[1:11] Recording in progress.
[1:12] Good evening everyone.
[1:14] I would like to congratulate
[1:15] you at the meeting
[1:16] city ​​electoral council
[1:18] Pano August 27, 2026
[1:19] at 6:00 p.m. Announcing
[1:20] meeting. Nominal
[1:22] the voice of the council members.
[1:23] Weber Gini
[1:24] Alexander
[1:25] Mike Gardner.
[1:28] Please, everyone.
[1:29] can you stand up for
[1:30] taking an oath
[1:31] loyalty.
[1:40] Swear on
[1:40] allegiance to the flag
[1:41] United States
[1:43] America and
[1:43] the republic that he
[1:44] represents, one
[1:45] nations under God,
[1:46] indivisible, with
[1:47] freedom and
[1:48] justice for
[1:49] everyone. Good.
[2:03] Approval of the order
[2:05] daytime. Any
[2:06] changes to the order
[2:07] daytime?
[2:11] Station
[2:11] snow removal regarding
[2:13] the snow is still here, as is
[2:14] after the motorway
[2:20] .
[2:20] Yes.
[2:21] Something else
[2:23] will remain,
[2:24] I would also say if
[2:25] only someone else doesn't
[2:27] wants to leave it at
[2:28] point 12, discussion
[2:29] future
[2:29] map update
[2:30] land use. I
[2:31] asked to include this
[2:33] to the agenda, I
[2:34] spent some
[2:35] research, and I feel
[2:36] satisfied, so we just want
[2:38] to inform people,
[2:39] when will it end
[2:40] submission deadline
[2:41] I don't see any comments in
[2:43] this need,
[2:45] okay, any others
[2:47] changes. Something else? I will consider the offer.
[2:51] on approval
[2:52] agenda with
[2:53] changes.
[2:54] I will make a suggestion.
[2:55] on approval
[2:56] agenda with
[2:57] changes.
[2:59] Any discussion?
[3:00] Is anyone "in favor"?
[3:02] 1.
[3:05] Public
[3:06] discussion. Not
[3:09] Could you come over?
[3:10] table and just
[3:11] to say your name,
[3:12] Please? Speaking
[3:14] about today
[3:15] evening, um, about
[3:16] tax accounts,
[3:17] My name is El. Of
[3:21] your tax
[3:23] accounts, I heard
[3:24] a lot of talking and
[3:25] various things, um, from
[3:26] public, um,
[3:27] some on the second
[3:28] place, some on
[3:29] the first. So I just
[3:32] I'll make it short.
[3:33] quick comment.
[3:34] So, regarding your
[3:35] taxes if you
[3:36] taxpayer and in
[3:37] Do you have any questions about
[3:38] account, please
[3:38] call for
[3:39] the number specified in
[3:40] upper part
[3:41] account. I will do everything.
[3:42] it is possible that
[3:43] answer yours
[3:44] question. If I don't
[3:45] I can answer
[3:46] him, and this
[3:47] regarding the assessment, I
[3:48] I'll hire someone else,
[3:49] who can you
[3:50] help. Ahem,
[3:51] information sheet,
[3:52] which was included in
[3:54] your, um,
[3:54] tax account,
[3:56] everyone had to get
[3:57] its. I hope I
[3:59] didn't miss anyone.
[4:00] It was a letter.
[4:01] politeness. That's all.
[4:03] Just a letter
[4:04] politeness with
[4:05] information about
[4:06] changes that mail
[4:07] submitted over a year ago
[4:08] . This is simply for the purpose of
[4:11] so that you know that you don't
[4:12] it's worth just throwing
[4:13] your tax
[4:14] postal account
[4:16] the box outside or
[4:17] anywhere, or in
[4:18] your personal
[4:19] mailbox 10
[4:20] November, thinking,
[4:21] that he will be
[4:22] delivered quickly.
[4:24] This will not happen. They even take them away
[4:27] near the post office
[4:28] mailboxes at the post office.
[4:29] They send them.
[4:31] Sometimes it takes two-
[4:31] three days to get them
[4:32] put the post office
[4:33] stamp. You will
[4:34] overdue. Such
[4:36] It has already happened. I
[4:37] I'm trying to do
[4:38] so that this does not happen
[4:39] it happened that people
[4:40] were not punished,
[4:41] thinking that they
[4:42] paid on time
[4:43] taxes. So this
[4:44] part
[4:45] information sheet
[4:46] is simply a courtesy.
[4:49] I also spoke with
[4:50] two separate
[4:51] postmasters,
[4:52] everyone in Bennington,
[4:54] to check if it is
[4:55] Indeed. I found
[4:56] it's on the internet, and that's it
[4:57] That's what happens.
[4:59] They take him away,
[5:00] picked up, in a day
[5:01] -two when he gets there
[5:02] gets it, it
[5:02] are passed through
[5:03] car. It is not on it.
[5:04] postal address is given
[5:05] stamp on the day when
[5:06] you throw it away. If
[5:07] you need
[5:08] postmark,
[5:09] take it to
[5:10] mail. Ask
[5:11] postmaster
[5:13] put on it
[5:14] date November 10 or 9
[5:15] . They will deliver
[5:17] stamp. His will be
[5:18] sent. I will receive an envelope from
[5:20] with two stamps. Ahem,
[5:23] and I will take the one that is
[5:24] mail that you
[5:25] ask. I will take it.
[5:27] fastest postal service
[5:28] stamp so that you don't
[5:30] had delays. Ahem,
[5:33] the letter also states
[5:34] my hours
[5:35] receipts, in which I
[5:36] actually here. We have
[5:39] mailbox
[5:40] outside, and we can't
[5:41] to come at these hours
[5:42] . Hmm, whatever will be
[5:43] dropped into this box
[5:45] at 17:00 November 10
[5:46] after 5:00 p.m., I
[5:47] I'll check it at 5:00 PM.
[5:48] Anything that will be omitted
[5:50] after 5:00 PM, there will be
[5:51] overdue. Everything that
[5:52] paid online, will be
[5:53] overdue after 5:00 PM
[5:55] , because electronic
[5:56] letters have a mark
[5:57] time. Um, and one more thing:
[5:59] tax rate, and
[6:00] if you don't understand,
[6:02] how to install
[6:03] tax rate,
[6:04] come and
[6:05] ask us, don't
[6:06] guess. Not
[6:08] accuse
[6:09] treasurer. Not
[6:10] blame the election
[6:11] commission. Rate
[6:13] tax establishes
[6:14] the election commission, which
[6:16] receives documentation
[6:17] from the treasurer. These
[6:20] the numbers are taken from
[6:21] your march on
[6:22] voting. They are
[6:23] your budget
[6:24] in numbers, the amount that
[6:26] need to increase
[6:27] due to taxes.
[6:29] The same applies to
[6:30] school budget, and
[6:31] the state establishes these
[6:32] rates. So know that
[6:33] we don't choose any
[6:35] what rate, what
[6:35] we want. We also
[6:36] taxpayers.
[6:38] Therefore, when you
[6:38] come to ask about yours
[6:40] tax bill,
[6:41] be kind to
[6:42] everyone with whom
[6:42] talk, because sometimes
[6:43] I'm not here, but others are.
[6:44] trying
[6:45] to answer your
[6:46] question. Hmm, and this
[6:47] all I can say
[6:49] . Thank you very much for that.
[6:50] allowed me.
[6:52] Thank you, Helen. Thank you for
[6:55] clarification regarding
[6:56] some questions that
[6:57] were small
[6:58] the problem is the last
[7:00] several years.
[7:06] Yes. And it is marked.
[7:08] This is clearly marked,
[7:09] where is it located
[7:09] submission box
[7:10] messages here, in
[7:11] city
[7:11] administration.
[7:12] Yes. And when you
[7:14] come, it means
[7:16] what you write, and this
[7:17] also marked. Yes.
[7:22] Do we have any others?
[7:23] public comments?
[7:29] But two weeks ago I
[7:31] said, during
[7:32] What did you just say?
[7:33] your name? Your name.
[7:34] Judy Stone.
[7:35] Thank you.
[7:36] Valley Drive, which is on
[7:37] west bank
[7:38] rivers.
[7:43] Two weeks ago, I
[7:44] to everyone present here,
[7:45] they said it would be on
[7:47] place for mine
[7:49] oil company
[7:50] or other petroleum products
[7:51] companies so that they
[7:52] could go there.
[7:54] Nothing has been said yet.
[7:55] and done. I still am
[7:56] I meet people.
[7:57] in the middle of the bridge, and there
[7:58] one line is written.
[8:02] Hmm, I feel a little gross,
[8:03] because I wonder if I would be
[8:05] member of the board, and
[8:06] did I need it?
[8:07] my dear, you know,
[8:09] um, leveled or
[8:10] broken for some
[8:11] special event, or,
[8:13] you know, trenches,
[8:14] dug up on
[8:15] Montgomery Road. I understand that, but that's how it is.
[8:20] . And I understand him.
[8:21] Custom-made cars.
[8:24] My question is: why?
[8:25] they can go for
[8:26] barrels, bring them,
[8:27] instead of
[8:28] wait for someone,
[8:30] Do you know who will deliver them?
[8:33] And I am very disappointed.
[8:34] because my oil
[8:35] the company, KCA, expects that
[8:37] I will say "yes", someone
[8:38] here will call them and
[8:39] will say: "We, you can
[8:41] "to come and deliver"
[8:42] because I really am
[8:44] less than a quarter of a tank. And I
[8:46] not very much
[8:47] satisfied because now
[8:48] , since the city was founded
[8:49] closed, price increased
[8:51] for 80 cents. So I
[8:52] I'm crying instead of 400
[8:54] quarters, now I'm crying 505
[8:55] , and I don't think that's
[8:57] fair to me
[8:58] or from someone
[8:59] another.
[9:00] You know what I mean?
[9:01] I say? If someone from
[9:02] could you go there
[9:03] to apply, would it be
[9:04] otherwise? That's what I need.
[9:05] interesting. You guys,
[9:07] Are you delaying this?
[9:08] April. This is disgusting, and I don't know. I am sure
[9:12] that other people in my
[9:13] the area feel that
[9:14] exactly. They don't know,
[9:16] What are they doing? They say, "We don't know,
[9:18] how are we going
[9:19] get oil...
[9:20] some of us, western
[9:21] oil, they transport it
[9:22] oil. ACN, Kevin Green,
[9:24] isn't that right?
[9:26] Maybe Mike Green
[9:27] the only one who, for
[9:28] in the words of his wife,
[9:29] follows the rules
[9:31] or requirements, but more
[9:32] no one
[9:32] complies. I saw
[9:34] like a dump truck of the past
[9:35] I was passing by at night.
[9:37] him. I think I am
[9:38] I miss. I am not
[9:40] I understand, probably.
[9:41] I was passing by today.
[9:44] OK,
[9:46] no one reads the signs.
[9:48] This must be a sign.
[9:49] stops with three
[9:50] directions, right? And that,
[9:51] what I heard two weeks ago
[9:52] so, one by one
[9:53] every corner,
[9:54] this was not the case
[9:55] done. I think I would
[9:56] installed something, but
[9:57] no one reads this,
[9:58] because I was sitting there
[9:59] last night,
[9:59] trying
[10:00] to return to one's own
[10:01] the house I live in
[10:02] there, across the river. Wagons
[10:03] they are descending
[10:04] just keep going
[10:05] go. Not even
[10:06] are stopping. So the sign
[10:07] I don't even stop...
[10:08] I mean, if there
[10:10] someone was sitting, you know,
[10:11] clinging to people,
[10:12] they would earn
[10:12] a lot of money. I
[10:14] just, you know, me
[10:15] I just don't know. I am not
[10:17] I know, have we had any more?
[10:18] barrels, couldn't we
[10:20] to get them. They are not
[10:21] put this
[10:22] week. I mean,
[10:23] it was two weeks
[10:24] ago. So, I have this
[10:25] the feeling that it was
[10:27] said only for that
[10:28] to calm us down,
[10:29] and it seemed to me that
[10:30] I was deceived because
[10:31] Joel sat nearby and
[10:33] said: "We will do it
[10:34] in two weeks", and he
[10:35] said this, and it seems
[10:36] , everyone heard it,
[10:38] and now this is not the place."
[10:39] So, here we are.
[10:41] Well, I think we...I
[10:42] I don't want you.
[10:43] interrupt and
[10:44] stop...you know, I'm with
[10:45] I agree with this. But,
[10:47] You know, something is needed.
[10:48] do. People just
[10:49] they constantly say that
[10:50] this will be done by
[10:51] two weeks, and this
[10:52] no. Now it will be
[10:54] two more weeks, maybe
[10:55] or another month. I have
[10:56] meaning that it gives...
[10:58] Are you going?
[10:58] call Mike
[11:00] Green tomorrow and
[11:00] to say that he
[11:01] fill Judy's tank in
[11:02] Tuesday,
[11:03] because last week you
[11:04] told Tara that she
[11:05] can't do this
[11:06] until everything is
[11:07] ready. I remember that.
[11:09] See?
[11:10] Oh, this
[11:11] yeah...I don't know. I have
[11:12] I mean, I don't know what
[11:14] you guys want
[11:15] make. Do you want
[11:16] deliver me oil,
[11:18] You know, I'll take it.
[11:19] five-gallon buckets,
[11:20] I'll bring her in my...
[11:21] Hey, I don't care.
[11:23] I agree, J. So what
[11:25] I will say that this is what two
[11:27] Friday ago, after
[11:28] the meeting at which we
[11:29] were here and we said
[11:31] two weeks, yes,
[11:34] we ordered barricades,
[11:35] barrels, whatever. We
[11:38] ordered them that
[11:39] Friday morning. Then
[11:41] Where did they come from?
[11:42] It's me, Joel...I don't know,
[11:44] Judy...I have...
[11:46] mind, isn't that what was taken?
[11:51] I feel like I would
[11:52] I thought that was so
[11:53] how can you do it
[11:55] this is the end,
[11:56] instead of
[11:57] to wait for someone
[11:58] dragging your feet and
[11:59] will bring them to you...
[12:00] Well, I...and I don't...you know,
[12:01] this question is for Joel
[12:03] ...I think you know,
[12:04] Where do they come from?
[12:06] I don't...I don't know that we don't
[12:07] we control, so to speak
[12:08] say, road
[12:09] brigade, if it is
[12:10] applies to any
[12:11] which of our
[12:12] departments, whether
[12:13] road wastewater
[12:14] or overloaded
[12:15] station. So I don't know.
[12:18] where are they from
[12:19] are taken. I know that,
[12:24] Sorry, I had
[12:25] a few conversations with
[12:26] Joel during
[12:27] the last one...obviously
[12:28] , we didn't talk about
[12:29] these are the first three or four
[12:30] days after order,
[12:32] but we had this
[12:33] conversation several times,
[12:34] this week a few
[12:35] times.
[12:39] So my question is: are they
[12:41] here?
[12:41] No. When they
[12:42] will they come?
[12:44] A week and they told me this in
[12:46] Friday before.
[12:47] They said that
[12:47] a week and a half, or
[12:49] now?
[12:50] No. No.
[12:51] A week and a half from
[12:51] the moment of the initial
[12:53] order. Yes.
[13:12] You borrow
[13:13] someone, for example,
[13:14] through someone through
[13:15] state. This is what I want. Noting this.
[13:19] What is it?
[13:20] Are you buying this?
[13:21] Yes. Yes.
[13:24] So the thing is, Judy,
[13:25] which is a little more than
[13:27] , um, and I'm going
[13:28] explain this because
[13:29] I understand your
[13:30] disappointment. Also
[13:32] I think there is...I think,
[13:34] You are absolutely right. THERE ARE
[13:35] more people who
[13:36] disappointed than
[13:37] only you.
[13:38] Yes. I mean, is it
[13:40] Can he come?
[13:42] So I don't know. I am not
[13:46] I know about Mike and KCM.
[13:49] The other day she said,
[13:50] who invited someone from
[13:52] city, so that he
[13:53] called and
[13:54] said everything was fine.
[13:55] IN
[13:55] I was personal.
[13:56] conversation. I was on
[13:58] construction
[13:58] the site. Mike
[14:00] repaired stoves, hmm,
[14:02] on the same
[14:02] construction
[14:03] the site. So,
[14:05] Sorry, I don't know.
[14:06] exactly what day is it was, Judy, but it
[14:09] was after our
[14:10] meeting here.
[14:11] Good. I saw him.
[14:12] wife two days ago.
[14:13] Yes. So, uh, I don't
[14:15] I think it was Los Angeles.
[14:16] and this is probably
[14:17] , was at the beginning
[14:18] last week,
[14:19] actually, when I
[14:20] talked to Mike.
[14:22] But, therefore, partly
[14:24] the reason why
[14:25] borrow barrels or,
[14:26] hmm, you know, buy
[14:29] them in place, I don't...
[14:30] you know, this is how I already
[14:32] said we don't
[14:32] we control it on
[14:33] microlevels. Lend
[14:37] barrels in this case
[14:38] It would be foolish,
[14:39] because we
[14:40] will have to
[14:40] modify...
[14:44] Let me
[14:45] to paraphrase that. We believe that we
[14:50] need
[14:50] modify barrels,
[14:52] so that they were
[14:52] vandal-proof.
[14:59] That's right. That's why we
[15:02] just go to
[15:03] Bennington, Shesbury
[15:04] or someone else to
[15:06] borrow, or even
[15:07] to the state to
[15:08] borrow barrels and
[15:09] put them there. To us
[15:13] need
[15:13] modify barrels, and
[15:15] we have...Joel has
[15:16] idea how to modify
[15:17] barrels so that they become
[15:19] a permanent thing that
[15:20] will last a long time and not
[15:21] will be thrown into the river
[15:23] . That's why we do nothing.
[15:27] did not borrow.
[15:30] So they spent 20 barrels
[15:31] . How many barrels? I
[15:36] received...
[15:41] So, you know, that's why
[15:43] we didn't just borrow
[15:44] barrels to put
[15:45] them there, you know, and we are
[15:47] Judy...I'm wasting
[15:52] money,
[15:57] you know, Joel has an action
[15:59] . There is a limit from which they come, you know, in
[16:05] there is a limit from which
[16:06] they are leaving. So
[16:21] somehow, you know
[16:22] , Joel has an idea that
[16:24] he is going
[16:27] to make sure they don't
[16:29] found themselves in the river, in
[16:30] floating waterfalls.
[16:38] I mean, we
[16:39] waiting for the barrels, how
[16:40] just get them,
[16:42] but, according to Joel,
[16:43] Correct me if I am.
[16:45] I'm wrong. No, if there is one
[16:48] vehicle,
[16:49] if the truck
[16:50] Mike is the only one
[16:51] vehicle
[16:52] on the bridge,
[16:54] This bridge is not there now.
[16:55] by mail order
[16:58] . So, is it would help if I can take
[17:08] DMV announcement, i.e.
[17:10] leave it, but
[17:11] tell them this. So,
[17:15] if you, if you, before
[17:17] than to go, before
[17:18] than to go
[17:19] tonight, I know that Mike and Casey
[17:21] have my number
[17:22] mobile phone.
[17:28] I can eat them too.
[17:29] to call. Yes,
[17:31] I'll call Mike.
[17:32] I can
[17:33] call Mike
[17:34] tomorrow.
[17:34] Tuesday.
[17:35] What is it?
[17:36] Tuesday.
[17:37] I'll call Mike.
[17:39] They are here on Tuesday.
[17:40] So
[17:40] I will call Mike.
[17:42] tomorrow.
[17:42] Good. On Tuesday.
[17:45] It's better not to forget.
[17:48] You better take mine.
[17:49] phone number and
[17:50] write to me
[17:51] reminder.
[17:52] Yes, but you'd better take it.
[17:53] my phone number and
[17:54] write to me
[17:54] reminder or something
[17:55] That's it, Judy. And this
[17:56] normally. And I, and I with
[17:58] I agree with this. Good. But
[17:59] Julie, everyone is here.
[18:00] they will tell you that
[18:01] Better write to me or
[18:02] something like that. But
[18:03] I will call you.
[18:04] They probably do too.
[18:05] They know your number.
[18:06] Yes, they know.
[18:07] Yes. Tell her to
[18:08] I called you.
[18:09] IN
[18:09] Casey, can you...
[18:10] pass it on to them
[18:11] message to
[18:11] they called
[18:12] me, if you want. And this
[18:13] may be the best
[18:14] decision if they
[18:15] I will be called,
[18:16] Be honest with yourself. I will pass this on to your...I
[18:19] I don't want to do it there.
[18:21] Why? I don't want to do it.
[18:23] this is live, but I...I
[18:24] I'll wait.
[18:25] I'll pass it on to you.
[18:29] Ellen says that she
[18:30] no matter who she is...
[18:33] So, honestly,
[18:35] Judy, this is where we are now.
[18:36] . And I completely understand.
[18:38] your disappointment. I
[18:39] ...I really...
[18:40] I know.
[18:41] You spend on 80
[18:42] cents...80 cents
[18:43] more than a dollar,
[18:44] You know, for oil. my
[18:45] bicycle. Yes.
[18:52] Let Casey
[18:53] call me or
[18:54] another girl in...another
[18:55] the girl in the office too
[18:56] super cute. So, well, in
[18:58] There is one more in the office, besides
[18:59] his wife. Yes. But
[19:03] in any
[19:04] anyway, we...we...we
[19:05] ...we...we...we...we...we...
[19:06] we...we...we...we...we...we
[19:07] ...we...we...we...can
[19:08] to work on this,
[19:09] and I will work on it
[19:10] tomorrow. IN
[19:11] Are you okay?
[19:14] Thank you. It seems that
[19:19] No, you're fine. IN
[19:21] You're all right, Judy.
[19:22] It was...And it was
[19:23] long. And I have to
[19:25] mind,
[19:26] Thank you, Judy. Beautiful
[19:29] nights.
[19:40] Thank you. Are there any more?
[19:41] public comments,
[19:43] Hannah? Yes.
[19:47] Good. Discussion with
[19:49] Lisa from CAT TV.
[19:58] Thank you for inviting me.
[19:59] today
[20:00] in the evening. My name is
[20:03] Director, I am here today.
[20:08] at a meeting in the evening.
[20:16] Um, I'm very grateful for
[20:17] the opportunity to be here,
[20:18] to discuss, um, and
[20:20] uh, our role in
[20:21] highlighting these
[20:22] meetings. Unfortunately, I
[20:28] couldn't be here
[20:29] tonight, to agree to the terms
[20:31] this vacation, so
[20:33] I know that she is.
[20:34] did, but I thought it would be
[20:36] a good idea
[20:37] to talk to you,
[20:38] guys. Um, I understand,
[20:42] that the council decided not to renew the agreement. Em
[20:46] , and uh, disappointed. I don't quite understand.
[20:49] to argue with
[20:50] about this. Um, I respect the process.
[20:52] decision-making
[20:53] council, and I just
[20:54] I wanted it clearly.
[20:55] clarify. We are very
[20:57] we take it seriously
[20:59] to our relationship with
[21:00] municipal
[21:01] partners. Um, us too
[21:02] We respect the advice, with
[21:03] which we work, and
[21:04] important work that
[21:06] you are doing. Um, we
[21:08] always considered these
[21:10] partnerships as
[21:10] opportunity to work
[21:12] together, inform
[21:13] residents and
[21:14] engage communities. Ahem,
[21:16] and provide access
[21:18] to the local
[21:19] municipality. Ahem,
[21:20] so, as I said, I think it is important that
[21:23] we shared ours
[21:24] point of view and, um,
[21:26] made sure that everyone
[21:27] understand that we do, why we do it like we do it
[21:30] we do, and we had, um,
[21:32] you know, the opportunity
[21:33] to ask a question,
[21:34] when do you have any
[21:35] question. Probably,
[21:37] couldn't hear you in
[21:38] frame. I just wanted to
[21:39] make sure that everyone
[21:41] understood. Um, so
[21:43] I tried
[21:44] prepare, um,
[21:45] you know, statements on
[21:47] based on some conversations,
[21:48] which I heard from the council.
[21:50] I hope I will answer many
[21:52] questions, but if not,
[21:53] please inform
[21:55] me. Um, obviously I am
[21:56] I understand that the cost
[21:58] was a council problem,
[21:59] which is clear,
[22:00] considering your
[22:01] limited budgets. Ahem,
[22:03] so I just wanted to discuss
[22:05] tariff increase.
[22:07] We notified the city
[22:08] in one year about
[22:09] tariff increase.
[22:10] Our rates are not
[22:11] increased since 2019
[22:13] year. Hmm, this tariff
[22:14] is 50 dollars
[22:16] per hour. Um, and he
[22:17] $50 left
[22:18] per hour during
[22:19] eight years old. Uh,
[22:21] this year it's 75
[22:22] dollars per hour, which
[22:23] there are
[22:23] competitive
[22:25] for a professional price on
[22:26] live broadcasts and
[22:27] production. Uh, us
[22:31] asked to negotiate
[22:32] about this price, perhaps,
[22:33] in early July, and I
[22:35] couldn't do it
[22:36] through our
[22:37] partner
[22:37] relationships with others
[22:39] municipalities. I
[22:42] did not consider it appropriate
[22:43] to set a lower
[22:45] a bet for women,
[22:46] while others
[22:47] will pay another. Uh,
[22:49] so I think you,
[22:51] Guys, agree with
[22:52] hereby. Uh, but I
[22:54] proposed
[22:55] to yield to
[22:56] processing fees, which
[22:58] changed this year.
[23:00] Uh, so again,
[23:02] I thought it was important.
[23:03] to warn you a year in advance
[23:04] so that you can
[23:05] prepare your own
[23:06] budget and, uh,
[23:07] put any
[23:08] questions and make up
[23:09] budget accordingly.
[23:11] So, uh, CAT has been around since 1991.
[23:15] year. Within 28
[23:17] years we have been offering
[23:19] services at your own expense. So we
[23:22] covered each
[23:23] school meeting
[23:25] council and electoral council
[23:26] in the cities that we serve, for
[23:28] own expense. Uh, uh,
[23:30] In 2019, we realized
[23:32] that our model
[23:33] financing
[23:34] is changing.
[23:35] Technologies
[23:36] changed. Regulations
[23:38] did not change. People
[23:39] stopped cable
[23:41] television that we
[23:42] finances. And to us
[23:43] really need
[23:44] was to think about
[23:45] our long-term
[23:46] stability. So we
[23:48] decided to conclude
[23:49] contract with
[23:50] institutions and our
[23:51] city ​​school
[23:52] advice to reimburse part
[23:54] actual costs,
[23:55] related to
[23:55] conducting these
[23:56] meetings. We cover over 200
[24:00] meetings so that you
[24:01] could explain this. I would like to say that
[24:06] the point is not that
[24:07] we made money on
[24:08] municipal
[24:09] meetings. The matter is
[24:10] in order to cover
[24:11] expenses, and we have
[24:12] very strong
[24:13] dedication to our
[24:14] mission and our
[24:15] communities, but we
[24:16] should also lead
[24:17] your business and
[24:18] to stay financially
[24:19] safe. So ours
[24:26] fee actually
[24:27] covers the time
[24:28] staff,
[24:29] equipment for
[24:30] subtitles,
[24:31] reusable direct
[24:32] Facebook broadcasts,
[24:33] YouTube, Comcast channel 1085,
[24:35] our website and
[24:36] mobile application, and
[24:37] also processing
[24:38] meetings after
[24:39] this and the organization
[24:41] and management
[24:41] special
[24:42] archived
[24:43] playlists. So I understand that it can
[24:50] it seems like we're just
[24:51] press the button.
[24:53] But behind this button
[24:54] There is a lot going on. THERE ARE
[24:56] people, there is equipment, there is
[24:58] technology, education,
[24:59] preparation and
[25:00] dissemination. Um, and
[25:03] more importantly, there is
[25:04] connection to
[25:05] residences of Cat. Um, I also understand that
[25:09] were certain
[25:10] concerns about
[25:11] that Kat is physically not
[25:12] present here, in
[25:13] room. Um, that's why I
[25:15] just wanted to be brief
[25:16] tell about it. Um,
[25:18] we switched to
[25:19] remote
[25:20] illumination,
[25:21] obviously, during COVID,
[25:22] when we helped
[25:23] to all urban and
[25:24] school boards
[25:25] learn to conduct
[25:26] virtual meetings.
[25:27] This was all new for
[25:29] everyone. But we had
[25:30] technology, and we
[25:31] knew how to do it.
[25:32] So this is what we
[25:33] really supported
[25:34] our goals. When
[25:37] personal coverage
[25:39] became possible again,
[25:40] um, panel, em,
[25:41] asked us
[25:42] continue
[25:43] remain
[25:43] virtual, um, and
[25:44] partly it was
[25:45] related to
[25:46] cost issues,
[25:47] so we satisfied
[25:48] this is a request, and that's it
[25:50] so we continue
[25:51] to be virtual, um
[25:52] . But what we
[25:55] virtual, not
[25:56] means that
[25:57] production is not
[25:57] is happening; we all
[25:59] we still provide
[26:00] direct production,
[26:01] monitoring,
[26:01] dissemination,
[26:02] post-production and
[26:03] archiving. Good.
[26:06] Um, so I just want to say that to me
[26:10] it seems that this
[26:11] more than just
[26:12] live broadcast. Ahem,
[26:14] CAT TV is 35 years old
[26:15] strengthening experience
[26:16] trust in communities,
[26:18] whom we serve. Um, and
[26:20] community members know,
[26:21] what they see
[26:23] at KTV, is verified,
[26:24] authentic and
[26:25] reliable. And they know where to find us.
[26:28] This is what we do. They
[26:29] know that if they
[26:31] tune in to KTV, then
[26:32] will see the meeting. We provide
[26:34] complete
[26:35] illumination,
[26:36] special archives and
[26:37] convenient access to
[26:38] government meetings.
[26:41] So we're not just
[26:42] we provide direct
[26:43] broadcast and
[26:44] press the button. We
[26:45] create a public
[26:46] recording and access to
[26:47] local history
[26:49] municipality. AND,
[26:52] honestly, these ideas
[26:53] arose from the Second
[26:54] World War II, about
[26:55] which I recently
[26:56] learned during
[26:57] research,
[26:58] after listening to the interview
[27:00] with a colleague where he
[27:01] really learned the lessons
[27:02] about the power of media and about
[27:03] how much
[27:04] what matters is who
[27:05] controls the media. And this
[27:09] was the basis for
[27:10] why in the United States was created
[27:12] public access. Ahem,
[27:15] and these are the principles on which
[27:16] KTV built. So why?
[27:20] it is important to have a third
[27:21] side in this
[27:22] process? Um, we
[27:24] independent of the city.
[27:27] Hmm, such a separation
[27:28] provides
[27:29] neutrality,
[27:29] transparency,
[27:30] accountability and
[27:31] public trust
[27:32] . We provide
[27:34] unedited
[27:35] unprejudiced
[27:35] time period for
[27:37] meeting coverage
[27:38] . Um, regardless of
[27:40] the one who enters
[27:41] composition of the electoral council
[27:42] Does he work for the city, um?
[27:44] , we take on
[27:45] responsibility. Um,
[27:47] we inform you about this,
[27:48] we spread this,
[27:49] we support this and
[27:51] we do before that
[27:51] available. If something
[27:55] will go wrong if the file
[27:56] accidentally deleted
[27:58] or somehow
[27:59] torn out, there is a technical
[28:00] problem or its
[28:01] not on Facebook or YouTube,
[28:07] you are responsible for this
[28:07] responsibility.
[28:10] The city is not responsible for this.
[28:11] answers. Um, so this one
[28:16] independence between
[28:17] these two things
[28:18] really can
[28:19] to protect the council, therefore
[28:20] what the council can indicate
[28:21] to the outside
[28:22] organization that takes
[28:23] on myself
[28:24] responsibility for
[28:25] these things, and this is one of
[28:26] the things we did
[28:27] for 35 years. I
[28:31] called it insurance
[28:33] a policy for this
[28:34] letter. Um, so that you
[28:37] knew that the councils and
[28:38] technology
[28:39] are changing, we
[28:39] remained
[28:40] unchanged throughout
[28:41] all these years. Um, I think that's one more thing.
[28:46] the question that arose,
[28:47] this is what we already have
[28:48] reported, uh,
[28:49] why do we need it
[28:51] cable television
[28:52] , and I think that's the case
[28:53] not necessarily in that,
[28:55] what a meeting
[28:56] is being recorded. It's about wider distribution
[28:59] this meeting and
[29:00] ensuring greater
[29:02] accessibility
[29:03] information for people.
[29:05] So, I'm doing
[29:07] casting for 30 years
[29:09] , 30 of those 35 years. And I know that in my time I
[29:13] learned that the chosen ones
[29:14] board of directors
[29:15] are changing. And CAT
[29:17] it has always been like this
[29:19] concept. That which
[29:21] The council is thinking today,
[29:22] may not be what it is
[29:24] the council thinks
[29:24] next year or
[29:25] in 10 years. And I
[29:28] accumulated enough
[29:29] years to know what, uh
[29:31] -uh, it could be
[29:32] truth. We play games
[29:36] for over 30 years. I don't know the exact year,
[29:40] when we started in
[29:41] Pennsylvania. But with
[29:44] of all the things that
[29:45] are changing, I think,
[29:46] what is that which is not
[29:47] changes, that's what
[29:48] people want to know what
[29:50] happening in their
[29:51] local service. Yet
[29:53] one concern,
[29:54] which I heard was
[29:55] because it's not enough
[29:56] people are looking at
[29:57] our platforms. And I think there is a difference.
[30:01] between size
[30:01] audience and
[30:02] publicly accessible
[30:04] to information. So
[30:06] some people, of course
[30:07] , still looking at
[30:08] traditional
[30:09] cable
[30:09] television. Um, and we can't tell you
[30:13] how many people
[30:14] watching because Comcast
[30:15] never been against
[30:16] such demographic
[30:17] indicators. Um, but we know that people still
[30:21] looking at
[30:22] cable
[30:23] television, and we know that this, um,
[30:25] remains important
[30:26] access point to
[30:27] information for
[30:28] many people who
[30:30] do not have computers
[30:31] and the internet or
[30:32] decided not to
[30:33] do. Hmm, I can.
[30:38] to tell you what
[30:40] the last eight
[30:41] months, um, on YouTube we
[30:42] saw an average of 54
[30:44] viewers per month
[30:46] meeting, um, at our
[30:47] YouTube channel, and, um,
[30:49] the most interesting thing is that
[30:50] observed annually
[30:52] 238 viewers. So, um,
[30:57] we follow a lot
[30:59] this on Facebook. Unfortunately,
[31:02] they changed their, um,
[31:04] platform. So they
[31:06] no longer archived
[31:08] live broadcasts
[31:09] meetings in the last
[31:10] 30 days. So no
[31:11] opportunities
[31:12] view this
[31:13] information by
[31:14] the last, um, one
[31:15] month. But I can
[31:19] to tell you that we
[31:20] were able to view
[31:21] analytics and, um,
[31:23] about 1300, um,
[31:24] views on our
[31:25] Facebook page in those
[31:26] days when it happened
[31:28] straight panel
[31:29] meeting. I can't
[31:37] to say that each of
[31:39] I watched these people.
[31:40] panel meeting, but
[31:42] I can say that
[31:43] CAT TV Facebook page
[31:44] every Thursday and on
[31:45] this site was 1300
[31:47] eyes. On average, this is
[31:53] about 10 people per
[31:54] meeting. We saw
[31:57] up to 40 people, and most
[31:58] of them, probably, by age
[32:00] from 20 to 25 years old. So what?
[32:03] actually
[32:04] What do these numbers mean? I understand that this is not
[32:07] television
[32:08] audience. We are not
[32:09] we are talking about numbers
[32:10] networks, you know, and about
[32:12] real people who
[32:13] interact with their
[32:14] local community. AND
[32:17] I don't think that's the case.
[32:18] only in how much
[32:19] people are watching. I think it is important that
[32:22] meeting
[32:23] was highlighted so that
[32:24] the government was accessible and
[32:26] transparent, and so that
[32:27] residents could
[32:28] find information.
[32:30] So, if you were watching
[32:31] only 10 people, these 10
[32:32] people don't care
[32:33] deserve
[32:35] access to your
[32:36] information. So, I
[32:38] remembered a little
[32:39] earlier than ours
[32:40] funding has begun
[32:42] change in 2019
[32:43] . I just want it fast.
[32:45] , uh, to point out on
[32:47] this. So, cable
[32:48] companies
[32:49] use
[32:50] public rights, so that
[32:51] deliver yours
[32:52] home delivery product
[32:53] people. Um, they
[32:54] must pay
[32:55] commission in exchange for
[32:56] use of this
[32:57] public network.
[33:01] They charge a fee.
[33:02] from their subscribers
[33:03] cable
[33:04] television, and this
[33:05] the fee is reduced to
[33:06] public good
[33:07] communities. People
[33:11] refuse to
[33:12] cable
[33:12] television and
[33:13] move to
[33:14] streaming
[33:15] on the Internet. Internet
[33:17] does not have the same
[33:18] established
[33:19] regulation. None
[33:22] public good,
[33:23] although they
[33:24] use that one
[33:25] the infrastructure itself
[33:26] and the same rights
[33:27] access. So this is
[33:29] federal issue,
[33:30] which will not be resolved
[33:31] here tonight.
[33:35] But this is the main
[33:35] the problem is that, um,
[33:36] no more
[33:37] mechanism
[33:38] financing
[33:39] public good,
[33:40] who was appointed.
[33:45] So, in conclusion, um,
[33:46] once again, I respect
[33:47] Word solution, and I'm not here
[33:49] in order to
[33:50] argue with him. I
[33:51] just wanted to have
[33:53] opportunity to explain
[33:54] our point of view, um,
[33:55] what is included in our
[33:56] service, and why we consider it valuable,
[33:59] and allow you,
[34:00] Guys, put any
[34:01] What questions? Um, but
[34:03] I think that after 30
[34:05] years of coverage
[34:06] municipal
[34:07] meetings even in our
[34:08] the time of technology is still
[34:09] it matters because
[34:11] I believe that
[34:11] transparency has
[34:12] value, and access to
[34:14] government matters.
[34:16] So I am happy to
[34:18] I will answer
[34:18] question.
[34:20] Thank you.
[34:21] Please. IN
[34:22] Does anyone have a question about this? IN
[34:25] I actually exist.
[34:26] a few questions. Hmm,
[34:27] Do you know how much?
[34:28] meetings you
[34:29] highlight in
[34:30] average for
[34:31] the last few years?
[34:33] I know we had
[34:34] such information, but
[34:35] She is not in front now.
[34:37] by me.
[34:37] Yes.
[34:44] Hmm, we covered, uh,
[34:51] two, I didn't count. Hmm,
[34:58] 12, about 30, I would
[35:00] said, from 25 to 30 on
[35:03] year.
[35:06] Good. One or two more.
[35:11] Or
[35:11] contacted CAT TV,
[35:13] as far as you know,
[35:14] residents of
[35:15] concerns about
[35:16] that CAT TV is no longer
[35:18] illuminates, uh,
[35:19] minor meetings
[35:20] advice?
[35:23] Yes. Good. And I have to
[35:27] I mean, just for
[35:28] of my teaching, I
[35:29] just trying
[35:30] understand, because I agree with you. I think that public
[35:33] access is incredible
[35:34] important. I think that
[35:35] we must have this
[35:36] somehow. Hmm, and
[35:38] so I definitely
[35:39] I support this. But I
[35:41] I'm trying to find out.
[35:43] can you, because I
[35:44] tried
[35:44] think about it, and you
[35:46] better informed in
[35:47] this than me. Or
[35:49] can you please provide
[35:50] example, when someone
[35:51] can have access to
[35:52] our meeting through
[35:54] Cat TV, while he has
[35:55] may not be accessible
[35:56] to the means that we
[35:57] now we give them
[36:00] cable television
[36:04] , channel 1085? So these
[36:09] The door was closed.
[36:11] Good.
[36:15] Um, you know, another one
[36:16] part of this is
[36:17] just wider
[36:18] distribution, and that
[36:20] the fact that both
[36:21] know how to go, so
[36:22] that we've been doing this for 35 years.
[36:29] Um, so I think this is
[36:31] gets a lot
[36:32] wider, um,
[36:33] dissemination
[36:34] thanks to platforms.
[36:43] Thank you to everyone I appreciate.
[36:45] your work. There is more
[36:46] any questions? You, um,
[36:49] I actually have
[36:50] a few quick ones
[36:51] questions, Lisa. Um,
[36:56] so we want to
[37:02] make sure that I
[37:03] everything is correct
[37:04] wrote down.
[37:04] Good. IN
[37:05] There are 54 of us. It seems we have
[37:07] there was a mid-range meeting,
[37:09] which had 54
[37:10] on YouTube.
[37:11] On
[37:12] meeting.
[37:13] Right. Good.
[37:14] On our YouTube.
[37:15] On YouTube. Yes, you have.
[37:16] radio. That's what we're about.
[37:17] we are talking. And on
[37:18] town meeting
[37:20] was 230
[37:20] 238 or something like that
[37:22] ...
[37:22] Yes, I have 230+. I am not
[37:25] could remember the exact
[37:26] number, but,
[37:26] and I mean that this
[37:28] close. We don't
[37:29] need to have accurate...
[37:30] Yes, 238.
[37:31] That's what I thought.
[37:32] Good. Hmm,
[37:35] which, of course, you know,
[37:36] everyone is paying attention to this
[37:37] attention, but I thought,
[37:39] that's great. I was
[37:40] very excited,
[37:41] when I saw this.
[37:42] No, me too. And this
[37:48] helps me, as well as
[37:50] what is sitting, and already
[37:51] helps for a while
[37:52] I understand one of
[37:53] reasons why we have
[37:55] there is no such thing
[37:55] personal participation in
[37:57] city ​​council, as
[37:58] before, when I was
[38:05] junior in the fire department
[38:06] part, fought for
[38:08] money...
[38:08] you know, there was
[38:10] crowded,
[38:11] Yes. So this is a bit for me.
[38:15] helps. Hmm, and 54
[38:21] YouTube users on
[38:22] meeting party–
[38:25] This is interesting.
[38:26] Yes. I mean that
[38:29] this is leadership again,
[38:32] Yes? And then, on
[38:34] sorry, I...I'm sorry not
[38:35] looked at the numbers
[38:36] Facebook, because, in my opinion,
[38:38] they could be
[38:39] higher. Hmm, I have
[38:41] there was only
[38:43] 1300 that were in the application
[38:45] Facebook.
[38:47] That's how much
[38:47] views were on
[38:48] our Facebook page
[38:50] on the day when
[38:50] held meetings with
[38:52] by the city council in
[38:53] live broadcast.
[38:54] Good.
[38:56] But I think that on
[38:58] recent meetings,
[39:00] which, um, I was able to
[39:01] view, there were 81
[39:02] viewing, hmm, on
[39:03] Facebook page.
[39:06] Good. Is this average?
[39:08] indicator, higher or lower,
[39:09] I understand. IN
[39:11] you have an idea, and you,
[39:13] probably not. So
[39:15] when we have 1300
[39:16] views or something
[39:17] this evening
[39:18] meetings, for example,
[39:20] tonight, yes
[39:21] ? IN
[39:24] there are a number of you
[39:25] views on Thursday
[39:26] in the evening without a husband?
[39:32] Look at them. I
[39:33] just not
[39:35] came,
[39:36] but
[39:38] I would be interested.
[39:39] to say that
[39:41] this is a site, so how
[39:42] I'm looking at this, this is
[39:44] if there were 800
[39:47] views or
[39:48] uses in the evening
[39:50] without meeting, but it would be
[39:51] 1300, and I really
[39:52] hypothetically
[39:53] I suppose.
[39:57] I understand that
[39:58] The audience is important in
[39:59] acceptance process
[40:01] solutions, but I...My
[40:02] purist view
[40:03] for this within 30
[40:04] years is that
[40:06] what if 10 people
[40:07] are watching, then it's 10
[40:08] people who had
[40:09] access, and that's important.
[40:13] Well, that's why I...I
[40:14] I hate to have
[40:15] access to the audience.
[40:18] Well, I look at it from...
[40:19] I think, therefore I want
[40:21] to be understood. I look at it from the same perspective.
[40:24] point of view, as you.
[40:25] Good. So, if so,
[40:31] then if we have
[40:32] average 54
[40:33] YouTube users,
[40:34] CAT TV YouTube users
[40:36] on the evening of the meeting, right?
[40:41] And then that Thursday
[40:42] in the evening we have
[40:43] Facebook app or something
[40:45] such, if in the evening at
[40:46] we meet
[40:47] there is a surge,
[40:48] isn't that right? Healthy
[40:54] common sense tells you that you, probably can
[40:56] take these numbers and
[40:57] to add them to a certain
[40:59] measures, right? It,
[41:00] probably not
[41:01] extremely accurate,
[41:02] but probably enough
[41:03] exactly, right?
[41:05] And you can
[41:06] look at these
[41:07] numbers for me. I would
[41:09] wanted it to be
[41:11] frankly with you, and I would
[41:12] wanted to see what it was
[41:13] for a number.
[41:16] Um, because I agree with
[41:18] Gee about this.
[41:20] Transparency, you know,
[41:21] transparency
[41:22] public access–
[41:23] This is a huge thing.
[41:24] you know. Um, I agree too,
[41:31] What is important here is not
[41:33] only channel 1085 and you know, and everything should be
[41:36] above.
[41:40] As far as I know,
[41:41] should consider all
[41:42] research that you
[41:43] conducted.
[41:44] Yes. And you know, if
[41:46] we could do it
[41:47] free of charge, we would
[41:48] did it
[41:48] free. This is ours
[41:50] mission. This is what
[41:51] important for us.
[41:52] Right. and me
[41:54] it's hard to notice.
[41:59] I understand that I
[42:00] It was difficult with this.
[42:02] I don't think we should.
[42:03] it was easy to accept
[42:04] decision. And I think that
[42:06] some of them, so I think that having a certain
[42:13] information, notes,
[42:14] which I did here, and
[42:15] Ginny and someone else,
[42:16] having certain factual
[42:18] numbers on which you can
[42:19] to base decisions on, and
[42:20] not hypothetical. Well,
[42:23] nobody says anything
[42:24] about viewing
[42:25] cat television
[42:26] on TV, right?
[42:27] well, when you go to
[42:28] Are you going to the coffee shop?
[42:29] in the grocery store
[42:30] shop. Nobody
[42:31] comes and does not say: "
[42:31] God, I saw it.
[42:32] cat television
[42:33] last night or something
[42:34] "such." You know,
[42:43] some people just
[42:44] these meetings or these
[42:46] numbers here, er, you know, the numbers that you
[42:48] provided, uh, some of the
[42:49] They knocked me down.
[42:51] Confused, to be honest.
[42:52] . So, first of all, this is 1300
[42:56] on meeting evenings
[42:57] against the infidels,
[42:59] that would be interesting, that
[43:02] justified, that's what I tried
[43:05] to say, correctly,
[43:06] so that I can do this
[43:07] to figure it out, it would be great if you could.
[43:11] give us this
[43:12] information for my
[43:13] poems, in
[43:16] Does anyone have anything else, well, I mean, you're here, and
[43:19] this is an important thing,
[43:22] of course, yes, but
[43:23] if you can provide
[43:25] we have these numbers, it was
[43:26] would be useful.
[43:26] Yes, you can just
[43:27] send them
[43:28] by email
[43:29] Tari, and she
[43:30] will distribute them to us.
[43:31] Yes.
[43:35] Thank you.
[43:35] Good. Thank you, Lisa.
[43:37] Thank you very much.
[43:42] Yes.
[43:46] Thank you.
[43:48] Good. Approval
[43:50] protocol. Meeting
[43:55] reign of August 13. IN
[44:01] Do you have a second?
[44:04] Any discussions?
[44:05] Correction. All who
[44:07] "by"? 1.
[44:09] Special meeting
[44:11] reign of August 13.
[44:12] Second. Any
[44:13] correction?
[44:14] Discussion. All who
[44:18] "by"? 1.
[44:20] Orders to be paid
[44:22] accounts on August 21 $
[44:25] 25 44543.
[44:30] Second.
[44:32] Any discussions?
[44:33] Everyone who is "in favor"?
[44:35] 1.
[44:35] Accounts payable
[44:36] debt on 28
[44:38] August $44,579.
[44:44] Second.
[44:45] Any discussion?
[44:47] Everyone who is "in favor"? I am counting
[44:50] salary 21
[44:52] August $ 13 44523.
[44:59] Second.
[44:59] Any discussion?
[45:01] Everyone who is "in favor"? I am calculating wages.
[45:05] August 28 fee $12,270.77.
[45:13] There is a second. Second. Be
[45:17] -what discussion?
[45:18] Everyone who is "in favor"...I'm fine
[45:23] . Bridge on the main road
[45:25] the streets begin
[45:25] update until you
[45:27] Go away, little one,
[45:33] behind us. You see,
[45:51] everything seems smooth,
[46:07] as if you all have
[46:09] execute Max
[46:10] million in D. Hmm, I think that's the maximum.
[46:21] a million, uh, between
[46:22] by two, er, 57,000, er, for
[46:24] something to do, and
[46:38] then yes, they were
[46:39] at the same price,
[46:40] actually common
[46:41] production volume
[46:42] here. 669, and then
[46:49] to make big
[46:51] holes for 57 231, which
[46:53] installed 124,172. They
[46:56] are going
[46:57] hold the plates,
[47:02] disappear. And they
[47:07] actually went down
[47:08] . We are none of them and
[47:11] looked at this and
[47:12] took their roots, and
[47:14] it was bigger. AND,
[47:17] um, before we
[47:22] Let's go deeper, I want to say that we
[47:25] turned to three
[47:26] different companies, one
[47:27] the company refused
[47:29] , um,
[47:30] refused to come
[47:32] , or they didn't have
[47:33] time or something like that. So
[47:35] I just want
[47:36] make sure that everyone
[47:37] know that we
[47:38] tried three different
[47:39] companies,
[47:40] which, in our opinion,
[47:41] were qualified
[47:42] , or, you know, Joel
[47:43] tried three different
[47:43] companies that, on his
[47:44] opinion, were
[47:45] qualified for
[47:46] work performance.
[47:47] French. One more thing,
[47:54] Max Million
[47:55] is this going to happen?
[47:56] make. Again.
[47:59] I will have
[48:00] problems if I will say that in September it
[48:03] what they told me
[48:04] said.
[48:05] Yes,
[48:06] Daniels was
[48:07] November. We
[48:10] They said that they
[48:11] maybe you will have to
[48:12] remove the heaters
[48:13] for concrete
[48:14] plaster. Um, me
[48:16] It didn't matter, Daniels.
[48:17] wanted to close the bridge, uh-
[48:19] uh, for two weeks, so
[48:20] to do this, and these
[48:21] the guys will try
[48:22] make a lane
[48:23] during the opening
[48:28] bridge. Um, or
[48:31] Can I put
[48:32] questions about
[48:32] estimates?
[48:33] Yes, in
[48:34] there are 57 of us in May, and in April we had 115.
[48:38] Are you thinking something?
[48:40] to deduct from this
[48:42] estimate 115?
[48:46] So, hmm, I think I
[48:48] would like to do with
[48:49] this, when we
[48:50] let's fix the main ones
[48:55] things, sorry. I wanted
[48:58] I wish we had already
[48:59] talked about another one
[49:00] a hole that goes through
[49:01] straight through. I
[49:04] fixed it and whatever
[49:05] what other bad places
[49:12] until a certain point,
[49:13] which we still have,
[49:14] because we calculated from
[49:16] 107 to approximately
[49:24] 200 from the grant, and then 20
[49:26] coincides so that
[49:27] make sure that this
[49:29] 9010. Oh,
[49:33] I'm not sure. I have
[49:34] look.
[49:35] Yes, we had to pay 20,000
[49:37] come up with 200 of them.
[49:40] Hmm,
[49:41] Yes.
[49:42] So maybe it's worth it
[49:44] be creative with
[49:45] proposal not
[49:46] exceed the amount
[49:47] grant.
[49:49] Yes.
[49:50] Hmm, our company is like that
[49:51] believes. Of course. I would like to move.
[50:00] go ahead with this and give them
[50:02] good, because it's not
[50:06] yes...we spent
[50:08] a lot of time, like...
[50:09] Yes, I mean like
[50:10] we must. I think I mean, I know,
[50:12] what did we talk about this
[50:13] several times. I read
[50:15] estimates. I
[50:16] reviewed them. I
[50:17] amazed by the fact (
[50:18] I shouldn't do this.
[50:19] to impress, I think that
[50:20] that's normal)
[50:21] someone from Maximan
[50:22] really arrived and
[50:22] looked at our bridge
[50:23] . Well, yes.
[50:25] I am amazed at how much
[50:26] times at different times
[50:27] scenarios people
[50:28] made a decision about
[50:29] Entrance.
[50:29] So I appreciate that this
[50:31] happened, and the fact that
[50:32] What do we have for this?
[50:32] financing. That
[50:34] the fact that we talked
[50:35] about what we
[50:35] need to start
[50:36] this as soon as possible.
[50:37] The idea that they
[50:38] can leave one
[50:39] the lane is open,
[50:40] so that we don't have to close completely
[50:43] bridge.
[50:43] We will do it.
[50:44] Probably.
[50:45] Yes.
[50:46] I just...I wouldn't...I would
[50:47] definitely supported
[50:48] persistence. I think we should
[50:50] need, as we see...I have
[50:52] meaning that people are very
[50:53] disappointed with
[50:54] many reasons and
[50:55] very worried. I am not
[50:57] I can imagine that we
[50:58] we'll be with this for a long time
[50:59] sit.
[51:00] No. They are justified...
[51:02] Yes.
[51:04] Emm worried and
[51:05] disappointed, that's for sure
[51:06] , and I know that our
[51:07] public comments...
[51:09] I don't think it was.
[51:10] ...
[51:12] I'm not with her for a while.
[51:13] I agree. I don't think so.
[51:14] that we delayed this.
[51:19] Hmm, you know, maybe
[51:21] to seem that on
[51:22] at first glance we
[51:23] went around the bushes,
[51:24] neighborhoods, flower gardens,
[51:25] house and every
[51:26] building, and all that.
[51:31] We bypassed this place.
[51:32] hundreds of times to make sure that we are trying to do
[51:36] the right things for
[51:37] city ​​and residents from
[51:38] that side, on that side
[51:39] groups. And the conditions,
[51:46] sorry, changed,
[51:47] you know, for example, from
[51:49] 115th, when we have
[51:50] initially there was no holes, and
[51:52] then, you know, now we do here, and I have
[51:55] meaning that it is constantly
[51:57] changes, and
[52:03] this causes problems,
[52:04] trying to attract
[52:05] people there so that they
[52:06] looked at this. I think there are several.
[52:09] things. Does anyone have
[52:10] something else they're talking about
[52:11] want to talk to
[52:12] about this?
[52:13] No. I just want
[52:14] make a proposal.
[52:15] Come on, Jamie.
[52:16] No, no, no. I just
[52:17] prepared to make
[52:18] proposal. Sorry.
[52:19] No, give it.
[52:20] Well, you know what? I will consider the offer,
[52:22] and then we will open
[52:23] discussion after
[52:24] this. How are you?
[52:25] Of course. Um, I suggest that we
[52:29] continued and
[52:30] authorized our
[52:31] road crew, um,
[52:32] to accept the maximum
[52:34] , um, the rate you
[52:35] we were given so that we wouldn't
[52:36] exceed the amount
[52:37] grant, um, and so that we
[52:39] moved forward with
[52:40] due diligence
[52:41] and speed. IN
[52:46] Do you have a second?
[52:48] Good. Now, do you have
[52:49] something for me
[52:50] discussion?
[52:53] I wonder if there will be any
[52:54] theft between
[52:58] plates or,
[53:03] Probably not.
[53:08] Yes. Just don't.
[53:10] add, um, more weight. Hmm,
[53:16] At first it was an idea
[53:17] , but now you
[53:18] returned to the 90s.
[53:21] But I know that we are
[53:22] Someone was talking.
[53:24] Yes. Protection, and I don't
[53:26] I can remember what it is.
[53:27] It's over.
[53:29] Um, two questions. On-
[53:31] first, metal
[53:32] plates, they
[53:33] suitable for
[53:36] repair?
[53:37] Yes. Yes, we have.
[53:39] Will you remove them?
[53:40] back after repair,
[53:41] are they not
[53:42] will be useful because
[53:43] we will do
[53:44] repair?
[53:45] Yes, we can't, um,
[53:46] put them all back
[53:48] .
[53:48] Good. Um, there is one thing,
[53:51] especially on, um,
[53:52] east side. Yes.
[53:56] That the hole wasn't there yet
[53:57] all the way through, but he
[53:58] probably started when
[53:59] we will fix this, we will be fine
[54:01] work from this
[54:02] side. We can
[54:05] pull this one out, and, uh,
[54:07] when will we take off
[54:08] repair plates,
[54:09] we'll look into it.
[54:11] That's what I wanted.
[54:12] think. They don't
[54:14] will need
[54:15] to worry about
[54:16] to screw them.
[54:18] So,
[54:19] well, they are on four of
[54:20] them.
[54:21] They are counting on
[54:22] four of them.
[54:23] Yes.
[54:23] And how many plates?
[54:24] now?
[54:25] Five.
[54:26] Good. Um, and
[54:34] Let's look around. I
[54:36] I'll find out what mine was.
[54:37] another question.
[54:38] Julie, do you have something?
[54:39] was it?
[54:40] This is a stupid question.
[54:42] Yes. So this is me
[54:47] worries, and if I
[54:48] reviewed
[54:48] previous May
[54:50] request from Match Famil with
[54:55] assumption. Therefore,
[55:00] if we them
[55:00] we exhibit, and they say that
[55:02] assume that this is
[55:04] the area they
[55:05] are going to fix
[55:06] what will happen if
[55:07] this is much bigger
[55:12] the area they
[55:13] will have to be fixed
[55:14] ? Because two of them
[55:15] they just
[55:16] continue
[55:16] assume. And then
[55:18] my other question
[55:19] was:
[55:19] let's answer by
[55:21] in turn.
[55:21] Good. Ahem,
[55:23] that is, you assume,
[55:24] that there will be two beams here,
[55:27] I assume that these are two
[55:29] feet deep and
[55:30] four feet
[55:31] wide, and then
[55:32] it is written that
[55:33] assuming that the beam
[55:35] has dimensions
[55:36] approximately 36 by 160. I
[55:39] thought the bridge had
[55:42] 179-180 is the beam that goes
[55:46] long ways.
[55:47] Well, that's what I assume about
[55:49] length, as well as
[55:50] length of the bridge. So I didn't know because I thought that
[55:53] the bridge is a house, it's 180
[55:55] feet. So plus or minus,
[55:57] but it was mine
[55:58] question, because there are 160 here.
[56:00] So I just
[56:01] I suppose that, in my opinion, the beams are going
[56:04] only from pair to pair,
[56:06] direct
[56:07] above it, and above.
[56:08] Yes.
[56:09] Make certain
[56:10] assumption, but then
[56:12] set this limit,
[56:13] not to exceed,
[56:14] it was my idea,
[56:15] because it is an assumption
[56:17] so that
[56:17] not to exceed.
[56:18] These are the only questions,
[56:19] What did you have? You are in
[56:21] okay?
[56:21] Perfectly. Yes. Good. Or
[56:24] Yes. We said no.
[56:29] will exceed 200,000,
[56:30] if any arise
[56:32] other small
[56:33] problems with this
[56:34] way. Us too
[56:38] need them
[56:39] repair. Everything we all know. Question
[56:50] it was in the tender that
[56:51] there will be those tenders,
[56:52] which we just saw
[56:53] here, and then, and then, the tender in
[56:56] April for 10 places, which
[56:57] had to be nourished.
[57:00] No.
[57:01] Good. This is not the one
[57:04] because when we
[57:05] first time we received it,
[57:06] there were no holes there.
[57:08] Good. This is the place where
[57:11] we were just going to
[57:12] add. So now we make two big ones
[57:17] holes. In fact, the whole
[57:22] this area, uh, on
[57:23] North, uh, where is the hole,
[57:25] very rude and very
[57:26] rude. So all this
[57:31] the plot is needed
[57:32] will do.
[57:34] And this is a question from
[57:35] Muhammad. Yes.
[57:37] When they do
[57:38] repair, I know
[57:39] answer, but I want
[57:40] to hear it from you.
[57:42] When they do
[57:43] repair, they fasten
[57:44] reinforcement in concrete.
[57:48] So when they tomorrow
[57:49] they will watch it with him,
[57:50] he will be able to hear from
[57:52] you that they strengthen
[57:53] reinforcement.
[57:55] Good.
[57:57] The fittings have disappeared.
[57:58] Well, I understand that. But
[58:00] he was worried that
[58:01] we will not...us
[58:02] needs to be fixed
[58:03] this armature.
[58:06] Yes. Good. Thank you. There is more
[58:09] some
[58:09] question? There are still some
[58:11] discussion? I have
[58:12] offer. I have
[58:14] a second to
[58:14] continue with JH Max Million
[58:19] for bridge repairs on
[58:20] an amount not exceeding
[58:22] grant
[58:23] financing in
[58:24] amount of 200,000 dollars.
[58:29] Everyone who was for it, I was
[58:31] against. Good. This
[58:41] point, I guarantee,
[58:42] will be expressed
[58:43] tomorrow, just because,
[58:44] that I know that Joel
[58:45] wants to get rid of this
[58:47] just as strong as
[58:48] ...Good. Uh,
[58:52] discussion of new
[58:53] hiring on the highway.
[58:57] Good. So, yes, everyone
[59:05] Agreed, let's continue with
[59:06] this question. I have
[59:10] one question?
[59:11] Yes. Regarding this. Um, this is
[59:17] $24, regardless
[59:18] from whether they have
[59:19] they are allowed to
[59:23] training, or something
[59:25] such as CDL, CDL,
[59:27] you know, because we
[59:27] talked about what we are going to spend
[59:30] learning, and I succeed
[59:31] to everything I have on
[59:32] mind you, you know what I mean? Well,
[59:34] I hope that
[59:35] let's find someone from CDL,
[59:36] but if we find
[59:37] a good boy who
[59:39] it doesn't have it, you know, in
[59:40] we may arise
[59:46] question if
[59:50] view all
[59:51] announcement, anyone
[59:53] from 24 to 35 years old,
[59:58] and almost all of them
[59:59] have 100% insurance
[1:00:00] or close to it.
[1:00:02] They can't do it.
[1:00:03] get. They are not
[1:00:04] can get it.
[1:00:05] Let's see.
[1:00:06] face to face.
[1:00:09] And I would like to find
[1:00:11] someone more or less
[1:00:13] decent, who
[1:00:14] install
[1:00:15] truck worth
[1:00:16] $300,000.
[1:00:17] Yes.
[1:00:23] Well, there are a few things, right?
[1:00:25] wrong? In winter
[1:00:27] need someone who
[1:00:28] will be reliable.
[1:00:31] Yes, yes? To Joel
[1:00:33] could call at
[1:00:34] 4:30 or 5:00 in the morning, and
[1:00:35] they would answer
[1:00:37] the call, and they
[1:00:38] will be able to stand up,
[1:00:39] to work and
[1:00:40] to drive a car
[1:00:41] , right? Um, you need
[1:00:46] a person who can
[1:00:47] to leave for
[1:00:47] elimination of consequences
[1:00:49] storm in the middle of the night with
[1:00:50] colleague, on whom
[1:00:53] they can
[1:00:54] to rely on one's own
[1:00:55] one to be in
[1:00:56] safety and do
[1:00:57] the right things. THERE ARE
[1:00:59] a lot, there are many
[1:01:00] things when it's not
[1:01:01] just an empty pile
[1:01:02] gravel, spread out on the road, and
[1:01:06] the person aligns
[1:01:07] gravel or something like that.
[1:01:09] Right.
[1:01:11] I would add one thing. Let
[1:01:13] this reliability will not
[1:01:15] only in winter, but all year round
[1:01:16] year.
[1:01:16] Well, that's exactly what I'm talking about.
[1:01:17] I say when I talk about
[1:01:18] storm, you know, when I
[1:01:19] I'm talking about damage.
[1:01:20] from the storm, I say,
[1:01:21] you know, today
[1:01:22] The evening is approaching.
[1:01:23] thunderstorms, probably. So,
[1:01:24] you know, you need
[1:01:25] a person who can
[1:01:26] to go out with a chainsaw.
[1:01:27] This is the type
[1:01:27] damage from
[1:01:28] the storm I'm talking about
[1:01:29] I spoke, brother.
[1:01:30] Um,
[1:01:31] and I was talking about
[1:01:32] just to come
[1:01:33] to work
[1:01:35] daily.
[1:01:37] Work five days
[1:01:38] per week.
[1:01:39] Yes.
[1:01:40] Our entire team is
[1:01:42] You guys don't drive.
[1:01:43] on the ring, you guys are great,
[1:01:45] or
[1:01:45] wrong?
[1:01:46] They don't take much.
[1:01:47] vacations. They, I have
[1:01:48] I mean, they always
[1:01:49] near.
[1:01:50] Yes.
[1:01:50] Always there if you are calling. Someone
[1:01:54] the new one will be an experience.
[1:02:00] IN
[1:02:00] someone has problems with
[1:02:02] hereby? IN
[1:02:02] I have several.
[1:02:03] questions. Therefore,
[1:02:05] because I know that in
[1:02:06] you had interviews
[1:02:08] earlier. So, can they
[1:02:11] these candidates
[1:02:12] resubmit
[1:02:13] application, that is, for this,
[1:02:14] can we
[1:02:15] call them and
[1:02:16] just to say that in
[1:02:22] we have another chance, because
[1:02:23] if they can
[1:02:25] to study, you know,
[1:02:26] Yes,
[1:02:30] okay, and then
[1:02:33] my question if
[1:02:34] they receive
[1:02:35] the salary of the generals, I don't want to talk.
[1:02:40] out loud about $24.
[1:02:42] Yes.
[1:02:43] So, if they are paid
[1:02:44] such an amount, and they have
[1:02:45] no CDL, me only
[1:02:48] I'm worried that after
[1:02:49] getting their CDL
[1:02:55] automatically
[1:02:55] are promoted to the rest
[1:02:57] crew,
[1:02:59] will they have to
[1:03:00] wait for the next one
[1:03:01] budget amount? So,
[1:03:03] just because I don't
[1:03:05] I know
[1:03:06] we were going
[1:03:07] leave it for now.
[1:03:09] What am I?
[1:03:12] think about this.
[1:03:13] , Julian, you know,
[1:03:14] because it is not
[1:03:15] a discussion that I don't
[1:03:16] Who did you discuss it with?
[1:03:17] wrong? My opinion from
[1:03:19] on this subject is as follows:
[1:03:20] if you have a candidate,
[1:03:21] who comes, and we hire a person, and their
[1:03:24] hired for $24
[1:03:26] for an hour, right? Hmm, ah
[1:03:28] then I would leave it
[1:03:33] at the discretion of the road
[1:03:35] the master, so that he
[1:03:36] came in three
[1:03:37] months to a person, as
[1:03:38] when someone comes
[1:03:39] to me, and I hire
[1:03:40] his bus driver.
[1:03:43] Um, I know that before in
[1:03:47] we were elementary
[1:03:48] rate, and in
[1:03:49] we had a 60-day
[1:03:51] period. We have since
[1:03:52] That's it.
[1:03:55] But I, as a manager,
[1:03:56] could tell his
[1:03:57] to the boss through
[1:03:59] two weeks: "Okay,
[1:04:01] look at this,
[1:04:02] You know, I'm right.
[1:04:03] This person really
[1:04:04] good. Let's just translate it
[1:04:05] right now, so that she
[1:04:06] remained."
[1:04:07] So I think that's it.
[1:04:08] maybe
[1:04:08] indefinite period.
[1:04:09] Well, that's what I mean,
[1:04:11] I understand this.
[1:04:11] for example,
[1:04:12] trial
[1:04:13] term. But On the other hand, I don't understand. I,
[1:04:16] as I said,
[1:04:17] worked in the city 24
[1:04:19] years, but I would
[1:04:22] I thought, and I know that
[1:04:23] they would do nothing
[1:04:24] said, but it can
[1:04:25] to be slapped in the face. And I know that
[1:04:28] we must
[1:04:29] try to attract
[1:04:30] people here; you
[1:04:31] needed
[1:04:32] responsible person
[1:04:33] . I totally do.
[1:04:34] I understand. But
[1:04:35] Blake is a slap in the face.
[1:04:37] Well, I know that even though you
[1:04:39] and a slap in the face,
[1:04:40] but I just,
[1:04:41] Do you understand what I mean? I
[1:04:43] not against it. I just think, maybe.
[1:04:45] that he could
[1:04:46] verify
[1:04:47] trial
[1:04:48] term, because it can
[1:04:49] to be unreliable
[1:04:50] a person, and
[1:04:51] Yes. No,
[1:04:52] I don't want others to
[1:04:53] the boys felt it,
[1:04:55] you know,
[1:04:57] Well, that's why...
[1:04:58] Right. And exactly
[1:04:59] therefore the goal of the leader
[1:05:01] there is acceptance
[1:05:01] determination, right?
[1:05:05] I somewhat agree with that,
[1:05:06] What does she say? I have
[1:05:08] there was such a conversation with
[1:05:09] Joel before that. Um,
[1:05:11] partly this
[1:05:12] preserving our
[1:05:13] current
[1:05:13] employees and
[1:05:14] their happiness.
[1:05:15] It's not just about
[1:05:16] to find someone
[1:05:18] new. Um, so
[1:05:19] need to consider
[1:05:20] all. That's all.
[1:05:21] Absolutely true. AND
[1:05:23] saving your
[1:05:24] current
[1:05:24] employees. And this,
[1:05:26] unfortunately, on
[1:05:28] unfortunately, in my opinion,
[1:05:35] caused by others
[1:05:36] a factor that even
[1:05:38] not related to
[1:05:38] financial side.
[1:05:40] This is age. You know, this is where
[1:05:43] we are now. And I think that
[1:05:47] we are so glad
[1:05:48] directors are needed
[1:05:49] answer yours
[1:05:50] opinion terro i think
[1:05:52] what do we need
[1:05:53] view scale
[1:05:57] wages, not only
[1:06:02] the amount, but also how it
[1:06:03] balanced. Therefore,
[1:06:06] regarding your opinion,
[1:06:07] new employee
[1:06:08] comes and earns
[1:06:09] exactly the same
[1:06:10] dollars per hour,
[1:06:11] How old is that guy?
[1:06:12] who works here,
[1:06:13] Sorry, 22 years old.
[1:06:14] And I, you know, I don't know.
[1:06:16] length of service, but
[1:06:17] this is what
[1:06:18] you mean.
[1:06:19] Yes,
[1:06:20] That's right. I think that
[1:06:21] we need this
[1:06:22] review. I think
[1:06:23] what is this that we
[1:06:24] really need
[1:06:25] to consider because
[1:06:27] it's something like
[1:06:28] budget and time.
[1:06:29] Yes. I think that in
[1:06:30] future,
[1:06:31] when we...Yes. You
[1:06:32] I really need this.
[1:06:34] review.
[1:06:34] And I think we
[1:06:35] must do this
[1:06:36] now,
[1:06:37] when do you become
[1:06:38] younger.
[1:06:39] Yes.
[1:06:40] Of course.
[1:06:42] You know, and I think that
[1:06:44] this is our job-
[1:06:45] review this, and
[1:06:46] because I agree with
[1:06:47] you, Tarot, and with you,
[1:06:48] Julie, in all of this,
[1:06:49] because it is
[1:06:50] unfair, no
[1:06:51] equal scale
[1:06:52] the wages we pay
[1:06:53] we have now. And so
[1:06:55] always was. And what I
[1:06:58] I'll take a risk and say that
[1:06:59] It's always been like that, no
[1:07:00] means that it has to
[1:07:02] remain. Good. AND
[1:07:04] it shouldn't be like that
[1:07:05] remain.
[1:07:06] That's right, Jamie. Therefore
[1:07:07] ,
[1:07:08] and that's for sure
[1:07:08] starts with
[1:07:09] budgeting.
[1:07:10] That's why you need
[1:07:11] enlarge article
[1:07:12] salary and
[1:07:13] increase everything else.
[1:07:16] Yes. And I think that if
[1:07:18] we weren't, I hate it
[1:07:19] it's to say, but already
[1:07:20] at the lower limit of the scale,
[1:07:23] you know, that would be
[1:07:24] easier to do.
[1:07:30] Well, we provide the best
[1:07:31] benefits than
[1:07:32] Williamstown and
[1:07:33] Bennington.
[1:07:35] But you...I just...I don't
[1:07:37] I disagree with this. I
[1:07:39] I'm just saying,
[1:07:41] okay, this is necessary
[1:07:42] to take into account. But I agree that this
[1:07:45] pay scale
[1:07:46] need to be lifted, but
[1:07:48] we also need
[1:07:49] take into account our
[1:07:50] party of privileges.
[1:07:53] But I will look into it and
[1:07:54] I will send you some of
[1:07:55] those that I receive from 197
[1:08:00] because I can't
[1:08:02] get none.
[1:08:04] I know that. And I'm not...I
[1:08:05] I'm just saying that
[1:08:07] in this area. Yes.
[1:08:08] In this area. So,
[1:08:10] if compared to
[1:08:11] some others
[1:08:12] larger accounts,
[1:08:13] they do not provide such
[1:08:14] the very advantages for SL.
[1:08:32] So are there any more?
[1:08:33] discussion on this
[1:08:34] reason? Does it suit you?
[1:08:36] us an ad that
[1:08:37] should Joel write?
[1:08:38] Thank you.
[1:08:40] How long is it?
[1:08:41] will last approximately
[1:08:42] a couple of weeks? Is it possible?
[1:08:45] Yes, probably, as long as we will not fill
[1:08:47] vacancy,
[1:08:48] Yes?
[1:08:50] No,
[1:08:52] I know that you like it.
[1:08:53] need before winter, but
[1:08:55] I'm running out.
[1:08:59] Facebook only. Yes. As
[1:09:05] long? You must have
[1:09:07] deadline. Fortnight.
[1:09:18] Today is the 10th or so,
[1:09:20] sorry, today is the 27th
[1:09:22] me. Under consideration
[1:09:29] deadline for week 7-
[1:09:30] th or the week of the 14th, as
[1:09:32] What do you think? Week 14-
[1:09:35] th. Gives them a couple of weeks
[1:09:36] to be there. And then
[1:09:38] , and then this will give, this will give, this
[1:09:43] will give, it seems, Terry and
[1:09:44] Joel, I would guess,
[1:09:45] that there will still be a process
[1:09:47] interviews. This will give,
[1:09:50] so far, it seems we have
[1:09:51] meeting of the 10th and 24th
[1:09:58] September. You will be given 10
[1:10:00] days to pass
[1:10:02] interviews, and then
[1:10:03] you will provide
[1:10:04] recommendation and
[1:10:05] Vote on the 24th. It
[1:10:08] Does that sound reasonable?
[1:10:11] Good. I hope so.
[1:10:16] I would leave it.
[1:10:17] submission process
[1:10:18] applications open until
[1:10:20] 12:00 on the 14th. It's Monday.
[1:10:23] 12:00 noon on the 14th. Simply
[1:10:28] so that we know what it's about
[1:10:29] You are leaving. Just so that in
[1:10:31] we were finite
[1:10:32] terms. So, 12:00 noon
[1:10:34] September 14 is a process
[1:10:36] submission of applications, and
[1:10:37] then you can
[1:10:38] to plan
[1:10:39] interviews and
[1:10:40] get
[1:10:41] recommendation of the 24th.
[1:10:47] Good. Cleaning
[1:10:48] snow.
[1:10:54] Did we vote?
[1:10:56] I don't think so.
[1:11:05] I just want
[1:11:05] to make sure that we
[1:11:07] will be beaten. Yes. Therefore,
[1:11:10] because cleaning
[1:11:11] the snow was constant
[1:11:12] problem,
[1:11:13] trying
[1:11:14] to satisfy needs
[1:11:15] urban complex,
[1:11:16] Joel and I
[1:11:17] talked about it.
[1:11:19] He said that they
[1:11:20] can do it,
[1:11:21] but he doesn't know when.
[1:11:22] Um, because this
[1:11:23] municipal building
[1:11:25] , we must
[1:11:25] to make sure that we work with shovels.
[1:11:30] Um, so I think this is
[1:11:31] depends on the council.
[1:11:34] previously said,
[1:11:35] that the road must
[1:11:36] engage in. So this is
[1:11:37] means that we should
[1:11:39] to conclude a contract or
[1:11:40] What should we do?
[1:11:45] Just thinking that,
[1:11:46] maybe it will be easier
[1:11:48] find someone who
[1:11:49] we will clear the snow,
[1:11:54] than having two different ones,
[1:11:56] more fair
[1:11:57] for people so that they
[1:11:58] wanted to do it.
[1:11:59] Yes, just hire
[1:12:01] someone, just to have
[1:12:02] opportunity to hire
[1:12:03] younger children. So,
[1:12:06] if you don't post
[1:12:07] video search on this
[1:12:08] damn shovel, they won't look at her.
[1:12:10] .
[1:12:13] It says PlayStation, 7 or something.
[1:12:16] No, I don't know. But
[1:12:19] I don't know how.
[1:12:22] Shuttling Sim works, first
[1:12:24] than they will do it.
[1:12:26] So,
[1:12:27] What would your council like?
[1:12:31] To conclude
[1:12:32] contract for
[1:12:32] outsider
[1:12:33] contractor,
[1:12:34] feeling that his
[1:12:35] took upon themselves. We
[1:12:36] have done this in the past
[1:12:37] for snow removal.
[1:12:42] Do you want to do that?
[1:12:43] exactly in the same terms?
[1:12:45] Um, how about I
[1:12:46] returned, uh, something to
[1:12:48] kind of request
[1:12:49] suggestions, something, where
[1:12:50] we can put
[1:12:51] our beds, but uh, or
[1:12:53] is in your budget
[1:12:54] funds to help
[1:12:55] We're cleaning up here.
[1:12:57] ? because we don't have
[1:13:02] budget for
[1:13:03] snow removal. It
[1:13:04] the only reason why I say so. Unless we will take on
[1:13:08] maintenance services
[1:13:09] land, but this, um,
[1:13:10] just looking into it.
[1:13:13] All this is happening.
[1:13:14] at the same time, you know. Um,
[1:13:16] look.
[1:13:20] Yes, because you have
[1:13:21] contract line. Or
[1:13:24] can you, do you have,
[1:13:27] um, or
[1:13:28] can we? So we
[1:13:30] let's include this in the request
[1:13:31] proposals. This is good.
[1:13:32] remark. I
[1:13:33] postpone request
[1:13:34] proposals. Can you ask Ellen
[1:13:39] to give the council a few
[1:13:40] options, where from
[1:13:44] can or should
[1:13:46] money coming in, right?
[1:13:47] Just so we can
[1:13:48] instead of
[1:13:49] to say: "Well, they
[1:13:50] should come
[1:13:51] from here, it doesn't matter,"
[1:13:52] give us some
[1:13:52] options where we come from
[1:13:54] could take them.
[1:13:55] From the ranks or from the general, or from
[1:13:56] both? WITH
[1:13:57] both.
[1:13:57] Good.
[1:13:58] Yes, please.
[1:14:01] Good.
[1:14:03] Just so we can
[1:14:04] make the right...
[1:14:05] Good. move, and we
[1:14:06] just...we
[1:14:07] We will return.
[1:14:08] Perfectly.
[1:14:09] Um, I'll ask Joel
[1:14:10] help me with
[1:14:11] request for proposals,
[1:14:11] before I write
[1:14:12] respond. regarding this
[1:14:13] ,
[1:14:14] Yes? Perfectly.
[1:14:15] But I think we
[1:14:16] ready to publish
[1:14:17] request for proposals and not
[1:14:18] wait. We will consider
[1:14:19] budget,
[1:14:20] but I think we don't.
[1:14:21] need to wait for
[1:14:22] budget figures. We
[1:14:23] have to pay for it
[1:14:24] anyhow. Simply,
[1:14:26] Yes? So, we must
[1:14:27] post a request
[1:14:28] proposals. So I
[1:14:31] assured. I don't know,
[1:14:32] what about the rest of the council.
[1:14:34] I am comfortable if
[1:14:36] Joel and Tara will sit down and
[1:14:37] will work together on
[1:14:38] creating a request
[1:14:39] proposals, which will be
[1:14:41] sent out without advice,
[1:14:42] without need
[1:14:43] to come back to this
[1:14:44] at another meeting 10
[1:14:45] September, and then
[1:14:46] wait again, and then
[1:14:48] began
[1:14:49] a blizzard, due to which
[1:14:50] We had no one.
[1:14:53] I am sure that
[1:14:54] I will consider the offer,
[1:14:55] so that Joel and Tara
[1:14:56] prepared a request
[1:14:57] offers on
[1:14:58] snow removal in
[1:14:59] city
[1:14:59] administration and
[1:15:00] sent him from somewhere
[1:15:02] -on what dates, which
[1:15:03] they consider
[1:15:04] appropriate.
[1:15:06] We will introduce this
[1:15:07] proposal.
[1:15:08] I will support her.
[1:15:10] Is there still discussion? All,
[1:15:12] Who is "for"?
[1:15:14] Thank you.
[1:15:14] I didn't mean to offend you.
[1:15:15] excessive load
[1:15:16] , guys, but I would prefer
[1:15:18] to have it done
[1:15:19] .
[1:15:19] The fewer hands, the
[1:15:20] better. Well,
[1:15:22] put it on
[1:15:23] month. Give to people,
[1:15:24] you know, we can
[1:15:25] bring it back here 10-
[1:15:26] yeah, and we'll do that
[1:15:27] exactly the same as before, because those
[1:15:29] people themselves perform
[1:15:30] the same job. Here
[1:15:31] Yes
[1:15:32] simply. It's easier that way. Yes
[1:15:35] . Yes.
[1:15:41] Good. Update from
[1:15:43] city ​​government. Thank you.
[1:15:44] for that.
[1:15:46] called Maxi
[1:15:47] in the morning. Nigel,
[1:15:57] we have several
[1:15:58] emails
[1:15:59] for our
[1:16:02] coordinator
[1:16:02] email from
[1:16:04] email.
[1:16:06] The review was completed.
[1:16:08] symbol E91. She
[1:16:11] visited the facilities and
[1:16:12] wrote emails
[1:16:14] letters to Vermont, 07
[1:16:15] Center Street, Montas
[1:16:16] Condo Lake, for
[1:16:17] Priscilla. Um, from
[1:16:19] David Fowle, our
[1:16:21] chairmen of the commission on
[1:16:22] planning. Commission on
[1:16:23] planning does
[1:16:24] significant progress in
[1:16:25] process improvement
[1:16:26] meetings, including
[1:16:28] previous packages
[1:16:29] documents,
[1:16:29] improved clarity
[1:16:30] order purposes
[1:16:31] day, improved
[1:16:32] protocol and
[1:16:33] improved
[1:16:34] attendance and
[1:16:35] understanding of responsibilities
[1:16:36] members, which contributed
[1:16:37] a significant achievement.
[1:16:38] There is now clarity regarding
[1:16:39] of how we will be
[1:16:41] to do one's duty
[1:16:42] duties, let's finish
[1:16:43] a new city plan, and
[1:16:44] the process is ongoing
[1:16:45] constantly. Our goal is—
[1:16:46] complete the project
[1:16:47] plan by the end of spring,
[1:16:48] which will allow
[1:16:49] engage the community,
[1:16:50] view in full
[1:16:51] and edit
[1:16:52] its by the end of 2027,
[1:16:53] which is now new
[1:16:54] term. Hmm, this is
[1:16:56] update from Nate from
[1:16:57] Protection Commissions
[1:16:59] nature. This is a bit
[1:17:00] longer. Hmm, this is for spring.
[1:17:02] and the summer of 2026.
[1:17:04] Protection Commission
[1:17:05] nature had another one
[1:17:06] busy season, which
[1:17:07] started with
[1:17:08] incredibly successful
[1:17:09] silent auction,
[1:17:10] held in church
[1:17:11] Faith this spring.
[1:17:12] Over 60 artists and
[1:17:13] artisans
[1:17:13] donated
[1:17:14] items that were
[1:17:15] sold at auction,
[1:17:16] to raise money for
[1:17:17] acquisition and
[1:17:18] installation of batus
[1:17:19] in general. We succeeded.
[1:17:20] to buy more than two
[1:17:21] dozens of batus,
[1:17:22] including a large
[1:17:23] the block that was
[1:17:24] installed on
[1:17:25] Bent trail.
[1:17:26] Installation
[1:17:27] private batus and
[1:17:28] private houses
[1:17:29] for bats
[1:17:30] started this
[1:17:31] summer and will last until
[1:17:32] autumn season.
[1:17:33] Moving on to summer,
[1:17:34] we focused on
[1:17:35] some additional
[1:17:36] projects, including
[1:17:37] coastal restoration
[1:17:38] rivers at the site of landslides
[1:17:39] on the Benb trail,
[1:17:40] completion of the map
[1:17:40] city ​​inventory
[1:17:42] and its placement on
[1:17:43] the city website,
[1:17:43] distribution
[1:17:44] local plants on
[1:17:45] Selectboard party,
[1:17:46] coordination privately
[1:17:47] funded
[1:17:48] edible walks
[1:17:49] plants with
[1:17:50] representatives
[1:17:51] the Burra people in
[1:17:51] library, cramped
[1:17:52] cooperation with the Commission
[1:17:53] from planning over
[1:17:54] development of the section
[1:17:55] about natural resources
[1:17:56] new city plan,
[1:17:57] acquisition,
[1:17:58] construction and
[1:17:59] table setting
[1:18:00] for a picnic in the park
[1:18:01] Queen. We also
[1:18:01] performed a wonderful
[1:18:02] work together with
[1:18:03] Parks Department
[1:18:04] and rest in
[1:18:05] urban forest,
[1:18:06] including creation
[1:18:07] paper map
[1:18:07] existing trails in
[1:18:08] urban forest,
[1:18:09] completion
[1:18:10] interactive map
[1:18:11] urban forest for
[1:18:11] with Tessa's help
[1:18:12] McAn, our
[1:18:13] city ​​forester, and
[1:18:14] Sam Page of BCRC,
[1:18:15] holding a very
[1:18:15] successful
[1:18:16] public march
[1:18:17] in the urban forest with
[1:18:18] Tessa McAn, who
[1:18:19] had an incredible
[1:18:19] a large number
[1:18:20] visitors thanks to
[1:18:21] advertising assistance
[1:18:22] from Green Mountain Club. We
[1:18:23] spoke out
[1:18:24] presentation about our
[1:18:25] Tom's Forest from ABC (
[1:18:26] Association of Commissions on
[1:18:28] nature conservation
[1:18:29] Vermont) within
[1:18:30] their series
[1:18:31] Town for story webinars. WITH
[1:18:32] looking forward to it
[1:18:33] that this fall
[1:18:34] we will gladly lead
[1:18:36] and we will participate in
[1:18:37] several additional
[1:18:38] projects, including
[1:18:39] exploring the possibility
[1:18:40] involving our
[1:18:41] urban forest to
[1:18:42] family programs
[1:18:43] forestry and
[1:18:44] forest carbon for
[1:18:45] getting additional
[1:18:46] funds for
[1:18:47] further
[1:18:47] improvement
[1:18:48] amenities,
[1:18:48] available in the city
[1:18:50] forest; work on
[1:18:50] by definition
[1:18:51] opportunities for
[1:18:52] receiving grants,
[1:18:53] which will allow us
[1:18:54] create an accessible
[1:18:55] access point for
[1:18:56] people with disabilities
[1:18:57] to the Husi River in the park
[1:18:58] Clayton; cooperation with
[1:19:00] BCRC and the commission on
[1:19:00] planning for
[1:19:01] implementation and
[1:19:02] grant management
[1:19:03] for research
[1:19:04] scope of work,
[1:19:05] given to Powell, who
[1:19:06] will be focused on
[1:19:07] improving safety
[1:19:08] and accessibility in
[1:19:09] downtown Palo; and
[1:19:10] finally finding a member
[1:19:11] communities,
[1:19:12] interested in
[1:19:12] filling vacancies
[1:19:14] in nature conservation
[1:19:15] region. After almost
[1:19:16] three years of work in
[1:19:17] we collected commissions
[1:19:18] truly dynamic
[1:19:19] team with very
[1:19:20] dynamic members,
[1:19:21] who are passionate about their
[1:19:22] work, incredible
[1:19:23] motivated and excellent
[1:19:25] promote projects
[1:19:26] between ours
[1:19:26] monthly
[1:19:27] meetings. We are very
[1:19:28] we are proud that
[1:19:29] we can continue
[1:19:30] work that will help
[1:19:31] improve life
[1:19:32] our neighbors here in
[1:19:33] It fell. Ideally.
[1:19:44] Nothing more.
[1:19:45] No others
[1:19:46] updates.
[1:19:47] Good. All business
[1:19:49] discussion and
[1:19:49] renewal.
[1:19:54] One that I can
[1:19:56] quickly decide which
[1:19:57] I'm adding it to the list because
[1:19:58] it is quite new. Hmm,
[1:20:00] as Nate mentioned,
[1:20:01] research
[1:20:02] sculptures, we
[1:20:03] received this grant
[1:20:05] agreement and BCRC. Hmm, well, we
[1:20:08] would like
[1:20:09] use BCRC
[1:20:10] as a project manager
[1:20:12] for this. Hmm, so we hope that Sam
[1:20:16] Paige, what are you all doing?
[1:20:17] appoint Sam
[1:20:18] Page Municipal
[1:20:19] project manager
[1:20:20] for research
[1:20:21] scope of work. Hmm, ah
[1:20:23] then we are going
[1:20:25] organize
[1:20:25] regular meetings with
[1:20:27] her, Nate, Tom and
[1:20:28] by me. And then, if there is
[1:20:29] a board member who
[1:20:30] would like to join
[1:20:32] to us, hmm, that would be
[1:20:33] gratefully. But to me
[1:20:35] just needed
[1:20:36] suggestion that Sam
[1:20:37] Paige was ours.
[1:20:38] project manager
[1:20:39] for a grant for
[1:20:39] volume research
[1:20:41] works. Forward.
[1:20:46] I will make a suggestion,
[1:20:48] so that we nominate Sam
[1:20:49] Page
[1:20:56] coordinator
[1:20:56] project for our
[1:20:57] volume research
[1:20:58] tunnel works
[1:21:00] center. Hmm, how is that?
[1:21:02] is it called? Grant for
[1:21:03] volume research.
[1:21:04] grant
[1:21:06] volumes. Some more
[1:21:09] discussion? All
[1:21:12] ready. It
[1:21:17] everything you had in
[1:21:19] old cases section?
[1:21:20] See the frame
[1:21:21] old cases with
[1:21:22] next meeting.
[1:21:23] Clayton Park. I do nothing about it.
[1:21:27] Clayton Park. Well, I
[1:21:31] checked the applications for
[1:21:32] grants, but found out,
[1:21:33] what do I need
[1:21:34] wait for one of
[1:21:35] them, so that first
[1:21:37] close our grant,
[1:21:38] but I still
[1:21:38] I'm checking other places.
[1:21:42] So I haven't received it yet.
[1:21:43] from this answer.
[1:21:47] So I'm still working.
[1:21:49] over this.
[1:21:49] Good.
[1:21:50] Um, mobile texting
[1:21:51] message, does he want
[1:21:53] I'd like to discuss something.
[1:21:54] about this? I
[1:21:55] sent you again
[1:21:56] instructions. There are three
[1:21:58] types of taxes that we
[1:22:00] could choose, um,
[1:22:01] for further
[1:22:02] development. Um, so there is
[1:22:05] this is a decision that
[1:22:06] need to accept, and
[1:22:08] also the decision that
[1:22:09] What will it be for?
[1:22:10] directed. Um, but I
[1:22:13] not sure if it's a good idea
[1:22:14] wants to spend some time
[1:22:16] public meetings, especially
[1:22:17] than you will vote
[1:22:18] for further development
[1:22:19] this question, or what
[1:22:21] council's consent on this
[1:22:22] reason? And I still
[1:22:25] I'm waiting for the numbers, my dear.
[1:22:27] The thing is that
[1:22:28] I don't want anything.
[1:22:29] to do until we
[1:22:30] we'll see some
[1:22:31] digits.
[1:22:32] I also think that we
[1:22:33] special needs
[1:22:34] fees for this
[1:22:35] discussion. I have on
[1:22:36] mean that this
[1:22:37] big enough
[1:22:38] question and enough
[1:22:39] It is important that we...
[1:22:41] Well, I think, and I think,
[1:22:43] that we should...I think,
[1:22:44] what should we, um,
[1:22:45] before engaging
[1:22:47] the public, I think I'm glad.
[1:22:49] must accept
[1:22:50] the decision that this is what we want to do as
[1:22:52] council. Agree.
[1:22:55] And then, if we are like
[1:22:56] glad, after
[1:22:57] we will get more
[1:22:58] information that we
[1:22:59] looking for now, after
[1:23:00] how we as a council,
[1:23:01] if we accept
[1:23:02] decision to move
[1:23:03] forward with local
[1:23:04] options tax,
[1:23:06] then we attract
[1:23:07] public. But
[1:23:08] if we don't get together
[1:23:09] move forward as
[1:23:10] council, why?
[1:23:11] waste everyone's time?
[1:23:13] Do you mean that
[1:23:15] I clearly understood that
[1:23:16] you would like to do,
[1:23:17] this is first
[1:23:18] vote if
[1:23:19] we are interested in that
[1:23:20] to make a tag. We are not talking about
[1:23:24] which option, and
[1:23:25] just about whether
[1:23:26] we are interested in
[1:23:27] future or
[1:23:28] at least investigate,
[1:23:30] and I think that Ginny
[1:23:31] is right. I think that
[1:23:32] we need
[1:23:33] special meeting
[1:23:34] only for packages
[1:23:35] options so that we can
[1:23:36] to say here, as a council,
[1:23:38] and just discuss,
[1:23:39] what do I think it is
[1:23:41] necessary.
[1:23:43] Yes. So, maybe I
[1:23:45] Haven't read about this in a long time.
[1:23:46] It's not that I don't think.
[1:23:47] that this is needed after
[1:23:49] how you decide,
[1:23:50] What do I think?
[1:23:51] Yes. I think this
[1:23:53] the council would like to do
[1:23:55] this is earlier.
[1:23:56] Therefore, I think that we
[1:23:57] need to spend
[1:23:58] meeting. We are like a council
[1:24:00] we decide yes or no.
[1:24:01] If that is the case, then we attract
[1:24:04] 100%.
[1:24:05] Good.
[1:24:06] This is my opinion.
[1:24:07] Yes, I agree.
[1:24:09] So we are waiting for
[1:24:13] numbers, and then we will decide whether
[1:24:15] shall we move
[1:24:16] further or not.
[1:24:17] And I also think that,
[1:24:18] as soon as we
[1:24:19] we'll get the numbers, I apologize. No,
[1:24:21] not immediately,
[1:24:22] as soon as we get the numbers, then
[1:24:23] we can
[1:24:24] to appoint
[1:24:24] a special meeting,
[1:24:25] so that we can
[1:24:26] discuss these numbers.
[1:24:27] Well, the only thing that bothers me
[1:24:29] anxious in anticipation
[1:24:30] numbers, and I would like them
[1:24:31] mother...Yes, more
[1:24:34] before we talk about it
[1:24:36] let's talk, but when
[1:24:37] will we get them? For
[1:24:40] Do we have any ideas?
[1:24:42] Hmm, that shouldn't be the case.
[1:24:43] long.
[1:24:46] Figures for tax from
[1:24:47] sale. These are the other two,
[1:24:50] for which we don't have
[1:24:51] data due to problems
[1:24:52] with confidentiality.
[1:24:54] Yes. Yes, we do, if that's the case.
[1:24:55] will take, say, if in
[1:24:56] we will not be given
[1:24:57] for two weeks,
[1:24:58] then maybe we will hold a special
[1:25:00] ...
[1:25:00] That's where I was. Yes,
[1:25:02] instead of
[1:25:02] wait, you know, if
[1:25:04] we are waiting for two weeks
[1:25:05] and we have no data,
[1:25:06] you know when we
[1:25:07] let's go back to
[1:25:07] next meeting
[1:25:09] board, and we have
[1:25:10] no data, I think,
[1:25:11] we should appoint
[1:25:12] date of the event
[1:25:13] meeting, in any case,
[1:25:14] special
[1:25:15] meeting, and then
[1:25:16] to make a decision. To
[1:25:17] at that time
[1:25:18] we, I hope, we should
[1:25:20] to deal with
[1:25:21] state from others
[1:25:22] issues and with tax
[1:25:24] the department is quite
[1:25:25] good.
[1:25:26] The state is quite good.
[1:25:27] it works in everything, but
[1:25:29] everything takes time. And I
[1:25:30] , you know, it's simple
[1:25:32] takes time. Um, me too
[1:25:34] I understand why this is.
[1:25:35] takes time. Simply
[1:25:37] limited staff,
[1:25:38] You know, it's not about
[1:25:39] because they are not
[1:25:40] want to supply us
[1:25:41] things, just
[1:25:42] limited staff.
[1:25:43] So, okay, let's go.
[1:25:45] Let's see again what
[1:25:46] will be until it is
[1:25:47] will sound like a plan.
[1:25:48] Sounds like a plan for
[1:25:49] me.
[1:25:49] Ideally. Let's discuss.
[1:25:55] Was it Cairo?
[1:25:56] I wasn't waiting, I was waiting,
[1:25:57] while you look
[1:25:58] your list. I know,
[1:25:59] that you have a list.
[1:26:00] Yes, I was waiting.
[1:26:02] This is the last one in the section
[1:26:03] old cases, if
[1:26:04] only we don't
[1:26:04] we take into account permissions
[1:26:05] for demolition, within the framework
[1:26:06] which, perhaps, this too.
[1:26:08] Therefore,
[1:26:10] good.
[1:26:11] For old cases.
[1:26:14] So, everyone had
[1:26:15] opportunity to get
[1:26:16] all information from
[1:26:17] Khazzi River with
[1:26:18] sediment removal
[1:26:19] hydroelectric power plant
[1:26:20] Hazzak. Good. Therefore,
[1:26:26] First I'm going
[1:26:27] tell you what
[1:26:29] I conducted research.
[1:26:30] as an administrator
[1:26:31] zoning, and what I, uh,
[1:26:32] I'm going to do as
[1:26:33] administrator
[1:26:34] zoning regarding
[1:26:35] permission. And then I want the election
[1:26:41] the council also acted with
[1:26:42] on this occasion, therefore
[1:26:44] that the electoral council is
[1:26:45] the owner of the property, therefore
[1:26:46] I think this is the solution.
[1:26:47] council. As
[1:26:51] administrator
[1:26:52] zoning, I'm going
[1:26:53] to adhere to, uh,
[1:26:54] instructions,
[1:26:55] last set
[1:26:56] instructions that I
[1:26:57] received from that
[1:26:58] the last one
[1:26:59] email,
[1:27:00] which we received on
[1:27:01] last, uh, meeting
[1:27:03] . Uh, I'm going.
[1:27:06] to issue a permit, and, um,
[1:27:07] based on the fact that
[1:27:09] he will have to
[1:27:10] apply for
[1:27:11] permission.
[1:27:13] Good. We are not
[1:27:14] we are going to give
[1:27:15] he just
[1:27:16] random resolution.
[1:27:17] He needs to submit
[1:27:18] application. So I will send
[1:27:20] him electronically
[1:27:21] letter and tell him that
[1:27:22] need to submit
[1:27:23] application for permission, and we
[1:27:24] let's help him
[1:27:25] go through this process. I
[1:27:26] researched this
[1:27:28] questions, and there are others
[1:27:29] things. Good. I am going
[1:27:32] follow
[1:27:33] Jess's recommendations,
[1:27:34] the second set, which
[1:27:35] she gave it to us. I think
[1:27:38] what is this
[1:27:39] safest
[1:27:40] way to do it that
[1:27:41] he must have all
[1:27:42] their state and
[1:27:43] federal permits,
[1:27:44] before something
[1:27:45] will fall into the river.
[1:27:48] And this is what I'm going to do.
[1:27:49] as
[1:27:50] administrator
[1:27:51] zoning. Um, do you have
[1:27:54] someone's question from
[1:27:55] on this occasion, first
[1:27:56] How do I continue? It
[1:27:58] the only thing that exists
[1:27:59] prerogative
[1:28:00] administrator. I am not
[1:28:02] I know, but I want to.
[1:28:03] respond to
[1:28:04] question if they
[1:28:06] you have, because the city
[1:28:07] Poel certainly is
[1:28:08] interested
[1:28:09] aside, and you guys
[1:28:11] ,
[1:28:12] is city B,
[1:28:15] because federal
[1:28:16] cleanup grant
[1:28:17] of this area, and therefore
[1:28:29] now, as an election
[1:28:31] I'm glad...What are you listening to?
[1:28:32] Darcy today
[1:28:33] in the evening etc.? Which
[1:28:38] your feelings as advice
[1:28:39] about how the council
[1:28:41] should proceed further?
[1:28:43] Because I still
[1:28:44] I think she should
[1:28:46] to do it, even
[1:28:47] if the administrator
[1:28:48] zoning will approve
[1:28:49] permission, and then this
[1:28:50] will reach this date, and
[1:28:51] they will be
[1:28:52] to work on the basis of
[1:28:53] this permission, and whether
[1:28:54] they will approve of him,
[1:28:55] or something like that after
[1:28:57] this. It sounds like this,
[1:28:59] Do you know what position?
[1:29:00] of the electoral council regarding
[1:29:02] how we feel and what
[1:29:04] should we do? Or
[1:29:08] We must as a council
[1:29:09] to set conditions,
[1:29:10] restrictions and others
[1:29:12] things about this? I just want yours.
[1:29:16] thoughts.
[1:29:16] AT,
[1:29:17] Well, that's our decision.
[1:29:19] Yes. I mean, I thought about it for a while.
[1:29:23] time. I would like to
[1:29:24] someone was present
[1:29:25] at the meeting. We already
[1:29:26] so many times
[1:29:27] talked about it on
[1:29:28] now. I would
[1:29:29] wanted to have
[1:29:29] opportunity to bet
[1:29:30] direct questions. I think Darcy
[1:29:32] violated several
[1:29:33] important issues, on
[1:29:34] which I would like
[1:29:35] get answers. I don't think so.
[1:29:37] adversarial process.
[1:29:39] Hmm, but if this
[1:29:39] so important, and
[1:29:41] I think they are.
[1:29:42] think, then I would like
[1:29:43] to be able to attract them,
[1:29:45] to ask a question
[1:29:46] as a board member, and I think that's reasonable.
[1:29:52] –set conditions, hmm,
[1:29:53] within the framework of the law on
[1:29:55] this; but I may
[1:29:56] I wouldn't feel this.
[1:29:57] if I could bet
[1:29:58] question. And yes, I read everything, but I also think that there is
[1:30:04] difference between reading
[1:30:05] reports and conversation with
[1:30:07] someone who
[1:30:07] represents the company
[1:30:09] . IN
[1:30:09] I have one question.
[1:30:11] .
[1:30:12] How is this related? IN
[1:30:16] he has a contract
[1:30:17] rent with us for this
[1:30:18] account that
[1:30:19] concerns the upper
[1:30:20] rent level. My
[1:30:23] the concern is
[1:30:24] in that, and I believe that
[1:30:25] he is covered, that's what
[1:30:27] you know, we talked
[1:30:28] about Darcy, who
[1:30:29] talked about
[1:30:30] sewer lines.
[1:30:31] Her most
[1:30:32] concern
[1:30:33] concerned
[1:30:34] sewer lines
[1:30:35] . Hmm,
[1:30:36] utilities. THERE ARE
[1:30:37] plumbing.
[1:30:38] Utilities.
[1:30:40] Yes. I think I can.
[1:30:47] to be wrong, but,
[1:30:48] considering that he
[1:30:49] everything properly
[1:30:50] provided, it would be
[1:30:52] one of the ways
[1:30:53] go through this process.
[1:31:07] But I was curious,
[1:31:08] which is stated in
[1:31:09] the lease agreement, which
[1:31:10] he is allowed
[1:31:11] to do, because it is in
[1:31:12] rental agreement,
[1:31:13] you know, uh, and I even
[1:31:15] didn't watch it
[1:31:16] completely, but,
[1:31:17] It seems there was
[1:31:18] section...Hmm, oh,
[1:31:25] It's up to you.
[1:31:26] Yes.
[1:31:28] I just want
[1:31:29] to make sure that we adhere to our
[1:31:31] lease agreement, but
[1:31:33] we also take care of
[1:31:37] Darcy's interests. All
[1:31:50] It's said and done,
[1:31:51] how deep
[1:31:52] they can dig,
[1:31:54] just as you can't
[1:31:55] to dig veins, etc.
[1:31:59] If you follow
[1:32:01] these rules and
[1:32:02] set points,
[1:32:03] which should
[1:32:04] to encompass us
[1:32:04] correct, but not
[1:32:05] any conditions,
[1:32:08] I would still like to
[1:32:10] know how details
[1:32:11] right and how is that
[1:32:12] will happen, the point is
[1:32:13] because the devil
[1:32:14] lies in the details,
[1:32:15] Where is this all going, I
[1:32:17] simply
[1:32:23] said that this is the first time,
[1:32:24] when I see the contract
[1:32:25] rent, and I didn't know that
[1:32:27] he was not
[1:32:27] registered in the city of Alo. So I am going
[1:32:32] register this because
[1:32:34] I contacted
[1:32:34] by email,
[1:32:36] because I searched a lot and
[1:32:37] found everything else,
[1:32:38] except for the lease agreement.
[1:32:41] Therefore,
[1:32:42] rental agreement
[1:32:42] never
[1:32:43] registered in
[1:32:44] city
[1:32:44] administration.
[1:32:45] No,
[1:32:46] it was a memorandum to
[1:32:47] rental agreement.
[1:32:48] Yes. Everything else.
[1:32:50] Armen suggested
[1:32:51] him immediately. Often.
[1:32:54] I told him, you know,
[1:32:56] I asked because I have
[1:32:57] he wasn't there, and I have
[1:32:58] I mean, I searched for everything,
[1:33:00] and I got it, like everything else
[1:33:01] different, but I just
[1:33:03] appealed to us
[1:33:04] could read this,
[1:33:05] because, as I said, I know it's a 30 year old
[1:33:08] rental agreement,
[1:33:11] and he gave me everything that
[1:33:12] I
[1:33:14] provided there. So I have
[1:33:16] meaning if we
[1:33:17] let's ask him to be
[1:33:18] present at
[1:33:19] meetings on Zoom, we can either personally,
[1:33:21] because I don't know where he is
[1:33:22] alive, but
[1:33:23] I don't think so.
[1:33:24] but if you can
[1:33:25] zoom in, and,
[1:33:27] maybe you know, we can
[1:33:28] even a representative,
[1:33:31] that's good,
[1:33:34] oh, I think, oh, isn't it
[1:33:35] another hour, this
[1:33:37] okay, that's it
[1:33:38] right,
[1:33:39] yes, I want to say,
[1:33:41] yes, I think there is
[1:33:42] representative on
[1:33:43] mobile, which could
[1:33:45] would do it.
[1:33:47] So, for me
[1:33:48] generally about the project
[1:33:49] there are several red ones
[1:33:50] flags. One of
[1:33:53] they were addressed to
[1:33:56] FEMA. FEMA level regarding
[1:33:59] of what it could be
[1:34:00] sediment and how much of it
[1:34:02] now, of course,
[1:34:03] differs from
[1:34:04] what they say,
[1:34:05] going to
[1:34:06] delete, right? AND
[1:34:10] I don't remember.
[1:34:11] by heart, I have
[1:34:12] no information, but
[1:34:13] they say that
[1:34:14] are going to delete
[1:34:15] from there a foot of sediment. FEMA
[1:34:18] from 2010 or something like that
[1:34:20] there was, I don't remember
[1:34:22] dates that are significantly
[1:34:23] were different. Therefore,
[1:34:26] What are we doing? I think
[1:34:29] that this is very important
[1:34:30] for us to know that they
[1:34:32] removed - one foot or so
[1:34:33] return to 2011
[1:34:38] what was there. Um,
[1:34:41] you know, I think that's
[1:34:42] key point. If
[1:34:45] they stated that
[1:34:46] one foot
[1:34:47] enough for
[1:34:48] dam operation,
[1:34:49] then I would say one
[1:34:51] foot, or
[1:34:53] wrong? But if it were
[1:34:55] it was as if it were
[1:34:57] not so, are they
[1:34:58] will address this
[1:34:59] FEMA numbers, and I think
[1:35:00] that Darcy was right
[1:35:02] opinion about who
[1:35:03] will determine and how we
[1:35:07] let's determine where it is located? Is there
[1:35:11] external agency,
[1:35:12] except the contractor,
[1:35:14] which determines that they
[1:35:16] dug up
[1:35:17] five feet, and that's it
[1:35:18] the place where they
[1:35:19] should be, and this
[1:35:20] normally.
[1:35:21] Who determines where these 5
[1:35:22] feet?
[1:35:23] Yes.
[1:35:24] Um, so I think,
[1:35:25] what she really had
[1:35:27] a good idea. This is what was I thinking? Um, I
[1:35:30] tried a lot
[1:35:32] to think, because I think that
[1:35:33] This, you know, is important.
[1:35:34] thing, and I, and I don't want to dissuade him from
[1:35:37] this. I just want
[1:35:38] make sure that this
[1:35:40] done,
[1:35:41] and, well, I have no doubt,
[1:35:43] that it will be done
[1:35:44] properly. I just want to
[1:35:48] make sure that this
[1:35:49] made so that it
[1:35:50] did not create
[1:35:51] problems for the city,
[1:35:56] infrastructure, be
[1:35:57] then the bridge, sewage
[1:35:58] or a water pipe along
[1:36:00] roads. The only thing that bothers me
[1:36:04] I'm worried about this.
[1:36:05] to make sure that we,
[1:36:06] not fulfilling
[1:36:07] due diligence,
[1:36:08] let's not create a problem
[1:36:09] in the future with
[1:36:10] infrastructure,
[1:36:11] because
[1:36:12] infrastructure
[1:36:13] incredibly important
[1:36:14] for all of us.
[1:36:16] I also think that
[1:36:17] regarding her
[1:36:18] remarks on the fact that
[1:36:19] Is this contaminated?
[1:36:20] material and where it is
[1:36:21] will be disposed of, I just don't know.
[1:36:23] answers to this
[1:36:24] question, and I would like
[1:36:25] to know her. And I think that
[1:36:28] given that this
[1:36:29] great idea, I agree with this, for
[1:36:32] except that in
[1:36:33] within the limits of what we
[1:36:39] can we or can't we
[1:36:40] make. Are we,
[1:36:42] I think this is a state,
[1:36:43] which is located in
[1:36:44] within the state, about which
[1:36:45] I, you know, can
[1:36:46] to say that
[1:36:47] we can rely on
[1:36:49] with permission or not, but I would like to know
[1:36:51] and I agree with you. I would also like to know,
[1:36:54] because where will it go? Or
[1:36:56] will this be thrown out?
[1:36:57] Karl's farm, and will it be
[1:36:58] she properly
[1:37:00] closed,
[1:37:01] and will we have
[1:37:02] problem with food,
[1:37:03] more precisely, with
[1:37:04] feed through
[1:37:05] five years on this
[1:37:06] place, because we are dealing with this
[1:37:08] everywhere, so I think
[1:37:10] what is this right
[1:37:11] remark, right?
[1:37:13] So I think we should
[1:37:14] need to contact
[1:37:16] to Armen, to ask
[1:37:17] his representative 10
[1:37:18] September. I, as
[1:37:20] administrator
[1:37:21] zoning, I will write
[1:37:22] him electronically
[1:37:23] letter and notification,
[1:37:24] what does he need
[1:37:25] to do for the process
[1:37:27] obtaining permission, and
[1:37:28] then, um, because in
[1:37:29] it is 10 days old
[1:37:30] waiting for this. So
[1:37:33] I will start this process.
[1:37:34] after Josh
[1:37:35] will approve its permission.
[1:37:38] He has 10 days.
[1:37:40] expectation
[1:37:41] after Josh
[1:37:42] will approve this permission.
[1:37:44] Question,
[1:37:46] What is it?
[1:37:47] I think he has
[1:37:48] sorry, I don't
[1:37:50] interrupted, he has 15
[1:37:51] days, I made a mistake. Ahem,
[1:37:55] would it be better,
[1:37:56] maybe like you,
[1:37:58] Mike, there are a few
[1:37:59] questions so that we
[1:38:00] sent these
[1:38:00] question
[1:38:01] in advance, so that,
[1:38:02] when he comes, we will not
[1:38:04] they buried him
[1:38:04] questions they have
[1:38:06] will not be.
[1:38:10] You know what I mean?
[1:38:11] I say, we will put
[1:38:12] question and let's say,
[1:38:14] what are these questions that we are going to put
[1:38:16] ,
[1:38:16] this is ours
[1:38:17] anxiety and
[1:38:18] questions that we are going to put
[1:38:20] at the meeting, so that when
[1:38:21] you will come, you were
[1:38:23] ready for these questions.
[1:38:24] I think that's reasonable.
[1:38:25] . The only thing I would say is
[1:38:27] This is what I wouldn't want.
[1:38:28] for someone to say that we
[1:38:29] responded to
[1:38:29] question, so no
[1:38:30] reasons to be on
[1:38:31] meeting, because here
[1:38:32] What's the matter: answer
[1:38:33] to the question, I want,
[1:38:34] so that they are ready,
[1:38:35] isn't that right? Because I want to get
[1:38:37] information they have
[1:38:38] there must be time
[1:38:39] to prepare. I am from
[1:38:40] I agree with you.
[1:38:41] But their response to
[1:38:43] maybe later
[1:38:44] cause secondary
[1:38:45] question that would be
[1:38:46] quite reasonable.
[1:38:48] Right. Therefore,
[1:38:49] at least the initial one
[1:38:51] the question they would
[1:38:52] They put it, and I agree with
[1:38:53] secondary
[1:38:54] questions, well, they would
[1:38:55] arose, but they
[1:38:57] would be ready for
[1:38:58] initial question:
[1:38:59] "Okay, as far as
[1:39:00] deep you
[1:39:01] are going to dig, and
[1:39:02] how will this affect
[1:39:03] sewer line?
[1:39:04] » So, here I am
[1:39:06] I agree 100% with
[1:39:08] both options.
[1:39:10] Good. So, I think that
[1:39:15] way to deal with this
[1:39:17] —that is to say, hmm, here
[1:39:18] list of questions that
[1:39:19] has an election commission,
[1:39:21] but we would ask
[1:39:22] personally
[1:39:22] representative
[1:39:23] respond to
[1:39:24] secondary issues,
[1:39:25] which can
[1:39:32] to arise from
[1:39:32] the main question. Or
[1:39:35] Does this seem reasonable?
[1:39:36] But I would also like to
[1:39:37] so that you can
[1:39:38] send this
[1:39:38] by email, I
[1:39:39] assured. Right.
[1:39:40] Yes. And I also wanted
[1:39:42] I wish he...
[1:39:44] Yes. Make sure
[1:39:45] that we are not forbidden
[1:39:46] also hear
[1:39:47] answers to our
[1:39:48] main questions.
[1:39:49] Right. Oh, I do.
[1:39:50] I want. Yes. But I
[1:39:51] just want, i just
[1:39:52] I want to make sure that
[1:39:54] we won't just
[1:39:55] bomb it
[1:39:56] issues that
[1:39:57] he has a little
[1:39:57] to investigate, and on which
[1:39:58] he will not be able to
[1:39:59] respond to
[1:40:00] meeting, and he will say:
[1:40:01] "Well, I can't
[1:40:01] answer this
[1:40:02] now, but I can
[1:40:03] answer this
[1:40:04] the next day or
[1:40:05] "two."
[1:40:05] I agree with you.
[1:40:07] Right. So I think there is, I think,
[1:40:09] what is really
[1:40:09] justified
[1:40:10] arguments from both
[1:40:11] parties. I think that
[1:40:12] we need
[1:40:13] to set a date by
[1:40:14] which we have
[1:40:15] to ask a question
[1:40:16] Mike or Tara, whoever
[1:40:17] it was not, and so
[1:40:18] how can they be
[1:40:19] to forward, for example,
[1:40:20] Well,
[1:40:21] I think this group
[1:40:22] questions we are talking about
[1:40:23] now we are talking,
[1:40:24] comes from
[1:40:25] election commission,
[1:40:26] my questions from
[1:40:27] administrator
[1:40:28] zoning, I conducted
[1:40:29] enough research
[1:40:31] so that
[1:40:32] I was comfortable,
[1:40:35] but these are your questions
[1:40:36] , or not
[1:40:37] Yes?
[1:40:37] I'm glad you
[1:40:38] listed the questions
[1:40:39] if you want
[1:40:39] distribute them among
[1:40:40] the rest of the election
[1:40:41] commissions so that we can
[1:40:42] to make an addition
[1:40:43] or editing.
[1:40:44] Yes.
[1:40:45] And then send
[1:40:46] him a list of questions,
[1:40:47] and I think that we,
[1:40:48] of course, we can
[1:40:49] to formulate it like this,
[1:40:50] so that you know that we give you some
[1:40:53] preventive
[1:40:53] question,
[1:40:54] but there may be
[1:40:55] secondary questions
[1:40:56] . So we would like to
[1:40:58] representative here
[1:40:59] answered.
[1:41:00] Good,
[1:41:01] Julie,
[1:41:01] Can I be?
[1:41:02] child? Because our
[1:41:04] next meeting
[1:41:05] will be the 10th, and they
[1:41:06] you need to be able to
[1:41:08] complete the process
[1:41:09] obtaining permission.
[1:41:11] Don't they have any?
[1:41:12] only until October 1st,
[1:41:14] to be able to go into the water? So
[1:41:17] that's what
[1:41:19] will we make a decision?
[1:41:20] No. So here's what I'm into
[1:41:22] I am right. That's why
[1:41:24] I am going to start.
[1:41:25] process of obtaining
[1:41:26] permission, probably
[1:41:27] tomorrow or on
[1:41:28] weekend. I am going
[1:41:29] contact Armen.
[1:41:30] So, the process
[1:41:31] obtaining permission...
[1:41:33] Good. Good.
[1:41:35] We will start as soon as
[1:41:36] he will get permission
[1:41:37] from us.
[1:41:39] Good. Then
[1:41:45] he can...i'm sure
[1:41:46] , that can...
[1:41:47] administrator
[1:41:48] zoning will approve
[1:41:49] this permission is based on
[1:41:50] what I said,
[1:41:51] just because
[1:41:52] research that I
[1:41:53] spent. Good. This
[1:41:58] permission. To Joshu
[1:42:01] need this permission,
[1:42:02] that
[1:42:03] to advance from
[1:42:04] government permit, and
[1:42:05] I know for sure that you mean, and I
[1:42:08] I'm trying to help.
[1:42:09] to advance this process,
[1:42:10] and that's great,
[1:42:11] thanks to the window.
[1:42:12] No, it's true. Because
[1:42:13] it has a window. So
[1:42:15] That's a great question. I think that if we had
[1:42:19] someone was here 10
[1:42:20] September,
[1:42:23] process of obtaining
[1:42:24] permission would already be there
[1:42:25] initiate. I don't want to
[1:42:26] delay the process
[1:42:27] obtaining permission in
[1:42:28] on this issue, whether
[1:42:29] wrong? While the election
[1:42:31] the commission will not say "yes"
[1:42:32] . So, if the election
[1:42:34] the commission will say "no",
[1:42:37] the whole process
[1:42:37] obtaining permission
[1:42:38] there will be no more
[1:42:39] initiate. But I don't
[1:42:40] I want to delay
[1:42:41] process if we are going to say "
[1:42:43] Yes".
[1:42:44] Does this make sense?
[1:42:46] Yes.
[1:42:46] Good. I just want to...
[1:42:50] sometimes I'm not very sure
[1:42:52] I explain, but I don't want to.
[1:42:53] delay it longer,
[1:42:55] than necessary, but I think September 10th,
[1:42:57] if we had one here
[1:42:59] representative, and for all
[1:43:00] our questions would be
[1:43:04] enough answers
[1:43:06] ,
[1:43:07] election commission
[1:43:08] could
[1:43:08] vote for
[1:43:09] approval.
[1:43:10] Yes.
[1:43:12] Process
[1:43:12] dredging and
[1:43:13] obtaining permission
[1:43:14] will already be held. AND
[1:43:17] there could be three, four,
[1:43:21] five days, during
[1:43:22] which they will have to
[1:43:23] wait for permission.
[1:43:24] Yes. Sprat
[1:43:25] days have
[1:43:26] to end, and then
[1:43:27] they will be able to start your own
[1:43:29] project.
[1:43:29] This is a question too.
[1:43:31] Sorry.
[1:43:31] No, that's normal. No.
[1:43:33] Does this seem reasonable?
[1:43:35] Yes.
[1:43:35] Good.
[1:43:37] Something else from this
[1:43:38] reason? Sorry. I just think that this
[1:43:44] the best course of action. AND
[1:43:46] I thank everyone for this.
[1:43:51] opinion on this matter
[1:43:52] and question. I think
[1:43:53] that's pretty good.
[1:43:56] Something else from our
[1:43:57] old business, or
[1:43:58] Is everything okay? It was
[1:43:59] the only last one? IN
[1:44:01] I only have one,
[1:44:02] Julia. Of course, I
[1:44:03] It would be a great pity,
[1:44:04] if you didn't do this
[1:44:05] done.
[1:44:05] I know it's because
[1:44:06] emails that
[1:44:08] we get. We
[1:44:09] received several
[1:44:10] letters, and I have
[1:44:11] only a group of
[1:44:11] rescue squad,
[1:44:13] regionalization.
[1:44:19] Guys, a few minutes.
[1:44:20] , is there any
[1:44:21] information that
[1:44:22] can be shared to
[1:44:23] our city residents
[1:44:25] had...And since I
[1:44:26] saw several
[1:44:27] emails
[1:44:28] from the residents, and from
[1:44:29] you guys too...well
[1:44:31] , was
[1:44:34] one electronic
[1:44:35] letter,
[1:44:36] and I know that the one who
[1:44:39] I can share, well,
[1:44:40] but I just...is there
[1:44:42] a place where we can
[1:44:43] view the protocol
[1:44:44] ...Sir, or not, sir?
[1:44:46] No...
[1:44:47] Good.
[1:44:50] Nick Zack from BCRC is
[1:44:51] coordinator of this
[1:44:53] groups.
[1:44:55] The rest of us are just
[1:44:56] group members.
[1:44:57] I'm just curious,
[1:44:58] or
[1:44:59] there is no other...um,
[1:45:01] just so people don't
[1:45:02] thought we were something
[1:45:03] we hide.
[1:45:04] I definitely do this.
[1:45:05] I will do it.
[1:45:05] Yes. I am not going.
[1:45:10] to resort to
[1:45:11] logistics of offers
[1:45:12] , because, um, honestly
[1:45:13] speaking 100% honestly and
[1:45:15] 100% transparent
[1:45:16] proposals that
[1:45:17] are considered, and
[1:45:18] options that are available on
[1:45:20] table. Our group
[1:45:26] definitely not
[1:45:27] decided on one,
[1:45:28] two, three, four, which
[1:45:30] no matter what the number.
[1:45:32] Right? They
[1:45:33] narrowed the circle, and I have
[1:45:37] See you soon,
[1:45:39] On the 9th.
[1:45:40] Yes.
[1:45:40] Because I missed it,
[1:45:41] I almost missed it.
[1:45:42] meeting, because I thought that
[1:45:43] this is the ninth, and
[1:45:44] I read it wrong
[1:45:45] email. IN
[1:45:46] anyway, I
[1:45:47] finally did so,
[1:45:48] that the process will be like this,
[1:45:58] that at the council meeting
[1:45:59] Bennington
[1:46:00] will take place
[1:46:00] informational
[1:46:01] meetings, at
[1:46:02] council meeting
[1:46:03] Bennington. This will be
[1:46:15] information meeting
[1:46:17] here, with everyone
[1:46:18] options, uh,
[1:46:19] Shesbury and Woodford,
[1:46:20] because it's four
[1:46:21] participating cities, uh, in
[1:46:23] this group. Uh, so how?
[1:46:32] only we will decide,
[1:46:34] which I believe will be 9-
[1:46:35] that number will be
[1:46:36] a decision has been made,
[1:46:37] deadline for
[1:46:38] so that all this is
[1:46:43] published, was 1
[1:46:44] October. Uh, we have
[1:46:47] meeting on the 9th.
[1:46:55] Everything will be like this, uh, we
[1:46:56] must all
[1:46:57] to finish on the 9th
[1:46:58] moment, and then, uh, in
[1:47:00] we have, uh, information,
[1:47:02] I don't remember how we met her.
[1:47:03] called, but in any case she, uh,
[1:47:06] she is a representative
[1:47:07] Bennington Rescue from their
[1:47:09] council. It is she.
[1:47:15] is going to convey
[1:47:16] information to
[1:47:16] wide
[1:47:17] public,
[1:47:18] will work on this.
[1:47:20] Good.
[1:47:23] Um, so now, um, this
[1:47:28] really going on. Um, I think this one
[1:47:34] email,
[1:47:43] maybe a little
[1:47:45] demanded things that, um
[1:47:46] , will be published
[1:47:52] to the general public, when
[1:47:53] The time will come.
[1:47:55] Good.
[1:47:56] And right now it's not like that
[1:47:58] someone something
[1:47:58] hid. We have
[1:48:02] there is simply no...I can
[1:48:03] tell you everything,
[1:48:04] what is happening on
[1:48:05] meetings, but many
[1:48:06] this does not apply
[1:48:08] that which
[1:48:08] will take place and
[1:48:09] will move forward,
[1:48:11] so, um, this is ongoing,
[1:48:12] so this electronic
[1:48:13] The letter was kind of...
[1:48:15] I know better,
[1:48:17] no...no...letter to which
[1:48:18] can you answer...
[1:48:19] actually it's something on
[1:48:20] like...thank you for your
[1:48:21] email, but
[1:48:22] for now...um, you know,
[1:48:24] no information,
[1:48:25] which one can
[1:48:25] to share with a wide audience
[1:48:26] the public, and that's what
[1:48:28] I just want to say
[1:48:29] ...No, I understand, Julie.
[1:48:30] No, and I appreciate that. I
[1:48:32] said...
[1:48:33] Yes.
[1:48:34] Mmm...
[1:48:35] answered, because I am becoming
[1:48:37] braver, but...
[1:48:41] Yes. Therefore,
[1:48:44] Oh, yes. Demonstration.
[1:48:47] So, she has one. You
[1:48:49] do you want to do this
[1:48:50] demonstration? I
[1:48:51] just...Yes.
[1:48:53] So, I gave you,
[1:48:54] Guys, a copy of what?
[1:48:56] Because it is a state
[1:48:58] regulations. So, I gave it to you guys,
[1:49:00] a copy of our
[1:49:01] previous
[1:49:02] demonstration
[1:49:03] the version we had
[1:49:04] to do for
[1:49:05] mobile home in
[1:49:06] Vermont. So, this and me
[1:49:09] did not remove her name,
[1:49:10] but this is an older version
[1:49:12] , which we had,
[1:49:14] and we did as
[1:49:15] it was written,
[1:49:17] demonstration. So
[1:49:20] she was appointed,
[1:49:21] as I said, for
[1:49:23] mobile homes,
[1:49:24] because it is a state
[1:49:25] statute, and I can
[1:49:26] say it's 19 or
[1:49:28] the last nine. But I
[1:49:32] just because we
[1:49:33] finally came up with
[1:49:34] the new version that I
[1:49:35] just wanted to, like
[1:49:36] Darcy, we could all
[1:49:37] to communicate because
[1:49:39] we are not...
[1:49:40] I think that the one that
[1:49:42] Hannah sent us
[1:49:43] sprat
[1:49:44] days ago,
[1:49:45] was well composed,
[1:49:46] or the one who has it
[1:49:47] composed,
[1:49:48] I am working on it.
[1:49:49] together, and therefore we use,
[1:49:52] as I said, when
[1:49:54] someone wants to take off
[1:49:55] mobile home,
[1:49:56] this is what they get
[1:49:57] now, and it will do
[1:50:01] our previous one
[1:50:02] version with state
[1:50:03] tax.
[1:50:04] I understand.
[1:50:06] Yes. 15 dollars is
[1:50:10] registration fee,
[1:50:11] and this is a state statute
[1:50:12] which I want to get
[1:50:14] not just from
[1:50:15] residents of the city. It
[1:50:18] registration fee,
[1:50:19] which is installed
[1:50:20] by statute.
[1:50:22] I think that now
[1:50:24] they talk a lot about
[1:50:25] it. I am ready now.
[1:50:27] accept the project
[1:50:32] permission to
[1:50:32] demonstration, which
[1:50:34] sent to us by Hannah 10
[1:50:35] days ago or something
[1:50:36] like this.
[1:50:39] 14.
[1:50:40] Yes, I am ready.
[1:50:41] accept this permission
[1:50:42] right now.
[1:50:43] This form. IN
[1:50:44] I just have a question.
[1:50:45] : Do we need
[1:50:46] policy? Because I know we have
[1:50:48] policy.
[1:50:49] I don't think so.
[1:50:50] politics, Julie. I think it's selective.
[1:50:54] the ad stops
[1:50:56] obtaining permission for
[1:50:57] demolition, which has
[1:50:58] be submitted for any
[1:51:00] -any demolition in
[1:51:01] within the city limits, and this
[1:51:02] covers this permit,
[1:51:03] application or permit that
[1:51:04] covers practically
[1:51:05] everything I couldn't do
[1:51:06] come up with a scenario,
[1:51:08] which was not there. So
[1:51:12] I don't know, I don't think so.
[1:51:14] I, what is this, so to speak?
[1:51:15] , council policy. It...
[1:51:16] this was...this city...this
[1:51:18] requirement as owner
[1:51:19] land in the city or
[1:51:20] property owner.
[1:51:21] This is an extension
[1:51:22] legislation in
[1:51:23] within the state.
[1:51:25] I am ready to accept it.
[1:51:27] .
[1:51:27] Make a suggestion
[1:51:28] about acceptance
[1:51:34] demolition permit/
[1:51:35] transfer to
[1:51:35] printed
[1:51:36] in form,
[1:51:37] presented to us
[1:51:38] August 14.
[1:51:40] Yes. August 14.
[1:51:43] I will support this.
[1:51:44] proposal. Any
[1:51:46] further discussion
[1:51:47] ? Um, and this permission, um,
[1:51:49] will have a fee in
[1:51:51] amount of 15 dollars.
[1:51:55] Yes. Good.
[1:51:57] Perfectly. I have
[1:51:58] offer. I have
[1:51:59] friend. There is still
[1:52:00] discussion? All who
[1:52:02] "by"?
[1:52:02] I.
[1:52:06] Look at me.
[1:52:08] So you know what? Your
[1:52:09] the electoral council has, and
[1:52:11] The city of Pau has...has
[1:52:12] demolition permit,
[1:52:13] which is approved
[1:52:14] by the electoral council.
[1:52:17] Head.
[1:52:18] Good.
[1:52:20] Oh. Get busy
[1:52:21] in the correct order
[1:52:22] daytime.
[1:52:24] No.
[1:52:25] There are no new cases.
[1:52:27] Any public
[1:52:28] comments? I understand.
[1:52:31] . Yes. So, I begin.
[1:52:36] read
[1:52:38] this morning. My
[1:52:42] mother had to go to
[1:52:43] hospitals through
[1:52:44] heart problems, and I want to sincerely thank you.
[1:52:47] to the Rescue service for their
[1:52:49] quick response at 4:30
[1:52:50] in the morning when they took her away, for
[1:52:52] professionalism, and she
[1:52:53] I really liked it.
[1:52:55] building. And I just
[1:52:58] I want publicly
[1:52:59] tell you guys,
[1:53:01] Thank you very much.
[1:53:03] Thanks, Rob. Any
[1:53:05] other public
[1:53:06] comments? Without hands.
[1:53:10] Good. Is it needed?
[1:53:11] us executive
[1:53:12] legal committee
[1:53:13] questions?
[1:53:14] We need it. Yes.
[1:53:18] Good. I will consider.
[1:53:19] petition for
[1:53:21] executive introduction
[1:53:22] Committee on Legal Affairs
[1:53:23] questions.
[1:53:24] I suggest going to
[1:53:25] executive
[1:53:26] meeting with
[1:53:26] legal issues. IN
[1:53:30] Do I have a request?
[1:53:31] second. All in favor?
[1:58:11] Recording is in progress.
[1:58:12] Let's consider
[1:58:13] request for withdrawal
[1:58:14] from the executive
[1:58:15] Committee on Legal Affairs
[1:58:16] questions.
[1:58:16] Second.
[1:58:18] Microphone is on.
[1:58:20] Yes. Yes. IN
[1:58:22] I have a request. IN
[1:58:23] I have a second to exit the executive
[1:58:25] Committee on Legal Affairs
[1:58:25] questions. Everyone who is "in favor"?
[1:58:27] I.
[1:58:29] Sorry. Uh, me
[1:58:30] I will consider the request.
[1:58:31] about the transfer
[1:58:32] meeting.
[1:58:32] I will move on to
[1:58:33] transfer
[1:58:33] meeting.
[1:58:34] Second.
[1:58:35] They look
[1:58:36] ideally. IN
[1:58:37] I have a request. IN
[1:58:38] I have a second. All,
[1:58:39] who is "for", about
[1:58:40] transfer
[1:58:40] meeting.
[1:58:42] Thank you all. AT,
[1:58:45] record.