[0:48] - Mesdames et Messieurs,
[0:49] bonsoir. Good evening, ladies
[0:50] and gentlemen. Bienvenue à la
[0:51] séance du conseil du mois de
[0:52] mars. Welcome to the march
[0:53] council meeting.
[0:54] We will begin with Councillor
[0:55] members, Council members
[0:56] reports, starting with
[0:58] Councillor Cowan.
[1:01] - Merci, Monsieur le Maire. Je
[1:02] me suis récemment préoccupée sur
[1:04] le fonctionnement de
[1:05] (---)
[1:06] . C'est assez important, puisque
[1:07] chaque année, la gros dépense
[1:08] les quelque 90 millions de
[1:10] dollars que nous, les citoyens
[1:12] de Pointe-Claire, nous envoyons.
[1:15] Il jette étonné par certaines
[1:16] des choses que j'ai apprises.
[1:18] When you read, you learn things.
[1:20] I read the law. It turns out the
[1:21] law requires our merit to brief
[1:24] Council on agribusiness in any
[1:27] agribusiness as is instructed to
[1:28] by Council at a public meeting.
[1:29] This has never happened in my
[1:32] two terms. It may not have
[1:34] happened for the 20 years of
[1:35] existence of the actual. So it
[1:38] certainly is not Mayor Thomas's
[1:39] fault, but now that we know how
[1:40] the law reads, this should
[1:42] change. I think it is in the law
[1:45] for in an important reason, that
[1:47] is to help balance the imbalance
[1:50] of power that exists with Agglo.
[1:54] J'ai également appris que le
[1:56] conseil serait finalisé avec le
[1:57] soutien de notre représentant
[1:59] là-bas, le maire Thomas. L'achat
[2:00] d'une église à Rosemont The
[2:03] (---)
[2:04] pour 2,5 millions de dollars. Il
[2:07] m'a frappé qu'une partie de cet
[2:08] argent pourrait être utilisé
[2:09] pour financer la restauration du
[2:12] vieux moulin. J'aimerais que le
[2:15] maire nous dise s'il a évoqué
[2:17] cette possibilité avant de voter
[2:18] en faveur de l'achat. Et pendant
[2:21] que je reste sur un sujet,
[2:23] j'aimerais féliciter la Société
[2:25] de sauvegarde du patrimoine de
[2:27] Pointe-Claire d'avoir finalement
[2:29] convaincu
[2:30] (---)
[2:31] de qu'inclure une
[2:32] (---)
[2:33] qui empêche gages la
[2:34] restauration nécessaire et
[2:35] assure l'accès au public. Entre
[2:36] ces deux acteurs, d'après, moi
[2:38] ils ont organisé le meilleur
[2:40] résultat possible. Bravo! From
[2:44] my deep dive into Agglo affairs,
[2:46] I was also surprised to learn
[2:47] that Mayor Thomas is on the
[2:49] Economic Committee. When you
[2:50] brief Council next month on what
[2:51] has been happening and what will
[2:53] happen at the Agglo, I think we
[2:54] would all like to know the
[2:56] committee's stance on the
[2:57] Fairview forest and in the
[2:58] context of the Bagot storm
[3:00] development freeze there, and
[3:01] built 39, what Pointe-Claire
[3:03] through Mayor Thomas Xin, a
[3:06] representative of the Agglo, has
[3:07] urged the environment committee
[3:11] (inaudible)
[3:12] . Finally at the November
[3:13] council meeting, this is Susan
[3:14] Weaver who asked Mayor Thomas
[3:16] about the car the city had
[3:17] provided him until his accident
[3:19] almost a year ago. She deposited
[3:21] documents that raised several
[3:23] discrepancies she had asked him
[3:24] about which he brushed off. I
[3:26] reviewed those documents and
[3:27] found Mrs. Weaver's concerns to
[3:29] be justified. I now deposit for
[3:31] the public record my email to
[3:33] mayor Thomas dated 16 January,
[3:35] where I shared my conclusions
[3:36] and my requests that he explain
[3:38] the discrepancies Mrs. Weaver
[3:41] reported last November, and
[3:42] state for the public record the
[3:43] extent to which he had declared
[3:44] personal use of the city car for
[3:46] income tax purposes. A simple
[3:48] request that two months later
[3:50] remains unanswered. So those are
[3:52] my opening remarks. Thank you
[3:53] very much.
[3:57] >> Councillor Cousineau?
[4:02] Councillor Stainforth?
[4:05] >> Good evening. I would just
[4:07] like to mention that the
[4:08] Pointe-Claire youth advisory
[4:10] board is looking for candidates.
[4:11] So, if you are between the age
[4:13] of 14 and 21, or if you know a
[4:19] young person between the age of
[4:20] 14 and 21 that is interested in
[4:25] sharing their ideas,
[4:27] representing their community to
[4:29] help us organize at the city
[4:30] level and to make
[4:33] recommendations, please direct
[4:34] them towards the application.
[4:36] You can find it on our social
[4:38] media, on our web page and it is
[4:42] really
[4:43] (applause)
[4:44] I have really had a privilege of
[4:46] sharing this since the beginning
[4:47] of this board. The kids that I
[4:49] have met over the last seven
[4:51] years are really, really
[4:54] incredible human beings. I'm
[4:57] sure they are all going to turn
[4:58] out to be really incredible
[5:01] adults. So it is a great group
[5:03] of kids to work with. And so I
[5:05] just wanted to put that out
[5:07] there. That if you know
[5:08] somebody, please share that we
[5:09] are looking to construct our new
[5:12] board for 2025 - 2026. Thank
[5:16] you.
[5:19] >> Councillor Bissonnette?
[5:21] - Bonsoir. >> Good evening. It's
[5:22] good news finally after all
[5:24] these years. We are finally
[5:26] going to get lakeshore paved
[5:28] from
[5:29] (inaudible)
[5:30] . The borders, the sidewalk
[5:31] repair and
[5:33] (inaudible)
[5:34] it was supposed to be done a few
[5:35] years ago. Ça a été retardé,
[5:40] mais le contrat a été approuvé
[5:41] ce soir. La compagnie, c'est un
[5:48] contrat de 2 millions 532822. Ça
[5:53] va faire du bien. Ça fait
[5:56] longtemps que ça n'a pas été
[5:57] réparée.
[6:09] Merci à l'administration pour
[6:10] ça. Thank you.
[6:14] >> Councillor Homan?
[6:16] >> Good evening, everyone. Last
[6:18] week was spring break as
[6:19] everyone knows. I would like to
[6:20] thank administration for
[6:24] extending our snow park in
[6:26] Belmont sunnyside. I have only
[6:28] had wonderful, wonderful
[6:32] comments. I think it's going to
[6:34] have to become a yearly event
[6:36] for sure. It went very, very
[6:38] well. So thank you very much.
[6:39] That's all.
[6:41] >> Councillor Tremblay.
[6:45] Councillor Thorstad-Cullen.
[6:46] >> Good evening, everyone. Juste
[6:49] un petit avis que le demain, le
[6:52] 2 mars, c'est la journée portes
[6:54] ouvertes pour
[6:55] (---)
[6:56] . Et tous nos partenaires, c'est
[6:59] vraiment important pour nous. Et
[7:01] alors, c'est demain à 111
[7:04] (---)
[7:05] , dans le village de Valois. De
[7:06] 11 heures à 20 heures dans le
[7:09] soir. So just a reminder and a
[7:12] shout out for the open house for
[7:14] why it that is happening
[7:16] tomorrow at the site in that
[7:18] wall village. 111 Donegani. It
[7:21] is their open house today. So,
[7:23] if you can please drop by and
[7:25] support them. It is from 11 a.m.
[7:28] to eight PM on Wednesday March
[7:30] 12th. Thank you
[7:41] In response to Councillor Cowan
[7:43] before we get started briefly,
[7:44] the missing documents for Mrs.
[7:47] Weaver was the accident. I have
[7:48] the police report. It was not at
[7:50] one in the morning, it was at
[7:52] 7:50. I have the actual police
[7:53] report. And I do have a document
[7:55] signed by me specifying the car
[7:56] was to be used Pour des raisons
[8:00] familiales, domestiques.
[8:02] Personal, family and domestic.
[8:03] Personnelles, familiales, et
[8:04] domestiques. Those are the
[8:06] results of my searches so far.
[8:08] But the accident was indeed at
[8:10] 7:50 in the morning as I
[8:11] specified. Mesdames et
[8:13] Messieurs, bonsoir. Good
[8:14] evening, ladies and gentlemen.,
[8:17] Bienvenue à la séance du conseil
[8:18] de mars. Welcome to the march
[8:19] council meeting. Encore cette
[8:21] année, la Ville a offert une
[8:23] multitude d'activités pour la
[8:25] semaine de la relâche. Nous
[8:28] espérons que vous avez profité
[8:30] des différentes activités. Ou
[8:32] que cette semaine vous a permis
[8:34] de vous reposer et de passer de
[8:37] bons moments en famille. The
[8:40] city again offered a multitude
[8:41] of activities for spring this
[8:43] year and spring break this year.
[8:44] We hope you enjoyed the various
[8:46] effectivity's or that you were
[8:47] able to take time to rest and
[8:48] spend quality time with your
[8:50] family. La journée est national
[8:53] du droit des femmes, le samedi
[8:55] le 8 mars marque la Journée
[8:58] internationale du droit des
[8:59] femmes. En 2025, cette journée
[9:03] est d'autant plus particulière,
[9:06] puisque nous soulignons la 85e
[9:09] anniversaire du droit de vote
[9:10] des femmes au Québec. C'est une
[9:13] occasion de souligner tout le
[9:14] chemin parcouru, de saluer le
[9:16] travail accompli vers l'égalité,
[9:18] et de poursuivre les efforts
[9:25] afin d'évaluer vers une société
[9:26] toujours plus juste et
[9:28] inclusive. Saturday March 8th
[9:32] marked International Women's
[9:35] Day. In 2025, this day is all
[9:37] the more special as we celebrate
[9:38] the 85th anniversary of the
[9:40] women's right to vote in Québec.
[9:42] This is an opportunity to
[9:43] underscore how far we have come,
[9:45] to salute the progress we have
[9:46] made towards equality, and to
[9:48] continue our efforts to become
[9:49] an ever fairer and more
[9:51] inclusive society. Le 2 mars
[9:55] dernier, le gouvernement fédéral
[9:56] a tenu, au centre nautique de la
[9:58] Baie de Valois, les événements
[10:00] de remise de la médaille du
[10:03] couronnement du roi Charles III.
[10:06] Lors de cet événement, ce sont
[10:08] plus de 12 résidents et
[10:11] résidentes de Pointe-Claire qui
[10:12] ont été reconnus pour leur
[10:14] contribution importante. Leur
[10:18] engagement illustre bien le
[10:19] sentiment de communauté que nous
[10:21] avons à Pointe-Claire. Monsieur
[10:25] (---)
[10:26] a reçu la médaille en
[10:27] reconnaissance de ces 40 années
[10:28] de bénévolat au sein de l'unité
[10:31] de sauvetage volontaire de
[10:33] Pointe-Claire. Depuis quatre
[10:36] décennies, monsieur Marc jouent
[10:38] un rôle essentiel dans la
[10:41] sécurité de notre communauté.
[10:43] Son engagement illustre
[10:45] parfaitement les valeurs de
[10:47] solidarité et d'entraide qui
[10:49] font la force de l'unité de
[10:50] sauvetage. Nous adressons nos
[10:53] plus sincères remerciements à
[10:57] monsieur Graham Meg pour son
[10:59] apport inestimable à notre
[11:01] communauté. On March 2nd, the
[11:05] federal government held the King
[11:06] Charles III coronation medal
[11:08] event at the Bay developer
[11:10] nautical Centre. During this
[11:11] event, more than 12 point quite
[11:13] residents received recognition
[11:14] for their valuable
[11:17] contributions. Their engagement
[11:18] and commitment exemplifies the
[11:19] sense of community we have in
[11:21] Pointe-Claire. Mr. Graham model
[11:24] is awarded the king Charles
[11:26] three coronation medal in
[11:28] recognition of his 40 years of
[11:29] volunteer work at the
[11:31] Pointe-Claire volunteer rescue
[11:32] unit. For decades, -- has played
[11:35] in the central role in the
[11:37] safety of our community. His
[11:39] commitment perfectly illustrates
[11:41] the values of solidarity and
[11:44] mutual support that are the
[11:46] strength of the volunteer rescue
[11:49] unit. We extend our sincere east
[11:52] thanks to -- for his invaluable
[11:54] contributions to our community.
[11:56] Nous tenons également à
[11:57] souligner l'engagement des
[12:00] résidents et résidentes de
[12:02] Pointe-Claire honoré lors de cet
[12:03] événement. We would also like to
[12:05] highlight the commitment of the
[12:07] Pointe-Claire residents honoured
[12:08] during this event. Dr. Gordon
[12:11] --, George --, Stewart Grant,
[12:16] Terry Herbert, Terry Hawkins,
[12:18] Sheila Larsen, Geneviève Lucia,
[12:22] Debbie mag would, Peter Murphy,
[12:25] Alison Saunders, Deborah and
[12:27] Sharon Brad well, Diana --.
[12:33] Toutes nos félicitations.
[12:35] Congratulations to all La Ville
[12:38] tient à souligner l'engagement
[12:40] de nos athlètes. Nous entraîneur
[12:43] et nous entraîneuse ainsi que
[12:44] leur parcours inspirant. Nous
[12:46] avons été heureux d'apprendre
[12:48] qu'ils soient reconnus dans leur
[12:50] milieu. Lors du gala annuel de
[12:53] plongeon Canada, les plongeons
[12:57] (---)
[12:58] et que les
[12:59] (---)
[13:00] ont respectivement reçu le titre
[13:02] de plongeur masculin et féminin
[13:04] de l'année. Madame Lee à, quant
[13:09] à elle, a été honoré du titre
[13:12] d'entraîneur senior et monsieur
[13:14] James
[13:15] (---)
[13:16] de celui d'entraîneur junior de
[13:17] l'année. Nous soulignons
[13:21] également l'athlète étudiant
[13:23] Oskar
[13:24] (---)
[13:25] , résidents de Pointe-Claire,
[13:26] qui est récipiendaire du
[13:27] programme de golf Québec et
[13:31] Fondation
[13:32] (---)
[13:33] . Toutes nos félicitations pour
[13:34] les reconnaissances bien
[13:35] méritées. The City would also
[13:38] like to highlight the commitment
[13:40] of our athletes and coaches and
[13:41] their inspiring careers. We were
[13:42] delighted to hear that they were
[13:44] recognized in the wider diving
[13:46] community. At the 2025 and you
[13:48] will dive Canada gala, divers
[13:50] Nathan Zsombor-Murray and Caeli
[13:53] McKay were named male and female
[13:56] driver of the year respectively.
[13:59] -- Was named senior coach of the
[14:01] year and James Wynne received
[14:03] the junior coach of the year
[14:04] award. We also salute student
[14:06] athlete, Oscar Ricketts, a
[14:08] Pointe-Claire resident who was a
[14:10] recipient of the golf Québec and
[14:13] -- scholarship program.
[14:16] Congratulations to all these
[14:17] well deserved accolades, on all
[14:20] these well deserved accolades.
[14:23] Comme on a toujours dit, le
[14:25] comité consultatif jeunesse est
[14:28] à la recherche de résidents et
[14:30] résidentes âgés de 14 à 21 ans
[14:31] qui souhaitent devenir membres.
[14:34] Ce comité fait des
[14:36] recommandations au conseil
[14:37] municipal pour bonifier l'offre
[14:38] de services pour les jeunes et
[14:40] favoriser la participation à la
[14:42] Ville. C'est des jeunes de votre
[14:45] entourage souhaite s'impliquer
[14:47] pour faire une différence dans
[14:48] la communauté, inviter-les à
[14:51] déposer leur candidature. The
[14:54] youth advisory board is looking
[14:55] for resident it's aged 14 to 21
[14:58] who wish to become members. The
[15:00] board makes recommendations to
[15:01] the City Council to approve the
[15:03] wide range of services for young
[15:05] citizens and to encourage their
[15:07] participation in Pointe-Claire.
[15:08] If you know residents between
[15:10] the age of 14 and 21 who would
[15:14] like to get involved and make a
[15:15] difference in their community,
[15:17] please invite them to apply. Moi
[15:20] de la francophonie en mars.
[15:22] Partout au Canada et dans le
[15:23] monde, nous célébrons le Mois de
[15:24] la francophonie. C'est une
[15:27] occasion de mettre en valeur la
[15:29] richesse et la vitalité de la
[15:31] langue française, ainsi que les
[15:33] contributions des francophones à
[15:35] notre patrimoine culturel et à
[15:37] notre identité collective. Vous
[15:40] êtes invités à profiter des
[15:42] initiatives de la bibliothèque
[15:44] pour célébrer la richesse de la
[15:46] langue française. In March,
[15:50] across Canada and around the
[15:52] world, we celebrate the month of
[15:57] the Francophonie. This is an
[15:58] opportunity to showcase the
[15:59] richness and vitality of the
[16:00] French language and the
[16:03] contributions of Francophones to
[16:04] our cultural heritage and
[16:06] collective identity. You are
[16:08] invited to take advantage of the
[16:10] libraries initiatives to
[16:11] celebrate the richness of the
[16:12] French language. Nous avons eu
[16:18] d'autres bonnes nouvelles au
[16:19] cours des deux dernières
[16:20] semaines. La Société pour la
[16:22] sauvegarde du patrimoine de
[16:23] Pointe-Claire à signer un bail
[16:25] de 50 ans avec la chute des 16
[16:29] de Montréal pour le
[16:30] (---)
[16:31] de Pointe-Claire. Cela lui
[16:34] permettra d'effectuer les
[16:35] travaux de réparation et de
[16:38] restauration, dans la première
[16:40] phase débutera en 2025. À terme,
[16:44] elle espère pouvoir ouvrir le
[16:46] moulin au public par le billet
[16:48] de visite guidée et d'autres
[16:51] activités culturelles et
[16:53] éducatives. La première phase
[16:56] des travaux sera financé par des
[16:59] dons privés, dont plus de 350000
[17:02] ont déjà été recueillis.
[17:06] J'encourage la communauté à
[17:09] participer à cet effort, et à
[17:11] soutenir la Société du
[17:14] patrimoine, qui est un organisme
[17:16] de bienfaisance enregistré, et
[17:19] peut émettre des reçus aux fins
[17:22] de l'impôt. Je compte faire ma
[17:24] part pour les aider à ramasser
[17:26] des fonds, car ils espèrent
[17:30] obtenir suffisamment des argents
[17:32] privés ou de financement du
[17:33] gouvernement provincial pour
[17:36] pouvoir poursuivre les travaux.
[17:39] J'aimerais bien que la Ville
[17:40] puisse aider à financer ce
[17:42] projet. Malheureusement, le
[17:45] conseil a rejeté l'entente que
[17:46] j'avais négocié pour réaliser ce
[17:48] projet en 2022. En vertu de son
[17:51] règlement actuelle adoptée en
[17:54] 2024, le conseil aurait la
[17:56] possibilité de fournir des
[17:58] fonds, mais uniquement sur une
[18:00] base discrétions Neil, une fois
[18:03] que le projet de restauration a
[18:04] déjà été entièrement achevé.
[18:07] Cela signifie que, d'une manière
[18:10] ou d'une autre, l'argent
[18:12] nécessaire à la réalisation des
[18:14] travaux devrait provenir de
[18:16] collecte de fonds privés et
[18:17] d'autres niveaux de
[18:18] gouvernement. Puisqu'il n'y
[18:20] aurait aucune sorte
[18:23] (---)
[18:24] au montant que Pointe-Claire
[18:25] pourrait donner, on ne pourrait
[18:27] pas compter sur notre aide
[18:29] financière pour imputer ou la
[18:32] prévoir dans le budget d'un
[18:34] projet. L'archidiocèse a rejeté
[18:37] cette option et ne pensait
[18:39] jamais être rembourser. Il est
[18:43] important que les citoyens
[18:45] comprennent cette distinction,
[18:47] car elles expliquent pourquoi la
[18:49] Société de patrimoine on a mis
[18:52] un pas de l'avant à chercher de
[18:56] collecter des fonds par ses
[18:57] propres moyens. Certains
[19:02] critiqueront, sans aucun doute,
[19:04] le plan de la Société du
[19:06] patrimoine. Comme ils ont
[19:07] critiqué le mien en 2022. Mais
[19:10] le fait est que l'entente que
[19:12] monsieur Ouimet et moi avons
[19:14] négocié à l'époque et le bail
[19:17] que
[19:18] (---)
[19:19] à négocier pour la Société du
[19:20] patrimoine maintenant représente
[19:22] les deux seules scissions
[19:24] viables mis sur la table en plus
[19:26] de 20 ans. À mon avis, notre
[19:29] conseil aurait dû décider, il y
[19:32] a plusieurs années, d'acheter ou
[19:35] d'export prier le moulin et la
[19:37] bande de terrain aux bord de
[19:38] l'eau, au sud du couvent. Nous
[19:41] aurions pu alors créer une par
[19:44] Dumoulin pour nos citoyens. Le
[19:46] moulin à plus de 300 ans. Il est
[19:49] l'emblème de notre ville. Notre
[19:52] bâtiment patrimonial le plus
[19:55] important, il y a des vins seul
[19:56] de son genre au Canada! Le fait
[20:00] qu'il tombent et qu'ils tombent
[20:01] en ruine sous nos yeux devrait
[20:04] être une si
[20:06] (---)
[20:07] collective pour notre
[20:08] communauté. À une époque notre
[20:11] existence notre identité, en
[20:13] tant que pays, sont menacés, il
[20:15] est plus important que jamais de
[20:18] célébrer notre histoire, notre
[20:20] culture, et notre patrimoine.
[20:23] Espérons que ce projet ira de
[20:26] l'avant, et que notre ville
[20:27] pourra un jour être un
[20:30] partenaire plutôt qu'un obstacle
[20:31] à sa réussite. We had some good
[20:35] news in the last two weeks. The
[20:37] Pointe-Claire heritage
[20:38] preservation society has signed
[20:40] a 50-year lease on Pointe-Claire
[20:42] windmill with the archdiocese of
[20:44] Montréal. This will give them
[20:45] the ability to carry out repairs
[20:48] and restoration work
[20:52] (applause)
[20:53] -- This will give them the
[20:55] ability to carry out repair and
[20:57] restoration work with the first
[20:59] phase to begin in 2025.
[21:01] Eventually, they hope to be able
[21:02] to open the windmill to the
[21:04] public through guided tours and
[21:05] other cultural and educational
[21:07] activities. The first phase of
[21:09] work will be funded with private
[21:11] donations of which over $350,000
[21:13] have already been raised. I
[21:15] would encourage the community to
[21:17] get involved in this effort and
[21:19] support the Heritage Society,
[21:21] which is a risk -- registered
[21:25] and can shoot tax receipts. I
[21:28] plan to do my part to help them
[21:29] obtain funds as they look to
[21:30] obtain a funding for the
[21:31] provincial government to be able
[21:32] to continue with for the work. I
[21:34] only wish the city could help
[21:36] fund this project.
[21:38] Unfortunately, Council rejected
[21:39] the subsidy agreement that I
[21:41] negotiated with the archdiocese
[21:42] to do this in 2022. Under its
[21:44] current bylaw, adopted in 2024,
[21:56] PC-2972, Council could provide
[21:57] funds but only on a
[21:58] discretionary basis once a
[21:59] project has already been fully
[22:00] completed. This means that one
[22:04] way or another the money to
[22:05] carry out the work we have to
[22:06] come from private fund raising
[22:08] and other levels of government.
[22:10] Since there would be no
[22:11] certainty as to whether or how
[22:12] much Pointe-Claire might give,
[22:15] our financial assistance could
[22:16] not be counted on to borrow or
[22:18] plan for any project budget. If
[22:21] you don't know what you've got,
[22:23] you cannot plan for the long
[22:24] term. The archdiocese rejected
[22:26] this option as they didn't
[22:28] believe they would ever get
[22:29] paid. It is important that
[22:31] citizens understand this
[22:33] distinction, since it explains
[22:34] why the Heritage Society stepped
[22:36] up and is seeking to raise money
[22:37] on its own. Someone no doubt
[22:40] would be critical of the
[22:41] heritage societies plans just as
[22:42] they were critical of mine in
[22:44] 2022. But the fact remains that
[22:46] the agreement Mr. Weemaes and I
[22:49] negotiated then, and the least
[22:51] it Andrew Swidzinski has
[22:52] negotiated with heritage society
[22:53] now, represent the only two
[22:55] viable solutions that anyone has
[22:56] put forward on this issue over a
[22:57] period of more than 20 years. In
[23:00] my view, Council should have
[23:02] bought or expropriated eat
[23:03] window and district of
[23:04] waterfront south of the convent
[23:06] many years ago. And turned it
[23:07] into a windmill park for
[23:09] citizens. The windmill is more
[23:10] than 300 years old. It is our
[23:13] cities emblem, our most
[23:14] important heritage building and
[23:16] one of only 20 of its kind in
[23:18] all of Canada. The fact that it
[23:20] is falling apart before our eyes
[23:22] should be a collective
[23:23] embarrassment to our community.
[23:25] At a time when our existence and
[23:28] identity as a country are being
[23:29] threatened, it is more important
[23:30] than ever to celebrate our
[23:33] history, our culture and our
[23:34] heritage. Let's hope that this
[23:35] project will move forward and
[23:37] that our city can one day be a
[23:38] partner instead of an obstacle
[23:40] to its success. Merci.
[24:05] - 1.1 Adoption de l'ordre du
[24:06] jour.
[24:07] >> For the adoption of the
[24:08] agenda. Do I have a mover?
[24:13] >> Bob Bissonnette, district 2.
[24:15] >> Seconder.
[24:17] >> Tara Stainforth, district 4.
[24:18] >> All in favour?
[24:23] >> 2.1 Proclamer le 13 mai 2025
[24:24] comme étant la Journée du denim
[24:27] pour le cancer du sein dans la
[24:28] Ville de Pointe-Claire.
[24:31] >> 3.1 Approve the minutes of
[24:32] the regular meeting of February
[24:33] 4, 2025, and of the special
[24:34] meeting of February 19, 2025.
[24:36] >> For 2.1 and 3.1, do I have a
[24:39] mover?
[24:40] >> But Bissonnette, to strict.
[24:41] To
[24:43] >> Seconder?
[24:44] >> Tara Stainforth, district
[24:45] four.
[24:46] >> All in favour?
[24:47] >> Thank you.
[24:51] >> Question period.
[24:54] - Période de questions. Pour la
[24:57] période de questions, vous avez
[24:58] été accueilli à l'entrée pour
[25:00] vous inscrire à la période de
[25:02] questions. Afin de vous
[25:04] promettre de demeurer à vos
[25:06] places jusqu'à l'appel de votre
[25:07] nom. Nous garderons 90 minutes
[25:10] pour la période de questions.
[25:13] Une personne à la fois au micro.
[25:16] Nous vous remercions d'attendre
[25:18] que le citoyen est terminé de
[25:20] poser sa question et que vous
[25:22] soyez appelés avant de vous
[25:24] lever pour faire votre question,
[25:27] nous accordons la priorité aux
[25:29] résidentes et aux résidents de
[25:32] Pointe-Claire. Les non-résidents
[25:33] pourront poser leurs questions
[25:35] par la suite si le temps n'est
[25:37] pas écoulé. For question period,
[25:40] you were greeted at the entrance
[25:41] to register so that you could
[25:43] remain seated until you hear
[25:45] your name. We shall stick to the
[25:47] 90 minute time limit for
[25:48] question period. One person at a
[25:50] time at the microphone. Thank
[25:52] you for waiting for a citizen to
[25:55] finish asking their questioned
[25:56] and to be called before you get
[25:57] up to ask yours. We give
[25:58] priority to Pointe-Claire
[26:00] residents. Non residents can ask
[26:01] their questions afterwards if
[26:03] time has not run out. To start,
[26:06] we will begin with Terri omen.
[26:16] >> Hello. Do I have to see what
[26:18] district I'm in? All right.
[26:20] >> Your name.
[26:21] >> Terry Allmand.
[26:24] >> So, I do not attend the last
[26:28] council meeting, but I believe
[26:31] that the subject of 15-minute
[26:33] cities was brought up? Okay. I
[26:35] don't think it was brought up --
[26:38] >> Very briefly. In a passing
[26:40] comment, yes.
[26:41] >> In fact, when I was listening
[26:42] back I missed it. So it was
[26:44] pretty brief.
[26:45] [Laughter]
[26:46] But I think it's a pretty
[26:47] important subject. I know that
[26:49] I'm very curious about it and
[26:50] I've done a little bit of
[26:52] dabbling on the internet with
[26:55] it, so I would like to find out
[27:00] how much this has been
[27:02] investigated here at the
[27:03] Pointe-Claire level. I did go to
[27:04] the cop station to ask if they
[27:05] had anything. I asked here. I
[27:08] call the. They said I had to go
[27:10] through communications
[27:14] Pointe-Claire.com to see if I
[27:15] could get a pamphlet or any
[27:16] information on.
[27:24] Anyway, I'm bringing up here
[27:26] tonight to actually encourage
[27:29] everyone to be curious about
[27:31] this subject because 15-minute
[27:33] cities, although they all sound
[27:34] great, to me it almost sounds
[27:36] like a pharmaceutical commercial
[27:40] where it's all sunshine out in
[27:42] nature and all that, and at the
[27:43] bottom all the adverse reactions
[27:48] that could happen. In the hopes
[27:51] of avoiding a situation where we
[27:53] have a rowdy bunch here, if we
[27:55] could take the time now to
[27:57] investigate that subject at the
[28:01] Canadian levels, but it has also
[28:02] been introduced in other
[28:03] countries. So, if we could
[28:07] maybe, as a support to each
[28:08] other, maybe form 18? Obviously,
[28:14] Cynthia Homan is my councillor,
[28:15] but if anyone wants to join in
[28:17] or anyone else who doesn't mind
[28:18] doing some research, that would
[28:19] be great. Just to find out a
[28:21] little bit more about what are
[28:23] the pros and cons of this.
[28:25] Because it's only advertised as
[28:26] a pro. I don't know about
[28:32] anybody here, but there is the
[28:33] wording 15-minute city, but
[28:35] there also is the wording smart.
[28:39] Smart does not mean intelligent,
[28:41] it's an acronym. Does anyone
[28:42] know what the acronym stands
[28:43] for?
[28:47] >> I know a couple of them.
[28:49] >> I'm not surprised. I'm not
[28:50] trying to put anyone on the
[28:51] spot. So many people did not
[28:52] know. All the women at the cop
[28:54] station had no idea what I was
[28:56] talking about even when I
[28:57] mentioned 15-minute cities.
[29:00] >> It's relatively recent.
[29:02] >> Well, it's been around for a
[29:04] while. Maybe not here, but it's
[29:06] been around for a while.
[29:07] >> Well, Europe is always way
[29:09] ahead of. Us
[29:10] >> West?
[29:11] >> Europe is always ahead of us.
[29:12] >> Yeah. Well, okay, let's get
[29:13] ahead of it ourselves. We have
[29:16] to find out it's a done deal.
[29:18] Right? So I'm just going to tell
[29:21] you what the smart stance for
[29:26] when it says smart city.
[29:28] Surveillance, monitoring,
[29:30] analysis, reporting, technology.
[29:33] Does that sound like a nice walk
[29:35] in the park? To me, it sounds
[29:38] like big brother is watching. It
[29:40] sounds like, and I hit seen so
[29:41] many cameras go up, and I'm
[29:44] thinking am I going to jaywalk?
[29:49] [Laughter]
[29:50] You know? Like what is going to
[29:51] happen if I do? Just stupid
[29:53] little things that could get
[29:54] people in trouble like it has in
[29:57] say, for example, China, which
[29:58] is an extreme example. It's
[30:00] actually dissociated system
[30:01] where they have cameras
[30:03] everywhere and this smart city
[30:05] setup, there is face recognition
[30:11] -- you won't believe it. Tap --
[30:14] type in on your computers and
[30:15] find out. I encourage everyone
[30:16] to do that. In fact, I think it
[30:18] would be a nice thing if we as a
[30:21] community got to know more about
[30:23] it together. If there was a site
[30:25] that we could have provided by
[30:27] the City where
[30:34] we could find our findings on
[30:36] the net, probably trustworthy,
[30:37] but let's go see what is garbage
[30:39] and what is not, but then let's
[30:41] not pretend it's a
[30:43] pharmaceutical ad. Like, put
[30:44] some good stuff out there. Not
[30:49] everyone is going to want to
[30:50] meet behind someone's desk here
[30:51] at City Council. But maybe there
[30:53] is a place where we can send
[30:54] where we find out about it?
[31:01] Maybe one of the guys, maybe
[31:03] Cynthia, maybe some others,
[31:04] might want to get together and
[31:05] discuss it a little bit? And you
[31:07] can include us if you want,
[31:09] whoever wants to put something
[31:10] in. Does that sound like a
[31:12] reasonable request?
[31:13] >> Totally.
[31:14] >> Okay.
[31:15] >> Yeah.
[31:16] >> Mister Mayor, may I?
[31:17] >> Yes, absolutely.
[31:18] >> The 15-minute city concept
[31:20] was actually developed in Paris
[31:21] few years ago. It's one of the
[31:24] underlying concepts that has
[31:27] been propelling this whole --
[31:31] PMAD process with the City of
[31:32] Montréal that we are working on.
[31:33] That is the -- what is it? Yeah.
[31:40] It is the whole rethink of the
[31:42] island of Montréal. Actually,
[31:44] the Montréal metropolitan
[31:45] community. It goes right back to
[31:46] the 15-minute city. The R.E.M.
[31:49] is part of that.
[31:50] >> Absolutely. Absolutely.
[31:52] >> But the 15-minute city is an
[31:57] ideal. To achieve it is that
[31:58] when you walk out of your door,
[32:00] within 15 minutes you will be
[32:02] able to get whatever it is you
[32:05] need, groceries, a job. That is
[32:06] the idea. It's not something
[32:09] that is likely, especially in
[32:10] Pointe-Claire where we are
[32:11] already rather built, it's not
[32:13] likely ever to be achieved in
[32:17] total. But it is an ideal, an
[32:19] objective. It is why the R.E.M.
[32:21] is there. It's the concept
[32:23] behind the R.E.M. stations, it's
[32:25] the concept behind the transit
[32:27] oriented development at the mass
[32:28] transit stations. It is all part
[32:30] of that ideal and the working
[32:34] hypothesis is that if you have
[32:35] that, you will minimize the use
[32:36] of the car. So people get around
[32:40] by walking, by public transit
[32:41] and by bicycle. By doing that,
[32:44] it will have a very positive
[32:46] effect on the environment. Those
[32:48] are the objectives of the
[32:50] 15-minute city. As for the smart
[32:52] city, I mean when you say
[32:54] surveillance, are you looking at
[32:56] people? Yes, but another way of
[32:57] looking at it is if you are
[32:58] looking at vehicles, for
[33:00] instance. Like, if you want to
[33:01] control traffic on Saint John or
[33:03] the other major arteries, you
[33:05] can have a smart, not an
[33:07] acronym, but the actual word, a
[33:09] smart traffic signalling system
[33:10] that picks up, it has sensors
[33:13] around Saint-Jean and all the
[33:14] feeder streets, so that you
[33:16] realize that cars that are
[33:18] approaching St. Joe. And you can
[33:20] automatically, through
[33:21] artificial intelligence
[33:22] analysis, suggest the
[33:23] signalling. So you minimize
[33:25] congestion. So, yes, you want to
[33:26] make sure, I think that you are
[33:29] not recording everybody's faces,
[33:31] but it might be useful to
[33:32] records vehicles. You don't
[33:35] necessarily have to have the
[33:38] capability to check to know
[33:39] which vehicle. For the purposes
[33:41] of signalling, it does not
[33:42] matter. It just matters that
[33:44] there are so many because
[33:45] approaching no. How can
[33:48] signalling be modified to
[33:49] prevent congestion?
[33:51] >> I don't know how it is we
[33:53] have survived this long this
[33:55] far.
[33:56] [Laughter]
[33:57] >> To answer your question,
[33:58] there has been citizen
[33:59] involvement in all of this since
[34:00] the beginning.
[34:01] >> Sorry?
[34:02] >> There has been a citizen
[34:03] involvement in revising the
[34:04] Planning Program right from the
[34:05] beginning. There may not have
[34:06] been anything specifically on
[34:08] the 15-minute city, but that is
[34:10] an underlying principle.
[34:12] >> Well, I mean, I understand
[34:15] the idea of less cars. Although
[34:17] they did come back
[34:18] (applause)
[34:19] Give back some more parking
[34:20] spaces in Montréal because it
[34:21] went overboard. You know, in
[34:24] terms of the bicycle routes and
[34:26] all that. I think they had to
[34:27] make some modifications because
[34:29] it was way too gung ho.
[34:37] What makes me worried is what
[34:39] are the next steps behind all of
[34:40] the green statements. Good for
[34:42] the environment and that. What
[34:44] are the next things really? I
[34:47] have this feeling there might be
[34:54] more. It's worth investigating.
[34:55] That is what I'm saying. What I
[34:56] don't want to see is if somebody
[34:59] says you've got a 15-minute
[35:01] range to get everything you
[35:04] want, so therefore that is all
[35:05] you get.
[35:10] Well, I don't know. That is what
[35:12] I don't want. I don't want to be
[35:13] limited in my movement. No?
[35:15] >> No.
[35:16] >> You can guarantee that to me?
[35:18] >> No guarantees, but that is
[35:19] not the objective.
[35:20] >> Logically speaking you would
[35:21] say no. I know it would kill my
[35:23] husband. He plays hockey in
[35:25] Montréal West. If he could not
[35:26] go there or if he had to take
[35:27] the R.E.M. to do it. No? Okay.
[35:31] >> It's a controversial subject.
[35:33] I have met a lot of people that
[35:34] really don't like the concept
[35:41] . Thing for me is that it's
[35:43] completely undermined by the
[35:45] affordability crisis. People who
[35:46] work in Pointe-Claire cannot
[35:47] afford to live in Pointe-Claire.
[35:48] If you are working in retail or
[35:50] you are working in the
[35:51] industrial park, you are living
[35:52] out by Vaudreuil to afford to
[35:54] come in. So, it is completely
[35:56] undermined by affordability. So,
[35:58] we are a long way from
[35:59] accomplishing that goal.
[36:01] >> Yeah. Well, okay. I just
[36:03] thought I would bring it up.
[36:05] >> No, I appreciate it.
[36:06] >> Just to be aware of this.
[36:08] Also, to invite any research
[36:09] that anyone else finds out about
[36:11] it.
[36:12] >> Mayor Thomas, may I add
[36:13] something?
[36:14] >> Yes, absolutely.
[36:15] >> I understand your concerns.
[36:16] Of course, I think everyone here
[36:18] shares in the concerns of being
[36:20] under surveillance, but we have
[36:24] gone to conferences as council
[36:26] members and our staff as well,
[36:29] everything that has to do with
[36:30] smart cities. It has more to do
[36:31] with collecting data in order to
[36:33] make the city more efficient and
[36:34] to meet the needs of our
[36:35] citizens better. As Mr. Cohen
[36:39] was saying, we will collect data
[36:40] on car movement so that we can
[36:43] determine whether or not if a
[36:45] street should have a -- or not
[36:47] on it. How many cars are passing
[36:49] down the street? What is the
[36:50] speed of the car for traffic
[36:52] flow? We collected on the number
[36:53] of people signed up for
[36:55] swimming, for example, so that
[36:56] we can see where our service
[36:58] offering has to go. We have
[37:01] different systems that we are
[37:03] using at the city in urban
[37:04] planning and in engineering
[37:06] where they are collecting data
[37:08] and they are layering maps so we
[37:10] know where pipes are and we know
[37:11] where gaslights are. So we know
[37:13] what our soil samples are so
[37:15] that when we do a project we are
[37:17] well outfitted to move forward
[37:19] on that project. So while the
[37:22] acronym is certainly alarming,
[37:25] the way you have said it, we
[37:26] have been too smart city
[37:29] conference is, not conferences
[37:31] that are just smart city, but
[37:33] workshops rather. It has more to
[37:35] do with the use of technology
[37:37] and collecting our data to offer
[37:40] better services and a more
[37:41] efficient and more
[37:42] environmentally friendly
[37:44] sustainable service offering as
[37:45] cities.
[37:46] >> Okay. And I guess that comes
[37:48] at a cost as well? Putting
[37:49] cameras everywhere?
[37:51] >> We haven't put cameras
[37:52] everywhere. It is more we will
[37:55] put -- they are not permanent
[37:57] installations. For example, we
[37:58] will track traffic, but they are
[37:59] non permanent installations that
[38:00] we move around. Just like they
[38:03] have weather tracking so that we
[38:05] know how much to salt went to
[38:07] salt. So the air temperature is
[38:09] tracked in different locations.
[38:12] That's because that affects how
[38:13] much salt should go down
[38:14] depending on the temperature.
[38:15] So, we are collecting data like
[38:17] that. We are not so interested
[38:19] in collecting images of your
[38:21] face or anything like that.
[38:23] >> Not like China.
[38:24] >> It's more how many books and
[38:26] mandarin are checked out at the
[38:27] library. Do we have to have a
[38:28] better service offering? It's
[38:31] more things like that in order
[38:32] to provide better services.
[38:34] >> I would like to get some
[38:35] research to find out how the
[38:36] people in Cambridge, England, I
[38:38] think it's Cambridge, how they
[38:40] are responding to their
[38:42] surveillance. Anyway, I just
[38:44] want to open the page on that
[38:46] and get some feedback. Not just
[38:47] for me because we are not
[38:49] actually living it right now,
[38:51] but you know. Okay. That's it. I
[38:52] want to get a more time.
[38:53] >> Thank you. She let Larsen?
[39:00] -- Sheila Larsen.
[39:04] >> I am very grateful to hear
[39:07] the praise that has been given
[39:09] already to Council, to the
[39:12] Pointe-Claire Heritage Society.
[39:14] And I just wanted to add my
[39:16] voice as a citizen who has loved
[39:19] that windmill every year since
[39:22] 1971 when I moved here. And I
[39:25] have been dismayed to see it
[39:27] falling into disrepair. And I've
[39:30] been dismayed to see that we
[39:31] were not able to do something
[39:33] for it. I used to live next door
[39:36] to Jan proud foot who did an
[39:39] original painting of the
[39:41] windmill that became part of the
[39:43] symbol for quite a long time. So
[39:45] I wanted to honour the people
[39:48] who did the hardest work. And I
[39:49] do not know them all, I'm an on
[39:52] again off again kind of member
[39:54] of that society, and so I cannot
[39:56] name all the names but I know
[39:58] that Andrew -- Andrew Swidzinski
[40:01] and normal point I think our to
[40:04] keep people. They have worked so
[40:09] doggedly without support for so
[40:11] long. I think that what they
[40:13] have done is basically a
[40:16] miracle. And based on that, what
[40:19] I would like to see, and because
[40:21] to me it is an important symbol,
[40:23] and we need to feel good about
[40:25] things these days, there's too
[40:27] many things to feel distressed
[40:29] about and stressed out about. I
[40:31] would love it if the City would
[40:34] support a really good
[40:35] promotional campaign to get
[40:37] every citizen. I was thinking,
[40:39] you know, if every citizen of
[40:40] Pointe-Claire gave ten bucks,
[40:42] that would be pretty amazing.
[40:44] That would add a lot of money. I
[40:46] have personally given some money
[40:48] to it and I will try and do that
[40:49] all the way through their
[40:51] campaign. But they are going to
[40:53] need more help than that. And so
[40:55] that brings me to my question.
[40:57] And I know this has not been a
[41:02] happy discussion among Council,
[41:05] but to me I really wish and I
[41:08] hoped that Council would come
[41:10] together and say the thank you
[41:12] for doing your part, heritage
[41:16] society. Now we are going to
[41:18] come forward and we are going to
[41:19] give you that support that you
[41:21] need. Not all of it, but a real
[41:23] good boost that will mean to all
[41:27] citizens of Pointe-Claire, and
[41:28] to everybody beyond in the
[41:31] Agglo, that we care about that
[41:32] place. We care about our
[41:34] heritage. We are proud of it and
[41:36] we are going to protect it and
[41:38] build it and develop it. I watch
[41:44] little television shows about
[41:46] places in England where they get
[41:47] their windmills from 1400 or
[41:51] 1600 working again. And they buy
[41:55] stone ground flower from them. I
[41:56] keep thinking why can't we? You
[41:59] know, that is my question. Why
[42:01] can't we? And maybe can we?
[42:04] >> We can. In fact, from what I
[42:06] am told by some of the founding
[42:11] members, Claude Arseneault in
[42:13] particular, that the mechanism
[42:14] sits in a basement in
[42:17] Pointe-Claire village that has
[42:18] been imported from France and
[42:19] that has been sitting in there
[42:20] for over a decade, that has not
[42:21] been put into the windmill. When
[42:22] I negotiated the original deal,
[42:24] that was factored it to the
[42:27] process. Mr. Weemaes and I
[42:29] factor that in. The idea was to
[42:31] get a functional windmill. I was
[42:32] speaking with Jeff Kelly last
[42:34] night. Why can't Pointe-Claire
[42:36] have a windmill as good as
[42:37] anyone else is? I would love
[42:39] that. Jeff was saying he bikes
[42:41] out to the one in -- and he
[42:43] loves it because it works. The
[42:45] issue of course is that we do
[42:46] not opponent. So we have to find
[42:47] a way to make it happen with
[42:49] that owning it and that has
[42:50] always been the problem. We have
[42:51] to learn that we have to suck it
[42:53] up and do our job in some way
[42:56] shape or form and not leave it
[42:57] up to reach private donors. That
[42:59] is where we are at now with the
[43:01] Heritage Society. They've done a
[43:03] wonderful job of raising money,
[43:05] but to plan how they are going
[43:07] to renovated and what kind of
[43:09] windmill we are going to get,
[43:10] they can only do that if they
[43:11] have the money upfront. So here
[43:14] in lies the dilemma of the
[43:16] situation we are in. So the
[43:18] money upfront right now, they
[43:19] have 350,000, you are quite
[43:21] right. They need more. So we
[43:22] need to find a way to get more
[43:23] in some way shape or form. I
[43:24] would love it if our city could
[43:25] do that.
[43:28] >> So would I. That would make
[43:30] me very proud after a year of
[43:32] not feeling quite so proud. So I
[43:34] leave with that hope.
[43:35] >> Absolutely. Mr. Cousineau?
[43:38] >> Yes. We actually have
[43:42] $8,350,000.
[43:45] >> No, they don't. They have
[43:48] $350,000.
[43:49] >> May I comment, sir?
[43:50] >> Yes, absolutely.
[43:51] >> Okay, Mister Mayor. I was
[43:52] going to wait until the end of
[43:53] question period to sit down the
[43:54] chair because every time I have
[43:55] brought this issue up to
[43:58] councillors, you stuck your head
[43:59] in the sand. Once again, you are
[44:02] misrepresenting the truth. You
[44:03] are blatantly lying. Okay? I
[44:06] will explain it to you. Feel
[44:07] free to answer. You just said
[44:12] your deal. There was no deal.
[44:16] Then you mentioned that the deal
[44:17] they just signed is the same
[44:19] with the access. No, it's not.
[44:20] First of all, has anyone seen
[44:22] the deal with the archdiocese?
[44:24] By the way, I was the first one
[44:25] on Facebook to commend the
[44:28] society for what they did and to
[44:31] get --. I believe he is a
[44:34] business person and he knows
[44:35] what to do. And I believe he can
[44:37] help nudge them further. So,
[44:38] they have my full support. But
[44:39] to hear what I'm saying -- so
[44:41] you are seeing that in your deal
[44:43] -- was there guaranteed access?
[44:45] No, there wasn't.
[44:47] >> You just asked the question.
[44:49] >> Go ahead because I have all
[44:50] the documents in the back. I
[44:51] will go and get them and I will
[44:52] show them to you. So please
[44:53] answer my question.
[44:54] >> Okay. This is the big myth
[44:59] and counter fuse that comes
[45:00] around this issue. Access to the
[45:02] windmill. It is a small little
[45:04] space with a working mechanism
[45:06] that you do not want to go
[45:07] inside anyway. Nor should you
[45:08] have someone go inside anyway.
[45:10] >> You just said you are going
[45:11] to have guided tours!
[45:12] >> They are historic. I will
[45:14] answer your question. The access
[45:17] agreement, the access terms that
[45:19] were in the deal that Mr.
[45:20] Weemaes and I negotiated, were
[45:22] actually better than the access
[45:23] terms that are in the current
[45:25] arrangement. And I have read
[45:26] that out in this meeting two
[45:30] years ago. I read the actual
[45:32] terms of access in the original
[45:34] arrangement that Mr. Weemaes and
[45:35] I negotiated and the current
[45:36] one. And the terms are actually
[45:38] better.
[45:39] >> No, you did not.
[45:40] >> Yes, I did.
[45:41] >> Please provide what those
[45:42] terms are.
[45:43] >> Ladies and gentlemen of
[45:44] Pointe-Claire, you can go back
[45:45] -- I'm not finished.
[45:46] >> I'm not finished.
[45:47] >> Councillor Stork, I am still
[45:53] talking.
[45:54] >> Okay, but --
[45:55] >> Councillor Stork, I'm still
[45:57] talking. Excuse me, folks, I am
[45:58] the chair of this meeting and I
[45:59] will continue to answer the
[46:01] question. Councillor Stork, I am
[46:03] not finished yet. The
[46:07] arrangement that was negotiated
[46:10] by the so stated about one, the
[46:12] Heritage Society, included
[46:14] private members who do not want
[46:15] their names known. It is
[46:17] preferable not to. They are
[46:19] kind, generous human beings.
[46:21] Yes, one of the names mentioned
[46:22] is actually a person I spoke to
[46:24] and encouraged to do so. So I
[46:27] know exactly what is going on
[46:29] with this. The terms of access
[46:32] is a snare and a delusion. It's
[46:33] a small little place where you
[46:35] don't want people going in,
[46:37] especially with a working
[46:38] mechanism. It's a mythology.
[46:41] It's a way of distracting. The
[46:43] real issue is that we have to
[46:44] get the thing fixed. I would
[46:46] like it fixed so it works. Let's
[46:48] not get hung up on little terms.
[46:50] Let's get the job done. Let's
[46:52] get the money we need to get it
[46:54] done. Who cares about semantics
[46:56] and arguments and positions?
[46:57] >> I would like to finish --
[46:59] >> I am not finished. Who cares
[47:01] about semantics?
[47:02] >> Answer the question.
[47:03] >> Councillor Stork, would you
[47:04] let me finish? The answer -- the
[47:07] issue here is we want to get
[47:08] this thing fixed in any way
[47:10] shape or form. The archdiocese
[47:12] has $350,000. It needs a lot
[47:14] more. We have to find a way to
[47:15] get it to them. To get a working
[47:17] windmill requires a lot of
[47:18] money. And of story.
[47:20] >> Okay. I would just like to
[47:22] add some other points. So thank
[47:23] you for not answering my
[47:25] question. You said this
[47:28] documentation is decisional. No,
[47:30] it is not decisional. The
[47:33] documentation is not
[47:35] discretionary. We created a
[47:37] bylaw, a written bylaw, with
[47:39] money put aside in the bank. It
[47:41] is very simple. Whoever the
[47:45] owner of the building files
[47:48] reports, put some stuff to get,
[47:49] it says exactly what they are
[47:50] going to. Yes, they get paid at
[47:51] the end. Just like they are when
[47:54] they go to the provincial
[47:55] government. They are going to
[47:56] get paid at the end. We
[47:58] duplicated the procedure. The
[48:00] procedure that the provincial
[48:01] government will use for the
[48:02] heritage decided to get any
[48:03] money whatsoever. So it is not
[48:05] decisional. It is not
[48:07] discretionary. I can ask our
[48:08] legal department right now, but
[48:10] I can guarantee I know the
[48:11] answer. We created it. They fill
[48:13] in the documentation. We don't
[48:14] have the option of not giving
[48:16] them money if they say -- they
[48:19] do what they say they are going
[48:20] to do. It's a legal bylaw we
[48:21] have created. The money is put
[48:23] aside. They do what they need to
[48:24] do and they have to do the same
[48:26] thing with the provincial
[48:27] government when they go look for
[48:28] money as we are asking. But once
[48:30] they do that we hand them the
[48:32] money. I will be more than happy
[48:33] to hand them money. I'm not
[48:36] speaking on behalf of Council,
[48:37] but I guarantee you that they
[48:38] are happy with it as well. And
[48:40] no, we have not seen this new
[48:42] agreement. Obviously, you have,
[48:43] Mister Mayor. Let me finish. I
[48:47] am not finished, sir. Okay? I
[48:49] have not finished. So when you
[48:52] had this agreement in 2000 --
[48:54] when you had your agreement, it
[48:55] was done completely behind our
[48:57] backs. I had emails, I won't
[48:59] make them all public, I have
[49:00] emails between certain members.
[49:02] Nobody on council. Not even our
[49:04] DG involved in these
[49:05] discussions. Then you present us
[49:07] an argument and written
[49:09] statements that we will have
[49:10] full access to the windmill.
[49:11] There is nothing in your
[49:13] agreement with the previous deep
[49:14] G who is not even here to speak
[49:16] for himself. So my point is very
[49:18] simple. It's not decisional.
[49:21] It's not discretionary. It is
[49:22] there. And the archdiocese is
[49:25] fully access -- they can still
[49:26] go forward. Sign the
[49:30] documentation and we will hand
[49:31] them the money. If they give
[49:33] them a proxy, but they will have
[49:34] to go through the same process
[49:36] to get the money from the
[49:37] provincial government. So we
[49:39] have the money there. To say
[49:41] that the City is doing nothing?
[49:42] We are handing the $967,000.
[49:46] Just please go fill out
[49:47] paperwork. When you hire someone
[49:48] for renovations, do you give
[49:50] them all the money upfront? I
[49:51] don't. Can we possibly set some
[49:54] goals?
[49:55] >> You usually have to pay in
[49:57] installments.
[49:58] >> Well to a certain extent.
[50:00] Again, I'm more than happy to
[50:01] send the legal documentation.
[50:03] This is exactly how the
[50:04] provincial government doesn't
[50:05] for grants. And we are doing
[50:06] exactly the same thing. To say
[50:08] the City does not want to do it.
[50:10] The city. The city. No, we have
[50:12] done everything we can. We have
[50:14] offered the money. It is still
[50:15] available. It is still available
[50:16] to whomever applies for it as
[50:18] long as the owner signs off on
[50:19] it. So, the money is there. So,
[50:22] we need to move forward with
[50:23] this. We need to fix that
[50:25] windmill.
[50:26] >> I agree. And I don't want to
[50:28] continue this --
[50:29] >> We have not done everything
[50:30] we can. If we did what we could,
[50:33] the money would be upfront. And
[50:35] I have dealt with Stephen
[50:37] Maroney, the representative, the
[50:39] archdiocese, and I've negotiated
[50:40] with them. I know him quite
[50:41] well. And he in no way will
[50:45] start any kind of reparation
[50:48] process in an arrangement where
[50:50] they get paid at the end of the
[50:51] game. They will not do that and
[50:53] they refused to do that. So that
[50:54] is our bottom line. That is why
[50:56] since the current arrangement
[50:57] has been in place the windmill
[50:58] has been indicate. Nothing has
[51:01] happened and nothing will happen
[51:04] until someone changes the
[51:05] current arrangement which is
[51:07] inadequate arrangement. So what
[51:08] the archdiocese has done, it has
[51:10] gone out and done it themselves
[51:12] because they know the money is
[51:13] not going to come any other way.
[51:14] And the archdiocese is not going
[51:15] to start repairs and the other
[51:17] way. So they are saving the
[51:20] stalemate effectively. That is
[51:21] what is going on here.
[51:22] >> And I would just finish by
[51:24] saying that I hope there can be
[51:26] something in between. I see that
[51:28] there is a grant being given to
[51:29] the lakeshore General Hospital
[51:31] Foundation. I am sure the City
[51:33] gives grants to people who
[51:35] haven't given their past
[51:38] expenses or the expenses for
[51:39] which they are asking for the
[51:41] money. Are you sure -- I am sure
[51:44] there are other presidents as
[51:45] well. I would hope that the city
[51:47] would show the goodwill and to
[51:49] want to preserve our heritage.
[51:52] Not only to preserve, but to say
[51:54] that windmill for all of us here
[51:56] in Pointe-Claire. And so I hope
[51:58] we can find some middle ground
[52:00] somewhere. I think we need a lot
[52:03] more finding of middle ground.
[52:04] Thank you.
[52:05] >> May I comment?
[52:06] >> Yes, absolutely.
[52:07] >> Yes, we do give grants. We
[52:09] give grants to nonprofit
[52:13] organizations that we support,
[52:14] that support our citizens. I
[52:17] 100% support what we put in
[52:19] place to give $8 million of hard
[52:22] earned tax payer money that they
[52:24] have given to us to do the job
[52:27] that the church is legally bound
[52:28] to do, which they are not doing.
[52:30] Okay? I want this to be very
[52:32] clear. They are legally bound to
[52:33] take care of their building and
[52:34] they have not done it. This is a
[52:37] four billion dollar organization
[52:40] and -- in Canada alone. They
[52:41] have 400 and $90 million in
[52:45] cash. Okay? These are the
[52:47] statistics. And they can't front
[52:50] $950,000 until the project is
[52:52] done? When we are going to hand
[52:53] the money over? This might not
[52:55] be a very popular opinion that I
[52:56] am sharing right now, but I
[52:58] support fixing that, but I do
[52:59] not support giving the hard
[53:00] earned money of my residents to
[53:03] somebody, carte blanche, without
[53:05] them even being -- willing to
[53:09] collect paperwork. That is where
[53:10] I stand on this issue. We are
[53:12] talking about a multi billion
[53:13] dollar organization. I am never
[53:15] going to vote to grant them
[53:17] money beyond what we have done.
[53:19] This is to safeguard our
[53:21] citizens money and to make sure
[53:23] that this project goes through
[53:24] in the best way possible. Nobody
[53:27] gets carte blanche had a cheque.
[53:29] When we are talking about grants
[53:30] that we give our nonprofit
[53:32] organizations, we are talking
[53:33] about $15,000, not 1 million
[53:36] dollars.
[53:38] >> And there is what the
[53:40] windmill is rotting.
[53:41] >> That is based on their
[53:42] finances I have to say. They
[53:43] have to fill out the paperwork
[53:44] and submit their finances. If
[53:46] they have earned too much money,
[53:47] their current goes down. That is
[53:49] how it works. So when a four
[53:51] billion dollar organization is
[53:52] coming to us, we do want to get
[53:55] this fixed, yes, but are they
[53:56] the most worthy of our money?
[53:58] Probably not because they,
[53:59] bylaw, should be fixing it
[54:00] themselves. But we all want to
[54:02] see this thing get fixed. That
[54:03] is why we have pledged 1 million
[54:06] dollars. It is not because they
[54:07] deserve it.
[54:08] >> And the windmill is currently
[54:11] the thing that suffers because
[54:13] they own it and they are not
[54:14] going to do it. So the only way
[54:16] around it is what the Heritage
[54:17] society has done. Because they
[54:19] have realized that this impasse
[54:21] that you have just heard is the
[54:22] reason why it will continue to
[54:24] rock. So whether we think it is
[54:26] just or not, we have to save it.
[54:29] That is what the Heritage
[54:31] society has done. They have
[54:33] realized that it's not going to
[54:34] happen appear. So they are doing
[54:36] it themselves. You just heard
[54:38] why. Susan Weaver?
[54:46] >> So, in light of your new
[54:49] information that you have a
[54:50] police report, I would like you
[54:53] to may be submitted to legal
[54:55] affairs so we can have access to
[54:57] information and compare it.
[54:58] Because the insurance company
[55:00] goes by what they have written.
[55:03] >> Well, the shortage of Québec
[55:05] trumps an insurance company who
[55:06] wasn't even there. I'm just
[55:07] telling you. The police officers
[55:09] there Trump the insurance
[55:10] company that find out after the
[55:11] fact. I'm just telling you.
[55:12] >> If it's an authentic
[55:14] document, could you please --
[55:17] >> Yes, it is authentic.
[55:18] >> And you will submit it?
[55:20] >> Of course. Of course. I will
[55:22] give it to madame Thibault.
[55:23] Absolutely. Alain Dubé look?
[55:29] >> Okay. First, concerning the
[55:31] windmill, I was part of that
[55:33] police with captain. T'j'fou. At
[55:35] the time of Mr. Mayor Belvedere
[55:40] and with Mr. Cousineau, we
[55:42] worked very hard to find a ways
[55:46] to get going with the windmill
[55:49] situation. And we ended up
[55:51] facing a situation where we need
[55:54] the help from the government,
[55:58] the Ministry of Heritage, and we
[55:59] also need help from the
[56:02] archdiocese. And we need help
[56:04] from the City. And we need help
[56:06] from all the -- and we need help
[56:09] from all kinds of people if
[56:10] people can get together and sit
[56:11] down and get to an agreement.
[56:13] There is a way. But I cannot see
[56:16] -- who has maybe ten members,
[56:19] very brave workers, get anywhere
[56:24] unless there are three big money
[56:28] makers that get together. We try
[56:32] our best to get those people
[56:34] together. It did not happen
[56:37] unfortunately. It would be great
[56:38] if it did. But I don't like to
[56:41] hear you guys, especially Mister
[56:44] Mayor, please, it's not my
[56:45] fault, it's their fault. T'j'We
[56:47] are not children here to listen
[56:49] to those things --
[56:50] >> Excuse me, I never said it
[56:51] wasn't my fault. Did I ever say
[56:53] that?
[56:54] >> What I'm trying to say --
[56:55] >> Excuse me.
[56:56] >> There is a way to get all
[57:01] together. I see the comment of
[57:05] Mrs. Stainforth. It's a great
[57:07] comment. I mean it's impossible
[57:08] for her not to say, come on, we
[57:11] are not going to put all our
[57:13] money into that. We need
[57:14] collaboration from the
[57:15] government. We need
[57:16] collaboration from the church.
[57:17] We need that. Unless we get
[57:19] that, we are not going to go
[57:21] anywhere. That is my opinion.
[57:23] Now, this is not the reason why
[57:24] I am here at the microphone. I
[57:26] am talking about something else.
[58:17] [Speaking French]
[58:55] [Speaking French]
[59:25] [Speaking French]
[59:59] Il ne peut pas le faire parce
[1:00:00] que tu vas par année. Autrement,
[1:00:01] il y a des gens qui feraient ça
[1:00:02] à toutes les fins de semaine,
[1:00:04] qui en feraient leur gagnait,
[1:00:05] leur gagne-pain, ils feraient
[1:00:07] des ventes de garage. Mais il y
[1:00:08] a une limite. On ne peut pas en
[1:00:10] faire plus que deux. Là-dedans,
[1:00:13] il n'y a pas de limite sur les
[1:00:14] événements spéciaux. Ça, ça veut
[1:00:16] dire qu'il y a un port qui peut
[1:00:18] décider des demandes et des
[1:00:20] événements spéciaux à toutes les
[1:00:21] fins semaines de l'été, il n'y a
[1:00:22] pas de limite. Alors, ça, c'est
[1:00:24] la première chose à laquelle
[1:00:25] j'aimerais vous interpeller pour
[1:00:28] (---)
[1:00:29] pendant que vous faites les
[1:00:30] petites modifications concernant
[1:00:32] l'architecture des terrasses.
[1:00:33] Peut-être que vous pourriez en
[1:00:34] même temps réfléchir à l'idée de
[1:00:35] dire que s'il y a des événements
[1:00:37] spéciaux, combien d'événements
[1:00:39] spéciaux est-ce qu'un bar, un
[1:00:40] club, ou n'importe quelle place
[1:00:42] peut faire dans une été. Il y a
[1:00:44] une limite, s'il vous plaît.
[1:00:46] Deuxième chose, il n'y a pas
[1:00:49] seulement la quantité, mais il a
[1:00:51] la force du bruit, le son, la
[1:00:55] puissance du son. Dans toutes
[1:00:56] les communautés du West Island,
[1:00:58] il y a des limites de son. 40
[1:01:01] décibels, 50 décibels,
[1:01:03] dépendant, Kirkland,
[1:01:05] Pierrefonds, je ne le sais pas.
[1:01:08] Ici, jamais vous parler du son.
[1:01:11] Jamais ce règlement ne concerne
[1:01:14] la quantité de son. Ça peut
[1:01:17] aller jusqu'à 100 décibels, je
[1:01:18] le sais, j'ai vécu l'expérience,
[1:01:20] j'étais un voisin d'un bord. Je
[1:01:21] suis voisin d'un bar qui, lui,
[1:01:23] ne se gêne pas pour mettre les
[1:01:26] sécure dans le tapis. C'est
[1:01:30] intolérable, et la société, si
[1:01:31] vous voulez, la sécurité
[1:01:34] publique, ils sont tannés de
[1:01:35] recevoir des plaintes et des
[1:01:36] plaintes, et des plaintes. C'est
[1:01:38] trop fort! Pourquoi est-ce que,
[1:01:43] contrairement à toutes les
[1:01:44] autres villes, vous ne
[1:01:45] réfléchissez pas à une limite de
[1:01:48] son concernant les événements
[1:01:50] spéciaux. C'est deux choses,
[1:01:52] deux points, que je retrouve
[1:01:54] pas, ici. Que je ne retrouve pas
[1:01:56] ce soir. Le son, la force du
[1:02:00] son, la quantité de décibels,
[1:02:02] qui me semble qu'il devrait y
[1:02:04] avoir une limite, parce qu'à
[1:02:06] Dorval, ils n'ont pas besoin
[1:02:07] d'entendre ça., Et, en même
[1:02:11] temps, la fréquence des
[1:02:12] événements spéciaux. Les espèces
[1:02:14] de party! J'aimerais ça, si vous
[1:02:17] plaît, que vous vous posez la
[1:02:19] question, est-ce que vous avez
[1:02:20] pensé à ça? Est-ce qu'il va se
[1:02:21] passer quelque chose à ce sujet?
[1:02:24] - Oui, je pense qu'on a des lois
[1:02:26] contre le bruit. Don't we have
[1:02:30] noise limits in our nuisance
[1:02:32] bylaw? Do we not?
[1:02:34] - Dans le fond, monsieur Dubuc,
[1:02:35] la façon dont on voulait
[1:02:36] adresser cette situation-là pour
[1:02:37] les terrasses, c'est qu'on
[1:02:38] pallier cette ligne-là avec
[1:02:39] notre règlement de nuisance.
[1:02:41] Vous allez voir, je discutais
[1:02:43] avec
[1:02:44] (---)
[1:02:45] , à partir du mois d'avril, une
[1:02:46] adoption d'un changement dans
[1:02:47] les règlements de nuisance, ou
[1:02:48] qu'on va venir adresser ces
[1:02:51] sections-là, et parce que le
[1:02:52] bruit, on ne va pas seulement le
[1:02:53] gérer pour les terrasses, mais
[1:02:54] aussi pour l'ensemble de la
[1:02:55] ville, dans le fond.
[1:02:58] - Si vous permettez, Madame
[1:03:00] Verdon, monsieur Dubuc. Dans le
[1:03:01] règlement de nuisance, je vous
[1:03:03] invite à les voir. J'ai sous les
[1:03:05] yeux présentement. Attendez un
[1:03:07] instant. J'imagine que vous avez
[1:03:09] consulté le règlement de zonage
[1:03:10] avec les modifications pour le
[1:03:12] zonage pour les terrasses, mais
[1:03:13] vous n'avez pas regardé le
[1:03:14] règlement de nuisance?
[1:03:17] - Je ne l'ai lu au complet, et
[1:03:19] jamais il y a été question de
[1:03:22] décibels ou jamais il a été
[1:03:24] question de fréquence des
[1:03:26] événements spéciaux.
[1:03:28] - Il n'y a pas de fréquence.
[1:03:30] Nous avons des dispositions
[1:03:33] concernant le fait de causer, de
[1:03:36] permettre de mettre un bruit
[1:03:37] entre 23 heures et 7 heures le
[1:03:41] matin, du bruit qui incommodent
[1:03:42] le voisinage. Ça, c'est interdit
[1:03:44] par le règlement.
[1:03:46] - Ça date du maire Arthur
[1:03:49] Séguin.
[1:03:50] - Oui, ça date. Mais c'est quand
[1:03:51] même des dispositions qui
[1:03:52] actuellement sont applicables,
[1:03:53] et même appliquées quand il y a
[1:03:55] des plaintes de la Sécurité
[1:03:56] publique., Alors soyez informés
[1:03:57] que ça existe. The en moins, on
[1:03:59] a des questions de décibels,
[1:04:01] juste terminer et ensuite je
[1:04:02] vous le saluer. Pour les
[1:04:04] questions de décibels, il y a
[1:04:05] dans le règlement de nuisance un
[1:04:08] nombre de décibels, 50 décibels
[1:04:10] entre 21 heures et 7 heures, et
[1:04:12] 60 décibels entre 60 et 21
[1:04:14] heures. Ça ne correspond pas
[1:04:16] nécessairement à votre demande,
[1:04:18] ça concerne uniquement les
[1:04:20] appareils de type thermopompes.
[1:04:22] Alors, on a la disposition. Mais
[1:04:24] il n'y a rien qui empêche, qu'on
[1:04:25] a travaillé le règlement des
[1:04:27] terrasses, monsieur Dubuc,
[1:04:29] monter parfaitement a été
[1:04:31] interpellée pour s'assurer qu'il
[1:04:32] y avait une cohérence entre la
[1:04:34] volonté qu'on avait pour
[1:04:36] réglementer les terrasses dans
[1:04:37] les règlements d'urbanisme, pour
[1:04:39] s'assurer que le règlement de
[1:04:42] nuisance à laisser de façon
[1:04:43] cohérente. Alors, c'est
[1:04:45] exactement ce que madame Verdon
[1:04:46] nous a mentionné. On va attacher
[1:04:48] des dispositions du règlement de
[1:04:50] nuisance. On va réviser le
[1:04:52] règlement de nuisance pour voir
[1:04:53] où est-ce qu'on doit intervenir,
[1:04:54] pour justement couvrir le bruit
[1:04:57] et le nombre d'événements, le
[1:05:00] demandeur va être limitée à un
[1:05:01] certain nombre d'événements
[1:05:03] ponctuels dans l'été. On ne veut
[1:05:04] pas nécessairement, et ça je
[1:05:05] pense que ça avait été... je me
[1:05:07] demande même s'ils n'avaient pas
[1:05:08] été ajustés dans le nouveau...
[1:05:10] ce que vous avez entre les
[1:05:11] mains, est-ce que c'est le
[1:05:12] premier projet de règlement?
[1:05:14] C'est pas le règlement?
[1:05:15] - J'ai essayé d'obtenir, il n'y
[1:05:17] a rien de disponible.
[1:05:18] - Le règlement de zonage, le
[1:05:20] second projet qu'on adopte ce
[1:05:21] soir et là. Et ça me surprend,
[1:05:24] parce que j'étais vraiment sous
[1:05:26] l'impression, attendez-moi un
[1:05:28] instant, que nous avions oui les
[1:05:32] discussions concernant les
[1:05:35] limites qu'on doit... la limite
[1:05:39] de fréquence des événements où
[1:05:40] un propriétaire pourrait
[1:05:42] dépenser les règles qui sont
[1:05:43] mentionnés là-dedans. Mais si
[1:05:45] vous permettez, ça va me faire
[1:05:47] plaisir de vous donner plus de
[1:05:48] renseignements dans les
[1:05:49] prochains jours ou semaines, si
[1:05:52] vous voulez me communiquer votre
[1:05:53] adresse courriel. Ça va me faire
[1:05:55] plaisir de vous donner plus de
[1:05:56] renseignements. Mais soyez sans
[1:05:58] crainte, les préoccupations que
[1:05:59] vous avez là, elles ont été
[1:06:02] adressées.
[1:06:03] - Parce qu'en ce moment, je vous
[1:06:06] vois en train de modifier
[1:06:10] tranquillement les questions
[1:06:12] architecturales. C'est très
[1:06:13] clair. Vous allez voter ce soir.
[1:06:16] Plein de petits amendements, la
[1:06:18] quantité de personnes qui
[1:06:19] peuvent avoir sur une terrasse,
[1:06:20] de quoi ça a l'air, une
[1:06:22] micro-terrasse, une plus grosse.
[1:06:24] Je vois que vous essayez de
[1:06:25] préciser des choses avec
[1:06:26] beaucoup d'attention. De façon
[1:06:29] carré... quasi chirurgicale!
[1:06:30] Mais quand c'est le temps de
[1:06:32] parler de quelque chose qui
[1:06:33] embête une grande quantité de la
[1:06:35] population, il n'y a rien.
[1:06:37] - Mais, Monsieur Dubuc, c'est
[1:06:39] que ce n'est pas dans la
[1:06:40] réglementation de zonage de
[1:06:42] construction que nous pouvons
[1:06:43] régler les problèmes de
[1:06:45] nuisance. Nous avons un
[1:06:46] règlement pour cela. Alors, ma
[1:06:48] suggestion était aux autres
[1:06:49] équipes à la Ville, attendons
[1:06:51] d'avoir des règlements
[1:06:52] d'urbanisme modifiées pour
[1:06:55] s'assurer que le conseil va
[1:06:57] voter en faveur de ce
[1:06:58] règlement-là. Une fois que cela
[1:07:00] sera fait, on va venir
[1:07:01] harmoniser le règlement de
[1:07:02] nuisance pour s'assurer que les
[1:07:05] nouvelles dispositions n'est pas
[1:07:06] comme conséquence de créer des
[1:07:09] nuisances, de nouvelles
[1:07:10] nuisances, ou d'empirer des
[1:07:11] nuisances existantes. Mais, il
[1:07:14] faut quand même attendre que les
[1:07:15] règlements soient adoptés, vous
[1:07:16] en conviendrez avec moi.
[1:07:17] - Est-ce que vous pouvez me
[1:07:18] donner une idée de votre
[1:07:20] calendrier pour ces
[1:07:21] modifications?
[1:07:22] - Comme madame Verdon l'a dit.
[1:07:23] Ce, soir on adopte le second
[1:07:25] projet pour le règlement de
[1:07:26] zonage, mais en avril, on va
[1:07:27] amorcer la procédure pour la
[1:07:30] modification des nuisances, le
[1:07:31] cas échéant. Donc, il y aura un
[1:07:33] avis de motion est un projet. Et
[1:07:34] l'adoption du règlement de
[1:07:35] nuisance sera fait pour mes.
[1:07:37] Alors, l'idée, c'est d'avoir
[1:07:38] quelque chose de final, si
[1:07:40] besoin avait de changer le
[1:07:41] règlement de nuisance, pour la
[1:07:43] prochaine saison estivale.
[1:07:45] - Pour celles du mois de mai?
[1:07:47] - Idéalement. Dans le meilleur
[1:07:50] des mondes. Un règlement adopté
[1:07:52] pour mes.
[1:07:53] - O.K.! J'espère que vous
[1:07:55] comprenez la raison pour
[1:07:56] laquelle je suis là.
[1:07:57] - Je suis... je comprends
[1:07:59] parfaitement, mais vous n'êtes
[1:08:00] pas le seul citoyen à avoir
[1:08:02] adressé la situation. Ces
[1:08:04] préoccupations. Là
[1:08:05] - Merci beaucoup.
[1:08:12] >> Maria --? Did I get that
[1:08:16] right, Maria? Okay.
[1:08:21] >> I am here -- good evening. I
[1:08:23] am here to ask a question
[1:08:28] regarding in the flooding
[1:08:29] incident of last weekend which
[1:08:32] took place on long meadow. Okay?
[1:08:36] But I would first of all like to
[1:08:40] thank publicly the fire
[1:08:45] department, public security,
[1:08:47] including the group of
[1:08:49] volunteers, I think they are
[1:08:51] from rescue something rather.
[1:08:52] >> Volunteer rescue, absolutely.
[1:08:54] >> They were fantastic. They
[1:08:56] held us up for those crazy 48
[1:08:58] hours and believe me it was
[1:09:00] crazy. When our sub pump it was
[1:09:03] flooded, inundated, by the ditch
[1:09:06] that separates the western side
[1:09:08] of long meadow from the golf
[1:09:10] course. We were at 102 long
[1:09:14] meadow. We were one of four
[1:09:16] houses at least that were
[1:09:18] affected. Thankfully with all
[1:09:20] these people that were involved
[1:09:22] we were able to contain the
[1:09:24] flooding within our house to the
[1:09:27] supplement it. Right? We could
[1:09:31] not -- our yard was minimally
[1:09:33] flooded, although our neighbours
[1:09:35] down the road had quite the
[1:09:38] adventure in their basement. It
[1:09:39] was flooded. I also appreciate
[1:09:44] the rapid response from my city
[1:09:46] council person and from the city
[1:09:51] manager delineating the measures
[1:09:54] that were taken including
[1:09:58] addressing the debris left in
[1:10:00] the ditch by Hydro Québec when
[1:10:03] they trimmed the trees. It
[1:10:05] blocks the flow of water. Also,
[1:10:08] the golf course which apparently
[1:10:10] at this time assumes
[1:10:13] responsibility for leaving a
[1:10:14] flap open. You know, we are
[1:10:18] dealing with our insurance. They
[1:10:21] told us, go ahead, deal with
[1:10:23] your insurance. We will take
[1:10:24] that responsibility. It does not
[1:10:27] reassure us though that this
[1:10:30] won't happen again. This is the
[1:10:32] second event. I have been at
[1:10:35] that house with my husband,
[1:10:36] Jonathan McLelland, for 23
[1:10:38] years. I think we have done all
[1:10:40] we could. We are on a high water
[1:10:44] table, we know that. We have
[1:10:45] three some pumps. We have flood
[1:10:47] sensors. We have a Generac
[1:10:50] because the power goes off in
[1:10:51] that area very often. We are
[1:10:54] covered. I cannot build a wall
[1:10:58] protecting my property from that
[1:11:00] ditch. Right? No, I am assuming,
[1:11:06] we have asked over the years, at
[1:11:08] least 23 years we have been
[1:11:09] there, we have asked for permits
[1:11:10] from the City at least four
[1:11:12] times if not five, and every
[1:11:15] time front stairs, driveway,
[1:11:17] propane tank, generator, it
[1:11:18] centre. The city sends
[1:11:21] representatives to see if we are
[1:11:23] being negligent. Are we
[1:11:25] respecting what we said our
[1:11:27] permit was about? After the job
[1:11:30] is done, to check that, you
[1:11:33] know, you need to cover your
[1:11:34] propane tank more, et cetera.
[1:11:36] That is an example. My question
[1:11:40] is, I'm assuming the City
[1:11:43] authorized the permits that were
[1:11:45] given to the Beaconsfield golf
[1:11:48] course to assume all of that
[1:11:50] drainage work that they have
[1:11:51] been doing since last summer. Is
[1:11:55] the city -- can the city
[1:11:58] reassure me that the same
[1:11:59] mechanism that is used for the
[1:12:00] private citizen, to follow up on
[1:12:05] the permits that we have been
[1:12:06] authorized, is the same
[1:12:07] mechanism in place to ensure
[1:12:10] that the work is being done?
[1:12:13] >> It's an excellent question.
[1:12:14] We have a similar struggle on
[1:12:18] Austin. It is flooded regularly
[1:12:19] in a similar manner. Do we have
[1:12:22] a guarantee of control over the
[1:12:24] golf course so that we can have
[1:12:27] repeated events of this kind of
[1:12:29] thing?
[1:12:30] >> Unfortunately, this is a
[1:12:33] tribunal matter between the golf
[1:12:34] course. But, yes, the golf
[1:12:36] course has permits and stuff
[1:12:37] like that, then we have the same
[1:12:38] process that we have for regular
[1:12:40] citizens.
[1:12:41] >> Are you checking that process
[1:12:43] because obviously this is the
[1:12:44] second time that that ditch
[1:12:48] apparently, and it has never
[1:12:49] happened before they began the
[1:12:51] drainage work, but this is
[1:12:52] happened. So this is a new
[1:12:54] event, a new type of situation,
[1:12:59] and I would like the City to
[1:13:00] assure me that -- there is
[1:13:06] nothing else I can add. If even
[1:13:11] my sump pump is organized
[1:13:13] properly, and it is, it will not
[1:13:15] prevent my yard from flooding.
[1:13:18] Do I need to put sandbags
[1:13:19] against my patio door? You know
[1:13:22] those homes are split level.
[1:13:24] There is a street level. The
[1:13:28] water will come right in through
[1:13:29] that patio door and the basement
[1:13:31] windows on the side. There is
[1:13:34] nothing else. There's nothing
[1:13:36] else we as private citizens can
[1:13:37] do. That is what I would like
[1:13:38] some reassurance from the city
[1:13:40] that you are following up that
[1:13:41] work.
[1:13:42] >> Well, I know someone in the
[1:13:44] room who barricades their house
[1:13:45] every year. It does untold --
[1:13:49] yeah. Yeah. And I have been to
[1:13:51] visit Stephanie's house. It is
[1:13:53] an issue. We've got to do
[1:13:55] something. I agree. I think,
[1:13:58] from what my DG, Madame Verdun
[1:14:01] is saying, it's that there's
[1:14:03] litigation going on right now.
[1:14:04] So we cannot speak on it
[1:14:06] specifically on our part.
[1:14:07] >> Okay.
[1:14:08] >> Is there litigation?
[1:14:09] >> No. It's because these two
[1:14:12] private citizens, the golf
[1:14:13] course and the citizens, so it's
[1:14:15] not something that the City will
[1:14:17] interfere between two citizens.
[1:14:19] But if we had some work that the
[1:14:23] golf course has to do, the City
[1:14:26] will for sure follow-up with
[1:14:28] them.
[1:14:29] >> I'm asking you to do that
[1:14:30] because I cannot go there. The
[1:14:33] person from the golf course was
[1:14:35] very friendly. They say climate
[1:14:37] with your insurance. I will do
[1:14:39] that, but I cannot go there and
[1:14:41] supervise that they are
[1:14:44] respecting the permit that they
[1:14:46] requested. You know? The City
[1:14:49] has a responsibility, I believe,
[1:14:53] as I have a responsibility as a
[1:14:55] private citizen when I ask for a
[1:14:57] permit to make sure that I
[1:14:58] follow what the permit is that I
[1:15:01] requested.
[1:15:02] >> If they are requesting a
[1:15:04] permit for work, we will follow
[1:15:06] the permit.
[1:15:07] >> Are you saying that you are
[1:15:08] not sure if they have?
[1:15:10] >> Right now, I don't know. I
[1:15:14] don't know the permits in place
[1:15:15] for all citizens in
[1:15:16] Pointe-Claire. I'm not sure --
[1:15:19] >> Because it's a humongous job
[1:15:21] that they've been doing since
[1:15:23] last summer. Anyone who lives in
[1:15:25] the area knows that it's a
[1:15:29] tremendous amount of work. And I
[1:15:31] would assume that they would
[1:15:33] need to request something from
[1:15:35] this city which may have an
[1:15:37] environmental impact. So I'm not
[1:15:43] clear on what you are saying.
[1:15:47] >> I don't know all the permits
[1:15:49] that people are requesting right
[1:15:51] now. This is a private matter. I
[1:15:52] think it would be better for you
[1:15:53] to contact me tomorrow and we
[1:15:54] will look at it.
[1:15:57] >> So that's it? To contact you
[1:16:00] directly?
[1:16:01] >> Exactly. Because I do not
[1:16:03] have all the
[1:16:05] [Inaudible]
[1:16:06] With me.
[1:16:07] >> We can certainly look into it
[1:16:08] by all means, since it. What are
[1:16:09] the environmental standards have
[1:16:10] been respected and if they are
[1:16:13] breaching city law. We can look
[1:16:15] into that for sure. Absolutely.
[1:16:16] >> Okay. Thank you.
[1:16:17] >> We have a similar situation
[1:16:20] on Austin every summer. Okay.
[1:16:21] >> Thank you.
[1:16:23] >> Jonathan McLelland?
[1:16:31] >> Hi. I will be quick. My wife
[1:16:33] just spoke and she mentioned
[1:16:34] what I wanted to say. It appears
[1:16:37] I am living in a flood zone. It
[1:16:39] has been two floods in six
[1:16:41] months. I just wanted to say how
[1:16:43] much we appreciate Pointe-Claire
[1:16:47] rescue and all of their efforts.
[1:16:49] They brought us eight pump. My
[1:16:53] question is around -- I
[1:16:54] understand they are volunteers
[1:16:56] through the fire department. I
[1:16:58] want to know what is the city
[1:17:01] doing to properly reconvince
[1:17:04] these people?
[1:17:05] [Laughter]
[1:17:07] >> I guess they are not paid,
[1:17:09] but I thought just off the top
[1:17:10] of my head they could get a
[1:17:12] break on taxes?
[1:17:13] >> They get great toys, the best
[1:17:15] ways they can put their hands
[1:17:16] on.
[1:17:17] [Laughter]
[1:17:18] >> But seriously, to depend on
[1:17:19] volunteers. This is a crisis
[1:17:20] situation we had for 72 hours.
[1:17:21] Without them my house would be
[1:17:23] flooded. At least four other
[1:17:24] houses on Longmeadow. It's a lot
[1:17:27] of money.
[1:17:28] >> Yep.
[1:17:30] >> It's costing. That is my
[1:17:33] question.
[1:17:34] >> It's a great question.
[1:17:35] >> Could the city do more?
[1:17:38] >> Well, that's a good question.
[1:17:40] These are excellent questions.
[1:17:42] My first term, my first time in,
[1:17:44] I went and watched the flooding
[1:17:46] on Austin. Phone to rescue must
[1:17:48] have been there for four or five
[1:17:50] days with pumps going nonstop.
[1:17:52] They saved six or seven houses.
[1:17:54] >> You call them and the answer.
[1:17:55] >> They are unbelievable. They
[1:17:57] are our guardian angels. They
[1:17:59] are absolutely our guardian
[1:18:00] angels. I want to speak to -- I
[1:18:03] mean, Mr. Tanguay can speak to
[1:18:04] this more specifically, but it's
[1:18:06] public security that I think --
[1:18:08] that looks after. Volunteer
[1:18:10] security is -- not the fire
[1:18:13] department.
[1:18:14] >> Not the fire department?
[1:18:15] >> No, Pointe-Claire Public
[1:18:16] Security. We value them
[1:18:18] immensely. We do give them the
[1:18:20] best equipment we can possibly
[1:18:21] give them whenever we can
[1:18:23] because they are a gift from
[1:18:24] heaven. So we do try our best to
[1:18:25] keep them happy. I don't know, I
[1:18:27] think they are volunteer rescue.
[1:18:29] Is there remuneration in any
[1:18:31] way, shape or form? I don't
[1:18:32] think. So
[1:18:33] >> It's all voluntary.
[1:18:34] >> They are all volunteers. Our
[1:18:37] job, which I think we do fairly
[1:18:38] well, is to try and give them
[1:18:39] the right equipment to do what
[1:18:40] they have to do.
[1:18:41] >> Okay. If I was part of
[1:18:43] Council I would suggest that in
[1:18:45] the budget, that there's at
[1:18:46] least a Christmas bonus or
[1:18:48] something because they deserve
[1:18:49] it.
[1:18:50] [Laughter]
[1:18:51] Thank you.
[1:18:52] >> There is a Christmas party.
[1:18:53] >> There is a Christmas party!
[1:18:56] We value them immensely.
[1:18:58] >> You guys get drunk and they
[1:19:00] watch.
[1:19:01] >> No, no.
[1:19:02] [Laughter]
[1:19:03] All right, --.
[1:19:11] >> First, I just wanted to
[1:19:14] mention something just off the
[1:19:18] cuff about your remarks about
[1:19:20] Brent Cowan. My understanding, I
[1:19:22] could be confused, but my
[1:19:24] understanding is that the Agglo
[1:19:26] and the CMM are two separate
[1:19:28] political organizations. So, it
[1:19:33] could be that the mayor has a
[1:19:35] seat on a committee on one and
[1:19:37] the CMM, the other, has a freeze
[1:19:39] on the Fairview forest. But they
[1:19:41] are two separate political
[1:19:43] bodies.
[1:19:44] >> The Agglo -- the CMF and put
[1:19:46] a freeze at the Agglo put a
[1:19:48] freeze and we put a freeze.
[1:19:49] There are three. Yes, they are
[1:19:52] separate, but they are all
[1:19:53] related. The mayor of Montréal
[1:19:54] sort of has a vice grip on both
[1:19:56] the CMM and the Agglo.
[1:19:59] >> Yeah. But essentially what
[1:20:02] happens first in terms of the
[1:20:05] payment of the CMM, then it has
[1:20:08] consequences. Hydro studies, for
[1:20:10] example, by the agglomeration
[1:20:11] and someone. So there is that
[1:20:12] kind of collaboration, but they
[1:20:14] are separate organizations. And
[1:20:16] in with, just off the top --
[1:20:17] >> Also, just to state, unless I
[1:20:20] have been misinformed, I believe
[1:20:21] there are two. It is CMM and the
[1:20:25] City of Pointe-Claire that have
[1:20:26] freezes on. I am unaware of an
[1:20:28] egg will freeze.
[1:20:29] >> First I've heard of it also.
[1:20:30] I would love to learn more. It's
[1:20:32] interesting.
[1:20:34] >> Anyhow. You have a question?
[1:20:37] >> Yes. The other thing I want
[1:20:38] to say is, again off the cuff,
[1:20:42] but it is so exhausting to
[1:20:44] listen to you guys played. It is
[1:20:47] so tiring. You know, I'm even
[1:20:51] getting emotional about it
[1:20:52] because it has been years now
[1:20:53] that we are trying to do
[1:20:55] something for Fairview forest.
[1:20:58] And I'm afraid it's going to
[1:20:59] fall victim not to a real valid
[1:21:04] reason why it can be saved, but
[1:21:06] because of some political
[1:21:07] football. It's going to suffer
[1:21:11] the same way the windmill does
[1:21:13] or anything else you guys are
[1:21:14] going to fight about. And you've
[1:21:16] got to find some way, even
[1:21:17] though there's not a lot of time
[1:21:19] left in your term, and you are
[1:21:20] already getting into electoral
[1:21:22] politics, but you've got to find
[1:21:23] some way -- you don't have to
[1:21:25] like each other, but you have to
[1:21:27] work together. It's like
[1:21:29] Pointe-Claire is a microcosm of
[1:21:30] what is happening in politics
[1:21:32] everywhere. And the citizens are
[1:21:34] the victims here. Things like
[1:21:36] Fairview forest are the victims.
[1:21:40] It's exhausting. It really is. I
[1:21:42] say that on the bottom of my
[1:21:43] heart. Okay. I wanted to give
[1:21:48] City Council a heads up on
[1:21:50] recent awards. The mayor stole
[1:21:53] my under. Two recent awards
[1:21:56] given to two members of safe
[1:21:58] Fairview forest. The
[1:22:00] organization, for those who
[1:22:01] don't know, save Fairview forest
[1:22:03] is a nonprofit community
[1:22:05] organization. It's 100% totally
[1:22:07] run by unpaid volunteers. There
[1:22:10] are people who worked tirelessly
[1:22:12] and selflessly and with a lot of
[1:22:15] dedication to saving
[1:22:16] Pointe-Claire's last substantial
[1:22:19] unprotected forest. So, two
[1:22:22] members of safety forest
[1:22:24] Organization were recently made
[1:22:26] recipients of the king Charles
[1:22:27] third coronation metal. This
[1:22:31] medal is awarded to Canadians
[1:22:32] who have made a significant
[1:22:34] contribution to any particular
[1:22:36] province, territory or region,
[1:22:37] or community of Canada. So the
[1:22:40] first one is already spoken
[1:22:42] today. Someone who I'm so proud
[1:22:44] to know personally, she let
[1:22:46] Larsen. She is a king Charles
[1:22:47] medalists and a member of safe
[1:22:49] Fairview forest. She is a
[1:22:50] dedicated active member of the
[1:22:51] forest and I see here most
[1:22:54] Saturdays, even in the most
[1:22:55] blowing and freezing of weather
[1:22:57] conditions, standing vigilant
[1:23:00] for Fairview forest and our
[1:23:02] weekly demonstrations. I also
[1:23:03] know her very fondly as raging a
[1:23:05] granny. She is a member of
[1:23:08] countless boards here in
[1:23:09] Pointe-Claire and community
[1:23:11] groups. She also sits on the
[1:23:12] City of Pointe-Claire's
[1:23:14] environment and sustainable
[1:23:15] development advisory committee.
[1:23:17] The second one, Jan Lucia, is
[1:23:21] also a member and president of
[1:23:23] safe Fairview forest. She is now
[1:23:25] also a king Charles medalists.
[1:23:27] And Francis Scarpaleggia who
[1:23:30] awarded her the medal described
[1:23:31] her as follows. Jen is one of
[1:23:34] the most civic minded and
[1:23:36] engaged citizens I know. She is
[1:23:38] deeply committed to her
[1:23:39] Pointe-Claire community and its
[1:23:41] quality of life, as well as to
[1:23:43] the broader issues of local and
[1:23:45] global environmental protection.
[1:23:48] Among the many recognized
[1:23:50] commitments, Jen received the
[1:23:51] king Charles award for was her
[1:23:53] work advocating for Fairview
[1:23:56] forest and also her work for
[1:23:57] bread basket and the
[1:23:58] Pointe-Claire environment and
[1:24:00] sustainable development
[1:24:01] committee. So I think they are
[1:24:04] well deserved and I can
[1:24:05] personally attest to their
[1:24:07] incredible contributions they
[1:24:08] make to Pointe-Claire. So I just
[1:24:10] had to get that in. Sorry. So my
[1:24:13] question, at a recent city
[1:24:14] council meeting and a resolution
[1:24:15] was passed, and I know you guys
[1:24:17] may had lots of problems is
[1:24:19] before you got a final
[1:24:21] resolution, asking the city
[1:24:22] administration to furnish
[1:24:24] Councillors with more
[1:24:25] information of the various
[1:24:27] aspects of the law and the
[1:24:29] conditions needed and the
[1:24:33] consideration and requiring --
[1:24:35] acquiring Fairview forest. One
[1:24:36] of the steps taken in that
[1:24:37] regard is a call for tenders to
[1:24:38] have an eco systemic study done
[1:24:40] on Fairview forest. So I would
[1:24:45] like to know if the contract has
[1:24:48] been awarded to be company it.
[1:24:53] Secondly, part of the same
[1:24:54] question, can we please receive
[1:24:55] the parameters asked to be
[1:24:58] studied in the contract? So,
[1:24:59] what exactly are they going to
[1:25:02] be studying? In eco systematic
[1:25:04] study is a very broad term and
[1:25:05] it can mean so many different
[1:25:07] things. Second question, has the
[1:25:09] city taken notice of and applied
[1:25:12] to or considered receiving
[1:25:15] funding under the new Canada
[1:25:17] Québec agreement to protect and
[1:25:19] conserve nature, with up to 100
[1:25:22] million dollars of new money?
[1:25:26] >> That is in your wheelhouse,
[1:25:28] Jill. You want to take a stab at
[1:25:30] that one? Particularly the first
[1:25:36] part of the question.
[1:25:38] >> With respect to the eco
[1:25:40] systemic study. Essentially, the
[1:25:43] contract has not been awarded
[1:25:44] yep. Stay tuned basically. With
[1:25:50] respect to the content of the
[1:25:52] study itself, the study looks
[1:25:54] at, and I will paraphrase a bit,
[1:25:57] it looks at how the environment
[1:25:59] essentially the natural
[1:26:01] Infrastructure Services our
[1:26:03] natural environment. In essence,
[1:26:07] it looks at the sequestration of
[1:26:13] carbon. It looks at how our
[1:26:14] green spaces essentially
[1:26:17] contribute to the rain water
[1:26:21] management, so on and so forth.
[1:26:23] It looks at various criteria
[1:26:24] that are looked at. It's for the
[1:26:26] entire territory of the City of
[1:26:27] Pointe-Claire but the studies
[1:26:28] being done.
[1:26:30] >> All right. Are those
[1:26:32] parameters available for the
[1:26:34] public?
[1:26:40] >> Through the access to
[1:26:43] information, it will be -- no?
[1:26:45] [Inaudible]
[1:26:50] >> Once the contract is awarded,
[1:26:51] it will be accessible. --
[1:26:54] >> If I may just comment as
[1:26:56] well? The tender process has
[1:26:58] finished, but now it has to go
[1:26:59] in front of the selection
[1:27:00] committee to actually finalized
[1:27:02] this election along with the
[1:27:04] parameters as I understand it.
[1:27:06] >> Okay. Thank you.
[1:27:08] >> Thank you. Stephanie Myers?
[1:27:12] You are done? Keep it rolling?
[1:27:14] Okay. Was it about the golf
[1:27:15] course? Okay. I visited Miss
[1:27:19] Myers's house and every year she
[1:27:21] has to protect her home from
[1:27:23] flooding. She works at it
[1:27:25] nonstop, nonstop. Okay.
[1:27:32] On est cinq points deux, je
[1:27:34] pense?
[1:27:35] - Cinq points, un déposé le
[1:27:37] rapport concernant le registre
[1:27:39] été tenu du 17 au 21 février
[1:27:40] 2025, relativement au Règlement
[1:27:41] PC-2988. Qui était un règlement
[1:27:45] d'emprunt pour la flotte de
[1:27:47] 500000 dollars,, et aucune
[1:27:51] signature n'a été recueilli.
[1:27:55] >> 5.2, Notice of motion and
[1:27:56] filing of a draft by-law
[1:27:57] amending Zoning By-law PC-2775
[1:27:58] to clarify the application of
[1:27:59] certain rules concerning the use
[1:28:02] of specific lands located in
[1:28:04] zones N2 and Cb9 when the
[1:28:05] boundaries of such lands have
[1:28:07] been modified by the
[1:28:08] implementation and operation of
[1:28:10] the Réseau Express Métropolitain
[1:28:12] (R.E.M)
[1:28:13] .. As part of the construction
[1:28:15] operation of the of the Réseau
[1:28:19] Express Métropolitain
[1:28:20] (R.E.M)
[1:28:21] ., The boundaries of certain
[1:28:22] zones in N2 and Cb9 were
[1:28:23] affected by an exploration
[1:28:25] procedure. This affected certain
[1:28:26] buildings and imposed additional
[1:28:28] constraints on the occupation
[1:28:29] and sitting up the buildings,
[1:28:31] the structures and construction
[1:28:32] on set lots, and land affected
[1:28:34] by the expropriation. The draft
[1:28:36] bylaw aims to modulate the rules
[1:28:38] governing the occupation land
[1:28:39] and the sitting of the buildings
[1:28:41] when 18th of servitude has been
[1:28:42] assigned between the parties and
[1:28:43] the City of Pointe-Claire as an
[1:28:46] intervenor, and when this deed
[1:28:47] has been published in the Québec
[1:28:48] land registry. The bylaw
[1:28:50] contains no provision subject to
[1:28:51] the approval by way of a
[1:28:52] referendum.
[1:28:54] - 5.3. Avis de motion et dépôt
[1:28:56] d'un projet de règlement
[1:28:57] modifiant le Règlement PC-2787
[1:28:58] sur les plans d'implantation et
[1:28:59] d'intégration architecturale on
[1:29:00] dans le but de supprimer
[1:29:04] certaines dispositions en
[1:29:05] matière de démolition à la suite
[1:29:06] de l'adoption du nouveau
[1:29:07] règlement sur la démolition des
[1:29:08] immeubles, et de revoir la
[1:29:09] terminologie associée à
[1:29:10] l'intérêt patrimonial ainsi
[1:29:12] qu'au caractère spécifique de
[1:29:13] Pointe-Claire. Dans une
[1:29:14] perspective d'efficacité, de
[1:29:16] cohérence réglementaire, la
[1:29:17] modification proposée vise à
[1:29:19] retirer du règlement PC-2787
[1:29:21] toutes les références à la
[1:29:23] démolition d'immeubles, puisque
[1:29:24] ces dernières seront dorénavant
[1:29:27] régis par le Règlement PC-2787.
[1:29:30] On agite les définitions
[1:29:32] immeuble patrimonial et
[1:29:34] bâtiments quant aux
[1:29:36] caractérisation spécifiques de
[1:29:37] Pointe-Claire. On
[1:29:38] (---)
[1:29:39] écrit dans les fiches de
[1:29:41] caractérisation réalisé par le
[1:29:42] groupe patriarche. Ces dernières
[1:29:43] sont regroupées dans
[1:29:44] l'inventaire patrimoniale étude
[1:29:46] patrimoniale bâti de
[1:29:47] l'arrondissement de
[1:29:48] Pointe-Claire, publié en 2005.
[1:29:50] Lequel contient plus de 160
[1:29:51] fiches des cultive concernant
[1:29:52] des bâtiments patrimoniaux, les
[1:29:55] bâtiments reconnus pour leurs
[1:29:56] intérêts au niveau architectural
[1:29:58] et paysager contribue aussi à ce
[1:30:00] caractère.
[1:30:03] - Pour cinq points de cinq
[1:30:04] points trois, un Who gives these
[1:30:05] notices of motion? Do I have a
[1:30:07] mover? Who gives them, yes.
[1:30:09] >> Brent Cowan, district eight.
[1:30:12] >> Thank you. 5.4, Adoption of a
[1:30:16] first draft by-law amending
[1:30:17] Zoning By-law PC-2775 to clarify
[1:30:20] the application of certain rules
[1:30:21] concerning the use of specific
[1:30:22] lands located in zones N2 and
[1:30:25] Cb9 when the boundaries of such
[1:30:26] lands have been modified by the
[1:30:29] implementation and operation of
[1:30:30] the Réseau Express
[1:30:31] Métropolitain.
[1:30:35] >> 45.4, do I have a mover?
[1:30:37] >> Brent Cowan, district number
[1:30:39] eight.
[1:30:40] >> Seconder?
[1:30:41] >> Eric Stork, district seven.
[1:30:43] >> All in favour?
[1:30:44] >> Thank you.
[1:30:48] - 5.5. Adoption d'un premier
[1:30:49] projet de règlement modifiant le
[1:30:50] Règlement PC-2787 sur les plans
[1:30:51] d'implantation et d'intégration
[1:30:52] architecturale dans le but de
[1:30:53] supprimer certaines dispositions
[1:30:54] en matière de démolition à la
[1:30:55] suite de l'adoption du nouveau
[1:30:56] règlement sur la démolition des
[1:30:57] immeubles, et de revoir la
[1:30:59] terminologie associée à
[1:31:00] l'intérêt patrimonial ainsi
[1:31:01] qu'au caractère spécifique de
[1:31:02] Pointe-Claire. 5.6, Adoption
[1:31:07] with modifications,, of a second
[1:31:12] draft by-law amending Zoning
[1:31:13] By-law PC-2775 to clarify
[1:31:14] definitions related to terrace
[1:31:15] and garden structures, and to
[1:31:16] frame the development and
[1:31:21] operation of commercial terraces
[1:31:22] and microterraces. The second
[1:31:25] draft bylaw differs from the
[1:31:26] first draft adopted on January
[1:31:27] 14th 2025. The main change is
[1:31:30] concerned the following. The
[1:31:31] addition of a definition to
[1:31:33] clarify the concept of that
[1:31:35] music. Some definitions have
[1:31:36] been reviewed and corrected to
[1:31:37] simplify them or facilitate
[1:31:38] their understanding. Setback
[1:31:41] distances have been added to
[1:31:42] protect the tranquillity of
[1:31:43] areas where the predominant
[1:31:45] permitted uses residential.
[1:31:47] Clarifications have been added
[1:31:48] to facilitate coexistence
[1:31:51] between two adjacent
[1:31:53] establishments. Heating
[1:31:54] appliances powered by
[1:31:55] electricity have been added to
[1:31:56] the list of authorized
[1:31:57] equipments. Clarifications
[1:31:58] regarding universal
[1:31:59] accessibility have been
[1:32:00] introduced. Regulation of
[1:32:02] musical and cultural
[1:32:03] performances, with or without
[1:32:04] sound application. A calculation
[1:32:07] method for determining the
[1:32:08] minimum and maximum area of a
[1:32:09] commercial terrasse has been
[1:32:11] added. Clarifications to specify
[1:32:13] that a terrasse can be divided
[1:32:14] into several zones have been
[1:32:16] added. The operating hours of
[1:32:19] tourists is
[1:32:20] (applause)
[1:32:21] The operating hours of interest
[1:32:22] have been reviewed and certain
[1:32:23] provisions are subject to the
[1:32:25] referendum approval process. A
[1:32:26] notice will be published on the
[1:32:27] City's website identifying the
[1:32:28] zones concerned on the way in
[1:32:29] which qualified voters may apply
[1:32:31] to have a register opened, as
[1:32:32] well as the number of signatures
[1:32:34] required for a referendum to be
[1:32:35] held.
[1:32:38] - 5.7. Adoption avec
[1:32:39] modifications d'un règlement
[1:32:40] modifiant le Règlement de
[1:32:41] construction PC-2786 concernant
[1:32:42] le calcul de la capacité
[1:32:44] d'accueil de même que les règles
[1:32:46] relatives à l'aménagement d'une
[1:32:47] structure au-dessus d'une
[1:32:48] terrasse commerciale. Le
[1:32:50] règlement est différent du
[1:32:51] projet de règlement adoptée le
[1:32:52] 14 janvier dernier, puisqu'un
[1:32:54] nouveau chapitre est situé
[1:32:56] exigences relatives à
[1:32:57] l'adaptation de bâtiments pour
[1:32:58] parcours sans obstacles a été
[1:33:00] ajouté au Règlement de
[1:33:03] construction PC-2786. Cette
[1:33:04] modification vise à répondre à
[1:33:05] une demande reçue concernant à
[1:33:07] l'accessibilité des terrasses
[1:33:08] qu'ils établissement est
[1:33:10] associé. Les autres
[1:33:11] modifications effectuées ne
[1:33:12] change pas en substance les
[1:33:13] dispositions réglementaires.
[1:33:14] Elle concerne l'ajout de
[1:33:16] précision de clarification dans
[1:33:17] le but de faciliter
[1:33:18] l'application réglementaire du
[1:33:20] Règlement.
[1:33:22] >> 5.8, Adoption with
[1:33:23] modifications of a by-law
[1:33:24] amending Site Planning and
[1:33:26] Architectural Integration
[1:33:27] Programme By-law PC-2787 in
[1:33:29] order to regulate commercial
[1:33:30] terraces. The bylaw is slightly
[1:33:33] different from the one adopted
[1:33:34] on January 14th. However, the
[1:33:36] essence of the draft bylaw
[1:33:37] presented on January 20th
[1:33:38] remains unchanged. The main
[1:33:40] changes consist in simplifying
[1:33:42] certain provisions, eliminating
[1:33:44] redundancies, and adding
[1:33:46] clarification to facilitate the
[1:33:47] implementation of the bylaw.
[1:33:50] 5.9. Adoption avec un
[1:33:51] modifications d'un règlement
[1:33:52] modifiant le Règlement des
[1:33:53] permis et certificats PC-2788
[1:33:54] afin de préciser les
[1:33:55] informations requises au dépôt
[1:33:56] d'une demande de certificat
[1:33:57] d'autorisation concernant une
[1:33:58] terrasse commerciale de même que
[1:33:59] la durée de validité dudit
[1:34:00] certificat d'autorisation.
[1:34:03] L'essence est la portée du
[1:34:04] règlement n'ont pas changé
[1:34:05] depuis l'adoption de celui-ci le
[1:34:06] 14 janvier 2025. Quelques
[1:34:09] ajustements mineurs ont été
[1:34:10] effectués dans le but de
[1:34:12] clarifier ou de préciser
[1:34:13] certaines exigences quant au
[1:34:14] contenu de certains documents.,
[1:34:18] 5.10, Adoption with
[1:34:20] modifications of a by-law
[1:34:21] amending Village Code PC-2880 in
[1:34:22] order to specify that commercial
[1:34:23] terraces or commercial
[1:34:24] micro-terraces are not governed
[1:34:25] by the Village Code. A
[1:34:29] clarification has been added to
[1:34:30] the content of the draft bylaw
[1:34:32] adopted on January 14th, to
[1:34:34] specify that modification
[1:34:35] applies to both commercial
[1:34:37] dresses and commercial micro
[1:34:38] terraces.
[1:34:42] - Pour 05. Do I have a mover.
[1:34:45] 05 à 05. 10 >> Seconder?
[1:34:50] >> Kelly Thorstad-Cullen,
[1:34:51] district three.
[1:34:52] >> Before voting, I will take a
[1:34:53] moment to explain why I will be
[1:34:54] voting against this bylaw. It's
[1:34:57] based on the prohibited --
[1:34:59] >> Excuse me. Just before you
[1:35:01] add something. Can you specify
[1:35:03] two which will be voting
[1:35:04] against? Is it the block?
[1:35:05] >> The bylaw. The block.
[1:35:08] >> The whole one?
[1:35:09] >> 5.5 to 5.10?
[1:35:12] >> Yes.
[1:35:13] >> Perfect.
[1:35:14] >> I will be voting against the
[1:35:15] bylaw based on the prohibitive
[1:35:16] activities on commercial
[1:35:17] terrasse is at section 5.26 Jay.
[1:35:20] This section is much too
[1:35:22] restrictive for my liking.
[1:35:24] First, there is what I would
[1:35:25] call excessive or over the top
[1:35:28] ban on activities such as
[1:35:31] dancing, theatrical for cinema
[1:35:32] to aggravate -- theatrical or
[1:35:36] cinematic craft fake
[1:35:37] performances as well as concerts
[1:35:38] and shows using loudspeakers or
[1:35:39] any other sound amplification
[1:35:42] devices, which I find is
[1:35:44] definitely excessive. This goes
[1:35:46] too far it takes us into
[1:35:47] footloose territory. It would be
[1:35:48] much more reasonable to allow
[1:35:50] the 60s and address any concerns
[1:35:52] about noise and nuisance but
[1:35:54] including specific limits based
[1:35:56] on decibels level workplace and
[1:35:58] proximity to residential homes.
[1:36:01] The bylaw already includes very
[1:36:03] strict limits to the hours in
[1:36:04] which music can be performed,
[1:36:06] and a cap on the number of
[1:36:08] participants on the terrasse
[1:36:09] which, in my view, is perhaps
[1:36:11] too low for summer crowds. We
[1:36:14] saw that especially at studio
[1:36:16] 77. Second, the bylaw allows for
[1:36:18] events with sound amplification,
[1:36:20] not dancing, to be authorized by
[1:36:22] the City on a case by case basis
[1:36:24] the special events. Again, I
[1:36:27] object to the principle that we
[1:36:28] should start by banning
[1:36:29] everything and then allow
[1:36:30] exceptions on a discretionary
[1:36:31] basis with no clear criteria. In
[1:36:34] a way that will force business
[1:36:35] owners to wade through red tape
[1:36:38] while being open to favouritism,
[1:36:40] possibly, and arbitrary
[1:36:41] decision-making. The rules
[1:36:42] should be clear and provide the
[1:36:43] same opportunities to everyone
[1:36:46] who follows them. Finally, the
[1:36:49] bylaw limits the opportunity to
[1:36:50] get a permit to activities that
[1:36:51] have been previously authorized
[1:36:53] by special events. The work
[1:36:56] previously is important here. It
[1:36:57] can easily be interpreted to
[1:36:58] mean that only business --
[1:37:00] businesses and terrasse is that
[1:37:02] hosted activities prior to this
[1:37:03] bylaw being passed would be
[1:37:05] allowed to host them in the
[1:37:06] future. Studio 77 may be
[1:37:09] grandfathered in and other
[1:37:10] business is, but new business is
[1:37:11] trying to get outdoor shows in
[1:37:13] Pointe-Claire and coming here is
[1:37:14] maybe out of luck. This is
[1:37:16] arbitrary and I think unfair. In
[1:37:18] the last couple of decades,
[1:37:19] Pointe-Claire has gone a little
[1:37:21] too far in the direction of a
[1:37:22] war on fun, in my opinion. You
[1:37:25] increasingly need to have a
[1:37:27] permit of some kind to do
[1:37:29] anything, whether you are a
[1:37:30] homeowner hosting an event on
[1:37:31] your street or running a
[1:37:32] business. Pointe-Claire south
[1:37:33] was once a resort town for
[1:37:35] tourists and had great indoor
[1:37:36] live music venues like the
[1:37:38] maples, the Edgewater at the
[1:37:40] pioneer. The success of studio
[1:37:42] 77 shows that conference after
[1:37:43] the pioneer was knocked down, it
[1:37:45] shows us that the market is
[1:37:46] still there and may even
[1:37:47] increase overtime. Along with
[1:37:50] the war on fun, Pointe-Claire
[1:37:51] has also seen aggressive
[1:37:53] residential development at the
[1:37:54] expense of commercial spaces.
[1:37:57] Developers and city planners
[1:37:58] often promised mixed use
[1:37:59] developments, but the result
[1:38:00] tends to be all presidential. It
[1:38:02] is simply more profitable for
[1:38:04] developers to build
[1:38:05] residentially only, while a
[1:38:07] luxury home owners don't like to
[1:38:08] have the noises and smells of
[1:38:10] bars and restaurants or grocery
[1:38:11] stores beneath them. My belief
[1:38:14] is that, here we go, that it
[1:38:16] claustrophobic 15-minute city
[1:38:17] made up of 600 square foot
[1:38:19] condos has an even greater need
[1:38:21] for businesses that give
[1:38:23] residences places together,
[1:38:25] socialize, and be entertained.
[1:38:29] That is the reason I will be
[1:38:30] voting against it. So, from 5.5
[1:38:33] to 5.10. Yes?
[1:38:35] >> Before you vote in gets to,
[1:38:36] are we including 5.5 which is
[1:38:39] concerning --
[1:38:40] >> Architectural?
[1:38:41] >> You are okay with 5.5, but
[1:38:43] then you vote against 5.6 and
[1:38:44] onwards?
[1:38:45] >> Yes.
[1:38:46] - Merci, Madame. So, all in
[1:38:50] favour? Against?
[1:38:55] >> Thank you.
[1:38:56] >> Okay.
[1:39:02] - 6.1?
[1:39:04] - 6.1. Accorder un soutien
[1:39:05] financier pour un montant total
[1:39:06] de 600$ à la Villa St-Louis.
[1:39:09] C'est fait et d'accorder pour
[1:39:11] faciliter
[1:39:12] (---)
[1:39:13] .
[1:39:14] >> 6.2, Grant financial support
[1:39:15] for a total amount of $ 1,600 to
[1:39:16] Les Amis du Vieux-Moulin. Les
[1:39:18] Amis du Vieux-Moulin. Requesting
[1:39:19] a donation for the City of
[1:39:21] Pointe-Claire to fund an
[1:39:22] activity for their golden age
[1:39:23] Club. 6.3. Deux Accorder un
[1:39:25] soutien financier pour un
[1:39:26] montant total de 35000$ à la
[1:39:27] Fondation Hôpital Général
[1:39:28] Lakeshore. Ce don de la Ville de
[1:39:30] Pointe-Claire pour mettre à
[1:39:34] l'information Fondation Hôpital
[1:39:35] Général Lakeshore. D'investir
[1:39:36] pour évaluer la qualité des
[1:39:37] soins de santé fournis et
[1:39:39] améliorer la qualité de vie de
[1:39:40] tous ceux qui franchissent leur
[1:39:41] porte. Le calcul est basé sur 1
[1:39:43] dollar tant qu'il est pour tous
[1:39:44] les résidents de Sinclair.
[1:39:46] >> 6.4, Authorize the lending of
[1:39:47] equipment for various events /
[1:39:48] fundraisers held on the
[1:39:49] territory of the city. The
[1:39:50] events concerned are Empty
[1:39:52] Bowls, which is a fund-raiser
[1:39:53] organized by bread basket. A
[1:39:56] softball tournament to benefit
[1:39:57] the lakeshore hospital organized
[1:39:58] by CP H. And poutine fist, we're
[1:40:00] gonna buy -- production.
[1:40:05] >> For 6.1 to 6.4, do I have a
[1:40:08] mover?
[1:40:09] >> Eric Stork, that including
[1:40:11] poutine fest.
[1:40:12] >> And a seconder?
[1:40:14] >> Cynthia Homan, district five.
[1:40:16] >> All in favour?
[1:40:19] - 7.1. Déposer le procès-verbal
[1:40:20] de la réunion du 27 novembre
[1:40:21] 2024 du Comité consultatif
[1:40:22] Stewart Hall.
[1:40:28] >> 7.2, File the minutes of the
[1:40:29] December 10, 2024, meeting of
[1:40:30] the Traffic Committee. 7.3.
[1:40:31] Déposer le procès-verbal de la
[1:40:32] réunion du 12 décembre 2024 du
[1:40:33] Comité d'art public. Ouais
[1:40:35] >> 7.4, File the minutes of the
[1:40:36] January 29, 2025, meeting of the
[1:40:37] Youth Advisory Board.
[1:40:47] >> 10.2, File the report
[1:40:49] concerning authorized
[1:40:50] reimbursements in connection
[1:40:51] with municipal
[1:40:52] councillors'research and support
[1:40:53] expenses, for fiscal year 2024.
[1:40:55] - 10.3. Déposer le rapport des
[1:40:56] dépenses des élus
[1:40:58] (frais de représentation,
[1:41:00] frais de congrès et colloques,
[1:41:01] frais de déplacement)
[1:41:02] pour l'année 2024.
[1:41:06] >> 10.4, Adopt a Policy on the
[1:41:07] establishment of immovable
[1:41:08] subcategories and division of
[1:41:09] the City's territory into
[1:41:10] sectors. Through this policy,
[1:41:11] the City of Pointe-Claire aims
[1:41:12] to pursue the following
[1:41:14] objectives
[1:41:15] | | |
[1:41:16] Based on mobile subcategories
[1:41:17] and the division of its
[1:41:18] territory into sectors. To adopt
[1:41:19] practices that optimize the
[1:41:20] city's efforts when preparing a
[1:41:21] new property assessment rule. To
[1:41:23] ensure that the process of
[1:41:25] developing a new assessment role
[1:41:27] proceeds with that delay and
[1:41:28] within the established
[1:41:29] deadlines, in accordance with
[1:41:30] the framework set out in the --
[1:41:32] municipal taxation. To guarantee
[1:41:34] the presence of a necessary data
[1:41:35] in the new property assessment
[1:41:37] role as well as been short its
[1:41:38] validity and integrity. To meet
[1:41:40] the city's objectives in terms
[1:41:41] of tax planning. Finally, to
[1:41:43] ensure that clear and precise
[1:41:44] information is available to the
[1:41:46] assessor one preparing a new
[1:41:47] property assessment --.
[1:41:49] - 10.5. Eux Autoriser
[1:41:50] l'utilisation des réserves aux
[1:41:51] livres pour effectuer le
[1:41:52] remboursement du refinancement
[1:41:53] de décembre 2025. Nous avons des
[1:41:55] règlements d'emprunts qui ont
[1:41:56] des soldats refinancer pour
[1:41:57] lesquels nous désirons payer
[1:41:59] comptant. Nous comptons donc
[1:42:00] utiliser nos réserves actuelles
[1:42:01] pour effectuer le rapport
[1:42:02] seulement du refinancement
[1:42:03] prévus à la tête suivante, soit
[1:42:05] le 17 décembre 2025. Pour un
[1:42:08] montant de 7 millions 718000
[1:42:11] dollars.
[1:42:13] >> 10.6, Authorize the
[1:42:14] participation of the City of
[1:42:15] Pointe-Claire in the purchasing
[1:42:16] consortium for the 2025-2026
[1:42:17] winter season, for the calls for
[1:42:18] tenders prepared by the City of
[1:42:19] Montreal for the supply and
[1:42:20] delivery of winter abrasives and
[1:42:22] deicing salt. In order to
[1:42:25] benefit from favourable
[1:42:26] financial conditions, the City
[1:42:27] of Pointe-Claire wishes to join
[1:42:29] the purchasing group for the
[1:42:30] City of Montréal to procure
[1:42:32] deicing salt required for its
[1:42:33] operations. The approximate
[1:42:34] annual quantity is around 6000
[1:42:37] tons, but it may vary up or down
[1:42:38] depending on climate change. In
[1:42:40] the event of a neat exceeding
[1:42:42] 6000 tons annually, for
[1:42:44] administrative efficiency
[1:42:45] purposes, the amount maybe
[1:42:46] increased if the necessary funds
[1:42:47] are available.
[1:42:49] Pour 10. >> 4
[1:42:52] Do I have a mover?
[1:42:54] >> Paul Bissonnette, district.
[1:42:55] To
[1:42:56] >> A seconder?
[1:42:57] >> Eric Stork, district seven.
[1:42:58] >> All in favour?
[1:43:00] >> Thank. You
[1:43:02] - 12.1. Déposer la liste des
[1:43:04] changements au personnel par
[1:43:05] décisions déléguées pour le mois
[1:43:06] de mars 2025.
[1:43:08] >> 12.2, Approve the list of
[1:43:09] non-delegated staff changes as
[1:43:10] of March 11, 2025.
[1:43:11] - 12.3. Approuver une elles
[1:43:12] modification à la politique sur
[1:43:13] les déplacements à la demande de
[1:43:14] l'employeur. Les montants sont
[1:43:15] réalisés à la hausse comme à la
[1:43:17] baisse. Le 1er mai de chaque
[1:43:18] année en fonction de l'indice
[1:43:19] moyen des prix à la
[1:43:21] consommation. Sous l'indice
[1:43:22] Transport privé province de
[1:43:23] Québec de l'année civile
[1:43:25] précédente. Au 1er mai 2025, les
[1:43:28] montants augmenteront d'un
[1:43:30] sous-.
[1:43:36] - Pour 12 points deux à 12
[1:43:37] points trois Do I have a mover?
[1:43:40] >> Kelly Thorstad-Cullen,
[1:43:42] district three.
[1:43:43] >> And a seconder?
[1:43:44] >> Cynthia Homan, district five.
[1:43:46] >> All in favour?
[1:43:47] >> Thank you. 14.1, Exercise the
[1:43:51] renewal option provided for in
[1:43:53] the contract entered into with
[1:43:54] Conception Paysage Inc., for the
[1:43:56] year 2025, in the amount of $
[1:43:57] 26,472.65, taxes included, for
[1:44:02] professional services for the
[1:44:03] monthly and annual inspection of
[1:44:05] the City's playgrounds.
[1:44:07] Inspection of the city's
[1:44:08] playgrounds is essential to
[1:44:09] ensure safe play areas for
[1:44:11] children. Every year, detailed
[1:44:12] monthly inspections of each
[1:44:13] piece of equipment art carried
[1:44:14] out by a professional service.
[1:44:17] - 14.2. Se prévaloir de l'option
[1:44:18] de renouvellement prévue au
[1:44:19] contrat intervenu avec 9042-0845
[1:44:20] Québec inc.
[1:44:21] (Mario C. et fils)
[1:44:22] , Pour l'année 2025, au montant
[1:44:23] de 93752,79$, taxes incluses,
[1:44:25] pour des travaux de plantation
[1:44:28] et d'entretien horticole
[1:44:29] incluant arrosage des boulevards
[1:44:30] Saint-Jean et des Sources, de
[1:44:31] l'avenue Holiday et Place de la
[1:44:32] Triade. Ce contrat sert à
[1:44:35] maintenir la pérennité des
[1:44:36] végétaux et à maintenir la
[1:44:37] pauvreté des aménagements.
[1:44:41] >> 14.3, Exercise the renewal
[1:44:42] option provided for in the
[1:44:43] contract entered into with Waste
[1:44:44] Management Québec Inc., for the
[1:44:46] period of April 1, 2025, to
[1:44:48] March 31, 2026, in the amount of
[1:44:49] $ 1 979 615.77, taxes included
[1:44:56] for the collection and transport
[1:44:57] of domestic waste, compostable
[1:44:58] materials, bulky items,
[1:44:59] Christmas trees and roll-off
[1:45:00] containers.
[1:45:02] - 14.4. Se prévaloir de l'option
[1:45:04] de renouvellement prévue au
[1:45:05] contrat intervenu avec Colas
[1:45:07] (anciennement Meloche,
[1:45:08] division de Sintra)
[1:45:09] et Construction DJL, pour la
[1:45:10] période de la mi-mars 2025 à la
[1:45:12] mi-mars 2026, au montant de
[1:45:14] 329679,32$, taxes incluses, pour
[1:45:16] la fourniture et le chargement
[1:45:18] d'enrobés bitumineux. Le mélange
[1:45:20] bitumineux sont nécessaires pour
[1:45:21] la réparation et l'installation
[1:45:23] des conduites d'eau, des égouts,
[1:45:25] des nids-de-poule, et des
[1:45:26] fissures de la chaussée, ainsi
[1:45:27] que pour la réparation des
[1:45:28] trottoirs adjacent à la
[1:45:29] chaussée.
[1:45:32] >> 14.5, two Exercise the
[1:45:34] renewal option provided for in
[1:45:35] the contract entered into with
[1:45:36] Environnement Routier NRJ Inc.,
[1:45:37] for the period of April 1, 2025,
[1:45:38] to March 31, 2026, in the amount
[1:45:39] of $ 121,427.40, taxes included
[1:45:46] for the collection by crane and
[1:45:48] transportation of waste
[1:45:49] materials from semi-buried
[1:45:50] containers. This contract
[1:45:52] ensures that all residual waste
[1:45:53] a committed in the city's semi
[1:45:55] brick containers will be
[1:45:56] collected at a regular frequency
[1:45:59] using proper equipment and
[1:46:00] ensuring proper disposal at the
[1:46:02] respective collection sites.
[1:46:03] - 14.6. Octroyer un contrat pour
[1:46:04] le remplacement et
[1:46:05] l'installation de raccordements
[1:46:06] de service pour l'année 2025, à
[1:46:09] EDJ, pour un montant total de
[1:46:10] 477076,76$, taxes incluses. Ce
[1:46:16] contrat est requis pour
[1:46:17] effectuer sur demande des
[1:46:18] travaux de remplacement et
[1:46:19] d'installation de raccordement
[1:46:20] de services résidentiels pour
[1:46:21] l'année 2025.
[1:46:24] >> 14.7, To award a contract for
[1:46:25] rental services of portable
[1:46:26] sinks, portable toilets and
[1:46:27] sanitary trailers for the years
[1:46:29] 2025, 2026 and 2027, to Sanivac
[1:46:34] for a total amount of $
[1:46:35] 188,591.19, taxes included, with
[1:46:37] the years 2028 and 2029 in
[1:46:39] option. These toilets and
[1:46:43] portable sinks and sanitary
[1:46:44] trailers are intended for use at
[1:46:45] various outdoor sites, with
[1:46:47] rental periods varying according
[1:46:48] to their need. The purpose of
[1:46:49] this approach is to maintain
[1:46:50] service and meet the needs of
[1:46:52] the population in the city's
[1:46:53] various parks and green spaces.
[1:46:55] According to the calendar of
[1:46:56] other activities also.
[1:46:57] - 14.8. Octroyer un contrat pour
[1:46:59] la fourniture et la livraison
[1:47:00] d'arbres pour l'année 2025, à
[1:47:02] Pépinière Jardin 2000 inc., pour
[1:47:04] un montant total de 199585,10$,
[1:47:07] taxes incluses. 14 points en 14
[1:47:11] points six. 14 points huit, je
[1:47:14] m'excuse. Do I have a mover?
[1:47:16] >> Eric Stork, district seven.
[1:47:18] >> And a seconder?
[1:47:20] >> All in favour?
[1:47:25] >> 15.1, To exercise the renewal
[1:47:27] option provided for in the
[1:47:28] contract entered into with
[1:47:29] Av-Tech Inc., for the period of
[1:47:32] April 1, 2025 to March 31, 2026,
[1:47:35] in the amount of $ 47,362.79,
[1:47:39] taxes included, for maintenance,
[1:47:40] inspection and repair services
[1:47:41] for generators in the city of
[1:47:42] Pointe-Claire.
[1:47:44] - 15.2. Se prévaloir de l'option
[1:47:45] de renouvellement prévue au
[1:47:46] contrat intervenu avec A.S.I.
[1:47:47] Expert Aquatique, pour la
[1:47:48] période du 1 avril 2025 au 31
[1:47:49] mars 2026, au montant de
[1:47:51] 5793,30$, taxes incluses, pour
[1:47:55] la fourniture et la livraison de
[1:47:57] produit chimiques pour les
[1:47:58] piscines de la Ville. Ce contrat
[1:48:01] prévoit la fournitures et
[1:48:02] livraisons sur demande de
[1:48:03] différents produits chimiques
[1:48:04] pour les piscines intérieures du
[1:48:06] Centre aquatique du
[1:48:07] (---)
[1:48:08] . Ces produits assurent que les
[1:48:09] piscines restent opérationnels
[1:48:10] et fonctionne de manière
[1:48:11] optimale.
[1:48:13] >> 15.3, To exercise the renewal
[1:48:14] option provided for in the
[1:48:15] contract entered into with Trane
[1:48:16] Canada ULC, for the period of
[1:48:17] April 1, 2025, to March 31,
[1:48:22] 2026, in the amount of $
[1:48:25] 85,858.52, taxes included, for
[1:48:27] the supply and the delivery,
[1:48:29] upon request, of various
[1:48:30] mechanical parts for HVAC
[1:48:31] systems. This contract provides
[1:48:33] for the supply and delivery on
[1:48:35] request of various mechanical
[1:48:36] parts for the heating,
[1:48:37] ventilation, air conditioning
[1:48:39] systems of the city's various
[1:48:40] buildings.
[1:48:41] - 15.4. Approuver une
[1:48:42] modification au contrat
[1:48:43] intervenu avec Aquatechno
[1:48:44] Spécialistes Aquatiques inc.,
[1:48:45] pour la fourniture et livraison
[1:48:47] de produit chimiques pour
[1:48:48] piscines et jeux extérieurs,
[1:48:50] pour un montant de 15601,84$,
[1:48:52] taxes incluses. L'augmentation
[1:48:55] des coûts fait suite à l'achat
[1:48:57] allemand extrêmes des leaders
[1:49:00] nier, qui a nécessité d'utiliser
[1:49:02] davantage de produits chimiques
[1:49:03] pour la qualité des piscines
[1:49:05] extérieures de la ville.
[1:49:07] >>
[1:49:08] >> For 15.1 to 15.4, do I have a
[1:49:10] mover?
[1:49:14] >> Brent Cowan, district eight.
[1:49:15] >> And a seconder?
[1:49:17] >> Tara Stainforth, district
[1:49:19] four.
[1:49:20] >> All in favour?
[1:49:21] >> Thank you. 16.1, To authorize
[1:49:24] the signature of the notice and
[1:49:25] consent to the reorganization of
[1:49:28] Groupe ABS Inc. in reference to
[1:49:29] the contract for professional
[1:49:30] services for geotechnical
[1:49:31] studies, environmental
[1:49:33] characterization and material
[1:49:34] quality control for municipal
[1:49:37] infrastructure rehabilitation
[1:49:38] for 2024, with two years in
[1:49:42] option. So the contract is
[1:49:43] partly in effect between the
[1:49:44] city and Groupe ABS Inc., --
[1:49:46] under the same contract.
[1:49:47] - 16.2. Octroyer un contrat pour
[1:49:48] la réfection des sentiers et de
[1:49:49] l'éclairage au parc Northview, à
[1:49:52] Groupe Damex, pour un montant
[1:49:54] total de 619023,68$, taxes
[1:49:57] incluses. 16.3, To award a
[1:50:02] contract for the repair of Du
[1:50:03] Bord-duLac-Lakeshore Road, from
[1:50:04] Raynor Avenue to the entrance of
[1:50:05] Highway 20, to Ali Excavation
[1:50:06] Inc., for a total amount of $
[1:50:10] 2,732,822.74, taxes included.
[1:50:14] The Works covered by the
[1:50:16] contract include resurfacing and
[1:50:17] related works on the section
[1:50:19] between rain Avenue and the
[1:50:20] Highway 20 ramp.
[1:50:21] - 16.4. Octroyer un contrat pour
[1:50:23] la reconstruction du et
[1:50:24] rond-point ouest de l'avenue
[1:50:25] Cedar, à Construction G-Nesis
[1:50:26] inc., pour un montant total de
[1:50:28] 965442,78$, taxes incluses. Les
[1:50:35] travaux consistent à la
[1:50:36] reconstruction de l'avenue
[1:50:37] Centre, incluant le remplacement
[1:50:38] de la conduite d'aqueduc, les
[1:50:40] égouts sanitaires et les coûts
[1:50:41] pluviales. Le remplacement des
[1:50:43] raccordement de services, la
[1:50:44] construction d'une bordure en
[1:50:45] béton de chaque côté, le pavage
[1:50:47] de la rue et la remise en état
[1:50:48] des lieux.
[1:50:51] >> 16.5, Award a contract for
[1:50:53] the replacement of street lights
[1:50:54] on Ashington and Inglewood
[1:50:55] avenues, to Laurin Laurin Inc.,
[1:50:57] for a total amount of $
[1:51:00] 324,684.80, taxes included. The
[1:51:03] city intends to replace the
[1:51:04] lighting system on Ashton and
[1:51:06] Inglewood avenues including
[1:51:07] basis, lamppost, conduits and
[1:51:08] all piece is required for the
[1:51:09] project.
[1:51:10] - 16.6. Octroyer un contrat pour
[1:51:11] des services professionnels pour
[1:51:12] l'inspection de la structure
[1:51:13] située sur le boulevard
[1:51:14] Saint-Jean au-dessus des voies
[1:51:16] du CN, du CP et de l'avenue
[1:51:18] Donegani, à IGF axiom inc., pour
[1:51:20] un montant total de 71164,50$,
[1:51:23] taxes incluses. La Ville devrait
[1:51:26] retenir les services
[1:51:27] professionnels d'une ferme pour
[1:51:28] effectuer les activités
[1:51:30] d'inventaires, d'inspecteur
[1:51:31] général et le calcul de la
[1:51:33] capacité portante ces
[1:51:34] structures.
[1:51:40] >> Holden. Hold on. Sorry. My
[1:51:43] mistake. 16.7, Approve the
[1:51:46] evaluation criteria to be used
[1:51:47] for projects involving the
[1:51:48] supply and the installation of
[1:51:49] play modules. This grid will be
[1:51:50] added to the eighth standard
[1:51:51] grids authorized and can be used
[1:51:53] for several playground model
[1:51:54] projects. Do I have a mover?
[1:51:59] >> Paul Bissonnette, district.
[1:52:01] Two
[1:52:02] >> And a seconder?
[1:52:03] >> Cynthia Homan, district five.
[1:52:04] >> All in favour? Yes,
[1:52:08] Councillor Cousineau?
[1:52:09] >> On that final, we have been
[1:52:13] asked by one owner On a eu des
[1:52:17] demandes, et je vais l'en
[1:52:18] français, par un propriétaire
[1:52:23] qui est après rebâtir sa maison.
[1:52:26] J'ai l'assurance qu'on va tout
[1:52:27] faire pour ne pas allonger son
[1:52:30] projet ou nuire à son prochain.
[1:52:32] - Monsieur Cousineau, est-ce que
[1:52:33] vous pouvez faire référence à un
[1:52:35] point dans l'ordre du jour pour
[1:52:36] nous guider?
[1:52:37] - Excusez-moi. Ça, c'est...
[1:52:41] - 16 points quatre?
[1:52:42] - Oui.
[1:52:44] - C'est le contrat pour la rue
[1:52:45] cet art, c'est ça?
[1:52:46] - Oui
[1:52:47] (rires)
[1:52:48] .
[1:52:49] - C'est noté. Une chose que je
[1:52:50] vous ai amené.
[1:52:59] - 17.1 Assemblée publique
[1:53:01] concernant une demande sur les
[1:53:02] projets particuliers de
[1:53:03] construction, de modification ou
[1:53:04] d'occupation d'un immeuble
[1:53:05] (PPCMOI)
[1:53:06] situé au 27, avenue Salisbury.
[1:53:07] Donc, une fois que j'aurai donné
[1:53:08] les détails du projet, les gens
[1:53:09] dans la salle auront l'occasion
[1:53:11] de s'exprimer s'ils le
[1:53:13] souhaitent. En raison d'un
[1:53:15] incendie, le bâtiment a perdu
[1:53:19] les droits acquis dont il
[1:53:22] bénéficiait. La reconstruction
[1:53:23] de salon funéraire tel que
[1:53:24] présentez déroge aux
[1:53:25] dispositions du Code villageois.
[1:53:27] La Ville doit donc se prononcer
[1:53:28] sur une demande effectuée en
[1:53:29] vertu du Règlement 29 57, sur
[1:53:32] les projets particuliers de
[1:53:33] construction de modification
[1:53:34] d'occupation d'un immeuble. Les
[1:53:36] aspects non conformes nos
[1:53:38] règlements sont: la marge
[1:53:40] latérale proposée ne respecte
[1:53:41] pas la marge latérale maximale
[1:53:44] réglementaire exigée tant du
[1:53:45] côté droit que c'est du côté de
[1:53:47] l'accès véhiculaire. Le taux
[1:53:50] d'importation superbement était
[1:53:51] inférieure au minimum requis de
[1:53:52] 40% dans cette zone. Coefficient
[1:53:55] d'occupation tout ça proposé est
[1:53:57] inférieure au minimum exigé dans
[1:54:00] la zone huppé quatre. La largeur
[1:54:03] de la façade proposée dépasse la
[1:54:04] largeur maximale permise pour
[1:54:06] chaque pan de façade, soit 12
[1:54:08] mètres. Et le pourcentage de la
[1:54:10] façade localisé dans la zone de
[1:54:12] façade tel que défini au Code
[1:54:14] villageois est inférieure au
[1:54:15] minimum requis, soit 90%. Notez
[1:54:18] que le projet de résolution
[1:54:20] qu'on ait des dispositions
[1:54:21] propres à une résolution
[1:54:23] susceptible d'approbation
[1:54:24] référendaire.
[1:54:31] - On continue?
[1:54:32] - Il, s'il vous plaît.
[1:54:36] >> 17.2, which is a public
[1:54:37] meeting regarding a specific
[1:54:39] construction, alteration or
[1:54:42] Occupancy Proposals for an
[1:54:43] Immovable
[1:54:44] (SCAOPI)
[1:54:45] request situated at 1890,
[1:54:46] boulevard des Sources. The
[1:54:49] company has submitted an
[1:54:51] application under by law --
[1:54:53] specific -- in order to carry
[1:54:56] out a project that deviates from
[1:54:58] the zoning bylaw -- for the
[1:55:00] purpose of expanding and
[1:55:02] reorganizing its operations. The
[1:55:04] aspects that do not comply with
[1:55:05] the bylaw are extension of the
[1:55:08] industrial use belonging to
[1:55:09] class the one, which is
[1:55:10] transport and storage, in zone
[1:55:12] and 25, which is not permitted.
[1:55:15] Project to consolidate and
[1:55:16] expand the company's operations
[1:55:17] in zones and 25 and and 29
[1:55:20] through a campus tie project,
[1:55:21] which is not permitted. Decrease
[1:55:23] of the forest space index to
[1:55:26] 0.18, while the regulatory floor
[1:55:28] space index is 0.33 in the
[1:55:31] concert zones. Development of
[1:55:32] parking spaces in zone and 29
[1:55:34] with a front yard which is not
[1:55:36] permitted. Development of
[1:55:38] parking spaces for trucks and
[1:55:40] trailers in the secondary yard
[1:55:43] in zone N25 which is not
[1:55:47] permitted. Setback within the
[1:55:48] project for the development of
[1:55:49] parking spaces that does not
[1:55:50] comply with the minimum
[1:55:51] regulatory setback requirement.
[1:55:54] Area of the secondary front
[1:55:55] setback used to park eight fleet
[1:55:57] of trucks and trailers in zone
[1:56:00] N25 exceeds the maximum area
[1:56:02] allowed. Glazed areas on the
[1:56:05] front facade of the new
[1:56:06] buildings that do not meet the
[1:56:07] minimum regulatory area
[1:56:10] requirements. Cancellation of --
[1:56:12] offences in the front and
[1:56:14] secondary yards which is not
[1:56:15] authorized. Insulation of a
[1:56:17] fence in the front and secondary
[1:56:18] front yards that exceeds the
[1:56:19] maximum permitted height. This
[1:56:21] draft resolution contains
[1:56:23] provisions, making it resolution
[1:56:24] subject by approval by way of
[1:56:26] referendum.
[1:56:33] - 17.3. Adopter un second projet
[1:56:34] de résolution pour un projet
[1:56:35] particulier de construction, de
[1:56:36] modification ou d'occupation
[1:56:37] d'un immeuble au 27, avenue
[1:56:39] Salisbury autorisant la
[1:56:40] construction d'un salon
[1:56:41] funéraire. Donc, la première
[1:56:43] portion de la consultation
[1:56:44] publique portait sur ce projet.
[1:56:46] On comprend qu'aucun commentaire
[1:56:47] n'ont été reçus ce soir. La
[1:56:49] second projet de résolution est
[1:56:52] donc présenté au conseil.
[1:56:54] - Pour 17.3 Do I have a mover?
[1:57:01] 17.3 is it not?
[1:57:02] >> 17.3.
[1:57:08] >> Brent Cowan, district eight.
[1:57:09] >> And a seconder?
[1:57:11] >> Kelly Thorstad-Cullen,
[1:57:12] district three.
[1:57:13] >> All in favour?
[1:57:15] >> Thank you. 17.4, Adopt a
[1:57:19] second draft resolution for a
[1:57:20] Specific Construction,
[1:57:21] Alteration or Occupancy Proposal
[1:57:22] for an Immovable at 1890 Des
[1:57:24] Sources Boulevard authorizing
[1:57:25] the construction of a new
[1:57:26] building and the redevelopment
[1:57:28] of the Manitoulin Transport
[1:57:30] site, in several phases.
[1:57:36] Do I have a mover?
[1:57:37] >> Eric Stork, district seven.
[1:57:38] >> And a seconder?
[1:57:40] >> Turf Stainforth, district
[1:57:41] four.
[1:57:42] >> All in favour?
[1:57:43] - Merci.
[1:57:45] - 17.5. Adopter un premier
[1:57:46] projet de résolution pour un
[1:57:47] projet particulier de
[1:57:48] construction, de modification ou
[1:57:49] d'occupation d'un immeuble au
[1:57:51] 600, boulevard Saint-Jean dans
[1:57:52] le but de régulariser l'usage
[1:57:54] existant « Brasserie
[1:57:55] (E-2)
[1:57:56] » de même que la terrasse
[1:57:57] commerciale, de transformer une
[1:57:58] partie de la brasserie en un
[1:58:01] restaurant D-1, et d'agrandir le
[1:58:02] bâtiment aux fins d'améliorer la
[1:58:04] fonctionnalité des opérations au
[1:58:05] sein de l'établissement. Les
[1:58:07] principales composantes du
[1:58:09] projet présenter sont les
[1:58:11] suivantes: régulariser l'usage
[1:58:12] non conforme de brasserie et
[1:58:13] deux, transformer une partie de
[1:58:14] la brasserie en usage
[1:58:16] restaurant, de maintenir une
[1:58:17] capacité d'accueil total de 272
[1:58:20] places assises, régulariser la
[1:58:22] terrasse existante, dont la
[1:58:23] superficie maximale de 225
[1:58:25] mètres carrés, il a capacité
[1:58:27] maximale de 177 places avec tous
[1:58:29] les équipements immobiliers et
[1:58:31] associés. Construire un bâtiment
[1:58:32] accessoire en remplacement de
[1:58:33] souliers existant pour
[1:58:35] l'entreposage des pactes
[1:58:36] gestions de matières duel. Le
[1:58:38] projet de résidus
[1:58:39] (---)
[1:58:40] dispositions propres à une
[1:58:41] (---)
[1:58:42] .
[1:58:44] - Pour 17.5 Do I have a mover?
[1:58:47] >> Eric Stork, district seven.
[1:58:49] >> And a seconder?
[1:58:50] >> Paul Bissonnette, district
[1:58:51] two.
[1:58:52] >> All in favour?
[1:58:53] >> Thank you. The persons
[1:58:57] present may interests Council on
[1:58:59] the item 17.6 to 17.8. 17.6 is
[1:59:05] Consider a minor exemption
[1:59:06] request concerning the property
[1:59:07] situated at 57 De breslay
[1:59:08] avenue.. It is to permit the
[1:59:10] width of a house that has more
[1:59:11] than one floor to occupy 75.5%
[1:59:14] of the width of the lancet,
[1:59:16] rather than the maximum
[1:59:17] permitted of 70%.
[1:59:21] >> For 17.6, do I have a mover?
[1:59:26] Yes, if you will. At the
[1:59:28] microphone.
[1:59:33] >> I am Stephanie Myers at 55
[1:59:35] Avenue to Bradley. I am voting
[1:59:37] in favour of this. These people
[1:59:39] have been very forthcoming with
[1:59:40] what declined to do at this
[1:59:42] location. I have been at that
[1:59:44] location for ten years. Sadly,
[1:59:46] I've lost my neighbour, she
[1:59:48] passed, she had been there her
[1:59:49] whole life. Since that time I
[1:59:51] know it's a bungalow and I know
[1:59:52] we value bungalows. I value a
[1:59:55] bungalow. But it's been tossed
[1:59:56] around and bought and sold it.
[1:59:58] Proposals have come and gone. It
[2:00:00] has sat vacant and nobody cares
[2:00:02] for it. The trees have never
[2:00:03] been trimmed. The yard is
[2:00:04] garbage. I would fully support
[2:00:08] having a nice home with a family
[2:00:09] who wants to live in the
[2:00:11] neighbourhood. Who wants to live
[2:00:13] in the neighbourhood with
[2:00:14] children for my children to play
[2:00:16] with. So, as much as I'm not
[2:00:18] looking forward to the
[2:00:19] construction, I would vote
[2:00:20] heavily in favour and passing
[2:00:22] that went through.
[2:00:23] >> Thank you, Chris Myers. So,
[2:00:28] for 17.6 do I have a mover?
[2:00:30] >> Brent Cowan, district eight.
[2:00:32] I moved to accept the Planning
[2:00:36] Advisory Committee
[2:00:37] recommendation to allow the
[2:00:38] minor exemption.
[2:00:39] >> And a seconder?
[2:00:40] >> Second and by Tara
[2:00:42] Stainforth, district four.
[2:00:43] >> All in favour?
[2:00:47] - 17.7. Considérer une demande
[2:00:51] de dérogation mineure concernant
[2:00:52] la propriété située au 155,
[2:00:53] avenue Broadview. Pour permettre
[2:00:55] un agrandissement avec un marge
[2:00:57] de recul avant de huit points 3
[2:00:59] mètres plutôt que la marge de
[2:01:00] recul minimal requis de 10
[2:01:01] mètres.
[2:01:03] Do I have a mover?
[2:01:04] - Pour 17.7 >> Cynthia Homan,
[2:01:08] district five.
[2:01:09] >> And a seconder?
[2:01:10] >> Brent Cowan, district eight.
[2:01:11] >> All in favour?
[2:01:16] >> 17.8, Consider a minor
[2:01:17] exemption request concerning the
[2:01:18] property situated at 119 Chesnut
[2:01:19] avenue. It is in order to permit
[2:01:22] a Florida space index of 0.34
[2:01:24] rather than the maximum
[2:01:25] permitted of 0.3. It is to
[2:01:27] permit the width of a house that
[2:01:29] has more than 14 to occupy 81%
[2:01:31] of the width of the land site
[2:01:32] rather than the maximum
[2:01:34] permitted of 70%. To permit also
[2:01:36] an extension with a front
[2:01:37] setback of 6.15 metres rather
[2:01:39] than the minimum required of
[2:01:41] 7.50 metres. And an extension
[2:01:43] with the right side setback of
[2:01:46] 2.04 metres rather than the
[2:01:47] minimum required side of 2.4
[2:01:50] metres.
[2:01:55] Do I have a mover?
[2:01:57] >> Eric Stork, district seven.
[2:01:58] >> And a seconder?
[2:01:59] >> Paul Bissonnette, district
[2:02:01] two.
[2:02:02] >> All in favour?
[2:02:03] >> Thank you.
[2:02:05] - 17.9. Considérer les plans
[2:02:07] d'implantation et d'intégration
[2:02:08] architecturale relatifs à la
[2:02:09] propriété située au 57, avenue
[2:02:10] de Breslay. Pour l'ajout d'un
[2:02:12] deuxième étage.
[2:02:14] >> For 17.9, do I have a mover?
[2:02:19] No?
[2:02:20] >> 17.9.
[2:02:21] >> 0.9.
[2:02:22] >> Bryan Cowan, district eight.
[2:02:23] >> A seconder?
[2:02:28] >> All in favour?
[2:02:29] >> Thank you. 17.10, Consider
[2:02:32] the site planning and
[2:02:34] architectural integration
[2:02:35] programme plans with respect to
[2:02:36] the property situated at 155
[2:02:38] Broadview Avenue. It is an
[2:02:41] extension on the left side of
[2:02:42] the existing homes over two
[2:02:44] storeys.
[2:02:50] Do I have a mover?
[2:02:51] >> Cynthia Homan, district five.
[2:02:53] >> And a seconder?
[2:02:56] >> All in favour?
[2:03:02] >> Mrs. Thorstad-Cullen, please.
[2:03:06] - 20, levée de la séance.
[2:03:07] Closure?
[2:03:08] >> Foreclosure, do I have a
[2:03:09] mover?
[2:03:10] >> Tara Stainforth, district.
[2:03:11] Four
[2:03:12] >> And a seconder?
[2:03:13] >> Eric Stork, district fourth.
[2:03:14] - Merci tout le monde. Thank you
[2:03:17] for your patience.