[0:00] So, we're going to have a meeting
tonight, but it won't include the public
[0:03] hearing that most of you, I'm sure, are
here for.
[0:06] » So, that public hearing will be
rescheduled to another date.
[0:09] » That's the um and public hearing is item
four, action item A is the Meguire
[0:13] annexation file number
>> 254.
[0:17] » To what date?
>> That's what I'm asking. To what date? So
[0:20] the next available on for us would be
the second
[0:26] Tuesday in November.
[0:32] » It'll be Wednesday because of voting. So
be
[0:35] » No, voting is the 4th. So that would be
the Monday.
[0:38] » Veterans Day.
>> Veterans Day.
[0:39] » Veterans Day.
>> That one's the second Wednesday. I think
[0:42] we're going Wednesday that week.
>> Yeah, we are.
[0:44] » Wednesday. Okay. So November 12th, the
Wednesday. So, the Meguire annexation
[0:49] file hearing is going to be
Wednesday, November 4th. Is that it?
[0:54] » 12.
>> 12.
[0:55] » 12th. Sorry.
>> Okay.
[0:57] » Do we need a motion to move it?
>> Let's go ahead. That'd be fine. Thank
[1:01] you.
>> Is it appropriate for me to make that
[1:05] motion?
>> Um, sure.
[1:07] » Okay. I would move to
postpone
[1:14] the
Meguire annexation filenx25-4
[1:21] to a date certain which would be
November
[1:26] 12th, 2025.
[1:30] » We have a motion. We have a second.
>> I'll second that motion.
[1:34] » And we'll call for a vote.
>> Uh Schloter,
[1:37] » yes.
>> Shriber,
[1:38] » yes.
>> Wilhham,
[1:40] » yes.
>> Kimble,
[1:42] » yes.
Okay.
[1:46] So, again, sorry folks that came out
here uh for that hearing, but uh we want
[1:52] to make sure that we have a a quorum and
no
[1:57] conflicts. So, that's what we'll do.
Are there any uh any other amendments to
[2:03] the agenda?
No, we can go on to the ceremonies,
[2:07] announcements, appointments, and
presentations now.
[2:10] Um, so the planning department, we do
have an additional staff member that um,
[2:16] you guys have not met yet. So, I'll go
ahead and
[2:23] » Hi everyone. I'm Paige Hunt, planner one
with the city of Post Falls. I've been
[2:29] working here for about four months now,
getting my degree at Eastern.
[2:35] Um, I'm glad to be a part of a good team
and yeah,
[2:40] » thank you.
>> Welcome. Welcome aboard.
[2:42] » Welcome.
[2:50] » Anything else, John?
>> Uh, nope. Nothing to add there? No.
[2:54] » Any declarations of conflict?
>> Um, nope. Sorry.
[3:00] » Not anymore.
>> No. Okay, we'll move on to the consent
[3:05] calendar. Um, on the action items for
the consent calendar, we have the
[3:10] meeting minutes from the September 9th
meeting
[3:13] and we've got the Harvest Meadows POD
and subdivision reason decision
[3:19] and the Echo Estates zoning
recommendation reason decision.
[3:22] Everybody have a chance to look at that?
>> Yep.
[3:25] » If you have, I'd take a motion.
[3:29] » I move to approve the consent calendar
as presented.
[3:32] Second.
>> Approved and seconded.
[3:37] Take uh a vote.
>> Wilham,
[3:40] » yes.
>> Shriber,
[3:41] » yes.
>> Shot,
[3:43] » yes.
>> Kimble,
[3:44] » yes.
>> Okay, moving on here. Um, this portion
[3:49] of our meeting is for citizens issues.
If anybody here has an issue they want
[3:53] to speak about that is not being
addressed in any portion of tonight's
[3:58] meeting, this is the time where you
could come forward and address the
[4:01] commission. You'd have five minutes.
[4:09] Okay.
Uh we'll move on to unfinished old
[4:13] business. Do we have any, John?
>> There's none.
[4:17] » Okay. And
we don't have any uh so moving on to
[4:23] public hearings. We don't have any uh we
don't have a public hearing but uh I
[4:28] believe we have a staff report.
>> Yes, there's the administrative staff
[4:32] report for the impact fee assessment.
[4:42] » Hi everyone.
Page Hunt Planner One, the City of Post
[4:47] Falls, presenting the fiscal year 2023
and fiscal year 2024 development impact
[4:54] fee report.
This report shows the impact fees and
[5:00] our payments required by local
governments of new developments for the
[5:04] purpose of providing new or expanded
public capital facilities required to
[5:08] serve the community in new developments.
These fees are used to shift the cost of
[5:14] financing public facilities from the
general taxpayer.
[5:18] A development impact fee report is a
requirement for every governmental
[5:22] entity in Idaho that collects impact
fees. Development impact fees shall not
[5:28] be used for any purpose other than
system improvement costs to create
[5:32] additional improvements to serve new
growth. Impact fees are spent every at
[5:40] least every eight years from the date
they were collected first in first out
[5:44] basis. A governmental entity may hold
the fees for longer than eight years if
[5:50] it identifies a reasonable cause and an
anticipated date.
[5:56] Uh the development impact fees for 2024
reflect beginning balances impact fees
[6:02] collected other revenues, expenditures,
interest, funds total, and the roads,
[6:07] parks, and public safety projects that
received impact fees during the fiscal
[6:12] year of 2024. In the fiscal year of
2024, approximately 5.2 million were
[6:18] collected in impact fees. And of those
impact fees, 3.5 million were spent on
[6:25] roads, parks, and public safety projects
to assist with mitigated growth in the
[6:30] community.
Um, as you can see here, I have circled
[6:36] the impact fees, which go to about 5.2
million, expenditures running 3.5
[6:43] million, leaving us with an end total of
16 million.
[6:50] Um on here's the history. So as we can
see from the fiscal year 2019 we had a
[6:56] beginning balance of 6.9 million
and at the end of the fiscal year 2023
[7:03] we had a total of 13.6 million.
Over the course of five years we have
[7:11] increased our balance while increasing
our expenditures.
[7:16] Um for future goals, we will be spending
more and our total balance will be
[7:22] decreasing with the projects that we
have planned on the expenditures.
[7:29] Uh on here we can see for the fiscal
year of 2024 all the projects for roads.
[7:36] The main one was pull line and Spokane
roundabouts coming out to about 2.3
[7:43] million for parks. We had the
[7:52] the um
land acquisition at 1.9 million. And
[7:58] then for public safety, this comes out
to
[8:05] another land acquisition for about just
under a million.
[8:12] And then this one is actually for the
fiscal year of 2024.
[8:16] This one we have contracts and
professional for 1 million total park
[8:22] projects. Black Bay Park coming out to
1.7 million. And then expenditures for
[8:30] public safety, we see that most of it is
going to the police funding.
[8:39] And then on here is the same concept for
the fiscal year 2024.
[8:46] And then this does not need any
decision. It's just for your knowledge.
[8:50] Is there any questions?
[8:55] » Anybody have any questions on the
presentation?
[8:58] » Just just a quick question. It looks
like fiscal year 2024 we didn't really
[9:03] have any big land acquisition. That was
more just in 2023. Yes, that was more in
[9:10] 2023.
>> And because I wasn't involved at that
[9:14] point, what was the big land acquisition
um both for the parks and then also for
[9:21] uh public safety? What were those two
were those just two large purchases or
[9:25] was it a whole bunch of purchases or
>> um
[9:29] » I actually don't know exactly for
the parks and the funds. That's just how
[9:35] finance itemizes it in their callouts as
land acquisition. I could punt though um
[9:42] because
>> I was just wondering
[9:44] » um Bob Seal I don't know if he may know
um because he goes to meetings that I
[9:50] don't go to.
>> Okay.
[9:55] Looks like Bob's verifying with a
representative from the police.
[10:03] » Bob Sea, community development director.
Um I actually can't remember the parks
[10:07] project that would have been purchased
that year. Um the PED was purchasing the
[10:12] land adjacent to the existing facility
for the parking lot expansion.
[10:16] » Okay.
>> I'm trying to remember what parks would
[10:19] have purchased that.
>> Is that like the QM expansion? buying
[10:23] all that land or was that even
>> that was I think that was before I think
[10:27] that was earlier um the the community
forest yeah piece
[10:31] » um
>> I think not that it matters didn't parks
[10:35] and public and public works join up
>> they did they joined on bar they did
[10:40] they bought a piece on hard graves that
was probably that year that you're
[10:43] looking at the timing
>> lines up what's that
[10:45] » the timing works yeah so it's like 15
acres on hard grave I believe five acres
[10:50] went to park and parks and 10 acres went
to public works Okay.
[10:53] » So, they kind of mix the
>> the selection there.
[10:56] » Just asking.
>> Yeah.
[10:57] » Thank you.
>> Good question.
[11:03] » I'm trying to understand the bottom
portion that's in the box. Is that a
[11:07] different way of presenting this? What's
the 17 million for roads?
[11:10] » That is just a summary regarding
the same concept. um impact fees that is
[11:21] going to be all of
um the balances rather than just the
[11:27] fees for
fiscal year 20.
[11:30] » Oh, those are balances.
>> Yes.
[11:32] » Yes. It's just the same way to represent
the same information, but that's like in
[11:35] summary of total. So, you're looking at
the impact fees in total that's
[11:39] collected in and other revenues tied
with expenditures, leaving you that 16.4
[11:45] 4 on the right versus when you look up
above, you're just looking at the
[11:49] beginning balance of fiscal year 20 uh
20 24 and you see that moving from the
[11:56] left to the right getting to that same
number that 16.4 million.
[12:05] » Any more questions?
[12:09] » Nope.
>> Thank you.
[12:10] » No, thank you.
[12:18] And like that was stated, there's no
really decision that's for this matter.
[12:22] Just as you guys acting as the impact
fee committee as well as part of the
[12:28] planning and zoning commission, uh gives
you a chance to review it before it goes
[12:32] to city council.
[12:36] » Okay. Are there any uh commissioner
comments?
[12:40] » No.
[12:44] Nope. Okay.
I move to adjourn.
[12:51] » Ajourned.