1 00:00:08,366 --> 00:00:08,366 2026 regular city council meeting to order. Will the city clerk please call the roll 2 00:00:14,433 --> 00:00:14,433 councilmember dayhoff here. Council member pikus here. Deputy mayor mayeda here. Mayor 3 00:00:21,333 --> 00:00:21,333 vohs here. Deputy mayor. Mayor, please lead us in the pledge. 4 00:00:49,733 --> 00:00:49,733 and now, if you'd please join us for a moment of silence. 5 00:01:11,333 --> 00:01:11,333 thank you. First up is public comment. In accordance with state law, an item not 6 00:01:19,666 --> 00:01:19,666 scheduled on the agenda may be brought forward by the general public for comment. However, 7 00:01:24,833 --> 00:01:24,833 the city council will not be able to discuss or take action on any issue not included on 8 00:01:30,400 --> 00:01:30,400 the agenda. You may speak up to three minutes. You have one opportunity. I have two 9 00:01:35,066 --> 00:01:35,066 speakers. First up, jim bonner. Good evening. First of all, I'd like to just give a shout out 10 00:01:46,333 --> 00:01:46,333 to the poway high school girls cheer and dance team. I don't know how many of you know of 11 00:01:53,400 --> 00:01:53,400 them or have watched them, but they're going to be heading for a national championship in 12 00:01:58,166 --> 00:01:58,166 vegas next month. They do a very good job. If anybody's familiar with pop warner 13 00:02:03,233 --> 00:02:03,233 football and cheer, they've had national championships over the years. So I'd like to bring a 14 00:02:08,200 --> 00:02:08,200 little bit of attention to them. And I know, you know, in this world of city council issues 15 00:02:14,433 --> 00:02:17,566 and traffic and this development and that development and this development and that council person and newspapers are full of publicizing, you know, 16 00:02:23,766 --> 00:02:23,766 things like carols for candlelight and other events. Maybe some of you out there may 17 00:02:28,133 --> 00:02:28,133 want to write a check to poway high, give it to doctor perniola at the poway high 18 00:02:34,533 --> 00:02:34,533 school and help fund them. It's going to be an expensive trip, and any of these events for 19 00:02:41,400 --> 00:02:41,400 such activities for the women's teams and these type of programs should be supported. I 20 00:02:47,100 --> 00:02:47,100 know many of you have sons and daughters that have been cheered on by these girls over 21 00:02:51,833 --> 00:02:51,833 the years and do a lot of hard work, and it's very tough and they do a great job, and it 22 00:02:58,100 --> 00:02:58,100 would be nice once in a while if more people would participate and cheer them on 23 00:03:02,700 --> 00:03:02,700 and give them the money. If you've got a business, if you've got money that you'd 24 00:03:07,366 --> 00:03:07,366 like to support, give it to doctor pegula. Write a check. It's going to go to the school 25 00:03:13,400 --> 00:03:13,400 only to help fund them. They didn't ask me to come up here and do that, but I'm familiar 26 00:03:18,500 --> 00:03:21,700 with this program. I've been watching those programs for years. I've helped them out, raise money, and I'd just like to see something other than the usual promotion and events in 27 00:03:28,866 --> 00:03:28,866 here and just, you know, give applause to them because they could be a national champion. 28 00:03:33,533 --> 00:03:33,533 thank you. Tony rubino. Good evening. I just would like to stop by and say thanks from, 29 00:03:48,033 --> 00:03:48,033 from on behalf of a lot of special needs parents, I want to thank the city and the staff 30 00:03:52,800 --> 00:03:52,800 for doing a heck of a job on snow day a couple of weeks ago. It was windy as could be. I 31 00:03:59,133 --> 00:03:59,133 spent the day holding our pop up tent from blowing off somewhere, but I think we 32 00:04:04,500 --> 00:04:04,500 probably passed out about 225 wristbands for security purposes. It includes the 33 00:04:10,933 --> 00:04:10,933 families and the parents and the children. But we every year we get compliments from people 34 00:04:16,733 --> 00:04:16,733 around that come from carlsbad, oceanside, del mar, and they say, we sure wish our city had 35 00:04:21,900 --> 00:04:21,900 something like this. So thanks again. Carrie sanchez did a super job with all of her staff. 36 00:04:26,466 --> 00:04:26,466 thanks so much. Thanks, tony. That concludes public comment. Next on our agenda is the 37 00:04:35,500 --> 00:04:35,500 consent calendar. Do we have any speakers on consent? No speakers on consent. I'm happy 38 00:04:40,333 --> 00:04:40,333 to move approval of the consent calendar second. Second, from councilmember pikus, this is a 39 00:04:47,700 --> 00:04:47,700 roll call vote. Will the city clerk please call the roll? Council member. Dull? Aye. 40 00:04:53,433 --> 00:04:53,433 council member pikus. I deputy mayor maida I and mayor voss I. Item passes. Thank you. Moving 41 00:05:02,166 --> 00:05:02,166 on to public hearings, next on the agenda is the public hearing for recycled water and 42 00:05:06,333 --> 00:05:06,333 wastewater rates. Written protest must be received prior to the close of tonight's 43 00:05:11,066 --> 00:05:11,066 public hearing. If you have a protest letter, please hand it in to the city clerk at this 44 00:05:15,666 --> 00:05:15,666 time. This is the public hearing for the proposed five year water, recycled water and 45 00:05:19,966 --> 00:05:19,966 wastewater rates. I will now open the public hearing. Director of finance greg 46 00:05:25,466 --> 00:05:25,466 schmollinger will present the item along with the powerpoint. Take it away, craig. Thank you, 47 00:05:32,266 --> 00:05:32,266 mayor and council members. So tonight as mentioned, we're going to go over and do a brief 48 00:05:38,400 --> 00:05:38,400 review of the noted rate information for the five year water, recycled water in 49 00:05:43,800 --> 00:05:43,800 wastewater rates. We did give a pretty lengthy, possibly two lengthy presentation on 50 00:05:50,233 --> 00:05:50,233 november 18th where we went over all the details, including for the cost of service study 51 00:05:54,900 --> 00:05:54,900 process involved in the rate making process that are included in this five year rate 52 00:06:00,700 --> 00:06:00,700 study. The agenda report from that meeting is also attached to this staff report. So if 53 00:06:06,100 --> 00:06:06,100 anyone's interested in getting that additional information, they're free to go in and look 54 00:06:10,200 --> 00:06:10,200 at the attached materials. All right. So looking at the agenda which I'll go through briefly, 55 00:06:18,333 --> 00:06:18,333 we'll kind of kick off with a brief review of the indirect cost allocation plan, which has 56 00:06:23,700 --> 00:06:23,700 been completed and posted online. Pass through provisions. As this is the first time the 57 00:06:30,066 --> 00:06:30,066 city is considering including those pass through provisions in this five year rate 58 00:06:34,866 --> 00:06:34,866 structure. Go through the water and wastewater rate drivers and the proposed revenue 59 00:06:40,633 --> 00:06:44,600 adjustments to each of those enterprises, and then look at the timeline and associated recommendations included there. So the indirect cost allocation plan, just high level review. 60 00:06:53,200 --> 00:06:53,200 this was included in the finance work plan for fiscal year 2425. That was a very 61 00:06:59,333 --> 00:06:59,333 in-depth process involving every city department working collaboratively to update this 62 00:07:04,433 --> 00:07:04,433 plan. What that does is it benefits ratepayers significantly in the form of 63 00:07:10,533 --> 00:07:10,533 splitting out costs for central service functions. Amongst all of those functions. And tonight 64 00:07:16,666 --> 00:07:16,666 that's applicable to water and sewer and recycled water services. So instead of having 65 00:07:21,833 --> 00:07:21,833 a water district, for example, paying for all of a finance department and it staff, city 66 00:07:27,100 --> 00:07:27,100 council and so on, they're paying for proportional share. So they benefit in that way. So 67 00:07:32,466 --> 00:07:32,466 this was called out in the current fiscal year 2526 budget to utilize the results of the 68 00:07:40,066 --> 00:07:40,066 update for the cost allocation plan. In this cost of service study. The results of that 69 00:07:45,466 --> 00:07:45,466 include a de minimis impact to the water enterprise, meaning not much of a change from our 70 00:07:51,033 --> 00:07:51,033 current practice, and it did result in a reduction in cost in the sewer enterprise, which 71 00:07:56,000 --> 00:07:56,000 you'll see reflected in the rate recommendations here shortly. And one last note we 72 00:08:00,566 --> 00:08:00,566 did publish the completed cost allocation plan update on the finance department website or 73 00:08:06,766 --> 00:08:06,766 web page. Excuse me, along with an accompanying memo, just kind of giving a high level overview 74 00:08:11,800 --> 00:08:11,800 of how to go through that 100 plus page document. So pass through provisions have been 75 00:08:21,100 --> 00:08:21,100 allowed under the the california government code since 2009. What that allows is 76 00:08:27,200 --> 00:08:27,200 for the automatic pass through of wholesale costs outside of an agency's control, with 30 77 00:08:32,966 --> 00:08:32,966 days written notice to customers as shown. That's the best practice utilized by the 78 00:08:38,266 --> 00:08:38,266 vast majority of water providers here in san diego county, but not currently poway. 79 00:08:43,833 --> 00:08:43,833 however, we are including that in this recommended five year rate structure going through 80 00:08:49,200 --> 00:08:49,200 your calendar year 2030. What that would include is wholesale water purchase costs that are 81 00:08:55,266 --> 00:08:55,266 outside of poway's control from the san diego county water authority, wholesale recycled 82 00:09:00,033 --> 00:09:00,033 water purchase costs that are outside of poway's control from the city of san diego, and 83 00:09:05,000 --> 00:09:05,000 wholesale wastewater treatment and disposal costs that are outside of poway's control from 84 00:09:09,200 --> 00:09:09,200 san diego metro joint powers authority. And there is a revision to the the volumetric 85 00:09:19,800 --> 00:09:19,800 water rate structure that we're recommending. And that's tied to some recent court rulings, 86 00:09:24,800 --> 00:09:24,800 including here in san diego county, which have successfully challenged the legal viability 87 00:09:30,566 --> 00:09:30,566 of our current and what many agencies utilize, which is a tiered volumetric water rate. 88 00:09:37,766 --> 00:09:37,766 again, so what the city is recommending is shifting gears from that uniform water rate 89 00:09:42,833 --> 00:09:42,833 structure into a more equitable and legally defensible uniform volumetric rate across the 90 00:09:49,400 --> 00:09:49,400 board. But we also affirm that our current tiered structure follows all of the provisions 91 00:09:55,466 --> 00:09:55,466 of the state. Proposition 218 cost of service principles as well. All right. So looking at 92 00:10:04,133 --> 00:10:04,133 what's driving the water rate adjustments. So the the two biggest drivers here are the 93 00:10:10,566 --> 00:10:10,566 wholesale water costs that I mentioned slider two ago from the san diego county water 94 00:10:15,266 --> 00:10:15,266 authority. That along with pumping costs. So energy costs make up a little over 60% of 95 00:10:22,566 --> 00:10:22,566 the water operating costs. So it's a sizable chunk of the cost of doing business for the 96 00:10:27,300 --> 00:10:27,300 water enterprise. Also included are the city capital improvement program projects, 97 00:10:33,400 --> 00:10:33,400 which include the water infrastructure improvement program, which is the largest 98 00:10:37,600 --> 00:10:37,600 suite of capital improvement program projects in the city's history, as well as other 99 00:10:43,333 --> 00:10:43,333 capital improvement program projects to make sure we have safe and reliable delivery of 100 00:10:47,966 --> 00:10:47,966 water to customers, on demand, ongoing operations and maintenance costs certainly 101 00:10:53,366 --> 00:10:53,366 factor into rate adjustments as well. And then also meeting our legally required debt covenants 102 00:11:00,033 --> 00:11:00,033 and payments on an annual basis. So to fund all of these costs, there is a proposal. We do have 103 00:11:06,366 --> 00:11:06,366 a proposal for a five year rate adjustments, which are being proposed as shown here at the 104 00:11:11,400 --> 00:11:11,400 bottom of this slide, which include a 9.9% adjustment in year one, and then flattening 105 00:11:17,933 --> 00:11:17,933 out to a 4% annual adjustment for years two through five. So the shown adjustments are the 106 00:11:25,433 --> 00:11:25,433 result of the cost of service study process. We went over at the november 18th, 2025 city 107 00:11:31,566 --> 00:11:31,566 council meeting where we discuss working with industry experts raffaello's financial 108 00:11:36,566 --> 00:11:36,566 consultants for the better part of the last year in consolidating that process. So 109 00:11:41,700 --> 00:11:41,700 sudhir wallace here in the front as well, who we work closely with from raftilose. So 110 00:11:46,000 --> 00:11:46,000 if there's any technical questions or any questions for the firm on their process, he 111 00:11:50,800 --> 00:11:50,800 certainly here to answer any questions on that. I do want to note that these year one 112 00:11:56,400 --> 00:11:56,400 adjustments include a 4.1% increase attributable to city of poway known cost, and the 113 00:12:03,300 --> 00:12:03,300 remainder of that 9.9%. So 5.8% is attributable to the increase in imported water costs from 114 00:12:10,533 --> 00:12:10,533 the san diego county water authority and as shown in the asterisks here, years two 115 00:12:15,833 --> 00:12:15,833 through five do not include pass through adjustments from wholesale service providers, 116 00:12:20,700 --> 00:12:20,700 including san diego county water authority. So switching gears, looking at wastewater, 117 00:12:27,300 --> 00:12:27,300 the largest driver for wastewater services are treatment and disposal costs, 118 00:12:32,166 --> 00:12:32,166 which are a contract through san diego metro joint powers authority. And of course, as 119 00:12:39,600 --> 00:12:39,600 cost increase through them, those are passed through to retail providers such as poway. 120 00:12:46,800 --> 00:12:46,800 the result of the cost of service study process in year one for poway is a 0% 121 00:12:54,700 --> 00:12:54,700 adjustment for year one, 2026 and year 0% in 2027. So year two and then 3% adjustments for 122 00:13:02,300 --> 00:13:02,300 years three through five. So I wanted to highlight briefly again that while there is a 0% 123 00:13:07,666 --> 00:13:07,666 adjustment for year one because of those cost of service study provisions in, when you realign 124 00:13:14,933 --> 00:13:14,933 the cost of providing service with the rates, it actually results in a net decrease to 125 00:13:19,566 --> 00:13:19,566 residential customers of about 2%, with a corresponding increase to commercial 126 00:13:24,233 --> 00:13:24,233 customers by a like amount. All right. In reflected here on this, this slide is the 127 00:13:35,000 --> 00:13:35,000 combined household impact under different usage volumes in each of those columns there. So the 128 00:13:41,900 --> 00:13:45,866 the current rate structure of tiered rates was industry standard, which helped meet state mandates for conservation efforts. As mentioned, there was court rulings that went 129 00:13:51,200 --> 00:13:51,200 away with the conservation approach and is steering agencies towards a uniform rate 130 00:13:55,600 --> 00:13:55,600 structure, which is exactly what poway is doing. Shown here is in the second column. So 131 00:14:02,766 --> 00:14:02,766 kind of one over from the left, second one over is the average poway customer, which uses 29 132 00:14:09,566 --> 00:14:09,566 units of water over a bi monthly billing period, which results in an increased cost 133 00:14:14,600 --> 00:14:14,600 impact of 9.6% under the recommended rates. So that's the combined water and sewer 134 00:14:19,666 --> 00:14:19,666 bill under those under those usage volumes in each one of those columns. So we took a 135 00:14:26,500 --> 00:14:26,500 look at what one of our neighboring agencies. So city of san diego is pretty close to 136 00:14:31,066 --> 00:14:31,066 us, wanted to look and see what their costs would be under that same scenario, that 29 units. 137 00:14:37,300 --> 00:14:37,300 and I was actually pretty surprised by this. Their total bill would be $512.83. So just 138 00:14:43,133 --> 00:14:43,133 about a dollar more than the proposed rates for city of poway. What that doesn't 139 00:14:47,733 --> 00:14:47,733 include is proposed adjustments in outyears for city of san diego as well. So that analysis 140 00:14:52,900 --> 00:14:52,900 will probably change in the next year or two. All right. So looking at the timeline, we're 141 00:15:02,266 --> 00:15:02,266 looking at a couple of dates here, including setting the public hearing which is 142 00:15:06,833 --> 00:15:06,833 happening tonight, which happen at the november 18th, 2025 city council meeting. The mailing of 143 00:15:14,733 --> 00:15:14,733 the proposition 218 notices to all customers in poway, which includes 15,946 properties, and 144 00:15:22,733 --> 00:15:22,733 that took place on november 21st. To make sure we hit that state, required 45 day noticing 145 00:15:29,500 --> 00:15:29,500 period prior to tonight's public hearing. If a majority protest does not exist at the 146 00:15:35,633 --> 00:15:35,633 conclusion of this public hearing, the proposed rates may be adopted by council. If 147 00:15:41,033 --> 00:15:41,033 adopted, they would go into effect beginning tomorrow for year one and then each january 148 00:15:45,500 --> 00:15:45,500 over the following four years. I do want to note that the rates that are included in the 149 00:15:51,433 --> 00:15:51,433 notice are not to exceed rates. So what that means is, if there's positive financial 150 00:15:56,866 --> 00:15:56,866 conditions for the city that result in some cost savings or some higher revenue than we 151 00:16:01,933 --> 00:16:01,933 anticipate, then the city 4% component for water services in year two through five, or 3% 152 00:16:09,500 --> 00:16:09,500 for wastewater for years three through five, we can implement something less than that. And 153 00:16:13,833 --> 00:16:13,833 that's not a hypothetical that actually happened for ramona water district a few years ago 154 00:16:19,900 --> 00:16:19,900 and city of carlsbad more recently than that. So we're certainly doing everything we 155 00:16:24,233 --> 00:16:24,233 can as a city to kind of drive down costs, look for other revenue sources, and hopefully 156 00:16:28,900 --> 00:16:28,900 realize those not to exceed values less than what we have noticed here tonight. All right. 157 00:16:37,000 --> 00:16:37,000 and then staff recommends opening the public hearing, which already took place, 158 00:16:41,533 --> 00:16:45,433 hearing any public comment and accepting all written protest provided during the public hearing and adding them to the the protest we've received to date. There's also a new 159 00:16:51,600 --> 00:16:51,600 category of objections, which should be considered if there were any and there have not 160 00:16:55,766 --> 00:16:55,766 been any. Upon conclusion of the public hearing, staff recommends adopting adopting 161 00:17:01,100 --> 00:17:01,100 the resolutions if a majority protest does not exist and a majority protest would exist. 162 00:17:07,066 --> 00:17:07,066 if 50% plus one of those customers did file a valid written protest, which would be 163 00:17:16,833 --> 00:17:16,833 7973 active accounts. So this concludes today's presentation. We're happy to answer any 164 00:17:22,533 --> 00:17:22,533 questions at this time. Thank you. Thank you craig I have two speakers jim bunner. How many 165 00:17:34,800 --> 00:17:34,800 public comments was that? 7900. A written protest, 50% plus one would be 7973. Do we know how 166 00:17:45,733 --> 00:17:45,733 many have been turned in? I think we're going to get to that in just a minute. Okay, 167 00:17:49,933 --> 00:17:49,933 good. I'm here to talk about fairness, and I wish there were a bigger crowd. But I think a 168 00:17:54,966 --> 00:17:54,966 lot of people realize where this vote will go anyways, so they didn't bother, but I will. 169 00:17:59,966 --> 00:17:59,966 he spoke about conservation and many of us, myself included, took out my entire lawn all the 170 00:18:06,500 --> 00:18:06,500 way around my house. Why? Because we're supposed to save water, correct? Okay, we're 171 00:18:11,866 --> 00:18:11,866 doing that. The public is doing that now. We're trying to save money with that. Now we're 172 00:18:18,400 --> 00:18:18,400 going to have to pay more for us doing our job. On trying to save water. I understand the 173 00:18:23,566 --> 00:18:23,566 city has done a great job chopping down trees for developments, and that's 174 00:18:27,766 --> 00:18:27,766 probably saving water. But that's not what is the driving force here. One other point 175 00:18:32,433 --> 00:18:32,433 about fairness is I have my own home, but I feel sorry if I understand correctly, that 176 00:18:37,433 --> 00:18:37,433 folks that live in the mobile home parks don't get a vote. Should they have to pay then 177 00:18:44,633 --> 00:18:44,633 they should get a vote for this. But that's not fair. And is it sacramento's fault that they 178 00:18:50,900 --> 00:18:50,900 don't get a vote? I don't think so. I think we could do something about that. Those 179 00:18:55,100 --> 00:18:55,100 individuals have a right to be able to be counted, and there are a lot of them, and many of 180 00:18:59,900 --> 00:18:59,900 them are seniors on fixed incomes, and they don't get a say. Think about that for a 181 00:19:05,500 --> 00:19:05,500 minute. They don't get a say that is wrong. And I think if you would allow them to, you 182 00:19:11,400 --> 00:19:11,400 wouldn't get your little cushy pat, little certain amount of people that answer to the to 183 00:19:16,000 --> 00:19:16,000 the emails and to the letters, you'd probably get a lot more people speaking. I know that I 184 00:19:20,300 --> 00:19:20,300 wrote to every one of you, and of course only one wrote back. And I think most of the public 185 00:19:25,166 --> 00:19:25,166 can realize probably who was the only person on that council to give a darn about writing 186 00:19:29,933 --> 00:19:33,566 back to their constituents, because I read a lot about people not getting any responses. And it's not surprising here. We've done our job as the as residents here. 187 00:19:40,400 --> 00:19:40,400 we pay our taxes, we try to conserve, find the money elsewhere to pay for this, 188 00:19:46,133 --> 00:19:46,133 maybe in compensation packages. Not everybody makes $500,000 a year or other salaries that can 189 00:19:54,100 --> 00:19:54,100 pay that. Think of the people that can't do it. Those folks that may, you know, especially 190 00:19:59,100 --> 00:19:59,100 the older seniors that are counting their pennies and now you want to take away water 191 00:20:04,166 --> 00:20:04,166 from them or make it more expensive. You can find ways you're smart people. You have 192 00:20:10,366 --> 00:20:10,366 no problem getting development past. You can figure this out. I know you can. It's not 193 00:20:18,200 --> 00:20:18,200 sacramento's fault. Everything, sacramento's fault and the public in this town knows that 194 00:20:22,900 --> 00:20:22,900 the taxpayers and the residents never win a thing. Prove me wrong. Final speaker is jerry 195 00:20:33,066 --> 00:20:33,066 bohlen. Thank you, mayor voss. Members of the city council. I think I speak for many people 196 00:20:45,300 --> 00:20:45,300 when I say nobody likes higher water rates, whether it's poway or san diego or anywhere in 197 00:20:50,633 --> 00:20:50,633 california. But for those who might not be aware, if you voted in the state of 198 00:20:56,366 --> 00:20:56,366 california in 1996, chances are you indirectly approved. Tonight's water rate increase 199 00:21:06,500 --> 00:21:06,500 4,202,429 people voted yes on prop 218, the so-called right to vote on taxes initiative. 200 00:21:14,333 --> 00:21:14,333 now, I've heard people I actually thought more people would be here tonight. But if 201 00:21:20,500 --> 00:21:20,500 you listen to various social media next door and some facebook groups that claim to 202 00:21:24,933 --> 00:21:24,933 be organizations, they often blame this council for every water rate increase. It's not 203 00:21:31,400 --> 00:21:31,400 their fault. Now, I've said this in the past and I'll say this again prop 218 is 204 00:21:38,833 --> 00:21:38,833 extremely flawed. It's inequitable. It should be reformed and amended on the 205 00:21:45,333 --> 00:21:45,333 capital steps of sacramento to come in the form of a ballot. More people are likely to 206 00:21:51,800 --> 00:21:51,800 circle a bubble, drop it off at a polling station. Then, rather than print their own pdf file 207 00:21:58,633 --> 00:21:58,633 by a 78 cent, stamp an envelope and mail it to city hall, let alone drive down here. Now 208 00:22:06,200 --> 00:22:06,200 there's an old saying if you want to enact change and you want to do something that's 209 00:22:11,000 --> 00:22:11,000 going to make a difference, complain to the right people. In this case, that might very 210 00:22:17,400 --> 00:22:17,400 well be the howard jarvis taxpayers association and the two authors of prop 218 from 211 00:22:24,933 --> 00:22:24,933 1996, jon coupal and jack cohen. And I just happen to have the howard jarvis taxpayers 212 00:22:31,433 --> 00:22:31,433 association's phone number for its president, john coupal. If you would like to call him and 213 00:22:36,533 --> 00:22:36,533 leave him a message. It's area code 91644499 50 and express your feelings on how it should 214 00:22:45,466 --> 00:22:45,466 be amended and reformed to be more fair and equitable to all the ratepayers. Thank you. That 215 00:22:54,833 --> 00:22:54,833 concludes our speakers and I will now close the public hearing. City clerk, do we need 216 00:22:59,433 --> 00:22:59,433 a continuance to count the number of written protests? No, we do not. I'll now ask the 217 00:23:03,900 --> 00:23:03,900 city clerk to announce the number of written protests received. 7974. Valid protests 218 00:23:11,900 --> 00:23:11,900 are needed to constitute a majority protest. 49 protests were received and verified as 219 00:23:18,566 --> 00:23:18,566 valid by today's 12 noon deadline. Ten protests were received after today's deadline 220 00:23:24,866 --> 00:23:24,866 and have not yet been verified. 59 total protests have been received. This does not 221 00:23:31,166 --> 00:23:31,166 constitute a majority protest. Thank you. I will now ask the city clerk to announce the 222 00:23:37,400 --> 00:23:37,400 number of objections received. Zero objections have been received. Thank you. We'll now 223 00:23:45,533 --> 00:23:45,533 go to council discussion and questions. We'll start with mr. Dayhoff. Thank you, mr. Mayor. 224 00:23:55,666 --> 00:23:55,666 I don't know how you do it. You're you've just remember all those numbers, you know, on the 225 00:24:01,100 --> 00:24:01,100 fly off the top of your head. That's really amazing. I don't think I could do that. I 226 00:24:06,566 --> 00:24:09,700 actually have some other numbers written down. I actually want to thank everybody who's come out tonight. You guys really represent, I think, the folks 227 00:24:14,000 --> 00:24:14,000 who truly care about, you know, learning the what's actually going on, learning the the 228 00:24:19,166 --> 00:24:19,166 truth about things, because you really have to come to these meetings and especially tonight 229 00:24:23,766 --> 00:24:23,766 because it's kind of complicated to really get that whole story, because you really 230 00:24:28,400 --> 00:24:32,400 can't get it anywhere else. There's not a whole lot of people that, you know, watch these videos either. And other places like social media aren't really there for facts. Okay. 231 00:24:38,466 --> 00:24:42,466 and actually, you know, other places like the wastewater joint powers authority, I sit on the board there that has a chamber just like this, and we have the policymakers here. 232 00:24:48,433 --> 00:24:48,433 it's a little bit slightly more policymakers, and it's filled not with the public. It's open 233 00:24:52,800 --> 00:24:52,800 to the public, but it's filled with staff members because, you know, they know the same thing 234 00:24:57,466 --> 00:24:57,466 that they need to show up here to actually understand what's really going on, you know, do 235 00:25:01,566 --> 00:25:01,566 sidebars and to do their jobs. So thank you guys for showing up. You know, knowledge is 236 00:25:06,200 --> 00:25:06,200 power. And, you know, with that comes some responsibility. But you guys are here and hopefully 237 00:25:11,333 --> 00:25:11,333 I'll give you something worthwhile. So if I had to really sort of if I had to 238 00:25:17,800 --> 00:25:17,800 summarize this whole process, this whole study in one word, I think that word would be 239 00:25:23,866 --> 00:25:23,866 transparency. Because this study, this, this whole thing has been one of the most 240 00:25:28,966 --> 00:25:28,966 transparent or led to one of the most transparent documents in powys history. With regard 241 00:25:33,200 --> 00:25:33,200 to what I would like to thank staff, especially you, craig and and eric and and chris for 242 00:25:38,300 --> 00:25:38,300 for making that happen. Because when you look at it, it, you know, in the past, in part 243 00:25:44,000 --> 00:25:44,000 because I've been doing this for a long time out there in the past when paul said, you 244 00:25:48,666 --> 00:25:48,666 know, these are our water rates. What's happening with them? Why are they, you know, going up? 245 00:25:52,733 --> 00:25:52,733 and it's always said, you know, most of our water rates are being driven by our outside 246 00:25:56,866 --> 00:26:00,833 water supplier. And the general critique has been, no, that's not true. You know, there's firetrucks, there's slush funds or whatever. But as we look at this study here, what we can 247 00:26:05,300 --> 00:26:09,266 see, it's broken down really clearly. You know, we're looking at, you know, year over year rate increases of about 3% for sewer and about 4% for for water. And this is in the 248 00:26:16,400 --> 00:26:20,333 context on the water side with the largest infrastructure project or largest, any kind of project in powys history. And both of those numbers are running around the cpi, which 249 00:26:25,500 --> 00:26:25,500 is generally what you expect about inflation. And on the sewer side, what we're looking 250 00:26:30,300 --> 00:26:30,300 at is effectively a refund like craig was talking about. You know, you've got like a 3% year 251 00:26:34,466 --> 00:26:34,466 over year and you've got a 0%. And the difference there is a refund. And and that really 252 00:26:39,400 --> 00:26:39,400 doesn't happen a lot in, in other municipalities. But it's happened here in poway before 253 00:26:43,900 --> 00:26:43,900 with the water rates. And it's happening. You know, again I think it's you know, it's 254 00:26:48,666 --> 00:26:48,666 really I think it it shows how poway is different than other places and in a good way. So, 255 00:26:58,400 --> 00:26:58,400 you know, there have been a couple of things that were missed. We're not going to talk 256 00:27:02,500 --> 00:27:02,500 about too much about that. But I do want to talk about what this what our studies really, 257 00:27:08,866 --> 00:27:08,866 really show. And because our water rates are not going up, you know, we're not paying 4% 258 00:27:14,633 --> 00:27:14,633 more or 3% more, whatever we're paying, you know, a fair amount more for, you know, our water 259 00:27:20,733 --> 00:27:20,733 costs. And it's pretty clear those are coming from the san diego county water authority. 260 00:27:25,733 --> 00:27:25,733 and I think we need to ask our, our, ourselves some pretty hard questions as to, you know, 261 00:27:31,166 --> 00:27:31,166 what's actually going on there. And some of the stuff is known and and it's been discussed, 262 00:27:37,666 --> 00:27:37,666 but there's actually some stuff that people aren't talking about. There's a political cost 263 00:27:42,100 --> 00:27:42,100 or political burden, I'm sorry, that's showing up on the san diego county water side, and 264 00:27:47,400 --> 00:27:47,400 it's coming from san diego city itself. And and the reason it's coming from the city of san 265 00:27:52,066 --> 00:27:52,066 diego is because they basically control that board. You know, we've got our seat on the board, 266 00:27:57,433 --> 00:27:57,433 and it's a weighted vote based pretty much based on how much money you spend or how much or 267 00:28:01,700 --> 00:28:01,700 how much water you use. And san diego controls, like 40% of, you know, the vote there. But 268 00:28:07,900 --> 00:28:07,900 there's this political burden coming from san diego, and it's being spread out across the 269 00:28:12,600 --> 00:28:12,600 entire region, including us. And I want to talk about that because I think we need to 270 00:28:18,166 --> 00:28:18,166 address this. And and what I'm talking about, I've talked about this on the wastewater 271 00:28:23,300 --> 00:28:23,300 side before. And the issue is project labor agreements are coming to the san diego county 272 00:28:29,500 --> 00:28:29,500 water authority. And they're they're really going to be a huge problem. And, you know, 273 00:28:34,533 --> 00:28:34,533 rainbow and fallbrook, you know, they saw the writing on the wall for this and a couple 274 00:28:38,966 --> 00:28:38,966 other things there. And they they detached from the agency a while ago. And that actually 275 00:28:43,766 --> 00:28:43,766 really impacted us. But they're on the edge. They're they're on the northern side. They can 276 00:28:48,566 --> 00:28:48,566 leave. They can, you know, get their water, you know, earlier in the pipe. But we can't. So 277 00:28:53,300 --> 00:28:53,300 we have to deal with this. And I think they left in part because, you know, when you're 278 00:28:57,766 --> 00:29:01,233 going with pla project labor agreements, you know, that current course that that we're all on now, you know, it's going to lead to like some pretty severe downstream 279 00:29:06,500 --> 00:29:10,100 consequences because like it or not, we're sailing, you know, directly into what is a financial storm of our own making. And it's I think it's going to lead to this tidal 280 00:29:14,933 --> 00:29:14,933 wave of costs that, that we haven't seen yet. But I think they're going to swamp us all 281 00:29:19,200 --> 00:29:19,200 because fundamentally, plas, they reduce competition. They get rid of market rate 282 00:29:25,966 --> 00:29:25,966 competition and result in what are true backroom deals. What are single bids effectively 283 00:29:32,133 --> 00:29:32,133 single bids in name only or in actual practice, and they result in massive cost overruns. 284 00:29:38,200 --> 00:29:42,133 and I've talked about this before. On the wastewater side, I talked about where there was a single bidder contract. You couldn't rescope it. It was for a project. There was, you know, 285 00:29:46,600 --> 00:29:46,600 no, no opportunity to do that. It was a $55 million project on the books. And the single bid 286 00:29:51,900 --> 00:29:51,900 came in at 100 and 110, $115 million. So a $60 million ballpark over overage on that. 287 00:29:59,100 --> 00:29:59,100 and that was that's like on the scale of our entire water infrastructure improvement 288 00:30:03,766 --> 00:30:03,766 project. And that was the overage. But, you know, these are coming to, you know, the, 289 00:30:10,333 --> 00:30:10,333 the the water side. And that's going to be a big issue, actually. I'll tell you a quick 290 00:30:15,066 --> 00:30:19,033 story about the pure water program, which is on the wastewater. I have a lot of insight on the wastewater side, because I sit on that board. The pure water program started 291 00:30:23,100 --> 00:30:23,100 out without plas, but because of the political baggage on san diego's side, they started 292 00:30:28,633 --> 00:30:28,633 implementing them, you know, not in the same name, but you know, all the components of the 293 00:30:32,666 --> 00:30:32,666 pla. And they got sued and the the unions basically lost that lawsuit. But the unions were 294 00:30:39,800 --> 00:30:39,800 very smart. And I don't blame them for this. You know, if I was in a union, you'd be 295 00:30:44,066 --> 00:30:48,000 wanting to get as much money for your people. And that's understandable. But our job up here as policy makers, our job is to to make policy and to be the the guardians of the public 296 00:30:55,300 --> 00:30:55,300 dollar. We're actually the last, you know, step in that process. And the folks here who are on 297 00:30:59,666 --> 00:30:59,666 staff, their job is to execute the policy. Even if it's bad policy, their job is to do that 298 00:31:05,833 --> 00:31:05,833 and to do it as well as they as well as they can. And sometimes, you know, some folks have lost 299 00:31:11,433 --> 00:31:11,433 sight of, you know, what their role is when they when they, you know, say whatever is 300 00:31:15,900 --> 00:31:15,900 necessary to get into office. But anyway, the unions, they were smart. They had they had 301 00:31:21,033 --> 00:31:21,033 their guys in the, in the assembly, a bunch of folks there. But they had a point 302 00:31:25,133 --> 00:31:25,133 person, really smart fella, you know, really slick, great smile, a lot of ambition, great 303 00:31:29,833 --> 00:31:29,833 pedigree. Much better tailor than than I have. And back then 2019 ish, he passed an assembly 304 00:31:36,333 --> 00:31:36,333 bill. He championed that it was ab 1290. And what that did is that forced plas onto the pure 305 00:31:43,533 --> 00:31:43,533 water program. And and we and because of this, it actually gives us a really great insight 306 00:31:50,433 --> 00:31:50,433 as to what their true costs are for plas, because the pure water program had a bunch of 307 00:31:56,100 --> 00:31:56,100 contracts that were already made, they didn't have plas and suddenly now they did. And just 308 00:32:01,700 --> 00:32:01,700 a couple examples. There's a bunch. I'll just give a couple. There was this is I think, 309 00:32:05,900 --> 00:32:05,900 contract h176935. It was a $75 million project, you know, competitively bid without a pla. 310 00:32:13,800 --> 00:32:13,800 and as soon as the pla came in, the first thing that happened was there was a $35 million 311 00:32:19,200 --> 00:32:19,200 overage. And that's a 47% increase in that particular contract. And, you know, 312 00:32:23,866 --> 00:32:23,866 another contract, h you know, 176955 that was a $45 million competitively bid contract. And 313 00:32:32,466 --> 00:32:32,466 as soon as the pla came in, the first thing that happened was there was a $40 million overage 314 00:32:37,233 --> 00:32:37,233 on that. So that was an 89% increase in costs. And, you know, that's a lot of money. 315 00:32:42,600 --> 00:32:42,600 that's a lot of money. But it's really just the tip of the iceberg. And, you know, there 316 00:32:46,700 --> 00:32:46,700 was a really good deal that they made, you know, and the the politician guy, you know, 317 00:32:51,433 --> 00:32:51,433 is, is, you know, I you may or may not know him, but I think he's doing pretty well. He's 318 00:32:56,666 --> 00:32:56,666 got a, you know, a great smile, his name. Let's see if I get this right. Maybe you guys have 319 00:33:01,666 --> 00:33:01,666 heard of him. His name is todd. Rex. Gloria. And so and so he brought those costs on. And 320 00:33:05,900 --> 00:33:05,900 we're actually taking it from both ways because of that. Because we pay into the pure 321 00:33:10,000 --> 00:33:10,000 water program. And so we pay direct costs that are higher and that pure. When the pure 322 00:33:14,700 --> 00:33:14,700 water program costs more money, it raises the cost. San diego residents pay for that water. 323 00:33:18,933 --> 00:33:18,933 and and then they use less water. And that means our per unit water rates go up. So we 324 00:33:24,700 --> 00:33:24,700 pay more, you know, on the front end and more on the back end by these things. And now 325 00:33:29,366 --> 00:33:29,366 they're coming to the san diego county water authority. And our guy on the san diego on on the 326 00:33:35,533 --> 00:33:35,533 board there, you know, eric, there is, is basically yelling and screaming about this, but 327 00:33:39,900 --> 00:33:39,900 he's just one voice. And we're a very small voice on that, on that council. And so we need 328 00:33:45,300 --> 00:33:45,300 more voices there. And I think a lot of the policy makers there really don't know what's 329 00:33:49,333 --> 00:33:49,333 what's coming. They haven't seen this before. Most of them. I think a few of them know 330 00:33:53,566 --> 00:33:53,566 what's going on. But but most of them haven't. And it's going to be really insidious there 331 00:33:58,333 --> 00:34:02,333 because unlike the pure water program, it's not going to be there's a bunch of contracts and now they're switching over to pla. It's just going to be straight pla and they're just 332 00:34:06,433 --> 00:34:06,433 going to be really high. And so you guys now know this. You've got some facts some new stuff. 333 00:34:12,200 --> 00:34:12,200 and I'm hoping what we can do and this is including everybody here in this room who's from 334 00:34:16,533 --> 00:34:16,533 poway and outside of poway. What I'm asking everybody to do is try to leverage your 335 00:34:21,400 --> 00:34:21,400 networks, your folks who live in san diego, folks who live in carlsbad, in vista, in san 336 00:34:28,433 --> 00:34:28,433 marcos, you know, santee national city, you know, el cajon, whatever it is, and call 337 00:34:33,166 --> 00:34:33,166 them up and tell them they need to talk to their policymakers because their elected 338 00:34:38,833 --> 00:34:38,833 policymakers, you know, need to know this. And who sit on that board, and they need to tell 339 00:34:44,200 --> 00:34:44,200 the san diego county water authority that it needs to maintain real competitive 340 00:34:49,233 --> 00:34:52,433 bidding, because you got to tell them that water is different because water is different, as jim is saying here, water is, you know, an essential component of life. 341 00:34:56,366 --> 00:34:56,366 it's not like something that's optional. You have to, you know, you have to buy it. And it 342 00:35:02,600 --> 00:35:02,600 demands because of this unique characteristic, it demands the most cost effective methods for 343 00:35:08,700 --> 00:35:08,700 getting it. You know, as I said, we're carrying that message here, but we need need help 344 00:35:14,166 --> 00:35:18,100 with that. And I'm not I'm telling you this to leverage these networks because it actually works. Okay. And now I've said we're the policymakers here, all right. 345 00:35:22,366 --> 00:35:22,366 and and the staff there, they execute policies. I on the wastewater jpa. I raise hell 346 00:35:28,966 --> 00:35:28,966 about single bitter contracts because that was not the only one that $60 million overage. I 347 00:35:33,200 --> 00:35:37,066 see them on occasion and I asked some really tough questions. And I get and they're sometimes they're really uncomfortable questions. You know, some staff members 348 00:35:40,000 --> 00:35:40,000 aren't aren't used to those kinds of questions. And, you know, the next project that was 349 00:35:46,600 --> 00:35:46,600 on that site that came on that after, you know, I'm raising hell about this and other 350 00:35:51,633 --> 00:35:51,633 things. The next project had seven bids. They were all competitive, and there was not 351 00:35:57,233 --> 00:35:57,233 a project labor agreement in sight. So so it works. You know, staff does listen to 352 00:36:03,866 --> 00:36:07,766 policymakers because that's their job. The job of staff is to listen to policymakers. The jobs of the policymakers is to listen to voters and the jobs of the voters. You know, the 353 00:36:13,000 --> 00:36:13,000 job of the voters is really to speak up and and make your voice heard. So I'm hoping, you 354 00:36:18,266 --> 00:36:18,266 know, some of you guys can can help take some action. I know I'm going to be trying to ask 355 00:36:22,833 --> 00:36:22,833 other folks to, but I think, you know, if we all work together, there's a chance we 356 00:36:27,600 --> 00:36:31,600 can actually have a meaningful impact on our future water rates. You know, move the move the dial a little bit. So with that, I will actually thank you for your time. I hope you got 357 00:36:36,933 --> 00:36:36,933 something a little bit useful out of this. And I will move approval. Thank you. 358 00:36:42,666 --> 00:36:42,666 councilmember. Councilmember pikus. All right. I think I'll start. Well, I guess I'll have 359 00:36:47,866 --> 00:36:47,866 to ask, peter, if we use more water, would we have a bigger voice in the san diego water 360 00:36:52,766 --> 00:36:52,766 board? Yes we would. We have to use a a lot more water, though. Just kidding. Okay. Questions 361 00:36:59,566 --> 00:36:59,566 for craig. I guess I should have thought of this before, but in your presentation you 362 00:37:04,733 --> 00:37:08,700 said they pass through has not been approved yet. I thought that was what was discussed back in 2024, when you were going to pass through the increase, or is that just a one 363 00:37:13,733 --> 00:37:13,733 time thing? Yes. Thank you, councilmember pikus. That was just a one time adjustment to 364 00:37:19,766 --> 00:37:23,100 rates, because those were far and beyond what we had forecasted in the last four year rate structure. So just passing on the one year adjustment for county water 365 00:37:27,333 --> 00:37:27,333 authority rates, that went up 13.52%, and we forecast them to only go up 6%. So from now on, 366 00:37:36,633 --> 00:37:36,633 we'll be doing this every year. The adjustment for the pass through, if approved, it would 367 00:37:42,066 --> 00:37:42,066 be authorized to pass that through with a 30 day notice. Correct. Now, also in your 368 00:37:47,866 --> 00:37:47,866 presentation, I guess I didn't realize this when I was reading the materials. Is that the the 369 00:37:54,666 --> 00:37:54,666 4% increase over the next couple of years and the 3% for the sewer does not include 370 00:38:00,066 --> 00:38:00,066 consumer cpi adjustments. I thought it did. Or was that broken out separate? So those 371 00:38:07,633 --> 00:38:07,633 do include adjustments to all the rate classifications outside of wholesale cost. So 372 00:38:14,133 --> 00:38:14,133 on the water side that would include the purchase water cost from san diego county water 373 00:38:19,166 --> 00:38:19,166 authority on the recycled water. It would be the recycled water purchase cost from city of san 374 00:38:24,200 --> 00:38:28,200 diego. And on the sewer side, that would be for the sewer treatment and disposal costs from metro jpa. Everything else beyond that, there's not a cpi included in there or anything 375 00:38:32,900 --> 00:38:32,900 that's all factored into the city component, the 4% on the water side or the 3% on the 376 00:38:38,200 --> 00:38:38,200 sewer side. So so I guess I so the 4% includes the cpi for the stuff that the 4% includes. Is 377 00:38:46,633 --> 00:38:46,633 that what you're saying? Or it includes all adjustments outside of the wholesale cost. 378 00:38:51,000 --> 00:38:51,000 so yes, every other cost that factors into the cost of providing service. So yes. All 379 00:38:55,900 --> 00:38:55,900 right. Thank you for that. Councilmember said. Otherwise other ways it's 4%. It won't be 380 00:39:01,266 --> 00:39:01,266 4% plus a cpi. The 4% is the 4%. And that's to not to exceed amount okay. So if the cpi is 381 00:39:08,633 --> 00:39:08,633 less than that will be less or something. As craig mentioned earlier, if there's additional 382 00:39:13,900 --> 00:39:13,900 revenues or cost savings along the way and there's a there's an ability to recommend a lower 383 00:39:22,166 --> 00:39:22,166 increase, that's exactly what staff would be doing. But we cannot exceed that 4% without 384 00:39:26,966 --> 00:39:26,966 going through an entire prop 218 process. Again, thank you for that. And these all, if we 385 00:39:34,066 --> 00:39:34,066 pass this tonight, this all takes effect tomorrow morning. Is that but you know the bill 386 00:39:38,833 --> 00:39:38,833 comes out every two months. Is it going to be prorated or are you just going to whoever gets 387 00:39:43,633 --> 00:39:43,633 in the billing cycle. It would be effective with bills mailed after today. So beginning 388 00:39:48,433 --> 00:39:48,433 tomorrow with bills mailed, it would include usage over that period. Thank you for that. 389 00:39:55,666 --> 00:39:55,666 let's see. Well peter said a lot and I'm going to clip out most of my notes here. But I'm 390 00:40:01,433 --> 00:40:01,433 just going to say that, you know, I remember a while back his words were the three things, 391 00:40:07,966 --> 00:40:07,966 three things that people look for in a expect from their water system is safe, reliable, 392 00:40:14,866 --> 00:40:14,866 and inexpensive in that order. And I think we've got the safety nailed down and the 393 00:40:22,266 --> 00:40:22,266 reliability and trying to hold the lid on expenses. I had a big thing about all the cost 394 00:40:28,800 --> 00:40:28,800 drivers, but craig already covered it, so I'm going to skip over those pages and 395 00:40:34,533 --> 00:40:34,533 mention that, you know. With careful cost analysis, the city is holding it down to 9.9%. I 396 00:40:43,500 --> 00:40:43,500 think that's pretty impressive and 4% in subsequent years. So very pleased by that. And let's 397 00:40:52,233 --> 00:40:52,233 see, the split between the fixed and per unit costs breaks down to 28% fixed and 72% per 398 00:40:59,333 --> 00:40:59,333 unit. Personally, I would have preferred it to be more per unit. You know, the per unit, 399 00:41:04,800 --> 00:41:04,800 100 gallons used and less the fixed charge, but is you know, and I mentioned that months ago, 400 00:41:09,500 --> 00:41:09,500 but craig pointed out is that you can't really sustain your system like that because if 401 00:41:14,833 --> 00:41:14,833 people start conserving too much, then the system, the water system goes broke. So 402 00:41:21,300 --> 00:41:21,300 this pretty much this model seems to work in most scenarios. And let's see, jim bonner did 403 00:41:31,433 --> 00:41:31,433 mention about the tiered water rates and the fairness. And I sympathize with him because 404 00:41:36,366 --> 00:41:36,366 those were my first words when we started talking about water many months ago was, you know 405 00:41:42,233 --> 00:41:42,233 what? It'd be nice to have different tiers so that people that you know are careless 406 00:41:47,200 --> 00:41:47,200 about their water use would be paying more, and people that are very, you know, 407 00:41:52,266 --> 00:41:52,266 conservation minded would get a break there. But the courts have decided that that's not to 408 00:41:57,333 --> 00:41:57,333 be the case anymore. So five, ten years ago, yeah, you could have done that, but now you 409 00:42:03,066 --> 00:42:03,066 can't. And I realize it's unfair. It feels unfair to the, you know, the apartment dweller 410 00:42:08,100 --> 00:42:08,100 who's paying the fixed charge in the same price per hundred gallon, 100 cubic feet, as, you 411 00:42:15,033 --> 00:42:15,033 know, someone with a couple of acres to water. But that's that's the way proposition 218 412 00:42:21,800 --> 00:42:21,800 was laid out. And unfortunately, we, the courts have said that's the way it's got to be. So 413 00:42:28,266 --> 00:42:28,266 unfortunately, that is not fair. And it disappoints me to. Let's see, built into this cost study 414 00:42:36,433 --> 00:42:36,433 which you didn't bring up, but you mentioned last november was that we do have ample reserves 415 00:42:41,400 --> 00:42:41,400 built into this and but not excessive. So just, you know, at the, at the good levels of 416 00:42:48,100 --> 00:42:48,100 good practice, which gives us permits us to retain our s&p bond rating of investment grade, 417 00:42:54,533 --> 00:42:54,533 double a minus. So that'll help us if we ever need to borrow money again. So good for that. 418 00:43:01,366 --> 00:43:01,366 and apparently for everybody is reevaluating water rates. And we are squarely in the middle 419 00:43:08,000 --> 00:43:08,000 of the pack. They're just slightly below the median, as you had mentioned, a dollar 420 00:43:12,566 --> 00:43:12,566 less than san diego. So per billing cycle. So that's pretty darn good. And. Let's see, our 421 00:43:22,633 --> 00:43:22,633 cost allocation said that this is this is what it costs. So unfortunately this is what we 422 00:43:29,500 --> 00:43:29,500 have to pay. And this is much must pass rulemaking here. Because if we don't pass it, 423 00:43:35,800 --> 00:43:35,800 the water enterprise can't really cut costs. I mean, craig and his people have done 424 00:43:41,000 --> 00:43:41,000 everything they could. And the only you know, if we don't pass this, we either stop doing 425 00:43:46,400 --> 00:43:46,400 maintenance or we start reducing water service or depleting our reserves. And I 426 00:43:51,466 --> 00:43:51,466 think peter showed me a graph of another jurisdiction that considered that and that the 427 00:43:56,500 --> 00:43:56,500 you know, it's like a is like, you know, crash landing into the, the x axis there. So not a 428 00:44:03,300 --> 00:44:03,300 good thing. And if we start cutting service and say, you know, let's just turn off the 429 00:44:07,700 --> 00:44:07,700 water treatment plant between midnight and 6 a.m. Eventually we'd be running afoul of state 430 00:44:12,566 --> 00:44:12,566 and federal law, not to mention fines and litigations from any accidents. So. Sadly, I know no 431 00:44:22,766 --> 00:44:22,766 one's happy about this increase. I don't like passing on increases, but we got to do it. 432 00:44:28,466 --> 00:44:28,466 and so I think most people understand that that's the way it is. And one final point. No. 433 00:44:36,066 --> 00:44:36,066 never mind. No final points. I'll stop there. Thanks so much. And I also second that we adopt 434 00:44:44,300 --> 00:44:44,300 these measures. Thanks. Thank you. Deputy mayor maeda. While some level of increase is 435 00:44:53,733 --> 00:44:53,733 inevitable, I'm concerned about how this will impact our low volume and low income users. 436 00:44:58,733 --> 00:44:58,733 when you're struggling to make ends meet, you reflexively start cutting back on expensive 437 00:45:03,800 --> 00:45:03,800 expenses. So it seems a bit cruel to impose such a high meter service charge and create 438 00:45:08,566 --> 00:45:08,566 a situation where even cutting back to zero gallons won't help you much. I would like to make 439 00:45:13,500 --> 00:45:13,500 a friendly amendment to decrease the bimonthly water meter service charge for single 440 00:45:17,800 --> 00:45:17,800 family utility customers by 25%, and increase the commodity per unit charge by 12%, while 441 00:45:24,300 --> 00:45:28,300 maintaining the yearly rate of increase. This would generate about the same level of revenue, assuming the average residential customer uses 29 units every two months, as 442 00:45:33,700 --> 00:45:33,700 referenced in table two on page five of the report. Do we have a second for that friendly 443 00:45:43,366 --> 00:45:43,366 amendment? I want to hear from craig as to what would a 25%? I guess that would be a 21% fixed 444 00:45:49,166 --> 00:45:49,166 in a. Was it an 89% of variable cost? Yeah. I'm not sure what those numbers would pencil out 445 00:45:58,400 --> 00:45:58,400 to be. We need to go through and kind of scrub what that would look like. But that would 446 00:46:03,933 --> 00:46:03,933 obviously reduce the amount of revenue we bring in on the fixed component as we're trying 447 00:46:08,266 --> 00:46:08,266 to balance out or more balance out where we recover our fixed costs for. So we do have a 448 00:46:14,400 --> 00:46:14,400 significant number of fixed costs, which is why we want to have at least a significant or 449 00:46:18,633 --> 00:46:18,633 somewhat significant amount of revenue brought in from that fixed charge. So we'd have an 450 00:46:23,733 --> 00:46:23,733 imbalance between what our fixed charges are and our fixed revenue sources are. So if 451 00:46:28,033 --> 00:46:32,033 there ever was any kind of drought or lower volume usage, there'd be an imbalance there. It could kind of spiral us downward and we'd have some financial issues. Is there any 452 00:46:39,566 --> 00:46:39,566 mechanism or we can help out those of lower income or have a hard time making these paying 453 00:46:45,766 --> 00:46:45,766 these water bills? Would be alan, chris or craig? I mean, from a legal perspective, I'm 454 00:46:56,600 --> 00:46:56,600 aware of some programs about, you know, not being, you know, certain limitations on forcing 455 00:47:01,533 --> 00:47:01,533 collections of water bills if people can't pay. But, you know, those are state laws. I, I'm 456 00:47:06,733 --> 00:47:06,733 not aware of any other sort of city programs. Can I just say something real? All right. Yeah. 457 00:47:14,200 --> 00:47:14,200 just piggybacking on what alan was just mentioning. There would be concerns using rate 458 00:47:19,866 --> 00:47:19,866 revenue to offset other users costs. So you couldn't use rate revenue to subsidize one class 459 00:47:25,966 --> 00:47:25,966 of users versus the other? There was recently a case up in la for la department of water 460 00:47:31,733 --> 00:47:35,400 and power, where there was a finding against them doing exactly that. So I would I would have some concerns about doing that. Just really quick. There is the san diego or 461 00:47:40,766 --> 00:47:40,766 something we pay into, which is a two on one program which has services for covering costs for 462 00:47:49,000 --> 00:47:49,000 utilities. I think there were like a handful of, I think like 1 or 2 residents in poway who 463 00:47:55,866 --> 00:47:55,866 took advantage of that. So the services are there. They're just not they're not in 464 00:48:02,000 --> 00:48:02,000 practice actually needed in our in our city. Hearing no second for that friendly amendment. I 465 00:48:17,800 --> 00:48:17,800 do wonder if. We're doing enough good enough job of promoting the 211 opportunities 466 00:48:27,933 --> 00:48:27,933 that could be there for those who are less fortunate. It might help backfill some of the 467 00:48:34,433 --> 00:48:34,433 need that's there. I'd like to see if we can do better. Making people aware of that in those 468 00:48:43,566 --> 00:48:43,566 circumstances. It's really uncomfortable to raise rates. We all pay them. You all pay 469 00:48:54,733 --> 00:48:54,733 them. I don't like high water bills any more than anybody else. But wishing doesn't 470 00:49:03,766 --> 00:49:03,766 change the math or the realities that we're dealing with. And to give some context 471 00:49:10,233 --> 00:49:10,233 to those realities, our neighbor, the city of san diego, recently already approved 472 00:49:15,266 --> 00:49:15,266 nearly a 30% increase in water rates, and now they're looking at another 44% increase in the 473 00:49:24,666 --> 00:49:24,666 very near future just to stay solvent. That's frightening. Against that backdrop, what's 474 00:49:33,666 --> 00:49:33,666 before us tonight is measured. It's transparent, and it's responsible, designed to 475 00:49:42,300 --> 00:49:42,300 maintain safe, reliable service, not just now, but for generations to come, while 476 00:49:47,700 --> 00:49:47,700 avoiding the kind of dramatic spikes that other cities are now facing. So with my comments 477 00:49:55,300 --> 00:49:55,300 reflected, hopefully on the 211 thing I will be supporting this. We have a motion from 478 00:50:03,900 --> 00:50:03,900 councilmember dayhoff and a second from councilmember pikus. Since the majority protest does 479 00:50:14,066 --> 00:50:14,066 not exist, a motion to adopt the resolutions establishing water service charges and rates 480 00:50:19,733 --> 00:50:19,733 and sewer services, charges and rates as enclosed as attachments a and b within the 481 00:50:26,966 --> 00:50:26,966 agenda staff report. This is a roll call vote. Will the city clerk please call the roll? 482 00:50:34,866 --> 00:50:34,866 councilmember dayhoff aye. Council member pikus I deputy mayor maita. No. Mayor voss I. 483 00:50:42,433 --> 00:50:42,433 item passes. Moving on to item five. General plan amendment 25 0001 and zone change 25 0001. A 484 00:50:54,666 --> 00:50:54,666 request to change the general plan, land use designation and zoning classification of 485 00:50:59,333 --> 00:50:59,333 parcels or portions thereof to the open space resource management or natural open 486 00:51:04,766 --> 00:51:04,766 space zoning designation at various locations citywide, and determine the project is 487 00:51:10,866 --> 00:51:10,866 categorically exempt from sequa. I will now open the public hearing assistant planner 488 00:51:15,900 --> 00:51:15,900 jasmine sanchez will present the item along with a powerpoint. Welcome, jasmine. 489 00:51:21,666 --> 00:51:21,666 good evening, honorable mayor and members of the council. My name is jasmine sanchez, 490 00:51:26,333 --> 00:51:26,333 assistant planner here on staff this evening I'm presenting a general plan amendment and zone 491 00:51:31,033 --> 00:51:31,033 change to update the city's general plan and zoning land use map for 32 parcels, or 492 00:51:36,433 --> 00:51:36,433 portions of a parcel that currently have biological conservation easements or are 493 00:51:41,833 --> 00:51:41,833 preserved as open space. This item represents a significant milestone towards achieving the 494 00:51:47,600 --> 00:51:47,600 vision of the poway subarea habitat conservation plan, also known as the hcp. In 1996, the 495 00:51:56,933 --> 00:51:56,933 city council adopted the hcp. It is a long term plan designed to preserve threatened and 496 00:52:02,700 --> 00:52:02,700 endangered plant and animal species, as well as their habitats. It covers about 497 00:52:11,366 --> 00:52:11,366 13,000 acres, which is more than half. The city requires that land under a biological 498 00:52:17,100 --> 00:52:17,100 conservation easement, also known as the bce, be rezoned as open space resource management, 499 00:52:23,233 --> 00:52:23,233 also known as osm, to reflect its permanent preservation status. The 32 parcels 500 00:52:29,300 --> 00:52:29,300 identified in the agenda report are all located within the hcp boundaries. With this action, 501 00:52:34,866 --> 00:52:34,866 more than 311 acres would be rezoned for permanent preservation. When a property 502 00:52:43,366 --> 00:52:43,366 owner develops land within the hcp area, they are required to mitigate any loss of natural 503 00:52:49,133 --> 00:52:49,133 habitat caused by that development. In most cases, this is done by permanently 504 00:52:53,800 --> 00:52:53,800 preserving a portion of their property as open space through a bce. A bce ensures that the 505 00:53:00,633 --> 00:53:00,633 protected land will remain undeveloped in the future. For 25 of these 32 parcels, only 506 00:53:10,100 --> 00:53:10,100 the portion of the property under a bce will be rezoned to osm. As shown in the example 507 00:53:16,533 --> 00:53:16,533 above, you can see individual homes that have been developed on the outside of the home is a 508 00:53:21,933 --> 00:53:21,933 green hatched area showing the previously dedicated bce. Only this green area is proposed to 509 00:53:28,300 --> 00:53:28,300 be rezoned, and the remaining portion will continue to be zoned residential. The proposed 510 00:53:34,500 --> 00:53:34,500 rezone will not affect the owner's existing property development rights. The 511 00:53:41,333 --> 00:53:41,333 remaining seven parcels have been acquired by the city for the purpose of preservation. 512 00:53:46,766 --> 00:53:46,766 habitat. In lieu fees have been used to fund all or a portion of these parcels. About 205 513 00:53:53,200 --> 00:53:53,200 acres will be rezoned to osm for permanent preservation. In the example shown above, about 514 00:54:00,066 --> 00:54:00,066 165 acres of land on van dam peak and about 39 acres of land on twin peaks will be rezoned 515 00:54:06,866 --> 00:54:06,866 and remain as open space in its natural condition. The parcels to be rezoned are outlined in 516 00:54:13,400 --> 00:54:13,400 red. The bce and properties acquired by the city have established a large contiguous 517 00:54:19,500 --> 00:54:19,500 open space area. This reflects the city's substantial progress in building the preserve and 518 00:54:25,633 --> 00:54:25,633 achieving the goals of the hcp. This item was duly noticed and was published in the powys news 519 00:54:35,000 --> 00:54:35,000 chieftain on january 8th, 2026. A notice was also mailed out to all property owners and 520 00:54:41,066 --> 00:54:41,066 occupants within 500ft of the 32 parcels being rezoned. Staff recommends the following. 521 00:54:48,633 --> 00:54:48,633 conduct a public hearing. Find that the project is categorically exempt from sequa 522 00:54:53,733 --> 00:54:53,733 approved general plan amendment 25 0001 and adopt the resolution and introduce the 523 00:55:00,533 --> 00:55:00,533 ordinance for zone change 25 0001 for first reading. This concludes staff's presentation 524 00:55:07,033 --> 00:55:07,033 and I'm available for any questions. Thank you. Jasmine. We have no speakers on this 525 00:55:13,100 --> 00:55:13,100 item. I will lead it off. I just want to note with some pride that in recent years 526 00:55:23,233 --> 00:55:23,233 we've continued. Yeah, you all heard me say I close the public hearing, right? Sorry about 527 00:55:30,800 --> 00:55:30,800 that. In recent years we've continued to grow highways, open space holdings. We have 528 00:55:37,966 --> 00:55:37,966 more open space as a percentage of our landmass than any other city in the county. I think, 529 00:55:44,066 --> 00:55:44,066 she said. Right around 50% of the city is open space. That doesn't happen by accident. It 530 00:55:51,266 --> 00:55:51,266 reflects long term discipline, respect for our natural assets and decisions like this one 531 00:55:58,533 --> 00:55:58,533 tonight that lock in preservation for generations to come. So for those that suggest 532 00:56:06,066 --> 00:56:06,066 that we're no longer the city in the country, the facts thousands and thousands of 533 00:56:12,900 --> 00:56:12,900 acres already preserved, augmented now by these 311 acres, say otherwise. The 534 00:56:19,700 --> 00:56:19,700 country, part of the city and the country is alive and well and growing, and I am happy to 535 00:56:26,200 --> 00:56:26,200 move this item. Deputy mayor maida. Any comment? No. Mr. Pikus, I think you've said 536 00:56:37,333 --> 00:56:37,333 everything I would have said. Thanks, mr. Dayhoff. Thank you, mr. Mayor. This is, I think, a 537 00:56:43,500 --> 00:56:43,500 really great opportunity to, you know, secure the open space for generations to come. I saw 538 00:56:50,066 --> 00:56:50,066 a picture of a gnatcatcher there. I like that catcher's eye. They sound like a little 539 00:56:54,333 --> 00:56:54,333 cat's meow when they're when they're little chirps. I have a question, though. So to jasmine, 540 00:56:59,333 --> 00:56:59,333 I noticed here there's a couple of pcs, four and seven and an rs seven property that are 541 00:57:07,266 --> 00:57:07,266 getting zone two open space of some kind, open space. Does this basically put them under 542 00:57:14,800 --> 00:57:14,800 prop control? You know, moving away from that to like if you people wanted to rezone it, 543 00:57:20,966 --> 00:57:20,966 they'd have to go to a vote. Is that an accurate assessment? Yeah. I'm sorry. No problem. 544 00:57:28,866 --> 00:57:28,866 yeah. Yeah I would say short answer is likely. Yes. And all of these, just to be clear, are 545 00:57:33,766 --> 00:57:33,766 already restricted by easements. So I mean as a as a functional matter, they can't really be 546 00:57:38,233 --> 00:57:38,233 developed regardless. But but yes okay. That's great. I thought as much I guess more of 547 00:57:45,400 --> 00:57:48,700 a trivia thing because apparently that doesn't matter. I do appreciate all of these being done at once. You know, every time anything is brought before council, it takes a 548 00:57:53,733 --> 00:57:53,733 reasonable chunk of resources and staff time and money. And so by doing these all in a 549 00:57:58,233 --> 00:57:58,233 block, I think it makes a lot of sense to to save money and improve cost efficiency. So I 550 00:58:03,766 --> 00:58:03,766 believe I will. Am I the second to approve this? Thank you. So we have a motion from the mayor, 551 00:58:11,900 --> 00:58:11,900 a second from council member dorff to approve the resolution and make the determination. The 552 00:58:17,133 --> 00:58:17,133 project is categorically exempt from california environmental quality act sequa as a class 553 00:58:22,533 --> 00:58:22,533 eight categorical exemption pursuant to section 15308 of the scl guidelines. This 554 00:58:29,333 --> 00:58:29,333 project also qualifies under the common sense exemption set forth in ceqa guidelines 1506 555 00:58:35,433 --> 00:58:35,433 one b3, because it can be seen with certainty that it has no possibility of resulting in 556 00:58:41,533 --> 00:58:41,533 significant impact on the environment, and introduce the ordinance for first reading by 557 00:58:46,300 --> 00:58:46,300 title only. Waive further reading and schedule the adoption of the ordinance for 558 00:58:50,633 --> 00:58:50,633 the february 3rd, 2026 regular city council meeting again. Motion by the mayor, second by 559 00:58:56,800 --> 00:58:56,800 council member dayhoff. Will the city clerk please title the ordinance for introduction and 560 00:59:01,366 --> 00:59:01,366 follow the roll call? Vote an ordinance of the city council of the city of poway, 561 00:59:07,166 --> 00:59:07,166 california. Changing the zoning classification of certain properties to open space 562 00:59:11,866 --> 00:59:11,866 resource management os or natural open space os, z 25 0001 council member dayhoff. 563 00:59:23,466 --> 00:59:23,466 aye. Council member picus I. Deputy mayor maeda I and mayor voss I. Item passes. Thank you. 564 00:59:31,700 --> 00:59:31,700 moving on to committee reports and all that stuff. This is an opportunity to briefly share 565 00:59:37,000 --> 00:59:40,666 regional committee assignment updates and or briefly highlight city and community events coming up in the next few weeks, or that you've attended. Council member 566 00:59:44,633 --> 00:59:44,633 dayhoff, thank you. Just really quick. Last year, late last year, I spent I had a dinner at 567 00:59:50,066 --> 00:59:50,066 the fire firefighter station. Thank you, chief mitchell. It was a great experience, you 568 00:59:55,100 --> 00:59:55,100 know, for my family to sort of get the nuance, see the how they actually operate. Very 569 00:59:59,766 --> 00:59:59,766 educational. They're a note for the public is while I was there, you know, they did have an 570 01:00:05,533 --> 01:00:05,533 emergency, as typically happens during the middle of dinner. And, you know, a couple of 571 01:00:09,933 --> 01:00:09,933 folks had to head out. And so they head out and they, you know, did their work and they 572 01:00:14,833 --> 01:00:14,833 came back because the the person calling in who needed help declined to go to the 573 01:00:20,666 --> 01:00:20,666 hospital. And then subsequently, they they got called again by the same person who eventually 574 01:00:26,266 --> 01:00:26,266 got taken to the hospital. And so I just really would encourage the public to 575 01:00:30,400 --> 01:00:30,400 understand that when the paramedics show up at your door, if they have to, they're there 576 01:00:35,700 --> 01:00:35,700 as professionals. They understand your situation a lot better than you do, 577 01:00:40,433 --> 01:00:44,000 particularly because, you know, you're really stressed about having this emergency. Do your best to seriously consider listening to them. They're not cutting corners. They're going 578 01:00:48,133 --> 01:00:48,133 to spend a lot of time at that hospital to make sure you're there safely, and the folks 579 01:00:52,733 --> 01:00:52,733 there at the hospital are going to be able to take care of you. And I think this lady made it 580 01:00:57,766 --> 01:00:57,766 out. But thank you guys for the work that you do. Council member picus I have nothing. 581 01:01:06,000 --> 01:01:06,000 deputy mayor rader. Last week we had the annual breakfast for our senior volunteer patrol in 582 01:01:18,566 --> 01:01:18,566 poway, and it's a great event every year and some stunning stats out of that breakfast. 583 01:01:26,533 --> 01:01:26,533 our senior volunteer patrol last year conducted 9546 patrols. 48,000. Let me get 584 01:01:41,300 --> 01:01:41,300 this right, covering a total of 48,000 miles. They did 3672 vacation checks and 6067 585 01:01:53,466 --> 01:01:53,466 security checks at houses of worship. That's an incredible gift to the city. These 586 01:02:02,066 --> 01:02:02,066 volunteers, day in and day out, augmenting the work of the sheriff's department and 587 01:02:06,333 --> 01:02:06,333 helping with fire situations, too. We are in their debt. It's always great to celebrate with 588 01:02:12,266 --> 01:02:12,266 them and appreciate being able to have breakfast with them. So I wanted to share that. Chris 589 01:02:20,500 --> 01:02:20,500 allen nothing for me. We will stand