[0:09] Leading the order
[0:12] for the Queen Annes County Planning Commission
[0:14] on July 9th, 2026.
[0:17] We'll start with the Pledge of Allegiance.
[0:19] I pledge allegiance to the flag
[0:22] in the United States of America and to the republic.
[0:25] She stands one nation under God, indivisible, liberty
[0:30] and justice for all
[0:36] public comments.
[0:40] We had no one signed up.
[0:41] Okay. Updates legislative and legal matters.
[0:51] Oh, you're right there. Sorry. Yeah, good morning.
[0:55] Move one over. Hmm. You wanna move one over?
[0:58] I'll just Scoot. That's it. Yeah.
[1:03] Good morning, Amy Mordoff, planning director.
[1:05] I have a few updates.
[1:08] As you know, we had a a long list
[1:10] of citizen sponsor text amendments.
[1:12] Three of them were approved on the 9th of June
[1:15] and will become effective on the 25th of July.
[1:19] Those were amendments to the airport,
[1:23] Kent Island Gateway District
[1:25] and the WVC had two text amendments.
[1:29] Those will become effective in July.
[1:32] As I said, two of them,
[1:37] 26 0 6, 26 0 5, 26 0 6 is the
[1:41] suburban commercial proposal
[1:44] to change the impervious surface limit from 45 to 80%.
[1:49] And then the proposal to alter the supplemental gas
[1:54] standards relative to the setback from an intersection
[1:57] and how you measure that setback.
[1:59] Those two text amendments
[2:02] had their public hearing on the 30th of June
[2:05] and are potentially up
[2:08] for a vote at the commissioner's next meeting,
[2:11] which is on the 14th of July.
[2:15] The other two text amendments
[2:17] that are still hanging out there are relative
[2:20] to the open space provisions, both in the TDR
[2:24] and NCD districts.
[2:28] Those projects have had a, they,
[2:33] those two text amendments had their public hearings on May,
[2:36] May 26th, and then on the 9th of June when they may have
[2:40] been voted upon, the commissioners were considerate
[2:44] of comments that were received relative
[2:47] to maybe narrowing down non-agricultural uses
[2:52] that are permissible in open space specific to
[2:57] projects that have been subject to the,
[3:00] the lot line adjustment as proposed.
[3:03] So the commissioners requested that staff
[3:08] put forward an amendment for their consideration.
[3:11] So they are going to introduce an amendment
[3:15] that is substantive enough
[3:17] because we are looking to change what is permissible
[3:22] in the open space.
[3:25] So at their next meeting, which is the 14th of July meeting,
[3:29] that amendment to the two amendments,
[3:32] which is really one amendment which will apply to both
[3:35] because the open space provisions are in one table.
[3:40] So the TTDR
[3:41] and NCD provisions are sit in the same place in terms of
[3:45] what is permissible in open space.
[3:47] So that amendment will be presented
[3:50] and introduced at the 14th of July meeting,
[3:52] and we'll come back to you for recommendation.
[3:55] So that one's taking a little
[3:57] longer to go through the process.
[3:59] In terms of general updates, just to let you know,
[4:04] I had mentioned to you the Turning Point Energy case,
[4:08] which is three co-located community solar projects
[4:14] that total almost 10 megawatts
[4:17] and is cited in the town of Centerville's growth area.
[4:22] I had mentioned that we were going to intervene in that case
[4:25] and Lindsey on our behalf filed that petition
[4:29] to Intervene, which was entered into the
[4:32] record on the 8th of June.
[4:34] And we are just continuing to participate
[4:37] in the public utility law judge
[4:40] and the Public Service Commission's
[4:42] consideration of that case.
[4:44] There are several dates that are relative
[4:47] to submitting testament testimony and briefs
[4:51] and Lindsay's just been keeping up with that.
[4:54] And we will be making comments
[4:56] and going on the record as appropriate to represent
[5:00] what we feel is the correct interpretation of our code
[5:03] and the state's renewable energy provisions.
[5:08] Additionally, we had
[5:13] canceled our August meeting for the Mako Conference.
[5:16] There was a thought
[5:17] that we might hold a special meeting in August if we had any
[5:21] items for the agenda, but we do not.
[5:23] So our next meeting will be on the,
[5:27] on the seventh in s September.
[5:30] I was trying to get the date, but, so no August, okay.
[5:32] Hmm, no August, no August.
[5:34] But at the Mako Conference, which is the 12th
[5:36] through the 15th of August, just to let you know that
[5:41] I'll be representing the county on a panel
[5:44] that is discussing building the bigger picture,
[5:48] and that is the county's,
[5:50] I'll be the county voice on a panel discussing a lot
[5:53] of the state provisions that impact development
[5:57] and how the county can leverage some of its resources
[6:01] and its own zoning to maximize some
[6:05] of the positive aspects of that partnership.
[6:09] As we've seen a lot of legislation
[6:11] that impacts our local zoning codes.
[6:14] Additionally, the Maker,
[6:16] the Mako Planners affiliate will hold a work session
[6:19] and I'll be chairing that session as the president
[6:22] of the Planners affiliate for Mako.
[6:25] That it, That's everything.
[6:27] Miscellaneous staff items,
[6:28] Those were my miscellaneous items.
[6:30] Okay.
[6:31] Alright. Major project. Thank you.
[6:37] Thank you. Reliable Development Company.
[6:43] Steve? Yes,
[7:01] Good morning.
[7:02] I'm Steve Johnson, senior Planner with planning and zoning.
[7:04] It's good to see everybody again.
[7:06] I want to thank Rob for filling in for me last month.
[7:08] I hope he didn't give you too much of trouble
[7:13] as stated by the the chair.
[7:14] We are here to discuss SP 26 dash oh two dash 0 1 72
[7:20] for Reliable Development Company LLC, who is proposing
[7:23] to construct a 40,040 square foot building for the design
[7:26] and fabrication of specialty vehicles
[7:28] and is requesting major site plan approval.
[7:32] This project did receive concept plan approval
[7:34] in December of last year.
[7:37] What you're about to see is essentially the same as
[7:39] what was presented then.
[7:42] Project's located in Stevensville south of Route 50
[7:44] and East Pier One Road behind the target.
[7:48] More specifically tax map 56 parcel 20 lot 1 0 9 totals
[7:52] 4.411 acres
[7:54] and is located off of Ellendale Farm Lane in Stevensville.
[7:57] The target is the large white building you see
[8:00] at the center of your screen there.
[8:02] And as you can see by the area,
[8:03] the property is currently utilized for agricultural use
[8:08] Property zoned urban commercial
[8:09] and is located within the Chester Stevensville growth area.
[8:12] It's also located in the priority funding area,
[8:14] which is not shown on the screen.
[8:19] Property's partially located within the RCA
[8:21] designation of the critical area.
[8:22] This is the dark green sliver property
[8:24] on the east side there.
[8:26] That area is subject to an easement that limits use
[8:28] to passive recreation planting
[8:30] and landscape landscaping associated,
[8:32] not associated with the proposal.
[8:35] No part of this proposal encroaches upon
[8:37] that area as required.
[8:40] All chapter 18 landscape requirements are met
[8:42] with this proposal that includes on onsite parking lot,
[8:45] street buffer and screening plantings.
[8:48] There are 0.189 acres of non-Title wetlands
[8:51] and 0.52 acres of the associated buffer buffer on site.
[8:55] These are the bright green areas
[8:56] at the center of your screen.
[8:58] The applicant is proposing to disturb 0.188 acres
[9:02] of wetlands and 0.435 acres of buffer.
[9:05] This disturbance has been authorized by MDE
[9:07] and a copy of that authorization
[9:09] was included in your packets.
[9:11] There are 0.40 acres of woodlands on site
[9:14] of which the applicant is proposing to clear 0.15 acres
[9:17] that is delineated on your screen
[9:19] as the hatch brown and white area.
[9:22] Forest conservation has been addressed
[9:24] with the original subdivision
[9:25] and there are no steep slope streams, erosion hazard areas,
[9:28] endangered species or areas
[9:29] of a hundred year floodplain on site light.
[9:34] Here's a look at the site plan.
[9:36] Access is taken off
[9:37] of Thompson Creek Road shown
[9:38] circled in yellow on your screen.
[9:41] All uc, district non-residential development standards are
[9:44] met with this proposal including floor area
[9:46] and imper area, which are both well
[9:47] below the maximum permitted all chapter 18 parking
[9:52] requirements met with this proposal and stormwater will be
[9:56] provided on site and has been reviewed and approved by DPW.
[9:59] Should you have any questions
[10:00] regarding the stormwater on site there
[10:02] as a representative from DPW here
[10:04] to answer any questions you may have.
[10:09] Property will be served by public water and sewer
[10:11] and the project meets the requirements
[10:13] of the adequate public facilities ordinance.
[10:15] A copy of the A PFO approval letter was included
[10:18] in your packets as well.
[10:20] There is a overhead flight easement that runs
[10:22] through this property, which restricts structures
[10:24] and plantings to a maximum height of 35 feet.
[10:27] This proposed development will comply with that restriction
[10:30] as the building is proposed to be 34.8 feet in height
[10:33] and all plantings will be kept below 35 feet.
[10:37] It should be noted that the airport manager does support
[10:40] conditional approval of the project subject
[10:42] to the conditions that were included.
[10:43] It's in the staff report.
[10:47] There are road improvements
[10:49] proposed as part of this development.
[10:50] They include milling, resurfacing, res striping,
[10:53] and minor widening along the south
[10:55] side of Thompson Creek Road.
[10:56] There in the dark dark ray that you see on your screen,
[10:58] that is to supply a full width shoulder and curb.
[11:05] During concept plan review,
[11:06] the planning commission had concerns with truck turning
[11:11] movements in and out of this site.
[11:13] To address that, the applicant has developed a truck turning
[11:15] exhibit that was included in your packets.
[11:17] This is a snippet from that.
[11:19] This is the inbound traffic coming into the site.
[11:22] The trucks are shown as light blue
[11:24] and the paths they take are shown as purple on your screens.
[11:30] And this is what outbound turning movements may look like.
[11:33] It's my understanding that the applicant has brought
[11:35] their traffic engineer here.
[11:36] So if you have any questions,
[11:37] they should be able to address those.
[11:41] Here's a look at the renderings of the building.
[11:43] This is looking towards the south.
[11:45] This is the entrance of the front of the building.
[11:48] This is looking towards the northeast shows, the west side
[11:52] and the rear of the building.
[11:55] This is looking towards the northwest,
[11:57] which is the east side of the building in the rear again,
[12:01] and this is looking towards the southwest.
[12:04] With that, before I turn it over to the applicant,
[12:07] I do want to thank them.
[12:08] They were a very good partner in this review,
[12:12] the app, both the applicant
[12:14] and the engineer worked really well with us and,
[12:17] and I, I wanted to give him a compliment for that.
[12:28] Good morning. Good morning.
[12:30] My name is Tim Glass Land Engineering
[12:33] and to my far right is John Brians with Tech Ops.
[12:36] Remember seeing him before and
[12:38] to my immediate right is Dorsey Schultz
[12:40] with reliable real estate Development.
[12:43] Mark Keeley, as Steve mentioned, is also behind me
[12:45] with traffic concepts
[12:47] and Genevieve McFarlane is also here as well.
[12:51] Thank you Steve. That was pretty comprehensive on
[12:54] what we could or discuss any further.
[12:58] I will just simply mention to you that with regards to
[13:03] the SHA approval
[13:04] and access we have, we've checked all the boxes there.
[13:07] Essentially where we're at right now is submitting
[13:09] for final bond estimates for surety
[13:11] and submitting the app, actual application.
[13:14] I mean, we're through that, that process with them.
[13:16] And also I think Steve just mentioned that we have the
[13:20] MDE letter of authorization for the little bit
[13:23] of non-Title wetland buffer
[13:24] permits that we'll need for this.
[13:25] That's ha that has been issued.
[13:29] Quick note on drainage
[13:30] and stormwater management, just the site's been designed to,
[13:35] you know, meet the needs of really the site layout,
[13:37] what the, what the owner needs to have accomplished on
[13:39] that site that conduct his business effectively as well
[13:44] as circulation and stormwater drainage features.
[13:47] So we on site we have one microbio retention area,
[13:50] which is an ESD practice as required,
[13:52] and two submerge gravel wetlands to not only capture
[13:55] that runoff directly from all the impervious areas,
[13:58] but to store it, treat it, attenuate it,
[14:00] and reduce flows ultimately
[14:02] and total off of the site per requirements.
[14:04] So that in a nutshell is as a stormwater,
[14:07] it does provide more than required
[14:09] of the environmental site design volume, which is a volume
[14:13] of water that you have to capture, hold, treat, filter,
[14:15] and then treat before it's released.
[14:17] So we, we do comply with, with those requirements as well.
[14:22] And Steve mentioned also, I mean, we're prepared
[14:24] to essentially, you know, take care of any minor technical,
[14:28] there's a couple of minor comments we got from sanitary
[14:31] district about some notes and specs and pipe material
[14:33] and some things like that that's already listed in there
[14:36] in their standard details and, and construction criteria.
[14:41] But they wanted us to kind of dot the,
[14:44] i's cross the T's on the plans.
[14:46] There's a couple of minor technical
[14:47] notes we've gotta deal with there.
[14:49] And then we've got sureties
[14:50] and cost estimates that are, that are produced
[14:52] and prepared, ready to submit back to DPW
[14:54] so we can get the maintenance and inspection
[14:56] agreements recorded for stormwater.
[14:57] These are all kind of the finish line items that have
[14:59] to be done on all these commercial jobs Anyway, so we're,
[15:03] we're prepared to wrap all this up, close this out
[15:08] and help John get moving forward with
[15:10] what he intends to do with this site.
[15:13] And with that, I think, John,
[15:14] if you might wanna say a few words about, about the project,
[15:17] who you are and so forth, that'd be helpful.
[15:19] John Brianna, I'm the president at Tech Ops Specialty
[15:22] vehicles that have been there for nine and a half years.
[15:24] I'll let go. What, what Steve said.
[15:27] You know, I think working on a project like this in any
[15:30] county is, is difficult.
[15:31] And I think the amount of teamwork that's needed over time
[15:34] and, and it does take time, is important.
[15:38] And the county, both Steve
[15:40] and Rob have been great in coordinating with us.
[15:42] Numerous site visits, a lot of engagement about
[15:45] how we comply, but also, you know, kind
[15:48] of meet the needs of the business.
[15:49] And, and as we evolve,
[15:51] I'll mention just a couple things about the business itself,
[15:54] the physical location, the actual, you know, can, can island
[16:00] location itself and, and some
[16:01] of the people involved in the business.
[16:03] The best way to describe what we do,
[16:04] and I think most people know,
[16:05] but it's to just kind of like talk about some examples
[16:09] of projects that we do.
[16:10] We do a lot of work for the US government and a lot of state
[16:13] and local, a lot of Maryland centric work.
[16:17] Everybody kind of knows about FIFA World Cup
[16:19] and that the fact that that's going on the most
[16:23] of the first half of this year,
[16:24] our business was involved in designing
[16:26] and building three quarters of the vehicles
[16:29] that are being used at FIFA World Cup for a lot of the,
[16:31] the drone defense, nature
[16:33] and security aspects of what they're doing.
[16:36] That's, that's an example of it, right?
[16:38] It's trucks and trailers
[16:39] and they're being used to kind of track
[16:41] and mitigate threats from a security standpoint to,
[16:45] you know, high profile events,
[16:48] national level security events around the country.
[16:50] That's some of the work we do.
[16:52] Our biggest customers tend to fall within the US government.
[16:55] Homeland Security is a principal customer of ours.
[16:58] And, and the agencies, the,
[17:00] the departments within Secret Service,
[17:02] Homeland Security Investigations,
[17:04] federal Protective Service groups like that.
[17:08] The, so that's kind of a little bit of what we do.
[17:10] We have engineers, we have technicians,
[17:12] a lot of trades in the building.
[17:14] And then typical kind of front
[17:15] office administrative support.
[17:17] The physical location ends up being
[17:19] very important for the business.
[17:21] And I'll give it just a couple examples of it.
[17:23] One, in dealing with our customers, you know,
[17:25] the US government and kind of a lot of the, the management
[17:28] of projects like this tend
[17:29] to be headquartered outta the DC area.
[17:32] The ability for those customers to come to us physically
[17:35] think about building a house, right?
[17:37] You wanna sit down with an architect
[17:39] and look at the review, put your hands around it
[17:41] as the house is getting built, you want to visit it, see
[17:44] how it's going with the overall intent to,
[17:46] to serve the US government
[17:47] and give them what they need to do their job.
[17:51] The physical location facilitates a lot of that progress.
[17:56] So being close to the DC you know, metro area.
[17:58] In addition to that, we serve a lot of military groups.
[18:01] Aberdeen Proven Ground is a customer of ours,
[18:03] PAX River area, Webster outlying
[18:05] Field as a customer of ours.
[18:06] So some of the military installations
[18:08] around the Maryland area also facilitate
[18:11] just good business practice
[18:12] and the ability to host customers when needed and,
[18:17] and have them be a part of the project
[18:19] and get what they need ultimately to support their mission.
[18:24] The businesses has been growing.
[18:26] I've been there nine and a half years
[18:28] and we've, we've nearly grown every year I've been there.
[18:31] KRM has been an am an amazing host. They're great.
[18:35] The business park is in high demand
[18:38] and the facility itself wasn't necessarily set up for
[18:41] what we do as a business.
[18:43] You know, larger doors
[18:45] to bring vehicles in and out of the building.
[18:48] Efficient work that's associated with that.
[18:50] The, the height of the building, you know, inside in order
[18:52] to do some of the testing we do on some of the vehicles.
[18:56] It it, and it just wasn't set up for that.
[18:58] So they have a backlog of, of requirements.
[19:00] We've been able to scale and grow there recently,
[19:02] but the reality is, is we need to find a new home.
[19:05] And this headquarters, you know, is, is,
[19:09] is in support of that.
[19:11] In addition, there's sensitive nature in some of what we do.
[19:14] So the ability to secure vehicles on our lot,
[19:16] not have it be such an open area, things like
[19:18] that end up facilitating what we do.
[19:20] And also allow us to consider more confidential work
[19:23] with the, for the, for the government.
[19:26] The people in the building are, are critical to what we do.
[19:29] It's a, it's a Maryland business.
[19:31] It's a Maryland LLC, it's owned by Marylanders,
[19:35] numerous Naval Academy graduates in that group.
[19:37] We are a veteran-owned small business.
[19:40] And then we pull from both the western
[19:41] and eastern shore of Maryland to support what we do.
[19:45] Head of engineering is the United States is a Maryland
[19:48] University of Maryland grad.
[19:50] Our front office, you know,
[19:53] somewhat comes from the western shore,
[19:54] some from the eastern shore, but a lot
[19:56] of our technicians in trades do come from Queen Anne County.
[19:59] And that's critical to what we do.
[20:02] The maritime industry is a nice
[20:04] sister industry to what we do.
[20:05] If, if you understand boats and working in engines and,
[20:09] and tinkering with tractors
[20:10] and et cetera, you tend to to be able to pick up what we do.
[20:14] And that's important for us to be able to continue to grow,
[20:17] to continue to find labor that we need to support
[20:20] what we do right here in the county.
[20:24] So I say all that just to say that it, it's, you know,
[20:26] we're, we're a business that's on the move and successful
[20:28] and it's, it's in many respects
[20:30] because of where we're located and it's as much a,
[20:33] a Maryland and Queen Anne County story as anything else.
[20:36] And I think our ability to continue to be here,
[20:38] to grow here is important.
[20:40] And I think, I think that's a, a large amount of pride
[20:43] that everybody can take in, in the success of this business,
[20:45] but a collective success of a
[20:46] Maryland and Queenland County business.
[20:51] Thank you, John. I guess at this point, you know,
[20:54] we would, we would entertain any questions you guys have,
[20:57] we'll be happy to answer those.
[20:58] Otherwise, you know, we would respectfully request your
[21:01] approval of the final site plan so that we can
[21:04] button this project up
[21:05] and like I said,
[21:07] get John moving in the right direction here.
[21:10] Questions Madam Chair?
[21:12] Go ahead, Ben. Steve, can, can you give us some sort
[21:16] of graphic of where the runway is
[21:18] for Bay Bridge Airport in relation to the building?
[21:22] Yeah, I, I might have
[21:23] to pop outta my presentation real quick.
[21:26] I'm curious as to whether the building's directly in the
[21:29] approach path to use a pilot term or whether it's offset.
[22:08] Okay, so the, the property in questions here
[22:10] that's highlighted in blue and here
[22:13] You're, here's your, that tells me
[22:14] what I, what I'm asking. Okay. Yep.
[22:17] Slightly offset. Yep. Thank you. Sure. Oh, I need,
[22:22] I have a question regarding your traffic patterns.
[22:25] I don't know if you wanna bring up your traffic person
[22:27] or if you can address that.
[22:28] And primarily it is,
[22:31] and I'll give the county department heads up
[22:34] that they'll be asked probably to weigh in on their opinion
[22:35] as well, looking at the, What we're calling this,
[22:40] your traffic post sign for outbound trucks leaving
[22:44] the proposed project going westbound or eastbound on on 50
[22:50] and recalling the conversation we had about ingress
[22:52] and egress out of this particular property at
[22:54] that intersection with Route 18 or eight south.
[23:00] And so why are the westbound
[23:06] traffic exiting your property crossing
[23:12] a a thoroughfare that's in a car sometimes challenging.
[23:17] And why are we sending, we you suggesting they
[23:22] go left outta there speaking specifically about larger
[23:24] trucks, tractor trailer scale
[23:26] and not going eastbound on that access road to the turnabout
[23:30] and coming back to get in the queue.
[23:34] So we have 45% of our traffic trucks
[23:39] and passenger car vehicles
[23:43] traveling westbound over the bridge so
[23:46] that traffic would exit the site making a left
[23:50] and then a right onto to Maryland eight
[23:53] and using the interchanged access 50.
[23:56] Right. But why not?
[23:57] Because that's a tricky exit coming off the property
[24:00] and onto that access road, whatever that name is,
[24:05] versus turning right, going down
[24:06] to the circle and coming back.
[24:09] So if you go to the circle,
[24:11] then you're turning right onto us 50
[24:14] and you've gotta go down and no,
[24:15] No, no, you go around the circle
[24:16] and come back to get in the queue. I'm just curious.
[24:20] Yeah, I mean that that,
[24:21] That's an, it's, it's a, it's an alternate route.
[24:24] So turning, turning right, going
[24:27] around the circle and then coming back.
[24:29] Correct. Because the, the design
[24:33] of the access as shown with the auto turn exhibit shows
[24:38] that you can, I, I
[24:41] wb 67 I think was the truck that we used,
[24:46] which is the largest tractor trailer can negotiate that. I,
[24:50] I have no question about the engineering involved in a,
[24:52] a truck being certified to make a particular turn.
[24:55] Yeah. Fantastic. Thank you for all that information
[24:58] and data I'm just talking about logistically speaking,
[25:01] I come at a target and I often wait several minutes in a car
[25:06] to turn left to go to that same intersection.
[25:08] And I'm just wondering as a tractor trailer driver in a
[25:11] circum under a similar circumstance that that would be
[25:14] that much more challenging.
[25:16] I'm just curious to why we're directing traffic
[25:18] to the left coming out of your this
[25:20] facility versus going right.
[25:21] Yeah, I just, I think that's, you know,
[25:23] a professional truck driver is gonna take the easiest route,
[25:26] I don't think going down to the roundabout
[25:28] and trying to Well,
[25:30] Well there's easy and they're safe and practical.
[25:33] So I'm just, we we talk about this a lot about yeah. Right.
[25:36] Specifically case in point are mining
[25:39] extraction facilities here in the county.
[25:41] Yeah. We require them to go way out
[25:44] of their way roundabout over the hill through the woods
[25:46] to avoid certain intersections
[25:48] or certain parts of town that are school bus heavy
[25:51] or business heavy or you know,
[25:52] soft shoulder, whatever the reason is.
[25:55] I understand what you're saying. We
[25:56] Can direct traffic where we choose to direct traffic
[25:58] and I'm just wondering if that, if we're currently under
[26:01] that yellow arrow that's proposed, if that's the safest
[26:04] egress from your property.
[26:05] I get what you're saying, it's a left, we're trying
[26:08] to eliminate left turn to where Well
[26:09] It's, it's a short, it's a short run there too, but
[26:12] I don't think,
[26:13] and maybe John can answer this is not really
[26:20] a, a large truck generator.
[26:22] I mean the trucks come in, deliver parts. There's
[26:25] One a day or something was per Joe's I
[26:26] Think.
[26:27] Yeah. And I'm not sure. So we, an I analyze
[26:30] traffic engineers analyze peak hour.
[26:33] I don't know exactly when your truck's coming in,
[26:36] but I probably not during peak hours.
[26:41] I know deliveries try not to come to facilities
[26:46] during peak time period.
[26:47] So I would suspect your truck traffic is not gonna arrive
[26:52] during that seven to 9 46 mid morning
[26:55] Later in the morning, sometimes afternoon.
[26:57] And I think that probably the, the small number
[27:00] of trucks accessing this site
[27:03] and then not being peak hour trips, I would think mitigates
[27:09] any, any conflicts with the commuting public.
[27:14] Okay. I see engineers representing the department,
[27:17] public works and roads.
[27:18] Do you have any, can you reaffirm these comments
[27:21] or alleviate my concerns Mr.
[27:25] Ger or Mr. Moore about egress of truck traffic on
[27:28] that stretch of road there?
[27:30] That's pretty congested at most times.
[27:33] Also Henry here, the state highway.
[27:35] That, that the state highway road, you might
[27:38] Chime in.
[27:39] That's fine. I, I defer to you as to
[27:41] who con addresses the concern and it's not a major one.
[27:45] It just seems like there's an alternate route
[27:47] that might be safer and better
[27:48] and why that's not being pro proposed as option A.
[27:52] I don't know, is my question.
[27:56] I mean, I can take it back to our
[27:57] Traffic.
[27:58] I think you're gonna need to be on a mic,
[27:59] sir, if you don't mind.
[28:03] I would add just quickly in support of Mr.
[28:06] Lay's reservations, I'd hate to be the sheriff that has
[28:10] to enforce unless enough space is there to clear the turn.
[28:16] I don't think that road sign
[28:18] that you proposed is particularly effective
[28:20] and in support of Commissioner Lay's position, I'd like
[28:23] to see something that says no right
[28:24] or no left turn right for trucks.
[28:28] Well again, we, we ran the auto turn
[28:30] and there's, it's, there's adequate space
[28:33] for the largest truck to, to turn left
[28:37] If there's no other traffic.
[28:39] Right? Well it's, it's, you wait for a gap.
[28:41] It's just, I mean these are professional truck drivers,
[28:43] they're gonna wait for a gap.
[28:44] Yeah, no, I understand that. And they're gonna proceed.
[28:48] I mean, you're also gonna have conflicts with traffic
[28:51] with a truck trying to negotiate the, the roundabout.
[28:55] Yes. So I, I think the safest way is to make,
[28:59] wait for a gap in traffic.
[29:01] It's gonna be off peak hour, make a left
[29:03] and then use, use the state road
[29:07] to access us 50.
[29:09] I think that's the safest, most efficient route for
[29:14] Trucks.
[29:15] Is that the state's position as well, sir?
[29:17] To the best of my knowledge, yes.
[29:18] And like I said, I can take it back to our traffic engineers
[29:21] and tractor division in the office
[29:24] and if what their thoughts are on trying to send tractor
[29:28] to trailers up to that roundabout,
[29:30] that is a very small roundabout to try
[29:32] to make a u-turn within it basically.
[29:35] Well if you're coming eastbound, you're take,
[29:36] you're cutting a u-turn on that,
[29:38] that's the proposed entrance route for eastbound traffic.
[29:41] Right? Sure. You're not coming off again.
[29:46] It, it, it also suggests it's a little weird that
[29:49] you're not, you're you're going out one way
[29:53] but you're not coming in that same way.
[29:55] Right? So if you turn the page, you're suggesting
[29:57] that eastbound traffic go all the way down to that circle,
[30:00] do that hairpin u-turn that we just mentioned
[30:02] and coming back into the facility.
[30:04] Why are you not getting off the exit ramp right off the
[30:07] bridge and turning right and then merging over?
[30:11] Well it's, I mean you're talking about going down
[30:13] and turning a truck, turning around
[30:18] the entire roundabout.
[30:19] If you're coming from westbound 50, you don't need
[30:23] to traverse through the entire roundabout. It's you're,
[30:26] But it's arguably a, a similar if not tighter turn,
[30:30] at least on the map we're looking at. I mean,
[30:32] If you're, if you're going all the way
[30:33] around the round the roundabout,
[30:34] the truck's gonna be dragging its wheels through the center
[30:37] of the roundabout if you're trying to,
[30:40] Which I believe is built for that.
[30:42] Yeah, it's, it's built for that.
[30:43] But again, you know, the analysis shows that
[30:47] and State Highway reviewed the study.
[30:49] They reviewed the trip distribution and the number of trips
[30:52] and they approved it and then they, they asked
[30:56] for the truck turning radius, which we provided them.
[30:59] And then we're, we're designing the access specifically
[31:04] for trucks to exit and enter.
[31:06] Again, I understand all the
[31:07] design, engineering, and forethought.
[31:09] Fantastic. Thank you. Appreciate that.
[31:10] No problems, no issues. It's the simple logistics of why
[31:14] you still haven't answer my question
[31:16] to why are we bringing trucks in one way
[31:18] but not the same way out.
[31:20] It seems to me that would be, if if your argument is
[31:23] where you want to position yourself, that's fine,
[31:26] but it seems contradictory to me this
[31:29] Way.
[31:30] So I think what he's talking about is this here.
[31:34] Right. So I yeah, we,
[31:38] we have distributed the traffic.
[31:40] There are 25 inbound
[31:45] AM trips from, from northbound.
[31:50] I'm on page 17.
[31:52] I'm looking at this, this exhibit here,
[31:54] this color coded wrap mount.
[31:56] Yeah,
[31:59] Yeah, that's, that exhibit's not my study.
[32:01] And one page has you
[32:03] leaving one way and the other way it's,
[32:05] If I may add, this was an exhibit
[32:07] that we put together internally
[32:08] and coordination with, with tech ops to coordinate with
[32:12] that study the count study that's in your packet as well.
[32:16] This is not meant for everyday traffic like we're talking
[32:18] about the larger trucks.
[32:20] That's what this is, is meant for.
[32:22] This will be an internal kind of logistics plan just
[32:25] for the trucking.
[32:26] It sounds like, you know, based on the time of arrival,
[32:30] what we've done from the study, it's gonna be off peak hours
[32:32] as Mark mentioned that left turnout of the site isn't
[32:36] as much of a conflict
[32:37] because there won't be as much,
[32:39] much cuing at that time of day. Yeah.
[32:41] But then why Okay then well, okay, fine, fine. Thank you.
[32:44] Addressed and answered. Still have,
[32:47] I'm waiting clarity on why inbound trucks coming from the
[32:51] Bay Bridge are going under the underpass to go to
[32:54] that roundabout to come back
[32:55] and instead of getting off at the exit,
[32:57] That's not happening.
[32:58] And I didn't do that in my study.
[33:00] All the traffic that's entering this site, if,
[33:05] if you, I don't know if you have the study, it's on page 17,
[33:08] they're arriving, they use the interchange
[33:13] to access eight
[33:14] and then they turn left onto Thompson Creek Road.
[33:21] So this, you're talking about the long rundown and
[33:23] Then I'm talking about this exhibit right there
[33:25] that has him going past your facility, coming back to it
[33:29] through the roundabout that we've been talking about.
[33:31] Why is that the preferred means of entering
[33:35] for eastbound traffic instead of getting off the exit,
[33:38] immediately coming off the Bay Bridge
[33:40] To reduce one left turn in that,
[33:42] that lane at the intersection of Route eight
[33:45] and Pine Creek route.
[33:47] Okay, we can, I'm, I'm hearing con contradicting,
[33:50] contradicting to ions on, on
[33:54] from an expert, traffic expert
[33:58] who says trucks are gonna take the path
[33:59] of release resistance and then
[34:01] the next comment is they're gonna go down underneath this,
[34:04] go around, skip through Maloo and come back.
[34:06] Okay. I, I just, I'm, I'm, I need, I still,
[34:09] I'm still not super clear on why we're not doing
[34:12] So can I.
[34:13] Same entrance and egress pathways.
[34:15] I, I, when I do a study, I try to take the
[34:19] worst case traffic scenario
[34:21] 'cause it's the easiest path for me to get
[34:24] Approved.
[34:25] Sure. Human nature. Yeah.
[34:25] So I had all my trips from coming across the Bay Bridge
[34:31] using the interchange
[34:32] and then as I said, coming down south,
[34:36] The shorter run.
[34:37] Yeah, right. The more logical Right.
[34:39] Direct route. And we, so then we did the auto turn just
[34:42] to make sure that truck traffic could do
[34:45] what I'm showing in the study and they can,
[34:48] and then I guess Dorsey had an alternative.
[34:53] I I don't think it's a good idea to say no left turns.
[34:56] I mean I think the best access is to, to keep
[35:02] the full access movement.
[35:04] 'cause again, this is a very limited
[35:09] generator in terms of tractor trailers.
[35:12] And again those tractor, the tractor trailer
[35:15] that will visit the site is most likely not gonna
[35:19] happen during the peak hour
[35:21] To the next page.
[35:23] I I hear you and I, I don't necessarily agree with you,
[35:26] but it's just from a presentation.
[35:29] But when I'm reading this, it sounds like you're
[35:33] proposing two different scenarios
[35:35] and then saying they're both the best, but I'm,
[35:37] I'm not. I'm I'm
[35:38] Saying okay, your team is Yes,
[35:40] Yes. And that,
[35:41] That's, and that's confusing
[35:42] to the people sitting over here that that's who are trying
[35:44] to interpret your intentions. If I,
[35:45] If I can just kind of summarize
[35:46] and bring back, we've got four want, two inbound,
[35:49] two outbound, I Sure, sure.
[35:55] Two inbound, two outbound.
[35:56] And the only route that differs from
[35:58] what was in the traffic report was this one
[36:01] where I show further down right at
[36:03] The circle and coming back through through Yep. Yes. That
[36:05] Was tip only to reduce any left turn at the
[36:08] End.
[36:09] That's not necessarily a preferred recommended route.
[36:11] That's just simply the alternative route.
[36:13] Simply like turning right turn only
[36:15] would be an alternate route. Yes sir. Understood.
[36:17] For the one tractor trailer that,
[36:19] that comes each once a day during off peak hours.
[36:23] Okay, now that, now that's clear. Okay.
[36:25] Thank Sorry for the confusion.
[36:26] No, no, it's, you leave a little, when you leave room
[36:29] for interpretation, you get different interpretations.
[36:34] But I appreciate you that, that Thank you. But
[36:36] I completely addressed Questions.
[36:38] Un unless the county department has anything to add
[36:40] or subtract from that testimony on behalf
[36:43] of Department of Public Works.
[36:45] 'cause you've been involved in this, I'm sure.
[36:49] Good morning. Lee Edgar, chief engineer
[36:52] with the Department of Public Works.
[36:54] I'm not quite as intimately knowledgeable with regard
[36:57] to the exhibit and how that all came together and such.
[37:00] So the applicant is really best to speak to that.
[37:03] But I am hearing the discussion and understand your question
[37:06] and concern and want to provide some insight
[37:08] with regard to that.
[37:10] Commissioner, you're always good to add, ask the question.
[37:12] As always, we're concerned about the safety
[37:16] and, you know, movement for our motoring public and such.
[37:19] In this case, as you brought up the, the matter of
[37:23] extractions and mines
[37:25] and such in the review of this project, the
[37:30] trucks coming in
[37:31] and out serving this are very, very few in number.
[37:35] Whereas with a mine that that product is,
[37:38] you have a vast quantity of vehicles coming in and out.
[37:42] I would tend to agree with the applicant that
[37:46] not restricting this
[37:48] and leaving, leaving the access to
[37:52] and from the site to the discretion
[37:54] of the truck driver would be the best scenario in this,
[37:59] in this case, for example, a tractor trailer and,
[38:04] and I don't know how many tractor trailers they would really
[38:06] have indicate that was kind of the worst case scenario.
[38:11] Making that right turn outta the site, going back
[38:15] to the traffic circle
[38:16] and coming back, the vehicles entering that circle,
[38:20] even though it is marked with a deceleration speed
[38:23] and such would coming off
[38:25] of the state highway would be presumably coming at a much
[38:28] higher rate of speed than, for example, vehicles coming
[38:33] off of Route eight, making that turn
[38:36] onto the road from that light.
[38:39] They have very little time to bring up speed.
[38:41] So I think if I were driving the truck leaving
[38:46] that site, I would likely opt to wait for a clear movement
[38:51] to make a left turn out of the site.
[38:53] To your point, it may take a little while depending on the
[38:57] queuing of vehicles and such,
[38:59] but I think it is very situational.
[39:02] And in this particular instance, the proposal as it is,
[39:06] which does not have signage
[39:07] or restrictions on how those
[39:11] vehicles which are delivering materials to
[39:14] or from the site would utilize their discretion.
[39:18] It would probably very be a very challenging thing
[39:20] to implement, unlike a mine for example, where
[39:24] that is the business
[39:25] and the drivers are very much trained to adhere
[39:28] to a haul route when you have a manufacturing facility
[39:31] and a occasional deliveries which may be coming in
[39:34] and out, different, different drivers
[39:37] and every, it would be very, very difficult if not,
[39:41] you know, really logistically impossible to
[39:44] enforce a haul route
[39:46] and could enter some confusion into that
[39:49] for the drivers who are doing it.
[39:50] So you're, you're very good to ask the question.
[39:53] I think there are valid questions in the terms
[39:55] of the motorist that's going to be pulling out,
[39:58] but I would agree that it's best to be left to the driver
[40:02] for that particular delivery.
[40:03] And so Mr. Edgar, thank you, appreciate that greatly.
[40:05] Good points all, would you, just to clarify your comments,
[40:10] you would not be in favor of a sign suggesting that in,
[40:14] in the application package, quote, attention all trucks,
[40:16] no left turns unless there's enough space
[40:18] to clear the eastbound drive lane.
[40:19] That seems as Mr.
[40:21] Till Commissioner Tillman stated silly to enforce
[40:26] and, and a and a professional trucker should know that,
[40:29] that they shouldn't turn if, if it's not safe, right?
[40:32] I mean what was that a, whose recommendation was that?
[40:35] The, a recommendation of the traffic expert
[40:37] for safety purposes or that
[40:39] That was our internal clarity.
[40:41] Just notify all truck drivers if we supposed
[40:43] to sign on our gate, on the gate
[40:45] of the site as they're leaving.
[40:46] Okay. This wouldn't be an an out
[40:48] On the road.
[40:49] See it's not a legal enforceable traffic
[40:51] sign, it's just a Correct.
[40:52] Hey guys, you're gals,
[40:53] you're coming into a congested area, right? Be
[40:56] Mindful practices. Yes. Okay.
[40:58] That work for you? Yeah. Yeah. Gotcha. Thank you Mr. Greg.
[41:00] Appreciate it. You're very welcome. Thank you.
[41:03] I would like to note that art's been among us for a while
[41:09] And if he doesn't connect he may do his vote
[41:11] through me, if that's okay.
[41:13] Okay, sure. Been emailing back
[41:15] and forth as long as you're okay, Lindsay.
[41:16] Yeah, as long as you announce it. Okay. Yep.
[41:20] Okay. Any other questions?
[41:25] Other comment? Sure.
[41:34] I arrived a little late and wasn't able to sign up.
[41:37] If I can, can I submit this for all of the commissioners,
[41:43] commissioners, Jay Aleg, queen Ann Conservation Association.
[41:46] I'm not here to oppose this project,
[41:48] but I did wanna raise just a couple of things for you all
[41:51] to consider and also hope to make an appeal
[41:53] to the applicant himself
[41:55] because there might be a couple of things here
[41:56] that could both be a soft cost savings
[42:00] and also beneficial for the environment.
[42:03] So I did, I reviewed their storm water management plan
[42:10] when it comes to the Chesapeake Bay
[42:11] and Maryland's rivers and creeks.
[42:14] We're making a lot of progress in a lot of areas,
[42:16] but the one area where we continue to fail is storm water.
[42:21] And the applicant is doing what's required right now,
[42:25] but there might be a better way to do this
[42:28] and this would be with a pervious surface
[42:32] within the parking lot.
[42:34] And the document that I've just
[42:36] provided to you was generated off an AI search.
[42:40] What it shows that a pervious parking lot can actually be
[42:43] cheaper than some of the storm water management plans
[42:46] that we currently have in place.
[42:49] And so one of the things that I would really like to appeal
[42:51] to the applicant for is to consider that and look into it
[42:55] because it may be a cost savings
[42:57] and it would certainly be more
[42:59] beneficial to the environment.
[43:01] The other two things that I just wanna mention also,
[43:04] which again appeal an appeal to the applicant when it comes
[43:08] to the landscaping of the property.
[43:11] If you all could make a specific note
[43:13] of planting only native species trees and shrubbery.
[43:19] Planting native is important for a lot of reasons,
[43:21] but especially in the trees.
[43:25] An oak tree, for example, harbors up to 400 different
[43:31] organisms locally and that can be beneficial
[43:34] to the, to our environment.
[43:35] And then very last on your lighting fixtures
[43:39] for your buildings, there's a website called the dark sky
[43:44] Dark Sky effort
[43:46] and it's meant to reduce light pollution
[43:50] in this area of Ken Island.
[43:51] Light pollution is a problem.
[43:53] There are fixtures online that are dark sky compliant,
[43:57] which still provide businesses with the necessary light,
[44:00] but they angle it downward
[44:02] and it's not like the big floodlights
[44:04] that you see all over the place.
[44:06] So three environmental things that
[44:08] I hope the app applicant will consider
[44:11] and it could be something that we could all celebrate.
[44:13] I'd love to see more businesses do these types of things
[44:16] and it's a bragging, it's a bragging right
[44:18] for Queen Anne's County and for the business.
[44:20] And a lot of times many
[44:22] of these things are less costly than some
[44:24] of the other things that are out there.
[44:26] So thank you for your time. Thank you.
[44:29] Any other public comment?
[44:34] Don't have it. Nothing. One line. Okay. Can I get a
[44:39] Just one follow up on that Madam chair?
[44:41] If I may, based on Mr.
[44:42] F Said's comment, I'm looking over at staff.
[44:44] Is this, are the landscaping plans not required
[44:47] or at least in large part to be
[44:49] required to be native plants?
[44:51] I think the majority of these are native on site, right?
[44:53] Their landscape architect is here.
[44:55] Nate Ter Nate, he may be able
[44:56] to answer your question about he on site.
[44:59] No, from my review of the list, they appear largely native,
[45:02] but I, I'm looking to you guys
[45:03] that I think there's actually language in our code
[45:06] that requires, we remember going
[45:08] through this with previous directors.
[45:09] Some, but not all. It's when readily available,
[45:12] some loop in there that allows people to substitute if
[45:16] we can't get stock or something.
[45:17] But that's the intent is to be, if not all,
[45:20] largely in part native plantings. Yes, correct.
[45:25] I did have someone that wanted to make common alive.
[45:27] Okay. Hello?
[45:54] I am allowing her to make comment, but no one
[45:57] Hello?
[46:02] Did they hang up?
[46:03] No, they're still there.
[46:08] Let me,
[46:18] Hi Lauren, if you're there, you're, you can unmute now.
[46:21] I made you a, gave you the ability to at least
[46:29] Just
[46:33] Lauren, are you there?
[46:44] I don't know.
[46:45] Muted. She's saying it won't
[46:50] let her on mute, but
[46:52] Didn she Type her
[46:53] Comment.
[46:54] Yeah. Lauren, if you can type your comment.
[46:56] I could read it for you. I'm not sure why it's
[46:58] not letting you unmute.
[47:47] Need some Elevator music. It's not allowing Yeah.
[47:50] Tell
[48:05] this is your only sole facility, correct?
[48:10] This one that we're, yes. Yeah,
[48:11] it's Yep. No other locations
[48:14] Fully Relocating
[48:15] From.
[48:16] And you, how long you been in the business park?
[48:18] Oh, six six as tech years since 17?
[48:21] Yeah. Are you bringing more jobs with this building?
[48:25] Maybe split. How many do you have
[48:26] now and how many are you bringing?
[48:28] It's, well, I mean maybe I'll just
[48:29] Let, It depends on contracts, basically. But's.
[48:33] Try that one. We don't Have to be
[48:34] exact. It's not pass out.
[48:35] Yeah. I mean it'll allow Us to get, all right.
[48:36] Lauren, could you try unmuting
[48:37] for us one more time? If you can hear me?
[48:40] A fuller one shift of of
[48:41] Employees.
[48:42] Okay, but how many do, would you, do you,
[48:44] if you don't wanna say how many
[48:45] employees you have, that's fine, I guess.
[48:47] No, we're pr it's on site on a given day
[48:50] is probably around 40.
[48:53] But you have people offsite too. The businesses supporting
[48:55] The salespeople.
[48:56] The, the vi my mic's going through. Yeah,
[48:59] But maybe she's not Hearing it on.
[49:02] Oh, it, it is possible if she had it muted on her end.
[49:05] I'm not, I'm not getting any text response.
[49:08] And I've made the meeting available so anyone could unmute
[49:11] and no one's unmuting. So
[49:13] Mr. Lee, in res response
[49:15] to your question about landscaping.
[49:16] Yes. Onsite encourages the use of native species,
[49:21] the encourages the use for the on onsite landscaping guests.
[49:26] Okay. She did send in a message. Thank you. Yep.
[49:28] Our messages, this is from Lauren
[49:31] Smuts, she said, sorry about that.
[49:33] I would like to know what the applicant is doing to adhere
[49:36] to the design standards in the uc zone guide,
[49:39] especially in regard to compatibility
[49:41] with surrounding development such as residential.
[49:44] Apologies that it won't. Let me unmute.
[49:49] So we've, we've submitted the UCTC design guideline notes
[49:53] and memo along with the package, you know,
[49:56] through the concept plan review the colored elevations
[49:59] that are included and extensive with review with staff.
[50:03] We were confident that we meet the standards within the
[50:07] design guidelines.
[50:09] It was a, a major topic of conversation during the PLA
[50:13] concept plan phase.
[50:15] And from that approval, we've had no substantial changes
[50:19] to the design of the building
[50:21] and the associated memo and code.
[50:24] Okay. As you Have further comment,
[50:32] She says, if they could please share some
[50:34] of the elements integrated into that design
[50:37] Piece.
[50:38] More water.
[50:40] Steve, if you want to pull up the colored
[50:42] elevation or is that something Yeah.
[50:44] Pull up with public comment.
[50:45] Do we typically do a back and forth or is it more No.
[50:48] Yeah, that's, if, if you guys would
[50:53] prefer to ask, and I
[50:54] I will go on record to say this does meet the
[50:56] TCUC design standards.
[50:58] We worked very hard with these, the applicant to, to get
[51:01] to this design initially.
[51:03] It, it needed some work
[51:05] and they, they've come a long way with it.
[51:06] So I just wanna put that out there.
[51:09] There was a memo in your packets that explains all this.
[51:14] Okay. Any other questions?
[51:19] Any other comments?
[51:22] I'm good. Can we get a
[51:24] proposal recommendation?
[51:29] Madam Chair? Having considered the testimony presented
[51:32] and having reviewed the findings outlined in the staff
[51:35] report, be it hereby resolve that the planning commission
[51:38] regarding the request by a reliable development company, LLC
[51:43] for major site plan approval
[51:44] to construct a 40,040 square foot building for the design
[51:49] and fabrication of specialty vehicles
[51:52] between a 4.411 acre parcel in the urban commercial zoning
[51:56] district, and is more particularly described in Department
[51:59] of Planning and zoning file.
[52:01] SP number 26 dash oh two dash oh 1 72
[52:06] hereby finds the site plan does meet all requirements of
[52:11] chapter 18.
[52:13] Will not substantially increase traffic hazards
[52:16] or safety concerns due to traffic generated, generated
[52:19] by the proposed use.
[52:21] The location or orientation of curb cuts
[52:23] or the layout of internal circulation
[52:27] does contain a layout of buildings, parking,
[52:30] roads, and utilities.
[52:31] That does not substantially increase fire, health
[52:34] or other public safety standards.
[52:36] Is a adequately buffered
[52:38] and screened to minimize potential adverse impacts
[52:41] to neighboring properties
[52:43] and public rights of way
[52:45] will not substantially increase stormwater drainage.
[52:47] Drainage, or pollution will not have an unreasonably adverse
[52:52] effect upon property values in the vicinity of the site,
[52:55] will not adversely affect the public welfare
[52:58] and will provide for public safety through compliance
[53:01] with the state Fire code and with any applicable county
[53:04] or municipal fire codes is compatible
[53:07] with the general character of the surrounding neighborhood
[53:10] and is consistent with the purpose, goals
[53:12] and objectives of the 2022 comprehensive plan
[53:16] and hereby grants minor site plan approval subject
[53:20] to the following conditions.
[53:22] All remaining edits and
[53:24] or documents required by the Department
[53:26] of Public Works planning and zoning
[53:27] or any other reviewing agency be reviewed and approved.
[53:31] All remaining comments, edits, and
[53:33] or documents required by the Maryland Department
[53:35] of Transportation State Highway
[53:37] Administration must be addressed.
[53:40] All required legal documents must be approved, signed
[53:43] and recorded prior to obtaining final site plan signatures
[53:47] All required bonds sureties review
[53:50] and inspection fees must be submitted to the Department
[53:53] of Public Works and the Department of Planning
[53:54] and zoning is appropriate.
[53:56] The conditions specified in the attached airport manager
[53:59] review number three, email dated
[54:02] June 18th, 2026 must be met.
[54:05] And the architecture
[54:06] and overall site design must substantially reflect the
[54:10] documents provided.
[54:12] Can I make one point of clarification?
[54:14] The staff report notes minor site plan approval
[54:16] instead of major site plan
[54:18] Approval. I
[54:18] Okay.
[54:19] Apologize. I I read that.
[54:21] I thought you in my mind I was okay.
[54:23] Just making sure. Yes. Okay.
[54:25] So may I amend my motion to, to make
[54:29] that major site plan approval. Thank you, Lindsay.
[54:31] It's supposed to be major. Yep. Apologize for that. Yep.
[54:35] I Okay.
[54:39] All those in favor? There's a like a second
[54:43] for public comment.
[54:44] I'm sorry. Second. Second. All in favor? Opposed?
[54:50] So did we get art's vote art?
[54:54] He hasn't emailed me. Right.
[55:15] And board member Eberts Berger votes in favor of the motion.
[55:18] Okay, so moved. Thank you. Thank you very much. Thank you.
[55:23] Thank you. Public comment
[55:30] there being none.
[55:32] Can I get my favorite resolution? Ajour?
[55:37] Second. Second? Second. All in favor? Aye. Aye.