1 00:00:00,140 --> 00:00:09,040 Random question. Why are manufactured homes given a business license? I may have to defer to Don on that specific. 2 00:00:12,360 --> 00:00:33,740 So Don Nelson Williams principal planner with the planning office. I think that's it is a type of license on the manufactured home license. I think it's just group it was just grouped in that for reporting purposes. It is a license that it's not part of the planning office. 3 00:00:33,740 --> 00:00:41,600 planning office as part of another division, but I believe it's collected at the same time of the year as business licenses. 4 00:00:41,940 --> 00:00:48,120 So from a tracking purposes, I think that's why it was probably always kind of grouped together in our reporting. 5 00:00:49,280 --> 00:00:50,160 Okay, thank you. 6 00:00:50,320 --> 00:00:52,160 Thank you for all you do, I yield. 7 00:00:53,220 --> 00:00:54,580 Thank you, Councilwoman. 8 00:00:55,280 --> 00:00:56,040 Councilman Neill. 9 00:00:56,040 --> 00:00:57,800 I thank you, Mr. Chairman. 10 00:00:57,980 --> 00:01:02,780 I'm kind of going to ride on what my colleague from the third district has just brought up. 11 00:01:03,340 --> 00:01:14,240 It struck me that what's in the DC, with a lot of the talent that has been repretired, fired, 12 00:01:14,860 --> 00:01:17,880 moved on, that maybe there's some federal work 13 00:01:27,900 --> 00:01:32,320 about the federal employees who've lost their job. 14 00:01:32,320 --> 00:01:37,620 Some of them have pensions, if they're little older, will have a pension so that we can 15 00:01:37,620 --> 00:01:38,300 attract them. 16 00:01:39,080 --> 00:01:41,920 Washington pays a really a high rate. 17 00:01:42,660 --> 00:01:48,600 When I was recruited back in Maryland, there was a difference of about $20,000 in my job 18 00:01:48,600 --> 00:01:54,100 classification, and what I was offered from the Labor Department, I chose not to go to Washington 19 00:01:54,100 --> 00:01:58,720 because I really appreciated and enjoyed doing what I was doing at the time. 20 00:01:58,720 --> 00:02:05,980 But I think that even with that fact that we do not pay as well as Washington does, if 21 00:02:05,980 --> 00:02:09,460 someone who has a pension, that may be part of the poll. 22 00:02:10,320 --> 00:02:12,620 And that is what we have. 23 00:02:13,220 --> 00:02:25,160 If there's any way we can tap into that from the city standpoint, what the Pellini Department 24 00:02:25,160 --> 00:02:30,360 department is done is noble. And of course, you've had in order to get the job done, you've 25 00:02:30,360 --> 00:02:37,840 been outside help, which is understandable and necessary. So I just throw that out as 26 00:02:37,840 --> 00:02:43,520 a thought as a possible pool that we can look at somewhere and see if we can tap them 27 00:02:43,520 --> 00:02:50,080 and to bring them in. Thank you. Thank you for your wisdom, Councilman Nile, Councilman 28 00:02:50,080 --> 00:02:55,940 Thank you, Council President, for recognizing me and I too echo what my colleagues have said. 29 00:02:56,080 --> 00:03:02,160 Thank you both and to your teams for the diligent hard work that you all have provided to us. 30 00:03:02,540 --> 00:03:03,880 It is greatly appreciated. 31 00:03:04,720 --> 00:03:17,220 In reference to what we're talking about as far as staff, do you know if you have to have a special certification or license for planning? 32 00:03:17,220 --> 00:03:23,890 you know if you're going to be the planning director there's a requirement but 33 00:03:23,890 --> 00:03:27,910 you know if there's a requirement for planning one and planning two as we're 34 00:03:27,910 --> 00:03:36,150 recruiting going forward. In terms of the planter one and two there are 35 00:03:36,150 --> 00:03:41,150 certain educational requirements as well as certifications depending upon the 36 00:03:41,150 --> 00:03:47,130 the position. I think the planter one gives us a little more leeway in terms of 37 00:03:47,130 --> 00:03:53,030 bringing it in closer to entry level if we need to, but the planter, too, definitely 38 00:03:53,030 --> 00:03:59,690 requires the education and we're looking for AICP certification as well. 39 00:04:00,010 --> 00:04:06,710 Thank you very much. I yield. Thank you. Any other questions? 40 00:04:08,450 --> 00:04:16,130 I have a couple. First of all, I echo the gratitude that has been expressed 41 00:04:16,130 --> 00:04:19,710 because the job being done is vital to our city. 42 00:04:20,410 --> 00:04:23,730 Our city can't have economic growth 43 00:04:23,730 --> 00:04:28,410 without the planning office and the building inspections 44 00:04:28,850 --> 00:04:33,490 and, of course, to keep things going and the fire marshal. 45 00:04:33,990 --> 00:04:36,850 It's an important, it's an important department 46 00:04:36,850 --> 00:04:41,750 for the citizens and to have economic prosperity. 47 00:04:42,150 --> 00:04:43,110 So, thank you all. 48 00:04:44,610 --> 00:04:47,730 My question has to do with the, 49 00:04:49,940 --> 00:04:54,540 because there are some shortages when it comes to being 50 00:04:54,540 --> 00:04:56,180 able to do an 51 00:04:59,820 --> 00:05:01,640 outside group. 52 00:05:02,660 --> 00:05:07,660 One of the things that interests me is the way some of the municipalities do it, 53 00:05:18,380 --> 00:05:18,400 I 54 00:05:18,400 --> 00:05:29,040 hire directly somebody who is clear by the town and they actually hire them and pay them 55 00:05:29,040 --> 00:05:38,050 directly instead of the taxpayers paying the firm because we do inspections like that 56 00:05:38,050 --> 00:05:40,070 for electrical others matters. 57 00:05:41,310 --> 00:05:52,850 Would that be like not to not to substitute but to augment would that be something we would consider? 58 00:05:53,890 --> 00:06:01,970 We actually have already considered that and at least one developer did take us up on that offer to keep his project moving at the pace he needed. 59 00:06:01,970 --> 00:06:18,210 I think one of the there's a lot of municipalities that do use these outside firms because it is again another field that's very difficult to find people who are qualified and to be able to perform these duties. 60 00:06:19,070 --> 00:06:30,470 One of the benefits of using the contractor right now is that they're actually helping to assist staff in terms of training, going over code requirements. 61 00:06:31,090 --> 00:06:36,770 and things of that nature so trying to go on all aspects looking at the future of 62 00:06:36,770 --> 00:06:40,430 the division and how best to serve it certainly something we're completely 63 00:06:40,430 --> 00:06:46,490 open to. Thank you and I have another question that I don't need an answer to 64 00:06:46,490 --> 00:06:52,370 right now that if you have it right now that's great but if you want to email 65 00:06:52,370 --> 00:07:00,270 it later I was just curious like with all the new apartments that are coming on 66 00:07:00,270 --> 00:07:07,130 board, which is great. Obviously, it's going to increase rental inspections. How does 67 00:07:07,130 --> 00:07:15,110 it impact it? And how are they counted? Like, when somebody is going to, you have an 68 00:07:15,110 --> 00:07:25,430 apartment complex that has 100 units, 150 units, 200. How does that impact the annual rental 69 00:07:25,430 --> 00:07:32,750 inspections? Well each unit is its own inspection because each unit 70 00:07:32,750 --> 00:07:37,770 deserves the same amount of time and attention to these inspections for 71 00:07:37,770 --> 00:07:43,530 the benefit of the occupant. One of the things we need to look at because we 72 00:07:43,530 --> 00:07:48,770 have a number of these apartment units on the horizon is what the effective 73 00:07:48,770 --> 00:07:53,310 staff is going to be and what our expectations are and how many we're going to be 74 00:07:53,310 --> 00:07:58,030 to complete a year. And technically we should be trying to get everybody done their annual 75 00:07:58,030 --> 00:08:02,450 housing inspections. So we need to make sure we have appropriate level of staff to 76 00:08:02,450 --> 00:08:07,670 provide that service. Thank you. Of course, we know we're close to annual 77 00:08:07,670 --> 00:08:13,430 for everybody. Right. You know, I don't know if we should change the code for buy annual 78 00:08:13,430 --> 00:08:19,070 or if we need the higher people. But if we can find, but that's something we'll have to think 79 00:08:19,070 --> 00:08:26,110 about. I want to thank you so much for the report and I'd like to entertain a 80 00:08:26,110 --> 00:08:29,230 motion to accept the report. It also moves. 81 00:08:31,370 --> 00:08:37,950 Seconded by Councilman Rochda to accept the planning, inspections, 82 00:08:37,950 --> 00:08:45,510 community development, 2024, annual report. Questions on the motion? All in favor? 83 00:08:46,750 --> 00:08:55,490 Any opposed to adopt the unanimous thank you if I could say one last thing okay sorry 84 00:08:55,490 --> 00:09:01,430 I just wanted to thank all the staff in the department for all their work and I 85 00:09:01,430 --> 00:09:05,270 would especially like to recognize Don Nelson Williams for the amount of 86 00:09:05,270 --> 00:09:08,510 effort that she has put it through in 2024. That 87 00:09:17,020 --> 00:09:20,160 takes us to item 7 which has been 88 00:09:20,160 --> 00:09:26,000 been removed from the consent agenda. It's now denied. I'm not on consent. Review of active 89 00:09:26,000 --> 00:09:35,820 recreation plan, potential occasionally requests, lands of for the LLLC, Cesar Street, town, 90 00:09:36,340 --> 00:09:48,840 houses at 207 Northwest Street, committee recommendation of approval. And let me, council 91 00:09:48,840 --> 00:10:04,880 Thank you for recognizing me, I asked that this item be pulled from the consent agenda because this property and also it's the same property referenced in agenda item number 11, the property owner was not able to attend when we discuss this at committee. 92 00:10:05,520 --> 00:10:06,600 He was out of state. 93 00:10:07,580 --> 00:10:08,920 They are available now. 94 00:10:09,260 --> 00:10:16,100 They have new information that they would like to provide to council for consideration to reconsider those items. 95 00:10:17,380 --> 00:10:22,500 Let me see, Council, number seven passed, didn't it? 96 00:10:22,960 --> 00:10:33,520 It did, but at for discussion, having the in lieu fee in that area, so in the downtown 97 00:10:33,520 --> 00:10:36,780 development district, there are impact fees that are waived. 98 00:10:37,260 --> 00:10:42,480 This fee, however, is not waived in that redevelopment area. 99 00:10:43,060 --> 00:10:52,740 And the developer brought forward the concern that this is a deterrent to redevelopment in an area that the cities otherwise targeting for redevelopment. 100 00:10:53,160 --> 00:10:57,960 So the property owner wanted to have that discussion and present that idea to council. 101 00:11:00,590 --> 00:11:06,010 They are in the audience if it would please you to bring them down to advocate on their own behalf. 102 00:11:06,070 --> 00:11:11,030 Please come forward and then name and address for the record please. 103 00:11:11,030 --> 00:11:11,630 being 104 00:11:18,060 --> 00:11:22,160 my name is Cameron Lowell and I'm at 117 West Reed Street right across 105 00:11:22,160 --> 00:11:27,000 from the fire hall here in downtown Dover. First and foremost I applaud that 106 00:11:27,000 --> 00:11:31,260 proclamation at the beginning of the meeting. I'm a parent to three beautiful 107 00:11:31,260 --> 00:11:36,260 daughters and two granddaughters and that warms my heart so thank you and I will 108 00:11:36,260 --> 00:11:43,140 start with acknowledging that woman right there Don Nelson Williams has been a 109 00:11:43,140 --> 00:11:46,980 rock star for this city. She has helped us through quite a few things here 110 00:11:46,980 --> 00:11:50,620 lately and I think she deserves another round of applause. 111 00:11:55,860 --> 00:12:01,220 So I have some graphics that I sent over and I don't know if we have those. 112 00:12:05,960 --> 00:12:10,820 But in short, we'll start with the 2019 comprehensive plan. 113 00:12:11,700 --> 00:12:17,960 Chapter 11 of that talks significantly about encouraging balanced housing opportunities 114 00:12:17,960 --> 00:12:23,680 for all residents, promoting adequate, safe and affordable housing for all residents in 115 00:12:23,680 --> 00:12:29,800 the city. Go to the slide after that, there's 116 00:12:31,880 --> 00:12:36,780 another PDF that will be after that. And if it's not 117 00:12:36,780 --> 00:12:41,860 there, I can babble about it quickly. Yeah, that's the one. There you go. 118 00:12:44,630 --> 00:12:47,150 So basically, chapter 11 of 119 00:12:47,150 --> 00:12:53,130 the comp plan is encouraging affordable housing. And they're encouraging infill residential development. 120 00:12:53,130 --> 00:13:04,010 They want those near transit and multimodal routes, which all of this was taken into account as we went through our DAC process. 121 00:13:04,970 --> 00:13:14,570 And if you look further through their goal number four is provide home ownership opportunities throughout the city, especially within low and moderate income neighborhoods. 122 00:13:15,170 --> 00:13:25,270 And then lastly, we've highlighted the fact that we want to continue to support the Restoring Central Dover initiative 123 00:13:25,270 --> 00:13:30,970 and the Downtown Dover development incentives to increase home ownership in the downtown area. 124 00:13:32,690 --> 00:13:38,330 So look, I, full disclosure, I have two adult children that just got back from Camp Pendleton. 125 00:13:39,230 --> 00:13:44,770 And they have 90 pound dogs, and I'd like to figure out for them not how to not live under my roof. 126 00:13:44,770 --> 00:13:47,490 So this is partially for selfish reasons, I assure you. 127 00:13:51,430 --> 00:13:54,210 Any home that they can find that they can afford, 128 00:13:54,930 --> 00:13:59,970 I don't know that I want them in that home because to me it's a total tear down. 129 00:14:00,290 --> 00:14:00,970 It's not safe. 130 00:14:02,210 --> 00:14:06,210 They were looking at fixer uppers and there's not a fixer upper that's an occupiable home 131 00:14:06,210 --> 00:14:07,930 that we can find that they can afford. 132 00:14:07,930 --> 00:14:10,390 So so 133 00:14:12,570 --> 00:14:28,190 this the next slide which talks about our downtown development district and I think everybody here knows the about the outline of the DDD and we're just inside of that because we happen to be right across the street from from that man's will be a garden and 134 00:14:28,190 --> 00:14:39,850 And the DDD incentives, and Dawn can speak more eloquently to this, but it waves water 135 00:14:39,850 --> 00:14:46,050 impact fees, sewer impact fees, building permit fees, and it's all designed to encourage 136 00:14:46,050 --> 00:14:51,750 people to redevelop these little posted stamps of dirt that have been forgotten downtown. 137 00:14:53,470 --> 00:14:57,530 There are some matching incentives from Kent County and 138 00:15:00,000 --> 00:15:29,120 And some tax incentives, and it's also in what's called an opportunity zone. And an opportunity zone is not for a developer like me. I'm just a hard work in general contractor. Opportunity zones are for people that have big capital gains. They invest in a community, but they have to leave the money there for 10 years. That's not us because we're trying to create homeownership opportunities. So that really doesn't apply to this conversation. But we have all these incentives. 139 00:15:29,120 --> 00:15:36,380 and then when we look at this cash in lieu of active recreation it's kind of like hey we're 140 00:15:36,380 --> 00:15:41,000 going to do all these things to try to help encourage development but we're going to basically make 141 00:15:41,000 --> 00:15:48,880 you pay 10% fee to parks and rack so it just kind of is in my opinion counterproductive I'll let 142 00:15:48,880 --> 00:15:50,100 that be your opinion. 143 00:15:52,600 --> 00:15:58,800 So through some spirited discussions with a few council members where does it 144 00:15:58,800 --> 00:16:06,700 go. And I believe that's why Dr. Sudler asked that question earlier, is where what's happening 145 00:16:06,700 --> 00:16:15,320 to that money, like it or not, when you say a donation, cash and lieu, it's a really 146 00:16:15,320 --> 00:16:21,380 nice word, but the cost of that home goes up by the amount of that donation. It's pretty 147 00:16:21,380 --> 00:16:27,840 simple math. So I understand the spirit of it. If we're going to build a 60 or 100 unit 148 00:16:27,840 --> 00:16:32,460 that apartment complex, and they're all stacked on top of each other, and there's a little 149 00:16:32,460 --> 00:16:38,080 tiny postage stamp of backyard that those tenants would need a place to recreate. 150 00:16:38,640 --> 00:16:45,400 In this scenario we have very wide units, they're 29 foot wide, so the backyard's big green 151 00:16:45,400 --> 00:16:48,540 grass, and there's a lot of space for people to recreate. 152 00:16:48,540 --> 00:17:03,820 And, you know, from my position for young families that are facing the economics of car insurance, groceries, fuel, everything it takes for a young family to make it in this world. 153 00:17:04,700 --> 00:17:13,060 What's more important? And we think we had this discussion. Do you want a place, do I need a place for my son-in-law to go to pull-ups? 154 00:17:13,060 --> 00:17:17,140 or do I need him to have enough money at the end of every week so that he can buy his 155 00:17:17,140 --> 00:17:23,220 toddler pull-ups. So I want to just discuss this with you because I feel it might discourage 156 00:17:23,220 --> 00:17:28,880 other people from trying to do projects similar to this, not necessarily looking for a concrete 157 00:17:28,880 --> 00:17:37,500 answer tonight. I just want to reconsider how we look at that and I'll yield to Councilwoman 158 00:17:37,500 --> 00:17:38,280 Thank you. 159 00:17:38,440 --> 00:17:38,860 That's the woman. 160 00:17:39,560 --> 00:17:40,960 Aren't you recognized? 161 00:17:41,300 --> 00:17:41,780 Thank you. 162 00:17:42,840 --> 00:17:50,560 So just when we were discussing it at committee, when it came up from a practical standpoint, 163 00:17:51,300 --> 00:17:52,380 it's four units. 164 00:17:53,980 --> 00:17:59,900 So and I tried to find it in the code, but I couldn't find it for the cash in lieu or and 165 00:17:59,900 --> 00:18:06,280 that was that waiver was either provide recreational opportunities or do the cash in lieu. 166 00:18:07,620 --> 00:18:15,660 But for homes, I guess my thought was, should that be a consideration? 167 00:18:15,940 --> 00:18:23,800 I could see 25 townhouses or 50 or 100 apartments that you'd want to provide those 168 00:18:23,800 --> 00:18:26,920 recreational opportunities to the residents. 169 00:18:27,860 --> 00:18:32,700 But for townhouses in a row, I just, from a practical standpoint, I just didn't see one 170 00:18:32,700 --> 00:18:37,340 the lot size there wouldn't have been room for a recreational activity too. I don't even 171 00:18:37,340 --> 00:18:41,840 know what the recreational activity would be that you could get for several houses 172 00:18:41,840 --> 00:18:46,040 to agree on. I guess maybe you could do like some botchy ball in the back yard or something 173 00:18:46,040 --> 00:18:57,320 but that just doesn't seem practical. So my question to our planning manager is, is there 174 00:18:57,320 --> 00:19:05,580 a minimum? Is there a threshold for the number of units? Could you help me out with that? 175 00:19:05,880 --> 00:19:08,660 I recognize our principal planner at this time. 176 00:19:09,600 --> 00:19:15,120 Don Nelson Williams, the principal planner in the city's planning office. So the provisions 177 00:19:15,120 --> 00:19:23,440 in the zoning ordinance for active recreation are found in Article 5 Section 10. There is 178 00:19:23,440 --> 00:19:34,120 a statement in here that the requirements apply to all residential development. It does 179 00:19:34,120 --> 00:19:44,880 not set a threshold. However, within this section of Code Article 5, Section 10.5, a number 180 00:19:44,880 --> 00:19:51,320 of years ago, there was a series of exemptions to recreation area and open space dedication 181 00:19:51,320 --> 00:19:59,400 that were established and these exemptions deal with that small development situation. 182 00:20:00,020 --> 00:20:07,760 So there's about five different, five or six different potential exemptions 183 00:20:07,760 --> 00:20:13,420 that are related to number of acres that are involved and the number of dwelling units. 184 00:20:13,420 --> 00:20:24,920 and it changes what is the normal active recreation area requirement of 275 square feet per dwelling unit to something less than that. 185 00:20:25,500 --> 00:20:41,080 In some cases, it takes you straight to a cash and loo. In other cases, it reduces that area requirement but may still set a minimum size threshold of that active recreation area. 186 00:20:41,080 --> 00:20:50,480 In any case, the option for if you can't meet the area requirement for active recreation, 187 00:20:50,880 --> 00:20:55,600 it offers this cash in lieu of area construction. 188 00:20:56,420 --> 00:21:03,300 These exemptions were added, I believe, back in 2009 was the last time the code was amended 189 00:21:03,300 --> 00:21:13,120 and it was in response to issues that we were having with doing that calculation of the 275 square 190 00:21:13,120 --> 00:21:20,420 feet per dwelling unit and if they couldn't meet that by developing active rec, what does that cash 191 00:21:20,420 --> 00:21:27,360 and lieu look like? I can think of, I believe there was at least one application that ended up before the 192 00:21:27,360 --> 00:21:32,680 board of adjustment because they're the only ones that can grant a variance or a waiver of these 193 00:21:32,680 --> 00:21:40,000 provisions related to the amount that that entity was going to have to pay. 194 00:21:42,560 --> 00:21:50,480 The code does not come into play when it's a single-vinc at lot that's going to pull 195 00:21:50,480 --> 00:21:53,960 a permit for a single unit on it. 196 00:21:54,200 --> 00:21:59,800 So a lot of what's happened in the downtown has not been subject to this provision. 197 00:21:59,800 --> 00:22:06,300 This provision really comes into play if you're appearing in front of the Planning Commission as part of your development. 198 00:22:06,860 --> 00:22:18,220 And in this case, the application at 207 Northwest Street is a conditional use before the Planning Commission and also a minor subdivision plan. 199 00:22:19,460 --> 00:22:26,900 Certainly, if you're interested in having us look at these active recreation area requirements, 200 00:22:26,900 --> 00:22:29,980 It could be something that staff could work on. 201 00:22:30,960 --> 00:22:41,120 It would be, the results would be potentially amendments to this section of code which would go through a formal review process in order to be adopted. 202 00:22:41,880 --> 00:22:55,180 I will note that when we were doing the recent updates to the C2 zoning district, we did identify a number of other areas of the code that likewise probably needed. 203 00:22:55,180 --> 00:23:01,640 some review and potential updates and this active recreation requirement was 204 00:23:01,640 --> 00:23:08,740 one of them. The code did recognize in these small exemptions locations in 205 00:23:08,740 --> 00:23:13,640 the redevelopment target area as one of the potential exemptions but it still 206 00:23:13,640 --> 00:23:19,160 leaves you with a requirement for a number or cash and blue. I don't know if that 207 00:23:19,160 --> 00:23:26,360 that helps you understand a little bit about where we are at the present time with what's 208 00:23:26,360 --> 00:23:26,940 in our code. 209 00:23:28,080 --> 00:23:28,680 It does. 210 00:23:28,920 --> 00:23:29,220 Thank you. 211 00:23:29,340 --> 00:23:30,100 That's very thorough. 212 00:23:30,240 --> 00:23:33,800 And I think you could cite the entire code by memory at this point. 213 00:23:37,220 --> 00:23:42,680 So with regard to that, the decision that was made the last time, I fully support the options 214 00:23:42,680 --> 00:23:50,800 were either provide a recreational amenity or do the cash in lieu and we voted to approve 215 00:23:50,800 --> 00:23:55,400 the cash in lieu and I think that was absolutely the right decision given those two options. 216 00:23:56,580 --> 00:24:03,080 If there's an opportunity, like you said to explore it further to take a look at those opportunities 217 00:24:03,080 --> 00:24:08,360 that there could be improvements, especially within the redevelopment target area, 218 00:24:08,360 --> 00:24:16,740 I certainly don't want to disincentivize development in that area, and make projects more expensive 219 00:24:16,740 --> 00:24:25,800 than they need to be, for this number of lots, for four units, what was the other point. 220 00:24:27,540 --> 00:24:31,220 So I would like for staff to take a look at that, but I'd like to hear what my colleagues 221 00:24:31,220 --> 00:24:31,880 have to say. 222 00:24:39,250 --> 00:24:47,090 I have a question again for our principal planner. 223 00:24:48,190 --> 00:24:57,350 The cash in lieu, first of all, is the code written or does it delineate between home 224 00:24:57,350 --> 00:25:06,830 ownership and or rental of apartments or townhouses. This is done from the 225 00:25:06,830 --> 00:25:13,310 planning office. It does not. The zoning ordinance looks at things by housing 226 00:25:13,310 --> 00:25:20,610 type single-family duplex townhouse apartments. It does not make a distinction of 227 00:25:20,610 --> 00:25:22,230 rental versus ownership. 228 00:25:24,760 --> 00:25:28,940 Okay, so basically single single family housing 229 00:25:28,940 --> 00:25:34,760 developments do not have to provide a recreational area in a development. Is 230 00:25:34,760 --> 00:25:39,600 that am I interpreting that correctly? No, they would. Any residential 231 00:25:39,600 --> 00:25:46,260 development be it a large subdivision that's got a hundred lots. In this case 232 00:25:46,260 --> 00:25:51,640 something as simple as four lots. A site plan that develops a series of 233 00:25:51,640 --> 00:25:54,220 of apartment buildings, all of them would require 234 00:25:54,220 --> 00:25:55,840 an active recreation area. 235 00:25:56,460 --> 00:26:00,740 So, okay, so obviously my development is a little bit older, 236 00:26:01,060 --> 00:26:07,580 but in a new development, if it was as simple as a sidewalk 237 00:26:07,580 --> 00:26:12,180 that you could walk around the block, so to speak, 238 00:26:12,460 --> 00:26:14,140 does that constitute recreational, 239 00:26:14,920 --> 00:26:19,790 or because I don't see housing developments, 240 00:26:20,010 --> 00:26:22,570 I can't think of any off the top of my head 241 00:26:22,570 --> 00:26:26,550 that require any type of recreation other than that. 242 00:26:27,150 --> 00:26:28,310 Can you give me an example? 243 00:26:28,850 --> 00:26:34,130 So, for example, a number of our recent subdivisions 244 00:26:34,130 --> 00:26:38,130 have a variety of common space areas. 245 00:26:38,630 --> 00:26:43,370 Some of them are, it may just be an open lawn area. 246 00:26:43,730 --> 00:26:48,730 There may be playground equipment such as in Lexington Glen 247 00:26:48,730 --> 00:26:57,990 and Patriot Village have areas that way, the project at Eden Hill, they've got the 248 00:26:57,990 --> 00:27:02,770 other extreme of a clubhouse building, the Clearview Meadows, probably the 249 00:27:02,770 --> 00:27:10,050 closest example to here that includes a clubhouse facility, has a large area 250 00:27:10,050 --> 00:27:16,290 that does include a designated walking trail that's separate from but connects to 251 00:27:16,290 --> 00:27:22,230 the sidewalk network on the streets. So it's been approached in a variety of ways and the 252 00:27:22,230 --> 00:27:29,750 apartments we tend to see things that may be interior to buildings, gym space, more of 253 00:27:29,750 --> 00:27:37,010 the meeting room type spaces, but they also include things like club houses and pools for example. 254 00:27:37,270 --> 00:27:42,430 Okay, yeah, understood. You know, the only examples that I have are like the apartments, like 255 00:27:42,430 --> 00:27:51,350 liander lakes and places like that. So based on should there be in your professional opinion, 256 00:27:53,960 --> 00:28:02,450 a cutoff, if you will, when it comes to the amount of actual lot space, 257 00:28:05,250 --> 00:28:12,970 Obviously, there's only four townhouses on this lot, which is going to take up the majority 258 00:28:12,970 --> 00:28:21,910 of the space on the lot, where cash and loo probably would not come into play, so to 259 00:28:21,910 --> 00:28:28,670 speak, as if I'm understanding a subdivision and things of that nature with acres and acres 260 00:28:28,670 --> 00:28:34,970 of property being carved up. But in this case, when there's a lot, maybe a lot in a half instance, 261 00:28:37,190 --> 00:28:44,230 do you think that we should readjust the ordinance to have a cutoff as far as like the square 262 00:28:44,230 --> 00:28:51,390 footage or the acreage on the property? So this is drawn with the planning office. So I think 263 00:28:51,390 --> 00:28:58,110 years ago there wasn't attempt in setting up something like that with this series of exemptions 264 00:28:58,110 --> 00:29:06,070 for small developments. Probably at the time what was put forth as exemptions kind of 265 00:29:06,070 --> 00:29:11,370 met the issues that we were experiencing. This is certainly a different type of housing 266 00:29:11,370 --> 00:29:19,630 market today. And so those exemptions or when does this requirement kick in is probably 267 00:29:19,630 --> 00:29:22,710 worth evaluating again. Thank you. 268 00:29:24,720 --> 00:29:29,120 Yeah, that makes sense. Okay. Oh, and then 269 00:29:29,120 --> 00:29:35,820 And I don't know who would answer this one, but in reference to the downtown development 270 00:29:35,820 --> 00:29:45,340 district and the waivers, is there a strong argument with what our contractor is saying 271 00:29:45,340 --> 00:29:57,620 about incentivizing development within our area and it's something like this constitute 272 00:29:57,620 --> 00:29:59,380 to potential waiver. 273 00:30:00,050 --> 00:30:09,950 You know, just to keep the spirit of development going in our downtown. So the downtown development 274 00:30:09,950 --> 00:30:14,790 district incentives and the incentives that are offered in the downtown redevelopment 275 00:30:14,790 --> 00:30:20,290 target area are not found in the zoning ordinance. They're part of a different section 276 00:30:20,290 --> 00:30:29,750 of the code of the overall code of ordinances in appendix C. And we recently just made some 277 00:30:29,750 --> 00:30:38,210 amendments to that. You could certainly consider it as a potential option for waivers, but it would 278 00:30:38,210 --> 00:30:47,230 have limited applicability in that it would be only related to residential development. I think 279 00:30:47,230 --> 00:30:55,750 the better place for potential changes to the program would be related to what the code requires 280 00:30:55,750 --> 00:30:59,310 in the zoning ordinance for that active recreation area. 281 00:30:59,890 --> 00:31:05,390 You could certainly look at size of the development number of lots, 282 00:31:05,890 --> 00:31:10,630 land size, proximity to existing recreational amenities, 283 00:31:11,390 --> 00:31:13,570 such as city and parks, 284 00:31:14,470 --> 00:31:19,090 number of things that way that you could look at probably more holistically 285 00:31:19,090 --> 00:31:25,430 in the downtown to address rather than waiting to a fee waiver 286 00:31:25,430 --> 00:31:27,750 if you will, later on. 287 00:31:29,720 --> 00:31:39,580 And the final question I have is how much have you calculated the amount of the cash 288 00:31:39,580 --> 00:31:41,340 in lieu has that been done yet? 289 00:31:42,320 --> 00:31:46,780 This is done for this particular application that has not been done. 290 00:31:46,900 --> 00:31:54,040 The calculation for cash in lieu requires the middle of an appraisal and then we do that 291 00:31:54,040 --> 00:32:01,920 calculation and the code outlines the type of appraisal and if we feel it's 292 00:32:01,920 --> 00:32:07,600 reasonable or not, then there's options for kind of an appeal of the apprais 293 00:32:07,600 --> 00:32:12,000 value, but at this point in time we have not received the appraisal in order 294 00:32:12,000 --> 00:32:19,140 to do that calculation. Okay. All right. Didn't know where I was going with this. 295 00:32:21,600 --> 00:32:22,280 When 296 00:32:22,280 --> 00:32:28,200 pulled off the agenda to have this discussion, but I think the more that I hear it, it's 297 00:32:28,200 --> 00:32:35,440 probably being that the last size is small and the enhancement would be great for the 298 00:32:35,440 --> 00:32:36,260 downtown area. 299 00:32:36,380 --> 00:32:43,020 I would be amenable to, you know, the waiver, and then, of course, with the addition of 300 00:32:43,020 --> 00:32:49,680 re-looking at the ordinance itself and making those changes to, you know, the code. 301 00:32:49,680 --> 00:32:52,400 So, that's all I have at this time. 302 00:32:52,780 --> 00:32:53,400 I yield. 303 00:32:54,500 --> 00:32:55,000 Thank you. 304 00:32:55,300 --> 00:32:58,280 Councilman Neal, and then Councilman Bogarty. 305 00:32:59,120 --> 00:32:59,860 Thank you, Mr. President. 306 00:33:01,220 --> 00:33:08,760 I think if we have an immediate problem, because this has already passed and it's forced now to approve. 307 00:33:09,560 --> 00:33:14,140 To pull this out, it's going to require some specific action. 308 00:33:14,140 --> 00:33:22,280 And you had, as mentioned to us that it would have had to go through the Board of Adjustments 309 00:33:22,780 --> 00:33:28,060 and it would have to go back to the Board of Adjustments for some sort of approval if 310 00:33:28,060 --> 00:33:29,900 we said that we wished to waver that. 311 00:33:30,880 --> 00:33:35,560 What would happen now if we say we want to pull that out because you have a second part 312 00:33:35,560 --> 00:33:45,880 this, which is also, we may want to pull out in regards to the alley, but that's a separate question. 313 00:33:46,600 --> 00:33:50,720 Would we have to pull this out? Wouldn't have to go back to the Board of Adjustments. 314 00:33:54,140 --> 00:34:00,480 So at this point, what is before you is a recommendation from the Parks Recreation Community 315 00:34:00,480 --> 00:34:07,200 Enhancement Committee in regards to how this project should provide its active recreation, 316 00:34:07,200 --> 00:34:10,640 and they've asked for this cash in lieu. 317 00:34:11,280 --> 00:34:14,060 My reference to the Board of Adjustment would be, 318 00:34:14,540 --> 00:34:18,160 it would be a specific application to the Board 319 00:34:18,160 --> 00:34:21,120 of Adjustment that the applicant would have to make 320 00:34:21,120 --> 00:34:25,060 if they were looking to totally not do any of the above, 321 00:34:25,680 --> 00:34:28,560 meaning it not provide any active recreation, 322 00:34:29,100 --> 00:34:33,600 nor pay any cash in lieu for this particular project. 323 00:34:33,600 --> 00:34:46,360 The provisions of the zoning ordinance, I don't believe grant that authority for the City Council to waive that those items in total as it's written today. 324 00:34:46,820 --> 00:35:01,340 Of course, we can't, the railhouse out as a form of entertainment for recreation, but anyhow, that means that basically they're going to have to make an application for that. 325 00:35:01,340 --> 00:35:07,500 It's going to have to delay the process as I understand what you've just said since we 326 00:35:07,500 --> 00:35:11,640 cannot do that, it has to go back out and it's going to delay the project. 327 00:35:16,250 --> 00:35:22,830 That could potentially be correct depending on their immediateness of how quickly they 328 00:35:22,830 --> 00:35:30,570 were going to move through a project but to totally waive the requirement for active recreation 329 00:35:30,570 --> 00:35:34,930 and the requirement for payment of a cash and lieu amount, 330 00:35:35,070 --> 00:35:37,710 it would take action by the Board of Adjustment. 331 00:35:38,490 --> 00:35:48,070 Okay, so unless we want to not go through with this at this time and delay it, 332 00:35:49,210 --> 00:35:55,710 basically faces a delay if we are going to wipe out or give them, 333 00:35:55,710 --> 00:36:00,530 and basically the cost of the recreation fee, 334 00:36:01,190 --> 00:36:03,050 we can't do anything about that. 335 00:36:03,510 --> 00:36:07,650 So the next thing that comes up is what about the alley 336 00:36:08,190 --> 00:36:10,390 and we haven't reached that point yet 337 00:36:10,390 --> 00:36:12,290 in our discussion, and I yield. 338 00:36:14,030 --> 00:36:16,030 Thank you, Councilman Bogarty. 339 00:36:16,350 --> 00:36:17,730 Thank you, Councilor President. 340 00:36:19,030 --> 00:36:22,850 I think you actually touched on something 341 00:36:22,850 --> 00:36:27,830 I'm now knowing the area and actually the real house does have a play area across the street 342 00:36:27,830 --> 00:36:31,930 So you can go in there and play and eat those amazing wings 343 00:36:31,930 --> 00:36:33,970 But that's neither here there 344 00:36:33,970 --> 00:36:36,410 My question is 345 00:36:37,430 --> 00:36:41,950 For consideration. I think you mentioned it in that area in an area that we are 346 00:36:42,610 --> 00:36:52,390 Discussing downtown there are there. How many parks are there and it's and are we can we eventually consider the walking distance from a 347 00:36:52,390 --> 00:37:02,710 development to a part given the space. So I am, I know there's one on a corner. So if 348 00:37:02,710 --> 00:37:08,090 it's, you know, if it's a development within two, three, four hundred feet from a park, 349 00:37:08,350 --> 00:37:13,810 you know, that's kind of a recreational area or you have, or you have two, but something 350 00:37:13,810 --> 00:37:21,890 to consider. I also wanted to know and I think my esteemed colleague said when you say 351 00:37:21,890 --> 00:37:29,110 recreation area is it to find exactly what has to be in a recreation area if it's just 352 00:37:29,110 --> 00:37:40,090 grass if it's just you know swings or whatever so there's really no definitive definition 353 00:37:41,560 --> 00:37:48,700 of what's in the recreation area, but then my last point is this, the size of the backyards, 354 00:37:49,280 --> 00:37:56,800 I mean, you know, most individuals will probably allow, you know, do workout or have their kids 355 00:37:56,800 --> 00:38:04,800 or whoever the recreation for kind of hang out in the backyard. Is there a standard, if you have a 356 00:38:04,800 --> 00:38:13,820 yard as a certain square footage per unit, I know you said 275 per unit, 275 feet per unit 357 00:38:13,820 --> 00:38:20,040 for other like apartments, but what's the reasonable size backyard that most people 358 00:38:20,040 --> 00:38:26,240 will say, this is where my kids or we'll kind of hang out anyway, is that taken into consideration 359 00:38:26,240 --> 00:38:30,860 because if I'm not mistaken, sir, each unit will have a backyard, correct? 360 00:38:30,860 --> 00:38:40,360 The two center units would be the smallest, and they're 29 feet by 45, so they're over 1200 square feet. 361 00:38:40,760 --> 00:38:50,900 So it's a pretty sizable area, and then the two end units will have the grass-based out towards northwest or towards the existing alley. 362 00:38:50,900 --> 00:38:55,620 So no spaces would be directly assigned to each of those unit. 363 00:38:55,840 --> 00:38:56,120 Yes sir. 364 00:38:56,180 --> 00:38:59,860 So each unit will have a space that's considered. 365 00:39:00,120 --> 00:39:04,700 I wanted to run my kids and get them tired of my grandkids and get them tired. 366 00:39:04,920 --> 00:39:08,500 They can bring them over to my daughter and son-in-law's house in the town. 367 00:39:08,700 --> 00:39:09,160 I appreciate it. 368 00:39:09,520 --> 00:39:10,160 I thank you. 369 00:39:10,480 --> 00:39:14,280 That's so considering the size of the backyards. 370 00:39:14,720 --> 00:39:19,140 Hopefully one, you know, I don't know if we can, if we're going to revisit this could 371 00:39:19,140 --> 00:39:21,800 that be considered in certain spaces as well. 372 00:39:22,740 --> 00:39:25,040 Again, I know that's not now, but in this case, 373 00:39:25,240 --> 00:39:26,600 I can take that into consideration. 374 00:39:26,600 --> 00:39:27,180 Thank you. 375 00:39:31,030 --> 00:39:31,530 Thank you. 376 00:39:32,050 --> 00:39:33,130 Are you else I think? 377 00:39:33,630 --> 00:39:34,970 Yes, thank you. 378 00:39:35,930 --> 00:39:39,590 And I will give right back to you, Mrs. Art. 379 00:39:40,050 --> 00:39:40,430 Thank you. 380 00:39:40,610 --> 00:39:42,110 I have two motions. 381 00:39:42,490 --> 00:39:43,070 I'd like to make. 382 00:39:43,070 --> 00:39:45,790 Well, before you do that, then, I have a question. 383 00:39:48,270 --> 00:39:58,910 My question for Mrs. Nelson Williams has to do with, you said that there can't be a waver 384 00:39:58,910 --> 00:39:59,610 in total. 385 00:40:00,330 --> 00:40:03,130 Can there be one, can there be a waver in part? 386 00:40:04,090 --> 00:40:12,170 And two, Councilman Bogarty sort of started swarming into an area where that I had questions 387 00:40:12,170 --> 00:40:22,630 about is dealt with the backyards if he just re-did his recreation plan and put a swing-set 388 00:40:22,630 --> 00:40:28,450 and barbecue pit in the backyards wouldn't have the whole lot cheaper than payment and 389 00:40:28,450 --> 00:40:30,050 lieu and fulfilled the requirements. 390 00:40:32,420 --> 00:40:38,060 So, this is John with the Planning Office, so the beginning of this section of code talks 391 00:40:38,060 --> 00:40:46,260 about that it's required because it's a certain type of application that's going before 392 00:40:46,260 --> 00:40:54,560 the Planning Commission. There is a definition of recreation area. I don't believe it's ever 393 00:40:54,560 --> 00:41:02,000 been interpreted that an individual yard area on an individual lot would satisfy the active 394 00:41:02,000 --> 00:41:09,080 recreation area because these active recreation areas are meant to be collectively used by the 395 00:41:09,080 --> 00:41:18,060 residential development and not necessarily just an individual landowner in how this section 396 00:41:18,060 --> 00:41:27,800 of code is written. So I'm not sure that we could at this point look at that to meet the requirements 397 00:41:27,800 --> 00:41:34,420 of the code for this particular development, but certainly if you're looking at future changes 398 00:41:34,420 --> 00:41:41,580 to the section of code, that's something that could be taken under consideration for one, 399 00:41:43,100 --> 00:41:50,980 for smaller scale projects, if they had a minimum yard size at time of development, that could 400 00:41:50,980 --> 00:41:55,620 certainly be considered, but I don't believe that the code would allow us to interpret that 401 00:41:55,620 --> 00:41:56,020 today. 402 00:41:56,720 --> 00:42:05,280 Thank you. I appreciate that. Councilwoman Arndt, any first of all, anyone else have any 403 00:42:06,440 --> 00:42:12,340 questions? Councilwoman Arndt to recognize. Thank you for recognizing me. In my mind, 404 00:42:12,500 --> 00:42:19,020 to maintain compliance with the code, the first thing that we should do is to vote again 405 00:42:19,020 --> 00:42:24,080 to approve the cash and loo donation for the active recreation that's 406 00:42:24,080 --> 00:42:29,980 requirement and you could appeal it to the board of adjustment. The next 407 00:42:29,980 --> 00:42:34,400 motion I would like to make would be to ask staff to review code specific to 408 00:42:34,400 --> 00:42:39,560 the zoning provisions of active recreation to consider lot size number of units 409 00:42:39,560 --> 00:42:44,920 and proximity to active recreation. So that would be making improvements moving 410 00:42:44,920 --> 00:42:50,000 forward, but we've already discussed and agreed upon that there's not a waiver that we 411 00:42:50,000 --> 00:42:52,240 could do at this time for this particular project. 412 00:42:53,520 --> 00:42:55,480 Thank you for the first motion. 413 00:42:55,900 --> 00:43:00,740 So the first motion is to approve the cash and lewd donation for the active recreation 414 00:43:00,740 --> 00:43:05,640 for the subdivision with the specific amount to be determined upon receipt of the appraisal 415 00:43:05,640 --> 00:43:08,140 in accordance with the zoning ordinance provisions. 416 00:43:13,700 --> 00:43:14,900 All right. 417 00:43:14,900 --> 00:43:21,460 Councilman Neil blotforth in his conversation with our principal planner. I'll say. Thank you. It's been moved by 418 00:43:22,220 --> 00:43:25,060 Councilman Arsac, and my councilman Rochelle 419 00:43:25,940 --> 00:43:26,540 discussion 420 00:43:27,800 --> 00:43:32,920 Councilman Neil since that is already approved. Do we really have to prove it again? 421 00:43:33,220 --> 00:43:39,140 Yes, and the reason why is because it's not approved by is because we may have removed it from the consent agenda 422 00:43:39,140 --> 00:43:47,320 And if it were on the consent agenda, that would have approved it by council, so we have 423 00:43:47,320 --> 00:43:48,220 to do it separately. 424 00:43:48,860 --> 00:43:49,840 Thank you, Mr. President. 425 00:43:50,120 --> 00:43:51,120 Thank you for your question. 426 00:43:53,740 --> 00:43:54,620 Dr. Suddler. 427 00:43:55,320 --> 00:43:57,280 I just want to say, thank you for recognizing me, Mr. President. 428 00:43:57,920 --> 00:44:01,260 Anderson, I just want to say I have to incur with Councilwoman Arne, I think it's a great 429 00:44:01,260 --> 00:44:01,920 observation. 430 00:44:02,720 --> 00:44:03,280 So I go. 431 00:44:04,340 --> 00:44:04,780 Thank you. 432 00:44:06,080 --> 00:44:06,500 All right. 433 00:44:07,460 --> 00:44:07,820 Yes. 434 00:44:07,820 --> 00:44:08,060 Yes. 435 00:44:11,670 --> 00:44:22,010 Mr. Bogarty. Yes. Mr. Neal. Yes. Dr. Pillsbury. Yes. Mrs. Aren't. Yes. Mr. 436 00:44:22,170 --> 00:44:24,590 Rosha. Yes. Dr. Suther. Yes. 437 00:44:27,140 --> 00:44:28,700 Council President Anderson. Yes. 438 00:44:30,160 --> 00:44:36,800 7-0. The motion passes. Thank you. Thank you for your information. Now let's get to the 439 00:44:40,540 --> 00:44:48,900 I would like to move to ask the staff to review the code specific to the zoning 440 00:44:48,900 --> 00:44:53,120 provisions for active recreation to consider a lot-sized number of units in proximity 441 00:44:53,120 --> 00:44:54,780 to existing active recreation. 442 00:44:54,780 --> 00:44:54,900 motion. 443 00:44:55,480 --> 00:44:56,460 Rocha Seconds. 444 00:44:56,560 --> 00:44:57,900 It's been moved by Council. 445 00:44:58,160 --> 00:44:59,840 We are to stay up to review. 446 00:45:00,000 --> 00:45:29,580 Thank you. The active recreation requirements in the code. And if you have the exact wording on that, ask staff to review the code specific to the zoning provision of reactive rec requirements with the three lot size number of units and then proximity to active recreation, existing parks and other features. Thank you. 447 00:45:31,420 --> 00:45:32,020 Is 448 00:45:34,670 --> 00:45:35,790 there a second? 449 00:45:36,870 --> 00:45:37,670 Rocha's second. 450 00:45:38,230 --> 00:45:38,330 Good. 451 00:45:38,830 --> 00:45:39,730 It's the second. 452 00:45:39,890 --> 00:45:40,450 Thank you. 453 00:45:43,070 --> 00:45:43,970 Any discussion? 454 00:45:49,300 --> 00:45:49,500 No. 455 00:45:49,660 --> 00:45:52,920 This one will just do, you know, need a roll call on it. 456 00:45:55,040 --> 00:45:55,900 All in favor? 457 00:45:56,400 --> 00:45:56,580 Aye. 458 00:45:56,880 --> 00:45:57,080 Aye. 459 00:45:57,580 --> 00:45:58,000 Any opposed? 460 00:45:59,400 --> 00:46:00,960 The motion passed unanimously. 461 00:46:02,700 --> 00:46:03,560 Thank you. 462 00:46:04,240 --> 00:46:07,280 And that brings us to number 11. 463 00:46:08,040 --> 00:46:09,640 Councilwoman Archer recognized. 464 00:46:10,360 --> 00:46:11,140 Thank you. 465 00:46:11,140 --> 00:46:16,320 So my rationale for pulling this one off, the consent agenda was as stated previously. 466 00:46:16,740 --> 00:46:22,180 The applicant was not able to join us for the discussion as he was at a state at the time. 467 00:46:22,440 --> 00:46:24,140 He has additional information. 468 00:46:24,360 --> 00:46:25,920 He would like to advocate on his own behalf. 469 00:46:26,920 --> 00:46:27,460 Thank you. 470 00:46:29,480 --> 00:46:33,920 And you are once again, your name every at your head. 471 00:46:34,220 --> 00:46:37,260 Still Cameron Loellan at 117 West Reed Street. 472 00:46:41,040 --> 00:46:49,120 So we've got some more graphics to put up here and so this is pursuant to rear access 473 00:46:49,120 --> 00:46:56,340 and alley waiver and our our engineer that took us through the DAC process is here this 474 00:46:56,340 --> 00:47:02,660 evening and one of the other individuals that was instrumental in helping us with that 475 00:47:02,660 --> 00:47:08,420 processes here are Fire Marshall, Jason O'Seca. So there's a graphic up there and it's going 476 00:47:08,420 --> 00:47:10,300 to be the one that's labeled as A. 477 00:47:17,720 --> 00:47:21,280 Yeah, yeah, so and there's some information that'll 478 00:47:21,280 --> 00:47:24,820 be repetitive, so I'll try not to dwell on that too much. 479 00:47:24,960 --> 00:47:33,040 That would be a pretty thin. So the this project, there was a house there and most members 480 00:47:33,040 --> 00:47:39,580 a counselor or well aware that it fell into disrepair and it was full of vagrants and drug 481 00:47:39,580 --> 00:47:43,880 activity and then fortunately our planning staff does a really good job by identifying that 482 00:47:43,880 --> 00:47:49,720 took the house down. We had attempted to buy that house and try to repair it and I tell people 483 00:47:49,720 --> 00:47:56,320 all the time they're never as bad as they look it was horrible. So once the property was demoed it went 484 00:47:56,320 --> 00:48:02,960 on the market and we made an offer but that offer was based on some very lengthy conversation 485 00:48:04,300 --> 00:48:12,580 with superwoman here on what we can and can't do and she advised us and our engineer and architect that we would have to go through the DAC. 486 00:48:14,120 --> 00:48:27,700 And so it became apparent very early on that we were going to have to do some things that were going to impact that affordability which is why we talked to you about the prior situation. 487 00:48:29,000 --> 00:48:38,740 But again, the 2019 plan is infill projects affordable housing and through the DAC comments 488 00:48:38,740 --> 00:48:42,840 and Doug Lieberman's here, you can join me Doug, if you'd like. 489 00:48:44,460 --> 00:48:51,660 We had some comments, if you want to just go ahead and go to the next slide, it's going 490 00:48:51,660 --> 00:48:54,680 to be B. That's what the beauty looked like before. 491 00:49:00,200 --> 00:49:07,400 So, at the advice of Councilwoman, aren't we did it by graphic that's actually a Google 492 00:49:07,400 --> 00:49:08,200 earth shot here? 493 00:49:08,940 --> 00:49:15,680 And the area at the top in dashed green is an easement that we would need in order 494 00:49:15,680 --> 00:49:17,840 to bring sewer and water into the project. 495 00:49:18,400 --> 00:49:24,620 And then the four rectangles that are blue, those are the townhouses and then the light 496 00:49:24,620 --> 00:49:32,300 gray is where the driveways would be. And through that DAC process there were some things 497 00:49:32,300 --> 00:49:37,380 that came up. The Kent Conservation District and Denrek wanted to see more green space. 498 00:49:39,840 --> 00:49:45,820 We as the father of one of the homeowners didn't really want an alley back there because 499 00:49:45,820 --> 00:49:50,260 we all know what happens in alleys in downtown Dover and I think Chief Johnson can attest 500 00:49:50,260 --> 00:49:53,280 So that, um, we'll save your comments for later. 501 00:49:53,760 --> 00:49:57,740 Um, but, uh, so, and then Doug refreshed my memory. 502 00:49:57,860 --> 00:50:03,400 We went, uh, and talked through with the, the Kent County MPO wanted us, not to have 503 00:50:03,400 --> 00:50:09,440 as many curb cuts, which in order to put an alley behind it, we would eat up all those 504 00:50:09,440 --> 00:50:15,180 backyards that we want these young families to have, and we would have to put a curb cut 505 00:50:15,180 --> 00:50:21,120 out there on northwest street, which would also take one and a half to parking spaces 506 00:50:21,120 --> 00:50:22,040 away from that, right? 507 00:50:23,000 --> 00:50:24,960 So, if I have anything wrong here, tell me to stop. 508 00:50:27,840 --> 00:50:34,360 So, through that process, we looked with our architect, Mark, who's here, 509 00:50:35,020 --> 00:50:38,160 and looked at the possibility of non-combustible building materials, 510 00:50:38,820 --> 00:50:42,720 and once we started to go down that road, it got very, very expensive, 511 00:50:42,720 --> 00:50:51,040 a very fast. So it was the advice of our fire marshal to sprinkle the buildings in lieu 512 00:50:51,040 --> 00:50:52,280 of having that rear access. 513 00:50:56,680 --> 00:51:02,880 You stand by that still? Okay. And the comment that was made 514 00:51:02,880 --> 00:51:08,480 by a few of the people that looked at it, and I've never been a firefighter. I'm not going 515 00:51:08,480 --> 00:51:16,380 run into building, but burning buildings, that's not my deal. But the, correct me if I'm 516 00:51:16,380 --> 00:51:23,140 wrong here, Jason, but you wouldn't put an apparatus in that where that easement is 517 00:51:23,140 --> 00:51:24,460 if it was an alley. Is that? 518 00:51:28,580 --> 00:51:31,720 Yes. Anybody else wants to come up? Come on up. 519 00:51:35,370 --> 00:51:41,590 Jason, I see a fire marshal. I just, I think the chief's online. I'm going to say some 520 00:51:41,590 --> 00:51:43,010 some of the tactics for him, that's you. 521 00:51:43,230 --> 00:51:44,490 Jim, thank you. 522 00:51:45,110 --> 00:51:46,910 I'll say some of the tactics for the fire chief 523 00:51:46,910 --> 00:51:49,790 he's online, because that's more his decision making. 524 00:51:50,950 --> 00:51:55,130 But what I can speak to, when I go to the DAC process 525 00:51:55,130 --> 00:51:58,250 before we do anything regarding rear access, 526 00:51:59,030 --> 00:52:00,990 I make sure the fire chiefs are aware of what we're doing. 527 00:52:01,010 --> 00:52:02,490 We work all the time with them. 528 00:52:03,030 --> 00:52:04,310 So they were very aware of what we were doing 529 00:52:04,310 --> 00:52:06,230 and referenced to eliminate the rear access, 530 00:52:06,270 --> 00:52:07,530 which I know we haven't done to yet. 531 00:52:10,950 --> 00:52:15,730 So during the DAC process, sort of rear access is required per code. 532 00:52:18,510 --> 00:52:20,350 You can always meet or exceed something. 533 00:52:21,410 --> 00:52:26,810 So sprinklers are not required, but in our world, sprinklers are exceeding something. 534 00:52:27,310 --> 00:52:31,150 So we have traded off in the past for sprinkler systems and townhouse units. 535 00:52:32,270 --> 00:52:34,050 I know you've heard about it already. 536 00:52:34,050 --> 00:52:36,270 One project was a representative lane. 537 00:52:37,170 --> 00:52:45,370 Another project was on Wodeck Road, which did not go forward, but it did get approved with no rare access for sprinkler in the buildings. 538 00:52:46,010 --> 00:52:48,530 The representative lane, we actually had a fire in there. 539 00:52:49,410 --> 00:52:55,710 Sprinkler system put the fire out on New Year's Eve and minor loss due to the sprinkler system. 540 00:52:56,730 --> 00:53:02,710 But when it comes to the fire department, and I think the chief can talk on this, we're talking 149, 541 00:53:02,710 --> 00:53:04,290 We'll say 150 feet on the rear. 542 00:53:05,190 --> 00:53:08,830 When they set their ladder trucks up, usually the first engine is going to go to the front. 543 00:53:09,530 --> 00:53:12,210 The ladders can go to that current alley or north street. 544 00:53:13,010 --> 00:53:14,810 It's going to reach halfway across. 545 00:53:14,810 --> 00:53:15,690 They have two ladders. 546 00:53:16,310 --> 00:53:17,650 I don't think it's going to be an issue. 547 00:53:17,690 --> 00:53:21,710 It's not going to be an issue with hose lines because the hose lines are 200 and 300 feet 548 00:53:21,710 --> 00:53:25,890 already on the trucks as standard, but I'll defer to him on the tactic side. 549 00:53:27,030 --> 00:53:36,070 Thank you. Chief Kerry, would you like to say something you recognize? 550 00:53:38,130 --> 00:53:46,350 First, I'm David Kerry, the part you can do. I think it's a good choice to go with this. 551 00:53:46,430 --> 00:53:47,970 For course, systems in the town houses, 552 00:53:50,300 --> 00:53:53,000 for access to financial art, 553 00:53:56,200 --> 00:53:59,820 our hostlines are anywhere from 200 to 300 feet long. 554 00:54:00,180 --> 00:54:01,760 Our guys are used to hailing them 555 00:54:02,260 --> 00:54:06,620 and making rear access around large park buildings 556 00:54:06,620 --> 00:54:09,780 and townhouse rows, other places in the city. 557 00:54:10,520 --> 00:54:12,980 With the sprinkler access, we don't need as much 558 00:54:13,480 --> 00:54:15,660 rear access as what we would 559 00:54:15,660 --> 00:54:17,700 if we did not have the sprinkler systems in the building. 560 00:54:19,540 --> 00:54:21,280 And as far as lighter truck access, 561 00:54:22,020 --> 00:54:24,180 we'll be able to get to the building from both ends 562 00:54:24,180 --> 00:54:25,840 and also the front of the building. 563 00:54:25,840 --> 00:54:27,600 And I don't think it'd be a problem. 564 00:54:27,600 --> 00:54:32,500 I think it's a, I think it was a good move in the right direction for the city to look 565 00:54:32,500 --> 00:54:36,560 at the residential sprinkler systems and start with this group of townhouses for that. 566 00:54:40,060 --> 00:54:40,620 Thank you. 567 00:54:41,880 --> 00:54:46,960 Questions from members to the, to the chief for the fire marshal? 568 00:54:49,820 --> 00:54:50,640 Councilman Russia. 569 00:54:51,300 --> 00:54:59,240 Yeah, not so much a question, but a statement, you know, based on what I've heard from the chief 570 00:54:59,240 --> 00:55:09,440 in the fire marshal and what information out that was provided by our fire marshal in 571 00:55:09,440 --> 00:55:16,520 reference to how the sprinklers worked in a similar town home scenario where the fire 572 00:55:16,520 --> 00:55:23,260 was actually put out before the fire department arrived to the building. I think that it's 573 00:55:23,260 --> 00:55:26,400 safe to say that we can, we can go ahead and move this, this forward. 574 00:55:29,590 --> 00:55:31,210 And I yield, you yield. 575 00:55:31,450 --> 00:55:32,510 Councilman Bogarty. 576 00:55:32,870 --> 00:55:34,290 And thank you, Council President. 577 00:55:34,910 --> 00:55:42,530 One of the things that I appreciate sometimes again, when you in this row, additional information 578 00:55:42,530 --> 00:55:43,410 helps you change. 579 00:55:43,550 --> 00:55:44,670 So it's not waffling. 580 00:55:45,270 --> 00:55:55,550 One of the things that helped me was the imagery and the, the positioning of the, the positioning 581 00:55:55,550 --> 00:56:00,930 other fire truck being being able to reach behind it. So thank you for the 582 00:56:00,930 --> 00:56:04,710 additional imagery, the colored imagery. I've seen that one but the other one 583 00:56:04,710 --> 00:56:10,950 with the actual house that will be erected there are proposed houses or town 584 00:56:10,950 --> 00:56:16,490 houses that would be erected. Thank you for that and again me not being a 585 00:56:16,490 --> 00:56:20,730 professional firefighter and have to already volunteer firefighter but all 586 00:56:20,730 --> 00:56:24,670 even our volunteers are professional and they're in their conduct. So thank you for 587 00:56:24,670 --> 00:56:29,350 that will help me to make a decision as well. 588 00:56:29,630 --> 00:56:30,830 Thank you. 589 00:56:31,190 --> 00:56:32,250 Your council president. 590 00:56:32,890 --> 00:56:33,310 Thank you. 591 00:56:33,890 --> 00:56:36,830 That particular, I probably won't let that be. 592 00:56:37,150 --> 00:56:41,810 It's really coming from the side and then being able to attack. 593 00:56:42,350 --> 00:56:47,550 And again, if the fire department says they are okay with it, I yield. 594 00:56:47,730 --> 00:56:48,010 Thank you. 595 00:56:48,510 --> 00:56:48,930 Thank you. 596 00:56:50,510 --> 00:56:51,630 Councilwoman Arndt. 597 00:56:51,630 --> 00:56:53,010 Thank you for recognizing me. 598 00:56:53,010 --> 00:56:58,050 I just want to reiterate the comments that I made at the last meeting that I do think 599 00:56:58,050 --> 00:57:02,930 this is the type of project that we're looking for for downtown, especially in the redevelopment 600 00:57:02,930 --> 00:57:10,330 area. This infilled development, more affordable housing, so many people are talking about how 601 00:57:10,330 --> 00:57:15,850 the price for houses are folks are being priced out of the market. And these are the types 602 00:57:15,850 --> 00:57:21,230 of projects that we should be looking towards and support. Thank you for the clarification 603 00:57:21,230 --> 00:57:28,030 on the emergency response, I was actually at railhouse and looking out the window and saw 604 00:57:28,030 --> 00:57:33,250 the property and I thought, you know, just like seeing it and seeing how relatively small 605 00:57:33,250 --> 00:57:38,570 the property is and understanding that there's asphalt on three sides, I just didn't think 606 00:57:38,570 --> 00:57:44,690 that we needed additional asphalt behind the property. So with that, I'm going to maintain 607 00:57:44,690 --> 00:57:49,330 my previous vote and if we're ready for a motion, I'm certainly willing to make it. 608 00:57:51,850 --> 00:57:54,370 Thank you, Council President Anderson, for recognizing me. 609 00:57:54,530 --> 00:57:59,870 My question is in regards to what the mayor had sort of brought forth in regards to 610 00:57:59,870 --> 00:58:03,830 the flames, possibly overtaking the sprinkler system. 611 00:58:04,150 --> 00:58:08,790 Can you just, the problem, can you talk about the probability of that occurring and that 612 00:58:08,790 --> 00:58:11,250 being a problem, just so I can put that to rest? 613 00:58:11,890 --> 00:58:19,750 in a one and two family dwelling setting that's very low. I'm not going to say it's never going to happen. 614 00:58:20,210 --> 00:58:26,010 I know we had an apartment building that had an exterior fire that burnt a roof off. 615 00:58:26,670 --> 00:58:30,390 If it was built today, it would have sprinklers on the balcony and that wouldn't have happened. 616 00:58:31,090 --> 00:58:38,290 So as the times evolve so to the standards, the biggest thing, like I said last time, 617 00:58:38,290 --> 00:58:40,170 not to beat this to that tonight. 618 00:58:41,070 --> 00:58:45,350 When it comes to sprinklers, I talk to say Fire Martial Night 619 00:58:45,350 --> 00:58:47,010 and one in two family dwellings in Delaware. 620 00:58:47,010 --> 00:58:50,910 There's been zero deaths in sprinkler residential fires. 621 00:58:52,470 --> 00:58:54,990 Materials today are built differently. 622 00:58:55,590 --> 00:58:57,750 Your house is as well as the items in there. 623 00:58:57,970 --> 00:58:58,650 They burn faster. 624 00:58:58,770 --> 00:58:59,390 They burn hotter. 625 00:59:00,250 --> 00:59:05,010 And the intent is to suppress that fire as soon as possible. 626 00:59:05,010 --> 00:59:08,650 So hopefully that's sprinklers 30 seconds to a minute into the fire. 627 00:59:08,770 --> 00:59:11,270 It's already activated, suppressing the fire. 628 00:59:12,690 --> 00:59:17,370 The average response time right now, the chief can probably help me out with this. 629 00:59:18,030 --> 00:59:23,510 The time you call 911 to getting the fire department dispatch to getting someone on scene, 630 00:59:23,730 --> 00:59:27,530 even if they're in the station, you're probably at four minutes at your best case scenario. 631 00:59:28,590 --> 00:59:30,890 Four minutes of a fire in today's world. 632 00:59:30,890 --> 00:59:34,790 If you're upstairs and the fire's downstairs, you're probably not making it out. 633 00:59:35,970 --> 00:59:40,730 I'm a big proponent of sprinklers, you're going to see it in the upcoming residential 634 00:59:40,730 --> 00:59:41,270 code. 635 00:59:42,570 --> 00:59:46,350 And this is a good thing not only for the developer, for the people that are going to live there. 636 00:59:47,450 --> 00:59:50,410 One thing we didn't haven't talked about is also good for our firefighters. 637 00:59:52,210 --> 00:59:55,010 Without the sprinklers, the fire lit fire gets bigger. 638 00:59:55,590 --> 00:59:56,890 It puts them at danger as well. 639 00:59:57,270 --> 00:59:58,790 Lightway construction fails faster. 640 00:59:58,790 --> 00:59:59,910 we have seen 641 01:00:00,000 --> 01:00:09,140 We have more firefighter injuries right here in Dover. And you'll see some of them when we do the building code. But it's also something for the firefighters. 642 01:00:11,900 --> 01:00:17,420 Thank you for feedback. I yield. Thank you for all you do. I get a department. Anyone else? I yield. 643 01:00:20,560 --> 01:00:27,700 Councilwoman Archie recognized for a motion. Thank you. I make you all may be seated. Thank you. 644 01:00:27,700 --> 01:00:36,010 I'll make a motion to approve the subdivision waiver, allowing the elimination of the rear access 645 01:00:36,010 --> 01:00:37,310 about Alley requirement. 646 01:00:37,910 --> 01:00:39,370 Pills, Barry, seconds. 647 01:00:39,890 --> 01:00:46,050 And maybe by Councilwoman Arnick, seconded by Dr. Pillsbury, is there a discussion? 648 01:00:47,230 --> 01:00:47,510 Discussion? 649 01:00:48,350 --> 01:00:49,130 Councilman Rosha? 650 01:00:49,630 --> 01:00:50,130 Yeah. 651 01:00:50,290 --> 01:00:52,990 The only thing, just do we need two motions on this? 652 01:00:53,330 --> 01:00:53,650 Is one. 653 01:00:53,770 --> 01:00:54,110 We will. 654 01:00:54,250 --> 01:00:54,750 We will. 655 01:00:54,750 --> 01:00:57,470 because there are two different waivers. 656 01:00:58,150 --> 01:00:58,410 Okay. 657 01:00:58,650 --> 01:01:04,030 Because the other part we want to have the sprinkler requirement. 658 01:01:04,650 --> 01:01:07,530 So if we approve the one, we definitely 659 01:01:07,530 --> 01:01:10,290 will want to approve the other in my humble opinion. 660 01:01:10,830 --> 01:01:14,950 And the other one's sort of irrelevant. 661 01:01:15,250 --> 01:01:17,370 Right. We're addressing appendix A right now. 662 01:01:17,790 --> 01:01:18,610 That is correct. 663 01:01:19,110 --> 01:01:19,390 Okay. 664 01:01:19,730 --> 01:01:20,430 I'm good. I yield. 665 01:01:21,790 --> 01:01:30,330 That is correct. Thank you for the clarification, which you read the admission and call the role, please, Madam Clerk. 666 01:01:35,900 --> 01:01:42,220 The motion is to approve the subdivision waiver allowing the elimination of the rear-access alley requirement. 667 01:01:46,660 --> 01:01:47,900 Thank you, Madam Clerk. 668 01:01:51,760 --> 01:01:52,500 Mr. Bogarty. 669 01:01:52,620 --> 01:01:52,780 Yes. 670 01:01:53,560 --> 01:01:54,300 Mr. Niel. 671 01:01:54,580 --> 01:01:54,740 Yes. 672 01:01:55,500 --> 01:01:56,320 Dr. Pillsbury. 673 01:01:56,760 --> 01:01:56,900 Yes. 674 01:01:57,480 --> 01:01:58,220 Mrs. Arn. 675 01:01:58,420 --> 01:01:58,600 Yes. 676 01:01:59,480 --> 01:02:00,100 Mr. Rocha. 677 01:02:00,420 --> 01:02:00,640 Yes. 678 01:02:00,640 --> 01:02:00,800 Yes. 679 01:02:01,300 --> 01:02:02,080 Dr. Sadler. 680 01:02:02,140 --> 01:02:02,320 Yes. 681 01:02:03,860 --> 01:02:05,660 Mr. Counts, President Anderson. 682 01:02:06,080 --> 01:02:06,280 Yes. 683 01:02:07,740 --> 01:02:08,660 7-0. 684 01:02:08,860 --> 01:02:16,130 The motion passes and that is a Councilwoman R to recognize. 685 01:02:16,710 --> 01:02:17,130 Thank you. 686 01:02:17,350 --> 01:02:22,810 I'd like to make a motion for approval of the waiver to allow the alternative use of residential 687 01:02:22,810 --> 01:02:26,150 sprinkler system to satisfy the re-emergency access requirement. 688 01:02:27,330 --> 01:02:28,310 Rocha, second. 689 01:02:28,530 --> 01:02:36,090 And move, but Councilwoman, aren't to approve the Planning Commission recommendation 690 01:02:36,610 --> 01:02:42,070 of the waiver to allow the alternative use of residential sprinkler to satisfy the 691 01:02:42,070 --> 01:02:48,590 rear emergency access requirement, and it's mesecmed by Councilman Rocha's, their discussion. 692 01:02:50,950 --> 01:02:53,390 Seeing none, Madam Clerk, please call the roll. 693 01:02:53,790 --> 01:02:54,150 Thank you. 694 01:02:54,410 --> 01:02:55,190 Mr. Bogueerty. 695 01:02:55,570 --> 01:02:55,770 Yes. 696 01:02:55,770 --> 01:03:04,650 Yes. Mr. Neill. Yes. Dr. Pillsbury. Yes. Mrs. Aren't. Yes. Mr. Rocha. Yes. Dr. Sutherland. Yes. 697 01:03:05,170 --> 01:03:06,990 Council President Anderson. Yes. 698 01:03:08,430 --> 01:03:22,730 I voted 7-0. The motion passes at this time since it was separated. At this time, I will accept the motion to accept the committee of the whole report. 699 01:03:22,730 --> 01:03:30,870 So moved by Councilman Neal, seconded by Councilman Russia to accept the Committee of the 700 01:03:30,870 --> 01:03:42,030 whole report. All in favor? Aye. Any opposed? Motion passes. That brings us to item 21, 701 01:03:42,530 --> 01:03:47,030 setting the property assessment of fields. The staff 702 01:03:50,200 --> 01:03:53,060 recommends 703 01:03:55,940 --> 01:03:57,180 the fields to be scheduled 704 01:03:57,180 --> 01:04:07,000 for May 27th, 2025 through May 30th, 2025 from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m., and one evening, if needed, 705 01:04:07,260 --> 01:04:11,100 the hearing times are subject to change on 706 01:04:14,420 --> 01:04:16,720 the setting of the property. 707 01:04:18,240 --> 01:04:20,720 Okay. All right. It's their emotion. 708 01:04:21,900 --> 01:04:24,580 I'm going to move for approval, but I do have a question. 709 01:04:25,520 --> 01:04:26,340 All right. 710 01:04:26,600 --> 01:04:28,580 The motion for approval is there. 711 01:04:28,840 --> 01:04:29,840 That's by Councillor McMillan. 712 01:04:30,260 --> 01:04:32,660 Thank you, by Dr. Teal Sparing. 713 01:04:33,420 --> 01:04:34,820 The floor is yours, councilman Niel. 714 01:04:35,340 --> 01:04:35,480 Yeah. 715 01:04:36,140 --> 01:04:43,240 We have proposed that the reassessments be delayed for two years because this is the assessment 716 01:04:43,240 --> 01:04:47,660 is coming now from Tyler, from Kent County is basically there. 717 01:04:48,280 --> 01:04:51,360 Now, we have we approved that delay for two years. 718 01:04:51,980 --> 01:05:00,000 I thought it was just one year while we not, so we, while they, this is being set up, 719 01:05:00,480 --> 01:05:03,000 that's why we need to do it for this year. 720 01:05:03,600 --> 01:05:04,360 Is that correct? 721 01:05:05,060 --> 01:05:06,260 I'll turn to staff. 722 01:05:07,700 --> 01:05:09,620 It would take effect 26. 723 01:05:10,040 --> 01:05:10,680 Is that correct? 724 01:05:12,060 --> 01:05:13,200 The assessment? 725 01:05:14,100 --> 01:05:16,400 My understanding that it was for two. 726 01:05:16,400 --> 01:05:23,680 but I just want to mention of it because what I saw was two years putting it in 727 01:05:23,680 --> 01:05:27,540 27. With this correct question, what is the rep? 728 01:05:29,640 --> 01:05:34,700 David, thank you, Council President. Again, my understanding is that it's a one-year 729 01:05:34,700 --> 01:05:42,940 deferral to use the Kent County assessment records and we do each year need to 730 01:05:42,940 --> 01:05:48,620 approve the assessments and hold an appeal based on our own numbers because 731 01:05:48,620 --> 01:05:53,300 there are some adjustments that get made as well. So this is something we have 732 01:05:53,300 --> 01:05:59,380 to do every time that we have, you know, set the tax rate or having a 733 01:05:59,380 --> 01:06:08,620 assessment. I believe it's a one year. Okay, now we've in this, each five years, well, 734 01:06:08,620 --> 01:06:15,260 then the next time that we be back on four years in advance, so that it will be five years 735 01:06:15,260 --> 01:06:21,040 from this year, or it will go to five years from 2000. 736 01:06:21,520 --> 01:06:26,420 That's a good question. My answer will be that it will be, you know, we'll use the county 737 01:06:26,420 --> 01:06:33,200 assessments beginning in year two and two, three and four and five that would be the new assessment 738 01:06:33,200 --> 01:06:35,060 record we would use for that date. 739 01:06:36,740 --> 01:06:41,120 I wish I could defer this actually to a former city manager and 740 01:06:41,120 --> 01:06:43,600 controller back there. Am I right Donna? 741 01:06:49,960 --> 01:06:50,940 She's been down this 742 01:06:50,940 --> 01:06:56,580 path a couple of times before so. There would be a problem with that 743 01:06:57,540 --> 01:07:02,060 protocol wise. This is an lump in the citizens at the moment. So 744 01:07:03,880 --> 01:07:07,740 okay, I'm about to say if you if you wanted to, I'd ask just as 745 01:07:07,740 --> 01:07:10,240 for a suspension of the rules and that wouldn't be a problem. 746 01:07:12,640 --> 01:07:14,280 Okay, that's fine. 747 01:07:25,820 --> 01:07:26,780 Please continue. 748 01:07:27,440 --> 01:07:32,980 No, the motion is on the floor. I just was, that was for clarification as to what we were 749 01:07:32,980 --> 01:07:39,820 looking at. And of course, we don't know what the effect is going to be, how it blends 750 01:07:39,820 --> 01:07:53,900 And then what they're going to come back in, we may need to extend the Pills process for a month depending but what we see coming back from Tyler this time, I yield. 751 01:07:53,900 --> 01:08:01,500 I can understand that. Thank you, Councilman. In the other discussion, 752 01:08:04,660 --> 01:08:06,340 there was a request 753 01:08:06,340 --> 01:08:13,940 for by the mayor to make a comment. That's also not protocol during regular meetings. 754 01:08:13,940 --> 01:08:20,580 It is during committee meetings. However, if anyone have objection, the suspension 755 01:08:20,580 --> 01:08:23,000 the rules to allow the mayor to comment on this item. 756 01:08:24,720 --> 01:08:29,240 Seeing no objection, Mr. Mayor, come on up if you like. 757 01:08:39,540 --> 01:08:44,850 Thank you, and it's their discussion from members. 758 01:08:49,760 --> 01:08:52,240 All in, unless we need a roll call, 759 01:08:52,500 --> 01:08:53,300 there's this all in favor. 760 01:08:54,320 --> 01:08:55,100 All in favor? 761 01:08:55,680 --> 01:08:56,020 Aye. 762 01:08:56,180 --> 01:08:56,380 Aye. 763 01:08:56,860 --> 01:08:57,440 Any opposed? 764 01:08:58,380 --> 01:08:59,620 The motion carries. 765 01:08:59,620 --> 01:09:00,540 The 766 01:09:04,350 --> 01:09:17,410 first reading of the proposed ordinance 2025-07 amending chapter 98 by establishing a public space naming policy in application procedure packet. 767 01:09:17,810 --> 01:09:24,910 The Councilwoman Arne, first action by City Council will take final action. 768 01:09:24,910 --> 01:09:27,970 on site City Council would take place in the second reading. 769 01:09:28,490 --> 01:09:37,250 March 24th, 2025, the proposed ordinance, 2025-07 is available at the entrance of Council 770 01:09:37,250 --> 01:09:43,490 Chambers on the City website at cityodover.com under government or by contacting the City 771 01:09:43,490 --> 01:09:54,610 Clerk's Office at 3002-736-708 or city clerk at dover.de.us 772 01:09:54,610 --> 01:10:01,970 email city clerk at over.de.us. Councilwoman Arn. It's your night tonight. 773 01:10:03,170 --> 01:10:06,730 Thank you for recognizing me just a quick overview of the proposed 774 01:10:06,730 --> 01:10:13,050 ordinance. It is to establish a clear and consistent process for renaming a 775 01:10:13,050 --> 01:10:17,310 public space within the city. Thank you. Thank you. Any questions? 776 01:10:20,610 --> 01:10:21,330 Councilman 777 01:10:21,330 --> 01:10:29,780 question. That you have all you just need for. That's why. If there are questions I will 778 01:10:29,780 --> 01:10:34,660 defer to Madame Clerk for the introduction of the ordinance and the accordance with 779 01:10:34,660 --> 01:10:38,960 section 1-9 of the Dovercud, Madame Clerk. 780 01:10:40,000 --> 01:10:47,560 Ordnance 2025-07, amending chapter 98 by establishing a public space naming policy and application 781 01:10:47,560 --> 01:10:52,720 and a procedure packet. This constitutes the first reading, the final reading is scheduled 782 01:10:52,720 --> 01:10:55,020 to take place on March 24, 2025. 783 01:10:55,560 --> 01:11:02,340 It's no action at this time. We now have the first reading, next, I don't, we now have 784 01:11:02,340 --> 01:11:09,920 the first reading of ordinance 2025-08 for the re-sony and the property located at 582 785 01:11:09,920 --> 01:11:15,500 a corn lane. It is recommended for referral to the Planning Commission for a public hearing 786 01:11:15,500 --> 01:11:23,580 on April 21st, 2025 and that a public hearing before City Council will be set for May 12th, 787 01:11:23,580 --> 01:11:30,400 2025 at 6.30 p.m. at which time the final reading and the Council action will take place. 788 01:11:30,900 --> 01:11:36,100 The ordinance is available at the entrance of Council Chambers or the City website at 789 01:11:36,100 --> 01:11:46,760 city of Dover.com under government or by contacting the clerk's office 736-7008 or city clerk 790 01:11:46,760 --> 01:11:54,340 at Dover.de.us. I will now entertain a motion for the referral as recommended. What is the 791 01:11:54,340 --> 01:12:01,520 pleasure of council? So moved. It's been moved by councilman Neal to recommend a referral 792 01:12:01,520 --> 01:12:08,880 as to refer as recommended. Second by Councilman Russia. Questions on the 793 01:12:08,880 --> 01:12:16,980 motion? All in favor? Aye. Any opposed? The motion is adopted unanimously. 794 01:13:01,320 --> 01:13:04,720 Further to the City Clerk for an introduction to proposed ordinance and 795 01:13:04,720 --> 01:13:08,060 accordance with Section 1-9 of the Dover Code. 796 01:13:10,700 --> 01:13:16,120 Warden, it's 2025-08, amending the zoning ordinance and zoning map of the city of 797 01:13:16,120 --> 01:13:21,520 Dover by changing the zoning designation of property located at 582 A corn lane. 798 01:13:21,780 --> 01:13:23,220 This constitutes the first reading. 799 01:13:23,460 --> 01:13:26,660 The final reading is scheduled to take place May 12, 2025. 800 01:13:30,550 --> 01:13:32,670 Thanks for the city manager's announcement. 801 01:13:34,130 --> 01:13:35,550 Thank you, Council President. 802 01:13:35,870 --> 01:13:37,650 I have no any announcements this evening. 803 01:13:40,450 --> 01:13:40,950 Thank you. 804 01:13:47,170 --> 01:13:52,410 Thank you, Mr. President, members of the council, I have guests with me this evening. 805 01:13:53,330 --> 01:13:57,090 As many of you know, there has been quite a bit of angst in the community about us 806 01:13:57,090 --> 01:13:59,690 not having a seen Patrick's Day parade. 807 01:14:00,770 --> 01:14:04,690 We could not find anyone who would volunteer to take over that responsibility. 808 01:14:05,450 --> 01:14:06,730 We did look in earnest. 809 01:14:06,730 --> 01:14:12,530 we do have a young lady Melissa Bergold who will step forward next year to make 810 01:14:12,530 --> 01:14:18,230 sure that we have a bigger and better St. Patrick's Day parade in 2026. Having 811 01:14:18,230 --> 01:14:19,390 said that, Ms. 812 01:14:21,450 --> 01:14:28,610 McOneal, on the 17th on St. Patrick's Day in front of City Hall, we 813 01:14:28,610 --> 01:14:34,170 will have a small celebration, a presentation of a proclamation to the Irish 814 01:14:34,170 --> 01:14:40,170 Society of Delaware. We will have a bagpiper and we will sing some Irish songs and St. Patrick 815 01:14:40,170 --> 01:14:46,050 is self will be there. But because I'm the fun mayor, we have something else that's going 816 01:14:46,050 --> 01:14:51,310 to happen. And I'd like to introduce my guest, Mr. Donny Legons, who operates one of my 817 01:14:51,310 --> 01:14:55,490 favorite places in Dover next to my home, the Real House. 818 01:14:58,340 --> 01:14:59,360 I'm Donny Liggins. 819 01:15:01,960 --> 01:15:29,760 Thank you all for having me here today. Last year, St. Patty's Day, the capital crawl was an amazing time, and it sucks that we don't have a parade this year, so they didn't do the event. So, we thought we would continue the tradition and pick up that mantle and run with it. So, my wife and I reached out to all of our neighboring bars and included in the glens this year, some of the glens, Irish mics, 90s tap house, gray fox, and us, of course, 820 01:15:30,260 --> 01:15:36,880 to continue the bar crawl so this Saturday from 1 to 8 will have a whole lot of fun 821 01:15:36,880 --> 01:15:41,440 the downtown over it was a lot of fun last year so we'll continue that last year 822 01:15:41,440 --> 01:15:45,040 was thinking it was just from 2 to 6 we're gonna do it from 1 to 8 because people 823 01:15:45,040 --> 01:15:49,840 wanted the party to keep going and it was safe. I didn't hear of any incidents last 824 01:15:49,840 --> 01:15:53,820 year so we're gonna try to keep that going this year and I'm just having to be a 825 01:15:53,820 --> 01:15:56,820 part of this I'm glad we reached out to our neighboring boroughs and not just 826 01:15:56,820 --> 01:16:00,980 have in just their warehouse because we do believe in that collaborative spirit here. 827 01:16:01,660 --> 01:16:02,580 And so just thank you. 828 01:16:03,680 --> 01:16:04,400 Thank you. 829 01:16:05,420 --> 01:16:10,020 And did you notice how he kind of scrunched down when he stood next to me because he knows 830 01:16:10,020 --> 01:16:14,140 how I feel about being a little bit on the vertically challenged side? 831 01:16:14,960 --> 01:16:15,620 Thanks, Tony. 832 01:16:16,460 --> 01:16:17,040 Thank you. 833 01:16:17,640 --> 01:16:18,420 Thank you. 834 01:16:18,980 --> 01:16:19,200 Yeah. 835 01:16:19,420 --> 01:16:20,740 Council member announcements. 836 01:16:21,120 --> 01:16:21,960 Dr. Subbler. 837 01:16:22,240 --> 01:16:22,640 Thank you. 838 01:16:22,880 --> 01:16:23,460 Not announcements. 839 01:16:23,640 --> 01:16:23,980 Just one. 840 01:16:24,200 --> 01:16:25,060 Just a little clarity. 841 01:16:25,060 --> 01:16:31,400 I do believe for that event would there be a bus like a party bus correct if you could speak to that just for a second 842 01:16:31,400 --> 01:16:32,980 If it's a kid 843 01:16:39,920 --> 01:16:42,240 in here. Yeah, there we go. Yes, there is a party bus 844 01:16:42,240 --> 01:16:44,200 So leaving from railhouse 845 01:16:44,200 --> 01:16:48,620 It's $20 to get on you give a wristband last year. I think they had t-shirts and things like that 846 01:16:48,620 --> 01:16:55,180 But we just want to keep it very simple that bus leaves from railhouse to Gumma Glens to Grey Fox to 90s 847 01:16:55,180 --> 01:17:00,600 And then I think I forgot stone rail market is also in there as well and then Irish mics 848 01:17:00,600 --> 01:17:05,120 20 bucks and a continuous loop every 30 minutes it'll go downtown so you can be 849 01:17:05,120 --> 01:17:09,420 safe you can have have a good time and anyone 21 and older can get on that bus 850 01:17:09,420 --> 01:17:13,280 with that wristband and how do they get achieved the wristband how do they get 851 01:17:13,280 --> 01:17:17,520 the wristband right on our Instagram page or our Facebook there's a link right 852 01:17:17,520 --> 01:17:21,220 there it goes right to a event bright and you can sign up online right there for 853 01:17:21,220 --> 01:17:26,700 it thank you you're doing a wonderful job appreciate it I appreciate you thank you 854 01:17:26,700 --> 01:17:27,160 Thank you. 855 01:17:27,310 --> 01:17:27,900 Thank you. 856 01:17:28,560 --> 01:17:29,980 Other member announcements? 857 01:17:33,520 --> 01:17:35,860 Any other council member announcements? 858 01:17:41,580 --> 01:17:51,300 I want to thank in advance Councilwoman Dr. Pillsbury for chairing the Council Committee 859 01:17:51,300 --> 01:17:57,360 of the whole tomorrow, and we look forward to create agenda. 860 01:17:57,360 --> 01:18:00,200 I'm busy on city business. 861 01:18:00,200 --> 01:18:09,380 We had some very positive business today, I was pleased with some progress. 862 01:18:09,800 --> 01:18:18,360 We made in Washington with the administration's deputy director for intergovernmental affairs 863 01:18:18,360 --> 01:18:27,000 There's a special assistant to President, and they are very interested in looking at some 864 01:18:27,000 --> 01:18:33,180 things when it comes to, because they want to reprogram some infrastructure money to 865 01:18:33,710 --> 01:18:42,280 harder infrastructure, and they're interested in our stormwater program, it was a very positive 866 01:18:42,280 --> 01:18:50,080 and water which would be interesting because I think that it's going to be a very positive thing. 867 01:18:50,460 --> 01:19:00,240 There may be a temporary cut in the, if you look at the continuing resolution 868 01:19:00,240 --> 01:19:10,660 that just passed a small cut in the revolving water fund but that is not looking like it would be a permanent thing 869 01:19:10,660 --> 01:19:17,180 and that's the long anyway. The by-partisan infrastructure bill 870 01:19:17,180 --> 01:19:25,960 is so that those things are looking very positive and we hopefully more to 871 01:19:25,960 --> 01:19:26,300 come. 872 01:19:28,440 --> 01:19:35,680 Is there any other business before the council, Mr. Mayor? This 873 01:19:45,250 --> 01:19:45,410 is 874 01:19:45,410 --> 01:19:51,150 most unusual. On behalf of myself and the members of City Council, we'd like to 875 01:19:51,150 --> 01:19:54,770 can gradually and recognize our city clerk. 876 01:19:55,070 --> 01:19:58,050 Ah, if I knew you were going to say that, I would have said no. 877 01:19:58,490 --> 01:20:00,870 So let's give her a sweet play of something very special. 878 01:20:01,210 --> 01:20:02,530 And she has to put up with you guys. 879 01:20:03,530 --> 01:20:04,510 Let's give her a stand. 880 01:20:07,970 --> 01:20:12,910 And of course, she has now certified municipal clerk. 881 01:20:14,010 --> 01:20:17,490 And that is quite an achievement. 882 01:20:17,710 --> 01:20:21,410 She did it in an extraordinarily short period of time 883 01:20:21,410 --> 01:20:27,410 in just three years, so that definitely is quite an achievement. 884 01:20:27,770 --> 01:20:30,030 Mr. President, fast and first. 885 01:20:37,630 --> 01:20:41,210 See, I should have done this, that only has just ruined the two weeks from now. 886 01:20:42,970 --> 01:20:43,970 We stand adjourned. 887 01:20:44,830 --> 01:20:45,170 Thanks.