1
00:00:02,740 --> 00:00:12,040
I just didn't want to work side to go into a different way. Sorry. We see you now. There you go, poor guys. You

2
00:00:17,440 --> 00:00:18,400
pulled the agenda.

3
00:00:20,440 --> 00:00:35,160
Larry, you can kick us off whenever you're ready. Okay. Well, let's begin by welcoming everybody to the August 10th board meeting for the power district, public infrastructure district number one.

4
00:00:36,880 --> 00:00:38,720
Do we need to do a roll call?

5
00:00:40,980 --> 00:00:42,120
I think we're good.

6
00:00:42,880 --> 00:00:44,760
Sort of why there's only the three of us.

7
00:00:45,440 --> 00:00:51,480
I'd like to make a motion to approve the December 15th board meeting minutes.

8
00:00:53,100 --> 00:00:53,800
I'll second that.

9
00:00:56,620 --> 00:00:56,900
Awesome.

10
00:00:59,580 --> 00:01:01,940
By casting a vote, let's vote on it then.

11
00:01:02,280 --> 00:01:04,920
So all those in favor say yes.

12
00:01:05,540 --> 00:01:06,020
Yes.

13
00:01:06,720 --> 00:01:06,800
Yes.

14
00:01:06,800 --> 00:01:08,300
Any opposed?

15
00:01:11,320 --> 00:01:17,120
Let the records show that the meeting minutes from December 15th have been approved.

16
00:01:19,640 --> 00:01:25,220
I'd like to turn the time over now to Ben Beis. He'd like to make a presentation on RFQ or RFP

17
00:01:25,220 --> 00:01:32,980
for a municipal service thond advisor. Great. Thank you, Mr. Chair. I'm going to share

18
00:01:33,680 --> 00:01:45,060
document. I said to you guys previously, the Inland ports RFP they did for financial

19
00:01:45,060 --> 00:01:51,180
municipal advisor. So I used that as my template. I made some changes. Really

20
00:01:51,180 --> 00:01:55,480
the purpose of this meeting is just so we can talk about this without breaking any

21
00:01:55,480 --> 00:02:02,660
open meetings laws. So I left most of the same. I just made some cleanup and some

22
00:02:02,660 --> 00:02:10,340
application of this one. So again, this would be issued so that we can get another contract

23
00:02:10,340 --> 00:02:22,800
as we're working on a agreement between Larry Miller and UFARE and the Fair Park to

24
00:02:22,800 --> 00:02:26,920
do some development of Fair Park Land, which will involve some bonding. So we'll want

25
00:02:26,920 --> 00:02:33,340
and municipal service advice around to help guide those discussions.

26
00:02:34,220 --> 00:02:36,700
So I'll just kind of go through this document.

27
00:02:36,980 --> 00:02:38,780
I can go as slow or fast as you want.

28
00:02:40,020 --> 00:02:46,280
I'll point out maybe some of the changes I made to import this document,

29
00:02:46,280 --> 00:02:48,720
and we can go through that.

30
00:02:49,160 --> 00:02:52,940
So back on purpose statement.

31
00:02:52,940 --> 00:03:01,920
Again, the two things that we're looking that we'd want to finance through this PID right

32
00:03:01,920 --> 00:03:06,180
now that we're talking about would be the new animal barns, which would be financed

33
00:03:06,180 --> 00:03:12,280
through tax increment revenues, there would be a tax sharing agreement between UFARE and

34
00:03:12,280 --> 00:03:13,740
the Power District to fund those.

35
00:03:14,480 --> 00:03:19,460
The second would be a multi-level parking garage, there would be financed through sales tax

36
00:03:19,460 --> 00:03:27,300
revenues that you for has, again, that would pledge to the district to build that.

37
00:03:27,840 --> 00:03:30,380
So, communications

38
00:03:32,940 --> 00:03:35,540
and question answer period pretty straightforward.

39
00:03:35,940 --> 00:03:40,000
This just says that I have to be done during certain time, that I have to go through.

40
00:03:41,340 --> 00:03:50,140
So my plan or my thinking was that we would use division of purchasing to do a courtesy

41
00:03:50,140 --> 00:03:55,880
posting of this. I think that's the best way to get it out. We can like contacts in the

42
00:03:55,880 --> 00:04:04,640
world know that it's out there, but then question answers can come through that system

43
00:04:04,640 --> 00:04:13,980
that they use. I think it's called bonfire and then whoever we like can be in charge

44
00:04:13,980 --> 00:04:18,920
of answering those questions and they would be available to all people that are looking

45
00:04:18,920 --> 00:04:26,360
to answer this RFP. This is pretty straightforward. I just

46
00:04:26,360 --> 00:04:29,200
standard language. I don't think I changed any of this from

47
00:04:29,200 --> 00:04:29,820
M and ports.

48
00:04:32,660 --> 00:04:35,360
Scope of work. We're looking for registered

49
00:04:35,880 --> 00:04:37,560
municipal advisory firms.

50
00:04:41,120 --> 00:04:44,700
We're closely with, obviously, this

51
00:04:44,700 --> 00:04:48,760
group as well as underwriters that they would help us get under

52
00:04:48,760 --> 00:04:58,300
contract with bond council to obtain some bonds, just kind of general scope of work.

53
00:04:58,520 --> 00:05:09,530
Again, this is pretty generic, for any sort of PID bond issuance, looking for a cover

54
00:05:09,530 --> 00:05:15,870
letter, some information on their firm, answers technical questions and their cost proposal.

55
00:05:15,870 --> 00:05:20,970
So the way this would be done was they would submit those first three items as one file and

56
00:05:20,970 --> 00:05:22,450
the cost proposal is nothing second.

57
00:05:23,350 --> 00:05:33,010
We would score the first three and then consider that the cost is a separate item just so

58
00:05:33,010 --> 00:05:38,030
there's no influence on that cost on the technical scoring.

59
00:05:39,710 --> 00:05:46,330
This just goes through what we're looking for in those three sections.

60
00:05:46,750 --> 00:05:53,210
Again, I didn't really change this from import, so it seems like that RFP served them well,

61
00:05:55,130 --> 00:05:57,830
and it should be good for our purposes as well.

62
00:06:00,930 --> 00:06:04,710
Manitory minimum requirements, if there's anything else that you have in mind that you would

63
00:06:04,710 --> 00:06:08,750
like to add to these, happy to talk about that.

64
00:06:09,370 --> 00:06:11,950
They must be registered with the MSRB and the SEC,

65
00:06:13,330 --> 00:06:14,970
demonstrate documented experience,

66
00:06:16,150 --> 00:06:20,170
serving as MA on rated and non-rated bond issuances.

67
00:06:21,590 --> 00:06:24,430
Just a note on that, that is a slight change I made.

68
00:06:27,110 --> 00:06:29,650
The tax increment bond that we look to do

69
00:06:29,650 --> 00:06:31,910
for the Barnes would be a non-rated bond issuance,

70
00:06:31,910 --> 00:06:44,350
Most likely, that means it's going to have a higher rate and then have the same sort of security of free payment as you would get on a rated bond.

71
00:06:44,890 --> 00:06:52,570
I think we can get the rated bond for the parking garage just because of the surety of those sales tax revenues that you first getting.

72
00:06:54,550 --> 00:06:59,350
So I want to make sure that they know that we'll have each and have experience with each.

73
00:06:59,470 --> 00:07:04,830
I don't think that should be an issue with the big MAs that typically are handling

74
00:07:04,830 --> 00:07:09,770
these type of bond issuances, but I just want to make sure that there's that differentiation.

75
00:07:15,240 --> 00:07:16,520
This is the technical criteria.

76
00:07:16,520 --> 00:07:23,140
area. The criteria, I believe, is the same for the scoring is what Inland Port did. I

77
00:07:23,140 --> 00:07:32,720
did change a little bit the weighting of it, but it's broke down to these three, sorry,

78
00:07:32,820 --> 00:07:41,420
just, let's see, five areas. The Firm and Team Qualifications, the Bond Structuring and

79
00:07:41,420 --> 00:07:44,820
strategy, pricing and negotiation expertise,

80
00:07:46,160 --> 00:07:48,280
experience with tax increment revenue bonds,

81
00:07:49,320 --> 00:07:51,260
and then RFP management experience.

82
00:07:51,740 --> 00:07:54,280
That's the only one with the different possible points.

83
00:07:54,440 --> 00:07:55,940
I didn't think that was as big of a deal.

84
00:07:56,740 --> 00:07:59,200
We would just lean on them a little bit to help us

85
00:07:59,200 --> 00:08:02,860
as we do additional RFPs for underwriters,

86
00:08:05,120 --> 00:08:08,280
trustees, other vendors like Bond Council.

87
00:08:10,660 --> 00:08:19,140
But it's nice to shove some of that work off onto them, especially since this is none of our primary jobs, but if we can have them do that, that'd be great.

88
00:08:19,420 --> 00:08:25,340
So any questions on technical criteria, any thoughts on point values there?

89
00:08:28,450 --> 00:08:30,350
No, I think you're waiting what's good then.

90
00:08:31,330 --> 00:08:38,550
Yeah, I have any questions. I may solve over all of them or relative to a point where I was 500 or 10.

91
00:08:39,050 --> 00:08:42,550
Right. Yeah, exactly. Good.

92
00:08:45,150 --> 00:08:48,750
I did change a little bit on the cost submission guidelines.

93
00:08:50,230 --> 00:08:53,410
I think this part is by the same separate document.

94
00:08:57,590 --> 00:08:59,150
Oh yeah, so this is where I did it.

95
00:08:59,150 --> 00:09:08,870
But so, typically, what's done is they'll just do a cost for a bond issuance, that'll

96
00:09:08,870 --> 00:09:13,410
be paid out of bond proceeds, so no one will have to fund any costs for that.

97
00:09:14,150 --> 00:09:19,210
I think there are some MAs that have some fees outside of that that could include just

98
00:09:19,870 --> 00:09:28,650
hourly rates for consulting services, a fixed retainer, other advisory work.

99
00:09:28,650 --> 00:09:33,890
So this does include the option to do that.

100
00:09:35,470 --> 00:09:39,670
I just made it clear that if they do propose any of those costs,

101
00:09:40,790 --> 00:09:44,650
that they need to include the expected hours reaches those tasks.

102
00:09:47,050 --> 00:09:52,230
And then we'd ask to, you know, hold them to those costs so we don't get caught with.

103
00:09:52,750 --> 00:09:55,250
Oh, we thought it was only going to be 10 hours and we did 30 hours.

104
00:09:55,250 --> 00:10:01,050
and now you also a whole bunch should more thousands of dollars so that is a little bit different

105
00:10:01,050 --> 00:10:07,630
from the import. I know that at least with the vendor they went with, they just did a transaction

106
00:10:07,630 --> 00:10:14,490
based fee. If there are any fees beforehand that's something that the euphoric front and again we just

107
00:10:14,490 --> 00:10:24,670
probably do some fees including the bond issuance to repay whoever pays those upfront costs.

108
00:10:25,410 --> 00:10:28,050
So it ends up coming out of the bond at the end of the day.

109
00:10:30,050 --> 00:10:32,390
And then I made this one worth 15 points.

110
00:10:33,010 --> 00:10:36,750
So again, the other ones were 45 points total.

111
00:10:37,030 --> 00:10:44,810
So this would take us to 60 points total and they just get the lowest proposed price.

112
00:10:45,750 --> 00:10:50,890
Would get the full 15 points and then depending on how much higher there was, it kind of just

113
00:10:52,410 --> 00:10:58,210
fewer points the higher they go, so that's a pretty established formula I think

114
00:10:58,210 --> 00:11:04,410
for RFPs is something like that for the cost. We do talk about they would need a

115
00:11:04,410 --> 00:11:14,670
minimum point value of 30 points to advance to the scoring portion of the RFP so

116
00:11:14,670 --> 00:11:21,590
So it can be a really poor proposal and then have a really low price and get in.

117
00:11:21,670 --> 00:11:25,550
It still needs at least those 30 points to be considered on the price.

118
00:11:28,210 --> 00:11:32,210
I did have an optional stage three of 30 minute presentations.

119
00:11:32,850 --> 00:11:37,890
I don't know that we'll need that, but if there's vendors that we feel are very equal and we want to do that,

120
00:11:38,070 --> 00:11:42,530
we do have the option to do a 30 minute presentation there.

121
00:11:46,640 --> 00:11:52,860
If they want any information that proposal protected, this lays out the outlines for doing that.

122
00:11:56,160 --> 00:12:04,480
We would make an award, we would ask them to agree to the standard terms and conditions.

123
00:12:06,920 --> 00:12:14,580
You fare has that are based almost exactly on the state of Utah's, so probably just modify

124
00:12:14,580 --> 00:12:18,760
those and change the name on that, but not ensure that we have some of those same protections

125
00:12:18,760 --> 00:12:24,200
built in to also have Utah contracts on the terms and conditions, and it just says we

126
00:12:24,200 --> 00:12:33,980
would, you know, prefer that we keep those without any modifications, but if they do want

127
00:12:33,980 --> 00:12:40,620
any of this lays out the process for modifying those, and it says we can reject a proposal

128
00:12:41,280 --> 00:12:46,400
if we can come to terms on their requested changes to terms and conditions.

129
00:12:50,340 --> 00:12:53,980
Appendix A is just their claim of business confidentiality, if they want to claim that.

130
00:12:56,460 --> 00:13:03,420
And then appendix B just lays out how the cost proposal should be submitted, again it's

131
00:13:03,420 --> 00:13:04,240
separate document.

132
00:13:06,320 --> 00:13:13,580
Any questions on that? Maybe just backing up. Our district policies allow for

133
00:13:13,580 --> 00:13:21,300
Larry to issue RFPs as the board chair. So the purpose of this meeting, again, is to work on

134
00:13:21,300 --> 00:13:26,020
this document. Make sure we are on the same page. At the end of the day, Larry is the one that can give

135
00:13:26,020 --> 00:13:32,800
the go-or-no-go for issuing this RFP based on his decision alone. So does it require a vote of the

136
00:13:32,800 --> 00:13:33,600
board to do that.

137
00:13:36,000 --> 00:13:41,380
So once we're feeling this documents in a good spot, we're ready to

138
00:13:41,380 --> 00:13:46,360
issue this, which I think probably comes when we're ready to sign the

139
00:13:46,360 --> 00:13:49,800
master lease agreement. Larry, I don't know that we need to get too far ahead of

140
00:13:49,800 --> 00:13:55,900
ourselves on that. Once that sign or imminent, I think would be a good time for

141
00:13:55,900 --> 00:13:59,100
we're learning to give you the, to give to go ahead on that.

142
00:14:00,640 --> 00:14:02,600
Larry, if you'd like to assign me as,

143
00:14:02,720 --> 00:14:04,660
as the point person to work with purchasing

144
00:14:04,660 --> 00:14:06,420
on getting this posted, I'm happy to do that.

145
00:14:07,360 --> 00:14:09,140
But, but really, we just need your approval

146
00:14:09,140 --> 00:14:11,520
on a final document, once we're ready to go.

147
00:14:12,480 --> 00:14:12,880
Terrific.

148
00:14:13,480 --> 00:14:16,680
Yeah, I would welcome you if you were to take a lead on that,

149
00:14:16,760 --> 00:14:17,000
right?

150
00:14:17,880 --> 00:14:18,180
Great.

151
00:14:18,740 --> 00:14:19,900
I'm directing all the questions.

152
00:14:20,100 --> 00:14:21,120
Is there a selection committee

153
00:14:21,120 --> 00:14:22,540
on all three of us on the selection committee?

154
00:14:22,640 --> 00:14:23,580
So it's rated properly?

155
00:14:25,340 --> 00:14:33,080
That's a good question. That was my thinking is that we just had the three of us be the scores for the RFP.

156
00:14:33,940 --> 00:14:36,300
I'm happy if there's a better way to do that.

157
00:14:39,220 --> 00:14:41,680
Happy to talk about that, but I think that probably makes sense.

158
00:14:42,420 --> 00:14:47,920
Yeah, with just three of us, I think you've got to have an odd number, so that makes sense. If you're okay with that, Andy.

159
00:14:47,920 --> 00:14:59,960
Yep, and then you'll be the direct point on questions. That's great. I noticed that the inland port RFQ actually had a provision there for best and final pricing too, is that in.

160
00:15:00,000 --> 00:15:01,780
Including there as well.

161
00:15:04,200 --> 00:15:05,900
I took that out.

162
00:15:08,020 --> 00:15:29,740
I, you know, I see, I see the reason for that. I also think maybe you just have. Make people give them, give you their best offer right up front and. Don't play those games. They're both, they're both correct, right? Yeah. So what do you think the cost of this bond issue is going to be?

163
00:15:29,740 --> 00:15:35,870
And are this finance group usually the percentage of the bond?

164
00:15:36,230 --> 00:15:41,730
Yeah, yeah, usually they do, you know, a cost on that bond issuance.

165
00:15:41,970 --> 00:15:45,990
So I can't remember what it is now.

166
00:15:45,990 --> 00:15:48,350
I want to say it's like one or two percent or something.

167
00:15:49,950 --> 00:15:50,390
Let

168
00:15:52,920 --> 00:15:55,860
me just check something real quick and give you a better answer.

169
00:16:02,040 --> 00:16:03,720
Those are pretty standard fees.

170
00:16:03,860 --> 00:16:07,200
You'll have the same thing with the underwriter they'll have their cost of bond issuance

171
00:16:07,200 --> 00:16:09,400
that are going to be built into that.

172
00:16:12,060 --> 00:16:20,480
So I should have said 0.1 to 0.2%, so get out of the

173
00:16:20,480 --> 00:16:33,040
lot. We're looking at, you know, probably 60 to 70 million total in tax increment bond

174
00:16:33,040 --> 00:16:38,940
and then probably 30 to 40 million in the rated bond for the parking garage.

175
00:16:39,320 --> 00:16:42,700
So I don't know that we'll do the tax income bond on one.

176
00:16:43,800 --> 00:16:45,980
In fact, we probably won't do it all at once,

177
00:16:46,220 --> 00:16:50,340
but this will get us to MA that can help figure the best way to time bonds.

178
00:16:50,380 --> 00:16:56,400
This we're looking at a series of bonds for development at the Fair Park.

179
00:17:00,900 --> 00:17:04,020
Terrific. I read through that in the import RFQ,

180
00:17:04,020 --> 00:17:07,800
and I thought it was pretty detailed. It had everything you need to have, right?

181
00:17:08,200 --> 00:17:13,080
Yeah. Who did they select? Are we allowed? I guess we can talk about that. Who did they wind up picking to?

182
00:17:13,880 --> 00:17:17,860
They were with ScienceBank on theirs.

183
00:17:19,560 --> 00:17:25,440
And theirs was a little bit different. They wanted someone that was under contract

184
00:17:25,440 --> 00:17:29,460
that their different project areas could use.

185
00:17:29,460 --> 00:17:35,020
So I just want to kind of sell some of those already available and ready to go if someone

186
00:17:35,020 --> 00:17:35,440
came to that.

187
00:17:35,560 --> 00:17:40,180
I don't know that they were doing it for a specific bond issuance, but as more of having

188
00:17:40,180 --> 00:17:45,380
someone under contract if a developer or a community needed that, they would have someone

189
00:17:45,380 --> 00:17:46,140
already to go.

190
00:17:47,640 --> 00:17:48,420
I understand.

191
00:17:48,600 --> 00:17:52,100
Well, I think basically there's like 13 locations of inland port throughout the state or

192
00:17:52,100 --> 00:17:52,400
something.

193
00:17:52,980 --> 00:17:53,320
In the Arctic.

194
00:17:53,760 --> 00:17:55,040
It takes up to 15 now.

195
00:17:55,200 --> 00:17:56,440
They just adopted one last week.

196
00:17:57,260 --> 00:17:58,220
So yeah.

197
00:17:58,220 --> 00:17:59,100
they've got a lot.

198
00:18:01,640 --> 00:18:07,500
I've talked with when they're going through this process, I met with

199
00:18:07,500 --> 00:18:13,780
one of the municipal advisers when they were here. Science Bank is one I know pretty well

200
00:18:13,780 --> 00:18:18,540
and then there's another group that I met with a few times as well. So I've got relationships

201
00:18:18,540 --> 00:18:25,720
with at least three MAs so I can make sure where this RFP when it goes out. So I think we should

202
00:18:25,720 --> 00:18:28,420
have some good options to pick from.

203
00:18:29,040 --> 00:18:29,260
Perfect.

204
00:18:30,060 --> 00:18:31,320
Can we review the date again?

205
00:18:31,540 --> 00:18:32,760
Or did you have a list at the front?

206
00:18:33,000 --> 00:18:34,440
I didn't put any dates in yet.

207
00:18:36,400 --> 00:18:41,460
So once we're ready to post, we'll probably

208
00:18:41,460 --> 00:18:44,280
give a deadline for questions.

209
00:18:44,660 --> 00:18:46,820
You'd probably give them a couple of weeks for questions.

210
00:18:47,200 --> 00:18:49,540
I can review on imports and see kind of what they have.

211
00:18:49,660 --> 00:18:51,920
I can't remember what they had in terms of how

212
00:18:51,920 --> 00:18:52,620
in between each.

213
00:18:52,620 --> 00:18:58,380
but give them a couple of weeks for questions and probably a month or so total for getting

214
00:18:58,380 --> 00:18:59,420
the proposals in.

215
00:19:02,020 --> 00:19:06,240
What's about a six week from launch date to selection date?

216
00:19:06,780 --> 00:19:07,240
Is that fair?

217
00:19:08,660 --> 00:19:09,880
It certainly could be.

218
00:19:09,960 --> 00:19:20,520
Let me see if I've got in the imports handy real quick and I can see what they did.

219
00:19:20,520 --> 00:19:24,040
So yeah, if we need to, if you think we ought to move that up a little bit

220
00:19:28,010 --> 00:19:33,310
We can certainly issue a beforehand, especially if we are just going to do

221
00:19:39,820 --> 00:19:43,880
Something where we pay on a bond issuance then it's it's pretty low risk to

222
00:19:45,760 --> 00:19:46,900
Do a beforehand

223
00:19:49,340 --> 00:19:54,440
Well part of this process is also going to help us determine the amount that we can bond for is that correct?

224
00:19:56,440 --> 00:19:58,440
To some extent, I think that really

225
00:19:59,060 --> 00:20:03,280
probably more with the at the underwriter

226
00:20:03,280 --> 00:20:06,980
is going to be the biggest determiner of that.

227
00:20:07,400 --> 00:20:11,200
But the imply gets some some models to some extent.

228
00:20:13,940 --> 00:20:16,660
I don't know why it's not opening for me.

229
00:20:19,990 --> 00:20:23,770
It looked to me like on their issuance date was May 8.

230
00:20:23,870 --> 00:20:24,910
And then their proposal.

231
00:20:24,910 --> 00:20:31,530
I take it back. It doesn't really list the actual date that it was announced, just the

232
00:20:31,530 --> 00:20:33,810
presentation dates and proposal due dates.

233
00:20:34,670 --> 00:20:42,500
So how long do they have on the so they posted on May 8th? Deadline for questions was

234
00:20:42,500 --> 00:20:49,380
May 15th with pretty quick turnaround. Yeah, proposal due date was May 23rd, and then it

235
00:20:49,380 --> 00:20:54,560
just says if needed interview and presentation with June 7th. So they only had more like

236
00:20:54,560 --> 00:21:00,240
two weeks. It sounds like to get everything in a week for questions. Another week and a half

237
00:21:00,240 --> 00:21:08,120
or something. Yeah, they're moving pretty quick. I think there was one potential offer that

238
00:21:08,120 --> 00:21:11,220
missed the deadline. So I don't know if it was a little bit quick for them or they just

239
00:21:11,980 --> 00:21:19,120
didn't get around to it. But that's a good baseline. Yeah.

240
00:21:21,580 --> 00:21:24,580
That puts it, you know, a month from now, that's right in the middle of the

241
00:21:24,580 --> 00:21:41,840
Yeah, that's kind of why I was. Oh, yeah, I think we're probably at least a couple weeks away from getting the document signed. So we can read and certainly push to have this done after the fair. I don't think that's an issue at all.

242
00:21:42,680 --> 00:21:44,900
Terrific. Otherwise, I think it looks great.

243
00:21:48,680 --> 00:21:58,680
Perfect. Well, like I said, I'll send this document out to both of you. Larry, if you

244
00:21:58,680 --> 00:22:05,120
just want to make any final changes and give me the final thumbs up, maybe what we ought

245
00:22:05,120 --> 00:22:14,500
to do. Well, actually I'll just say Larry, I'll have you decide on the final dates of

246
00:22:14,500 --> 00:22:19,920
issuance. Okay. I think that's your progative as board chair to do that.

247
00:22:22,060 --> 00:22:22,900
If you just want

248
00:22:22,900 --> 00:22:30,280
to give me the dates that we want on that first page there, when we feel like we're ready

249
00:22:30,280 --> 00:22:34,780
to issue that, you just give me a thumbs up on the final version of the document and those

250
00:22:34,780 --> 00:22:38,920
dates and I'll work with purchasing at that point to get a posted. Okay, perfect.

251
00:22:41,890 --> 00:22:42,370
Perfence.

252
00:22:43,190 --> 00:22:49,730
Why not? This has been the year for our accused for us and our fees. I mean, you're next

253
00:22:49,730 --> 00:22:57,890
person. I'm sure you're doing it all the time too. Well, all the time, yep. But no, I'm

254
00:22:57,890 --> 00:23:05,770
excited for this. I do have an off topic question. Do we have bonds in place to protect defense

255
00:23:05,770 --> 00:23:11,890
and legal for the board members? We don't just because we were, when we set this up,

256
00:23:11,890 --> 00:23:20,110
we did it as a kind of an inactive district there's there's a few things we probably need to do

257
00:23:20,570 --> 00:23:26,490
we'll need to adopt a budget and and get some of those things in place once we start being active

258
00:23:26,490 --> 00:23:32,090
I don't know if that'll happen this physical year in which case we do a budget amendment or

259
00:23:32,610 --> 00:23:40,030
if it's more like next physical year so we will want to get like that I'll age to talk about like that

260
00:23:40,810 --> 00:23:49,750
like crime and liability insurance yeah we can do that pretty quickly do you

261
00:23:49,750 --> 00:23:55,090
go through local Utah government's trust I believe we do okay that's what you

262
00:23:55,090 --> 00:23:59,990
fair does too I think they're they're the big one there's another company

263
00:23:59,990 --> 00:24:05,350
I was looking at that I was trying to get some quotes from they never got back to

264
00:24:05,350 --> 00:24:11,210
me and so I went with that. I think that's what most municipalities and counties and

265
00:24:11,210 --> 00:24:16,850
stuff in the state use. So I definitely think that will be appropriate once we have a budget

266
00:24:16,850 --> 00:24:21,050
and actually have activity in the district.

267
00:24:21,750 --> 00:24:27,230
Terrific. I appreciate that information. It's just such a litigious society anymore that

268
00:24:27,230 --> 00:24:28,990
you have to have production. Yeah,

269
00:24:31,550 --> 00:24:36,270
make sense. I appreciate that reminder. And we will

270
00:24:36,270 --> 00:24:41,270
want to probably there's five other things I'm not thinking of right now that want to

271
00:24:41,270 --> 00:24:46,070
do ones who are actually active and are spending money out of this pit. But after the time

272
00:24:46,070 --> 00:24:52,310
being, it's I think we're okay. Excellent. Well, I don't have any further questions.

273
00:24:57,340 --> 00:25:01,340
That document sent it over and then I'll just look at some dates and we'll go from there.

274
00:25:01,960 --> 00:25:02,060
Okay.

275
00:25:02,460 --> 00:25:02,960
That sounds good.

276
00:25:03,280 --> 00:25:04,180
It doesn't require a vote.

277
00:25:04,340 --> 00:25:05,000
It's more of an informal.

278
00:25:06,200 --> 00:25:06,640
Yeah.

279
00:25:07,020 --> 00:25:07,380
More than anything.

280
00:25:08,200 --> 00:25:08,480
Yep.

281
00:25:08,660 --> 00:25:11,480
It's all to you to give us to go ahead, Larry, so.

282
00:25:11,940 --> 00:25:12,720
Let's do it.

283
00:25:13,000 --> 00:25:15,180
And with that, I'll take a motion to end the meeting.

284
00:25:16,820 --> 00:25:17,680
So moved.

285
00:25:19,750 --> 00:25:20,270
All right.

286
00:25:20,850 --> 00:25:21,990
The meeting's adjourned.

287
00:25:22,490 --> 00:25:22,630
Okay.

288
00:25:23,210 --> 00:25:23,950
Thank you both.

289
00:25:24,450 --> 00:25:24,810
Thanks.

290
00:25:24,950 --> 00:25:25,390
Appreciate it.

291
00:25:25,390 --> 00:25:25,530
Thanks for watching.