1:06:25] to allow that to happen which is
[1:06:26] why I would like us to have a
[1:06:29] consultation with the
[1:06:30] participation process to hear
[1:06:31] from the people on this matter.
[1:06:33] That is my answer.
[1:06:36] - Est-ce qu'il y a d'autres
[1:06:38] réponses?
[1:06:42] >> I think I made my position
[1:06:44] pretty clear.
[1:06:46] - Monsieur Bissonnette? >> I
[1:06:48] have written my position, many,
[1:06:50] many times in many different
[1:06:53] forms and many different
[1:06:54] locations, rather.
[1:07:00] - Merci.
[1:07:02] - Je pense que c'est tout.
[1:07:03] Merci, Monsieur Lapointe.
[1:07:13] >> Good evening. I have not been
[1:07:17] able to come to every council
[1:07:19] meeting and so maybe some things
[1:07:22] have passed me by when I
[1:07:24] could've been here listening
[1:07:25] more intently but I have been
[1:07:30] passionate about the environment
[1:07:33] and saving the environment for
[1:07:35] as long as I can remember. Even
[1:07:38] though my memory is getting
[1:07:40] shorter, it goes back a long
[1:07:42] way. It is partly why I chose to
[1:07:45] come to live in Pointe-Claire,
[1:07:47] to stay in Pointe-Claire, even
[1:07:49] after my family all moved away
[1:07:51] was because of the protection of
[1:07:53] green spaces, the nature and why
[1:07:57] I chose to move to a town house
[1:08:00] where I get terracotta in my
[1:08:02] backyard, which is a very, very
[1:08:04] special gift. I am certainly one
[1:08:07] of the people who is passionate
[1:08:09] about saving Fairview forest,
[1:08:11] you know that already and I have
[1:08:17] participated in most of the --
[1:08:19] fourth of the five public
[1:08:21] consultation sessions that the
[1:08:23] city organized through a
[1:08:25] consulting firm and somebody
[1:08:28] along the way decided that we
[1:08:29] could not speak about Fairview
[1:08:32] forest during those public
[1:08:34] consultation sessions, even ones
[1:08:37] that were about private green
[1:08:39] space, for heaven's sake.
[1:08:41] Anyway, we did. We did anyway.
[1:08:43] The hundred or so people that
[1:08:45] were in the room talks about
[1:08:47] saving Fairview forest in spite
[1:08:50] of what we were told what we
[1:08:53] could not say. While it was not
[1:08:54] going to be recorded, it was
[1:08:56] certainly loudly heard. Frankly,
[1:08:59] I do not think we need another
[1:09:01] consultation. I think the
[1:09:03] dedication of people for the
[1:09:05] last, what, three years, four
[1:09:08] years of standing outside on a
[1:09:11] Saturday and whatever the
[1:09:14] weather, every single Saturday.
[1:09:17] I am not one of the most devoted
[1:09:18] ones, but I admire those who
[1:09:20] are. That says a lot. The people
[1:09:22] who honk their horns and give us
[1:09:25] a thumbs up. The people that
[1:09:27] have signed petitions. I think
[1:09:29] we have heard from Pointe-Claire
[1:09:31] people. The green spaces are
[1:09:34] special and important to us and
[1:09:35] we need to save it. I was quite
[1:09:40] surprised when I learned tonight
[1:09:42] that one of the points on the
[1:09:45] agenda, point number just a
[1:09:49] minute, let me get it here, 11.1
[1:09:54] approved of sale to be entered
[1:09:57] into with the five regarding
[1:10:02] lots of the catastrophe Québec.
[1:10:03] De la Faune et des parcs.
[1:10:12] It was pointed out to me that
[1:10:14] that specific area is the green
[1:10:19] space between the canoe and
[1:10:21] kayak in club and the -- which
[1:10:27] I've actually traverse not long
[1:10:29] ago when I have to park at the
[1:10:30] canoe club to get into an event.
[1:10:35] I know it's a lovely part. I
[1:10:37] know it's waterfront. It is
[1:10:39] green space. I have questions
[1:10:43] and I will put them into one.
[1:10:45] First of all, I'd like to know
[1:10:47] what this is about. It is coming
[1:10:50] up as approving a deed of sales
[1:10:54] so I'd like to know what is
[1:10:57] this, why is this, who is this,
[1:11:01] what does this mean, how did
[1:11:03] this come about? I just missed
[1:11:07] December. I do not remember this
[1:11:10] being mentioned in November
[1:11:12] December, whenever I was here,
[1:11:13] how did this come about without
[1:11:14] citizens knowing and what is
[1:11:15] this about? I would like that
[1:11:18] answer.
[1:11:19] >> From what I know on the
[1:11:22] matter, it's an administrative
[1:11:26] exchange. I think it has been
[1:11:29] given to the City of
[1:11:30] Pointe-Claire. We are taking
[1:11:31] over our own land from the
[1:11:33] provincial --'s at the
[1:11:34] provincial government or the
[1:11:36] federal? Provincial. It is an
[1:11:38] administrative manoeuvre nothing
[1:11:39] really has changed except we are
[1:11:41] now more responsible for its
[1:11:43] management. That's what I
[1:11:45] understand. Does anybody want to
[1:11:46] elaborate on that?
[1:11:48] >> Basically part of the part
[1:11:50] was still owned by the
[1:11:54] environment ministry, it just
[1:11:56] transferred to the city but we
[1:11:57] recognize at the same time that
[1:11:59] they use it for more than 50
[1:12:02] years.
[1:12:03] >> Okay. It would've been clear
[1:12:05] if it said it was indeed a
[1:12:08] purchase. It means we are
[1:12:10] getting it, is that what you are
[1:12:12] meeting? They are selling, we
[1:12:13] are buying, it is going to be
[1:12:15] Pointe-Claire and it will come
[1:12:17] under our environment rules and
[1:12:21] caring for keeping our
[1:12:22] environment? Is that correct?
[1:12:23] >> It will still be a park. It's
[1:12:25] the same thing. It's a transfer
[1:12:27] between us and the Environment
[1:12:30] minister.
[1:12:31] >> What I understand, the rules
[1:12:33] of waterfront still or other
[1:12:35] levels of government. The water
[1:12:37] is overlooked by other levels of
[1:12:41] government.
[1:12:42] >> I know, usually, the border
[1:12:43] is also to be naturally
[1:12:45] protected so we do not have the
[1:12:46] erosion in that kind of thing.
[1:12:48] >> You got it.
[1:12:49] >> That makes it a little clear
[1:12:51] Simpson on the environment
[1:12:52] committee to not, I thought I
[1:12:54] should've known something about
[1:12:56] this because the way I read it,
[1:12:58] it sounded like it could've been
[1:13:00] us getting rid of the land and
[1:13:01] I'm glad to hear we have not.
[1:13:03] Thank you.
[1:13:09] - Geneviève Lussier?
[1:13:16] - Bonjour, tout le monde. Thank
[1:13:19] you everybody. I was about to
[1:13:21] ask about 11.1. Mr. Stork
[1:13:23] answered outside and that's good
[1:13:24] and it's good to get
[1:13:25] clarification about that point.
[1:13:26] I also want to ask about a
[1:13:29] follow-up about Mr. Stork had
[1:13:32] said about the PMAD provision.
[1:13:36] Right now, Fairview forest
[1:13:39] appears into the if it gets
[1:13:44] passed in the spring, was there
[1:13:45] planning to do, Je ne sais pas
[1:13:48] si c'est madame Verdun ou
[1:13:49] monsieur Thomas qui peut me
[1:13:50] répondre, mais c'est quoi le
[1:13:52] processus légal? What is a legal
[1:13:54] process going forward at the
[1:13:56] municipal level? If the City is
[1:13:58] to comply to that one is a legal
[1:14:03] process going forward after that
[1:14:05] gets passed in the spring? I
[1:14:07] guess, what is a timeline for
[1:14:09] that?
[1:14:10] >> Very good question. Madame
[1:14:12] Verdon, avez-vous une réponse?
[1:14:13] Madame Verdon?
[1:14:17] >> Can I answer in French? -
[1:14:18] Oui, pas de problème.
[1:14:19] - Dans le fond, le processus,
[1:14:21] présentement, on ne se conforme
[1:14:23] pas. On se conforme au schéma
[1:14:25] d'aménagement de l'agglomération
[1:14:26] de Montréal. Donc, le chez
[1:14:28] madame May d'agglomération de
[1:14:30] Montréal doit se conformer au
[1:14:31] pénal qui doit se conformer aux
[1:14:32] (---)
[1:14:33] environnementales. Nous, on doit
[1:14:35] attendre que le schéma de la
[1:14:36] main l'agglomération soit
[1:14:39] changée pour conformer aux PMAD
[1:14:40] et ensuite la ville doit faire
[1:14:43] ses règlements de conformité au
[1:14:45] schéma.
[1:14:46] - O.K., Le schéma d'aménagement
[1:14:48] récemment a été changé par
[1:14:49] rapport à la forêt Fairview et
[1:14:50] aussi. Ils ont fait un
[1:14:51] changement qui est un projet de
[1:14:52] règlement, je pense. Mais c'est
[1:14:53] à 50% de la forêt au moins.
[1:14:56] C'est le milieu humide est plus
[1:14:58] une bordure de bottés de 30
[1:15:00] mètres. Ça va faire partie de ça
[1:15:03] aussi?
[1:15:04] - Oui, ça va être ça. Dans le
[1:15:06] fond, le schéma qui a été changé
[1:15:09] et avec les plans de milieux
[1:15:11] humides, ils ont des plans... je
[1:15:13] sais de raccourcir les
[1:15:14] raccourcis. Dans les milieux
[1:15:16] humides. Ils doivent aussi, tous
[1:15:17] les MRC, dont la l'agglomération
[1:15:19] de Montréal doit avoir la
[1:15:20] gestion des milieux humides. La
[1:15:22] Ville doit pouvoir se conformer
[1:15:24] aussi à cette disposition-là du
[1:15:26] schéma.
[1:15:27] - O.K., Donc, au moins 50% de la
[1:15:30] forêt
[1:15:31] (---)
[1:15:32] qu'on ne va pas toucher?
[1:15:33] - J'ai pas exactement les
[1:15:35] chiffres avec moi, mais oui,
[1:15:37] dans le fond, on va devoir se
[1:15:39] conformer aux plans des milieux
[1:15:42] humides de la région.
[1:15:44] - O.K., On commence avec ça.
[1:15:45] Parfait, merci beaucoup.
[1:15:52] - Ils auraient Home?
[1:15:58] - Bonsoir. Alors, moi, je
[1:16:01] voulais remercier le conseil.
[1:16:04] Monsieur Cohen et la direction
[1:16:06] de la ville d'avoir embarqué
[1:16:10] dans le projet des jardins
[1:16:12] communautaires dans le quartier
[1:16:14] en Haïda. Je suis très
[1:16:16] reconnaissante. Je veux faire de
[1:16:18] ce jardin-là quelque chose qui
[1:16:19] va être porteurs pour notre
[1:16:22] quartier. Et je veux impliquer
[1:16:23] le plus de gens possible
[1:16:24] là-dedans. Et je voulais vous
[1:16:26] remercier.
[1:16:28] - Merci beaucoup. Robert Peck.
[1:16:39] >> Thank you City Councillors, I
[1:16:41] am a former resident of
[1:16:44] Pointe-Claire. My father was a
[1:16:45] World War II veteran who settled
[1:16:46] in Lakeside Heights and I grew
[1:16:47] up on circle Road so it's my
[1:16:49] first time back in about 40
[1:16:53] years. I was a 35-year Canadian
[1:16:55] diplomat. My last assignment was
[1:16:57] ambassador to Greece. I am to
[1:16:59] lean a long-standing and I'm
[1:17:01] here basically to add my voice
[1:17:03] of support for the Athens park
[1:17:05] initiative. If I could just very
[1:17:07] briefly say why. I went to
[1:17:11] Northview elementary school and
[1:17:13] then Lindsey Place high school.
[1:17:15] Athens pizza was very much a
[1:17:17] part of our lives. It followed
[1:17:19] for subsequent generations in my
[1:17:21] own family and I am sure it's
[1:17:23] true for many other families in
[1:17:26] Pointe-Claire. For thousands of
[1:17:27] Pointe-Claire residents in those
[1:17:28] in the surrounding area, Athens
[1:17:31] pizza headed Greek Canadian
[1:17:33] employees represented the
[1:17:34] generosity and kindness of
[1:17:36] Greece known. Athens pizza was
[1:17:40] also emblematic of the hard work
[1:17:41] and sacrifice of the ways of
[1:17:43] Greek in immigrants in the post
[1:17:44] war period who came to Canada to
[1:17:46] start a new life and the
[1:17:47] proposed plan for Athens Park
[1:17:49] with on only honour the founder
[1:17:51] of Athens peas -- pizza but the
[1:17:55] important contribution of
[1:17:56] persons of Greek heritage so
[1:17:57] that the community of Québec and
[1:18:00] Canada. My question is very
[1:18:01] simple, how can individual such
[1:18:03] as myself practically support
[1:18:05] efforts to move this initiative
[1:18:07] along leading to an early
[1:18:09] integration of Athens Park in
[1:18:10] the celebration? The park, in my
[1:18:12] mind, symbolically has
[1:18:14] importance that transcends the
[1:18:15] borders of Pointe-Claire. There
[1:18:17] is my question. I have a second
[1:18:20] question on something totally
[1:18:21] different with the national
[1:18:22] focus of the night but I'd be
[1:18:25] interested in any comments.
[1:18:27] >> You are a subsequent
[1:18:29] question. All I can say is, we
[1:18:31] are all on board. I mean it's a
[1:18:34] good initiative. What I could
[1:18:36] encourage you to do is to come
[1:18:39] back and keep doing this every
[1:18:40] month. Come back we month and
[1:18:41] remind us. I think it's well in
[1:18:43] the minds and everybody is
[1:18:48] pleased. It's pretty much a
[1:18:50] unanimous thing. I do not see
[1:18:51] any problems. You are, right
[1:18:54] bureaucracy can only slow things
[1:18:55] up. You putting it in our faces,
[1:18:59] it's never a bad thing.
[1:19:00] >> Thank you.
[1:19:01] >> Now your subsequent national
[1:19:03] question.
[1:19:04] >> Could everybody pay attention
[1:19:06] to this kind of presentation or
[1:19:10] discourse because a matter of
[1:19:11] heritage is coming up and as a
[1:19:14] current concern in this is exact
[1:19:17] point of heritage. The
[1:19:20] ambassador was talking about was
[1:19:21] the definition of heritage or an
[1:19:24] aspect of heritage of the city
[1:19:26] is an important memory in that
[1:19:28] important memory is being
[1:19:31] conserved in this way. I just
[1:19:33] wanted to mention this is
[1:19:34] exactly the kind of thing we are
[1:19:36] thinking about now in trying to
[1:19:37] define heritage in
[1:19:40] Pointe-Claire, in operational
[1:19:42] way, in other words, how would
[1:19:44] help proper decisions going
[1:19:46] forward. This is an example.
[1:19:48] >> Thank you. My second
[1:19:50] question, I am here basically to
[1:19:52] make a pitch about something I'm
[1:19:53] very, very passionate about. I
[1:19:55] have been leading a national
[1:19:57] campaign regarding the national
[1:19:59] field of honour, which as you
[1:20:00] know, is a national historic
[1:20:01] site located in Pointe-Claire.
[1:20:04] It is the largest Canadian and
[1:20:06] allied veterans cemetery in
[1:20:08] Canada with veterans from 23
[1:20:12] countries and it's on our
[1:20:13] backdoor here in Pointe-Claire.
[1:20:15] As a former Canadian ambassador,
[1:20:16] I have visited the graves of
[1:20:18] Canadian soldiers around the
[1:20:20] world meticulously maintained in
[1:20:22] perpetuity by the Commonwealth
[1:20:24] work race Commission. The last
[1:20:25] post fund, with two I have been
[1:20:27] working with for quite some
[1:20:29] years now, a nonprofit
[1:20:30] organization that is when the
[1:20:31] cemetery for Décarie basically
[1:20:33] is running out of money. They
[1:20:35] have four years in which has
[1:20:36] long. Their endowment would be
[1:20:37] completed in a few short years,
[1:20:39] largely because of rising
[1:20:41] overhead costs and declining
[1:20:43] revenues for burials, which is
[1:20:44] one of their major revenue
[1:20:46] streams. With the recent federal
[1:20:47] cabinet shuffle in Ottawa, we
[1:20:49] now have the third minister of
[1:20:51] veterans of here that we have
[1:20:52] been working with. The new MP,
[1:20:55] who is now the minister, is
[1:20:57] Darren Fisher, he's an MP for
[1:20:58] Nova Scotia. Two Montréal area
[1:21:01] liberal parliamentarians, you
[1:21:03] all know Francis the local MP
[1:21:07] and
[1:21:12] [Inaudible]
[1:21:13] Have been champions. I also lead
[1:21:14] with another former ambassador,
[1:21:15] petition to the House of Commons
[1:21:16] last September where we had
[1:21:18] nearly 1500 signatory which
[1:21:21] included two former ministers of
[1:21:23] former affairs, a former
[1:21:24] Governor General who all said
[1:21:26] let's get this done. In the
[1:21:27] scheme of things, it is peanuts.
[1:21:29] This is not big money we are
[1:21:30] talking about. The last veterans
[1:21:34] affairs minister made a private
[1:21:37] visit last November to the field
[1:21:40] of honour and we thought
[1:21:43] something was in the offing.
[1:21:44] Alas, in the government
[1:21:46] following economic statement, we
[1:21:48] guide a statement saying as we
[1:21:50] have been told before, we will
[1:21:51] continue to work with the
[1:21:52] national field of honour to find
[1:21:55] a way to preserve the legacy of
[1:21:58] veterans but there was no money
[1:22:01] attached like there were four
[1:22:02] other initiatives so it fell
[1:22:06] flat. As we all know, the 80th
[1:22:09] anniversary of the Second World
[1:22:10] War in 2025. My appeal to you
[1:22:13] all tonight is what better
[1:22:14] occasion for Canada to honour
[1:22:15] the sacrifice and legacy of
[1:22:17] veterans who rest in the
[1:22:19] national field of honour by to
[1:22:21] announce the federal government
[1:22:22] will ensure that the cemetery
[1:22:25] will be maintained and taken
[1:22:26] over by the government of
[1:22:28] Canada. I should add that the
[1:22:29] National Post Fund has offered
[1:22:31] to transfer gratuitously the
[1:22:35] properties, the federal
[1:22:36] government, as well as a 900,000
[1:22:38] dollar in the trust fund. It's a
[1:22:41] gift to the federal government.
[1:22:43] My request to all of you is, we
[1:22:46] are pushing the new ministers
[1:22:48] veteran affairs and what remains
[1:22:50] of the government. We all know
[1:22:51] that there is going to be an
[1:22:52] election in the fall but that
[1:22:53] will not be probably until the
[1:22:55] spring. We are urge, urging
[1:22:58] minister Fischer to get it done.
[1:23:00] My question is, could I request,
[1:23:04] respectfully, that the City
[1:23:07] Council pass a resolution urging
[1:23:10] minister Fisher, the Middle East
[1:23:12] are a veteran affairs, to take
[1:23:14] the necessary steps to ensure
[1:23:16] perpetuity the viability and
[1:23:17] sustainability of the field of
[1:23:19] honour, a national historic
[1:23:20] site, in the boundaries of
[1:23:22] Pointe-Claire? That is my
[1:23:23] request, that is my question.
[1:23:24] Thank you.
[1:23:25] >> It sounds like a reasonable
[1:23:27] one and I cannot speak for the
[1:23:28] rest of Council but I thank you
[1:23:30] for your encouragement.
[1:23:33] >> Thank you. Thank you very
[1:23:34] much.
[1:23:39] - Louise arrêt? C'est la fin de
[1:23:44] la période de questions.
[1:23:49] >> Sorry, may I just add
[1:23:51] something?
[1:23:52] >> Absolutely.
[1:23:53] >> Just so it does not fall
[1:23:54] through the cracks, would you
[1:23:56] mind emailing madame Verdon your
[1:24:00] request? Like I said, there's a
[1:24:01] lot of things that come across a
[1:24:02] table in that way we can ensure
[1:24:03] that we get it done.
[1:24:11] - 5.1 Avis de motion et dépôt
[1:24:12] d'un projet de règlement
[1:24:13] décrétant un emprunt à long
[1:24:14] terme et une dépense en
[1:24:15] immobilisations de 500 000 $
[1:24:16] pour le remplacement et la mise
[1:24:17] à niveau de la flotte des
[1:24:18] véhicules du service des travaux
[1:24:19] publics et des immeubles. Le
[1:24:22] type de véhicules visés sont
[1:24:24] avec utilitaires, une
[1:24:25] camionnette, une rétro
[1:24:27] excavatrice, une déchiqueteuse
[1:24:28] et deux remorques. 5.2, a notice
[1:24:31] of motion filing of a draft
[1:24:37] by-law amending Zoning By-law
[1:24:38] PC-2775 in order to clarify
[1:24:39] definitions related to terrace
[1:24:40] and garden structures, and to
[1:24:41] regulate the development and the
[1:24:42] use of commercial terraces and
[1:24:43] microterraces.
[1:24:46] - 5.3 Avis de motion et dépôt
[1:24:47] d'un projet de règlement
[1:24:48] modifiant le Règlement de
[1:24:49] construction PC-2786 concernant
[1:24:50] le calcul de la capacité
[1:24:51] d'accueil de même que les règles
[1:24:52] relatives à l'aménagement d'une
[1:24:54] structure au-dessus d'une
[1:24:55] terrasse commerciale. >> 5.4,
[1:25:02] Notice of motion and filing of a
[1:25:03] draft by-law amending Site
[1:25:04] Planning and Architectural
[1:25:05] Integration Program By-law
[1:25:06] PC-2787 in order to regulate
[1:25:07] commercial terraces.
[1:25:12] - Avis de motion et dépôt d'un
[1:25:13] projet de règlement modifiant le
[1:25:14] Règlement des permis et
[1:25:15] certificats PC-2788 afin de
[1:25:16] préciser les informations
[1:25:17] requises au dépôt d'une demande
[1:25:18] de certificat d'autorisation
[1:25:19] concernant une terrasse
[1:25:20] commerciale de même que la durée
[1:25:22] de validité dudit certificat
[1:25:24] d'autorisation. >> The motion
[1:25:27] 5.6 Notice of motion and filing
[1:25:28] of a draft by-law amending the
[1:25:29] Village Code PC-2880 in order to
[1:25:31] clarify that commercial terraces
[1:25:34] are not governed by the Village
[1:25:35] Code.
[1:25:38] >> Who presents these notices of
[1:25:41] motion? 5.1 to 5.6.
[1:25:46] >> Brent Cowan. District 8. 5.7,
[1:25:47] Adoption of a first draft by-law
[1:25:48] amending Zoning By-law PC-2775
[1:25:49] in order to clarify definitions
[1:25:50] (---)
[1:25:51] les principales modifications
[1:25:52] proposées selon le type de
[1:25:53] terrasse concerne les usages
[1:25:54] permettant l'aménagement et
[1:25:55] l'exploitation, la localisation,
[1:25:56] les règles relatives à
[1:25:57] l'aménagement et le
[1:25:58] positionnement. No
[1:26:12] Les activités permises ou
[1:26:14] prohibée, la capacité d'accueil
[1:26:16] maximale tenant compte des
[1:26:17] moyens d'évacuation des
[1:26:19] (---)
[1:26:20] de même que du nombre minimal de
[1:26:21] cases de stationnement requis.
[1:26:23] Ainsi que les heures
[1:26:24] d'opération. Certaines
[1:26:26] dispositions sont sujet à
[1:26:27] l'approbation des personnes
[1:26:28] habiles à voter. Une
[1:26:30] consultation publique sera tenue
[1:26:31] dans quelques semaines avant
[1:26:34] l'adoption du second projet est
[1:26:35] un avis sera publié pour donner
[1:26:37] les détails de cette
[1:26:39] consultation. Après l'adoption
[1:26:41] du second projet, un avis sera
[1:26:42] publié qui s'adressera, elle,
[1:26:44] aux personnes habiles à voter du
[1:26:46] secteur. Enfin, une version
[1:26:48] finale sera présentée au Conseil
[1:26:50] pour une adoption finale.
[1:26:58] >> 5.8 Adoption of a first draft
[1:26:59] by-law amending the Construction
[1:27:00] By-law PC-2786 regarding the
[1:27:02] calculation of occupancy
[1:27:03] capacity as well as the rules
[1:27:04] related to the construction of a
[1:27:05] structure above a commercial
[1:27:06] terrace. The purpose of such an
[1:27:08] amendment to establish the rules
[1:27:09] to ensure the quality and safety
[1:27:10] of people on commercial
[1:27:12] terraces.
[1:27:14] - 5.9, Adoption d'un premier
[1:27:15] projet de règlement modifiant le
[1:27:16] Règlement sur les plans
[1:27:17] d'implantation et d'intégration
[1:27:21] architecturale PC-2787 afin
[1:27:22] d'encadrer les terrasses
[1:27:23] commerciales. Dans le but de
[1:27:24] mener une équité, un équilibre,
[1:27:25] une saine cohabitation et une
[1:27:27] cohésion dans le développement
[1:27:28] ou le développement du
[1:27:29] territoire. Il est important de
[1:27:30] définir les objectifs et des
[1:27:32] critères pour encadrer
[1:27:33] l'aménagement et l'exploitation
[1:27:34] des terrasses commerciales, et
[1:27:36] ce peu importe la localisation
[1:27:37] de ses dernières à l'intérieur
[1:27:38] du territoire de paix
[1:27:40] Pointe-Claire.
[1:27:43] >> 5.10 Adoption of a first
[1:27:44] draft By-law amending the
[1:27:45] Village Code, by-law PC-2880 of
[1:27:46] the city of Pointe-Claire, in
[1:27:47] order to clarify that commercial
[1:27:49] terraces are not governed by the
[1:27:50] Village Code. The purpose of
[1:27:52] this amendment to clarifying
[1:27:53] harbour new harmonized to rule
[1:27:55] applicable to commercial
[1:27:57] tariffs.
[1:27:58] - Pour 5,7 à 5,10? Do I have a
[1:28:02] mover?
[1:28:03] >> Prepare to move this motion
[1:28:05] or like to explain to everybody
[1:28:06] this is a first draft bylaw.
[1:28:09] There is the plan to have a
[1:28:10] public consultation going
[1:28:12] forward to get everybody to
[1:28:14] weigh in on this first draft
[1:28:18] does not mean it's the final
[1:28:19] version. It gives the
[1:28:20] opportunity for those, that kind
[1:28:22] of feedback. The -- putting in a
[1:28:25] commercial terrasse operation,
[1:28:26] there is always going to be the
[1:28:28] issue of promoting business
[1:28:30] versus the nuisance to
[1:28:32] potentially to businesses on the
[1:28:34] side and residents that might
[1:28:35] live nearby. This is a difficult
[1:28:40] balance to effect and that is
[1:28:42] why it's important to have the
[1:28:43] feedback of the people that will
[1:28:44] be involved in that opportunity
[1:28:46] will be there. With that said, I
[1:28:48] move the adoption of the first
[1:28:50] draft bylaw identified at 5.7
[1:28:54] through 5.10. Brent Cowan.
[1:28:57] District 8.
[1:28:58] >> And seconder?
[1:29:01] >> Eric Stork. District 7.
[1:29:02] >> I would like to speak to 5.7
[1:29:04] and 5.10. Pour moi, je votre
[1:29:09] contre les
[1:29:11] (---)
[1:29:12] cinq points sept à cinq points
[1:29:13] dix, parce qu'ils appliquent
[1:29:14] l'adoption d'un nouveau projet
[1:29:15] de règlement avec lequel je suis
[1:29:16] en désaccord. Ils contraindra
[1:29:20] excessivement les commerçants de
[1:29:22] Pointe-Claire avec la
[1:29:24] bureaucratie et limitera leur
[1:29:25] capacité à s'engager dans des
[1:29:28] activités commerciales à
[1:29:29] l'extérieur de leur
[1:29:31] établissement, comme les
[1:29:32] terrasses, les cours, etc.. Plus
[1:29:36] important encore, ce règlement
[1:29:38] perpétuera une tendance en cours
[1:29:41] depuis des années, voire des
[1:29:44] décennies, en limitant la
[1:29:45] capacité des citoyens de
[1:29:47] Pointe-Claire à s'amuser sans
[1:29:49] problème à l'extérieur et à
[1:29:52] l'intérieur des établissements
[1:29:53] commerciaux. Les clauses du
[1:29:55] règlement que je trouve
[1:29:57] excessive sont les suivantes:
[1:30:00] sur les terrasses commerciales,
[1:30:02] les activités telles que la
[1:30:05] danse, les représentations
[1:30:07] théâtrales ou cinématographique
[1:30:10] ou les spectacles utilisant des
[1:30:13] haut-parleurs ou tout autre
[1:30:15] appareil d'amplification du sont
[1:30:17] sont interdits. Donc, la danse,
[1:30:22] les haut-parleurs et
[1:30:23] l'amplification du sont sont
[1:30:25] interdits. Sérieusement. La
[1:30:28] capacité... deuxième: la
[1:30:30] capacité maximale de la terrasse
[1:30:31] et le nombre de places
[1:30:34] correspondant à la moitié des
[1:30:36] places intérieures de
[1:30:38] l'établissement, ou 25 places.
[1:30:40] Dans le cadre du studio 77, cela
[1:30:44] signifie 27 personnes au total
[1:30:46] et nous savons tous qu'il y a
[1:30:48] toujours eu beaucoup plus que
[1:30:50] cela et que le nombre de
[1:30:52] personnes n'est jamais
[1:30:54] (---)
[1:30:55] dangereux ou problématique.
[1:30:57] Comme nous le savons tous, les
[1:30:58] lieux de spectacle ont été
[1:31:00] traités avec
[1:31:02] (---)
[1:31:03] pendant de nombreuses années,
[1:31:05] voire des décennies. Et
[1:31:06] j'aimerais que cela change. Je
[1:31:09] conviens que les établissements
[1:31:11] commerciaux ne devraient pas
[1:31:13] être autorisés à perturber ou à
[1:31:17] nuire à la qualité de vie de
[1:31:19] leurs voisins et que le volume
[1:31:21] sonore devrait toujours être
[1:31:24] contrôlé. Mais j'ai l'impression
[1:31:25] que la Ville peut faire
[1:31:27] davantage de compromis afin de
[1:31:29] s'assurer que les citoyens de
[1:31:31] Pointe-Claire ne perde pas la
[1:31:32] possibilité de célébrer et de
[1:31:34] profiter de la vie de manière
[1:31:37] raisonnable, en particulier dans
[1:31:38] leurs villages commerciaux. I
[1:31:44] debated because Councillor Cohen
[1:31:46] was indeed correct, will be a
[1:31:48] consultation process, but I
[1:31:49] quite simply do not like the
[1:31:51] first draft for the reasons that
[1:31:53] I have just specified in French
[1:31:54] but I will elaborate in English.
[1:31:58] I am against 5.7 and 5.10
[1:32:01] because they involve the
[1:32:02] adoption of a new draft bylaw
[1:32:03] that I disagree with because I
[1:32:06] feel little overly constraint
[1:32:08] Pointe-Claire merchant with
[1:32:09] bureaucracy and limit their
[1:32:10] ability to engage in commercial
[1:32:12] activities on the outside of
[1:32:13] their establishments example,
[1:32:15] terraces, courtyards, et cetera.
[1:32:17] More importantly, this bylaw
[1:32:19] will perpetuate an ongoing trend
[1:32:21] for years even decades limiting
[1:32:23] the ability of Pointe-Claire
[1:32:25] citizens to have harmless finds
[1:32:27] both inside and outside of
[1:32:28] commercial establishment. The
[1:32:31] clauses of the bylaw that I find
[1:32:33] excessive are, number one, a
[1:32:35] commercial terraces activities
[1:32:37] such as dancing, theatrical or
[1:32:41] cinematography performances or
[1:32:42] shows using loudspeakers or any
[1:32:44] other sound amplification
[1:32:46] devices are prohibited. So
[1:32:48] dancing, speakers and
[1:32:52] amplification interests are
[1:32:53] prohibited. Seriously? For me,
[1:32:55] that is a little harsh. Number
[1:32:57] two, the maximum terrasse
[1:32:59] capacity shall be the number of
[1:33:00] seats corresponding to half the
[1:33:02] establishment indoor seating or
[1:33:04] 25 seats. In the case of studio
[1:33:07] 77, which is big for
[1:33:08] Pointe-Claire Village, this
[1:33:09] would mean 27 people total. We
[1:33:12] all know that there are many
[1:33:13] more than that and that the
[1:33:15] volume of people never seem
[1:33:17] cramped, dangerous or a problem
[1:33:18] in the events that occurred
[1:33:21] there. As we all know, live
[1:33:24] entertainment have been treated
[1:33:25] to this day for many years and
[1:33:27] decades now and I like this to
[1:33:28] change. I agree that commercial
[1:33:30] establishment should not be
[1:33:31] permitted to disrupt or
[1:33:32] adversely affect the quality of
[1:33:34] life with their neighbours and
[1:33:35] sound volume should always be
[1:33:37] controlled but somehow I feel
[1:33:39] that more compromise can be made
[1:33:40] on the part of this city in
[1:33:42] order to also ensure that
[1:33:43] Pointe-Claire citizens do not
[1:33:45] lose out on the ability to
[1:33:46] celebrate and enjoy life in a
[1:33:49] reasonable matter especially in
[1:33:51] their commercial villages. That
[1:33:53] is my take on that. We have a
[1:34:00] mover. I had a mover. Did we
[1:34:01] have a seconder? Non?.
[1:34:05] >> Now.
[1:34:06] >> Do I have a seconder?
[1:34:09] Councillor Brent Cowan moved.
[1:34:12] 5.7 to 5.10.
[1:34:14] >> Eric Stork. District 7. I
[1:34:15] liked as a speak to the matter
[1:34:16] as well.
[1:34:17] >> Absolutely.
[1:34:18] >> Just for clarification, this
[1:34:19] bylaw is the general bylaw in
[1:34:21] terms of outdoor music and
[1:34:23] outdoor speakers. You can still
[1:34:25] do such events through a special
[1:34:27] permit process. We do not want
[1:34:29] to be something general across
[1:34:30] the board. One guy is playing
[1:34:32] rap music, the other guys
[1:34:33] playing classic next pre-show.
[1:34:34] That we want to have some sort
[1:34:35] of control element so you can
[1:34:36] still do outdoor shows in terms
[1:34:40] of the special process which is
[1:34:42] standard. Another thing, just to
[1:34:44] clarify, is the 50% rule is
[1:34:47] actually a bylaw that exists and
[1:34:50] if we aren't happy with, it then
[1:34:51] we should potentially change it
[1:34:53] but we have to follow the rules
[1:34:55] that governs us this moment.
[1:34:57] Thank you.
[1:34:59] >> All in favour of 5.7 to 5.10?
[1:35:03] All against? Cinq points 11?
[1:35:13] - 5.11 Adoption sans
[1:35:14] modification d'un Règlement
[1:35:15] relatif à la démolition des
[1:35:16] immeubles. Les principaux
[1:35:17] objectifs visés par le Règlement
[1:35:18] de démolition sont: protégés
[1:35:21] améliorer et mettre en valeur le
[1:35:23] cadre bâti des immeubles
[1:35:25] présentant une
[1:35:26] (---)
[1:35:27] un bien culturel au sens de la
[1:35:28] Loi sur le patrimoine culturel.
[1:35:30] Maintenir un parc immobilier de
[1:35:32] qualité et adapter, permettant
[1:35:33] de répondre aux besoins des
[1:35:35] ménages. S'assurer que le
[1:35:36] programme préliminaire de
[1:35:37] réalisation du sol dégagé
[1:35:39] contribué à la mise en valeur du
[1:35:41] paysage urbanisé existant. Avant
[1:35:42] le recours ultime à la
[1:35:45] démolition, donner la priorité à
[1:35:46] la rénovation, à la restauration
[1:35:48] ou à la réutilisation des
[1:35:50] bâtiments existants dans une
[1:35:51] perspective de durabilité, de
[1:35:53] réduction de l'empreinte
[1:35:54] carbone, lorsque l'entretien du
[1:35:55] bâtiment est encore
[1:35:56] raisonnablement possible,
[1:35:58] notamment en ce qui concerne les
[1:36:00] investissements requis.
[1:36:01] Planifier globalement
[1:36:02] l'exécution des travaux dans une
[1:36:04] perspective de gestion
[1:36:05] écologique et responsable des
[1:36:06] ressources affectées au projet.
[1:36:08] Et enfin, régler les problèmes
[1:36:10] de salubrité, de nuisance ou de
[1:36:12] sécurité des bâtiments
[1:36:15] obsolètes.
[1:36:16] - Pour cinq points 11. Do I have
[1:36:18] a mover?
[1:36:19] >> Brent Cowan.
[1:36:21] District 8. I'd asked for that
[1:36:22] to be read an English for the
[1:36:24] benefit of the audience.
[1:36:26] >> Adoption of the modification
[1:36:33] modification of a By-law
[1:36:34] respecting the demolition of
[1:36:35] immovables.. Protect enhance the
[1:36:36] move those that have heritage
[1:36:37] value or constitute cultural
[1:36:38] property within the meaning of
[1:36:39] the cultural heritage Act.
[1:36:40] Improve the quality and
[1:36:42] functionality of housing while
[1:36:43] maintaining the housing stock
[1:36:44] that needs expressed needs.
[1:36:46] Ensure that the preliminary
[1:36:47] program for the realization of
[1:36:48] the vacated lounge contribute to
[1:36:50] the enhancement of the existing
[1:36:52] urbanized landscape. Before
[1:36:54] resorting ultimately to
[1:36:56] demolition, give priority to
[1:36:57] renovating, restoring, or using
[1:36:59] existing buildings on the
[1:37:01] sustainability and carbon
[1:37:02] footprint reduction perspective
[1:37:03] in cases where maintaining the
[1:37:05] building is still reasonably
[1:37:07] possible. Particularly in terms
[1:37:08] of the investment required. Plan
[1:37:10] the overall execution of the
[1:37:12] work from the perspective of
[1:37:14] ecological and responsible
[1:37:15] management of the resources
[1:37:16] allocated to the project and
[1:37:18] lastly, resolve how, uses and
[1:37:21] safety issues related to
[1:37:22] obsolete buildings.
[1:37:25] >> So I move item 5.11. Brent
[1:37:30] Cowan. District 8.
[1:37:31] >> Seconder?
[1:37:35] >> All in favour?
[1:37:37] >> If I may? What is not written
[1:37:42] in that by law and I have asked
[1:37:46] for at least eight years -- I
[1:37:51] will get under ten years -- is
[1:37:55] that the replacement plan is not
[1:38:04] -- it has nothing to do with the
[1:38:08] demolition. Finally, I got that,
[1:38:11] it took a while but now the
[1:38:16] committee cannot state after
[1:38:19] seeing the plans. I was told
[1:38:23] that you will see a volumes and
[1:38:26] site planning no reshapes or
[1:38:33] things like that. I am really
[1:38:34] happy about this.
[1:38:37] - Donc, vous votez pour,
[1:38:38] Monsieur Cousineau?
[1:38:39] - Oui.
[1:38:40] - Vous êtes pour? O.K.. >> 6.1
[1:38:48] Consider a request for revision
[1:38:49] pertaining to the decision of
[1:38:50] the Demolition Committee
[1:38:51] regarding the refusal of the
[1:38:52] demolition and of the programme
[1:38:53] for the reutilization of the
[1:38:54] vacated land of the immovable
[1:38:56] located at 191 Du
[1:38:57] bord-du-lac-lakeshore road. An
[1:39:00] application for review of the
[1:39:01] decision rendered on November
[1:39:02] 14th, 2024 by the demolition
[1:39:04] committee has been filed. This
[1:39:06] decision refuses the request to
[1:39:07] demolish the building as well as
[1:39:09] the program of a realization of
[1:39:10] the vacated land. The building
[1:39:12] in question is not a heritage
[1:39:14] building. The application for
[1:39:15] review was received within the
[1:39:17] time limits prescribed by the
[1:39:19] bylaw. PC 20 and 18. In
[1:39:22] accordance with article 38 of
[1:39:23] the bylaw, Council must render a
[1:39:25] decision on the demolition
[1:39:26] request and the program of the
[1:39:28] realization of the vacated land
[1:39:29] as submitted to the demolition
[1:39:30] committee. Council may appeal
[1:39:31] the decision of the demolition
[1:39:33] committee or render the decision
[1:39:34] that the committee should have
[1:39:36] rendered.
[1:39:40] >> For 6.1 in 6.2 as well.
[1:39:45] Est-ce qu'on a déjà eu 6,2? On a
[1:39:49] fait les deux? Le deuxième?
[1:39:52] - 6.2 Autoriser la participation
[1:39:53] de certains membres du conseil,
[1:39:54] ainsi que 2 employés aux assises
[1:39:55] annuelles de l'Union des
[1:39:56] municipalités du Québec devant
[1:39:58] se tenir du 14 au 16 mai 2025, à
[1:40:00] Québec. L'autorisation vise
[1:40:02] monsieur le maire de même que
[1:40:04] les
[1:40:05] (---)
[1:40:06] terres Stainforth est au stade
[1:40:08] Colin. Les conseillers Eric
[1:40:10] Stork et
[1:40:11] (inaudible)
[1:40:12] Bruno Tremblay et Brad Caron,
[1:40:13] ainsi que la directeur général,
[1:40:16] Karina Verdon et le directeur
[1:40:19] adjoint
[1:40:20] (inaudible)
[1:40:21] .
[1:40:22] - Alors, pour six points à six
[1:40:23] points de vue... Do I have a
[1:40:24] mover?
[1:40:27] >> And seconder?
[1:40:28] - Je veux m'adresser... >> Paul
[1:40:31] Bissonnette. District 2.
[1:40:34] >> Mayor, would you be surprised
[1:40:37] -- precise for 6.1, what is the
[1:40:41] decision for Council? From
[1:40:43] Council, please? Is it possible
[1:40:45] to do the vote for 6.1. I would
[1:40:48] also need to know what is the
[1:40:49] decision from Council.
[1:40:50] >> Myself as well because I was
[1:40:52] clear on a subsequent one but
[1:40:56] 6.1 is. We are voting to support
[1:40:58] the decision by either support
[1:41:02] or uphold the decision of the
[1:41:04] demolition committee.
[1:41:05] >> Does Council uphold the
[1:41:08] decision of the motion committee
[1:41:12] or overturn the decision?
[1:41:15] >> For 6.1, we are voting yay to
[1:41:17] uphold and nay --
[1:41:20] >> We can just ask it in one
[1:41:22] version.
[1:41:23] >> Who is in favour.
[1:41:24] >> All in favour of upholding
[1:41:26] the decision of the demolition
[1:41:27] committee?
[1:41:28] >> Do I address Council before
[1:41:29] we go to vote? Not Council. I
[1:41:35] will object to that decision
[1:41:38] even though I voted for not
[1:41:41] demolish sheen previously. 5.11
[1:41:47] was not considered back then and
[1:41:50] other reasons why I voted
[1:41:56] against the demolition,
[1:41:58] originally, was trying to save
[1:42:01] some material. The debate was on
[1:42:04] another level so I will be
[1:42:07] voting against.
[1:42:10] >> We are about to vote.
[1:42:12] >> You know what I mean.
[1:42:16] >> Maybe we do not know what you
[1:42:18] mean, Claude Cousineau. Could
[1:42:19] you be more specific?
[1:42:21] >> I will be voting against the
[1:42:27] committee's decision.
[1:42:30] >> So you want to overturn the
[1:42:33] motion committee decision?
[1:42:34] >> Yes.
[1:42:35] >> Thanks.
[1:42:36] >> We are going to have the vote
[1:42:38] right, now are we? Pour 6,1...
[1:42:40] All in favour of supporting the
[1:42:42] --
[1:42:43] >> I could just. I want to make
[1:42:46] something clear. Legally, the
[1:42:48] decision that we are making
[1:42:50] today is to uphold the decision
[1:42:54] by demolition committee with the
[1:42:56] information provided at the
[1:42:59] time. Obviously the gentleman
[1:43:01] who introduce himself earlier is
[1:43:04] questioning some reports and
[1:43:07] such. We are bound by the fact
[1:43:09] to make the decision based upon
[1:43:11] that information even though you
[1:43:12] disagree with it. The important
[1:43:14] thing here is if you want to put
[1:43:16] into question the information,
[1:43:19] you can do so. From us, we
[1:43:21] cannot make a decision based on
[1:43:23] other factors. We have to look
[1:43:24] at the information that is
[1:43:27] provided. Hopefully that makes
[1:43:30] sense but I'd be more than happy
[1:43:32] to explain it to you after. What
[1:43:33] I'm trying to say is that
[1:43:36] whatever information is provided
[1:43:38] by the demolition committees
[1:43:39] what we have to base it on. An
[1:43:41] opinion, second thought, I did
[1:43:42] this, way I did, that we have to
[1:43:43] go off of the information that
[1:43:45] is provided. If you question
[1:43:47] that information provided, that
[1:43:48] is something that should be done
[1:43:50] further down the line. Hopefully
[1:43:53] that makes sense.
[1:43:55] >> Can I add just a very short
[1:44:00] thing? This is not my first
[1:44:02] rodeo. I can bring up some
[1:44:05] addresses and it's so, so
[1:44:08] arbitrary that it's not fair for
[1:44:10] the citizens, for the owner.
[1:44:13] That is why I am voting against.
[1:44:20] To overturn the decision,
[1:44:23] whatever the vote is.
[1:44:29] >> All in favour of supporting
[1:44:31] the decision of the demolition
[1:44:34] committee?
[1:44:39] All against?
[1:44:50] >> 6.2 for some? You know hot
[1:44:52] for 6.2.
[1:44:53] >> Do I have a mover?
[1:45:00] >> Bruno Tremblay. District 6.
[1:45:02] >> And seconder?
[1:45:06] >> Paul Bissonnette. District 2.
[1:45:07] >> Of a very? I'm against?
[1:45:17] >> Organizations from the meld
[1:45:19] and pretty much 6.3 dollars
[1:45:20] Grant a financial support to
[1:45:21] various non-profit organizations
[1:45:22] for a total amount of $ 8,935.
[1:45:23] The organization's concerns are
[1:45:24] as follows, Via Association
[1:45:27] (---)
[1:45:28] Mark Vanier est une, Fondation
[1:45:29] Yvon Lamarre, l'habitation
[1:45:31] jeunesse de l'ouest de l'île.
[1:45:35] - 6.4 Autoriser la participation
[1:45:36] des membres du conseil au
[1:45:37] congrès annuel de la Fédération
[1:45:38] Canadienne des Municipalités
[1:45:41] devant se tenir du 29 mai au 1
[1:45:42] juin 2025, à Ottawa.
[1:45:44] L'autorisation vise monsieur le
[1:45:45] maire de même que Madame les
[1:45:47] conseillères Table Austin forte
[1:45:48] et Kelly Thorstad-Cullen.
[1:45:50] Messieurs les conseillers Eric
[1:45:51] Stork, Claude Cousineau, Bruno
[1:45:53] Tremblay et Braun Caron.
[1:45:56] >> For 6.3 and 6.4, do I have a
[1:45:59] mover?
[1:46:01] >> Cynthia Homan. District 5.
[1:46:02] >> And seconder?
[1:46:04] >> Tara Stainforth. District 4.
[1:46:05] >> You all in favour?
[1:46:07] >> Thank you.
[1:46:08] >> 7.1, for the minutes of
[1:46:09] October 23rd 2024 meeting of the
[1:46:13] youth advisory board.
[1:46:14] - 7.2 Déposer le procès-verbal
[1:46:15] de la réunion du 27 novembre
[1:46:16] 2024 du Comité consultatif
[1:46:17] jeunesse. 7.3, to file the
[1:46:23] minutes of the November 28,
[1:46:24] 2024, meeting of the
[1:46:25] Pointe-Claire Public Library
[1:46:26] Advisory Board.
[1:46:29] - 7.4 Nommer des membres au sein
[1:46:30] du Comité consultatif Stewart
[1:46:31] Hall. Suite à des mandats... à
[1:46:32] la fin des mandats de Cameron
[1:46:34] Tilson et de Jones
[1:46:35] (---)
[1:46:36] le comité consultatif recommande
[1:46:37] la nomination de deux nouveaux
[1:46:39] membres, soit madame
[1:46:41] (---)
[1:46:42] et madame Claudia Oliver a pour
[1:46:43] des mandats de trois, en soit du
[1:46:44] 1er janvier 2025 ou 31 décembre
[1:46:48] 2027. >> 7.5 Renew the mandates
[1:46:51] of members of the Canoe Kayak
[1:46:52] Club. These are the following
[1:46:53] members, Archambault, Julie
[1:46:59] Samson.
[1:47:00] - Pour cette virgule quatre et
[1:47:02] 7,5
[1:47:03] Do I have a mover.
[1:47:05] >> Cynthia Homan. District 5.
[1:47:06] >> Seconder?
[1:47:09] >> Tara Stainforth. District 4.
[1:47:10] >> All of our?
[1:47:11] - 8.1 Autoriser le paiement d'un
[1:47:12] montant de 41 522,20 $,
[1:47:13] représentant la cotisation
[1:47:14] annuelle à l'Union des
[1:47:15] municipalités du Québec, et ce,
[1:47:16] incluant la cotisation au
[1:47:17] Carrefour du capital humain. >>
[1:47:18] Thank you.
[1:47:28] >> 9.1 Exercise the renewal
[1:47:29] option provided for in the
[1:47:30] contract entered into with
[1:47:31] SPÉCIALISTES DE LA TRADUCTION
[1:47:32] R&R INTERNATIONAL INC., For the
[1:47:33] year 2025, in the amount of $
[1:47:35] 79,746.66, taxes included, for
[1:47:38] professional translation and
[1:47:39] revision services.
[1:47:42] - 9.2 Se prévaloir de l'option
[1:47:44] de renouvellement prévue au
[1:47:45] contrat intervenu avec PÉNÉGA
[1:47:46] COMMUNICATIONS INC.pour l'année
[1:47:47] 2025, au montant de 118681,79 $,
[1:47:51] taxes incluses, pour des
[1:47:52] services professionnels pour la
[1:47:53] refonte, la sauvegarde et les
[1:47:54] mises à jour du site Web et de
[1:47:55] l'intranet.
[1:47:58] - >> For 8.1, nine point to 9.2,
[1:48:02] do I have a mover?
[1:48:04] Bruno Tremblay, district six. >>
[1:48:07] Bruno Tremblay. District 6.
[1:48:08] >> And seconder?
[1:48:10] >> Eric Stork you. District 7.
[1:48:11] He
[1:48:13] >> Then cute.
[1:48:19] - 10,1. >> Budget amendment 10.1
[1:48:21] to find a list of budget
[1:48:22] amendments and the register of
[1:48:23] cheques for the period of
[1:48:24] November 26, 2024, to December
[1:48:25] 31, 2024.
[1:48:34] - 10.2 Autoriser un soutien
[1:48:35] financier à la campagne
[1:48:36] Centraide 2024 au montant
[1:48:37] équivalent à 75% de la
[1:48:38] contribution des employés. La
[1:48:39] contribution total s'élève à
[1:48:40] (---)
[1:48:41] avec un ajout de 75% de ses
[1:48:42] contributions par la ville, soit
[1:48:43] 14750 dollars et 86, la
[1:48:47] contribution totale à Centraide
[1:48:48] et de 34418 dollars et 67. >>
[1:48:54] 10.3 Creation of residential and
[1:48:56] non-residential building
[1:48:57] subcategories for the
[1:48:59] 2026-2027-2028 assessment role.
[1:49:01] The act respecting municipal
[1:49:03] taxation allows municipalities
[1:49:04] to create subcategories of
[1:49:06] renewables on the assessment
[1:49:07] role. For taxation purposes, it
[1:49:09] is therefore proposed to create
[1:49:11] the following sub categories of
[1:49:13] nonresidential immovable is
[1:49:14] within the commercial category.
[1:49:17] First category, superregional
[1:49:19] cop shopping centre, 200 stores
[1:49:20] or more. Regional shopping
[1:49:22] centre which is 100 299 stores.
[1:49:25] Local shopping centres, 49 to 99
[1:49:28] stores. Neighbourhood shopping
[1:49:29] centres, from 15 to 44 stores
[1:49:31] and also neighbourhood shopping
[1:49:33] centre with 14 storms or less.
[1:49:35] And data hosting services. Four
[1:49:37] residential buildings, it is
[1:49:38] proposed to create the snow
[1:49:39] category of six dwellings or
[1:49:42] more.
[1:49:44] - 10.4 Autoriser un amendement
[1:49:45] budgétaire afin de transférer
[1:49:46] des fonds pour couvrir les
[1:49:47] postes budgétaires déficitaires
[1:49:48] du service des Travaux Publics
[1:49:49] et Immeubles. Le montant du
[1:49:50] transfert et de 67300 dollars
[1:49:52] transférés à quatre postes
[1:49:53] budgétaires différents.
[1:49:55] - Alors, pour une 10,2 à 10,4.
[1:49:59] Do I have a mover?
[1:50:03] >> Bruno Tremblay. So district
[1:50:04] 6.
[1:50:05] >> Seconder?
[1:50:07] >> Tara Stainforth. District 4.
[1:50:08] Or
[1:50:09] >> A line favour?
[1:50:13] >> 10.5 Exercise the renewal
[1:50:14] option provided for in the
[1:50:15] contract entered into with
[1:50:17] GROUPE D'IMPORTATION ET
[1:50:18] DISTRIBUTION HUGO INC. Also
[1:50:21] known as
[1:50:22] (PROMOTION PLUS)
[1:50:23] , for the period of February 1,
[1:50:24] 2025, to January 31, 2026, in
[1:50:26] the amount of $ 59,866.67, taxes
[1:50:28] included for the supply of work
[1:50:30] clothes for blue collar workers.
[1:50:36] - 10.6 Octroyer un contrat pour
[1:50:37] des services d'entretien et
[1:50:38] d'assistance technique des
[1:50:39] logiciels Biblio Mondo, à
[1:50:40] Inmedia Technologies, pour les
[1:50:41] années 2025, 2026 et 2027, pour
[1:50:43] un montant total de 160 904,32
[1:50:44] $, taxes incluses. Bobby Homan
[1:50:50] d'eau et le système de
[1:50:52] bibliothèque intégré qui
[1:50:54] contrôle les acquisitions, le
[1:50:56] catalogage, les publications en
[1:50:57] tout genre. Les tout
[1:50:58] (---)
[1:50:59] de sécurité quant aux prêts et
[1:51:01] le portail Web de la
[1:51:03] bibliothèque et les services aux
[1:51:05] clients. >> 10.7 Award a
[1:51:07] contract for Azure backup and
[1:51:09] recovery for the years 2025 to
[1:51:10] 2028, to ITI INC. For a total
[1:51:12] amount of $ 376,299, taxes
[1:51:15] included. The proposed
[1:51:19] resolution will replace -- the
[1:51:21] proposed solution, sorry, will
[1:51:23] replace our current backup
[1:51:24] system and will also enable
[1:51:25] secure backup and recovery in
[1:51:26] the air gap cloud. The City has
[1:51:28] joined the group formed by the
[1:51:32] since 2022 in this contract is
[1:51:34] within the framework of said
[1:51:37] group.
[1:51:39] - 10.8 Octroyer un contrat pour
[1:51:40] l'achat des licences VMWARE pour
[1:51:41] l'année 2025, à SOFTCHOICE LP,
[1:51:43] pour un montant total de 99
[1:51:45] 338,40 $, taxes incluses. Les
[1:51:50] licences
[1:51:51] (---)
[1:51:52] incluent le support et entretien
[1:51:53] de nos systèmes vidéo
[1:51:57] (---)
[1:51:58] et nos serveurs est assez pour
[1:52:01] l'année 2025. Le support et
[1:52:03] entretien couvre le système de
[1:52:07] virtualisation
[1:52:08] (---)
[1:52:09] la majorité des employés. >> For
[1:52:13] 10.5 to 10.8, do I have a mover?
[1:52:19] >> Paul Bissonnette. District 2.
[1:52:20] >> Seconder?
[1:52:22] >> Cynthia Homan. District 5.
[1:52:24] >> All in favour?
[1:52:30] >> Madeleine 11.1 Approve a deed
[1:52:31] of sale to be entered into with
[1:52:32] the ministère de
[1:52:33] l'Environnement, de la Lutte
[1:52:36] contre les changements
[1:52:37] climatiques, de la Faune et des
[1:52:38] Parcs, regarding lot 6 505 648
[1:52:39] of the Cadastre of Québec. Part
[1:52:40] of the car lot will be to come
[1:52:44] lot 600 58 in its acquisition
[1:52:46] will become the city owner of
[1:52:47] the entire park.
[1:52:55] - 12.1 Déposer la liste des
[1:52:56] changements au personnel par
[1:52:57] décisions déléguées pour le mois
[1:52:58] de janvier 2025. >> 12.2 Approve
[1:52:59] the list of non-delegated staff
[1:53:01] changes as of January 14, 2025.
[1:53:02] 13. Inspection et sécurité
[1:53:05] - Pour 11,1 à 11,2
[1:53:08] Do I have a mover?
[1:53:11] - Je propose d'approuver la
[1:53:13] liste des changements au
[1:53:15] personnel. >> And seconder?
[1:53:18] - Oui, je les ai comme mélangé.
[1:53:21] C'est comme moitié phrase pour
[1:53:23] le un et le deux. Je veux que je
[1:53:25] le répète? Déposer la liste des
[1:53:27] changements personnels et
[1:53:28] approuver la liste des
[1:53:29] changements au personnel.
[1:53:31] - 11,1 aussi.
[1:53:33] - Je suis désolé.
[1:53:34] (rires)
[1:53:36] - Et approuvé un acte de vente.
[1:53:38] (rires)
[1:53:40] - Thera c'était une forte,
[1:53:42] district IV. >> And seconder.
[1:53:45] >> Eric Stork. District 7.
[1:53:46] >> All in favour?
[1:53:48] >> Thank you.
[1:53:54] - 14.1 Se prévaloir de l'option
[1:53:55] de renouvellement prévue au
[1:53:56] contrat intervenu avec MARIO C.
[1:53:57] ET FILS
[1:53:58] (9042-0845 QUÉBEC INC.)
[1:53:59] , pour l'année 2025, au montant
[1:54:00] de 80 160,57 $, taxes incluses,
[1:54:01] pour des travaux d'entretien
[1:54:02] horticole et de plantation à
[1:54:03] taux horaire. Ce contrat permet
[1:54:04] le maintien et la pérennité des
[1:54:06] aménagements constitués de
[1:54:07] vivaces et d'arbustes dans les
[1:54:09] parcs et espaces verts sur le
[1:54:11] territoire de la ville.
[1:54:14] >> 14.2 Exercise the renewal
[1:54:15] option provided for in the
[1:54:16] contract entered into with MARIO
[1:54:17] C. ET FILS, for the year 2025,
[1:54:20] in the amount of $ 452 723,13,
[1:54:22] taxes included for maintenance
[1:54:23] and mowing of green spaces and
[1:54:25] sports fields. This contract
[1:54:28] provides for the mowing of green
[1:54:30] spaces and sports fields on city
[1:54:31] grounds as well as the edges of
[1:54:33] Highway. The contract ensure
[1:54:34] that grass areas are kept clean
[1:54:36] by removing waste as well.
[1:54:40] - 14.3 Renouveler le contrat
[1:54:41] dans le cadre de l'appel
[1:54:43] d'offres regroupé n°
[1:54:45] 2023-8115-50 pour la location
[1:54:46] des véhicules légers du Centre
[1:54:48] d'acquisitions gouvernementales
[1:54:50] à ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS CANADA,
[1:54:52] pour un montant total de 109
[1:54:53] 638,25 $ taxes incluses, pour la
[1:54:57] deuxième période du 1 février
[1:54:59] 2025 au 31 janvier 2026. >> 14.4
[1:55:03] Award a contract for the supply
[1:55:04] and the delivery of bulk
[1:55:05] materials for the year 2025, to
[1:55:08] MATÉRIAUX PAYSAGERS SAVARIA
[1:55:09] LTÉE, for a total amount of $
[1:55:13] 59,354.37, taxes included. There
[1:55:15] is contract covers a supply and
[1:55:17] delivery of various mixes of
[1:55:19] potting soil for the maintenance
[1:55:20] of green spaces, sports fields,
[1:55:22] floral arrangements, annual
[1:55:26] flowers, perennials and shrubs
[1:55:27] and for tree planting in the
[1:55:28] city.
[1:55:31] - 14.5 Octroyer un contrat pour
[1:55:32] la fourniture et la livraison de
[1:55:33] pièces d'égout et d'aqueduc par
[1:55:34] lot pour l'année 2025, à
[1:55:35] ST-GERMAIN ÉGOUTS ET AQueDUCS
[1:55:37] INC. Pour les lots A, c'est,
[1:55:44] bien E, G et I ), WOSELEY CANADA
[1:55:45] INC.
[1:55:46] (Lots B, F et H)
[1:55:47] Et IRON4CITY pour le logis
[1:55:51] (---)
[1:55:53] pour un montant total de 402
[1:55:54] 304,43 $, taxes incluses.
[1:55:55] (---)
[1:55:56] Chacun des lots a été octroyé au
[1:55:58] (---)
[1:55:59] conforme de ce lot. >> 14.6
[1:56:02] Award a contract for the supply
[1:56:03] and the delivery of a new
[1:56:04] asphalt paver, to 9018-7980
[1:56:06] QUÉBEC INC. Honour
[1:56:11] (INSTA-MIX)
[1:56:12] , for a total amount of $
[1:56:13] 275,940, taxes included. This
[1:56:14] contract is for the replacement
[1:56:15] of the current asphalt paving
[1:56:17] machine, which has reached the
[1:56:18] end of his youthful life.
[1:56:20] - Pour 14,1 à 14,6 Do I have a
[1:56:24] mover?
[1:56:25] >> Paul Bissonnette. -- But
[1:56:28] Bruno Tremblay. District 6. You
[1:56:29] >> Seconder?
[1:56:31] >> Paul Bissonnette. District 2.
[1:56:32] What
[1:56:34] >> I am against 14.1. I am
[1:56:36] voting against 14.1 in 14.4. I
[1:56:39] support all the others.
[1:56:41] >> Duly noted.
[1:56:46] - 14.7 Octroyer un contrat pour
[1:56:47] des travaux d'arboriculture à
[1:56:49] proximité du réseau électrique
[1:56:50] pour l'année 2025, à ÉMONDAGE ET
[1:56:52] ABATTAGE DIONNE INC., Pour un
[1:56:53] montant total de 95 314,28 $,
[1:56:56] taxes incluses, avec les années
[1:56:58] 2026 et 2027 en option.
[1:57:01] Puisqu'il faut être accrédité
[1:57:02] par Hydro-Québec pour travailler
[1:57:03] à proximité du réseau, une
[1:57:05] entreprise spécialisée dans ce
[1:57:06] type de travaux fournira un
[1:57:08] service efficace aux citoyens
[1:57:09] est requis.
[1:57:11] >> 14.8 Award a contract for the
[1:57:13] production and the delivery of
[1:57:15] pre-assembled rain-water barrels
[1:57:16] for the years 2025 and 2026, to
[1:57:18] USD GLOBAL INC., For a total
[1:57:20] amount of $ 43,644.51, taxes
[1:57:21] included, with the years 2027
[1:57:24] and 2028 in option. In response
[1:57:29] to the interest shown by
[1:57:30] residents in sustainable
[1:57:31] development and water
[1:57:33] conservation and in particular
[1:57:34] in obtaining rainwater barrels,
[1:57:36] the city is committed to
[1:57:37] supplying these barrels to
[1:57:38] residents at a reduced price
[1:57:40] compared to the market.
[1:57:42] - 14.9 Approuver une
[1:57:44] modification au contrat
[1:57:45] intervenu avec LES SERVICES
[1:57:46] PIERRE GOULET INC., Pour la
[1:57:47] détection de fuites d'eau sur le
[1:57:48] territoire de Pointe-Claire,
[1:57:49] pour un montant de 1 149,75 $,
[1:57:51] taxes incluses. Le but de cette
[1:57:54] modification et de se conformer
[1:57:55] à la demande de la direction de
[1:57:56] la gestion stratégique de l'eau
[1:57:59] municipale, des Affaires
[1:58:00] municipales et de l'habitation
[1:58:01] pour écouter sur une base
[1:58:02] annuelle un minimum de 100
[1:58:04] boîtiers de services afin de
[1:58:05] trouver les fuites sur les
[1:58:06] branchement qui ne sont pas
[1:58:07] toujours détectables par
[1:58:08] l'écoute au poteau d'incendie.
[1:58:11] >> 14.10 Approve a change order
[1:58:12] to the contract within the
[1:58:13] framework of the group purchase
[1:58:15] no. 2023-8115-50 for the rental
[1:58:18] of light vehicles from the
[1:58:19] Government Acquisition Center
[1:58:23] often known as the
[1:58:25] (CAG)
[1:58:26] to ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS CANADA,
[1:58:28] for a total amount of $ 20
[1:58:29] 786,13, including taxes, for the
[1:58:30] period from February 1, 2024, to
[1:58:31] January 31, 2025.
[1:58:37] - 14.11 Approuver une
[1:58:38] modification au contrat
[1:58:39] intervenu avec ZONE SST, pour
[1:58:40] les services d'un conseiller en
[1:58:41] santé et sécurité, pour un
[1:58:42] montant de 31 274,56 $, taxes
[1:58:45] incluses. Le service
[1:58:48] (---)
[1:58:49] est l'immeuble discontinue leurs
[1:58:50] efforts et projets en cours avec
[1:58:51] le même conseils en santé et
[1:58:54] sécurité pour combler le manque
[1:58:55] de personnel jusqu'à la fin août
[1:58:58] 2025.
[1:58:59] >> 14.7 to 14.11, do I have a
[1:59:03] mover?
[1:59:04] >> Bruno Tremblay. District 6.
[1:59:06] >> And seconder?
[1:59:07] >> Cynthia Homan. District 5. To
[1:59:09] >> All in favour?
[1:59:12] >> 15.1 Award a contract for
[1:59:13] inspection and repair work on
[1:59:14] fire protection components for
[1:59:15] the years 2025 and 2026, to
[1:59:18] PRÉVENTION-INCENDIE SAFETY FIRST
[1:59:19] INC., For a total amount of $
[1:59:21] 209,625.87, taxes included, with
[1:59:22] the years 2027, 2028 and 2029 in
[1:59:23] option.
[1:59:28] The equipment covered by this
[1:59:30] contract includes hydrants,
[1:59:32] sprinkler systems, fire pump,
[1:59:35] motors, sprinklers and fire
[1:59:36] detection systems.
[1:59:40] - 15.2 Approuver une
[1:59:41] modification au contrat
[1:59:43] intervenu avec CONSTRUCTION CPB
[1:59:44] INC., Pour des travaux
[1:59:45] d'agrandissement et
[1:59:46] réaménagement des Travaux
[1:59:47] Publics, pour un montant de 114
[1:59:48] 600,99 $, taxes incluses. Les
[1:59:51] modifications incluent des
[1:59:52] travaux d'architecture,
[1:59:54] d'électricité, de structure et
[1:59:55] de mécanique.
[1:59:58] >> 16.1 Authorize the signing of
[1:59:59] a consent form with Bell Canada
[2:00:00] for the burial work of the Bell
[2:00:02] network near the intersection of
[2:00:04] Bord-du-Lac-Lakeshore Road and
[2:00:05] Sainte-Anne Avenue. The purpose
[2:00:06] of this resolution is to
[2:00:07] authorize Mr. physiology, active
[2:00:10] admissible engineering
[2:00:11] department, to sign the consent
[2:00:12] notice prepared by Bell Canada
[2:00:13] for the burial of the Bell
[2:00:14] Service is located on the three
[2:00:16] Hydro Québec poles on behalf of
[2:00:17] the City of Pointe-Claire.
[2:00:20] - Pour 15,1 à 15,2, 16,1. Do I
[2:00:25] have a mover.
[2:00:27] >> Paul Bissonnette. District 2.
[2:00:28] >> And?
[2:00:30] - Je vais voter contre le 15,2.
[2:00:31] >> Tara Stainforth. District 4.
[2:00:34] J'aimerais avoir l'opportunité
[2:00:35] de m'expliquer. Depuis le début,
[2:00:39] ce bâtiment-là aux Travaux
[2:00:43] publics, j'ai voté contre
[2:00:47] systématiquement. On est à près
[2:00:48] de 2 millions de surplus avec...
[2:00:52] en approuvant ce montant-là. Et
[2:00:56] si vous vous souvenez, à 10,4,
[2:01:01] on a loue des montants parce que
[2:01:07] (---)
[2:01:08] des immeubles, Travaux publics
[2:01:11] est déficitaire. C'est pour ça
[2:01:13] que je vote contre. Merci.
[2:01:25] - Les personnes qui sont
[2:01:26] présentes peuvent s'adresser au
[2:01:27] Conseil concernant les items
[2:01:31] 17.1 et 17.3. May address
[2:01:34] Council Madam 17.1 and 17.3. On
[2:01:41] continue. 17.1 Considérer une
[2:01:44] demande de dérogation mineure
[2:01:45] concernant la propriété située
[2:01:46] au 245,
[2:01:51] ... vous avez une question?
[2:01:53] (rires)
[2:01:57] >> I think you think you can
[2:01:58] take the microphone away.
[2:01:59] - Considérer une demande de
[2:02:01] grâce
[2:02:02] (---)
[2:02:03] aux située au 245, boulevard
[2:02:07] Brunswick
[2:02:08] (anciennement 1-243 Frontenac)
[2:02:09] , afin de permettre 27 espaces
[2:02:10] de stationnement extérieurs
[2:02:11] réservés aux visiteurs au lieu
[2:02:12] du minimum requis de 43.
[2:02:15] - Alors, pour 17,1. Do I have a
[2:02:19] mover?
[2:02:20] >> Eric Stork. District 7. What
[2:02:22] >> Seconder?
[2:02:26] >> Brent Cowan. District 8.
[2:02:27] >> All in favour?
[2:02:28] >> Thank you.
[2:02:32] >> 17.2 Consider a minor
[2:02:33] exemption request concerning the
[2:02:34] property situated at 30
[2:02:35] Hillcrest Avenue. It is to
[2:02:36] authorize an extension which
[2:02:37] will result in the main building
[2:02:38] having a lot coverage of 34%
[2:02:39] rather than the maximum
[2:02:41] permitted of 30%.
[2:02:45] - Pour 17,2. Do I have a mover?
[2:02:49] >> Paul Bissonnette. District 2.
[2:02:50] >> And seconder?
[2:02:52] >> Cynthia Homan. District 5.
[2:02:53] >> All in favour?
[2:02:56] >> What's the language we are
[2:02:58] voting on? I approve minor
[2:03:04] variance. I move it.
[2:03:08] >> And Cynthia second it. All in
[2:03:11] favour? All against?
[2:03:27] - 17.3 Considérer une demande de
[2:03:28] dérogation mineure concernant la
[2:03:29] propriété située au 2800,
[2:03:30] autoroute Transcanadienne
[2:03:36] (sur l'immeuble portant le
[2:03:38] numéro 2800A et ayant front
[2:03:39] sur la voie de service sud)
[2:03:40] . Pour permettre un appareil sur
[2:03:41] le toit du côté est du bâtiment
[2:03:43] qui n'est pas entièrement
[2:03:44] dissimulé de la vue d'une
[2:03:46] personne de 1 mètre 82 et de
[2:03:49] grandeur, si tu es à la limite
[2:03:50] de propriété, en bordure de
[2:03:53] l'emprise publique, par un écran
[2:03:54] visuel intégré ou emménager au
[2:03:58] bâtiment.
[2:03:59] >> For 17.3, do I have a mover?
[2:04:02] >> Eric Stork. District 7. The
[2:04:04] >> And seconder?
[2:04:06] >> Brent Cowan to approve the
[2:04:09] minor exemption.
[2:04:10] >> All in favour?
[2:04:15] >> Excuse me, Mister Mayor,
[2:04:16] could we have the count that
[2:04:20] happened at 17.2. It was not
[2:04:22] clear.
[2:04:23] >> It was moved to approve the
[2:04:25] minor variance and voted
[2:04:32] against.
[2:04:33] >> Thank you. It just was not
[2:04:34] clear on my end. Thank you very
[2:04:36] much.
[2:04:38] >> 17.4 Consider the site
[2:04:39] planning and architectural
[2:04:40] integration programme plans with
[2:04:41] respect to the property situated
[2:04:42] at 245 Brunswick Boulevard
[2:04:44] (previously 1-243 Frontenac)
[2:04:46] it is a new construction.
[2:04:49] - 17.5 Considérer les plans
[2:04:50] d'implantation et d'intégration
[2:04:51] architecturale relatifs à la
[2:04:54] propriété située au 50, avenue
[2:04:55] du Golf. Pour des modifications,
[2:04:57] des plans déjà approuvées
[2:04:59] concernant la porte d'entrée et
[2:05:00] la porte de garage.
[2:05:02] >> 17.6 Consider the site
[2:05:04] planning and architectural
[2:05:05] integration programme plans with
[2:05:06] respect to the property situated
[2:05:07] at 30 Hillcrest Avenue. It is a
[2:05:09] Brandon exterior renovations.
[2:05:12] - 17.7 Considérer les plans
[2:05:13] d'implantation et d'intégration
[2:05:14] architecturale relatifs à la
[2:05:15] propriété située au 5, avenue
[2:05:16] Jervis Bay. Pour une démolition
[2:05:18] et une nouvelle construction.
[2:05:20] >> 17.8 Consider the site
[2:05:21] planning and architectural
[2:05:22] integration programme plans with
[2:05:23] respect to the property situated
[2:05:24] at 96 Montrose Avenue. It is the
[2:05:28] installation of solar panels.
[2:05:31] - 17.9 Considérer les plans
[2:05:33] d'implantation et d'intégration
[2:05:35] architecturale relatifs à la
[2:05:36] propriété située au 50, avenue
[2:05:37] Parkdale. Pour des rénovations à
[2:05:38] l'extérieur.
[2:05:40] >> 17.10 Consider the site
[2:05:41] planning and architectural
[2:05:42] integration programme plans with
[2:05:43] respect to the property situated
[2:05:44] at 20 Victoria Avenue. They are
[2:05:47] exterior renovations.
[2:05:48] - Pour 17,4, 17,10. Do I have a
[2:05:52] mover?
[2:05:53] >> Cynthia Homan. District 5.
[2:05:55] >> And seconder?
[2:05:59] >> Bruno Tremblay. District 6.
[2:06:00] >> All in favour?
[2:06:02] - Je suis contre le 17,6 parce
[2:06:05] que j'étais contre le 17,9.
[2:06:11] - O.K..
[2:06:16] - 17,11.
[2:06:19] - 17.11 Adopter un premier
[2:06:20] projet de résolution pour un
[2:06:21] projet particulier de
[2:06:22] construction, de modification ou
[2:06:23] d'occupation d'un immeuble car
[2:06:26] (PPCMOI)
[2:06:27] au 27, avenue Salisbury
[2:06:29] (anciennement le 222,
[2:06:30] Autoroute 20)
[2:06:31] autorisant la construction d'un
[2:06:32] salon funéraire. En raison de
[2:06:33] l'incendie, le bâtiment a perdu
[2:06:34] les droits acquis dont il
[2:06:36] bénéficiait. La reconstruction
[2:06:38] d'un salon funéraire tel que
[2:06:39] présenté déroge aux dispositions
[2:06:41] du Code villageois. La Ville
[2:06:43] doit donc se prononcer sur une
[2:06:44] demande effectuée en vertu du
[2:06:47] Règlement PC 29 57 sur les
[2:06:51] (PPCMOI)
[2:06:52] .
[2:06:55] >> 17.12 Adopt a first draft
[2:06:56] resolution for a Specific
[2:06:57] Construction, Alteration or
[2:06:58] Occupancy Proposal for an
[2:07:01] Immovable
[2:07:02] (SCAOPI)
[2:07:03] at 1890 Des sources boulevard
[2:07:06] authorizing the construction of
[2:07:07] a new building and the
[2:07:08] redevelopment of the Manitoulin
[2:07:09] Transport site, in several
[2:07:10] phases. The company has
[2:07:12] submitted an application under
[2:07:15] bylaw governing specific
[2:07:16] instructions, operational
[2:07:18] occupancy proposals for removal
[2:07:20] in order to carry the project
[2:07:21] the deviate from the zoning by
[2:07:24] law for the purpose of expanding
[2:07:26] in reorganizing its operation.
[2:07:30] - 17.13 Adopter un premier
[2:07:31] projet de résolution pour un
[2:07:32] projet particulier de
[2:07:33] construction, de modification ou
[2:07:34] d'occupation d'un immeuble au
[2:07:37] 11-15, avenue Water's Edge
[2:07:38] autorisant la construction d'un
[2:07:39] nouvel immeuble multifamilial de
[2:07:40] 3 étages comprenant 16 unités
[2:07:42] d'habitation. La demande telle
[2:07:44] que présentée fait l'objet d'une
[2:07:46] demande de recommandations...
[2:07:48] fait l'objet d'une
[2:07:50] recommandation défavorable du
[2:07:52] CCU et vous recommandé de
[2:07:54] refuser le projet.
[2:07:57] >> For 17.11, is 1712 and 17.13,
[2:08:02] and may I remind the Council
[2:08:04] that at 17.13, we are voting who
[2:08:08] votes in favour of refusing the
[2:08:11] project. We are voting -- if you
[2:08:13] are voting in the affirmative,
[2:08:16] it's to refuse the project.
[2:08:18] - Pour 7,11, 7,12, sept virgule
[2:08:21] Thera. Do I have a mover?
[2:08:26] >> Brent Cowan. District 8. Hi
[2:08:27] >> And seconder?
[2:08:31] >> Tara Stainforth. District 4.
[2:08:32] >> All in favour?
[2:08:33] - Monsieur Cousineau?
[2:08:36] - 17,12, 17,13.
[2:08:41] - Vous votez contre 17 virgule,
[2:08:43] 12 17,13? Vous êtes en faveur de
[2:08:46] 17,11?
[2:08:47] - Oui.
[2:08:50] >> Those against?
[2:08:51] - Alors, pour 17,11 contre
[2:08:57] 17,12...
[2:08:58] - Juste un instant.
[2:09:01] - Je pense que je vais suggérer,
[2:09:03] pour être certaine de faire un
[2:09:06] point...
[2:09:07] - Au coeur, pour 7,11.
[2:09:12] All in favour? - 17,2.
[2:09:18] All in favour? - Monsieur
[2:09:22] Tremblay a voté contre 17,12,
[2:09:23] parfait.
[2:09:25] >> Those against? We are getting
[2:09:29] those against, it might help us.
[2:09:32] 17,13. All those in favour of
[2:09:36] voting in refusing the project?
[2:09:38] Those against?
[2:09:40] - Vous êtes d'accord pour
[2:09:41] refuser le projet, Monsieur
[2:09:43] Cousineau?
[2:09:44] (inaudible)
[2:09:45] La manière que monsieur le maire
[2:09:46] l'a présenté.
[2:09:47] - Vous êtes d'accord pour
[2:09:48] refuser le projet?
[2:09:49] - Oui. Il devrait prendre des
[2:09:52] médicaments avant de venir...
[2:09:53] - Monsieur Tremblay, vous êtes
[2:09:55] d'accord de refuser 17,13.
[2:09:57] >> Should be doing a thorough
[2:09:58] time to make sure?
[2:10:06] 18.1 Award a contract for the
[2:10:07] supply and the delivery of
[2:10:08] French and English library books
[2:10:09] for the year 2025, to LIVRES
[2:10:10] BABAR INC., LIBRAIRIE CLIO,
[2:10:12] PARAGRAPHE, LIBRAIRIE MONET,
[2:10:14] LIBRAIRIE RAFFIN and LIBRAIRIE
[2:10:17] DE VERDUN, for a total amount of
[2:10:18] $ 295,000, taxes included. It is
[2:10:21] to meet the needs of its
[2:10:22] clientele in 2025, the library
[2:10:24] will purchase books in French
[2:10:25] and English for adults and
[2:10:26] children from approved
[2:10:27] bookstores in the Montréal area
[2:10:29] as prescribed by the act
[2:10:31] respecting the development of
[2:10:32] Québec firms in the book
[2:10:33] industry.
[2:10:35] - 18.2 Approuver une entente à
[2:10:36] intervenir avec Hockey West
[2:10:37] Island Inc. Concernant un
[2:10:38] partenariat avec l'association
[2:10:39] sportive. Cette entente, de même
[2:10:42] que celles mentionnées au point
[2:10:46] 18,3 à 18,5 de l'ordre du jour,
[2:10:49] établit la répartition des
[2:10:51] responsables tes entre la ville
[2:10:52] et l'organisme afin d'assurer
[2:10:54] l'habitation des normes en
[2:10:56] vigueur et à la mise à la
[2:10:58] disposition de l'organisme des
[2:11:00] installations et du matériel
[2:11:01] nécessaire pour la réalisation
[2:11:03] de leur offre de services. Il
[2:11:04] s'est inscrits dans la poursuite
[2:11:08] du
[2:11:09] (---)
[2:11:10] améliorant et spécifiant le
[2:11:11] soutien aux organismes
[2:11:12] partenaires dans la réalisation
[2:11:13] de leurs activités au bénéfice
[2:11:14] des citoyens de Pointe-Claire.
[2:11:19] >> 18.3 Approve an agreement to
[2:11:20] be entered into with
[2:11:21] Pointe-Claire Ringette
[2:11:22] Association regarding a
[2:11:23] partneship with the sports
[2:11:24] association.
[2:11:25] - 18.4 Approuver une entente à
[2:11:26] intervenir avec Club de Patinage
[2:11:27] de Pointe-Claire concernant un
[2:11:28] partenariat avec l'association
[2:11:29] sportive.
[2:11:31] >> 18.5 Approve an agreement to
[2:11:32] be entered into with Soccer
[2:11:33] Pointe-Claire regarding a
[2:11:34] partnership with the sports
[2:11:35] association.
[2:11:38] >> For 18.1 to 18.5, do I have a
[2:11:42] mover?
[2:11:43] >> I move to approve them all.
[2:11:46] Tara Stainforth. District 4. The
[2:11:47] >> And seconder?
[2:11:52] >> Paul Bissonnette. District 2.
[2:11:53] >> All in favour?
[2:12:00] - 18.6 Approuver une entente à
[2:12:01] intervenir avec la Commission
[2:12:02] Scolaire Lester-B.-Pearson
[2:12:03] concernant l'utilisation d'une
[2:12:05] portion du terrain adjacent à la
[2:12:06] cour d'école
[2:12:08] (École secondaire Horizon)
[2:12:10] pour l'installation d'un jardin
[2:12:12] communautaire temporaire.
[2:12:13] Fluctuations temporaire d'une
[2:12:14] portion du terrain adjacent à la
[2:12:16] cour d'école permettra
[2:12:18] l'installation d'un jardin
[2:12:20] communautaire et la tenue de
[2:12:21] certaines activités culturelles
[2:12:22] ou de loisirs, en lien avec la
[2:12:25] présence de jardins
[2:12:26] communautaires.
[2:12:28] >> 18.7 Authorize a donation of
[2:12:29] a family open paddle membership
[2:12:30] to the Teresa Dellar Palliative
[2:12:32] Care Residence. The residences
[2:12:34] organizing a silent auction as a
[2:12:36] fund-raiser for their annual
[2:12:37] Valentine's Day ball on February
[2:12:39] 14th, 2025. I have requested an
[2:12:40] open panel membership as a
[2:12:42] donation to raise funds for the
[2:12:44] option.
[2:12:46] >> I think we might separate
[2:12:49] 18.6 from the two subsequent
[2:12:51] because there will be votes
[2:12:53] against.
[2:12:54] >> You want to do 18.6 first?
[2:12:55] >> You do not mind. For 18.6, do
[2:12:57] I have a mover?
[2:13:02] >> That is me. Bruno Tremblay.
[2:13:05] District 6. For
[2:13:06] >> Seconder?
[2:13:08] >> Eric Stork. District 7.
[2:13:09] >> All in favour? That was
[2:13:14] against?
[2:13:21] >> I just want to point out I do
[2:13:23] not have nothing against
[2:13:24] community gardens, but with the
[2:13:25] information we received on this
[2:13:27] particular project, I cannot
[2:13:28] vote in favour. Thank you.
[2:13:30] >> I'd also like to speak. I
[2:13:32] agree. I am not against
[2:13:34] community gardens. Anyone that
[2:13:35] knows me, I love and fought for
[2:13:38] community gardens for a long
[2:13:39] time, unfortunately, how this
[2:13:40] was presented to us, I could not
[2:13:42] vote consciously in favour until
[2:13:43] some adjustments were done,
[2:13:45] which was not how it turned out.
[2:13:47] That is why I voted against it.
[2:13:52] - Pour appuyer monsieur
[2:13:53] Bissonnette et madame Homan, il
[2:13:57] nous manque beaucoup
[2:13:59] d'informations avant d'approuver
[2:14:00] ou des approuver.
[2:14:11] >> Can we get a get a
[2:14:15] clarification. I think it was
[2:14:16] carried 4 to 3?
[2:14:18] - 18.8 Autoriser la
[2:14:19] participation d'une employée au
[2:14:22] 1er Sommet de la pagaie organisé
[2:14:23] par la Fédération internationale
[2:14:24] de canoë devant se tenir du 27
[2:14:26] février au 2 mars 2025 à
[2:14:29] Hangzhou, Chine.
[2:14:32] (Aucune dépense ne sera
[2:14:33] engagée par la ville pour
[2:14:34] cette participation)
[2:14:35] . La Fédération internationale
[2:14:36] de canots et inviter madame
[2:14:37] Émilie fournir, responsable du
[2:14:38] club de canoë-kayak, à cet
[2:14:40] événement. Les frais de
[2:14:41] déplacement sont payés par la
[2:14:43] Fédération internationale de
[2:14:44] canots et. Madame fournaises
[2:14:45] siège actuellement sur le Comité
[2:14:48] de planche à pagaie, chapeauté
[2:14:49] par cette fédération.
[2:14:53] - Pour 17,8, et 17,8
[2:14:54] (---)
[2:14:55] . Do I have a mover?
[2:14:59] >> Bruno Tremblay. District 6.
[2:15:01] The
[2:15:02] >> And seconder?
[2:15:03] >> Eric Stork. District 7.
[2:15:05] >> All in favour?
[2:15:10] >> Pleasure.
[2:15:11] >> Foreclosure. Do I have a
[2:15:13] mover?
[2:15:14] >> Tara Stainforth. District 4.
[2:15:15] >> And seconder?
[2:15:18] >> Bruno Tremblay. District 6.
[2:15:19] >> All in favour? Welcome to
[2:15:21] 2025, folks. Merci beaucoup.