[0:25] Ok, good evening, bonsoir mes chéries, mesdames,
bonsoir à toutes.
[0:30] Ladies and gentlemen, good evening, and welcome
to September
[0:34] 2026, regular council meeting.
[0:36] Before we get started, I just wanted to make
one little comment
[0:39] about last month, there was a gentleman that
came and asked about our financial
[0:43] aid program for de water mitigation on people's
homes.
[0:46] And he wanted to know why we weren't including
townhouse, condo,
[0:51] or shared properties for common areas.
[0:54] I don't have a yes or no form tonight.
[0:57] I told him we'd have un answer form.
[1:00] What we're looking at as a council, on his
administration,
[1:03] of what that would affect, the number of units
like that à
[1:06] Point Claire, how much it would cost, so on,
so forth.
[1:08] And we'll come back with an answer in the near
future.
[1:11] It's not a no, it's not yet, mais we're definitely
looking at.
[1:14] So that's the gentleman Ça vient de Prima
I, Prima II, I think,
[1:17] in that area, the Greenwich area.
[1:19] Ok.
[1:20] Depuis le lancement de notre programme d'aide
financier pour la gestion des aides
[1:25] privé en juillet, nous avons reçu 185 demandes
et 132 ont déjà été acceptées.
[1:33] So since that launching of that aid programme,
we've had 185 requests for
[1:40] financial aid for water mitigation, and 132
have so far been accepted.
[1:45] So it's a process, and sometimes you might
get to know because you're missing
[1:49] information, but we're looking at each one
very closely and trying to get as many
[1:53] through as we can, as fast as we can.
[1:56] These are numbers that are encouraging.
[1:58] Ils se disent: Ils sont encourageants.
[2:00] C'est-à-dire que le monde veut prendre responsabilité
et trouver une
[2:03] solution pour leurs maisons.
[2:06] C'est encourageant que si so many people reaching
out to us, it shows that they're
[2:09] taking climate change seriously, and that they
want to waterproof their
[2:14] house and make it as safe as possible, so down
the road, we'll have less people
[2:21] with damaged properties.
[2:24] It is important to submit your application,
confirm that your project
[2:27] is eligible before beginning any work.
[2:30] That's another...
[2:32] C'est somebody's cell phone?
[2:37] Very important.
[2:38] Some people started their work, and then they
came and they
[2:40] asked for the financing.
[2:41] Unfortunately, c'est not how the programme
works, so we
[2:49] The other part of the program was Ecohabitation.
[2:53] Ecohabitation, c'est une compagnie qui va venir,
[2:56] puis il va faire une évaluation de ta maison,
puis il va dire: Qu'est-ce
[2:59] que tu as besoin de faire?
[3:00] Il ne fait pas le ouvrage, mais il va faire
une évaluation de ta maison.
[3:04] Mettre une sape pompe, changer tes fenêtres,
[3:07] ranger les cracks dans ton fonds d'agence,
je ne sais pas quoi exactement,
[3:10] mais il va venir faire l'évaluation.
[3:13] Le programme-là, il va commencer fin septembre,
commence mid octobre.
[3:19] C'est sûr, il y a un coup.
[3:20] Les coups-là sont couverts par le programme
de financement par la ville.
[3:25] So that company that will be coming in, Ecohabitation,
to come and evaluate your
[3:29] properties, to give on what you need to do
to waterproof your house, will be up and
[3:34] running sometime between the middle of...
[3:37] Closer à the end of september, beginning of
octobre.
[3:40] The cost of that will be covered by the city.
[3:42] The city will be built for à l'évaluation,
et nous allons le déduit en off de
[3:48] l'argent que vous reçiez pour votre subvention.
[3:51] C'est un programme que si vous le évaluez,
ne veut pas dire que vous avez besoin
[3:54] de faire tout le travail à partager.
[3:55] Ça peut être long terme, mais on vous donne
un roadmap de ce qui a à faire.
[4:00] Obviously, there'll be probably lots of demands
at the beginning.
[4:03] We're not saying no to anybody, but you might
have to wait time in order
[4:08] for them to fulfill all their requests.
[4:16] Pour Dumont, qui était au Blues Fest, ça
fait deux semaines
[4:20] passées dans le village.
[4:23] Blues Festival, it was a great success this
year.
[4:27] The village filled up with 2 o'clock going
on to 11:30 in the evening.
[4:31] The turnout was phenomenal.
[4:33] The weather was absolutely perfect.
[4:35] You couldn't ask for better.
[4:37] It was a great event.
[4:38] We are a major partner in that, along with
Dollar Di Zermo, Dorval, and Pierre Fonds.
[4:44] Pierre Fonds, Jim Bais et his team, a bunch
of other people,
[4:49] our major partners, organize these events.
[4:51] Tell you, I think it went without a hitch this
year.
[4:54] So congratulations to all the organizers, all
the volunteers.
[4:58] Congratulations to our staff who was on site
at 6:00 in the morning and finished
[5:02] at 3:00 in the morning, setting it up, taking
it down, cleaning everything up,
[5:05] opening up the village.
[5:07] So they deserve a big thank you, and the administration
council for supporting it.
[5:12] The money does go to organizations that we
all use de l'Espagne, d'un autre côté,
[5:15] d'un autre côté, d'un autre côté, d'un
autre côté, d'un autre côté,
[5:16] d'un autre côté, d'un autre côté, d'un
autre côté, d'un autre côté,
[5:17] d'un autre côté, d'un autre côté, d'un
autre way or another.
[5:17] So it's a great cause.
[5:23] Ok. Et notre nouveauté arrive bientôt.
[5:26] Notre nouvelle Ispa citoyen, ou citoyen espace,
en anglais,
[5:31] sera lancée le 1ᵉʳ octobre.
[5:33] La plateforme va permettre aux résidents de
recevoir des alertes,
[5:36] de soumettre des soumissions et de rapporter
des issues to the city online.
[5:39] A mobile app will be also available, making
it easy to access the city
[5:44] et de l'accéder à l'avis du site.
[5:45] La ville a différents services en ligne directement
de votre téléphone et de
[5:48] rester au courant sur les messages et les informations
de la ville.
[5:51] Notre objectif est de rendre les échanges
entre la ville
[5:56] plus simples et plus accessibles, et de nouvelles
fonctionnalités.
[6:00] Cette fonctionnalité viendra progressivement
ajouter à la plateforme.
[6:05] I strongly encourage you to create your account
starting October 1st
[6:09] and explore this new tool.
[6:11] Even if you already have an account with our
current alert system,
[6:14] it will be important to create a new account
so that you can personalize the
[6:17] types de messages et de notifications you would
like to receive.
[6:24] The 22nd of august, last month, we inaugurated
the peer in the
[6:30] in the name of Mr. Mcmerci, former mayor of
Point Claire.
[6:33] He had a lot to do with protecting the shoreline,
water management, green spaces.
[6:39] So we found it quite fitting that the pier
that was built, I think,
[6:42] for the millennium, 2000, in Edgewater Park,
was renamed after him.
[6:48] His family was on site.
[6:50] A lot of nice tributs, and it was nice to hear
his
[6:53] grandchildren talk so proudly of them.
[6:55] You could see how they were moving forward
in their life.
[6:57] One of them is becoming an archéologiste,
and it just seems to fall in line
[7:01] with what Mr. Mcmurch was all about.
[7:03] So he left his mark in Point Claire.
[7:07] And again, it was a beautiful day, beautiful
ceremony.
[7:11] So I'd like to thank everybody who made that
happen.
[7:15] Le 22 août dernier, on a nommé le quai dans
Park Edgewater,
[7:22] après Mr. Mcmerchill, l'ancien maire de la
ville de Point-Clair.
[7:26] Pas juste le maire, il était un conseiller,
il était un employé.
[7:29] Lui, il a eu beaucoup d'implication dans la
protection de l'héberge, les espaces
[7:35] verts, puis le lot à Point-Clair.
[7:37] On trouve que c'est vraiment une place idéale
pour nommer après lui.
[7:42] Sa famille était ici, ses grands-enfants étaient
ici.
[7:46] Je peux dire que quand on voit les faces de
ses petits-enfants puis les grands
[7:50] enfants, c'est fun de voir la fierté de leur
grand-papa.
[7:55] .
[8:00] Je suis très honnête de l'avoir appelé Monsieur
McMerci.
[8:03] Au printemps, dans le quartier.
[8:05] En le printemps, l'année dernière, nous avons
commencé notre rencontre.
[8:09] C'était un café raconte, où nous rencontrons
tous les districts
[8:12] avec un conseil d'un maire, et les citoyens
allaient venir
[8:14] nous demander des questions.
[8:15] C'était plus comme un un, plutôt que de sitting
in this type of
[8:18] atmosphere, they'll be starting again in the
fall, and we'll be
[8:22] doing the same format.
[8:23] So you'll be getting stuff in the mail, you'll
be getting stuff online,
[8:27] you'll be inform that these things will be
taking place.
[8:30] And please come and bring your ideas, suggestions,
questions, whatever, to us.
[8:35] And anything that we can hear from you guys
just helps us move ahead.
[8:39] Like you heard, we just approved a new capital
expenditure plan.
[8:44] All these ideas and stuff, you guys, ça va
être great.
[8:46] You can go into ça pour les next years to
come.
[8:48] So if you have anything, please pay attention
et show up.
[8:51] We'd be more than welcome à answering your
questions.
[8:54] On va commencer les cafés de raconte bientôt
l'automne.
[8:59] Tu auras reçu les dates dans le poste ou sur
le site Web.
[9:03] C'est important que tu te présentes, puis
ils te viennent demander tes
[9:06] questions, puis dis qu'est-ce que tu veux ou
qu'est-ce que tu as
[9:09] besoin dans ton communauté.
[9:11] On est là pour ça, puis ça va être un peu
plus comme un one-on-one.
[9:18] It's more personalised.
[9:20] S'il vous plaît, si vous avez le temps, présentez-vous
puis
[9:24] demandez des questions.
[9:30] Ok.
[9:32] Et enfin, je voudrais vous rappeler que la
registration pour le programme est
[9:36] en train de se faire en Maltais.
[9:38] Je veux vous inviter aussi de profiter des
activités qui seront proposées
[9:42] lors des journées de culture.
[9:47] Filem, music, exhibitions, artistic activities.
[9:50] There will be something for everyone.
[9:52] I hope that many of you will take the time
and opportunity to participate.
[9:55] So pay attention.
[9:56] Lots of great programming coming up for the
fall-winter sessions.
[10:01] Very good. On va aller à l'agenda.
[10:04] Est-ce que vous voulez faire les rapports des
membres du conseil?
[10:06] Oui, un petit détail.
[10:09] On va commencer avec Mr. Stork.
[10:13] Bonjour tout le monde, juste deux dièmes.
[10:17] I'd like to thank Stevie Cohen for his lyrics
in Lemonade.
[10:21] Last week-end, it was beautiful, it was well-intended,
twice as many people.
[10:25] Ils ont fait plus d'argent aussi for the Montreal
Children's Hospital.
[10:29] It was great to see those little kids up there
singing.
[10:32] It was truly beautiful.
[10:34] C'était vraiment de toute beauté.
[10:35] If you didn't come this year, please come next
year.
[10:38] Not à faire, finally, after about five, six,
seven years, the tribute to
[10:44] Athens Park will become a reality.
[10:46] September 26, we all know where the location
was.
[10:50] On va faire une dédication, un little celebration,
[10:54] with some unveiling of a plaque and such, in
honor of the owners of Athens
[11:26] Il n'y a pas grand-chose.
[11:28] La construction continue, puis Je suis là
si vous avez des questions.
[11:31] Merci.
[11:33] Mike Pratt.
[11:35] Bonjour tout le monde, bonsoir tout le monde.
[11:37] Good evening, everyone.
[11:39] Nothing today from District 8.
[11:42] Madame Homan.
[11:48] Nothing to report at this time. Thank you.
[11:53] Bonsoir tout le monde, c'est la même chose
pour District 2,
[11:55] il n'y a pas des choses spécifiques pour ce
soir.
[11:58] There's nothing specific for.
[12:02] Bonsoir à tous.
[12:04] Il n'y a rien de spécial qui n'a pas été
mentionné déjà.
[12:07] Donc, bonne soirée à tous.
[12:09] Monsieur Matthews?
[12:10] Oui, bonsoir de District 2.
[12:13] Juste pour vous aviser qu'il y a quand même
des gros travaux qui se
[12:17] sont entrepris sur Lakeshore.
[12:20] Donc, s'il vous plaît, vous demandez des questions
s'il le faut.
[12:26] Il y a eu un nouveau trajet qu'on ne peut pas
accéder via de route vers l'ouest.
[12:32] Puis, entre temps, juste être au courant que
l'autobus 202, si c'est votre autobus
[12:37] de choix, qu'il y a un léger détour qui est
en place et sinon de contacter la STM
[12:46] pour des services de transport adaptés.
[12:50] Donc, merci et bonne soirée.
[12:53] Merci, monsieur Tromblay.
[12:55] Bonsoir, good evening.
[12:57] No comments for me tonight.
[12:58] Aucun commentaire ce Merci.
[13:01] Monsieur Chesnisky.
[13:03] Thank you, Mr. Mayor.
[13:04] I've got two items that I want to mention concerning
decisions of the traffic
[13:10] committee affecting my district that were tabled
at the last meeting and
[13:14] that I can now speak about.
[13:17] The first is that, thanks to efforts from residents,
the
[13:23] fund following the application that I made
on that subject,
[13:27] parking on the West Side of Vista is in the
process now of being expanded
[13:34] back so that it will only be restricted during
[13:38] the rush hour periods where the new 230 bus
is actually passing.
[13:41] It will no longer be banned 24 7, on that side
of the street.
[13:46] So I think that's a positive development.
[13:49] Another decision was made by the traffic committee
as well, which I,
[13:53] as you can imagine from the things that I've
said here in the past, disagree with,
[13:58] which is that overnight winter parking at Greenwich
will not be permitted.
[14:05] This, I can only say that I would hope that
Council will eventually
[14:10] reconsider that position because it is a problem.
[14:15] Frankly, as an explanation for the decision,
the fact that it's not done
[14:19] elsewhere in Point Claire is not a valid one.
[14:23] It doesn't hurt anyone to allow it.
[14:27] And furthermore, if we're going to be allowing
more of
[14:29] these style developments than downtown style
parking accommodations
[14:34] are eventually going to have to be made for
them because otherwise, we're
[14:36] going to get the worst of both worlds.
[14:38] Thank you.
[14:40] Thank you.
[14:40] Monsieur Jouard, vous avez les réponses aux
questions sur le question
[14:43] de la question de la.
[14:45] Non, il n'y a aucun suivi d'intérêt public.
[14:47] There's no public interest.
[14:49] Ça, il faut l'attester.
[14:50] Thank you very much. We go to the agenda, please.
[14:53] Oui, le point 1.
[14:54] 1, adoption de l'ordre du jour, adoption of
the agenda,
[14:56] avec le retrait des points 17.4 et 17.
[14:59] 5.
[15:00] So to adopt the agenda with the withdrawal
of 17.4 and 17.
[15:06] 5. Ok.
[15:07] Can we have a move in seconder for that, please?
[15:13] Eric Stork, District 7.
[15:15] Closing Claudine Demers, District 1.
[15:17] Just to give you...
[15:19] All in favor?
[15:21] All in favor, sorry.
[15:23] All in favor?
[15:25] Thank you.
[15:26] I just want to talk about 17.
[15:29] 4, why it was pulled and just to give a...
.
[15:35] Yeah, okay, no problem.
[15:37] All in favor?
[15:39] Thank you.
[15:41] So two items were taken off the agenda, 17.5
17.
[15:43] 4, was 199 Bordjilack, Lakeshore Road.
[15:50] It was a renovation project. It was taken off.
[15:53] The gentleman is not going to go along with
this project anymore.
[15:56] He notified us today en writing that he's stopping
that project.
[16:00] And 17.5 was the same thing, 17. 4, 17.
[16:05] 5.
[16:06] Same address, project been pulled. Thank you.
[16:10] 3. 1.
[16:12] Approved the minutes of the regular meeting
held on August 11, 2026,
[16:15] and of the special meeting held on August 25,
2026.
[16:19] Can we have a move on seconder, please?
[16:20] Eric Stork, District 7.
[16:22] Claudine Demers, District 1. All in favor?
[16:26] Thank you.
[16:28] Période de questions.
[16:30] Question, period?
[16:34] You'll be called up according to your list.
[16:36] The first person will be Marc Sandalowski.
[16:46] Good evening, Mr. Mayor and Counselors. Good
evening.
[16:50] My name is Marc Sandalowski from 17th Avenue,
Jean Drain, better known as ZQ3.
[16:57] I'm here today with our Board of Directors,
Hélène Ferland
[17:02] et Randy Reutmann.
[17:03] Hélène was with me at the special meeting
that we had a couple of weeks ago.
[17:09] Just for everyone's clarification, we represent
48 condo units in our
[17:15] building, as well as the horizontal board.
[17:17] That's 152 co-owners across three condo buildings.
[17:22] We chose lead certified buildings to meet strict
globally recognized standards for
[17:28] environmental sustainability, energy efficiency,
[17:32] and healthy indoor environments.
[17:34] Regardless, EQ3, as many in the room, have
experienced two flood dans deux ans.
[17:41] Pour clarifier les mémoions, nous sommes des
propriétaires d'un hôtel.
[17:45] Nous sommes des propriétaires d'un hôtel
à la maison.
[17:48] Nous sommes des propriétaires d'un hôtel
à la maison.
[17:49] Nous sommes originaires de tout un district
in Point Claire.
[17:53] I myself have been in Point Claire since 1985,
you believe it is?
[18:00] And I paid three welcome taxes.
[18:02] So I'm here.
[18:04] Thank you.
[18:05] And as with any single dwelling household or
townhouse in Point Claire,
[18:10] we pay, in most cases, what a typical family
home pays in municipal taxes.
[18:16] We, too, want to protect our investments.
[18:19] If you reflect on it, it seems a little bit
ridiculous to have
[18:23] Equinox condos owners excluded from the bylaw
3002,
[18:29] to offset some minor part of flood costs, when
we have suffered similar
[18:33] consequences, but yet we still pay significant
taxes.
[18:37] In effect, you're asking co-owners to subsidize,
in some form,
[18:42] all other homeowner types.
[18:44] So, again, we ask if we could be included under
the by law amendment to PC 2002.
[18:50] I know you're voting on it tonight.
[18:53] On a proactive note, since the last special
meeting and noting
[18:57] some feedback from the last meeting, we prepared
and submitted a plan of action
[19:01] detailing both non-preventive or emergency
actions that we've taken and preventative
[19:07] actions based on expert input, many that we
still are in the middle of evaluating.
[19:14] We also We have a request for stormwater assistance
with details and attachments.
[19:19] And we have request a meeting with our councillor,
Bruno, and we're ready to meet
[19:23] with any municipal representatives, including
you, Mr. Mayor,
[19:28] to make sure that we're visible, that we're
on the same page
[19:32] with issues equally raised by the three Prima
townhouses and by Austin residents,
[19:38] seeking city-led actions that will address
holistic solutions for our area.
[19:43] That's not to say we don't have actions, but
we do believe there are other
[19:47] actions required, city level.
[19:50] So I have a two-part question, and I think
you started to answer it.
[19:55] Has there been any progress to further amend
by law
[19:59] PC And two, to include Equinox condo buildings,
as we had touched
[20:03] on at the last meeting?
[20:05] So like I was mentioning earlier, it's something
we're amending the bylaw
[20:10] tonight pour other stuff we came across last
month or two months ago.
[20:15] Since the bylaw was written, and it's continuously
in adaptation,
[20:19] adaptation mode, if you'd like to say.
[20:21] So we're going to analyze your situation with
condos.
[20:24] It's not the condo, like we've said many times,
it's a problem.
[20:26] You own your condo, it's yours, the money...
[20:29] It's a common area, finding a solution, a way
of managing that,
[20:34] and the financial burden, all that.
[20:36] That's what we have to evaluate right now.
[20:38] The program is new, and we're evolving weekly
on it, because we
[20:42] meet about it every week.
[20:43] So we will have un for you in the near future.
[20:46] Yes. No, that's very encouraging, at least.
[20:48] The other bigger point, of course, is in terms
of city-led solutions,
[20:53] and you're touching on it.
[20:55] You opened up with the statement that you're
looking at our area,
[20:58] but that includes the condos, right? Yes, exactly.
[21:01] Condos, townhouses.
[21:03] Like I said, the condo or the townhouse is
not the problem.
[21:07] If you own that, it's the shared area that's
the problem.
[21:10] We need to adapt our bylaw, and we have to
understand what
[21:13] we're getting ourselves into.
[21:15] There's a lot of stuff that goes into it.
[21:16] We just have to understand it, so it ends up
being something
[21:18] fair for everybody, right? Yeah.
[21:20] So it's new to us, we're going to figure it
out.
[21:22] We've heard a lot of music from Prima and from
the homeowners, but we just
[21:27] wanted to make sure we're at the party.
[21:28] We're looking at it all, and We're all open
around this table to
[21:32] facilitate, but also there's a financial burden
on the city, too.
[21:36] So we're trying to take baby steps.
[21:37] We can't do it all at once.
[21:39] So we have to understand before we say, yes,
we're going to do it, what's the
[21:43] possibility, what's it going to cost, et so
on, et so forth.
[21:45] It's all your money, it's a tax-period money.
[21:47] We got to make sure that we're doing this right.
[21:49] I don't know what the time frame is, but do
you have some rough time frame for-
[21:53] I would say within the next two months, if
we can make a decision by
[21:57] next council meeting, great.
[21:59] We'll give us deux months. Excellent.
[22:01] Thank you. Thank you.
[22:03] Melissa Hogan.
[22:15] Hello.
[22:17] My name is Melissa Hogan.
[22:19] I'm a resident of District 7 and a lifelong
PointClair citizen.
[22:22] I'm here tonight regarding the Interim Control
Bylaw, PC 2946,
[22:27] and the motion to file a draft to amend said
à la loi, pour exclure
[22:31] zone R-22 de son application.
[22:34] Mon fils, le quartier de l'Académie des Précis
de mai, situé à 477
[22:38] F Delmar, est en zone RC-22.
[22:42] Je suis membre de l'Académie des Précis de
mai pour I'm currently the President of
[22:47] the Parent Advisory Committee at the Daycare.
[22:49] I'm here today on behalf of the 80 local families
whose children
[22:53] attend the daycare.
[22:54] The majority of our families live in districts
3, 5, 7, and 8, with 85%
[23:00] living within a kilometer of the daycare.
[23:03] I cannot stress enough how instrumental this
daycare is, not only to our families,
[23:08] but the community at large.
[23:10] One of Point Claire's strategic missions is
to attract and retain families.
[23:14] Child care is essential infrastructure.
[23:17] Without it, the community becomes less attractive
to young families.
[23:21] The loss of this day care would eliminate 20%
of the child care capacity in our
[23:26] region and devastate 80 local families.
[23:31] Rather than present you with more statistics,
I'd like to take a minute to
[23:34] speak to you about the day care itself.
[23:36] L'académie des Pritzitimé encourages the
children to take advantage of many of the
[23:41] boroughs' wonderful facilities and activities.
[23:43] There are six local parcs within walking distance,
which the children visit daily,
[23:48] skating lessons at Bob Bernie Arena, swimming
gym lessons at the
[23:52] Point Claire Aquatic Center, and in the summer,
swimming lessons at Viking Pool.
[23:56] I do not know of any other daycare in Montreal
that can offer these activities.
[24:01] It is not only a wonderful opportunity for
the kids to learn new skills with their
[24:05] friends, but also a chance to free up weekend
time that would otherwise be
[24:09] overscheduled with such activities.
[24:12] When I speak with other parents, they are always
amazed to hear
[24:14] everything my son does with his daycare.
[24:17] I think you can see from the number of parents
who came out during dinner, bath,
[24:21] and bedtime to show their support, that we
all feel this is an exceptional
[24:26] daycare that needs to be preserved.
[24:29] We are not anti-développement, mais we feel
very strongly that this
[24:33] particular project needs to go back to the
drawing board and find a more suitable
[24:38] solution that keeps l'Académie de Pritzitie
in our community.
[24:42] I urge Council l'Académie des Précis de mai
dans notre communauté.
[24:44] Je vous encourage à reconnaître que l'Académie
des Précis de mai est far more
[24:47] than a building, and this community will lose
far more than a building
[24:52] if the project goes through as is currently
presented.
[24:56] If the daycare is closed, one in every five
child care spaces will
[24:59] be lost, and 80 families will be forced to
find other solutions,
[25:04] much farther from home, in an already strained
system, where
[25:07] demand significantly exceeds availability.
[25:10] As working parents, this will be extremely
stressful.
[25:14] According to the City of Pointclair's Ethical
Values Framework,
[25:17] Bylaw PC 3,000, Section 400, quality of service
means placing
[25:21] citizens at the heart of priorities.
[25:24] Pointclair citizens, and most importantly,
our children, deserve access to
[25:28] quality child care close to home.
[25:31] And Pointclair families deserve support in
balancing work and parenthood.
[25:35] We respectfully ask that
[26:02] you that would like to come up the mic to register?
[26:04] I think only three are speaking, but we are,
as you can see, out of 80
[26:09] families, about 15 of us showed up. Ok, no,
I see that.
[26:12] I appreciate that, I respect that, and good
to you guys.
[26:15] I was going to go through the list and get...
[26:20] I don't want to make you all sit around and
wait till it gets up on the agenda.
[26:23] So either I can take the three questions, if
the audience doesn't mind,
[26:27] just jump to the three other people that come
to the mic,
[26:31] clear up this file, and let them move on.
[26:33] It will take maybe six, seven minutes, and
then they can leave and not have to
[26:37] stay here, because they all got young kids
at home and stuff, I assume.
[26:39] Thank you, I'm sûr. Are we okay with that?
[26:42] Can I
[27:15] regarding the proposal to remove 477 Delmer
Avenue from
[27:18] the interim bylaw freeze.
[27:20] Ms. Hogan has provided counsel with statistics
and facts about the day care
[27:24] and the child care shortage in the area.
[27:27] Rather than repeating those numbers, I would
like to provide a parent's
[27:31] perspective and paint you the picture of a
new mother.
[27:34] You're navigating one of the biggest transitions
of your life.
[27:38] You are recovering physically, adjusting to
soupless nights,
[27:42] attending medical appointments, learning how
to care for this little
[27:45] person who depends on you for everything.
[27:48] At the same time, you are desperately searching
for child
[27:52] care because you will soon have to return to
the work that you love,
[27:57] your career that you built, but You need your
child care.
[28:01] You put your name on CPE waiting lists before
your child is even born.
[28:07] You make phone calls, send emails, read reviews,
and seek
[28:11] advice from other parents. Months pass.
[28:14] Most places never call you back.
[28:16] This was my reality.
[28:18] This summer, 2026, I finally received a call
from a CPE
[28:23] for my four and a half year old son.
[28:26] I had been on the waiting list since I was
five months pregnant.
[28:29] Five years.
[28:31] Fortunately, in 2022, l'Académie des Petsits
Mets had space
[28:34] available before I returned to work.
[28:37] Like many parents, I felt enormous relief.
[28:42] Not only did I find child care, I found exceptional
child care.
[28:47] The educators are excellent, and the location
allows working families
[28:51] like mine to balance child care and work responsibilities.
[28:55] This issue extends beyond a single daycare.
[28:57] It is about preserving community services and
ensuring that development does not
[29:02] come at the expense of the infrastructure families
rely on every day.
[29:07] I understand this is a complex issue, but important
questions remain.
[29:12] So I respectfully ask Council to keep this
property within the interim bylaw freeze
[29:17] and to allow a fulsome analysis of the impacts
and potential alternatives
[29:21] before making an irreversible decision.
[29:25] Child care is essential for working families,
and I urge Council
[29:29] to preserve this important service.
[29:31] I did have one question tonight for you, Mr.
Mayor and Council members.
[29:36] What binding commitments, if any, are currently
in place to protect the
[29:41] daycare's continued operation and prevent an
interruption in child
[29:45] care for the families it serves?
[29:49] It's a great question, but it's a complicated
situation, right?
[29:53] Because we don't own the building.
[29:54] We can't dictate to the owner, Don't sell your
building, keep a daycare,
[29:59] déponeur, whatever he wants.
[30:00] He has the right to sell his building.
[30:02] That he has the right to do.
[30:04] And I'm going to explain to you, if you don't
mind waiting,
[30:06] until the other people speak, and then I'll
give you a
[30:08] little statement after, okay? Okay.
[30:12] I'm going to say one thing before my little
statement.
[30:15] Everybody at this table is taking it very serious.
[30:18] And it's been an ongoing file, and we're looking
at all kinds de stuff,
[30:21] but it's work in progress, and we hear you,
we understand you.
[30:25] But there's that other side that he wants to
sell, too, right?
[30:28] So, nothing straightforward.
[30:30] A lot of questions to be answered, perhaps,
before a freeze is removed.
[30:34] A lot de questions to be answered. Thank you
very much.
[30:35] So, next. Andrew Asali.
[30:39] All right.
[30:41] Good evening, mayor and council members.
[30:43] My name is Andrew Asli.
[30:45] I'm a Pointclair resident.
[30:46] I'm here about 477 Delmar. Item 5.
[30:51] 6, which proposes removing the property zone
from the city's
[30:54] interim control protection.
[30:56] My oldest son attends l'État de l'État de
Pizy.
[30:59] Mon fils le attend à l'État de l'État de
Pizy.
[31:00] Mon fils le a secrétait pour janvier.
[31:03] Finding childcare for our first child took
the better part of a year.
[31:08] We visited approximately 10 daycares, considered
carefully whom we could trust
[31:11] with our child, and joined several waiting
lists.
[31:14] Throughout that process, we had no certainty
that a suitable place
[31:18] would become available when we needed it.
[31:20] We were fortunate that the timing worked out
à l'Académie de Pizyme.
[31:25] The other daycares indicated availability well
well well well well
[31:29] well well well started there.
[31:30] After months of effort and uncertainty, we
finally had something
[31:35] our family could depend on.
[31:37] Losing this daycare would mean starting that
search again,
[31:40] this time needing two places, and two different
age groups, at the same daycare.
[31:46] The government's latest published count recorded
30 688 children across Québec
[31:52] waiting for an immediately needed child care
place, including 4
[31:56] 689 in Montreal alone.
[31:59] These did not already occupy a place and recognize
child care services
[32:03] such as Our Children Do.
[32:05] Those figures date from mai 2025, as the government's
registration portal
[32:12] is currently going through a revision.
[32:15] In May 2025, Téviah reported on a mother who
waited two years for a child care
[32:19] place, only for the day care to close one month
later.
[32:23] Her family was less searching once again.
[32:26] That experience should be a warning to this
council.
[32:30] Point clair, families who have secured child
care, should not be pushed back into
[32:33] that uncertainty by decisions made here, tonight.
[32:37] Council has an opportunity to prevent that
outcome for the children attending today,
[32:41] and to preserve access to those who will need
this day care tomorrow.
[32:46] These are some of the most formative years
of our child's lives.
[32:50] The foundations of learning, emotional development,
[32:52] and relationships are being established.
[32:55] Research from Harvard Center on Developing
a Child,
[32:59] emphasises the importance of stable, responsive
relationships with
[33:02] caregivers during these early years.
[33:03] For a son, that means educators he knows and
trusts,
[33:07] familiar routines, and friends he sees every
day.
[33:10] These relationships take time to build.
[33:13] Finding another place would not instantly replace
that security and sense of
[33:17] belonging he has developed there.
[33:18] Those human consequences deserve serious consideration
before decisions
[33:24] are made that could disrupt them.
[33:27] The daycare has capacity for 80 children, potentially
serving up to 80 families at a
[33:30] time, but its contribution reaches much further.
[33:33] Since opening in 2012, it has supported successive
groups of
[33:37] children and families in this community.
[33:39] Every year, children move on to school and
younger children take their place.
[33:44] Closing it would remove a resource that future
neighborhood
[33:49] families will also need.
[33:51] Those past, present, and future families all
have a stake in this decision.
[33:54] Their interests are being decided here, whether
or not they've
[33:57] heard about the proposal.
[33:59] People cannot voice et les concerns about a
threat they do not know existe.
[34:03] Their absence from this room must not be mistaken
for acceptance.
[34:06] I understand that agendas and minutes are published
online,
[34:10] but the residents most directly affected are
also caring for babies and young
[34:14] children while managing work and appointments
and meals and bedtime.
[34:18] They have very little spare time to review
council documents,
[34:20] follow successive decisions, and recognize
that a reference to RC22
[34:26] concerns their children's daycare.
[34:30] Hosting documents online does not, by itself,
give those families a
[34:33] meaningful opportunity to participate.
[34:36] For that opportunity to be real, they need
to be reached directly,
[34:39] told plainly what is at stake, and given the
time to respond while
[34:42] their voices can still make a difference.
[34:45] I'm asking Council to retain RC22's protection
and work with the owner,
[34:49] operator, and community to preserve this daycare
at its current location.
[34:53] If relocation becomes unavoidable, there should
be an approved,
[34:57] funded plan that allows the same daycare, its
educators, and its children,
[35:02] to continue together without an interruption
in service.
[35:05] Parents should not discover that their daycare's
future has been decided, only
[35:09] when they are told to find somewhere else.
[35:11] Families with the least time to follow municipal
proceedings are among
[35:15] those who stand the most to lose.
[35:17] Council must make a meaningful effort to hear
them before removing the protection
[35:22] that gives this community time to secure the
daycare's future.
[35:26] Thank you. Thank you.
[35:28] I'm going to... There's one more person, right?
[35:30] Maybe last, yes. That's it?
[35:32] I've got a question.
[35:33] Okay, go ahead. Sorry.
[35:37] Okay.
[35:38] I'd like to ask, will the Council defer the
proposed removal of RC22
[35:45] les termes control by law until affected families
have been directly informed and
[35:49] consulted with options for preserving l'académie
des Potsillons, à 477 Delmar,
[35:56] and have been examined with the owner and operator.
[36:00] Ok, so can we go to the item on the agenda?
[36:03] Can I just call the last lady that was...
[36:05] Or you want to go- OK, go ahead.
[36:06] Is there one more lady who wants to speak?
[36:07] There was a lady called Jessica Royca.
[36:11] So I don't get an answer. You will, and once...
[36:13] I'm going to ask everybody with an answer.
[36:15] To everybody is going to cover up what you're
asking.
[36:17] I'm not avoiding your question.
[36:18] I just don't want to do it three times.
[36:20] Ok, so go ahead.
[36:22] I'd really like you to go as fast as you can,
because everybody in this room is
[36:26] waiting, and we're being léaniers, but we
need to...
[36:28] So go ahead.
[36:30] So when you started this meeting, you guys
were talking about all the
[36:33] celebrations over the summer, all of the things
were communities and
[36:36] families gathered, which is really important.
[36:39] The heart of a city is a family, is un The
basis and crux of that are your
[36:47] families that are living within the actual
Point Claire village,
[36:51] Point Claire area, everywhere.
[36:54] For them to be able to go to work, to be able
to survive,
[36:58] they need to be able to have a lot of the time
to working parents,
[37:02] which means day care has to be something that
comes into play.
[37:07] There will not be enough places for the kids
with the current
[37:12] day care that are allowed.
[37:14] There's maybe two or three positions per age
group at max,
[37:18] at all of them that are currently available,
which means some families will
[37:22] have to make very, very, very big sacrifices.
[37:25] Someone's going to have to stay home, because
if you have no one to watch
[37:28] your kids, what are you going to do?
[37:31] With that said, I have a couple of questions.
[37:35] The first: what direct outreach has the city
made to the families affected by
[37:43] the proposal, beyond publishing agendas and
minutes online.
[37:46] Once again, RC22, as a parent, I had no idea
what that meant
[37:52] until recently when I was informed.
[37:54] But most of the parents that were spoken to
today at our daycare
[37:59] had no idea what what was happening, which
is part of why they're not here today.
[38:03] Because when we spoke to them and we were informing
them as part of the parental
[38:07] committee, I'd say we were maybe 5 out of the
80
[38:11] parents that dropped off their kids today,
that actually knew what was happening.
[38:16] I know this might sound like a silly question,
but maybe freeze me until you
[38:21] could at least speak to those affected within
your community that you are
[38:25] representing, so that way, parents and the
city could come to some understanding.
[38:33] My other question is: what alternatives could
the city provide?
[38:39] If the daycare cannot remain at 477 Delmar,
will council defer removing RC
[38:45] to protection until an approved and funded
relocation occurs.
[38:50] Thank you.
[38:52] Okay.
[38:53] So what I'd like to propose, if you're okay
with it, council,
[38:58] is if we go to the item on the agenda now,
we make our decision how
[39:02] we're going to move forward.
[39:03] That way, you guys can not have to...
[39:07] No, there's no decision.
[39:08] First of all, let me explain something, what's
happening tonight.
[39:11] Tonight is a motion to put it forward, okay?
[39:14] And the adoption.
[39:15] But there's no decision tonight if we're going
to go ahead or we're
[39:20] not going to go ahead.
[39:21] So what happens tonight, the motion gets put
forward.
[39:23] Everybody's made aware of what's going on.
[39:26] And then we have had a big conversation about
this tonight, on the weekend.
[39:31] This is not a new file, and it's been going
on with your daycare
[39:34] for probably over three years now.
[39:36] So what we're going to do, we're going to go
to the
[39:41] item on the agenda now, so you don't have to
wait for it to show
[39:43] up, because I think c'est what I am, 17 something?
[39:45] 5. 6.
[39:45] 5. 6?
[39:47] Ok. 5.
[39:47] 2. Ok, 5.
[39:49] 2.
[39:50] We'll do that.
[39:51] We'll make our statement.
[39:52] You guys will be free to go.
[39:54] And then we have a lot of questions.
[39:56] We've come up between les deux ourselves. If
we answer.
[40:00] You guys have got some great questions that
you've asked me.
[40:03] We're going to get those answers.
[40:04] And then when we come back next month, then
we'll make a decision then.
[40:09] In the meantime, we need time to answer all
your questions and our questions.
[40:14] So we're going to go forward with what's on
the agenda.
[40:16] It's juste un motion to put it forward.
[40:18] What's that going to do?
[40:19] Is going to get everybody on the same page
to react.
[40:22] Ok?
[40:22] Because just saying, oh, we're going to just
remove it.
[40:25] And we need to get the ball rolling because
it's been going
[40:27] on for a long time.
[40:30] Proceed that way, if you're okay with that.
[40:32] Just in order to not complicate the agenda,
if you're okay with it,
[40:36] I don't mind reading both of them, French and
English.
[40:38] That's fine.
[40:39] But maybe we can just do, for their benefit,
we can read it
[40:43] and you can continue explaining. That's fine.
[40:45] But we will put the motion forward in order
when we get to it.
[40:48] You want to wait till we get to the order?
Okay.
[40:50] Yeah, but I can read it now. It doesn't matter.
[40:52] I'll read it out loud. That's not an issue.
[40:53] It's just for the motion to be given.
[40:55] I'd rather be given it in order. Okay.
[40:57] Are we just trying to free them up? That's
all.
[40:59] That's fine.
[41:08] Juste pour votre bénéfice, je vais vous dire
de toute façon ce
[41:11] qui était prévu qu'on allait lire. Ok?
[41:12] Ok.
[41:13] Juste pour votre bénéfice, je vais vous dire
de toute façon ce
[41:14] qui était prévu qu'on allait lire. Ok?
[41:14] Ok. Ok.
[41:15] I'm just going to say something to get back
to some of your questions
[41:17] because I'm trying to make it general.
[41:19] I don't have all the answers tonight. I don't
want to...
[41:21] But we have done a lot of work as a council
and as a city administration.
[41:25] We have reached out to the owner and we have
looked at the areas,
[41:29] other buildings in the area that could be accommodating
for the situation.
[41:33] We're working with the owner, we're working
with the developer,
[41:36] we're working with the vendor.
[41:37] But again, we haven't gotten any solid answers
yet.
[41:41] This is all coming up.
[41:42] It's come up pretty fast, I don't want anybody
to think
[41:46] that we haven't done anything. We're not taking
this serious.
[41:48] It's a unique situation, and everybody has
rights.
[41:52] You guys, like I said earlier, the owner has
a right to sell his
[41:56] building, somebody has a right to buy it, and
you guys have the right to
[42:00] try to keep your daycare there.
[42:01] But as a city, we have to be...
[42:06] We're very sensitive, and we understand, we
all know people have kids that need a
[42:11] daycare, but we also have to be careful.
[42:13] We have to make sure we get all the as, we
make a baser our decision on facts
[42:17] and not just hearsay and so on, so forth.
[42:19] So that's what we're going to end up doing.
[42:21] And we're going to end up with a better view
of the situation down the road.
[42:27] Because right now, we just...
[42:28] All kinds de going on out there, and nothing's
clair.
[42:31] So until we get factual information, not only
from you guys,
[42:35] mais from everybody else, we're going to take
our time to make the right decision.
[42:39] If I may.
[42:39] It could also maybe be a little bit less technical
on the agenda
[42:45] for those parents in the future.
[42:48] We would greatly appreciate it.
[42:50] I hear you, and it's not easy.
[42:52] No, I- You guys have a very difficult- Monestical
stuff is not easy.
[42:54] And it's not only your files, all the files,
it's not easy, right?
[42:57] Et a lot de people don't pay attention to what's
on in their city
[43:00] until there's a situation.
[43:02] Everything we do is done by process.
[43:04] Nobody, everything is done, every file, every
item on the agenda,
[43:07] has gone through a lot of work before it gets
on this agenda.
[43:11] Some files are discussed with urban planning,
so for two, three years before
[43:14] it comes here, and lots of back and forth.
[43:17] So nothing's taken lightly, but when it does
get here, it feels like,
[43:20] Oh, a decision was just made like that.
[43:22] There's been a lot of backroom.
[43:23] But tonight, again, discussion around the table.
[43:26] A lot of great questions came up, and we've
made un commitment here.
[43:31] We're going to go out and try to get those
answers, factual information.
[43:35] And then we'll be able to portray that to you
and make the right
[43:39] decision based on that information.
[43:42] Madame Guteriz?
[43:45] C'est la vie de motion et le dépôt d'un projet
de règlement modifiant le règlement
[43:48] de contrôle intérimaire PC 29 46 dans le
but d'exclure la zone RC 22
[43:54] de son application.
[43:55] Ce règlement modificateur est la dernière
étape avant de pouvoir traiter la demande
[44:00] de permis pour la construction de 16 maisons
de ville, soit pour le
[44:03] redéveloppement du 477 avenue Del Mar.
[44:06] Les résolutions requises préalablement ont
déjà été adoptées par le conseil.
[44:10] Cet amendement n'est pas soumis au processus
d'approbation référendaire et ne
[44:13] doit pas faire l'objet d'un examen de conformité
aux objectifs du schéma
[44:17] d'aménagement et de développement de l'agglomération
de Montréal.
[44:20] L'adoption d'un tel règlement sera mise au
vote à une séance subséquente du conseil.
[44:26] Ce n'est pas obligé d'être octobre, ça peut
être novembre, c'est une
[44:28] séance subséquente du conseil OK.
[44:31] So she can read the ending.
[44:32] So it's a notice of motion and filing of a
draft by law, Amending Interim Control By
[44:36] law, PC 2946, in order to exclude zone RC 22
from its application.
[44:41] This Amending By law is the last step required
in order to be able to process
[44:45] the permit application for the construction
of 16 townhouses, which is
[44:49] the redevelopment of 477 Delmore Avenue.
[44:52] The previously required resolutions have been
adopted by council.
[44:55] This amendment is not subject to approval by
way of referendum and does not require
[45:00] conformity review with the objectives of the
land use, planning,
[45:03] and development concept of the Montreal agglomération.
[45:06] The adoption of the bylaw will be voted on
at a subsequent meeting of Council.
[45:10] As she said, it's not necessarily in October,
not necessarily in November.
[45:14] It will be once décider de ce que c'est sur
la date.
[45:16] D'accord.
[45:17] Vous voulez continuer avec le reste de l'agenda
en rède order et y aller?
[45:20] Ou vous voulez continuer à le faire en rède
ouverte?
[45:22] Je pense que nous devons passer le temps à
la finir le débat.
[45:23] Et après, on reviendra.
[45:27] Ok. On va suivre l'agenda.
[45:31] Nous allons passer le reste de la question.
[45:33] Mais encore...
[45:35] .
[45:37] Non, il n'y a pas de décision. Non, il n'y
a pas de décision.
[45:39] Le notice of motion. Sorry, notice of motion.
[45:41] I was just trying to alleviate them from this
meeting.
[45:46] If we were just to put the notice motion forward,
then they could all leave.
[45:52] Instead of having to wait for all the questions,
I know we're
[45:54] jumping the agenda.
[45:55] Are we okay, legally?
[45:58] We're good to Are you guys okay with that?
[46:02] I know. Just so they can leave.
[46:05] I'm breaking all kinds of rules.
[46:07] I'm going to get my hand slapped.
[46:08] I'm going to tell you right now.
[46:10] But it would just alleviate 15, 16 people,
young kids, they can go home.
[46:15] Let's go to 5.
[46:16] 6. Let's go ahead.
[46:18] Ok, then we'll return to the regular order
of the agenda.
[46:21] 5. 6, you've read the motion?
[46:24] Read it, if somebody- We've read it.
[46:25] I just need somebody to put the motion forward.
[46:28] Please, can I have somebody to put the motion
Cynthia Home in District 5.
[46:32] Perfect. Thank you.
[46:34] That's all that's going to happen tonight.
[46:36] The motion put forward.
[46:37] Information will be made public. We'll get
the answers.
[46:40] We'll come back to you. You'll see it on the
agenda.
[46:42] We'll let somebody know.
[46:44] Then you can spread the word amongst yourselves.
[46:45] We don't have the ability to call 80 day care
parents, but you'll get the word
[46:50] spread out when we've gotten the answers and
the stuff to be able to
[46:53] make our propre decision.
[46:55] All right? So you're free to go.
[46:58] I'd like to thank, I think, you should thank
everybody in this room
[47:01] for having the patience in letting this happen,
because...
[47:02] Thank you, everyone. C'est une unique situation.
[47:04] Thank you. Thank you.
[47:06] We appreciate.
[47:08] Thank you.
[47:10] Next person is Ken Lyons.
[47:15] Mr. Lyons?
[47:20] Oui, bienvenue.
[47:21] C'est un peu simple.
[47:23] Je vais essayer de rapporter quelque chose
sur le site de la ville de la
[47:29] ville, de quelques poteaux.
[47:30] Ils appellent de être à Hymes, pratiquement,
[47:35] 15 mètres de la ville de Kirtland.
[47:39] Vous allez dans le site, il y a un adresse.
[47:43] Il n'y a pas d'adresse là. Il n'y a pas d'adresse.
[47:45] So can I put a request in? Can't do it.
[47:48] Done.
[47:48] Well, why don't you just tell Mr. Jouard, on
va le faire.
[47:52] Il y a un moyen de dire: Il y a des problèmes
à ce point
[47:57] où il n'y a pas de ville.
[48:00] This should be a means to say, there's problems
in a spot
[48:00] where there's no civic address.
[48:00] There should be a way of making a report, to
fix it.
[48:03] The other thing is a simple comment.
[48:07] It's to show my appreciation to the person
that organized or
[48:13] specified that lines be painted on St.
[48:17] John's Road as we come out of Fairview.
[48:21] That is the most brilliant thing.
[48:23] Been after that for maybe 30 years.
[48:27] It's finally done. So I'm saying, yay.
[48:30] There you go. 30 years, we broke a record.
[48:32] Pretty good. There you go.
[48:34] One last thing, directed to you, Mr. Maire.
[48:38] I have trouble hearing you because, frequently,
you speak too close to
[48:43] the mic, and it gives us problems.
[48:46] I strongly suggest, you talk with your specialists
in the
[48:51] audio system, that you get yourself a level
earmark, mic.
[48:55] You put that on yourself, you can move around
as much as you want.
[48:59] The sound will be generally always excellent.
[49:03] Please consider it seriously.
[49:05] Well, you can see, I've been trying to move
this around.
[49:07] I feel like I'm swallowing the mic.
[49:08] I feel like it's right in my face.
[49:10] So I'm trying to move it around. So good point.
[49:12] Well taken. Thank you.
[49:13] Thank you.
[49:15] Next.
[49:16] Normand à la pointe.
[49:19] Vous passez votre tour? Ok.
[49:21] Gary Carr.
[49:32] Good evening, Mr. Mayor and Council.
[49:35] I came across a company called Pure Pave.
[49:39] What they do is they pave roads.
[49:42] Their system is a new system and it's being
tested right now in Ottawa, which
[49:47] has somewhat the same weather as we do.
[49:51] When you pave the road, instead of the water
forcing to the sewer
[49:54] system, it goes directly through the paving
and into the road itself.
[50:00] Je ne sais pas si vous avez eu la chance de
prendre un look à l'avis.
[50:03] Je l'ai forwardé à vous et à monsieur Girardin.
[50:06] Je n'ai pas vu l'application, mais je vais
regarder.
[50:12] Merci.
[50:15] Thank you.
[50:16] We see each other now, I'll get back to what
I think about it.
[50:19] All right, thank you.
[50:21] Claude Cousinot.
[50:28] Oh, thank you.
[50:40] Premièrement, je veux remercier Monsieur...
[50:47] Ce n'est pas grave.
[50:52] Il a répondu à mes questions.
[50:55] Lui, il s'en souvient.
[50:57] Pour 5,7 à l'agenda, si je comprends bien,
[51:05] c'est pour faire suite à la motion du 25.
[51:11] Ok.
[51:13] Le 1,6 pour le moulin est inclus là-dedans.
[51:20] La technicalité était la subvention donnée
par le gouvernement de 600 000.
[51:27] Ça va être tout expliqué quand on de la
pointe.
[51:31] J'étais ici.
[51:35] En effet, c'est ça.
[51:38] Est-ce que s'il fallait qu'il arrive quelque
chose à la Société de la
[51:46] sauvegarde du patrimoine de Pointe-Clair.
[51:52] Si elle faisait défaut, qui est-ce qui se
ramasse avec le Big Mutts ball?
[52:01] Je vais laisser monsieur Jauard nous répondre
à cette question-là.
[52:10] Le gouvernement a des critères par rapport
à l'aide financière qui est octroyée, donc
[52:15] essentiellement, ça dépend des conditions.
[52:18] Je ne peux pas me prononcer si c'est quelque
chose d'aussi vague,
[52:21] mais il y a des critères essentiellement pour
l'octroi et la
[52:25] reprise des subventions.
[52:29] Ok.
[52:30] Deuxième partie: est-ce que l'administration
de la ville de
[52:35] Point-Clair a vu l'entente ou le buy entre
la société et le diocese?
[52:47] Moi, je ne l'ai pas vu personnellement.
[52:51] On a vu les premiers suspects, je pense, puis
c'est tout?
[52:55] Non?
[52:57] Maître Thibault?
[53:03] Ça serait important de le voir, puis d'en
prendre connaissance.
[53:08] C'est tout. Merci.
[53:10] Merci. Si vous pouvez répondre à ça, bien.
[53:13] .
[53:16] Susan Weaver.
[53:33] Ok.
[53:36] This came up earlier.
[53:39] This has been a subject ongoing in the community.
[53:44] When will the urban plan be available for the
public?
[53:49] I'm curious, and it seems that other people
are, too.
[53:52] Is it going to be three months?
[53:53] Do you have a timeline?
[53:54] Might be available?
[53:57] I know... No?
[53:58] Ok.
[53:58] No, I don't want to say We're coming to the
end of our discussions
[54:02] amongst ourselves.
[54:04] So we have two more meetings scheduled.
[54:05] I believe the last one is September 25th, and
then they're going to finish writing
[54:09] it up, and then they'll present to us, I assume.
[54:12] And then it will...
[54:13] So when do you think Mr. Jouard, we've been
asking for a date,
[54:16] but the beginning of the new year?
[54:19] Yeah, the intent is at the end of this year,
beginning of the new year.
[54:22] That would be...
[54:24] So let's say around January. Okay.
[54:27] And I would like an explanation of why some
[54:32] projects are removed from the freeze before
the urban plan has been finalized.
[54:39] I've heard that it is needed to be done in
Point Claire because
[54:44] of the last four So for the years, there has
been little revenue,
[54:47] and it's for ongoing upkeep, like the infrastructure
that needs to be done.
[54:52] And also, I'm thinking that maybe, perhaps,
you want to avoid more lawsuits.
[54:58] Because as of May, 2026, there were 16 pending
files before the
[55:05] court, plus the previous mayor's personal ongoing
case of 168,000.
[55:11] This is a lot of money.
[55:13] So your question to why some stuff was taken
out of the RCI before an urban plan.
[55:19] How do you choose?
[55:21] There's a lot of stuff that goes...
[55:23] So first of all, an RCI is usually in place
for about two to three years.
[55:30] Maximum, and under normal circumstance.
[55:32] Usually, un RCI is put on one particular zone
or two zones,
[55:35] not almost the whole city.
[55:38] While there's an RCI on, a développeur est
allowed to deposit that
[55:42] project anyway, because there's already an
urban plan in
[55:45] place, and they can deposit a plan adhering
to the old bylaw.
[55:51] The bylaws are in place. They're allowed to
do that.
[55:52] That's their rights.
[55:54] By using the RCI, by having the RCI there,
and by having all these discussions that
[56:01] they've been having with council, the past
council, this new council over
[56:04] the last couple of years, urban planning is
getting a better idea
[56:09] of what the people want moving forward.
[56:12] So they've been able to use the RCI as a tool
to get some better projects,
[56:18] actually, than what they're allowed to actually
do with the old bylaws,
[56:20] if you understand where I'm going.
[56:22] But something like the project on La Brust
and St.
[56:24] John's Road, that apartment building is going
up there, and correct me if I'm
[56:29] wrong, the The reason why it got taken out,
the RCI, was it had been
[56:32] presented prior to the RCI.
[56:34] There's a bunch of stuff that went on.
[56:36] Then the gentleman came back with a totally
affordable housing project.
[56:39] So every unit in that project is affordable.
[56:42] So that was a decision that was taken by council.
[56:44] We need affordable housing.
[56:46] He's way beyond the criteria that we were looking
at 10% or 20%.
[56:51] He's willing to make the whole building affordable.
[56:53] He had a program CMHC.
[56:55] That's why that one got taken out, because
it met all the criteria,
[56:57] if not more, than what the city wanted. So
that's why.
[57:01] So it's cause by cause.
[57:03] There's no rhyme or reason, but every project
is looked at.
[57:06] And if it's a good project, we have all the
right in the
[57:08] world to remove from the RCI.
[57:10] And it's been going on five years, six years
soon, that's been going on.
[57:14] This has to come to an
[57:45] I came to this evening.
[57:47] I am part of the Prima buildings off of Mason
and Point Claire.
[57:52] I came this evening with two questions.
[57:54] I think there was a gentleman earlier who asked
about the advancement of
[57:59] common areas in the subsidy grant.
[58:02] So thank you so much for that update, and we
look forward to understanding
[58:05] how those conversations progress.
[58:08] We also, as a co-ownership, had a first discussion
last Friday avec
[58:14] Ecohabitation, with a young lady named Alicia
Ruelle, who is incredibly
[58:18] well-informed and very, very helpful.
[58:21] I'm not sure if she actually spoke to you.
I think there was a parlé à vous.
[58:25] Je pense qu'il y avait un meeting, il y a un
jour.
[58:28] Elle a dit que une visite à un site visit
would be helpful to understand
[58:34] further recommendations for our individual
homes and the co-ownership.
[58:39] It's our understanding que la visite à un
site visit must be aligned upon by
[58:42] both Ecohabitation and the city.
[58:45] We would like to seek your alignment to have
them visit our property.
[58:50] Then, I guess, confirm that I could absorb
the
[58:55] fee for such a visit, because there's obviously
a fee
[58:59] as part of my own homeowners' grant, if that
makes sense.
[59:03] We have dates planned already, Mr. Jouard,
in order to...
[59:07] We're going on doing a site visit with the
rate coming up?
[59:09] End of September, beginning of October.
[59:11] It's been scheduled already. Oh, wonderful.
[59:14] For Prima buildings? Yes.
[59:18] Ok. Do you require for us to have someone...
[59:22] Should we follow up with you offline to see
if we can accompany the visit for...
[59:26] ? Yeah, absolutely.
[59:27] Ok. Oh, wonderful.
[59:28] Great news. Well, thank you so much.
[59:30] There you go. Thank you for coming.
[59:31] Thank you.
[59:33] Michel Charent.
[59:39] Good evening.
[59:42] I had two questions.
[59:44] One was Just to know for the maintenance and
occupancy by law,
[59:50] just a follow-up to know where it's going now?
[59:53] We haven't had that discussion again.
[59:55] They're still working on it.
[59:56] We're a little bit overwhelmed with other priorities,
but
[1:00:02] nothing's come with that yet. Okay.
[1:00:03] And then I have a curious question.
[1:00:09] When there's a new développement, when a developer
comes in to develop an
[1:00:15] For example, from what I understand, FP Innovations
on Saint-Jean, near
[1:00:21] Sèche-Field, is going to get torn down.
[1:00:23] Is that what I...
[1:00:27] Okay, well...
[1:00:29] Not yet.
[1:00:30] Okay, but let's say there's an
[1:00:36] area that is going to be developed.
[1:00:42] Does the city, à Point Claire,
[1:00:48] have a zoning bylaw whereby the developer
[1:00:54] has to set aside part of land for green space?
[1:01:03] Yep, absolutely.
[1:01:05] In land and money.
[1:01:08] And what à un urban planner.
[1:01:14] But to me, it's not a very big park.
[1:01:22] When you look, I don't know how many
[1:01:29] condos there are, but it's in relative to
[1:01:37] how many condos there are, it looks very small.
[1:01:45] And so my concern is,
[1:01:49] other developments that are going to come
[1:01:56] into Point Claire, is there a way that Point
Claire can
[1:02:01] ensure that there are green spaces, dog parks,
facilities that are for the
[1:02:08] enjoyment of the citizens in Point Claire?
[1:02:12] Absolutely.
[1:02:14] So that project, that area there, was developed
in 2008.
[1:02:20] The actual concept was done around 2008.
[1:02:24] It was probably one of the first development
projects in Point Claire.
[1:02:27] It took a long time to get going, but we inherited
what was there.
[1:02:31] Moving forward with the new reality and everything
else, how important green
[1:02:37] space is now, it's completely different.
[1:02:38] It was five years ago, 10 years ago, 20.
[1:02:41] So there's a bigger value put on that now.
[1:02:43] So every project we're looking at, that's what
we're looking at.
[1:02:46] How can we generate more green space?
[1:02:48] How can we have more parks?
[1:02:50] Sometimes people complain about height the
buildings, but height the buildings,
[1:02:55] you have to remember, some of the densifications,
[1:02:57] we'll use high mess, for instance. Ok?
[1:02:59] Those buildings 10 ou 11 stories high on Hymes
Boulevard.
[1:03:02] So that's in a Todd area.
[1:03:03] That's in an area that's within 1 km, the Rennes,
the way the crueils fly.
[1:03:09] The government dictates number of doors per
hectare that you have
[1:03:13] to put in an area like OK?
[1:03:16] So I'm just going to pick a number.
[1:03:17] Let's say it's 300 doors per hectare.
[1:03:20] The government says, so good, so we have a
choice.
[1:03:22] We put four buildings of X number of doors,
or we put two buildings a little
[1:03:27] bit higher, but have more green space.
[1:03:30] That's the balance that we have to...
[1:03:31] That's what we're balancing.
[1:03:32] So on Hymis, right now, those new buildings,
[1:03:35] compared to what was there originally, an industrial
building,
[1:03:39] we increase the green space by over...
[1:03:41] I say, there's almost 60% green space.
[1:03:43] We probably increase by over 40 when those
developments took place.
[1:03:47] But do those green spaces...
[1:03:49] It should be a mix, maybe some trees and forest,
[1:03:56] dog park, something for the teenagers, not
just for the babies.
[1:04:01] No, absolutely.
[1:04:02] But I'm just giving you an exemple, when we're
up against...
[1:04:04] When it comes to green space, the height of
the buildings,
[1:04:06] it's a big puzzle, right?
[1:04:08] But we are all much more protective over a
green
[1:04:15] We need to integrate more green spaces.
[1:04:18] That's why my point was, those types of buildings,
it frees up...
[1:04:23] Higher buildings free up more green space.
It's not ideal.
[1:04:25] It's not always on public space, but at least
it's green space.
[1:04:28] Now, we have to find a way to get more public...
[1:04:31] We know that area is missing public space.
We know that.
[1:04:33] We're looking at all kinds of options. We're
looking at everything.
[1:04:35] Moving forward, we're going to find solutions.
[1:04:37] Ok, parfait. Thank you.
[1:04:41] Charles Des Rochers?
[1:04:45] Charles Des Rochers, District 1. Bonjour.
[1:05:00] Moi, pour faire comme les autres, ça fait
depuis 1955 que je suis à Pointe-Clair.
[1:05:06] Lorsque j'étais jeune, j'ai toujours resté
dans le village de Pointe-Clair.
[1:05:10] Il y avait...
[1:05:11] Si on concerne le 356 bord du lac.
[1:05:15] Je vois qu'il y a beaucoup de choses à voter
ce soir, plus tard dans la réunion.
[1:05:19] Quand j'étais jeune, c'était White Rose qui
était là.
[1:05:22] Je ne sais pas si un de vous connaissent ça.
[1:05:24] Ils vendaient l'essence, c'était un garage.
[1:05:26] Après ça, c'est devenu juste un garage.
[1:05:30] Ça a été un garage il n'y a pas longtemps.
[1:05:32] Maintenant, je vois qu'il y a plusieurs...
[1:05:35] Je ne sais pas comment je peux appeler ça,
dérégations mineures,
[1:05:38] plans d'implantation, ce soir.
[1:05:41] Dans tout ça, vu qu'il vendait de l'essence,
il y avait
[1:05:46] des systèmes à essence souterraines.
[1:05:49] Je voudrais savoir si dans vos décisions,
dans vos discussions, si un, vous savez
[1:05:54] que les systèmes d'essence sont toujours là,
puis ils n'ont jamais été enlevés.
[1:06:00] Qu'est-ce que la ville...
[1:06:02] Parce qu'elle a vu, il y avait un droit à
qui?
[1:06:05] C'était un droit à qui de garage, mais là,
c'est un changement,
[1:06:08] c'est un nouvel usage.
[1:06:10] Surtout que je vois qu'il y a une demande de
plan d'implantation.
[1:06:15] Un plan d'implantation, d'habitude, c'est parce
qu'on agrandit,
[1:06:17] c'est ce que je peux comprendre, mais je reviens
à ma question principale:
[1:06:21] qu'est-ce que la ville a pensé au fait que
des citernes à gaz
[1:06:28] souterraines d'enterrés dans le sol, puis
ça n'a jamais été enlevé.
[1:06:33] Je voudrais rajouter que le bord de l'eau est
très proche, puis que l'entrée d'eau
[1:06:38] est juste l'autre côté de la pointe des Seurs.
[1:06:41] Je pourrais vous parler, j'ai vu à Saint-Ange
de la Belleville
[1:06:43] l'année passée, ils ont repéré un peu le
bord de l'eau et
[1:06:47] l'environnement du Québec était là et il
y avait beaucoup d'huile dans l'eau.
[1:06:52] Je reviens à ma question.
[1:06:53] Mais je ne connais pas exactement le règlement
sur est-ce que la ville...
[1:06:57] Je sais que si le propriétaire d'une bâtisse,
il
[1:07:02] croise pour une raison à l'autre, il veut
mettre une foundation, station,
[1:07:06] il faut qu'il fasse des tests de contamination.
[1:07:10] Si tu ne touches pas le terrain, je n'ai pas
sûr.
[1:07:13] C'est une très bonne question.
[1:07:15] Je peux vous dire- Je n'ai pas le report, mais
on peut trouver le report
[1:07:19] pour vous dans le prochain jour.
[1:07:20] Je pense que c'est important.
[1:07:22] Je peux rajouter que ce qui arrive, c'est que
le ministère de l'Environnement,
[1:07:25] c'était en temps normal maintenant ou il y
a juste une trentaine d'années,
[1:07:31] le ministère de l'Environnement, ça serait
maillé, probablement à la ville
[1:07:33] aussi, parce que ça aurait été rapporté
sur une liste.
[1:07:42] D'ailleurs, il y a un autre terrain, je ne
sais pas si vous le savez,
[1:07:45] Il y a un autre terrain dans le village de
Point-Clair, qui est sur la liste.
[1:07:48] Mais à côté de Romanos?
[1:07:50] Qui est sur la liste parce qu'il y a déjà
eu des citades à gaz.
[1:07:52] Les citades à gaz ont été enlevés, mais
c'est quand même sur la
[1:07:55] liste des terrains contaminés.
[1:07:58] Il y en avait un, l'autre, c'était le grand
terrain qui a fait
[1:08:02] tellement de troubles ici sur Rhinmus, là
où tout le monde se
[1:08:07] lancait un peu la balle.
[1:08:08] Là, ce que je comprends, le terrain, il n'est
pas sur la liste parce que ça
[1:08:11] fait tellement longtemps qu'il n'y a pas eu
d'essence de vendu là, que finalement,
[1:08:16] le ministère de l'Environnement, il n'existait
même pas.
[1:08:18] Un des instrateurs du ministère de l'Environnement,
c'était Clifford Lincoln,
[1:08:22] qui est encore vivant à Beaconfield.
[1:08:24] Ça vous donne une idée.
[1:08:26] Je répète encore: moi, je suis né en 1955.
[1:08:32] Ma mère était là: Mon arrière-grand-père,
comme de la chanson:
[1:08:35] Mon arrière-grand-père.
[1:08:38] Moi, je voudrais au moins savoir, au moins
c'est la conscience du village,
[1:08:42] est-ce que vous êtes au courant qu'il y a
des systèmes à gare,
[1:08:44] puis c'est un danger public?
[1:08:46] Qu'est-ce que vous voulez faire?
[1:08:47] Moi-même, je ne suis pas au courant, mais
comme je dis, on va faire une petite
[1:08:52] investigation.
[1:08:52] On va demander des questions dans les services
dans les prochains jours.
[1:08:56] On va répondre dans nous autres dans une coupe
de jour, puis on
[1:08:59] va avoir des reports.
[1:09:00] Oui, mais là, c'est parce que là, vous allez
donner des permis ce soir.
[1:09:04] Mais il ne change pas le bâtisse à le moment.
[1:09:08] Même à ça, il change l'utilisation.
[1:09:10] Il change l'utilisation, mais...
[1:09:12] Mais là, j'en profite, justement.
[1:09:14] C'est ça ma question: est-ce que vous avez
l'intention de faire quoi par rapport
[1:09:18] aux citoyens qui sont enterrés?
[1:09:19] Parce que vous avez un devoir aussi d'avoir
le règlement de
[1:09:22] la ville de surveiller ça.
[1:09:23] Si vous n'étiez pas au courant, là, vous
l'êtes.
[1:09:26] À moins que vous me disiez que je ne connais
pas ce que je parle,
[1:09:30] Il y a d'autres gens qui peuvent confirmer
mon témoignage.
[1:09:33] Je comprends ce que tu dis, mais comme je dis,
je n'ai pas les réponses.
[1:09:38] Si on est au courant de les tanques dans le
terre, on n'est pas au courant.
[1:09:41] Mais ce soir, qu'est-ce qui va passer?
[1:09:44] C'est des le règlement pour les changements
intérieurs.
[1:09:47] Je pense qu'ils ne font rien, ils ne creusent
pas, ils ne font
[1:09:50] pas les grosses rénovations.
[1:09:52] Quand on va rendu là, on va expliquer un peu
plus.
[1:09:55] Je suis ici maintenant.
[1:09:57] Parce que là, vous parlez du stationnement,
là, vous
[1:09:59] parlez de faire des bons deals des fois.
[1:10:01] Vous avez fait un bon deal au coin du quartier.
[1:10:04] Vu que vous avez un pouvoir avec les nouveaux
propriétaires,
[1:10:07] peut-être que c'est le temps de négocier
le coin, puis de tardre le bras peut-être,
[1:10:10] le nouveau propriétaire pour qu'il enlève
les citernes à gare.
[1:10:12] À moins que vous pensez que ce n'est pas important
Non, je pense
[1:10:16] que c'est très important.
[1:10:17] Je pense que vous avez monté un bon point,
mais comme ce soir,
[1:10:22] je ne peux pas le prendre.
[1:10:23] Est-ce qu'il y a des tanks ou pas de tanks.
[1:10:24] D'habitude- Moi, je vous dis quand il y en
a.
[1:10:27] Je comprends, c'est ça que tu dis, mais nous
autres, comme une ville,
[1:10:31] on va vérifier ça demain.
[1:10:34] On va voir dans les prochains jours qu'est-ce
que c'est la
[1:10:37] responsabilité de la ville.
[1:10:38] Mais ce soir, on va passer ou on regarde une
demande pour les rénovations
[1:10:45] intérieures. Ils ne creuse pas dans la terre.
[1:10:48] Ça, c'est une autre chose.
[1:10:50] Lui, comme propriétaire, le propriétaire
est responsable aussi.
[1:10:54] D'habitude, quand on va aux banques, il demande
le financement et tout,
[1:10:57] il demande pour un test de contamination aussi.
[1:11:01] Mais on va vérifier ce que tu dis, on va voir
qu'est-ce qu'on peut faire.
[1:11:04] Changement d'usage.
[1:11:05] Deuxième question sur le prénom, c'est pour
l'autobus 201.
[1:11:08] Il faut que j'aille vite parce que le temps
n'est pas pour ça.
[1:11:11] Le 201, le système d'autobus, ça ne fonctionne
pas.
[1:11:14] Je ne sais pas ce que le 201, par exemple,
parce qu'il n'y a pas tellement d'autobus
[1:11:18] dans le Point de l'Aire qui passait, ils ont
changé ça, ça faisait 40 ans.
[1:11:22] Mais là, je me demandais, est-ce que le comité
de circulation
[1:11:25] a de quoi faire dans ça?
[1:11:26] Ce n'est pas le comité de circulation, ça,
c'est les le STM qui a imposé ça
[1:11:31] sur nous quand le remet est ouvert.
[1:11:33] Mais là, on a une ligne directe avec le STM.
[1:11:35] On a plusieurs plaintes, on n'est pas content
avec les changements qu'il a fait.
[1:11:39] Puis là, il a dit: Donne-nous autres une charge,
donne-nous un peu de temps pour
[1:11:42] les faire réajuster, mais ça ne marche pas.
[1:11:44] Là, on va avoir d'autres appels dans les prochains
mois qui s'en vient pour voir
[1:11:48] qu'est-ce qu'il peut faire, parce que ce n'est
pas juste un point clair.
[1:11:51] Les nouveaux routes, probablement 70% des nouveaux
routes ne marchent pas.
[1:11:56] Il faut qu'on trouve des solutions.
[1:11:58] Est-ce que c'est le comité de circulation,
c'est qui s'occupe de ça?
[1:12:01] Non, ce n'est pas le comité de circulation.
[1:12:03] Ce n'est pas le comité de circulation? C'est
le STM, le système de transport.
[1:12:06] La circulation ne s'occupe pas de la circulation.
[1:12:08] Pas de les autobus.
[1:12:09] Pas de les autobus. Merci.
[1:12:12] Ne vous occupez pas. Ne vous occupez pas du
train de rien.
[1:12:15] La circulation, pas le transport, rien par
rapport à...
[1:12:17] Ils viennent dans notre district, il fait qu'est-ce
qu'il veut.
[1:12:20] C'est ça le truc. Ce n'est pas ce qu'ils disent.
[1:12:22] Merci. Merci.
[1:12:24] Janet Hannah?
[1:12:34] Good evening.
[1:12:36] Good evening. Bonsoir.
[1:12:39] First of all, as you know, we pay a lot of
taxes.
[1:12:42] I have brought this up every time I come here.
[1:12:46] Federal income tax, provincial income tax,
property tax, water tax, school tax,
[1:12:52] GST, QST, PST, and all the STs.
[1:12:56] And then we see in the budget, which I was
not aware that
[1:13:00] there was a meeting, a special meeting, that
took place half an
[1:13:04] hour before this one.
[1:13:06] It would have been nice to actually have sent
a notice to everybody by paper,
[1:13:11] delivered at home, so that people know that
this is an
[1:13:15] important meeting, because it impacts the money
that's going to
[1:13:17] come out of our pockets.
[1:13:19] So I think all urgent meetings, such as that
one, where we need to know
[1:13:25] how our money is being spent, where our money
is being spent,
[1:13:28] and we need to have the last word on whether
we agree to how
[1:13:33] it should be spent or not.
[1:13:36] I see that there's a lot that is being told
about how we should make our homes
[1:13:42] flood-resistant, water-resistant.
[1:13:45] That brings the onus on us, the residents.
[1:13:48] That should not be the case.
[1:13:52] What I would like to know is what have you
done concretely to stop flooding?
[1:13:58] And please don't tell us that you have done
your best, because that
[1:14:01] statement expired three years ago.
[1:14:03] We need to know concretely, and we need to
have the information
[1:14:07] available also on the website.
[1:14:10] So there is a site on the website for flood
mitigation,
[1:14:13] the things that we've been doing. There is
a whole site just on that.
[1:14:16] There's a page just on that.
[1:14:17] If you'd like to know what we've done, since
I can just speak as of November,
[1:14:21] since this council got put into place, we've
got 11 projects
[1:14:24] approved by Oasis program.
[1:14:25] 6.8 million dollars from the federal government
coming to us
[1:14:28] to realize 11 projects.
[1:14:30] We just did a 2.8 million dollar project on
Belmont and Terracotta.
[1:14:33] We built a Burm on Terracotta to stop the water
from going into
[1:14:36] the house on Saddlewood.
[1:14:38] We dug down the soccer field on Belmont, at
the bottom of Terracotta,
[1:14:42] dug that down, made that a retention tank,
what they call a sponge park, to absorb
[1:14:46] all the water coming off of Terracotta.
[1:14:48] We've put in a demand to buy a truck to help
us to suck out all
[1:14:53] our sewers on our own.
[1:14:54] We don't have to rely on an outside company.
[1:14:56] We've started inspecting and cleaning all our
drains.
[1:15:01] There's so many things we've done.
[1:15:02] I'm forgetting half of them. Gilles, help me
here.
[1:15:04] Implantation of the financial aid program,
sir.
[1:15:06] Oh, yeah. We started the financial aid program.
[1:15:08] So that money that you see, what we're trying
to do is get people,
[1:15:13] get their houses water-resilient.
[1:15:15] We don't have flooding, so we don't have flooding.
[1:15:16] So we started financial aid program where we
were giving you up to 5,000 dollars per
[1:15:20] household, up to 50% de the renovation to make
your house more water-resilient.
[1:15:24] That paperwork takes approximately up to three
days to complete.
[1:15:29] Well, Et pour 5 000 dollars, if our expenditures
and the repairs were
[1:15:35] far more than 5 000 dollars, where does that
leave us?
[1:15:39] It leaves you in a great place, because don't
forget, you just mentioned,
[1:15:42] this is taxpayers money, we have to spend it
reasonably.
[1:15:44] So we're not going to open up...
[1:15:46] You, as a homeowner, will be benefiting from
the work that you
[1:15:50] do on your house when it comes time to resell
your house down the road.
[1:15:53] It will add value because your insurance company
and stuff can say, Well,
[1:15:57] you can tell your insurance company and your
real estate agent that you've done
[1:16:01] the work to make it and you've had no flooding
in the last three,
[1:16:03] five, or whatever number.
[1:16:04] As far as filling it the forms, I've done it.
[1:16:07] Some of us have done it.
[1:16:08] It's not three days, it's a day, an hour.
[1:16:11] It's not that long, but you have to follow
the route.
[1:16:13] We're trying. It's a new programme.
[1:16:14] We initiated, we're trying to help as many
people as we can, just like
[1:16:18] we did with the ash bore.
[1:16:19] There's a great example, the people that benefit
from the ash
[1:16:22] bore when the trees all got contaminés.
[1:16:24] Some people have had over $100,000 in damage.
[1:16:28] What's $5,000 going to do OK, so ask the people
who will cancel the program then.
[1:16:32] At the same time, you've got vehicles, replacement
vehicles,
[1:16:36] that totals $8 million over the span of the
next four years.
[1:16:39] Why are we spending $8 million replacing vehicles
when the Point clair,
[1:16:46] Public Works people are waltzing around that
there wasn't a single person
[1:16:49] to help us during the flood? Oh, I don't disagree.
[1:16:52] And yet $8 million are spent.
[1:16:54] And how are we able to veto such a decision
so that our money is not spent
[1:17:01] replacing vehicles, especially when you're
worried about being green,
[1:17:05] why are the vehicles always...
[1:17:06] Why are we spending so much money?
[1:17:09] That's exactly why we're replacing them, because
the newer
[1:17:12] technology is much greener. You got 1.
[1:17:14] 4, $1.6 million in there.
[1:17:16] There's a truck to help us maintain our sewer
system.
[1:17:19] There's lots of money going into buying specialized
equipment in order to maintain
[1:17:23] our system due to the new réalité.
[1:17:25] Every time we replace a truck, the technology
is changing so fast.
[1:17:31] We're trying to keep our fleet as green as
possible.
[1:17:33] We're getting rid of all the big vans and pickup
trucks trying to
[1:17:36] go électrique or hybrid.
[1:17:38] We're trying to be as green as we can.
[1:17:40] These équipements, they work hard and they
have a- You don't need to go électrique.
[1:17:44] That is not Ça, c'est pour le purpose.
[1:17:45] Je ne suis pas en train de dire: Hybride, gas.
[1:17:47] We're buying the latest technology with the
best equipment to do the job.
[1:17:51] And right now, the big, big, big dump trucks
and big motors,
[1:17:53] you don't go électrique. With that, we still
have to go with gas.
[1:17:56] But they're so much better, so much greener
today than they were five ago.
[1:18:00] The technology is changing every day.
[1:18:01] Yeah, but that's money that's coming right
out of our pockets.
[1:18:04] Those cars, had they stayed, there would have
been a lot more money in
[1:18:09] the coffers, and we would not be paying so
much in taxes.
[1:18:12] Parce que c'est vrai que ça se passe en tous
les cas.
[1:18:14] Les voitures, ça se passe en tous les cas.
[1:18:14] Les voitures, tax, what happens is that the
city is
[1:18:17] able to repossesse their property.
[1:18:19] They would have paid mortgage interest rates.
[1:18:22] They would have taken 30 years to pay the mortgage
on their homes.
[1:18:26] And if they don't successfully pay the property
tax, in a flash,
[1:18:31] you repossesse their home. We don't repossesse.
[1:18:34] The city doesn't repossesse houses.
[1:18:35] We do not repossesse houses.
[1:18:37] We do everything we can.
[1:18:38] I can tell you, in the 15 years I've been involved
in politics in Point Claire,
[1:18:42] I've seen a couple of houses come up because
the
[1:18:46] people either passed away, the state couldn't
pay the taxes, it got sold.
[1:18:51] We do everything we can.
[1:18:52] When somebody's behind in their taxes, I can
tell you, and Dajot Guterez is a
[1:18:57] person that handles ça, we make every effort.
[1:19:01] We come up with special payment plans, we give
them time.
[1:19:04] We don't put people on the street, never.
[1:19:06] I say that with confidence.
[1:19:08] We try to find a solution.
[1:19:09] As far as paying taxes, I'm going to give you
the same spiel I give to everybody.
[1:19:13] I don't know how much you're paying in taxes.
[1:19:15] Five, six thousand dollars on your house? Yep.
[1:19:17] How much are you paying?
[1:19:19] Five thousand. Five thousand.
[1:19:20] More than five thousand.
[1:19:21] Just take that number, five thousand dollars.
[1:19:23] Take 53% of that as what?
[1:19:27] 2,500, approximately.
[1:19:28] That money goes to We run the city of Point
Claire, on the balance of that.
[1:19:33] So everything that you get, all the services-
Then we need to
[1:19:36] separate from the city of Montréal. We did.
[1:19:38] We need to completely not give them a penny.
[1:19:41] Sorry, not just separate, but not give them-
I'm not going
[1:19:44] to get an argument with you.
[1:19:45] But anyways, the whole idea, my main concern
is the
[1:19:50] flood, and all the actions that need to be
taken, to avoid having any further floods,
[1:19:56] and not make our homes flood-resistant, but
make a city flood resistance,
[1:20:01] so that our homes do not get flood. Good point.
[1:20:04] So guess what? The city is a joint venture.
[1:20:06] Like I told everybody here for the last six
months, it's a joint venture.
[1:20:11] We, as a city, has to do what we can do, which
we're doing a lot.
[1:20:16] Second is, homeowners have to do...
[1:20:18] Some people don't have backflow bell, some
people don't have sump pumps,
[1:20:20] sump pumps are broken.
[1:20:22] There's all kinds of issues.
[1:20:23] We've never had to do that at all prior to
three years ago.
[1:20:28] Exactement.
[1:20:41] . Martin Gendron.
[1:20:49] Monsieur le maire, membre du conseil, bonsoir.
[1:20:57] Merci pour l'opportunité.
[1:20:59] Alors, Sur le sujet des drainage ditches dans
nos
[1:21:03] backyards, les résidents de Sunnyside, monsieur
le maire, on aimerait savoir
[1:21:08] où est-ce qu'on en est rendu avec ce dossier-là,
s'il vous plaît.
[1:21:11] Comme je l'ai dit, c'est un dossier in the
works.
[1:21:17] C'est un dossier, comme je l'ai dit la dernière
fois,
[1:21:19] on a rencontré, on a eu des rencontres, on
est en train de travailler dans les
[1:21:23] archives, de trouver les documentations.
[1:21:26] Il n'y a pas une ditch ou une fossée qui qui
est clair, clair, clair.
[1:21:33] Il y a des sections qui ont les propriétaires,
il y a d'autres qui...
[1:21:37] À la ville, on est en train de faire un grand,
grand inventory de tout
[1:21:41] ça pour comprendre la situation.
[1:21:43] Ce n'est pas fait juste comme ça, ça va prendre
de l'ouvrage, mais on est
[1:21:47] en train de tout regarder la situation.
[1:21:50] Vous comprenez bien que mon intervention, c'est
précisément les
[1:21:56] quelques trois maisons où est-ce que les ruisseaux
sont bloqués Vous
[1:22:00] saisissez bien ça, monsieur le maire?
[1:22:02] Oui, on est au courant, puis monsieur Jouard
est au courant.
[1:22:06] Comme je dis, c'est une grande ville, il y
a beaucoup de places,
[1:22:09] il y a beaucoup de situations partout, mais
c'est une priorité dans la section-là
[1:22:14] de Michigan, Sunnyside, Courbreeze.
[1:22:17] On sait qu'une troupe, on est en train de trouver
des
[1:22:21] solutions puis comprendre tout ça.
[1:22:23] Tu n'es pas le seul, mais je peux dire qu'on
travaille dessus.
[1:22:27] Je n'ai pas le capacité de dire plus que celle-là.
[1:22:31] Monsieur le Maire, merci.
[1:22:32] Maintenant, je dois vous quitter. Merci beaucoup.
[1:22:35] Bonne soirée. Merci.
[1:22:36] Sheila Larson.
[1:22:47] Good evening. Good evening.
[1:22:49] On my way here today or this evening, I stopped
and looked at the bulletin
[1:22:55] boards that are outside the library about water
conservation and consumption.
[1:23:01] I'm proud of what Point Claire is doing in
terms of educating us and
[1:23:07] improving our understanding of our own role
in improving our environment.
[1:23:15] However, at the same time, I'm here about something
that, to me,
[1:23:18] is a very regressive step, a step backwards,
and that is
[1:23:24] the Hazardous Waste Collection.
[1:23:26] I know that it's not point clair that gets
to decide what the agglomération does,
[1:23:34] but my understanding is that they've stopped
the mobile
[1:23:38] Hazardous Waste Collections, which, two or
three times a year,
[1:23:42] would be very conveniently located in the parking
lot, and we could bring things.
[1:23:48] Now, what I was looking at, at home, just to
see what I would
[1:23:53] do about hazardous waste.
[1:23:57] And for light bulbs, it's one place, it's another,
or you have to drive to
[1:24:02] Lassal for several things, but then there are
things, they don't take there.
[1:24:07] Whereas when we had one here, we could bring
all the things,
[1:24:12] it would get sorted, and then taken to whatever
is the most appropriate place.
[1:24:18] My question is: I wonder if our ECOCenter could
consider
[1:24:25] handling the hazardous waste, collecting it
for us,
[1:24:30] which at least makes it a local trip to deliver
these products, and thinking of...
[1:24:36] I mean, I'm a senior, but I happen to have
a car,
[1:24:39] but I know many people who don't, and what
are they going to do if they
[1:24:44] can't drive to Lassalle or figure out online
what to do with these products
[1:24:49] that should not go in the garbage?
[1:24:52] What will happen is they will go in the garbage.
[1:24:55] Absolutely. And that means we're actually creating
[1:24:59] hazard for us, with our eyes wide open
[1:25:06] and our understanding full and clear.
[1:25:13] We're allowing something that should never
happen, to happen.
[1:25:23] So that is my question.
[1:25:28] It might not be able to be answered tonight.
[1:25:38] I can ask you right à l'approximaté à l'approximaté
d'environ 1 million dollars,
[1:25:46] more than any other year.
[1:25:46] And then they turned around, they cut out this
hazard's waste thing,
[1:25:46] which was costing Montreal approximately a
million dollars a year.
[1:25:47] Amongst the 15 municipalities, it's a lot of
money,
[1:25:50] but give us the option.
[1:25:52] Say, Guys, we can't afford it.
[1:25:53] Do you guys willing to pay?
[1:25:55] What they told us, we pushed, came to shove.
[1:25:57] We had some very, very strong conversations
intervention
[1:26:00] with Soraya about it.
[1:26:03] What they said was, We got all these great
options.
[1:26:05] You can bring it to the ECHO Centre in Celeran.
[1:26:08] You can bring your paint to the hardware store.
[1:26:11] We said, Yeah, great.
[1:26:12] If you don't buy your paint, or if it's not
a Rhona paint,
[1:26:14] they won't take it back.
[1:26:15] Echo Centre, they cut down the hours that they're
open à Saint-Laurent.
[1:26:18] Vous pouvez les ramener à la peau de la vente.
[1:26:18] Ils m'ont dit: Oui, très bien.
[1:26:18] Donc, si vous ne prenez pas votre peau, si
ce n'est pas une histoire
[1:26:18] de vêtement, c'est bon. Ils vont nous le dire.
[1:26:18] Ils vont nous le dire. Ils vont nous le dire.
[1:26:18] Ils vont nous le dire. Ils vont nous le dire.
[1:26:18] Ils vont nous le dire. Ils vont nous le dire.
[1:26:18] Ils vont nous le dire. Ils vont nous le dire.
[1:26:18] Écoute, le centre, ils ont les heures pour
que ça soit ouvré, c'est ça?
[1:26:18] Oui.
[1:26:19] Tout ça pour dire que c'est un sujet très
chaud entre nous.
[1:26:22] Nous, on est poussés à Montréal, on est
en train de trouver des réponses
[1:26:24] et on a demandé de le réinventer. Ok?
[1:26:27] C'est la façon dont on va aller.
[1:26:28] Ils m'ont dit ce qu'ils allaient faire.
[1:26:30] Ils m'ont dit de le collecter dans notre quartier.
[1:26:32] Ils m'ont dit de le ramener.
[1:26:35] Ils m'ont dit de le ramener.
[1:26:37] Il faut être careful. I don't know.
[1:26:44] You have to be careful. None of us want to
endanger our employees.
[1:26:47] Putting two things together, it might be leaking,
cause getting burnt.
[1:26:51] We're not experts, not either way.
[1:26:53] So all I can tell you, long story short, is
that we're all pushing to get Montreal
[1:26:57] to reinstate that program or come up with a
better program because I agree with you,
[1:27:02] 100%, I've seen it, where the pain cans are
now put on this
[1:27:06] end of the street because they have nowhere
to take them.
[1:27:09] So all I can tell you, Mrs. Larson, is I can't
promise you anything, but
[1:27:13] we're all fighting to get it reinstated.
[1:27:14] Well, maybe what you could do is we could start
a petition as
[1:27:18] City Point Claire and get all of us signing,
and that might give
[1:27:22] you a little bit more weight.
[1:27:24] But something like that, because it's just
disgusting that we are
[1:27:28] paying 53% of our tax dollar goes directly
downtown.
[1:27:33] And this service, which probably when it came,
what, two or three times a year,
[1:27:39] in one place, and people all took it there,
then they just had to card it away.
[1:27:45] I thought, why can't we be doing that still?
[1:27:48] So I hope that you find a way, if they're not
going to fund it,
[1:27:51] that we find a way to do it, because our reputation
as an ecological,
[1:27:58] as well as économique city, I think is at
waste.
[1:28:02] And before I leave the subject, what I also
consider hazardous waste,
[1:28:07] and I've spoken to you about this over the
years, and to mayor
[1:28:11] Thomas as well, is glass.
[1:28:13] Separation.
[1:28:15] To me, it's a hazardous waste to throw it in
the garbage or to put it in the blue
[1:28:19] bin, which means it's garbage as soon as it
hits the truck.
[1:28:23] So I won't do it. I save it.
[1:28:25] I sometimes make myself an annual trip to Sutton
or somewhere where
[1:28:30] they have a container.
[1:28:32] And those containers work.
[1:28:33] And they've worked in the Eastern Township
for separating glass.
[1:28:37] We used to separate glass.
[1:28:40] Can we do it again?
[1:28:41] We talked about that when I was maire.
[1:28:43] La première fois que je suis venu, on rentra,
on a eu la information.
[1:28:45] We talked to the mayor and the director general
up in Eastern town,
[1:28:49] it's all about it.
[1:28:50] And then, Québec came out with these new stores
that are supposed to open up.
[1:28:54] We can bring your glass. Consignation.
[1:28:57] Which, I'm not sure if they do things like
jars.
[1:29:01] But they haven't got the number of stores open
that we're supposed to open,
[1:29:05] or these outlets are supposed to open something
like 400, and they've
[1:29:07] only opened 40 or something.
[1:29:09] But they're controlling that industry right
now.
[1:29:12] So that's why nobody wants to get into collecting
or separating ourselves.
[1:29:18] But we've talked about it, you've been heard,
hopefully,
[1:29:21] Québec will step up and do a much better job
and solve that one issue.
[1:29:25] But right now, they're moving forward with
their plan.
[1:29:28] Do you know if we're going to have a consignation
in Point Claire?
[1:29:32] Off the top of my head, I don't know.
[1:29:33] Because down, we're finding the grocery stores,
their things are out of order.
[1:29:39] So there again, what do we do?
[1:30:15] Are you talking about tempos?
[1:30:17] Yes, the Winter Culture, yeah.
[1:30:20] When- We haven't- The council hasn't taken
a decision on it yet.
[1:30:22] We ask since a long time about it.
[1:30:24] We ask since a long time, and too many people
ask about it.
[1:30:28] Council has come to the council.
[1:30:30] I think every year, it's come to the table.
[1:30:32] Every year, council makes a decision, and it's
always been so easy.
[1:30:40] But I don't know the answer about Point Claire.
[1:30:50] Ok, thank you.
[1:30:53] Thank you.
[1:30:56] Nasser Al Dhabi?
[1:30:59] They're leaving the bylaw the way it is, and
it's no.
[1:31:03] We'd have to relook it again, but right now,
we're not looking at it,
[1:31:06] and it's still no until we take it to the next
step.
[1:31:07] But right now, it's no.
[1:31:08] We're not- Yeah, but a dollar, they have it,
and it's...
[1:31:10] Dollar, it has it, but some areas don't.
[1:31:12] Beaconfield doesn't have it, Kirkland doesn't
have it.
[1:31:15] Many municipalities don't have it.
[1:31:17] Can you tell me what the reason? Why do you
say no?
[1:31:19] Well, there's one reason is that everybody
thinks it's a save all solution.
[1:31:24] That if you put up a car temple, that you don't
need anything else,
[1:31:27] you don't need a snow removal contractor, your
car is protected.
[1:31:30] But there's a danger to it, too, because it
does fill up with snow en wintertime.
[1:31:33] It has to be cleared off.
[1:31:35] You still need to clear the ice in front of
your driveway.
[1:31:37] The snowbank, the city snowbank.
[1:31:39] Esthétiquement, it blocks the front of your
house.
[1:31:42] So for emergency vehicles, if you talk to firemen,
ambulants,
[1:31:45] drivers, in the wintertime, when people have
these big carports,
[1:31:49] temples, dans leur driveway, sometimes it makes
it very hard to see the
[1:31:52] address, and makes it very difficult for accessibility
for emergency vehicles.
[1:31:55] In the event, there's been temples have blown
away in the windstorm.
[1:31:59] We're having more and more windstorms now.
[1:32:01] Ça a causé un lot de damage, because they're
not
[1:32:04] attached down properly, secured properly, which
is nobody's fault.
[1:32:07] Sometimes, everybody thinks they're done right,
mais with what we're living, with
[1:32:10] le climate change, things are erratic.
[1:32:13] So it's been a décision à point Very many
municipalities not to have them
[1:32:17] anymore or not to have them.
[1:32:18] I mean, not that it falls on deaf ears when
you ask, but then when we do discuss
[1:32:24] it, the answer comes back no all the time.
[1:32:26] But you can study how we do it safely. You
could.
[1:32:29] But they're supposed to all be installs safely,
but
[1:33:00] il y a still accidents every year.
[1:33:00] Anyway, right now, I'm sorry, monsieur, we
can, again, we'll put on the agenda,
[1:33:00] we'll discuss it down the road, but right now,
no.
[1:33:00] But we are looking I will, because you were
one of the gentlemen that
[1:33:01] talked about wood stoves, and Eric Stork asked
me to bring it up.
[1:33:01] The bylaw has been written.
[1:33:01] We're going to get to see it next month, and
there'll be a new bylaw
[1:33:01] coming up concerning wood stoves. Thank you
a lot.
[1:33:01] Thank you. That's very good.
[1:33:01] I have also...
[1:33:01] It's very good, the street Brebroke, between
Maywood and Hasting.
[1:33:10] They fill up all the crack with a rubber. And
even the
[1:33:45] for an inspector, go buy and
[1:33:47] take a pas de trafic sur cette voie.
[1:33:56] Mais Maywood, ils missent Maywood pour tout
le refaire.
[1:34:05] On a répondu à votre question de
[1:34:13] Maywood il y a un petit moment.
[1:34:20] Oui, je sais.
[1:34:23] Vous dites que l'année dernière, Since the
flood, have we can do.
[1:34:32] Thank you very much. Short term, thank you.
[1:34:32] Kim Laberge? Good evening, Kim from District
7.
[1:34:32] First, I just like to say thank you for the
ease and the quick turnaround
[1:34:32] for the financial assistance. Thank you.
[1:34:32] I've used it.
[1:34:32] Yes, it may take a bit of time to fill out,
[1:34:33] but I think the people behind the scenes
[1:34:41] are doing We've done for sûr,
[1:34:45] and it started this week, we started removing
all the bark chips off
[1:34:50] of all the plantations down the middle of Hymis.
[1:34:53] That contributed, believe it or not, to when
we had that much rain,
[1:34:57] the bark chips started this week.
[1:34:58] We started removing all the bark chips off
of all the plantations
[1:34:58] down the middle of Hymis.
[1:34:59] That contributed, believe it or not, to when
we had that much rain,
[1:34:59] the bark chips started It floated down to a
sewer, where you have that little
[1:35:02] spiral, and it got stuck on top and blocked
all the top of the sewers.
[1:35:06] So we've eliminated, we started removing all
the bark chips.
[1:35:09] I think it was this Saturday we started, or
last week.
[1:35:12] Anyway, we started. That's one of the things.
[1:35:13] We're still looking at the retention tanks,
and trying to figure out.
[1:35:18] But yes, it's the... Well, he's left now.
[1:35:20] But yes, we're working hard and trying to find
out what went wrong.
[1:35:24] If it was a bark chips, we're having those
tanks cleaned out,
[1:35:27] and we're testing pour their efficiencies.
[1:35:28] We just haven't Ça, ça all the work yet.
[1:35:31] Do we have a timeline when we think we might
know the answer to the retention?
[1:35:35] Gilles, do you know? I don't have a specific
timeline.
[1:35:38] No. Not specific.
[1:35:39] As soon as possible, is what we're-We're working
on it now, as we speak.
[1:35:42] So it's not like- By end of year? Sorry?
[1:35:44] By end of year, we should know. For sure.
[1:35:46] Hopefully, within the next couple of months,
if we want to...
[1:35:49] I mean, it's going to rain, we want to know
that they're working.
[1:35:52] I agree. Yes.
[1:35:53] You already touched on my next question, so
the woodchips.
[1:35:56] Yes, I've noticed, because I walk within le
[1:36:30] OK, so we should be seeing improvements weekly.
[1:36:34] Let me know. I will.
[1:36:35] All right. Thank you.
[1:36:37] Thank you.
[1:36:39] Cynthia Perrin?
[1:36:46] Good evening. Bonsoir.
[1:36:47] Bonsoir. Bonsoir.
[1:36:47] Bonsoir. Monsieur le Maire, Councilors.
[1:36:51] I also want to talk about the Paprican property.
[1:36:57] It's now FP Innovations.
[1:36:59] I'm not sure exactly what is happening with
respect to the zoning.
[1:37:04] I have been a resident across the street for
30 years.
[1:37:11] If we take the intensification and we start
[1:37:17] to build 10-story buildings in that space,
and if they are not set back further
[1:37:24] on the road, then there's a lot of loss of
privacy.
[1:37:29] I pay the same rate of taxes as everyone else.
[1:37:33] And so I respect the need for green space,
but I would like to voice that I would
[1:37:41] like to see not 10-store buildings, but something
more conservative and set
[1:37:47] back, and that will help to accommodate the
green space that my fellow
[1:37:53] constituent has also talked about.
[1:37:56] The second thing that I want to talk about
is We have embarked in a
[1:38:04] lot of intensification, and I understand why
we are doing that.
[1:38:09] When I first moved to Point Claire, one of
the things that
[1:38:13] really appealed to me was the fact that we
had this big industrial base
[1:38:17] that supported our tax base.
[1:38:20] The business landscape has changed.
[1:38:25] As a result, if we go down Hymes, it's all
intensification.
[1:38:30] There are 10-story high rises all over the
place.
[1:38:35] We're starting to do that in parts of Boulevard
Saint-Jean as well.
[1:38:40] There's other parts of Point Claire, where
we're also doing that,
[1:38:47] and Burnswick as well.
[1:38:49] But what struck me is that in the spring of
2000, was it 24, 25,
[1:38:57] we had public consultations, and we We looked
at a program to
[1:39:02] re-image Boulevard Saint-Jean.
[1:39:06] And what people were focused on was making
it, reducing the amount of cars,
[1:39:14] making it more accessible.
[1:39:16] They were talking about bike lanes.
[1:39:19] But with all of the intensification in terms
of the apartments that are going
[1:39:24] up, the volume of traffic up and down
[1:39:28] Saint-Jean has It's absolutely insane.
[1:39:38] On top of that, I don't know if we have a bylaw
to restrict heavy vehicles
[1:39:43] running up and down that corridor.
[1:39:47] There's a lot of residential properties there.
[1:39:50] The heavy vehicles, they're noisy, they are
spewing all kinds of toxic fumes,
[1:39:59] and not doing anything for a roadway.
[1:40:02] It certainly doesn't address the concerns that
were raised in the
[1:40:07] public consultations a couple of years ago.
[1:40:11] So is there a way that we can restrict these
heavy vehicles?
[1:40:16] We already have an increase of cars.
[1:40:19] Can we restrict the heavy vehicles for coming
down St.
[1:40:22] John, especially between, I would say, Brunswick
and all the way
[1:40:27] down to the Bordelack?
[1:40:28] This is all residential.
[1:40:32] It's hard to restrict them. We can't restrict
them.
[1:40:34] It's the main thoroughfares. So Sources, St.
[1:40:36] John, St. Charles, are main thoroughfares.
[1:40:38] We do have an industrial park.
[1:40:39] We're surrounded by a large industrial park.
[1:40:42] But not down St. John.
[1:40:43] No, but the trucks- But they should be using
sources, for example, where all
[1:40:48] the industrial- And they do use sources.
[1:40:50] We got problems on sources.
[1:40:52] So that's a conversation comes up regularly.
[1:40:54] But St. John, it's all residential.
[1:40:56] Well, a good part of it.
[1:40:57] But you also have to get from the 40 to the
20, too, right?
[1:41:01] So they need to get there somehow.
[1:41:03] So it's complicated.
[1:41:04] There's a lot less trucks on St.
[1:41:05] John's than there are on sources.
[1:41:06] Sources is definitely heavy traffic all the
time, okay?
[1:41:11] We've taken measures on sources.
[1:41:13] We're opening up signage and this and that.
[1:41:14] Can I propose that you do a study just to see
what is going on there?
[1:41:18] Because I can tell you, the amount of traffic
on St.
[1:41:22] John now compared to five years ago, compared
to 10 years ago,
[1:41:27] to compared 30 years ago, when we purchased
here, completely different.
[1:41:32] We do traffic studies every time there's a
new project.
[1:41:38] A lot of the traffic, believe it or not, is
coming in the morning,
[1:41:45] coming from Pierrefonds, West, and Dauert,
because you're coming to
[1:41:47] the 40 and the 20, right? You're taking St.
[1:41:50] John's Road, and in the evening, it's going
back out there
[1:41:52] because there's no other way.
[1:41:53] What we need is another artery, like Jacques-Bouzard
corridor between St.
[1:41:57] John's and Saint-Charles, another, which has
been on the map for 100 years,
[1:42:01] to open up another North-South artery. That's
what we need.
[1:42:05] And there's many reasons pour 100 ans pour
ouvrir un appartement Nord-Southous.
[1:42:06] C'est ce que nous avons besoin. Il y a beaucoup
de raisons.
[1:42:07] Pas seulement Point Claire is densifying, but
Dauert, densified,
[1:42:09] Pierrefonds, everybody densified.
[1:42:11] But we have the two highways in our territory,
right?
[1:42:13] And everybody has to get So it's complicated.
[1:42:16] But we do surveys when there are projects on
the table, we look at the
[1:42:21] traffic flow, the number of cars.
[1:42:23] There is a lot of volume.
[1:42:24] À un certain times of day, absolutely.
[1:42:27] But we try to mitigate it with...
[1:42:31] I guess one of the great examples is Cubic
in Valois,
[1:42:36] where you got four buildings there, and oh
my God, the traffic,
[1:42:39] the whole city is going to be blocked up.
[1:42:41] But not everybody gets up in the morning, leaves
at the same time, right?
[1:42:44] And there's been no issue with this, an even
flow there, and the flow as well.
[1:42:48] So all that stuff is taken into consideration.
[1:42:50] Just take into consideration the number of
units that have been added just
[1:42:57] within the last seven years. Absolutely.
[1:43:00] Each unit, if they're 10-story high, you're
talking 200 families.
[1:43:05] Yeah, absolutely.
[1:43:06] So it's- And with the rim now, with the two
stations,
[1:43:09] you're going to have the government's forcing,
higher densification
[1:43:13] around those stations.
[1:43:14] The idea is that you won't use your car, that
you'll be able to
[1:43:18] access public transport.
[1:43:20] But we all know public transit on the West
Island, it's tough.
[1:43:25] My very last question, and I'm sorry to keep
you.
[1:43:28] Yeah, because we're way past. It's the very
last question.
[1:43:31] Is there any work in terms of infrastructure
[1:43:36] planned to take all of the hydro lines and
the lines that are
[1:43:44] up on La dernière personne, Daniel Monty.
[1:44:16] Daniel Monpetit, monsieur le maire, les conseillers,
conseillères.
[1:44:23] Moi, j'ai une question.
[1:44:25] J'ai remarqué, je vois souvent dans le village
de Point-Clair,
[1:44:27] je viens de Point-Clair.
[1:44:28] J'ai passé dernièrement puis entre le Studio
77 puis le terrain de la ville,
[1:44:32] il y a quelqu'un qui a coupé tous les...
[1:44:35] Je ne dirais pas le mot les arbres.
[1:44:37] On sait tous c'est qui?
[1:44:39] Ok, mais c'est une très bonne- Je peux attendre,
je n'ai pas de problème.
[1:44:43] Non, c'est une très bonne question.
[1:44:44] Juste ton adresse, je veux.
[1:44:45] Moi, j'étais dans un village.
[1:44:47] La journée que c'est arrivée, j'étais chez
Gigi's pour lunch, puis là,
[1:44:52] j'ai sorti de Gigi's, puis j'ai vu un camion,
puis j'ai vu
[1:44:55] qu'il était en train de couper les arbres.
[1:44:56] Là, j'étais au hôtel de ville, j'ai envoyé
des inspections.
[1:45:00] Next time call me.
[1:45:02] Ça va arrêter bien plus vite.
[1:45:03] La ville est passée vite.
[1:45:05] Moi, j'ai le droit, je ne travaille plus à
la ville.
[1:45:07] Non, je sais, mais là, il est coupé comme
tu dis tout.
[1:45:10] Ça n'a pas de lieu, c'est un massacre.
[1:45:12] C'est incroyable qu'est-ce qu'il a fait.
[1:45:15] Là, on est en train de faire une investigation.
[1:45:18] On sait c'est qui qui a coupé les arbres,
on sait la compagnie, mais là,
[1:45:22] il faut qu'on en checke d'autres choses.
[1:45:23] C'est qui qui donnait...
[1:45:25] Il y a beaucoup de choses. Mais y a-tu eu un
permis pour faire ça?
[1:45:28] Non, mais je peux pas parler plus que ça.
[1:45:31] S'il y avait eu un permis, ça aurait été
pire,
[1:45:33] mais s'il y a pas eu de permis, j'espère qu'on
va pouvoir envoyer moller.
[1:45:36] C'est ça, je peux dire, we are on top of it,
OK?
[1:45:39] Merci beaucoup. Bonne soirée.
[1:45:45] The time is up.
[1:45:45] However, there is one special request from
a gentleman, I think, standing outside.
[1:45:49] He would like to ask a question to Council.
[1:45:50] No problem. We've broken all the rules tonight.
[1:45:52] Let's break some more. Okay, so Ryan McDonald.
[1:45:57] Sorry, Council.
[1:45:59] But I'm going to hold you to three minutes,
okay?
[1:46:05] Yes, I'll try my best here. All right.
[1:46:08] Good evening, mayor and respected members of
the council.
[1:46:11] My name is Ryan McDonald.
[1:46:13] I'm a resident of Point Claire, Cedar Park
Heights, District 4.
[1:46:17] I'm here as a safety advocate for vulnerable
road users,
[1:46:20] which includes pedestrians and cyclists, and
a vocal supporter of public transit
[1:46:25] development, both in Pointclair and notre Montreal
Metropolitan area.
[1:46:32] In light of the city's ongoing focus on road
safety, I know you guys try to take
[1:46:37] that very seriously, the influx of new residents
on both sides
[1:46:41] of Autoroute 40, the arrival of the
[1:46:44] Fairview Point Claire Rem station, and the
planned rehabilitation of the
[1:46:50] Saint-Jean Autoroute 40 overpass by the MTQ,
that is supposed to include a bike
[1:46:56] path on the west side, from what I read.
[1:47:00] That could have changed by now.
[1:47:02] What specific infrastructure upgrades or traffic
calming measures are currently
[1:47:06] being planned by the city or its engineering
department to ensure
[1:47:10] the safety of pedestrians and cyclists along
the Saint-Jean Corridor,
[1:47:14] on either line of the Bridge.
[1:47:15] That's the approaches to the overpasses.
[1:47:20] It's a bit complicated because the MTQ is going
to read to the overpass next year,
[1:47:25] and they're going to integrate that bike plan,
like you said, on the west side,
[1:47:28] which will be secured on the section going
over the overpass, right?
[1:47:31] There'll be a cement wall there, and that'll
be protected.
[1:47:34] The rest of it is up to us to do, and it's
very hard, how are we going
[1:47:38] to protect the people crossing from St.
[1:47:41] John's across those arms or elbows, whatever
you want to call them.
[1:47:44] Isla Plains?
[1:47:46] The off-rampss or on-rampss.
[1:47:47] How are you going to protect that?
[1:47:48] Because if you put traffic lights or stop-side,
you're going to
[1:47:51] back up all the traffic.
[1:47:52] So it's a big, big issue.
[1:47:54] We do have work plan, I think, in 2028, 2029?
[1:47:58] 29, to redo those ramps and try to make it
as safe as possible en y ajoutant
[1:48:04] de la lumière, de la lumière, de la lumière,
de la lumière.
[1:48:06] Vous avez plus de la lumière.
[1:48:07] Nous sommes en train de regarder toutes les
options possible.
[1:48:09] But right now, the only thing happening there
would be that section of
[1:48:13] overpass that will be secure.
[1:48:16] All right. The only...
[1:48:18] Again, I'll just go a little bit.
[1:48:19] The only way to do it is to get a complete
overpass over to 40
[1:48:23] for pedestrian and bikes only, going over to
12 lanes of highway without
[1:48:27] having to my gate, those elbows, right?
[1:48:32] Those on-rampss and off-rampss. Yes.
[1:48:34] Well, I know there is an idea to impose that
thing along...
[1:48:40] I forget the name of the street, exactly. Austin.
[1:48:43] Austin. Yeah, that's right.
[1:48:44] We're short 40 million, but we're good. I know.
[1:48:46] And I heard that it was deemed way too expensive
for the city to
[1:48:49] achieve even with the grants.
[1:48:51] Sorry, second question, in a way.
[1:48:55] I, personally, I know I'm a younger person.
[1:48:59] I am I'm physically capable.
[1:49:01] When I can afford to, I like to take my bike
to the rem to
[1:49:07] get to other places on the island.
[1:49:10] I would appreciate if more attention was
[1:49:19] given to those people outside of cars.
[1:49:22] I realize that there are more cars on the road
than ever with the
[1:49:26] increase in population.
[1:49:27] But it is also important to realize that the
only way of reducing
[1:49:34] car usage or cars, the amount of volume of
cars on our streets,
[1:49:38] is to give people viable alternatives to driving,
which is something I try to do.
[1:49:44] I I'm adventurous.
[1:49:46] I ride on Saint-Jean within feet of cars going
60, 70 km/h.
[1:49:52] But I do so because it is an efficient way
of transport for me.
[1:49:58] It takes me 7 minutes to get from my doorstep
to the rem station.
[1:50:02] That way, even though I have to cross the bridge.
[1:50:05] I think that it's something that a lot more
people would feel comfortable to
[1:50:09] do if they had a safe way to do so.
[1:50:12] It's part of every discussion, every time we
We're doing a bike plan.
[1:50:15] In our road infrastructure work or whatever
we can, we're
[1:50:18] intégrating bike path.
[1:50:19] Or, for instance, we're getting Bixie.
[1:50:22] Hopefully, we'll have Bixie here next year
or two years from now.
[1:50:24] So we're looking at all our options, but it's
part of our planning
[1:50:27] on a day-to-day basis.
[1:50:29] So where we can and where we can afford it,
we're doing it.
[1:50:31] We are coming up with an overall plan for the
city, and we do take it seriously.
[1:50:36] It's always about priorities, right?
[1:50:38] And I'm not saying taking a bike is not an
important thing, but there's so many
[1:50:43] things right now that C'est fini?
[1:50:56] Ok, we're finished.
[1:50:58] Alors l'agenda commence à cinq 5.
[1:50:59] 1, avis de motion et dépôt d'un projet...
On est en livre.
[1:51:02] 5.
[1:51:02] 1, avis de motion et dépôt d'un projet de
règlement décrit un emprunt à long terme
[1:51:09] et une dépense en immobilisation de 1 940
000 pour divers travaux devant être
[1:51:13] exécutés sur les bâtiments de la ville.
[1:51:15] De façon non-exhaustive, les divers travaux
visent le Centre
[1:51:18] sportif Oliver Hart et le Centre culturel Stuart
Hart, ainsi que les services
[1:51:23] professionnels pour divers autres bâtiments,
ainsi que la main d'œuvre
[1:51:27] directement associée à ces projets.
[1:51:28] Le montant à financer sera remboursé par
le biais d'une taxe imposée à l'ensemble
[1:51:32] de la municipalité sur la base de la valeur
foncière des immeubles imposables,
[1:51:35] et ce, sur une période de 20 ans.
[1:51:39] .
[1:51:41] Andrew Swudzinski, District 4. .
[1:51:44] . .
[1:51:44] . .
[1:51:44] . .
[1:51:44] .
[1:52:30] Une dépense en immobilisation de 4 495 000
dollars pour des projets de resurfaçage.
[1:52:35] De façon non-exhaustive, la somme sera affectée
aux travaux de
[1:52:37] resurfaçage sur le chemin du bord du lac Lakeshore,
à partir de l'avenue 5,
[1:52:41] vers l'ouest, et aux travaux de resurfaçage
du boulevard
[1:52:44] Saint-Jean, entre l'avenue Sedgefield et le
boulevard Imus,
[1:52:47] ainsi que la main d'œuvre directement associée
à ces projets.
[1:52:49] Le montant à financer sera remboursé par
le biais d'une taxe imposée à l'ensemble
[1:52:53] de la municipalité, sur la base de la valeur
foncière des
[1:52:55] immeubles imposables, et ce, sur une période
de 20 ans.
[1:53:00] .
[1:53:01] Mike Pratt, 20, quartier numéro 8. Merci.
[1:53:04] 5,4. 5,4.
[1:53:06] Notice of motion in filing of a draft bylaw
decréing a long-term borrowing and a
[1:53:09] capital expenditure of 9 385,000 dollars for
various civil infrastructure,
[1:53:14] electrical, and landscape architecture works,
including stormwater management.
[1:53:18] The works covered, involved, but are not limited
to: the complete
[1:53:21] reconstruction of infrastructures in the Tampico
secteur,
[1:53:24] the replacement of concrete roadway lighting
systems on Pardot, Duc of Kent,
[1:53:28] and Douglas-Chêne avenues, various Avis de
[1:53:50] motion et dépôt d'un projet de règlement
[1:53:52] décritant les tarifs exigeants pour le financement
des biens,
[1:53:54] services et activités offerts par la ville
de Point-Clair pour
[1:53:57] l'exercice financier 20-27.
[1:53:59] De façon générale, la La tarification des
biens, services et activités
[1:54:01] a augmenté de 2,05 pour cent.
[1:54:04] La tarification pour le non-résidentiel est
établie en fonction d'un écart de
[1:54:08] 140 pour cent du tarif résidentiel.
[1:54:10] Can somebody put a motion for it, please?
[1:54:12] Eric Stork, District 7.
[1:54:14] Thank 5,7.
[1:54:19] Adoption d'un règlement sur la création d'un
programme d'aide financière pour la
[1:54:22] préservation et la restauration du patrimoine.
[1:54:24] Un avis de motion, un dépôt de projets de
règlements ont été faits le 25 août 2026.
[1:54:29] Ceci est l'adoption du règlement par lequel
la Ville établit un programme
[1:54:32] municipal d'aide financière visant à la préservation
et la restauration des biens
[1:54:36] meubles et immeubles patrimoniaux de propriétés
privées.
[1:55:00] Des milliers.
[1:55:00] Ils go up and down, ils go south, the north,
and nothing happened.
[1:55:05] But I think we're in a very good position to
say that we should all be proud that
[1:55:09] everybody got together, the administration,
society, and le
[1:55:13] provincial government, to come up with the
funding necessary to
[1:55:18] preserve and protect the biggest part of our
heritage of Point
[1:55:21] Claire, the logo, which is a windmill.
[1:55:24] On that note, I just like to thank everybody
[1:55:26] that's worked hard over the years.
[1:55:28] Sometimes it wasn't fun, it was ugly, but this
is a great ending to a
[1:55:34] hope or the beginning of a new chapter that
we'll all be proud of down the road
[1:55:38] moving forward, and we'll be able to enjoy
for many, many years.
[1:55:42] And so will the new people coming to Point
Claire
[1:56:20] OK, can I have a move or a seconder?
[1:56:21] Move or a seconder, please.
[1:56:23] Second by.
[1:56:26] Kelly Thorsted-Cullen, District 3. All in favor?
[1:56:30] Thank you. 5.
[1:56:31] 8.
[1:56:31] Adoption of a by-law, amending by-law PC-3002,
[1:56:35] establishing a financial assistance program
for stormwater management
[1:56:38] on private residential property.
[1:56:40] A notice of motion was given and a draft by-law
was filed on august 25, 2026.
[1:56:44] This is the final adoption of the by-law, by
which the city modifies the previously
[1:56:48] adopted by-law, in order to clarify certain
terms, and
[1:56:51] broaden its scope concerning townhouses.
[1:56:53] Ok, on a un mot pour un seconder, pour 5,8,
please.
[1:56:56] Mike Badvin, District 8.
[1:57:04] 6,1. 6,1.
[1:57:05] Accorder un soutien financier pour un montant
total de 1 300 $ à la Fraternité
[1:57:09] des policiers et policières de Montréal.
[1:57:10] C'est pour le repas annuel des Fèves-aux-Lors.
[1:57:13] 130 repas seront achetés par la ville au coût
de 10 $ chacun.
[1:57:16] 6,2.
[1:57:17] Grant financial support for a total amount
of 2,600 sous Les Amis du
[1:57:21] Vieux Moulin de Point-Clair.
[1:57:23] The amount awarded is to finance the culture
and social activities
[1:57:26] of the Golden Age Club.
[1:57:28] 6,3.
[1:57:28] Accorder un soutien financier au montant de
25 000 $ à l'Association des
[1:57:31] marchands du village de Valois.
[1:57:33] Le montant octroyé vise à financer la réalisation
de divers événements
[1:57:36] au courant de l'année.
[1:57:37] Ces événements sont organisés dans le but
d'encourager les petits commerces
[1:57:40] et développer l'économie locale. .
[1:57:45] Kelly Thorsted-Cullen, District 3.
[1:57:49] Second by. Eric Stork, secteur 7.
[1:57:52] Thank you. 6.
[1:57:53] 4. No vote.
[1:57:56] Sorry. All in favor?
[1:57:59] Thank you. 8.
[1:57:59] 1: de désigner
[1:58:35] le conseiller Bruno Tremblay pour les
[1:58:37] mois d'octobre, novembre et décembre 2026.
[1:58:41] .
[1:58:42] .
[1:58:44] . .
[1:58:44] . .
[1:58:46] .
[1:58:48] .
[1:59:03] Autoriser la fermeture de règlements d'emprunt.
[1:59:06] L'objet de 24 règlements d'emprunt ont été
réalisés et la Ville demande au ministère
[1:59:10] d'annuler de ses registres les soldes résiduaires
qui s'élèvent à 40 252 468,00.
[1:59:30] Cote, Lakeview Avenue. 10.
[1:59:31] 4.
[1:59:33] Octroyons un contrat pour la migration des
logiciels Ico à Ico Solutions pour un
[1:59:37] montant total de 52 888,50 sous taxes incluses.
[1:59:42] Ico est le logiciel utilisé par le service
de l'inspection sécurité publique.
[1:59:49] Clodine Demers, District 1.
[1:59:51] Mike Buss-20.
[1:59:52] Quartier numéro 8.
[1:59:54] All in favor?
[1:59:56] Merci. Thank you.
[1:59:57] 12. 1.
[1:59:59] Fire the list of Approuver la liste des changements
au
[2:00:06] personnel par décision non déléguée au
8 septembre 2026.
[2:00:09] .
[2:00:12] Ludovic Matthews, District 2.
[2:00:15] Kelly Thorsted-Cullen, District 3. All in favor?
[2:00:20] Thank you. 13.
[2:00:20] 1.
[2:00:23] Award a contract for animal shelter services
to Especia de Montréal for a
[2:00:27] total approximate amount of $50,000 taxes included.
[2:00:31] Since the yearly services required fluctuate
every year, the contract is
[2:00:35] established on a basis of unit prices.
[2:00:38] The director of the inspection, public security,
will be
[2:00:41] authorised to sign the agreement.
[2:00:42] Kevin, move or seconder for 13.
[2:00:44] 1, 14,1.
[2:00:53] Ce prévalor de l'option de renouvellement
prévue au contrat intervenu
[2:00:56] avec 3024407 Canada Inc.
[2:00:59] Entreprise vaillant, 1994, pour la saison hivernale
2026-2027
[2:01:03] au montant de 496 207,09 $.
[2:01:07] Taxe incluse pour la location avec opérateur
d'équipement de déneigement.
[2:01:11] Ceci est la dernière année d'option.
[2:01:12] Ce contrat est requis pour effectuer les travaux
de déblayement et
[2:01:18] 14,2: exercise the renewal option provided
for in the contract entered
[2:01:21] into Wixou Excavation Inc.
[2:01:23] For the 2026-2027 winter season in the amount
of $1 686,215.
[2:01:27] 33.
[2:01:31] Taxes included: personal removal in the industrial
park and the Greenwich sector.
[2:01:35] This is the last renewal option.
[2:01:38] 14,3: se prévalore de l'option de renouvellement
prévue au contrat intervenu
[2:01:41] avec TechMix division de Beauval-inc.
[2:01:44] Pour l'année 2027, au montant de 84 219,19
sous taxes inclus.
[2:01:49] Pour la fourniture sur demande de l'asphalte
tiède, ceci est la
[2:01:52] première et unique année d'option.
[2:02:00] Ludovic Matthews, District 2. Alden Weber.
[2:02:05] Thank you.
[2:02:06] 14,4.
[2:02:07] Award a contract for Structural pruning and
felling works on young trees for
[2:02:11] the fall 2026 to Arbaud Design Inc.
[2:02:13] For a total amount of 62,494,66 taxes included.
[2:02:18] This contract will allow the required maintenance
to be carried out on public
[2:02:22] trees planted since 2015, which are more than
7,000 trees planted.
[2:02:29] 14,5.
[2:02:29] Et On a distribué un contrat pour le dommage
et l'entretien de sentiers,
[2:02:32] hivernaux et pistes de ski de fonds pour la
période du 1ᵉʳ décembre 2026 au 12
[2:02:36] mars 2027 à les rénovations Jocelyn D.
[2:02:38] Cost, Inc, pour un montant total de 63 903,11
$, taxes incluses avec
[2:02:43] deux périodes optionnelles.
[2:02:45] Ce contrat permet aux citoyens de profiter
pleinement des espaces verts et des
[2:02:48] installations récréatives tout au long de
l'hiver.
[2:03:00] 0,01 $, 81 cents taxes included.
[2:03:02] This is in order to resurface the section of
Saint-Jean Boulevards between Lakeview
[2:03:06] Avenue and Duval du Lac, Lakeshore Road.
[2:03:09] We have a mover 14. 4, 14.
[2:03:10] 5, and 14.
[2:03:12] 6, please.
[2:03:14] Andrew Swudzinski, District 4. Second by.
[2:03:19] All in favor?
[2:03:21] Merci. Thank you.
[2:03:22] 15. 1.
[2:03:24] Attribuer un contrat pour la fourniture et
la livraison de pièces, outils,
[2:03:27] matériaux et équipements en menuiserie pour
la du 1ᵉʳ septembre 2026 au 31 août
[2:03:32] 2027 à Quincaillerie Notre-Dame de Saint-Henri,
INC, pour un montant total de
[2:03:36] 71 310,87 sous taxes incluses, avec trois périodes
optionnelles.
[2:04:10] 16,2.
[2:04:10] Approuvé une entente à intervenir avec la
Ville de Montréal concernant le paiement
[2:04:13] de services rendus pour la conception des travaux
sur les avenues Victoria,
[2:04:17] Saint-Clair, Waverly et Lakeview.
[2:04:19] Ceci dans le cadre d'un projet par la ville
de Montréal pour des travaux de
[2:04:23] construction d'une conduite d'eau principale.
[2:04:25] La ville de Point-Clair souhaitait intégrer
aux travaux de Montréal des
[2:04:28] travaux relevant de sa compétence, et notamment
des travaux de construction
[2:04:31] et de remplacement de conduite d'eau et d'égouts,
des travaux de réfection de
[2:04:35] trottoirs, de chaussées et de pavage.
[2:04:37] Le projet a depuis été mis en suspens par
la ville de Montréal.
[2:04:40] Cependant, des plans de conception avaient
déjà été élaborés.
[2:04:43] La présentante entente Qui porte sur le paiement
par la ville de Point-Clair des
[2:04:47] frais correspondant à sa Cote-Port pour les
plans, soit 213 524,30 $.
[2:05:00] .
[2:05:01] Kelly Thorsted-Cullen, District 3. All in favor?
[2:05:07] Thank you. 16.
[2:05:08] 3.
[2:05:09] Approved the city representative to the Ministère
de l'Environement de la
[2:05:12] Lutte Contre les Changements Climatiques, de
la Faune et des Parcs,
[2:05:15] in connection with the Public Shoreline Stabilization
Program
[2:05:18] with the City of Point Claire.
[2:05:20] The chosen city representative is the project
manager, Landscape Architecture
[2:05:24] from the Engineering Department.
[2:05:26] Kevin Movers, seconder, pour 16.
[2:05:27] 3.
[2:05:28] Claudine Demers, District.
[2:05:31] Bruno Tremblay, District 6. All in favor?
[2:05:35] Thank you.
[2:05:37] Les points d'urbanisme.
[2:05:39] Les personnes présentes peuvent s'adresser
au conseil concernant les points 17.
[2:05:42] 1, 17. 2, 17.6 et 17.
[2:05:45] 9. À quel moment?
[2:05:48] Maintenant.
[2:05:50] Si c'est un des points que je viens de dénumérer.
[2:05:51] Oui. Parfait.
[2:05:55] Bonjour, André Clermont, Vieux de Golfe.
[2:05:58] Ma question, c'est pour le 3 26, mais au bord
du lac.
[2:06:02] Je me demandais quelle sorte de commerces qui
va aller et qui s'en vient.
[2:06:14] Je ne suis pas sûr quelle sorte de business
va aller là, mais je pense
[2:06:18] qu'ils vont faire une division.
[2:06:19] Ils vont diviser en deux.
[2:06:21] Je pense qu'il va y avoir un côté qui est
bureau, je pense, puis là...
[2:06:26] Art Gallery. Puis une galerie d'art.
[2:06:28] Puis En haut, ça reste résidentiel?
[2:06:32] Ça va rester par les bureaux résidentiels.
[2:06:37] Là, ce qui m'inquiète un petit peu, c'est
l'exemption pour le stationnement.
[2:06:42] Oui.
[2:06:43] Parce que là, présentement, dans le village,
le stationnement, il est rare.
[2:06:47] Puis dernièrement, j'ai vu que l'urbanisme,
[2:06:50] ils sont prêts à donner des permis pour des
restaurants sans stationnement.
[2:06:56] Là, c'est beau, c'est des le commerce, ça
va attirer,
[2:07:01] c'est correct, mais ça prend de la place mettre
les autos.
[2:07:05] Mais c'est comme tous les autres commerces
que vous voulez dans le village,
[2:07:09] quand il manque des stationnements sur ton
terrain, tu payes un frais à la ville,
[2:07:16] puis avec l'argent là, on achète ou on fait
d'autres
[2:07:19] stationnements comme on le fait sur L'Antier,
on a acheté le coin,
[2:07:23] le stationnement de Rochon-Plumet, on prend
l'argent là, puis on a essayé de
[2:07:29] trouver des par les espaces de stationnement.
[2:07:31] Mais c'est parce que pour acheter les espaces
de stationnement, il y a
[2:07:34] quelque chose qui ne fonctionne pas.
[2:07:36] Parce que je pense que vous avez de la compétition,
parce qu'il y en a d'autres
[2:07:38] qui vendent des espaces de stationnement.
[2:07:41] C'est qui qui vend?
[2:07:42] Comme exemple, le restaurant dans l'Ouvres,
[2:07:45] quand ils ont ouvert, ça prenait des espaces
de stationnement.
[2:07:48] Le fleuriste Ouest-Mantes, ils ont levé la
main.
[2:07:51] Je ne sais pas s'ils ont vendu ou ils ont donné,
parce que les conditions pour le
[2:07:54] permis du Lourdes étaient que le fleuriste
fournisse quatre places de stationnement,
[2:07:59] si je ne me trompe pas.
[2:08:01] Ils ne respectent pas leurs engagements.
[2:08:04] Puis, il n'y a pas longtemps, pour le 6 Golf,
il y avait eu une
[2:08:08] demande aussi de changement de zonage.
[2:08:10] L'urbaniste était prêt à donner un permis
de restaurant sans stationnement encore,
[2:08:14] puis Le fleuriste, il lève la main encore
puis il est prêt à vendre
[2:08:17] des places de stationnement.
[2:08:19] Est-ce que c'est juste vous qui peut en vendre
des places de
[2:08:21] stationnement ou le privé aussi?
[2:08:23] Non, mais si je comprends bien, le Westman
Florist, première chose où il y
[2:08:29] a Luz, C'est les mêmes propriétaires de
[2:08:31] West Mount Forest, c'est le même propriétaire
de
[2:08:32] Westman Florist, c'est la même famille.
[2:08:34] Puis même 6 Golf, à l'instant, je pense que
[2:08:38] probablement quand il a mis ça à vendre,
puis il a trouvé un acheteur,
[2:08:42] il probablement peut...
[2:08:44] Je ne suis pas sûr, mais pour faire avancer
le dossier-là,
[2:08:49] il dit: On va trouver la solution pour l'instantiement.
[2:08:53] Mais West Mount, c'est le même propriétape.
[2:08:56] Peut-être ça, c'est- Parce que là, je me
demandais si c'est
[2:09:00] C'est réservé juste à vous autres, la ville,
ou il y a quelqu'un qui peut
[2:09:04] lever la main et dire: Moi, je peux m'en fournir
des espaces.
[2:09:06] Parce que là, avec Lourdes puis Floristes,
comme j'ai dit, ils ne
[2:09:11] respectent pas leurs engagements.
[2:09:13] C'est que pour avoir le permis, Lourdes, c'est
inconditionnel.
[2:09:17] Là, si on va chez le Floristes, on regarde
sur l'asphalte puis partout,
[2:09:20] c'est bien indiqué que le stationnement, il
est pour le Floristes seulement.
[2:09:24] Il y a nulle part, c'est écrit que le Lourdes,
[2:09:27] le monde peut aller stationner là.
[2:09:29] Là, s'il y a une exemption de stationnement,
là,
[2:09:33] puis on ouvre des commerces, puis déjà là,
je ne sais pas si vous vous promenez,
[2:09:37] tout le monde dans le village, les fins de
semaine ou le jour du soir,
[2:09:39] des espaces, il n'y en a pas.
[2:09:41] C'est plein. Là, qu'est-ce que ça fait?
[2:09:44] C'est la rue Golf, le monde se promènent,
ils stationnent où ce qu'il ne faut pas,
[2:09:46] ils stationnent devant les entrées, puis il
y a des places d'interdit,
[2:09:49] puis ils stationnent.
[2:09:51] Puis l'urbanisme passe.
[2:09:53] Ce n'est pas l'urbanisme, c'est la sécurité
publique.
[2:09:55] Si on ne fait pas de plainte, ils ne font rien.
[2:09:59] Là, ce n'est pas à nous autres de faire des
plaintes tout le temps.
[2:10:01] Ils passent, eux autres, ils devraient faire
leur job.
[2:10:05] En tout cas, moi, ce qui me concerne le plus,
c'est une exemption de
[2:10:09] stationnement.
[2:10:11] Je pense qu'avant d'accorder ça, il faut y
penser deux fois.
[2:10:13] Il y a beaucoup les études qui étaient faites,
le urban planning, il y a fait la
[2:10:20] recherche puis tout.
[2:10:21] Ça, c'est dans le règlement.
[2:10:23] C'est dans le règlement de la Coupe de villageois
que si il manque des
[2:10:26] stationnements, c'est une décision de ville
qu'on peut demander un
[2:10:33] montant d'argent pour le manque d'espace.
[2:10:36] C'est parce que c'est beau de donner de l'argent,
mais c'est acheter des espaces
[2:10:41] de stationnement qui n'existent pas.
[2:10:43] Je comprends, mais quand on a fait lancer puis
on a ajouté je ne
[2:10:49] sais pas combien il se passe exactement, j'oublie,
ça fait cinq, six ans, à penser,
[2:10:53] l'argent de le fonds de stationnement, on a
payé pour l'espace.
[2:11:00] Il y a beaucoup de choses qui vont se passer.
[2:11:02] À un moment, dans le village, il y a une entente
que...
[2:11:09] Je ne sais pas comment on dit ça en français,
mais shared parking.
[2:11:12] Si mon commerce est ouvert pendant le jour.
[2:11:16] Les nuits, je vais laisser d'autres moins utiliser
mon stationnement.
[2:11:19] C'est une bonne idée, mais est-ce que c'est
correct pour la
[2:11:22] personne qui est le propriétaire de ce stationnement-là,
le usage, l'asphalte?
[2:11:25] Il y a des choses à régler, mais je pense
qu'en tout Là, ça va bien.
[2:11:31] Oui, il manque du stationnement.
[2:11:34] On ne va jamais avoir assez de stationnement
parce que tout le monde,
[2:11:36] il veut stationner en avant la porte de commerce.
[2:11:39] Il ne veut pas marcher, mais dans les villages,
tu n'as pas besoin de ton genre.
[2:11:44] Tu vas aller marcher, tu vas stationner puis
tu vas marcher.
[2:11:47] Oui, mais pour marcher, on le voit comme la
rue Lentier,
[2:11:49] c'est plein tous les stationnements.
[2:11:51] C'est des périodes occupées.
[2:11:52] C'est juste jusqu'où ça va aller?
[2:11:54] On va te donner d'autres permis de restaurant,
des exemptions
[2:11:57] de stationnement?
[2:11:58] Moi, je pense qu'avant, quand tu fournis Quand
tu faisais un
[2:12:00] commerce avant, il fallait que tu fournisses
du stationnement.
[2:12:03] Ça, je trouvais ça bon.
[2:12:04] Oui, mais comme vous êtes au courant, il n'y
a pas de terrain dans le village.
[2:12:07] Il n'y a pas de terrain pour faire des stationnements.
[2:12:11] Là, est-ce qu'on va laisser les places vides,
fermées parce qu'il manque deux,
[2:12:16] trois places de stationnement ou whatever?
[2:12:19] Un restaurant, ce n'est pas deux, trois places
de stationnement.
[2:12:22] Je comprends ce que tu dis, mais on n'a pas
vraiment les
[2:12:30] de stationnements dans le village.
[2:12:32] Dans les dernières quelques années, on n'a
pas eu trop de pleins.
[2:12:35] Ça va bien.
[2:12:36] Les pleins, c'est que les espaces sont de plus
en plus rares.
[2:12:39] Puis là, si on continue, ce n'est pas les
exemptions de
[2:12:44] stationnement, c'est où que ça arrête?
[2:12:47] C'est dans le règlement.
[2:12:48] C'est urban planning, puis le parc a dit que
c'est correct, commence le dossier.
[2:12:53] Ce n'est pas juste nous.
[2:12:54] Il a fait le recherche, il a fait le devoir,
puis là, il dit: OK,
[2:12:57] c'est correct, il manque trois, deux, trois
espaces.
[2:13:00] Quand le métro a au bord, il était là, il
y a eu beaucoup plus de charges partout
[2:13:06] sur le terrain, mais ça, on a coupé tout
ça.
[2:13:08] On ne veut pas qu'ils mettent le fer grandir
le stationnement
[2:13:12] sur les côtés puis tout ça.
[2:13:14] Ça, c'est parce que le terrain est assez grand
pour mettre d'autres stationnements,
[2:13:18] mais ce n'est pas sur le bord de l'eau.
[2:13:20] On ne veut pas faire ça.
[2:13:21] Là, il y a un compromis qui a été fait,
probablement, entre le urban planning puis
[2:13:27] le propriétaire. Ok, merci.
[2:13:29] Merci.
[2:13:31] Pour continuer, j'ai le droit de parler du
stationnement.
[2:13:36] En tout cas, je suis d'accord un peu ce que
monsieur Clermont dit.
[2:13:40] Je suis là même depuis 1955 que je suis dans
le village de Pointe-à-Aire.
[2:13:45] Il y a un problème de stationnement dans le
village.
[2:13:47] Dites ce que vous voudrez, monsieur le maire.
[2:13:48] Il y en a un.
[2:13:50] J'en suis personnellement au courant de tout
ça.
[2:13:54] J'ai vendu des sapins, des places commerciales
et tout ça.
[2:13:58] Il y a tellement de monde qui dit qu'il y a
un problème de stationnement.
[2:14:00] Je ne vois pas pourquoi vous dites qu'il n'y
en a pas.
[2:14:02] Il y en a un.
[2:14:02] Il y a de quoi aller avec l'urbaniste qui ne
fonctionne pas.
[2:14:06] Si l'urbaniste pense qu'il n'y en a pas, il
y en a un.
[2:14:09] Là, le 326, ce que je comprends, c'est grand,
mais il y a de la place.
[2:14:15] Il y a de la place pour du stationnement.
[2:14:17] Je ne vois pas pourquoi vous lui donnez...
[2:14:20] J'essaie de voir le nombre de pieds carrés
avec le nombre d'espaces de stationnement.
[2:14:24] Il est assez grand.
[2:14:25] Il faut être du stationnement, puis je ne
vois pas pourquoi
[2:14:28] vous lui donnez une permission.
[2:14:29] Parce que moi, dans ma tête, ça me donne
une raison d'agrandir ou
[2:14:33] d'éventuellement, on ne sait pas, ça va être
un restaurant encore une fois.
[2:14:36] Parce que c'est tentant d'avoir un restaurant
sur le bord
[2:14:38] de l'eau, on s'entend.
[2:14:40] Même que vous n'avez pas le droit de dire
que vous ne voulez pas avoir de
[2:14:43] stationnement sur le bord de l'eau.
[2:14:45] Qu'est-ce qu'il va y avoir d'abord sur le bord
de l'eau?
[2:14:47] Il ne va laisser ça rien, le terrain vacant
comme ça tout le temps?
[2:14:50] Je ne vois pas ça, moi.
[2:14:52] Écoute, moi, on n'est pas impliqués dans
le dossier-là.
[2:14:55] Quand le propriétaire présente les plans,
il présente ça en urban planning,
[2:15:00] il y a le planning, il fait le research, il
fait le travaux.
[2:15:03] Après ça, ça va au committee pack puis après
ça, ça vient à nous.
[2:15:06] Je ne sais pas c'est quoi les plans dans cinq
ans.
[2:15:09] Déjà, je n'ai aucune idée, mais la chose
que je sais qu'il ne veut
[2:15:15] pas prendre l'espace vert pour du stationnement
sur le terrain-là, madame.
[2:15:19] C'est ça que c'est les recommandations de
le committee pack.
[2:15:25] Le comité d'urbanisme, mais moi, je peux vous
dire qu'il
[2:15:27] n'y en a pas d'espace vert.
[2:15:28] Il n'y en a pas un, il n'y a pas un carré
Il n'y a pas un pied carré
[2:15:31] d'espace vert sur ce terrain-là.
[2:15:33] Vous allez voir, il n'y a pas un pied carré
d'espace vert.
[2:15:36] Ne me dites pas que l'espace vert, il n'y a
pas un pied carré d'espace vert.
[2:15:40] Mais là, c'est quoi l'entente finalement?
[2:15:42] Allez-vous le laisser?
[2:15:43] Est-ce qu'il va payer du stationnement pas
cher ou il va se stationner ailleurs?
[2:15:48] Parce qu'il pourrait se servir d'un autre terrain
comme vous avez fait
[2:15:51] chez Lourdes pour accaparer du stationnement
ailleurs.
[2:15:54] Il va payer le prix qui est dans le règlement.
[2:15:56] Je ne sais pas c'est quoi le prix pour le stationnement.
[2:15:58] Je n'ai aucune idée.
[2:15:59] C'est dans le règlement de la ville.
[2:16:01] Ce n'est pas C'est dans le règlement de la
C'est pas cher, c'est 3 500.
[2:16:04] Oui, mais l'autre choix, c'est comme il disait
monsieur Clermont
[2:16:06] qui expliquait, c'est de prendre un terrain
ailleurs
[2:16:09] puis de mettre du stationnement ailleurs.
[2:16:12] C'est ce que a fait Lourdes.
[2:16:14] Lourdes, comme j'ai dit, Lourdes- Qu'est-ce
qui arrive?
[2:16:18] C'est ça, on vous dit: On ne peut pas savoir
d'avant,
[2:16:22] mais là, vous donnez le droit de pas de stationnement,
mais il n'y a
[2:16:25] pas rien qui vient avec ça.
[2:16:26] C'est quoi?
[2:16:28] Qu'est-ce qui arrive? Allez-vous charger trois
millions?
[2:16:31] Combien de places? Premièrement, on n'a rien.
[2:16:33] L'argent va dans le fonds. Oui, ça, je croyais.
[2:16:36] Je veux savoir combien de places.
[2:16:38] Je pense que c'est trois places. Et combien?
[2:16:40] Trois places?
[2:16:41] Il y a cinq places de stationnement de tous
les deux.
[2:16:44] Il ne va Pour combien il va acheter trois places.
[2:16:47] Ok.
[2:16:49] Je vais faire une place en avant.
[2:16:51] J'ai dit trois parties en avant.
[2:16:53] J'ai quatre parties en avant. C'est ça.
[2:16:55] J'ai voté pour ne pas prendre ces places-là,
payer puis avoir
[2:16:59] des sapiens pour les bâtir.
[2:17:01] Comme ça, il y a de la place, mais il n'est
pas obligé d'en prendre.
[2:17:06] Il y a de la place, c'est satisfaisable.
[2:17:07] Vous avez le droit de prendre la voir.
[2:17:09] Je ne comprends pas la logique.
[2:17:12] C'est comme L'Ouz, c'est un genre où vous
allez mettre des affaires- On a déjà
[2:17:15] discuté L'Ouz, c'est fini la conversation.
[2:17:17] C'est fini, on a discuté L'Où?
[2:17:19] C'est ça ou ce n'est pas explicable?
[2:17:23] C'est explicable dans le sens que le fleuriste...
[2:17:25] Je vais juste expliquer.
[2:17:26] Le fleuriste, il ferme à 5h00, le L'Où, il
ferme 11h00.
[2:17:31] C'est correct.
[2:17:35] .
[2:17:38] Non, tu ne peux pas rester en derrière puis
parler, s'il vous plaît.
[2:17:41] Il faut que tu viennes au micro parce que le
monde à la maison
[2:17:43] n'écoute pas, c'est pour ça.
[2:17:45] Moi, je ne comprends pas. Il y a de la place.
[2:17:47] Je ne sais pas pourquoi vous me donnez l'exercice.
[2:17:49] Il y a de la place.
[2:17:51] Non, le comité d'urbanisme, il y a un comité?
[2:17:54] Oui. Là, ça va.
[2:17:57] Le urban planning, c'est le comité. Il y a
du monde.
[2:18:00] Il y a du monde qui l'a choisi de laisser lui
acheter les places.
[2:18:02] Le comité a décidé.
[2:18:03] Pourquoi c'est accepté à un, puis pas à
l'autre?
[2:18:05] Ok, merci beaucoup. Bonne soirée.
[2:18:07] On a fait ça du favoritisme. Merci.
[2:18:11] .
[2:18:15] De 7,1. De 7,1.
[2:18:19] Considérer une demande de dérogation mineure
concernant la propriété au 27
[2:18:22] avenue Salisbury pour permettre l'installation
d'une enseigne monument
[2:18:25] située à deux mètres de l'emprise de la
rue, à un endroit où ce type
[2:18:28] d'enseignes n'est pas autorisé.
[2:18:30] La recommandation du comité consultatif d'urbanisme
est à l'effet
[2:18:32] d'approuver la demande. .
[2:18:36] Claudine Demers, District 1.
[2:18:38] . .
[2:18:40] . .
[2:18:40] .
[2:18:40] . .
[2:18:41] .
[2:19:15] . All in favor?
[2:19:17] Thank you. 17.
[2:19:18] 3.
[2:19:20] Considérer les plans d'implantation et d'intégration
architecturale relatifs à
[2:19:24] la propriété au 101 avenue Dieppe.
[2:19:32] Il s'agit de permettre la construction
[2:19:41] d'une habitation unifamiliale
[2:19:45] avec un garage attaché.
[2:19:50] La recommandation du Comité consultatif d'urbanisme
est à l'effet
[2:19:59] d'approuver les plans. .
[2:19:59] Cynthia Home, District 5. Second by.
[2:19:59] Eric Stork, District 7. All in favor?
[2:19:59] Merci. 17.
[2:19:59] 6. 17.
[2:19:59] 6.
[2:19:59] Consider a minor exemption request concerning
the property situated
[2:19:59] at 326 de Baltolac, Lakeshore Road.
[2:19:59] This is to permit at 326-326 A de Baltolac,
Lakeshore,
[2:19:59] which is lot 2528-101.
[2:19:59] A parking in the front setback where it is
not permitted, and a parking area with a
[2:20:03] side setback of 0 m, rather than the minimum
required of 1.5 m.
[2:20:07] The Planning Advisory Committee's recommendation
is to approve the request.
[2:20:11] We have a mover and seconder for 17.
[2:20:13] 6.
[2:20:15] Ludovic Matthews, District 2.
[2:20:18] Second by. Mike Podvin, District 8.
[2:20:21] All in favor?
[2:20:23] Thank you. 17.
[2:20:24] 7.
[2:20:25] Considérer les plans d'implantation et d'intégration
architecturale relatifs à la
[2:20:29] propriété au 326 Chemin du bord du lac Lakeshore.
[2:20:32] Il s'agit de rénovation extérieure et l'aménagement
d'une aire de stationnement.
[2:20:35] La recommandation du Comité consultatif d'urbanisme
est à l'effet
[2:20:38] d'approuver les plans.
[2:20:40] Ludovic Matthews, District 2.
[2:20:45] Second by.
[2:20:46] All in favor?
[2:20:50] Thank you. 17.
[2:20:51] 8.
[2:20:52] Consider an exemption from the requirement
to provide the required parking spaces for
[2:20:58] the property located at 326 Duval de la Lake
Shore Road.
[2:21:01] This is to permit a request aiming to provide
for the
[2:21:05] eight required parking spaces, and that a compensation
of $10,500
[2:21:09] be paid for the three missing spaces.
[2:21:12] The Planning Advisory Committee's recommendation
is to.
[2:21:14] Ludovic Mathieu, District 2. .
[2:21:14] . .
[2:21:14] . .
[2:21:14] . .
[2:21:14] .
[2:21:14] C'est pour permettre un recueil aimé pour
fournir cinq de les huit appartements
[2:21:14] nécessaires et que la compensation de 10 500
$ soit payée pour les trois espaces.
[2:21:14] Le plan d'advisoire du comité de déclaration
est de faire
[2:21:14] l'envoyer le recueil.
[2:21:16] Vous avez un mot, Monsieur le Secrétaire,
pour 17,8, s'il vous plaît?
[2:21:18] Ludovic Mathieu, Districteur.
[2:21:20] Second, Mike Podvin, quartier numéro 8.
[2:21:23] All in favor? Thank you.
[2:21:26] 17. 9.
[2:21:28] Considérer une demande de dérogation mineure
concernant la propriété au 191,
[2:21:34] bord du lac Lakeshore, c'est pour permettre
un accès véhiculaire
[2:21:37] d'une largeur de 11 mètres plutôt que le
maximum permis de 6.
[2:21:40] 1.
[2:21:41] La recommandation du comité constatif d'urbanisme
est à l'effet
[2:21:44] d'approuver la demande.
[2:21:48] Kelly Thorsted, Cullen, District 3. Second
by.
[2:21:51] Eric Stork, District 7. All in favor?
[2:21:56] Can I just ask all people that are in favor?
[2:21:58] Yeah, raise your hands, please. All in favor?
[2:22:01] Yes, and against.
[2:22:03] Merci. 17.
[2:22:04] 10. 17.
[2:22:04] 10.
[2:22:09] Consider the site plan and architectural integration
program plans with respect to
[2:22:13] the property situated at 191 Sevalte-l'Aques-Lakes-Shore
Road.
[2:22:16] This is for the modification of the approved
configuration of the semicircular
[2:22:20] driveway associated with the new residence,
the construction
[2:22:22] de laquelle il a été prévu.
[2:22:24] Le conseil d'administration du conseil d'administration
est
[2:22:26] de l'apprendre le plan.
[2:22:27] Vous avez un mot en seconde pour 17,10.
[2:22:31] Kelly Thurstedt-Cullen, District 3.
[2:22:33] Seconde par Eric Stork, secteur CEP. Tous en
favor?
[2:22:39] Those against. Against.
[2:22:41] Merci. Thank you.
[2:22:43] 17-11.
[2:22:47] Considérer les plans d'implantation et d'intégration
architecturale relatifs
[2:22:50] à la propriété au 30 avenue Clermont.
[2:22:52] Il s'agit de rénovations extérieures et la
recommandation du comité consultatif
[2:22:56] d'urbanisme est à l'effet d'approuver les
plans.
[2:22:58] You have a move in second 17-11.
[2:23:00] Auton de Merce, District 1.
[2:23:03] Second by. Andrew Switinski, District 4.
[2:23:05] All in favor?
[2:23:08] Thank you.
[2:23:09] 17-12. 17-12.
[2:23:12] Consider the site planing an architectural
integration program plans with respect to
[2:23:15] the property situated 84 de Dieppe Avenue.
[2:23:18] This is for modifications to the previously
approved plans
[2:23:21] under Resolution 2026-040.
[2:23:23] The Planning Advisory Committee's recommendation
is to approve the plans.
[2:23:27] We're moving seconder for 1712, please.
[2:23:30] Eric Stork, District 7.
[2:23:32] Second by.
[2:23:33] Bruno Tremblay, District 6. All in favor?
[2:23:37] Thank you.
[2:23:39] 1713.
[2:23:39] Considérer les plans d'implantation et d'intégration
architecturale relatifs à la
[2:23:43] propriété au 7 avenue de Georgia Crescent.
[2:23:45] Il s'agit de la construction d'une nouvelle
habitation unifamiliale et la
[2:23:48] recommandation du Comité consultatif d'urbanisme
est à l'effet
[2:23:51] d'approuver les plans.
[2:23:53] .
[2:23:55] Mike Paul-Vin, quartier numéro 8.
[2:23:58] .
[2:24:00] . .
[2:24:00] . .
[2:24:01] . .
[2:24:01] .
[2:24:15] .
[2:24:18] Clousine Demers, District 1.
[2:24:23] Renottre Amie, District 6.
[2:24:25] . .
[2:24:26] . .
[2:24:26] . .
[2:24:26] . .
[2:24:45] La D'Astrade relative au lot 2 527 535 du Cadastre
du Québec.
[2:24:49] C'est pour permettre la subdivision d'un terrain,
soit l'actuelle 114 avenue Duke
[2:24:53] of Kent, dans le but de permettre la construction
de deux
[2:24:55] habitations unifamiliales.
[2:24:57] Et la recommandation du Comité consultatif
d'urbanisme est à l'effet
[2:24:59] d'approuver la demande.
[2:25:01] .
[2:25:04] Mike Podvin, District 8. Second by.
[2:25:09] Andrew Swadinski, District 4. All in favor?
[2:25:12] Thank you. 17, 16.
[2:25:15] Adopt a final resolution for a specific construction,
alteration or occupancy
[2:25:20] proposal for an immovable, SCAOP, at 3300 Sources
Boulevard,
[2:25:24] known as Barby Barn, for the construction of
a multi-residential building.
[2:25:28] A specific construction, alteration or occupancy
proposal for an
[2:25:32] immovable was submitted to permit the demolition
of the Barby Barn building in
[2:25:36] order to build a multifamily residential project
of 249 units.
[2:25:40] The building, which is located within a commercial
zone C8, is subject to a SCAOP
[2:25:45] analysis due to the proposed residential use.
[2:25:48] As per the zoning by law, residential Class
C1,
[2:25:51] C2 multifamily is not a permitted use.
[2:25:54] The proposed project will promote social inclusion
and diversity by offering a
[2:25:58] range of apartments such as a studio, one,
two, and three bedrooms, 10%
[2:26:03] of which meet the definition of affordable
housing, in accordance with the definition
[2:26:07] established by the Canada Mortgage and Housing
Corporation.
[2:26:12] The Planning Advisory Committee's recommendation
is to approve the proposal.
[2:26:15] A public notice was given on august 25th, 2026,
regarding the process for
[2:26:20] approval by way of referendum.
[2:26:21] And subsequently to this notice, no request
were submitted to the city.
[2:26:25] We are not, therefore, now at the final step.
[2:26:28] We have a move on second, or seconder for 17,
16, please.
[2:26:31] Kelly Thorsted, Cullen, District 3. Seconde
by.
[2:26:34] Cynthia Holman, District 5. All in favor?
[2:26:37] .
[2:26:40] I just wanted to reiterate that my vote is
[2:26:46] based on the primordial need for an active
mixed-use ground floor
[2:26:52] within the Todd zone, especially on the corner
of one of the
[2:26:55] most important intersections in the West Island.
[2:26:57] J'aimerais réitérer que mon vote est basé
sur le besoin primordial d'avoir un
[2:27:02] rez-de-chaussée actif à usage mixte à l'intérieur
d'une Air Tod,
[2:27:06] surtout sur le coin d'une des intersections
les plus
[2:27:10] importantes de l'ouest de l'île. Merci.
[2:27:14] Andrew, sorry.
[2:27:16] Je dois parler également, merci Monsieur le
Maire, sur cet enjeu-là.
[2:27:21] Comme j'avais dit au début du processus, je
pense qu'avec ce bâtiment-là,
[2:27:26] vu son isolement des autres quartiers et des
services résidentiels de Point-Clair.
[2:27:31] Il y avait une occasion de faire du développement
commercial.
[2:27:35] Je crois que ça aurait été un meilleur endroit
pour un
[2:27:40] hôtel que celui qui est proposé du Haut Colonnade
de Point-Clair.
[2:27:48] Donc, je pense qu'on aurait une belle occasion
de faire du développement
[2:27:51] commercial dans cet endroit.
[2:27:54] S'il y avait du résidentiel, je crois, comme
le conseiller Matthews
[2:28:00] que le premier étage commercial offrant des
services à la population aurait été
[2:28:07] la chose à faire dans cet endroit.
[2:28:11] On a vu ce soir avec le débat sur le 477 Delmore,
[2:28:17] l'importance des services commerciaux comme
une
[2:28:21] garderie, comme un dépanneur pour un quartier.
[2:28:26] Là, on est en train de construire un quartier
densifié
[2:28:30] qui va être plutôt résidentiel dans cet
endroit-là, du côté DDO,
[2:28:34] du côté Point-Clair.
[2:28:37] Si on n'est pas capable de défendre le principe
du commercial
[2:28:42] sur une propriété qui bientôt va devenir
essentiellement le lieu
[2:28:49] de choc point, where traffic will pass on foot
to get to the rem station,
[2:28:55] then where would we have commercial space in
that area?
[2:28:59] Our commercial services are very easy to give
up.
[2:29:05] They're not so easy to preserve in the city,
and I think we need to make
[2:29:08] more of an effort to preserve them.
[2:29:10] Comme j'ai dit à l'époque, je suis également
en désaccord avec le
[2:29:13] principe de retirer des propriétés du règlement
de contrôle intérimaire avant
[2:29:20] la mise en place du nouveau plan d'urbanisme,
non seulement pour des
[2:29:23] raisons de planification, mais parce que la
stratégie du point de vue juridique,
[2:29:29] je comme étant problématique.
[2:29:32] Donc, ce sont mes raisons. Merci.
[2:29:35] Merci, monsieur Chuzinski-Caïcha.
[2:29:39] Oui.
[2:29:40] Je suis en grande partie en accord avec les
propos de mes collègues
[2:29:45] par rapport à ce développement.
[2:29:48] Je préfère moi également un développement,
voir quelque chose de commercial dans le
[2:29:52] coin pour la plupart des raisons qui ont été
énoncées par le conseiller Swozyński
[2:29:58] et aussi par les principes établis
[2:30:07] ou rédigés par mon collègue, le conseiller
Matthews.
[2:30:29] Merci beaucoup. .
[2:30:29] . .
[2:30:29] . .
[2:30:29] . .
[2:30:29] . .
[2:30:34] Là, j'ai besoin: whoever's against. Who's
against?
[2:30:37] La proposition: trois ici. Parfait, merci.
[2:30:45] 17,17: Approuver une entente à intervenir
entre la ville et 1605 94,1 Canada Inc.
[2:30:51] Établissant les modalités visant à assurer
le maintien de l'abordabilité des
[2:30:54] logements qui seront aménagés au 3300 boulevard
des Sources.
[2:30:57] Cette entente établit les paramètres visant
à assurer le maintien de
[2:31:00] l'abordabilité d'environ 14% des logements
qui seront aménagés pour une
[2:31:03] période minimale de 10 ans.
[2:31:05] .
[2:31:09] Eric Stork, District 7.
[2:31:11] Mike Pasbain, District 8.
[2:31:22] 18,1.
[2:31:22] Authorize an employee to represent the city
at Art, Toronto, 2026,
[2:31:26] to be held from October 29th to November 1st,
in Toronto.
[2:31:31] The city appoints Manal Ben Chaban, manager,
exhibitions curator for the
[2:31:35] Art Gallery, in order to represent it at this
major event for galleries
[2:31:39] from Canada and abroad.
[2:31:41] C'est la deuxième réunion pour l'entreprise.
[2:31:43] Cynthia Homen, district
[2:31:46] Ludovic Matthews, District 2.
[2:31:56] Claudine Demers, District 1. Second, vice.
[2:31:59] Andrew.
[2:32:26] Andrew Zuzinski, District 4. Merci.
[2:32:26] Bonne soirée. Merci.
[2:32:26] Bonne soirée.